Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M907148199 on April 10, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19150-19158, June 23, 2000
The Amino-terminal Region of the Fusion Peptide of Influenza
Virus Hemagglutinin HA2 Inserts into Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Micelle
with Residues 16-18 at the Aqueous Boundary at Acidic pH
OLIGOMERIZATION AND THE CONFORMATIONAL FLEXIBILITY*,
Ding-Kwo
Chang
,
Shu-Fang
Cheng,
Vishwa
Deo Trivedi, and
Shyh-Haur
Yang
From the Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, Republic of China
Received for publication, September 1, 1999, and in revised form, April 3, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The conformation and interactions with membrane
mimics of the NH2-terminal fragment 1-25 of HA2,
HA2-(1-25), of influenza virus were studied by spectroscopic methods.
Secondary structure analysis of circular dichroism data revealed 45%
helix for the peptide at pH 5.0. Tryptophan fluorescence quenching by
acrylamide and NMR experiments established that the Trp14
is inside the vesicular interior and residues 16-18 are at the micellar aqueous boundary. NBD fluorescence enhancement of the NH2-terminal labeled fluorophore on the vesicle-bound
peptide indicated that the NH2 terminus of the fusion
peptide was located in the hydrophobic region of the lipid bilayer. No
significant change in insertion depth was observed between pH 5.0 and
7.4. Collectively, these spectroscopic measurements pointed to an
equilibrium between helix and non-helix conformations, with helix being
the dominant form, for the segment in the micellar interior. The
conformational transition may be facilitated by the high content of
glycine, a conformationally flexible amino acid, within the fusion
peptide sequence. Self-association of the 25-mer peptide was observed in the N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine
SDS-gel electrophoresis experiments. Incorporating the NMR signal
attenuation, fluorescence, and gel electrophoresis data, a working
model for the organization of the fusion peptide in membrane bilayers
was proposed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The hemagglutinin (HA)1
glycoprotein of influenza virus is responsible for viral attachment to
and fusion with the target cell (1, 2). HA molecules are expressed on
the viral surface as homotrimers (3). Proteolysis of the proprotein HA
(4) generates two polypeptide chains, HA1 and HA2, linked by a
disulfide bond. HA1 acts as the receptor-binding subunit while HA2
anchors the HA molecule onto the viral membrane and mediates fusion
with the target cell membrane. The fusion activity of proteolyzed HA is
triggered by lowering the pH to about 5.0. HA has been shown to
associate with and disrupt the membrane bilayer in order to exert its
fusogenic function (5, 6).
Structures of the ectodomain of enzymatically cleaved HA2 have been
determined by x-ray crystallography at both neutral and acidic pH (3,
7). In essence, the conformational change from neutral to low pH states
consists in the transition of B-loop (55-76) to helix (8) and
transition of helix (105-113) to a loose turn. The resultant trimeric
helical rod spans more than 100 Å and is packed on its external face
by three shorter COOH-terminal helices in an antiparallel orientation.
However, the NH2-terminal fusion peptide, which has been
shown to be exposed at the fusion pH (9, 10) and to insert into and
disrupt the membrane bilayer (11, 12), was not included in the
structural determination at low pH (13), particularly in the membranous
environment. Recently, the HA2-mediated fusion mechanism has been
studied in considerable detail by several laboratories. Thus, Kemble
et al. (14), Melikyan et al. (15), and Song
et al. (16) reported intermediate steps which include
hemifusion or stunted fusion in the mechanism leading to full membrane
fusion. These intermediate structures involve reorientation of lipid
molecules in the outer and inner leaflets of membranes in contact. It
has also been deduced from Fourier transform infrared and electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic experiments that the fusion
peptide of influenza virus inserted into the membrane at a tilted angle
(17-19). These results necessitate examination of the structure of HA2
fusion domain and its interactions with the membrane at high resolution.
The NH2-terminal region of HA2 encompassing the first 15 amino acids is highly conserved among various strains of influenza viruses. It is characterized by high content of glycine and alanine residues, followed by a more polar region encompassing residues 21-37
and leucine zipper-like domain starting at residue 38. Like other
enveloped viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), this
region is termed fusion peptide because of its importance in fusing
with the target membrane, as highlighted by the observation that a
single amino acid attachment to, or deletion of, the
NH2-terminal glycine renders HA fusion incompetent
(6). The orientation and the depth of insertion of HA2 into the
membrane bilayer may provide some insight into the HA2-mediated fusion mechanism.
Synthetic peptides corresponding to the NH2-terminal
sequence of HA2 have been shown to cause liposome fusion and red blood cell lysis (20-22). From EPR and infrared spectroscopic experiments (22), it was deduced that the HA2 fusion peptide inserted into the
vesicle at an oblique angle and the NH2 terminus of the
fusion segment is located near the hydrocarbon-polar head group
interface of the bilayer. The hydrophobic photolabeling technique can
be used to probe the protein insertion into the membrane, but is unable
to directly determine the insertion depth (23).
It was also found that substitution of glutamic acids at positions 11 and 15 affected little the capacity of hemolysis and the fusion pH
(21). On the other hand, deletion of the NH2-terminal glycine or its substitution by glutamic acid abolished the liposome fusion activity of the fusion peptide, and substitution of this amino
acid residue changed the activating pH and
-helical content (20,
24).
Fluorescence measurements have been employed in the previous
investigations on the insertion depth of HA2 fusion peptide into the
model membrane (25, 26). The data by Clague et al. (26) placed Trp14 approximately 8 Å from the center of
vesicular bilayer and suggested no appreciable positional change
between neutral and acidic pH. For these experiments, only the location
of the tryptophan probe can be deduced.
In order to understand the structural basis of the fusion peptide of
HA2, we carried out investigation on the peptides corresponding to
HA2-(1-25) and HA2-(1-20) from strain X31 of the influenza virus,
using NMR spectroscopy which affords information on the dynamics and
structure at the atomic resolution as well as insertion depth on the
amino acid level. Data from circular dichroism (CD), fluorescence, and
NMR experiments enabled us to locate residues 16-18 of the fusion
peptide at the interface of aqueous phase and hydrocarbon interior of
micelle or vesicle. The result strikingly indicated the localization of
Glu11 in the hydrophobic core of SDS micelle and pointed to
the oligomerization of the peptide. Propensity for the latter property
was substantiated by SDS-gel electrophoresis. Identification of the
region residing in the membranous core and CD data analysis implied a
conformational equilibrium for the segment, thus providing a
rationalization of high content of highly conserved glycine residues in
the fusion peptide sequence.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials
Two peptides corresponding to residues 1-25, HA2-(1-25)
(NH2-GLFGAIAGFIENGWEGMIDGWYGFR), and residues 1-20,
HA2-(1-20), of HA2 (strain X31) of influenza virus were synthesized in
an automated mode by a solid phase synthesizer from Applied Biosystems
(Foster City, CA) model 431A using 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc)
chemistry. The peptides were cleaved from the resins by trifluoroacetic
acids and purified by high performance liquid chromatography on a Vydac C18 reverse-phase column. The primary sequence of the peptide was
ascertained by electrospray mass spectrometry.
SDS was acquired from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany)
and d25-SDS from Cambridge Isotope (Andover,
MA). Lipids, 1,2-ditetradecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), and
1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine
(DPPS) were acquired from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Acrylamide,
5-doxyl-stearic acid (5-DXSA), proteinase K, and
7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD) were purchased from Sigma. Otadecyl
rhodamine B chloride (R18) was acquired from Molecular Probes (Eugene,
OR). Reagents for electrophoresis and molecular weight markers were
products of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All reagents were used in the
experiments without further purification. Solutions containing vesicles
were prepared by solubilizing the lipids in a chloroform:methanol (4:1, v/v) mixture and drying the sample under nitrogen stream before dissolving in buffer solution. Mixtures of peptides and SDS or phospholipids were sonicated for 30-60 min before measurements.
The amino-terminal labeling of the peptide with NBD was prepared by the
standard procedure (27). Briefly, 1 mg of pure peptide was reacted with
2 equivalents of the NBD probe in dry dimethyl formamide at room
temperature for 20 h. The conjugated peptide was further purified
by high performance liquid chromatography as described above for
the unlabeled peptide.
Methods
NMR Experiments
Micellar solutions containing
HA2-(1-25):d25-SDS 1.2:120 mM were
used for NMR measurements. One-dimensional and two-dimensional 1H NOESY and TOCSY NMR experiments were performed on a
Bruker AMX-500 spectrometer as described previously (28). In
deuteron-hydrogen (D-H) exchange experiments, the peptide-incorporated
SDS sample in the NMR tube was lyopholized three times with pure
H2O. D2O:H2O (9:1) (v/v) was added
immediately before acquiring NMR data (28). The 1H signal
attenuation with varying pH is due to an increase in amide proton
exchange rate at pH 8.0 compared with pH 5.0 (29, 30), resulting in
higher relaxation rate and weaker signal (30, 31) at higher pH.
Relaxation enhancement by 5-DXSA is due to dipolar interaction between
its unpaired electron on the doxyl moiety and the proton, and hence is
highly sensitive to the distance between them.
Structure Calculations
A total of 365, including 118 non-sequential, NOE interactions
and 24 intra-residue dihedral angles were utilized in the structural computations using distance geometry/simulated annealing protocols of
Biosym programs InsightII, Discover, and NMRchitect (version 97.0) from
Molecular Simulations, Inc. (San Diego, CA). NOE data were converted
into interproton distance using H2/H3 cross-peak of the aromatic ring
of phenylalanine as reference. A range of 0.6 to 1.0 Å was allowed to
vary in the distance constraints. In the simulated annealing protocol,
the temperature was raised to 1000 K in four steps followed by a
molecular dynamics run for 34 ps to allow more conformational space to
be explored. The system was subsequently annealed to 300 K in 10 steps
for a total of 66 ps and minimized by the steepest-descent and
conjugated-gradients methods before final refined structures were obtained.
Circular Dichroism Experiments
CD experiments were carried on a Jasco 720 spectropolarimeter at
ambient temperature. Cells with path lengths of 0.1 and 1.0 mm were
employed for sample solutions containing final concentrations of 75 µM, 15 mM HA2-(1-25):SDS and 12 µM, 1.2 mM HA2-(1-25):DMPC, respectively.
Peptide concentration was determined by UV absorbance denatured in 6 M guanidinium chloride, using
= 12,660 liter mol
1·cm
1 at 280 nm for HA2-(1-25)
containing one tyrosine and two tryptophan residues (32). Spectra were
recorded from 184 or 190-260 nm at scanning rate of 20 nm·min
1 with a time constant of 4 s, step
resolution of 0.1 nm, and band width of 1 nm. For each of the peptide
preparations, final CD profile was obtained by averaging four scans.
CD data were represented in units of extinction coefficient, 
(liter mol
1·cm
1), which is converted by

= [
]/3300, where [
] is the mean residue
ellipticity (degree cm2 dmol
1). In turn,
[
] is obtained from the observed ellipticity (
) according to
[
] =
·l
1·c
1·n
1,
where l is the cell length in mm, c is the molar
concentration, and n is the number of amino acid residues in
the peptide. Quantitative prediction of the secondary structure (helix,
in particular) was accomplished by fitting CD data with
Hennessey-Johnson (H.-J.) algorithm (33), by the program
Varselec, using 33 proteins of known secondary structure as
the basis set.
Fluorescence Experiments
Steady State Fluorescence Studies--
Fluorescence measurements
of HA2-(1-25) in aqueous buffer, SDS micellar solution, and DMPC or
DPPS vesicular solution were performed on a JASCO spectrofluorometer,
model FP-777, using a cell of 1 cm in length at 25 °C. Fluorescence
emission spectra in 300-450 nm range were recorded by using 280 nm
excitation wavelength with a scan rate of 100 nm min
1,
response time of 1 s and data interval of 0.1 or 0.2 nm. The band
widths for excitation and emission were 5 and 1.5 nm, respectively. The
average from two independent scans was taken for all spectral measurements. Appropriate blanks were subtracted to obtain the corrected spectra. The solutions used in this experiment contained 10 µM of the peptide, 50 mM sodium chloride as
well as 2.5-4.0 mM SDS or 1.2 mM phospholipid.
Acrylamide Quenching Studies--
The fluorescence quenching
study monitors accessibility of the fluorophore to the acrylamide
quencher. An incremental amount of acrylamide stock solution (1 M) was added to the peptide (10 µM) solutions
to make final concentrations of acrylamide up to 50 µM.
Corrections due to dilution were made to the observed fluorescence intensities. The data were analyzed by the Stern-Volmer equation (34),
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where F0 is the fluorescence intensity at
the zero quencher concentration, F is the fluorescence
intensity at any given quencher concentration [Q], whereas
KSV represents the apparent Stern-Volmer quenching constant, obtained from the slope of
F0/F versus
[Q] plot. The reported KSV values
were the average of two independent measurements.
Binding of Peptide to Membrane and Accessibility of Peptide to
Proteolytic Cleavage--
The ability of the peptide to bind to lipid
membrane was studied by using fluorescent-labeled peptide. The peptide
and the lipid concentrations were 1 and 500 µM,
respectively. NBD fluorescence is sensitive to its environment (27,
35). A blue shift (from 550 to 528 nm) concomitant with an increase in
fluorescence intensity arises from association of the labeled peptide
with the membrane. Spectra were collected by employing 467 nm
excitation wavelength. The protease cleavage experiment was performed
under similar experimental conditions at neutral or acidic pH. The
protease (~30 µg/ml) was added to the NBD-conjugated peptide bound
to the lipid bilayer and loss in fluorescence was measured with time
(35). In the control experiment, the peptide was preincubated with the
same amount of protease followed by the addition of phospholipid. The net retention of fluorescence is attributed to the protection of
peptide from protease cleavage. The percent protection was defined as
fluorescence intensity after addition of the protease relative to that
before the protease treatment.
Octadecylrhodamine Chloride B (R18) Human Erythrocyte Content
Mixing Assay--
Self-quenching of R18 was used to study the fusion
efficiency of the 25-mer peptide. Dequenching is observed as a result
of R18 being encapsulated in larger merged cells.
Human red blood cells (RBC) were labeled according to the earlier
procedures (5, 36) with minor modifications. Briefly, cells were washed
three times with cold PBS and used for counting. About 109
cells suspended in 2 ml of PBS were labeled by using 40 µl of R18
solution (1 mg/ml in ethanol) in small aliquots with mild shaking. The
suspension was made to 10 ml with PBS and kept at room temperature in
dark. The cells were further washed twice and finally suspended in 10 ml of PBS. 200-250 µl of labeled RBC was suspended in 500 µl of
PBS followed by addition of peptide at final concentration of 50 µM. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 556 and 590 nm, respectively, for fluorescence measurements. The suspension was
acidified to pH 5.0 by sodium citrate prior to the addition of peptide
for acidic condition. The measured dequenching was normalized by the
dequenching obtained with adding 5 µl of 10% (v/v) Triton X-100
according to,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where Ft and Fo are
fluorescence intensities at a given time t and at time 0 (before addition of the peptide), respectively, while F is
the fluorescence after introduction of Triton X-100 and is taken as
fluorescence at infinite dilution of probe. The time course was
followed for 10 min with excitation and emission band widths of 5 and
1.5 nm, respectively.
The percentage of fluorescence dequenching was measured relative to the
increased value obtained with the control solution by adding 0.1%
(v/v) Triton X-100 to the R18-encapsulated RBC dispersion.
Tricine SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
Tricine SDS-PAGE was performed according to the procedures used
by Pristkar et al. (38). The stacking, spacer, and running gels with 4, 10, and 16.5% of acrylamide, respectively, were used as
described by Schägger and Jagow (39). Peptide samples were incubated with buffer solutions containing 1% of SDS, 0.06 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), and 20% of sucrose or glycerol.
Fixing, staining, and destaining times were adjusted to 1 min, 1 h, and overnight, respectively, to reduce the extent of diffusion
(38).
 |
RESULTS |
R18 Content Mixing Assay Shows That HA2-(1-25) Induces Fusion of
Vesicles at Low pH Analogous to HA2--
Fluorescence dequenching
measurements were conducted on the HA2-(1-25)- and R18-incorporated
RBC dispersion at acidic and neutral pH to examine the fusion
efficiency of the peptide. Fig. 1
displays time courses of the R18 spread in the presence of the fusion
peptide at pH 5.0 and 7.4. The rate and extent of lipid fusion are
greatly diminished at neutral pH as compared with those at acidic pH.
The fusion peptide is thus active at low pH characteristic of HA2
fusion activity.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Kinetics of R18 mixing due to
HA2-(1-25)-induced fusion of RBC at pH 5.0 (top
trace) and 7.4 (lower trace). Final
peptide concentration in reaction medium was kept at 50 µM. Time scans were recorded at the emission wavelength
of 590 nm using 556 nm excitation wavelength at room temperature.
Addition of 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 to R18-entrapped RBC suspension
was taken as infinite dilution of R18 as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
CD Data of HA2-(1-25) Indicate That Substantial Non-helix
Structure Exists in SDS Micellar Solution in Addition to 45% of
-Helix--
The CD profile of fusion peptide in SDS solution and
secondary structure analyzed by the Hennessey-Johnson prediction
procedure are shown in Fig. 2,
top and inset, respectively.
-Helix accounts for 45% of the secondary structure while a substantial fraction is in
form. Judging from ellipticity at 222 nm shown at the bottom of Fig. 2, helix content in the DMPC solution is
close to that in the SDS micelle solution. Helical content is not
significantly decreased at elevated pH for the peptide in SDS solution,
but slightly less at neutral pH in DMPC solution. Our CD results are in
line with previous studies on the shorter fusion peptide sequences of
HA2 (22, 25) and those deduced from the Fourier transformed-IR measurement on the fusion peptide HA2-(1-23) (18).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Far-UV CD spectra of HA2-(1-25) at pH 5.0 and 7.0 in SDS (top) and DMPC
(bottom) solutions at 298 K. The concentration of
HA2-(1-25):SDS is 75 µM, 15 mM and that of
HA2-(1-25):DMPC is 12 µM, 1.2 mM. The
analyzed data of SDS micellar solution of secondary structure using
Hennessey-Johnson protocol is represented in the inset of
the top panel. As judged from the ellipticity at 222 nm,
helicity is essentially the same in SDS and DMPC dispersions. Moderate
decrease in helicity can be observed for the peptide in both media upon
elevating the pH.
|
|
Insertion of HA2-(1-25) into Micelles and Phospholipid Bilayers Is
Deduced from Fluorescence of Tryptophan Residues within the Peptide and
of the NBD-labeled Peptide--
Fluorescence experiments were
conducted making use of the tryptophan residues at positions 14 and 21 for HA2-(1-25) and position 14 for HA2-(1-20). Table
I summarizes emission peak and quenching results at acidic and neutral pH. For HA2-(1-25) at acidic pH, the
emission maximum shifts from 349.0 nm in buffer solution to 342.0 nm in
SDS micelle solution and to 332 nm in DMPC solution, indicating that
tryptophan residues are in the hydrophobic environment when bound to
the micelle or vesicle.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of pH on influenza HA2 fusion sequences, HA2-(1-25) and
HA2-(1-20), studied in different media at 25 °C by fluorescence
spectroscopy
The values for HA2-(1-20) are shown in italics. NA, not applicable.
|
|
Acrylamide KSV quenching data reveal that
Trp14 is localized within about 5 Å from the lipid bilayer
surface (40) at pH 5.0. For both 20-mer and 25-mer peptides,
KSV in DMPC dispersion is somewhat smaller than
that in SDS solution at the same pH. These results suggest that the
position of Trp14 in the hydrophobic region of the two
membrane mimics is similar, since the difference in
KSV between the two media reflects in part the
larger head group of the phospholipid, leading to a larger separation
between the acrylamide probe and the fluorophore. Hence SDS micelle is
a reasonable model for study on the insertion of fusion domain into
membrane bilayer.
KSV is slightly smaller for the two peptides at
pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4 in the same micellar or vesicular suspension
(Table I), suggesting a slightly deeper penetration of both peptides at
acidic pH (41). A large blue shift in tryptophan fluorescence and much
deeper penetration into large unilamellar vesicles at acidic pH
relative to neutral pH was reported by Rafalski et al. (42)
on HA2-(1-20). However, a lack of insertion of HA2-(1-20) into
vesicles has been noted as the pH was changed to 7.0 from 5.0 at which
the peptide was found inserted (24).
Further evidence of penetration of the peptide into the membrane is
provided by NBD-labeled peptide. Fig.
3A illustrates an increase of
NBD fluorescence, along with a blue shift, upon incubating the labeled
peptide in the DMPC and DPPS suspensions. In support of the result
deduced from data in Table I, Fig. 3A indicates a
slightly deeper insertion at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Binding and protection of NBD-labeled peptide
in various phospholipid bilayers monitored at the fluorescence emission
wavelength of 528 nm. A, binding of the NBD-labeled
peptide to DMPC or DPPS suspensions. NBD fluorescence spectra represent
data: a, in DMPC at acidic pH; b, in DMPC at
neutral pH; c, in DPPS at acidic pH; d, in DPPS
at neutral pH; and e, in aqueous medium at acidic pH. (It
gives rise to a spectrum very close to trace e at neutral
pH.) The dramatic increase in the NBD fluorescence in traces
a-d compared with e indicates that the NH2
terminus of HA2-(1-25) is in the apolar environment when the peptide
binds to the phospholipid bilayer. Higher fluorescence intensity at
acidic pH than at neutral pH (compare a to b and
c to d) suggests a slightly deeper penetration
into the bilayer at acidic pH for the peptide. B, binding of
the NBD-labeled peptide to the DMPC vesicle at acidic pH as probed by
proteinase K cleavage. In curve 1, the lipid suspension was
added to the peptide solution at time point a, causing an
enhanced fluorescence which maintains a steady value. Curve
2 displays drop in fluorescence intensity with proteinase K (~30
µg) treatment at time point b to probe the accessibility
of peptide in the lipid bilayer to the enzyme. Curve 3 represents the control experiment with the peptide precleaved by the
proteinase. A marginal increase in fluorescence was due to scattering
of the lipid suspension. C, kinetics of protection of the
labeled peptide from proteinase K cleavage in various lipid solutions.
Curves a-d represent results obtained with solutions
designated by the same symbols in panel A. The percent
protection as indicated for each spectrum was the ratio of steady
fluo rescence intensities after and before the proteinase K treatment.
The data also suggest stronger interaction of the fusion peptide with
DMPC than DPPS, and stronger binding at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4.
|
|
Accessibility of the fusion peptide in the lipid bilayer was probed by
proteinase K cleavage. Fig. 3B shows a drop in NBD fluorescence of the labeled peptide in the DMPC bilayer upon addition of proteinase K at point b of curve 2. This suggests that the peptide
undergoes fluctuation when inserting into the membrane such that the
NH2 terminus of HA2-(1-25), to which NBD is attached, is
accessible to the enzyme external to the membrane. The result also
implies that the NH2 terminus is near the apolar-aqueous interface of the vesicle. Curve 3 of the figure indicates that NBD is
externally bound to the vesicle when it is excised from the fusion
peptide prior to incubation with the vesicle solution.
Tricine SDS-PAGE Experiment Demonstrates the Propensity of
Self-assembly of HA2-(1-25)--
Since the fusion peptide has been
shown to insert into the membrane bilayer, we examined the
self-assembly state of the fusion peptide in the SDS detergent
solution. The result shown in Fig. 4
indicates that both monomeric and dimeric species are present in the
SDS environment, demonstrating the tendency of HA2-(1-25) to
oligomerize.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Self-assembly of HA2-(1-25) revealed by the
Tricine SDS-PAGE experiment. The molecular mass of the HA2 fusion
peptide was 2.76 kDa. Lanes a and b represent the
peptide and standard molecular weight markers, respectively. The two
bands in lane a correspond to monomeric and dimeric species.
The arrows indicate the standard molecular weights.
|
|
NMR Experiments Show the NH2-terminal Portion of
HA2-(1-25) Penetrates into the SDS Micelle with Significant Helix Form
in Equilibrium with Non-helix Form--
Fig.
5 presents the fingerprint region of the
NOESY spectrum of HA2-(1-25) in the presence of SDS micelles.
Nonsequential NOE cross-peaks are summarized in Fig.
6.
-Helix structure, characterized by
d(i, i+3) and
d(i, i+4) relations, are seen in the
regions 2-13 and 17-24, with the segment 14-16 exhibiting weaker
helical character. The NOE results are consistent with the data in Fig. 7 which displays deviation of the
chemical shifts of
H and
H of a given amino acid from that of the
random structure, as well as coupling constants
3JNH
H evaluated from
one-dimensional spectrum and XEASY program.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Backbone NH/ H
regions of NOESY spectra of 1.2 mM HA(1-25) in 120 mM SDS micellar solution at 300 K and pH 5.0 with a mixing
time of 300 ms. Sequential connectivity and representative
non-sequential NOE interactions are indicated.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Summary of 1H NOE interactions
for HA(1-25):SDS solution from Fig. 5.
dNN(i, j) and
dsx(i, j) denote observed
NOE interactions between the backbone amide protons of residues
i and j, and interactions involving the side
chain proton of residue i and the proton of residue
j, respectively. Other NOE interactions are represented
similarly. The thickness of the lines is
approximately proportional to the peak intensity. Helical structure is
characterized by d(i, i+3) and
d(i, i+4) NOE peaks.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Difference in the observed chemical shifts
of H ( ) and H
( ) from those of the random-coil values versus
residue number for HA2-(1-25) in SDS micellar solution analyzed
with data of Fig. 5. Negative values indicate an
upfield shift. The helical structure is characterized by an upfield
shift in H and a downfield shift in H.
3JNH H (×) values are
obtained from the average of one-dimensional spectrum where peaks can
be resolved and two-dimensional spectra analyzed by XEASY. A smaller
coupling value corresponds to higher helicity. Larger
3JNH H values near the
COOH terminus may reflect the effect from the fraying end that is
located outside the micelle. This is in contrast to the small
3JNH H values for the
NH2-terminal residues which are inside the micelle. The
chemical shift and coupling data indicate that residues 2-14 are
primarily in helix conformation.
|
|
The results of backbone amide proton peak attenuation by varying pH or
by 5-DXSA are presented in Fig.
8A, along with data on the D-H
exchange rate. NOESY spectra for HA2-(1-25) before and 7 h after
introduction of 90% D2O into the fusion peptide/SDS suspension are also shown. The spectrum in Fig. 8B
highlights the effect of amide D-H exchange on some of the resonance
peaks. At higher pH, the protons exposed to the aqueous phase exhibit higher exchange rate, resulting in broadened and weaker peaks in NOESY
or TOCSY spectrum. For all three methods, it is clear that the residues
3-11 region resides in the apolar milieu of SDS micelle. The pH
variation result indicates that the Met17-Ile18
stretch is more exposed to the solvent at the micellar-aqueous boundary
at neutral pH. On the other hand, the D-H exchange experiment (Fig. 8,
A and B) suggests that this stretch is less
accessible to solvent molecules at pH 3.5. The 5-DXSA experiment
indicated that Trp14 and Ile18 are in the
apolar environment of micelle near the head group interface. Fig.
8A shows that at low pH Ile18 is located in the
apolar region of micelle but near the head groups. Asp19 is
clearly outside of the SDS micelle. Note also that the polar Glu11 and Asn12 are in the interior of the
micelle. Our result is consistent with photolabeling data (43), which
suggested that the NH2-terminal residues 1-22 of HA2
insert into the membrane bilayer. Of the two glutamic acids, the one at
position 15 is clearly more exposed to solvent molecules than that at
position 11, especially based on D-H exchange data displayed in Fig.
8B.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
A, determination of insertion position
of HA2-(1-25) into SDS micelle by NMR methods using signal
attenuation: , pH 8 (310 K) versus pH 5 (300 K); ,
amide D-H exchange after 7 h in 90% D2O at pH 3.5 and
295 K; ×, signal reduction due to enhanced proton relaxation by mixing
0.24 mg of 5-DXSA to the micelle suspension at pH 5 (300 K). Compared
with the other two methods presented in the figure, the D-H exchange is
relatively more sensitive to the accessibility of solvent molecules.
Thus residues 12-16 exhibit exchange effect of deuteron while the pH
variation method shows a transition in intensity attenuation near
Ile18. The 5-DXSA spin label method indicates that both
segments of residues 1-12 and 19-25 are farther from the spin label
which is near the SDS head group. The result is in accord with results
from the other two methods in that the region 1-12 is deeply embedded
in the micelle whereas the 19-25 region is external to the micelle.
B, NOESY fingerprint region of NOESY spectra for D-H
exchange measurement (used in solid squares in panel
A above) to probe insertion of the fusion peptide into SDS micelle
at pH 3.5. The spectra were taken from the sample before
(top) and after (bottom) the introduction of 90%
D2O. Residues whose NH/ H cross-peaks are attenuated more
prominently or broadened beyond detection are marked. Backbone amide
hydrogens of the COOH-terminal portion of the peptide clearly exchange
with deuterons more rapidly than those of the NH2-terminal
half do.
|
|
Calculated Structures Based on NOE Data Reveal a Larger Fluctuation
in the Polar, COOH-terminal Region of HA2-(1-25) in Association with
SDS Micelle--
To further explore the structural heterogeneity of
the peptide, molecular simulation using distance constraints derived
from NOE data in the presence of SDS micelle was performed. Fig.
9 shows the root mean square deviation of
each of the residues in the peptide, with the superposition of 16 calculated structures shown in the inset. The fluctuation is
larger at both ends owing, in part, to the fraying effect. However,
larger structural fluctuation is observed in the region 19-24 as
compared with the corresponding region 2-7 (with the same sequential
distance from the two respective termini). Hence, greater
conformational heterogeneity at the COOH-terminal segment is not
totally due to the fraying end effect. This result corroborates with
the idea that residues 16-18 are located at the micelle-water
boundary, and consequently larger root mean square deviation values are
obtained for the residues 19 and beyond which lie outside the
micelle.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Root mean square deviation in Å of 16 structures calculated using distance constraints derived from NMR
data. The superposed structures are displayed at the
top. The structural fluctuation is larger for residues near
the COOH terminus than for residues near the NH2 terminus,
consistent with the notion of more ordered structure of the
NH2-terminal region of HA2-(1-25) inserted into the
micellar interior.
|
|
A model of trimeric assembly of HA2-(1-25) using one of the structures
shown in Fig. 9 is depicted in Fig. 10.
Side chains of residues 6, 9, and 11-19 are explicitly displayed to
show the accessibility of water molecules in the interhelical space. It is noteworthy in this arrangement that the side chains of
Glu11, Glu15, and Asp19 are
shielded from contact with the apolar region of the membrane external
to the trimer as the fusion peptide molecules assemble in the membrane.
On the other hand, side chains of Trp14, Met17,
and Ile18 are on the external face of the trimer, rendering
them exposed to the hydrophobic environment in our insertion mode.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Proposed trimeric assembly, in the
membranous medium, of the fusion peptide of influenza virus with a
representative structure calculated based on NMR constraints. The
model incorporates results from NMR and fluorescence data.
Ile6, Phe9, and
Glu11-Asp19 are colored as indicated to
highlight their orientation with respect to the surrounding lipid
molecules. Axial and side views are displayed at the top and
bottom panels, respectively. The apparent right angle
between the helix axis and the membrane surface does not imply a
perpendicular insertion for the fusion peptide. Note in the side view
that Gly16-Ile18 are near the head groups of
the surrounding lipid molecules. Whereas side chains of
Glu11, Glu15, and Asp19 are
shielded from approach by lipids, those of Trp14 and
Ile18 are clearly more accessible to lipid molecules; water
molecules can be accommodated in the interhelical space to mediate
interactions between polar amino acid residues. Side chains of
Ile6, Phe9, Trp14, and
Met17 are seen exposed to the hydrophobic phase, consistent
with photolabeling data of BHA2 in the liposomes (44).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The acrylamide fluorescence quenching (Table I) and CD (Fig. 2)
experiments in vesicular and micellar solutions suggest the suitability
of using the SDS micelle to probe the insertion of HA2-(1-25) into
lipid bilayers. NMR attenuation technique detects the 1H
signal change by pH variation, D-H exchange and spin label on the
contiguous amino acids along a fusion peptide sequence (31). Supported
by fluorescence experiments using acrylamide quenching and NBD-labeled
peptide, the NMR results shown in Fig. 8 allow a precise determination
of the penetration position of the fusion peptide in the membrane
environment. Compared with another method of probing the burial depth,
fluorescence quenching of fluorophore attached to fusion peptide by
spin-labeled lipids (40), the present approach offers two advantages.
First, the attenuation profile is along the entire peptide chain,
allowing a clear identification of boundary of the two regions between
which there is a large distinction in water accessibility. In contrast,
the fluorescence method is based on the distance dependent quenching
between the fluorophore and the quencher moieties on the two different
molecules and therefore subject to uncertainties such as the
orientation of the interacting groups and flip-flop of the labeled
phospholipid. Second, there is no additional perturbation of membrane
structure since no spin-label and fluorophore are necessary. Using the
EPR technique, Macosko et al. (19) determined that the
NH2-terminal fusion peptide of the HA2-(1-127) fragment
inserted into the membrane bilayer with a maximum depth of 15 Å from
the phosphate group, suggesting that the fusion peptide did not
traverse both leaflets of the bilayer. Still another method,
hydrophobic photolabeling, is not capable of directly pinpointing the
depth of penetration (44).
Among the three NMR methods adopted in the present work, D-H exchange
affords a more sensitive 1H signal attenuation for residues
near the apolar-polar boundary. Thus resonance intensity of
Gly13-Gly16 is largely reduced in D-H exchange
experiments whereas these signals are gradually affected by pH
variation (Fig. 8A). This is in part due to the fact that
D-H exchange measurements were made at minutes or longer after the
onset of introducing deuterium oxide into SDS solution.
For HA2-(1-25) in SDS dispersion, the helix content is found to be
45% (Fig. 2), which amounts to 11 helical residues. However, data from
NMR, and fluorescence measurements on the Trp quenching by acrylamide
(Table I) as well as NBD-labeled peptide (Fig. 3A) at pH 5.0 enable us to locate the residues (Gly13-Ile18)
near the micelle-water or vesicle-water interface but inside the apolar
interior of micelle and the NH2 terminus of the peptide in
the hydrophobic region. Hence it is impossible for the micelle-inserted portion of the peptide to adopt a purely helical structure. On the
other hand, NMR data (Fig. 7) indicate that segment 2-14 is located
inside the micelle primarily as helix. Taken together, our data lead to
the proposition that there is an equilibrium between helix and
non-helix conformations for the region, with helix being the
predominant form. This may be rationalized by the presence of a high
content of glycine, known for its conformational plasticity, within the
segment. A mutational study by Steinhauser et al. (21) on
the effect of substituting glycine within HA2 by bulky non-polar amino
acids indicated that the fusogenicity was greatly impaired by changes
at positions 1 and 8, and only the alanine substitution was tolerated.
Identification of residues near the membrane-water interface and the
proposition of transition between helix and non-helix forms for the
portion of HA2 immersed in the membrane bilayer may be germane to the
HA2-mediated fusion. First, it is impossible to span both leaflets of
the membrane bilayer for a helical peptide sequence of about 16 amino
acid residues, especially if an oblique insertion mode is adopted by
the fusion peptide as deduced from IR and EPR measurements (17-19).
This means that, at some stage of fusion process, only the outer
leaflet of the membrane is perturbed. Moreover, it is speculated that,
in order to destabilize the membrane, e.g. for fusion pore
formation and dilation, a transformation between helix and other forms
such as
strand may occur for the membrane-immersed segment.
However, based on our data alone, it is not certain that these
non-helix forms are essential in the fusion process. Helix-to-
strand transition has been found for HA2-(1-20) in phospholipid
vesicle solution containing cholesterol and lipophosphoglycan (45), an
inhibitor for pore formation. It is of interest to note that the 20-mer
peptide undergoes the transformation only when the lipophosphoglycan is
inserted into the outer, but not the inner, leaflet of lipid bilayer, a
phenomenon consistent with the idea that insertion of HA2-(1-25) with
enhanced helical structure does not lead to its spanning both leaflets. Helix was implied as the fusion active form of the peptide in the discussion.
Decrease in the conjugated NBD fluorescence (Fig. 3A) and in
the KSV value (Table I) for SDS- and PC-bound
HA2-(1-25) when pH was changed from 7.4 to 5.0 suggests that a
slightly deeper burial of the peptide at acidic pH. This is also
consistent with the result inferred from Fig. 8A and the
proteinase K protection assay shown in Fig. 3C.
Propensity of self-assembly of the fusion peptide in the SDS
environment is presented in Fig. 4 under shearing flow in the electric
field. Trimeric form has been found for the HA2 ectodomain excluding
the fusion peptide sequence in crystal diffraction studies. Our result
suggests that tendency for the fusion peptide to oligomerize in the
membrane-mimic medium may play a role in the virus-mediated fusion, as
proposed previously for the NH2-terminal region of gp41 of
HIV-1 (29). The paradox of the polar (and ionic) amino acid residues
Glu11 and Asn12 embedding in the apolar region
of SDS micelle can be resolved by the oligomerization of fusion peptide molecules.
In the present study, helix is found as the primary form for the
inserted segment of the 25-mer peptide, hence it is likely to
constitute a fusion active conformation. Additionally, the self-assembly propensity is observed for the peptide. Incorporating the
spectroscopic results from the present work, we propose a model
illustrated in Fig. 10 for the organization of HA2-(1-25) in the
membrane bilayer at an intermediate step of fusion. The peptide helical
monomers are oriented with the polar face (Glu11,
Asn12, and Glu15) pointing to each other in the
inner lumen of the oligomer, to reduce the unfavorable free energy
caused by immersing these residues in the hydrophobic milieu.
Interactions between the polar residues may be mediated by water
molecules; thus the oligomeric assembly in the membrane interior may be
a loose association between monomers of the fusion peptide domain. In
support of the importance of polar amino acids at these positions in
self-association of the fusion peptide, only amino acids such as Gln
and Thr are found to replace Glu15 among influenza virus
strains. A lack of close interaction between the spin labels in the
HA2-(1-127) polypeptide was observed from an EPR study by Macosko
et al. (19).
Results of Fig. 8 can be explained by our model. Thus Trp14
and Ile18 are on the face exposed to apolar region near the
micellar head groups. This leads to a larger attenuation of
Trp14 and Ile18 peaks by 5-DXSA but a smaller
reduction in proton signal intensity of Ile18 by deuteron
exchange, as exhibited in Fig. 8A. The arrangement is in
agreement with acrylamide fluorescence quenching experiments, which
suggest that Trp14 is inside the hydrocarbon core of the
vesicle near the aqueous boundary. The arrangement renders these
residues more accessible to the nitroxide moiety attached to the acyl
chain of 5-DXSA, but impedes its access to residues 12, 13 and 16, which experience less signal reduction by the spin label.
It is of interest to note that the BHA2 hydrophobic photolabeling data
in the liposome solution can be rationalized by the model illustrated
in Fig. 10. Thus the side chains of Ile6, Phe9,
Trp14, and Met17, which are at the labeling
maxima (44), are more exposed to the hydrophobic environment. The
photolabeling data in liposome dispersion are, insofar as the model
shown in Fig. 10 is concerned, consistent with those from various
biophysical techniques undertaken in micellar and vesicular solutions.
We have studied the fusion peptide of human immunodeficiency virus type
1 (HIV-1) which also possesses high Gly/Ala content (28). It was found
that the highly conserved Ala15-Gly16 is
localized at the micellar-aqueous boundary and Gly16 is
conformationally flexible. A role similar to Gly16 of HIV-1
may be played by the highly conserved Gly20 (or
Gly16) of HA2. The fusion peptides of both HIV-1 and
influenza virus are at the NH2 terminus of their
transmembrane subunit. Hence glycines may confer the flexibility in
conformational transition of the segment in the membrane apolar core
during the fusion mediated by viruses with similar structural features
of fusion peptides (37).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at
http://www.jbc.org) contains Purification and Analysis of Peptides
HA2-(1-25) and HA2-(1-20) in supplementary data.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax:
886-2-27898594; E-mail: dkc@chem.sinica.edu.tw.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M907148199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HA, hemagglutinin;
DMPC, 1,2-ditetradecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine;
DPPS, 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine;
5-DXSA, 5-doxyl-stearic acid;
R18, octadecyl rhodamine B chloride;
NOESY, two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy;
TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy;
NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect;
CD, circular dichroism;
DG, distance geometry;
HIV-1, human
immunodeficiency virus type 1;
RBC, red blood cells;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
NBD, 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stegmann, T.,
Doms, R. W.,
and Helenius, A.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.
18,
187-211
|
| 2.
|
White, J. M.
(1992)
Science
258,
917-924
|
| 3.
|
Wilson, I. A.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1981)
Nature
289,
366-373
|
| 4.
|
Klenk, H.-D.,
Rott, R.,
Orlich, M.,
and Blodorn, J.
(1975)
Virology
68,
426-439
|
| 5.
|
Schoch, C.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9267-9274
|
| 6.
|
Gething, M. J.,
Doms, R. W.,
York, D.,
and White, J.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
11-23
|
| 7.
|
Bullough, P. A.,
Hughson, F. M.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1994)
Nature
371,
37-43
|
| 8.
|
Carr, C. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1993)
Cell
73,
823-832
|
| 9.
|
Skehel, J. J.,
Bayley, P. M.,
Browns, E. B.,
Martin, S. R.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
White, J. M.,
Wilson, I. A.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
968-972
|
| 10.
|
Daniels, R. S.,
Douglas, A. R.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1983)
J. Gen. Virol.
64,
1657-1662
|
| 11.
|
Tsurudome, M.,
Glück, R.,
Graf, R.,
Falchetto, R.,
Schaller, U.,
and Brunner, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
20225-20232
|
| 12.
|
Stegmann, T.,
Delfino, J. M.,
Richards, F. M.,
and Helenius, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18404-18410
|
| 13.
|
Wharton, S. A.,
Calder, L. J.,
Ruigrok, R. W. H.,
Skehel, J. J.,
Steinhauser, D. A.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
240-246
|
| 14.
|
Kemble, G. W.,
Danieli, T.,
and White, J. M.
(1994)
Cell
76,
383-391
|
| 15.
|
Melikyan, G. B.,
Brener, S. A.,
Ok, D. C.,
and Cohen, F. S.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
995-1005
|
| 16.
|
Song, L.,
Ahkong, Q. F.,
Gevgescauld, G.,
and Lucy, J. A.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1065,
54-62
|
| 17.
|
Ishiguro, R.,
Kimura, N.,
and Takahashi, S.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
9792-9797
|
| 18.
|
Gray, C.,
Tatulian, S. A.,
Wharton, S. A.,
and Tamm, L. K.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
2275-2286
|
| 19.
|
Macosko, J. C.,
Kim, C.-H.,
and Shin, Y.-K.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
267,
1139-1148
|
| 20.
|
Wharton, S. A.,
Martin, S. R.,
Ruigrok, R. W.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1988)
J. Gen. Virol.
69,
1847-1857
|
| 21.
|
Steinhauser, D. A.,
Wharton, S. A.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
6643-6651
|
| 22.
|
Lüneberg, J.,
Martin, I.,
Nubler, F.,
Ruyschaert, J.-M.,
and Herrmann, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27606-27614
|
| 23.
|
Harter, C.,
Bächi, T.,
Semenza, G.,
and Brunner, J.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
1856-1864
|
| 24.
|
Long, M. L.,
Waring, A. J.,
and Hammer, D. A.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1430-1439
|
| 25.
|
Lear, J. D.,
and DeGrado, W. F.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6500-6505
|
| 26.
|
Clague, M. J.,
Knutson, J. R.,
Blumenthal, R.,
and Hermann, A.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
5491-5497
|
| 27.
|
Rapaport, D.,
and Shai, Y.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23769-23775
|
| 28.
|
Chang, D. K.,
Cheng, S. F.,
and Chien, W. J.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
6593-6602
|
| 29.
|
Chang, D. K.,
Cheng, S. F.,
and Trivedi, V. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5299-5309
|
| 30.
|
Wüthrich, K.
(1986)
NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 31.
|
Chang, D. K.,
and Cheng, S. F.
(1998)
J. Biomol. NMR
12,
549-552
|
| 32.
|
Johnson, W. C., Jr.
(1990)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
7,
205-214
|
| 33.
|
Hennessey, J. P., Jr.,
and Johnson, W. C., Jr.
(1981)
Biochemistry
20,
1085-1094
|
| 34.
|
Lakowicz, J. R.
(1983)
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy
, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 35.
|
Rajarathnam, K.,
Hochman, J.,
Schindler, M.,
and Ferguson, M. S.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
3168-3176
|
| 36.
|
Morris, S. J.,
Sarkar, D. P.,
White, J. M.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
3972-3978
|
| 37.
|
Pécheur, E. I.,
Sainte-Marie, J.,
Bienvenüe, A.,
and Hoekstra, D.
(1999)
J. Membr. Biol.
167,
1-17
|
| 38.
|
Pritsker, M.,
Rucker, J.,
Hoffman, T. L.,
Doms, R. W.,
and Shai, Y.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
11359-11371
|
| 39.
|
Schägger, H.,
and Jagow, G. V.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379
|
| 40.
|
Breukink, E.,
van Kraaij, C.,
van Dalen, A.,
Demel, R. A.,
Siezen, R. J.,
de Kruijff, B.,
and Kuipers, O. P.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
8153-8162
|
| 41.
|
Barratt, M. D.,
and Laggner, P.
(1974)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
363,
127-133
|
| 42.
|
Rafalski, M.,
Ortiz, A.,
Rockwell, A.,
van Ginkel, L. C.,
Lear, J. D.,
DeGrado, W. F.,
and Wilschut, J.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
10211-10220
|
| 43.
|
Durrer, P.,
Galli, C.,
Hoenke, S.,
Corti, C.,
Glück, R.,
Vorherr, T.,
and Brunner, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13417-13421
|
| 44.
|
Harter, C.,
James, P.,
Bächi, T.,
Semenza, G.,
and Brunner, J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
6459-6464
|
| 45.
|
Razinkov, V.,
Martin, I.,
Turco, S. J.,
Cohen, F. S.,
Ruyschaert, J.-M.,
and Epand, R. M.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
262,
890-899
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Huang, C.-L. Chen, and A. Herrmann
Bilayer Conformation of Fusion Peptide of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study
Biophys. J.,
July 1, 2004;
87(1):
14 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Wilson, A. L. Maerz, and P. Poumbourios
Evidence That the Transmembrane Domain Proximal Region of the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Fusion Glycoprotein gp21 Has Distinct Roles in the Prefusion and Fusion-activated States
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2001;
276(52):
49466 - 49475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|