Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001103200 on March 15, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18682-18691, June 23, 2000
An Activated L-selectin Mutant with Conserved Equilibrium Binding
Properties but Enhanced Ligand Recognition under Shear Flow*
Oren
Dwir
,
Geoffrey. S.
Kansas§¶, and
Ronen
Alon
From the
Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute
of Science, Rehovot, 76100 Israel and the § Department of
Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern Medical School,
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Received for publication, February 10, 2000, and in revised form, March 14, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Selectins mediate the initial tethering and
rolling of leukocytes on vessel walls. Adhesion by selectins is a
function of both ligand recognition at equilibrium and mechanical
properties of the selectin-ligand bond under applied force. We describe
an EGF domain mutant of L-selectin with profoundly augmented
adhesiveness over that of native L-selectin but conserved ligand
specificity. This mutant, termed LPL, was derived by a substitution of
the EGF-like domain of L-selectin with the homologous domain from P-selectin. The mutant bound soluble carbohydrate L-selectin ligand with affinity comparable with that of native L-selectin but interacted with all surface-bound ligands much more readily than native
L-selectin, in particular under elevated shear flow. Tethers mediated
by both native and mutant L-selectin exhibited similar lifetimes under a range of shear stresses, but the rate of bond formation by the mutant
was at least 10-fold higher than that of native L-selectin toward
distinct L-selectin ligands. Enhanced rate of bond formation by the
mutant was associated with profoundly stronger rolling interactions and
reduced dependence of rolling on a threshold of shear stress. This is
the first demonstration that the EGF domain can modulate the binding of
the lectin domain of a selectin to surface-immobilized ligands under
shear flow without affecting the equilibrium properties of the selectin
toward soluble ligands.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Selectins mediate the tethering of flowing leukocytes to the
vessel wall and the propagation of tethers into rolling adhesions in
the direction of flow (1-4). Leukocyte rolling is the first of several
sequential steps that control the entry of leukocyte subsets into
lymphoid organs and inflamed sites (5, 6). Binding of the two
endothelial selectins, P- and E-selectins, and the leukocyte selectin,
L-selectin, to cell surface carbohydrate ligands under shear flow is
labile and occurs in fractions of seconds (7, 8). L-selectin, expressed
on almost all circulating leukocytes, binds to sulfated
sialyl Lewisx-related glycoproteins expressed on high
endothelial venules of peripheral lymphoid tissues (9-12) or on
endothelium of inflamed vessels (13-17). L-selectin also recognizes
fucosylated sialoglycoproteins on myeloid cells (18, 19), including
P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (pSGL-1), the major P-selectin ligand
(20, 21). These interactions support the rolling of free flowing
leukocytes over a layer of adherent leukocytes or in suspension
(21-26). Purified high endothelial venule-derived ligands, including
CD34, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MadCAM-1),
podocalyxin-like protein,
GlyCAM-1,1 as well as
isolated P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1, can support rolling of
L-selectin-expressing cells in hydrodynamic shear and serve as useful
tools in the elucidation of the dynamics of selectin adhesiveness (21,
27-30).
Selectins contain a single N-terminal lectin domain, followed by an
epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain, a series of short consensus
repeats (SCRs), a transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic tail (3, 4,
31). Electron microscopy and hydrodynamic analysis confirm that
selectins are rigid asymmetric molecules (32). Although the crystal
structure of E-selectin predicts little interaction between the lectin
and EGF domain (33), deletions of the EGF domain of selectins abolish
ligand recognition (34). The precise roles of the EGF domain and the
SCRs are unclear.
Adhesion of selectins to their carbohydrate ligands is a function of
both kinetic properties of ligand recognition as measured in the
absence of applied forces, as well as the mechanical properties of
selectin-ligand bonds, which control the kinetics of bond formation and
breakage in the presence of shear forces (35). The latter properties
control the effective strength of a given receptor-ligand interaction
independently of the apparent bond affinity in the absence of force
(36). To gain new insights into the molecular basis of
selectin-mediated adhesion and its regulation by equilibrium and
mechanical properties of selectin bonds, we compared the dynamic properties of bonds formed by native L-selectin with those exhibited by
an L-selectin mutant in which the EGF-like domain of L-selectin has
been replaced with the homologous domain from P-selectin. This mutant,
designated LPL (37), has previously been shown to retain the ligand
specificity of native L-selectin and displays increased adhesiveness
toward L-selectin-ligand expressing myeloid cells (37). The detailed
kinetic characterization of this mutant performed in the present study
reveals a dramatically augmented ability of the mutant over that of
native L-selectin to mediate rolling on all L-selectin ligands tested,
both as a cell-associated or cell-free form. This enhanced adhesion is
also associated with abolishment of the shear threshold requirement of
adhesion, an unprecedented property of selectin-dependent
rolling (38, 39). This study is a first demonstration that the EGF
domain can regulate the adhesive activity of L-selectin by altering the
kinetics of ligand recognition under shear flow without affecting
affinity to soluble ligand in the absence of flow.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies and Reagents
The anti-L-selectin mAbs, DREG-200 and DREG-56 (40), and mAb
CA21, directed against the C terminus of the cytoplasmic tail of
L-selectin (41) were kindly provided by Dr. T. K. Kishimoto (Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT). The rabbit polyclonal antibody CAM02, derived against an internal peptide of
GlyCAM-1 (42) was a gift from Dr. Steven Rosen (University of
California, San Francisco). LAM1-101, directed against the SCR domain
of L-selectin (43), was a generous gift of Dr. T. Tedder (Duke
University, Durham, NC). The anti-VCAM-1 mAb, 4B9, was a gift from Dr.
R. Lobb (Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA). All mAbs were used as purified
Ig. Rabbit anti-murine IgG Fc, fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, and preimmune mouse IgG were
obtained from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). DREG-200 Fab fragments were generated by papain digestion, followed by the removal of undigested IgG on protein-G agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (44). Fab purity was confirmed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. GlyCAM-1, purified from mouse
serum by immunoaffinity chromatography, was a generous gift from Dr. S. Rosen, and was stored frozen in PBS (10). Peripheral node addressin
(PNAd), purified from human tonsil lysates by MECA-79 mAb affinity
chromatography (45), was a generous gift from Dr. Ellen Berg (Protein
Design Labs, Mountain View, CA). The glycoprotein mixture was stored in
1% octyl glucoside/PBS solution at 4 °C. The chemically synthesized
neoglycolipid 3',6-disulfo Lex
(glc)-phosphatidylethanolamine dipalmitoyl (C16:0) was a gift from Dr.
Laura Kiessling (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI). Fucoidin, a
plant-derived sulfated polyfucan that saturably blocks the lectin
domains of L-selectin and P-selectin (2), bovine serum albumin
(fraction V), protein A, Ca2+- and Mg2+-free
Hanks' balanced salt solution, Ficoll-Hypaque 1077, n-octyl-
-glucopyranoside (octyl glucoside), and the
protease inhibitors pepstatin, leupeptin, aprotinin, benzamidine
hydrochloride, 1,10-phenanthroline, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and
soybean trypsin inhibitor were obtained from Sigma. The L-selectin
polysaccharide ligand PPME was FITC-labeled as described (46) and was
kindly supplied by Lloyd Stoolman (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
MI). Human serum albumin (HSA; Fraction V), was obtained from
Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Fucoidin was covalently conjugated to HSA
(fucoidin-HSA) as described previously (46).
Cells
The stable expression of cDNA encoding native human
L-selectin or the L-selectin chimera, LPL, in the mouse pre-B cell line 300.19 was described elsewhere (37). Clones expressing similar levels
of native and chimeric L-selectin were maintained in RPMI 1640, supplemented with antibiotics, 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and 0.1 µM 2-mercaptoethanol. Peripheral blood
granulocytes were isolated from anticoagulated blood after dextran
sedimentation and density separation over Ficoll-Hypaque (47).
Immunofluorescence Flow Cytometry, Immunogold Labeling, and mAb
Binding Assays
Indirect immunofluorescence was performed on washed cells that
were suspended in PBS supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and 5 mM EDTA. Cells were incubated at 4 °C with either 10 µg/ml of the L-selectin mAb DREG-200 or with preimmune mouse IgG as a
control for background staining. Cells were washed, stained with
FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig, resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.05% sodium azide, and immediately analyzed in a FACScan flow
cytometer (Beckton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium). Localization of
L-selectin was assessed by immunoelectron microscopy as described previously (48). The sectioned cells (40-60 cells/experiment) were
examined with a Phillips 410 electron microscope (Phillips; Eindhoven,
The Netherlands); only representative cells were photographed.
125I-Labeled DREG-200 was prepared by the chloramine T
method (49), using a ratio of 50 µg of protein to 0.5 mCi of
carrier-free sodium 125iodide. L-selectin or LPL
transfected cells (1 × 106/ml) were incubated in
binding medium (Hanks' balanced salt solution/10 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) in the presence of 1-200 nM
125I-labeled DREG-200 mAb for 10 min at 24 °C and for an
additional 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed three times with
binding medium at 4 °C, and cell-associated
-radioactivity was
determined. FITC-PPME binding to the various transfectants (1 × 105/ml) was determined by incubating cells in 0.1 ml of
binding medium with the polysaccaride ligand for 10 min at 24 °C.
Cells were diluted into 2 ml of binding medium and immediately analyzed
for FITC staining by fluorescence-activated cell sorter. PPME staining was completely blocked by Ca2+ chelation with 5 mM EDTA. Short term PPME binding was determined by
incubating cells with the ligand for 0.5-5 min followed by dilution
and immediate fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis.
Preparation of Ligand-coated Substrates
Concentrates of GlyCAM-1, fucoidin-HSA, or DREG-200 (intact or
Fab fragment) were diluted in coating medium (PBS supplemented with 20 mM bicarbonate, pH 8.5) and adsorbed onto the plates for 2 h at 37 °C. PNAd aliquots were diluted to concentrations of 10 ng/ml to 100 µg/ml in the coating medium and immediately adsorbed onto a polystyrene plate for 15 h at 4 °C. The 3'6 disulfo
Lex glycolipid was dissolved at 0.5-2 µg/ml in 20:1
methanol:butanol solution containing 4 µg/ml of egg lecitin
phosphatidylcholine (Sigma) and coated as described previously (50).
All substrates were washed five times with PBS and blocked with PBS
supplemented with 2% human serum albumin (PBS/HSA) at 4 °C.
GlyCAM-1 site densities were assessed using 125I-labeled
CAM02. Because this polyclonal Ab is directed against a short segment
exposed on the mucin backbone, at saturation, a single antibody
molecule was assumed to bind to each immobilized GlyCAM-1 molecule. The
ligand density of PNAd was expressed in input coating concentrations
(µg/ml).
Cell-free L-selectin and LPL were derived from lysates of transfected
300.19 cells. Crude transfectant lysates were lysed and prepared as
described previously (51), and cleared lysates were immediately used
for coating. Polystyrene plates were coated with L-selectin or its EGF
mutant using an antibody capture procedure designed to optimize the
functionality of the cell-free selectin and eliminate
Fc-dependent interactions of neutrophils perfused over the
adhesive substrate. Substrates were prepared by directly coating
protein A onto a polystyrene plate (at 20 µg/ml in coating medium,
followed by quenching with PBS/HSA and addition of rabbit anti-mouse
IgG Fc, 20 µg/ml in PBS/HSA). Unbound IgG was removed by multiple
washing, and anti-L-selectin cytoplasmic tail mAb CA21, diluted in
PBS/HSA, was then adsorbed at different concentrations (1-20 ng/ml)
onto the immobilized rabbit anti-mouse IgG. The site density of CA21 on
the various substrates was determined by radioimmunoassay using
125I-labeled CA21 mAb. To assure maximal immunoadsorption
of solubilized native or chimeric L-selectin, each CA21 mAb spot was
overlaid three times with lysate aliquots, each time for 4 h at
4 °C. Following the last lysate adsorption, substrates were washed
with PBS supplemented with 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.02% sodium azide and subjected to
extensive washing with cell binding medium (Hanks' balanced salt
solution/10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin).
Laminar Flow Assays
Cell Tethering and Rolling Measurements--
The polystyrene
plate, on which purified ligand was adsorbed, was assembled in a
parallel plate laminar flow chamber as described previously (1, 52).
Transfected cells were washed in H/H medium containing 5 mM
EDTA, resuspended in H/H medium at 107 cells/ml and stored
at 4 °C up to 1 h before each flow experiment. Stored cells
were resuspended in cell binding medium at 106 cells/ml and
perfused at room temperature through the flow chamber at desired flow
rates, generated with an automated syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus,
Natick, MA). Cellular interactions were visualized at two different
fields of view (each one 0.17 mm2 in area) using a 10×
objective of an inverted phase contrast microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon
Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Tethering events were defined as adhesive
interactions of those freely flowing cells (herein termed cell flux)
moving closest to the lower wall of the flow chamber coated with the
test substrate and that are therefore the only population potentially
capable of interacting with the substrate. This flux was visualized by
their brighter images and slower motions than cells moving at more
distant layers of the perfusate. Two types of initial cell tethers to
the substrate were determined: transient tethers, cells that attached
briefly to the substrate without initiating rolling motions, and
rolling tethers, cells that remained rolling on the substrate,
i.e. moving at a mean velocity not more than a fourth the
hydrodynamic velocity for at least 3 s after initial tethering.
The number of each type of tethered cells was divided by the cell flux
to yield the frequency of initial tethers. For cell inhibition studies,
cells were preincubated for 5 min at 4 °C in H/H medium with 5 µg/ml of the L-selectin blocking mAb, DREG-200, or preimmune mouse
IgG, diluted 1:10 with the binding medium, and perfused into the
chamber. For cell-free selectin or LPL mutant blocking, cells were
perfused into the flow chamber in the presence of 50 µg/ml of the
L-selectin ligand, fucoidin, or 5 mM EGTA. More than 98%
of all transient cell tethers to the various glycoprotein ligands were
L-selectin-specific, because they were blocked by fucoidin. Rolling
velocities were determined by following the cell displacements over
2-3 s as described previously (29).
To follow the kinetics of leukocyte release by a shear drop, cells were
allowed to roll on high density ligands at 1.75 dyn/cm2 for
at least 20 s before the flow rate was dropped to 0.2 dyn/cm2. To estimate the time lapse required for the flow
system to reach a shear stress of 0.2 dyn/cm2, given that
at this shear value, a noninteracting cell traveled at a velocity of 60 µm/s, the time point at which leukocytes freely moving at 1.75 dyn/cm2 reached this lower velocity, after being subjected
to the same shear drop was determined. The number of originally rolling
cells remaining bound to the substrate after this time point was
determined by frame-by-frame analysis.
Dissociation Kinetics of Transient Tethers--
Transient
tethers to low density ligands were defined as temporary pauses when
separated by at least 50 µm of motion at the hydrodynamic velocity
and when no cell motion (<1 µm displacement) occurred while the cell
was tethered to the substrate (8). The duration of transient tethers
was determined at a resolution of 0.02 s by manually counting the
number of frames during which the tethered cell was motionless (53).
Tethers lasting less than 0.04 s were reanalyzed at a resolution
of 0.02 s on high fidelity video (Panasonic AG-7355, Osaka, Japan)
using a digital still playback mode. Sufficient videotape was analyzed
(60-120 s) to obtain 30-40 tethering events, and the natural log of
the number of cells that remained bound was plotted as a function of
the tether duration time. The slope of the curve represents
koff.
Image Analysis
An imaging system was developed for quantitative analysis of
instantaneous velocities of cell rolling on different adhesive substrates. Video frame images consisting of 768 × 574 pixels (with a pixel size of 1.15 µm using a 10× objective), were digitized using a Matrox Pulsar frame grabber (Matrox Graphics Inc., Dorval, Quebec, Canada), and images were scanned and processed by the WSCAN-Array-3 imaging software (Galai, Migdal-Ha'emek, Israel), running on an Atlas pentium MMX-200 work station. Cell motions were
identified from images tracked at 0.02-s intervals. The program output
provided the coordinates of the center point of each cell in successive
interlaced fields 0.02 s apart.
A computer program for cell motion analysis was developed in
collaboration with the lab of Prof. David Malah (Electric Engineering Faculty, Technion, Haifa, Israel). The software runs under Matlab 5.2 and compares instantaneous positions of individual cells at successive
video images over a period of up to 5 s. Tethers of individual
cells rolling persistently on the ligand-coated field or moving through
it in a jerky motion were determined according to changes in
instantaneous cell velocities in the flow direction. A rolling pause
was defined as an instantaneous velocity drop to below 29 µm/s at
shear stresses of 1-1.75 dyn/cm2. This threshold velocity
value gave optimal correlation between pause analysis performed on
representative cells by the computerized system and manually, directly
from the video monitor. The step distances between successive pauses of
an individual rolling cell were averaged to yield the mean step
distance of a given rolling cell.
 |
RESULTS |
LPL Supports Stronger Adhesion than Native L-selectin on Different
L-selectin Ligands--
Native L-selectin and the EGF domain mutant
LPL were stably expressed in the pre-B cell line 300.19 (37), and
clones with comparable surface expression levels of each molecule were
isolated (Fig. 1A). As on
other leukocytes, L-selectin preferentially localizes on the
microvillar surface projections of 300.19 pre-B cells (54). Because
selectin localization to tips of microvilli has been argued to augment
its ability to support initial cell tethering in shear flow (55, 56),
we compared the surface distribution of the native and mutated
L-selectin on the 300.19 clones by immunogold labeling. Transmission
electron microscopy of sectioned cells confirmed that both
transfectants have comparable microvilli both in number and dimensions
(data not shown). Immunogold localization of L-selectin indicated
similar localization of both L-selectin and LPL to microvilli with a
comparable distribution between the tips and other regions of the
microvilli (Fig. 1B). Variable clusters of L-selectin and
LPL were identified on both cell transfectants, and their mean size was
similar. These results suggest that the surface distribution and degree
of constitutive clustering of the EGF domain mutant LPL are similar to
those of native L-selectin in 300.19 cells.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Surface expression and distribution of
L-selectin and LPL on transfected pre-B cells. A,
immunofluorescence flow cytometry of 300.19 clones stably transfected
with cDNA encoding full-length L-selectin (native L-selectin) or an
EGF domain mutant of L-selectin, which substitutes a P-selectin-derived
EGF domain for the EGF domain of L-selectin (37). Transfectants were
stained with the anti-L-selectin mAb DREG-200, followed by FITC-labeled
goat anti-mouse mAb (filled histograms). Background staining
with nonbinding preimmune mouse IgG is shown in the open
histograms. B, localization of L-selectin (I
and II) and LPL (III and IV) expressed
by transfected pre-B cells using immunoelectron microscopy.
Transfectants were prefixed, incubated with the lectin domain-specific
mAb, DREG-200, followed by a secondary rabbit IgG. Cells were then
immunogold-labeled with 5-nm gold-protein A conjugates. Gold staining
is marked by arrows. The photomicrographs shown for each
cell type are representative of 40-60 cells examined for each
experimental group.
|
|
L-selectin and LPL transfectants were first perfused over substrates
coated with purified GlyCAM-1, a prototypic L-selectin ligand that
supports efficient rolling of L-selectin- expressing leukocytes under
physiological shear flow (29, 57). Surprisingly, LPL-expressing cells
established rolling on different GlyCAM-1-coated substrates much more
readily than L-selectin expressing cells, (Fig.
2A). Moreover, the rolling of
LPL-expressing cells on GlyCAM-1 was 5-7-fold slower than
L-selectin-mediated rolling under identical experimental conditions
(Fig. 2A) and remained much more adherent than L-selectin
transfectants did when subjected to elevated shear stresses (data not
shown), collectively suggesting that the LPL mutant is more adhesive
toward GlyCAM-1 than native L-selectin. Consistent with their enhanced
adhesiveness to GlyCAM-1, LPL-expressing cells also rolled more readily
than L-selectin expressing cells on substrates containing distinct
L-selectin ligands, including human PNAd (Fig. 2A), the
neoglycoconjugate fucoidin-HSA (Fig. 2B) or the lipid-linked
3',6-disulfated Lex (Fig. 2C). The higher
adhesiveness of the LPL mutant toward these ligands was more marked at
higher shear stresses and at lower ligand coating densities (Fig. 2,
A and B, and data not shown). The similarity of
the results obtained with molecularly dissimilar ligands with both
native L-selectin and LPL indicates that rolling on each of these
ligands was mediated exclusively by the lectin domain, making unlikely
any direct contribution from direct interactions between the foreign
EGF domain in LPL and the different L-selectin ligands.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The adhesiveness of EGF domain mutant of
L-selectin expressed on murine 300.19 pre-B cells is stronger than that
of native L-selectin. A, frequency of L-selectin- or
LPL-expressing pre-B cells capable of initiating rolling adhesions over
substrates coated with different densities of GlyCAM-1 or with low
density PNAd under physiological shear flow. Mean velocities of 20-25
L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells rolling on the ligand are
indicated at the top of each bar. S.E. values for
the mean rolling velocities were 2.2, 0.5, 5.9, 0.8, and 2.3 µm/s,
respectively, for the indicated mean values. Data are representative of
six independent experiments. B, frequency of L-selectin- or
LPL-expressing pre-B cells capable of initiating stable rolling
adhesions over substrates coated with fucoidin-HSA coated at 5 µg/ml,
when perfused at the indicated shear stresses over the immobilized
glycoconjugate. Data points represent the mean ± range of
frequency values determined on two fields of view. No shear threshold
was required for the adhesion of either transfectant to fucoidin-HSA
(data not shown). All rolling adhesions were specifically blocked in
the presence of the L-selectin blocking mAb, DREG-200, but not the
control anti-VCAM-1 mAb, 4B9 (not shown). C, frequency of
L-selectin- or LPL-expressing pre-B cells capable of initiating rolling
adhesions or immediately arrested over immobilized glycolipid bearing
the L-selectin carbohydrate ligand, 3',6-disulfated Lex
coated at 0.5 µg/ml under shear flow. Data in A-C are
representative of six independent experiments.
|
|
Displacement motions of leukocytes rolling on selectins or selectin
ligands are comprised of discrete steps or jerks separated by transient
pauses (53, 58). Because the microkinetics of these rolling motions
provide insights into the dynamic parameters of tether formation and
breakage, we used computerized image analysis to closely follow the
microdynamics of rolling mediated by L-selectin and LPL on medium
density GlyCAM-1. Microkinetic analysis of representative cells within
the fraction of LPL or L-selectin-expressing cell rolling on GlyCAM-1
at 40 sites/µm2 revealed that pauses of LPL-expressing
cells were 4-fold longer than pauses of L-selectin expressing cells
(mean duration of 0.14 ± 0.01 s versus mean
duration of 0.03 ± 0.01 s, respectively; Fig.
3, n = 10). This
dramatically increased pause duration of LPL cells is consistent with
either a greater number of bonds formed, a longer lifetime of these
bonds, or a combination of both.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Microkinetics of rolling adhesions mediated
by L-selectin- and LPL-expressing pre-B cells on GlyCAM-1.
Instantaneous velocities of representative L-selectin- and
LPL-expressing cells rolling on GlyCAM-1 (40 sites/µm2)
at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2. Motion was analyzed by
computerized cell tracking as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Instantaneous velocities were derived from cell
displacements between successive frames (0.02 s apart) in the flow
direction. Cell moving at a speed lower than 25 µm/s were considered
as transiently pausing on the ligand-coated substrate. The mean
velocities of the L-selectin and LPL-expressing cells depicted here
were 80 and 7.5 µm/s, respectively. The mean step distance between
pauses of rolling L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells was 9.9 and 1.1 µm, respectively.
|
|
To distinguish between these possibilities, we analyzed the step
distance between successive rolling pauses, i.e. the forward travel distance between rolling pauses (53, 58). Shorter step distances
of a cell rolling under a given shear stress correspond to increased
rate of bond formation (58). Remarkably, the mean step distance of LPL
cells rolling on GlyCAM-1 at 40 sites/µm2 was 5-fold
smaller than the mean step distance of L-selectin cells measured under
identical conditions cells (mean step distance of 1.74 ± 0.09 µm versus mean step distance of 8.66 ± 0.71 µm, respectively; Fig. 3, n = 10). Similar differences were
observed on PNAd-coated surfaces: LPL-mediated rolling was associated
with 3-fold longer pauses and 6-fold smaller mean step distance than the corresponding microkinetic parameters of L-selectin expressing cells rolling on identical PNAd-coated substrates (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggest a much higher rate of bond formation by LPL than by L-selectin during rolling on GlyCAM-1 and
PNAd, manifested as significantly increased numbers of stable tethers,
slower rolling velocities, longer durations of rolling pauses, and
closer spacing of these pauses (i.e. smaller step distance).
The Cellular kon of LPL Is Higher than That of
L-selectin, but the Cellular koff Is Similar--
The
enhanced adhesiveness of the LPL EGF domain mutant was suggestive of
enhanced bond formation and/or stability. The most direct measure of
tether bond formation and duration is the analysis of transient tethers
on densities of ligands too low to support stable tethers,
i.e. rolling (53). These tethers are supported by the
smallest number of bonds formed by individual selectin molecules
interacting with their immobilized ligands under shear flow (53). The
dependence of cell tethering on site density of extremely diluted
GlyCAM-1 was determined at a representative shear stress (1 dyn/cm2), a value permissive for both L-selectin- and
LPL-mediated tethering to the ligand. Consistent with the dynamic
behavior of the mutant on high density GlyCAM-1, the frequency of
transient tethering mediated by LPL was markedly higher than that of
native L-selectin on all GlyCAM-1 densities
1 site/µm2 (Fig.
4A). The tethering frequency
of L-selectin-expressing cells diminished rapidly when the coating
density of GlyCAM-1 dropped below 0.08 sites/µm2. At that
GlyCAM-1 density, tethering of LPL-expressing cells was equivalent to
that supported by L-selectin expressing cells on substrates coated with
20-30-fold higher site density of GlyCAM-1 (Fig. 4A and
data not shown). Therefore, the cellular kon of
LPL tethers to GlyCAM-1 is ~20-30-fold higher than that of native L-selectin tethers.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Association and dissociation kinetics of
transient tethers mediated by L-selectin and LPL on low density
GlyCAM-1. A, frequencies of tethers mediated by
L-selectin- or LPL-expressing pre-B cells at 1 dyn/cm2 on
substrates coated with low densities of GlyCAM-1. Tethers were
determined as explained in the legend to Fig. 2. At densities indicated
by asterisks a small portion of LPL tethers were followed by
rolling motions. LPL- and L-selectin-mediated tethering was completely
blocked in the presence of soluble fucoidin (50 µg/ml) or EGTA (data
not shown). B, effect of shear stress on kinetics of
dissociation of L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells at three different
shear stresses. L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells were tested on
substrates coated with GlyCAM-1 1.2 sites/µm2 for
L-selectin-expressing cells and 0.04 sites/µm2 for
LPL-expressing cells. Tether frequencies of L-selectin and LPL on these
respective substrates were similar at the various indicated shear
stresses. Duration of tethers were determined as explained under
"Experimental Procedures." Data points that fit a first order
dissociation curve are connected by a straight line, slope equals
koff. r, coefficient of
correlation. The data points that did not fit the curve are indicated
by the open symbols. At a shear stress of 0.5 dyn/cm2 L-selectin and LPL tethers dissociated from the
GlyCAM-1 substrates with a single koff of 9.6 s 1 and 11.8 s 1, respectively (data not
shown). One experiment representative of three is shown.
|
|
Given this difference between L-selectin and LPL in cellular on rates,
the dissociation kinetics of these transient tethers was next compared.
More than 95% of the transient tethers, mediated by either L-selectin
or LPL, dissociated from GlyCAM-1 with first order kinetics (Fig.
4B). The dissociation data of each transfectant fit a
single, straight line, which corresponded to a single
koff, and the homogeneity of the lifetime of
these tethers indicated that the transient tethers represented quantal
adhesive units. Notably, the koff of these
quantal tethers mediated by either L-selectin or LPL was quite similar
between 0.5 and 1 dyn/cm2 (Fig. 4B and data not
shown). These results suggest that interactions between either
L-selectin or LPL and GlyCAM-1 exhibit similar cellular
koff and comparable response of the
koff to increasing shear force. Similar results
were obtained on low density PNAd substrates (data not shown). The
higher kinetic stability of LPL-mediated rolling pauses at higher
GlyCAM-1 or PNAd concentrations described above is therefore due to a
higher number of bonds formed by the mutant than by L-selectin rather
than to an increase in individual bond lifetime or decrease in the
cellular dissociation rate. These kinetic results demonstrate that the
effective avidity of LPL for surface-bound ligand under shear flow is
significantly higher than that of L-selectin. However, despite this
marked difference between LPL and L-selectin avidity toward
surface-immobilized ligands, both molecules bound the soluble
L-selectin carbohydrate ligand PPME with identical avidity in
saturation binding assays performed in the absence of shear flow (Fig.
5). The rate of PPME binding to either
L-selectin or LPL appeared also similar under these conditions (Fig.
5). These results indicate that the EGF domain mutant exhibits
augmented binding solely to surface-immobilized L-selectin ligands
under shear flow rather than to a soluble L-selectin ligand in the
absence of shear flow.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Saturation binding of soluble PPME to
L-selectin- and LPL-expressing pre-B cells. Shown is the mean
fluorescence intensity (M.F.I.) of the indicated transfected
cells incubated in binding medium for 10 min with increasing
concentration of FITC-PPME as explained under "Experimental
Procedures." Inset, short term PPME binding to L-selectin
and LPL. Fluorescence intensity was measured for cells incubated for
30 s with FITC-PPME (0.25 µg/ml), diluted into fresh medium, and
immediately analyzed. Maximal PPME binding under these conditions was
reached within 3 min of incubation (data not shown).
|
|
The EGF Mutant Exhibits a Greatly Reduced Shear Threshold for
Tethering to L-selectin Ligands--
Because adhesion through
L-selectin requires shear stress above a threshold value to form and
persist (38, 39), we compared the shear threshold required for
L-selectin and LPL to promote and sustain stable rolling on GlyCAM-1.
L-selectin-expressing cells required a threshold of 0.5 dyn/cm2 to establish stable tethers on GlyCAM-1 coated at
80 sites/µm2 (Fig.
6A); below this shear stress,
cells could tether only transiently to the ligand. Importantly, the
transient tethering efficiency also dropped sharply when the shear
stresses was reduced to 0.3 dyn/cm2, indicating that shear
not only enhanced the conversion of L-selectin transient tethering into
stable tethering leading to rolling adhesion but also directly enhanced
the frequency of transient L-selectin tethers, as previously reported
for PMN tethered to low density PNAd (53). In contrast, LPL-expressing
cells tethered and rolled on identical GlyCAM-1 substrates below this
shear stress, and the efficiency of LPL-expressing cells capable of
rolling on GlyCAM-1 was nearly shear-independent (Fig. 6A).
This greatly reduced shear threshold requirement for LPL tethering was
observed on GlyCAM-1 as low as 1 site/µm2 (data not
shown). Interestingly, L-selectin failed to support any tethering to
GlyCAM-1 coated at 40 sites/µm2, at shear stresses below
0.5 dyn/cm2, whereas LPL both tethered and rolled on this
ligand under identical shear conditions (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Loss of shear stress dependence of adhesion
mediated by the EGF domain mutant on GlyCAM-1. A,
effect of shear stress on the extent of tethering and rolling of
L-selectin- and LPL-expressing pre-B cells on substrates coated with
GlyCAM-1 at 80 sites/µm2. Tethers were classified as
transient or stable tethers (i.e. followed by rolling), as
explained under "Experimental Procedures." These experiments show
the existence of two distinct threshold values for L-selectin
adhesions: a high one for establishment of rolling adhesions and a
lower one for initiation of tethering. B, release of
adherent L-selectin- expressing or LPL-expressing pre-B cells rolling
on GlyCAM-1 by a sharp drop of shear stress. Cells rolling at 1.75 dyn/cm2 on GlyCAM-1 at 80 sites/µm2 were
subjected to an abrupt drop of shear stress to 0.2 dyn/cm2
at t = 0, and their release kinetics were measured as
explained under "Experimental Procedures." Data points represent
the means ± range of measurements taken in two fields of view.
The experiment shown is representative of five.
|
|
Shear threshold is required not only to initiate L-selectin rolling but
also to maintain it (38). Indeed, cells rolling through L-selectin at
permissive shear stress were rapidly released to the medium when the
shear was dropped to subthreshold levels and subsequently traveled at
their hydrodynamic velocity (Fig. 6B). By contrast, LPL
transfectants, rolling on identical substrates, remained adherent to
the substrate when subjected to an identical drop in shear stress (Fig.
6B) and dissociated slowly from the substrate only at much
later periods (data not shown). The release of L-selectin expressing
cells from the substrate in response to a drop in shear force to
subthreshold level has been recently suggested to be a function of the
number of bonds formed between a rolling cell and the ligand at the
adhesive contact zone of the cell and substrate (58). The slower
release of LPL-expressing cells rolling on GlyCAM-1 compared with
L-selectin expressing cells in response to a shear drop to subthreshold
values is consistent with a higher number of bonds simultaneously
formed by the mutant than by L-selectin at the adhesive contact zone,
in agreement with the results of the microkinetic analysis (Fig.
3).
LPL Binds a Surface-immobilized Lectin Domain-specific mAb More
Efficiently than Native L-selectin--
The above data show that an
L-selectin EGF domain mutant can stimulate the adhesive reactivity of
L-selectin to immobilized ligands under flow. To test whether the EGF
mutation characterized here enhanced the intrinsic adhesiveness of the
lectin domain, we next analyzed the tethering of L-selectin and LPL to
domain-specific mAbs under defined conditions of shear flow at antibody
concentrations too low for stable cell capture from the flow. When
perfused over substrates coated with low density of the L-selectin
lectin domain-specific mAb, DREG-200, L-selectin-expressing cells
transiently tethered to this mAb much less efficiently than
LPL-expressing cells did (Fig.
7A). In contrast, cells
expressing either L-selectin or LPL tethered at lower but similar
efficiency to the L-selectin-SCR domain-specific mAb, LAM-1-101 (Fig.
7A). Higher efficiency of LPL tethering than of L-selectin
tethering was also observed on immobilized Fab fragments of DREG-200,
in particular at higher shear stresses (Fig. 7B). However,
both L-selectin and LPL bound soluble DREG-200 with identical
equilibrium affinity (Kd of 1.3-1.8 × 10
8 M). This is a further direct
demonstration that the EGF domain mutation augments the intrinsic
adhesive reactivity of the lectin domain toward surface-immobilized
ligand, independently of the equilibrium binding properties of this
domain to the same ligand in solution.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Tethering in shear flow of L-selectin- and
LPL-expressing pre-B cells on immobilized anti-L-selectin mAbs.
A, tethering of L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells to the
lectin domain mAb DREG-200 (coated at 0.1 µg/ml) or the SCR domain
specific mAb, LAM1-101 (coated at 10 µg/ml). Tethering was measured
at a shear stress of 0.4 dyn/cm2, and all tethers were
transient. 4B9, an isotype matched control mAb to VCAM-1, did not
tether any flowing cells under identical conditions. Tethering to the
SCR-specific mAb was diminished at higher shear stresses or low coating
densities. The LAM-1-101 epitope was expressed at comparable levels on
both L-selectin- and LPL-transfected cells (data not shown).
B, tethering of L-selectin- and LPL-expressing cells to
DREG-200 Fab fragments coated at 10 µg/ml at different shear
stresses. More than 90% of cell tethers to the Fab fragment were
transient. Soluble fucoidin blocked the majority of tethering events in
this system (not shown), and background tethering to the Fab fragment
at different shear stresses, determined in the presence of fucoidin (50 µg/ml) was therefore subtracted from all tethering data. More than
90% of cell tethers to the Fab fragment were transient. The extent of
both type of tethers (transient or arrested) were expressed in
frequency units, as described in previous figures. Results in
A and B are the means ± range of data
collected in two fields, in a single experiment representative of
five.
|
|
Cell-free LPL Supports Higher Frequency of Tethering and Rolling
than Native L-selectin--
The augmented adhesive activity of the
mutant toward different ligands could in principle depend on the
cellular background on which LPL was expressed. We therefore tested
whether, in a cell-free state, LPL could still interact more
efficiently than L-selectin with cell surface L-selectin ligands. A
single-step procedure to immobilize solubilized full-length L-selectin
in a uniform functional orientation on a solid substrate was developed. Native L-selectin or LPL was extracted from their respective
transfectants and adsorbed onto a surface coated with a capturing
antibody, mAb CA21 (41), directed against the C terminus of the
cytoplasmic tail, which is shared between L-selectin and the LPL chimera.
Neutrophils, known to express high levels of L-selectin ligands (18,
21), established stable rolling adhesion in physiological shear flow on
immobilized cell-free L-selectin or LPL (Fig.
8A), and all adhesion was
completely abolished by L-selectin blocking with fucoidin or EGTA (Fig.
8A and data not shown). However, the fraction of neutrophils
capable of rolling was quite low on L-selectin captured at site
densities lower than 200 sites/µm2 (Fig. 8). In contrast,
cell-free LPL, identically immobilized, supported up to 50-fold higher
frequency of neutrophil rolling than the native cell-free L-selectin
(Fig. 8), and LPL-mediated rolling of neutrophils was much slower than
cell-free L-selectin-mediated rolling when each was immobilized at
identical densities (Fig. 8B, numbers above
bars). L-selectin completely failed to support any rolling
when coated at 20 sites sites/µm2, whereas LPL at this
density supported efficient rolling (Fig. 8B).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Cell-free LPL interacts more efficiently with
neutrophil ligands than cell-free L-selectin under flow.
A, frequency of neutrophil tethering on surface-adsorbed
cell-free L-selectin or LPL. Frequencies of total tethers of
neutrophils at a shear stress of 1 dyn/cm2 were measured on
L-selectin or LPL, each adsorbed on the indicated densities of
immobilized CA21, a mAb specific for the cytoplasmic-tail of both
L-selectin molecules. Saturation binding of each L-selectin isoform to
the immobilized tail-specific mAb was verified by multi-cycle
adsorptions of lysates containing either L-selectin or LPL. In control
experiments, neutrophils were perfused on the same substrates in the
presence of soluble fucoidin at 50 µg/ml. Inclusion of EGTA in the
perfusate also fully blocked tethering (data not shown). No tethering
was observed on substrates coated with CA21 and then with lysates of
either L-selectin or LPL-transfected pre-B cells that had been depleted
on an anti-L-selectin mAb affinity column (data not shown). At
representative densities of immobilized CA21, the fractions of tethered
cells that established rolling after tethering to the substrates are
indicated. Results represent the means ± range of data collected
in two fields of view. Ranges smaller than 5% of the mean are not
shown. B, effect of shear stress on tethering followed by
rolling of neutrophils perfused over immunoadsorbed L-selectin or LPL.
LPL and L-selectin were adsorbed on substrates coated with the
indicated site densities of the anti-cytoplasmic tail antibody CA21.
These substrates were found to support comparable levels of rolling
adhesions at optimal conditions of shear flow. The mean velocities of
neutrophils rolling on L-selectin or on LPL at 2 dyn/cm2
are indicated on top of the stack bars. Results
in A and B are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
Neutrophil rolling on high density cell-free L-selectin was established
only as the shear stress approached 1.5 dyn/cm2 (Fig.
8B), confirming previous results that neutrophil rolling on
immobilized L-selectin also requires a shear threshold (59). In
contrast, neutrophils established rolling on immobilized cell-free LPL
at a 3-fold lower shear stress (Fig. 8B). A marked
difference in the shear requirement between L-selectin and LPL was also
observed in the response of neutrophils to a sharp drop in shear
stress. Neutrophils rolling on L-selectin at 1.8 dyn/cm2
rapidly released upon a drop of shear to 0.25 dyn/cm2,
whereas neutrophils rolling on LPL at 1.8 dyn/cm2 remained
adherent for at least 10 s after being subjected to an identical
shear drop (data not shown). This indicates that cell-free LPL, like
the cell surface expressed molecule, is much less dependent on a
threshold of shear stress to promote or maintain rolling adhesions with
neutrophil-based ligands than native L-selectin. The properties of
these two molecules observed when they were expressed on cell surfaces
were therefore precisely recapitulated when they were expressed in
cell-free form. The strikingly higher binding activity of cell-free LPL
toward neutrophil L-selectin ligands therefore demonstrates that the
stronger adhesiveness of LPL seen above was an intrinsic rather than a
cellular property of the L-selectin EGF domain mutant.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The biophysical basis of adhesion by selectins and its regulation
by ligand recognition and mechanical properties of bonds subjected to
hydrodynamic force in shear flow is still obscure (38, 39, 53, 59). It
has become increasingly evident that selectin adhesiveness under fluid
shear is controlled by both cellular and mechanical properties
independently of selectin binding to soluble ligands under equilibrium
(36, 60). To address the contribution of equilibrium and mechanical
properties of selectin bonds to selectin adhesion under flow, we have
characterized the kinetic properties of adhesion mediated by L-selectin
and LPL, an L-selectin EGF domain swap mutant. This L-selectin mutant
has conserved the ligand binding specificity and equilibrium binding affinity to soluble ligands of native L-selectin but exhibited dramatically augmented adhesiveness to structurally distinct L-selectin ligands, including the high endothelial venule-derived ligands GlyCAM-1
and PNAd, L-selectin ligands expressed on intact neutrophils, and
glycoconjugate L-selectin ligands such as fucoidin and sulfated Lex. This augmented adhesion was particularly evident under
limiting conditions of high shear flow or low ligand densities that
minimize the duration of the cell-substrate contact. The higher
adhesiveness of the mutant resulted in a dramatic enhancement of the
rate of tether formation to immobilized ligands, corresponding to a
higher cellular kon, and was manifested as
increased numbers of rolling cells, slower rolling velocities, and a
significantly reduced shear threshold requirement for both the
initiation and maintenance of rolling. Notably, these properties were
each recapitulated by a cell-free immobilized form of LPL. The present
study therefore constitutes the first evidence that the kinetics of
L-selectin bond formation to immobilized ligand can be regulated under
shear flow by the EGF-like domain independent of soluble ligand
recognition, which is controlled primarily by the lectin domain of the
selectin (37). Our findings extend recent results suggesting that
kinetic stability of L-selectin bonds under shear flow can be modulated by chemical modification of an L-selectin ligand, independent of
equilibrium properties of the bonds (36). Analysis of the properties of
the EGF mutant showed that it tethered to low density GlyCAM-1
10-30-fold faster than L-selectin but dissociated from the ligand with
identical koff and exhibited a similar response of koff to increasing shear stresses. Thus, the
reactive compliance (35, 53) and kinetic stability of native L-selectin
bonds were conserved in bonds mediated by the EGF mutant. The longer duration of the pauses exhibited by LPL during rolling, together with
the conserved koff of single bonds mediated by
the EGF mutant, therefore suggest that the mutant can form multiple
bonds with immobilized ligand much more readily than native L-selectin,
because of a higher kon of its bonds.
What could be the molecular basis for this higher
kon? Previous epitope mapping of LPL with
different mAbs directed against distinct epitopes in each of the
domains of the molecule suggested that LPL retained the overall
structure of native L-selectin (61). Furthermore, both L-selectin and
LPL would be expected to associate equally with the cytoskeleton,
because they share identical membrane proximal, transmembrane, and
cytoplasmic domains (54, 60). L-selectin rolling velocity can be
affected by proteolytic shedding of the selectin by a cell surface
protease (62, 63). However, we found that the mutant and wild type
forms were similarly susceptible to spontaneous or phorbol
ester-induced shedding (data not shown), consistent with shedding being
controlled by regions of the molecule near the membrane distal from the
EGF-like domain (64, 65). The possibility that the EGF domain mutant
has augmented spontaneous clustering on the surface of the pre-B cells
appears unlikely in light of the results obtained by immunogold
staining (Fig. 1). A recent study in the same pre-B cell system
indicated that dimerization of L-selectin caused a modest decrease of
rolling velocity with no shift in the shear threshold requirement of
L-selectin (66). In contrast, LPL-mediated rolling was 5-10-fold
slower than rolling mediated by L-selectin, and its shear threshold
requirement was dramatically changed. Thus, enhanced dimerization of
the EGF domain mutant could not have accounted for its intrinsically
increased adhesiveness. Moreover, a purified cell-free form of the
mutant immobilized on a substrate also exhibited dramatically augmented tethering and rolling over that of native L-selectin, even though both
molecules were identically attached to the substrate through binding to
a tail-specific mAb (Fig. 8). The faster bond formation and
correspondingly higher cellular kon mediated by
the EGF mutant under all experimental conditions therefore reflects
intrinsic binding properties of the mutant rather than differences in
surface topology, receptor clustering, shedding properties, or
cytoskeletal attachment.
Previous functional analysis of the LPL mutant (37) provided the first
indication of an important role for the EGF domain in cell adhesion by
selectins, although the molecular mechanism(s) by which the EGF domain
exerted its effect was not elucidated in that study. Under the assay
conditions employed in the previous work (37), HL60 cells failed to
attach to COS cells expressing L-selectin but did attach to COS cells
expressing LPL. The current results make it clear that the ability of
LPL but not L-selectin to mediate detectable adhesion of transfected
COS cells to HL-60 cells was due to the higher adhesiveness of LPL for
L-selectin ligands per se, rather than to any newly acquired
specificity. The present results argue strongly against any direct
interaction between the P-selectin EGF domain in LPL and any of the
L-selectin ligands tested, which might account for the enhanced
adhesiveness of LPL. Increased adhesiveness of LPL was observed on
entirely distinct glycoprotein L-selectin ligands of both leukocyte and endothelial origin, as well as on purely carbohydrate selectin ligands,
such as fucoidin and sulfated Lex, which presumably
interact exclusively with the lectin domain of L-selectin. Moreover,
increased LPL adhesiveness was observed also on an immobilized
L-selectin mAb that interacts exclusively with the lectin domain on the
LPL mutant. In addition, P-selectin expressed in the same pre-B cells
failed to detectably interact with any of the L-selectin ligands tested
(data not shown). The introduction of the EGF domain of P-selectin into
the L-selectin backbone in LPL therefore did not change the adhesive
specificity or ligand recognition properties of the L-selectin EGF
mutant. Finally, the observation that the P-selectin EGF domain also
imparts higher levels of adhesion to the P-selectin lectin domain (37) suggests that the P-selectin EGF domain has an inherent enhancing effect on the adhesive activity of both L-selectin- and
P-selectin-lectin domains to which it is attached.
Rates of tether bond formation measured on adhesive substrates under
flow conditions reflect the effective or cellular
kon of surface-based L-selectin associating with
a surface-bound ligand, under nonequilibrium conditions (67). The
cellular on rate is therefore distinct from and not necessarily
predictively related to the molecular thermodynamic on rate between
soluble and surface-bound counter-receptors measured at equilibrium.
Cellular kon, unlike molecular
kon, could vary with the availability and
diffusivity of the receptors within the interacting surfaces and the
separation distance between these surfaces (68, 69). However, as
pointed out above, LPL shares identical dimensions, cytoskeletal
associations, and surface distribution with L-selectin, and thus,
topographical or diffusion considerations could not account for the
markedly higher cellular kon of this EGF mutant.
Furthermore, the enhanced adhesiveness of the mutant was retained in
its cell-free state, when both the mutant and the native L-selectins
were identically anchored to an adhesive surface through their shared
cytoplasmic domain. The identical koff measured
here for LPL and native L-selectin, together with their similar
equilibrium binding to the soluble carbohydrate ligand, PPME, indicate
that the molecular thermodynamic kon of both
variants toward soluble L-selectin ligands is quite similar. This was
further supported by the similarly rapid binding of soluble PPME to
both cell surface L-selectin and LPL.
The lectin domain of the LPL mutant appears to be stabilized in a
conformation with higher accessibility to immobilized ligand than the
corresponding domain in native L-selectin. Direct support for this
conclusion was provided by the faster rates of tethering mediated by
the lectin domain on LPL to an immobilized lectin-specific mAb,
DREG-200, but not to an SCR-specific mAb. Increased elasticity of
lectin domain regions outside the receptor-ligand interface have been
proposed to regulate mechanical properties of L-selectin bonds without
altering selectin affinity to soluble ligand (36). Our results suggest
that subtle conformational changes of the lectin domain introduced by
the EGF domain swap could dramatically facilitate the recognition by
the lectin domain of an immobilized ligand. This is likely due to the
fact that surface-bound ligand is dynamically restricted within the
adhesive contact zone, in contrast to a soluble ligand. Although the
precise nature of this conformational change is still unclear, it is
evident that the EGF domain swap in LPL did not alter the conformation
of the lectin domain to an extent that it could bind soluble
carbohydrate ligands more efficiently than native L-selectin. This is
probably because soluble ligands have diffusion rate orders of
magnitude faster than those of immobilized ligands (35) and would not
discriminate between subtle conformations of the lectin domain.
An unprecedented property of selectin-dependent rolling is
that it requires shear stress above a threshold value to form and persist (38, 39), in sharp contrast to most types of adhesive interactions that are destabilized by applied shear forces (35, 70,
71). The biophysical basis of these unique properties of L-selectin is
still unclear. Fluid shear may enhance rolling by the generation of
torque forces subsequent to cell tethering (39). Kinetic analysis of
L-selectin interactions with low density ligands has revealed
specialized properties of L-selectin bonds, such as shorter lifetimes
and lower susceptibility of the bond lifetime to applied force
(i.e. lower reactive compliance), compared with other
selectin bonds that show reduced or no requirement for a threshold
shear to form and persist (53). We now show that increased cellular
kon of selectin interaction without alteration in its bond lifetime reduces dramatically the threshold shear required
by this interaction to initiate and maintain rolling adhesion. Recent
studies predicted that shear flow acts to increase L-selectin bond
number at adhesive contact zones (58). Binding rate of surface-bound
reactants increase with the relative velocity between the adhesive
surfaces because of an increase of collision rate with increasing shear
(72). Shear flow may act to facilitate cellular transport along the
adhesive contact zone to increase the probability of bond formation and
may increase the force with which selectins contact their ligands on
counter surfaces (39). Our results extend this idea and demonstrate a
reciprocal relationship between the kinetics of tether bond formation
and the shear threshold requirement of selectin adhesion. When
L-selectin bond formation with immobilized ligand is rendered high, as
with the EGF mutant, the requirement for shear-facilitated cell
transport along the adhesive contact zone to increase the probability
of bond formation is diminished, resulting in reduced dependence of
adhesion on a threshold shear stress.
In summary, we have made use of an EGF domain mutant of L-selectin with
unexpectedly high reactivity of the lectin domain toward
surface-immobilized ligands to test how augmentation of L-selectin
adhesiveness affects the dynamic stability and shear dependence of
rolling adhesion at the cell substrate contact zone. Higher rates of
bond formation by the EGF domain mutant resulted in slower rolling, a
reflection of a larger number of bonds forming at any given time at the
cell substrate contact zone. The LPL mutant is the first example of a
specific domain of an adhesion molecule controlling a particular
dynamic property of that molecule. The present results extend previous
findings that linked the dynamics of selectin-mediated rolling to
intrinsic bond lifetime in the presence of shear forces (36, 53). This
is the first evidence that selectin adhesiveness is controlled by the
binding reactivity of the lectin domain toward surface-bound ligand
under shear flow. Our results suggest for the first time that
mechanical properties of the lectin domain can be regulated by the EGF
domain independent of the equilibrium binding properties of the
molecule. Future crystallographic and spectroscopic analysis of
L-selectin may highlight how the EGF domain and possibly other
ectodomains of the molecule regulate selectin adhesion independent of
the thermodynamic equilibrium aspects of soluble ligand recognition.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. S. Rosen, E. Berg, T. Kishimoto, L. Stoolman, T. Tedder, R. Lobb, and L. Kiessling for
gifts of reagents. We thank Drs. R. McEver and T. Springer for helpful
discussion of the manuscript, H. Sabanay (Weizmann Institute) for
technical assistance with the electron microscopy studies, and Dr. S. Schwarzbaum and R. Poch for editorial assistance. Special thanks to
Moshe Miller, Shahar Feldman, Nimrod Peleg, Renato Kresch-Keshet, and Prof. D. Malah (Signal and Image Processing Lab, Technion) for invaluable help in the development of the computerized imaging software
for rolling and tethering analysis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by funds from the Israel
Science Foundation founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities (to R. A.), by National Institutes of Health Grant HL55647 (to G. S. K.), and by funds from the United States
Israel Binational Science Foundation (to R. A. and G. S. K).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.
Incumbent of The Tauro Career Development Chair in Biomedical
Research and recipient of the Yigal Allon Fellowship. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9342482; Fax: 972-8-9344141; E-mail: ronalon@wicc.weizmann.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001103200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GlyCAM-1, glycoprotein cell adhesion molecule 1;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
HSA, human serum albumin;
Lex, Lewis x;
PNAd, peripheral
node addressin;
PMN, polymorphonuclear;
SCR, short consensus repeat;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PPME, phosphomannan monoeiter.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lawrence, M. B.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1991)
Cell
65,
859-873
|
| 2.
|
Rosen, S. D.,
and Bertozzi, C. R.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
663-673
|
| 3.
|
McEver, R. P.,
Moore, K. L.,
and Cummings, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11025-11028
|
| 4.
|
Kansas, G. S.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3259-3287
|
| 5.
|
Springer, T. A.
(1994)
Cell
76,
301-314
|
| 6.
|
Butcher, E. C.,
and Picker, L. J.
(1996)
Science
272,
60-66
|
| 7.
|
Kaplanski, G.,
Farnarier, C.,
Tissot, O.,
Pierres, A.,
Benoliel, A. M.,
Alessi, M. C.,
Kaplanski, S.,
and Bongrand, P.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
64,
1922-1933
|
| 8.
|
Alon, R.,
Hammer, D. A.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1995)
Nature
374,
539-542
|
| 9.
|
Watson, S. R.,
Imai, Y.,
Fennie, C.,
Geoffroy, J. S.,
Rosen, S. D.,
and Lasky, L. A.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
2221-2229
|
| 10.
|
Lasky, L. A.,
Singer, M. S.,
Dowbenko, D.,
Imai, Y.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Grimley, C.,
Fennie, C.,
Gillett, N.,
Watson, S. R.,
and Rosen, S. D.
(1992)
Cell
69,
927-938
|
| 11.
|
Berg, E. L.,
Mullowney, A. T.,
Andrew, D. P.,
Goldberg, J. E.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
469-477
|
| 12.
|
Clark, R. A.,
Fuhlbrigge, R. C.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
721-731
|
| 13.
|
Ley, K.,
Gaehtgens, P.,
Fennie, C.,
Singer, M. S.,
Lasky, L. A.,
and Rosen, S. D.
(1991)
Blood
77,
2553-2555
|
| 14.
|
Spertini, O.,
Luscinskas, F. W.,
Kansas, G. S.,
Munro, J. M.,
Griffin, J. D.,
Gimbrone, M. A., Jr.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
2565-2573
|
| 15.
|
Ley, K.,
Tedder, T. F.,
and Kansas, G. S.
(1993)
Blood
82,
1632-1638
|
| 16.
|
von Andrian, U. H.,
Chambers, J. D.,
Berg, E. L.,
Michie, S. A.,
Brown, D. A.,
Karolak, D.,
Ramezani, L.,
Berger, E. M.,
Arfors, K. E.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1993)
Blood
82,
182-191
|
| 17.
|
Akahori, T.,
Yuzawa, Y.,
Nishikawa, K.,
Tamatani, T.,
Kannagi, R.,
Miyasaka, M.,
Okada, H.,
Hotta, N.,
and Matsuo, S.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
5384-5392
|
| 18.
|
Fuhlbrigge, R. C.,
Alon, R.,
Puri, K. D.,
Lowe, J. B.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
837-848
|
| 19.
|
Ramos, C. L.,
Smith, M. J.,
Snapp, K. R.,
Kansas, G. S.,
Stickney, G. W.,
Ley, K.,
and Lawrence, M. B.
(1998)
Blood
91,
1067-1075
|
| 20.
|
Spertini, O.,
Cordey, A. S.,
Monai, N.,
Giuffre, L.,
and Schapira, M.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
523-531
|
| 21.
|
Walchek, B.,
Moore, K. L.,
McEver, R. P.,
and Kishimoto, T. K.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1081-1087
|
| 22.
|
Rochon, Y. P.,
Simon, S. I.,
Lynam, E. B.,
and Sklar, L. A.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
1385-1393
|
| 23.
|
Bargatze, R. F.,
Kurk, S.,
Butcher, E. C.,
and Jutila, M. A.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1785-1792
|
| 24.
|
Alon, R.,
Fuhlbrigge, R. C.,
Finger, E. B.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
849-865
|
| 25.
|
Patel, K. D.,
and McEver, R. P.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
4555-4565
|
| 26.
|
Lim, Y. C.,
Snapp, K.,
Kansas, G. S.,
Camphausen, R.,
Ding, H.,
and Luscinskas, F. W.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
2501-2508
|
| 27.
|
Berg, E. L.,
McEvoy, L. M.,
Berlin, C.,
Bargatze, R. F.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1993)
Nature
366,
695-698
|
| 28.
|
Puri, K. D.,
Finger, E. B.,
Gaudernack, G.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
261-270
|
| 29.
|
Dwir, O.,
Shimron, F.,
Chen, C.,
Singer, M.,
Rosen, S. D.,
and Alon, R.
(1998)
Cell. Adhes. Commun.
6,
349-370
|
| 30.
|
Sassetti, C.,
Tangemann, K.,
Singer, M. S.,
Kershaw, D. B.,
and Rosen, S. D.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1965-1975
|
| 31.
|
Rosen, S. D.
(1993)
Semin. Immunol.
5,
237-247
|
| 32.
|
Ushiyama, S.,
Laue, T. M.,
Moore, K. L.,
Erickson, H. P.,
and McEver, R. P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15229-15237
|
| 33.
|
Graves, B. J.,
Crowther, R. L.,
Chandran, C.,
Rumberger, J. M.,
Li, S.,
Huang, K. S.,
Presky, D. H.,
Familletti, P. C.,
Wolitzky, B. A.,
and Burns, D. K.
(1994)
Nature
367,
532-538
|
| 34.
|
Pigott, R.,
Needham, L. A.,
Edwards, R. M.,
Walker, C.,
and Power, C.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
130-135
|
| 35.
|
Bell, G.
(1978)
Science
200,
618-627
|
| 36.
|
Puri, K. D.,
Chen, S.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1998)
Nature
392,
930-933
|
| 37.
|
Kansas, G. S.,
Saunders, K. B.,
Ley, K.,
Zakrzewicz, A.,
Gibson, R. M.,
Furie, B. C.,
Furie, B.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
609-618
|
| 38.
|
Finger, E. B.,
Puri, K. D.,
Alon, R.,
Lawrence, M. B.,
von Andrian, U. H.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1996)
Nature
379,
266-269
|
| 39.
|
Lawrence, M. B.,
Kansas, G. S.,
Kunkel, E. J.,
and Ley, K.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
717-727
|
| 40.
|
Kishimoto, T. K.,
Jutila, M. A.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2244-2248
|
| 41.
|
Kahn, J.,
Ingraham, R. H.,
Shirley, F.,
Migaki, G. I.,
and Kishimoto, T. K.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
461-470
|
| 42.
|
Lasky, L. A.,
Singer, M. S.,
Dowbenko, D.,
Imai, Y.,
Henzel, W.,
Fennie, C.,
Watson, S.,
and Rosen, S. D.
(1992)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
57,
259-269
|
| 43.
|
Steeber, D. A.,
Engel, P.,
Miller, A. S.,
Sheetz, M. P.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
952-963
|
| 44.
|
Hermanson, G. T.
(1996)
Antibody Modification and Conjugation: Bioconjugate Techniques
, pp. 478-483, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA
|
| 45.
| |