![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 19513-19520, June 30, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 31, 2000
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPP) has diverse
biological functions acting inside cells as a second messenger to
regulate proliferation and survival, and extracellularly, as a ligand
for G protein-coupled receptors of the endothelial differentiation
gene-1 subfamily. Based on sequence homology to murine and human
sphingosine kinase-1 (SPHK1), which we recently cloned (Kohama, T.,
Oliver, A., Edsall, L., Nagiec, M. M., Dickson, R., and
Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23722-23728), we have now cloned a second type of mouse and human
sphingosine kinase (mSPHK2 and hSPHK2). mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 encode
proteins of 617 and 618 amino acids, respectively, both much larger
than SPHK1, and though diverging considerably, both contain the
conserved domains found in all SPHK1s. Northern blot analysis revealed
that SPHK2 mRNA expression had a strikingly different tissue
distribution from that of SPHK1 and appeared later in embryonic
development. Expression of SPHK2 in HEK 293 cells resulted in elevated
SPP levels. D-erythro-dihydrosphingosine was a
better substrate than D-erythro-sphingosine for
SPHK2. Surprisingly, D,
L-threo-dihydrosphingosine was also
phosphorylated by SPHK2. In contrast to the inhibitory effects on
SPHK1, high salt concentrations markedly stimulated SPHK2. Triton X-100
inhibited SPHK2 and stimulated SPHK1, whereas phosphatidylserine
stimulated both type 1 and type 2 SPHK. Thus, SPHK2 is another member
of a growing class of sphingolipid kinases that may have novel functions.
Sphingosine-1-phosphate
(SPP)1 is a bioactive
sphingolipid metabolite that regulates diverse biological processes,
acting both inside and outside cells (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). SPP plays important roles as a second messenger to regulate cell growth and
survival (3, 4). Many external stimuli, particularly growth and
survival factors, activate sphingosine kinase (SPHK), the enzyme that
forms SPP from sphingosine. This rapidly growing list includes
platelet-derived growth factor (3, 5-7), nerve growth factor (8, 9),
vitamin D3 (10), muscarinic acetylcholine agonists (11), tumor necrosis
factor- Interest in SPP has accelerated recently with the discovery that
it is a ligand of the G protein-coupled cell surface receptor EDG-1
(17, 21). This rapidly led to the identification of several other
related receptors, named EDG-3, -5, -6, and -8, which are also specific
SPP receptors (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 22). Sphinganine-1-phosphate,
which is structurally similar to SPP and only lacks the trans double
bond at the 4 position, but not lysophosphatidic acid or
sphingosylphosphorylcholine, also binds to these receptors (23),
demonstrating that EDG-1 belongs to a family of G protein-coupled
receptors that bind SPP with high affinity and specificity (reviewed in
Refs. 2 and 22). The EDG-1 family of receptors are differentially
expressed, mainly in the cardiovascular and nervous systems, and are
coupled to a variety of G proteins and thus can regulate diverse signal transduction pathways culminating in pleiotropic responses
depending on the cell type and relative expression of EDG receptors.
Although the biological functions of the EDG-1 family of G
protein-coupled receptors are not completely understood, recent studies
suggest that binding of SPP to EDG-1 stimulates migration and
chemotaxis (24, 25) and as a consequence may regulate angiogenesis (24, 26, 27). EDG-5 may play a role in cytoskeletal reorganization during
neurite retraction, which is important for neuronal differentiation and
development (23, 28).
Critical evaluation of the role of SPP requires cloning of the enzymes
that regulate its metabolism. Recently, we purified rat kidney SPHK to
apparent homogeneity (29) and subsequently cloned the first mammalian
SPHK, designated mSPHK1 (30). Independently, two genes, termed LCB4 and
LCB5, were also shown to code for SPHKs in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (31). Moreover, data base searches identified
homologues of mSPHK1 in numerous widely disparate organisms, including
worms, plants, and mammals, demonstrating that the enzyme is encoded by
a member of a highly conserved gene family (30). Comparison of the
predicted amino acid sequences of the known SPHK1s revealed five blocks
of highly conserved amino acids (30). However, several lines of
evidence indicate that there may be multiple mammalian SPHK isoforms.
The finding that SPHK activity in platelets could be
chromatographically fractionated into several forms with differing
responses to detergents and inhibition by known SPHK inhibitors
suggested the presence of multiple enzyme forms in human platelets
(32). Moreover, homology searches against a comprehensive nonredundant
data base revealed that several of the expressed sequence tags (dbEST)
at NCBI had significant homology to conserved domains of mSPHK1 (30),
yet they had substantial sequence differences. Thus, we embarked on an
effort to clone other SPHK isoforms. We report here the cloning,
functional characterization, and tissue distribution of a second type
of mammalian SPHK (SPHK2) that has distinct sequence, properties, and
tissue distribution.
Materials--
SPP, sphingosine, and
N,N-dimethylsphingosine were from Biomol Research Laboratory
Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA). All other lipids were purchased from
Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL). [ cDNA Cloning of Murine Sphingosine Kinase-2
(mSPHK2)--
BLAST searches of the EST data base identified a mouse
EST clone (GenBankTM accession number AA839233), which had
significant homology to conserved domains of mSPHK1 (30) yet had
substantial sequence differences. Using this EST, a second isoform of
SPHK, denoted mSPHK2, was cloned by two different PCR approaches.
In the first, we used the method of PCR cloning from a mouse
cDNA library (Stratagene). Approximately 1 × 106
phages were plated on twenty 150-mm plates, plaques were collected, and
plasmids were isolated using standard procedures (33). An initial PCR
reaction was carried out with a sequence specific primer (M-3-1,
5'-CCTGGGTGCACCTGCGCCTGTATTGG) and the M13 reverse primer. The longest
PCR products were gel-purified and used as the template for a second
PCR, which contained a sequence-specific antisense primer (M-3-2,
5'-CCAGTCTTGGGGCAGTGGAGAGCC-3') and the T3 primer. The final PCR
products were subcloned by TOPO TA cloning (Invitrogen) and then
sequenced. Platinum high fidelity DNA polymerase (Life Technologies,
Inc.) was used for the PCR amplifications with the following cycling
parameters: 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 2 min with a final primer extension at 72 °C for
5 min.
In a second approach, 5'-RACE PCR was performed with the 5'-RACE System
for rapid amplification of cDNA ends according to the
manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies, Inc.).
Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts using
a Quick Prep mRNA purification kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
First strand cDNA was synthesized at 42 °C for 50 min with 5 µg of Swiss 3T3 poly(A)+ RNA using a target antisense
primer designed from the sequence of AA839233 (m-GSP1,
5'-AGGTAGAGGCTTCTGG) and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Inc.). Two consecutive PCR reactions using this cDNA
as a template and LA Taq polymerase (TaKaRa) were carried
out as follows: first PCR, 94 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of
94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and primer
extension at 72 °C for 5 min with 5'-RACE Abridged Anchor Primer,
5'-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACGGGIIGGGIIGGGIIG and the target-specific
antisense primer m-GSP2, 5'-GCGATGGGTGAAAGCTGAGCTG; second PCR,
same conditions except that the annealing temperature was 65 °C,
with Abridged Universal Amplification Primer, 5'-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC and m-GSP3, 5'-AGTCTCCAGTCAGCTCTGGACC. PCR products were cloned into pCR2.1 and sequenced, and final PCR products were subcloned into
pCR3.1 and pcDNA 3 expression vectors.
cDNA Cloning of Human Sphingosine Kinase-2
(hSPHK2)--
Poly(A)+ RNA from HEK293 cells was used for
a 5'-RACE reaction. Target-specific antisense primers (h-GSP1,
5'-CCCACTCACTCAGGCT; h-GSP2, 5'-GAAGGACAGCCCAGCTTCAGAG; h-GSP3,
5'-ATTGACCAATAGAAGCAACC) were designed according to the sequence
of a human EST clone (accession number AA295570). First strand cDNA
was synthesized with 5 µg of HEK293 mRNA and h-GSP1. This
cDNA was used as a template in an initial PCR reaction using
5'-RACE Abridged Anchor Primer and h-GSP2. Then, nested PCR was carried
out using the Abridged Universal Amplification Primer and h-GSP3. The
resulting PCR products were cloned and sequenced as described above.
Overexpression and Measurement of Activity of SPHK2--
HEK293
cells (ATCC CRL-1573) and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (ATCC CRL-1658)
were cultured as described previously (34). HEK293 cells were seeded at
6 × 105/well in poly-L-lysine-coated
6-well plates. After 24 h, cells were transfected with 1 µg of
vector alone or with vectors containing sphingosine kinase constructs
and 6 µl of LipofectAMINE PLUS reagent plus 4 µl of LipofectAMINE
reagent/well. 1-3 days after transfection, cells were harvested and
lysed by freeze-thawing as described previously (30). In some
experiments, cell lysates were fractionated into cytosol and membrane
fractions by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 60 min.
SPHK activity was determined in the presence of sphingosine, prepared
as a complex with 4 mg/ml BSA and [ Lipid Extraction and Measurement of SPP--
Cells were washed
with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped in 1 ml of methanol
containing a 2.5-µl conc. HCl. Lipids were extracted by adding 2 ml
of chloroform, 1 M NaCl (1:1, v/v) and 100 µl of 3N NaOH,
and the phases were separated. The basic aqueous phase containing SPP,
and devoid of sphingosine, ceramide, and the majority of phospholipids,
was transferred to a siliconized glass tube. The organic phase was
re-extracted with 1 ml of methanol, 1 M NaCl (1:1, v/v)
plus 50 µl of 3N NaOH, and the aqueous fractions were combined. Mass
measurements of SPP in the aqueous phase and total phospholipids in the
organic phase were carried out exactly as described (8, 36).
Northern Blotting Analysis--
Poly(A)+ RNA
blots containing 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA/lane from multiple
adult mouse and human tissues, and mouse embryos were purchased from
CLONTECH. Blots were hybridized with the 1.2-kb PstI fragment of mouse EST AA389187 (mSPHK1 probe),
the 1.5-kb EcoRI fragment of pCR3.1-mSPHK2, the 0.3-kb
PvuII fragment of pCR3.1-hSPHK1, or the 0.6-kb
EcoRV-SphI fragment of human EST AA295570 (hSPHK2
probe), after gel-purification and labeling with
[ Cloning of Type 2 Sphingosine Kinase
Blast searches of the EST data base identified several ESTs that
displayed significant homology to our recently cloned mSPHK1 sequence
(30). Specific primers were designed from the sequences of these ESTs
and were used to clone a new type of mouse and human SPHK (named mSPHK2
and hSPHK2) by the approaches of PCR cloning from a mouse brain
cDNA library and 5'-RACE PCR.
ClustalW alignment of the amino acid sequences of mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 is
shown in Fig. 1A. The open
reading frames of mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 encode polypeptides of 617 and 618 amino acids, respectively, with 83% identity and 90% similarity. Five
highly conserved regions (C1-C5), identified previously in SPHK1s
(30), are also present in both type 2 kinases. Interestingly, the
invariant GGKGK positively charged motif in the C1 domain of SPHK1 is
modified to GGRGL in SPHK2, suggesting that it may not be part of the
ATP binding site as previously proposed (30). A motif search also
revealed that a region beginning just before the conserved C1 domains
of mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 (amino acid 147-284) also has homology to the
diacylglycerol kinase catalytic site.
Compared with SPHK1, both SPHK2s encode much larger proteins containing
236 additional amino acids (Fig. 1B). Moreover, their sequences diverge considerably from SPHK1 in the center and at the
amino termini. However, after amino acid 140 of mSPHK2, the sequences
of type 1 and type 2 mSPHK have a large degree of similarity. These
sequences (amino acids 9-226 for mSPHK1 and 141-360 for mSPHK2),
which encompass domains C1-C4, have 47% identity and 79% similarity
(Fig. 1B). In the carboxyl-terminal portion of the proteins
there are also large homologous regions, which include the C5 domain,
from amino acids 227-381 for mSPHK1 and 480-617 for mSPHK2, with 43%
identity and 78% similarity (Fig. 1B). The overall
divergence suggests that SPHK2 probably did not arise as a simple gene
duplication event.
Tissue Distribution of Sphingosine Kinase Type 2
The tissue distribution of SPHK2 mRNA expression in
adult mouse was compared with that of SPHK1 by Northern blotting (Fig. 2A). In most tissues,
including adult liver, heart, kidney, testis, and brain, a predominant
3.1-kb SPHK2 mRNA species was detected, indicating ubiquitous
expression. However, the level of expression was markedly variable and
was highest in adult liver and heart and barely detectable in the
skeletal muscle and spleen (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the
expression pattern of mSPHK1 is quite different, with highest mRNA
expression of a 2.2-kb transcript in adult lung, spleen, and liver,
although expression in liver does not predominate as with mSPHK2.
mSPHK1 and mSPHK2 were both temporally and differentially expressed
during embryonic development. mSPHK1 was expressed highly at mouse
embryonic day 7 and decreased dramatically after embryonic day 11 (Fig.
2B). In contrast, at embryonic day 7, mSPHK2 expression was
much lower than mSPHK1 and gradually increased up to embryonic day 17. The hSPHK2 2.8-kb mRNA transcript was mainly expressed in adult
kidney, liver, and brain, with much lower expression in other tissues
(Fig. 2C). Interestingly, expression of SPHK2 in human
kidney is very high and relatively much lower in the mouse kidney,
whereas the opposite pattern holds for the liver.
Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of a Novel
Mammalian Sphingosine Kinase Type 2 Isoform*
§,
,
,
,
,
§**
Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington,
D. C. 20007, ¶ Pharmacology and Molecular Biology Research
Laboratories, Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo 140-8710, Japan, and
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Regulation, National
Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(12), and cross-linking of the immunoglobulin receptors
Fc
R1 (13) and Fc
R1 (14). Intracellular SPP, in turn, mobilizes
calcium from internal stores independently of inositol triphosphate
(11, 15), as well as eliciting diverse signaling pathways leading to
proliferation (16, 17) and suppression of apoptosis (4, 8, 17-19). Moreover, competitive inhibitors of SPHK block the formation of SPP and
selectively inhibit calcium mobilization, cellular proliferation, and
survival induced by these various stimuli (reviewed in Ref. 1). Thus,
it has been suggested that the dynamic balance between levels of the
sphingolipids metabolites, ceramide and SPP, and consequent regulation
of opposing signaling pathways, is an important factor that determines
the fate of cells (19). For example, stress stimuli increase ceramide
levels leading to apoptosis, whereas survival factors stimulate SPHK
leading to increased SPP levels, which suppress apoptosis (19).
Moreover, the SPHK pathway, through the generation of SPP, is
critically involved in mediating tumor necrosis factor-
-induced
endothelial cell activation (12), and the ability of high density
lipoproteins to inhibit cytokine-induced adhesion molecule expression
has been correlated with its ability to reset this sphingolipid
rheostat (12). This has important implications for the protective
function of high density lipoproteins against the development of
atherosclerosis and associated coronary heart disease. Recent data have
also connected the sphingolipid rheostat to allergic responses
(20).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Poly-L-lysine and collagen were from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). Restriction enzymes were from New
England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Poly(A)+ RNA blots of
multiple mouse adult tissues were purchased from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). LipofectAMINE PLUS and
LipofectAMINE were from Life Technologies, Inc.
-32P]ATP in kinase
buffer (35) containing 200 mM KCl, unless indicated otherwise. 32P-SPP was separated by TLC and quantified with
a phosphoimager as described previously (30).
-32P]dCTP. Hybridization in ExpressHyb buffer
(CLONTECH) at 65 °C overnight was carried out
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Blots were reprobed with
-actin as a loading control (CLONTECH). Bands
were quantified using an imaging analyzer (BAS2000, Fuji film).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Predicted amino acid sequences of murine and
human type 2 SPHK. A, ClustalW alignment of the
predicted amino acid sequences of mSPHK2 and hSPHK2. Identical and
conserved amino acid substitutions are shaded dark and
light gray, respectively. The dashes represent
gaps in sequences, and numbers on the right refer to the
amino acid sequence of mSPHK2. The conserved domains (C1-C5) are
indicated by lines. B, schematic representation
of conserved regions of SPHK1 and SPHK2. The primary sequence of mSPHK2
is compared with that of mSPHK1.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Tissue-specific expression of type 1 and type
2 SPHK. A, mSPHK2 (upper panel) and mSPHK1a
(middle panel) probes were end-labeled and hybridized to
poly(A)+ RNA blots from the indicated mouse tissues as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1,
heart; lane 2, brain; lane 3, spleen; lane
4, lung; lane 5, liver; lane 6, skeletal
muscle; lane 7, kidney; lane 8, testis. A
-actin probe (lower panel) was used as a loading control.
B, expression of mSPHK1a and mSPHK2 during mouse embryonic
development. Poly(A)+ RNA blots from embryonic days
(E) 7, 11, 15, and 17 mouse embryos were probed as in
A. C, tissue-specific expression of hSPHK2.
Lane 1, brain; lane 2, heart; lane 3,
skeletal muscle; lane 4, colon; lane 5, thymus;
lane 6, spleen; lane 7, kidney; lane
8, liver; lane 9, small intestine; lane 10,
placenta; lane 11, lung; lane 12,
leukocyte.
Activity of Recombinant Sphingosine Kinase Type 2
To investigate whether mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 encode bona
fide SPHKs, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with
expression vectors containing the corresponding cDNAs. Because
previous studies have indicated that SPHK might be present in cells in
both soluble and membrane-associated forms (3, 32, 37-39), recombinant SPHK2 activity was measured both in cytosol and in membrane fractions of transfected cells. As described previously (30), untreated or
vector-transfected HEK293 cells have low levels of SPHK activity (Fig.
3A). 24 h after
transfection with mSPHK2 or hSPHK2, in vitro SPHK activity
was increased by 20- and 35-fold, respectively, and then decreased
thereafter (Fig. 3A). In contrast, SPHK activity in cells
transfected with mSPHK1 was much higher, 610-fold greater than basal
levels 24 h after transfection and remained at this level for at
least 3 more days (data not shown). As in HEK293 cells, transfection of
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts with mSPHK1 resulted in much higher SPHK activity
than with mSPHK2. We previously found that, similar to untransfected
cells, the majority of SPHK activity in cells transfected with mSPHK1
was cytosolic (30). Similarly, in cells transfected with either mSPHK2
or hSPHK2, 17 and 26%, respectively, of the SPHK activity was
membrane-associated (Fig. 3A), although Kyte-Doolittle
hydropathy plots did not suggest the presence of hydrophobic
membrane-spanning domains.
|
Transfection of HEK293 cells with mSPHK2 and hSPHK2 also resulted in 2.2- and 3.3-fold increases, respectively, in SPP, the product formed by SPHK (Fig. 3B), in agreement with previous studies of sphingolipid metabolite levels after transfection with mSPHK1, which showed a lack of correlation of fold increases in SPP levels and in vitro SPHK enzyme activity (30, 34).
Characteristics of Recombinant mSPHK2
Substrate Specificity--
Although SPHK2 is highly
homologous to SPHK1, there are substantial sequence differences.
Therefore, it was of interest to compare their enzymatic properties.
Typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics were observed for recombinant SPHK2
(data not shown). The Km for
D-erythro-sphingosine as substrate is 3.4 µM, almost identical to the Km
previously found for SPHK1 (29). Although the naturally occurring
D-erythro-sphingosine isomer was the best substrate for SPHK1 (30),
D-erythro-dihydrosphingosine was a better
substrate for SPHK2 than D-erythro-sphingosine
(Fig. 4A). Moreover, although
D,L-threo-dihydrosphingosine
and phytosphingosine were not phosphorylated at all by SPHK1, they were
significantly phosphorylated by SPHK2, albeit much less efficiently
than sphingosine. Like SPHK1, other lipids including
N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS), C2- or
C16-ceramide, diacylglycerol, or phosphatidylinositol, were not
phosphorylated by SPHK2 (Fig. 4A), suggesting high
specificity for the sphingoid base.
|
DMS and threo-DHS have previously been shown to be potent competitive inhibitors of SPHK1 (40) and have been used to block increases in intracellular SPP levels resulting from various physiological stimuli (3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14, 41). However, because threo-DHS is a substrate for SPHK2, it is not useful as a tool to investigate the role of SPHK2/SPP signaling. Thus, it was important to characterize the inhibitory potential of the nonsubstrate DMS on SPHK2. Surprisingly, we found that although DMS was also a potent inhibitor of SPHK2 (Fig. 4B), it acted in a noncompetitive manner (Fig. 4, C and D). The Ki for DMS with SPHK2 was 12 µM, slightly higher than the Ki of 4 µM with SPHK1, suggesting that it can be used to inhibit both types of SPHK.
mSPHK2 had highest enzymatic activity in the neutral pH range from 6.5 to 8 with optimal activity at pH 7.5 (Fig.
5A), a pH dependence similar
to that of SPHK1 (data not shown). The activity decreased markedly at
pH values below and above this range.
|
Effects of KCl and NaCl-- Most of the SPHK activity in human platelets is membrane-associated and extractable with 1 M NaCl (32). Furthermore, the salt extractable SPHK from platelets has different properties than the cytosolic enzyme. It was thus of interest to determine the effect of high salt concentrations on recombinant SPHK1 and SPHK2. Interestingly, we found that high ionic strength had completely opposite effects on their activities. SPHK1 was markedly inhibited by either NaCl and KCl, with each causing 50% inhibition at a concentration of 200 mM (Fig. 5B). In contrast, SPHK2 activity was dramatically stimulated by increasing the salt concentration, with a maximal effect at a concentration of 400 mM, although KCl was much more effective than NaCl. However, above this concentration, SPHK2 activity decreased sharply although remaining elevated even at 1 M salt (Fig. 5C). Kinetic analysis of mSPHK2 in the presence and absence of high concentrations of salt indicated that the Km for sphingosine was unaltered, whereas the Vmax was increased (Fig. 5, D and E). The physiological significance of these observations remains to be determined but it could be related to different subcellular localizations of the two types of SPHK.
Substrate Presentation--
Because sphingolipids are highly
lipophilic, in in vitro SPHK assays, sphingosine is usually
presented in micellar form with Triton X-100 or as a complex with BSA
(42, 43). Furthermore, detergents such as Triton X-100 have been shown
to stimulate the activity of SPHK in rat brain extracts (37) and the
enzyme from rat kidney (29), and we previously found that the stability of rat kidney SPHK was increased in the presence of certain detergents (29). However, when the effect of increasing concentrations of Triton
X-100 on the activities of SPHK1 and SPHK2 were compared, some
unexpected results were found. Concentrations of detergent up to
0.005% had no effect, but at higher concentrations, SPHK2 activity was
inhibited and SPHK1 activity was markedly stimulated (Fig.
6A). At a concentration of
Triton X-100 of 0.5%, SPHK1 activity was increased by more than
4-fold, whereas SPHK2 was almost completely inhibited. Thus, Triton
X-100 could be used to differentially determine SPHK1 and SPHK2
activities in tissues or cells that express both types.
|
Interestingly, increasing the BSA concentration from our usual SPHK assay conditions with sphingosine-BSA complex as substrate, i.e. 0.2 mg/ml BSA, caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of SPHK2 activity without affecting SPHK1 activity (Fig. 6B). Therefore, when measuring SPHK activity in cell or tissue extracts, the method of substrate presentation, whether in mixed micelles or in BSA complexes, must be carefully optimized because the differential effects of Triton X-100 and BSA on activity could yield different results depending on the relative expression of the two types of SPHK.
Effects of Phospholipids-- Acidic phospholipids, particularly phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid, and phosphatidylinositol, and cardiolipin to a lesser extent, induced a dose-dependent increase in SPHK activity in Swiss 3T3 fibroblast lysates, whereas neutral phospholipids had no effect (42). In agreement, the enzymatic activity of recombinant SPHK1 and SPHK2 was stimulated by phosphatidylserine; the activity of both was maximally increased 4-fold at a concentration of 40 µg/ml (Fig. 6C) and inhibited by higher concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. These effects of phosphatidylserine appeared to be specific because other phospholipids, including phosphatidylcholine, had no effect on the enzyme activity. In contrast, the activities of the three major forms of SPHK in human platelets were not affected by phosphatidylserine (32).
The mechanism by which phosphatidylserine enhances the enzymatic activity of SPHK is not yet understood. One possibility is that phosphatidylserine possesses unique membrane-structuring properties, which better present the substrate, sphingosine. A second possibility is that SPHK contains determinants that specifically recognize the structure of the serine headgroup and that these determinants may only become exposed upon interaction of SPHK with membranes. In this regard, the molecular basis for the remarkable specificity of protein kinase C for phosphatidylserine has been the subject of much debate. However, recent data reveal that lipid structure and not membrane structure is the major determinant in the regulation of protein kinase C by phosphatidylserine (44).
Concluding Remarks
The presence of multiple ESTs in the data base with significant
homologies to SPHK1 as well as the identification of several genes in
S. cerevisiae encoding different SPHKs (31) suggested that
there may be a large and important SPHK gene family. In this study, we
have cloned and characterized a second type of SPHK that has some
unique properties. Although SPHK2 has a high degree of homology to
SPHK1, especially in the previously identified conserved domains
identified in type 1 SPHKs (30), it is much larger (65.2 and 65.6 kDa
for hSPHK2 and mSPHK2, respectively, versus 42.4 kDa for
mSPHK1) and contains an additional 236 amino acids. Furthermore, its
differential tissue expression, temporal developmental expression,
cellular localization, and kinetic properties in response to increasing
ionic strength and detergents are completely different from SPHK1,
suggesting that it most likely has a different function and regulates
levels of SPP in a different manner than SPHK1, which is known to play
a prominent role in regulating cell growth and survival. Thus, type 2 SPHK might be involved in regulation of some of the numerous biological
responses attributed to SPP, such as angiogenesis and allergic responses.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Ayako Yamamoto for excellent technical assistance and Drs. Emanuela Lacana and Tom I. Bonner for helpful suggestions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant GM43880 from the National Institutes of Health (to S. S.) and Postdoctoral Fellowship BC961968 from the United States Army Medical Research and Material Command, Prostate Cancer Research Program (to V. E. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF245447 and AF245448.
§ Contributed equally to this work.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Cntr., 353 Basic Science Bldg., 3900 Reservoir Rd. NW, Washington, D. C. 20007. Tel.: 202-687-1432; Fax: 202-687-0260; E-mail: spiegel@bc.georgetown.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002759200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SPP, sphingosine-1-phosphate; SPHK, sphingosine kinase; EDG, endothelial differentiation gene; mSPHK, mouse SPHK; EST, expressed sequence tag; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; hSPHK, human SPHK; BSA, bovine serum albumin; kb, kilobase; DMS, N,N-dimethylsphingosine; threo-DHS, D,L-threo- dihydrosphingosine; TLC, thin layer chromatography; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Spiegel, S. (1999) J. Leukocyte Biol. 65, 341-344 |
| 2. | Goetzl, E. J., and An, S. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 1589-1598 |
| 3. | Olivera, A., and Spiegel, S. (1993) Nature 365, 557-560 |
| 4. | Cuvillier, O., Pirianov, G., Kleuser, B., Vanek, P. G., Coso, O. A., Gutkind, S., and Spiegel, S. (1996) Nature 381, 800-803 |
| 5. | Bornfeldt, K. E., Graves, L. M., Raines, E. W., Igarashi, Y., Wayman, G., Yamamura, S., Yatomi, Y., Sidhu, J. S., Krebs, E. G., Hakomori, S., and Ross, R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 193-206 |
| 6. | Pyne, S., Chapman, J., Steele, L., and Pyne, N. J. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 237, 819-826 |
| 7. | Coroneos, E., Martinez, M., McKenna, S., and Kester, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23305-23309 |
| 8. | Edsall, L. C., Pirianov, G. G., and Spiegel, S. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 6952-6960 |
| 9. | Rius, R. A., Edsall, L. C., and Spiegel, S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 173-176 |
| 10. | Kleuser, B., Cuvillier, O., and Spiegel, S. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 1817-1824 |
| 11. | Meyer zu Heringdorf, D., Lass, H., Alemany, R., Laser, K. T., Neumann, E., Zhang, C., Schmidt, M., Rauen, U., Jakobs, K. H., and van Koppen, C. J. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2830-2837 |
| 12. | Xia, P., Gamble, J. R., Rye, K. A., Wang, L., Hii, C. S. T., Cockerill, P., Khew-Goodall, Y., Bert, A. G., Barter, P. J., and Vadas, M. A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14196-14201 |
| 13. | Choi, O., H., Kim, J.-H., and Kinet, J.-P. (1996) Nature 380, 634-636 |
| 14. | Melendez, A., Floto, R. A., Gillooly, D. J., Harnett, M. M., and Allen, J. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9393-9402 |
| 15. | Mattie, M., Brooker, G., and Spiegel, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3181-3188 |
| 16. | Rani, C. S. S., Wang, F., Fuior, E., Berger, A., Wu, J., Sturgill, T. W., Beitner-Johnson, D., LeRoith, D., Varticovski, L., and Spiegel, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10777-10783 |
| 17. | Van Brocklyn, J. R., Lee, M. J., Menzeleev, R., Olivera, A., Edsall, L., Cuvillier, O., Thomas, D. M., Coopman, P. J. P., Thangada, S., Hla, T., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 229-240 |
| 18. | Perez, G. I., Knudson, C. M., Leykin, L., Korsmeyer, S. J., and Tilly, J. L. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 1228-1232 |
| 19. | Cuvillier, O., Rosenthal, D. S., Smulson, M. E., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2910-2916 |
| 20. | Prieschl, E. E., Csonga, R., Novotny, V., Kikuchi, G. E., and Baumruker, T. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 1-8 |
| 21. | Lee, M. J., Van Brocklyn, J. R., Thangada, S., Liu, C. H., Hand, A. R., Menzeleev, R., Spiegel, S., and Hla, T. (1998) Science 279, 1552-1555 |
| 22. | Spiegel, S., and Milstien, S. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1484, 107-116 |
| 23. | Van Brocklyn, J. R., Tu, Z., Edsall, L. C., Schmidt, R. R., and Spiegel, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4626-4632 |
| 24. | Wang, F., Van Brocklyn, J. R., Hobson, J. P., Movafagh, S., Zukowska-Grojec, Z., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35343-35350 |
| 25. | English, D., Kovala, A. T., Welch, Z., Harvey, K. A., Siddiqui, R. A., Brindley, D. N., and Garcia, J. G. (1999) J. Hematother. Stem Cell Res. 8, 627-634 |
| 26. | Lee, O. H., Kim, Y. M., Lee, Y. M., Moon, E. J., Lee, D. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, K. W., and Kwon, Y. G. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264, 743-750 |
| 27. | Lee, M. J., Thangada, S., Claffey, K. P., Ancellin, N., Liu, C. H., Kluk, M., Volpi, M., Sha'afi, R. I., and Hla, T. (1999) Cell 99, 301-312 |
| 28. | MacLennan, A. J., Marks, L., Gaskin, A. A., and Lee, N. (1997) Neuroscience 79, 217-224 |
| 29. | Olivera, A., Kohama, T., Tu, Z., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12576-12583 |
| 30. | Kohama, T., Olivera, A., Edsall, L., Nagiec, M. M., Dickson, R., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23722-23728 |
| 31. | Nagiec, M. M., Skrzypek, M., Nagiec, E. E., Lester, R. L., and Dickson, R. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19437-19442 |
| 32. | Banno, Y., Kato, M., Hara, A., and Nozawa, Y. (1998) Biochem. J. 335, 301-304 |
| 33. | Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Smith, J. A., Seidman, J. G., and Struhl, K. (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , pp. 9.1.4-9.1, Wiley-Interscience, New York |
| 34. | Olivera, A., Kohama, T., Edsall, L. C., Nava, V., Cuvillier, O., Poulton, S., and Spiegel, S. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 545-558 |
| 35. | Olivera, A., and Spiegel, S. (1998) in Methods in Molecular Biology (Bird, I. M., ed), Vol. 105 , pp. 233-242, Humana Press Inc., Totawa, NJ |
| 36. | Edsall, L. C., and Spiegel, S. (1999) Anal. Biochem. 272, 80-86 |
| 37. | Buehrer, B. M., and Bell, R. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 3154-3159 |
| 38. | Olivera, A., Rosenthal, J., and Spiegel, S. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 223, 306-312 |
| 39. | Ghosh, T. K., Bian, J., and Gill, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22628-22635 |
| 40. | Edsall, L. C., Van Brocklyn, J. R., Cuvillier, O., Kleuser, B., and Spiegel, S. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 12892-12898 |
| 41. | Machwate, M., Rodan, S. B., Rodan, G. A., and Harada, S. I. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 70-77 |
| 42. | Olivera, A., Rosenthal, J., and Spiegel, S. (1996) J. Cell. Biochem. 60, 529-537 |
| 43. | Olivera, A., Barlow, K. D., and Spiegel, S. (2000) Methods Enzymol. 311, 215-223 |
| 44. | Johnson, J. E., Zimmerman, M. L., Daleke, D. L., and Newton, A. C. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 12020-12025 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-Q. Lai, A. W. Irwan, H. H. Goh, H. S. Howe, D. T. Yu, R. Valle-Onate, I. B. McInnes, A. J. Melendez, and B. P. Leung Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Sphingosine Kinase Modulation in Inflammatory Arthritis J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 8010 - 8017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kimura, T. Ohmori, Y. Kashiwakura, R. Ohkawa, S. Madoiwa, J. Mimuro, K. Shimazaki, Y. Hoshino, Y. Yatomi, and Y. Sakata Antagonism of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor-2 Enhances Migration of Neural Progenitor Cells Toward an Area of Brain Infarction * Supplemental Materials and Methods Stroke, December 1, 2008; 39(12): 3411 - 3417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, H.-Y. Guan, L.-Y. Gong, L.-B. Song, N. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Yuan, Y.-J. Zheng, Z.-S. Huang, and M. Li Clinical Significance of Sphingosine Kinase-1 Expression in Human Astrocytomas Progression and Overall Patient Survival Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6996 - 7003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Machesky, G. Zhang, B. Raghavan, P. Zimmerman, S. L. Kelly, A. H. Merrill Jr., W. J. Waldman, J. R. Van Brocklyn, and J. Trgovcich Human Cytomegalovirus Regulates Bioactive Sphingolipids J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2008; 283(38): 26148 - 26160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Serrano-Sanchez, Z. Tanfin, and D. Leiber Signaling Pathways Involved in Sphingosine Kinase Activation and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Release in Rat Myometrium in Late Pregnancy: Role in the Induction of Cyclooxygenase 2 Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4669 - 4679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Marsolais, B. Hahm, K. H. Edelmann, K. B. Walsh, M. Guerrero, Y. Hatta, Y. Kawaoka, E. Roberts, M. B. A. Oldstone, and H. Rosen Local Not Systemic Modulation of Dendritic Cell S1P Receptors in Lung Blunts Virus-Specific Immune Responses to Influenza Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 896 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Paugh, B. S. Paugh, M. Rahmani, D. Kapitonov, J. A. Almenara, T. Kordula, S. Milstien, J. K. Adams, R. E. Zipkin, S. Grant, et al. A selective sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor integrates multiple molecular therapeutic targets in human leukemia Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 1382 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Miller, S. E. Alvarez, S. Spiegel, and D. A. Lebman Sphingosine Kinases and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Are Critical for Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Activation and Promotion of Migration and Invasion of Esophageal Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4142 - 4151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takabe, S. W. Paugh, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel "Inside-Out" Signaling of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate: Therapeutic Targets Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2008; 60(2): 181 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishiuma, Y. Nishimura, T. Okada, E. Kuramoto, Y. Kotani, S. Jahangeer, and S.-i. Nakamura Inhalation of sphingosine kinase inhibitor attenuates airway inflammation in asthmatic mouse model Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1085 - L1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yan, S. Chen, B. You, and J. Sun Activation of sphingosine kinase-1 mediates induction of endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis by epoxyeicosatrienoic acids Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 308 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Leclercq, P. A. B. Moretti, M. A. Vadas, and S. M. Pitson Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A Interacts with Sphingosine Kinase and Directly Enhances Its Catalytic Activity J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9606 - 9614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Anelli, C. R. Gault, A. B. Cheng, and L. M. Obeid Sphingosine Kinase 1 Is Up-regulated during Hypoxia in U87MG Glioma Cells: ROLE OF HYPOXIA-INDUCIBLE FACTORS 1 AND 2 J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3365 - 3375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sekiguchi, T. Iwasaki, M. Kitano, H. Kuno, N. Hashimoto, Y. Kawahito, M. Azuma, T. Hla, and H. Sano Role of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate in the Pathogenesis of Sjogren's Syndrome J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1921 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Sankala, N. C. Hait, S. W. Paugh, D. Shida, S. Lepine, L. W. Elmore, P. Dent, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel Involvement of Sphingosine Kinase 2 in p53-Independent Induction of p21 by the Chemotherapeutic Drug Doxorubicin Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10466 - 10474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Samy, C. A. Meyer, P. Caplazi, C. L. Langrish, J. M. Lora, H. Bluethmann, and S. L. Peng Cutting Edge: Modulation of Intestinal Autoimmunity and IL-2 Signaling by Sphingosine Kinase 2 Independent of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5644 - 5648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|