Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000193200 on April 10, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18818-18823, June 23, 2000
Ligand Binding and Structural Properties of Segments of
GABAA Receptor
1 Subunit Overexpressed in
Escherichia coli*
Jun
Hang,
Haifeng
Shi,
Dongyang
Li,
Yinglei
Liao,
Dejun
Lian,
Yazhong
Xiao, and
Hong
Xue
From the Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong
Received for publication, January 11, 2000, and in revised form, April 4, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The
-aminobutyric acid, type A
(GABAA), receptor is the target for numerous
therapeutic compounds. In the present study, the
Gln28-Leu296,
Gln28-Arg276,
Gln28-Arg248, and
Gln28-Glu165 (numbering of bovine precursor
protein) segments of its
1 subunit were overexpressed in
Escherichia coli, along with
Cys166-Leu296 produced previously, for
structural analysis by circular dichroism and ligand binding studies by
fluorescence spectroscopy. Results showed that the protein segments
were rich in
-sheet structures. Binding of the fluorescent
benzodiazepine Bodipy-FL Ro-1986 was evident from fluorescence
resonance energy transfer and fluorescence anisotropy measurements. The
binding affinity was in the micromolar range. The binding was
attributable more to Cys166-Leu296 than to
Gln28-Glu165 and was inhibited by known
central benzodiazepine site ligands. Three point mutations, Y187A,
T234A, and Y237A, were found to perturb protein secondary structures.
Studies with the single Trp mutants W198Y and W273Y indicated that
Trp273 was closer to the binding site than
Trp198.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
-Aminobutyric acid
(GABA)1 is the major
inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. The type A
receptors of GABA (GABAA receptors) (1) are fast acting,
ligand-gated chloride ion channels, which are believed to adopt a
pentameric structure (2) with the regulated ion channel formed along
the vertical axis of subunit interfaces. Since the cloning of the first
two subunits,
1 and
1, in 1987 (3), as
many as 18 different subunits have been identified (4). Of the myriad
number of GABAA receptor isoforms possible,
1
2
2 is believed to
represent the major adult isoform (5).
GABAA receptors serve as the targets of many important
neuroactive drugs (6-8), and substantial effort has been made to
understand the structure of BZ-binding site (9). Evidence from
site-directed mutagenesis, photoaffinity labeling, and pharmacological
studies collectively suggest that
and
subunits contribute to
the BZ-binding site (10-14). A majority of the amino acid residues
suggested to be essential for BZ binding are located on the
1 subunit and include such residues as
His101, Tyr159, Thr206, and
Tyr209 (numbering of rat mature protein) (9, 14-18). These
studies therefore pointed to a key role for the
1
subunit in determining the binding properties of various BZ ligands to
the GABAA receptor.
To date, several systems have been utilized to express recombinant
GABAA receptors. Radioactive ligand binding studies have been performed with cell lines, and electrophysiological studies have
been done in cell lines and in Xenopus laevis oocytes
(19-22). However, these systems could not provide adequate amounts of
protein for structural characterization. Without structural
information, it would be difficult to ascertain whether a deleterious
mutation might act directly to alter an active site residue or
indirectly through disruption of protein conformation. To overcome this
shortcoming and allow insight into the structure and function
relationship of GABAA receptors, a high expression system
is of urgent importance.
Previously, we have reported the overexpression of the
Cys166-Leu296 segment of GABAA
receptor
1 subunit and the delineation of a structural
domain within the segment (23, 24). Segment
Cys166-Leu296 has been demonstrated to be able
to form stable secondary structures (23) and rosette-like quaternary
structures (25). In the present study the properties of
Cys166-Leu296 along with the
Gln28-Arg248,
Gln28-Arg276,
Gln28-Leu296, and
Gln28-Glu165 polypeptides were characterized
with respect to ligand binding and protein folding. Site-directed
mutagenesis was applied to the three residues Tyr187,
Thr234, and Tyr237 (numbering of bovine
precursor protein), previously identified to be important for ligand
binding (16, 17, 18), and to the two Trp residues Trp198
and Trp273 in order to gain insight into the
structure-function relationships of BZ binding.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The cDNA clone, pCDM8-b
1,
encoding bovine
1 subunit was a gift from Dr. A. N. Bateson of the University of Alberta. The plasmid pTrcHis was purchased
from Invitrogen; diazepam and estazolam were from Wuhan Pharmaceutical
Co., China; GABA and muscimol were from Sigma; and the fluorescent BZ
ligand Bodipy-FL Ro-1986 (BFR) was from Molecular Probes, Inc. Ethyl
ester of
-carboline-3-carboxylate (
-CCE) was a gift from Prof.
Richard W. Olsen of UCLA.
Construction of Expression Plasmids and Mutagenesis--
All
subcloning and mutagenesis were performed with the PCR-based
Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) with slight modifications in which Pfu DNA polymerase was used instead,
and DpnI treatment was replaced by gel purification of
linear PCR products. A 2.3-kilobase pair DNA containing the full-length
cDNA (GenBankTM accession number X05717) encoding the
mature peptide (Gln28-Gln456) of bovine
GABAA receptor
1 subunit was subcloned from
pCDM8-b
1 to pTrcHis for expression after removal of the
upstream vector sequence excepting the mini-cistron with a pair of PCR
primers (P1 and P2 in Table I). Based on
this initial subclone more deletional and substitutional mutants were
made using PCR primers designated in Table I. Silent base substitutions
were incorporated into the primers (Table I) to optimize codon usage
and introduce termination codons as appropriate. All insert sequences
were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Expression and Purification--
Freshly transformed
Escherichia coli cells of NovaBlue strain (Novagen, Inc.,
Madison, WI) were stored in 10% Me2SO aliquots at
80 °C. After induction of the growing culture with 0.4 mM isopropyl-
-thiogalactoside for 6 h (23), the
cells were harvested and washed once with 200 ml of solution A (50 mM Tris·Cl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.5), lysed in 100 ml of solution B (50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA,
pH 8.5, 250 µg/ml lysozyme) at 37 °C for 30 min, diluted with 100 ml of solution C (50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA,
pH 8.5), homogenized with an Ultra-Turrax T25 homogenizer (Janke & Kunkel IKA-Labortechnik, Germany), and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The pellet was resuspended in 100 ml of solution D (2% deoxycholic acid, 50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA,
pH 8.5), re-homogenized, collected at 9,500 rpm × 30 min, washed
with 100 ml of solution E (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 8.5), and
centrifuged at 9,500 rpm for 20 min. The resultant pellet was
resuspended in 4 M urea (10 ml per g of pellet) prior to
centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min and washed in 100 ml of
solution E. The pellet was solubilized in 2% SDS, 0.1 M
-mercaptoethanol, pH 12, and subjected to gel filtration on a
Superdex 200 HR 26/60 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The sample
was eluted using a refolding buffer, containing 250 mM Arg,
100 mM Tris, and 1 mM EDTA, with 0.3 mM L-cystine and 3 mM
L-cysteine added just before use, at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min. The pooled fractions were dialyzed against 10 mM
Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, for 3 days, with three buffer changes per day.
Protein Identification and Quantification--
Protein
concentrations were determined photometrically (26). The molecular
weight and purity of proteins were estimated using 15% SDS-PAGE. The
identities of recombinant proteins were confirmed by N-terminal amino
acid sequencing. Mass spectroscopic analyses were provided by Molecular
Biology Resource Facility, University of Oklahoma Health Science
Center, and N-terminal protein sequencing was by the Protein Service
Laboratory, University of British Columbia.
CD Measurements--
All CD spectra were obtained using a JUSCO
J-720 spectropolarimeter at room temperature with a 0.1-cm path length
cuvette for far-UV CD or 1-cm for near-UV CD. The protein samples were 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, for far-UV and 1 mg/ml for near-UV CD. Secondary structure contents were estimated from
far-UV CD (27).
Fluorescence Measurements--
All fluorescence measurements
were performed at room temperature using a Perkin-Elmer model LS50B
luminescence spectrometer. A stock of 1.65 mM BFR in
Me2SO at
20 °C was diluted into buffer just before use.
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)--
Protein
solutions were mixed with 0.41 µM BFR in the cuvette, and
450-550 nm emission spectra at 5-nm slit were obtained at 280, 295, 340, or 490 nm excitation and 2.5-nm slit width. Light at 280 nm
excited both BFR and protein intrinsic fluorophores, whereas light at
340 nm excited only BFR. This was utilized to correct for errors in BFR
concentration and interference from protein scattering on fluorescence
intensity. For this purpose, two sets of emission spectra, one with
excitation wavelength of 280 nm and the other of 340 nm, were recorded
in parallel. The ratio of respective fluorescence intensities,
INT280/INT340, was used as an index of FRET;
this was replaced by INT295/INT340 in the case
of single Trp mutants.
Fluorescence Anisotropy (FA) and Equilibrium Dissociation
Constant (Kd)--
FA was measured at an excitation wavelength
of 490 nm with a 10-nm slit and an emission wavelength of 511 nm with a
10-nm slit. For saturation experiments, 0.165 µM BFR in
10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, was titrated with protein. At such
a low BFR concentration, FA would be proportional to the concentration
of ligand-receptor complex. Therefore, the fraction of bound ligand
present at each titration point could be estimated from change in FA
(
A) as a function of protein concentration after
correction for fluorescence intensity difference between free and bound
ligands (28) and was employed to calculate Kd. The
maximal FA increase (
Amax) estimated from a
nonlinear least square fitting of the saturation curve to a single-site
binding model was Scatchard plotted as [bound]/[free] = [bound]/([protein]
[bound]) versus [bound] = [BFR]total ×
A/
Amax to yield the
Kd of ligand-receptor complex, where bound or free
refers to fraction of receptor bound to ligand or free of ligand. For
competitive inhibition assay, 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, containing 0.165 µM BFR and 10 µM
Cys166-Leu296 was titrated in turn with
-CCE, estazolam, diazepam, GABA, or muscimol solution amounting to
less than 4% volume of the assay mixture and monitored by FA measurements.
Fluorescence Quenching (FQ)--
To measure FQ by BFR, single
Trp mutant proteins of 1.5 µM in 10 mM
Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, was titrated with 1.65 mM BFR. The
emission intensity at 342 nm with 7-nm slit was recorded at 295 nm
excitation with 5-nm slit. The ratio of the initial fluorescence
intensity versus the intensity at each titration point was
plotted against the quencher concentration (29).
 |
RESULTS |
Expression, Purification, and Identification--
All subclones of
GABAA receptor
1 subunit segments were
successfully expressed. Under the current purification protocol, about
10 mg of purified product was obtained per liter of culture. The high
level expression and the purity of the recovered recombinant proteins
are demonstrated in Fig. 1.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
SDS-PAGE analysis of the recombinant
GABAA receptor segments. Receptor proteins were
purified as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane
1, molecular mass standards; lane 2, total cell lysates
of E. coli expressing the segment
Gln28-Leu296; lane 3, pellet of the
total cell lysates shown in lane 2; lanes 4-8,
purified segments Gln28-Leu296,
Gln28-Arg276,
Gln28-Arg248,
Gln28-Glu165, and
Cys166-Leu296, respectively.
|
|
Secondary Structure and Tertiary Packing--
Secondary structure
contents of recombinant receptor segments estimated from far-UV CD
spectra are presented in Table II. The
ratio
/
, the content of
-strand relative to
-helix, was calculated for Cys166-Leu296, and its point
mutation variants were calculated for comparison. All the polypeptides
formed not only stable
-rich secondary structure (Fig.
2A) but also ordered tertiary
packing as evident from their near-UV CD spectra. As illustrated in
Fig. 2B, the CD spectrum of
Gln28-Leu296 showed distinct signals around
270-295 nm characteristic of proteins with well packed aromatic side
chains.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Representative CD spectra of receptor
segments. A, far-UV spectra of
Gln28-Arg248 and
Gln28-Leu296. B, near-UV spectrum
of Gln28-Leu296. C, far-UV spectra
of Ala substitution mutants and the wild-type
Cys166-Leu296. D, far-UV spectra of
single Trp mutants of Cys166-Leu296 along with
that of the wild type.
|
|
Fluorescent Ligand Binding--
The five overexpressed
polypeptides, namely Gln28-Arg248,
Gln28-Arg276,
Gln28-Leu296,
Gln28-Glu165, and
Cys166-Leu296, were active in binding the
fluorescent BZ ligand BFR. Analysis of the variation of FA of BFR with
protein concentrations yielded the binding constants
Kd for the five segments, which range from 1.96 to
9.97 µM (Fig. 3B
and Table II). Cys166-Leu296, the shortest
segment among the five, was selected for further analysis.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
BFR binding by
Cys166-Leu296 and its mutants as measured by
FRET and FA. A and B, analysis of
Cys166-Leu296 and the three putative
binding-site mutants. Closed circles,
Cys166-Leu296; open circles, Y187A;
closed squares, T234A; open squares, Y237A;
closed triangles, Cys166-Leu296
with the fluorescence dye Bodipy-FL replacing BFR. The saturation
curves of FRET in A were each obtained as the line of
sigmoidal (Boltzman) fit of the data. Excitation was carried out at 280 or 340 nm. INT280 = maximal fluorescence intensity of BFR
excited at 280 nm. INT340 = maximal fluorescence intensity
of BFR excited at 340 nm. For the saturation curves of FA and Scatchard
transformations (inset B), excitation and
emission were at 490 and 511 nm, respectively. C and
D show the analysis of the two single Trp mutants.
Closed circles, W198Y; open circles, W273Y. For
the saturation curves of FRET in C, INT295 = maximal fluorescence intensity of BFR excited at 295 nm. For the
saturation curves of FA and Scatchard transformations (inset
in D), excitation and emission were at 490 and 511 nm,
respectively.
|
|
Quenching of Ligand Fluorescence by Receptor--
When BFR was
excited at 490 nm, the
max of its excitation spectrum
and where no protein absorption occurred, its emission intensity was
diminished by the addition of receptor protein (Fig. 4A). In addition, a red shift
of the emission spectrum became evident. In comparison, no significant
changes in BFR fluorescence emission were observed with the addition of
the same concentration of lysozyme (14.30 kDa), which has a molecular
weight similar to that of Cys166-Leu296 (14.83 kDa). Therefore the quenching caused by the receptor protein was not
nonspecific protein effects.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Changes in BFR emission upon protein
titration. A, red-shift in max and
decrease in intensity. Emission spectra of BFR (0.41 µM)
excited at 490 nm in the absence (solid line) or presence of
10 µM Cys166-Leu296
(dashed line) or 10 µM lysozyme (dotted
line). B, FRET from protein to BFR. Emission of BFR
(0.41 µM) increasingly enhanced by increasing
concentrations of Cys166-Leu296 (0, 0.657, 1.970, 3.284, 4.925, and 6.567 µM, from the
bottom to the top). Excitation was at 280 nm.
AFU, arbitrary fluorescence unit.
|
|
FRET from Receptor to Ligand--
In contrast to the quenching
observed with 490 nm excitation, the fluorescence intensity of
BFR increased upon addition of receptor protein in a
concentration-dependent manner when the excitation
wavelength was set at 280 nm to excite both ligand fluorescence and
intrinsic protein Trp fluorescence (Fig. 4B). The phenomenon
indicates that the energy released from protein fluorescence emission
was transferred to the ligand. The hyperbolic increase of FRET index
with protein concentration is shown in Fig. 3A.
Competitive Inhibition--
To assess whether the binding of BFR
to the receptor segment bore any resemblance to ligand binding to the
BZ-binding site in the central nervous system, the effects of competing
ligands were examined. The known high affinity central BZ site ligand
-CCE exerted a strong inhibitory effect on
A in the FA
binding assay. Diazepam and estazolam, two BZ ligands with affinities lower than
-CCE, caused moderate inhibition, and the two non-BZ site
ligands muscimol and GABA caused only very minor inhibition (Fig.
5).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of BFR binding to
Cys166-Leu296 by competing compounds. The
solid curves represent nonlinear least squares fit of the
data. Results are recorded as percentage of BFR binding to
Cys166-Leu296 in the presence of -CCE
(closed squares), diazepam (closed circles),
estazolam (open squares), GABA (open circles), or
muscimol (closed triangles).
|
|
Point Mutations--
Five point mutations were made on segment
Cys166-Leu296 at three putative binding-site
residues, Tyr187, Thr234, and
Tyr237, and the two Trp residues, Trp198 and
Trp273. Their effects on protein secondary structures were
examined with far-UV CD (Fig. 2, C and D; Table
II). Secondary structure content and the
/
ratio of each of the
five-point mutants were compared with that of
Cys166-Leu296 through statistical analyses by
Student's t test for significance. Significant changes from
the wild-type parameters (p < 0.05) are shown in bold
face in Table II.
Compared with wild-type Cys166-Leu296, the
Y187A mutant showed an increase in
-sheets (p = 0.0197), a decrease in
-helix (p = 0.0091), and
hence increased
/
ratio (p = 0.0087). This
suggests that Tyr187 in the wild-type
Cys166-Leu296 probably contributed to the
maintenance of an
-helical structure that was likely converted into
a more extended structure upon Ala substitution of the residue. T234A
showed a decrease in
-sheets (p = 0.0068), an
increase in
-helix (p = 0.0074), and a decreased
/
ratio (p = 0.0031), suggesting the possibility
that Thr234 was involved in maintaining a
-stranded
structure. Among the three "binding site" mutants, Y237A gave rise
to the least change in secondary structures, which was mainly shown as
a slight increase in the content of "Others" (p = 0.0089). The changes in
-helix and
-sheet contents caused by the
two single Trp mutants were both insignificant (Fig. 2D and
Table II). Nevertheless, it was noticeable that W273Y mutation reduced
the content of
-turn (p = 0.0073), which could be
the consequence of the disruption of a
-turn structure in
Cys166-Leu296 involving
Trp273.
The three mutants Y187A, T234A and Y237A retained both Trp residues but
exhibited a reduced FRET (Fig. 3A). They also bound BFR more
weakly. Their Kd values calculated from FA were 13.83, 8.38, and 10.27 µM, respectively (Fig.
3B and Table II). Compared with 4.85 µM for
the wild-type Cys166-Leu296, these mutants
caused statistically significant 2-3-fold reductions in binding affinity.
The two single Trp mutants W198Y and W273Y diminished in FRET values,
as the consequence of the removal of one of the intrinsic fluorophores.
However, their BFR binding Kd values of 5.97 and
4.77 µM obtained from FA were both not significantly different from that of Cys166-Leu296 judging
from the t test (Fig. 3D and Table II). The FRET
was stronger for the W198Y mutant, which retained Trp273,
than the W273Y mutant, which retained Trp198 instead (Fig.
3C), indicating that Trp273 was situated closer
to the BZ-binding site than Trp198.
The relative accessibility of the two Trp residues in
Cys166-Leu296 by the ligand was also evaluated
by quenching of Trp fluorescence by BFR. Addition of BFR caused
decreases in protein intrinsic Trp fluorescence in both mutants (Fig.
6). However, the fluorescence of
Trp273 in the W198Y mutant was more severely quenched by
BFR than that of Trp198 in W273Y, indicating that
Trp273 was more accessible to the ligand than
Trp198, in agreement with the FRET results.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Stern-Volmer plot for ligand quenching of
intrinsic Trp fluorescence. The emission was scanned from 300 to
400 nm with the excitation wavelength set at 295 nm.
F0 = fluorescence intensity at 342 nm in the
absence of BFR; F = fluorescence intensity at 342 nm in
the presence of BFR at the indicated concentration. Closed
circles, W198Y; open circles, W273Y.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The overexpression of the Cys166-Leu296
segment of GABAA receptor
1 subunit was
previously found to generate a protein domain with stable folding and
rich in
-structures (23, 24). In the present study the three
overlapping long segments obtained so far containing an extension to
the N terminus, namely Gln28-Arg248,
Gln28-Arg276, and
Gln28-Leu296, also were all rich in
-strands, ranging from 45.7 to 51.9% (Table II). Segment
Gln28-Arg248 would comprise the entire
putative extracellular domain except for two amino acids,
Gln28-Arg276 additionally almost the entire
first transmembrane region, and Gln28-Leu296
additionally almost the entire second transmembrane region (3). Since
the three segments were identical at the N terminus portion up to
Arg248, their differences in secondary structure contents
resulted from differences at the C terminus portion. Dividing the
longest protein Gln28-Leu296 into two gave
rise to the shorter Gln28-Glu165 and
Cys166-Leu296. The latter was more enriched
than the former in
-strands, whereas the former contained more
-helix. These results were consistent with the secondary structure
predictions reported earlier (24). The higher
-helical content of
Gln28-Arg276 than
Gln28-Leu296 suggests that residues
Glu277-Leu296, a part of the putative second
transmembrane region, did not form an
-helical structure within
segment Gln28-Leu296. However, it is not ruled
out that these residues could participate in an
-helix within the
full-length receptor.
In this regard, these GABAA
1 N terminus
segments resemble the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the prototype
of the fast-acting ligand-gated ion channel receptor superfamily (30).
The N-terminal extracellular domain of the Torpedo nicotinic
acetylcholine receptor
-subunit, approximately equivalent to
Gln28-Arg248 of GABAA receptor
1 subunit, was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells (31), and E. coli
(32), respectively. It was also
-rich, containing 51%
-sheet
(31) or 45%
-stranded structures (32), levels that were comparable with the 51.9%
-strand content of
Gln28-Arg248 recorded in Table II.
Accordingly, a
-rich extracellular N terminus portion might
represent a general occurrence among this superfamily of ligand-gated
ion channel receptors.
Fluorescent ligand binding assays (33, 34) were particularly
advantageous for recombinant GABAA receptors. They offer sensitivities comparable to that of radio-ligand assays, and
fluorescent BZ derivatives such as BFR exhibit high affinity and
selectivity for the GABAA receptor (35-37). Unlike
radio-ligand assays, fluorescence measurements do not require a
separation of the bound and free forms of ligand and thus make possible
the analysis of even relatively weak receptor-ligand interactions by
means of homogenous phase assays such as FRET and FA. Furthermore,
measurements such as FRET could provide structural insight into the
ligand-binding site.
Several lines of evidence supported a specific binding of BFR to the
purified GABAA
1 receptor
Cys166-Leu296 segment. First, the emission of
BFR was changed in both intensity and
max by addition of
the segment but not by the control protein lysozyme (Fig. 4). Second,
the change in BFR fluorescence was dependent on protein concentration
and was saturable (Fig. 3). Third, the inhibition of BFR binding
exerted by potential competitors (Fig. 6) was strongest with
-CCE, a
GABAA receptor reverse agonist selective for BZ type I
receptors, Ki 0.3 nM (14), more modest
with ligands with lower BZ affinities, namely diazepam (Ki 16.1 nM) (14) and estazolam
(Ki 17.0 nM) (38), and minimal with the
non-BZ ligands muscimol and GABA. These experimental results suggested
that the observed BZ ligand binding to
Cys166-Leu296 is likely to be biologically relevant.
It is noteworthy, however, that the Kd displayed by
the various receptor segments for BFR in the micromolar range (Table
II) were considerably higher than those reported for native GABAA receptors in the nanomolar range. This points to the
existence of specific binding sites with only low affinity in these
recombinant proteins. Previous studies have shown that co-expression of
combinations of
,
, and
subunits was required to produce
GABAA receptors with pharmacological properties resembling
that of native receptors (14) and suggested that the BZ-binding site
was located at the interface of
1 and
2
subunits (6, 9). Therefore, the low affinity BFR binding displayed by
the purified GABAA
1 subunit segments could
be the consequence of the lack of contributions not only from the rest
of the
1 subunit but also from the
2 subunit.
Since the homo-oligomeric GABAA receptors formed by
subunits were found not to be modulated by BZ (14), it was somewhat unexpected that a segment of
1 subunit alone could bind
specifically a BZ ligand. A possible explanation could be that the weak
interaction between BZ ligand and
1 subunit would be
difficult to detect by heterogeneous phase assays that require a
separation of the bound and free ligand. The FRET and FA assays
employed in the present study, because they do not require such
separation, are intrinsically more sensitive for the detection of
weaker receptor-ligand interactions. Both FRET and FA involve
homogeneous assay systems and are ideal with purified proteins but not
membranous preparations of receptors. This is especially true with FA,
which is a relatively insensitive method and requires high receptor
expression and high membrane volume per well of assay so that FA is not
a method of choice for homomeric GABAA receptors that
express only poorly.
The finding that the 131-residue Cys166-Leu296
was more active than its immediate N-terminal neighbor
Gln28-Glu165 in BZ ligand binding was
consistent with previous reports on the residues important for BZ
modulation. Except for His101, all such reported residues
were located within the Cys166-Leu296 segment,
including the residues Tyr159, Tyr161,
Thr162, Gly200, Ser204,
Thr206, Tyr209, and Val211
(numbering of rat mature protein) (16-18, 39-41). Three of these residues, Tyr159/Tyr187,
Thr206/Thr234, and
Tyr209/Tyr237 in
1 subunit
(numbering of rat mature/bovine precursor polypeptides), proposed to be
involved in receptor-BZ interaction are also homologous to residues in
subunits believed to be responsible for receptor-GABA interaction.
In view of this, Cys166-Leu296 was mutated at
these three residues in order to evaluate their individual
contributions to protein structure and BFR binding. The three mutations
caused varying degrees of secondary structure alterations (Fig.
2C and Table II) and decrease in FRET (Fig. 3A)
in addition to 2-3-fold reduction in the binding affinity as measured
by the dissociation constant (Table II). Although the extent of
decrease in binding affinity caused by the three-point mutations
deviated from previous reports by others (16-18) using different
experimental systems, the simultaneous changes in secondary structure
and in ligand binding affinity caused by the three mutations suggest
that the functional effects of mutations at these residues (14, 16-18)
could be mediated at least in part by structural effects of these
residues on the receptor. This possibility is also highlighted by the
fact that these residues are conserved in both
and
subunits,
even though
subunits are believed not to be involved in BZ binding
(14).
The fluorescence of BFR was reduced and red-shifted in the presence of
Cys166-Leu296 (Fig. 4). This suggests that the
BZ-binding site on this polypeptide was relatively polar in
microenvironment or surrounded by fluorescence-quenching element(s).
The two Trp residues in Cys166-Leu296 were
both non-essential to BFR binding (Fig. 3D and Table II). The FRET measurements indicated that Trp273 was located
closer to the BFR-binding site than Trp198, and this was
further supported by FQ experiments, in which Trp273 was
found to be more accessible to interaction with BFR than Trp198 (Fig. 6).
In conclusion, the lack of an abundant supply of recombinant proteins
has for many years limited the structure-function characterization of
the GABAA receptor. The present study shows that
overexpression of segments of the receptor makes possible experimental
analysis that could contribute usefully to a deeper understanding of
GABAA receptor. The ready availability of these fragments
has also permitted the initiation in our laboratory of their
crystallization trials aimed toward a three-dimensional structural
analysis of the receptor.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Professors R. Wayne Davies and J. Tze-Fei Wong for helpful discussions and Dr. David Miller-Martini for
critical reading of the manuscript. Prof. R. W. Olsen and Dr.
A. N. Bateson are sincerely acknowledged for generous supplies of
-CCE and bovine GABAA receptor
1 subunit
cDNA clone, respectively. Technical assistance from Hui Zheng,
Peggy Lee, and Ruiai Chu is acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Research Grant Council of
Hong Kong.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 852-23588707;
Fax: 852-23581552; E-mail: hxue@ust.hk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000193200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
GABAA,
-aminobutyric acid, type
A;
BZ, benzodiazepine;
BFR, Bodipy-FL Ro-1986;
FQ, fluorescence
quenching;
FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer;
FA, fluorescence anisotropy;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
-CCE, ethyl ester of
-carboline-3-carboxylate;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Macdonald, R. L.,
and Olsen, R. W.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
17,
569-602
|
| 2.
|
Nayeem, N.,
Green, T. P.,
Martin, I. L.,
and Barnard, E. A.
(1994)
J. Neurochem.
62,
815-818
|
| 3.
|
Schofield, P. R.,
Darlison, M. G.,
Fujita, N.,
Burt, D. R.,
Stephenson, F. A.,
Rodriguez, H.,
Rhee, L. M.,
Ramachandran, J.,
Reale, V.,
Glencorse, T. A.,
Seeberg, P. H.,
and Barnard, E. A.
(1987)
Nature
328,
221-227
|
| 4.
|
Mehta, A. K.,
and Ticku, M. K.
(1999)
Brain Res. Rev.
29,
196-217
|
| 5.
|
McKernan, R. M.,
and Whiting, P. J.
(1996)
Trends Neurosci.
19,
139-143
|
| 6.
|
Stephenson, F. A.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
310,
1-9
|
| 7.
|
Gupta, S. P.
(1995)
Prog. Drug Res.
45,
67-106
|
| 8.
|
Costa, E.,
and Guidotti, A.
(1996)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
17,
192-200
|
| 9.
|
Sigel, E.,
and Buhr, A.
(1997)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
18,
425-429
|
| 10.
|
Buhr, A.,
and Sigel, E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8824-8829
|
| 11.
|
Buhr, A.,
Baur, R.,
and Sigel, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11799-11804
|
| 12.
|
Stephenson, F. A.,
Duggan, M. J.,
and Pollard, S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
21160-21165
|
| 13.
|
Günther, U.,
Benson, J.,
Benke, D.,
Fritschy, J. M.,
Reyes, G.,
Knoflach, F.,
Crestani, F.,
Aguzzi, A.,
Arigoni, M.,
Lang, Y.,
Bluethmann, H.,
Mohler, H.,
and Lüscher, B.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7749-7753
|
| 14.
|
Sieghart, W.
(1995)
Pharmacol. Rev.
47,
181-234
|
| 15.
|
Wieland, H. A.,
Lüddens, H.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1426-1429
|
| 16.
|
Buhr, A.,
Schaerer, M. T.,
Baur, R.,
and Sigel, E.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
676-682
|
| 17.
|
Buhr, A.,
Baur, R.,
Malherbe, P.,
and Sigel, E.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
49,
1080-1084
|
| 18.
|
Amin, J.,
Brooks-Kayal, A.,
and Weiss, D. S.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
833-841
|
| 19.
|
Levitan, E. S.,
Schofield, P. R.,
Burt, D. R.,
Rhee, L. M.,
Wisden, W.,
Kohler, M.,
Fujita, N.,
Rodriguez, H. F.,
Stephenson, A.,
Darlison, M. G.,
Barnard, E. A.,
and Seeberg, P. H.
(1988)
Nature
335,
76-79
|
| 20.
|
Pritchett, D. B.,
Lüddens, H.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1989)
Science
245,
1389-1392
|
| 21.
|
Hadingham, K. L.,
Harkness, P. C.,
McKernan, R. M.,
Quirk, K.,
Le Bourdelles, B.,
Horne, A. L.,
Kemp, J. A.,
Barnard, E. A.,
Ragan, C. I.,
and Whiting, P. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6378-6382
|
| 22.
|
Carter, D. B.,
Thomsen, D. R.,
Im, W. B.,
Lennon, D. J.,
Ngo, D. M.,
Gale, W.,
Im, H. K.,
Seeberg, P. H.,
and Smith, M. W.
(1992)
Bio/Technology
10,
679-681
|
| 23.
|
Xue, H.,
Chu, R.,
Hang, J.,
Lee, P.,
and Zheng, H.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
216-219
|
| 24.
|
Xue, H.,
Hang, J.,
Chu, R.,
Xiao, Y.,
Li, H.,
Lee, P.,
and Zheng, H.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
55-61
|
| 25.
|
Xue, H.,
Zheng, H.,
Li, H.,
Kitmitto, A.,
Zhu, H.,
Lee, P.,
and Holzenburg, A.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
739-742
|
| 26.
|
Gill, S. C.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
182,
319-326
|
| 27.
|
Sreerama, N.,
and Woody, R. W.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
242,
497-507
|
| 28.
|
Wei, A.,
and Herron, J. N.
(1993)
Anal. Chem.
65,
3372-3377
|
| 29.
|
Lehrer, S. S.,
and Leavis, P. C.
(1978)
Methods Enzymol.
49,
222-236
|
| 30.
|
Karlin, A.,
and Akabas, M. H.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
1231-1244
|
| 31.
|
West, A. P., Jr.,
Bjorkman, P. J.,
Dougherty, D. A.,
and Lester, H. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25468-25473
|
| 32.
|
Schrattenholz, A.,
Pfeiffer, S.,
Pejovic, V.,
Rudolph, R.,
Godovac-Zimmermann, J.,
and Maelicke, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32393-32399
|
| 33.
|
Hemmilä, I.,
and Webb, S.
(1997)
Drug Discovery Today
2,
373-381
|
| 34.
|
Checovich, W. J.,
Bolger, R. E.,
and Burke, T.
(1995)
Nature
375,
254-256
|
| 35.
|
McCabe, R. T.,
de Costa, B. R.,
Miller, R. L.,
Havunjian, R. H.,
Rice, K. C.,
and Skolnick, P.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
2934-2940
|
| 36.
|
Krantis, A.,
Nichols, K.,
de Blas, A.,
and Staines, W.
(1994)
Neurosci. Lett.
176,
32-36
|
| 37.
|
Fraser, D. D.,
Duffy, S.,
Angelides, K. J.,
Perez-Velazquez, J. L.,
Kettenmann, H.,
and MacVicar, B. A.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
2720-2732
|
| 38.
|
Miller, L. G.,
Galpern, W. R.,
Byrnes, J. J.,
and Greenblatt, D. J.
(1992)
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
43,
413-416
|
| 39.
|
Wieland, H. A.,
and Lüddens, H.
(1994)
J. Med. Chem.
37,
4576-4580
|
| 40.
|
Renard, S.,
Olivier, A.,
Granger, P.,
Avenet, P.,
Graham, D.,
Sevrin, M.,
George, P.,
and Besnard, F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13370-13374
|
| 41.
|
Pritchett, D. B.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1421-1425
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Y. Tsang, S.-K. Ng, Z. Xu, and H. Xue
The Evolution of GABAA Receptor-Like Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
February 1, 2007;
24(2):
599 - 610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xu, S. Fang, H. Shi, H. Li, Y. Deng, Y. Liao, J.-M. Wu, H. Zheng, H. Zhu, H.-M. Chen, et al.
Topology characterization of a benzodiazepine-binding {beta}-rich domain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit
Protein Sci.,
October 1, 2005;
14(10):
2622 - 2637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shi, S. Y. Tsang, M. K. Tse, Z. Xu, and H. Xue
Recombinant extracellular domain of the three major subunits of GABAA receptor show comparable secondary structure and benzodiazepine binding properties
Protein Sci.,
November 1, 2003;
12(11):
2642 - 2646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shi, S. Y. Tsang, H. Zheng, J. N. Sturgis, and H. Xue
Two {beta}-rich structural domains in GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit with different physical properties: Evidence for multidomain nature of the receptor
Protein Sci.,
August 1, 2002;
11(8):
2052 - 2058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|