JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M904148199 on April 10, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18810-18817, June 23, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/25/18810    most recent
M904148199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terstegen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Graeve, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terstegen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Graeve, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Inhibition of Interleukin-6-dependent STAT Activation by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases Depends on Tyrosine 759 in the Cytoplasmic Tail of Glycoprotein 130*

Lara TerstegenDagger §||, Petros GatsiosDagger **, Johannes G. BodeDagger , Fred SchaperDagger , Peter C. HeinrichDagger , and Lutz GraeveDagger §

From the Dagger  Institut für Biochemie and § Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung "Biomat.," RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Received for publication, May 27, 1999, and in revised form, March 30, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases stimulated by phorbol 13-myristate 12-acetate (PMA) have been shown to inhibit interleukin-6-induced activation of STAT3 (Sengupta, T. K., Talbot, E. S., Scherle, P. A., and Ivashkiv, L. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11107-11112). In the present study we demonstrate that in addition to STAT3, also tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1, signal transducer gp130, and phosphotyrosine-phosphatase SHP2 underlies negative regulation by MAP kinases. Stimulation of Erks by basic fibroblast growth factor or a constitutively active mutant of Raf also led to down-regulation of STAT activity. Using chimeric receptor mutants we show that tyrosine 759 of glycoprotein 130 is crucial for the inhibitory effect of MAP kinases. Inhibition is also dependent on gene transcription and translation indicating that newly synthesized proteins are involved. Both PMA and basic fibroblast growth factor rapidly stimulate mRNA expression of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) and this induction is strongly reduced by an inhibitor of MAP kinase activation. Together with recent results demonstrating that SOCS-3 can bind in vitro to a phosphorylated tyrosine 759 peptide of glycoprotein 130 these data suggest SOCS-3 to be instrumental in the inhibition of the Janus kinase/STAT pathway by MAP kinases.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Jak1/STAT pathway is activated by numerous cytokines and growth factors and transduces the signal from surface receptors to respective target genes in the nucleus (1-3). In the case of interleukin-6 (IL-6), binding to its receptor (gp80) triggers the dimerization of the signal transducer gp130 resulting in the autophosphorylation/activation of noncovalently associated Jak1, Jak2, and Tyk2 (1). These tyrosine kinases phosphorylate the cytoplasmic tail of gp130 thereby creating recruitment sites for SH2 domain containing signaling components such as STAT1, STAT3, and the phosphotyrosine-phosphatase SHP2 which are also subject to phosphorylation (4, 5). Activated STATs homo- or heterodimerize, translocate to the nucleus and bind to enhancer elements of target genes. SHP2 negatively regulates IL-6-induced gene transcription and was shown to act as an adaptor linking the Jak/STAT pathway to the MAP kinase pathway via Grb2 (6-8).

Recently, two families of proteins have been cloned that negatively regulate the Jak/STAT pathway, i.e. suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and protein inhibitors of activated STATs (PIAS) (9-13). SOCS proteins are induced upon STAT activation and in turn inhibit the activity of Jaks. PIAS bind to activated STAT dimers and prevent STAT-mediated gene activation. How PIAS are regulated is currently unknown.

A number of other mediators have been reported to down-regulate Jak/STAT activation, e.g. transforming growth factor beta , granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor, and angiotensin II (14-16). The protein kinase C activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was recently shown to inhibit IL-6-induced STAT3 activation via the Erk/MAP kinases (17). The mechanism of this inhibition, however, remains to be elucidated.

Here, we demonstrate that PMA does not only inhibit tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 but also tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1, gp130, and SHP2. The inhibitory effect of PMA was found to be strictly dependent on tyrosine 759, the known recruitment site for SHP2, of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130. Furthermore, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), a physiological activator of MAP kinases (18), negatively regulates IL-6-induced STAT activation in a similar fashion. Since both, PMA and bFGF, led to a rapid induction of SOCS-3 mRNA expression we propose that not only STAT activation but also activation of the MAP kinase pathway induces the expression of the inhibitory SOCS-3 protein thereby resulting in the down-regulation of the Jak/STAT pathway.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- PD98059 and SB202190 were from Calbiochem (Bad Soden, Germany). Anisomycin, actinomycin D, and cycloheximide were from BIOMOL (Hamburg, Germany). PMA was purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was from Life Technologies, Inc. (Eggstein, Germany), and fetal calf serum from Seromed (Berlin, Germany). Recombinant human IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor sgp80 were prepared as described (19, 20). Human recombinant erythropoietin was kindly provided by Drs. J. Burg and K.-H. Sellinger (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Penzberg, Germany). Human recombinant bFGF was purchased from Promega (Mannheim, Germany).

Cell Culture and Stimulation of Cells-- HepG2 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 mixture; COS-7 and NIH-3T3 cells in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium at 5% CO2 in a water-saturated atmosphere. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, streptomycin (100 mg/liter), and penicillin (60 mg/liter). NIH-3T3 cells were serum-deprived 18 h before stimulation.

Cells grown in a 100-mm dish to 80% confluence were preincubated with anisomycin (10 ng/ml), actinomycin D (1 µg/ml), cycloheximide (10 µg/ml), PD98059 (10 µM), or SB202190 (10 µM) for 45 min followed by PMA (10-7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) treatment for 45 min. Cells were then stimulated with Epo (7 units/ml), IL-6 (100 units/ml), or IL-6 (100 units/ml), and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for an additional 15 min.

DNA Constructs and Transfection Procedures-- Generation of cDNAs for Eg, Eggamma 440, and EgY759F (EgYFYYYY) was described (5, 7). The expression vector pSVL-Eg encoding the chimeric Epo/gp130 receptor was modified by polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis leading to a Phe for Tyr-683 substitution. The integrity of all constructs was verified by DNA sequence analyses using an ABI PRISMTM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). COS-7 cells were transfected with 20 µg of total DNA by using standard calcium-phosphate precipitates. Cells were incubated with precipitate for 18 h, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and cultured in fresh medium for at least 8 h. Cells were then split and incubated for another 24 h. The constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged with a HA-epitope) expression plasmid has been described (21).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)-- Nuclear extracts were prepared as described (22). EMSAs were performed using a double-stranded 32P-labeled mutated m67SIE-oligonucleotide from the c-fos promotor (m67SIE: 5'-GATCCGGGAGGGATTTACGGGAAATGCTG-3') (23, 24). The protein-DNA complexes were separated on a 4.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 7.5% glycerol in 0.25-fold TBE (20 mM Tris, 20 mM boric acid, 0.5 mM EDTA) at 20 V/cm for 4 h. Gels were fixed in 10% methanol, 10% acetic acid, and 80% water for 1 h, dried, and autoradiographed.

Immunoprecipitation-- Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and solubilized in 1 ml of lysis buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 0.25 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 15% glycerol) for 30 min at 4 °C. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation, and the cell lysates were incubated with specific antibodies at 4 °C for a minimum of 2 h. The immune complexes were bound to protein A-Sepharose (5 mg/ml in lysis buffer) for 1 h at 4 °C. When monoclonal antibodies were used, rabbit anti-mouse IgG was bound to the protein A-Sepharose beads. After centrifugation, the Sepharose beads were washed three times with wash buffer (0.05% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 15% glycerol). The samples were boiled in gel electrophoresis sample buffer and the precipitated proteins were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide (7.5 or 10%) gels. The following antibodies were used: anti-gp130 mouse monoclonal antibody (B-T12) (25) and anti-SHP2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, CA).

Immunoblotting and Immunodetection-- The electrophoretically separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes by the semidry Western blotting method. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in TBS-N (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40) for 15 min. The blots were incubated with primary antibodies in TBS-N for 1 h. After extensive rinsing with TBS-N, blots were incubated with secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit IgG, or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h and developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The following primary antibodies were used: phosphotyrosine-specific STAT1 (Tyr-701) and STAT3 (Tyr-705) rabbit polyclonal antibodies (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), HA.11 mouse monoclonal antibody (BabCO, Richmond, CA), anti-STAT1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA), anti-STAT3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (kindly provided by Dr. Müller-Esterl, Mainz, Germany), anti-active MAP kinases Erk1/2, anti-active JNK, anti-active p38 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), anti-phosphotyrosine mouse monoclonal antibody 4G10, anti-gp130 mouse monoclonal antibody (B-P4) (25), anti-gp130, raised against the cytoplasmic part of gp130 (Upstate Biotechnology, NY), and anti-SHP2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA).

Luciferase Assay-- HepG2 cells were grown on 60-mm dishes to 30% confluence and transfected in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum using standard calcium phosphate precipitates, with 3.5 µg of reporter construct plasmid DNA (a 246-base pair upstream promotor fragment of the human alpha 1-antichymotrypsin gene) (26), 1.5 µg of internal control plasmid DNA pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 2.5 µg of the constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged with a HA-epitope) expression plasmid. Cells were incubated with the precipitate for 18 h, cultured in fresh medium for at least 8 h, and stimulated with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for an additional 18 h. Cell lysates were prepared and luciferase and beta -galactosidase activity was measured according to manufacturers instructions (Promega). Luciferase activities were normalized to beta -galactosidase activities.

Northern Analysis-- Total RNA was isolated from cultured NIH-3T3 cells using the total RNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Gel electrophoresis and Northern blot analyses were performed with 15 µg of total RNA as described in Ref. 27 using alpha -32P-labeled murine SOCS-3 cDNA (11) and a 0.5-kilobase fragment of human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA as probes (kindly provided by Dr. M. Burchert-Graeve, Aachen, Germany).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3 Activation by PMA-- The inhibition by PMA of the IL-6-induced STAT activation was studied in human hepatoma cells (HepG2). After pretreatment with 0.1 µM PMA for 45 min IL-6 (100 units/ml) was added for 15 min. Activation of STAT1 and STAT3 requires phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues, i.e. Tyr-701 in STAT1 and Tyr-705 in STAT3. Thus, we performed Western blot analyses of nuclear extracts using specific antibodies against the tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of STAT1 and STAT3 (Fig. 1A). Tyrosine phosphorylation of both, STAT1 and STAT3, was induced by IL-6 and clearly decreased upon PMA pretreatment (Fig. 1A). PMA incubation alone did not result in STAT activation.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3 activation by PMA. A, HepG2 cells were pretreated with PMA (10-7 M) for 45 min before stimulation with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for 15 min. Cells were harvested and nuclear extracts were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." 50 µg of nuclear proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with (left panel) phosphospecific STAT1 (Tyr-701) or (right panel) phosphospecific STAT3 (Tyr-705) antibodies. Blots were stripped and reprobed with antibodies against STAT1 or STAT3. Immunogenic proteins were visualized with the ECL system. B, HepG2 cells were stimulated as above. Preincubation with the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059 (10 µM) was for 45 min. 10 µg of nuclear extracts were mixed with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide (mutated SIE probe of the c-Fos promoter) and EMSAs were performed. The positions of the activated STAT homo- and heterodimers are indicated by arrows. C, COS-7 cells were pretreated with PMA (10-7 M) for 45 min before stimulation with IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. EMSAs were performed as described above.

These results confirm recent findings with respect to STAT3 (17) and show that also STAT1 activation is affected by PMA. EMSA revealed that the reduced STAT phosphorylation results in a strongly diminished binding of STAT1 and STAT3 to the STAT1/3-specific SIE probe (Fig. 1B). Inhibition of STAT activation by PMA was partially reversed by the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059. This suggests that the inhibitory effect of PMA requires the activation of MAP kinases as recently proposed (17). Inhibition was not reversed by the specific p38 kinase inhibitor SB202190 (data not shown).

We have shown that after PMA treatment the IL-6 receptor is rapidly released from the cell surface of transfected COS-7 cells and primary human monocytes by shedding, i.e. limited proteolysis of the membrane-bound receptor form (28). This raises the question whether the observed inhibition of the IL-6-induced STAT activation by PMA is due to a loss of IL-6-binding sites at the cell surface. In order to exclude this possibility, COS-7 cells, which endogenously express only gp130 but not the IL-6 receptor, were pretreated with PMA for 45 min and then stimulated with a combination of IL-6 and a recombinant soluble IL-6 receptor. The soluble IL-6 receptor has been shown to act agonistically on cells that express only gp130 (29). As shown in Fig. 1C, the inhibitory effect of PMA on the IL-6 response was also observed in COS-7 cells which suggests that shedding of the IL-6 receptor is not involved. Similar results were obtained in HepG2 cells (data not shown). Furthermore, surface expression of gp130 was not affected by PMA.2

Time Dependence of Erk Activation by PMA-- In order to analyze which members of the MAP kinase family are activated by PMA treatment, HepG2 (Fig. 2A) and COS-7 (Fig. 2B) cells were treated with PMA for 0-180 min upon which total cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analyses using antibodies specific for the activated forms of MAP kinases. These antibodies only recognize MAP kinases that are phosphorylated at threonine and tyrosine residues in a characteristic Thr-X-Tyr motif. In both cell types activated Erk2 and to a minor extent Erk1 were detected after 5 min. Maximal activation was observed at 30 min (Fig. 2, left panel). In contrast, a negligible activation of JNKs and p38 was observed. Anisomycin, a known activator of all three MAP kinases, led to the phosphorylation of all three MAP kinase family members (Fig. 2, right panel). These data demonstrate that the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 by PMA parallels the inhibitory effect on STAT activation. Interestingly, anisomycin did not inhibit STAT activation by IL-6 (data not shown). This could be explained by the fact that after anisomycin treatment activation of Erk1/2 was less pronounced (compare left and right panels in Fig. 2, A and B). Alternatively, co-activation of JNK and p38 MAP kinases might counteract the inhibitory effect of Erk1/2. Such a possibility is supported by our recent finding that p38 activation is necessary for STAT activation upon hyperosmotic shock (30).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time dependence of MAP kinase activation in HepG2 and COS-7 cells by PMA. A, HepG2 cells; and B, COS-7 cells were treated with PMA (10-7 M) or anisomycin (10 µg/ml) for the times indicated. Cells were harvested and total cell lysates were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." 50 µg of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with anti-active MAP kinase Erk1/2, anti-active JNK, and anti-active p38 antibodies. Immunogenic proteins were visualized with the ECL system. The positions of the activated MAP kinase are indicated by arrows.

Inhibition of STAT Activation by Overexpression of a Constitutively Active Raf-- Erk1 and Erk2 are activated by MAP kinase kinase-1/2 which in turn become phosphorylated by an activated Raf kinase (31). Therefore, we overexpressed a constitutively active form of Raf (Raf-BxB (21)) in COS-7 cells and studied its effect on STAT activation (Fig. 3A). In this experiment, activation of STAT1 was achieved by co-expression of an erythropoietin receptor/gp130 chimera (Eg) and stimulation with Epo. This chimera consists of the extracellular domain of the erythropoietin (Epo) receptor and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic parts of gp130 and allows us to study the activation of STAT factors in transfected cells independently of the endogenous gp130 (5). Overexpression of Raf-BxB (Fig. 3B, left panel) resulted in a strong inhibition of the Epo-induced STAT1 signal (Fig. 3A) and in the activation of Erk2 (Fig. 3B, middle panel). In addition, expression of a reporter gene under the control of the IL-6 responsive promoter of the human alpha 1-antichymotrypsin gene (26) was strongly diminished in cells expressing Raf-BxB (Fig. 3C). Expression of the Eg chimera with an expected molecular mass of ~68 kDa was not affected by co-expression of Raf-BxB (Fig. 3B, right panel). Thus, also activation of the Erk2 kinase by constitutively active Raf results in an inhibition of the Jak/STAT pathway.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inhibition of STAT activation by overexpression of constitutively active Raf. A, COS-7 cells were transfected transiently with the pSVL-Eg chimera (mock) or with pSVL-Eg and a HA-tagged constitutively active Raf kinase (Raf BxB). 48 h after transfection cells were stimulated with Epo (7 units/ml) for 15 min, nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSA were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. B, whole cell lysates were prepared, 50 µg of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with anti-HA (left panel) or anti-active MAP kinase Erk1/2 (middle panel) or anti-gp130 (cytoplasmic part) (right panel) antibodies. C, HepG2 cells were transfected with the reporter construct plasmid DNA (a 246-base pair upstream promotor fragment of the human alpha 1-antichymotrypsin gene), an internal control plasmid DNA pCH110, and the constitutively active Raf1 kinase (Raf BxB, tagged with a HA-epitope) expression plasmid. Luciferase assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Gp130 and SHP2 Is Also Inhibited by PMA-- The level at which PMA inhibits the Jak/STAT pathway is not clear. Sengupta et al. (17) demonstrated a small decrease in Jak1 and Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation upon PMA pretreatment. In order to assess whether the signal transducer gp130 is also affected in its tyrosine phosphorylation we pretreated HepG2 cells with PMA for 45 min and then stimulated them with IL-6 for 15 min. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies against gp130 and Western blot analysis was performed with a phosphotyrosine-specific antibody. Upon IL-6 stimulation tyrosine phosphorylation of gp130 was increased about 6-fold. PMA inhibited the IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of gp130 by about 60% (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Inhibition of IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of gp130 and SHP2 by PMA. HepG2 cells were pretreated with PMA (10-7 M) for the times indicated before stimulation with IL-6 (100 units/ml) for 15 min. Cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitations with anti-gp130 (A) or anti-SHP2 (B) antibodies were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Precipitated proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane, and analyzed by immunodetection with a specific anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) (upper panel). Blots were stripped and reprobed with anti-gp130 or anti-SHP2 antibodies (lower panel) for verification of equal loading. A, the resulting autoradiograph was scanned and quantitated using the PhosphorImager (Storm 840, Molecular Dynamics, CA).

Similar experiments were performed to investigate the tyrosine phosphorylation status of the phosphatase SHP2 which is known to contribute to the IL-6-induced signaling although its specific function remains to be elucidated (7, 32). SHP2 was proposed to be a gp130-associated adaptor connecting the signal transducer to Grb2 thereby linking the Jak/STAT to the MAP kinase pathway (8). We have recently shown that tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2 is increased in response to IL-6 in a Jak1-dependent manner (7). PMA treatment of HepG2 cells resulted in a time-dependent decrease (maximal inhibition after 60 min) of the IL-6-induced SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). Together with the data of Sengupta et al. (17) these findings show that tyrosine phosphorylation of all components of the Jak/STAT cascade (gp130, Jaks, SHP2, and STATs) is affected by PMA.

Role of the Cytoplasmic Part of Gp130-- Activation of STATs and SHP2 requires prior phosphorylation of tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic domain of gp130 which then recruit these proteins via their intrinsic SH2 domains (4, 5). To analyze the importance of specific tyrosine residues of the cytoplasmic part of gp130 for the PMA effect, we again made use of Eg chimeric receptor mutants (5) (Fig. 5A). Stimulation of COS-7 cells transfected with the wild-type Eg-chimera led to the activation of STAT1 which is diminished upon preincubation with PMA (Fig. 5B, first panel). Activation of STAT3 is consistently not observed in these cells unless overexpressed (5). A chimeric construct Eggamma 440 containing only the Jak-binding sites (box 1 and box 2) of gp130 and the tyrosine module YDKPH of the interferon gamma  receptor crucial for the activation of STAT1 via interferon gamma , however, resulted in a STAT1 activation that was resistant to pretreatment with PMA (Fig. 5B, fourth panel). This suggests that the activity of Jak kinases is not directly affected by PMA treatment and that sequences downstream of box 1 and box 2 of the cytoplasmic tail of gp130 are necessary for the inhibitory effect of PMA. To further analyze the role of specific tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic part of gp130 we took advantage of the EgY759F chimera, in which phenylalanine is substituted for Tyr-759 of gp130 (7). Tyr-759 is required for the recruitment and activation of SHP2 (4). Epo-induced STAT1 activation was not inhibited by PMA in cells expressing EgY759F (Fig. 5B, second panel). In contrast, substitution of phenylalanine for Tyr-683 (EgY683F) did not affect the inhibitory effect induced by PMA (Fig. 5B, right panel). This finding suggests that Tyr-759 within the cytoplasmic part of gp130 plays an essential role in the inhibition of STAT activation by PMA.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Role of the cytoplasmic part of gp130. A, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected as described under "Experimental Procedures" with expression vectors for the chimeric receptors depicted. B, cells were preincubated with PMA (10-7 M) for 45 min followed by stimulation with Epo (7 units/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT Activation by bFGF-- The FGF receptor as a receptor tyrosine kinase is known to activate the MAP kinase cascade upon FGF binding (18). To examine also whether this physiological stimulus leads to an inhibitory effect on STAT signaling, we studied NIH-3T3 cells which endogenously express FGF receptors. Upon stimulation with bFGF we detected Erk2 activation after 15 min which was transient and diminished after 30 min (Fig. 6A). Activation of JNKs and p38 was not observed (data not shown). Incubation of NIH-3T3 cells with bFGF or PMA prior to stimulation with IL-6/sgp80 resulted in an inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT activation (Fig. 6B). Also in the case of bFGF, the observed inhibition was sensitive to the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (Fig. 6C).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition of IL-6-induced STAT1 and STAT3 activation by bFGF. A, NIH-3T3 cells were stimulated with bFGF (10 ng/ml) for the times indicated. Whole cell lysates were prepared, 50 µg of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with anti-active MAP kinase Erk1/2 antibodies. B, cells were preincubated with PMA (10-7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min followed by an exposure to IL-6 (100 units/ml) and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. C, cells were preincubated with the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059 (10 µM) for 45 min and incubated with bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min followed by an exposure to IL-6 (100 units/ml) and sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

mRNA and Protein Synthesis Are Crucial for STAT Inhibition by PMA and bFGF-- In order to determine whether the inhibitory effect on STAT activation of PMA or bFGF necessitates de novo mRNA and protein synthesis we preincubated HepG2 and NIH-3T3 cells with actinomycin D or cycloheximide, inhibitors of mRNA or protein synthesis, respectively. Cells pretreated with actinomycin D (Fig. 7A) or cycloheximide (Fig. 7B) showed a partial reversal of the inhibitory PMA/bFGF effect indicating that this inhibitory mechanism is, at least in part, mediated by the expression of newly induced genes.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   mRNA synthesis is crucial for STAT inhibition by PMA and bFGF. A, HepG2 cells (upper panel) were pretreated with PMA (10-7 M) for 45 min followed by an IL-6 (100 units/ml) stimulus, respectively. NIH-3T3 cells (lower panel) were pretreated with PMA (10-7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml)) for 45 min followed by IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Actinomycin D (1 µg/ml) treatment for 45 min preceded PMA or bFGF incubation. B, HepG2 cells (upper panel) and NIH-3T3 cells (lower panel) were pretreated with PMA or bFGF and IL-6 or IL-6 plus sgp80 as described in A. Cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) treatment for 45 min preceded PMA or bFGF incubation. Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

PMA and bFGF Induce SOCS-3 Gene Expression-- Recently, it was reported that IL-6 stimulation results in the induction of SOCS-3 gene expression, a feedback inhibitor of the Jak/STAT pathway (11). In order to study whether SOCS-3 might play a role in the inhibition of IL-6 signaling by PMA and bFGF, Northern blot analyses were performed with RNA from NIH-3T3 cells stimulated with IL-6/sgp80, PMA, or bFGF for 45 min. As shown in Fig. 8A, not only IL-6/sgp80 but also PMA and bFGF induce the expression of SOCS-3 mRNA. No increase of SOCS-1 mRNA could be detected (data not shown). To analyze whether the SOCS-3 induction by PMA and bFGF is sensitive to inhibition of Erk activation we again made use of the MEK inhibitor PD98059. NIH-3T3 cells were pretreated with PD98059 for 45 min before stimulation with PMA or bFGF for an additional 45 min and Northern blot analyses were performed. The induction of SOCS-3 mRNA levels by PMA and bFGF was largely reversed upon pretreatment with the MEK inhibitor (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   SOCS-3 mRNA is rapidly up-regulated upon PMA and bFGF treatment. A, total RNA (15 µg/lane) isolated from NIH-3T3 cells stimulated with IL-6 (100 units/ml) plus sgp80 (0.5 µg/ml), PMA (10-7 M), and bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min was hybridized with the 32P-labeled cDNA probe for the murine SOCS-3 gene and the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a loading control. B, NIH-3T3 cells were preincubated with PD98059 (10 µM) for 45 min before stimulation with PMA (10-7 M) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) for 45 min. Northern blots were performed as described in A.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study presents a number of novel findings with respect to the molecular mechanism of PMA-induced and Erk-dependent down-regulation of the Jak/STAT pathway. First, a physiological activator of MAP kinases, namely bFGF, also results in a down-modulation of STAT activity. Second, transcription and translation are at least in part essential for the inhibition of the IL-6-induced STAT activation by PMA/bFGF. Third, both PMA and bFGF rapidly induce SOCS-3 mRNA expression in a MEK-dependent manner. And finally, the PMA-induced inhibition is dependent on Tyr-759 of the cytoplasmic part of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130.

Our findings strongly suggest that prestimulation of cells with activators of MAP kinases such as PMA or bFGF inhibits a subsequent STAT activation by IL-6 via the rapid induction of the negative feedback inhibitor SOCS-3. Such a model is consistent with the dependence of the inhibitory effect on de novo transcription and protein synthesis. It is, furthermore, supported by the fact that both, the inhibition of STAT activation and the induction of SOCS-3, are largely reversed by the action of the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059.

Recently, we could demonstrate in monocytic cells that activators of the MAP kinase p38, namely lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha , inhibit a subsequent STAT activation by IL-6 (33). This inhibition was also paralleled by a rapid SOCS-3 induction which in this case was sensitive to inhibition of p38. Interestingly, in rat hepatocytes and HepG2 cells tumor necrosis factor-alpha neither down-modulate STAT activation nor induce SOCS-3. Thus, in all experimental systems in which activation of MAP kinases resulted in an inhibition of the Jak/STAT pathway, SOCS-3 induction was observed. Although this is only a correlation, it strongly argues for a crucial role of SOCS-3 as a mediator of MAP kinase-dependent Jak/STAT inhibition. Final proof of our model would require the specific inhibition of SOCS-3 induction by antisense technology or gene knock-out. Unfortunately, SOCS-3 knock-out mice die at days 12-16 of embryonic development (34).

The murine SOCS-3 promotor has recently been cloned and a STAT1/3-binding site was identified and shown to be necessary for the induction of SOCS-3 by leukemia inhibitory factor (35). Our data (this study and Ref. 33) as well as recent results from other groups (36, 37) suggest also that binding sites for MAP kinase-activated transcription factors such as TCF and Elk-1 (38) must exist within the SOCS-3 regulatory region. Overexpression of c-Jun and c-Fos had no effect, suggesting that transcription factors different from AP-1 are involved in this induction.3 Since IL-6 does not only activate the Jak/STAT pathway but also the MAP kinase pathway our results further imply that induction of SOCS-3 mRNA expression by IL-6 is due to the synergistic effect of activated STATs and MAP kinase-dependent transcription factors. This could explain why IL-6 is a more potent inducer of SOCS-3 than PMA or bFGF which do not activate STATs (Fig. 8A). It should be pointed out that induction of SOCS-3 by PMA/bFGF is only incompletely inhibited by the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 indicating also that Erk1/2-independent pathways are involved in this induction.

Why does the inhibition of STAT activation by PMA depend on Tyr-759 of the cytoplasmic part of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130? Tyr-759 is one of the five tyrosine residues which have been demonstrated to act as recruitment sites for signaling molecules. Whereas STAT3 and STAT1 are recruited to phosphotyrosine residues with the consensus sequence YXXQ and YXPQ, respectively, the YSTV motif of Tyr-759 was described to bind the SH2 domain containing tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (4, 5). However, in our study the tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2, which is believed to increase its catalytic activity (39), is also inhibited by PMA making an involvement of SHP2 in our scenario unlikely. Schmitz et al. (40) recently demonstrated that Tyr-759 of gp130 is necessary for the inhibitory effect of overexpressed SOCS-3 on the STAT-responsive alpha 2-macroglobulin promoter in HepG2 cells. They could further show that SOCS-3 protein in vitro binds to a phosphorylated Tyr-759 containing peptide and that a recombinant SH2 domain of SOCS-3 interacts with this phosphopeptide (40). This strongly suggests that SOCS-3, whether overexpressed or induced by PMA/bFGF, exerts its inhibitory effect by binding to phosphorylated Tyr-759 of gp130. How SOCS-3 blocks the activity of Jak kinases and the phosphorylation of STATs remains unclear. SOCS-1 was found to bind to phosphorylated Tyr-1007 in the activation loop of Jak2 (41). The N-terminal located kinase inhibitory region of SOCS-1 also contributed to this binding and was essential for Jak2 kinase inhibitory activity. A similar mechanism was proposed for SOCS-3. However, compared with SOCS-1, the affinity of its SH2 domain for Jak2 is weaker whereas that of its kinase inhibitory region is stronger (42). Our model suggests that SOCS-3 can exert its inhibitory effect not only by binding directly to Jaks but also by binding to the receptor chain (Fig. 9). Future studies will address this question in detail.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Proposed mechanism of the PMA/bFGF-induced inhibition of the IL-6-induced STAT activation.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. S. Ludwig and U. Rapp (Würzburg) for kindly providing the expression plasmid for the constitutively active Raf mutant and helpful discussions and Drs. R. Starr and D. Hilton (Melbourne) for the generous supply of the SOCS-3 cDNA. We thank W. Frisch for excellent technical assistance, A. Martens and S. Thiel for helpful discussions, and Drs. I. Behrmann and G. Müller-Newen for critical reading of the manuscript. Additionally, we thank J. Wijdenes (Besancon) for kindly providing anti-gp130 antibodies.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| Recipient of a junior scientist award by the IZKF "Biomat."

Contributed equally to the results of this work.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut für Biochemie, Klinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany. Tel.: 49-241-80-88-837; Fax: 49-241-88-88-428; E-mail: gatsios@RWTH-Aachen.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M904148199

2 S. Thiel and L. Graeve, unpublished observation.

3 P. Gatsios, unpublished observation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Jak, Janus kinase; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; Epo, erythropoietin; Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; gp, glycoprotein; Grb2, growth factor receptor-bound protein 2; IL, interleukin; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PMA, phorbol 13-myristate 12-acetate; PVDF, polyvinyl difluoride; SIE, Sis-inducible element; sgp80, soluble interleukin-6 receptor gp80; SH2, Src homology 2; SHP2, SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; PIAS, protein inhibitors of activated STATs.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Heinrich, P. C., Behrmann, I., Müller-Newen, G., Schaper, F., and Graeve, L. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 297-314
2. Pellegrini, S., and Dusanter-Fourt, I. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 248, 615-633
3. Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1997) Science 277, 1630-1635
4. Stahl, N., Farruggella, T. J., Boulton, T. G., Zhong, Z., Darnell, J. E., Jr., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1995) Science 267, 1349-1353
5. Gerhartz, C., Heesel, B., Sasse, J., Hemmann, U., Landgraf, C., Schneider-Mergener, J., Horn, F., Heinrich, P. C., and Graeve, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12991-12998
6. Symes, A., Stahl, N., Reeves, S. A., Farruggella, T., Servidei, T., Gearan, T., Yancopoulos, G., and Fink, J. S. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 697-700
7. Schaper, F., Gendo, C., Eck, M., Schmitz, J., Grimm, C., Anhuf, D., Kerr, I. M., and Heinrich, P. C. (1998) Biochem. J. 335, 557-565
8. Fukada, T., Hibi, M., Yamanaka, Y., Takahashi-Tezuka, M., Fujitani, Y., Yamaguchi, T., Nakajima, K., and Hirano, T. (1996) Immunity 5, 449-460
9. Naka, T., Narazaki, M., Hirata, M., Matsumoto, T., Minamoto, S., Aono, A., Nishimoto, N., Kajita, T., Taga, T., Yoshizaki, K., Akira, S., and Kishimoto, T. (1997) Nature 387, 924-929
10. Endo, T. A., Masuhara, M., Yokouchi, M., Suzuki, R., Sakamoto, H., Mitsui, K., Matsumoto, A., Tanimura, S., Ohtsubo, M., Misawa, H., Miyazaki, T., Leonor, N., Taniguchi, T., Fujita, T., Kanakura, Y., Komiya, S., and Yoshimura, A. (1997) Nature 387, 921-924
11. Starr, R., Willson, T. A., Viney, E. M., Murray, L. J., Rayner, J. R., Jenkins, B. J., Gonda, T. J., Alexander, W. S., Metcalf, D., Nicola, N. A., and Hilton, D. J. (1997) Nature 387, 917-921
12. Chung, C. D., Liao, J., Liu, B., Rao, X., Jay, P., Berta, P., and Shuai, K. (1997) Science 278, 1803-1805
13. Liu, B., Liao, J., Rao, X., Kushner, S. A., Chung, C. D., Chang, D. D., and Shuai, K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10626-10631
14. Bright, J. J., and Sriram, S. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 1772-1777
15. Sengupta, T. K., Schmitt, E. M., and Ivashkiv, L. B. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9499-9504
16. Bhat, G. J., Abraham, S. T., and Baker, K. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22447-22452
17. Sengupta, T. K., Talbot, E. S., Scherle, P. A., and Ivashkiv, L. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11107-11112
18. Geer, v. d., P., Hunter, T., and Lindberg, R. A. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 251-337
19. Arcone, R., Pucci, P., Zappacosta, F., Fontaine, V., Malorni, A., Marino, G., and Ciliberto, G. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 541-547
20. Weiergräber, O., Hemmann, U., Kuster, A., Müller-Newen, G., Schneider, J., Rose-John, S., Kurschat, P., Brakenhoff, J. P., Hart, M. H., Stabel, S., and Heinrich, P. C. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 234, 661-669
21. Hoffmeyer, A., Grosse-Wilde, A., Flory, E., Neufeld, B., Kunz, M., Rapp, U. R., and Ludwig, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4319-4327
22. Andrews, N. C., and Faller, D. V. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499
23. Wagner, B. J., Hayes, T. E., Hoban, C. J., and Cochran, B. H. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 4477-4484
24. Wegenka, U. M., Buschmann, J., Lütticken, C., Heinrich, P. C., and Horn, F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 276-288
25. Wijdenes, J., Heinrich, P. C., Müller-Newen, G., Roche, C., Gu, Z. J., Clement, C., and Klein, B. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 3474-3481
26. Kordula, T., Rydel, R. E., Brigham, E. F., Horn, F., Heinrich, P. C., and Travis, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4112-4118
27. Gatsios, P., Haubeck, H. D., Van de Leur, E., Frisch, W., Apte, S. S., Greiling, H., Heinrich, P. C., and Graeve, L. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 241, 56-63
28. Müllberg, J., Schooltink, H., Stoyan, T., Günther, M., Graeve, L., Buse, G., Mackiewicz, A., Heinrich, P. C., and Rose-John, S. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 473-480
29. Mackiewicz, A., Schooltink, H., Heinrich, P. C., and Rose-John, S. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 2021-2027
30. Bode, J. G., Gatsios, P., Ludwig, S., Rapp, U., Häussinger, D., Heinrich, P. C., and Graeve, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30222-30227
31. Daum, G., Eisenmann-Tappe, I., Fries, H. W., Troppmair, J., and Rapp, U. R. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 474-480
32. Kim, H., Hawley, T. S., Hawley, R. G., and Baumann, H. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1525-1533
33. Bode, J. G., Nimmesgern, A., Schmitz, J., Schaper, F., Schmitt, M., Frisch, W., Häussinger, D., Heinrich, P. C., and Graeve, L. (1999) FEBS Lett. 463, 365-370
34. Marine, J. C., McKay, C., Wang, D., Topham, D. J., Parnagas, E., Nakajima, H., Pendeville, H., Yasukawa, H., Sasaki, A., Yoshimura, A., and Ihle, J. N. (1999) Cell 98, 617-627
35. Auernhammer, C. J., Bousquet, C., and Melmed, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 6964-6969
36. Stoiber, D., Kovarik, P., Cohney, S., Johnston, J. A., Steinlein, A., and Decker, T. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 2640-2647
37. Mao, Y., Ling, P. R., Fitzgibbons, T. P., McCowen, K. C., Frick, G. P., Bistrian, B. R., and Smith, R. J. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 5505-5515
38. Price, M. A., Rogers, A. E., and Treisman, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2589-2601
39. Vogel, W., Lammers, R., Huang, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Science 259, 1611-1614
40. Schmitz, J., Weissenbach, M., Haan, S., Heinrich, P. C., and Schaper, F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12848-12856
41. Yasukawa, H., Misawa, H., Sakamoto, H., Masuhara, M., Sasaki, A., Wakioka, T., Ohtsuka, S., Imaizumi, T., Matsuda, T., Ihle, J. N., and Yoshimura, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1309-1320
42. Sasaki, A., Yasukawa, H., Suzuki, A., Kamizono, S., Syoda, T., Kinjyo, I., Sasaki, M., Johnston, J. A., and Yoshimura, A. (1999) Genes Cells 4, 339-351


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Tanaka, N. Tanaka, Y. Saeki, K. Tanaka, M. Murakami, T. Hirano, N. Ishii, and K. Sugamura
c-Cbl-Dependent Monoubiquitination and Lysosomal Degradation of gp130
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2008; 28(15): 4805 - 4818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. X. Andersson, V. R. Sopasakis, E. Wallerstedt, and U. Smith
Insulin Antagonizes Interleukin-6 Signaling and Is Anti-inflammatory in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9430 - 9435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. McWhinnie, D. V. Pechkovsky, D. Zhou, D. Lane, A. J. Halayko, D. A. Knight, and T. R. Bai
Endothelin-1 induces hypertrophy and inhibits apoptosis in human airway smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L278 - L286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. Hu and J. Nicholas
Signal Transduction by Human Herpesvirus 8 Viral Interleukin-6 (vIL-6) Is Modulated by the Nonsignaling gp80 Subunit of the IL-6 Receptor Complex and Is Distinct from Signaling Induced by Human IL-6
J. Virol., November 1, 2006; 80(21): 10874 - 10878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Stross, S. Radtke, T. Clahsen, C. Gerlach, R. Volkmer-Engert, F. Schaper, P. C. Heinrich, and H. M. Hermanns
Oncostatin M Receptor-mediated Signal Transduction Is Negatively Regulated by SOCS3 through a Receptor Tyrosine-independent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8458 - 8468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Park, J.-M. Luo, S. Hisheh, A. R. Harvey, and Q. Cui
Cellular Mechanisms Associated with Spontaneous and Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor-cAMP-Induced Survival and Axonal Regeneration of Adult Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2004; 24(48): 10806 - 10815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Gomez-Guerrero, O. Lopez-Franco, G. Sanjuan, P. Hernandez-Vargas, Y. Suzuki, G. Ortiz-Munoz, J. Blanco, and J. Egido
Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Regulate Fc Receptor Signaling and Cell Activation during Immune Renal Injury
J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 6969 - 6977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
N. Higashi, H. Kunimoto, S. Kaneko, T. Sasaki, M. Ishii, H. Kojima, and K. Nakajima
Cytoplasmic c-Fos induced by the YXXQ-derived STAT3 signal requires the co-operative MEK/ERK signal for its nuclear translocation
Genes Cells, March 1, 2004; 9(3): 233 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Yamada, D. Zhu, K. Zhang, and A. Saxon
Inhibition of Interleukin-4-induced Class Switch Recombination by a Human Immunoglobulin Fc{gamma}-Fc{epsilon} Chimeric Protein
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 32818 - 32824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. J. M. Ceponis, D. M. McKay, R. J. Menaker, E. Galindo-Mata, and N. L. Jones
Helicobacter pylori Infection Interferes with Epithelial Stat6-Mediated Interleukin-4 Signal Transduction Independent of cagA, cagE, or VacA
J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 2035 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Mahboubi, N. C. Kirkiles-Smith, J. Karras, and J. S. Pober
Desensitization of Signaling by Oncostatin M in Human Vascular Cells Involves Cytoplasmic Tyr Residue 759 in gp130 but Is Not Mediated by Either Src Homology 2 Domain-containing Tyrosine Phosphatase 2 or Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 25014 - 25023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. J.