JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000193200 on April 10, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18818-18823, June 23, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/25/18818    most recent
M000193200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Ligand Binding and Structural Properties of Segments of GABAA Receptor alpha 1 Subunit Overexpressed in Escherichia coli*

Jun Hang, Haifeng Shi, Dongyang Li, Yinglei Liao, Dejun Lian, Yazhong Xiao, and Hong XueDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong

Received for publication, January 11, 2000, and in revised form, April 4, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The gamma -aminobutyric acid, type A (GABAA), receptor is the target for numerous therapeutic compounds. In the present study, the Gln28-Leu296, Gln28-Arg276, Gln28-Arg248, and Gln28-Glu165 (numbering of bovine precursor protein) segments of its alpha 1 subunit were overexpressed in Escherichia coli, along with Cys166-Leu296 produced previously, for structural analysis by circular dichroism and ligand binding studies by fluorescence spectroscopy. Results showed that the protein segments were rich in beta -sheet structures. Binding of the fluorescent benzodiazepine Bodipy-FL Ro-1986 was evident from fluorescence resonance energy transfer and fluorescence anisotropy measurements. The binding affinity was in the micromolar range. The binding was attributable more to Cys166-Leu296 than to Gln28-Glu165 and was inhibited by known central benzodiazepine site ligands. Three point mutations, Y187A, T234A, and Y237A, were found to perturb protein secondary structures. Studies with the single Trp mutants W198Y and W273Y indicated that Trp273 was closer to the binding site than Trp198.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

gamma -Aminobutyric acid (GABA)1 is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. The type A receptors of GABA (GABAA receptors) (1) are fast acting, ligand-gated chloride ion channels, which are believed to adopt a pentameric structure (2) with the regulated ion channel formed along the vertical axis of subunit interfaces. Since the cloning of the first two subunits, alpha 1 and beta 1, in 1987 (3), as many as 18 different subunits have been identified (4). Of the myriad number of GABAA receptor isoforms possible, alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 is believed to represent the major adult isoform (5).

GABAA receptors serve as the targets of many important neuroactive drugs (6-8), and substantial effort has been made to understand the structure of BZ-binding site (9). Evidence from site-directed mutagenesis, photoaffinity labeling, and pharmacological studies collectively suggest that alpha  and gamma  subunits contribute to the BZ-binding site (10-14). A majority of the amino acid residues suggested to be essential for BZ binding are located on the alpha 1 subunit and include such residues as His101, Tyr159, Thr206, and Tyr209 (numbering of rat mature protein) (9, 14-18). These studies therefore pointed to a key role for the alpha 1 subunit in determining the binding properties of various BZ ligands to the GABAA receptor.

To date, several systems have been utilized to express recombinant GABAA receptors. Radioactive ligand binding studies have been performed with cell lines, and electrophysiological studies have been done in cell lines and in Xenopus laevis oocytes (19-22). However, these systems could not provide adequate amounts of protein for structural characterization. Without structural information, it would be difficult to ascertain whether a deleterious mutation might act directly to alter an active site residue or indirectly through disruption of protein conformation. To overcome this shortcoming and allow insight into the structure and function relationship of GABAA receptors, a high expression system is of urgent importance.

Previously, we have reported the overexpression of the Cys166-Leu296 segment of GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit and the delineation of a structural domain within the segment (23, 24). Segment Cys166-Leu296 has been demonstrated to be able to form stable secondary structures (23) and rosette-like quaternary structures (25). In the present study the properties of Cys166-Leu296 along with the Gln28-Arg248, Gln28-Arg276, Gln28-Leu296, and Gln28-Glu165 polypeptides were characterized with respect to ligand binding and protein folding. Site-directed mutagenesis was applied to the three residues Tyr187, Thr234, and Tyr237 (numbering of bovine precursor protein), previously identified to be important for ligand binding (16, 17, 18), and to the two Trp residues Trp198 and Trp273 in order to gain insight into the structure-function relationships of BZ binding.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The cDNA clone, pCDM8-balpha 1, encoding bovine alpha 1 subunit was a gift from Dr. A. N. Bateson of the University of Alberta. The plasmid pTrcHis was purchased from Invitrogen; diazepam and estazolam were from Wuhan Pharmaceutical Co., China; GABA and muscimol were from Sigma; and the fluorescent BZ ligand Bodipy-FL Ro-1986 (BFR) was from Molecular Probes, Inc. Ethyl ester of beta -carboline-3-carboxylate (beta -CCE) was a gift from Prof. Richard W. Olsen of UCLA.

Construction of Expression Plasmids and Mutagenesis-- All subcloning and mutagenesis were performed with the PCR-based Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) with slight modifications in which Pfu DNA polymerase was used instead, and DpnI treatment was replaced by gel purification of linear PCR products. A 2.3-kilobase pair DNA containing the full-length cDNA (GenBankTM accession number X05717) encoding the mature peptide (Gln28-Gln456) of bovine GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit was subcloned from pCDM8-balpha 1 to pTrcHis for expression after removal of the upstream vector sequence excepting the mini-cistron with a pair of PCR primers (P1 and P2 in Table I). Based on this initial subclone more deletional and substitutional mutants were made using PCR primers designated in Table I. Silent base substitutions were incorporated into the primers (Table I) to optimize codon usage and introduce termination codons as appropriate. All insert sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Primers used in PCR-based cloning and mutagenesis

Expression and Purification-- Freshly transformed Escherichia coli cells of NovaBlue strain (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI) were stored in 10% Me2SO aliquots at -80 °C. After induction of the growing culture with 0.4 mM isopropyl-beta -thiogalactoside for 6 h (23), the cells were harvested and washed once with 200 ml of solution A (50 mM Tris·Cl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.5), lysed in 100 ml of solution B (50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.5, 250 µg/ml lysozyme) at 37 °C for 30 min, diluted with 100 ml of solution C (50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.5), homogenized with an Ultra-Turrax T25 homogenizer (Janke & Kunkel IKA-Labortechnik, Germany), and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The pellet was resuspended in 100 ml of solution D (2% deoxycholic acid, 50 mM Tris·Cl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.5), re-homogenized, collected at 9,500 rpm × 30 min, washed with 100 ml of solution E (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 8.5), and centrifuged at 9,500 rpm for 20 min. The resultant pellet was resuspended in 4 M urea (10 ml per g of pellet) prior to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min and washed in 100 ml of solution E. The pellet was solubilized in 2% SDS, 0.1 M beta -mercaptoethanol, pH 12, and subjected to gel filtration on a Superdex 200 HR 26/60 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The sample was eluted using a refolding buffer, containing 250 mM Arg, 100 mM Tris, and 1 mM EDTA, with 0.3 mM L-cystine and 3 mM L-cysteine added just before use, at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min. The pooled fractions were dialyzed against 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, for 3 days, with three buffer changes per day.

Protein Identification and Quantification-- Protein concentrations were determined photometrically (26). The molecular weight and purity of proteins were estimated using 15% SDS-PAGE. The identities of recombinant proteins were confirmed by N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Mass spectroscopic analyses were provided by Molecular Biology Resource Facility, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, and N-terminal protein sequencing was by the Protein Service Laboratory, University of British Columbia.

CD Measurements-- All CD spectra were obtained using a JUSCO J-720 spectropolarimeter at room temperature with a 0.1-cm path length cuvette for far-UV CD or 1-cm for near-UV CD. The protein samples were 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, for far-UV and 1 mg/ml for near-UV CD. Secondary structure contents were estimated from far-UV CD (27).

Fluorescence Measurements-- All fluorescence measurements were performed at room temperature using a Perkin-Elmer model LS50B luminescence spectrometer. A stock of 1.65 mM BFR in Me2SO at -20 °C was diluted into buffer just before use.

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-- Protein solutions were mixed with 0.41 µM BFR in the cuvette, and 450-550 nm emission spectra at 5-nm slit were obtained at 280, 295, 340, or 490 nm excitation and 2.5-nm slit width. Light at 280 nm excited both BFR and protein intrinsic fluorophores, whereas light at 340 nm excited only BFR. This was utilized to correct for errors in BFR concentration and interference from protein scattering on fluorescence intensity. For this purpose, two sets of emission spectra, one with excitation wavelength of 280 nm and the other of 340 nm, were recorded in parallel. The ratio of respective fluorescence intensities, INT280/INT340, was used as an index of FRET; this was replaced by INT295/INT340 in the case of single Trp mutants.

Fluorescence Anisotropy (FA) and Equilibrium Dissociation Constant (Kd)-- FA was measured at an excitation wavelength of 490 nm with a 10-nm slit and an emission wavelength of 511 nm with a 10-nm slit. For saturation experiments, 0.165 µM BFR in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, was titrated with protein. At such a low BFR concentration, FA would be proportional to the concentration of ligand-receptor complex. Therefore, the fraction of bound ligand present at each titration point could be estimated from change in FA (Delta A) as a function of protein concentration after correction for fluorescence intensity difference between free and bound ligands (28) and was employed to calculate Kd. The maximal FA increase (Delta Amax) estimated from a nonlinear least square fitting of the saturation curve to a single-site binding model was Scatchard plotted as [bound]/[free] = [bound]/([protein] - [bound]) versus [bound] = [BFR]total × Delta A/Delta Amax to yield the Kd of ligand-receptor complex, where bound or free refers to fraction of receptor bound to ligand or free of ligand. For competitive inhibition assay, 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, containing 0.165 µM BFR and 10 µM Cys166-Leu296 was titrated in turn with beta -CCE, estazolam, diazepam, GABA, or muscimol solution amounting to less than 4% volume of the assay mixture and monitored by FA measurements.

Fluorescence Quenching (FQ)-- To measure FQ by BFR, single Trp mutant proteins of 1.5 µM in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 9.0, was titrated with 1.65 mM BFR. The emission intensity at 342 nm with 7-nm slit was recorded at 295 nm excitation with 5-nm slit. The ratio of the initial fluorescence intensity versus the intensity at each titration point was plotted against the quencher concentration (29).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression, Purification, and Identification-- All subclones of GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit segments were successfully expressed. Under the current purification protocol, about 10 mg of purified product was obtained per liter of culture. The high level expression and the purity of the recovered recombinant proteins are demonstrated in Fig. 1.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SDS-PAGE analysis of the recombinant GABAA receptor segments. Receptor proteins were purified as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, molecular mass standards; lane 2, total cell lysates of E. coli expressing the segment Gln28-Leu296; lane 3, pellet of the total cell lysates shown in lane 2; lanes 4-8, purified segments Gln28-Leu296, Gln28-Arg276, Gln28-Arg248, Gln28-Glu165, and Cys166-Leu296, respectively.

Secondary Structure and Tertiary Packing-- Secondary structure contents of recombinant receptor segments estimated from far-UV CD spectra are presented in Table II. The ratio beta /alpha , the content of beta -strand relative to alpha -helix, was calculated for Cys166-Leu296, and its point mutation variants were calculated for comparison. All the polypeptides formed not only stable beta -rich secondary structure (Fig. 2A) but also ordered tertiary packing as evident from their near-UV CD spectra. As illustrated in Fig. 2B, the CD spectrum of Gln28-Leu296 showed distinct signals around 270-295 nm characteristic of proteins with well packed aromatic side chains.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Secondary structures of and ligand binding by recombinant GABAA receptor segments


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Representative CD spectra of receptor segments. A, far-UV spectra of Gln28-Arg248 and Gln28-Leu296. B, near-UV spectrum of Gln28-Leu296. C, far-UV spectra of Ala substitution mutants and the wild-type Cys166-Leu296. D, far-UV spectra of single Trp mutants of Cys166-Leu296 along with that of the wild type.

Fluorescent Ligand Binding-- The five overexpressed polypeptides, namely Gln28-Arg248, Gln28-Arg276, Gln28-Leu296, Gln28-Glu165, and Cys166-Leu296, were active in binding the fluorescent BZ ligand BFR. Analysis of the variation of FA of BFR with protein concentrations yielded the binding constants Kd for the five segments, which range from 1.96 to 9.97 µM (Fig. 3B and Table II). Cys166-Leu296, the shortest segment among the five, was selected for further analysis.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   BFR binding by Cys166-Leu296 and its mutants as measured by FRET and FA. A and B, analysis of Cys166-Leu296 and the three putative binding-site mutants. Closed circles, Cys166-Leu296; open circles, Y187A; closed squares, T234A; open squares, Y237A; closed triangles, Cys166-Leu296 with the fluorescence dye Bodipy-FL replacing BFR. The saturation curves of FRET in A were each obtained as the line of sigmoidal (Boltzman) fit of the data. Excitation was carried out at 280 or 340 nm. INT280 = maximal fluorescence intensity of BFR excited at 280 nm. INT340 = maximal fluorescence intensity of BFR excited at 340 nm. For the saturation curves of FA and Scatchard transformations (inset B), excitation and emission were at 490 and 511 nm, respectively. C and D show the analysis of the two single Trp mutants. Closed circles, W198Y; open circles, W273Y. For the saturation curves of FRET in C, INT295 = maximal fluorescence intensity of BFR excited at 295 nm. For the saturation curves of FA and Scatchard transformations (inset in D), excitation and emission were at 490 and 511 nm, respectively.

Quenching of Ligand Fluorescence by Receptor-- When BFR was excited at 490 nm, the lambda max of its excitation spectrum and where no protein absorption occurred, its emission intensity was diminished by the addition of receptor protein (Fig. 4A). In addition, a red shift of the emission spectrum became evident. In comparison, no significant changes in BFR fluorescence emission were observed with the addition of the same concentration of lysozyme (14.30 kDa), which has a molecular weight similar to that of Cys166-Leu296 (14.83 kDa). Therefore the quenching caused by the receptor protein was not nonspecific protein effects.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Changes in BFR emission upon protein titration. A, red-shift in lambda max and decrease in intensity. Emission spectra of BFR (0.41 µM) excited at 490 nm in the absence (solid line) or presence of 10 µM Cys166-Leu296 (dashed line) or 10 µM lysozyme (dotted line). B, FRET from protein to BFR. Emission of BFR (0.41 µM) increasingly enhanced by increasing concentrations of Cys166-Leu296 (0, 0.657, 1.970, 3.284, 4.925, and 6.567 µM, from the bottom to the top). Excitation was at 280 nm. AFU, arbitrary fluorescence unit.

FRET from Receptor to Ligand-- In contrast to the quenching observed with 490 nm excitation, the fluorescence intensity of BFR increased upon addition of receptor protein in a concentration-dependent manner when the excitation wavelength was set at 280 nm to excite both ligand fluorescence and intrinsic protein Trp fluorescence (Fig. 4B). The phenomenon indicates that the energy released from protein fluorescence emission was transferred to the ligand. The hyperbolic increase of FRET index with protein concentration is shown in Fig. 3A.

Competitive Inhibition-- To assess whether the binding of BFR to the receptor segment bore any resemblance to ligand binding to the BZ-binding site in the central nervous system, the effects of competing ligands were examined. The known high affinity central BZ site ligand beta -CCE exerted a strong inhibitory effect on Delta A in the FA binding assay. Diazepam and estazolam, two BZ ligands with affinities lower than beta -CCE, caused moderate inhibition, and the two non-BZ site ligands muscimol and GABA caused only very minor inhibition (Fig. 5).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition of BFR binding to Cys166-Leu296 by competing compounds. The solid curves represent nonlinear least squares fit of the data. Results are recorded as percentage of BFR binding to Cys166-Leu296 in the presence of beta -CCE (closed squares), diazepam (closed circles), estazolam (open squares), GABA (open circles), or muscimol (closed triangles).

Point Mutations-- Five point mutations were made on segment Cys166-Leu296 at three putative binding-site residues, Tyr187, Thr234, and Tyr237, and the two Trp residues, Trp198 and Trp273. Their effects on protein secondary structures were examined with far-UV CD (Fig. 2, C and D; Table II). Secondary structure content and the beta /alpha ratio of each of the five-point mutants were compared with that of Cys166-Leu296 through statistical analyses by Student's t test for significance. Significant changes from the wild-type parameters (p < 0.05) are shown in bold face in Table II.

Compared with wild-type Cys166-Leu296, the Y187A mutant showed an increase in beta -sheets (p = 0.0197), a decrease in alpha -helix (p = 0.0091), and hence increased beta /alpha ratio (p = 0.0087). This suggests that Tyr187 in the wild-type Cys166-Leu296 probably contributed to the maintenance of an alpha -helical structure that was likely converted into a more extended structure upon Ala substitution of the residue. T234A showed a decrease in beta -sheets (p = 0.0068), an increase in alpha -helix (p = 0.0074), and a decreased beta /alpha ratio (p = 0.0031), suggesting the possibility that Thr234 was involved in maintaining a beta -stranded structure. Among the three "binding site" mutants, Y237A gave rise to the least change in secondary structures, which was mainly shown as a slight increase in the content of "Others" (p = 0.0089). The changes in alpha -helix and beta -sheet contents caused by the two single Trp mutants were both insignificant (Fig. 2D and Table II). Nevertheless, it was noticeable that W273Y mutation reduced the content of beta -turn (p = 0.0073), which could be the consequence of the disruption of a beta -turn structure in Cys166-Leu296 involving Trp273.

The three mutants Y187A, T234A and Y237A retained both Trp residues but exhibited a reduced FRET (Fig. 3A). They also bound BFR more weakly. Their Kd values calculated from FA were 13.83, 8.38, and 10.27 µM, respectively (Fig. 3B and Table II). Compared with 4.85 µM for the wild-type Cys166-Leu296, these mutants caused statistically significant 2-3-fold reductions in binding affinity.

The two single Trp mutants W198Y and W273Y diminished in FRET values, as the consequence of the removal of one of the intrinsic fluorophores. However, their BFR binding Kd values of 5.97 and 4.77 µM obtained from FA were both not significantly different from that of Cys166-Leu296 judging from the t test (Fig. 3D and Table II). The FRET was stronger for the W198Y mutant, which retained Trp273, than the W273Y mutant, which retained Trp198 instead (Fig. 3C), indicating that Trp273 was situated closer to the BZ-binding site than Trp198.

The relative accessibility of the two Trp residues in Cys166-Leu296 by the ligand was also evaluated by quenching of Trp fluorescence by BFR. Addition of BFR caused decreases in protein intrinsic Trp fluorescence in both mutants (Fig. 6). However, the fluorescence of Trp273 in the W198Y mutant was more severely quenched by BFR than that of Trp198 in W273Y, indicating that Trp273 was more accessible to the ligand than Trp198, in agreement with the FRET results.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Stern-Volmer plot for ligand quenching of intrinsic Trp fluorescence. The emission was scanned from 300 to 400 nm with the excitation wavelength set at 295 nm. F0 = fluorescence intensity at 342 nm in the absence of BFR; F = fluorescence intensity at 342 nm in the presence of BFR at the indicated concentration. Closed circles, W198Y; open circles, W273Y.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The overexpression of the Cys166-Leu296 segment of GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit was previously found to generate a protein domain with stable folding and rich in beta -structures (23, 24). In the present study the three overlapping long segments obtained so far containing an extension to the N terminus, namely Gln28-Arg248, Gln28-Arg276, and Gln28-Leu296, also were all rich in beta -strands, ranging from 45.7 to 51.9% (Table II). Segment Gln28-Arg248 would comprise the entire putative extracellular domain except for two amino acids, Gln28-Arg276 additionally almost the entire first transmembrane region, and Gln28-Leu296 additionally almost the entire second transmembrane region (3). Since the three segments were identical at the N terminus portion up to Arg248, their differences in secondary structure contents resulted from differences at the C terminus portion. Dividing the longest protein Gln28-Leu296 into two gave rise to the shorter Gln28-Glu165 and Cys166-Leu296. The latter was more enriched than the former in beta -strands, whereas the former contained more alpha -helix. These results were consistent with the secondary structure predictions reported earlier (24). The higher alpha -helical content of Gln28-Arg276 than Gln28-Leu296 suggests that residues Glu277-Leu296, a part of the putative second transmembrane region, did not form an alpha -helical structure within segment Gln28-Leu296. However, it is not ruled out that these residues could participate in an alpha -helix within the full-length receptor.

In this regard, these GABAA alpha 1 N terminus segments resemble the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the prototype of the fast-acting ligand-gated ion channel receptor superfamily (30). The N-terminal extracellular domain of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha -subunit, approximately equivalent to Gln28-Arg248 of GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit, was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells (31), and E. coli (32), respectively. It was also beta -rich, containing 51% beta -sheet (31) or 45% beta -stranded structures (32), levels that were comparable with the 51.9% beta -strand content of Gln28-Arg248 recorded in Table II. Accordingly, a beta -rich extracellular N terminus portion might represent a general occurrence among this superfamily of ligand-gated ion channel receptors.

Fluorescent ligand binding assays (33, 34) were particularly advantageous for recombinant GABAA receptors. They offer sensitivities comparable to that of radio-ligand assays, and fluorescent BZ derivatives such as BFR exhibit high affinity and selectivity for the GABAA receptor (35-37). Unlike radio-ligand assays, fluorescence measurements do not require a separation of the bound and free forms of ligand and thus make possible the analysis of even relatively weak receptor-ligand interactions by means of homogenous phase assays such as FRET and FA. Furthermore, measurements such as FRET could provide structural insight into the ligand-binding site.

Several lines of evidence supported a specific binding of BFR to the purified GABAA alpha 1 receptor Cys166-Leu296 segment. First, the emission of BFR was changed in both intensity and lambda max by addition of the segment but not by the control protein lysozyme (Fig. 4). Second, the change in BFR fluorescence was dependent on protein concentration and was saturable (Fig. 3). Third, the inhibition of BFR binding exerted by potential competitors (Fig. 6) was strongest with beta -CCE, a GABAA receptor reverse agonist selective for BZ type I receptors, Ki 0.3 nM (14), more modest with ligands with lower BZ affinities, namely diazepam (Ki 16.1 nM) (14) and estazolam (Ki 17.0 nM) (38), and minimal with the non-BZ ligands muscimol and GABA. These experimental results suggested that the observed BZ ligand binding to Cys166-Leu296 is likely to be biologically relevant.

It is noteworthy, however, that the Kd displayed by the various receptor segments for BFR in the micromolar range (Table II) were considerably higher than those reported for native GABAA receptors in the nanomolar range. This points to the existence of specific binding sites with only low affinity in these recombinant proteins. Previous studies have shown that co-expression of combinations of alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits was required to produce GABAA receptors with pharmacological properties resembling that of native receptors (14) and suggested that the BZ-binding site was located at the interface of alpha 1 and gamma 2 subunits (6, 9). Therefore, the low affinity BFR binding displayed by the purified GABAA alpha 1 subunit segments could be the consequence of the lack of contributions not only from the rest of the alpha 1 subunit but also from the gamma 2 subunit.

Since the homo-oligomeric GABAA receptors formed by alpha  subunits were found not to be modulated by BZ (14), it was somewhat unexpected that a segment of alpha 1 subunit alone could bind specifically a BZ ligand. A possible explanation could be that the weak interaction between BZ ligand and alpha 1 subunit would be difficult to detect by heterogeneous phase assays that require a separation of the bound and free ligand. The FRET and FA assays employed in the present study, because they do not require such separation, are intrinsically more sensitive for the detection of weaker receptor-ligand interactions. Both FRET and FA involve homogeneous assay systems and are ideal with purified proteins but not membranous preparations of receptors. This is especially true with FA, which is a relatively insensitive method and requires high receptor expression and high membrane volume per well of assay so that FA is not a method of choice for homomeric GABAA receptors that express only poorly.

The finding that the 131-residue Cys166-Leu296 was more active than its immediate N-terminal neighbor Gln28-Glu165 in BZ ligand binding was consistent with previous reports on the residues important for BZ modulation. Except for His101, all such reported residues were located within the Cys166-Leu296 segment, including the residues Tyr159, Tyr161, Thr162, Gly200, Ser204, Thr206, Tyr209, and Val211 (numbering of rat mature protein) (16-18, 39-41). Three of these residues, Tyr159/Tyr187, Thr206/Thr234, and Tyr209/Tyr237 in alpha 1 subunit (numbering of rat mature/bovine precursor polypeptides), proposed to be involved in receptor-BZ interaction are also homologous to residues in beta  subunits believed to be responsible for receptor-GABA interaction. In view of this, Cys166-Leu296 was mutated at these three residues in order to evaluate their individual contributions to protein structure and BFR binding. The three mutations caused varying degrees of secondary structure alterations (Fig. 2C and Table II) and decrease in FRET (Fig. 3A) in addition to 2-3-fold reduction in the binding affinity as measured by the dissociation constant (Table II). Although the extent of decrease in binding affinity caused by the three-point mutations deviated from previous reports by others (16-18) using different experimental systems, the simultaneous changes in secondary structure and in ligand binding affinity caused by the three mutations suggest that the functional effects of mutations at these residues (14, 16-18) could be mediated at least in part by structural effects of these residues on the receptor. This possibility is also highlighted by the fact that these residues are conserved in both alpha  and beta  subunits, even though beta  subunits are believed not to be involved in BZ binding (14).

The fluorescence of BFR was reduced and red-shifted in the presence of Cys166-Leu296 (Fig. 4). This suggests that the BZ-binding site on this polypeptide was relatively polar in microenvironment or surrounded by fluorescence-quenching element(s). The two Trp residues in Cys166-Leu296 were both non-essential to BFR binding (Fig. 3D and Table II). The FRET measurements indicated that Trp273 was located closer to the BFR-binding site than Trp198, and this was further supported by FQ experiments, in which Trp273 was found to be more accessible to interaction with BFR than Trp198 (Fig. 6).

In conclusion, the lack of an abundant supply of recombinant proteins has for many years limited the structure-function characterization of the GABAA receptor. The present study shows that overexpression of segments of the receptor makes possible experimental analysis that could contribute usefully to a deeper understanding of GABAA receptor. The ready availability of these fragments has also permitted the initiation in our laboratory of their crystallization trials aimed toward a three-dimensional structural analysis of the receptor.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Professors R. Wayne Davies and J. Tze-Fei Wong for helpful discussions and Dr. David Miller-Martini for critical reading of the manuscript. Prof. R. W. Olsen and Dr. A. N. Bateson are sincerely acknowledged for generous supplies of beta -CCE and bovine GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit cDNA clone, respectively. Technical assistance from Hui Zheng, Peggy Lee, and Ruiai Chu is acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 852-23588707; Fax: 852-23581552; E-mail: hxue@ust.hk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000193200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GABA, gamma -aminobutyric acid; GABAA, gamma -aminobutyric acid, type A; BZ, benzodiazepine; BFR, Bodipy-FL Ro-1986; FQ, fluorescence quenching; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; FA, fluorescence anisotropy; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; beta -CCE, ethyl ester of beta -carboline-3-carboxylate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Macdonald, R. L., and Olsen, R. W. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 569-602
2. Nayeem, N., Green, T. P., Martin, I. L., and Barnard, E. A. (1994) J. Neurochem. 62, 815-818
3. Schofield, P. R., Darlison, M. G., Fujita, N., Burt, D. R., Stephenson, F. A., Rodriguez, H., Rhee, L. M., Ramachandran, J., Reale, V., Glencorse, T. A., Seeberg, P. H., and Barnard, E. A. (1987) Nature 328, 221-227
4. Mehta, A. K., and Ticku, M. K. (1999) Brain Res. Rev. 29, 196-217
5. McKernan, R. M., and Whiting, P. J. (1996) Trends Neurosci. 19, 139-143
6. Stephenson, F. A. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 1-9
7. Gupta, S. P. (1995) Prog. Drug Res. 45, 67-106
8. Costa, E., and Guidotti, A. (1996) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 17, 192-200
9. Sigel, E., and Buhr, A. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 425-429
10. Buhr, A., and Sigel, E. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8824-8829
11. Buhr, A., Baur, R., and Sigel, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11799-11804
12. Stephenson, F. A., Duggan, M. J., and Pollard, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 21160-21165
13. Günther, U., Benson, J., Benke, D., Fritschy, J. M., Reyes, G., Knoflach, F., Crestani, F., Aguzzi, A., Arigoni, M., Lang, Y., Bluethmann, H., Mohler, H., and Lüscher, B. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7749-7753
14. Sieghart, W. (1995) Pharmacol. Rev. 47, 181-234
15. Wieland, H. A., Lüddens, H., and Seeburg, P. H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1426-1429
16. Buhr, A., Schaerer, M. T., Baur, R., and Sigel, E. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 676-682
17. Buhr, A., Baur, R., Malherbe, P., and Sigel, E. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 1080-1084
18. Amin, J., Brooks-Kayal, A., and Weiss, D. S. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 833-841
19. Levitan, E. S., Schofield, P. R., Burt, D. R., Rhee, L. M., Wisden, W., Kohler, M., Fujita, N., Rodriguez, H. F., Stephenson, A., Darlison, M. G., Barnard, E. A., and Seeberg, P. H. (1988) Nature 335, 76-79
20. Pritchett, D. B., Lüddens, H., and Seeburg, P. H. (1989) Science 245, 1389-1392
21. Hadingham, K. L., Harkness, P. C., McKernan, R. M., Quirk, K., Le Bourdelles, B., Horne, A. L., Kemp, J. A., Barnard, E. A., Ragan, C. I., and Whiting, P. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6378-6382
22. Carter, D. B., Thomsen, D. R., Im, W. B., Lennon, D. J., Ngo, D. M., Gale, W., Im, H. K., Seeberg, P. H., and Smith, M. W. (1992) Bio/Technology 10, 679-681
23. Xue, H., Chu, R., Hang, J., Lee, P., and Zheng, H. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 216-219
24. Xue, H., Hang, J., Chu, R., Xiao, Y., Li, H., Lee, P., and Zheng, H. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 55-61
25. Xue, H., Zheng, H., Li, H., Kitmitto, A., Zhu, H., Lee, P., and Holzenburg, A. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 296, 739-742
26. Gill, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326
27. Sreerama, N., and Woody, R. W. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 242, 497-507
28. Wei, A., and Herron, J. N. (1993) Anal. Chem. 65, 3372-3377
29. Lehrer, S. S., and Leavis, P. C. (1978) Methods Enzymol. 49, 222-236
30. Karlin, A., and Akabas, M. H. (1995) Neuron 15, 1231-1244
31. West, A. P., Jr., Bjorkman, P. J., Dougherty, D. A., and Lester, H. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25468-25473
32. Schrattenholz, A., Pfeiffer, S., Pejovic, V., Rudolph, R., Godovac-Zimmermann, J., and Maelicke, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32393-32399
33. Hemmilä, I., and Webb, S. (1997) Drug Discovery Today 2, 373-381
34. Checovich, W. J., Bolger, R. E., and Burke, T. (1995) Nature 375, 254-256
35. McCabe, R. T., de Costa, B. R., Miller, R. L., Havunjian, R. H., Rice, K. C., and Skolnick, P. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 2934-2940
36. Krantis, A., Nichols, K., de Blas, A., and Staines, W. (1994) Neurosci. Lett. 176, 32-36
37. Fraser, D. D., Duffy, S., Angelides, K. J., Perez-Velazquez, J. L., Kettenmann, H., and MacVicar, B. A. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 2720-2732
38. Miller, L. G., Galpern, W. R., Byrnes, J. J., and Greenblatt, D. J. (1992) Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 43, 413-416
39. Wieland, H. A., and Lüddens, H. (1994) J. Med. Chem. 37, 4576-4580
40. Renard, S., Olivier, A., Granger, P., Avenet, P., Graham, D., Sevrin, M., George, P., and Besnard, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13370-13374
41. Pritchett, D. B., and Seeburg, P. H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1421-1425


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S.-Y. Tsang, S.-K. Ng, Z. Xu, and H. Xue
The Evolution of GABAA Receptor-Like Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 599 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
Z. Xu, S. Fang, H. Shi, H. Li, Y. Deng, Y. Liao, J.-M. Wu, H. Zheng, H. Zhu, H.-M. Chen, et al.
Topology characterization of a benzodiazepine-binding {beta}-rich domain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit
Protein Sci., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2622 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
H. Shi, S. Y. Tsang, M. K. Tse, Z. Xu, and H. Xue
Recombinant extracellular domain of the three major subunits of GABAA receptor show comparable secondary structure and benzodiazepine binding properties
Protein Sci., November 1, 2003; 12(11): 2642 - 2646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
H. Shi, S. Y. Tsang, H. Zheng, J. N. Sturgis, and H. Xue
Two {beta}-rich structural domains in GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit with different physical properties: Evidence for multidomain nature of the receptor
Protein Sci., August 1, 2002; 11(8): 2052 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/25/18818    most recent
M000193200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomi