![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19146-19149, June 23, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received for publication, March 9, 2000, and in revised form, April 14, 2000
Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is an essential
enzyme for maintaining genomic integrity. Here we describe a UDG from
the extreme thermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus. The enzyme
is a member of a new class of enzymes found in prokaryotes that is
distinct from the UDG enzyme found in Escherichia coli,
eukaryotes, and DNA-containing viruses. The A. fulgidus UDG
is extremely thermostable, maintaining full activity after heating for
1.5 h at 95 °C. The protein is capable of removing uracil from
double-stranded DNA containing either a U/A or U/G base pair as well as
from single-stranded DNA. This enzyme is product-inhibited by both
uracil and apurinic/apyrimidinic sites. The A. fulgidus UDG
has a high degree of similarity at the primary amino acid sequence
level to the enzyme found in Thermotoga maritima, a
thermophilic eubacteria, and suggests a conserved mechanism of
UDG-initiated base excision repair in archaea and thermophilic eubacteria.
Uracil-DNA glycosylase
(UDG)1 is a ubiquitous enzyme
found in most eukaryotes and prokaryotes (1-3). This enzyme removes
uracil that is present in DNA either due to deamination of cytosine or misincorporation of dUMP in place of dTMP (4, 5) and is the primary
activity in the base excision repair pathway for the removal of uracil
from DNA. The protein has been well characterized in both
Escherichia coli and from eukaryotic cells; the crystal structures of the E. coli, human, and herpes simplex virus
UDGs have been solved (6-8). A high degree of similarity has been noted for the E. coli enzyme and its eukaryotic analogues;
for example, the human enzyme and the E. coli proteins are
55.7% identical (9).
UDG activities have been shown to be present in several thermophiles
(10-12). However, several bacterial genomes lack sequences complementary to the E. coli ung gene (13). This suggests
that if UDG activities are present in these organisms, they may differ significantly from the E. coli/eukaryotic/viral UDG enzymes
at least at the primary amino acid sequence level.
We have isolated a gene from the thermophile Thermotoga
maritima that expresses a uracil-DNA glycosylase (14). The gene was discovered by having weak sequence similarity to the E. coli G:T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase (mug)
gene. The protein is thermostable and acts to remove uracil from both
U/A and U/G base pairs in DNA. Analogous genes appear to be present in
several other prokaryotic organisms in both eubacteria and archaea.
These findings suggest that the T. maritima UDG is a member
of a new class of DNA repair enzymes.
In this study we describe the isolation and characterization of the
uracil-DNA glycosylase from Archaeoglobus fulgidus (15). This is the first UDG to be isolated from archaea. This protein is
highly homologous to the enzyme from T. maritima, yet is
considerably more heat-stable. These findings suggest a conserved
mechanism of uracil base excision repair in archaea.
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids--
BW310 (l-, ung-1,
relA1, spoT1, thi-, obtained from E. coli Genetic Stock
Center, Yale University) was lysogenized with Cloning of the A. fulgidus UDG Gene--
PCR was carried out
using a pUC18 plasmid containing an insert of A. fulgidus
genomic DNA (GAFFT53 pUC18 TIGR clone, obtained from American Type
Culture Collection) as template, and the oligonucleotides 5'-GGGGAAGCTAGCATGGAGTCTCTGGACGAC-3' and
5'-GGCCGGGGATCCTCATAGGTAATCAAAGAG-3' containing NheI and
BamHI restriction sites at the 3' and 5' ends, respectively,
for subsequent cloning into the pET28a vector system (Novagen). The DNA
sequence of the insert was confirmed by DNA sequencing analysis. The
plasmid expressing the His tag fusion protein, pET28a-afung,
was expressed in E. coli strain BW310(DE3).
Enzyme Purification--
BW310 (pET28a-afung) was
inoculated into LB medium containing 34 mg/ml kanamycin (LB-kan) and
was grown overnight at 37 °C. The overnight culture was diluted 1:50
with fresh LB-kan medium and was grown at 37 °C until the
A600 of the culture reached 0.8. Isopropyl-1-thio- DNA Substrates--
DNA containing 3H-labeled uracil
was prepared by nick translation of calf thymus DNA as described
previously (14). Oligonucleotide substrates were prepared as follows:
30-mer 5'-ATATACCGCGG(U/C)GGCCGATCAAGCTTATT-3' was 5'-end-labeled with 32P and was annealed to either
5'-AATAAGCTTGATCGGCCGACCGCGGTATAT-3' to give a double-stranded 30-mer
with a single U/A base pair or to 5'-AATAAGCTTGATCGGCCGGCCGCGGTATAT-3'
to give a double-stranded 30-mer with a single U/G base pair. An
analogous substrate containing a T/G base pair was also prepared. The
annealing of the oligonucleotides was performed as described previously
(14, 16). Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing AP sites were
prepared as follows: unlabeled double-stranded 30-mers (15 nmol) were
incubated with 150 ng of AFUDG at 37 °C overnight (16 h) in 50 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA (Promega; nuclease and uracil-DNA
glycosylase-free) in a total volume of 200 µl. Following the
reaction, an equal volume of phenol/chloroform was added to the
reaction mixture, and the oligonucleotides containing AP sites were
recovered following ethanol precipitation and lyophilization and were
dissolved in 150 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA.
Reactions with Double-stranded DNA--
Reactions (100 µl)
contained 0.75 pmol of DNA substrate containing 3H-labeled
uracil (15,000 cpm), 50 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA, 0.1 pmol of
AFUDG protein and were incubated at 70 °C for 10 min. Reactions were
stopped by the addition of 110 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid and 11 µl of calf thymus DNA (2.5 mg/ml). The samples were centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 5 min. Radioactivity contained in the
supernatant was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Reactions with Single-stranded DNA--
A solution (100 µl)
containing 0.75 pmol of DNA substrate containing 3H-labeled
uracil (15,000 cpm), 50 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA was
incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. AFUDG (0.1 pmol, preincubated at
95 °C) was added, and the reaction was continued for 10 min.
Reactions were stopped by the addition of 110 µl of 10%
trichloroacetic acid and 11 µl of calf thymus DNA (2.5 mg/ml). The
samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min.
Radioactivity contained in the supernatant was determined by liquid
scintillation counting.
A. fulgidus Uracil-DNA Glycosylase--
An open reading frame
(ORF) analogous to the UDG gene from T. maritima (14) was
identified following a BLAST (17) search of the A. fulgidus
genomic DNA (15). This ORF was identified at the Institute for Genomic
Research data base (locus AF2277) as being homologous to a DNA
polymerase from the Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage SPO1
(18). This ORF encodes a 199-amino acid protein of 22,718 daltons and
has a pI of 6.75. The sequence of this ORF was amplified by PCR, and
the PCR product was cloned into an expression vector, pET28a, which
places a histidine tag at the 5' end of the gene. The gene was
expressed in an E. coli strain deficient in UDG activity,
and the expression product was purified as a His tag fusion protein as
shown in Fig. 1.
Activity on Double-stranded DNA--
The UDG activity of the
expressed protein was determined using a double-stranded DNA substrate
containing 3H-labeled uracil substituted for thymine and
was measured at 70 °C. The protein did not lose activity when
preincubated without substrate at 95 °C for up to 1.5 h. The
enzyme was also active at temperatures 37 °C and above. A time
course for the release of uracil at 70 °C is shown in Fig.
2. The Km for release of uracil from this substrate was determined from Lineweaver-Burk analysis to be 0.5 µM, over a substrate range of 0.03 to
0.6 µM (Fig. 3). The enzyme
did not contain any apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease or lyase
activities, as well as exonuclease activities, and did not function as
a DNA polymerase. The enzyme demonstrated no difference in activity
within a pH range of 7.0 to 8.5. We have denoted the enzyme as A. fulgidus UDG (AFUDG); the gene is denoted as afung.
Activity on Single-stranded DNA--
The activity of the expressed
protein was also measured in a single-stranded DNA substrate containing
3H-labeled uracil substituted for thymine and was measured
at 95 °C. The Km for release of uracil from this
substrate was also determined from Lineweaver-Burk analysis to be 0.5 µM, over a substrate range of 0.03 to 0.6 µM. The kinetic constants (Km,
kcat, and
kcat/Km determined for both
double- and single-stranded DNA) are shown in Table
I.
Substrate Specificity of AFUDG--
To determine if AFUDG could
remove uracil opposite guanine, as would occur in DNA following
cytosine deamination, double-stranded oligonucleotide substrates
containing either a single U/A or U/G base pair were prepared, and the
activity of AFUDG on these substrates was determined. These substrates
are subject to alkaline cleavage at the internal AP site following
removal of uracil (16, 19, 20). The substrates were treated at 50 °C
with AFUDG to prevent thermal melting of the duplex oligonucleotides.
As seen in Fig. 4, the enzyme was capable
of removing uracil from both types of substrates, as seen by the
formation of an 11-mer with an unsaturated sugar-phosphate group at the
3' end (21) when the reaction products are resolved on a denaturing
gel. The enzyme did not remove thymine from an analogous
oligonucleotide substrate containing a T/G base pair under identical
reaction conditions. These results suggest that AFUDG has similar
enzymatic functions as the T. maritima UDG (14).
Product Inhibition of AFUDG--
It has been shown previously that
uracil-DNA glycosylases are product-inhibited by uracil and, in most
cases, AP sites present in DNA (22-24). As seen in Fig.
5, an increasing concentration of uracil
up to 10 mM resulted in up to a 40% reduction in the removal of uracil. In contrast, 2-deoxyribose 5-phosphate (dRp) at a
concentration of 5 mM resulted in less than a 10%
reduction of activity. To determine if AP sites present in DNA were
inhibitory, 30-mer oligonucleotides as described above containing AP
sites (either opposite G or A) were prepared and were incubated with AFUDG and the double-stranded DNA substrate containing
3H-labeled uracil. As shown in Fig.
6, oligonucleotides containing AP sites
opposite both A or G were inhibitory (greater than 50% inhibition with
a concentration of 4 µM and higher).
We have described a novel uracil-DNA glycosylase found in A. fulgidus that functions similarly to the E. coli UDG
and the T. maritima UDG but with an extremely high degree of
heat stability. The enzyme is a member of a new class of UDGs that have
functional similarity to the E. coli/eukaryotic/DNA-containing virus class of enzymes but differ
at the primary amino acid sequence level. This class of enzymes has
been found in both archaea as well as eubacteria and in both
thermophiles and mesophiles (14).
The A. fulgidus UDG is the first enzyme of its type to be
identified and characterized from archaea. Fig.
7 shows an alignment of multiple amino
acid sequences identified for putative homologues of AFUDG in archaeal
species. In addition to A. fulgidus, homologues have been
identified so far in Pyrococcus horikoshii, Pyrococcus abyssi, and Aeropyrum pernix.
The gene encoding AFUDG was identified initially as a homologue of a
DNA polymerase from the bacteriophage SP01 that infects B. subtilis (15, 18). This phage substitutes hydroxymethyluracil for
thymine in its DNA (26, 27). AFUDG demonstrated no DNA polymerase
activity and is considerably smaller in size (21 versus 106 kDa) than the SP01 DNA polymerase; however, it shows considerable homology to the amino-terminal end of the SP01 DNA polymerase. Whether
AFUDG is capable of removing hydroxymethyluracil from DNA remains to be investigated.
AFUDG was found to be inhibited by both uracil as well as AP sites
present in DNA. The degree of inhibition by an AP site was essentially
the same if the AP site was opposite A or opposite G. Inclusion of
sugar-phosphate (dRp) in the reaction did not effectively inhibit the
activity of AFUDG, suggesting the enzyme requires an intact AP site for
recognition. Other UDG activities are also inhibited by intact AP
sites; however, it has been demonstrated that a form of the human
mitochondrial enzyme exists that is resistant to AP site inhibition
(24).
We believe that AFUDG is used in the first step for the removal of
uracil in a base excision repair pathway in A. fulgidus and
suggests a conservation of the UDG-initiated base excision repair
pathway in archaea. Recently, it has been demonstrated that archaeal
DNA polymerases can recognize uracil residues in the template strand
and stall DNA synthesis (28). It is possible that archaeal DNA
polymerases may interact directly with the uracil-DNA glycosylase, thus
providing a role for this enzyme in removing uracil residues that may
result at replication forks.
*
This work was supported by NCI Grant CA52025 from the
National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 20, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001995200
The abbreviations used are:
UDG, uracil-DNA
glycosylase;
AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic;
AFUDG, A. fulgidus
uracil-DNA glycosylase;
dRp, deoxyribose phosphate;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
ORF, open reading frame;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid.
Uracil-DNA Glycosylase in the Extreme Thermophile
Archaeoglobus fulgidus*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
DE3 using the
lysogenation kit from Novagen. The plasmid pET28a was obtained from Novagen.
-D-galactopyranoside was then added to
a final concentration of 1 mM, and the culture was
incubated for an additional 3 h at 30 °C. Cells were pelleted
by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C
and then resuspended in 2 ml of ice-cold buffer containing 5 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9 (1× binding buffer). Cells were lysed
by sonication with 4 × 10-s bursts. The sonicate was clarified by
centrifugation at 12,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min
(fraction I). Fraction I (3 ml, 2 mg/ml) was applied at a flow rate of
0.5 ml/min to a 1.2-ml His-Bind Resin Ni2+ column
(Novagen), which was subsequently washed with 12 ml of 1× binding
buffer. Protein was eluted from the column with buffer containing 60 (6 ml), 100, 250, and 500 mM (3 ml each) imidazole in 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9. AFUDG was
mainly found in the 60 mM imidazole fraction (fraction II).
Fraction II (2.5 ml, 80 µg/ml) was loaded on a PD-10 gel filtration
column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and eluted with 3.5 ml of buffer A
(50 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol) (fraction III). Fraction III (3 ml,
55 µg/ml) was applied to a MonoS HR 5/5 column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), and protein was eluted from the column with a 20-ml linear
gradient from buffer A to buffer A containing 1 M NaCl at a
flow rate of 1 ml/min. Fractions (0.5 ml each) were assayed for AFUDG
activity. Active fractions were pooled (fraction IV). The enzyme was
eluted with a salt concentration of 0.45-0.5 M NaCl.
Fraction IV (1.0 ml, 85 µg/ml) was added to an equal amount of
glycerol and was stored at
20 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purification of A. fulgidus
UDG. The purity of the enzyme was evaluated on a 12%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel that was stained with Coomassie Blue.
Lanes 1 and 5, molecular weight markers;
lane 2, fraction I (6 µg); lane 3, fraction II
(2 µg); lane 4, fraction IV (2.2 µg). The sizes of the
molecular mass markers are given in the margin in kDa. It is estimated
that purity of the protein in fraction IV is >95%.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Time course for the release of uracil from a
double-stranded DNA substrate containing 3H-labeled
uracil. Reactions were incubated at 70 °C, and release of
uracil was determined by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Lineweaver-Burk plot for the determination of
Km for the release of uracil from a
double-stranded DNA substrate containing 3H-labeled
uracil. Substrate range, 0.03 to 0.6 µM;
Km = 0.5 µM.
Kinetic constants for AFUDG

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
AFUDG removes uracil from double-stranded
oligonucleotides containing either a U/G or U/A base pair. The
30-mer double-stranded oligonucleotides (20 fmol each) were incubated
in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 50 mM MOPS-KOH, pH
7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA, 10 ng of AFUDG, for 10 min at 50 °C. The reactions were stopped by the
addition 20 µl of 0.1 M NaOH, and the samples were heated
at 90 °C for 30 min to cleave the phosphodiester bonds at the abasic
sites. The samples were resolved on a 20% polyacrylamide gel
containing 7 M urea. Lane 1, (U/A) 30-mer not
treated with enzyme; lane 2, (U/A) 30-mer incubated with
enzyme; lane 3, (T/G) 30-mer not treated with enzyme;
lane 4, (T/G) 30-mer incubated with enzyme; lane
5, (U/G) 30-mer not treated with enzyme; lane 6, (U/G)
30-mer incubated with enzyme.

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Uracil inhibits the activity of AFUDG.
The release of uracil from a double-stranded DNA substrate containing
3H-labeled uracil was determined in a 10-min reaction at
70 °C in the presence of uracil base. The release of uracil was
determined by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
AP sites inhibit the activity of AFUDG.
The release of uracil from a double-stranded DNA substrate containing
3H-labeled uracil was determined in a 10-min reaction at
50 °C in the presence of AP site-containing oligonucleotides. The
release of uracil was determined by precipitation with trichloroacetic
acid.
, 30-mer containing AP site opposite A;
, 30-mer containing
AP site opposite G.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Amino acid alignment of A. fulgidus uracil-DNA glycosylase with putative homologues
from P. horikoshii, P., and A. pernix. Homologous ORFs were identified by using
TBLASTN software at the National Center for Biotechnology Information
(17). The amino acid sequences were aligned using the program CLUSTALW
(25). Black boxes indicate identity and shaded
boxes indicate conservative changes.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Depts. of Radiology
and Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-2239; Fax: 718-430- 4039; E-mail: frankin@aecom.yu.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Mosbaugh, D. W.,
and Bennett, S. E.
(1994)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
48,
315-370
2.
Krokan, H. E.,
Standal, R.,
and Slupphaug, G.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
325,
1-16
3.
Cunningham, R. P.
(1997)
Mutat. Res.
383,
189-196
4.
Lindahl, T.
(1993)
Nature
362,
709-715
5.
Tye, B. K.,
Nyman, P. O.,
Lehman, I. R.,
Hochhauser, S.,
and Weiss, B.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
154-157
6.
Mol, C. D.,
Arvai, A. S.,
Slupphaug, G.,
Kovil, B.,
Alseth, I.,
Krokan, H. E.,
and Tainer, J. A.
(1995)
Cell
80,
869-878
7.
Savva, R.,
McAuley-Hecht, K.,
Brown, T.,
and Pearl, L.
(1995)
Nature
373,
487-493
8.
Ravishankar, R.,
Sagar, M. B,
Roy, S.,
Purnapatre, K.,
Hanada, P.,
Varshney, U.,
and Vijayan, M.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4880-4887
9.
Olsen, L. C.,
Aasland, R.,
Wittwer, C. U.,
Krokan, H. E.,
and Helland, D. E.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
3121-3125
10.
Kaboev, O. K.,
Luchkina, L. A.,
Akhmedov, A. T.,
and Bekker, M. L.
(1981)
FEBS Lett.
132,
337-340
11.
Warner, H, R.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
154,
1451-1454
12.
Koulis, A.,
Cowan, D. A.,
Pearl, L. H.,
and Savva, R.
(1996)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
143,
267-271
13.
Aravind, L.,
Walker, D. R.,
and Koonin, E. V.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1223-1242
14.
Sandigursky, M.,
and Franklin, W. A.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
531-534
15.
Klenk, H.-P.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Tomb, J.-F.,
White, O.,
Nelson, K. E.,
Ketchum, K. A.,
Dodson, R. J.,
Gwinn, M.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Peterson, J. D.,
et al..
(1997)
Nature
390,
364-370
16.
Varshney, U.,
and van de Sande, J. H.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
4055-4061
17.
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schäffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lippman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402
18.
Scarlato, V.,
and Gargano, S.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
118,
109-113
19.
Eftedal, I.,
Guddal, P. H.,
Slupphaug, G.,
Volden, G.,
and Krokan, H. E.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2095-2101
20.
Dianov, G.,
Price, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1605-1612
21.
Mazumder, A.,
Gerlt, J. A.,
Absalon, M. J.,
Stubbe, J.,
Cunningham, R. P.,
and Withka, J.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
1119-1126
22.
Lindahl, T.,
Ljungquist, S.,
Siegert, W.,
Nyberg, B.,
and Sperens, B.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
3286-3294
23.
Domena, J. D.,
Timmer, R. T.,
Dicharry, S. A.,
and Mosbaugh, D. W.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
6742-6751
24.
Bharati, S.,
Korokan, H. E.,
Kristiansen, L.,
Otterlei, M.,
and Slupphaug, G.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4953-3959
25.
Higgins, D. G.,
Thompson, J. D.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
266,
383-402
26.
Glassberg, J.,
Slomiany, R. A.,
and Stewart, C. R.
(1977)
J. Virol.
21,
54-60
27.
Glasberg, J.,
Franck, M.,
and Stewart, C. R.
(1977)
J. Virol.
21,
147-152
28.
Greagg, M. A.,
Fogg, M. J.,
Panayotou, G.,
Evans, S. J.,
Connolly, B. A.,
and Pearl, L. H.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
16,
9045-9050
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Choi, J.-G. Song, K. H. Nam, J. I. Lee, H. Bae, G. A. Kim, Y. Sun, and S.-T. Kwon Unique Substrate Spectrum and PCR Application of Nanoarchaeum equitans Family B DNA Polymerase Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 74(21): 6563 - 6569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kiyonari, M. Uchimura, T. Shirai, and Y. Ishino Physical and Functional Interactions between Uracil-DNA Glycosylase and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen from the Euryarchaeon Pyrococcus furiosus J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 24185 - 24193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wardle, P. M. J. Burgers, I. K. O. Cann, K. Darley, P. Heslop, E. Johansson, L.-J. Lin, P. McGlynn, J. Sanvoisin, C. M. Stith, et al. Uracil recognition by replicative DNA polymerases is limited to the archaea, not occurring with bacteria and eukarya Nucleic Acids Res., February 11, 2008; 36(3): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Georg, L. Schomacher, J. P. J. Chong, A. I. Majernik, M. Raabe, H. Urlaub, S. Muller, E. Ciirdaeva, W. Kramer, and H.-J. Fritz The Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ExoIII homologue Mth212 is a DNA uridine endonuclease Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2006; 34(18): 5325 - 5336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Grogan Cytosine Methylation by the SuaI Restriction-Modification System: Implications for Genetic Fidelity in a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2003; 185(15): 4657 - 4661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Chung, E. K. Im, H.-Y. Park, J. H. Kwon, S. Lee, J. Oh, K.-C. Hwang, J. H. Lee, and Y. Jang A novel uracil-DNA glycosylase family related to the helix-hairpin-helix DNA glycosylase superfamily Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2003; 31(8): 2045 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang, J.-H. Chiang, S. Fitz-Gibbon, M. Lebel, A. A. Sartori, J. Jiricny, M. M. Slupska, and J. H. Miller Direct Interaction between Uracil-DNA Glycosylase and a Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Homolog in the Crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22271 - 22278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Starkuviene and H.-J. Fritz A novel type of uracil-DNA glycosylase mediating repair of hydrolytic DNA damage in the extremely thermophilic eubacterium Thermus thermophilus Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2002; 30(10): 2097 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Hinks, M. C. W. Evans, Y. de Miguel, A. A. Sartori, J. Jiricny, and L. H. Pearl An Iron-Sulfur Cluster in the Family 4 Uracil-DNA Glycosylases J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(19): 16936 - 16940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Makarova, L. Aravind, N. V. Grishin, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin A DNA repair system specific for thermophilic Archaea and bacteria predicted by genomic context analysis Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2002; 30(2): 482 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Fitz-Gibbon, H. Ladner, U.-J. Kim, K. O. Stetter, M. I. Simon, and J. H. Miller Genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum PNAS, January 9, 2002; (2002) 241636498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang, I. T. Phan, S. Fitz-Gibbon, M. K. K. Shivji, R. D. Wood, W. M. Clendenin, E. C. Hyman, and J. H. Miller A thermostable endonuclease III homolog from the archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2001; 29(3): 604 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Sartori, P. Schar, S. Fitz-Gibbon, J. H. Miller, and J. Jiricny Biochemical Characterization of Uracil Processing Activities in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2001; 276(32): 29979 - 29986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Hogrefe, C. J. Hansen, B. R. Scott, and K. B. Nielson Archaeal dUTPase enhances PCR amplifications with archaeal DNA polymerases by preventing dUTP incorporation PNAS, January 22, 2002; 99(2): 596 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. I. Belova, R. Prasad, S. A. Kozyavkin, J. A. Lake, S. H. Wilson, and A. I. Slesarev A type IB topoisomerase with DNA repair activities PNAS, May 22, 2001; 98(11): 6015 - 6020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Fitz-Gibbon, H. Ladner, U.-J. Kim, K. O. Stetter, M. I. Simon, and J. H. Miller Genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum PNAS, January 22, 2002; 99(2): 984 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |