Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909390199 on March 30, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19258-19267, June 23, 2000
DcE2F, a Functional Plant E2F-like Transcriptional Activator
from Daucus carota*
Diego
Albani
§,
Luisa
Mariconti¶,
Stefano
Ricagno¶,
Letizia
Pitto
,
Cristina
Moroni**,
Kristian
Helin**, and
Rino
Cella¶
From the
Department of Botany and Plant Ecology,
University of Sassari, Via Muroni 25, 07100 Sassari, the
¶ Department of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pavia,
Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, the
Istituto di Mutagenesi e
Differenziamento, Via Svezia 10, 56124 Pisa, and the ** European
Institute of Oncology, Department of Experimental Oncology, Via
Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
Received for publication, November 25, 1999, and in revised form, March 13, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
In animal cells the progression of the cell cycle
through G1/S transition and S phase is under the
control of the pRB/E2F regulatory pathway. The E2F transcription
factors are key activators of genes coding for several regulatory
proteins and for enzymes involved in nucleotide and DNA synthesis. In
this report we have detected the presence of E2F-like DNA binding
activities in carrot nuclear extracts, and we have isolated a carrot
cDNA (DcE2F) encoding a plant E2F homologue. The DcE2F gene is
expressed in proliferating cells and is induced during the
G1/S transition of the cell cycle. Supershift experiments
using anti-DcE2F antiserum have confirmed that the DcE2F protein is a
component of the carrot E2F-like nuclear activities. DNA binding assays
have demonstrated that the DcE2F protein can recognize a canonical E2F
cis-element in association with a mammalian DP protein.
Furthermore, transactivation assays have revealed that DcE2F is a
functional transcription factor that can transactivate, together with a
DP partner, an E2F-responsive reporter gene in both plant and mammalian cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cell division in plants is mainly restricted to meristems and is
regulated both temporally and spatially in response to plant growth
regulators and environmental signals. Meristematic cell division occurs
during the entire plant life, and because plant cells cannot migrate,
control of cell proliferation is responsible for the formation of plant
organs and structures (1). Remarkably, however, plant cells can readily
undergo multiple cycles of endoreduplication, and additionally most of
them are totipotent and can reprogram cell division even after
completing their differentiation. These unique features suggest a
unique flexibility in the control of the cell cycle in plants.
In animal cells a pivotal role in the progression of cell cycle is
played by the E2F family of transcription factors, which are key
components of a critical checkpoint regulating entry of cells into S
phase (2, 3). Progression through the G1 and S phase of the
cell cycle ultimately depends on the activation of genes coding for
regulatory proteins and for the enzymes involved in nucleotide and DNA
synthesis. The expression of many of these genes is largely under the
control of the E2F family of transcription factors, which appear to be
activated by multiple mitogenic signaling pathways. The E2F proteins
bind to specific DNA sequences through a winged helix motif, forming
prevalently heterodimers with distantly related partners of the DP
(DRTF1 polypeptide) family (4). In mammalian
cells six distinct E2F proteins associate with two different DP members
and bind to similar DNA elements, which are conserved in the promoters
of several genes that are activated in late G1 and near the
boundary G1/S. E2F gene targets include cell growth
regulators such as cyclin A, Cdc2, c-Myc, and proliferating cell
nuclear antigen and enzymes such as dihydrofolate reductase, thymidine
kinase, ribonucleotide reductase, and DNA polymerase
(5, 6). The
importance of the E2F factors for cell cycle progression is further
highlighted by the demonstration that transient overexpression of
several members of the E2F family is able to induce S phase in
quiescent cells in the absence of growth factors (7, 8).
The activity of the E2F factors is in part regulated by members of the
pocket protein family, which includes the product of the retinoblastoma
tumor suppressor gene (pRB)1
and the related proteins p107 and p130. These proteins possess a highly
conserved A/B pocket domain that is the target of viral transforming
proteins such as adenovirus E1A (2). The pocket proteins are also the
targets of cyclin-dependent kinase activities, and once
hypophosphorylated they can bind the activation domain of the various
E2F transcription factors, thereby repressing their transcriptional
activity. Furthermore, recent results indicate that the pocket proteins
can recruit to the E2F complex a transcriptional repressor such as the
HDAC1 histone deacetylase (9, 10). The recruitment of histone
deacetylase to promoters containing E2F DNA binding sites is believed
to lead to chromatin condensation and to an efficient silencing of
transcription. It is therefore now widely believed that the binding of
the E2Fs to promoter elements can lead to both repression and
activation of transcription, depending on their association with the
pocket proteins. Such a concept also provides an explanation for the
observation that the E2Fs can act as oncogenes as well as tumor
suppressor genes (11, 12).
The mammalian E2F factors have similar primary structures with a highly
conserved DNA-binding domain, found near the N terminus, followed by a
DP dimerization domain containing a leucine heptad repeat. Next to the
dimerization domain is conserved another region, named marked box,
which in human E2Fs is the target of the adenovirus E4 protein (13).
The C-terminal region contains a transactivation domain that is
characterized by the presence of several acidic residues and the
presence of a short conserved region involved in the binding to the
pocket proteins. E2F-6 lacks the activation domain and the pRB binding
region, and it has been shown to function as an inhibitor of
E2F-dependent transcriptional activity (14). E2F-1, E2F-2,
and E2F-3, but not the other mammalian E2Fs, possess a conserved domain
at the N terminus that can bind to cyclin A/CDK2 (15). The DP-1 and
DP-2 partners of E2F contain DNA binding and dimerization regions
related to the E2F proteins but lack activation domains and other
conserved regions (3).
A plant homologue of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene has been
discovered and characterized in maize (16-18), suggesting that the
transition from G1 to S phase, a key passage during cell cycle, is regulated similarly in animal and plant cells. The existence of pRB proteins that can interact with plant D-type cyclins
and viral replication proteins indicated that homologues of the E2F factors might be present in plant cells and could be involved in the
regulation of genes responsible for S phase progression. In this paper
we describe the isolation and characterization of DcE2F, a E2F-like
gene from carrot cells that is expressed in proliferating cells. We
demonstrate that the carrot E2F protein is a functional transcription
factor that can bind a canonical E2F cis-element in
association with a mammalian DP protein and can transactivate through
this binding site a reporter gene in both plant and mammalian cells.
During the preparation of this manuscript, the isolation of wheat and
tobacco E2F homologues was also described (19, 20). Taken together with
these results, our data demonstrate that the pRB/E2F pathway is
conserved in plants, and the isolation of plant E2F provides a new tool
to understand how plant growth and development is controlled.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plant Materials--
Plants of Daucus carota L. cv.
Lunga di Amsterdam were grown under normal greenhouse conditions.
Carrot cell suspension cultures were maintained as described previously
(21). For cellular synchronization, quiescent cells from a carrot
culture grown to plateau were washed and incubated for 48 h in
fresh Muzashige and Skoog liquid medium lacking hormones and sucrose.
The cells were released from starvation by dilution in fresh Muzashige
and Skoog medium containing growth regulators and sucrose. At different
time points after release, small samples were used for DNA synthesis
assay by [3H]thymidine pulse labeling experiments, and
the remaining aliquots were collected and immediately frozen in liquid
nitrogen before isolation of total RNA. For the isolation of carrot
nuclei, cells from an actively dividing suspension culture were washed
in protoplast isolation buffer (22) and resuspended in approximately 5 volumes of enzyme mixture containing 1% cellulase Onozuka R-10
(Yakult) 0.5% Pectinase (Serva) in protoplast isolation buffer. After
incubation for about 6 h at 25 °C, the suspension was
centrifuged for 5 min at 200 × g, and the pelleted
protoplasts were washed three times with protoplast isolation buffer.
After resuspension in approximately 10 volumes of ice-cold resuspension
buffer (0.4 M sucrose, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.3% Triton X-100, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), the protoplasts were disrupted in a
Teflon homogenizer (1,000 revolutions/min, 5 strokes for three times).
The homogenate was then centrifuged for 5 min at 3,000 × g, and the pellets were resuspended in two volumes of ice-cold wash buffer (0.4 M sucrose, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The nuclei were finally spun down at
2,000 × g for 5 min, and the pellets were stored at
80 °C.
Isolation of Carrot Nuclear Extracts--
Pelleted nuclei were
resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 40 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 20% glycerol, 1 mg/ml antipain, 1 mg/ml leupeptin) and were lysed by adding 0.1 volume
of cold 4 M (NH4)2SO4.
After incubation for 30 min with constant movement at 4 °C, the
lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g, and the nuclear
proteins of the supernatant were precipitated by slowly adding 0.5 volume of cold 4 M
(NH4)2SO4 and incubating 60 min at
4 °C with constant movement. The nuclear proteins were then
recovered by centrifugation for 10 min at 4 °C in microcentrifuge
and then resuspended in dialysis buffer (same as lysis buffer but
without MgCl2) and dialyzed 3 h at 4 °C against the
same buffer. The resulting nuclear extracts were divided in small
aliquots and stored in liquid nitrogen.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot
Analysis--
Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from carrot cell
culture using oligo(dT) cellulose (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
following a standard batch procedure (23). Total RNA was isolated by
the hot phenol method (24). For Northern blot analysis, the RNA samples
were resolved in formaldehyde gels, transferred to Hybond-N membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and hybridized with a DcE2F probe labeled
by the random primer method (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). To verify the
level of synchronization, after removal of the DcE2F probe, the filter
was subsequently hybridized with a carrot UBI-CEP probe (25).
Isolation of DcE2F cDNAs--
To amplify carrot E2F-like
cDNAs, 3'-RACE reactions were performed on carrot
poly(A)+ RNA using a degenerate primer of sequence
GCGAATTCMGIMGIATHTAYGA (where I is inosine, M is A/C, H is
A/T/C, Y is C/T, and the nucleotides in italics represent the added
cloning site) containing all the possible codons for the conserved
amino acid sequence RRIYD. Nested PCR reactions were performed with a
second primer of sequence GCGAATTCGAYATHACIAAYGT containing
all the possible codons for the amino acid sequence DITNV. Reverse
transcription and PCR reactions were conducted as described previously
(26). After electrophoretic analysis of the nested reactions, the major
PCR fragment, corresponding to a partial DcE2F cDNA, was isolated
and subcloned into the plasmid pBluescriptII KS+ (Stratagene).
To isolate full-length DcE2F clones, approximately 500,000 plaque-forming units from a carrot cell suspension cDNA library (27) constructed in
ZAPII (Stratagene) were screened with the partial DcE2F probe. Hybridization and washings were performed as
previously reported (26). Two hybridizing plaques were purified and the
plasmids containing the DcE2F cDNAs were excised in vivo according to the manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing was performed on
both strands of the longest cDNA clone (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
sequencing kit).
Production of Recombinant DcE2F and DP-1 Proteins--
For the
construction of the pRSET-DcE2F expression vector the DcE2F cDNA
was digested with the enzymes BamHI and HindIII, and the resulting DNA fragment, containing the entire DcE2F coding region preceded by 35 base pairs of the upstream untranslated region,
was inserted into the corresponding sites of the polylinker of pRSET-A
(Invitrogen). The pRSET-DcE2F plasmid was then introduced into
Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) for the production of a
recombinant DcE2F protein carrying a histidine-tagged N-terminal
extension of 48 amino acids. The HIS-DcE2F protein was purified under
nondenaturing condition by metal affinity chromatography on
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen) as previously reported
(26). For purification under denaturing conditions, cell lysis and
affinity chromatography were performed in phosphate buffer containing 8 M urea. Electrophoretic analysis of the eluted proteins
revealed a single polypeptide of the expected dimensions indicating a
purification to near homogeneity of the recombinant DcE2F protein. The
bacterial GST-DP1 expression vector was introduced into E. coli XL-1 blue cells, and the recombinant protein was purified by
chromatography on glutathione-agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
according to manufacturer's instructions.
DcE2F Antiserum and Immunoblotting--
The His-DcE2F protein
eluted under denaturing conditions was dialyzed and used directly for
rabbit immunization. For Western analysis, proteins fractionated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were transferred to Hybond-C
extra membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a semi-dry blotting
apparatus (Hoefer Scientific Instruments). The blots were incubated
with the anti-DcE2F polyclonal serum, and immunodetection was performed
using ECL chemiluminescence detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
For the
electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with carrot nuclear
extracts or recombinant DcE2F and DP-1 proteins, the cloned
double-stranded oligonucleotides were gel purified and labeled by a
fill-in reaction with Klenow DNA polymerase in the presence of
[
-32P]dATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The sequences
of the probes were 5'-aattcTTTTCCCGCGCTTTTgaatt-3' for the canonical
E2F binding site (EC) and 5'-aattcTTTTCCATCGCTTTTgaatt-3' for the
mutated E2F binding site (EM). In both sequences the lowercase letters represent the EcoRI cloning sites. The DNA binding reactions
with carrot nuclear extracts were conducted incubating 1.5-6 µg of nuclear proteins with 50,000 cpm of radiolabeled oligonucleotide probes
and 2 µg of sheared salmon sperm DNA in 15 µl of 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, and 10 mM dithiothreitol for 30 min at room temperature. The DNA binding of the recombinant proteins was conducted similarly without adding the salmon sperm DNA. For the competition experiments, increasing amounts of annealed unlabeled oligonucleotides were included in the reactions with the EC probe. The supershift
experiments were carried out by preincubating the binding reactions
with 1 µl of polyclonal anti-DcE2F serum or preimmune serum for 30 min at room temperature before adding the probe. The protein-DNA
complexes were electrophoresed for 3 h at 4 °C on 4%
polyacrylamide gels in 0.5× TBE.
The EMSAs in mammalian cells were performed essentially as described
(28) using a E2F binding probe of sequence
5'-ATTTAAGTTTCGCGCCCTTTCTCAA-3'. Extracts were prepared from U2OS cells
transfected with each of the indicated expression plasmids (6 µg/100-mm dish). 10 µg of the extracts were used for Western
blotting as shown in Fig. 8A. To determine the protein
composition of the complexes in EMSAs, the following antibodies were
used: KH95 (anti E2F-1) (29), TFD10 (anti-DP-1) (8), and 12CA5
(anti-hemagglutinin tag) (30). To generate an expression plasmid for
DcE2F, the full open reading frame of DcE2F was amplified by PCR using
primers specific for DcE2F and containing BamHI restriction
sites in the ends. The PCR product was subsequently cloned into
BamHI-digested pCMVHA (29) to generate pCMVHADcE2F.
pCMVE2F-1 and pCMVDP-1 have been described previously (29, 31).
Transactivation Assays--
For the construction of the DcE2F
effector plasmid to be used in plant protoplasts, the cDNA was
digested with HindIII, blunt-ended with Klenow DNA
polymerase, and then digested with BamHI yielding a DNA
fragment, containing the entire DcE2F coding region. This fragment was
inserted into the BamHI and blunt-ended SacI
sites found upstream of the terminator sequence of the nos
gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cloned as a
SacI/EcoRI fragment into pUC19. The DcE2F/NOS gene fusion was then digested with BamHI and
EcoRI, and the resulting DNA fragment was inserted
downstream of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) duplicated 35 S
promoter in the plasmid pFF19 (32) to give rise to the p35 S-DcE2F
construct. The p35 S-DP1 effector was obtained by cloning into pFF19 a
BamHI/SalI-digested DNA fragment from pBSK-DP1
(29). For the construction of the chimeric 6XE2F-minimal 35 S
promoter-GUS reporter construct, a DNA fragment containing the six E2F
binding sites was isolated from the pGL3TATAbasic-6XE2F vector (8)
after digestion with AspI, blunt ending with Klenow DNA
polymerase and digestion with XhoI. This fragment was then cloned into HindIII (filled in with Klenow DNA polymerase)
and SalI sites of pBI221.9 to give rise to the pBI221-E2F
reporter construct.
The transactivation experiments in plant cells were conducted with
protoplasts isolated from carrot somatic embryos at the heart torpedo
stages of development. The embryos were incubated with 1% cellulase
and 0.2% pectinase in protoplast isolation buffer (27.2 mg/liter
KH2PO4, 101 mg/liter KNO3, 1.4 g/liter CaCl2, 246 mg/liter MgSO4, 0.16 mg/liter KI, 0.025 mg/liter CuSO4, 10 mM MES,
and 0.7 M sorbitol, pH 5.5). The protoplasts were pelleted and washed twice in the same buffer without enzymes and then
resuspended at a density of 7.5 × 106 protoplasts
ml
1 in 10 mM Hepes, 130 mM KCl,
10 mM NaCl, 4 mM CaCl2, 0.2 M mannitol, pH 7.2. For electroporation, aliquots of 0.4 ml
of the protoplast suspension were placed in the electroporation
cuvettes (ECU-104, Equibio) and then mixed with 10 µg of each test
plasmid, 5 µg of CaMV 35 S-CAT plasmid (as internal control) and
sonicated calf thymus DNA to a total of 50 µg of DNA. After
incubation on ice for 10 min, the electrical pulse was delivered by the
Electroporator II (Invitrogen) charged to 330 V electric potential, 500 microfarad capacitance, and 500
resistance. After 10 min on ice,
the protoplasts were diluted with 2.1 ml of culture medium (Gamborg's
B5 medium supplemented with 300 mg/liter
CaCl2-H2O, 825 mg/liter
NH4NO3, 100 mg/liter sodium pyruvate, 200 mg/liter malic acid, 200 mg/liter citric acid, 300 mg/liter casamino
acids, 200 mg/liter yeast extract, 20 g/liter saccarose, 76 g/liter
mannitol, 0.1 mg/liter 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 0.2 mg/liter
6BAP, 10
6 M
-naphtaleneacetic acid, 5 × 10
7 M zeatin riboside, pH 5.6) and
incubated 40 h in the dark at 25 °C. GUS activity was measured
as described by Gallie et al. (33). CAT assays was performed
using the CAT detection kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as described
by the manufacturer.
Transactivation assays in mammalian cells were performed as described
previously (8) using pGL3TATAbasic-6xE2F as reporter construct and
pCMV
-gal (CLONTECH) to normalize for
transfection efficiency. For a 60-mm tissue culture dish, 30 ng of the
indicated expression plasmid was transfected in combination with 1 µg
of pGL3TATAbasic-6xE2F and 500 ng of pCMV
-gal. Cells were harvested 36 h after addition of the DNA-calcium phosphate coprecipitate.
 |
RESULTS |
Carrot Nuclear Extracts Contain E2F-like DNA Binding
Activities--
Following the discovery of plant homologues of the
retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, a yeast two-hybrid assay has
shown that the maize pRB protein can bind to human and
Drosophila E2F transcription factors (34). A transcription
interference assay has further shown that maize pRB can inhibit
E2F-dependent transcriptional activation in animal cells
(34). These remarkable properties of maize pRB strongly indicated that
plant homologues of the animal E2F family of transcription factors were
likely to exist and to be involved in the regulation of genes
responsible for the progression of the cell cycle through the
G1/S transition. To investigate the presumed presence of
E2F-like factors in plant cells, DNA binding assays using carrot
nuclear extracts were performed (Fig. 1).
Animal E2F/DP complexes as well as cellular E2F DNA binding activities
have been shown to specifically recognize a consensus sequence
TTT(C/G)(G/C)CG(C/G), and mutations of the internal invariable CG
doublet have been shown to greatly reduce E2F binding efficiency (4).
Accordingly, EMSAs on carrot nuclear extracts were performed with a
canonical E2F binding probe of sequence 5'-TTTTCCCGCGCTTTT-3' and with
a mutated probe of sequence 5'-TTTTCCATCGCTTTT-3'. As shown in Fig. 1,
carrot nuclear extracts contain DNA binding activities, which, as
expected for E2F complexes, recognize the canonical sequence but are
unable to bind to the mutated probe. Furthermore, as also shown in Fig.
1, competition experiments with excess of unlabeled probes confirmed
the binding specificity for the canonical sequence and demonstrated
that E2F-like DNA binding activities exist in carrot cells.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Detection of E2F-like DNA binding activities
in carrot nuclear extracts. EMSAs performed with carrot nuclear
extracts (6 µg) show the formation of DNA-protein complexes with a
probe containing a canonical E2F binding site (EC) but not
with a probe containing critical mutations of the consensus sequence
(EM). The binding to the E2F probe is abolished by the
addition of increasing amounts of unlabeled EC probe (EC
competitor) but is unaffected by the addition of similar amounts
of unlabeled EM probe (EM competitor), confirming the
specificity of the carrot E2F-like DNA binding activities. N.E.,
nuclear extract.
|
|
Isolation of the Carrot DcE2F cDNA--
Although E2F-like DNA
binding activities were detected in carrot nuclear extracts, it
remained uncertain whether they could correspond to a real functional
homologue of the E2F transcription factors or could simply represent
unrelated nuclear factors that are able to discriminate between the two
EMSA probes. To verify the molecular nature of these DNA binding
activities, we proceeded to the isolation of a carrot homologue of
animal E2Fs. The indication that all the E2F binding activities in
animal cells are heterodimers, formed by E2F and DP partners, precluded
the possibility to isolate E2F homologues by Southwestern screening
procedures. All the animal E2F and DP factors, however, possess highly
conserved DNA-binding domains that are found near the N termini of the
proteins. In view of the perfect identity of a portion of this domain
in the mammalian E2Fs and in a E2F homologue of Drosophila
melanogaster (35, 36), we proceeded to the isolation of a plant
E2F homologue using PCR techniques. A pair of degenerate primers
encoding the conserved amino acid sequences RRIYD and DITNV were used
in 3'-RACE reactions performed with poly(A)+ RNA isolated
from actively dividing carrot cells. Using the same strategy we also
attempted the isolation of a DP homologue with a pair of degenerate
primers encoding the amino acid sequences RRVYD and DALNV, which are
conserved in the human and Drosophila DP proteins. Although
the 3'-RACE reactions performed with the DP-specific primers were
unsuccessful, the reactions performed using the E2F-specific primers
led to the isolation of a PCR fragment of about 1.2 kilobases, which
was cloned and sequenced. All the clones analyzed corresponded to a
unique partial cDNA coding for a carrot E2F-like factor. The
subsequent screening of a carrot cDNA library led to the isolation
of two longer cDNA clones corresponding to distinct transcripts of
the same carrot E2F-like gene, which we called DcE2F. Both cDNAs
contain a complete open reading frame and are identical to the RACE
products over the overlapping region. In Fig.
2 is shown the sequence of the longest
cDNA clone along with the deduced amino acid sequence of the DcE2F
protein. The shorter cDNA starts 64 nucleotides downstream of the
5' end of the longer clone and shows a considerable smaller size
resulting from the position of its poly(A) tail, which is located 386 nucleotides upstream of the one of the longer cDNA. The longest
DcE2F cDNA is 2191 base pairs long, excluding the poly(A) tail and
contains an open reading frame coding for a potential protein of 431 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 47.5 kDa. The putative ATG start codon is preceded by a 5'-untranslated region of 258 base
pairs containing two in-frame TAA termination triplets and two
additional upstream ATGs, both of which are followed shortly by
in-frame stop codons.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid
sequence of the longest DcE2F cDNA. The two short upstream
open reading frames in the 5'-untranslated leader sequence are
underlined. The position of the poly(A) tail in the shorter
cDNA is indicated by a black arrowhead. The conserved
RRIYDITNV peptide sequence, encoded by the degenetate primers used for
the 3'-RACE reactions, is underlined in the DcE2F
protein.
|
|
The DcE2F protein shows extended homology to the recently reported E2F
homologues of wheat and tobacco (19, 20), with 50 and 54% amino acid
identity, respectively. Compared with animal E2Fs, the carrot protein
shows the highest homology to human E2F-2 with 32% amino acid
identity. As reported in Fig. 3, a
sequence alignment with tobacco NtE2F, wheat TmE2F and human E2F-2
reveals a remarkable conservation of the DNA-binding domain that shows 75% amino acid identity with the corresponding domain in the E2F-2 sequence. The DP dimerization domain and the marked box are also well
conserved in the plant E2Fs (Fig. 3) and for the DcE2F protein show,
respectively, up to 52 and 62% amino acid identity with human E2Fs.
The pRB binding/transcriptional activation domain, which is conserved
in five of the human E2Fs, is not well conserved in the plant E2F
proteins. A cyclin A-binding domain is also absent in the plant E2F
sequences; however, this domain is shared only by human E2F-1, E2F-2,
and E2F-3 and could be a specific feature of these tree members because
it is not observed in any other animal E2F. Recently, it has been
demonstrated that the cyclin-binding domain of E2F-1, E2F-2, and E2F-3
contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS) of sequence
P(A/V)KR(K/R)L(D/E)L that is able to efficiently direct these E2Fs to
the nucleus and to promote their activity. E2F-4 and E2F-5, lacking the
cyclin-binding domain, are predominantly localized in the cytosol and
are transiently directed to the nucleus only during the G1
phase of the cell cycle, possibly through interaction with associated
factors such as DP-2 (8, 37, 38). Although DcE2F lacks a conserved
cyclin-binding domain, it possess a N-terminal NLS of the SV40 large
T-antigen type that should be able to direct the protein to the nucleus independently of interactions with other nuclear factors. This NLS of
sequence PSKRKP starts at position 35 of the DcE2F protein and is
partly similar to the NLS of the three human E2Fs.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Amino acid sequence alignment of DcE2F with
tobacco NtE2F, wheat TmE2F, and human E2F-2. Conserved residues
are shown with a black background, whereas amino acid
similarities have a gray background. The conserved
functional domains and the putative NLS are indicated.
|
|
Because human cells possess several E2F genes, we performed a Southern
blot analysis on carrot DNA using the DcE2F cDNA as a probe to
verify whether carrot cells could contain more than one E2F homologue.
Although the results of this analysis are consistent with the presence
of only one E2F gene in the carrot genome (data not shown), we cannot
exclude the possibility that other carrot genes could encode distantly
related E2F proteins.
The Expression of the DcE2F Gene Is Induced upon Re-entry into Cell
Cycle--
Studies on the expression of some of the human E2F genes
during progression of the cell cycle have revealed distinct patterns of
transcription that are specific for different E2F members. E2F-1 and
E2F-2 transcripts are almost undetectable in quiescent cells, and
following serum stimulation, their expression is strongly induced as
cells re-enter cell cycle and progress from G1 to S phase.
Conversely, E2F-3, E2F-4, and at a lower level also E2F-5 are clearly
expressed in quiescent cells, but also their expression increases
during re-entry into cell cycle. In cycling cells, the expression of
E2F-1, E2F-2, and E2F-3 remains relatively constant, whereas the
expression of E2F-4 and E2F-5 fluctuates, reaching a peak in
mid-G1 and returning to the initial levels as cells enter S
phase (5, 39). To investigate the expression of the DcE2F gene in
carrot cells during re-entry into cell cycle, Northern blot analyses
were conducted on total RNA isolated from a carrot cell culture
synchronized by starvation (Fig.
4A). The efficiency of
synchronization was determined by monitoring
[3H]thymidine uptake (Fig. 4B). The RNA
samples were isolated from quiescent cells of a culture at plateau
(Fig. 4A, lane pl) and from cells harvested at
various times after the release from starvation (Fig. 4A,
lanes 0-15). Equal amounts of RNA, as verified by staining with ethidium bromide (data not shown), were analyzed for each sample.
To further evaluate the efficiency of synchronization, the same blot
was also hybridized with a probe for a ubiquitin-carboxyl extension
mRNA from carrot (UBI-CEP), which shows a cell cycle-regulated expression restricted to the late G1 phase (25). The
efficiency of synchronization and its extension in time are cell
culture dependent, and, as shown by [3H]thymidine uptake
and by hybridization with the probe UBI-CEP, our carrot cell culture
could sustain only a partial synchronization. Nevertheless, as shown in
Fig. 4A, the DcE2F transcripts are hardly detectable in
quiescent cells, and their expression increases remarkably after
release from starvation reaching a peak after 5 h similarly as the
UBI-CEP mRNA. Our results therefore suggest that the expression of
the DcE2F gene, like in the case of mammalian E2F-1 and E2F-2, is
strongly induced during re-entry into cell cycle. Moreover, further
resembling the expression of UBI-CEP mRNA, DcE2F expression appears
to decrease slightly after 9 h from release, suggesting that, as
in the case of mammalian E2F-4 and E2F-5, the DcE2F gene could be
regulated during cell cycle progression in proliferating cells. In
agreement with such a notion, the expression of tobacco NtE2F in
synchronized BY-2 cells has been recently shown to fluctuate during
cell cycle, peaking in the late G1 phase (20), and the
expression of wheat TmE2F has been shown to be up-regulated during the
transition to the S phase in cells partially synchronized by
hydroxyurea treatment (19).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of the DcE2F gene is induced in
quiescent carrot cells re-entering cell cycle. A,
expression of the DcE2F gene in partially synchronized carrot cells.
The Northern blot analysis was conducted on total RNA isolated from a
cell culture at plateau (pl) and from aliquots of a cell
culture subjected to starvation (0) harvested at different
hours after readdition of nutrients (1, 3,
5, 7, 9, 12, and
15). Each sample contained equal amounts of RNA as also
evaluated by staining with ethidium bromide prior blotting. The blot
was first hybridized with the DcE2F probe (DcE2F) and subsequently
analyzed with a probe for carrot UBI-CEP. B,
[3H]thymidine uptake of the partially sychronized carrot
cell culture. DNA synthesis was monitored by
[3H]thymidine pulse labeling experiments on samples of
the same aliquots used for RNA isolation.
|
|
Carrot E2F Is a Ubiquitous Protein--
To verify the presence and
distribution of the DcE2F protein, Western blot analyses were carried
out on total extracts from carrot cell culture and from various tissues
of 40-day-old plantlets. To obtain specific antibodies, the coding
region of the DcE2F cDNA was expressed in E. coli to
produce a recombinant DcE2F protein carrying a N-terminal extension of
48 amino acids containing six consecutive histidine residues. The
His-tagged DcE2F protein was purified to near homogeneity by
nickel-chelate chromatography and was used to raise polyclonal
antibodies in rabbit. The Western blot analyses revealed that in all
the tissue samples tested the anti-DcE2F serum recognize a single
protein, which in agreement with the lack of the N-terminal extension
is slightly smaller than the purified His-DcE2F protein (Fig.
5). The apparent molecular mass of both
recombinant and endogenous DcE2F is slightly larger than predicted,
recalling the electrophoretic behavior of wheat TmE2F and human E2F-1
(19, 28). A single endogenous E2F protein of the same size is also
recognized in extracts from carrot cell cultures (data not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Immunodetection of the DcE2F protein.
Western blot analysis with total extracts from carrot leaves
(L), roots (R), hypocotyls (H), apical
meristems (M), and petioles (P) isolated from
40-day-old plantlets. 15 µg of each extract was loaded on an 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and processed for Western blotting as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Two different amounts of
recombinant DcE2F protein (His-CEF) were included as
positive controls.
|
|
The DcE2F Protein Recognizes a Consensus E2F Binding Site in
Association with a DP Protein--
Having previously detected DNA
binding activities in carrot nuclear extracts that can recognize a
canonical E2F binding consensus sequence, we assessed whether
recombinant DcE2F can show a similar DNA binding specificity.
Furthermore, in view of the fact that the human E2Fs are known to bind
to DNA prevalently as heterodimers with a DP protein, we investigated
whether DcE2F could also need a partner to recognize E2F
cis-elements. Because plant DP homologues have not yet been
reported, the DNA binding assays were performed using human DP-1
produced in bacteria as a recombinant GST-DP1 fusion protein. The EMSAs
were performed incubating various amounts of the His-DcE2F and GST-DP1
proteins with DNA probes containing a canonical (EC) or a mutated (EM)
E2F consensus sequence. As shown in Fig.
6A, His-DcE2F together with
GST-DP1 bind efficiently to the EC probe without recognizing the
mutated sequence. Furthermore, DcE2F alone shows only a negligible
binding to the EC probe, and its DNA binding capacity increases
proportionally to the amount of recombinant DP-1 included in the
sample. Because GST-DP1 alone does not recognize the EC probe (data not
shown), it is clear that, as reported for the human E2Fs, the high
affinity binding of DcE2F to the canonical sequence requires the
formation of a heterodimer with a DP partner. Competition experiments
with canonical or mutated E2F binding DNA sequences confirmed the
binding specificity of the DcE2F/DP-1 complex (Fig. 6B). A
100-fold excess of unlabeled canonical sequence can totally abolish the
binding of the DcE2F/DP-1 complex to the labeled probe, whereas a
similar excess of mutated probe has almost no effects on DNA
recognition. The DcE2F/DP-1 complex therefore shows specificity similar
to that of the endogenous E2F-like activities (Fig. 1). To determine
whether DcE2F is indeed a component of the E2F-like activities detected
in carrot nuclear extract, supershift experiments with anti-DcE2F
antibodies were performed. As shown in Fig. 6C, the addition
of DcE2F antiserum to the nuclear extracts supershifted the binding
complex, confirming the molecular nature of the E2F-like activities of
carrot cells.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
DNA binding properties of DcE2F.
A, DcE2F binds the DNA in association with DP-1. EMSA
showing the binding of the His-DcE2F/GST-DP1 complex to the canonical
E2F binding site (EC) but not to the mutated site
(EM). The DNA binding capacity of His-DcE2F is dependent on
the amount of GST-DP1 included in the sample. B, binding
specificity of the His-DcE2F/GST-DP1 complex for the canonical
(EC) E2F binding probe as shown by competition with
10-100-fold excess of unlabeled EC probe (EC competitor)
and by lack of competition with 30- and 100-fold excess of unlabeled
mutated probe (EM competitor). C, the DcE2F
protein is a component of the E2F-like DNA binding activities contained
in carrot nuclear extracts. Polyclonal anti-DcE2F serum (anti-DcE2F)
supershifts the protein-DNA complexes formed with the canonical E2F
binding probe, whereas preimmune serum has no effects on these
complexes.
|
|
DcE2F Is a Transcriptional Activator--
Despite the high
conservation of the DNA binding, DP dimerization, and marked box
domains, the pRB binding domain is poorly conserved in the DcE2F
protein. Furthermore, the region surrounding this putative pRB binding
domain is not homologous to the activation domain of animal E2Fs. In
consideration of the presence in human cells of several E2F members,
one of which lacks an activation domain and functions as a repressor,
it was interesting to understand whether DcE2F can act as a
transcriptional activator. To address this question we tested the
transcriptional activity of DcE2F in vivo by performing
transactivation experiments in carrot protoplasts (Fig.
7). The reporter gene used for these
assays (Fig. 7A, pBI221-E2F) consisted of a minimal
67-base pair CaMV 35 S promoter fused to the GUS gene (pBI221.9),
upstream of which was inserted a DNA fragment with six consecutive
canonical E2F cis-elements. The DcE2F effector plasmid (Fig.
7A, p35 S-DcE2F) consisted of the entire DcE2F coding region
placed under the control of the double CaMV 35 S promoter in the
expression plasmid pFF19 (32). The same promoter was also used to drive
the expression of human DP-1 (Fig. 7A, p35 S-HsDP1). To
account for variations in the efficiency of transformation, a CAT
reporter construct was included in all the experiments, and in each
case the GUS activity was normalized against the CAT activity. Whereas
the transactivation with DP-1 as only effector was done twice, each
other experiment was performed three times with consistent results, and
the averaged normalized GUS activity is reported in Fig. 7B.
Transient expression of the pBI221-E2F reporter gene in carrot
protoplasts yielded a very low GUS activity that is only slightly
higher than the one obtained with the pBI221.9 construct. This
indicates that endogenous E2F-like binding activities are not
sufficient to activate the minimal promoter containing the six E2F
binding sites. Furthermore, transient expression of either effector
alone together with pBI221-E2F did not increase the GUS activity
considerably, but as shown in Fig. 7B, co-expression of both
DcE2F and DP-1 effectors was able to transactivate efficiently
pBI221-E2F via the six E2F binding sites, giving an increase in GUS
expression of over 15-fold.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
DcE2F, together with human DP-1, activates
transcription in carrot protoplasts via canonical E2F binding
sites. A, structure of GUS (uidA gene)
reporter constructs and of the DcE2F and DP-1 effector constructs used
in this study. B, GUS activity in carrot protoplasts
following transient expression of the indicated constructs.
Cotransfection of a CAT reporter construct was included in all the
experiments to normalize for transfection efficiency. The average
normalized GUS values obtained in at least two independent
transfections are shown. Bars represent the standard
deviations.
|
|
DcE2F Is Able to Activate E2F-dependent Transcription
in Animal Cells--
To investigate whether DcE2F could have similar
activities as the animal E2Fs in mammalian cells, the full-length DcE2F
cDNA was inserted into a mammalian expression vector and
transfected into mammalian cells with or without a plasmid expressing
human DP-1. DcE2F was epitope-tagged at its N terminus to allow the recognition of the expressed protein. As shown in Fig.
8A, DcE2F is efficiently
expressed in mammalian cells, and the coexpression of human DP-1 does
not change the expression of DcE2F. Extracts were prepared for EMSA
using a consensus E2F DNA binding site as a probe to evaluate whether
ectopically expressed DcE2F formed DNA-binding complexes in
vivo. As shown in Fig. 8B, the expression of DcE2F
alone did not lead to any detectable increase in E2F DNA binding
activity in mammalian cells; however, when co-expressed with DP-1, a
strong increase in DNA binding activity was observed. This DNA binding
activity was specific (data not shown), and it was shown to contain the
epitope-tagged DcE2F and DP-1 (supershifts with specific antibodies in
the right panel of Fig. 8B). As a control for these
experiments, we used human E2F-1 expressed with and without human DP-1.
The expression of human E2F-1 alone led to a slight increase in E2F DNA
binding activity of the transfected cells (Fig. 8B);
however, in agreement with previously published results (29, 40, 41)
the coexpression of E2F-1 with DP-1 led to a significant increase in
DNA binding activity. To test whether DcE2F has transactivating
potential in mammalian cells, the DcE2F expression plasmid was
transfected with or without a human DP-1 expression plasmid and a
reporter construct containing six E2F DNA binding sites. As shown in
Fig. 8C, DcE2F is capable of transactivating the
E2F-dependent reporter construct in a manner that is
strictly dependent on the coexpression of human DP-1. These data are in
complete agreement with the transactivation potential of DcE2F in plant
cells (Fig. 7), in which the coexpression of DP-1 is also required for
transactivation of an E2F-dependent reporter construct.
However, these results are in contrast to human E2F-1, which under the
conditions shown here efficiently transactivates the E2F reporter
construct in the absence of DP-1 coexpression. In summary, our results
show that DcE2F has the ability to transactivate an
E2F-dependent reporter construct in mammalian cells, and
that it is capable of binding human DP-1 in vivo.
Furthermore, our data show that DcE2F is less potent as a
transcriptional activator than human E2F-1 in mammalian cells, and
because it binds human DP-1 and a consensus E2F DNA binding site
efficiently, it may suggest that DcE2F interacts less efficiently with
the basic transcriptional machinery in mammalian cells than human
E2F-1.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The DcE2F/DP-1 complex activates
transcription in human cells. A, efficient expression
of DcE2F in mammalian cells. Extracts were prepared from U2OS cells
transfected with expression plasmids with the indicated genes. 10 µg
of each extract was loaded on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and
processed for Western blotting as described under "Experimental
Procedures." E2F-1 expression was revealed by probing the blot with a
monoclonal antibody to E2F-1 (KH95), DP-1 expression by a DP-1
monoclonal antibody (TFD10), and DcE2F by a monoclonal antibody to the
hemagglutinin epitope tag (12CA5). B, DcE2F/DP-1 complexes
form in mammalian cells and bind the E2F DNA-binding site. EMSA
performed with extracts from U2OS cells transfected with the indicated
expression plasmids shows the formation of specific DNA-protein
complexes with a probe containing a canonical E2F binding site
(left panel). Supershifts with the specific antibodies
described above confirmed the nature of the retarded complex
(right panel). The E2F/DP-1/PP complex indicates a complex
between an E2F/DP-1 and a pocket protein (pRB, p107, or p130),
s.s. indicates supershift. C, transactivation of
E2F reporter by DcE2F. Expression plasmids for the indicated proteins
were transfected into U2OS cells together with a luciferase reporter
construct containing six E2F DNA binding sites upstream of a TATA
element. Cotransfection of a plasmid expressing -galactosidase was
performed to normalize for transfection efficiency. Cells were
harvested 36 h after transfection and analyzed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activity. Fold activation compared with control is
shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In recent years the study of the plant cell cycle has made
considerable progress thanks to the isolation of plant genes coding for
cyclins, CDKs, cyclin-dependent kinase-inhibiting proteins, and DNA replication licensing factors (42). These findings suggested that in plants, as in other eukaryotes the CDKs and their associated proteins are key regulators of the cell cycle. However, the nature of
the CDK targets and their mode of action remain largely unknown. The
discovery of E2F homologues in carrot, wheat (19), and tobacco (20)
demonstrates the existence of a pRB/E2F pathway that is likely to
control cell proliferation in plants. Although S phase-specific transcription factors unrelated to E2F have been recently involved in
the control of proliferating cell nuclear antigen genes in plants (43),
other genes that are activated in late G1 and near the
boundary G1/S could be regulated by plant E2Fs.
Like the wheat and tobacco homologues, the carrot DcE2F protein
possesses a similar domain organization as the animal E2Fs. The most
strikingly conserved region, as also reported for the animal E2Fs,
corresponds to the DNA-binding domain. The extensive homology of this
domain, in fact, allowed the isolation of the carrot E2F homologue by
PCR techniques. Other highly conserved regions include the dimerization
domain and the marked box, whereas the C-terminal pRB binding and
activation domains are partly conserved between the plant E2Fs but are
very distinct when compared with animal E2Fs. This could explain why
the C-terminal region of wheat TmE2F can mediate an efficient binding
to maize pRB in a yeast two-hybrid assay, but it is not recognized well
by the human pocket proteins (19). In wheat TmE2F a putative pRB
binding region of consensus
DYX6DX4DMWE has been
identified upon comparison with animal E2Fs, but this consensus is
slightly different in the DcE2F protein where it shows the sequence
DYX4DX6DMWK. It remains
to be verified whether the DcE2F C-terminal region is also able to bind
maize pRB and whether these similar consensus sequences are indeed
essential for pRB recognition.
The remarkable conservation of the DNA binding and dimerization domain
of plant E2Fs predicted that they could recognize a DNA sequence
similar to that of the animal E2Fs (19). Although it is known that the
DP proteins have an influence on the DNA-binding site specificity of
the E2F complexes (44), our analysis indicates that the DcE2F protein
has DNA binding properties very similar to those of animal E2Fs.
Furthermore, the high affinity binding of DcE2F to the canonical DNA
sequence requires the formation of a heterodimer with DP-1. This
requirement suggests that functional homologues of the DP proteins
exist in plants. Nevertheless, our attempts to isolate a carrot DP-like
gene using a similar PCR approach as with DcE2F have been unsuccessful
so far. However, the plant functional homologues of DP could be less
conserved than the E2Fs in their DNA-binding domain. Moreover, E2F
partners not homologous to DP could be involved in the formation of
active E2F complexes in plant cells. This hypothesis finds support in a
recent report indicating that human cells contain a protein different
from DP that can stimulate E2F-dependent transcription by
heterodimerizing with E2F-1 through a Myc-type helix-loop-helix motif
(45).
In view of the poor conservation of the putative pRB binding and
activation domains, it was crucial to verify whether the carrot E2F
protein is a functional trancriptional activator. For this analysis the
DcE2F cDNA was inserted in an expression vector containing the
double 35 S CaMV promoter and directing a constitutive high level of
expression in plant cells. Together with human DP-1, transactivation of
a GUS reporter gene in plant protoplasts via multimers of the canonical
E2F binding DNA sequence confirmed the activation potential of the
carrot factor. Remarkably, DcE2F was also able to transactivate,
although less efficiently than human E2F-1, an E2F responsive promoter
in human cells, suggesting that despite low sequence similarity, the
activation domain of plant and human E2Fs are functionally conserved.
Consistent with the results of the EMSA analysis, which indicate the
necessity of a DP partner for high affinity DNA binding, expression of
the DcE2F effector alone was not able to transactivate the 6XE2F-35 S
promoter in carrot protoplasts. Furthermore, because it is known that
heterodimerization with DP-1 is not sufficient to target E2Fs to the
nucleus (8, 38), it can be inferred that DcE2F possesses a functional
NLS and that the incapacity of DcE2F to transactivate by itself is not
due to its cytosolic localization, as in the case of E2F-4 and E2F-5,
but derives from the need of a suitable partner for efficient DNA
binding. Interestingly, the DcE2F-dependent transactivation
obtained in carrot cells differs with what previously reported for
E2F-1 in human cells where, although increased considerably by the
co-expression of DP-1, transient expression of E2F-1 alone was able to
transactivate via the E2F binding sites (Fig. 8C). It is
likely, therefore, that both DcE2F and the putative carrot DP-like
dimerizing protein are limiting factors for E2F-dependent
expression in carrot protoplasts and that overexpression of only one of
the two partners is not sufficient to give transactivation.
The DcE2F gene is preferentially expressed in proliferating cultured
cells, and Northern blot analyses on partially synchronized carrot
cells suggest that, like the human E2F-1 and E2F-2 genes, the DcE2F
gene is hardly expressed in G0 and is induced as cells re-enter cell cycle and progress from G1 to S phase. This
pattern of expression is consistent with an involvement of DcE2F in the induction of cell proliferation. Furthermore, in agreement with similar
analyses on the expression of wheat and tobacco E2Fs (19, 20), these
results indicate that the transcription of DcE2F could be regulated in
a phase-specific manner during carrot cell cycle progression.
Nevertheless, although at a very low level, undividing cells are likely
to express the DcE2F gene. In this respect, Western blot analyses have
shown that the DcE2F protein is distributed ubiquitously in all the
plant tissues examined, suggesting a cell division-independent
accumulation of the carrot E2F factor. The accumulation of DcE2F
protein in differentiated undividing cells could serve important
regulatory functions and, as for the human E2Fs, the carrot factor
could be subjected to post-translational or targetting control.
Furthermore, as shown by the DNA binding and transactivation studies,
the activity of the plant E2F proteins is likely to depend on specific
interactions with plant DP-like partners and is expected to be strongly
regulated by associated factors such as the plant pRB-related proteins. The presence in mammalian cells of many E2Fs suggests that some of the
E2F/DP combinations could exert specific or unique functions in
particular types of cells or during particular stages of development. Gene targeting in knockout mice has indeed demonstrated that E2F-5 is
dispensable for cell proliferation and is involved in the regulation of
cell secretion in differentiated neural tissue (46). Whether or not
more than one E2F member exists in plant cells, the apparent constitutive and ubiquitous nature of the DcE2F protein in
differentiated tissue suggests that, as reported for the mammalian
factors, the plant E2Fs are likely to be involved in both induction and
repression of gene activity. Because DcE2F can recognize a canonical
E2F cis-element, the isolation and the analysis of plant
promoters containing this conserved consensus sequence will be an
important first step toward the definition of plant E2F functions. The
discovery of these target genes will demonstrate whether DcE2F is
indeed involved in cell cycle control and/or whether it has other
important unrelated functions during cell growth and differentiation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. M. Fabbi
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e
dell'Emilia-Romagna, Sezione di Pavia) for raising antibodies in
rabbit, Dr. A. Balestrazzi (Dipartimento di Genetica e Microbiologia,
Università di Pavia) for performing Southern blot experiments,
and M. Evangelista (Istituto di Mutagenesi e Differenziamento, CNR,
Pisa) for skillful assistance with the transactivation experiments in
carrot protoplasts.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants of the University of Pavia
"Progetto di Ricerca di Ateneo" and by "Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Interesse Nazionale" of Ministero dell'
Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ251586.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-79-228645;
Fax: 39-79-233600; E-mail: albani@ssmain.uniss.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909390199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
pRB, retinoblastoma;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
GUS,
-glucuronidase;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
UBI-CEP, ubiquitin-carboxyl
extension;
CaMV, cauliflower mosaic virus;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
NLS, nuclear localization signal;
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Meyerowitz, E. M.
(1997)
Cell
88,
299-308
|
| 2.
|
Dyson, N.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2245-2262
|
| 3.
|
Helin, K.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
28-35
|
| 4.
|
Zheng, N.,
Fraenkel, E.,
Pabo, C. O.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
666-674
|
| 5.
|
Leone, G.,
DeGregori, J.,
Yan, Z.,
Jakoi, L.,
Ishida, S.,
Williams, R. S.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2120-2130
|
| 6.
|
Lavia, P.,
and Jansen-Dürr, P.
(1999)
BioEssays
21,
221-230
|
| 7.
|
Lukas, J.,
Petersen, B. O.,
Holm, K.,
Bartek, J.,
and Helin, K.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1047-1057
|
| 8.
|
Müller, H.,
Moroni, M. C.,
Vigo, E.,
Petersen, B. O.,
Bartek, J.,
and Helin, K.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5508-5520
|
| 9.
|
Luo, R. X.,
Postigo, A. A.,
and Dean, D. C.
(1998)
Cell
92,
463-473
|
| 10.
|
Ferreira, R.,
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
Robin, P.,
Harel-Bellan, A.,
and Trouche, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10493-10498
|
| 11.
|
Yamasaki, L.,
Jacks, T.,
Bronson, R.,
Goillot, E.,
Harlow, E.,
and Dyson, N. J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
537-548
|
| 12.
|
Field, S. J.,
Tsai, F. Y.,
Kuo, F.,
Zubiaga, A. M.,
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.,
Livingston, D. M.,
Orkin, S. H.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1996)
Cell
85,
549-561
|
| 13.
|
Jost, C. A.,
Ginsberg, D.,
and Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(1996)
Virology
220,
78-90
|
| 14.
|
Cartwright, P.,
Müller, H.,
Wagener, C.,
Holm, K.,
and Helin, K.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
611-623
|
| 15.
|
Krek, W.,
Ewen, M. E.,
Shirodkar, S.,
Arany, Z.,
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1994)
Cell
78,
161-172
|
| 16.
|
Grafi, G.,
Burnett, R. J.,
Helentjaris, T.,
Larkins, B. A.,
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Sellers, W. R.,
and Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8962-8967
|
| 17.
|
Xie, Q.,
Sanz-Burgos, A. P.,
Hannon, G. J.,
and Gutierrez, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4900-4908
|
| 18.
|
Ach, R. A.,
Durfee, T.,
Miller, A. B.,
Taranto, P.,
Hanley-Bowdoin, L.,
Zambryski, P. C.,
and Gruissem, W.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5077-5086
|
| 19.
|
Ramirez-Parra, E.,
Xie, Q.,
Boniotti, M. B.,
and Gutierrez, C.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
3527-3533
|
| 20.
|
Sekine, M.,
Ito, M.,
Uemukai, K.,
Maeda, Y.,
Nakagami, H.,
and Shinmyo, A.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
460,
117-122
|
| 21.
|
Nielsen, E.,
Rollo, F.,
Parisi, B.,
Cella, R.,
and Sala, F.
(1979)
Plant Sci. Lett.
15,
113-125
|
| 22.
|
Banks, M. S.,
and Evans, P. K. A.
(1976)
Plant Sci. Lett.
7,
409-416
|
| 23.
|
Bartels, D.,
and Thompson, R. D.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
2961-2978
|
| 24.
|
Shirzadegan, M.,
Christie, P.,
and Seemann, J. R.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6055
|
| 25.
|
Balestrazzi, A.,
Cella, R.,
and Carbonera, D.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
117,
720
|
| 26.
|
Albani, D.,
Hammond-Kosack, M. C. U.,
Smith, C.,
Conlan, S.,
Colot, V.,
Holdsworth, M.,
and Bevan, M. W.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
171-184
|
| 27.
|
Bernacchia, G.,
Primo, A.,
Giorgetti, L.,
Pitto, L.,
and Cella, R.
(1998)
Plant J.
13,
317-329
|
| 28.
|
Helin, K.,
Lees, J. A.,
Vidal, M.,
Dyson, N.,
Harlow, E.,
and Fattaey, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
337-350
|
| 29.
|
Helin, K.,
Wu, C. L.,
Fattaey, A. R.,
Lees, J. A.,
Dynlacht, B. D.,
Ngwu, C.,
and Harlow, E.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1850-1861
|
| 30.
|
Field, J.,
Nikawa, J.,
Broek, D.,
MacDonald, B.,
Rodgers, L.,
Wilson, I. A.,
Lerner, R. A.,
and Wigler, M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
2159-2165
|
| 31.
|
Helin, K.,
Harlow, E.,
and Fattaey, A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6501-6508
|
| 32.
|
Timmermans, M. C.,
Maliga, P.,
Vieira, J.,
and Messing, J.
(1990)
J. Biotechnol.
14,
333-344
|
| 33.
|
Gallie, D. R.,
Lucas, W. J.,
and Walbot, V.
(1989)
Plant Cell
1,
301-311
|
| 34.
|
Huntley, R.,
Healy, S.,
Freeman, D.,
Lavender, P.,
de Jager, S.,
Greenwood, J.,
Makker, J.,
Walker, E.,
Jackman, M.,
Xie, Q.,
Bannister, A. J.,
Kouzarides, T.,
Gutierrez, C.,
Doonan, J. H.,
and Murray, J. A.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
37,
155-169
|
| 35.
|
Ohtani, K.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1603-1612
|
| 36.
|
Dynlacht, B. D.,
Brook, A.,
Dembski, M.,
Yenush, L.,
and Dyson, N.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6359-6363
|
| 37.
|
Lindeman, G. J.,
Gaubatz, S.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Ginsberg, D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5095-5100
|
| 38.
|
Verona, R.,
Moberg, K.,
Estes, S.,
Starz, M.,
Vernon, J. P.,
and Lees, J. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
7268-7282
|
| 39.
|
Sardet, C.,
Vidal, M.,
Cobrinik, D.,
Geng, Y.,
Onufryk, C.,
Chen, A.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2403-2407
|
| 40.
|
Krek, W.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Shirodkar, S.
(1993)
Science
262,
1557-1560
|
| 41.
|
Bandara, L. R.,
Buck, V. M.,
Zamanian, M.,
Johnston, L. H.,
and La Thangue, N. B.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4317-4324
|
| 42.
|
Doonan, J.,
and Fobert, P.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
824-830
|
| 43.
|
Kosugi, S.,
and Ohashi, Y.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
1607-1619
|
| 44.
|
Tao, Y.,
Kassatly, R. F.,
Cress, W. D.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6994-7007
|
| 45.
|
Suzuki, M.,
Okuyama, S.,
Okamoto, S.,
Shirasuna, K.,
Nakajima, T.,
Hachiya, T.,
Nojima, H.,
Sekiya, S.,
and Oda, K.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
853-865
|
| 46.
|
Lindeman, G. J.,
Dagnino, L.,
Gaubatz, S.,
Xu, Y.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Warren, H. B.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1092-1098
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sozzani, C. Maggio, S. Varotto, S. Canova, C. Bergounioux, D. Albani, and R. Cella
Interplay between Arabidopsis Activating Factors E2Fb and E2Fa in Cell Cycle Progression and Development
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2006;
140(4):
1355 - 1366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. d. l. P. Sanchez, S. H. Gurusinghe, K. J. Bradford, and J. M. Vazquez-Ramos
Differential response of PCNA and Cdk-A proteins and associated kinase activities to benzyladenine and abscisic acid during maize seed germination
J. Exp. B |