Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000010200 on April 11, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18638-18646, June 23, 2000
Mechanisms for High Affinity Mannose 6-Phosphate Ligand Binding
to the Insulin-like Growth Factor II/Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor
NEGATIVE COOPERATIVITY AND RECEPTOR OLIGOMERIZATION*
James C.
Byrd and
Richard G.
MacDonald
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4525
Received for publication, January 4, 2000, and in revised form, March 31, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The two mannose 6-phosphate
(Man-6-P) binding domains of the insulin-like growth factor II/mannose
6-phosphate receptor (Man-6-P/IGF2R), located in extracytoplasmic
repeats 1-3 and 7-9, are capable of binding Man-6-P with low affinity
and glycoproteins that contain more than one Man-6-P residue with high
affinity. High affinity multivalent ligand binding sites could be
formed through two possible mechanisms: the interaction of two Man-6-P
binding domains within one Man-6-P/IGF2R molecule or by receptor
oligomerization. To discriminate between these mechanisms, truncated
FLAG epitope-tagged Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs, containing one or both of
the Man-6-P binding domains, were expressed in 293T cells, and
characterized for binding of pentamannose phosphate-bovine serum
albumin (PMP-BSA), a pseudoglycoprotein bearing multiple Man-6-P
residues. A construct containing all 15 repeats of the Man-6-P/IGF2R
extracytoplasmic domain bound PMP-BSA with the same affinity as the
full-length receptor (Kd = 0.54 nM)
with a curvilinear Scatchard plot. The presence of excess unlabeled
PMP-BSA increased the dissociation rate of pre-formed
125I-PMP-BSA/receptor complexes, suggesting negative
cooperativity in multivalent ligand binding and affirming the role of
multiple Man-6-P/IGF2R binding domains in forming high affinity binding sites. Truncated receptors containing only one Man-6-P binding domain
and mutant receptor constructs, containing an Arg1325
Ala mutation that eliminates binding to the repeats 7-9 binding domain, formed high affinity PMP-BSA binding, but with reduced stoichiometries. Collectively, these observations suggest that alignment of Man-6-P binding domains of separate Man-6-P/IGF2R molecules is responsible for the formation of high affinity Man-6-P binding sites and provide functional evidence for Man-6-P/IGF2R oligomerization.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The sorting of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes from the
trans-Golgi network to pre-lysosomal acidic vesicles occurs through the
recognition of mannose 6-phosphate
(Man-6-P)1 markers by two
membrane-bound mannose 6-phosphate receptors (MPRs), the
cation-dependent Man-6-P receptor (CD-MPR), and the
insulin-like growth factor II/Man-6-P receptor (Man-6-P/IGF2R). Most
lysosomal enzymes are modified in the Golgi to contain multiple Man-6-P groups as a part of their glycosylation repertoire (for review see Ref.
1). Although multiple pathways may participate in lysosomal targeting
of proteins, disruption of the Man-6-P sorting pathway has been found
in several human diseases, including lysosomal enzyme storage diseases
such as Pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy and I-cell disease (2-4). In
addition, increased secretion of Man-6-P-bearing lysosomal enzymes has
been associated with cancers of the breast and prostate (5-8), which
may be due to disruption of targeting carried out by the CD-MPR, the
Man-6-P/IGF2R, or both.
It is not yet fully understood why mammals produce two different MPRs.
Whereas both the CD-MPR and Man-6-P/IGF2R can recognize proteins
containing Man-6-P residues, they have overlapping but distinct
functions in the sorting of specific hydrolases. Many studies have
shown that the expression of only one or the other MPR is insufficient
for targeting all Man-6-P-bearing hydrolases to the lysosomal
compartment (9-14). Furthermore, studies using antibodies against the
ligand binding domains of the CD-MPR and the Man-6-P/IGF2R have shown
that the Man-6-P/IGF2R participates in the endocytosis of lysosomal
enzymes from the cell surface, whereas the CD-MPR does not (15).
Although the two receptors appear to have distinct functions, the
CD-MPR and Man-6-P/IGF2R are likely to have shared a similar ancestral
origin, as each of the 15 extracytoplasmic repeats of the Man-6-P/IGF2R
shares 14 to 28% sequence identity with the entire extracytoplasmic
domain of the CD-MPR (16).
The CD-MPR is a 46-kDa membrane glycoprotein that binds
monophosphomannosylated ligands with low affinity
(Kd = 6-8 µM) and forms a high
affinity bivalent Man-6-P-binding site (Kd = 200 nM) through receptor oligomerization (17-19). The
Man-6-P/IGF2R is a much larger (300-kDa) type I transmembrane
glycoprotein that comprises a short NH2-terminal signal
sequence, followed by 15 homologous repeats, a transmembrane domain,
and a 167-residue cytoplasmic domain (16, 20). The Man-6-P/IGF2R binds
at least three classes of ligands through unique sites in the
extracytoplasmic domain. The Man-6-P/IGF2R binds IGF-II at the cell
surface, resulting in the internalization and degradation of this
mitogenic growth factor in the lysosomal compartment (21-24). The
receptor also binds urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor,
which may be involved in the activation of latent transforming growth
factor-
(25-27). Finally, the receptor interacts with proteins that
bear the Man-6-P marker, resulting in sorting to the lysosomal
compartment. Functional mapping studies of the extracytoplasmic domain
of the Man-6-P/IGF2R have revealed the location of two distinct binding domains for Man-6-P (28, 29), which may have distinct specificities for
sorting lysosomal enzymes (30). Arg426 in repeat 3 and
Arg1325 in repeat 9 of the human receptor are thought to
interact non-covalently with the Man-6-P moiety during ligand binding,
as mutation of these residues in the bovine receptor eliminates Man-6-P
binding to their respective binding domains (28).
Like the CD-MPR, the Man-6-P/IGF2R binds monovalent Man-6-P ligands
with low affinity (Kd = 6-7 µM) and
divalent phosphomannosylated ligands with high affinity
(Kd = 1-20 nM) (31), but the mechanism
for the formation of two unique high affinity sites is not understood.
Two models have been proposed to explain the Man-6-P/IGF2R's ligand
binding characteristics. Intramolecular interactions between the two
extracytoplasmic Man-6-P binding domains could account for high
affinity binding (31). On the other hand, receptor oligomerization
could result in the formation of two unique high affinity sites, which
may explain observations of functional differences between the repeat 3 and repeat 9 Man-6-P binding domains with respect to their preference for sorting specific hydrolases (30). Studies of the oligomeric state
of the receptor, however, have led to paradoxical results. Sucrose
gradient centrifugation and gel filtration chromatography of purified
bovine receptors in the absence of exogenous ligands suggest that the
receptor exists in solution in the monomeric state (32, 33), whereas
cross-linking analysis of the receptor in cell culture suggests that
the receptors form oligomeric structures (19). Finally, the addition of
exogenous multivalent phosphomannosylated ligands has been shown to
increase the internalization rate of the Man-6-P/IGF2R in cell culture
models and to result in the presence of receptor dimers as determined
by gel filtration chromatography (33).
In order to discriminate between the intramolecular and intermolecular
models of high affinity multivalent phosphomannosylated ligand
binding to the Man-6-P/IGF2R, we have characterized wild-type and
mutant receptor constructs for the ability to interact with a
multivalent Man-6-P ligand. Our data indicate that the Man-6-P/IGF2R displays negative cooperativity in binding the multivalent ligand, and
that receptors containing only one functional Man-6-P binding domain,
either repeat 3 or repeat 9, are capable of forming a high affinity
Man-6-P binding site. Truncation of the Man-6-P/IGF2R, however,
revealed that multiple regions outside of the minimal Man-6-P binding
domains in repeats 3 and 9 play a role in both the formation of
bivalent Man-6-P binding sites and the resultant affinity of these
sites toward PMP-BSA. These observations suggest that receptor
oligomerization is the mechanism for the formation of high affinity
Man-6-P binding in the extracytoplasmic domain of this receptor.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated
DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) or the University of Nebraska Medical
Center Molecular Biology Core Facility (Omaha, NE). Recombinant human IGFs were provided by M. H. Niedenthal (Lilly Research
Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN). The native Y-2448
O-phosphomannan of Hansenula holstii was a gift
from Dr. M. E. Slodki (Midwest Area Northern Regional Research
Center, Peoria, IL, retired). Carrier-free Na125I (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) was used for radioiodination of IGF-II and
pentamannose phosphate-bovine serum albumin (PMP-BSA) to specific
activities between 40 and 80 Ci/g by Enzymobead reagent (Bio-Rad) and
IODOGENTM reagent (Pierce), respectively. The pCMV5 vector (34) was
provided by Dr. David W. Russell (University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX), and the 8.6-kilobase pair human
Man-6-P/IGF2R cDNA (20) was a gift of Dr. William S. Sly (St. Louis
University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO). Other reagents and supplies
were obtained from sources as indicated.
Synthesis and Expression of Truncated FLAG Epitope-tagged
Receptor Constructs--
A minireceptor construct, termed 15F,
encompassing all 15 repeats of the extracytoplasmic domain of the
Man-6-P/IGF2R followed by a FLAG epitope tag, was created from a
full-length human Man-6-P/IGF2R cDNA (20) as described previously
(35). The R1325A mutant was created using the QuikChangeTM mutagenesis
kit (Stratagene) and a two-step cassette strategy described previously
(35). Complementary mutagenic primers were designed for that procedure corresponding to nt 4103-4140, changing CGC to GCG at nt 4120-4122 to
create the R1325A missense mutation and a C to G silent mutation at nt
4125, which incorporated a novel SalI site for diagnostic purposes. The presence of the mutation was confirmed by sequencing across the mutated region.
A set of eight carboxyl-terminal FLAG-tagged minireceptor constructs
was engineered in a pCMV5RIX expression vector using a strategy
developed previously in our laboratory (36). Using the full-length
Man-6-P/IGF2R and 15F(R1325A) cDNAs as templates, the following
constructs encompassing truncated forms of the extracytoplasmic domain
of the Man-6-P/IGF2R were made by amplification with Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs): repeats 1-3F (nt 148-1554,
corresponding to residues 1-469), 1-8F (nt 148-3807, corresponding
to residues 1-1220), 1-9F (nt 148-4242, corresponding to residues
1-1365), 1-11F (nt 148-5100, corresponding to residues 1-1651),
7-9F (nt 2926-4242, corresponding to residues 927-1365), 7-15F (nt
2926-7002, corresponding to residues 927-2285), 1-9F with the R1325A
mutation, and 1-11F with the R1325A mutation. To ensure consistent
translation, the signal sequence containing the amino-terminal 71 residues of the first repeat was fused to the beginning of the 7-9F
and 7-15F constructs as described (36). All of the constructs
contained a 3' 24-nt sequence encoding an eight-residue FLAG tag,
DYKDDDDK, followed by a stop codon and an XbaI restriction
site. The nucleotide sequences of the Man-6-P/IGF2R cDNA constructs
that passed through mutagenesis or amplification procedures were
verified by sequence analysis. In addition, the constructs that
demonstrated unexpected or interesting ligand binding properties
(i.e. 1-8F, 1-9F, and 7-15F) were prepared again in a new
amplification reaction using the strategy discussed above, and the
ligand-binding properties were confirmed using both constructs.
Transient expression of the constructs was carried out in 293T human
embryonic kidney cells cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum plus 5 µg/ml gentamycin at
37 °C in 5% CO2. The transfections were done by a
modification of the calcium phosphate method described previously (37).
Cells were fed with fresh medium 24 h after transfection, and cell
lysates were prepared on the 5th to 6th day after transfection by
solubilization with 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, as described
earlier (36). Once the lysates were collected, 20 µl aliquots were
electrophoresed on an 8-18% gradient SDS-PAGE gel under reducing
conditions and electroblotted to BA85 nitrocellulose. The blots were
blocked with 3% nonfat milk in 15 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 and probed with the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (VWR Scientific, Chicago, IL) (1:1000 dilution) followed by a
secondary rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). The resultant
antibody complex was developed with 125I-protein A (NEN
Life Science Products) and detected with autoradiography followed by
PhosphorImager analysis (Molecular Dynamics) to quantify relative
expression of the receptor constructs.
Synthesis of PMP-BSA--
PMP, containing a Man-6-P group as the
terminal mannose residue, was hydrolyzed and purified from a yeast cell
wall phosphomannan following the procedure of Murray and Neville (38).
The conjugation of PMP to BSA was carried out following the procedure
of Braulke et al. (39). BSA (15 mg/ml) was incubated in the
presence of 0.2 M PMP and 160 mM
NaCNBH3 at 37 °C for 4-5 days. The resultant product
was purified on a 30-ml G-50 Sephadex column in phosphate-buffered saline. The flow-through fractions were collected, pooled, and stored
at
20 °C. Aliquots (25 µg) of the protein were iodinated to
specific activities of approximately 50 Ci/g by incubation in 0.3 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, with 2 mCi Na125I
using pre-coated IODOGEN tubes for 25 min. The product was separated from free iodine on a G-50 Sephadex column. The iodinated PMP-BSA was
collected from the flow-through fractions and stored at
20 °C
until use.
Ligand Binding Analysis--
The minireceptor constructs were
routinely immunoadsorbed to anti-FLAG M2 resin (Sigma) to separate them
from other proteins, especially the endogenous 293T Man-6-P/IGF2R,
present in the cell lysates. Aliquots (20-30 µl) of Triton X-100
cell lysates containing equal amounts of FLAG-tagged construct, based
on PhosphorImager analysis of anti-FLAG immunoblots, were incubated
with 12 µl of packed M2 resin in HEPES-buffered saline, pH 7.4, with
1% BSA and 5 mM Man-6-P at 3 °C for 14-16 h. Addition
of 5 mM Man-6-P at this stage prevented co-precipitation of
endogenous phosphomannosylated ligands. The construct-laden resin was
collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for
approximately 10-12 s. Finally, the resin pellets were washed twice
with 0.75 ml of HEPES-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.05% Triton
X-100 (HBST) and then subjected to the studies described below.
The ability of the constructs to bind 125I-PMP-BSA or
125I-IGF-II was first measured by incubating the
immunoadsorbed constructs, or resin exposed to CMV5-transfected control
lysates, with 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA or 2 nM 125I-IGF-II in binding buffer (HBST + 0.5%
BSA) at 3 °C for 3-5 h. Three hours of incubation was adequate for
the constructs to reach binding equilibrium, as determined by affinity
chromatography experiments (35) and by replicate binding reactions
incubated for 16 h, in which the amount of binding was identical
to reactions incubated for only 3 h (data not shown). Following
the binding reaction, the resin pellets were washed twice with 0.75 ml
of HBST to remove unbound ligand, collected by centrifugation, and counted in a
counter. Specific binding was determined by
subtracting the counts/min ligand bound in replicate reactions carried
out in the presence of 5 mM Man-6-P or 1 µM
IGF-II. Affinity measurements were carried out by competitive binding
analysis. Equal amounts of the receptor constructs were immunoadsorbed
to M2 resin and incubated with 1 nM
125I-PMP-BSA in the presence of increasing concentrations
of unlabeled PMP-BSA (from 0 to 500 nM) at 3 °C for 4-5
h. The resins were washed and counted as described above. The data were
then fit to a model for one-site competitive binding using GraphPad
PrismTM software. In addition to PMP-BSA binding, the ability of 1-3F, 7-9F, 1-9F, 15F, and 15F(R1325A) receptor constructs to interact with
immobilized Man-6-P was determined using a PMP-Sepharose affinity
depletion assay developed previously (35).
Test for Negative Cooperativity--
To determine if the
Man-6-P/IGF2R displays negative cooperativity in binding PMP-BSA, the
rate of 125I-PMP-BSA dissociation from immunoadsorbed 15F
construct was measured in the presence of 25 nM unlabeled
PMP-BSA or Man-6-P. Equal amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F were incubated
in the presence of 250 pM 125I-PMP-BSA in
binding buffer. Following a 3-h incubation at 3 °C, the resin
pellets were washed twice with 0.75 ml of HBST at 3 °C, and then
diluted 75-fold with HBST only, HBST with 25 nM PMP-BSA, or
HBST with 25 nM Man-6-P and incubated at 3 °C. At time
intervals (from 0 to 100 min), the amount of remaining bound ligand was determined by collecting and counting the resin pellets. The increase in dissociation rate was also assayed in the presence of increasing concentrations of Man-6-P (0-50 mM) or PMP-BSA (0-150
nM) in a similar fashion. Equal amounts of the pre-formed
125I-PMP-BSA·15F complex were diluted with 1 ml of HBST
containing increasing concentrations of either Man-6-P or PMP-BSA, and
dissociation was allowed to proceed for 20 min at 3 °C. The resin
pellets were collected and counted to determine the amount of bound
radioligand remaining.
 |
RESULTS |
IGF-II and PMP-BSA Binding Analysis of the Extracytoplasmic Domain
of the Man-6-P/IGF2R--
To study the ability of the Man-6-P/IGF2R to
interact with multivalent Man-6-P-bearing proteins, a wild-type soluble
receptor construct, called 15F, was engineered and expressed in human
embryonic kidney cells (293T cells). This construct comprised the
entire extracytoplasmic domain followed by a FLAG-epitope tag, which allowed separation of the constructs from the endogenous 293T Man-6-P/IGF2R and other cellular proteins. Interestingly, the 15F
construct was expressed as a homogeneous 250-kDa protein, which was not
secreted into conditioned medium, but was soluble in cell lysates
prepared by a freeze/thaw method (35). Therefore, Triton X-100 cell
extracts were used to prepare the constructs for the analysis of
Man-6-P binding.
PMP-BSA, a pseudoglycoprotein containing multiple Man-6-P residues, was
synthesized and iodinated for use as a multivalent ligand to measure
the ability of the 15F construct to bind phosphomannosylated ligands.
Competitive binding analysis with PMP-BSA revealed that the wild-type
15F construct bound with high affinity (Kd = 0.54 ± 0.18 nM, mean ± S.E., n = 8) with a Hill slope of
0.75 ± 0.03, mean ± S.E.
(n = 8, data not shown). Analysis of the data by
Scatchard plot revealed a curvilinear plot consistent with the Hill
slope of
0.75 (Fig. 1A). The
curvilinear nature of the plot is similar to previously reported
binding analyses of full-length Man-6-P/IGF2R employing both naturally
occurring and synthetic multivalent phosphomannosylated ligands (30,
31). Furthermore, IGF-II affinity analysis using an analogous
competitive binding assay demonstrated that the extracytoplasmic domain
of the receptor is capable of binding IGF-II with the same affinity as
the full-length receptor (36) (Kd = 2.8 ± 0.44 nM, n = 8) and a slope factor consistent
with the presence of a single class of binding sites (Hill slope =
1.01 ± 0.05 S.E., n = 8) (35).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
125I-PMP-BSA binding analysis of
the wild-type 15F Man-6-P/IGF2R construct. A, Scatchard
analysis with 125I-PMP-BSA was used to characterize the
ability of the wild-type 15F Man-6-P/IGF2R construct to interact with
multivalent ligands. Equal amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F were incubated
in the presence of 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA with
increasing concentrations of unlabeled PMP-BSA, ranging from 0 to 500 nM. After a 3-h incubation at 3 °C, unbound ligand was
washed away, and resulting resin pellets were collected and counted in
a counter to determine the ratio of bound to free ligand.
B, the effect of excess unlabeled ligand on the dissociation
rate of 125I-PMP-BSA from the 15F construct was determined
by incubating equal amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F with 250 pM 125I-PMP-BSA for 5 h at 3 °C and
then washing the unbound ligand away. Equal amounts of the pre-formed
125I-PMP-BSA·15F complexes were then diluted with HBST,
HBST + 25 nM Man-6-P, or HBST + 25 nM PMP-BSA
as described under "Experimental Procedures." At time intervals
between 0 and 100 min, the resin pellets were collected and counted in
a counter to determine the remaining bound ligand. C,
the relative abilities of Man-6-P and PMP-BSA to increase the
dissociation rate of 125I-PMP-BSA from the 15F construct
were determined by diluting equal amounts of pre-formed
125I-PMP-BSA·15F complexes in HBST containing the
indicated concentrations of Man-6-P or PMP-BSA. After allowing
dissociation to proceed for 20 min at 3 °C, the amount of remaining
bound ligand was determined and plotted as a function of the unlabeled
ligand concentration. The data for PMP-BSA (solid line) and
Man-6-P (dashed line) were fit to sigmoidal dose-response
curves using GraphPad PrismTM.
|
|
The Extracytoplasmic Domain of the Man-6-P/IGF2R Displays Negative
Cooperativity in Binding PMP-BSA--
To determine if the curvilinear
Scatchard plot for PMP-BSA binding observed for the wild-type 15F
construct was due to negative cooperativity, we used an experimental
approach developed by De Meyts and colleagues, who addressed the rate
of dissociation of radiolabeled insulin from the insulin receptor in
the presence of unlabeled ligand (40). If the Man-6-P/IGF2R displays
negative cooperativity in binding PMP-BSA, we would predict that the
dissociation rate of PMP-BSA would increase with increasing ligand
occupancy of the receptor. First, the rate of 125I-PMP-BSA
dissociation from a pre-formed 125I-PMP-BSA·15F complex
was measured in the presence or absence of 25 nM Man-6-P or
PMP-BSA (Fig. 1B). The presence of 25 nM PMP-BSA dramatically increased the rate of dissociation in comparison to the
control and 25 nM Man-6-P reactions, causing 50% of the radioligand/receptor complex to dissociate after only 25 min. To
eliminate the possibility that receptor rebinding accounts for this
observation, the effect of increasing dilution of radioligand on the
dissociation of the pre-formed 125I-PMP-BSA·15F complex
was measured in the presence or absence of 25 nM PMP-BSA
and was found to be constant over a dilution range of 30-180-fold
(data not shown).
To further characterize this phenomenon, the ability of PMP-BSA and
Man-6-P to increase the dissociation rate of radiolabeled PMP-BSA from
15F was measured over a wide range of unlabeled ligand concentrations.
Aliquots of resin bearing the immunoadsorbed
125I-PMP-BSA·15F complexes were incubated with increasing
concentrations of Man-6-P (0-50 mM) or PMP-BSA (0-150
nM). Dissociation of radioligand from the receptor complex
was allowed to proceed for 20 min at 3 °C, after which the amount of
bound radioligand remaining was determined. An enhancement of
125I-PMP-BSA dissociation from 15F with the addition of
unlabeled ligands resulted in dose-response curves with
EC50 values of 8.2 nM for PMP-BSA and 28.4 µM for Man-6-P (Fig. 1C). A concentration of
Man-6-P over 1000-fold higher than that of PMP-BSA was necessary to
cause the same increase in dissociation, which correlates with the
lower affinity displayed by the Man-6-P/IGF2R in binding free Man-6-P
relative to the multivalent ligand, PMP-BSA.
Only One Intact Man-6-P Binding Domain Is Necessary for the
Formation of High Affinity PMP-BSA Binding--
To determine if both
the repeat 3 and repeat 9 Man-6-P binding domains are required for the
formation of high affinity binding, a 15F Man-6-P/IGF2R construct
bearing an R1325A missense mutation was generated by site-directed
mutagenesis. Mutation of the residue corresponding to the human
Arg1325 to an alanine in the bovine receptor has been shown
previously to destroy the function of the repeat 9 Man-6-P binding
domain (28). The wild-type 15F and 15F(R1325A) constructs were
transiently expressed in 293T cells, and Triton X-100 cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-FLAG M2 antibody. The blots
revealed that both of the constructs were expressed as homogeneous
250-kDa proteins (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the Man-6-P and IGF-II binding
characteristics of 15F and 15F(R1325A). A, expression
of 15F wild-type (WT) and 15F mutant (R1325A)
constructs was determined using equal volumes (20 µl) of Triton X-100
cell extracts from cells transiently transfected with each construct,
or the empty CMV5 vector. Proteins were resolved on 6% reducing
SDS-PAGE, subjected to anti-FLAG M2 immunoblot analysis, and developed
with 125I-protein A. Band intensities were quantified by
PhosphorImager analysis. B, direct ligand binding assays.
Equal amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F and 15F(R1325A) constructs were
incubated in the presence of 2 nM 125I-IGF-II
or 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA for 3-4 h at 3 °C.
Bound ligand was determined by centrifuging the resin pellets, washing,
and counting in a counter. Radioactivity retained in the presence
of either 1 µM IGF-II or 5 mM Man-6-P was
subtracted from each binding reaction to determine the specific binding
for 125I-IGF-II and 125I-PMP-BSA, respectively.
C, Scatchard plot analysis of PMP-BSA binding was conducted
by incubating equimolar amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F and 15F(R1325A)
in the presence of increasing concentrations of
125I-PMP-BSA from 0.05 to 2.5 nM for 3 h
at 3 °C. The amounts of bound and unbound ligand were determined as
described above, and nonspecific binding was calculated by including 5 mM Man-6-P in a parallel set of binding reactions for each
concentration of labeled ligand.
|
|
In comparison to the wild-type 15F construct, the 15F(R1325A) mutant
demonstrated very similar IGF-II binding characteristics in a direct
binding assay (Fig. 2B). But when analyzed for its ability
to bind 125I-PMP-BSA, the R1325A mutant demonstrated a
48.8 ± 4.1% (n = 5) reduction in binding
compared with wild type (Fig. 2B). When subjected to
competitive binding analysis, the R1325A mutant demonstrated high
affinity for PMP-BSA (Kd = 2.29 ± 0.78 nM, number of transfections = 5). This overall
affinity is 4.2-fold lower than observed for the wild-type 15F.
However, the affinity of PMP-BSA binding to the R1325A mutant was
somewhat variable when comparing lysates prepared from different
transfections, suggesting that conditions present at the time of
transfection or cell lysis contributed to the formation of the Man-6-P
binding affinity. Scatchard plot analysis of the R1325A mutant from a
transfection that demonstrated affinity identical to the wild-type 15F
showed parallel plots that retained curvilinear nature (Fig.
2C).
Because there was an observed decrease in the number of binding sites
for PMP-BSA in the R1325A mutant samples, the ability of this construct
to bind immobilized PMP was measured using a PMP-Sepharose resin
affinity depletion assay. Purified 15F and 15F(R1325A) were exposed to
sequential rounds of incubation with PMP-Sepharose, after which the
amount of unbound receptor construct was determined by M2 immunoblot
analysis of the supernatant fractions (Fig.
3). The affinity chromatography revealed
that 15F(R1325A) is capable of binding PMP-Sepharose to the same extent
as wild type, with about 80% binding after only one exposure. Within
the limitations of this assay, no evidence was found for the presence of subpopulations of Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs differing in affinity for
PMP-Sepharose.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
PMP-Sepharose affinity depletion
analysis. A, aliquots (400 µl) of purified 15F and
15F(R1325A) were subjected to three rounds of incubation with
PMP-Sepharose (100 µl of resin) for 3 h at 3 °C. The amount
of remaining unbound Man-6-P/IGF2R construct after each exposure was
determined by pelleting the affinity matrix by centrifugation, followed
by anti-FLAG immunoblot of the supernatant fraction. A replicate
experiment with ethanolamine-blocked Sepharose was used to demonstrate
a lack of nonspecific interaction between the 15F constructs and the
Sepharose-resin. B, the radioactivity associated with each
immunoblot was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis and plotted as the
percentage of the construct remaining in the supernatant fraction after
each round of PMP-Sepharose incubation.
|
|
Man-6-P Binding Characteristics of Truncated Minireceptor
Constructs--
A series of truncated receptor constructs was designed
that encompassed the repeat 3, repeat 9, or both Man-6-P binding
domains. These constructs were expressed in 293T cells to determine the minimum portions of the extracytoplasmic domain required for the formation of high affinity Man-6-P binding sites (Fig.
4A). Aliquots of Triton X-100
cell lysates from cells transiently transfected with the constructs, or
transfected with the empty pCMV5 vector, were analyzed by anti-FLAG
immunoblots to verify and quantify construct expression. All eight
constructs were expressed as homogeneous proteins consistent with their
predicted Mr (Fig. 4B). The
expression of the truncated constructs was quantified by PhosphorImager
analysis so that equimolar amounts of all the constructs could be
immunoadsorbed to anti-FLAG resin for analysis of ligand binding.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Schematic diagram and expression of truncated
Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs. A, the constructs used in
this study are diagrammed, with squares representing the
repeating units of the extracytoplasmic domain of the Man-6-P/IGF2R.
The presence of an intact repeat 3 or repeat 9, which are thought to be
directly involved in Man-6-P binding, is indicated by shaded
squares. The presence of the R1325A mutation, which
eliminates Man-6-P binding to the repeat 9 binding domain, is indicated
by an asterisk (*). B, expression of
Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs. Equal volumes (20 µl) of Triton X-100 cell
extracts from cells transiently transfected with each construct, or the
empty CMV5 vector, were resolved on 6-12% reducing gels and subjected
to anti-FLAG M2 immunoblot analysis and developed with
125I-protein A.
|
|
The minimal domains of the Man-6-P/IGF2R required for Man-6-P binding
have been previously localized to repeats 1-3 and 7-9 (28, 29). To
determine the relative affinities of truncated receptors containing
only these minimal binding domains for PMP-BSA, the 1-3F and 7-9F
Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs were transiently expressed in 293T cells.
Whereas both of these constructs were capable of binding PMP-Sepharose
(data not shown), they showed little ability to interact with 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA in the direct binding assay
(Fig. 5), suggesting that they bind with
a much lower affinity than the 15F construct. Another construct
containing repeats 1-9 followed by a FLAG epitope tag, 1-9F, was
capable of binding 125I-PMP-BSA under these same assay
conditions (Fig. 5). Even though 1-9F contains both Man-6-P binding
domains, it bears a large deletion of the extracytoplasmic domain. We
therefore compared the ability of 1-9F and 15F to bind PMP-BSA using a
direct binding assay. Equimolar amounts of 1-9F and 15F were
immunoadsorbed to M2 resin and subjected to direct binding analysis or
immunoblot analysis (Fig. 6). From three
separate sets of transfections, 1-9F bound only 42.5 ± 6.1%
(n = 4) of the PMP-BSA as compared with 15F. In
addition, we tested the ability of the 1-9F and 15F constructs to bind
PMP-Sepharose to determine if subpopulations of the 1-9F constructs
were present in a form that could not bind ligand. Whereas 1-9F
demonstrated an approximately 50% decrease in the number of high
affinity binding sites for PMP-BSA, no differences were observed in its
ability to interact with PMP-Sepharose as compared with the wild-type
15F construct (data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Direct 125I-PMP-BSA binding by
Man-6-P/IGF2R minireceptor constructs. Direct binding of
125I-PMP-BSA was conducted in duplicate using equimolar
amounts of immunoadsorbed constructs as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Lysates from cells transfected with the empty pCMV5
vector were used as negative controls and demonstrated no specific
binding to 125I-PMP-BSA (data not shown). The specific
binding data were plotted as a percentage of that of the wild-type
1-9F construct.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the Man-6-P binding properties
of 15F and 1-9F Man-6-P/IGF2R minireceptor constructs. Equimolar
amounts of immunoadsorbed 15F and 1-9F constructs were subjected to
anti-FLAG immunoblot on a reducing 6% SDS-PAGE gel (A) or
125I-PMP-BSA direct binding analysis (B) as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Even though there was no
difference in the ability of 1-9F and 15F to be immunoadsorbed to M2
anti-FLAG resin, 1-9F demonstrated a ~50% reduction in ligand
binding.
|
|
To rule out the possibility that the observed decrease in PMP-BSA
binding to the 1-9F construct was due to a loss of binding to the
repeat 9 Man-6-P binding domain, two experimental approaches were
employed. First, in view of the possibility that the addition of a FLAG
epitope next to repeat 9 may disrupt ligand binding to this region, we
generated a 1-11F construct that contained two additional repeats
carboxyl-terminal to the repeat 9 binding site. Surprisingly, this
construct demonstrated the same binding characteristics as the 1-9F
construct in the direct binding assay (Fig. 5). Second, we generated
1-9F and 1-11F constructs bearing the R1325A mutation to eliminate
binding to the 9th repeat. If the failure to form available high
affinity binding sites displayed by the 1-9F and 1-11F constructs was
due to an inability to form an intact repeat 9 binding domain, we would
predict that these mutants, 1-9F(R1325A) and 1-11F(R1325A) would
demonstrate the same PMP-BSA binding characteristics as their wild-type
counterparts. However, when assayed for the ability to bind
125I-PMP-BSA, the mutants demonstrated a 52 ± 3%
(n = 6) reduction in 125I-PMP-BSA binding
relative to wild-type 1-9F, which is analogous to the observed loss of
binding for the 15F(R1325A) relative to the wild-type 15F construct
(Fig. 5). Competitive binding and Scatchard plot analyses of 1-9F and
1-9F(R1325A) revealed that both constructs had high affinity for
PMP-BSA, equivalent to the wild-type 15F, but the mutation caused a
reduction in the number of apparent binding sites measurable in this
assay (Fig. 7, panels A and B). These data suggest a role for the
carboxyl-terminal region of the Man-6-P/IGF2R extracytoplasmic domain
in the formation of the number of competent high affinity Man-6-P
binding sites.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Analysis of PMP-BSA binding affinity of
Man-6-P/IGF2R minireceptor constructs. A, constructs
demonstrating lower 125I-PMP-BSA than the wild-type 1-9F
receptor construct in the direct binding experiment were subjected to
competitive binding analysis. Equimolar amounts of the constructs were
immunoadsorbed to M2 resin and incubated in the presence of 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA with increasing concentrations
of unlabeled PMP-BSA (0-500 nM). Following a 3-h binding
reaction at 3 °C, the resin pellets were washed, collected, and
counted to determine the amount of bound ligand. The binding data were
fit to a model of one-site competitive binding using GraphPad PrismTM
and plotted as a percentage of wild-type 1-9F binding. The competitive
binding data for 1-9F versus 1-9F(R1325A) (B)
and 1-9F versus 7-15F and 1-8F (C) were
converted and plotted as bound/free versus bound ligand for
Scatchard plot analysis.
|
|
To determine what other regions of the Man-6-P/IGF2R extracytoplasmic
domain play a role in the formation of the Man-6-P binding sites,
constructs containing repeats 1-8 and 7-15, with only one Man-6-P
binding domain each, were analyzed. The 1-8F and 7-15F constructs
were capable of binding when incubated with 1 nM
125I-PMP-BSA, but the overall binding was substantially
reduced when compared with equimolar amounts of the 1-9F construct,
with a 71.2 ± 1.8% (n = 3) reduction for 1-8F
and a 71.8 ± 1.9% (n = 3) decrease for 7-15F in
comparison to 1-9F (Fig. 5). Affinity analyses of 1-8F and 7-15F
revealed an approximately 50% decrease in Bmax
in comparison to 1-9F, and a 1.8-2.0-fold reduction in affinity, as shown by competitive binding analysis and Scatchard plot
(Fig. 7, panels A and C).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In order to determine the portions of the Man-6-P/IGF2R
extracytoplasmic domain that contribute to the formation of high
affinity multivalent Man-6-P ligand binding, we have characterized the binding properties of several truncated receptor constructs. First, a
construct encoding the extracytoplasmic domain, followed by a FLAG
epitope tag, 15F, was assayed for its ability to interact with a
synthetic multivalent ligand, PMP-BSA. As previously reported, transient expression of the 15F construct in 293T cells revealed that
it was not secreted into the medium, but was found at high levels in
Triton X-100 and freeze/thaw cell extracts (35). This construct bound
IGF-II and PMP-BSA with the same affinities as reported for the
full-length rat Man-6-P/IGF2R. In addition, like other multivalent
phosphomannosylated ligands binding to the full-length Man-6-P/IGF2R,
both naturally occurring and synthetic (30, 31), PMP-BSA binding to the
15F construct exhibited a curvilinear Scatchard plot.
Two models have been previously proposed to explain the difference in
affinity of the Man-6-P/IGF2R toward monovalent Man-6-P and multivalent
phosphomannosylated ligands. First, the simultaneous interaction of a
single multivalent ligand with each of the Man-6-P binding domains in
the extracytoplasmic domain of the receptor could account for the
observed increase in affinity (31). In such a model, the intramolecular
interconnection between the two domains would account for the increase
in affinity for multivalent ligand binding over the monovalent ligand.
The second model accounts for the increased affinity through
intermolecular alignment of two Man-6-P binding domains on separate
receptor molecules through receptor oligomerization (33). However, in
order for this type of intermolecular interaction to account for
increased affinity, an interaction between two receptor molecules would
have to exist outside of the bridging effect caused by the presence of
a multivalent ligand. Tethering the receptors to the membrane could
account for high affinity in the full-length Man-6-P/IGF2R, but it
seems that another type of receptor-receptor interaction must occur to
explain the ability of soluble receptor constructs to bind with high
affinity. Such interactions have been shown to occur in receptors such
as the epidermal growth factor receptor (41), the fibroblast growth
factor receptor (42), and the CD-MPR (18).
The existence of Man-6-P/IGF2R oligomers has been previously reported.
Chemical cross-linking studies of the Man-6-P/IGF2R in intact U937
monocytes were the first to suggest that Man-6-P/IGF2R oligomers may
exist in the cell membrane (43). However, studies of purified
Man-6-P/IGF2R in solution using both gel filtration chromatography and
sucrose gradients have determined that the Man-6-P/IGF2R exists in a
monomeric form under these conditions (32). While this report was in
preparation, York et al. (33) confirmed those studies and
further reported that the addition of a lysosomal enzyme to purified
Man-6-P/IGF2R preparations allows the detection of a protein complex
with a Stokes radius consistent with two molecules of receptor bound to
one molecule of enzyme as measured by gel filtration chromatography.
The existence of receptor oligomers alone, however, does not exclude
the possibility that the Man-6-P/IGF2R binds multivalent
phosphomannosylated ligands through an intramolecular interaction.
Two approaches were undertaken in this study to discern between the
intramolecular and intermolecular models for multivalent Man-6-P ligand
binding. First, the Man-6-P binding domain of repeat 9 in 15F was
mutated to eliminate its binding function. The mutation of
Arg1334 in the bovine receptor, corresponding to
Arg1325 in the human receptor (16), to either alanine or
lysine, was shown to cause a loss of binding to the repeat 7-9 Man-6-P
binding domain (28). If the intramolecular model accounts entirely for the formation of high affinity sites, we would predict that mutation of
the 9th repeat binding domain in an intact receptor would affect the
affinity, while having no effect on the overall stoichiometry of
PMP-BSA binding. However, the 15F(R1325A) mutant Man-6-P/IGF2R bound
with high affinity in the nanomolar range (Kd = 2.85 nM), but demonstrated a ~50% reduction in the number of
available binding sites. This result suggests that the formation of
high affinity occurs through an intermolecular mechanism, with little contribution from intramolecular binding. As previously reported, if
the intramolecular model accounted for high affinity binding, the
cooperative contribution of each binding domain should be multiplicative rather than additive (31). In addition, the overall affinity of the R1325A mutant was variable when measured in lysates prepared from separate transfections in 293T cells. While this study
was ongoing, Marron-Terada et al. (30) reported that the full-length bovine receptor bearing the Arg1334
Ala
mutation sorted lysosomal enzymes with about 50% of the wild-type
receptor's efficiency. They also reported that the mutant bound
-glucuronidase, a heavily glycosylated, phosphomannosylated lysosomal enzyme, with an affinity about one-half that of the wild-type
receptor. This phenomenon of variable affinity could be explained if
mutation of this Arg residue destabilized the quaternary or tertiary
structure of the extracytoplasmic domain of the receptor.
The second approach employed to determine if the presence of only the
repeat 3 or the repeat 9 binding domain is sufficient for formation of
high affinity Man-6-P binding was the study of truncated receptor
constructs containing only one of these Man-6-P binding domains.
Flag-tagged constructs encoding the minimal binding domains for
Man-6-P, repeats 1-3 and 7-9, did not bind PMP-BSA with high affinity
even though they were capable of binding PMP-Sepharose (data not
shown). This observation suggests that regions outside repeats 1-3 and
7-9 are necessary for the formation, or stabilization, of high
affinity binding sites. In agreement with this assessment, constructs
containing larger sections of the extracytoplasmic domain containing
only one Man-6-P binding domain, 1-8F and 7-15F, were capable of
binding PMP-BSA with affinities in the nanomolar range. However, these
constructs only formed a fraction of the number of high affinity
PMP-BSA binding sites when compared with equimolar amounts of the 15F construct.
In addition to forming fewer binding sites per receptor molecule, the
1-8F and 7-15F constructs bound PMP-BSA with half the affinity of the
15F construct, indicating that regions in both halves of the
Man-6-P/IGF2R's extracytoplasmic region contribute to the affinity of
the resultant multivalent ligand binding sites. Whereas the 1-8F
construct bound with a reduced Bmax and lower affinity than the 15F construct, constructs containing repeats 1-9 and
1-11 bearing the R1325A mutation, 1-9F(R1325A) and 1-11F(R1325A), showed dramatic increases in the number and affinity of sites formed.
However, these constructs still formed fewer high affinity Man-6-P
binding sites than the 15F(R1325A) construct. In the context of
Man-6-P/IGF2R oligomers, these observations may be explained if
multiple interactions along the extracytoplasmic domains between monomers of a dimeric receptor are necessary for the formation of high
affinity Man-6-P binding. Currently available data are consistent with
the possibility that development of a binding site of proper
conformation requires other portions of the receptor, either within a
monomeric structure or contributed by the partner subunit of a dimeric species.
Further evidence that regions outside of the minimal Man-6-P binding
domains are necessary for the formation of high affinity binding comes
from studies using the wild-type 1-9F and 1-11F constructs, which
contain both Man-6-P binding domains. These constructs bind PMP-BSA
with very similar characteristics. Both display high affinity toward
the multivalent ligand, with affinities identical to the 15F construct.
However, when compared with the number of binding sites formed by
equimolar amounts of 15F, the 1-9F and 1-11F constructs demonstrate
~50% fewer sites. In these constructs, both the repeat 3 and repeat
9 Man-6-P binding domains appear to contribute equally to the overall
number of binding sites, as the 1-9F(R1325A) and 1-11F(R1325A) mutant
constructs both demonstrate a further 50% reduction in PMP-BSA
binding, without affecting the overall affinity, compared with their
wild-type counterparts. We infer from these data that repeats 12-15
likely contain necessary components for the formation of
binding-competent receptors. We anticipated that receptor subspecies
with only low affinity for multivalent ligand would exist in
preparations of the constructs that show reduced numbers of PMP-BSA
binding sites as compared with 15F. The 1-9F construct, however,
demonstrated no alteration in its ability to interact with
PMP-Sepharose as compared with 15F (data not shown). As the 1-3F and
7-9F constructs were also capable of interacting with PMP-Sepharose,
while showing almost no binding to PMP-BSA in the direct binding assay,
it seems likely that this affinity chromatography is capable of
detecting both low and high affinity binding sites. Resolution of this
question will have to await better techniques directed at
discriminating between low and high affinity binding displayed by the
Man-6-P/IGF2R.
Scatchard plot analyses of all the constructs characterized in this
study revealed curvilinear plots for 125I-PMP-BSA binding.
The curvilinear nature of the Scatchard plot for PMP-BSA binding to the
Man-6-P/IGF2R could be accounted for by any one of three explanations
(for review see Ref. 44). First, the presence of more than one binding
site with differing affinities toward PMP-BSA could account for a
curvilinear Scatchard plot. Second, the presence of subpopulations of
the Man-6-P/IGF2R with interconverting affinities, between low and high
affinity could account for this observation. Finally, the affinity of
the Man-6-P/IGF2R toward PMP-BSA could depend on the ligand occupancy
of the receptor resulting in negative cooperativity between more than
one binding domain. In order to address the possibility that the
Man-6-P/IGF2R displays negative cooperativity in binding PMP-BSA, we
used an experimental approach developed by De Meyts and colleagues (40) to identify negatively cooperative interactions of insulin with its
receptor. In studying the effect of the presence of unlabeled ligand
concentration on the dissociation rate of a pre-formed radioligand-receptor complex, negative cooperativity would manifest as
an increase in the rate of dissociation of radioligand from the
receptor as a function of increasing unlabeled ligand concentration. In
other words, koff would be dependent on the
ligand occupancy of the receptor, as has been observed for insulin
binding to its receptor (40, 45-47).
The observation that the presence of unlabeled PMP-BSA can accelerate
the dissociation rate of radioligand from a pre-formed 125I-PMP-BSA·15F complex reported in this study supports
a negative cooperativity model for ligand interaction with the 15F
construct. In addition, constructs containing only one Man-6-P binding
domain demonstrate a curvilinear Scatchard plot in binding PMP-BSA.
Therefore, the observed negative cooperativity is not likely due to
intramolecular interaction between the repeats 3 and 9 Man-6-P binding
domains of a monomeric receptor, but likely due to alignment of
corresponding binding domains between two receptor molecules as shown
in Fig. 8. A similar mechanism for
negative cooperativity can be found in the example of insulin binding
to its receptor. Recent electron cryomicroscopy studies of the insulin
receptor have revealed that an insulin receptor dimer forms a single
binding site in which the L1 Cys-rich domain of one
-subunit and the
L2 domain of the other
-subunit interact with distinct residues of
insulin (48). The same study also revealed that an insulin binding site
from a single dimer was capable of simultaneously binding two insulin molecules, explaining the negative cooperativity of binding at high
concentrations of insulin.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Proposed model for interaction of
phosphomannosylated ligands with the Man-6-P/IGF2R. The
extracytoplasmic repeats of the Man-6-P/IGF2R are illustrated as
ovals, with the Man-6-P binding domains represented by
shaded ovals. Binding of two phosphomannosylated ligands
(shaded circles) to an Man-6-P/IGF2R dimer would result in
1:1 stoichiometry of high affinity binding. As ligand concentration
increases, the receptor could bind with a 2:1 stoichiometry of
ligand:receptor with lower affinity, resulting in the observed negative
cooperativity at high concentrations of ligand.
|
|
Negatively cooperative Man-6-P binding interactions may play a role in
the rate of trafficking of the Man-6-P/IGF2R. The reported finding that
the addition of up to 10 nM
-glucuronidase to cells in
culture increased the internalization of the Man-6-P/IGF2R, whereas the
addition of 5000 nM of a small multivalent Man-6-P bearing
peptide did not (33), is of particular interest. One possible
interpretation of those findings is that increased internalization of
the Man-6-P/IGF2R may only occur under conditions where one molecule of
ligand is bound per receptor, and not at concentrations of ligand that
result in higher stoichiometries of ligand binding. The binding of a
single bivalent ligand to the Man-6-P/IGF2R in a high affinity state
may result in a conformational change in a receptor oligomer, or
complex, such that the tyrosine-based internalization signal of the
cytoplasmic domain more effectively interacts with adaptor complexes
such as AP-1 and AP-2. It will be interesting to determine the
internalization rate of the Man-6-P/IGF2R at various concentrations of
bivalent ligand to determine if high concentrations of ligand can
interfere with the increase in Man-6-P/IGF2R internalization. It will
also be important to test whether the CD-MPR is capable of displaying a
similar phenomenon in binding multivalent lysosomal enzymes. An
important consideration for lysosome biogenesis is that the specificity
of hydrolase targeting displayed by the Man-6-P/IGF2R and the CD-MPR
may result from differences in their affinity toward lysosomal enzymes
at different concentrations of ligand that are present in specific
environments of the cell.
In summary, this study of truncated receptor constructs has led to
several important observations about the Man-6-P/IGF2R with respect to
its ability to form high affinity Man-6-P binding sites. First, only
one of the two extracytoplasmic Man-6-P binding domains is required for
the formation of high affinity, strongly supporting the hypothesis that
receptor oligomerization is responsible for the ability of multivalent
ligands to interact with the receptor with high affinity. In addition,
our laboratory has recently found that the IGF2R is capable of forming
dimers (49). Second, regions of the IGF2R outside of the minimal
Man-6-P binding domain play a role in the formation of high affinity
sites. Finally, the high affinity sites display negative cooperativity
in their ability to bind multivalent ligands. These observations may
not only be important in the context of the specificity of lysosomal
enzyme targeting by this receptor, but may lay a foundation for
understanding how this protein functions in the context of the cell.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Rockefeller University for
permission to use the 293T cells. We also appreciate discussion with
and suggestions from Beverly S. Schaffer, Dr. Jung H. Y. Park, Dr.
Robert E. Lewis, Dr. C. Kirk Phares, and Dr. Myron L. Toews. We also
thank Margaret H. Niedenthal of Lilly Research Laboratories for
providing the IGFs, and Drs. William S. Sly and David W. Russell for
providing the human Man-6-P/IGF2R cDNA and pCMV5, respectively. We
are also grateful to the University of Nebraska Medical Center
Molecular Biology Core Facility for nucleotide sequence analysis of the truncated Man-6-P/IGF2R constructs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant DK44212 (to R. G. M.) and by stipend support from the
Emley Fellowship, the Dr. Fred W. Upson grant-in-aid, and the Kate
Field grant-in-aid awards through the University of Nebraska Medical Center. DNA sequencing costs were subsidized by National Institutes of
Health NCI Core Grant CA36727 and the Nebraska Research Initiative.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, 984525 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
68198-4525. Tel.: 402-559-7824; Fax: 402-559-3920; E-mail: rgmacdon@unmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000010200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Man-6-P, mannose
6-phosphate;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
Man-6-P/IGF2R, mannose
6-phosphate/ insulin-like growth factor II receptor;
PMP, pentamannose
phosphate;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
CD-MPR, cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor;
MPR, mannose
6-phosphate receptor;
nt, nucleotide(s);
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
HBST, HEPES-buffered saline containing Triton
X-100.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
Lobel, P.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
12115-12118
|
| 2.
|
Lemansky, P.,
Gieselmann, V.,
Hasilik, A.,
and von Figura, K.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
9023-9030
|
| 3.
|
Kornfeld, S.,
Reitman, M. L.,
Varki, A.,
Goldberg, D.,
and Gabel, C. A.
(1982)
Ciba Found. Symp.
92,
138-156
|
| 4.
|
Reitman, M. L.,
Varki, A.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1981)
J. Clin. Invest.
67,
1574-1579
|
| 5.
|
Ross, J. S.,
Nazeer, T.,
Figge, H. L.,
Fisher, H. A.,
and Rifkin, M. D.
(1995)
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
104,
36-41
|
| 6.
|
Sleat, D. E.,
Chen, T. L.,
Raska, K., Jr.,
and Lobel, P.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
3424-3430
|
| 7.
|
Mathieu, M.,
Vignon, F.,
Capony, F.,
and Rochefort, H.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
815-822
|
| 8.
|
Mathieu, M.,
Rochefort, H.,
Barenton, B.,
Prebois, C.,
and Vignon, F.
(1990)
Mol. Endocrinol.
4,
1327-1335
|
| 9.
|
Kasper, D.,
Dittmer, F.,
von Figura, K.,
and Pohlmann, R.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
615-623
|
| 10.
|
Ludwig, T.,
Munier-Lehmann, H.,
Bauer, U.,
Hollinshead, M.,
Ovitt, C.,
Lobel, P.,
and Hoflack, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3430-3437
|
| 11.
|
Ludwig, T.,
Ovitt, C. E.,
Bauer, U.,
Hollinshead, M.,
Remmler, J.,
Lobel, P.,
Ruther, U.,
and Hoflack, B.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5225-5235
|
| 12.
|
Munier Lehmann, H.,
Mauxion, F.,
Bauer, U.,
Lobel, P.,
and Hoflack, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15166-15174
|
| 13.
|
Pohlmann, R.,
Boeker, M. W.,
and von Figura, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27311-27318
|
| 14.
|
Sohar, I.,
Sleat, D.,
Gong Liu, C.,
Ludwig, T.,
and Lobel, P.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
903-908
|
| 15.
|
Stein, M.,
Zijderhand Bleekemolen, J. E.,
Geuze, H.,
Hasilik, A.,
and von Figura, K.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
2677-2681
|
| 16.
|
Lobel, P.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2563-2570
|
| 17.
|
Tong, P. Y.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7970-7975
|
| 18.
|
Roberts, D. L.,
Weix, D. J.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kim, J. J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
639-648
|
| 19.
|
Stein, M.,
Braulke, T.,
Krentler, C.,
Hasilik, A.,
and von Figura, K.
(1987)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
368,
937-947
|
| 20.
|
Oshima, A.,
Nolan, C. M.,
Kyle, J. W.,
Grubb, J. H.,
and Sly, W. S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2553-2562
|
| 21.
|
Oka, Y.,
Rozek, L. M.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
9435-9442
|
| 22.
|
Oka, Y.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
9090-9093
|
| 23.
|
Nielsen, F. C.,
Wang, E.,
and Gammeltoft, S.
(1991)
J. Neurochem.
56,
12-21
|
| 24.
|
Auletta, M.,
Nielsen, F. C.,
and Gammeltoft, S.
(1992)
J. Neurosci. Res.
31,
14-20
|
| 25.
|
Gleizes, P. E.,
Munger, J. S.,
Nunes, I.,
Harpel, J. G.,
Mazzieri, R.,
Noguera, I.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1997)
Stem Cells
15,
190-197
|
| 26.
|
Godar, S.,
Horejsi, V.,
Weidle, U. H.,
Binder, B. R.,
Hansmann, C.,
and Stockinger, H.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
1004-1013
|
| 27.
|
Nykjaer, A.,
Christensen, E. I.,
Vorum, H.,
Hager, H.,
Petersen, C. M.,
Roigaard, H.,
Min, H. Y.,
Vilhardt, F.,
Moller, L.,
Kornfeld, S.,
and Gliemann, J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
815-828
|
| 28.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
Rose, P. A.,
Molkentin, J. D.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Brzycki, M. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5457-5463
|
| 29.
|
Westlund, B.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23233-23239
|
| 30.
|
Marron-Terada, P. G.,
Brzycki-Wessell, M. A.,
and Dahms, N. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22358-22366
|
| 31.
|
Tong, P. Y.,
Gregory, W.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7962-7969
|
| 32.
|
Perdue, J. F.,
Chan, J. K.,
Thibault, C.,
Radaj, P.,
Mills, B.,
and Daughaday, W. H.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
7800-7811
|
| 33.
|
York, S. J.,
Arneson, L. S.,
Gregory, W. T.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1164-1171
|
| 34.
|
Andersson, S.,
Davis, D. L.,
Dahlbäck, H.,
Jörnvall, H.,
and Russell, D. W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8222-8229
|
| 35.
|
Byrd, J. C.,
Devi, G. R.,
De Souza, A. T.,
Jirtle, R. L.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24408-24416
|
| 36.
|
Garmroudi, F.,
Devi, G.,
Slentz, D. H.,
Schaffer, B. S.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
642-651
|
| 37.
|
Pear, W. S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396
|
| 38.
|
Murray, G. J.,
and Neville, D. M., Jr.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
11942-11948
|
| 39.
|
Braulke, T.,
Causin, C.,
Waheed, A.,
Junghans, U.,
Hasilik, A.,
Maly, P.,
Humbel, R. E.,
and von Figura, K.
(1988)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
150,
1287-1293
|
| 40.
|
De Meyts, P.,
Roth, J.,
Neville, D. M., Jr.,
Gavin, J. R.,
and Lesniak, M. A.
(1973)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
55,
154-161
|
| 41.
|
Boni-Schnetzler, M.,
and Pilch, P. F.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
7832-7836
|
| 42.
|
Plotnikov, A. N.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Hubbard, S. R.,
and Mohammadi, M.
(1999)
Cell
98,
641-650
|
| 43.
|
Stein, M.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Hasilik, A.,
and von Figura, K.
(1987)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
368,
927-936
|
| 44.
|
De Lean, A.,
and Rodbard, D.
(1979)
in
The Receptors: A Comprehensive Treatise
(O'Brien, R. D., ed), Vol. 1
, pp. 143-192, Plenum Press, Ithaca, New York
|
| 45.
|
De Meyts, P.,
Bianco, R. A.,
and Roth, J.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
1877-1888
|
| 46.
|
De Meyts, P.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
and Roth, J.
(1978)
Nature
273,
504-509
|
| 47.
|
De Meyts, P.,
and Roth, J.
(1975)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
66,
1118-1126
|
| 48.
|
Luo, R. Z.,
Beniac, D. R.,
Fernandes, A.,
Yip, C. C.,
and Ottensmeyer, F. P.
(1999)
Science
285,
1077-1080
|
| 49.
|
Byrd, J. C.,
Park, J. H. Y.,
Schaffer, B. S.,
Garmroudi, F.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18647-18656
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: