![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 19422-19427, June 23, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90048
Received for publication, December 20, 1999, and in revised form, April 6, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pituitary tumor-transforming gene
(PTTG) is a recently characterized oncogene whose
expression product contains a transcriptional activation domain at the
C terminus. To understand the mechanisms involved in PTTG biological
functions, we used yeast two-hybrid screening to identify proteins that
interact with PTTG. This study reports the isolation and
characterization of a novel PTTG-binding factor (PBF). PBF contains an
open reading frame of 179 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass
of 22 kDa. In Northern blot analyses, PBF mRNA was ubiquitously
expressed in human tissues. Glutathione S-transferase
pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that PBF
interacts specifically with PTTG under both in vitro and
in vivo conditions. The PTTG binding domain in PBF was
located within the C-terminal 30-amino acid region that contain a
nuclear localization signal. Immunofluorescence and subcellular
fractionation studies showed that PTTG is predominantly expressed in
the cytoplasm with partial nuclear localization, whereas PBF is
localized both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The interaction
between PBF and PTTG facilitated PTTG translocation from the cytoplasm
to the nucleus. Furthermore, PBF is required for transcriptional
activation of basic fibroblast growth factor by PTTG. In summary, we
have characterized a novel PTTG-binding protein that facilitates PTTG
nuclear translocation and potentiates its transcriptional activation function.
Pituitary tumor-transforming gene
(PTTG)1 was
isolated by its differential mRNA expression in rat pituitary tumor
cells (1). Overexpression of PTTG induces cell
transformation and generates tumors in nude mice (1). Several human
PTTG homologues have since been cloned (2-5). High level
expression of PTTG mRNA in multiple types of tumors as well as in
carcinoma cell lines (2-7) suggests that PTTG may be involved in
tumorigenesis of many tissues in addition to the pituitary. In normal
adult tissues, PTTG mRNA expression is restricted to a small number
of tissues, including testis, thymus, and placenta (1-3).
The mechanisms involved in PTTG biological function are largely
unknown. To elucidate the biological function of PTTG, we have used a
yeast two-hybrid system to identify proteins that associate with PTTG
(8). This report shows that the ribosomal protein S10 and a novel human
homologue of the bacterial heat-shock protein, DnaJ (HSJ2), interact
specifically with PTTG under both in vitro and in
vivo conditions (8). Association of PTTG with these proteins
indicates that PTTG may link to the ribosome and is involved in the
regulation of translation (8). In addition, during the rat
spermatogenic cycle, PTTG mRNA is expressed stage specifically in
only spermatocytes and spermatids, suggesting that PTTG may play a role
in rat spermatogenesis (8). The C-terminal portion of human PTTG was
shown to function as a transcriptional activator when fused to a
heterologous DNA binding domain (2). In NIH3T3 cells that overexpress
PTTG, increased expression of bFGF mRNA and protein was observed
(3). A recent study demonstrates that PTTG is a sister chromatid
separation inhibitor, and degradation of PTTG is required for proper
sister chromatid separation during the cell cycle (9). These
observations suggest that PTTG is a multifunctional protein that can
exert its effect both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus.
We now report the cloning and the characterization of a novel protein
encoding a PTTG-binding factor, PBF. We have used both in
vitro binding and immunoprecipitation assays to demonstrate that
PBF interacts specifically with PTTG. With deletion analyses, we have
located the regions that are required for PBF and PTTG binding to the C
terminus of both proteins. We have determined the subcellular
localization of PTTG and PBF and showed that co-expression of PBF
increased PTTG nuclear staining. Furthermore, we have shown that PBF is
required for activation of bFGF transcription by PTTG.
Cell Lines and Transfection--
COS-7 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum. Transient transfections were performed using the
calcium phosphate precipitation method as described previously
(10).
Dot Blot and Northern Blot Analyses--
Human RNA master blot
and multiple tissue Northern blots were purchased from
CLONTECH, and the blots were probed with human Plasmids--
The full-length cDNA encoding PBF with the
hemagglutinin (HA) epitope from pACT2 was cloned into the
BamHI site of the eukaryotic expression vector pBK-CMV
(Stratagene) to obtain HA-tagged PBF (HA·PBF). The ExSite polymerase
chain reaction-based site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was
used to construct the PBF nuclear localization signal (NLS) deletion
mutant (HA·PBF
The PBF N-terminal and C-terminal deletion mutants (N45, N90, N148, and
C30) were generated from pACT2-PBF-wt using the ExSite polymerase chain
reaction-based site-directed mutagenesis kit following the
manufacturer's instructions (Stratagene). PTTG deletion mutants
(mut(1-5)) were described previously (8).
The PTTG-green fluorescent fusion protein was obtained by subcloning
the coding region of PTTG into the BglII and
HindIII sites of pEGFP-C1 (CLONTECH) to
obtain GFP·PTTG. The plasmid pLuc-bFGF containing the bFGF
promoter ( In Vitro Transcription/Translation of PBF--
PBF cDNA was
subcloned into the pBK-CMV vector (Stratagene) and used as the DNA
template for the production of PBF protein. The in vitro
transcription/translation reactions were performed using the
TNT®-coupled reticulocyte lysate system with
T3 RNA polymerase and biotinylated lysine-tRNA (Promega). The reactions
were carried out according to manufacturer's protocols.
Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Protein Pull-down
Assays--
The PTTG·GST fusion protein construct was described
previously (8). Expression of the fusion protein was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl- Immunoprecipitation--
Transfected cells were lysed with 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 5 mM EDTA, 300 mM
NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40 in the
presence of the protease inhibitors, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 µg/ml each of leupeptin,
pepstatin, and aprotinin. The cell lysate was incubated with
anti-X-press antibody (Invitrogen) at 4 °C for 2 h.
Immunoprecipitated complexes were bound to protein A/G-Sepharose at
4 °C. The beads were washed four times in lysis buffer, and then
proteins were eluted in sample buffer and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE.
After electroblotting, the membranes were incubated with anti-HA
antibody and visualized by ECL.
Yeast Two-hybrid Interaction and Colony Lift Filter
Assays--
These assays were performed as described previously
(8).
Fluorescence Microscopy--
Cells transfected with GFP·PTTG
only were fixed 24-48 h post-transfection with 2% neutral buffered
formaldehyde (2% formaldehyde, 20 mM NaPO4, pH
7.4) in Hanks' balanced salt solution for 15 min at 37 °C, washed
with phosphate-buffered saline three times, and examined under a
fluorescent microscope. Cells transfected with HA·PBF or
HA·PBF Subcellular Fractionation--
The nuclear and cytosol fractions
were prepared using the method described by Dignam et al.
(12) from COS-7 cells transfected with PTTG, PBF, or both expression
plasmids. The samples were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE. After
electroblotting, the membranes were incubated with various antibodies
and analyzed by ECL. The antibodies include a monoclonal antibody
against hnRNP (diluted 1:1000) and a polyclonal antibody against Raf1
at a dilution of 1:200 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Luciferase Assays--
Luciferase assays were performed as
described previously (6).
Cloning of a cDNA Encoding PBF--
Using the yeast two-hybrid
screen with rat PTTG as bait, several positive clones were isolated
from a human testis cDNA library (8). One cDNA of 2790 bp has a
canonical initiation codon at nucleotide 229 and a 3'-untranslated
region of 2025 bp (Fig. 1A). This cDNA, designated as PBF, contains an open reading frame of 179 amino acids (Fig. 1A) with a predicted molecular mass of 22 kDa and a pI of 10.57.
Homology searches against the EBI and GenBankTM data bases reveal that
the PBF amino acid sequence has 92% identity to a previously characterized cDNA termed C21orf3 (13) (Fig. 1B). The
C21orf3 gene was mapped to chromosome 21q22.3 where several
hereditary disorders have been linked (14, 15). Nucleotide sequence
comparisons against the expressed sequence tag (EST) database
identified more than 100 human ESTs derived from lung, uterus, heart,
testis, bone marrow, pancreas, spleen, melanocytes, and neurons.
Identity matches were also found with human ESTs corresponding to
cDNAs overexpressed in colon carcinomas, Wilms' tumor, and
parathyroid tumors. Several mouse ESTs showed more than 80% identity
to PBF and probably represent the murine homologue of PBF.
Analysis of protein sequence using the PROSITE data base of protein
sites and patterns revealed putative phosphorylation sites for cyclic
AMP- and GMP-dependent protein kinase, protein kinase C,
and casein kinase II (Fig. 1A). Five potential glycosylation sites for N-linked and O-linked oligosaccharides
were found. Prediction of sorting signals and cellular localization for
PBF was performed using the PSORT program. A cleavable N-terminal
signal was identified between amino acids 31 and 32. A potential
nuclear localization signal sequence was identified at the C terminus
(Fig. 1A).
Tissue Distribution of Human PBF--
The tissue distribution of
PBF mRNA was determined using a human RNA master blot. The results
show that PBF mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in all the tissues
analyzed, with the highest level of expression detected in placenta
(data not shown). To determine the transcript size of the PBF mRNA,
Northern blot analysis was performed on selected tissues. As shown in
Fig. 2, a unique transcript of 2.8 kilobases was observed (Fig. 2, upper panel). The transcript size on the Northern blot suggests that the PBF cDNA clone (2790 bp) is likely to be full length. The membrane was also probed with the
actin control to confirm mRNA integrity as well as loading efficiency (Fig. 2, lower panel).
In Vitro Interaction between PBF and PTTG--
To test the binding
specificity of PBF to PTTG, the ability of in vitro
transcribed and translated PBF to bind bacteria-expressed PTTG was
examined. PBF was retained on Sepharose beads only in the presence of
GST·PTTG (Fig. 3, lane 2),
whereas no protein was retained when GST alone was added (Fig. 3,
lane 1). These results demonstrate that PBF specifically
binds PTTG in vitro.
PBF and PTTG Interact via C-terminal Regions of Both
Proteins--
To determine the regions of PBF involved in interaction
with PTTG, PBF deletion mutants fused to the yeast Gal4 activation domain vector were constructed (Fig.
4A). These fusion plasmids were used to cotransform yeast with the hybrid plasmid containing PTTG
and the Gal4 DNA binding domain. The interaction between PBF deletion
mutants and PTTG was monitored by the expression of HIS3 and
lacZ reporter genes, which were monitored by growth on
histidine-deficient medium and production of
To determine the region of PTTG involved in interaction with PBF, PTTG
N-terminal deletion mutants constructed in the Gal4 DNA binding domain
vector (8) and PBF constructed in the Gal4 activation domain vector
were used in the similar yeast two-hybrid assays. No change in the
interaction between PBF and PTTG was detected when the N-terminal
123-amino acid deletion mutant (PTTG mut4) was used (Fig.
4B). The PBF/PTTG interaction was completely abrogated only
when the N-terminal 154 amino acids were deleted (PTTG mut5). These
results suggest that the region between amino acids 123 and 154 of PTTG
is essential for interaction with PBF.
Interaction of PBF and PTTG in Vivo--
To determine whether PBF
and PTTG associate with each other in mammalian cells, we transiently
cotransfected COS-7 cells with HA-tagged PBF (wild type and C-terminal
30-amino acid deletion mutant) and His-tagged PTTG expression plasmids.
Total lysates were subjected to Western blot analyses to confirm the
expression of individual protein in the transfected cells (Fig.
5, A and B). The
lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-His antibody, and the bound
protein was detected by Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody.
As shown in Fig. 5, anti-HA antibody detected a band in lysates from
cells cotransfected with the wild type PBF and PTTG expression
plasmids, whereas no band was detected in lysates from cells
cotransfected with PTTG and the C-terminal deletion mutant of PBF (Fig.
5, C). This is consistent with the results from the yeast
two-hybrid assays above in which the C-terminal 30-amino acid domain
was shown to be required for PBF binding to PTTG. The results suggest
that PBF interacts specifically with PTTG in mammalian cells via the 30 amino acids at the C terminus.
Subcellular Localization of PBF--
PBF contains a bipartite
nuclear localization signal between amino acids 149 and 166 at the C
terminus. To test whether this potential NLS has any effect on PBF
subcellular localization, the HA-tagged PBF constructs containing
either a full-length PBF (HA·PBF) or a deletion mutant lacking the
NLS sequence (HA·PBF PBF Facilitates PTTG Nuclear Translocation--
To characterize
the biological significance of the interaction between PBF and PTTG,
both proteins were transfected into COS-7 cells, and the subcellular
localization was examined. Initially COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with GFP·PTTG only. Expression of GFP·PTTG was
predominantly observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7A) with partial nuclear
localization. When COS-7 cells were cotransfected with both GFP·PTTG
and HA·PBF, most of the GFP·PTTG expression was now localized to
the nucleus (Fig. 7B). Our deletion studies using yeast
two-hybrid assays showed that the C-terminal 30-amino acid domain
including the nuclear localization signal is required for PBF binding
to PTTG. We then tested whether the NLS deletion construct of PBF was
still able to promote PTTG nuclear accumulation. As shown in Fig.
7C, in cells cotransfected with GFP·PTTG and HA·PBF
The relative nuclear versus cytoplasmic distribution of PBF
and PTTG was also examined by subcellular fractionation. Nuclear or
cytoplasmic fractions were prepared from transfected cells. The purity
of the fractions was verified by probing the membrane with the nuclear
(anti-hnRNP) or cytoplasmic (anti-Raf1) protein specific antibody. As
shown in Fig. 8, in cells transfected
with PTTG alone the majority of the PTTG was detected in the cytoplasm. In contrast, in cells cotransfected with PBF and PTTG expression plasmids, there was a dramatic increase in the immune activity of PTTG
in the nuclear fraction (Fig. 8). Quantitation of the immunoblot showed
that the amount of PTTG present in the nucleus increased from less than
15% to more than 70% after coexpression with PBF (not shown). These
results indicate that the interaction between PBF and PTTG facilitates
PTTG translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and the nuclear
localization signal of PBF is required for PTTG nuclear
translocation.
PBF Is Required for PTTG Activation of bFGF Transcription--
To
further explore the functional implication of PBF/PTTG interaction, we
tested whether PBF affects the function of PTTG as a transcriptional
activator. Previously it had been demonstrated that bFGF expression was
induced in NIH3T3 cells that overexpress PTTG (3). To test whether PTTG
was capable of activating bFGF transcription, COS-7 cells
were transiently transfected with bFGF promoter linked to
luciferase together with the PTTG expression plasmid. As shown in Fig.
9, transfection of PTTG expression vector alone had little effect on luciferase activity of the bFGF
reporter gene. Similarly, transfection of PBF expression vector alone
did not change the reporter gene activity (Fig. 9). However, when PTTG
and PBF were coexpressed, the luciferase activity of the reporter gene
was induced more than 3-fold. These results suggest that PBF is
required for PTTG activation of bFGF transcription.
In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a
novel PTTG-binding factor. PBF shares its highest sequence homology
with a previously isolated cDNA, C21orf3 (13). Although the
C21orf3 gene has been mapped to chromosome 21q22.3, where several hereditary disorders have been linked (14, 15), the functions
of the C21orf3 gene product have not been characterized. The
PBF mRNA tissue distribution pattern is similar to that of C21orf3,
which is also ubiquitously expressed.
We have used biochemical and immunological methods to show that PBF can
form a complex with PTTG under both in vitro and in vivo conditions and that this interaction requires the C-terminal portion of both proteins. The sequence required for PTTG to interact with PBF was located within the C-terminal 75-amino acid domain. This
result agrees with the previous study in which the interactive domain
of PTTG with S10 and HSJ2 proteins was mapped to the same region (8).
Several motifs that are known to mediate protein-protein interactions
are present in this region, including a leucine-zipper motif (16)
between amino acids 169 and 190, as well as two putative SH3 (17)
domains at amino acids 169 and 176. The functional significance of
these motifs in mediating interaction of PTTG with other proteins is
currently being investigated. Our results also showed that the
C-terminal 30 amino acids of PBF are both necessary and sufficient to
mediate its interaction with PTTG.
PBF contains a bipartite NLS between amino acids 149 and 166. Proteins
entering the nucleus are directed by NLS sequences that are present in
nuclear proteins (18). The NLS sequences are recognized by specific
cytosolic proteins that help to direct the nuclear protein to the
nuclear pore complex and its translocation through the nuclear envelope
(19-21). The NLS is generally either a short basic region of 4-8
amino acids or a bipartite basic sequence separated by 4-15 amino
acids (22-24). Our results show that PBF is predominantly localized to
the nucleus and that deletion of the NLS sequence abolished PBF nuclear
localization. This indicates that the NLS sequence is required for PBF
nuclear localization as well as interaction with PTTG.
PTTG does not contain a consensus NLS sequence, and our indirect
immunofluorescence and subcellular fractionation studies show that PTTG
exhibits a predominantly cytoplasmic localization. This result is in
agreement with results from a previous study indicating that human PTTG
is mainly expressed in the cytoplasm (2). However, coexpression of both
PBF and PTTG in the same cells resulted in translocation of PTTG from
the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Our studies indicate that nuclear
translocation of PTTG requires the presence of the NLS of PBF because
coexpression of a PBF mutant that lacks its NLS was unable to bind PTTG
and failed to promote PTTG nuclear accumulation. These results suggest that one of the functions of PBF is to bind PTTG and direct it into the
nucleus. This function of PBF is reminiscent of the function of HCF, a
cellular factor involved in herpes simplex virus immediate-early gene
induction (25, 26). HCF is part of a multicomponent protein complex
containing VP16 and Oct-1 (25, 26). A recent study showed that nuclear
trafficking of VP16 is HCF-dependent (27). Like PTTG, VP16
itself does not contain a consensus NLS and is localized predominantly
in the cytoplasm. It was shown that coexpression with HCF resulted in
VP16 nuclear translocation and that the NLS within the C terminus of
HCF was required for this function (27).
It has been shown that the C-terminal portion of human PTTG has
transcriptional activation activity when fused to a heterologous DNA
binding domain (2). For PTTG to function as a transcriptional activator, the presence of PTTG in the nucleus is required. Our results
show that transcriptional activation of the bFGF gene requires the presence of both PTTG and PBF. These results suggest that
PBF potentiates the PTTG transactivation function by facilitating its
nuclear translocation. Another common mechanism that affects the
subcellular distribution and functions of a protein is phosphorylation. One such example is the family of transcription factors called STAT
proteins (signal transducers and activators of transcription). STAT
proteins are involved in the initiation of gene expression by many
cytokines and cell growth factors. Upon activation by tyrosine
phosphorylation through the cytoplasmic domain of stimulated receptors,
the phosphorylated STAT proteins dimerize and are translocated to the
nucleus for transcriptional activation by binding to specific recognition sites (28). There are several potential phosphorylation sites for different kinases on both PBF and PTTG, and the effects of
phosphorylation on the subcellular distribution and functions of these
proteins are currently being investigated.
In summary, this work provides biochemical and functional evidence that
PBF binds PTTG directly and is able to promote PTTG nuclear
translocation and its transcriptional activation activity. Interaction
between PBF and PTTG and the subsequent nuclear translocation of PTTG
suggest a potential mechanism by which PTTG might function as a
transcriptional activator.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin or PBF cDNA probe according to manufacturer's instructions.
NLS) in which the putative NLS sequence (amino acids
149-166) was deleted. The primers used were primer 1, 5'-TGTTTTAAAGAAGAAAACCCGTATGCTA-3' and primer 2, 5'-CCTCCTGCCGTATCCGCCTCTCCT-3'.
1,058/+54 bp) was fused upstream of the luciferase reporter
gene (11).
-thiogalactopyranoside at 37 °C for 90 min. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in sonication buffer (150 mM KCl, 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.5 mM
EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin), and lysed by
sonication. The bacterial cell lysate containing GST fusion proteins
was incubated at room temperature for 30 min with
glutathione-Sepharose-4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The beads
were washed three times with the sonication buffer and incubated with
20 µl of in vitro translated PBF at 4 °C for 2 h.
The beads were then washed extensively, boiled in 2× SDS-loading
buffer, and loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After
electroblotting, the blot was incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase, washed, and detected by chemiluminescence.
NLS, or cotransfected with GFP·PTTG and HA·PBF or
GFP·PTTG and HA·PBF
NLS were fixed and blocked with 1% fetal calf serum in phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were then incubated at
37 °C with 1:100 anti-HA antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for
1 h and with 1:10 anti-mouse IG-rhodamine (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 1 h at 37 °C, with three phosphate-buffered saline washes after each incubation. Slides were examined with fluorescence microscopy. The fluorescence data are based on multiple transfection experiments.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignment and structural features of
PBF. A, PBF nucleotide and amino acid sequence. The
deduced amino acid sequence of PBF is shown below the cDNA
sequence. The nucleotide and amino acid numbers are labeled to the
left of each lane. Phosphorylation sites for
protein kinase C, cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinases,
and casein kinase II are underlined. The potential nuclear
localization signal is shaded. B, amino acid
sequence alignment of PBF and C21orf3. A BESTFIT comparison is shown.
The identical amino acid residues between the two proteins are
shaded.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Tissue distribution and transcript size of
PBF mRNA. Poly(A+) RNA from indicated human adult
tissues were probed with a PBF cDNA probe. The 2.8-kilobase PBF
transcript is indicated by an arrow. The blot was also
probed with human actin cDNA to ensure equal loading of RNA on each
lane.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In vitro interaction between PBF
and PTTG. In vitro transcribed and translated PBF
(input) was incubated with glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST
(lane 1) or GST·PTTG fusion protein (lane 2).
The bound proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE, blotted, and
visualized by ECL.
-galactosidase, respectively. Deletion of 148 amino acids from the N terminus (N45,
N90, and N148) had no effect on PBF/PTTG interaction (Fig. 4B). However, deletion of the 30 amino acids from the C
terminus (C30) abolished interaction between PBF and PTTG (Fig.
4B). These results suggest that the 30 amino acids that
include the nuclear localization signal in the C terminus of PBF are
necessary and sufficient for PBF binding to PTTG.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Identification of PBF/PTTG interactive
domains. A, schematic diagram of Gal4 activation domain
(Gal AD) and PBF deletion fusion constructs. B,
interaction between various deletion mutants of PBF and PTTG in the
yeast two-hybrid system. Yeast cells (GC1945) were cotransformed with
the indicated pair of fusion constructs. Colonies grown on the
selective medium were tested for
-galactosidase activity by colony
lift filter assay. wt, wild type; GAD, Gal4
activation domain; GBD, Gal4 binding domain.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
In vivo association of PBF and
PTTG. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated
plasmids. A and B, Western blot analysis using
anti-HA (A) and anti-His (B) monoclonal
antibodies. C, immunoprecipitation (IP) of cell
lysates prepared from transfectants with anti-His monoclonal antibody.
The immunocomplexes were separated on SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed
with anti-HA monoclonal antibody.
NLS) were transfected into COS-7 cells. As
shown in Fig. 6A, HA·PBF was
mainly expressed in the nucleus, but there was also significant expression in the cytoplasm. In contrast, the NLS deletion mutant, HA·PBF
NLS, yielded a predominantly perinuclear and cytoplasmic staining pattern (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that NLS
is required for PBF localization to the nucleus.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Subcellular localization of PBF. COS-7
cells were transfected with HA·PBF (A) or HA·PBF
NLS
(B). 24-48 h after transfection cells were fixed. HA-tagged
proteins were detected with anti-HA monoclonal antibody and a
rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody.
NLS, the expression of GFP·PTTG remained mainly in the cytoplasm, indicating that PBF lacking the NLS can no longer bring PTTG
into the nucleus.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Nuclear translocation of PTTG by PBF.
COS-7 cells were transfected with GFP·PTTG (A), GFP·PTTG
and HA·PBF (B), or GFP·PTTG and HA·PBF
NLS
(C). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were fixed.
GFP·PTTG was detected by green fluorescence.

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Subcellular localization of PTTG and
PBF. The nuclear and cytosol fractions were prepared as described
under "Materials and Methods." The purity of the fractions was
verified using anti-Raf1 (cytosol) and anti-hnRNP (nuclear) antibodies.
GFP·PTTG was detected by anti-GFP antibody. HA·PBF protein was
detected with anti-HA antibody. The plasmids used for transfection are
indicated on the top of the panels. C,
cytosol; N, nuclear fraction.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
PBF is required for transcriptional
activation of bFGF by PTTG. COS-7 cells were transiently
cotransfected with pCMV-PTTG or pCMV-PBF, either alone or together, and
a reporter plasmid containing
1054 bp of the bFGF promoter sequence
fused to the reporter gene luciferase construct (bFGF-LUC). Forty-eight
hours after transfection, cell extracts were assayed for luciferase
activity that is represented as relative light units.
Bars indicate the mean of three independent
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Peter A. Cattini and Dr. G. Dreyfuss for providing the bFGF-luc plasmid and anti-hnRNP antibody, respectively.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-02346 and DK-56608 (to L. P.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF149785.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., D2019, Los Angeles, CA 90048. Tel.: 310-423-7682; Fax: 815-352-6253; E-mail: pei@cshs.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910105199
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PTTG, pituitary tumor-transforming gene; PBF, PTTG-binding factor; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; HA, hemagglutinin; NLS, nuclear localization signal; GFP, green fluorescent protein; bp, base pairs; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase; hnRNP, heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; EST, expressed sequence tag; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; HCF, host cell factor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Pei, L., and Melmed, S. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 433-441 |
| 2. | Dominguez, A., Ramos-Morales, F., Romero, F., Rios, R. M., Dreyfus, F., Tortolero, M., and Pintor-Toro, J. A. (1998) Oncogene 17, 2187-2193 |
| 3. | Zhang, X., Horwitz, G. A., Prezant, T. R., Valentinin, A., Nakashima, M., Bronstein, M. D., and Melmed, S. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 156-166 |
| 4. | Lee, I. A., Seong, C., and Choe, I. S. (1999) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 47, 891-897 |
| 5. | Kakar, S. S. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 240, 317-324 |
| 6. | Pei, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5219-5225 |
| 7. | Saez, C., Japon, M. A., Ramos-Morales, F., Romero, F., Segura, D. I., Tortolero, M., and Pintor-Toro, J. A. (1999) Oncogene 18, 5473-5476 |
| 8. | Pei, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3151-3158 |
| 9. | Zou, H., McGarry, T. J., Bernal, T., and Kirschner, M. W. (1999) Science 285, 418-422 |
| 10. | Graham, F. L., and van der Eb, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467 |
| 11. | Pasumarthi, K. B. S., Jin, Y., and Cattini, P. A. (1997) J. Neurochem. 68, 898-908 |
| 12. | Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1489 |
| 13. | Yaspo, M. L., Aaltonen, J., Horelli-Kuitunen, N., Peltonen, L., and Lehrach, H. (1998) Genomics 49, 133-136 |
| 14. | Aita, U. M., Liu, J., Knowles, J. A., Terwilliger, J. D., Baltazar, R., and Grunna, A. (1999) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 210-217 |
| 15. | Sinet, P. M., Theophile, D., Rahmani, Z., Chettouh, Z., Blouin, J. L., Prieur, M., Noel, B., and Delebar, J. M. (1994) Biomed. Pharmacother. 48, 247-252 |
| 16. | Landschulz, W. H., Johnson, P. F., and McKnight, S. L. (1988) Science 240, 1759-1764 |
| 17. | Koch, C. A., Anderson, D., Moran, M. F., Ellis, C., and Pawson, T. (1991) Science 252, 668-674 |
| 18. | Dingwall, C., and Laskey, R. A. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 478-481 |
| 19. | Corbett, A. H., and Silver, P. A. (1997) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 193-211 |
| 20. | Pemberton, L. F., Blobel, G., and Rosenblum, J. S. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 392-399 |
| 21. | Adams, S. A., and Gerace, L. (1991) Cell 66, 837-847 |
| 22. | Kalderon, D., Robers, B. L., Richardson, W. D., and Smith, A. E. (1984) Cell 39, 499-509 |
| 23. | Robbins, J., Dilworth, S. M., Laskey, R. A., and Dingwall, C. (1991) Cell 64, 615-623 |
| 24. | Nigg, E. A. (1997) Nature 386, 779-787 |
| 25. | O'Hare, P. (1993) Semin. Virol. 4, 145-155 |
| 26. | Wilson, A. C., Cleary, M. A., Lai, J. S., LaMarco, K., Peterson, M. G., and Herr, W. (1993) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58, 167-178 |
| 27. | Boissiere, S. L., Hughes, T., and O'Hare, P. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 480-489 |
| 28. | Koster, M., and Hauser, H. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 260, 137-144 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Vlotides, T. Eigler, and S. Melmed Pituitary Tumor-Transforming Gene: Physiology and Implications for Tumorigenesis Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 165 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vlotides, M. Cruz-Soto, T. Rubinek, T. Eigler, C. J. Auernhammer, and S. Melmed Mechanisms for Growth Factor-Induced Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene-1 Expression in Pituitary Folliculostellate TtT/GF Cells Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3321 - 3335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tfelt-Hansen, D. Kanuparthi, and N. Chattopadhyay The emerging role of pituitary tumor transforming gene in tumorigenesis. Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2006; 4(2): 130 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Stratford, K. Boelaert, L. A. Tannahill, D. S. Kim, A. Warfield, M. C. Eggo, N. J. L. Gittoes, L. S. Young, J. A. Franklyn, and C. J. McCabe Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene Binding Factor: A Novel Transforming Gene in Thyroid Tumorigenesis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4341 - 4349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Tsai, S.-J. Lin, Y.-M. Cheng, H.-M. Chen, and L.-Y. C. Wing Expression and Functional Analysis of Pituitary Tumor Transforming Growth Factor-1 in Uterine Leiomyomas J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3715 - 3723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Boelaert, R Yu, L A Tannahill, A L Stratford, F L Khanim, M C Eggo, J S Moore, L S Young, N J L Gittoes, J A Franklyn, et al. PTTG's C-terminal PXXP motifs modulate critical cellular processes in vitro J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 663 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. BOELAERT, L. A. TANNAHILL, J. N. BULMER, S. KACHILELE, S. Y. CHAN, D. KIM, N. J. L. GITTOES, J. A. FRANKLYN, M. D. KILBY, and C. J. MCCABE A potential role for PTTG/securin in the developing human fetal brain FASEB J, September 1, 2003; 17(12): 1631 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. McCabe, K. Boelaert, L. A. Tannahill, A. P. Heaney, A. L. Stratford, J. S. Khaira, S. Hussain, M. C. Sheppard, J. A. Franklyn, and N. J. L. Gittoes Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Its Receptor KDR/Flk-1, and Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene in Pituitary Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4238 - 4244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Borghi, S. Molinari, G. Razzini, F. Parise, R. Battini, and S. Ferrari The nuclear localization domain of the MEF2 family of transcription factors shows member-specific features and mediates the nuclear import of histone deacetylase 4 J. Cell Sci., March 14, 2002; 114(24): 4477 - 4483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pei Activation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Cascade Regulates Pituitary Tumor-transforming Gene Transactivation Function J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2000; 275(40): 31191 - 31198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pei Identification of c-myc as a Down-stream Target for Pituitary Tumor-transforming Gene J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2001; 276(11): 8484 - 8491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |