![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 19469-19474, June 30, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 26, 2000, and in revised form, April 12, 2000
A novel heparin-binding protein was
purified to homogeneity from bovine prepartum mammary gland secretion
using heparin-Sepharose chromatography and reverse-phase high
performance liquid chromatography successively. Structural information
obtained by N-terminal amino acid sequencing of a series of
proteolytically generated peptides permitted the cloning of the
corresponding cDNA. The isolated cDNA was 1170 base pairs long
and consisted of an 83-base pair 5'-untranslated region followed by a
702-base pair coding region and a 385-base pair 3'-untranslated region.
The open reading frame resulted in a protein comprising 234- amino
acid residues, including a signal sequence. Instead of
Lys24 as the predicted N terminus, Edman degradation
of the native protein revealed N-terminal processing at two sites as
follows: a primary site between Arg31-Gly32
and a secondary site between Arg51-Ser52. The
amino acid sequence showed a significant similarity with that of human
(60%) and mouse (53%) fibroblast growth factor-binding protein
(FGF-BP). Accordingly, ligand blotting experiments revealed that bovine
FGF-BP bound FGF-2. The theoretical mass of the protein predicted from
the cDNA sequence is 22.5 kDa. However, the molecular mass of the
purified protein was estimated to 28.6 kDa by mass spectrometry and 36 kDa by electrophoresis. The apparent molecular weight differences are
most likely due to post-transcriptional modifications, shown to involve
N- and O-glycosylation of Asn155
and Ser172, respectively. All 10 cysteine residues in the
protein participated in disulfide bonds, and the pattern was identified
as Cys71-Cys88,
Cys97-Cys130,
Cys106-Cys142,
Cys198-Cys234, and
Cys214-Cys222. As the 10 cysteines of the
three known FGF-BPs are positionally conserved, the disulfide bond
pattern of bovine FGF-BP may be regarded as representative for the
FGF-BP family.
The fibroblast growth factor
(FGF)1 family, with its
prototype members FGF-1 and FGF-2, comprises structurally related
heparin-binding proteins involved in a variety of biological processes
including morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling (1-6).
Signaling by members of the FGF family is dependent upon a
dual-receptor system, consisting of four high affinity tyrosine kinase
receptors, termed fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), and of
low affinity heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) that enhances ligand presentation to the FGFRs (7-9). Despite the ubiquitous presence of
FGFs throughout the body, their interaction with the signal-transducing receptors is tightly controlled. Sequestration of FGF by the heparan sulfate-rich extracellular matrix (ECM) seems to fulfill this role by
inflicting a local differential distribution of FGFs and FGFRs.
Furthermore, the binding and release from ECM seem important as means
of protection and optimizing the biological effect of FGF-2 (10, 11).
Several mechanisms have been proposed for the release of active FGFs
from the ECM reservoir. The classical route is release of the growth
factors upon digestion of HSPG by glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes
or protease activity (9, 13-15). However, recent transfection studies
have revealed the existence of an alternate mode that does not require
matrix degradation but instead involves an FGF-binding protein
(FGF-BP). The heparin-binding protein FGF-BP is distinct from cellular
receptor molecules and binds to FGF-1 and FGF-2 in a non-covalent,
reversible manner. Besides decreasing the affinity or accessibility of
FGF for ECM-HSPGs, FGF-BP has been shown to protect FGF-2 from
degradation and preserves its mitogenic activity (16-20).
In rodents in situ hybridization and Northern analysis have
shown that FGF-BP expression is prominent in skin and intestine during
the perinatal growth (19). The down-regulation of FGF-BP in the adults
is, however, reversed in tumor samples, cell lines derived from
squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and some colon cancers (16, 20, 21).
The involvement of FGF-BP in skin cancer is supported by the findings
that the chemotherapeutic agent all-trans-retinoic acid
reduces FGF-BP expression in SCC xenografts, inhibits their angiogenesis, and leads to a decrease of the tumor growth rate (22,
23). Moreover, FGF-BP mRNA expression is up-regulated by direct
transcriptional mechanisms in phorbol ester-promoted skin cancer (19,
24). The significance of FGF-BP expression in tumors has also been
assessed in vitro and in situ by transfection studies. Overexpression or conversely reduced expression by ribozyme targeting suggests that FGF-BP mobilizes and activates extracellular stored FGF-2 and promotes angiogenesis and growth of xenografted tumors
in mice (16, 17, 19).
Previously, FGF-BP cDNAs from human and mouse have been cloned, and
their predicted open reading frames encode proteins of 234- and
251-amino acid residues, respectively. A comparison of their deduced
amino acid sequences shows 63% similarity, including a conserved
location of all cysteine residues (19, 20). The purified form of FGF-BP
is a 17-kDa heparin-binding protein (HBp17), derived from culture
medium conditioned by the human epidermal carcinoma cell line A431.
HBp17 binding of FGF-1 and FGF-2 can be reversed by heparin, which in
turn binds a cluster of basic amino acids in the C-terminal half of the
molecule (20, 25). Because of its scarcity, very little information is
available regarding structural features of FGF-BP so far.
In bovine mammary gland the growth-promoting activity peaks in the
early stage of the last trimester of gestation. Accordingly, mammary
gland secretion drawn from this period is a rich source of different
growth-promoting substances (26, 27). In the present study, we report
the purification and structural characterization of bovine FGF-BP
recovered from bovine prepartum mammary gland secretion (BPMS). Peptide
mapping, cDNA cloning, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing allowed
disclosure of the primary structure of a member of the FGF-BP family
for the first time.
Miscellaneous--
FGF-1 and FGF-2 (purified from bovine brain)
were from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Trypsin
(L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated),
Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease, and chymotrypsin were all
from Worthington. Reagents used for protein sequencing were purchased
from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) filters were from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA). Proteins were
iodinated with Na125I using chloramine T as the oxidizing
agent. The reaction was stopped with metabisulfite, and the ligands
were desalted on a PD10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Mr markers used were SeeBlue Pre-Stained
standards (NOVEX, San Diego, CA) or SDS molecular weight standard from
Bio-Rad. The amount of purified protein was assayed with a kit provided
by Bio-Rad.
Preparation of Bovine Prepartum Mammary Gland
Secretion--
Bovine prepartum mammary gland secretion (BPMS) was
collected 3-5 weeks before parturition by hand milking. BPMS was
acidified by lowering the pH to 4.6 and centrifuged 30 min at
40,000 × g. The resulting fatty overlayer and the
precipitate material were discharged, and the clear interface was
readjusted to pH 7.4. The processed secretion was transferred to
dialysis tubing (Spectrum, Laguna Hills, CA) and dialyzed overnight at
4 °C against 20 liters of 50 mM
NH4HCO3, pH 8.1.
Purification of the FGF-BP--
300 ml of BPMS dialysate was
batch-incubated for 2 h with 400 ml of heparin-agarose (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated in 50 mM
NH4HCO3, pH 8.1. The heparin-agarose was
extensively washed with 50 mM
NH4HCO3 and packed on a column (diameter 50 mm). The column was developed with a linear gradient of 50 mM to 1.5 M NH4HCO3 at
4 °C with a flow rate of 50 ml/h. The eluate was collected and
aliquots from each fraction were taken before freeze-drying. The
aliquots were subjected to SDS-PAGE and electroblotting following
standard procedures. A selection of consecutive fractions from the
heparin affinity chromatography was dissolved in 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid and passed over a 1-ml Resource RPC column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) equilibrated with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (flow 1 ml/min).
Bound material was eluted using a linear gradient of 0-55% 2-propanol
in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid for the initial 65 min and then with a
55-80% gradient for the following 7 min. Collected fractions were
evaporated under vacuum (Hetrovac, Heto Laboratory Equipment, Denmark).
The fractions were submitted to SDS-PAGE and electroblotting.
N-terminal amino acid sequencing of excised bands of Coomassie-stained
components was carried out using an ABI 477A/120A automated protein
sequencing system (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Santa Clara, CA).
Spectrophotometric scanning of SDS-PAGE was done with a Shimadzu CS-930
dual wavelength scanner.
Peptide Mapping and Analysis--
Purified FGF-BP, either
unmodified or carboxymethylated by standard procedures, was subjected
to proteolytic digestion with trypsin (3 h) or S. aureus V8
protease (18 h) at 37 °C in 50 mM NH4HCO3, pH 8.1, with a protein-to-protease
ratio of 50:1 (w/w). The resulting peptides were purified by
reverse-phase chromatography on a SMART-system equipped with a 2.1 × 100-mm C2/C18 µRPC column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a
linear gradient from 0 to 60% of acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid at 25 °C (flow 0.15 ml/min). Selected tryptic peptides were
subdigested with chymotrypsin (3 h) at 37 °C, and the generated
peptides were purified using the described conditions.
Cystine-containing fractions were selected by amino acid analysis of
aliquots treated with performic acid prior to hydrolysis. N-terminal
amino acid sequences were obtained by sequential Edman degradation as
described above. Carbohydrate composition analysis was carried out
using a Dionex pulsed-electrochemical detector and a polymeric
anion-exchange CarboPac PA1 column (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA) as
described (28). Molecular mass was determined by matrix-assisted laser
desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS)
on a Bruker Biflex mass spectrometer (Bruker-Franzen, Bremen, Germany).
Screening of Mammary Gland cDNA Library--
The amino acid
sequences QPTNYP, KGKFVT, FFTGNP, KNNAYWK, and YXGETWG
obtained from the peptide mapping were used to design the following
degenerated oligonucleotide probes: A,
5'-CA(A/G)CC(A/G/C/T)AC(A/G/C/T)AA(C/T)TA(C/T)CC; B,
5'-AA(A/G)GG(A/G/C/T)AA(A/G)TT(C/T) GT(A/G/C/T)AC; C,
5'-TT(C/T)TT(C/T)AC(A/G/C/T)GG(A/G/C/T)AA(C/T)CC; D, 5'-AA
(A/G)AA(C/T)AA(C/T)GC(A/G/C/T)TA(C/T)TGGAA; and E,
5'-TA(C/T)TG(C/T)TG(C/T)GG(A/G/C/T)GA(A/G)AC(A/G/C/T)TGGGG. The
oligonucleotides were purchased from DNA Technology, Aarhus, Denmark.
All oligonucleotides were [ Ligand Blotting--
Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 16%
Tris-Tricine gels and electroblotted onto PVDF filters using 15 mM Tris, pH 8.3, 120 mM glycerol, 0.03% SDS,
and 20% methanol as transfer buffer. Afterward, the filters were
soaked in blocking solution containing 10 mM Tris buffer,
pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 0.01%
Tween 20 at room temperature for 1 h. PVDF filters were rinsed
with binding solution containing 2.5 mM
NaH2PO4, 124 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl, 1.2 mM, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and then incubated overnight at 4 °C
with 30 pM 125I-FGF-BP (100,000 cpm/ml) (29).
In some experiments 125I-FGF-BP was supplemented with 1.5 µM unlabeled FGF-BP or 10 µg/ml heparin. After washing
in binding buffer, bound ligands were visualized by autoradiography.
Purification of Bovine FGF-BP--
Bovine prepartum mammary gland
secretion collected 3-5 weeks before parturition was centrifuged to
remove debris and subjected to heparin affinity chromatography (Fig.
1A). The bound proteins were
eluted with a linear gradient of ammonium bicarbonate, and aliquots
from each fraction were collected, pooled, and freeze-dried. Proteins
present in each pool were resolved by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to PVDF membrane. Coomassie-stained protein bands were then dissected and subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis. Homology searches based on the retrieved amino acid sequences revealed that the
predominant 83-kDa protein recovered was lactoferrin. Based on
spectrophotometric scanning, we estimated that lactoferrin and
lactoferrin-derived fragments comprised more than 90% of all the
heparin-binding protein isolated from the secretion (Fig. 1C). Among the minor protein components, eluting in the
1.0-1.2 M ammonium bicarbonate interval, was a previously
unidentified protein migrating as a 36-kDa band in SDS-PAGE. The 36-kDa
band resembled the amino acid sequence of FGF-BP as previously deduced from human and mouse cDNA (19, 20). Thus, to purify the putative bovine FGF-BP homolog further, the 36-kDa enriched fractions were pooled, freeze-dried, and processed by reverse-phase HPLC (Fig. 1B). As revealed by SDS-PAGE and confirmed by N-terminal
amino acid sequencing, the 36-kDa protein and its 34-kDa N-terminal truncated derivative coeluted in the peak fraction at approximately 38% solvent B (Fig. 1B). By using a colorimetric assay, we
estimated that about 30 µg of purified FGF-BP were extracted from 300 ml of BPMS.
cDNA Cloning and Sequencing--
To obtain the complete
protein sequence, bovine FGF-BP was cleaved using trypsin, and/or
chymotrypsin, and the amino acid sequences of reverse-phase
HPLC-purified peptides were determined. A bovine mammary gland cDNA
library was screened using degenerated oligonucleotides based on the
amino acid sequence derived from the bovine FGF-BP digests. The
resulting 1170-bp cDNA and its derived amino acid sequence are
shown in Fig. 2. The deduced amino acid
sequence was verified by the finding that all proteolytically generated
peptides analyzed by N-terminal amino acid sequencing were encompassed
in the open reading frame. A putative initiation codon was found at
position 85, representing the first in-frame ATG codon in the 5-prime
region. Two consecutive stop codons commenced from position 787. Assuming the methionine codon to be the initiator, the open reading
frame encodes 234 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of
22,648 Da. Only one potential N-glycosylation site with the
canonical (Asn-X-(Ser/Thr), X
When the whole protein sequence of bovine FGF-BP was submitted to a
data base search, only human and mouse FGF-BP showed close resemblance
(Fig. 3). Similar to the bovine sequence
the open reading frame of human FGF-BP translates to 234 residues (20), and the mouse protein was extended with an additional 17 residues (19).
The amino acid sequence of the bovine protein was 60 and 53% identical
to that of FGF-BP from human and mouse, respectively. Notably, the
positions of all the 10 cysteines present in each of the three proteins
are conserved.
Analysis of Disulfide Bridges--
To localize disulfide bridges
in bovine FGF-BP, the purified protein was cleaved with trypsin, and
the resulting fragments were separated by reverse-phase HPLC. Aliquots
of the eluted peptide fractions were subjected to amino acid analyses,
and retrieved fractions containing cysteine were analyzed by N-terminal
sequencing and MALDI-TOF-MS (Table I).
Sequence analysis revealed the tryptic peptides T6 and T9 to coelute.
Taking into account that both peptides contain only one cysteine, the
finding suggests that T6 and T9 are covalently connected, via a
disulfide bond between Cys71 and Cys88. Mass
spectrometry confirmed this conclusion, as the obtained mass peaks at
m/z 1160.2, 734.8, and 1893.6 agree with the calculated weight of the T6 and T9, and a disulfide-linked complex between the two
peptides. Trypsin digestion also produced a cysteine-containing fraction that comprised T10, T15, and T17+T18. Subdigestion with chymotrypsin followed by reverse-phase HPLC resulted in a chromatogram where T15 (containing Cys130) coeluted with and a new
peptide T10.I containing Cys97. Mass spectroscopy of the
fraction revealed a mass corresponding to the size of T15 linked to
T10.I, demonstrating that Cys97 is bound to
Cys130. The chymotrypsin cleavage also resulted in the
formation of a T10.II peptide, which contained Cys106.
N-terminal sequencing revealed that T10.II coeluted with the tryptic
peptide T17+T18, which includes Cys142. In support of a
disulfide bond between Cys106 and Cys142, the
detection of the molecular mass of 1571.7 Da corresponded well to the
size of a disulfide-linked complex between T10.II and T17+T18. Both
amino acid sequencing and mass spectrometry showed the presence of
T29.I, which originates from a tryptic cleavage following
Lys208 and an intrinsic C-terminal processing between
Phe224 and Phe225. The existence of an internal
disulfide bond between the included Cys214 and
Cys222 was demonstrated by identification of a
di-phenylthiohydantoin-cystine in the 14th cycle of the Edman
degradation of T29.I. This also agrees with the finding that reduction
of T29.I resulted in a mass increase from m/z 1890.7 to
1893.5, corresponding to the reduction of one cystine for two
cysteines. The disulfide bond between Cys198 and
Cys234 was not directly identified but deduced by
elimination. Moreover, the existence of a disulfide bond between
Cys198 and Cys234 explains why the observed
background sequence of T29.II accompanies the N-terminal amino acid
sequence of unreduced bovine FGF-BP (see Fig. 2).
Glycosylation--
Tryptic peptide fragments purified by
reverse-phase HPLC were analyzed for the presence of the amino sugars
GalNAc and GlcNAc. GlcNAc was detected in the tryptic fraction T22,
which contained the only consensus sequence for
N-glycosylation in the binding protein. A carbohydrate
composition analysis of T22 performed by high pH anion-exchange
chromatography showed the presence of GlcNAc, GalNAc, galactose,
mannose, and sialic acid in a molar ratio of 2:1:1:5:1 (results not
shown). In favor of N-glycosylation, amino acid sequencing
of T22 did not detect an asparagine in the third step, and finally,
instead of the calculated 915.1-Da molecular mass of T22, mass
spectrometry revealed a peak at m/z 2790.2 (Table I).
Collectively our results warrant the attachment of a carbohydrate to
Asn155.
In contrast to N-glycosylation, no consensus amino acid
sequence for O-glycosylation exists. However, evidence for
an O-linked glycosylation on Ser172 was found.
Following digestion with S. aureus V8 protease, GalNAc was
observed in a fraction containing the octapeptide
168LMEPSPMD175. Thus, no Ser172 was
detected upon Edman degradation, and the mass spectrum of the
octapeptide showed a peak at m/z 2121.9. Since the
calculated mass of the unmodified peptide was 920.1 Da, this suggests
that the carbohydrate moieties amount to 1201.8 Da.
Binding of Bovine FGF-BP to FGF--
The previously reported
presence of an FGF binding domain within human FGF-BP prompted us to
investigate the binding specificity of bovine FGF-BP. We tested the
ability of FGF-BP to bind FGF-1 and FGF-2, using ligand blotting
analysis. Following electrotransfer of the two growth factors, bovine
serum albumin, and a crude preparation of BPMS to PVDF, the membrane
was probed with radiolabeled bovine FGF-BP.
The analysis revealed
125I-FGF-BP binding affinity towards FGF-2, whereas we
observed no detectable binding to FGF-1 (Fig. 4). As controls, the
bovine serum albumin and crude BPMS did not bind
125I-FGF-BP, and the binding of radiolabeled FGF-BP could
be blocked with an excess of the non-radiolabeled ligand. The binding
activity of FGF-BP toward FGF-2 was not observed in the presence of 10 µg/ml heparin (data not shown).
This paper describes the purification and characterization of a
novel heparin-binding protein secreted from the bovine mammary gland.
Partial amino acid sequences obtained from purified material enabled
isolation of a full-length cDNA from a mammary gland library and
deduction of the amino acid sequence of bovine FGF-BP. The derived
amino acid sequence was confirmed by peptide mapping, covering 74% of
the purified protein. Glycosylation sites and disulfide bridges were
also assigned (Fig. 5).
Inspection of the cDNA sequence predicts that the unprocessed
bovine FGF-BP is 234 residues long, which is equivalent to the human
counterpart. Based on the known structural requirements it is expected
that signal peptidase would cleave between residues 23 and 24 during
the secretion process, resulting in Lys24 at the N
terminus. Nevertheless, the predominant forms of the purified protein
observed in the present study started at Gly32 and
Ser52, respectively. The enzyme responsible for this
processing remains to be elucidated. However, it is noteworthy that a
dibasic sequence is found in the C terminus of the removed peptides
(Arg30-Arg31 and
Lys48-X-X-Arg51),
suggesting that one or more subtilisin-like endopeptidases may be
responsible for the processing (31). A similar phenomenon is seen in
human FGF-BP, where it has been reported that the purified protein
starts with Lys34 (20). However, no dibasic sequence prior
to an eventual processing site is found in the human precursor. Whether
secondary modification of the N-terminal is a common phenomenon linked
to FGF-BPs must await further investigations as well as elucidation of
the proteases involved.
Applied methods for estimating the molecular weight of the isolated
FGF-BP gave different results. Based on the amino acid composition, the
molecular mass of the predominant 203-residue form was calculated to
22,648 Da. Measurement by mass spectrometry estimated the molecular
mass to 28,549 Da, whereas the protein migrates as a 36-kDa protein in
SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The discrepancy in mass between the isolated
protein and the translated cDNA sequence was at least partly due to
post-translational modifications. A search for glycosylation sites
revealed the presence of glycans on Asn155 and
Ser172, resulting in an additional mass of about 3074 Da.
The collected data do not explain the remaining difference between the
calculated and observed molecular weights. However, the apparently
anomalous behavior of the bovine FGF-BP in SDS-polyacrylamide gels is
most likely a result of the basic nature of the protein (estimated pI
is 9.3) and the attached carbohydrate. The literature provides no data
on glycosylation of the other FGF-BPs; however, the bovine N-linked glycosylation site has no counterpart in the
predicted amino acid sequences of human and mouse FGF-BP. Although the
O-glycosylated residue in the bovine protein is conserved in
human and mouse FGF-BP, a prediction of the presence of
O-linked glycosylation in the two proteins is currently not possible.
Contrary to the bovine homolog, human FGF-BP purified from A431
epidermoid carcinoma cells migrates notably faster in SDS-PAGE than the
molecular mass prescribed by its translated cDNA sequence, i.e. 17 versus 22.7 kDa (20). It is
unclear whether the apparent molecular mass of the human FGF-BP
reflected an electrophoretic artifact or is due to the lack of protein
sequence per se. Considering the similarity in overall amino
acid composition, charge, and hydrophobic character between the
predicted human and bovine molecule, the difference in SDS-PAGE
migration pattern is unexpected. Whereas protein sequencing of the
purified bovine protein identifies the predicted C terminus
unambiguously, this is not so for the human counterpart, and the
precise position of its C-terminal is unknown. Hence, our observations
support the notion by Wu and co-workers (20) that the purified form of
human FGF-BP could result from proteolytic C-terminal processing.
Cleavage using a combination of trypsin and chymotrypsin allowed us to
solve the organization of the disulfide bridges for bovine FGF-BP. All
cysteine residues are involved in disulfide bonds, and the pattern is
as follows: Cys71-Cys88,
Cys97-Cys130,
Cys106-Cys142,
Cys198-Cys234, and
Cys214-Cys222. Care was taken to reduce the
probability of disulfide bond shuffling, and indeed no alternate
bonding patterns were identified. No information is available regarding
the three-dimensional structure or the disulfide bridge pattern of
human or mouse FGF-BP, but the finding that all cysteines are
positionally conserved in the three proteins suggests that they are
structurally alike.
The principal heparin-binding site of human FGF-BP purified from
A431-conditioned medium has recently been localized to residues Arg110-Phe143 (25). This sequence does not
include any of the proposed consensus sequences for protein-heparin
interactions (32). However, the high content of basic amino acid
clusters in this region may contribute to the binding specificity.
Similar to its human counterpart, a highly positive net charge
characterizes the region in the bovine FGF-BP homolog (estimated pI
value of the human and bovine fragments are 10.8 and 10.9, respectively).
Previously, direct physical evidence for interaction between FGF-BP and
FGF-2 has been based on chromatographic methods. By using the ligand
blotting technique, we confirmed that FGF-BP has a heparin-sensitive
binding activity toward FGF-2. Although previous cross-linking
experiments have shown that HBp17 binds FGF-1 (20), we were not able to
confirm this in the bovine system using the ligand blotting technique
nor by reproducing the cross-linking experiment (data not shown). The
suggested alternate processing and/or truncation may explain the
differences in the binding specificity of human HBp17 and bovine
FGF-BP. Alternatively, divergence in species or applied methodology may
have influenced the apparent functionality of the purified binding proteins.
Previous studies have shown that high expression of FGF-BP is found in
the skin and intestine of the perinatal only (19). On the protein
level, FGF-BP has so far been detected only in epidermal and colon
carcinoma cells (20, 25). In the present work, we found that expression
of FGF-BP is not restricted to perinatal and pathological conditions. A
physiological role for FGF-BP in pregnant mammary gland is not known.
However, it is notable that the importance of FGF-2 signaling in
pregnancy-dependent lobuloalveolar development of the
mammary gland recently has been reported (12, 33, 34). The
accessibility of purified bovine FGF-BP opens for future investigations
concerning the involvement of FGF-BP in physiological and pathological processes.
We thank Anni Boisen and Lars Bilde Gildberg
for excellent technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by grants from the Danish Dairy
Research Foundation (Danish Dairy Board) and The Danish Research and Development Program for Food Technology.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF271896.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: the Protein
Chemistry Laboratory, Dept. of Molecular and Structural Biology,
University of Aarhus, Science Park, Gustav Wieds Vej 10, DK-8000 Aarhus
C, Denmark. Tel.: 45 89 42 50 93; Fax: 45 86 13 65 97; E-mail:
cwh@ imsb.au.dk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 14, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002550200
The abbreviations used are:
FGF, fibroblast
growth factor;
FGFR, FGF receptor;
FGF-BP, fibroblast growth factor
binding protein;
BPMS, bovine prepartum mammary gland secretion;
ECM, extracellular matrix;
MALDI-TOF-MS, matrix assisted laser
desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography;
SCC, squamous cell carcinomas;
HSPG, heparan
sulfate proteoglycan;
PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)
ethyl]glycine.
Structural Characterization of the Fibroblast Growth
Factor-binding Protein Purified from Bovine Prepartum Mammary Gland
Secretion*
,
,
,
, and
¶
Protein Chemistry Laboratory, Department of
Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, Science Park,
Gustav Wieds Vej 10, DK-8000 Aarhus C and the § Danish
Institute of Animal Science, Research Centre Foulum,
DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP-labeled at the 5'
using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) and incubated with
a bovine mammary gland cDNA library derived from a Holstein cow,
lactating for 12 days, and 1-day post-estrus (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA). Approximately 400,000 plaques were screened by in situ
hybridization. Prehybridization was performed in 6× SSPE (1× = 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), 5× Denhardt's solution (1× = 0.02% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% Ficoll-400, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone), 0.5%
SDS, 0.1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA for 2 h at 42 °C. Hybridization was done in 6× SSPE, 1× Denhardt's solution, 0.25% SDS, 0.2 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA for 36 h at 42 °C. The filters were washed
twice at room temperature with 2× SSC (1× = 0.15 M NaCl,
15 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0) containing 0.1% SDS and once
at 42 °C with 6× SSC containing 0.1% SDS. The air-dried filters
were exposed to Fuji RX film. cDNA inserts from positive clones
were subcloned and sequenced on both strands using Big Dye sequencing
kit and an ABI prism 310 Genetic analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). Both the
cDNA and the amino acid sequences were used in a FASTA search
looking for structural homologs in the EMBL data base.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purification of bovine FGF-BP from BPMS.
A, heparin-agarose chromatography of BPMS. Following removal
of debris and dialysis against buffer A containing 0.05 M
ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.1, BPMS was applied to a heparin-Sepharose
column (5 × 25 cm) as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The column was eluted with a linear gradient of
0.05-1.5 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.1. Fractions of 10 ml were collected at a flow rate of 50 ml/h. Aliquots of every peak and
shoulder were pooled, and their proteins were identified. Based on
their content of the bovine FGF-BP homolog, the heparin-binding
proteins in the 1.0-1.2 M ammonium bicarbonate interval
(boldface bar) were selected and freeze-dried for further
fractionation. B, reverse-phase HPLC of the selected
fractions. The freeze-dried proteins were redissolved in 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid, and aliquots were rechromatographed on a Resource
RPC column (1 ml). After the wash with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, the
column was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-55% 2-propanol in 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid for the initial 65 min, followed by a linear
65-80% gradient for 7 min. The resulting peaks were collected at a
flow rate of 1 ml/min and evaporated under vacuum. The fraction
containing the purified FGF-BP homolog eluted at approximately 38%
2-propanol (boldface bar). C, SDS-PAGE of
fractionated BPMS. Lane 1, crude BPMS extract. Lane
2, total protein eluted from the heparin affinity chromatography.
Lane 3, purified bovine FGF-BP. Proteins were resolved in
10-20% polyacrylamide gels under nonreducing conditions and stained
with Coomassie Blue. To each lane 4 µg of protein was applied.
Molecular mass markers are shown on the left.
Pro) sequence was found (residues 155-157). A prediction of the secretory signal sequence using the neural network-based SignalP program (30) suggests
that the bovine FGF-BP has a cleavage site between Ala23
and Lys24. However, instead of the predicted
Lys24 as the leading amino acid residue, Edman degradation
of the purified FGF-BP protein revealed N-terminal processing at two
sites as follows: a primary site between Arg31 and
Gly32 and a secondary site between Arg51 and
Ser52. In addition, a more thorough analysis of the amino
acid sequencing data revealed a background sequence accompanying
the non-reduced FGF-BP. As deduced from the cDNA
sequence, the background sequence, FLSMVQGSSC, represents the
C-terminal part (residues 225-234) of the purified FGF-BP (Fig.
2).

View larger version (81K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The cDNA sequence and the deduced amino
acid sequence of bovine FGF-BP. The shaded residue
indicates the predicted N-terminal amino acid following cleavage of the
signal sequence. Boldface double underlined residues
indicate the encountered N-terminal amino acids of isolated FGF-BP. The
single potential N-linked glycosylation site is shown in
boldface italic. Asterisks mark two consecutive termination
codons at the end of the reading frame. Amino acid sequence obtained by
peptide mapping and Edman degradation is underlined.

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Amino acid sequence comparison of the deduced
amino acid sequence of bovine, human, and mouse FGF-BP.
Shaded characters indicate conserved residues.
Dark-shaded boxes show the cysteine residues.
Peptide mapping analysis of bovine FGF-BP using N-terminal sequencing
and MALDI-TOF-MS

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Ligand blotting analysis of the binding of
bovine FGF-BP to FGF. Lane 1, 1 µg of bovine FGF-1;
lane 2, 1 µg of bovine FGF-2; lane 3, 1 µg of
bovine serum albumin; and lane 4, 50 µg of proteins from a
crude preparation of BPMS. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE in
16% Tris-Tricine gels. After electrophoresis, the proteins were
electrotransferred from the gel onto PVDF membrane. The filters were
incubated with 30 pM bovine 125I-FGF-BP with
(A) or 30 pM bovine 125I-FGF-BP
supplemented with 1.5 µM unlabeled bovine FGF-BP
(B). Molecular mass markers are shown on the
left.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
View larger version (5K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Schematic representation of the distribution
of disulfide bonds and glycosylation sites in bovine FGF-BP.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Basilico, C.,
and Moscatelli, D.
(1992)
Adv. Cancer Res.
59,
115-165
2.
Friesel, R. E.,
and Maciag, T.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
919-925
3.
Coulier, F.,
Pontarotti, P.,
Roubin, R.,
Hartung, H.,
Goldfarb, M.,
and Birnbaum, D.
(1997)
Mol. Evol.
44,
43-56
4.
Mason, I. J.
(1994)
Cell
78,
547-552
5.
Klein, S.,
Roghani, M.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1997)
Exper. Suppl. (Basel)
79,
159-192
6.
Metzger, R. J.,
and Krasnow, M. A.
(1999)
Science
284,
1635-1639
7.
Klagsbrun, M.,
and Baird, A.
(1991)
Cell
67,
229-231
8.
Ornitz, D. M.,
and Leder, P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16305-16011
9.
Bashkin, P.,
Doctrow, S.,
Klagsbrun, M.,
Svahn, C. M.,
Folkman, J.,
and Vlodavsky, I.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
1737-1743
10.
Saksela, O.,
Moscatelli, D.,
Sommer, A.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
743-751
11.
Dinbergs, I. D.,
Brown, L.,
and Edelman, E. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29822-2929
12.
Jackson, D.,
Bresnick, J.,
Rosewell, I.,
Crafton, T.,
Poulsom, R.,
Stamp, G.,
and Dickson, C.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
1261-1268
13.
Saksela, O.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
767-775
14.
Brunner, G.,
Gabrilove, J.,
Rifkin, D. B.,
and Wilson, E. L.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
1275-1283
15.
Buczek-Thomas, J. A.,
and Nugent, M. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25167-25172
16.
Czubayko, F.,
Smith, R. V.,
Chung, H. C.,
and Wellstein, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28243-28248
17.
Czubayko, F.,
Liaudet-Coopman, E. D.,
Aigner, A.,
Tuveson, A. T.,
Berchem, G. J.,
and Wellstein, A.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
1137-1140
18.
Rak, J.,
and Kerbel, R. S.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
1083-1084
19.
Kurtz, A.,
Wang, H. L.,
Darwiche, N.,
Harris, V.,
and Wellstein, A.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2671-2681
20.
Wu, D. Q.,
Kan, M. K.,
Sato, G. H.,
Okamoto, T.,
and Sato, J. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16778-16785
21.
Okamoto, T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Kan, M.,
Sakamoto, A.,
Takada, K.,
and Sato, J. D.
(1996)
In Vitro Cell. & Dev. Biol. Anim.
32,
69-71
22.
Liaudet-Coopman, E. D. E.,
and Wellstein, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21303-21308
23.
Liaudet-Coopman, E. D.,
Berchem, G. J.,
and Wellstein, A.
(1997)
Clin. Cancer Res.
3,
179-184
24.
Harris, V. K.,
Liaudet-Coopman, E. D.,
Boyle, B. J.,
Wellstein, A.,
and Riegel, A. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19130-19139
25.
Wang, X. C.,
Chen, J. H.,
Crab, J. W.,
and Sato, J. D.
(1998)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
46,
81-87
26.
Sandowski, Y.,
Peri, I.,
and Gertler, A.
(1993)
Livest. Prod. Sci.
35,
35-48
27.
Talhouk, R. S.,
Neiswander, R. L.,
and Scharnbacher, F. L.
(1996)
J. Reprod. Fertil.
106,
221-230
28.
Hvarregaard, J.,
Andersen, M. H.,
Berglund, L.,
Rasmussen, J. T.,
and Petersen, T. E.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
240,
628-636
29.
Heegaard, C. W.,
Simonsen, A. C.,
Oka, K.,
Kjoller, L.,
Christensen, A.,
Madsen, B.,
Ellgaard, L.,
Chan, L.,
and Andreasen, P. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20855-20861
30.
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Brunak, S.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1-6
31.
Barr, P. J.
(1991)
Cell
66,
1-3
32.
Hileman, R. E.,
Fromm, J. R.,
Weiler, J. M.,
and Linhardt, R. J.
(1998)
BioEssays
20,
156-167
33.
Plath, A.,
Einspanier, R.,
Gabler, C.,
Peters, F.,
Sinowatz, F.,
Gospodarowicz, D.,
and Schams, D.
(1998)
J. Dairy Sci.
81,
2604-2613
34.
Lavandero, S.,
Chappuzeau, A.,
Sapag-Hagar, M.,
and Oka, T.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
439,
351-356
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Zhang, Y. Chen, M. R. Swift, E. Tassi, D. C. Stylianou, K. A. Gibby, A. T. Riegel, and A. Wellstein Effect of FGF-binding Protein 3 on Vascular Permeability J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2008; 283(42): 28329 - 28337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Xie, E. Tassi, M. R. Swift, K. McDonnell, E. T. Bowden, S. Wang, Y. Ueda, Y. Tomita, A. T. Riegel, and A. Wellstein Identification of the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF)-interacting Domain in a Secreted FGF-binding Protein by Phage Display J. Biol. Chem., January 13, 2006; 281(2): 1137 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. West, C. G. Rees, L. Duchesne, S. J. Patey, C. J. Terry, J. E. Turnbull, M. Delehedde, C. W. Heegaard, F. Allain, C. Vanpouille, et al. Interactions of Multiple Heparin Binding Growth Factors with Neuropilin-1 and Potentiation of the Activity of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13457 - 13464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tassi, A. Al-Attar, A. Aigner, M. R. Swift, K. McDonnell, A. Karavanov, and A. Wellstein Enhancement of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Activity by an FGF-binding Protein J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 40247 - 40253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mongiat, J. Otto, R. Oldershaw, F. Ferrer, J. D. Sato, and R. V. Iozzo Fibroblast Growth Factor-binding Protein Is a Novel Partner for Perlecan Protein Core J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 10263 - 10271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |