Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001222200 on March 29, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19000-19008, June 23, 2000
Identification and Characterization of a Potent, Selective, and
Orally Active Antagonist of the CC Chemokine Receptor-1*
Meina
Liang
§,
Cornell
Mallari¶,
Mary
Rosser
,
Howard P.
Ng
**,
Karen
May
,
Sean
Monahan
§§,
John G.
Bauman
,
Imadul
Islam
,
Ameen
Ghannam
,
Brad
Buckman
,
Ken
Shaw
,
Guo-Ping
Wei
,
Wei
Xu
,
Zuchun
Zhao
,
Elena
Ho¶,
Jun
Shen¶,
Huynh
Oanh¶,
Babu
Subramanyam¶,
Ron
Vergona¶,
Dennis
Taub¶¶,
Laura
Dunning
,
Susan
Harvey
,
R. Michael
Snider
,
Joseph
Hesselgesser
,
Michael M.
Morrissey
,
H. Daniel
Perez
, and
Richard
Horuk
From the Departments of Discovery
Research,
Biological Research, ¶ Pharmacology, and

Immunology, Berlex Biosciences, Richmond, Calfornia 94804 and ¶¶ Laboratory of Immunology, NIA, National Institutes of
Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224
Received for publication, February 11, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The CC chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is a prime
therapeutic target for treating autoimmune diseases. Through high
capacity screening followed by chemical optimization, we identified a
novel non-peptide CCR1 antagonist,
R-N-[5-chloro-2-[2-[4-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-methyl-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethoxy]phenyl]urea hydrochloric acid salt (BX 471). Competition binding
studies revealed that BX 471 was able to displace the CCR1 ligands
macrophage inflammatory protein-1
(MIP-1
), RANTES, and monocyte
chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3) with high affinity
(Ki ranged from 1 nM to 5.5 nM). BX 471 was a potent functional antagonist based on its
ability to inhibit a number of CCR1-mediated effects including
Ca2+ mobilization, increase in extracellular acidification
rate, CD11b expression, and leukocyte migration. BX 471 demonstrated a
greater than 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 compared with 28 G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that
BX 471 was orally active with a bioavailability of 60% in dogs.
Furthermore, BX 471 effectively reduces disease in a rat experimental
allergic encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. This study is
the first to demonstrate that a non-peptide chemokine receptor
antagonist is efficacious in an animal model of an autoimmune disease.
In summary, we have identified a potent, selective, and orally
available CCR1 antagonist that may be useful in the treatment of
chronic inflammatory diseases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
It is clear that the inappropriate interaction of immune cells,
such as T lymphocytes and monocytes, can lead to extensive inflammation
and tissue destruction, which is a hallmark of several autoimmune
diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Immune
cells are sent on their destructive journey by chemoattractant
molecules known as chemokines, which interact with and signal through
specific cell surface chemokine receptors. Chemokine receptors belong
to the GPCR1 superfamily and
have been viewed as attractive therapeutic targets by the
pharmaceutical industry mainly because of their central role in
regulating leukocyte trafficking. The premise that drugs that can
inhibit the directed migration and activation of immune cells could be
useful therapeutically has prompted the search for specific and highly
potent chemokine receptor antagonists.
Autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis
are characterized by interactions between invading T lymphocytes and
tissue macrophages that result in extensive inflammation, tissue
damage, and chronic disease pathologies. Numerous studies have
demonstrated CCR1 expression in these cell types, and a variety of
evidence provides strong in vivo concept validation for a
role of this receptor in animal models of these diseases. For example, Karpus et al. (1, 2) were able to show in a mouse EAE model of multiple sclerosis that antibodies to MIP-1
prevented the development of both initial and relapsing paralytic disease as well as
infiltration of mononuclear cells into the central nervous system.
Treatment with MIP-1
antibody was also able to ameliorate the
severity of ongoing disease. These results led the authors to conclude
that MIP-1
plays an important role in this T-cell-mediated disease.
Furthermore, in a recent study, Rottman et al. (3) were able
to demonstrate in a mouse EAE model of multiple sclerosis that CCR1
knockout mice had a significantly reduced incidence of disease compared
with wild type mice. The spinal cords of the wild type mice showed
non-suppurative myelitis, whereas those from the CCR1 knockouts were
minimally inflamed. Taken together these data strongly support the idea
that CCR1 plays a role in the pathogenesis of EAE and furthermore
suggest a role in the pathophysiology of the human disease, multiple sclerosis.
From the data discussed above it is apparent that CCR1 antagonists
could potentially be very important therapeutically in multiple
sclerosis and in other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in which
target cells expressing the receptor play a role. For this reason we
have established a program to develop highly potent and specific CCR1
antagonists. Recently we described a functional CCR1 antagonist
belonging to the 4-hydroxypiperidine class (4). This molecule was shown
to have a Ki of 40 nM for CCR1 and a
250-fold selectivity against other GPCR tested.
In this report, we describe the discovery and pharmacological
characterization of a novel, potent, and selective functional CCR1
antagonist. The compound, BX 471, is able to displace the CCR1 ligands
MIP-1
, RANTES, and MCP-3 with high affinity (Ki ranged from 1 nM to 5.5 nM) and is a potent
functional antagonist based on a number of in vitro
biological assays including the inhibition of Ca2+
mobilization, extracellular acidification rate, CD11b expression, and
leukocyte migration. BX 471 demonstrated a greater than 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 versus other GPCR in both receptor
binding assays and functional assays. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that BX 471 had an oral bioavailability of 60% in dogs. Finally, even
though BX 471 binds to rat CCR1 with a 100-fold reduced affinity (Ki = 121 ± 60 nM), it is still
able to effectively reduce disease in a rat EAE model of multiple
sclerosis. The in vivo demonstration of efficacy for a
CCR1-specific receptor antagonist could represent a major advance in
the treatment of multiple sclerosis, where peripheral leukocyte
recruitment and activation are critical to disease pathology.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Unlabeled chemokines were from Peprotech (Rocky
Hill, NJ). 125I-Labeled chemokines were obtained from NEN
Life Science Products.
CCR1 Expression Vectors--
CCR1 cDNA was obtained as
described (5) and inserted into a mammalian expression vector
containing the SV40 replication origin, the human cytomegaloviral
enhancer with the puromycin-N-acetyl-transferase gene
(puromycin resistance) and hygromycin B gene (hygromycin resistance)
similar to that described previously (6).
Cell Lines--
The human monocytic cell line THP-1, Jurkat
cells, and the HEK293 cell line were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection and were cultured as described previously (4). For
binding assays, cells were harvested and washed once with
phosphate-buffered salt solution. Cell viability was assessed by trypan
blue exclusion, and cell number was determined by counting the cells in
a hemocytometer.
CCR1 Expressing Cells--
The transfection and selection of
HEK293 cells stably expressing human CCR1 was as described previously
(4).
Chemokine Binding Studies--
Binding assays were performed by
filtration as described previously (4). Radiolabeled chemokines at a
final concentration of approximately 0.1-0.2 nM were used
as ligand. HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1 at 8,000 or 300,000 cells
per assay point were used as the receptor source. Nonspecific binding
was determined in the presence of 100 nM unlabeled
chemokine. The binding data were curve-fitted with the computer program
IGOR (Wavemetrics) to determine the affinity and number of sites.
Cytosolic Ca2+ Measurements--
HEK293 cells
expressing human CCR1 were plated on poly-D-lysine-coated
black wall 96-well plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at
80,000 cells/well and were cultured overnight. Cells were then loaded
with 4 µM Fluo-3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), a
calcium-sensitive fluorescence dye, for 60 min at 37 °C in Hanks' balanced salts solution (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 20 mM Hepes, 3.2 mM calcium chloride, 1% fetal
bovine serum, 2.5 mM probenecid, and 0.04% pluronic acid.
The excess dye was removed by gently washing cells 4 times with assay
buffer (Hanks' balanced salts solution containing 20 mM
Hepes, 2.5 mM probenecid, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin)
using a Denley washer (Labsystems, Franklin, MA). Changes in
intracellular free Ca2+ concentration were measured with a
FLIPR (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) immediately after the addition
of agonist at 37 °C. To examine the antagonistic activity of BX 471, the cells were pretreated with the compound for 15 min before the
addition of agonist. The intracellular Ca2+ concentration
in nM was calculated based on the equation Ca2+ = KD (F
Fmin)/(Fmax
F) (7). KD is the dissociation constant
of the complex of Fluo-3 and Ca2+ (390 nM for
Fluo-3). F is the measured fluorescence intensity. Fmax is the maximal fluorescence intensity
determined in the presence of 0.1% triton X-100.
Fmin is the minimum fluorescence intensity determined in the presence of 0.1% Triton X-100 plus 5 mM EGTA.
Measurement of Extracellular Acidification in HEK
Cells--
Extracellular acidification was measured in a
microphysiometer as described previously (4).
Chemotaxis--
Cell migration was examined using a 48-well
microchemotaxis assay as described previously (8).
CD11b Expression on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells--
CD11b expressed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a whole
blood assay was measured as described (9). Briefly, human whole blood
was collected by venipuncture into 2.5-ml Vacutainer tubes containing
EDTA. The blood was kept at room temperature and used immediately after
phlebotomy. The whole blood samples (200 µl) were pretreated with or
without 1 µM BX 471 at 37 °C for 15 min followed by
treatment with or without 100 nM MIP-1
for an additional
15 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 1 ml of cold
phosphate-buffered salt solution wash. The tubes were centrifuged
(200 × g for 7 min at 4 °C), and the supernatant was removed by aspiration. The cell pellet was resuspended in cold
phosphate-buffered salt solution, 10 µl of 1 mg/ml heat-aggregated IgG was added, and the tubes were incubated for 10 min at 4 °C. Antibodies CD11b FITC (5 µl) and CD14 PE (20 µl) were added to each
assay tube and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C. Finally, 1 ml of
ice-cold phosphate-buffered salt solution was added, and the cells were
pelleted as above and analyzed by FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).
Determination of Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Dogs--
Fasted
male beagle dogs (n = 3 per treatment group) were given
BX 471 either by oral gavage or by intravenous injection via the
cephalic vein at a dose of 4 mg/kg. The compound was dissolved in a
vehicle of 40% aqueous cyclodextrin. Serial blood samples were
collected utilizing an in-dwelling catheter in the jugular vein at the
indicated time points up to 6 h post-dosing. EDTA was used as an
anticoagulant. The samples were centrifuged (1000 × g
for 10 min at 4 °C), and plasma was stored frozen until analyzed for
drug levels by HPLC-MS (electrospray mode operated under a positive ion
mode). Plasma samples were thawed and denatured by the addition of four
parts of ice-cold methanol containing a fixed amount of an internal
standard to one part of plasma. The resulting protein precipitate was
removed by centrifugation at 5000 × g, and the
supernatants were analyzed directly. Concurrently plasma calibration
standards of BX 471 were prepared over the range of quantification,
processed, and analyzed under identical conditions. A FISONS, VG
Platform single quadrupole instrument was used in these analyses with
an electrospray inlet operated at 3.57 kV. Chromatographic separation
was accomplished using a YMC AQ octadecyl silane reversed phase column
(4.6 × 250 mm) following a short isocratic elution method (35%
methanol, 65% water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid). The total
column flow (1 ml/min) was split post-column to infuse 50 µl/min into
the mass spectrometer. The chromatograms were collected over a total
run time of 7.5 min/sample following a 50-µl injection on the column.
The ions were collected in a single ion positive ionization mode. A
calibration curve for quantification was generated by plotting ion
current ratios between the internal standard peak and the analyte in
the plasma standards over the quantification range. Calculations of
percent oral availability was deduced from the area under curve
measurements. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using
WinNonLin version 3.0.
WST-1 Staining--
THP-1 and HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1
were incubated with various concentrations of BX 471 for 24 and 72 h followed by the addition of 10 µl of WST-1 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) into 100 µl of culture medium. After 1 h of
incubation with the dye at 37 °C, the optical density was measured
by the SpectraMax plate reader at 440 nm.
EAE Study in Lewis Rats--
Male Lewis rats were immunized
subcutaneously into both hind footpads with 50 µl of a guinea pig
spinal cord homogenate. The guinea pig spinal cord homogenate was
prepared by homogenizing guinea pig (male Hartley) whole spinal cords
and adjusting the concentration to 1 g/ml with 0.9% physiological
saline. This homogenate was then diluted (1:1) with complete Freund's
adjuvant containing 1 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis. One
day after immunization the animals were injected subcutaneously 3 times/day with increasing doses of the CCR1 antagonist BX 471 (5, 20, and 50 mg/kg) dissolved in 40% cyclodextrin insaline solution or with
the vehicle as a control. There were 10 animals per treatment group.
Rats were weighed, and clinical symptoms were evaluated on a daily
basis throughout the study and scored as follows: 0, no symptoms; 1, complete tail paralysis; 2, paraparesis, abnormal gait; 3, paralysis of
one hind limb; 4, paralysis of both hind limbs; 5, moribund or dead.
Clinical score data were analyzed using an analysis of variance and
Fisher's least significant difference.
 |
RESULTS |
BX 471 Displaced Ligand Binding to CCR1--
Chemical optimization
of compounds identified from high capacity screening of our compound
libraries, using a CCR1 binding assay as described (4), yielded the
lead compound, designated BX 471 (Fig.
1). In competition binding experiments
with HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1, BX 471 was able to displace
125I-RANTES binding in a
concentration-dependent manner with a Ki of 2.8 nM, which is similar to the KD
for RANTES of 1 nM (Fig. 2,
Table I). In addition to RANTES, other
ligands that bind to CCR1 with high affinity include MIP-1
and
MCP-3. Competition binding studies showed that BX 471 could displace
both 125I-MIP-1
and 125I-MCP-3 binding from
human CCR1 with Ki values of 1 and 5.5 nM, respectively (Table I). These data demonstrated that BX
471 was a potent inhibitor of CCR1.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Radiolabeled human RANTES binding to human
CCR1 was displaced by unlabeled RANTES, MIP-1
and BX 471. HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1 were
incubated for 30 min at room temperature with 125I-RANTES
in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled RANTES,
MIP-1 or BX 471. The binding reactions were terminated by filtration
of cells through a GFB glass fiber filter soaked in 3%
polyethyleneimine. The data shown are specific binding as a percentage
of total binding ± S.D. Specific binding was ~10% of total
125I-RANTES added. Total binding was approximately 2500 cpm, and nonspecific binding was approximately 800 cpm. The results
shown in each case were from two separate studies. The inset
shows a Scatchard plot for BX 471 displacement of
125I-RANTES binding to CCR1.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
The displacement of radiolabeled MIP-1 , RANTES, and MCP-3 binding to
CCR1-transfected HEK293 cells by BX 471
HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1 were incubated with radiolabeled
ligands MIP-1 , RANTES, and MCP-3 in the presence of increasing
concentrations of BX 471. The binding assay was terminated by
filtration as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
Ki values were calculated by fitting the data with
the computer program IGOR (wavemetrics) and presented as the mean of
two experiments ± S.E.
|
|
Functional Antagonism for CCR1--
To demonstrate that BX 471 is
a functional antagonist for human CCR1, we measured the ability of the
compound to inhibit agonist-induced Ca2+ mobilization in
CCR1-expressing cells. As shown in Fig.
3, MIP-1
at 30 nM induced
a rapid and transient increase in intracellular Ca2+ (Fig.
3, inset). BX 471 inhibited the Ca2+ transients
induced by submaximal concentrations of CCR1 ligands, 30 nM
MIP-1
, 300 nM RANTES, and 100 nM MCP-3 in a
concentration-dependent manner with IC50 values
of 5, 2, and 6 nM, respectively, demonstrating functional
antagonism for CCR1 (Fig. 3). When given alone, the compound did not
induce Ca2+ transients, indicating that the compound has no
intrinsic agonistic activity (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
BX 471 inhibited the ability of CCR1 agonists
MIP-1 , RANTES, and MCP-3 to increase
Ca2+ transients in HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1.
Fluo-3-loaded cells were pretreated with increasing concentrations of
BX 471 for 15 min and then stimulated with CCR1 agonists MIP-1 (30 nM), RANTES (300 nM), and MCP-3 (100 nM). The changes in fluorescence representing the changes
in Ca2+ concentration were measured by FLIPR at 37 °C.
Data shown were average fluorescence counts (percent of the counts in
the absence of BX 471) ± S.D. The inset graph
shows the time course of the MIP-1 -induced increase of intracellular
Ca2+ concentration. The Ca2+ concentration was
shown as nM, calculated as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
The reversibility of receptor inhibition by an antagonist is a
desirable property for a therapeutic agent. The Ca2+
mobilization assay was used to test the reversibility of the BX 471 effect. HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1 were treated with 300 nM BX 471 for 30 min at 37 °C, and under these
conditions CCR1 was completely inhibited. The compound was then removed
from cells by 8 washes with media and assay buffer. The
Ca2+ transients in response to 30 nM MIP-1
was then measured. As shown in Fig. 4,
MIP-1
at 30 nM increased intracellular Ca2+
concentration, and the response was completely inhibited by 300 nM BX 471. After removal of BX 471, the MIP-1
-induced
Ca2+ transients recovered, indicating the reversibility of
the CCR1 inhibition by BX 471.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Reversibility of BX 471 inhibition on
CCR1-mediated increase in Ca2+ transients on HEK293 cells
expressing human CCR1. Fluo-3-loaded cells were pretreated with or
without 300 nM BX 471 for 30 min during loading. After 30 min of pretreatment, BX 471 was removed by rinsing cells 4 times with
media at 37 °C followed by rinsing 4 times with assay buffer. Some
of the untreated cells were incubated with 300 nM BX 471 for 15 min. Then all the cells were stimulated with or without 30 nM MIP-1 . The changes in fluorescence representing the
changes in Ca2+ concentration were measured by FLIPR at
37 °C. Data shown were average fluorescence counts (percent of the
counts in the absence of BX 471) ± S.D.
|
|
To further examine the functional antagonism of BX 471, we measured its
ability to inhibit the extracellular acidification rate in response to
MIP-1
in THP-1 cells using the microphysiometer (10). As shown in
Fig. 5, MIP-1
induced a rapid increase
in the extracellular acidification rate, reaching a maximum after about
2 min and returning close to base-line levels within 8 min. The
response elicited by MIP-1
was inhibited by BX 471 in a
concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of
approximately 1 nM (Fig. 5).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The CCR1 antagonist, BX 471, inhibits the
ability of MIP-1 to increase the extracellular
acidification rate in THP-1 cells. Cells were pretreated with
increasing concentrations of BX 471 for 30 min and then stimulated with
1 nM MIP-1 . The increase in acidification rate was
monitored using a microphysiometer. Data have been normalized as
percentage biological response. Data shown are representative of at
least three separate studies.
|
|
As an additional measurement of the functional antagonism of BX 471 for
CCR1, the expression of the integrin CD11b on monocytes was measured in
a whole blood assay using FACScan analysis (Fig. 6). MIP-1
dose responsively induced
the expression of CD11b on monocytes with an EC50 of 110 nM (Fig. 6A). Blood from two separate donors was
incubated with 1 µM BX 471 and then stimulated with 100 nM MIP-1
. The CCR1 antagonist inhibited CD11b
up-regulation by MIP-1
by 100% and 65%, respectively (Fig. 6,
B and C).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
BX 471 inhibits the
MIP-1 -induced up-regulation of CD11b in human
blood. A, MIP-1 dose-response curve. Human whole
blood was collected and pretreated with increasing concentrations of
MIP-1 at 37 °C for 15 min. The reaction was terminated, and the
expression of CD11b was determined by FACScan analysis using
FITC-labeled antibody against CD11b. B and C,
inhibition of MIP-1 -induced CD11b up-regulation by BX 471. Human
whole blood from two separate donors was collected and pretreated with
or without 1 µM BX 471. The blood was then stimulated
with or without 100 nM MIP-1 . Data are expressed as
fluorescence intensity.
|
|
Chemokines were originally defined and classified as potent leukocyte
chemoattractants mediating their effects through GPCR like CCR1 (11).
Thus, characterization of a putative CCR1 antagonist would be
incomplete without demonstrable inhibition of leukocyte migration
elicited by a chemokine stimulus. Fig. 7
shows that BX 471 is able to inhibit the directed migration of both
human lymphocytes and monocytes in response to the CCR1 ligands
MIP-1
and RANTES but has no effect on the CCR5 ligand MIP-1
, the
CCR2 ligand MCP-1, or the CXCR4 ligand stromal-derived factor 1
.
Thus, BX 471 is a potent inhibitor of leukocyte migration and is
specific for the CCR1 receptor since it is unable to affect the
directed migration of cells in response to various chemokine ligands
for CCR5, CCR2, CXCR1, and CXCR4. It thus shows functional selectivity as well as functional antagonism.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The CCR1 antagonist, BX 471, inhibits
chemotaxis of human lymphocytes and monocytes induced by
MIP-1 and RANTES. A,
lymphocytes were examined for their ability to migrate in response to
various CC and CXC chemokines (100 nM) in the presence or
absence of the CCR1 antagonist BX 471 (100 nM) as described
under "Experimental Procedures." B, monocytes were
examined for their ability to migrate in response to various CC and CXC
chemokines (100 nM) in the presence or absence of the CCR1
antagonist BX 471 (100 nM) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The results shown are the mean of three
experiments ± S.E. HPF, high power field.
|
|
Schild Analysis of BX 471--
The mechanism of the antagonistic
effect of BX 471 was examined on CCR1-transfected cells by Schild
analysis (12). The concentration-response curves for Ca2+
transients induced by MIP-1
in the presence of increasing
concentrations of BX 471 were determined (Fig.
8). BX 471 shifted the
concentration-response curves to the right. However, the CCR1
inhibition by BX 471 could be overcome by increasing concentrations of
MIP-1
, suggesting surmountable antagonism (Fig. 8A).
After transformation of the data, a linear Schild plot was generated
with a slope of 1.29, which is not significantly different from unity
(Fig. 8B). The pA2 value of 8.45 was obtained from the
intercept on the x axis. The deduced Ki
of 3.5 nM from the Schild plot is consistent with the
Ki predicted from the receptor binding assay (Fig. 2
and Table I).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Concentration-response curves for the ability
of MIP-1 to increase Ca2+
transients in HEK293 cells expressing human CCR1 in the presence of
increasing concentrations of BX 471. A, Fluo-3-loaded
cells were pretreated with increasing concentrations of BX 471 for 15 min followed by increasing concentrations of MIP-1 . The changes in
fluorescence representing the changes in Ca2+ concentration
were measured by FLIPR at 37 °C. Data shown were average
fluorescence counts. B, Schild plot of transformed data from
A. The results shown are representative of three separate
studies.
|
|
Selectivity of BX 471 for CCR1--
Since CCR1 belongs to a large
family of GPCR that numbers well over 450 members (13), it is important
to determine the specificity of the CCR1 antagonist to establish its
therapeutic utility. The selectivity of BX 471 was thus tested for
inhibition of radioligand binding against a panel of 28 GPCR, including
related chemokine receptors. Although BX 471 had a
Ki of inhibition for CCR1 ranging from 1 to 5.5 nM (Table I), it had less than 50% inhibitory activity for
all receptors tested at a concentration of 10 µM (Table
II). These data indicated that BX 471 had
a greater than 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 compared with all other GPCR tested.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Specificity of BX 471 binding to GPCR
BX 471 was tested in receptor binding assays on a number of GPCR. All
receptors were expressed in HEK293 cells except for the following: CCR5
in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells; CXCR4 in Jurkat,
adrenergic 2 in NBR1 cells, bradykinin in HS729 cells,
endothelin in Chinese hamster ovary cells, muscarinic M1 and M2 in
Sf9 insect cells. Binding assays were carried out in whole cells
at 4 °C and at compound concentrations of 1 and 10 µM.
DARC, Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines; Me, methyl;
SDF1 -stromal-derived factor 1 ; AB-MECA,
4-aminobenzyl-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine; NMS,
N-methyl-scopolamine; 8-OH-DPAT,
8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl-amino)-tertralin; MGSA, melanoma
growth stimulatory activity.
|
|
Effect of BX 471 on General Toxicity--
To demonstrate that CCR1
antagonism by BX 471 was not due to the cellular toxicity of the
compound, THP-1- or CCR1-transfected HEK293 cells were treated with BX
471 at concentrations up to 10 µM for 24 h, and
cellular toxicity was monitored by measuring WST-1 staining. No
significant toxicity was observed (data not shown). The toxicity for BX
471 was further examined in vivo by a battery of serum
diagnostic tests including hepatic and renal function tests and blood
electrolytes on rabbits that had been dosed with BX 471 at 20 mg/kg/day
for 30 days. The test results all fell within the normal range (data
not shown). The results suggest that the inhibition of BX 471 on CCR1
activation was not due to cellular toxicity and that chronic treatment
with the drug had no adverse effects on the normal physiology of the animals.
Pharmacokinetics of BX 471 in Dogs--
The oral bioavailability
of BX 471 was examined in conscious dogs. BX 471 was administered to
fasted male beagle dogs at 4 mg/kg in a vehicle of 40% cyclodextrin in
saline by bolus intravenous injection via the cephalic vein or by oral
gavage. The plasma samples were prepared, and compound concentrations
in the plasma were determined by HPLC-MS. As shown in Fig.
9, BX 471 reached peak plasma levels
approximately 2 h after oral dosing and maintained measurable
concentrations for up to 6 h. BX 471 exhibits a volume of
distribution (0.5 l/kg) close to the volume of body water (0.6 l/kg),
suggesting that the compound is confined primarily to the aqueous
volume (Table III). Low clearance, 2 ml/min/kg (which represents less than 10% of the total liver blood
flow) in the dog resulted in a moderate terminal half-life of 3 h
(Fig. 9 and Table III). For dogs that were orally dosed, the half-life
for BX 471 was approximately 3 h. Calculations of percent oral
availability using area under curve measurements obtained from analysis
using TOPFIT software indicated that BX 471 is an orally absorbed drug
in fasted dogs with an oral bioavailability of approximately 60% (Fig.
9 and Table III).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Time course of plasma concentrations of BX
471 after dosing dogs intravenously or orally. Fasted male beagle
dogs (n = 3 per treatment group) were administered BX
471 by either oral gavage (po) or intravenous injection
(iv) via the cephalic vein at a dose of 4 mg/kg. Serial
blood samples were collected at the indicated time points up to 6 h post-drug. The samples were analyzed for drug levels by HPLC-MS. Data
are shown as plasma concentrations of BX 471 at the indicated time
points post-drug. Calculations of percent oral availability using area
under curve measurements were obtained from analysis using TOPFIT
software.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Pharmacokinetic parameters for BX 471 in dog
Absolute bioavailability (%F) was estimated to be 60%.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonLin version 3.0 software. AUC, area under curve.
|
|
Efficacy of BX 471 in a Rat EAE Model of Multiple
Sclerosis--
Before determining the efficacy of BX 471 in a rat EAE
model of multiple sclerosis, we tested its ability to inhibit MIP-1
binding to rat CCR1 receptors. Scatchard analysis of competition binding studies with BX 471 demonstrated that the compound was able to
inhibit chemokine binding to rat CCR1 with a Ki of
121 ± 60 nM (data not shown), which was approximately
100 times less effective for rat CCR1 than for human CCR1. In addition, BX 471 does not inhibit chemokine binding to rat CCR5 (data not shown)
and is thus specific for rat CCR1.
From pharmacokinetic studies in rats, we determined that the
subcutaneous administration of BX 471 three times a day would give
blood drug levels of 1 to 5 µM (data not shown), which we calculated would be about 10-50 times the Ki on rat
CCR1 receptors and should be sufficient for inhibition of MIP-1
binding. Unfortunately in contrast to the pharmacokinetic data obtained in the dog, BX 471 was poorly orally available in the rat (<20%, data
not shown). Based on these studies, a rat EAE model of multiple sclerosis was set up.
Animals were dosed subcutaneously three times a day with vehicle or
with BX 471 at 5, 20, and 50 mg/kg. The CCR1 antagonist, BX 471, dose-dependently decreased the severity of the disease (Fig. 10A). At the highest
dose, 50 mg/kg, there was a marked reduction in the clinical score that
was statistically significant at p = 0.05 (analyzed by
analysis of variance) compared with the vehicle control. However, even
at the lower two doses of BX 471, 20 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg, there were
still noticeable decreases in the clinical score. This is more readily
observed by expressing the data as the average accumulated clinical
score per treatment group (Fig. 10B). Statistical analysis
of the average accumulated clinical score data by t test
revealed that the 50 and 20 mg/kg doses were statistically significant
compared with the vehicle control p = 0.003 and
p = 0.014, respectively.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The CCR1 antagonist, BX 471, decreases the
severity of disease in a rat EAE model of multiple sclerosis.
Disease was induced in male Lewis rats as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Animals were either treated with vehicle
(40% cyclodextrin in saline) or with solutions of BX 471 (5, 20, and
50 mg/kg) three times a day as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A, average clinical scores in Lewis rats
treated with BX 471. B, average cumulative clinical score in
Lewis rats treated with BX 471. For details see under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Increasing evidence suggests a role for the chemokines MIP-1
and RANTES in autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis (1, 2, 14, 15) and in organ transplant rejection
(16-18). A receptor for these chemokines, CCR1, could therefore be a
major therapeutic target. Indeed, recent studies with CCR1 knockout
mice in animal models of multiple sclerosis (3) and organ transplant
rejection (19) have implicated this receptor in the pathogenesis of
these diseases. Based on these data, we established a program to
discover potent, selective, small molecule antagonists of CCR1 for the
treatment of autoimmune diseases and organ transplant rejection.
The approach to identify CCR1 antagonists was to screen our compound
library with a high throughput 125I-MIP-1
binding assay
(4). The compounds identified from screening were chemically optimized,
and this led to the discovery of BX 471 (Fig. 1). BX 471 was a potent
inhibitor of chemokine binding to CCR1 (Fig. 2 and Table I) and
inhibited the activation of CCR1 measured by Ca2+
mobilization, extracellular acidification, CD11b expression, and cell
migration (Figs. 3, 5, 6, and 7).
The direct mechanism by which BX 471 inhibits the activation of human
CCR1 has not yet been established. However, based on our studies, we
favor the idea that the compound directly binds to CCR1, leading to the
blockade of receptor activation. MIP-1
was able to bind to both CCR1
and CCR5 with high affinity. However, BX 471 was able to inhibit the
binding and activation of CCR1 but not CCR5. Therefore, it is unlikely
that BX 471 inhibits CCR1 by direct binding to the CCR1 ligand,
MIP-1
. In addition, BX 471 did not demonstrate toxicity either
in vitro or in vivo. Furthermore, BX 471 showed
greater than a 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 when tested in 28 other
GPCR binding assays and in cell migration assays in response to
MIP-1
, MCP-1, interleukin-8, and stromal-derived factor 1
. These
data suggest that CCR1 inhibition by BX 471 is not due to either
cellular toxicity or nonspecific interaction with other cell surface
receptors. Furthermore, a radiolabeled active analogue of BX 471 was
able to bind to CCR1 with high affinity (data not shown).
The antagonism of CCR1 by BX 471 appeared to be reversible and
surmountable (Figs. 4 and 8). The data is consistent with competitive antagonism. Mechanistically, competitive antagonism is observed when an
antagonist binds to the same site on a receptor as the agonist but is
incapable of activating the receptor, therefore preventing receptor
binding and subsequent activation of the receptor by its agonist. In
addition, similar Schild data could also be obtained if the antagonist
were to bind to a separate but interacting site on the receptor from
the agonist binding site.
Studies with a number of GPCR have revealed that the receptor binding
sites for antagonists can be distinct from the agonist binding sites
(20-22). For example, Gether et al. (21) demonstrate that
non-conserved residues in transmembrane segments V and VI were
essential for the binding of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, CP-96345, to its receptor but were not important for the binding of the
natural peptide ligand, substance P. Since the chemical structure of BX
471 does not resemble the natural ligands of CCR1, it is tempting to
speculate that BX 471 binds to separate or overlapping sites on CCR1
rather than to those involved in chemokine binding.
Although peptide antagonists of chemokine receptors have been described
(23, 24), their sub-optimal metabolic stability and oral
bioavailability have limited their therapeutic utility. Non-peptide
antagonists could potentially overcome these disadvantages. Studies
show that BX 471 was 60% orally available when tested in conscious
dogs. It appeared to be relatively stable in plasma with a clearance
rate of 2 ml/min/kg and maintained a measurable level for at least
6 h (Fig. 9 and Table III). Therefore, if these profiles of BX 471 are confirmed in humans, this compound would provide a better
alternative as a therapeutic candidate than the peptide antagonists reported.
We have previously identified a small molecule CCR1 antagonist,
2-2-diphenyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl)valeronitrile (4, 25).
In addition, a patent filed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.
reported a CCR1 antagonist, a urea piperidine derivative of the nitrile
group, that is structurally similar to our 4-hydroxypiperidine series
(26). This compound, however, demonstrated potential cross-reactivity
with several biogenic amine neurotransmitter receptors. Furthermore,
Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. has recently reported small molecule CCR1
antagonists (27). This patent disclosure reports a group of tricyclic
amides that inhibited receptor binding with an IC50 of 1.8 nM. These compounds were also reported to inhibit binding
to CCR3 with a similar IC50 (1.7 nM), making
them less specific than the Berlex compound. The fact that these
compounds are quaternary ammonium salts may further limit their
therapeutic use due to potential pharmacokinetic problems such as poor
oral absorption and rapid elimination. Thus, based on these studies, BX
471 appears to be more highly specific and superior on pharmacological and pharmacokinetic grounds to the other reported CCR1 antagonists.
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease mediated by extensive
infiltration of T lymphocytes and monocytes into the central nervous
system followed by resident macrophage and microglia activation. This
results in an extensive inflammation and subsequent demyelination of
the white matter in the central nervous system (28). Although the
mechanisms responsible for causing this immunologic damage in the
central nervous system are still unknown, regulation of the recruitment
of activated immune cells and the extravasation of these cells into the
central nervous system has been readily studied. Chemokine-induced
recruitment of leukocyte subsets clearly plays roles in chronic
inflammatory diseases and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of
multiple sclerosis (29-31). Based on chemokine antibody neutralization
experiments, there is evidence for a role of MIP-1
in animal models
of multiple sclerosis (1, 2). Although recruitment into the vasculature
of the brain is likely to be directed by these chemoattractant
proteins, leukocyte activation also takes place and results in the
up-regulation of adhesion molecules. Neutralization of leukocyte
integrins has demonstrated an ability to inhibit or prevent EAE in
rodent models (32-35) and has even been proposed as a possible therapy
in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (36). Since we have data showing
that BX 471 is able to inhibit the MIP-1
-induced up-regulation of adhesion molecules like CD11b on primary human leukocytes (Fig. 6), we
rationalized that the CCR1 antagonist BX 471 could be effective in an
EAE animal model of multiple sclerosis.
The CCR1 antagonist, BX 471, at 50 mg/kg gives a 50% reduction of
clinical score in the rat EAE model (Fig. 10). The much higher doses of
BX 471 that are required to be effective in rat EAE could be due to the
fact that the compound has a Ki for inhibition of
MIP-1
binding for rat CCR1 of 121 nM, compared with a
compound Ki of 1-2 nM for human CCR1.
Based on these considerations, it is likely that much lower doses of BX
471 (500 µg/kg or less) would be required to be therapeutically
effective in treating multiple sclerosis in humans.
The complex pathology of the development of multiple sclerosis
demonstrates the involvement of several factors that are both peripheral and central nervous system-specific. Clearly, inhibition of
peripheral leukocyte activation and recruitment can effect the
development of central nervous system pathologies. Inhibition of
central nervous system-specific glial activation can also ameliorate the effects of neuronal and oligodendrocyte dysfunction and
destruction. CCR1 expression within demyelinating plaques of
multiple sclerosis brains on T-lymphocytes, macrophage/microglia, or
vascular expression on T lymphocytes implicate this receptor in the
pathology of this disease. It is highly likely that a stepwise process
of leukocyte accumulation in the central nervous system occurs in
multiple sclerosis. Lymphocyte expression of CCR1 in the periphery
leads to accumulation of activated cells in blood vessels of multiple sclerosis brains; after transendothelial migration to the perivascular regions, the receptor would likely be down-modulated. Here the expression of other chemokine receptors such as CCR5 and CXCR3, markers
of Th1 type T lymphocytes, would be necessary for disease progression.
Although a number of chemokines, MIP-1
, RANTES, MCP-1, interferon
inducible protein of 10KD, monokine induced by interferon
(reviewed
in Refs. 37-39) and various receptors CCR1, CCR5, CXCR3 (38, 39) have
been visualized in EAE or multiple sclerosis brains, the consequential
versus causative ramifications for the development of
multiple sclerosis pathology remain to be proven. Only by the use of
specific chemokine receptor inhibitors to treat multiple sclerosis in
human clinical trials will the significance of these molecules be elucidated.
In summary, we have identified a potent, selective, small molecule
functional antagonist for CCR1, BX 471. The inhibition of CCR1 by the
compound appears to be reversible and surmountable. Studies in dogs
demonstrated that the compound is orally available and relatively
stable in plasma, and the compound appears to be effective in an EAE
model of multiple sclerosis in the rat. We believe that BX 471 represents a CCR1 antagonist possessing high potential as a therapy
among all the CCR1 inhibitors reported so far. Multiple sclerosis is a
particularly devastating disease of the central nervous system. Other
than immunosuppresive drugs like steroids, which have a myriad of side
effects, or the use of interferons, no orally active drugs are
available for its treatment. Safety studies with BX 471 in a variety of
animal species have revealed no toxicity, hemodynamic, or central
nervous system effects with the drug at doses way in excess of the
blood plasma levels observed in this animal study (data not shown).
Thus, a specific treatment with an orally available small molecule like
BX 471 may represent a potential therapeutic alternative to the current drugs of choice in treating patients with multiple sclerosis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Meina Liang, Berlex
Biosciences, Dept. of Molecular Pharmacology, 15049 San Pablo Ave.,
Richmond, CA 94804. Tel.: 510-669-4091; Fax: 510-262-7844; E-mail:
meina_liang@berlex.com.
**
Current address: Coulter Pharmaceutical, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
§§
Current address: Mirus Corp., Madison, WI 53719.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 29, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001222200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptors;
CCR1, CC chemokine receptor-1;
MIP-1
, macrophage inflammatory protein-1
;
MCP-3, monocyte chemotactic
protein-3;
MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1;
EAE, experimental
allergic encephalomyelitis;
HEK293, human embryonic kidney cells;
FLIPR, fluorometric imaging plate reader;
FACScan, fluorescence-activated cell scanner;
HPLC-MS, high pressure liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry;
BX 471, R-N-[5-chloro-2-[2-[4-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-methyl-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethoxy]phenyl]urea
hydrochloric acid salt.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Karpus, W. J.,
Lukacs, N. W.,
McRae, B. L.,
Strieter, R. M.,
Kunkel, S. L.,
and Miller, S. D.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
5003-5010
|
| 2.
|
Karpus, W. J.,
and Kennedy, K. J.
(1997)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
62,
681-687
|
| 3.
|
Rottman, J. B.,
Silva, R.,
Slavin, A.,
Weiner, H. L.,
Gerard, C. G.,
and Hancock, W. W.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
666 (abstr.)
|
| 4.
|
Hesselgesser, J.,
Ng, H. P.,
Liang, M.,
Zheng, W.,
May, K.,
Bauman, J. G.,
Monahan, S.,
Islam, I.,
Wei, G. P.,
Ghannam, A.,
Taub, D. D.,
Rosser, M.,
Snider, R. M.,
Morrissey, M. M.,
Perez, H. D.,
and Horuk, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15687-15692
|
| 5.
|
Neote, K.,
DiGregorio, D.,
Mak, J. Y.,
Horuk, R.,
and Schall, T. J.
(1993)
Cell
72,
415-425
|
| 6.
|
Armatruda, T. T.,
Gerard, N. P.,
Gerard, C.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10139-10144
|
| 7.
|
Grynkiewicz, G.,
Poenie, M.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3440-3450
|
| 8.
|
Taub, D. D.,
Key, M. L.,
Clark, D.,
and Turcovski-Corrales, S. M.
(1995)
J. Immunol. Methods
184,
187-198
|
| 9.
|
Conklyn, M. J.,
Neote, K.,
and Showell, H. J.
(1996)
Cytokine
8,
762-766
|
| 10.
|
Parce, J. W.,
Owicki, J. C.,
Kercso, K. M.,
Sigal, G. B.,
Wada, H. G.,
Muir, V. C.,
Bousse, L. J.,
Ross, K. L.,
Sikic, B. I.,
and McConnell, H. M.
(1989)
Science
246,
243-247
|
| 11.
|
Baggiolini, M.
(1998)
Nature
392,
565-568
|
| 12.
|
Arunlakshana, O.,
and Schild, H. O.
(1959)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
14,
48-58
|
| 13.
|
Horn, F.,
Weare, J.,
Beukers, M. W.,
Horsch, S.,
Bairoch, A.,
Chen, W.,
Edvardsen, O.,
Campagne, F.,
and Vriend, G.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
275-279
|
| 14.
|
Barnes, D. A.,
Tse, J.,
Kaufhold, M.,
Owen, M.,
Hesselgesser, J.,
Strieter, R.,
Horuk, R.,
and Perez, D. H.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
2910-2919
|
| 15.
|
Plater-Zyberk, C.,
Hoogewerf, A. J.,
Proudfoot, A. E. I.,
Power, C. A.,
and Wells, T. N. C.
(1997)
Immunol. Lett.
57,
117-120
|
| 16.
|
Wiedermann, C. J.,
Kowald, E. N.,
Reinish, N.,
Kaehler, C. M.,
von Luettichau, I.,
Pattison, J. M.,
Huie, P.,
Sibley, R. K.,
Nelson, P. J.,
and Krensky, A. M.
(1993)
Curr. Biol.
3,
735-739
|
| 17.
|
Pattison, J.,
Nelson, P. J.,
Huie, P.,
Von, L. I.,
Farshid, G.,
Sibley, R. K.,
and Krensky, A. M.
(1994)
Lancet
343,
209-211
|
| 18.
|
Grone, H. J.,
Weber, C.,
Weber, K. S.,
Grone, E. F.,
Rabelink, T.,
Klier, C. M.,
Wells, T. N.,
Proudfood, A. E.,
Schlondorff, D.,
and Nelson, P. J.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1371-1383
|
| 19.
|
Gao, W.,
Topham, P. S.,
King, J. A.,
Smiley, S. T.,
Csizmadia, V. B. L.,
Gerard, C. J.,
and Hancock, W. W.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
35-44
|
| 20.
|
Beinborn, M.,
Lee, Y. M.,
McBride, E. W.,
Quinn, S. M.,
and Kopin, A. S.
(1993)
Nature
362,
348-350
|
| 21.
|
Gether, U.,
Johansen, T. E.,
Snider, R. M.,
Lowe, J. A. d.,
Nakanishi, S.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1993)
Nature
362,
345-348
|
| 22.
|
Kong, H.,
Raynor, K.,
Yano, H.,
Takeda, J.,
Bell, G. I.,
and Reisine, T.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8042-8046
|
| 23.
|
Proudfoot, A. E. I.,
Power, C. A.,
Hoogewerf, A. J.,
Montjovent, M. O.,
Borlat, F.,
Offord, R. E.,
and Wells, T. N. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2599-2603
|
| 24.
|
Simmons, G.,
Clapham, P. R.,
Picard, L.,
Offord, R. E.,
Rosenkilde, M. M.,
Schwartz, T. W.,
Buser, R.,
Wells, T. N. C.,
and Proudfoot, A. E. I.
(1997)
Science
276,
276-279
|
| 25.
|
Ng, H. P.,
May, K.,
Bauman, J. G.,
Ghannam, A.,
Islam, I.,
Liang, M.,
Horuk, R.,
Hesselgesser, J.,
Snider, R. M.,
Perez, H. D.,
and Morrissey, M. M.
(1999)
J. Med. Chem.
42,
4680-4694
|
| 26.
| Kato, K., Yamamoto, M., Honda, S., and Fujisawa, T. (1997) in World
(PCT) Patent WO-9724325
|
| 27.
| Naya, A., Owada, Y., Saeki, T., Ohkawi, K., and Iwasawa, K. (1998) in
World (PCT) Patent W0-9804554
|
| 28.
|
Ebers, G. C.
(1986)
in
Diseases of the Nervous System
(Asbury, A. K.
, McKhann, G. M.
, and McDonald, W. I., eds)
, pp. 1268-1281, Ardmore Medical Books, Philadelphia
|
| 29.
|
Merrill, J. E.
(1987)
Immunol. Today
8,
146-150
|
| 30.
|
Benveniste, E. N.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
32,
C1-C16
|
| 31.
|
Luster, A. D.
(1998)
N. Engl. J. Med.
338,
436-445
|
| 32.
|
Cannella, B.,
Cross, A. H.,
and Raine, C. S.
(1993)
J. Neuroimmunol.
46,
43-55
|
| 33.
|
Kent, S. J.,
Karlik, S. J.,
Cannon, C.,
Hines, D. K.,
Yednock, T. A.,
Fritz, L. C.,
and Horner, H. C.
(1995)
J. Neuroimmunol.
58,
1-10
|
| 34.
|
Keszthelyi, E.,
Karlik, S.,
Hyduk, S.,
Rice, G. P.,
Gordon, G.,
Yednock, T.,
and Horner, H.
(1996)
Neurology
47,
1053-1059
|
| 35.
|
Yednock, T. A.,
Cannon, C.,
Fritz, L. C.,
Sanchez-Madrid, F.,
Steinman, L.,
and Karin, N.
(1992)
Nature
356,
63-66
|
| 36.
|
Leger, O. J.,
Yednock, T. A.,
Tanner, L.,
Horner, H. C.,
Hines, D. K.,
Keen, S.,
Saldanha, J.,
Jones, S. T.,
Fritz, L. C.,
and Bendig, M. M.
(1997)
Hum. Antibodies
8,
3-16
|
| 37.
|
Hesselgesser, J.,
and Horuk, R.
(1999)
J. Neurovirol.
5,
13-26
|
| 38.
|
Balashov, K. E.,
Rottman, J. B.,
Weiner, H. L.,
and Hancock, W. W.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6873-6878
|
| 39.
|
Sorensen, T. L.,
Tani, M.,
Jensen, J.,
Pierce, V.,
Lucchinetti, C.,
Folcik, V. A.,
Qin, S.,
Rottman, J.,
Sellebjerg, F.,
Strieter, R. M.,
Frederiksen, J. L.,
and Ransohoff, R. M.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
807-815
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. W. Distler, A. Akhmetshina, G. Schett, and O. Distler
Monocyte chemoattractant proteins in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis
Rheumatology,
November 4, 2008;
(2008)
ken401v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-E. Turner, H.-J. Paust, O. M. Steinmetz, A. Peters, C. Meyer-Schwesinger, F. Heymann, U. Helmchen, S. Fehr, R. Horuk, U. Wenzel, et al.
CCR5 Deficiency Aggravates Crescentic Glomerulonephritis in Mice
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2008;
181(9):
6546 - 6556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|