|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19177-19184, June 23, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and the Department
of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey
Pines Rd., La Jolla, California
Received for publication, February 28, 2000, and in revised form, April 2, 2000
Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)
is a mammalian integral membrane enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis
of a number of neuromodulatory fatty acid amides, including the
endogenous cannabinoid anandamide and the sleep-inducing lipid
oleamide. FAAH belongs to a large class of hydrolytic enzymes termed
the "amidase signature family," whose members are defined by a
conserved stretch of approximately 130 amino acids termed the
"amidase signature sequence." Recently, site-directed mutagenesis
studies of FAAH have targeted a limited number of conserved residues in
the amidase signature sequence of the enzyme, identifying Ser-241 as
the catalytic nucleophile and Lys-142 as an acid/base catalyst. The
roles of several other conserved residues with potentially important
and/or overlapping catalytic functions have not yet been examined. In
this study, we have mutated all potentially catalytic residues in FAAH
that are conserved among members of the amidase signature family, and have assessed their individual roles in catalysis through chemical labeling and kinetic methods. Several of these residues appear to serve
primarily structural roles, as their mutation produced FAAH variants
with considerable catalytic activity but reduced expression in
prokaryotic and/or eukaryotic systems. In contrast, five mutations,
K142A, S217A, S218A, S241A, and R243A, decreased the amidase activity
of FAAH greater than 100-fold without detectably impacting the
structural integrity of the enzyme. The pH rate profiles, amide/ester
selectivities, and fluorophosphonate reactivities of these mutants
revealed distinct catalytic roles for each residue. Of particular
interest, one mutant, R243A, displayed uncompromised esterase activity
but severely reduced amidase activity, indicating that the amidase and
esterase efficiencies of FAAH can be functionally uncoupled.
Collectively, these studies provide evidence that amidase signature
enzymes represent a large class of serine-lysine catalytic dyad
hydrolases whose evolutionary distribution rivals that of the catalytic
triad superfamily.
The amidase signature
(AS)1 family was originally
identified by primary structure analysis, which revealed a highly
conserved serine- and glycine-rich sequence present in several amidases of bacterial and fungal origin (1, 2). The number of proteins containing the AS sequence has since greatly increased, and presently more than 80 known or predicted members of this family can be identified in public data bases. Proteins containing the AS sequence exist in archaea (3), eubacteria (1, 4-6), fungi (7), nematodes,
plants, insects, birds (8), and mammals (9). The substrate
specificities and biological functions of these enzymes vary widely,
including carbon/nitrogen metabolism in fungi through the hydrolysis of
acetamide (10), the generation of properly charged tRNAGln
in eubacteria through the transfer of ammonia from glutamine (11), and
the degradation of neuromodulatory fatty acid amides in mammals (9).
The evolutionary and functional breadth of the AS family highlights the
importance of achieving a thorough understanding of its mechanistic and
structural features. Toward this end, we have initiated a research
program aimed at characterizing the structure and function of the AS
enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) (9, 12-14).
FAAH is a mammalian integral membrane enzyme responsible for the
catabolism of the fatty acid amide family of endogenous signaling lipids (9). Representative fatty acid amides degraded by FAAH include
the endocannabinoid anandamide (15) and the sleep-inducing lipid
oleamide (16, 17). Fatty acid amides display an intriguing number of
bioactivities in mammals, including the induction of sleep (16, 18, 19)
and analgesia (20-22), indicating that FAAH may serve as an attractive
target for pharmaceutical efforts aimed at influencing endogenous pain
and/or sleep-wake systems (23, 24). In support of this notion,
FAAH-resistant analogues of anandamide show enhanced pharmacological
activity in vivo (20, 25).
Previous work in our laboratory has identified the catalytic
nucleophile of FAAH as serine 241, one of three conserved serine residues in the AS sequence (13). Additionally, we have determined that
FAAH does not utilize a histidine base for catalysis, indicating that
AS enzymes employ a catalytic mechanism distinct from the Ser-His-Asp
catalytic triad common to most serine hydrolases (26). Subsequent
mutagenesis and kinetic efforts identified a conserved lysine residue,
Lys-142, as a strong candidate for the catalytic base of FAAH
responsible for nucleophile activation (14). Although the data obtained
in these studies clearly supported central catalytic roles for Ser-241
and Lys-142, the abundance of conserved, potentially catalytic residues
in the AS sequence raised the possibility that other residues might
possess equally important and/or overlapping catalytic functions.
Indeed, a previous study on the Rhodococcal J1 amidase, a
bacterial AS enzyme, had proposed that a conserved aspartic acid
(Asp-237 in FAAH) acted as the catalytic base for this enzyme (27). In
order to clarify the roles that conserved residues play in the
hydrolytic mechanism of the AS family, we have examined the function of
all potentially catalytic residues in FAAH. These residues were
selected based on two criteria: 1) high conservation among AS enzymes,
and 2) possession of a side chain capable of participating in acid/base
catalysis and/or hydrogen bonding. The results of this investigation
reveal that only a limited subset of conserved AS residues play
catalytic roles, with several other conserved residues appearing to be
primarily of structural importance.
Generation of FAAH Mutants--
FAAH mutants were constructed in
the prokaryotic expression vector pTrcHis A (Invitrogen) using the
Quickchange procedure (Stratagene) (13). The N206A mutant was generated
using overlap extension polymerase chain reaction (28, 29) with two
complementary primers containing the desired mutation and two primers
at the 5' and 3' ends of the FAAH cDNA. The mutants were subcloned
into the pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression vector (Invitrogen) using
standard molecular biology procedures. The mutants were sequenced
through their entire coding region and found to contain only the
desired mutation.
Expression and Analysis of FAAH Mutants--
The FAAH mutants
were expressed in the Escherichia coli strain BL21 and
purified as described (12). All E. coli expression constructs contained a deletion of the N-terminal transmembrane domain
of FAAH. Deletion of this region facilitated its purification from
E. coli but had no effect on the enzymatic activity of FAAH (12). Importantly, the membrane-binding properties of FAAH were not
affected by this deletion, and consequently, all purifications and
enzyme reactions were performed in the presence of detergents.
Transient transfections of FAAH mutants into COS-7 cells were performed
as detailed (9, 30). Cells were scraped in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium following transfection, rinsed twice with buffer 1 (12.5 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), and resuspended in 200 µl of buffer 1. The
cells were sonicated using a 50-watt tip sonicator and centrifuged in a
table top ultracentrifuge at 100,000 × g for 1 h
in a TLA-100 rotor (Beckman Instruments). The pellet from this spin was
resuspended by sonication in 200 µl of buffer 2 (20 mM
Hepes, pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton
X-100), rocked for 1 h at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h. The supernatant from this spin,
constituting solubilized FAAH membrane extracts, was collected, and its
protein concentration was determined using the Dc protein
assay kit (Bio-Rad). Nearly all FAAH activity and immunoreactivity
present in the crude COS-7 lysate resided in this soluble membrane
extract. Samples could be frozen in buffer 2 at FAAH Activity Assays--
All FAAH assays were performed as
described using a TLC assay (12, 13). Briefly,
[14C]oleamide or oleoyl methyl ester (OME) was incubated
with FAAH preparations, and aliquots were removed at various times and
quenched with 0.2 N HCl. The substrate and product were
extracted with ethyl acetate and separated on TLC plates using 50%
ethyl acetate/hexanes. The radioactivity associated with substrate and
product was then quantitated using a PhosphorImager (Packard Instrument
Co.). Initial rates were determined during the linear phase of the
reaction (up to approximately 20% conversion at 100 µM
substrate). Errors presented with activity from COS-7 extracts indicate
the standard deviation of the activity present in three independent
transfections. Buffers used for standard assays and pH rate profile
determinations were identical to those used previously (13). The
kcat values presented in the pH
versus kcat profiles of the S217A and
S218A mutants were calculated based on the concentration of purified proteins measured by their UV absorbance at 280 nm as described previously (12). Solvent isotope effect studies were conducted in a
buffer containing 50 mM Bis-Tris propane, 150 mM NaCl. The pD of the D2O buffer was adjusted
with a DCl solution prepared by saturating D2O with gaseous
HCl and was measured using a standard pH meter. The pD of the
D2O solution was calculated by adding 0.4 to the pH
measured by the meter. Reactions were conducted in 95%
D2O. The ratio
kH2O/kD2O
was determined by measuring the rate of hydrolysis of saturating concentrations of oleamide or OME at pH (pD) values from 6.0 to 9.5. Maximal activity was obtained for FAAH between pH or pD 8.5 and 9.5 and
the ratios of the activities in H2O and D2O at
this plateau level are reported as
kH2O/kD2O.
The S217A mutant showed no pH or pD dependence and therefore the ratio
kH2O/kD2O
was pH-independent.
Sequence Alignments--
Significant homology among AS enzymes is
confined to a region corresponding to residues 134-257 of FAAH
(referred to herein as the AS sequence). Comparison of the primary
structures of 86 AS enzymes over this segment revealed 23 positions
where residues were conserved in 75% or more of the aligned sequences
(Fig. 1). Of these conserved positions,
11 amino acids in FAAH were selected for mutagenesis based on their
potential ability to participate in acid/base chemistry and/or hydrogen
bonding. The following mutants were generated: K142A, E143Q, D167A,
N206A, S217A, S218A, D237A, D237N, D237E, S241A, R243A, R243K, K255A,
and T257A.
Expression of FAAH Mutants--
Initially, attempts were made to
express the indicated mutants in E. coli using the pTrcHis
vector, a system that provides high expression levels of FAAH protein
with a His6 tag for purification (12). In this system, only
the K142A (14), S217A, S218A, and S241A (13) mutants were expressed at
high enough levels to permit their purification. The properties of the
purified S241A and K142A mutants have been characterized previously and
indicate that these residues serve as the nucleophile and general
base/acid catalyst of FAAH, respectively (13, 14). The purified S217A
and S218A mutants were previously found to exhibit 2300- and 95-fold
lower kcat values than FAAH, respectively, with
no changes in their Km values for oleamide (13). The
gel filtration migration profiles and circular dichroism spectra of the
K142A, S217A, S218A, and S241A mutants were indistinguishable from
those of FAAH, indicating that the observed catalytic deficits were not
due to gross structural alterations (13, 14). All of the other FAAH
mutants (E143Q, D167A, N206A, D237A, D237N, D237E, R243A, R243K, K255A,
and T257A) were expressed mainly as inclusion bodies in E. coli, preventing a detailed analysis of their catalytic function
in this system. Nonetheless, for many of the mutants (with the
exception of D237N, D237A, R243A, and R243K), significant FAAH activity
could be detected in crude E. coli lysates (data not shown).
In order to examine the catalytic properties of the large number of
FAAH mutants that were ineffectively produced in E. coli, these variants were expressed in a eukaryotic system. cDNAs
encoding FAAH mutants were transfected into COS-7 cells, resulting in
significant levels of expression for all of the proteins examined with
the exception of the D237A and R243K mutants (Fig.
2A, upper panel). The D237A
and R243K mutants were expressed at greater than 20-fold lower levels
than FAAH (data not shown), and their analysis was not pursued further.
The N206A and D237N mutants were expressed approximately 5- and 10-fold
worse than FAAH, respectively (Fig. 2B, upper panel),
whereas all of the other mutants, K142A, E143Q, D167A, S217A, S218A,
D237E, S241A, R243A, K255A, and T257A, expressed to levels at least
50% of that observed for FAAH. Thus, the expression of FAAH mutants in
COS-7 cells provided a system where the majority of these variants
could be directly compared. Importantly, the extremely low levels of
endogenous FAAH activity in COS-7 cells permitted the kinetic analysis
of transfected mutants with up to 300-fold reductions in catalytic
activity.
Oleamide Hydrolase Activity of FAAH Mutants--
The levels of
oleamide hydrolase activity in solubilized membrane preparations from
COS-7 cells transfected with various FAAH mutants are shown in Table
I. The E143Q, D167A, N206A, D237E, K255A,
and T257A mutants retained greater than 10% of the oleamide hydrolase
activity of FAAH. When the relative expression levels of these mutants
were taken into account, all of the enzymes with the exception of the
K255A mutant displayed greater than 25% of wild type activity (the
K255A mutant exhibited slightly less than 20% of wild type activity).
The D237N mutant showed approximately 40-fold reduced activity, which
in combination with its 10-fold lower expression indicated that this
variant was at least 20% as active as wild type FAAH. In contrast to
the significant catalytic activities displayed by the aforementioned
FAAH mutants, the K142A, S217A, S218A, S241A, and R243A mutants all
exhibited
The ~100-fold catalytic deficiency displayed by the S218A mutant was
similar to the 95-fold reduction in activity observed for the E. coli-derived form of this enzyme (13). Considering that the K142A,
S217A, and S241A mutants all exhibited greater than 1000-fold
reductions in kcat relative to FAAH when
purified from E. coli (13, 14), their activities were
predictably below the background levels of endogenous FAAH activity in
COS-7 cells (0.2 nmol/min/mg). The R243A mutant exhibited more than a
200-fold decrease in oleamide hydrolase activity that, when evaluated
in the context of its slightly lower expression, corresponded to at
least a 100-fold decrease in amidase activity.
Fluorophosphonate Reactivity of FAAH Mutants--
The ability of
FAAH mutants to react with a biotin-conjugated fluorophosphonate
inhibitor (FP-biotin) (31) was examined. Greatly reduced rates of
labeling with fluorophosphonates are typically caused by mutations that
1) decrease the strength of the serine nucleophile of a hydrolase (32)
and/or 2) disrupt residues involved in transition state stabilization,
such as those composing the oxyanion hole of a hydrolase (33, 34). All
of the FAAH mutants that displayed at least 20% wild type activity also exhibited near wild type levels of FP-biotin reactivity (Fig. 2,
A and B, lower panels). In contrast, the K142A,
S217A, and S241A mutants showed dramatically decreased reactivities
with FP-biotin (Fig. 2A, lower panel), consistent with their
compromised catalytic activities. Interestingly, the S218A and R243A
mutants, despite their severely reduced amidase activities, reacted
with FP-biotin to a similar extent as FAAH (Fig. 2, A and
B, lower panels). More detailed kinetic analyses revealed
that the S218A and R243A mutants displayed wild type rates of
reactivity with FP-biotin (data not shown), indicating that these
residues do not participate in the activation of the nucleophile of
FAAH. The loss of fluorophosphonate reactivity exhibited by the S241A and K142A mutants agrees with data from previous studies and supports proposed roles for these residues as the nucleophile and catalytic base/acid of FAAH, respectively (13, 14). In contrast, the high
catalytic activity and fluorophosphonate reactivity of the D237N mutant
(Fig. 2B, lower panel) argue against a previously suggested
role for this residue as a catalytic base involved in nucleophile
activation (27).
Esterase Activities of FAAH Mutants--
FAAH is unusual among
serine hydrolases in that the enzyme degrades structurally similar
amides and esters at equivalent rates (14). The equivalent
kcat and
kcat/Km values for the amide
and ester substrates of FAAH are not due to a common rate-limiting deacylation step but rather to similar acylation rates for these substrates (14). The E. coli-derived K142A mutant was
previously found to lose this atypical behavior, reacting with esters
more than 500-fold faster than amides (14). Consistent with this finding, the esterase activity of the K142A mutant from COS-7 cells was
compromised only 30-fold (at pH 9.0) despite a complete loss of
detectable amidase activity. The hydrolysis rates for OME were
determined for the S217A, S218A, S241A, and R243A mutants in order to
evaluate whether any of these mutations also altered the unusual
amide/ester reactivity of FAAH (Table
II). The S217A and S241A mutants
exhibited negligible esterase activity, whereas the S218A mutant
displayed similarly compromised esterase and amidase activities
relative to those of FAAH. Although both the amidase and esterase
activities of the S217A mutant were below the background activity in
COS-7 cells, we observed similar amidase and esterase activities for
this mutant when purified from E. coli (data not shown). The
amidase and esterase activities of the S241A mutant were below
detection for both COS-7- and E. coli-derived forms of the
protein.
Interestingly, the R243A mutant hydrolyzed OME at only a 4-fold slower
rate than FAAH (Table II), contrasting sharply with its ~300-fold
reduced amidase activity (Table I). Considering the approximately
2-fold reduced expression of this mutant relative to FAAH, its esterase
activity approached wild type levels at pH 9.0. The R243A mutant also
exhibited 1) a Km value for OME, 16 ± 4 µM, similar to that of FAAH (34 ± 8 µM) and 2) wild type rates of reactivity with FP-biotin
(see above). These data indicate that the R243A mutant is a properly
folded protein with an active site structure that is largely intact.
Given that both the R243A and K142A mutants displayed altered
amide/ester selectivities, we considered the possibility that these
residues might depend on one another for proper function. For example,
Arg-243 could reduce the pKa of Lys-142, allowing
this lysine residue to serve as a general acid/base catalyst at
physiological pH. In order to test such a postulate, a mutant was
constructed in which both Lys-142 and Arg-243 were mutated to alanine
(K142A/R243A). The K142A/R243A mutant possessed significantly lower
esterase activity than the less active of the two single mutants,
K142A, suggesting that the effect of the R243A mutant on amide/ester
selectivity was not occurring through modification of the properties of
Lys-142.
pH Rate Profiles of FAAH Mutants--
We have previously found
that for oleamide, the kcat and
kcat/Km values of FAAH depend
on an ionizable base with an apparent pKa of 7.9, whereas Km is pH-independent (13). However, the pH
rate profile of FAAH is unusual in that the slope of
kcat versus pH is <1 even well below
the apparent pKa determined in the fit. Therefore,
to obtain the indicated pKa value, a curve fit was
employed that assumed a non-zero activity for the enzyme with its
catalytic base in the protonated state. The value of this lower
activity limit was 15-20-fold below the maximal activity exhibited by
FAAH. Even with this parameter, the curve fit was not ideal, and due to
the instability of FAAH below pH 5, it has not been possible to
directly confirm the existence of a lower activity limit.
We have previously shown that the K142A mutant exhibits a log-linear
dependence of kcat on pH with a slope of 0.9, consistent with a function for Lys-142 as a general base catalyst (14). The activity of the S241A mutant was not detectable with either OME or
oleamide and therefore could not be analyzed for pH dependence. The pH
rate profile of the R243A mutant was determined for the enzyme from
solubilized COS-7 microsomes using saturating concentrations of OME
(open squares, Fig. 3). The pH
rate profile of FAAH with OME was also determined (open
circles, Fig. 3) and did not differ significantly from the pH
versus kcat profile determined for
the purified enzyme with oleamide (solid diamonds, Fig.
4). In contrast to the unusual pH rate
profile of FAAH, the R243A mutant exhibited an ideal single ionizable
residue pH rate profile dependent on an apparent catalytic base with a
pKa of 6.8. Notably, due to the differences in their
respective pH rate profile shapes, the activity of the R243A mutant was
essentially identical to that of FAAH at pH 7.0 (taking into account
the approximately 2-fold lower expression of the mutant).
In order to determine the pH rate profiles of the S217A and S218A
mutants, whose activities in COS-7 extracts were extremely low or below
detection, these enzymes were purified from E. coli as
described previously (13). Both the S217A (open circles, Fig. 4) and S218A (solid triangles, Fig. 4) mutants
exhibited much weaker pH dependences than FAAH. The pH rate profile of
the S218A mutant was qualitatively similar to FAAH, showing dependence on an apparent base with a pKa of 7.1. However, this mutant exhibited only a 3.5-fold reduction in activity from pH 8.0 to
5.5, compared with the 20-fold reduction in activity observed for FAAH
over this same pH range. The S217A mutant exhibited an essentially flat
pH rate profile with less than a 30% change in kcat over the pH range 6.0-9.0. Thus the pH
rate profiles of the mutants, K142A, R243A, S217A, and S218A, were all
readily distinguishable from one another and deviated significantly
from the pH rate profile of wild type FAAH.
Deuterium Isotope Effects--
The lack of pH dependence exhibited
by the S217A mutant suggested that the rate-limiting step for oleamide
hydrolysis by this enzyme may not involve a proton transfer or depend
on an ionizable residue. Enzymatic reactions that exhibit no pH
dependence sometimes operate by a mechanism in which a physical step is
rate-limiting, such as a conformational change in enzyme structure.
Further evidence that a reaction proceeds with a non-chemical
rate-limiting step can be obtained by determining the solvent deuterium
isotope effect for the reaction. The absence of a solvent deuterium
isotope effect indicates that there is no proton transfer occurring in
the transition state of the reaction and is consistent with a
non-chemical rate-limiting step. One example of an enzyme that exhibits
such behavior is prolyl oligopeptidase, a serine hydrolase that shows
no solvent deuterium isotope effect and, like FAAH, hydrolyzes amides
and esters at similar rates (35).
The solvent deuterium isotope effects on the
kcat values for oleamide hydrolysis were
determined to be 2.9 and 1.8 for FAAH and the S217A mutant,
respectively. The Km values of FAAH for oleamide in
D2O and H2O were equivalent, suggesting that the decreased activity of the enzyme in D2O was not due to
a loss of substrate binding or structural integrity. Additionally, the kH2O/kD2O
values were similar for FAAH-catalyzed oleamide and OME hydrolysis. These solvent deuterium isotope effects indicate that a proton transfer
is likely occurring in the rate-limiting step(s) of the reactions
catalyzed by both FAAH and the S217A mutant.
Prior to this investigation, a comprehensive analysis of the
function of conserved residues in the AS sequence had not been conducted. Although several reports have described the mutagenesis of a
select number of conserved AS residues in either FAAH (13, 14, 36, 37)
or the Rhodococcal J1 amidase (27), these efforts have
produced contradictory proposals regarding the nature of the core
catalytic components of the AS family. In the present investigation,
all of the conserved AS residues capable of either acid/base chemistry
and/or hydrogen bonding were mutated in FAAH, and the resulting mutants
were analyzed in a single expression system. The results of this study
clarify the respective catalytic importance of conserved AS residues
and provide strong support for the classification of AS enzymes as a
family of serine-lysine catalytic dyad hydrolases.
Only five of the conserved residues in the AS sequence, Lys-142,
Ser-217, Ser-218, Ser-241, and Arg-243, were critical for the amidase
activity of FAAH. The reduced expression levels of folded protein for
other FAAH mutants when produced in E. coli, as well as the
poor expression of the D237A, D237N, and N206A mutants in COS-7 cells,
indicate that several of the conserved residues of the AS sequence are
likely structurally important rather than catalytically important.
These results, when coupled with the observation that a large number of
conserved glycine and proline residues are found in the AS sequence,
suggest that this region encodes both a catalytic and structural
domain. It is interesting to note that with the exception of Arg-243,
the residues most critical for catalysis (Lys-142, Ser-217, Ser-218, and Ser-241) were also the only residues that could be mutated to yield
proteins that expressed well in E. coli. Thus, there appears
to be strikingly little overlap between the catalytic and structural
components of the AS sequence.
In all cases, FAAH mutants with high catalytic activity showed
fluorophosphonate reactivities comparable with that of the wild type
enzyme. Interestingly, however, the converse was not necessarily
observed, as the S218A and R243A mutants exhibited greatly reduced
amidase activity but wild type fluorophosphonate reactivity. These data
indicate that although efficient catalysis was strongly dependent on a
functional Ser-241 nucleophile, an effective nucleophile did not in
turn guarantee high amidase activity. Although the precise catalytic
functions played by Ser-218 and Arg-243 are currently unclear, these
residues would be predicted to impact the activity of FAAH through a
mechanism independent of the nucleophilicity of Ser-241. Potential
roles in facilitating leaving group protonation and/or transition state
stabilization could satisfy such a criterion.
Our results do not support a previous proposal that Asp-237 (or its
analogous residue in the Rhodococcal JI amidase) serves as a
catalytic base for the activation of the serine nucleophile of the AS
family (27). Mutation of Asp-237 to asparagine or glutamate produced
enzymes with only modest decreases in catalytic activity (2-4-fold)
and reactivities with FP-biotin comparable to that of FAAH. These
properties are inconsistent with an important catalytic function for
this residue. Considering further the poor expression of the D237N and
D237A mutants, a structural role for this residue seems more likely.
Given the greatly reduced fluorophosphonate reactivity displayed by the
S217A mutant, it is tempting to speculate that this residue may be
involved in nucleophile activation. However, it is important to stress
that the reactivity of serine hydrolases with fluorophosphonate
inhibitors not only depends on nucleophile strength but also, in some
cases, on transition state binding residues (e.g. oxyanion
hole residues) (33, 34). Although such functions can potentially be
distinguished by separately determining the binding and reactivity
components of the second order rate constant for fluorophosphonate
reactivity (kobs/[I]) (33, 34),
this type of analysis has not been possible in our system due to the
low solubility and weak binding of FP-biotin to FAAH. Regardless, the
S217A mutant does react with ethoxy oleyl fluorophosphonate at serine
241 (13), clearly demonstrating that Ser-217 is not the nucleophile of
FAAH. Additionally, we have previously shown that the S217A mutant
purified from E. coli possesses a 2300-fold lower
kcat than FAAH and an unaltered
Km value for oleamide (13). Collectively, such
kinetic data, when coupled with the total conservation of Ser-217 among
AS enzymes, support a central role for this residue in the catalytic
mechanism for the AS family, possibly as a participant in nucleophile
activation or as an oxyanion hole constituent.
Based on the kinetic properties, substrate selectivities, and chemical
reactivities of the S241A and K142A mutants expressed in E. coli, we previously proposed that FAAH utilizes Ser-241 as a
catalytic nucleophile and Lys-142 as a catalytic base for nucleophile
activation (13, 14). The results presented here fortify these
conclusions, providing compelling support that Lys-142 acts as the
catalytic base for FAAH in a role analogous to histidine in the
catalytic triad of traditional serine hydrolases (38, 39). Most
importantly, Lys-142 is the only conserved ionizable residue among AS
enzymes that can be mutated to yield an enzyme with extreme reductions
in both hydrolase activity and fluorophosphonate reactivity. The
absence of any other ionizable residue that affects nucleophile
strength suggests that the Ser-Lys dyad of FAAH is not modified by an
additional ionizable residue analogous to the aspartic acid of the
catalytic triad (32, 38).
Why FAAH displays such an unusually flat pH rate profile is currently
unclear. One other serine hydrolase, carboxypeptidase Y, has been found
to exhibit a weak pH dependence of activity that plateaus at acidic pH
(40). Interestingly, like FAAH, carboxypeptidase Y is capable of
reacting with amide and ester substrates at similar rates, provided
they contain a C-terminal carboxyl moiety (40, 41). The modest pH
dependence of carboxypeptidase Y has been proposed to reflect a
mechanism in which the proton from the serine nucleophile of the enzyme
is transferred to the leaving group of the substrate concomitant with
nucleophile attack (40). In this mechanism, the protonated histidine
could support activity by giving a proton to the leaving group while
simultaneously removing a proton from the attacking nucleophile. We
have postulated a similar mechanism for FAAH to explain the equivalent
acylation rates of its amide and ester substrates (14). This mechanism was based on experimental evidence that the similarity of the amide and
ester hydrolysis rates of FAAH depends on the presence of a residue
that can both receive a proton from the serine nucleophile of the
enzyme and donate a proton to the leaving group of the substrate in a
concerted or coupled manner (14).
The catalytic mechanisms described above for carboxypeptidase Y and
FAAH are essentially equivalent but were initially proposed to explain
two different catalytic properties: the weak pH dependence of
carboxypeptidase Y and the similar amide/ester acylation rates of FAAH.
It is therefore possible that a catalytic mechanism in which
nucleophile attack and leaving group protonation are strongly coupled
is responsible for both of the unusual properties shared by these two
enzymes (i.e. flattened pH rate profiles and comparable amide/ester hydrolytic efficiencies).
The pH rate profiles of the FAAH mutants investigated in this study
follow an interesting trend that supports the aforementioned mechanism.
For example, the two mutants that exhibit comparable amide/ester
hydrolysis rates, S217A and S218A, also show exaggeratedly flat pH rate
profiles, whereas the R243A mutant, which hydrolyzes esters much faster
than amides, shows a steep pH dependence in the acidic range. The pH
dependence previously reported for the K142A mutant, a FAAH variant
that also hydrolyzes esters much faster than amides, is also very steep
throughout its catalytically active range (14). Thus the ability of
FAAH to react with amides and esters at comparable rates seems tightly
correlated with a modest pH dependence on catalysis, particularly at
acidic pH.
The presence of a highly conserved residue, Arg-243, in the AS sequence
that is necessary for amidase activity but dispensable for esterase
activity suggests that the AS family represents a pure class of
amidases rather than a collection of general hydrolytic enzymes
(including both amidases and esterases). To date (with the notable
exception discussed below), the biological substrates of all known AS
enzymes are amides (1, 4-7, 11). This feature distinguishes the AS
family from the superfamily of Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad hydrolases,
which contains both amidases and esterases (26). In general, esterases
utilizing the catalytic triad are very poor amidases (42, 43), whereas
the amidases (proteases) are exceptional esterases, hydrolyzing esters
much faster than even their biological amide substrates (32, 44, 45).
Whether the low esterase activity exhibited by FAAH is the result of
selective pressure on the enzyme to reduce esterolytic activity or is
an inherent outcome of the special catalytic mechanism used by the AS
family remains to be determined. On this note, the ability to normalize
the efficiency of amide and ester hydrolysis may be important for the
function of FAAH in vivo. Presently, at least two FAAH
substrates, the amide anandamide (9, 46) and the ester
2-arachidonoylglycerol (47, 48), are thought to be involved in
endogenous cannabinoid signaling. The similar reactivity of FAAH with
these substrates may serve to coordinate the levels of these signaling
molecules in vivo and/or prevent inefficient amide
hydrolysis due to competition from inherently more reactive ester
substrates (14). Interestingly, one product of the current investigation is a FAAH mutant, R243A, that is an efficient fatty acid
esterase but a severely defective fatty acid amidase. The introduction
of this mutant into cell or organismal systems lacking FAAH may provide
a means to distinguish the relative importance of the amidase and
esterase activities of this enzyme in vivo.
Serine hydrolases are one of the most widely distributed and thoroughly
studied enzyme families. The vast majority of serine hydrolases thus
far identified, including most serine proteases, lipases, and
esterases, contain the classical Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad. More
recently, a select set of distinct serine hydrolases have been
characterized including the Ser-Lys dyad proteases of eubacteria
(49-53) and a Ser-Asp-containing lipase,
Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2
(54). However, these alternative serine hydrolase types are limited to
a small subset of enzymes or organisms. In contrast, the AS enzymes
represent a large family of non-classical serine hydrolases whose
evolutionary distribution rivals that of the catalytic triad superfamily.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant MH58542, the Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, the Searle Scholars Program (to B. F. C.), and the National Science Foundation (to M. P. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001607200
The abbreviations used are:
AS, amidase
signature;
FAAH, fatty acid amide hydrolase;
OME, oleoyl methyl ester;
Bis-Tris, 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol;
FP-biotin, biotin-conjugated fluorophosphonate inhibitor.
Clarifying the Catalytic Roles of Conserved Residues in the
Amidase Signature Family*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C indefinitely
with no effect on enzyme activity. Western blots were performed using
rabbit anti-FAAH antibodies (12) followed by horseradish
peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibodies. For FP-biotin studies,
samples were treated with 2 µM FP-biotin for 30 min as
described (31), followed by blotting using horseradish
peroxidase-coupled avidin.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignment of amidase signature
enzymes. Significant sequence homology can be found among AS
enzymes over a region comprising residues 134-257 of FAAH. Consensus
residues are shown above the alignment, and the percentage
of residues matching the consensus from an alignment of 86 AS enzymes
is indicated. FAAH, fatty acid amide hydrolase, Rattus
norvegicus (accession number gi:1680722); AMD,
acetamidase, Emericella nidulans (accession number
gi:101782); Celeg, predicted amidase, Caenorhabditis
elegans (accession number gi:6425411); GluAT,
GlutRNAGln amidotransferase, Bacillus
subtilis (accession number gi:2589195); IAAH,
indoleacetamide hydrolase, Pseudomonas syringae (accession
number gi:77820); Nicam, nicotinamidase,
Mycobacterium smegmatis (accession number gi:3869278);
Nylam, 6-aminohexanoate cyclic dimer hydrolase,
Flavobacterium sp. (accession number gi: 148711);
RhoJI, JI amidase, Rhodococcus rhodochrous
(accession number gi:563984); Urea, urea
amidolyase, Pichia jadini (accession number
gi: 742250); VDHAP, vitamin D3
hydroxylase-associated protein, Gallus domesticus
(accession number gi:1079452).

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of FAAH mutants in COS-7
cells. The indicated FAAH mutants were expressed in COS-7 cells,
and membrane extracts were isolated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." All protein samples were treated with 2 µM
FP-biotin for 30 min prior to quenching with 2× SDS loading buffer.
A, 10 µg of each protein extract were loaded on a reducing
SDS-PAGE gel and protein was detected by blotting with either anti-FAAH
antibodies (upper panel) or avidin-horseradish peroxidase
(lower panel). In general the relative amount of labeling
with FP-biotin as judged by the avidin-horseradish peroxidase signal
was consistent with the amount of FAAH immunoreactivity. However, the
K142A, S217A, and S241A mutants exhibited no detectable labeling with
FP-biotin despite wild type levels of FAAH immunoreactivity.
B, the FAAH and avidin signals from varying amounts of FAAH
protein extract (1-10 µg) were compared with those from 10 µg of
protein extract of the D237E, R243A, N206A, and D237N mutants. Please
note that the left and right panels represent
different exposure times. The amount of FAAH immunoreactivity observed
for 10 µg of the D237E and R243A mutant protein extracts (right
panel) was similar to that for 5 µg of FAAH extract, indicating
a 2-fold decrease in expression for these two mutants. The N206A and
D237N mutants exhibited approximately 5- and 10-fold lower expression
levels than FAAH, respectively. For the N206A, D237E, D237N, and R243A
mutants, the relative amount of FAAH immunoreactivity correlated well
with the amount of FP-biotin signal as judged by avidin detection,
suggesting that these proteins label with FP-biotin to near wild type
levels.
1% of the oleamide hydrolase activity of FAAH. Thus, only
five conserved AS residues (Lys-142, Ser-217, Ser-218, Ser-241, and
Arg-243) were critical for the amidase activity of FAAH.
Oleamide hydrolysis rates of FAAH mutants expressed in COS-7 cells
Oleoyl methyl ester hydrolysis rates of FAAH mutants expressed in COS-7
cells

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
pH versus
Vmax profiles for OME hydrolysis by FAAH
and the R243A mutant from transfected COS-7 cells. The pH
dependences of Vmax for OME hydrolysis by FAAH
(open circles) and the R243A (open squares)
mutant are shown with the curve fits obtained by non-linear least
squares regression. The curve fit for FAAH indicates a catalytic base
with a pKa of 7.9 and assumes a lower activity limit
at low pH that is 15-fold lower than the maximal activity. The curve
fit for the R243A mutant indicates a catalytic base with a
pKa of 6.8 with no lower activity limit.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
pH versus
kcat profiles for oleamide hydrolysis by
FAAH, the S217A mutant, and the S218A mutant. The pH dependences
of kcat for oleamide hydrolysis by FAAH
(solid diamonds), the S218A mutant (solid
triangles), and the S217A mutant (open circles) are
shown. Curve fits were obtained by non-linear least squares regression
and indicate a basic residue involved in catalysis with a pH of 7.9 (FAAH) or 7.1 (S218A). The lower activity limits for FAAH and the S218A
mutants were 20- and 3.5-fold below the maximal activity, respectively.
The S217A mutant exhibited less than a 30% change in activity between
pH 6.0 and 9.0, and no ionizable residue pKa values
could be predicted from the profile.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Skaggs
Institute for Chemical Biology, Dept. of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-8633; Fax: 858-784-2345; E-mail:
cravatt@scripps.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Mayaux, J. F.,
Cerebelaud, E.,
Soubrier, F.,
Faucher, D.,
and Petre, D.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
6764-6773
2.
Chebrou, H.,
Bigey, F.,
Arnaud, A.,
and Galzy, P.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1298,
285-293
3.
Sako, Y.,
Nomura, N.,
Uchida, A.,
Ishida, Y.,
Morii, H.,
Koga, Y.,
Hoaki, T.,
and Maruyama, T.
(1996)
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46,
1070-1077
4.
Kobayashi, M.,
Komeda, H.,
Nagasawa, T.,
Nishiyama, M.,
Horinouchi, S.,
Beppu, T.,
Yamada, H.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
217,
327-336
5.
Boshoff, H. I.,
and Mizrahi, V.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5809-5814
6.
Hashimoto, Y.,
Nishiyama, M.,
Ikehata, O.,
Horinouchi, S.,
and Beppu, T.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1088,
225-233
7.
Gomi, K.,
Kitamoto, K.,
and Kumagai, C.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
108,
91-98
8.
Ettinger, R. A.,
and DeLuca, H. F.
(1995)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
316,
14-19
9.
Cravatt, B. F.,
Giang, D. K.,
Mayfield, S. P.,
Boger, D. L.,
Lerner, R. A.,
and Gilula, N. B.
(1996)
Nature
384,
83-87
10.
Hynes, M. J.
(1975)
Aust. J. Biol. Sci.
28,
301-313
11.
Curnow, A. W.,
Hong, K.,
Yuan, R.,
Kim, S.,
Martins, O.,
Winkler, W.,
Henkin, T. M.,
and Soll, D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11819-11826
12.
Patricelli, M. P.,
Lashuel, H. A.,
Giang, D. K.,
Kelly, J. W.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
15177-15187
13.
Patricelli, M. P.,
Lovato, M. A.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
9804-9812
14.
Patricelli, M. P.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14125-14130
15.
Devane, W. A.,
Hanus, L.,
Breuer, A.,
Pertwee, R. G.,
Stevenson, L. A.,
Griffin, G.,
Gibson, D.,
Mandelbaum, A.,
Etinger, A.,
and Mechoulam, R.
(1992)
Science
258,
1946-1949
16.
Cravatt, B. F.,
Prospero-Garcia, O.,
Siuzdak, G.,
Gilula, N. B.,
Henriksen, S. J.,
Boger, D. L.,
and Lerner, R. A.
(1995)
Science
268,
1506-1509
17.
Lerner, R. A.,
Siuzdak, G.,
Prospero-Garcia, O.,
Henriksen, S. J.,
Boger, D. L.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9505-9508
18.
Basile, A. S.,
Hanus, L.,
and Mendelson, W. B.
(1999)
Neuroreport
10,
947-951
19.
Mendelson, W. B.,
and Basile, A. S.
(1999)
Neuroreport
10,
3237-3239
20.
Calignano, A.,
La Rana, G.,
Giuffrida, A.,
and Piomelli, D.
(1998)
Nature
394,
277-281
21.
Jaggar, S. I.,
Hasnie, F. S.,
Sellaturay, S.,
and Rice, A. S.
(1998)
Pain
76,
189-199
22.
Smith, P. B.,
Compton, D. R.,
Welch, S. P.,
Razdan, R. K.,
Mechoulam, R.,
and Martin, B. R.
(1994)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
270,
219-227
23.
Boger, D. L.,
Henriksen, S. J.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1998)
Curr. Pharmacol. Des.
4,
303-314
24.
Di Marzo, V.,
and Deutsch, D. G.
(1998)
Neurobiol. Dis.
5,
386-404
25.
Romero, J.,
Garcia-Palomero, E.,
Lin, S. Y.,
Ramos, J. A.,
Makriyannis, A.,
and Fernandez-Ruiz, J. J.
(1996)
Life Sci.
58,
1249-1257
26.
Dodson, G.,
and Wlodawer, A.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
347-352
27.
Kobayashi, M.,
Fujiwara, Y.,
Goda, M.,
Komeda, H.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11986-11991
28.
Horton, R. M.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Ho, S. N.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
61-68
29.
Ho, S. N.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Horton, R. M.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
51-59
30.
Giang, D. K.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2238-2242
31.
Liu, Y.,
Patricelli, M. P.,
and Cravatt, B. F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14694-14699
32.
Craik, C. S.,
Roczniak, S.,
Largman, C.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1987)
Science
237,
909-913
33.
Ordentlich, A.,
Barak, D.,
Kronman, C.,
Ariel, N.,
Segall, Y.,
Velan, B.,
and Shafferman, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11953-11962
34.
Ordentlich, A.,
Barak, D.,
Kronman, C.,
Ariel, N.,
Segall, Y.,
Velan, B.,
and Shafferman, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19509-19517
35.
Polgar, L.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
15548-15555
36.
Omeir, R. L.,
Arreaza, G.,
and Deutsch, D. G.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
264,
316-320
37.
Goparaju, S. K.,
Kurahashi, Y.,
Suzuki, H.,
Ueda, N.,
and Yamamoto, S.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1441,
77-84
38.
Carter, P.,
and Wells, J. A.
(1988)
Nature
332,
564-568
39.
Carter, P.,
and Wells, J. A.
(1987)
Science
237,
394-399
40.
Stennicke, H. R.,
Mortensen, U. H.,
and Breddam, K.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
7131-7141
41.
Mortensen, U. H.,
Remington, S. J.,
and Breddam, K.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
508-517
42.
Gassama-Diagne, A.,
Rogalle, P.,
Fauvel, J.,
Willson, M.,
Klaebe, A.,
and Chap, H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13418-13424
43.
Simons, J. W.,
Cox, R. C.,
Egmond, M. R.,
and Verheij, H. M.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
6346-6351
44.
Bender, M. L.,
Schonbaum, G. R.,
and B, Z.
(1962)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
84,
2540-2550
45.
Carter, P.,
and Wells, J. A.
(1990)
Proteins
7,
335-342
46.
Deutsch, D. G.,
and Chin, S. A.
(1993)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
46,
791-796
47.
Mechoulam, R.,
Ben-Shabat, S.,
Hanus, L.,
Ligumsky, M.,
Kaminski, N. E.,
Schatz, A. R.,
Gopher, A.,
Almog, S.,
Martin, B. R.,
Compton, D. R.,
Pertwee, R. G.,
Griffin, G.,
Bayewitch, M.,
Barg, J.,
and Vogel, Z.
(1995)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
50,
83-90
48.
Sugiura, T.,
Kondo, S.,
Sukagawa, A.,
Nakane, S.,
Shinoda, A.,
Itoh, K.,
Yamashita, A.,
and Waku, K.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215,
89-97
49.
Paetzel, M.,
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Strynadka, N. C.
(1998)
Nature
396,
186-190
50.
Lin, L. L.,
and Little, J. W.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
210,
439-452
51.
Dalbey, R. E.,
Lively, M. O.,
Bron, S.,
and van Dijl, J. M.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
1129-1138
52.
Strynadka, N. C.,
Adachi, H.,
Jensen, S. E.,
Johns, K.,
Sielecki, A.,
Betzel, C.,
Sutoh, K.,
and James, M. N.
(1992)
Nature
359,
700-705
53.
Peat, T. S.,
Frank, E. G.,
McDonald, J. P.,
Levine, A. S.,
Woodgate, R.,
and Hendrickson, W. A.
(1996)
Nature
380,
727-730
54.
Dessen, A.,
Tang, J.,
Schmidt, H.,
Stahl, M.,
Clark, J. D.,
Seehra, J.,
and Somers, W. S.
(1999)
Cell
97,
349-360
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. D. Ekici, M. Paetzel, and R. E. Dalbey Unconventional serine proteases: Variations on the catalytic Ser/His/Asp triad configuration Protein Sci., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 2023 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, F. Ramirez, G. Krishnamurthy, A. Gilbert, N. Kadakia, J. Xu, G. Kalgaonkar, M. K. Ramarao, W. Edris, K. E. Rogers, et al. High-Throughput Screening for the Discovery of Inhibitors of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Using a Microsome-Based Fluorescent Assay J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2006; 11(5): 519 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shapir, G. Cheng, M. J. Sadowsky, and L. P. Wackett Purification and Characterization of TrzF: Biuret Hydrolysis by Allophanate Hydrolase Supports Growth Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 72(4): 2491 - 2495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shapir, M. J. Sadowsky, and L. P. Wackett Purification and Characterization of Allophanate Hydrolase (AtzF) from Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2005; 187(11): 3731 - 3738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. McKinney and B. F. Cravatt Evidence for Distinct Roles in Catalysis for Residues of the Serine-Serine-Lysine Catalytic Triad of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37393 - 37399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shrestha, R. A. Dixon, and K. D. Chapman Molecular Identification of a Functional Homologue of the Mammalian Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase in Arabidopsis thaliana J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 34990 - 34997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shin, Y. S. Yun, H. M. Koo, Y. S. Kim, K. Y. Choi, and B.-H. Oh Characterization of a Novel Ser-cisSer-Lys Catalytic Triad in Comparison with the Classical Ser-His-Asp Triad J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24937 - 24943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. McLeish, M. M. Kneen, K. N. Gopalakrishna, C. W. Koo, P. C. Babbitt, J. A. Gerlt, and G. L. Kenyon Identification and Characterization of a Mandelamide Hydrolase and an NAD(P)+-Dependent Benzaldehyde Dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas putida ATCC 12633 J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2003; 185(8): 2451 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. El Bawab, J. Usta, P. Roddy, Z. M. Szulc, A. Bielawska, and Y. A. Hannun Substrate specificity of rat brain ceramidase J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 141 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Martinez, J. Tomkins, L. P. Wackett, R. Wing, and M. J. Sadowsky Complete Nucleotide Sequence and Organization of the Atrazine Catabolic Plasmid pADP-1 from Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2001; 183(19): 5684 - 5697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Day, F. Rakhshan, D. G. Deutsch, and E. L. Barker Role of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase in the Transport of the Endogenous Cannabinoid Anandamide Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2001; 59(6): 1369 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
|