![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 19700-19706, June 30, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry, Kansas State University,
Manhattan, Kansas 66506
Received for publication, March 9, 2000, and in revised form, April 14, 2000
Of the isoforms of plant
phospholipase D (PLD) that have been cloned and characterized, PLD Phospholipase D (PLD)1
(EC 3.1.4.4) catalyzes the hydrolysis of phospholipids at the terminal
phospohodiester bond, producing a free head group and phosphatidic
acid. Activation of PLD in the cell generates signaling messengers and
is involved in a wide range of cellular processes, including
phytohormone action (1, 2), meiosis (3), defense response (4), and
vesicular trafficking (5). The activity of PLD is tightly regulated, and its cellular regulation is often coordinated with the networks of
cellular signaling machinery (6, 7). In plants, Ca2+ has
been proposed to be an important regulator for PLD (7). All PLDs cloned
from plants require Ca2+ for activity. A positive
correlation between increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and
increased PLD activity was indicated in plant tissues in which
Ca2+ levels were perturbed, using various
Ca2+-ATPase inhibitors and calmodulin antagonists (8). In
addition, plant PLDs display two distinct types of Ca2+
dependence. PLD Little is known, however, about the mechanism by which Ca2+
modulates PLD activity. Potentially, Ca2+ may associate
directly with PLD, and such a binding could induce a conformational
change in the enzyme to facilitate its binding to a membrane surface
and/or its activation for catalysis. Alternatively, Ca2+
may change the surface charge, potential, and/or shape of a membrane. In this case, a specific interaction between Ca2+ and PLD
is not envisaged.
Sequence analyses of several cloned plant PLDs have suggested possible
ways by which Ca2+ can differentially control the
activities of the isoforms. Each of the PLDs is inferred to have a
Ca2+/phospholipid-binding C2 domain of approximately 130 amino acid residues near its N terminus (9, 13). C2 domains have been identified in more than 100 proteins, most of which are involved in
lipid metabolism, signal transduction, or membrane trafficking (13-17). These domains often mediate
Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding and thus
play an important role in associating C2-bearing proteins with
substrates and membranes (18-20).
Three-dimensional structures determined for the C2 domains in
snaptotagmin 1A (21-23), phospholipase C Herein we present results that provide the first evidence that the
isolated domains PLD Construction of PLD Expression and Purification of Recombinant PLD C2
Proteins--
The poly-His-fused C2 proteins were expressed in
E. coli BL21(DE3) (Novagen), and the GST fusion proteins
were expressed in E. coli BL21. The cells were grown at
37 °C to an absorbance of ~1.0 at 600 nm and induced at 25 °C
with isopropyl-1-thio-
To remove the His tag, the solubilized protein was incubated with
highly pure thrombin at a ratio of 1 unit of thrombin to 1 mg of fusion
protein at room temperature for 8 h. To remove undigested fusion
proteins, urea was added to the solution to a final concentration of 8 M, and the solution was passed through a
Ni2+-charged His-resin column. The C2 proteins without the
tag did not bind to the resin and were refolded by passing through a
Sephacryl S-100 gel filtration column (29). The monomeric, refolded
proteins were collected and concentrated by dialysis under a negative
pressure. Purity of the proteins was tested by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (30) and reverse-phase high pressure liquid
chromatography. The monomeric form of the proteins was confirmed by
size-exclusion chromatography. The refolding of the fusion proteins and
the isolated C2 domains was monitored by CD spectroscopy (31). Protein
molar concentrations were determined using
The GST fusion proteins were purified according to the procedure
described previously (33). Bacteria were pelleted from a 50 ml culture,
washed twice with a buffer (STE buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, pH 8.0) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM
EDTA at pH 8.0, and suspended in 5 ml of STE buffer containing 200 µg/ml lysozyme. The suspension was incubated on ice for 30 min, and
dithiothreitol and Sarkosyl (9% (w/v); Sigma) were added to the
suspension to final concentrations of 5 mM and 1.5%,
respectively. After mixing, the cell suspension was sonicated for 2 min
and centrifuged at 27,200 × g for 10 min at 4 °C.
Triton X-100 (20% v/v) was added to the supernatant to a final
concentration of 4%. The solution was then incubated with 600 µl of
50% (w/v) glutathione-agarose for 30 min at room temperature. The
fusion protein-agarose beads in a column were washed with 20 volumes of
STE buffer to remove unbound proteins, stored at 4 °C, and used
within 2 weeks.
CD Spectroscopy of PLD C2 Domains--
CD spectra of PLD Microcalorimetric Titration Studies of PLD C2
Domains--
Thermodynamic properties of Ca2+ binding by
PLD C2 domains were measured by isothermal titration calorimetry using
a MicroCal OMEGA calorimeter (34). PLD Phospholipid Binding Assays--
A modified version of a
previously described method (35) was employed to determine the amounts
of phospholipids bound to PLD C2 domains. A phospholipid mixture
consisting of 250 µg of PC (egg yolk), 100 µg of phosphatidylserine
(PS) (egg yolk), and 2 µCi of 3H-labeled PC
(dipalmitoyl-glycero-3-P-[methyl-3H]choline,
DuPont) in chloroform was dried under a stream of nitrogen. The dried
lipids were resuspended in 1 ml of water by vigorous vortexing for 2 min, followed by sonication for 30 s on an ice bath. The lipid
vesicles were centrifuged briefly to remove large aggregates. GST
fusion proteins bound to glutathione-agarose beads were suspended in 9 volumes of a binding buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, and the various concentrations of Ca2+
to be tested. The buffered Ca2+ solutions were prepared by
appropriate dilution of the standard Ca2+ solution with
Chelex 100-treated buffer. Equal volumes of the agarose beads and PC/PS
vesicles (50 µl each) were mixed and incubated at room temperature
for 30 min with vigorous shaking. The beads were pelleted by
centrifugation and washed three times with 1 ml of the binding buffer
containing the test concentration of Ca2+. Lipids bound to
the protein-agarose beads were quantitated by scintillation counts. GST
bound to glutathione-agarose beads was used to determine background
phospholipid binding. All experiments were repeated at least three
times. Binding activity was expressed as cpm per unit of GST activity.
A similar procedure was followed to determine phosphatidylinoistol
4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) binding by PLD C2
domains as a function of Ca2+ concentration, using lipid
vesicles made up of 400 µg of PIP2 mixed with 0.4 µCi
of 3H-labeled PIP2
(dipalmitoyl-glycero-3-P-[inositol-2-3H]inositol
4,5-bisphosphate, DuPont).
Solubility and Refolding of PLD Ca2+-induced Conformational Changes of PLD C2
Domains--
The CD spectra of PLD
Ca2+ binding by the two PLD C2s was monitored by measuring
negative ellipticity at 208 nm for PLD Thermodynamics of Ca2+ Binding by PLD
A striking difference was also observed between PLD Ca2+-dependent Phospholipid Binding of
PLD
In the case of PIP2, an acidic phospholipid, a negative
effect on binding due to Ca2+ was observed for both PLD Although plant PLD has long been known to require Ca2+
for activity, the mechanism by which Ca2+ influences PLD
activity is yet to be understood. The present study has provided the
first evidence that the putative C2 domain of plant PLD is indeed an
independent Ca2+-binding unit. Furthermore, PLD Both PLD The present study shows that both PLD The present work, however, shows that PLD *
This work was supported by Grant 32322-AC4 from the
Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society (to R. K.), United States Department of Agriculture Grant
97-35304-4877 (to X. W.), and National Science Foundation Grant
IBN-9808729 (to X. W.). This is contribution 00-219-J of the
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
Kansas State University, Willard Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel.:
785-532-6422; Fax: 785-532-7278; E-mail: wangs@ksu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 20, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001945200
2
The following thermodynamic parameters were
obtained from the least-squares fits of the experimental data with
three different binding models: for n = 1, Kd = 590 ± 10 µM; The abbreviations used are:
PLD, phospholipase
D;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PIP2, phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate;
cPLA2, cytoplasmic phospholipase A2;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
Chaps, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]- 1-propanesulfonate.
Distinct Ca2+ Binding Properties of Novel C2 Domains
of Plant Phospholipase D
and
*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
requires millimolar levels of Ca2+ for optimal
activity, whereas PLD
is most active at micromolar concentrations of
Ca2+. Multiple amino acid sequence alignments suggest that
PLD
and PLD
both contain a Ca2+-dependent
phospholipid-binding C2 domain near their N termini. In the present
study, we expressed and characterized the putative C2 domains of PLD
and PLD
, designated PLD
C2 and PLD
C2, by CD spectroscopy,
isothermal titration calorimetry, and phospholipid binding assay. Both
PLD C2 domains displayed CD spectra consistent with anticipated major
-sheet structures but underwent spectral changes upon binding
Ca2+; the magnitude was larger for PLD
C2. These
conformational changes, not shown by any of the previously
characterized C2 domains of animal origin, occurred at micromolar
Ca2+ concentrations for PLD
C2 but at millimolar levels
of the cation for PLD
C2. PLD
C2 exhibited three
Ca2+-binding sites: one with a dissociation constant
(Kd) of 0.8 µM and the other two with
a Kd of 24 µM. In contrast, isothermal titration calorimetry data of PLD
C2 were consistent with
1-3 low affinity Ca2+-binding sites with
Kd in the range of 590-470 µM. The thermodynamics of Ca2+ binding markedly differed for the
two C2 domains. Likewise, PLD
C2 bound phosphatidylcholine (PC), the
substrate of PLD, in the presence of submillimolar Ca2+
concentrations, whereas PLD
C2 did so only in the presence of millimolar levels of the metal ion. Both C2 domains bound
phosphatidylinoistol 4,5-bisphosphate, a regulator of PC hydrolysis
by PLD. However, added Ca2+ displaced the bound
phosphatidylinoistol 4,5-bisphosphate. Ca2+ and PC binding
properties of PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 follow a trend similar to the
Ca2+ requirements of the whole enzymes, PLD
and PLD
,
for PC hydrolysis. Taken together, the results suggest that the C2
domains of PLD
and PLD
have novel structural features and serve
as handles by which Ca2+ differentially regulates the
activities of the isoforms.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
represents the conventional PLD that requires Ca2+ in the millimolar range and can be active toward
vesicles composed of phosphatidylcholine (PC) only (9, 10). This PLD
has been purified, cloned, and characterized from several plant species (7). PLD
represents the newly identified PLD that is
polyphosphoinositide-dependent and most active at
micromolar ranges of Ca2+ (11, 12).
1 (24),
cPLA2 (25, 26), and protein kinase C
(27) reveal in
each case an anti-parallel eight-stranded
-sandwich structure. Two
or three Ca2+ ions bind to the loops that connect the
strands at one end (21-27). Alignment and molecular modeling of the
N-terminal sequences of PLD
and PLD
with known C2 structures
(Figs. 1 and 2) suggest that PLD
C2 has all the conserved
Ca2+-binding residues, whereas PLD
C2 lacks at least two
of these potential Ca2+ ligands due to substitution. This
predicts a lower affinity toward Ca2+ for PLD
C2. Thus,
the observed requirements of different levels of Ca2+ for
catalysis by the whole enzymes, PLD
and PLD
(9-12), may arise
out of different Ca2+ affinities of the C2 domains.
C2 and PLD
C2 bind Ca2+ with
different affinities and exhibit differences in the levels of
Ca2+ required for PC binding, a pattern analogous to the
Ca2+ demands of catalysis by the whole enzymes.
Furthermore, Ca2+ binding triggers unprecedented
conformational changes in PLD
C2 and PLD
C2, thus suggesting that
these plant C2 domains are novel structural variants.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C2 and PLD
C2 Expression
Plasmids--
The putative C2 domain of Arabidopsis PLD
corresponds to the amino acid sequence 8-151. A DNA fragment coding
for this region was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction
(Perkin-Elmer Cetus) and inserted into vectors pET 15b (Novagen) and
pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The pET vector was used for
producing the C2 proteins with 6 histidine residues fused at the N
terminus, and the pGEX vector was used for those fused with glutathione S-transferase (GST) at the N terminus. For fragments
inserted into the pET vector, an NdeI restriction site was
added to the 5'-end, and a stop codon followed by a BamHI
site was added to the 3'-end. To clone the DNA fragments into the pGEX
vector, a BamHI site was incorporated into the 5'-end, and a
stop codon followed by an EcoRI site was incorporated into
the 3'-end. Similarly, the DNA region coding for Arabidopsis
PLD
C2 (amino acid residues 156-302) was generated by the
polymerase chain reaction and cloned into pET and pGEX vectors. To
increase the solubility of PLD
C2, a loop region consisting of amino
acid residues 173-190 was deleted from PLD
C2 (Fig. 1), and the
deletion was generated by a sequential polymerase chain reaction, as
described previously (28). The single cysteine residue, Cys-285, near
the C-terminal end of the PLD
C2 constructs was substituted with
serine to minimize possible complications in solubility and refolding.
The constructs were verified by DNA sequencing and transformed into
Escherichia coli BL21 or E. coli BL21 (DE3) for
protein expression.
-galactopyranoside at a final concentration of
0.2 mM for the GST fusion proteins and 1 mM for
the poly-His fusion proteins. After overnight induction, the cells were
harvested and lysed by sonication. After centrifugation, both the
poly-His and GST fusion proteins were found in particulate fractions.
To purify the His-tagged proteins, the particulate pellet isolated from
1 liter of culture was washed with a binding buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, and 5 mM imidazole at pH
8.0) and solubilized in the same binding buffer containing 8 M urea. After centrifugation, the supernatant was passed
through a 10-ml Ni2+-charged His-resin column equilibrated
with the binding buffer. The column was thoroughly washed with a
washing buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M
NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 8 M urea at pH 8.0. Proteins bound to the resin were eluted with a 1 M
imidazole elution buffer. Urea in the denatured recombinant protein was
diluted by adding the solution dropwise into a stirring buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) and 2.0 M
urea at 4 °C. The solution was kept at 4 °C for 1 h and
incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The protein solution was
dialyzed against 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, overnight at
4 °C and then concentrated by means of a negative pressure dialysis
system (Spectrum).
280 values of
24,300 M
1
cm
1 for PLD
C2 and 20,300 M
1 cm
1
for PLD
C2, on the basis of their amino acid sequences and
calculated molecular masses of 16,673 and 13,500 Da, respectively
(32).
C2
and PLD
C2 were recorded with a Jasco J-720 spectropolarimeter. Each
sample was scanned 64 times to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. PLD
C2 in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, was placed in a 1-cm
cell, and Ca2+ or EGTA was added using a microsyringe
(Hamilton). Reference CD spectra were recorded with the same series of
Ca2+ solutions, but without the protein, and were
subtracted from the corresponding protein spectra. The molar
ellipticity was calculated using an analysis program supplied with the
instrument. For Ca2+ titration, the molar ellipticity was
determined at a specific UV wavelength as a function of the added metal
ion concentration.
C2 (0.05 mM) or
PLD
C2 (0.25 mM) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 (Chelex-100 treated) was placed in a 1.38-ml sample cell. A syringe
(100 or 250 µl) loaded with 10 mM standard
CaCl2 solution (Fisher Scientific) was used for a series of
automatic injections of 10 µl each into a protein solution. After
each injection, a 5-min pause was allowed for reaching the baseline.
Heat produced due to dilution was measured by injecting the
Ca2+ solution into the sample cells from which PLD C2
proteins were omitted. For each titration step, the heat of dilution
was subtracted from the corresponding Ca2+ binding data of
the C2 domains. Data were fit to appropriate binding models and
thermodynamic parameters determined from nonlinear least-squares fits,
using the ORIGINTM software.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C2 and PLD
C2--
The
His-tagged PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 were solubilized with urea, purified
using a Ni2+-affinity column, refolded by step dilutions of
urea, and subjected to size exclusion chromatography. PLD
C2 was
found to exist as a monomer up to a concentration of 1 mg/ml. A
workable concentration of refolded PLD
C2 was difficult to attain,
as the protein, in the absence of urea, precipitated at much lower
concentrations (<100 µg/ml) than did PLD
C2. Addition of agents
such as 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (Chaps), ammonium sulfate, and arginine did not increase solubility of
the protein. In the presence of 4 M proline, which has been found to increase protein solubility (36), PLD
C2 remained in
solution after urea concentration was decreased to 0.1 M by dilution with 6 M proline. However, PLD
C2 aggregated
when proline was removed by dialysis. Therefore, a deletion
mutant, PLD
C2
173-190, was constructed
(Fig. 1) with the hope of improved
solubility. Deletion of residues 173-190 made loop 1 of the mutant
similar in length to that of cPLA2 C2 and was anticipated
to have a minimal effect on the overall folding and function of PLD
C2 on the basis of amino acid sequence alignment (Fig. 1) and molecular
modeling (Fig. 2). Indeed, a dominant
-sheet structure of PLD
C2
173-190 was
indicated by CD spectroscopy (31), thus suggesting that it was
correctly refolded (Fig. 3). The deletion
mutant possessed significantly improved solubility. PLD
C2
173-190 was used in subsequent studies,
as it remained a soluble monomer up to a concentration of 3 mg/ml. For
brevity, the deletion mutant is referred to as PLD
C2 throughout the
text.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Alignment of amino acid sequences of
PLD
C2 and PLD
C2
with cPLA2 C2 and phospholipase C
1 C2. Ca2+ ligands are
identified by boldface letters (amino acid codes). In the case of
PLD
C2, nonacidic amino acid residues that occur in positions
corresponding to Ca2+ ligands in cPLA2 C2 and
phospholipase C
1 C2 are underlined. The
eight
-sheet strands and three Ca2+ binding loops
(CBL), as defined previously (13), are identified.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Structure modeling of PLD
C2 and PLD
C2. A, ribbon
model of the x-ray crystal structure of cPLA2 C2 (Protein
Data Bank code 1rlw; 25). B, a modeled structure of PLD
C2 generated with the amino acid sequence shown as PLD
in Fig. 1
except that the fragment 24-40 was deleted. C, a modeled
structure of PLD
C2 generated with the amino acid sequence shown as
PLD
173-190 in Fig. 1. The amino acid
residues serving as Ca2+ ligands in cPLA2 C2
(25) and the corresponding residues of PLD C2s are labeled and appear
in boldface. The molecular models were generated with the
Swiss-Model program (43-45), using the crystal structure of
cPLA2 C2 (25) as a template. The amino acid residues
omitted for the purpose of construction of the models are identified in
B and C. All the structures were viewed and
manipulated using the RasMol program (University of
Massachusetts).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Far UV CD spectra of PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 in the presence and
absence of Ca2+. A, Ca2+
binding by PLD
C2 at different concentrations of Ca2+
and Mg2+ as indicated. B, reversibility of
Ca2+-induced conformational changes of PLD
C2 following
the addition of 2 mM EGTA to PLD
C2 in 1 mM
Ca2+. C, Ca2+ binding by PLD
C2
at different concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ as
indicated. D, reversibility of Ca2+-induced
conformational changes of PLD
C2 following the addition of 2 mM EGTA to PLD
C2 in 1 mM Ca2+.
The protein concentrations used were 3 µM for PLD
C2
and 2 µM for PLD
C2. The C2 samples were dissolved in
Chelex 100-treated 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, for all the
measurements.
C2 and PLD
C2 are consistent
with proteins having dominant
-sheet structures (31). Both PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 exhibited spectral changes in response to titration of
Ca2+ (Fig. 3). The CD-detected conformational changes
occurred at millimolar levels of Ca2+ for PLD
C2 (Fig.
3A) but at micromolar levels of the metal ion for PLD
C2
(Fig. 3C). The negative peak in the 203-210 nm range and
its shoulder in the 215-222 nm range both showed decreases in
ellipticity with the addition of Ca2+, and the magnitude
was greater for PLD
C2. The CD spectral changes were specific to
Ca2+, as Mg2+ had almost no effect (Fig. 3,
A and C). The Ca2+-triggered
conformational changes were reversible; addition of the chelator EGTA
to Ca2+-bound PLD
C2 or PLD
C2 reproduced the CD
spectrum obtained of the Ca2+-free C2 domain (Fig. 3,
B and D). These results suggest that the
expressed PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 are properly folded and undergo reversible conformational changes upon binding Ca2+.
Irreversible spectral changes might imply trapping of
metastable structures such as misfolded and/or partly folded conformer(s).
C2 and at 203 nm for PLD
C2 as a function of the metal ion concentration (Fig.
4). From the CD data, apparent
dissociation constants of ~1 mM and ~80 µM are estimated for Ca2+ complexes with
PLD
C2 and PLD
C2, respectively.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Ca2+ titration of
PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 as
monitored by CD spectroscopy. CD spectra were recorded at
different concentrations of Ca2+ or Mg2+added
to PLD
C2 or PLD
C2 in Chelex 100-treated 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, at 25 °C. Changes in ellipticity at 208 and 203 nm
were plotted as a function of Ca2+ concentration for PLD
C2 and PLD
C2, respectively. Values were means ± S.E. of three
independent experiments. Lines drawn through the data
points represent nonlinear least-squares fits. From the graphs,
apparent dissociation constants of ~1 mM and ~80
µM are estimated for Ca2+ complexes with
PLD
C2 and PLD
C2, respectively.
C2 and PLD
C2--
Thermodynamic properties of Ca2+ binding to PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 were determined by isothermal titration calorimetry
experiments (Fig. 5). In the case of
PLD
C2, the binding data (Fig. 5A) are consistent with
one high affinity site (Kd = 0.8 µM) and two low affinity sites (Kd = 24 µM). For PLD
C2, the microcalorimetric titration (Fig.
5B) could be carried out only with micromolar, rather than
millimolar, protein solutions due to low solubility (1 mg/ml). The CD
data yield an apparent dissociation constant of ~1 mM for
Ca2+-PLD
C2 complex (Fig. 4). Therefore,
microcalorimetric titrations are best carried out with millimolar
protein solutions in order to determine with certainty all the three
binding parameters: number of binding sites (n),
dissociation constants, and enthalpy change (34). In the present case,
the titration data (Fig. 5B) were fit to binding equations
by assuming n = 1, 2, or
3.2 All the three cases
appear equally feasible, with Kd ranging from 580 µM for n = 1 to 470 µM for
n = 3. Thus, it has not been possible to determine the
number of binding sites on PLD
C2 unambiguously. However, the
dissociation constants calculated are all in the millimolar range,
irrespective of the number of binding sites assumed. This permits us to
draw the valid conclusion that PLD
C2 has a lower affinity for
Ca2+, relative to PLD
C2.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Isothermal calorimetric titration of
Ca2+ with PLD
C2 and
PLD
C2. A, Ca2+
titration of PLD
C2; B, Ca2+ titration of
PLD
C2. Proteins were dissolved in Chelex-100 treated, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. A 250- or 100-µl syringe loaded with
the stock CaCl2 solution provided a series of automatic
injections of 10 µl each into the protein solution and the heat
absorbed or liberated was recorded for each injection (upper
panels in A and B). Identical injections
were carried out using a solution without protein in the sample cell at
30 °C. In this case, the heat of dilution was measured for each
injection (data not shown) and subtracted from the respective data
obtained with the C2 domains to determine heat changes due solely to
Ca2+ binding. These results are shown in the bottom
panels in A and B. Lines drawn
through the data points represent nonlinear least-squares
fits, and the calculated thermodynamic parameters are given in Table I.
The line in B corresponds to the case of one
binding site.
C2 and PLD
C2
in the thermodynamics of Ca2+ binding (Table
I). PLD
C2 binds endothermically one
Ca2+ at the high affinity site and exothermically two
Ca2+ at the low affinity sites (Fig. 5A). Thus,
the binding process is entropy-driven at the first site, whereas at the
second and third sites, it is aided by both enthalpy and entropy
changes. On the other hand, Ca2+ binding to PLD
C2
involves a positive enthalpy change and is consequently entropy-driven
(Fig. 5B; Table I). This thermodynamic conclusion is
unaffected by the number of binding sites assumed.2 The
results suggest that PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 each have distinct structural features that affect the thermodynamics of Ca2+
binding. Interestingly, cPLA2 C2 (25) and PLD
C2 show
drastic differences in thermodynamics of Ca2+ binding
(Table I), despite having similar binding loops (Figs. 1 and 2).
Thermodynamics of Ca2+ binding to PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 at
30 °C, pH 7.5
C2 and PLD
C2--
One of the potential consequences of
Ca2+ binding to a C2 domain is to promote phospholipid
binding. To facilitate measurements of phospholipid binding, PLD
C2
and PLD
C2 domains were each fused to GST, and the effects of
Ca2+ on the PC- and PIP2 binding capabilities
of the fusion proteins were assessed. Phospholipid binding by GST alone
was determined and used as a reference. In the absence of
Ca2+, both PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 bound low levels of
PC/PS vesicles, and the binding ability increased with Ca2+
concentration (Fig. 6A).
PLD
C2 exhibited enhanced PC binding at submillimolar
Ca2+ and reached a plateau at ~1 mM
Ca2+. The apparent dissociation constant for the
Ca2+·PLD
C2 complex is estimated to be ~100
µM. In contrast, PLD
C2 bound PC only in the presence
of millimolar Ca2+, with an apparent dissociation constant
of >1 mM for the Ca2+·PLD
C2 complex. The
different levels of Ca2+ requirements by PLD
C2 and
PLD
C2 for binding PC are analogous to the different
Ca2+ affinities of the two C2 domains as determined from CD
and isothermal titration calorimetry data. The amounts of phospholipids
bound to PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 decreased when EGTA was added to the
lipid-bound proteins (data not shown), thus indicating that formation
of Ca2+·EGTA complex led to dissociation of the C2
domains from PC/PS vesicles. Mg2+, on the other hand, had a
negligible effect on PC binding by the two PLD C2 domains (Fig.
6A).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Ca2+ dependence of phospholipid
binding by PLD
C2 and PLD
C2. Glutathione-agarose beads bound with PLD
C2 or PLD
C2 were mixed with 3H-labeled phospholipid vesicles at
25 °C. The beads were washed with buffer three times, and
scintillation counts were determined. Bound phospholipids were
quantified as counts per min per unit of GST activity. Values are
means ± S.E. of three independent of experiments. A,
binding of vesicles made up of PC/PS (2.5:1) and 3H-labeled
PC. B, binding of vesicles made up of unlabeled and
3H-labeled PIP2. Lines drawn through
the data points represent nonlinear least-squares
fits.
C2 and PLD
C2 (Fig. 6B): maximal amounts of
PIP2 bound to the C2 domains in the absence of
Ca2+, and the added metal ion displaced the bound
phospholipid. The Ca2+ titration data are consistent with
an apparent dissociation constant of ~100 µM for the
Ca2+·PLD
C2 complex and >0.6 mM for the
Ca2+·PLD
C2 complex. The PIP2 binding
characteristics of the PLD C2 domains are in contrast to their
Ca2+-dependent PC binding properties.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C2 and
PLD
C2 exhibit distinct affinities for Ca2+;
Ca2+-dependent conformational changes and
substrate binding both occur at millimolar ranges of Ca2+
for PLD
C2 but at submillimolar levels of the cation for PLD
C2.
These different Ca2+ requirements by PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 have been demonstrated by three independent methods: CD
spectroscopy, microcalorimetric titration, and an affinity pull-down
assay. The difference in Ca2+ affinities between the two C2
domains is consistent with the multiple amino acid sequence alignments
(Fig. 1) and molecular models (Fig. 2); a lower affinity toward
Ca2+ is anticipated for PLD
C2 due to the absence of two
potential Ca2+ ligands. The Ca2+ affinities and
Ca2+-dependent PC binding behavior of PLD
C2
and PLD
C2 parallel the Ca2+ requirements of the whole
enzymes, PLD
and PLD
, for phospholipid hydrolysis (11, 12). This
correspondence suggests that Ca2+ modulates PLD
and
PLD
activities by differentially interacting with the C2 domains of
the isoforms.
C2 and PLD
C2 also bind PIP2. Unlike PC
binding, PIP2 binding occurs without Ca2+ and
is inhibited by the metal ion in a
concentration-dependent manner, in the submillimolar range
for PLD
C2 and in the millimolar range for PLD
C2. This suggests
that the C2 domains bind PC and PIP2 by different
mechanisms, as discussed below. Interestingly, the whole enzymes
exhibit a different behavior; PIP2 is an effector required
for the activity of PLD
, but not PLD
, in the presence of
millimolar concentrations of Ca2+ (9, 12). Also, PLD
binds PIP2 twice as much as does PLD
(9). It is,
therefore, inferred that PLD contains an additional PIP2-binding site(s) in a region other than the C2 domain.
C2 and PLD
C2 associate
with PC vesicles in a Ca2+-dependent manner.
This Ca2+-promoted phospholipid binding renders C2-bearing
proteins able to be associated with membranes (13), which can be
important for PLD targeting and activation for catalysis. Two models
have been advanced to explain how Ca2+ binding increases
the affinity of C2 domains for membrane phospholipids. According to the
model based on NMR studies of snaptotagmin 1A C2 (13, 21, 23), charge
neutralization of Asp residues by Ca2+ allows positively
charged side-chains in the loops to interact with negatively charged
phospholipids, and the ternary structure thus formed is mainly
supported by electrostatic interactions. An alternative
electrostatic-hydrophobic switch model has been proposed on the basis
of x-ray crystallographic studies of cPLA2 C2 (25). In this
case, Ca2+ binding not only brings about charge
neutralization but also exposes hydrophobic residues in the
Ca2+-binding loops for subsequent insertion into neutral
membrane lipids. Both of these models do not predicate any significant Ca2+-conferred conformational changes. The structurally
characterized Ca2+-free and Ca2+-bound C2
domains from snaptotagmin 1A, cPLA2, phospholipase C
1, and protein kinase C
do not reveal any well
defined conformational transitions either for the flexible binding
loops or for the rigid the
-sheet scaffold region (21-27).
C2 and PLD
C2 undergo
significant conformational changes due to Ca2+ binding and
that Ca2+ removal reverses these changes. This may present
a variation of the electrostatic-hydrophobic switch model;
Ca2+ binding to a PLD C2 domain perturbs the secondary
structure of the protein to expose a hydrophobic surface that binds to
neutral phospholipids, such as PC, and to membranes. Conversely,
withdrawal of Ca2+ dissociates the complex by restoring the
original conformation of the C2 domain. The PIP2 binding
data of PLD
C2 and PLD
C2 also appear to be consistent with the
proposed model; the anionic phospholipid binds to the C2 domain, at a
site different from the PC-binding site, by electrostatic attractions,
and the Ca2+-exposed hydrophobic surface hinders this
binding process. The envisioned model is supported by the CD-sensitive
conformational changes and thermodynamics of Ca2+ binding
by PLD
C2 and PLD
C2. Positive entropy changes, as determined for
the plant PLD C2 domains, have been observed for Ca2+
binding by EF-hand proteins, such as calmodulin (37) and bullfrog troponin C (38) and are thought to arise out of exposure of hydrophobic
groups to water (39). In these and other Ca2+-binding
EF-hand proteins, such as recoverin (40) and S100B (41), the metal ion
binding results in conformational changes that expose otherwise hidden
hydrophobic groups to facilitate protein binding. In the case of
annexins, Ca2+ binding causes a major conformational shift
that favors interaction with phospholipid membranes (42). The
significant conformational changes that accompany Ca2+
binding by the plant PLD C2 domains, however, have no precedence among
all the C2 domains studied thus far. This suggests the presence of
unique variations of the C2 domain structure in plant PLDs. Structural
studies of Ca2+-free and Ca2+-bound PLD C2s
will provide insight into the functional diversity of this class of C2
domains and the differential regulation of plant PLD isoforms by
Ca2+.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
Kansas State University, Willard Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel.:
785-532-6262; Fax: 785-532-7278; E-mail: krish@ksu.edu.
H = 6.52 ± 0.07 kcal/mol; for n = 2, Kd = 530 ± 10 µM;
H = 3.16 ± 0.04 kcal/mol; for n = 3, Kd = 470 ± 20 µM;
H = 2.03 ± 0.04 kcal/mol.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Lu, F.,
Zheng, S. Q.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
2183-2196
2.
Jacob, T.,
Ritchie, S.,
Assmann, S. M.,
and Gilroy, S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12192-12197
3.
Rose, K.,
Rudge, S. A.,
Frohman, M. A.,
Morris, A. J.,
and Engebrecht, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12151-12155
4.
Waite, K. A.,
Wallin, R.,
Qualliotine-Mann, D.,
and McPhail, L. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15569-15578
5.
Jones, D.,
Morgan, C.,
and Cockcroft, S.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1439,
229-244
6.
Frohman, M. A.,
Sung, T. C.,
and Morris, A. J.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1439,
175-186
7.
Wang, X.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
120,
645-651
8.
De Vrije, T.,
and Munnik, T.
(1997)
J. Exp. Bot.
48,
1631-1637
9.
Qin, W.,
Pappan, K.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28267-28273
10.
Wang, X.,
Xu, L.,
and Zheng, L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20312-20317
11.
Pappan, K.,
Zheng, S.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7048-7054
12.
Pappan, K.,
Qin, W.,
Dyer, J. H.,
Zheng, L.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7055-7061
13.
Nalefski, E. A.,
and Falke, J. J.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
2375-2390
14.
Ponting, C. P.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
162-166
15.
Rizo, J.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15879-15882
16.
Kopka, J.,
Pical, C.,
Hetherington, A. M.,
and Muller-Rober, B.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
36,
627-637
17.
Mikoshiba, K.,
Fukuda, M.,
Ibata, K.,
Kabayama, H.,
and Mizutani, A.
(1999)
Chem. Phys. Lipids.
98,
59-67
18.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1988)
Nature
334,
661-665
19.
Medkova, M.,
and Cho, W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19852-19861
20.
Lomasney, J. W.,
Cheng, H.,
Roffler, S. R.,
and King, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21995-22001
21.
Shao, X.,
Davletov, B. A.,
Sutton, R. B.,
Südhof, T. C.,
and Rizo, J.
(1996)
Science
273,
248-251
22.
Sutton, R. B.,
Davletov, B. A.,
Berghuis, A. M.,
Südhof, T. C.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
929-938
23.
Shao, X.,
Fernandez, I.,
Südhof, T. C.,
and Rizo, J.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
16106-16115
24.
Essen, L. O.,
Perisic, O.,
Lynch, D. E.,
Kantan, M.,
and Williams, R. L.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2753-2762
25.
Perisic, O.,
Fong, S.,
Lynch, D. E.,
Bycroft, M.,
and Williams, R. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1596-1604
26.
Xu, G.,
McDonagh, T., Yu, H.,
Nalefski, E. A.,
Clark, J. D.,
and Cumming, D. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
280,
485-500
27.
Sutton, R. B.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1998)
Structure
6,
1395-1405
28.
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1995)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, pp. 8.51-8.59, John Wiley, New York
29.
Ackers, G. K.
(1970)
Adv. Protein Chem.
24,
342-343
30.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
31.
Johnson, W. C.
(1990)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
7,
205-214
32.
Wada, Y.,
Sobue, K.,
Mastsuo, T.,
Katakuse, I.,
Kakiuchi, S.,
Matsuda, H.,
and Hayshi, A.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
832,
383-386
33.
Frangioni, J. V.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1993)
Anal. Biochem.
210,
179-187
34.
Wiseman, T.,
Williston, S.,
Brandts, J. F.,
and Lin, L.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
179,
131-137
35.
Davletov, B. A.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26386-26390
36.
Sammuel, D.,
Kumar, T. K. S.,
Jayaraman, G.,
Yang, P. W.,
and Yu, C.
(1997)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
41,
235-242
37.
Milos, M.,
Schaer, J. J.,
Comte, M.,
and Cox, J. A.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
6279-6287
38.
Imaizumi, M.,
Tanokura, M.,
and Yamada, K.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
7963-7966
39.
Ross, P. D.,
and Subramanian, S.
(1981)
Biochemistry
20,
3096-3102
40.
Ames, J. B.,
Tanaka, T.,
Ikura, M.,
and Stryer, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30909-30913
41.
Smith, S. P.,
and Shaw, G. S.
(1998)
Structure
6,
211-222
42.
Concha, N. O.,
Head, J. F.,
Kaetzel, M. A.,
Dedman, J. R.,
and Seaton, B. A.
(1993)
Science
261,
1321-1324
43.
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723
44.
Peitsch, M. C.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
274-279
45.
Peitsch, M. C.
(1995)
Bio/Technology
13,
658-660
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Faraudo and A. Travesset Phosphatidic Acid Domains in Membranes: Effect of Divalent Counterions Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2806 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Dowd, S. Coursol, A. L. Skirpan, T.-h. Kao, and S. Gilroy Petunia Phospholipase C1 Is Involved in Pollen Tube Growth PLANT CELL, June 1, 2006; 18(6): 1438 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang Regulatory Functions of Phospholipase D and Phosphatidic Acid in Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses Plant Physiology, October 1, 2005; 139(2): 566 - 573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Monteiro, Q. Liu, S. Lisboa, G. E. F. Scherer, H. Quader, and R. Malho Phosphoinositides and phosphatidic acid regulate pollen tube growth and reorientation through modulation of [Ca2+]c and membrane secretion J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2005; 56(416): 1665 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pappan, L. Zheng, R. Krishnamoorthi, and X. Wang Evidence for and Characterization of Ca2+ Binding to the Catalytic Region of Arabidopsis thaliana Phospholipase D{beta} J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 47833 - 47839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhao and X. Wang Arabidopsis Phospholipase D{alpha}1 Interacts with the Heterotrimeric G-protein {alpha}-Subunit through a Motif Analogous to the DRY Motif in G-protein-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1794 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dhonukshe, A. M. Laxalt, J. Goedhart, T. W. J. Gadella, and T. Munnik Phospholipase D Activation Correlates with Microtubule Reorganization in Living Plant Cells PLANT CELL, November 1, 2003; 15(11): 2666 - 2679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. McGee, J. L. Roe, T. A. Sweat, X. Wang, J. A. Guikema, and J. E. Leach Rice Phospholipase D Isoforms Show Differential Cellular Location and Gene Induction Plant Cell Physiol., October 15, 2003; 44(10): 1013 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|