![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18810-18817, June 23, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, May 27, 1999, and in revised form, March 30, 2000
Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases
stimulated by phorbol 13-myristate 12-acetate (PMA) have been shown to
inhibit interleukin-6-induced activation of STAT3 (Sengupta, T. K., Talbot, E. S., Scherle, P. A., and Ivashkiv, L. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11107-11112).
In the present study we demonstrate that in addition to STAT3, also
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1, signal transducer gp130, and
phosphotyrosine-phosphatase SHP2 underlies negative regulation by MAP
kinases. Stimulation of Erks by basic fibroblast growth factor or a
constitutively active mutant of Raf also led to down-regulation of STAT
activity. Using chimeric receptor mutants we show that tyrosine 759 of
glycoprotein 130 is crucial for the inhibitory effect of MAP kinases.
Inhibition is also dependent on gene transcription and translation
indicating that newly synthesized proteins are involved. Both PMA and
basic fibroblast growth factor rapidly stimulate mRNA expression of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) and this induction is
strongly reduced by an inhibitor of MAP kinase activation. Together
with recent results demonstrating that SOCS-3 can bind in
vitro to a phosphorylated tyrosine 759 peptide of glycoprotein 130 these data suggest SOCS-3 to be instrumental in the inhibition of
the Janus kinase/STAT pathway by MAP kinases.
The Jak1/STAT pathway is
activated by numerous cytokines and growth factors and transduces the
signal from surface receptors to respective target genes in the nucleus
(1-3). In the case of interleukin-6 (IL-6), binding to its receptor
(gp80) triggers the dimerization of the signal transducer gp130
resulting in the autophosphorylation/activation of noncovalently
associated Jak1, Jak2, and Tyk2 (1). These tyrosine kinases
phosphorylate the cytoplasmic tail of gp130 thereby creating
recruitment sites for SH2 domain containing signaling components such
as STAT1, STAT3, and the phosphotyrosine-phosphatase SHP2 which are
also subject to phosphorylation (4, 5). Activated STATs homo- or
heterodimerize, translocate to the nucleus and bind to enhancer
elements of target genes. SHP2 negatively regulates IL-6-induced gene
transcription and was shown to act as an adaptor linking the Jak/STAT
pathway to the MAP kinase pathway via Grb2 (6-8).
Recently, two families of proteins have been cloned that negatively
regulate the Jak/STAT pathway, i.e. suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and protein inhibitors of activated STATs
(PIAS) (9-13). SOCS proteins are induced upon STAT activation and in
turn inhibit the activity of Jaks. PIAS bind to activated STAT dimers
and prevent STAT-mediated gene activation. How PIAS are regulated is
currently unknown.
A number of other mediators have been reported to down-regulate
Jak/STAT activation, e.g. transforming growth factor Here, we demonstrate that PMA does not only inhibit tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 but also tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1,
gp130, and SHP2. The inhibitory effect of PMA was found to be strictly
dependent on tyrosine 759, the known recruitment site for SHP2, of the
IL-6 signal transducer gp130. Furthermore, basic fibroblast growth
factor (bFGF), a physiological activator of MAP kinases (18),
negatively regulates IL-6-induced STAT activation in a similar fashion.
Since both, PMA and bFGF, led to a rapid induction of SOCS-3 mRNA
expression we propose that not only STAT activation but also activation
of the MAP kinase pathway induces the expression of the inhibitory
SOCS-3 protein thereby resulting in the down-regulation of the Jak/STAT pathway.
Materials--
PD98059 and SB202190 were from Calbiochem (Bad
Soden, Germany). Anisomycin, actinomycin D, and cycloheximide were from
BIOMOL (Hamburg, Germany). PMA was purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was from Life
Technologies, Inc. (Eggstein, Germany), and fetal calf serum from
Seromed (Berlin, Germany). Recombinant human IL-6 and soluble
IL-6 receptor sgp80 were prepared as described (19, 20). Human
recombinant erythropoietin was kindly provided by Drs. J. Burg and
K.-H. Sellinger (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Penzberg, Germany).
Human recombinant bFGF was purchased from Promega (Mannheim, Germany).
Cell Culture and Stimulation of Cells--
HepG2 cells were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 mixture; COS-7 and
NIH-3T3 cells in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium at 5%
CO2 in a water-saturated atmosphere. Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium was supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, streptomycin (100 mg/liter), and penicillin (60 mg/liter). NIH-3T3 cells were serum-deprived 18 h before stimulation.
Cells grown in a 100-mm dish to 80% confluence were preincubated with
anisomycin (10 ng/ml), actinomycin D (1 µg/ml), cycloheximide (10 µg/ml), PD98059 (10 µM), or SB202190 (10 µM) for 45 min followed by PMA (10 DNA Constructs and Transfection Procedures--
Generation of
cDNAs for Eg, Eg Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Nuclear
extracts were prepared as described (22). EMSAs were performed using a
double-stranded 32P-labeled mutated m67SIE-oligonucleotide
from the c-fos promotor (m67SIE:
5'-GATCCGGGAGGGATTTACGGGAAATGCTG-3') (23, 24). The protein-DNA
complexes were separated on a 4.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 7.5%
glycerol in 0.25-fold TBE (20 mM Tris, 20 mM
boric acid, 0.5 mM EDTA) at 20 V/cm for 4 h. Gels were
fixed in 10% methanol, 10% acetic acid, and 80% water for 1 h,
dried, and autoradiographed.
Immunoprecipitation--
Cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and solubilized in 1 ml of lysis buffer
(0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 0.25 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 15% glycerol) for 30 min
at 4 °C. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation, and the cell lysates were incubated with specific antibodies at 4 °C for a
minimum of 2 h. The immune complexes were bound to protein
A-Sepharose (5 mg/ml in lysis buffer) for 1 h at 4 °C. When
monoclonal antibodies were used, rabbit anti-mouse IgG was bound to the
protein A-Sepharose beads. After centrifugation, the Sepharose beads
were washed three times with wash buffer (0.05% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and 15% glycerol). The samples were
boiled in gel electrophoresis sample buffer and the precipitated
proteins were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide (7.5 or 10%) gels. The
following antibodies were used: anti-gp130 mouse monoclonal antibody
(B-T12) (25) and anti-SHP2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, CA).
Immunoblotting and Immunodetection--
The electrophoretically
separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) membranes by the semidry Western blotting method. Nonspecific
binding was blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in TBS-N (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1%
Nonidet P-40) for 15 min. The blots were incubated with primary
antibodies in TBS-N for 1 h. After extensive rinsing with TBS-N,
blots were incubated with secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit IgG,
or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h and developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The following primary antibodies were
used: phosphotyrosine-specific STAT1 (Tyr-701) and STAT3 (Tyr-705)
rabbit polyclonal antibodies (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), HA.11
mouse monoclonal antibody (BabCO, Richmond, CA), anti-STAT1 rabbit
polyclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA),
anti-STAT3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (kindly provided by Dr.
Müller-Esterl, Mainz, Germany), anti-active MAP kinases Erk1/2,
anti-active JNK, anti-active p38 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Promega,
Mannheim, Germany), anti-phosphotyrosine mouse monoclonal antibody
4G10, anti-gp130 mouse monoclonal antibody (B-P4) (25), anti-gp130,
raised against the cytoplasmic part of gp130 (Upstate Biotechnology,
NY), and anti-SHP2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA).
Luciferase Assay--
HepG2 cells were grown on 60-mm dishes to
30% confluence and transfected in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum using standard calcium
phosphate precipitates, with 3.5 µg of reporter construct plasmid DNA
(a 246-base pair upstream promotor fragment of the human
Northern Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated from cultured
NIH-3T3 cells using the total RNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Gel
electrophoresis and Northern blot analyses were performed with 15 µg
of total RNA as described in Ref. 27 using Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3 Activation by
PMA--
The inhibition by PMA of the IL-6-induced STAT activation was
studied in human hepatoma cells (HepG2). After pretreatment with 0.1 µM PMA for 45 min IL-6 (100 units/ml) was added for 15 min. Activation of STAT1 and STAT3 requires phosphorylation of specific
tyrosine residues, i.e. Tyr-701 in STAT1 and Tyr-705 in
STAT3. Thus, we performed Western blot analyses of nuclear extracts
using specific antibodies against the tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of
STAT1 and STAT3 (Fig. 1A).
Tyrosine phosphorylation of both, STAT1 and STAT3, was induced by IL-6
and clearly decreased upon PMA pretreatment (Fig. 1A). PMA
incubation alone did not result in STAT activation.
These results confirm recent findings with respect to STAT3 (17) and
show that also STAT1 activation is affected by PMA. EMSA revealed that
the reduced STAT phosphorylation results in a strongly diminished
binding of STAT1 and STAT3 to the STAT1/3-specific SIE probe (Fig.
1B). Inhibition of STAT activation by PMA was partially
reversed by the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059. This suggests that the
inhibitory effect of PMA requires the activation of MAP kinases as
recently proposed (17). Inhibition was not reversed by the specific p38
kinase inhibitor SB202190 (data not shown).
We have shown that after PMA treatment the IL-6 receptor is rapidly
released from the cell surface of transfected COS-7 cells and primary
human monocytes by shedding, i.e. limited proteolysis of the
membrane-bound receptor form (28). This raises the question whether the
observed inhibition of the IL-6-induced STAT activation by PMA is due
to a loss of IL-6-binding sites at the cell surface. In order to
exclude this possibility, COS-7 cells, which endogenously express only
gp130 but not the IL-6 receptor, were pretreated with PMA for 45 min
and then stimulated with a combination of IL-6 and a recombinant
soluble IL-6 receptor. The soluble IL-6 receptor has been shown to act
agonistically on cells that express only gp130 (29). As shown in Fig.
1C, the inhibitory effect of PMA on the IL-6 response was
also observed in COS-7 cells which suggests that shedding of the IL-6
receptor is not involved. Similar results were obtained in HepG2 cells
(data not shown). Furthermore, surface expression of gp130 was not
affected by PMA.2
Time Dependence of Erk Activation by PMA--
In order to analyze
which members of the MAP kinase family are activated by PMA treatment,
HepG2 (Fig. 2A) and COS-7
(Fig. 2B) cells were treated with PMA for 0-180 min upon
which total cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analyses using
antibodies specific for the activated forms of MAP kinases. These
antibodies only recognize MAP kinases that are phosphorylated at
threonine and tyrosine residues in a characteristic
Thr-X-Tyr motif. In both cell types activated Erk2 and to a
minor extent Erk1 were detected after 5 min. Maximal activation was
observed at 30 min (Fig. 2, left panel). In contrast, a
negligible activation of JNKs and p38 was observed. Anisomycin, a known
activator of all three MAP kinases, led to the phosphorylation of all
three MAP kinase family members (Fig. 2, right panel). These
data demonstrate that the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 by PMA parallels
the inhibitory effect on STAT activation. Interestingly, anisomycin did
not inhibit STAT activation by IL-6 (data not shown). This could be
explained by the fact that after anisomycin treatment activation of
Erk1/2 was less pronounced (compare left and right
panels in Fig. 2, A and B). Alternatively,
co-activation of JNK and p38 MAP kinases might counteract the
inhibitory effect of Erk1/2. Such a possibility is supported by our
recent finding that p38 activation is necessary for STAT activation
upon hyperosmotic shock (30).
Inhibition of STAT Activation by Overexpression of a Constitutively
Active Raf--
Erk1 and Erk2 are activated by MAP kinase kinase-1/2
which in turn become phosphorylated by an activated Raf kinase (31). Therefore, we overexpressed a constitutively active form of Raf (Raf-BxB (21)) in COS-7 cells and studied its effect on STAT activation
(Fig. 3A). In this experiment,
activation of STAT1 was achieved by co-expression of an erythropoietin
receptor/gp130 chimera (Eg) and stimulation with Epo. This chimera
consists of the extracellular domain of the erythropoietin (Epo)
receptor and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic parts of gp130 and
allows us to study the activation of STAT factors in transfected cells independently of the endogenous gp130 (5). Overexpression of Raf-BxB
(Fig. 3B, left panel) resulted in a strong inhibition of the
Epo-induced STAT1 signal (Fig. 3A) and in the activation of
Erk2 (Fig. 3B, middle panel). In addition, expression of a reporter gene under the control of the IL-6 responsive promoter of the
human Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Gp130 and SHP2 Is Also Inhibited by
PMA--
The level at which PMA inhibits the Jak/STAT pathway is not
clear. Sengupta et al. (17) demonstrated a small decrease in Jak1 and Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation upon PMA pretreatment. In order
to assess whether the signal transducer gp130 is also affected in its
tyrosine phosphorylation we pretreated HepG2 cells with PMA for 45 min
and then stimulated them with IL-6 for 15 min. Cell lysates were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies against gp130 and
Western blot analysis was performed with a phosphotyrosine-specific antibody. Upon IL-6 stimulation tyrosine phosphorylation of gp130 was
increased about 6-fold. PMA inhibited the IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of gp130 by about 60% (Fig.
4A).
Similar experiments were performed to investigate the tyrosine
phosphorylation status of the phosphatase SHP2 which is known to
contribute to the IL-6-induced signaling although its specific function
remains to be elucidated (7, 32). SHP2 was proposed to be a
gp130-associated adaptor connecting the signal transducer to Grb2
thereby linking the Jak/STAT to the MAP kinase pathway (8). We have
recently shown that tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2 is increased in
response to IL-6 in a Jak1-dependent manner (7). PMA
treatment of HepG2 cells resulted in a time-dependent decrease (maximal inhibition after 60 min) of the IL-6-induced SHP2
tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). Together with the data of Sengupta et al. (17) these findings show that tyrosine
phosphorylation of all components of the Jak/STAT cascade (gp130, Jaks,
SHP2, and STATs) is affected by PMA.
Role of the Cytoplasmic Part of Gp130--
Activation of STATs and
SHP2 requires prior phosphorylation of tyrosine residues within the
cytoplasmic domain of gp130 which then recruit these proteins via their
intrinsic SH2 domains (4, 5). To analyze the importance of specific
tyrosine residues of the cytoplasmic part of gp130 for the PMA effect,
we again made use of Eg chimeric receptor mutants (5) (Fig.
5A). Stimulation of COS-7
cells transfected with the wild-type Eg-chimera led to the activation
of STAT1 which is diminished upon preincubation with PMA (Fig.
5B, first panel). Activation of STAT3 is consistently not
observed in these cells unless overexpressed (5). A chimeric construct
Eg Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT Activation by bFGF--
The FGF
receptor as a receptor tyrosine kinase is known to activate the MAP
kinase cascade upon FGF binding (18). To examine also whether this
physiological stimulus leads to an inhibitory effect on STAT signaling,
we studied NIH-3T3 cells which endogenously express FGF receptors. Upon
stimulation with bFGF we detected Erk2 activation after 15 min which
was transient and diminished after 30 min (Fig.
6A). Activation of JNKs and
p38 was not observed (data not shown). Incubation of NIH-3T3 cells with
bFGF or PMA prior to stimulation with IL-6/sgp80 resulted in an
inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT activation (Fig. 6B). Also
in the case of bFGF, the observed inhibition was sensitive to the
MEK inhibitor PD98059 (Fig. 6C).
mRNA and Protein Synthesis Are Crucial for STAT Inhibition by
PMA and bFGF--
In order to determine whether the inhibitory effect
on STAT activation of PMA or bFGF necessitates de novo
mRNA and protein synthesis we preincubated HepG2 and NIH-3T3 cells
with actinomycin D or cycloheximide, inhibitors of mRNA or protein
synthesis, respectively. Cells pretreated with actinomycin D (Fig.
7A) or cycloheximide (Fig.
7B) showed a partial reversal of the inhibitory PMA/bFGF effect indicating that this inhibitory mechanism is, at least in part,
mediated by the expression of newly induced genes.
PMA and bFGF Induce SOCS-3 Gene Expression--
Recently, it was
reported that IL-6 stimulation results in the induction of SOCS-3 gene
expression, a feedback inhibitor of the Jak/STAT pathway (11). In order
to study whether SOCS-3 might play a role in the inhibition of IL-6
signaling by PMA and bFGF, Northern blot analyses were performed with
RNA from NIH-3T3 cells stimulated with IL-6/sgp80, PMA, or bFGF for 45 min. As shown in Fig. 8A, not
only IL-6/sgp80 but also PMA and bFGF induce the expression of SOCS-3
mRNA. No increase of SOCS-1 mRNA could be detected (data not
shown). To analyze whether the SOCS-3 induction by PMA and bFGF is
sensitive to inhibition of Erk activation we again made use of the MEK
inhibitor PD98059. NIH-3T3 cells were pretreated with PD98059 for 45 min before stimulation with PMA or bFGF for an additional 45 min and
Northern blot analyses were performed. The induction of SOCS-3 mRNA
levels by PMA and bFGF was largely reversed upon pretreatment with the
MEK inhibitor (Fig. 8B).
This study presents a number of novel findings with respect to the
molecular mechanism of PMA-induced and Erk-dependent
down-regulation of the Jak/STAT pathway. First, a physiological
activator of MAP kinases, namely bFGF, also results in a
down-modulation of STAT activity. Second, transcription and translation
are at least in part essential for the inhibition of the IL-6-induced
STAT activation by PMA/bFGF. Third, both PMA and bFGF rapidly induce
SOCS-3 mRNA expression in a MEK-dependent manner. And
finally, the PMA-induced inhibition is dependent on Tyr-759 of the
cytoplasmic part of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130.
Our findings strongly suggest that prestimulation of cells with
activators of MAP kinases such as PMA or bFGF inhibits a subsequent STAT activation by IL-6 via the rapid induction of the negative feedback inhibitor SOCS-3. Such a model is consistent with the dependence of the inhibitory effect on de novo transcription
and protein synthesis. It is, furthermore, supported by the fact that both, the inhibition of STAT activation and the induction of SOCS-3, are largely reversed by the action of the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059.
Recently, we could demonstrate in monocytic cells that activators of
the MAP kinase p38, namely lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis
factor- The murine SOCS-3 promotor has recently been cloned and a
STAT1/3-binding site was identified and shown to be necessary for the
induction of SOCS-3 by leukemia inhibitory factor (35). Our data (this
study and Ref. 33) as well as recent results from other groups (36, 37)
suggest also that binding sites for MAP kinase-activated transcription
factors such as TCF and Elk-1 (38) must exist within the SOCS-3
regulatory region. Overexpression of c-Jun and c-Fos had no effect,
suggesting that transcription factors different from AP-1 are involved
in this induction.3 Since
IL-6 does not only activate the Jak/STAT pathway but also the MAP
kinase pathway our results further imply that induction of SOCS-3
mRNA expression by IL-6 is due to the synergistic effect of
activated STATs and MAP kinase-dependent transcription
factors. This could explain why IL-6 is a more potent inducer of SOCS-3 than PMA or bFGF which do not activate STATs (Fig. 8A). It
should be pointed out that induction of SOCS-3 by PMA/bFGF is only
incompletely inhibited by the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 indicating also
that Erk1/2-independent pathways are involved in this induction.
Why does the inhibition of STAT activation by PMA depend on Tyr-759 of
the cytoplasmic part of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130? Tyr-759 is
one of the five tyrosine residues which have been demonstrated to act
as recruitment sites for signaling molecules. Whereas STAT3 and STAT1
are recruited to phosphotyrosine residues with the consensus sequence
YXXQ and YXPQ, respectively, the YSTV motif of
Tyr-759 was described to bind the SH2 domain containing tyrosine
phosphatase SHP2 (4, 5). However, in our study the tyrosine
phosphorylation of SHP2, which is believed to increase its catalytic
activity (39), is also inhibited by PMA making an involvement of SHP2
in our scenario unlikely. Schmitz et al. (40) recently
demonstrated that Tyr-759 of gp130 is necessary for the inhibitory
effect of overexpressed SOCS-3 on the STAT-responsive We thank Drs. S. Ludwig and U. Rapp
(Würzburg) for kindly providing the expression plasmid
for the constitutively active Raf mutant and helpful discussions and
Drs. R. Starr and D. Hilton (Melbourne) for the generous supply of the
SOCS-3 cDNA. We thank W. Frisch for excellent technical assistance,
A. Martens and S. Thiel for helpful discussions, and Drs. I. Behrmann
and G. Müller-Newen for critical reading of the manuscript.
Additionally, we thank J. Wijdenes (Besancon) for kindly
providing anti-gp130 antibodies.
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Contributed equally to the results of this work.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut für
Biochemie, Klinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany. Tel.: 49-241-80-88-837; Fax: 49-241-88-88-428; E-mail: gatsios@RWTH-Aachen.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M904148199
2
S. Thiel and L. Graeve, unpublished observation.
3
P. Gatsios, unpublished observation.
The abbreviations used are:
Jak, Janus kinase;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
ECL, enhanced
chemiluminescence;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
Epo, erythropoietin;
Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor;
gp, glycoprotein;
Grb2, growth factor
receptor-bound protein 2;
IL, interleukin;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal
kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
PMA, phorbol 13-myristate
12-acetate;
PVDF, polyvinyl difluoride;
SIE, Sis-inducible element;
sgp80, soluble interleukin-6 receptor gp80;
SH2, Src homology 2;
SHP2, SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling;
PIAS, protein
inhibitors of activated STATs.
The Inhibition of Interleukin-6-dependent STAT
Activation by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases Depends on Tyrosine 759 in the Cytoplasmic Tail of Glycoprotein 130*
§¶
,
¶**,
,
,
, and
§
Institut für Biochemie and
§ Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische
Forschung "Biomat.," RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor, and angiotensin II
(14-16). The protein kinase C activator phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA) was recently shown to inhibit IL-6-induced STAT3
activation via the Erk/MAP kinases (17). The mechanism of this
inhibition, however, remains to be elucidated.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
7
M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) treatment for 45 min. Cells were then
stimulated with Epo (7 units/ml), IL-6 (100 units/ml), or IL-6 (100 units/ml), and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for an additional 15 min.
440, and EgY759F (EgYFYYYY) was described (5,
7). The expression vector pSVL-Eg encoding the chimeric Epo/gp130
receptor was modified by polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis leading
to a Phe for Tyr-683 substitution. The integrity of all constructs was
verified by DNA sequence analyses using an ABI PRISMTM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). COS-7 cells were transfected with 20 µg of total DNA by using standard calcium-phosphate precipitates. Cells were incubated with precipitate for 18 h, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and cultured in fresh medium for at
least 8 h. Cells were then split and incubated for another 24 h. The constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged with a
HA-epitope) expression plasmid has been described (21).
1-antichymotrypsin gene) (26), 1.5 µg of internal
control plasmid DNA pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 2.5 µg
of the constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged with a
HA-epitope) expression plasmid. Cells were incubated with the
precipitate for 18 h, cultured in fresh medium for at least 8 h, and stimulated with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for an additional 18 h.
Cell lysates were prepared and luciferase and
-galactosidase
activity was measured according to manufacturers instructions
(Promega). Luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase activities.
-32P-labeled
murine SOCS-3 cDNA (11) and a 0.5-kilobase fragment of human
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA as probes (kindly
provided by Dr. M. Burchert-Graeve, Aachen, Germany).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3
activation by PMA. A, HepG2 cells were pretreated with
PMA (10
7 M) for 45 min before stimulation
with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for 15 min. Cells were harvested and nuclear
extracts were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." 50 µg of nuclear proteins were separated by 10%
SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with
(left panel) phosphospecific STAT1 (Tyr-701) or (right
panel) phosphospecific STAT3 (Tyr-705) antibodies. Blots were
stripped and reprobed with antibodies against STAT1 or STAT3.
Immunogenic proteins were visualized with the ECL system. B,
HepG2 cells were stimulated as above. Preincubation with the specific
MEK inhibitor PD98059 (10 µM) was for 45 min. 10 µg of
nuclear extracts were mixed with a 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide (mutated SIE probe of the c-Fos promoter) and EMSAs
were performed. The positions of the activated STAT homo- and
heterodimers are indicated by arrows. C, COS-7
cells were pretreated with PMA (10
7 M) for 45 min before stimulation with IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. EMSAs were performed as described above.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Time dependence of MAP kinase activation in
HepG2 and COS-7 cells by PMA. A, HepG2 cells; and
B, COS-7 cells were treated with PMA (10
7
M) or anisomycin (10 µg/ml) for the times indicated.
Cells were harvested and total cell lysates were prepared as described
under "Experimental Procedures." 50 µg of protein were separated
by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were
incubated with anti-active MAP kinase Erk1/2, anti-active JNK, and
anti-active p38 antibodies. Immunogenic proteins were visualized with
the ECL system. The positions of the activated MAP kinase are indicated
by arrows.
1-antichymotrypsin gene (26) was strongly
diminished in cells expressing Raf-BxB (Fig. 3C). Expression
of the Eg chimera with an expected molecular mass of ~68 kDa was not
affected by co-expression of Raf-BxB (Fig. 3B, right panel).
Thus, also activation of the Erk2 kinase by constitutively active Raf
results in an inhibition of the Jak/STAT pathway.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of STAT activation by
overexpression of constitutively active Raf. A, COS-7
cells were transfected transiently with the pSVL-Eg chimera
(mock) or with pSVL-Eg and a HA-tagged constitutively active
Raf kinase (Raf BxB). 48 h after transfection cells
were stimulated with Epo (7 units/ml) for 15 min, nuclear extracts were
prepared and EMSA were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1.
B, whole cell lysates were prepared, 50 µg of protein were
separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes
were incubated with anti-HA (left panel) or anti-active MAP
kinase Erk1/2 (middle panel) or anti-gp130 (cytoplasmic
part) (right panel) antibodies. C, HepG2 cells
were transfected with the reporter construct plasmid DNA (a 246-base
pair upstream promotor fragment of the human
1-antichymotrypsin gene), an internal control plasmid
DNA pCH110, and the constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged
with a HA-epitope) expression plasmid. Luciferase assays were performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of IL-6-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of gp130 and SHP2 by PMA. HepG2 cells were
pretreated with PMA (10
7 M) for the times
indicated before stimulation with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for 15 min. Cell
lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitations with anti-gp130
(A) or anti-SHP2 (B) antibodies were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Precipitated proteins
were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane, and
analyzed by immunodetection with a specific anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody (4G10) (upper panel). Blots were stripped and
reprobed with anti-gp130 or anti-SHP2 antibodies (lower
panel) for verification of equal loading. A, the
resulting autoradiograph was scanned and quantitated using the
PhosphorImager (Storm 840, Molecular Dynamics, CA).
440 containing only the Jak-binding sites (box 1 and box 2) of
gp130 and the tyrosine module YDKPH of the interferon
receptor
crucial for the activation of STAT1 via interferon
, however,
resulted in a STAT1 activation that was resistant to pretreatment with
PMA (Fig. 5B, fourth panel). This suggests that the activity
of Jak kinases is not directly affected by PMA treatment and that
sequences downstream of box 1 and box 2 of the cytoplasmic tail of
gp130 are necessary for the inhibitory effect of PMA. To further
analyze the role of specific tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic
part of gp130 we took advantage of the EgY759F chimera, in which
phenylalanine is substituted for Tyr-759 of gp130 (7). Tyr-759 is
required for the recruitment and activation of SHP2 (4). Epo-induced
STAT1 activation was not inhibited by PMA in cells expressing EgY759F
(Fig. 5B, second panel). In contrast, substitution of
phenylalanine for Tyr-683 (EgY683F) did not affect the inhibitory
effect induced by PMA (Fig. 5B, right panel). This finding
suggests that Tyr-759 within the cytoplasmic part of gp130 plays an
essential role in the inhibition of STAT activation by PMA.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Role of the cytoplasmic part of gp130.
A, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected as described
under "Experimental Procedures" with expression vectors for the
chimeric receptors depicted. B, cells were preincubated with
PMA (10
7 M) for 45 min followed by
stimulation with Epo (7 units/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were
prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the legend to Fig.
1.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3
activation by bFGF. A, NIH-3T3 cells were stimulated
with bFGF (10 ng/ml) for the times indicated. Whole cell lysates were
prepared, 50 µg of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and
blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with anti-active
MAP kinase Erk1/2 antibodies. B, cells were preincubated
with PMA (10
7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min followed by an exposure to IL-6 (100 units/ml) and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed
as described in the legend to Fig. 1. C, cells were
preincubated with the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059 (10 µM) for 45 min and incubated with bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min followed by an exposure to IL-6 (100 units/ml) and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed
as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
mRNA synthesis is crucial for STAT
inhibition by PMA and bFGF. A, HepG2 cells (upper
panel) were pretreated with PMA (10
7 M)
for 45 min followed by an IL-6 (100 units/ml) stimulus, respectively.
NIH-3T3 cells (lower panel) were pretreated with PMA
(10
7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml)) for 45 min
followed by IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min.
Actinomycin D (1 µg/ml) treatment for 45 min preceded PMA or bFGF
incubation. B, HepG2 cells (upper panel) and
NIH-3T3 cells (lower panel) were pretreated with PMA or bFGF
and IL-6 or IL-6 plus sgp80 as described in A. Cycloheximide
(10 µg/ml) treatment for 45 min preceded PMA or bFGF incubation.
Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the
legend to Fig. 1.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
SOCS-3 mRNA is rapidly up-regulated upon
PMA and bFGF treatment. A, total RNA (15 µg/lane)
isolated from NIH-3T3 cells stimulated with IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus
sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml), PMA (10
7 M), and bFGF
(10 ng/ml) for 45 min was hybridized with the 32P-labeled
cDNA probe for the murine SOCS-3 gene and the glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a loading control.
B, NIH-3T3 cells were preincubated with PD98059 (10 µM) for 45 min before stimulation with PMA
(10
7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min.
Northern blots were performed as described in A.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, inhibit a subsequent STAT activation by IL-6 (33). This
inhibition was also paralleled by a rapid SOCS-3 induction which in
this case was sensitive to inhibition of p38. Interestingly, in rat
hepatocytes and HepG2 cells tumor necrosis factor-
neither
down-modulate STAT activation nor induce SOCS-3. Thus, in all
experimental systems in which activation of MAP kinases resulted in an
inhibition of the Jak/STAT pathway, SOCS-3 induction was observed.
Although this is only a correlation, it strongly argues for a crucial
role of SOCS-3 as a mediator of MAP kinase-dependent Jak/STAT inhibition. Final proof of our model would require the specific inhibition of SOCS-3 induction by antisense technology or gene
knock-out. Unfortunately, SOCS-3 knock-out mice die at days 12-16 of
embryonic development (34).
2-macroglobulin promoter in HepG2 cells. They could
further show that SOCS-3 protein in vitro binds to a
phosphorylated Tyr-759 containing peptide and that a recombinant SH2
domain of SOCS-3 interacts with this phosphopeptide (40). This strongly
suggests that SOCS-3, whether overexpressed or induced by PMA/bFGF,
exerts its inhibitory effect by binding to phosphorylated Tyr-759 of gp130. How SOCS-3 blocks the activity of Jak kinases and the
phosphorylation of STATs remains unclear. SOCS-1 was found to bind to
phosphorylated Tyr-1007 in the activation loop of Jak2 (41). The
N-terminal located kinase inhibitory region of SOCS-1 also contributed
to this binding and was essential for Jak2 kinase inhibitory activity. A similar mechanism was proposed for SOCS-3. However, compared with
SOCS-1, the affinity of its SH2 domain for Jak2 is weaker whereas that
of its kinase inhibitory region is stronger (42). Our model suggests
that SOCS-3 can exert its inhibitory effect not only by binding
directly to Jaks but also by binding to the receptor chain (Fig.
9). Future studies will address this
question in detail.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Proposed mechanism of the PMA/bFGF-induced
inhibition of the IL-6-induced STAT activation.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Recipient of a junior scientist award by the IZKF
"Biomat."
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Heinrich, P. C.,
Behrmann, I.,
Müller-Newen, G.,
Schaper, F.,
and Graeve, L.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
334,
297-314
2.
Pellegrini, S.,
and Dusanter-Fourt, I.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
248,
615-633
3.
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635
4.
Stahl, N.,
Farruggella, T. J.,
Boulton, T. G.,
Zhong, Z.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1995)
Science
267,
1349-1353
5.
Gerhartz, C.,
Heesel, B.,
Sasse, J.,
Hemmann, U.,
Landgraf, C.,
Schneider-Mergener, J.,
Horn, F.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Graeve, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12991-12998
6.
Symes, A.,
Stahl, N.,
Reeves, S. A.,
Farruggella, T.,
Servidei, T.,
Gearan, T.,
Yancopoulos, G.,
and Fink, J. S.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
697-700
7.
Schaper, F.,
Gendo, C.,
Eck, M.,
Schmitz, J.,
Grimm, C.,
Anhuf, D.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Heinrich, P. C.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
335,
557-565
8.
Fukada, T.,
Hibi, M.,
Yamanaka, Y.,
Takahashi-Tezuka, M.,
Fujitani, Y.,
Yamaguchi, T.,
Nakajima, K.,
and Hirano, T.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
449-460
9.
Naka, T.,
Narazaki, M.,
Hirata, M.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Minamoto, S.,
Aono, A.,
Nishimoto, N.,
Kajita, T.,
Taga, T.,
Yoshizaki, K.,
Akira, S.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1997)
Nature
387,
924-929
10.
Endo, T. A.,
Masuhara, M.,
Yokouchi, M.,
Suzuki, R.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Mitsui, K.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Tanimura, S.,
Ohtsubo, M.,
Misawa, H.,
Miyazaki, T.,
Leonor, N.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Fujita, T.,
Kanakura, Y.,
Komiya, S.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1997)
Nature
387,
921-924
11.
Starr, R.,
Willson, T. A.,
Viney, E. M.,
Murray, L. J.,
Rayner, J. R.,
Jenkins, B. J.,
Gonda, T. J.,
Alexander, W. S.,
Metcalf, D.,
Nicola, N. A.,
and Hilton, D. J.
(1997)
Nature
387,
917-921
12.
Chung, C. D.,
Liao, J.,
Liu, B.,
Rao, X.,
Jay, P.,
Berta, P.,
and Shuai, K.
(1997)
Science
278,
1803-1805
13.
Liu, B.,
Liao, J.,
Rao, X.,
Kushner, S. A.,
Chung, C. D.,
Chang, D. D.,
and Shuai, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10626-10631
14.
Bright, J. J.,
and Sriram, S.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
1772-1777
15.
Sengupta, T. K.,
Schmitt, E. M.,
and Ivashkiv, L. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9499-9504
16.
Bhat, G. J.,
Abraham, S. T.,
and Baker, K. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22447-22452
17.
Sengupta, T. K.,
Talbot, E. S.,
Scherle, P. A.,
and Ivashkiv, L. B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11107-11112
18.
Geer, v. d., P.,
Hunter, T.,
and Lindberg, R. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
251-337
19.
Arcone, R.,
Pucci, P.,
Zappacosta, F.,
Fontaine, V.,
Malorni, A.,
Marino, G.,
and Ciliberto, G.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
198,
541-547
20.
Weiergräber, O.,
Hemmann, U.,
Kuster, A.,
Müller-Newen, G.,
Schneider, J.,
Rose-John, S.,
Kurschat, P.,
Brakenhoff, J. P.,
Hart, M. H.,
Stabel, S.,
and Heinrich, P. C.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
234,
661-669
21.
Hoffmeyer, A.,
Grosse-Wilde, A.,
Flory, E.,
Neufeld, B.,
Kunz, M.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Ludwig, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4319-4327
22.
Andrews, N. C.,
and Faller, D. V.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2499
23.
Wagner, B. J.,
Hayes, T. E.,
Hoban, C. J.,
and Cochran, B. H.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
4477-4484
24.
Wegenka, U. M.,
Buschmann, J.,
Lütticken, C.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Horn, F.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
276-288
25.
Wijdenes, J.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
Müller-Newen, G.,
Roche, C.,
Gu, Z. J.,
Clement, C.,
and Klein, B.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
3474-3481
26.
Kordula, T.,
Rydel, R. E.,
Brigham, E. F.,
Horn, F.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Travis, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4112-4118
27.
Gatsios, P.,
Haubeck, H. D.,
Van de Leur, E.,
Frisch, W.,
Apte, S. S.,
Greiling, H.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Graeve, L.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
56-63
28.
Müllberg, J.,
Schooltink, H.,
Stoyan, T.,
Günther, M.,
Graeve, L.,
Buse, G.,
Mackiewicz, A.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Rose-John, S.
(1993)
Eur. J. Immunol.
23,
473-480
29.
Mackiewicz, A.,
Schooltink, H.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Rose-John, S.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
2021-2027
30.
Bode, J. G.,
Gatsios, P.,
Ludwig, S.,
Rapp, U.,
Häussinger, D.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Graeve, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30222-30227
31.
Daum, G.,
Eisenmann-Tappe, I.,
Fries, H. W.,
Troppmair, J.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
474-480
32.
Kim, H.,
Hawley, T. S.,
Hawley, R. G.,
and Baumann, H.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1525-1533
33.
Bode, J. G.,
Nimmesgern, A.,
Schmitz, J.,
Schaper, F.,
Schmitt, M.,
Frisch, W.,
Häussinger, D.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Graeve, L.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
463,
365-370
34.
Marine, J. C.,
McKay, C.,
Wang, D.,
Topham, D. J.,
Parnagas, E.,
Nakajima, H.,
Pendeville, H.,
Yasukawa, H.,
Sasaki, A.,
Yoshimura, A.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1999)
Cell
98,
617-627
35.
Auernhammer, C. J.,
Bousquet, C.,
and Melmed, S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6964-6969
36.
Stoiber, D.,
Kovarik, P.,
Cohney, S.,
Johnston, J. A.,
Steinlein, A.,
and Decker, T.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
2640-2647
37.
Mao, Y.,
Ling, P. R.,
Fitzgibbons, T. P.,
McCowen, K. C.,
Frick, G. P.,
Bistrian, B. R.,
and Smith, R. J.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
5505-5515
38.
Price, M. A.,
Rogers, A. E.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2589-2601
39.
Vogel, W.,
Lammers, R.,
Huang, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1993)
Science
259,
1611-1614
40.
Schmitz, J.,
Weissenbach, M.,
Haan, S.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Schaper, F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12848-12856
41.
Yasukawa, H.,
Misawa, H.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Masuhara, M.,
Sasaki, A.,
Wakioka, T.,
Ohtsuka, S.,
Imaizumi, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1309-1320
42.
Sasaki, A.,
Yasukawa, H.,
Suzuki, A.,
Kamizono, S.,
Syoda, T.,
Kinjyo, I.,
Sasaki, M.,
Johnston, J. A.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1999)
Genes Cells
4,
339-351
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Tanaka, N. Tanaka, Y. Saeki, K. Tanaka, M. Murakami, T. Hirano, N. Ishii, and K. Sugamura c-Cbl-Dependent Monoubiquitination and Lysosomal Degradation of gp130 Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2008; 28(15): 4805 - 4818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. X. Andersson, V. R. Sopasakis, E. Wallerstedt, and U. Smith Insulin Antagonizes Interleukin-6 Signaling and Is Anti-inflammatory in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9430 - 9435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. McWhinnie, D. V. Pechkovsky, D. Zhou, D. Lane, A. J. Halayko, D. A. Knight, and T. R. Bai Endothelin-1 induces hypertrophy and inhibits apoptosis in human airway smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L278 - L286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hu and J. Nicholas Signal Transduction by Human Herpesvirus 8 Viral Interleukin-6 (vIL-6) Is Modulated by the Nonsignaling gp80 Subunit of the IL-6 Receptor Complex and Is Distinct from Signaling Induced by Human IL-6 J. Virol., November 1, 2006; 80(21): 10874 - 10878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stross, S. Radtke, T. Clahsen, C. Gerlach, R. Volkmer-Engert, F. Schaper, P. C. Heinrich, and H. M. Hermanns Oncostatin M Receptor-mediated Signal Transduction Is Negatively Regulated by SOCS3 through a Receptor Tyrosine-independent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8458 - 8468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Park, J.-M. Luo, S. Hisheh, A. R. Harvey, and Q. Cui Cellular Mechanisms Associated with Spontaneous and Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor-cAMP-Induced Survival and Axonal Regeneration of Adult Retinal Ganglion Cells J. Neurosci., December 1, 2004; 24(48): 10806 - 10815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gomez-Guerrero, O. Lopez-Franco, G. Sanjuan, P. Hernandez-Vargas, Y. Suzuki, G. Ortiz-Munoz, J. Blanco, and J. Egido Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Regulate Fc Receptor Signaling and Cell Activation during Immune Renal Injury J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 6969 - 6977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Higashi, H. Kunimoto, S. Kaneko, T. Sasaki, M. Ishii, H. Kojima, and K. Nakajima Cytoplasmic c-Fos induced by the YXXQ-derived STAT3 signal requires the co-operative MEK/ERK signal for its nuclear translocation Genes Cells, March 1, 2004; 9(3): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamada, D. Zhu, K. Zhang, and A. Saxon Inhibition of Interleukin-4-induced Class Switch Recombination by a Human Immunoglobulin Fc{gamma}-Fc{epsilon} Chimeric Protein J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 32818 - 32824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. M. Ceponis, D. M. McKay, R. J. Menaker, E. Galindo-Mata, and N. L. Jones Helicobacter pylori Infection Interferes with Epithelial Stat6-Mediated Interleukin-4 Signal Transduction Independent of cagA, cagE, or VacA J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 2035 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mahboubi, N. C. Kirkiles-Smith, J. Karras, and J. S. Pober Desensitization of Signaling by Oncostatin M in Human Vascular Cells Involves Cytoplasmic Tyr Residue 759 in gp130 but Is Not Mediated by Either Src Homology 2 Domain-containing Tyrosine Phosphatase 2 or Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 25014 - 25023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. |