JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M905866199 on March 22, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19297-19305, June 23, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/25/19297    most recent
M905866199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Califano, D.
Right arrow Articles by de Franciscis, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Califano, D.
Right arrow Articles by de Franciscis, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Signaling through Ras Is Essential for ret Oncogene-induced Cell Differentiation in PC12 Cells*

Daniela CalifanoDagger , Claudia Rizzo§, Amelia D'AlessioDagger , G. Luca Colucci-D'Amato§, Gaetano Calì§, Paola Cannada BartoliDagger ||, Giovanni SantelliDagger , Giancarlo Vecchio§**, and Vittorio de Franciscis§Dagger Dagger §§

From the § Centro di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, c/o Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare, Università di Napoli "Federico II," via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy, Dagger  Oncologia Sperimentale "E," Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale," via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy, and Dagger Dagger  CNRS Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Received for publication, July 23, 1999, and in revised form, March 20, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Specific germline mutations of the receptor tyrosine kinase, Ret, predispose to multiple endocrine neoplasia types 2A and 2B and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. The mechanisms by which different Ret isoforms (Ret-2A and Ret-2B) cause distinct neoplastic diseases remain largely unknown. On the other hand, forced expression of these mutated versions of Ret induces the rat pheochromocytoma cell line, PC12, to differentiate. Here we used an inducible vector encoding a dominant-negative Ras (Ras p21N17) to investigate the contributions of the Ras pathway to the phenotype induced in PC12 cells by the expression of either Ret-2A or Ret-2B mutants. We show that the Ret-induced molecular and morphological changes are both mediated by Ras-dependent pathways. However, even though inhibition of Ras activity was sufficient to revert Ret-induced differentiation, the kinetics of morphological reversion of the Ret-2B- was more rapid than the Ret-2A-transfected cells. Further, we show that in Ret-transfected cells the suc1-associated neurotrophic factor-induced tyrosine phosphorylation target, SNT, is chronically phosphorylated in tyrosine residues, and associates with the Sos substrate. These results indicate the activation of the Ras cascade as an essential pathway triggered by the chronic active Ret mutants in PC12 cells. Moreover, our data indicate SNT as a substrate for both Ret mutants, which might mediate the activation of this cascade.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thus far, four ligands have been identified for the protein tyrosine kinase, Ret: the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, neurturin, persephin, and artemin. Ret association with either of these ligands is mediated by the presence of distinct glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in the same molecular complex (1). In adult central and peripheral nervous systems, Ret is expressed in specific subsets of neuronal populations and participates in the neuronal reaction to axon injury (1-3).

Specific mutations of the ret gene are the causative genetic events for the inheritance of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN)1 type 2A and 2B syndromes and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (4). MEN-2A and MEN-2B are distinct hereditary neoplastic syndromes both characterized by medullary thyroid carcinomas and pheochromocytomas. MEN-2A also features hyperplasia of parathyroid cells, whereas MEN-2B is a more severe disease, being associated with skeletal abnormalities, ganglioneuromas of the intestinal tract, and mucosal neuromas, and is also characterized by an earlier age of tumor onset (5). Mutations in cysteine residues of the extracellular domain are the most frequent causative genetic event of familial medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN-2A syndromes (4). A single point mutation, which results in a Thr for Met substitution at codon 918 within the Ret catalytic domain, is responsible for the MEN-2B syndrome (4). Each of these mutations convert Ret into a dominant transforming protein (Ret-2A and Ret-2B oncogenes) and cause constitutive activation of its intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity (6-8).

In MEN-2 syndromes, the molecular mechanisms by which the mutated Ret alleles contribute to the development of neuroendocrine neoplasms remain largely unknown (9, 10). The inheritance of specific ret mutations causes distinct disease phenotypes, thus suggesting that some specific cell types undergo abnormal proliferation depending on the type of Ret activation (either via a MEN-2A or via a MEN-2B mutation) (4, 5). Indeed, Ret-2A and Ret-2B differ in their activation mechanisms. For Ret-2A, activation results from the formation of stable receptor homodimers linked by a disulfide bridge, whereas Ret-2B proteins do not constitutively dimerize and display altered substrate specificity (4, 8).

The effects of tyrosine kinase receptors are mediated by the concerted activation of several signaling pathways including those of phospholipase C-gamma , phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and the Ras/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (also known as ERK) (11). In the rat pheochromocytoma cell line, PC12, activation of the Ras signaling cascade is a prerequisite for nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced cell differentiation (12, 13). Even though it has been shown that Ras is implicated in Ret-induced neuronal differentiation, little is known about the contribution of this pathway to the biological effects triggered by Ret mutants in neuroectodermal cells (14, 15). For instance, the expression of Ret active mutants and their causal function in neuroendocrine tumors, associated with MEN-2 syndromes, are difficult to reconcile with the dramatic differentiating effects observed when the same mutants are overexpressed either in PC12 or in human neuroblastoma cells (7, 14-16). Moreover, an understanding of how the different Ret mutations (either associated with MEN-2A or MEN-2B syndromes) lead to diverse tumor phenotypes is lacking (15, 17-20).

Ret codes for two alternative splice isoforms, Ret9 and Ret51, that differ in their carboxyl terminus for 9 and 51 amino acids, respectively (21). Consensus binding sites for Shc are present on both isoforms, whereas a potential site for the Src homology 2 domain of Grb2 is only present on the long isoform. Indeed, there is good evidence that either Retwt, or harboring a MEN-2 type mutation, may interact with Shc and Grb2; these interactions are likely to mediate the induction of Ras activity (18, 22-25). On the other hand, a number of receptor tyrosine kinases induce phosphorylation in tyrosine residues of multiple-docking site proteins as, for example, IRS-1, IRS-2, SNT, and FRS2 (FGF receptor substrate-2), which, in turn, recruit enzymes involved in specific signaling cascades (26-29). FRS2 is a recently identified docking protein, probably identical to the NGF substrate, SNT, which binds Grb2 and Sos (29). Further, acute stimulation of Ret induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of SNT, thus suggesting the existence of a distinct potential way for Ret to trigger downstream signaling and activate the Ras/MAP kinase signaling pathway (17, 28).

Here we used two recently established stable cell lines of PC12 cells (PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B), which express the short isoform of the active Ret variants (Ret9C634Y and Ret9M918T, respectively) (30), as a model system. We took advantage of these cell lines to further study the biological consequences caused by the activation of the Ras signaling pathway in PC12 cells transfected either with pRet9C634Y or pRet9M918T.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- PC12 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated horse serum and 5% fetal calf serum. PC12/wt-Cl.9, PC12/MEN2A-Cl.3, and PC12/MEN2B-Cl.7 (PC12 derivative cell lines, which expressed Ret9wt, Ret9C634Y, and Ret9M918T, respectively) were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated horse serum, 5% fetal calf serum, and gpt selection medium as reported previously (30). For Ras p21N17 induction experiments, cells were treated for 6 h with 0.5 µM dexamethasone (Sigma), dissolved in 10 nM Me2SO. Untreated control cultures contained the same concentration of Me2SO (vehicle). For NGF treatment, 100 ng/ml were added to the culture medium. Mouse 2.5 S NGF was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. For morphological assays, 4 × 104 cells were plated in a 60-mm diameter tissue culture dish, and dexamethasone (0.5 µM) or 2-mercaptoethanol (0, 125, 250, and 500 µM and 1 mM) was added, twice per week, for the indicated time.

Transfection Experiments-- The PMMrasDN plasmid is an inducible expression vector which encodes the dominant negative mutant of Ha-Ras, Ras p21N17 (kindly provided by S. Halegoua) (13). The pZipN17 contains the gene for Ras p21N17 inserted in pZipneoSV(X) (31) (kindly provided by M. Karin). The pKrox-24-CAT (C4) contains sequences from -1150 to +200 base pairs relative to the Krox-24 promoter transcriptional start site fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene (kindly provided by Moses V. Chao, Cornell University, New York, NY). The pvgf-CAT contains the vgf promoter, the 5'-noncoding and the first methionine (from -803 to +710) fused in frame with the initiating methionine of the CAT gene (32). The cDNA of Ha-Raswt was inserted in the BamHI site of the pBabe Puro vector plasmid. Expression vectors for Ret9C634Y and Ret9M918T (pRet9C634Y and pRet9M918T, respectively) were described previously (8, 30). PC12/MEN2A-Cl.3 and PC12/MEN2B-Cl.7 were transfected with the PMMrasDN plasmid together with pWLneo using the Lipofectin reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) as reported previously (30). The transfected cells were selected in presence of G418 (400 µg/ml) (Life Technologies, Inc.), and individual cell colonies were isolated and expanded. For transient transfection assays, cells were plated at 3 × 105cells in a 60-mm diameter tissue culture dish 24-36 h prior to transfection. The PC12 cells were transfected using the Lipofectin reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.), as reported previously (30). Transient transfections were carried out with 2 µg of reporter plasmid pKrox-24-CAT, together with 0.6 µg of pRet9C634Y or pRet9M918T, and with increasing amounts of pZipN17. PC12/MEN2AN17-R1, and PC12/MEN2BN17-R2 cells, were transfected with 2 µg of pvgf-CAT together with 8 µg of pBabe Ha-Ras either in presence or not of dexamethasone. In all experiments, total transfected DNA was kept constant by adding the empty vector. Transfection efficiency was checked for each experimental point by cotransfection with the pSV-Luc reporter plasmid, and measuring the luciferase activity.

CAT Assays-- Cell extracts were prepared 72 h after transfection, and CAT activity was analyzed by thin layer chromatography with 95% chloroform, 5% methanol, as described previously (14). After running, the individual sections from thin layer chromatography plate, corresponding to acetylated and nonacetylated chloramphenicol, were cut from the thin layer chromatography plate and counted in a scintillation counter. For each independent experiment, the percentage of conversion to acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol was calculated and normalized for the transfection efficiency. Values from three independent experiments, each made in duplicate, were used to calculate standard deviation and plotted on an arbitrary scale as relative promoter induction.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy midi kit (Qiagen). 20 µg of total RNA were size-fractionated on a denaturing formaldehyde agarose gel and blotted onto nylon membranes (Hybond-N, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The Ha-ras probe used was excised from the PMMrasDN plasmid. To obtain Krox-24 probe, a 60-mer oligonucleotide was synthesized according to the published sequence and subsequently 32P-labeled using the Klenow fragment of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase and a 3'-terminal specific 9-mer. The vgf probe used was excised from the pV2-2 plasmid (32). 32P labeling of the probes was performed using a multiprime DNA labeling system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Hybridization and washing were carried out under stringent conditions: 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 60 °C. Autoradiography was performed using X-AR films (Eastman Kodak Co.) at -80 °C for 1-7 days with intensifying screens.

Kinase Assay-- Exponentially growing parental PC12 and PC12 variant cell lines were lysed with 1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer containing: 10 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.4 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate. Protein concentrations were estimated by a modified Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). 400 µg of proteins from each sample were immunoprecipitated with anti-ERK-1-specific antibodies (C-16, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 4 °C for 2 h. The immunoprecipitates were washed once with lysis buffer and twice with assay buffer (see below). The immunoprecipitates were assayed for kinase activity by incubating with 8 µg of myelin basic protein and 8 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP in 30 µl of assay buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 0.1 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 40 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 100 µM ATP for 30 min at 30 °C. Reactions were terminated by adding 2× Laemmli buffer and proteins were separated by 14% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The protein gel was dried for 1 h at 80 °C and exposed to a X-AR film (Eastman Kodak Co.). Under our experimental conditions, the ERK immunoprecipitates were mainly (approximately 80%) ERK-1/p44 and, to a lesser extent, ERK-2/p42, as verified by immunoblot with the same anti-ERK-1 antibody (data not shown).

Immunofluorescence-- Cells were seeded at low confluence on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (15 µg/ml) (Sigma). PC12 and PC12/MEN2 cells were either treated with 2-mercaptoethanol for 11 days or left untreated. PC12/MEN2N17 cells were treated with Me2SO (vehicle) or dexamethasone (0.5 µM). At 11 days, cells were washed twice with PBS (8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 2 mM KCl, 0.136 M NaCl, pH 7.4), fixed for 20 min in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. After two washes with PBS, cells were stained with Hoechst-33258 (Sigma) for 5 min. After two washes with PBS, coverslips were mounted and analyzed with a Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope.

For phalloidin experiments, PC12 and PC12/MEN2 cells were treated with 2-mercaptoethanol for 8 days or left untreated. PC12/MEN2N17 cells were treated with Me2SO or dexamethasone (0.5 µM) for 8 days. Cells were trypsinized and seeded on glass coverslips. 24 h later, cells were fixed and permeabilized as described above. Coverslips were incubated for 1 h in humidified atmosphere at room temperature with Texas Red-coupled phalloidin (Sigma), which specifically binds to polymerized actin.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting-- Between 106 and 107 cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS, then lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% glycerol, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 1,5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM NaF, 20 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 40 µg/ml aprotinin, and clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 min. Protein concentrations were estimated by a modified Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of proteins (2 mg) were incubated with rabbit anti-Ret polyclonal antibody, as indicated, for 16 h at 4 °C and subsequently incubated with protein A-Sepharose CL4-B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were washed five times with the above mentioned lysis buffer and boiled in Laemmli buffer for 5 min before electrophoresis. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE (7.5% polyacrylamide) under reducing conditions and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (Millipore Co., Bedford, MA). Immunoblotting was carried out using either anti-Ret antibodies or anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibodies (4G10, Upstate Biotechnology), peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, and detected with the Amersham ECL system (3). For co-immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-FRS-2 antibodies, cells were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 40 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate. 2 mg of proteins were precleared with rabbit IgG and protein G-plus agarose (Calbiochem), then centrifuged for 5 min at 2500 rpm; the supernatants were cemented with anti-FRS-2 antibodies (H-91, Santa Cruz) overnight at 4 °C and subsequently incubated with protein G-plus agarose (Calbiochem) for 1 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) and blotted with anti-RET (C-19, Santa Cruz) and anti-FRS-2 (H-91, Santa Cruz) antibodies.

p13suc1 Capture and Immunoblotting-- Between 106 and 107 cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS, then lysed in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 25 mM NaF, 20 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 40 µg/ml aprotinin, and clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 min as previously reported (27). Protein concentrations were estimated using a modified Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). The SNT protein was isolated from cell lysates incubating equal amounts of protein with p13suc1-agarose (Oncogene Science) as described (27) for 3 h at 4 °C. p13suc1-agarose-captured proteins were washed three times with the above mentioned lysis buffer and boiled in Laemmli buffer for 5 min before electrophoresis. Captured proteins were subjected to 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, under reducing conditions, and transferred to polyvinylidene membrane (Millipore Co., Bedford, MA). Immunoblotting was carried out using either anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibodies (PY20, Santa Cruz), or anti-Sos1 (Upstate Biotechnology), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and detected with the Amersham ECL system.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression of Ras p21N17 in PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B Cells-- We have previously described the establishment of stable PC12 variant cell lines, PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cell lines, which express the Ret9 active mutants, Ret-2A (Cys-634 right-arrow Tyr) and Ret-2B (Met-918 right-arrow Thr), respectively (30). We decided to utilize two cell clones, PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 and PC12/MEN2B-cl.7 (hereafter named PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B), which express comparable amounts of the exogenous Ret mutants (Ret-2A and Ret-2B, respectively) (see Fig. 2 of Ref. 30). Thus, we transfected both these cell lines with an inducible expression vector, coding for a dominant-negative mutant of Ras (Ras p21N17). Transfected cells (PC12/MEN2AN17 and PC12/MEN2BN17) were selected for resistance to G418, and individual clones were subsequently isolated and analyzed. Dexamethasone-inducible ras transcripts were detected both in PC12/MEN2AN17 and in PC12/MEN2BN17 cell clones, and the induction of ras transcripts was determined at 6 h of dexamethasone treatment (Fig. 1 and data not shown). For further analysis, we decided to use two representative PC12/MEN2AN17 (-cl.R1 and -cl.R3) and two PC12/MEN2BN17 (-cl.R2 and -cl.R6) cell clones. The magnitude of the Ras p21N17 mRNA induction largely varied among the clones analyzed. In the -R3 and -R6, the induction was between 8 and 10 times lower than in the -R1 and -R2 (Fig. 1). All PC12/MEN2AN17 and PC12/MEN2BN17 clones were morphologically indistinguishable from the parental cells (compare Fig. 3 to Fig. 4 and data not shown).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Ras expression induced by dexamethasone in PC12/MEN2N17 cells. Northern blot analysis of total cellular RNA (20 µg/lane) obtained from PC12 and PC12 variant cells as indicated: parental PC12, PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 (MEN2A), PC12/MEN2AN17 (MEN2AN17), PC12/MEN2B-cl.7 (MEN2B), and PC12/MEN2BN17 (MEN2BN17). Cells were treated for 6 h either with vehicle (-) or with dexamethasone (0.5 µM) (+), as indicated (DEX). Filters were hybridized with a ras probe and equal gel loading was confirmed by the hybridization of the same filter with a ribosomal 18 S probe. The relative amounts of Ret protein in all cell lines utilized were determined by Western blot with anti-Ret antibodies and normalized with anti-tubulin antibodies. The amount of Ret in PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 was arbitrarily taken = 1. The resulting relative amounts were: PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 = 1; PC12/MEN2AN17-R1 = 1.3; PC12/MEN2B-cl.7 = 1.1; PC12/MEN2BN17-R2 = 1.1; PC12 parental = undetectable; PC12/MEN2A-pool = 0.5.

Expression of Ras p21N17 Reverts Ret-2A- and Ret-2B-induced Neuronal Differentiation in PC12 Cells-- NGF induction of PC12 cell differentiation involves the expression of a complex pattern of genes, including immediate-early (fos, Krox-24) and late response genes (vgf, SCG10, peripherin) (33). We have previously demonstrated that Ret-2A and Ret-2B are able to induce a differentiative expression program in PC12 cells (30). However, in these cells, differentiation is not terminal. Indeed, expression of the vgf and SCG10 genes is not associated to block of proliferation. To determine the possible involvement of Ras in the Ret-2A- and Ret-2B-induced neuronal differentiation, we analyzed the expression of Krox-24 (also known as NGFI-A, zif/268, Egr1, PC1, TIS8, d2) and vgf genes in PC12/MEN2AN17 and PC12/MEN2BN17 clones after stimulation with dexamethasone. Fig. 2A reports the results from representative clones (PC12/MEN2AN17-cl.R1 and PC12/MEN2BN17-cl.R2) compared with parental PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B. In Ras p21N17-transfected cells, the vgf but not the Krox-24 transcripts were present at lower levels than parental cells (Fig. 2A, compare lane 5 to lane 3 and lane 9 to lane 7), and similar results were obtained by the PC12/MEN2AN17-R3 and the PC12/MEN2BN17-R6 cells (data not shown). We do not know whether the low basal levels of vgf transcripts, in Ras p21N17-transfected cells, reflect a clonal difference in the cell lines or the presence of low, non-induced levels of dominant-negative Ras (see below). On the other hand, in PC12/MEN2AN17-R1 and PC12/MEN2BN17-R2 cells, stimulation with dexamethasone resulted in inhibition of both Krox-24 and vgf genes expression (Fig. 2A, lanes 6 and 10). Consistently, the activity of the downstream Ras effector, ERK-1, was depressed to basal levels (Fig. 2B, compare lane 1 to lane 6 and lane 7 to lane 12).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ras is required for expression of Krox-24 and vgf genes and for ERK kinase activity. A, Northern blot analysis of total cellular RNA (20 µg/lane) obtained from PC12 and PC12 variant cells as indicated: parental PC12, either untreated or stimulated for 5 h with NGF (100 ng/ml) as indicated; PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 (MEN2A); PC12/MEN2AN17-cl.R1 (MEN2AN17); PC12/MEN2B-cl.7 (MEN2B); PC12/MEN2BN17-cl.R2 (MEN2BN17) were treated for 6 h either with vehicle (-) or with dexamethasone (0.5 µM) (+), as indicated (DEX). The same filters were hybridized with either a Krox-24-specific or vgf-specific probe as indicated, and equal gel loading was confirmed with a ribosomal 18 S probe. B, the cells and the treatment were the same as in A (except for NGF stimulation that lasted for 10 min). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-ERK-1 antibody and assayed for kinase activity as described under "Experimental Procedures." In each experiment we verified that the same amounts of ERK were used in the kinase assay. Proteins from each of the immunoprecipitates were separated on 11% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the same anti-ERK-1 antibody. Immunoblots confirmed that the same amount of ERK was used in each kinase assay (data not shown). The results shown were typical and representative of two independent experiments. C, PC12 cells were transfected with pKrox-24-CAT (2 µg) together with pRet9C634Y (0.6 µg) or pRet9M918T (0.6 µg). Where indicated, cells were also cotransfected with increasing amount of the pZipN17 expressing the Ras p21N17 mutant. The inhibition, calculated as the difference between the CAT activity in the absence and in the presence of pZipN17, is plotted as percentage relative to the induction observed in the absence of pZipN17. Results were from a representative experiment, and they were confirmed in two independent experiments each performed in duplicate. D, PC12 variant cells were transfected with pvgf-CAT (2 µg) together with either the pBabe Ha-Ras or the pBabe vector (8 µg), as indicated. Where indicated, dexamethasone was added 5 h after transfection. Results are expressed as percentage of conversion to acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol.

To further confirm these expression data, we performed CAT-based assays in the parental PC12 cells. We have previously shown that activated forms of Ret induce the transcription of a reporter plasmid containing the CAT gene fused to a fragment of the Krox-24 promoter (Krox-24-CAT) (14, 30). Thus, to evaluate the ability of a dominant inhibitory mutant of Ha-ras (Ras p21N17) to inhibit the expression of Krox-24-CAT, we transfected the PC12 cells with an expression vector for each active Ret mutants (pRet9C634Y or pRet9M918T) either alone or together with increasing amounts of an expression vector containing the Ras p21N17 (pZipN17). As shown in Fig. 2C, Ras p21N17 expression inhibited the transcription driven by the Krox-24 promoter to similar extents, when induced by the Ret-2A or by the Ret-2B mutants (reaching more than 80% of inhibition with 4 µg of pZipN17).

Further, to confirm that, in PC12/MEN2AN17 and PC12/MEN2BN17 cell clones, the blocked vgf expression was the consequence of the inhibited Ras activity, we performed transient transfection using a vgf-CAT construct as reporter gene. Expression of vgf-CAT was highly depressed upon stimulation with dexamethasone, and rescued by forced expression of the Ha-raswt (Fig. 2D).

Ret and Ras Activities Are Required for Maintenance of the Flat-adherent Cell Phenotype-- We next studied whether the signal triggered by the Ret mutants and conveyed through Ras was necessary to determine the flat, substrate-adherent phenotype that is characteristic of both the PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells. We first addressed the question of whether the flat morphology depended on the continuous Ret activity. To accomplish this we took advantage of the fact that the C634Y mutation causes stable disulfide-linked homodimers, which activate the tyrosine kinase activity. Thus, in agreement with recent reports, treatment of PC12/MEN2A cells with a reducing agent should inhibit RetC634Y dimer formation and abrogate their activity (34).2 On the other hand, since the M918T mutation causes the Ret tyrosine kinase activation by a distinct mechanism that does not involve the formation of stable dimers, the PC12/MEN2B cells should be insensitive to reducing agents, and thus can be used as a negative control. We treated both the PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells with increasing amounts of 2-mercaptoethanol (0, 125, 250, and 500 µM and 1 mM). Mercaptoethanol had no toxic effect on Ret-transfected PC12 cells up to 500 µM (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 3, continuous treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol, at 250 (data not shown) and 500 µM, caused a dramatic change in morphology, clearly visible at 6 days (data not shown), and up to 11 days of treatment (Fig. 3A) and converting a large fraction of PC12/MEN2A, but not of PC12/MEN2B, cells into a small and round-shaped phenotype with little substrate adherence. These cells behave morphologically similar to parental PC12 and formed aggregates overgrowing on a layer of flat cells, morphologically similar to the untreated PC12/MEN2A controls. Nuclear integrity of cells treated with 2-mercaptoethanol was assessed by staining with Hoechst dye (Fig. 3B). Moreover, to further confirm morphological reversion, cells from PC12, PC12/MEN2A aggregates, or PC12/MEN2B were picked up, dissociated, plated again on sterile microscope coverglass for 24 h, and stained with phalloidin. As shown in Fig. 3C, the PC12/MEN2A aggregates were constituted of small round-shaped cells, similar to the control parental PC12 cells. On the other hand, when replated, cells from PC12/MEN2B behave as flat-adherent and similar to the untreated controls (Fig. 3C and data not shown). Morphological reversion of the PC12/MEN2A was associated with a clear reduction in phosphotyrosine content of the mature 170-kDa Ret product, but not of the 150-kDa isoform, which is not exposed on the cell membrane (Fig. 3D, upper panel, lanes 1 and 2). In the PC12/MEN2B cells, no appreciable reduction in phosphotyrosine content of Ret was observed (Fig. 3D, upper panel, lanes 3 and 4), in agreement with the absence of morphological reversion (Fig. 3, A-C, right panels). Moreover, in PC12/MEN2A cells, Ret tyrosine phosphorylation was not completely abrogated, in good agreement with the observation that morphological reversion was only partial even upon 11 days of treatment.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Reversion of the PC12/MEN2 cell morphology upon treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol. A, phase contrast photomicrograph of PC12, PC12/MEN2A, and PC12/MEN2B cells. PC12, PC12/MEN2A, and PC12/MEN2B cells were grown for 11 days either in the absence (upper panels) or presence of 2-mercaptoehanol (500 µM) (lower panels) as indicated. The microphotographs represent three independent experiments. The same results were observed when independent cell clones were analyzed for each cell line. B, PC12, PC12/MEN2A or PC12/MEN2B cells were grown on glass coverslips in absence (upper panels) or in presence of 2-mercaptoethanol (500 µM) for 8 days (lower panels). Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258. Phase contrast microphotograph (upper panels) and Hoechst staining (lower panels) are shown. C, cells were grown as in A, picked up, trypsinized, and plated on glass coverslips. 24 h later, cells were fixed and stained with phalloidin. PC12 round cells were from random fields (left panels), PC12/MEN2A were either from random fields (untreated) or from aggregates (middle panels), and PC12/MEN2B flat cells were from random fields (right panels). The figure is representative of at least three fields for each cell line and confirmed in three independent experiments. D, expression and phosphorylation of Ret after 2-mercaptoethanol treatment. PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells were grown either in absence or in presence of 2-mercaptoethanol (500 µM) for 11 days as indicated. Proteins from each lysate from the designated cells (2 mg) were immunoprecipitated with anti-Ret antibodies, separated on SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with either anti-Ret antibody or anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, as indicated.

To determine whether the morphology, characteristic of the Ret-transfected cells, was the consequence of the chronic stimulation of Ras activity by Ret mutants, we used the PC12/MEN2AN17 and PC12/MEN2BN17 cell clones. A phenotypic reversion to small rounded cells was evident at 5 days in PC12/MEN2BN17-R2 (Fig. 4A, middle panel), and at 8 days of treatment with dexamethasone in PC12/MEN2AN17-R1 (data not shown), and increased in both cell lines up to 11 days (Fig. 4A, lower panel). Similar results were obtained using the PC12/MEN2AN17-R3 and the PC12/MEN2BN17-R6 cells, in which Ras p21N17 transcripts were inducible to lower extents. In these cell lines reversion was observed at 9 days in the -R6, and at 12 days in the -R3 cells (data not shown). As a control, we treated the parental cells (PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B) with the same amounts of dexamethasone, and no changes in cell shape were observed for up to 11 days (data not shown). Morphological reversion was thus confirmed as in Fig. 3C by replating cells from either PC12/MEN2AN17 or PC12/MEN2BN17 aggregates followed by staining with phalloidin (Fig. 4B). The actin cytoskeleton was similar to that of the parental PC12 cells, and neurites were generally no more visible (compare Fig. 4B to Fig. 3C). The results are consistent with previous reports, which indicate that expression of Ras p21N17 inhibits differentiation of PC12 cells but not proliferation (35, 36).


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Reversion of PC12/MEN2N17 cells morphology induced by the expression of Ras p21N17. A, phase contrast microphotograph of PC12/MEN2AN17-R1 and MEN2BN17-R2 cells. PC12/MEN2AN17-R1 and PC12/MEN2BN17-R2 cells were grown up to 11 days either in the absence (vehicle) or in presence of dexamethasone (0.5 µM) as indicated. The microphotographs are representative of three independent experiments. B, cells were grown as in A, picked up, trypsinized, and plated on coverslips. 24 h later, cells were fixed and stained with phalloidin. PC12/MEN2AN17 (MEN2AN17) and PC12/MEN2BN17 (MEN2BN17) cells were either from random fields (vehicle) or aggregates (dexamethasone). The figure is representative of at least three fields for each cell line, and confirmed in three independent experiments.

Ret Mutants Induce FRS2/SNT Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Association with Sos-- Although the biochemical functions for SNT still remain to be determined, compelling evidence suggests that SNT, and SNT-like proteins, provide docking sites for signaling molecules involved in Ras activation (28, 29).

Thus, we tried to determine whether the chronic stimulation of Ret tyrosine kinase was capable of triggering the persistent tyrosine phosphorylation of SNT. As already reported, SNT was not phosphorylated in tyrosine residues in parental PC12 cells, and become phosphorylated upon NGF stimulation (Fig. 5A, upper panel). In contrast, both in the PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells, SNT was constitutively phosphorylated at high levels, comparable to those reached in the NGF-stimulated parental PC12 cells (Fig. 5A, upper panel, lanes 3 and 7). Consistent with a previous report (27), Ret-induced SNT-tyrosine phosphorylation was not affected when Ras activity was inhibited (Fig. 5A, upper panel, lanes 6 and 10).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Ret-2A and Ret-2B expression induce tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2/SNT in PC12. A, cell lysates were from the following cells: parental PC12, either left untreated or stimulated for 10 min with NGF (100 ng/ml) as indicated; PC12/MEN2A-cl.3 (MEN2A); PC12/MEN2AN17-cl.R1 (MEN2AN17); PC12/MEN2B-cl.7 (MEN2B); PC12/MEN2BN17-cl.R2 (MEN2BN17). Cells were treated for 6 h either with vehicle (-) or with dexamethasone (0.5 µM) (+), as indicated (DEX). Cell lysates were incubated with p13suc1-agarose, eluted, and analyzed: anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblot of p13suc1-agarose captured proteins (upper panel) and anti-Sos1 immunoblot of p13suc1-agarose captured proteins (lower panel). The results are representative of three independent experiments. Molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons. The position of SNT is also indicated. B, cell lysates from PC12, PC12/wt, PC12/MEN2A, and PC12/MEN2B were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Ret (left panel) or anti-FRS-2 antibodies (right panel), separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-Ret, anti-FRS2, or anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies, as indicated.

Upon NGF stimulation the Suc1·SNT complex is found associated to a number of proteins, some of which are phosphorylated on tyrosine residues, including the NGF receptor, TrkA, and Sos1 (27, 28). Consistent with this, we observed a pattern of tyrosine phosphorylated products, in both Ret-transfected cell lines (Fig. 5A, upper panel). In the PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells, the Suc1·SNT complex seems to be associated to the same phosphorylated products as in the NGF-stimulated PC12 parental cells. We next examined the association of Sos to the Suc1·SNT complex. Fig. 5A (lower panel) shows an immunoblot of suc1-captured proteins with antibodies directed against Sos1. A band corresponding to a protein doublet of 180 kDa was clearly detected in p13suc1-agarose precipitates from PC12 cells stimulated with NGF, but only barely in precipitated from untreated cells. Sos1 was also easily detected in suc1-captured proteins from PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells; this association was upstream and independent of Ras activity. According to previous findings, Sos association with the Suc1·SNT complex is ligand-dependent in parental PC12 cells and correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of SNT (28, 29). SNT has recently been shown to be highly related, or identical, to the FGF receptor signaling molecule, FRS2 (29). Thus, because of the absence of SNT-specific antibodies, we used anti-FRS2 antibodies to demonstrate that endogenous FRS2/SNT co-immunoprecipitate with the Ret active oncoproteins in PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B (Fig. 5B).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Here we have demonstrated that, in PC12 cells, chronic Ret-stimulation of Ras is required to maintain differentiation. In fact, both expression of neuronal specific genes and cell morphology were dependent on Ras activity. Moreover, we propose SNT tyrosine phosphorylation as an additional Ras-independent component of the transducing machinery triggered by Ret.

Nerve growth factor-induced differentiation in PC12 cells requires signaling by Ras and MAP kinase. Indeed, persistent stimulation of this signaling cascade has been implicated in PC12 cell terminal differentiation, and the forced expression of an interfering Ras mutant blocks the NGF from inducing neurite outgrowth and expression of neuron-specific genes (12, 13, 33, 37, 38). The expression of Ret active variants, Ret9 or the Ret51 isoforms, induces the PC12 cells to differentiate, and, in most cases, differentiation is terminal being associated with growth arrest (7, 14, 15, 30).

Consistently, recent reports indicate that Ret signaling requires the stimulation of the Ras cascade (14, 15). On the other hand, activated Ret causes medullary thyroid carcinomas, and frequently pheochromocytomas in MEN-2 syndromes (5). As possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy (terminal differentiation in PC12 cells versus hyperplasia and tumors in MEN-2 syndromes), it has been proposed that the abundance of Ret active molecules would be crucial to discriminate between proliferation and terminal differentiation (15). Accordingly, expression in PC12 cells of the active Ret mutants at low levels results in isolation of stable cell lines, which reproduce in vitro some of the biological events caused by Ret in human tumors, including unlimited growth (15, 30, 41).

These PC12 cell lines, which express the Ret9 isoform of active Ret mutants (PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cell lines), are partially differentiated. Indeed, important molecular markers characteristic of the PC12 neuronal differentiation are expressed, but differentiation is not terminal and proliferation is not blocked (30). Because of the strong implication of Ras in determining terminal differentiation of PC12 cells, the question arises as to whether or not Ras activity is still required for maintenance of the differentiated phenotype in these cells that actively proliferate.

Our results show that expression of an inducible Ras p21N17 mutant in PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B cells is sufficient to abrogate the expression of genes belonging to the early and late neuronal response (Krox-24 and vgf, respectively). Moreover, even though basal, non-induced levels of Ras p21N17 were hardly detectable, they were sufficient enough to severely impair the vgf gene expression, but not to revert the flat cell shape. This indicates that, despite the chronic activity of Ret, the extent of Ras stimulation is low enough to allow the basal Ras p21N17 to partially interfere with its downstream signaling. Stronger induction of Ras p21N17 was needed to revert from flat to PC12-like small-rounded cell morphology and to completely repress vgf and Krox-24 gene expression. Thus, in these cells, the Ras signaling cascade seems to be stimulated at intermediate levels, which are enough to induce neuronal gene expression, but still compatible with cell proliferation (41). Even though it seems likely that Ret, and Ret mutants, trigger the activation of various independent pathways (39, 40) that may contribute to the choice between cell proliferation (as observed in tumors) and terminal differentiation (as frequently observed in vitro), these results indicate that signaling through Ras is strictly required for Ret-induced differentiation.

In contrast to the more frequent MEN-2A-like mutations, located in the extracellular domain, the MEN-2B mutation does not provoke constitutive dimerization of the Ret protein (6, 8). Indeed, despite the fact that compelling experimental data suggest that the biochemical events initiated by Ret-2A differ from those initiated by Ret-2B mutants, the detailed characterization of such events is still lacking. Here we report that, in PC12 cells, both Ret-2A and Ret-2B require the continuous activity of Ras to elicit morphological and molecular differentiation. However, the Ret9M918T-transfected cells are more sensitive than the Ret9C634Y-transfected cells, to the inhibitory action of Ras p21N17. In fact, phenotypic reversion was more rapid in pRet9M918T-transfected compared with pRet9C634Y-transfected cells. A possible interpretation of these data is that some Ret downstream signal is stimulated to different degrees in PC12/MEN2A, compared with PC12/MEN2B cells. If this was the case, the different kinetics of reversion might reflect the levels of stimulation of specific substrates in these different cell lines. This hypothesis is well supported by evidence in fibroblasts of a minor transforming efficiency displayed by Ret9M918T, compared with Ret9C634Y short isoforms (15, 23).

On the other hand, since in PC12 Ret-transfected cells (PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B) the expression of the Ras p21N17 was sufficient to elicit morphological reversion, it seems reasonable to interpret the present results as a weaker stimulation of Ras downstream signaling activity triggered by Ret-2B compared with Ret-2A. However, we cannot exclude that other differences, between the PC12/MEN2A and PC12/MEN2B, render the PC12/MEN2B cells more sensitive to the inhibitory action of Ras p21N17, including the activation of other signaling pathways involved in PC12 cell differentiation. Indeed, we were unable to measure any difference, between Ret-2A and Ret-2B, in the extent of inhibition of Krox-24 or vgf gene expression by Ras p21N17.

SNT was first characterized in PC12 cells as a protein that is rapidly phosphorylated in tyrosine upon stimulation with neurotrophins and might associate with the cell cycle protein Suc1 (27). More recently it has been shown that SNT-like products are phosphoproteins present in different cell types and weakly associate with fibroblast growth factor receptor (33). Furthermore, a new signaling molecule, named FRS2, has been recently described, which shares striking homologies, and probably identity, with SNT (29). Upon NGF or FGF stimulation, FRS2 is targeted to the cell membrane, and acts as a docking site for Grb2 and Sos cell signaling molecules. We and others have recently shown that, upon acute stimulation of a Ret chimeric receptor, SNT became rapidly phosphorylated in tyrosine residues (17, 28). In the present study, we present evidence which indicates that induction of SNT tyrosine phosphorylation by chronically active Ret mutants is persistent and Ras-independent. Consistent with what has been described in NGF-stimulated PC12 cells (27), in Ret-transfected cells, the Suc1·SNT complex associates with a number of additional proteins phosphorylated in tyrosine residues. Moreover, we show that, in the Ret-transfected cells, FRS2/SNT associates with Sos1 and with the Ret active variants. These data buttress the notion that SNT-like products can recruit the Ras exchange factor, Sos, to the cell membrane (28). They also indicate FRS2/SNT as a potential substrate for Ret, which might link receptor activation to the Ras/MAP kinase pathway. Whether FRS2/SNT tyrosine phosphorylation is necessary to mediate Ret signaling is presently unknown and will be the focus of further research.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to S. Halegoua, M. Karin, M. V. Chao, and R. Possenti for generously providing reagents. We are also grateful to M. Santoro and C. Thermes for discussions and suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Target Project on Biotechnology; by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC); and by Fondazione Telethon Grant A.097.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Recipient of an AIRC fellowship.

|| Recipient of a fellowship from Ministero della Sanità (Fondo Sanitario Nazionale 1994).

** Scholar-in-residence at the Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

§§ Supported by EC Grant BIO4-CT97-5078. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Centro di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. Tel.: 39-081-7463052, Fax: 39-081-7701016; E-mail: defranci@unina.it.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M905866199

2 M. Billaud, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MEN, multiple endocrine neoplasia; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; FRS2, fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NGF, nerve growth factor; SNT, suc1-associated neurotrophic factor-induced tyrosine phosphorylation target; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Rosenthal, A. (1999) Neuron 22, 201-203
2. Tsuzuki, T., Takahashi, M., Asai, M., Iwashita, T., Matsuyama, M., and Asai, J. (1995) Oncogene 10, 191-198
3. Colucci-D' Amato, G. L., D' Alessio, A., Filliatreau, G., Florio, T., Di Giamberardino, L., Chiappetta, G., Vecchio, G., Fusco, A., Santoro, M., and de Franciscis, V. (1996) Cell Growth Diff. 7, 1081-1086
4. Edery, P., Eng, C., Munnich, A., and Lyonnet, S. (1997) BioEssays 19, 389-394
5. Goodfellow, P. J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 446-452
6. Asai, N., Iwashita, T., Matsuyama, M., and Takahashi, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1613-1619
7. Borrello, M. G., Smith, D. P., Pasini, B., Bongarzone, I., Greco, A., Lorenzo, M. J., Arighi, E., Miranda, C., Eng, C., Alberti, L., Bocciardi, R., Mondellini, P., Scopsi, L., Romeo, G., Ponder, B. A. J., and Pierotti, M. A. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2419-2417
8. Santoro, M., Carlomagno, F., Romano, A., Bottaro, D. P., Dathan, N. A., Grieco, M., Fusco, A., Vecchio, G., Matostokova, B., Kraus, M. H., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1995) Science 267, 381-383
9. Smith, D. P., Eng, C., and Ponder, B. A. J. (1994) J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 18, 43-49
10. Michielis, F. M., Chappuis, S., Callou, B., Pasini, A., Talbot, M., Monier, R., Lenoir, G. M., Feunteun, J., and Billaud, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3330-3335
11. Kazlauskas, A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 5-14
12. Hagag, N., Halegoua, S., and Viola, M. (1986) Nature 319, 680-682
13. D' Arcangelo, G., and Halegoua, S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3146-3155
14. Califano, D., Monaco, C., De Vita, G., D'Alessio, A., Dathan, N. A., Possenti, R., Vecchio, G., Fusco, A., Santoro, M., and de Franciscis, V. (1995) Oncogene 11, 107-112
15. Rossel, M., Pasini, A., Chappuis, S., Geneste, O., Fournier, L., Schuffenecker, I., Takahashi, M., van Grunsven, L. A., Urdiales, J. L., Rudkin, B. B., Lenoir, G. M., and Billaud, M. (1997) Oncogene 14, 265-275
16. D'Alessio, A., De Vita, G., Cali, G., Nitsch, L., Fusco, A., Vecchio, G., Santelli, G., Santoro, M., and de Franciscis, V. (1995) Cell Growth Diff. 6, 1387-1394
17. Rizzo, C., Califano, D., Colucci-D'Amato, G. L., De Vita, G., D'Alessio, A., Dathan, N. A., Fusco, A., Monaco, C., Santelli, G., Vecchio, G., Santoro, M., and de Franciscis, V. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29497-29501
18. Liu, X., Vega, Q. C., Decker, R. A., Pandey, A., Worby, C. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5309-5312
19. Bocciardi, R., Mograbi, B., Pasini, B., Borrello, M. G., Pierotti, M. A., Bourget, I., Fischer, S., Romeo, G., and Rossi, B. (1997) Oncogene 15, 2257-2265
20. Bongarzone, I., Vigano, E., Alberti, L., Borrello, M. G., Pasini, B., Greco, A., Mondellini, P., Smith, D. P., Ponder, B. A., Romeo, G., and Pierotti, M. A. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2295-2301
21. Tahira, T., Ishizaka, Y., Itoh, F., Sugimura, T., and Nagao, M. (1990) Oncogene 5, 97-102
22. van Weering, D. H., Medema, J. P., van Puijenbroek, A., Burgering, B. M., Baas, P. D., and Bos, J. L. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2207-2214
23. Asai, N., Murakami, H., Iwashita, M., and Takahashi, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17644-17649
24. Arighi, E., Alberti, L., Torriti, F., Ghizzoni, S., Rizzetti, M. G, Pelicci, G., Pasini, B., Bongarzone, I., Piutti, C., Pierotti, M. A., and Borrello, M. G. (1997) Oncogene 14, 773-782
25. Lorenzo, J. M., Gisch, G. D., Houghton, C., Stonehouse, T. J., Pawson, T., Ponder, B. A. J., and Smith, D. P. (1997) Oncogene 14, 763-771
26. Pawsons, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Science 278, 2075-2080
27. Rabin, S. J., Cleghon, V., and Kaplan, D. R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2203-2213
28. Wang, J. K., Xu, H., Li, H. C., and Goldfarb, M. (1996) Oncogene 13, 721-729
29. Kouhara, H., Hadari, Y. R., Spivak-Kroizman, T., Shilling, J., Bar-Sagi, D., Lax, I., and Schlessinger, J. (1997) Cell 89, 693-702
30. Califano, D., D'Alessio, A., Colucci-D'Amato, G. L., De Vita, G., Monaco, C., Santelli, G., Di Fiore, P. P., Vecchio, G., Fusco, A., Santoro, M., and de Franciscis, V. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7933-7937
31. Feig, L. A., and Cooper, G. M. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2472-2478
32. Possenti, R., Di Rocco, G., Nasi, S., and Levi, A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3815-3819
33. Segal, R. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 463-489
34. Siegel, P. M., and Muller, W. J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8878-8883
35. Szeberenyi, J., Cai, H., and Cooper, G. M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 5324-5332
36. Klesse, L. J., Meyers, K. A., Marshall, C. J., and Parada, L. F. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2055-2068
37. Vossler, M. R., Yao, H., York, R. D., Pan, M. G., Rim, C. S., and Stork, P. J. (1997) Cell 89, 73-82
38. Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185
39. Chiariello, M., Visconti, R., Carlomagno, F., Melillo, R. M., Bucci, C., de Franciscis, V., Fox, G. M., Jing, S., Coso, O., Gutkind, J. S., Fusco, A., and Santoro, M. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2435-2445
40. van Weering, D. H., de Rooij, J., Marte, B., Downward, J., Bos, J. L., and Burgering, B. M. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1802-1811
41. Colucci-D'Amato, G. L., D'Alessio, A., Califano, D., Calì, G., Rizzo, C., Nitsch, L., Santelli, G., and de Franciscis, V. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19306-19314


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. D. Read, P. J. Goodfellow, E. R. Mardis, N. Novak, J. R. Armstrong, and R. L. Cagan
A Drosophila Model of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1057 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
H. Volk, H. Potschka, and W. Loscher
Immunohistochemical Localization of P-glycoprotein in Rat Brain and Detection of Its Increased Expression by Seizures Are Sensitive to Fixation and Staining Variables
J. Histochem. Cytochem., April 1, 2005; 53(4): 517 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Myers and L. M. Mulligan
The RET Receptor Is Linked to Stress Response Pathways
Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 64(13): 4453 - 4463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
V Vasko, M Saji, E Hardy, M Kruhlak, A Larin, V Savchenko, M Miyakawa, O Isozaki, H Murakami, T Tsushima, et al.
Akt activation and localisation correlate with tumour invasion and oncogene expression in thyroid cancer
J. Med. Genet., March 1, 2004; 41(3): 161 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. D'Alessio, D. Califano, M. Incoronato, G. Santelli, T. Florio, G. Schettini, M. S. Carlomagno, L. Cerchia, and V. de Franciscis
The Tyrosine Phosphatase Shp-2 Mediates Intracellular Signaling Initiated by Ret Mutants
Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4298 - 4305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. C. Specht, O. N. Tucker, M. Hocever, D. Gonzalez, L. Teng, and T. J. Fahey III
Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Thyroid Nodules
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 358 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
J. R Hansford and L. M Mulligan
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and RET: from neoplasia to neurogenesis
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2000; 37(11): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. L. Colucci-D'Amato, A. D'Alessio, D. Califano, G. Cali, C. Rizzo, L. Nitsch, G. Santelli, and V. de Franciscis
Abrogation of Nerve Growth Factor-induced Terminal Differentiation by ret Oncogene Involves Perturbation of Nuclear Translocation of ERK
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2000; 275(25): 19306 - 19314.
[Abstract]