JBC Advanced Peptides, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M907148199 on April 10, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19150-19158, June 23, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/25/19150    most recent
M907148199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, D.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, D.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Amino-terminal Region of the Fusion Peptide of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin HA2 Inserts into Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Micelle with Residues 16-18 at the Aqueous Boundary at Acidic pH

OLIGOMERIZATION AND THE CONFORMATIONAL FLEXIBILITY*,

Ding-Kwo ChangDagger, Shu-Fang Cheng, Vishwa Deo Trivedi, and Shyh-Haur Yang

From the Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, Republic of China

Received for publication, September 1, 1999, and in revised form, April 3, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The conformation and interactions with membrane mimics of the NH2-terminal fragment 1-25 of HA2, HA2-(1-25), of influenza virus were studied by spectroscopic methods. Secondary structure analysis of circular dichroism data revealed 45% helix for the peptide at pH 5.0. Tryptophan fluorescence quenching by acrylamide and NMR experiments established that the Trp14 is inside the vesicular interior and residues 16-18 are at the micellar aqueous boundary. NBD fluorescence enhancement of the NH2-terminal labeled fluorophore on the vesicle-bound peptide indicated that the NH2 terminus of the fusion peptide was located in the hydrophobic region of the lipid bilayer. No significant change in insertion depth was observed between pH 5.0 and 7.4. Collectively, these spectroscopic measurements pointed to an equilibrium between helix and non-helix conformations, with helix being the dominant form, for the segment in the micellar interior. The conformational transition may be facilitated by the high content of glycine, a conformationally flexible amino acid, within the fusion peptide sequence. Self-association of the 25-mer peptide was observed in the N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine SDS-gel electrophoresis experiments. Incorporating the NMR signal attenuation, fluorescence, and gel electrophoresis data, a working model for the organization of the fusion peptide in membrane bilayers was proposed.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The hemagglutinin (HA)1 glycoprotein of influenza virus is responsible for viral attachment to and fusion with the target cell (1, 2). HA molecules are expressed on the viral surface as homotrimers (3). Proteolysis of the proprotein HA (4) generates two polypeptide chains, HA1 and HA2, linked by a disulfide bond. HA1 acts as the receptor-binding subunit while HA2 anchors the HA molecule onto the viral membrane and mediates fusion with the target cell membrane. The fusion activity of proteolyzed HA is triggered by lowering the pH to about 5.0. HA has been shown to associate with and disrupt the membrane bilayer in order to exert its fusogenic function (5, 6).

Structures of the ectodomain of enzymatically cleaved HA2 have been determined by x-ray crystallography at both neutral and acidic pH (3, 7). In essence, the conformational change from neutral to low pH states consists in the transition of B-loop (55-76) to helix (8) and transition of helix (105-113) to a loose turn. The resultant trimeric helical rod spans more than 100 Å and is packed on its external face by three shorter COOH-terminal helices in an antiparallel orientation. However, the NH2-terminal fusion peptide, which has been shown to be exposed at the fusion pH (9, 10) and to insert into and disrupt the membrane bilayer (11, 12), was not included in the structural determination at low pH (13), particularly in the membranous environment. Recently, the HA2-mediated fusion mechanism has been studied in considerable detail by several laboratories. Thus, Kemble et al. (14), Melikyan et al. (15), and Song et al. (16) reported intermediate steps which include hemifusion or stunted fusion in the mechanism leading to full membrane fusion. These intermediate structures involve reorientation of lipid molecules in the outer and inner leaflets of membranes in contact. It has also been deduced from Fourier transform infrared and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic experiments that the fusion peptide of influenza virus inserted into the membrane at a tilted angle (17-19). These results necessitate examination of the structure of HA2 fusion domain and its interactions with the membrane at high resolution.

The NH2-terminal region of HA2 encompassing the first 15 amino acids is highly conserved among various strains of influenza viruses. It is characterized by high content of glycine and alanine residues, followed by a more polar region encompassing residues 21-37 and leucine zipper-like domain starting at residue 38. Like other enveloped viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), this region is termed fusion peptide because of its importance in fusing with the target membrane, as highlighted by the observation that a single amino acid attachment to, or deletion of, the NH2-terminal glycine renders HA fusion incompetent (6). The orientation and the depth of insertion of HA2 into the membrane bilayer may provide some insight into the HA2-mediated fusion mechanism.

Synthetic peptides corresponding to the NH2-terminal sequence of HA2 have been shown to cause liposome fusion and red blood cell lysis (20-22). From EPR and infrared spectroscopic experiments (22), it was deduced that the HA2 fusion peptide inserted into the vesicle at an oblique angle and the NH2 terminus of the fusion segment is located near the hydrocarbon-polar head group interface of the bilayer. The hydrophobic photolabeling technique can be used to probe the protein insertion into the membrane, but is unable to directly determine the insertion depth (23).

It was also found that substitution of glutamic acids at positions 11 and 15 affected little the capacity of hemolysis and the fusion pH (21). On the other hand, deletion of the NH2-terminal glycine or its substitution by glutamic acid abolished the liposome fusion activity of the fusion peptide, and substitution of this amino acid residue changed the activating pH and alpha -helical content (20, 24).

Fluorescence measurements have been employed in the previous investigations on the insertion depth of HA2 fusion peptide into the model membrane (25, 26). The data by Clague et al. (26) placed Trp14 approximately 8 Å from the center of vesicular bilayer and suggested no appreciable positional change between neutral and acidic pH. For these experiments, only the location of the tryptophan probe can be deduced.

In order to understand the structural basis of the fusion peptide of HA2, we carried out investigation on the peptides corresponding to HA2-(1-25) and HA2-(1-20) from strain X31 of the influenza virus, using NMR spectroscopy which affords information on the dynamics and structure at the atomic resolution as well as insertion depth on the amino acid level. Data from circular dichroism (CD), fluorescence, and NMR experiments enabled us to locate residues 16-18 of the fusion peptide at the interface of aqueous phase and hydrocarbon interior of micelle or vesicle. The result strikingly indicated the localization of Glu11 in the hydrophobic core of SDS micelle and pointed to the oligomerization of the peptide. Propensity for the latter property was substantiated by SDS-gel electrophoresis. Identification of the region residing in the membranous core and CD data analysis implied a conformational equilibrium for the segment, thus providing a rationalization of high content of highly conserved glycine residues in the fusion peptide sequence.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials

Two peptides corresponding to residues 1-25, HA2-(1-25) (NH2-GLFGAIAGFIENGWEGMIDGWYGFR), and residues 1-20, HA2-(1-20), of HA2 (strain X31) of influenza virus were synthesized in an automated mode by a solid phase synthesizer from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) model 431A using 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry. The peptides were cleaved from the resins by trifluoroacetic acids and purified by high performance liquid chromatography on a Vydac C18 reverse-phase column. The primary sequence of the peptide was ascertained by electrospray mass spectrometry.

SDS was acquired from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany) and d25-SDS from Cambridge Isotope (Andover, MA). Lipids, 1,2-ditetradecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine (DPPS) were acquired from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Acrylamide, 5-doxyl-stearic acid (5-DXSA), proteinase K, and 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD) were purchased from Sigma. Otadecyl rhodamine B chloride (R18) was acquired from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Reagents for electrophoresis and molecular weight markers were products of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All reagents were used in the experiments without further purification. Solutions containing vesicles were prepared by solubilizing the lipids in a chloroform:methanol (4:1, v/v) mixture and drying the sample under nitrogen stream before dissolving in buffer solution. Mixtures of peptides and SDS or phospholipids were sonicated for 30-60 min before measurements.

The amino-terminal labeling of the peptide with NBD was prepared by the standard procedure (27). Briefly, 1 mg of pure peptide was reacted with 2 equivalents of the NBD probe in dry dimethyl formamide at room temperature for 20 h. The conjugated peptide was further purified by high performance liquid chromatography as described above for the unlabeled peptide.

Methods

NMR Experiments Micellar solutions containing HA2-(1-25):d25-SDS 1.2:120 mM were used for NMR measurements. One-dimensional and two-dimensional 1H NOESY and TOCSY NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker AMX-500 spectrometer as described previously (28). In deuteron-hydrogen (D-H) exchange experiments, the peptide-incorporated SDS sample in the NMR tube was lyopholized three times with pure H2O. D2O:H2O (9:1) (v/v) was added immediately before acquiring NMR data (28). The 1H signal attenuation with varying pH is due to an increase in amide proton exchange rate at pH 8.0 compared with pH 5.0 (29, 30), resulting in higher relaxation rate and weaker signal (30, 31) at higher pH. Relaxation enhancement by 5-DXSA is due to dipolar interaction between its unpaired electron on the doxyl moiety and the proton, and hence is highly sensitive to the distance between them.

Structure Calculations A total of 365, including 118 non-sequential, NOE interactions and 24 intra-residue dihedral angles were utilized in the structural computations using distance geometry/simulated annealing protocols of Biosym programs InsightII, Discover, and NMRchitect (version 97.0) from Molecular Simulations, Inc. (San Diego, CA). NOE data were converted into interproton distance using H2/H3 cross-peak of the aromatic ring of phenylalanine as reference. A range of 0.6 to 1.0 Å was allowed to vary in the distance constraints. In the simulated annealing protocol, the temperature was raised to 1000 K in four steps followed by a molecular dynamics run for 34 ps to allow more conformational space to be explored. The system was subsequently annealed to 300 K in 10 steps for a total of 66 ps and minimized by the steepest-descent and conjugated-gradients methods before final refined structures were obtained.

Circular Dichroism Experiments CD experiments were carried on a Jasco 720 spectropolarimeter at ambient temperature. Cells with path lengths of 0.1 and 1.0 mm were employed for sample solutions containing final concentrations of 75 µM, 15 mM HA2-(1-25):SDS and 12 µM, 1.2 mM HA2-(1-25):DMPC, respectively. Peptide concentration was determined by UV absorbance denatured in 6 M guanidinium chloride, using epsilon  = 12,660 liter mol-1·cm-1 at 280 nm for HA2-(1-25) containing one tyrosine and two tryptophan residues (32). Spectra were recorded from 184 or 190-260 nm at scanning rate of 20 nm·min-1 with a time constant of 4 s, step resolution of 0.1 nm, and band width of 1 nm. For each of the peptide preparations, final CD profile was obtained by averaging four scans.

CD data were represented in units of extinction coefficient, Delta epsilon (liter mol-1·cm-1), which is converted by Delta epsilon  = [theta ]/3300, where [theta ] is the mean residue ellipticity (degree cm2 dmol-1). In turn, [theta ] is obtained from the observed ellipticity (theta ) according to [theta ] = theta ·l-1·c-1·n-1, where l is the cell length in mm, c is the molar concentration, and n is the number of amino acid residues in the peptide. Quantitative prediction of the secondary structure (helix, in particular) was accomplished by fitting CD data with Hennessey-Johnson (H.-J.) algorithm (33), by the program Varselec, using 33 proteins of known secondary structure as the basis set.

Fluorescence Experiments

Steady State Fluorescence Studies-- Fluorescence measurements of HA2-(1-25) in aqueous buffer, SDS micellar solution, and DMPC or DPPS vesicular solution were performed on a JASCO spectrofluorometer, model FP-777, using a cell of 1 cm in length at 25 °C. Fluorescence emission spectra in 300-450 nm range were recorded by using 280 nm excitation wavelength with a scan rate of 100 nm min-1, response time of 1 s and data interval of 0.1 or 0.2 nm. The band widths for excitation and emission were 5 and 1.5 nm, respectively. The average from two independent scans was taken for all spectral measurements. Appropriate blanks were subtracted to obtain the corrected spectra. The solutions used in this experiment contained 10 µM of the peptide, 50 mM sodium chloride as well as 2.5-4.0 mM SDS or 1.2 mM phospholipid.

Acrylamide Quenching Studies-- The fluorescence quenching study monitors accessibility of the fluorophore to the acrylamide quencher. An incremental amount of acrylamide stock solution (1 M) was added to the peptide (10 µM) solutions to make final concentrations of acrylamide up to 50 µM. Corrections due to dilution were made to the observed fluorescence intensities. The data were analyzed by the Stern-Volmer equation (34),
F<SUB>0</SUB>/F=1+K<SUB><UP>SV</UP></SUB> · [Q] (Eq. 1)
where F0 is the fluorescence intensity at the zero quencher concentration, F is the fluorescence intensity at any given quencher concentration [Q], whereas KSV represents the apparent Stern-Volmer quenching constant, obtained from the slope of F0/F versus [Q] plot. The reported KSV values were the average of two independent measurements.

Binding of Peptide to Membrane and Accessibility of Peptide to Proteolytic Cleavage-- The ability of the peptide to bind to lipid membrane was studied by using fluorescent-labeled peptide. The peptide and the lipid concentrations were 1 and 500 µM, respectively. NBD fluorescence is sensitive to its environment (27, 35). A blue shift (from 550 to 528 nm) concomitant with an increase in fluorescence intensity arises from association of the labeled peptide with the membrane. Spectra were collected by employing 467 nm excitation wavelength. The protease cleavage experiment was performed under similar experimental conditions at neutral or acidic pH. The protease (~30 µg/ml) was added to the NBD-conjugated peptide bound to the lipid bilayer and loss in fluorescence was measured with time (35). In the control experiment, the peptide was preincubated with the same amount of protease followed by the addition of phospholipid. The net retention of fluorescence is attributed to the protection of peptide from protease cleavage. The percent protection was defined as fluorescence intensity after addition of the protease relative to that before the protease treatment.

Octadecylrhodamine Chloride B (R18) Human Erythrocyte Content Mixing Assay-- Self-quenching of R18 was used to study the fusion efficiency of the 25-mer peptide. Dequenching is observed as a result of R18 being encapsulated in larger merged cells.

Human red blood cells (RBC) were labeled according to the earlier procedures (5, 36) with minor modifications. Briefly, cells were washed three times with cold PBS and used for counting. About 109 cells suspended in 2 ml of PBS were labeled by using 40 µl of R18 solution (1 mg/ml in ethanol) in small aliquots with mild shaking. The suspension was made to 10 ml with PBS and kept at room temperature in dark. The cells were further washed twice and finally suspended in 10 ml of PBS. 200-250 µl of labeled RBC was suspended in 500 µl of PBS followed by addition of peptide at final concentration of 50 µM. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 556 and 590 nm, respectively, for fluorescence measurements. The suspension was acidified to pH 5.0 by sodium citrate prior to the addition of peptide for acidic condition. The measured dequenching was normalized by the dequenching obtained with adding 5 µl of 10% (v/v) Triton X-100 according to,
<UP>% Dequenching</UP>=<FR><NU>(F<SUB>t</SUB>−F<SUB>o</SUB>)</NU><DE>(F−F<SUB>o</SUB>)</DE></FR> (Eq. 2)
where Ft and Fo are fluorescence intensities at a given time t and at time 0 (before addition of the peptide), respectively, while F is the fluorescence after introduction of Triton X-100 and is taken as fluorescence at infinite dilution of probe. The time course was followed for 10 min with excitation and emission band widths of 5 and 1.5 nm, respectively.

The percentage of fluorescence dequenching was measured relative to the increased value obtained with the control solution by adding 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 to the R18-encapsulated RBC dispersion.

Tricine SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) Tricine SDS-PAGE was performed according to the procedures used by Pristkar et al. (38). The stacking, spacer, and running gels with 4, 10, and 16.5% of acrylamide, respectively, were used as described by Schägger and Jagow (39). Peptide samples were incubated with buffer solutions containing 1% of SDS, 0.06 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), and 20% of sucrose or glycerol. Fixing, staining, and destaining times were adjusted to 1 min, 1 h, and overnight, respectively, to reduce the extent of diffusion (38).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

R18 Content Mixing Assay Shows That HA2-(1-25) Induces Fusion of Vesicles at Low pH Analogous to HA2-- Fluorescence dequenching measurements were conducted on the HA2-(1-25)- and R18-incorporated RBC dispersion at acidic and neutral pH to examine the fusion efficiency of the peptide. Fig. 1 displays time courses of the R18 spread in the presence of the fusion peptide at pH 5.0 and 7.4. The rate and extent of lipid fusion are greatly diminished at neutral pH as compared with those at acidic pH. The fusion peptide is thus active at low pH characteristic of HA2 fusion activity.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Kinetics of R18 mixing due to HA2-(1-25)-induced fusion of RBC at pH 5.0 (top trace) and 7.4 (lower trace). Final peptide concentration in reaction medium was kept at 50 µM. Time scans were recorded at the emission wavelength of 590 nm using 556 nm excitation wavelength at room temperature. Addition of 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 to R18-entrapped RBC suspension was taken as infinite dilution of R18 as described under "Experimental Procedures."

CD Data of HA2-(1-25) Indicate That Substantial Non-helix Structure Exists in SDS Micellar Solution in Addition to 45% of alpha -Helix-- The CD profile of fusion peptide in SDS solution and secondary structure analyzed by the Hennessey-Johnson prediction procedure are shown in Fig. 2, top and inset, respectively. alpha -Helix accounts for 45% of the secondary structure while a substantial fraction is in beta  form. Judging from ellipticity at 222 nm shown at the bottom of Fig. 2, helix content in the DMPC solution is close to that in the SDS micelle solution. Helical content is not significantly decreased at elevated pH for the peptide in SDS solution, but slightly less at neutral pH in DMPC solution. Our CD results are in line with previous studies on the shorter fusion peptide sequences of HA2 (22, 25) and those deduced from the Fourier transformed-IR measurement on the fusion peptide HA2-(1-23) (18).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Far-UV CD spectra of HA2-(1-25) at pH 5.0 and 7.0 in SDS (top) and DMPC (bottom) solutions at 298 K. The concentration of HA2-(1-25):SDS is 75 µM, 15 mM and that of HA2-(1-25):DMPC is 12 µM, 1.2 mM. The analyzed data of SDS micellar solution of secondary structure using Hennessey-Johnson protocol is represented in the inset of the top panel. As judged from the ellipticity at 222 nm, helicity is essentially the same in SDS and DMPC dispersions. Moderate decrease in helicity can be observed for the peptide in both media upon elevating the pH.

Insertion of HA2-(1-25) into Micelles and Phospholipid Bilayers Is Deduced from Fluorescence of Tryptophan Residues within the Peptide and of the NBD-labeled Peptide-- Fluorescence experiments were conducted making use of the tryptophan residues at positions 14 and 21 for HA2-(1-25) and position 14 for HA2-(1-20). Table I summarizes emission peak and quenching results at acidic and neutral pH. For HA2-(1-25) at acidic pH, the emission maximum shifts from 349.0 nm in buffer solution to 342.0 nm in SDS micelle solution and to 332 nm in DMPC solution, indicating that tryptophan residues are in the hydrophobic environment when bound to the micelle or vesicle.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effect of pH on influenza HA2 fusion sequences, HA2-(1-25) and HA2-(1-20), studied in different media at 25 °C by fluorescence spectroscopy
The values for HA2-(1-20) are shown in italics. NA, not applicable.

Acrylamide KSV quenching data reveal that Trp14 is localized within about 5 Å from the lipid bilayer surface (40) at pH 5.0. For both 20-mer and 25-mer peptides, KSV in DMPC dispersion is somewhat smaller than that in SDS solution at the same pH. These results suggest that the position of Trp14 in the hydrophobic region of the two membrane mimics is similar, since the difference in KSV between the two media reflects in part the larger head group of the phospholipid, leading to a larger separation between the acrylamide probe and the fluorophore. Hence SDS micelle is a reasonable model for study on the insertion of fusion domain into membrane bilayer.

KSV is slightly smaller for the two peptides at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4 in the same micellar or vesicular suspension (Table I), suggesting a slightly deeper penetration of both peptides at acidic pH (41). A large blue shift in tryptophan fluorescence and much deeper penetration into large unilamellar vesicles at acidic pH relative to neutral pH was reported by Rafalski et al. (42) on HA2-(1-20). However, a lack of insertion of HA2-(1-20) into vesicles has been noted as the pH was changed to 7.0 from 5.0 at which the peptide was found inserted (24).

Further evidence of penetration of the peptide into the membrane is provided by NBD-labeled peptide. Fig. 3A illustrates an increase of NBD fluorescence, along with a blue shift, upon incubating the labeled peptide in the DMPC and DPPS suspensions. In support of the result deduced from data in Table I, Fig. 3A indicates a slightly deeper insertion at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4. 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Binding and protection of NBD-labeled peptide in various phospholipid bilayers monitored at the fluorescence emission wavelength of 528 nm. A, binding of the NBD-labeled peptide to DMPC or DPPS suspensions. NBD fluorescence spectra represent data: a, in DMPC at acidic pH; b, in DMPC at neutral pH; c, in DPPS at acidic pH; d, in DPPS at neutral pH; and e, in aqueous medium at acidic pH. (It gives rise to a spectrum very close to trace e at neutral pH.) The dramatic increase in the NBD fluorescence in traces a-d compared with e indicates that the NH2 terminus of HA2-(1-25) is in the apolar environment when the peptide binds to the phospholipid bilayer. Higher fluorescence intensity at acidic pH than at neutral pH (compare a to b and c to d) suggests a slightly deeper penetration into the bilayer at acidic pH for the peptide. B, binding of the NBD-labeled peptide to the DMPC vesicle at acidic pH as probed by proteinase K cleavage. In curve 1, the lipid suspension was added to the peptide solution at time point a, causing an enhanced fluorescence which maintains a steady value. Curve 2 displays drop in fluorescence intensity with proteinase K (~30 µg) treatment at time point b to probe the accessibility of peptide in the lipid bilayer to the enzyme. Curve 3 represents the control experiment with the peptide precleaved by the proteinase. A marginal increase in fluorescence was due to scattering of the lipid suspension. C, kinetics of protection of the labeled peptide from proteinase K cleavage in various lipid solutions. Curves a-d represent results obtained with solutions designated by the same symbols in panel A. The percent protection as indicated for each spectrum was the ratio of steady fluo rescence intensities after and before the proteinase K treatment. The data also suggest stronger interaction of the fusion peptide with DMPC than DPPS, and stronger binding at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.4.

Accessibility of the fusion peptide in the lipid bilayer was probed by proteinase K cleavage. Fig. 3B shows a drop in NBD fluorescence of the labeled peptide in the DMPC bilayer upon addition of proteinase K at point b of curve 2. This suggests that the peptide undergoes fluctuation when inserting into the membrane such that the NH2 terminus of HA2-(1-25), to which NBD is attached, is accessible to the enzyme external to the membrane. The result also implies that the NH2 terminus is near the apolar-aqueous interface of the vesicle. Curve 3 of the figure indicates that NBD is externally bound to the vesicle when it is excised from the fusion peptide prior to incubation with the vesicle solution.

Tricine SDS-PAGE Experiment Demonstrates the Propensity of Self-assembly of HA2-(1-25)-- Since the fusion peptide has been shown to insert into the membrane bilayer, we examined the self-assembly state of the fusion peptide in the SDS detergent solution. The result shown in Fig. 4 indicates that both monomeric and dimeric species are present in the SDS environment, demonstrating the tendency of HA2-(1-25) to oligomerize.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Self-assembly of HA2-(1-25) revealed by the Tricine SDS-PAGE experiment. The molecular mass of the HA2 fusion peptide was 2.76 kDa. Lanes a and b represent the peptide and standard molecular weight markers, respectively. The two bands in lane a correspond to monomeric and dimeric species. The arrows indicate the standard molecular weights.

NMR Experiments Show the NH2-terminal Portion of HA2-(1-25) Penetrates into the SDS Micelle with Significant Helix Form in Equilibrium with Non-helix Form-- Fig. 5 presents the fingerprint region of the NOESY spectrum of HA2-(1-25) in the presence of SDS micelles. Nonsequential NOE cross-peaks are summarized in Fig. 6. alpha -Helix structure, characterized by d(i, i+3) and d(i, i+4) relations, are seen in the regions 2-13 and 17-24, with the segment 14-16 exhibiting weaker helical character. The NOE results are consistent with the data in Fig. 7 which displays deviation of the chemical shifts of alpha H and beta H of a given amino acid from that of the random structure, as well as coupling constants 3JNHalpha H evaluated from one-dimensional spectrum and XEASY program.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Backbone NH/alpha H regions of NOESY spectra of 1.2 mM HA(1-25) in 120 mM SDS micellar solution at 300 K and pH 5.0 with a mixing time of 300 ms. Sequential connectivity and representative non-sequential NOE interactions are indicated.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Summary of 1H NOE interactions for HA(1-25):SDS solution from Fig. 5. dNN(i, j) and dsx(i, j) denote observed NOE interactions between the backbone amide protons of residues i and j, and interactions involving the side chain proton of residue i and the proton of residue j, respectively. Other NOE interactions are represented similarly. The thickness of the lines is approximately proportional to the peak intensity. Helical structure is characterized by d(i, i+3) and d(i, i+4) NOE peaks.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Difference in the observed chemical shifts of alpha H () and beta H (open circle ) from those of the random-coil values versus residue number for HA2-(1-25) in SDS micellar solution analyzed with data of Fig. 5. Negative values indicate an upfield shift. The helical structure is characterized by an upfield shift in alpha H and a downfield shift in beta H. 3JNHalpha H (×) values are obtained from the average of one-dimensional spectrum where peaks can be resolved and two-dimensional spectra analyzed by XEASY. A smaller coupling value corresponds to higher helicity. Larger 3JNHalpha H values near the COOH terminus may reflect the effect from the fraying end that is located outside the micelle. This is in contrast to the small 3JNHalpha H values for the NH2-terminal residues which are inside the micelle. The chemical shift and coupling data indicate that residues 2-14 are primarily in helix conformation.

The results of backbone amide proton peak attenuation by varying pH or by 5-DXSA are presented in Fig. 8A, along with data on the D-H exchange rate. NOESY spectra for HA2-(1-25) before and 7 h after introduction of 90% D2O into the fusion peptide/SDS suspension are also shown. The spectrum in Fig. 8B highlights the effect of amide D-H exchange on some of the resonance peaks. At higher pH, the protons exposed to the aqueous phase exhibit higher exchange rate, resulting in broadened and weaker peaks in NOESY or TOCSY spectrum. For all three methods, it is clear that the residues 3-11 region resides in the apolar milieu of SDS micelle. The pH variation result indicates that the Met17-Ile18 stretch is more exposed to the solvent at the micellar-aqueous boundary at neutral pH. On the other hand, the D-H exchange experiment (Fig. 8, A and B) suggests that this stretch is less accessible to solvent molecules at pH 3.5. The 5-DXSA experiment indicated that Trp14 and Ile18 are in the apolar environment of micelle near the head group interface. Fig. 8A shows that at low pH Ile18 is located in the apolar region of micelle but near the head groups. Asp19 is clearly outside of the SDS micelle. Note also that the polar Glu11 and Asn12 are in the interior of the micelle. Our result is consistent with photolabeling data (43), which suggested that the NH2-terminal residues 1-22 of HA2 insert into the membrane bilayer. Of the two glutamic acids, the one at position 15 is clearly more exposed to solvent molecules than that at position 11, especially based on D-H exchange data displayed in Fig. 8B.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, determination of insertion position of HA2-(1-25) into SDS micelle by NMR methods using signal attenuation: open circle , pH 8 (310 K) versus pH 5 (300 K); black-square, amide D-H exchange after 7 h in 90% D2O at pH 3.5 and 295 K; ×, signal reduction due to enhanced proton relaxation by mixing 0.24 mg of 5-DXSA to the micelle suspension at pH 5 (300 K). Compared with the other two methods presented in the figure, the D-H exchange is relatively more sensitive to the accessibility of solvent molecules. Thus residues 12-16 exhibit exchange effect of deuteron while the pH variation method shows a transition in intensity attenuation near Ile18. The 5-DXSA spin label method indicates that both segments of residues 1-12 and 19-25 are farther from the spin label which is near the SDS head group. The result is in accord with results from the other two methods in that the region 1-12 is deeply embedded in the micelle whereas the 19-25 region is external to the micelle. B, NOESY fingerprint region of NOESY spectra for D-H exchange measurement (used in solid squares in panel A above) to probe insertion of the fusion peptide into SDS micelle at pH 3.5. The spectra were taken from the sample before (top) and after (bottom) the introduction of 90% D2O. Residues whose NH/alpha H cross-peaks are attenuated more prominently or broadened beyond detection are marked. Backbone amide hydrogens of the COOH-terminal portion of the peptide clearly exchange with deuterons more rapidly than those of the NH2-terminal half do.

Calculated Structures Based on NOE Data Reveal a Larger Fluctuation in the Polar, COOH-terminal Region of HA2-(1-25) in Association with SDS Micelle-- To further explore the structural heterogeneity of the peptide, molecular simulation using distance constraints derived from NOE data in the presence of SDS micelle was performed. Fig. 9 shows the root mean square deviation of each of the residues in the peptide, with the superposition of 16 calculated structures shown in the inset. The fluctuation is larger at both ends owing, in part, to the fraying effect. However, larger structural fluctuation is observed in the region 19-24 as compared with the corresponding region 2-7 (with the same sequential distance from the two respective termini). Hence, greater conformational heterogeneity at the COOH-terminal segment is not totally due to the fraying end effect. This result corroborates with the idea that residues 16-18 are located at the micelle-water boundary, and consequently larger root mean square deviation values are obtained for the residues 19 and beyond which lie outside the micelle.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Root mean square deviation in Å of 16 structures calculated using distance constraints derived from NMR data. The superposed structures are displayed at the top. The structural fluctuation is larger for residues near the COOH terminus than for residues near the NH2 terminus, consistent with the notion of more ordered structure of the NH2-terminal region of HA2-(1-25) inserted into the micellar interior.

A model of trimeric assembly of HA2-(1-25) using one of the structures shown in Fig. 9 is depicted in Fig. 10. Side chains of residues 6, 9, and 11-19 are explicitly displayed to show the accessibility of water molecules in the interhelical space. It is noteworthy in this arrangement that the side chains of Glu11, Glu15, and Asp19 are shielded from contact with the apolar region of the membrane external to the trimer as the fusion peptide molecules assemble in the membrane. On the other hand, side chains of Trp14, Met17, and Ile18 are on the external face of the trimer, rendering them exposed to the hydrophobic environment in our insertion mode.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Proposed trimeric assembly, in the membranous medium, of the fusion peptide of influenza virus with a representative structure calculated based on NMR constraints. The model incorporates results from NMR and fluorescence data. Ile6, Phe9, and Glu11-Asp19 are colored as indicated to highlight their orientation with respect to the surrounding lipid molecules. Axial and side views are displayed at the top and bottom panels, respectively. The apparent right angle between the helix axis and the membrane surface does not imply a perpendicular insertion for the fusion peptide. Note in the side view that Gly16-Ile18 are near the head groups of the surrounding lipid molecules. Whereas side chains of Glu11, Glu15, and Asp19 are shielded from approach by lipids, those of Trp14 and Ile18 are clearly more accessible to lipid molecules; water molecules can be accommodated in the interhelical space to mediate interactions between polar amino acid residues. Side chains of Ile6, Phe9, Trp14, and Met17 are seen exposed to the hydrophobic phase, consistent with photolabeling data of BHA2 in the liposomes (44).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The acrylamide fluorescence quenching (Table I) and CD (Fig. 2) experiments in vesicular and micellar solutions suggest the suitability of using the SDS micelle to probe the insertion of HA2-(1-25) into lipid bilayers. NMR attenuation technique detects the 1H signal change by pH variation, D-H exchange and spin label on the contiguous amino acids along a fusion peptide sequence (31). Supported by fluorescence experiments using acrylamide quenching and NBD-labeled peptide, the NMR results shown in Fig. 8 allow a precise determination of the penetration position of the fusion peptide in the membrane environment. Compared with another method of probing the burial depth, fluorescence quenching of fluorophore attached to fusion peptide by spin-labeled lipids (40), the present approach offers two advantages. First, the attenuation profile is along the entire peptide chain, allowing a clear identification of boundary of the two regions between which there is a large distinction in water accessibility. In contrast, the fluorescence method is based on the distance dependent quenching between the fluorophore and the quencher moieties on the two different molecules and therefore subject to uncertainties such as the orientation of the interacting groups and flip-flop of the labeled phospholipid. Second, there is no additional perturbation of membrane structure since no spin-label and fluorophore are necessary. Using the EPR technique, Macosko et al. (19) determined that the NH2-terminal fusion peptide of the HA2-(1-127) fragment inserted into the membrane bilayer with a maximum depth of 15 Å from the phosphate group, suggesting that the fusion peptide did not traverse both leaflets of the bilayer. Still another method, hydrophobic photolabeling, is not capable of directly pinpointing the depth of penetration (44).

Among the three NMR methods adopted in the present work, D-H exchange affords a more sensitive 1H signal attenuation for residues near the apolar-polar boundary. Thus resonance intensity of Gly13-Gly16 is largely reduced in D-H exchange experiments whereas these signals are gradually affected by pH variation (Fig. 8A). This is in part due to the fact that D-H exchange measurements were made at minutes or longer after the onset of introducing deuterium oxide into SDS solution.

For HA2-(1-25) in SDS dispersion, the helix content is found to be 45% (Fig. 2), which amounts to 11 helical residues. However, data from NMR, and fluorescence measurements on the Trp quenching by acrylamide (Table I) as well as NBD-labeled peptide (Fig. 3A) at pH 5.0 enable us to locate the residues (Gly13-Ile18) near the micelle-water or vesicle-water interface but inside the apolar interior of micelle and the NH2 terminus of the peptide in the hydrophobic region. Hence it is impossible for the micelle-inserted portion of the peptide to adopt a purely helical structure. On the other hand, NMR data (Fig. 7) indicate that segment 2-14 is located inside the micelle primarily as helix. Taken together, our data lead to the proposition that there is an equilibrium between helix and non-helix conformations for the region, with helix being the predominant form. This may be rationalized by the presence of a high content of glycine, known for its conformational plasticity, within the segment. A mutational study by Steinhauser et al. (21) on the effect of substituting glycine within HA2 by bulky non-polar amino acids indicated that the fusogenicity was greatly impaired by changes at positions 1 and 8, and only the alanine substitution was tolerated.

Identification of residues near the membrane-water interface and the proposition of transition between helix and non-helix forms for the portion of HA2 immersed in the membrane bilayer may be germane to the HA2-mediated fusion. First, it is impossible to span both leaflets of the membrane bilayer for a helical peptide sequence of about 16 amino acid residues, especially if an oblique insertion mode is adopted by the fusion peptide as deduced from IR and EPR measurements (17-19). This means that, at some stage of fusion process, only the outer leaflet of the membrane is perturbed. Moreover, it is speculated that, in order to destabilize the membrane, e.g. for fusion pore formation and dilation, a transformation between helix and other forms such as beta  strand may occur for the membrane-immersed segment. However, based on our data alone, it is not certain that these non-helix forms are essential in the fusion process. Helix-to-beta strand transition has been found for HA2-(1-20) in phospholipid vesicle solution containing cholesterol and lipophosphoglycan (45), an inhibitor for pore formation. It is of interest to note that the 20-mer peptide undergoes the transformation only when the lipophosphoglycan is inserted into the outer, but not the inner, leaflet of lipid bilayer, a phenomenon consistent with the idea that insertion of HA2-(1-25) with enhanced helical structure does not lead to its spanning both leaflets. Helix was implied as the fusion active form of the peptide in the discussion.

Decrease in the conjugated NBD fluorescence (Fig. 3A) and in the KSV value (Table I) for SDS- and PC-bound HA2-(1-25) when pH was changed from 7.4 to 5.0 suggests that a slightly deeper burial of the peptide at acidic pH. This is also consistent with the result inferred from Fig. 8A and the proteinase K protection assay shown in Fig. 3C.

Propensity of self-assembly of the fusion peptide in the SDS environment is presented in Fig. 4 under shearing flow in the electric field. Trimeric form has been found for the HA2 ectodomain excluding the fusion peptide sequence in crystal diffraction studies. Our result suggests that tendency for the fusion peptide to oligomerize in the membrane-mimic medium may play a role in the virus-mediated fusion, as proposed previously for the NH2-terminal region of gp41 of HIV-1 (29). The paradox of the polar (and ionic) amino acid residues Glu11 and Asn12 embedding in the apolar region of SDS micelle can be resolved by the oligomerization of fusion peptide molecules.

In the present study, helix is found as the primary form for the inserted segment of the 25-mer peptide, hence it is likely to constitute a fusion active conformation. Additionally, the self-assembly propensity is observed for the peptide. Incorporating the spectroscopic results from the present work, we propose a model illustrated in Fig. 10 for the organization of HA2-(1-25) in the membrane bilayer at an intermediate step of fusion. The peptide helical monomers are oriented with the polar face (Glu11, Asn12, and Glu15) pointing to each other in the inner lumen of the oligomer, to reduce the unfavorable free energy caused by immersing these residues in the hydrophobic milieu. Interactions between the polar residues may be mediated by water molecules; thus the oligomeric assembly in the membrane interior may be a loose association between monomers of the fusion peptide domain. In support of the importance of polar amino acids at these positions in self-association of the fusion peptide, only amino acids such as Gln and Thr are found to replace Glu15 among influenza virus strains. A lack of close interaction between the spin labels in the HA2-(1-127) polypeptide was observed from an EPR study by Macosko et al. (19).

Results of Fig. 8 can be explained by our model. Thus Trp14 and Ile18 are on the face exposed to apolar region near the micellar head groups. This leads to a larger attenuation of Trp14 and Ile18 peaks by 5-DXSA but a smaller reduction in proton signal intensity of Ile18 by deuteron exchange, as exhibited in Fig. 8A. The arrangement is in agreement with acrylamide fluorescence quenching experiments, which suggest that Trp14 is inside the hydrocarbon core of the vesicle near the aqueous boundary. The arrangement renders these residues more accessible to the nitroxide moiety attached to the acyl chain of 5-DXSA, but impedes its access to residues 12, 13 and 16, which experience less signal reduction by the spin label.

It is of interest to note that the BHA2 hydrophobic photolabeling data in the liposome solution can be rationalized by the model illustrated in Fig. 10. Thus the side chains of Ile6, Phe9, Trp14, and Met17, which are at the labeling maxima (44), are more exposed to the hydrophobic environment. The photolabeling data in liposome dispersion are, insofar as the model shown in Fig. 10 is concerned, consistent with those from various biophysical techniques undertaken in micellar and vesicular solutions.

We have studied the fusion peptide of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) which also possesses high Gly/Ala content (28). It was found that the highly conserved Ala15-Gly16 is localized at the micellar-aqueous boundary and Gly16 is conformationally flexible. A role similar to Gly16 of HIV-1 may be played by the highly conserved Gly20 (or Gly16) of HA2. The fusion peptides of both HIV-1 and influenza virus are at the NH2 terminus of their transmembrane subunit. Hence glycines may confer the flexibility in conformational transition of the segment in the membrane apolar core during the fusion mediated by viruses with similar structural features of fusion peptides (37).

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains Purification and Analysis of Peptides HA2-(1-25) and HA2-(1-20) in supplementary data.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax: 886-2-27898594; E-mail: dkc@chem.sinica.edu.tw.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M907148199

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HA, hemagglutinin; DMPC, 1,2-ditetradecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; DPPS, 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine; 5-DXSA, 5-doxyl-stearic acid; R18, octadecyl rhodamine B chloride; NOESY, two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy; TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy; NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect; CD, circular dichroism; DG, distance geometry; HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; RBC, red blood cells; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; NBD, 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Stegmann, T., Doms, R. W., and Helenius, A. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18, 187-211
2. White, J. M. (1992) Science 258, 917-924
3. Wilson, I. A., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1981) Nature 289, 366-373
4. Klenk, H.-D., Rott, R., Orlich, M., and Blodorn, J. (1975) Virology 68, 426-439
5. Schoch, C., and Blumenthal, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9267-9274
6. Gething, M. J., Doms, R. W., York, D., and White, J. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 11-23
7. Bullough, P. A., Hughson, F. M., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1994) Nature 371, 37-43
8. Carr, C. M., and Kim, P. S. (1993) Cell 73, 823-832
9. Skehel, J. J., Bayley, P. M., Browns, E. B., Martin, S. R., Waterfield, M. D., White, J. M., Wilson, I. A., and Wiley, D. C. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 968-972
10. Daniels, R. S., Douglas, A. R., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1983) J. Gen. Virol. 64, 1657-1662
11. Tsurudome, M., Glück, R., Graf, R., Falchetto, R., Schaller, U., and Brunner, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20225-20232
12. Stegmann, T., Delfino, J. M., Richards, F. M., and Helenius, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18404-18410
13. Wharton, S. A., Calder, L. J., Ruigrok, R. W. H., Skehel, J. J., Steinhauser, D. A., and Wiley, D. C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 240-246
14. Kemble, G. W., Danieli, T., and White, J. M. (1994) Cell 76, 383-391
15. Melikyan, G. B., Brener, S. A., Ok, D. C., and Cohen, F. S. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 995-1005
16. Song, L., Ahkong, Q. F., Gevgescauld, G., and Lucy, J. A. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1065, 54-62
17. Ishiguro, R., Kimura, N., and Takahashi, S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 9792-9797
18. Gray, C., Tatulian, S. A., Wharton, S. A., and Tamm, L. K. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 2275-2286
19. Macosko, J. C., Kim, C.-H., and Shin, Y.-K. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 267, 1139-1148
20. Wharton, S. A., Martin, S. R., Ruigrok, R. W., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1988) J. Gen. Virol. 69, 1847-1857
21. Steinhauser, D. A., Wharton, S. A., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 6643-6651
22. Lüneberg, J., Martin, I., Nubler, F., Ruyschaert, J.-M., and Herrmann, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27606-27614
23. Harter, C., Bächi, T., Semenza, G., and Brunner, J. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 1856-1864
24. Long, M. L., Waring, A. J., and Hammer, D. A. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 1430-1439
25. Lear, J. D., and DeGrado, W. F. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 6500-6505
26. Clague, M. J., Knutson, J. R., Blumenthal, R., and Hermann, A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 5491-5497
27. Rapaport, D., and Shai, Y. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23769-23775
28. Chang, D. K., Cheng, S. F., and Chien, W. J. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 6593-6602
29. Chang, D. K., Cheng, S. F., and Trivedi, V. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5299-5309
30. Wüthrich, K. (1986) NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
31. Chang, D. K., and Cheng, S. F. (1998) J. Biomol. NMR 12, 549-552
32. Johnson, W. C., Jr. (1990) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 7, 205-214
33. Hennessey, J. P., Jr., and Johnson, W. C., Jr. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 1085-1094
34. Lakowicz, J. R. (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy , Plenum Press, New York
35. Rajarathnam, K., Hochman, J., Schindler, M., and Ferguson, M. S. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 3168-3176
36. Morris, S. J., Sarkar, D. P., White, J. M., and Blumenthal, R. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3972-3978
37. Pécheur, E. I., Sainte-Marie, J., Bienvenüe, A., and Hoekstra, D. (1999) J. Membr. Biol. 167, 1-17
38. Pritsker, M., Rucker, J., Hoffman, T. L., Doms, R. W., and Shai, Y. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11359-11371
39. Schägger, H., and Jagow, G. V. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379
40. Breukink, E., van Kraaij, C., van Dalen, A., Demel, R. A., Siezen, R. J., de Kruijff, B., and Kuipers, O. P. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 8153-8162
41. Barratt, M. D., and Laggner, P. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 363, 127-133
42. Rafalski, M., Ortiz, A., Rockwell, A., van Ginkel, L. C., Lear, J. D., DeGrado, W. F., and Wilschut, J. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10211-10220
43. Durrer, P., Galli, C., Hoenke, S., Corti, C., Glück, R., Vorherr, T., and Brunner, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13417-13421
44. Harter, C., James, P., Bächi, T., Semenza, G., and Brunner, J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6459-6464
45. Razinkov, V., Martin, I., Turco, S. J., Cohen, F. S., Ruyschaert, J.-M., and Epand, R. M. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 262, 890-899


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Q. Huang, C.-L. Chen, and A. Herrmann
Bilayer Conformation of Fusion Peptide of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study
Biophys. J., July 1, 2004; 87(1): 14 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. A. Wilson, A. L. Maerz, and P. Poumbourios
Evidence That the Transmembrane Domain Proximal Region of the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Fusion Glycoprotein gp21 Has Distinct Roles in the Prefusion and Fusion-activated States
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 49466 - 49475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Ve