Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M908879199 on March 10, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19218-19223, June 23, 2000
The Two Toxoplasma gondii Hypoxanthine-Guanine
Phosphoribosyltransferase Isozymes Form Heterotetramers*
E. Lucile
White,
Larry J.
Ross,
Richard L.
Davis
,
Sabrina
Zywno-van Ginkel,
Geetha
Vasanthakumar§, and
David W.
Borhani¶
From the Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute,
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
Received for publication, November 2, 1999, and in revised form, March 8, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Two isozymes of the purine salvage enzyme
hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT) of the
apicomplexan protozoan Toxoplasma gondii are encoded by the
single HGPRT gene as a result of differential splicing. Western
blotting of total T. gondii protein shows that both
isozymes I and II, which differ by 49 amino acids, are expressed. Both
form enzymatically active homotetramers when overexpressed in
Escherichia coli. The specific activity of HGPRT-I is five
times that of HGPRT-II. When both isozymes are co-expressed in E. coli, HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramers form. The predominant
heterotetramer has enzymatic activity similar to HGPRT-II, and gel
filtration chromatography demonstrates that its size is intermediate
between the sizes of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II. Mass spectrometric analysis
of cross-linked homo- and heterotetramers reveals species of distinct
molecular mass for HGPRT-I, HGPRT-II, and HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II and
suggests that the predominant heterotetramer consists of one HGPRT-I
subunit and three HGPRT-II subunits. The implications of this finding
are discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Encephalitis caused by the apicomplexan protozoan Toxoplasma
gondii is the second leading cause of death among patients with AIDS (1). Much effort has been expended on the characterization of this
parasite and on the discovery and development of new drugs to treat
T. gondii infections (2, 3). A widely recognized drug target
in parasitic protozoa is the enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase
(HGPRT1; EC 2.4.2.8) (4, 5).
HGPRT catalyzes the Mg2+-dependent conversion
of hypoxanthine, guanine, or xanthine and
-D-5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) to purine
nucleotides and inorganic pyrophosphate. It is a key purine salvage
enzyme in T. gondii, which cannot carry out the de
novo synthesis of purine nucleotides required for growth and
replication (6, 7).
The cloning of T. gondii HGPRT revealed the presence of two
cDNAs, differing by 147 nucleotides, that appear to result from differential splicing of the nascent transcript from the single HGPRT
gene (8, 9). It is the smaller 230-amino acid isozyme I (HGPRT-I),
which is homologous to human HGPRT, that we (11, 12)2 and others (13) have
crystallized. Enzymatically active HGPRT-I is a homotetramer (12). The
larger T. gondii HGPRT isozyme, HGPRT-II, has a 49-amino
acid insertion following Glu7 (GenBankTM
accession number U10083). How the three-dimensional structure of
HGPRT-I is altered to accommodate the insertion in HGPRT-II, which is
located at a subunit interface within the HGPRT tetramer, is not known.
T. gondii HGPRT is the only HGPRT known that may exist as
two isozymes. From a drug design perspective, therefore, it is
important to know whether Toxoplasma expresses HGPRT-II as a
stable enzyme, and if so whether HGPRT-I or HGPRT-II (or both) is the
true drug target in Toxoplasma. If both HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II
are expressed in Toxoplasma, do they form homotetramers
only, or are they capable of forming heterotetramers as well? If so, do
they form a preferred heterotetramer or a statistical mixture of all
possible heterotetramers? How do the enzymatic activity and sensitivity
to inhibitors of HGPRT heterotetramers compare with HGPRT-I and
HGPRT-II homotetramers?
We report here our initial investigations into these questions, which
show that T. gondii does express stable HGPRT-II, that the HGPRT-II homotetramer possesses enzymatic activity distinct from
that of HGPRT-I, that HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II form a particular heterotetramer when both are co-expressed in Escherichia
coli, and that this heterotetramer possesses enzymatic
activity similar to that of the HGPRT-II homotetramer.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
HGPRT Expression
Subcloning into pET9a--
Plasmids pET15b-C1 (previously pETC1;
Ref. 8) and pET15b-C3 (pETC3; Ref. 8), which contain the T. gondii HGPRT isozymes I and II coding sequences, respectively,
inserted into vector pET15b (Novagen, Inc.; Ref. 14), were digested
with NdeI and BamHI overnight at 37 °C. pET9a
was digested as well. pET9a is similar to pET15b but lacks the
N-terminal His6 tag and contains a kanamycin rather than an
ampicillin resistance marker. Digested DNAs were separated by
electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel; the appropriate fragments were
extracted from the gel (GeneClean, BIO 101, Inc.) and then ligated with
T4 DNA ligase (16 h, 15 °C). Competent E. coli XL1 Blue
cells were transformed to kanamycin resistance with the ligated DNAs
and grown on 2x-YT (16 g/liter tryptone, 10 g/liter yeast extract, and
5 g/liter NaCl) agar plates containing 25 µg/ml kanamycin. Colonies
were screened for the presence of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II inserts by
restriction enzyme (NdeI and BamHI) analysis of
plasmid DNA. Two positive clones were named pET9a-C1 and pET9a-C3. Open
reading frames in each plasmid construct were confirmed by automated
DNA sequencing (PRISM Dye Terminator kit/PRISM 377 sequencer, Applied
Biosystems, Inc.) to ensure that no sequence artifacts were introduced
during the subcloning process.
Co-expression of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II--
Competent E. coli BL21(DE3) cells were transformed to simultaneous
ampicillin and kanamycin resistance with plasmids pET9a-C1 and
pET15b-C3 or plasmids pET9a-C3 and pET15b-C1 (2x-YT agar plates containing 25 µg/ml kanamycin and 100 µg/ml ampicillin). Single colonies of E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET9a-C1/pET15b-C3 and
BL21(DE3)/pET9a-C3/pET15b-C1 were separately inoculated into 5 ml of
2x-YT broth containing 25 µg/ml kanamycin and 100 µg/ml ampicillin
and grown overnight (250 rpm, 37 °C). The overnight cultures were
diluted into 1 liter of medium and shaken at 37 °C. When the
cultures reached an A600 of ~0.8, expression
of HGPRT was induced by the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (final
concentration, 1 mM). Cells were harvested 3 h later
by centrifugation, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, repelleted, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
80 °C. HGPRT-II was expressed similarly, using plasmid pET15b-C3.
HGPRT Purification and Characterization
Purification and Enzymatic Assay--
Isozyme II of T. gondii HGPRT was purified from the pET15b expression culture by
Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography followed by thrombin
digestion (to remove the N-terminal His6 tag) and gel
filtration, essentially as described previously for HGPRT-I (12).
HGPRT-II was found to be unusually susceptible to thrombin digestion.
Consequently, proteolysis was carried out with 5 units of thrombin/ml
for 2 h (rather than 4 units/ml overnight) on ice and was followed
by passage through a small benzamidine-agarose affinity column to remove the thrombin. Additional protease inhibitors were added to the
purified enzyme. T. gondii HGPRT heterotetramers were
purified from the co-expression cultures in the same manner. HGPRT
kinetics were measured spectrophotometrically at 37 °C as described
(12), in a buffer containing the purine base, PRPP, 100 mM
Tris·HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Vmax values were converted to
kcat values using protein concentrations determined by Bradford assay (bovine
globulin standard; Ref. 15).
Subunit Ratio and Cross-linking--
Discontinuous
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), performed according to
Laemmli (16), was used to assess HGPRT purity, to determine approximate
subunit molecular masses, and to assess the extent of cross-linking
reactions. HGPRT-I to HGPRT-II ratios were determined by densitometry
(Shimadzu CS-9000 dual wavelength flying spot scanner, single lane
scans at 595 nm) of gels stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250
(Pierce Gelcode Blue). Cross-linking reactions were performed by
incubating 100 µl of HGPRT (2.5 mg/ml) in phosphate-buffered saline
and 2 µl of disuccinimidyl suberate (20 mM in
Me2SO, Pierce) for 30 min at room temperature. Reactions
were quenched by addition of 1 µl of 1 M ethanolamine.
Western Blotting of T. gondii Total Soluble
Protein--
Purified recombinant T. gondii HGPRT-I was
separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue
G-250, destained, and rinsed extensively in H2O. The band
at ~27 kDa was cut from the gel. Polyclonal rabbit antisera were
prepared by HRP Inc. (Denver, PA). The minced gel containing ~125
µg of protein was injected subcutaneously into each of two rabbits
along with Freund's adjuvant. Two additional injections were made, and
the rabbits were bled for serum production. Preimmunization bleeds were
also taken. T. gondii parasites (RH strain tachyzoites) were
lysed by freeze-thawing and brief sonication in 25 mM
Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PRPP, 1% Nonidet P-40. The lysate was centrifuged (10,000g, 4 °C, 10 min). 12 µg of T. gondii
soluble protein was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE; recombinant T. gondii HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II (400 ng each) and molecular mass
markers were included on the gel as standards. The gel was transferred
to Hybond-ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in Towbins buffer (25 mM Tris·HCl, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v)
methanol, pH 8.3, at 100 V for 1 h). A 1:1000 dilution of the
rabbit polyclonal anti-HGPRT-I antiserum was used as the primary
antibody, and a 1:1500 dilution of the Enhanced Chemiluminesence Western Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) anti-rabbit IgG antibody was
used as the secondary antibody. Preimmunization serum was used in
control experiments.
Gel Filtration Chromatography--
Samples were applied at
4 °C to a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 gel filtration column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 25 mM Tris·HCl, pH
8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 10%
glycerol. The column was calibrated with thyroglobulin (Stokes radius,
85.0 Å), aldolase (48.1), ovalbumin (30.5), and ribonuclease A (16.4).
Partition coefficients were calculated from the elution volumes of the
proteins, blue dextran (~2 × 106 Da), and acetone.
Stokes radii were determined from partition coefficients using an
empirical inverse error function complement (erfc
1)
relationship (17). Frictional coefficients and Perrin shape factors
were calculated from the Stokes radii (18).
Mass Spectrometry and Amino Acid Sequencing--
MALDI-TOF mass
spectra were obtained on a Voyager Elite mass spectrometer (positive
mode) with delayed extraction technology (PerSeptive Biosystems). The
acceleration voltage was set at 25 kV, and 10-50 laser shots were
summed. The matrix was sinapinic acid (Aldrich) dissolved in
CH3CN/0.1% CF3CO2H (1:1). The
spectrometer was calibrated with apomyoglobin or bovine serum albumin.
Samples were diluted 1:10 with matrix before pipetting 1 µl onto a
smooth plate. N-terminal sequencing was done by automated Edman
degradation on a gas-phase microsequencing system (model PI 2090E,
Beckman). The amino acid residue released in a given cycle was
identified from the difference chromatogram (comparison with the
previous cycle).
 |
RESULTS |
Expression, Purification, and Characterization of HGPRT-II--
We
showed previously that expression of T. gondii HGPRT-I in
E. coli (pET15b vector) provides large quantities of
homogeneous, enzymatically active protein (12). HGPRT-II was expressed
using the same approach. It was purified to apparent homogeneity by Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography, proteolytic removal
of the N-terminal His6 tag, and gel filtration
chromatography. Isozyme II had enzymatic properties similar to but
distinct from isozyme I. As shown in Table
I, HGPRT-II had about one-fifth the
specific activity of HGPRT-I regardless of whether hypoxanthine,
guanine or xanthine was the substrate. The Michaelis constants of the
two isozymes were similar, with the PRPP Km of
HGPRT-II tending to be higher than that of HGPRT-I. Also, the guanine
Km of HGPRT-II was six times higher than that of
HGPRT-I, with the result that the catalytic efficiency of the isozymes
differed by 30-fold with this substrate. These kinetic differences
between HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II agree in broad terms (except for guanine) with those reported previously (9).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Enzymatic activity of the T. gondii HGPRT isozymes
Enzymatic activity was determined at pH 8.0, 37 °C.
Km values are reported for the varied substrate; the
concentration of the other substrate was fixed at ten times its
Km value.
|
|
The subunit molecular mass of HGPRT-II, as determined by SDS-PAGE, was
33,500 Da. Both it and HGPRT-I (27,500 Da) migrated at a somewhat
higher position than that predicted from their calculated molecular
masses. Nonetheless, mass spectrometric analysis (MALDI-TOF) of both
isozymes confirmed that they possessed the correct mass (for HGPRT-I,
the observed mass was 26,668 Da and the calculated mass was 26,667 Da;
for HGPRT-II, the observed mass was 31,767 Da and the calculated mass
was 31,766 Da; masses include an N-terminal peptide, Gly-Ser-His, that
remains after thrombolytic removal of the His6 tag).
HGPRT-II eluted much earlier than HGPRT-I from a gel filtration column,
well in excess of that expected from molecular mass differences,
suggesting that it possessed a higher oligomeric state than HGPRT-I
(Fig. 1). Comparison of its elution
volume with those of standards of known size revealed that HGPRT-II had a Stokes radius of 49.2 Å, compared with 38.2 Å for HGPRT-I (17). We
had determined previously from its Stokes radius that HGPRT-I was a
tetramer (Perrin shape factor F, 1.04; axial ratio,
~1.9:1; assumes 0.35 g of H2O/g of HGPRT-I), a
result that has been verified repeatedly by the observation of this
aggregation state exclusively in more than eight distinct T. gondii HGPRT crystal structures (axial ratio ~1.6:1; Refs.
11-13).2,3 When the shape
factor was calculated for possible HGPRT-II aggregation states (dimer
through octamer), only an octamer appeared physically reasonable
(F, 1.03; axial ratio, ~1.7:1) (18). Other possible aggregation states afforded axial ratios of >3.5:1. These results suggested that HGPRT-II either adopts a dramatically more open conformation than HGPRT-I, or more likely that it, like HGPRT-I, forms
a tetramer, but one prone to further aggregation to an octamer under
the chromatography conditions.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Gel filtration chromatography of T. gondii HGPRTs. HGPRTs were separated on a Superdex 200 column and detected by absorbance at 280 nm. Shown from top
to bottom are: HGPRT-I; HGPRT-II; a 1:1 physical mixture of
HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II; and co-expressed, affinity-purified
HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer (HGPRT-II tagged). Elution volumes
for the HGPRTs are indicated. Elution volumes for the calibration
standards were: blue dextran, 112.8 ml; thyroglobulin, 124.9 ml;
aldolase, 176.9 ml; ovalbumin, 216.0 ml; ribonuclease A, 256.3 ml;
acetone, 325.0 ml.
|
|
Both HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II Are Expressed in
Toxoplasma--
Immunological detection was used to determine whether
both T. gondii HGPRT cDNAs give rise to stable protein
in the parasite. A polyclonal rabbit antiserum was raised against
homogeneous recombinant HGPRT-I. Western blotting showed that the
antiserum cross-reacted well with recombinant HGPRT-II, as expected
from the high similarity in amino acid sequence. A Western blot of
total T. gondii soluble protein using this antiserum for
detection is shown in Fig. 2. It was
clear that approximately equal amounts of both HGPRT-I and
HGPRT-II subunits were present in Toxoplasma. Control blots using preimmunization serum demonstrated that the bands in Fig. 2 arose
specifically from HGPRT. The possibility that the band we attributed to
HGPRT-I in the parasite actually arose from contaminating human HGPRT,
an inevitable low level contaminant given that the parasites were grown
in human fibroblasts, was excluded because a control blot showed that
the antiserum did not cross-react with recombinant human HGPRT.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western blot of Toxoplasma
total soluble protein. T. gondii soluble total
protein was separated by electrophoresis, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and detected with anti-HGPRT-I polyclonal antiserum
(lane 1). The positions of molecular mass standards
(lane M) and recombinant HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II are
indicated.
|
|
HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II Form Heterotetramers When Co-expressed in E. coli--
We took advantage of the differences between the pET15b and
pET9a vectors (N-terminal His6 tag and ampicillin
resistance versus no tag and kanamycin resistance) to
express both T. gondii HGPRT isozymes (one tagged and one
untagged) simultaneously in E. coli. The only way the
untagged HGPRT subunit could bind to a Ni2+-agarose
affinity chromatography column would be as part of a heterotetramer
with the tagged subunit.
Maintenance of the double antibiotic selection allowed tagged HGPRT-I
(pET15b) and untagged HGPRT-II (pET9a) to be co-expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). The reciprocal experiment (untagged HGPRT-I and
tagged HGPRT-II) was also successful. The soluble fraction of the cell
lysate was passed over Ni2+-agarose, and nonspecifically
bound proteins were eluted with a 150 mM imidazole wash.
Bound protein was then eluted with 450 mM imidazole, which
was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and densitometry. Regardless of whether
HGPRT-I or HGPRT-II carried the His6 tag, specifically
bound protein consisted of a 1:3 ratio of the HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II
subunits (Fig. 3), even when the relative
expression levels of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II differed. This is the first
evidence that HGPRT heterotetramers can and do
form when both isozymes are heterologously expressed in E. coli. Control experiments showed that untagged HGPRT-I, HGPRT-II,
or HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramers, by themselves, do not bind to
Ni2+-agarose.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SDS-PAGE analysis of T. gondii
HGPRT-I/HGPRT-II co-expression in E. coli.
Top panel, untagged HGPRT-I co-expressed with tagged
HGPRT-II. Bottom panel, tagged HGPRT-I co-expressed with
untagged HGPRT-II. The positions of molecular mass standards
(lane M) and HGPRT-I (lane 1) and HGPRT-II
(lane 2) standards from a separate experiment are indicated
(HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II were both tagged and thrombin-cleaved; N terminus
GSHMASKPIE; subunit masses of 26,667 and 31,766 Da). Lanes
3-7, HGPRT co-expression. Lane 3, total lysate;
lane 4, lysate supernatant; lane 5,
Ni2+-agarose flow-through; lane 6,
Ni2+-agarose wash; lane 7,
Ni2+-agarose eluate. In the top gel, expression
of the two isozymes is nearly equal (lane 3), and a small
amount of untagged HGPRT-I (lane 5; no N-terminal
methionine; subunit mass 26,255 Da) flows through the
Ni2+-agarose column. In the bottom gel, a large amount of
unbound HGPRT-II (lane 5; arrowhead; N terminus
ASKPIEESR; 31,353 Da) is present. The expression of tagged HGPRT-I is
nearly undetectable in the lysate (lane 3) but is clearly
captured by the Ni2+-agarose column (lane 7).
Densitometry areas of lanes 7, top panel,
HGPRT-II, 14,832; HGPRT-I, 5,167 (ratio 2.9:1); bottom
panel, HGPRT-II, 15,941; HGPRT-I, 5,196 (ratio 3.1:1).
|
|
When HGPRT-II bore the His6 tag, both proteins were
expressed at moderate, approximately equal levels (Fig. 3, top
panel). The majority of the HGPRT bound specifically to
Ni2+-agarose as the 1:3 HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer.
Excess untagged HGPRT-I, which did not bind, was enzymatically active.
The purified heterotetramer had specific enzymatic activity much more
similar to HGPRT-II than HGPRT-I (Table I).
In the reciprocal experiment, tagged HGPRT-I was barely detectable in
cell lysates 3 h after
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside induction, whereas
untagged HGPRT-II was expressed at very high levels (Fig. 3,
bottom panel). As before, the 1:3 HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer bound specifically to Ni2+-agarose, whereas
the large excess of untagged HGPRT-II did not. Unbound co-expressed
HGPRT-II appeared to have a lower molecular mass by SDS-PAGE (31,500 Da) compared with HGPRT-II expressed alone (33,500 Da, after thrombin
cleavage of the His6 tag). Purification of unbound HGPRT-II
by gel filtration chromatography (Stokes radius, 50.2 Å) provided a
sample of >95% purity that possessed enzymatic activity equivalent to
that of HGPRT-II expressed alone. N-terminal sequencing (ASKPIEESR) and
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (observed mass was 31,408 Da) suggested
that it comprised amino acids 2-279 of HGPRT-II (calculated mass was
31,353 Da). It is not clear why HGPRT-II lacking the N-terminal
4-residue remnant (GSHM) of the His6 tag migrates at the
expected position by SDS-PAGE, whereas HGPRT-II and HGPRT-I with the
tag remnant migrate at slightly higher than expected masses. SDS-PAGE
yields at best only approximate molecular masses, because of its
sensitivity to a variety of factors. Nevertheless, the mass spectral
results for all three proteins agree very well with the masses
calculated from their amino acid compositions.
Additional Evidence That HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II Heterotetramers
Form--
Although the results of the co-expression experiments
presented above, by their very design, provided strong evidence that HGPRT heterotetramers were formed, we sought additional confirmatory evidence. As shown in Fig. 1, the Ni2+-agarose-bound HGPRT
heterotetramer had a gel filtration elution volume more similar to the
elution volume of HGPRT-II than HGPRT-I. A control experiment with a
physical mixture of the two homotetramers (Fig. 1) showed conclusively
that the peak of intermediate mobility was due to a distinct
heterotetrameric species (Stokes radius, 47.7 Å).
Cross-linking experiments were also performed on HGPRT-I, HGPRT-II, a
physical mixture of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II, and the co-expressed, purified HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II (peak from the gel filtration column; Fig.
1, bottom). Cross-linking with disuccinimidyl suberate was confirmed by
SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. As shown in Fig.
4, cross-linked HGPRT-I (tagged,
thrombin-cleaved) exhibited peaks corresponding to the masses of the
monomer, dimer, trimer, and tetramer. The observed masses agreed well
with masses calculated from the subunit mass (26,667 Da), plus the mass
of the cross-linker molecule(s) (intersubunit or intrasubunit
cross-links: +138 Da (suberate-1,8-diyl,
C8H12O2); singly attached, quenched
cross-linker molecule: +199 Da (8-(2-hydroxyethyl)-suberamide-1-yl,
C10H18NO3)). Cross-linked HGPRT-II
(tagged, thrombin-cleaved) exhibited corresponding peaks (subunit mass,
31,766 Da). As we have observed on several occasions, a minor amount of
an N-terminally truncated HGPRT-II, HGPRT-II', was present in these
samples (N-terminal sequence CTPNE, residues 24-279; observed mass,
28,895 Da; calculated mass, 28,881 Da). The ratio of full-length
HGPRT-II to HGPRT-II' was >6:1 (Fig. 3). The 1:3 (molar subunit ratio)
physical mixture of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II (both tagged,
thrombin-cleaved) when cross-linked exhibited peaks corresponding to
the separated isozymes only; no peaks were observed for cross-links
between HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II (e.g. calculated mass for the
HGPRT-I/HGPRT-II dimer, 58,433 Da).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mass spectrometric analysis of cross-linked
HGPRTs. MALDI-TOF mass spectra of cross-linked HGPRTs were
obtained as described under "Experimental Procedures." Shown from
top to bottom are: HGPRT-I (tagged,
thrombin-cleaved); HGPRT-II (tagged, thrombin-cleaved); a 1:3 physical
mixture of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II (both tagged, thrombin-cleaved); and
co-expressed, purified (Ni2+-agarose followed by Superdex
200) HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer (HGPRT-I untagged, HGPRT-II
tagged, thrombin-cleaved). The appropriate subunit masses are given in
the text and Table II. Note that the different proteins ionize with
different efficiencies. In particular, HGPRT-I appears to ionize much
more efficiently than HGPRT-II, and the HGPRT-II-containing samples
consist predominantly of full-length HGPRT-II, with a minor amount
(<17%) of HGPRT-II'. The m/z ratio of the peaks
are indicated. In the spectrum of the HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II
heterotetramer, six peaks (A-F) listed in Table II are
indicated, and the positions of unobserved peaks attributable to
HGPRT-I cross-linked to itself are marked by stars.
|
|
The mass spectrum of cross-linked HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II (HGPRT-I untagged,
observed subunit mass, 26,218 Da; calculated mass (residues 2-230),
26,255 Da; HGPRT-II tagged and thrombin-cleaved, subunit mass, 31,667 Da) is notable for the absence of cross-linked HGPRT-I peaks (Fig. 4,
stars) and the presence of two novel peaks (Fig. 4,
A and D). Possible expected and observed masses
for a cross-linked heterotetramer are summarized in Table
II. No peak was observed for the HGPRT-I
homodimer (Fig. 4, left star). By contrast, a new peak for
the HGPRT-I/HGPRT-II heterodimer was observed (peak A). Peaks for the HGPRT-II/HGPRT-II homodimer and the
HGPRT-II·HGPRT-II' heterodimer were also observed. Similarly, of the
possible cross-linked trimers, only those corresponding to the HGPRT-II
homotrimer and the HGPRT-II/HGPRT-II/HGPRT-II' and
HGPRT-II/HGPRT-II/HGPRT-I (peak D) heterotrimers were
observed. The HGPRT-I homotrimer was not observed (Fig. 4, right
star). The simplest interpretation of these results is that
co-expressed HGPRT consists of a tetramer that contains no more than
one HGPRT-I subunit, i.e. a 1:3 HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Masses of cross-linked HGPRT-I:HGPRT-II
Cross-linked HGPRTs were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy. The
mass calculated from the subunit composition is compared with that
determined by mass spectroscopy.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
HGPRT has been characterized from many mammalian, protozoal, and
bacterial organisms. To the best of our knowledge, only the HGPRT from
T. gondii has been found to exist as two isozymes. This
finding is especially interesting for two reasons. First, T. gondii HGPRT is a novel drug target for the treatment of
opportunistic toxoplasmosis in AIDS patients (4, 5). Because there are two HGPRTs in T. gondii, both should be evaluated as drug
targets. Second, the two isozymes, HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II, are encoded by a single HGPRT gene (9). Two research groups each isolated from
T. gondii cDNA libraries two mature HGPRT transcripts
that appear to result from differential splicing of the nascent
transcript (8, 9). We thought at first that the isolation of the
HGPRT-II cDNA was a cloning artifact, perhaps as a result of
inefficient or incomplete processing of the nascent HGPRT-II mRNA
to the mature, HGPRT-I mRNA in T. gondii. This thought
was reinforced by the fact that it is the smaller HGPRT-I that is
homologous to all other known HGPRTs, including its closest known
relative, Plasmodium falciparum HGPRT (19, 20), and that all
other organisms possess only one HGPRT protein.
Our experiments with the HGPRT-II isozyme show that it possesses high
enzymatic activity when expressed in E. coli, like HGPRT-I. Donald et al. (9) previously reported enzymatic activities for recombinant HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II that agree relatively well with
our values (Table I). Because of purification difficulties with
HGPRT-II, however, these workers were not able to state conclusively whether the differences they observed between HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II were
real. Our straightforward purification of HGPRT-II now shows that it is
indeed enzymatically different from HGPRT-I.
Western blotting of T. gondii total soluble protein, using
polyclonal antiserum raised against recombinant HGPRT-I, demonstrated that both isozymes are expressed as protein in the parasite.
Our findings indicate, therefore, that the isolation of two HGPRT cDNAs from T. gondii was not an artifact but rather that
this organism actually has two functional HGPRTs. Although it is not clear why Toxoplasma has two HGPRTs, the significance for
drug design is clear: recombinant HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II have different catalytic rate and Michaelis constants (especially for guanine and
PRPP), and thus they may have different susceptibility to inhibitors.
Also, certain mutations in human HGPRT bestow cooperativity upon this
usually noncooperative enzyme (10, 21). Experiments are in progress to
determine whether HGPRT-II or the heterotetramer exhibits cooperativity.
Because T. gondii HGPRT exists as two isozymes, each of
which is a homotetramer when expressed in E. coli, a natural
question to ask is whether the isozymes are capable of forming
heterotetramers? Our co-expression experiments have provided an
affirmative answer to this question. Indeed, when HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II
are simultaneously expressed in E. coli, a heterotetramer
comprising one HGPRT-I subunit and three HGPRT-II subunits forms.
The evidence for this unexpected 1:3 heterotetramer is as follows.
First, the co-expression experiment was designed to provide heterotetramers in which only one isozyme carried a purification tag.
Affinity-purified heterotetramers were separated by SDS-PAGE, and
densitometry showed that the HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II subunits were present
in a 1:3 ratio, regardless of whether HGPRT-I or HGPRT-II was tagged
and regardless of the very different relative and absolute expression
levels of the two isozymes (Fig. 3). Second, gel filtration
chromatography of the affinity-purified heterotetramers revealed
predominantly a single species, with a mobility intermediate between
those of HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II but closer to HGPRT-II (Fig. 1). Third,
when the heterotetramers were cross-linked and analyzed by MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry, cross-linked HGPRT-I subunits were not
observed, but cross-linked HGPRT-I and HGPRT-II subunits were observed (Fig. 4 and Table II).
In E. coli, formation of the 1:3 HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II
heterotetramer is accompanied by formation of the homotetramers. It
is intriguing that the 1:3 HGPRT-I·HGPRT-II heterotetramer has
enzymatic activity and physical properties similar to HGPRT-II (Table I
and Fig. 1). It is not clear why this particular heterotetramer is the one formed in E. coli, rather than a statisical mixture of
heterotetramers. It is unknown whether HGPRT heterotetramers form in
T. gondii.
Our gel filtration results suggest that the HGPRT-II homotetramer and
the heterotetramer may form larger oligomers. It is unclear at this
point whether these enzymes are truly octamers, as their Stokes radii
would suggest, or whether they are just tetramers prone to further
aggregation. Certainly, the fact that the HGPRT-I dimer is not observed
in cross-linked samples of the heterotetramer suggests that the latter
interpretation is correct. Octameric HGPRT would also be unprecedented.
Analytical ultracentrifugation and crystallization experiments with
HGPRT-II and the heterotetramer are planned to address this issue.
Finally, further studies are contemplated to express tagged HGPRT-I and
HGPRT-II in T. gondii itself, which will allow for the
confirmation that heterotetramers form in situ. If so, their
purification and characterization will be undertaken.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Prof. David Roos (University of
Pennsylvania) for sharing results on the immunohistochemical
localization of the two T. gondii HGPRT isozymes in T. gondii parasites prior to publication, Prof. Elmer Pfefferkorn and
Susan Borotz (Dartmouth Medical School) for supplying the T. gondii pellets, and Susan Tendian for performing some of the
Western blotting experiments. We thank Kelly Morrison for determining
the N-terminal sequences and Lori Coward for measuring the mass
spectra, which were carried out at the Peptide Synthesis and Analysis
and Mass Spectrometry Shared Facilities of the University of Alabama at
Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center (CA13148). The mass
spectrometer was purchased with funds from National Institutes of
Health shared instrumentation Grant S10RR11329 and from a Howard Hughes
Medical Institute infrastructure support grant to the University of Alabama.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants AI39952 (to D. W. B.) and AI30279 (to James R. Piper).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present Address: IntegriDerm, LLC, 2130 Memorial Parkway, SW,
Huntsville, AL 35801.
§
Present Address: Monsanto Co., 700 Chesterfield Parkway North, St.
Louis, MO 63198.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Organic
Chemistry, Southern Research Institute, 2000 Ninth Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35205. Tel.: 205-581-2555; Fax: 205-581-2877; E-mail: borhani@sri.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 10, 1999, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M908879199
2
A. Héroux, E. L. White, L. J. Ross, A. P. Kuzin, and D. W. Borhani, submitted for publication.
3
A. Héroux and D. Borhani, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HGPRT, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase;
HGPRT-I, T.
gondii HGPRT, isozyme I (short form);
HGPRT-II, T.
gondii HGPRT, isozyme II (long form);
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted
laser desorption ionization-time of flight;
PRPP,
-D-5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Murray, H. W.
(1991)
in
Harrison's Principals of Internal Medicine
(Wilson, J. D.
, Braunwald, E.
, Isselbacher, K. J.
, Petersdorf, R. G.
, Martin, J. B.
, Fauci, A. S.
, and Root, R. K., eds), 12th Ed.
, pp. 795-799, McGraw-Hill, New York
|
| 2.
|
Tuazon, C. U.
(1989)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
23 (Suppl. A),
77-82
|
| 3.
|
Kovacs, J. A.
(1994)
Ann. Intern. Med.
120,
945-955
|
| 4.
|
Wang, C. C.
(1984)
J. Med. Chem.
27,
1-9
|
| 5.
|
Ullman, B.,
and Carter, D.
(1995)
Infect. Agents Disease
4,
29-40
|
| 6.
|
Hassan, H. F.,
and Coombs, G. H.
(1988)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
54,
47-84
|
| 7.
|
Krug, E. C.,
Marr, J. J.,
and Berens, R. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10601-10607
|
| 8.
|
Vasanthakumar, G.,
van Ginkel, S.,
and Parish, G.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
147,
153-154
|
| 9.
|
Donald, R. G. K.,
Carter, D,
Ullman, B.,
and Roos, D. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14010-14019
|
| 10.
|
Balendiran, G. K.,
Molina, J. A.,
Xu, Y.,
Torres-Martinez, J.,
Stevens, R.,
Focia, P. J.,
Eakin, A. E.,
Sacchettini, J. C.,
and Craig, S. P., III
(1999)
Protein Sci.
8,
1023-1031
|
| 11.
|
Héroux, A.,
White, E. L.,
Ross, L. J.,
Davis, R. L.,
and Borhani, D. W.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14495-14506
|
| 12.
|
Héroux, A.,
White, E. L.,
Ross, L. J.,
and Borhani, D. W.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14485-14494
|
| 13.
|
Schumacher, M. A.,
Carter, D.,
Roos, D. S.,
Ullman, B.,
and Brennan, R. G.
(1996)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3,
881-887
|
| 14.
|
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorff, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89
|
| 15.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 16.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 17.
|
Ackers, G. K.
(1970)
Adv. Prot. Chem.
24,
343-446
|
| 18.
|
Cantor, C. R.,
and Schimmel, P. R.
(1980)
Biophysical Chemistry, Part II, Ch. 10-12
, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, CA
|
| 19.
|
King, A.,
and Melton, D. W.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
10469-10481
|
| 20.
|
Vasanthakumar, G.,
Davis, R. L., Jr.,
Sullivan, M. A.,
and Donahue, J. P.
(1990)
Gene
91,
63-69
|
| 21.
|
Lightfoot, T.,
Lewkonia, R. M.,
and Snyder, F. F.
(1994)
Human Mol. Genet.
3,
1377-1381
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Chaudhary, R. G. K. Donald, M. Nishi, D. Carter, B. Ullman, and D. S. Roos
Differential Localization of Alternatively Spliced Hypoxanthine-Xanthine-Guanine Phosphoribosyltransferase Isoforms in Toxoplasma gondii
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 10, 2005;
280(23):
22053 - 22059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.