![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 19803-19807, June 30, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 13, 1999, and in revised form, April 13, 2000
The epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like family of
growth factors elicits cellular responses by stimulating the
dimerization, autophosphorylation, and tyrosine kinase activities of
the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Although several
different EGF-like ligands are capable of binding to a single ErbB
family member, it is generally thought that the biological and
biochemical responses of a single receptor dimer to different ligands
are indistinguishable. To test whether an ErbB receptor dimer is
capable of discriminating among ligands we have examined the effect of four EGF-like growth factors on signaling through the ErbB4 receptor homodimer in CEM/HER4 cells, a transfected human T cell line
ectopically expressing ErbB4 in an ErbB-null background. Despite
stimulating similar levels of gross receptor tyrosine phosphorylation,
the EGF-like growth factors betacellulin, neuregulin-1 The accurate interpretation of growth factor-encoded signals by
cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases
(RTKs)1 is critical to the
cellular growth regulatory processes that underlie tissue development.
The mammalian ErbB signaling network, consisting of four known receptor
tyrosine kinases and more than ten epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like
growth factor ligands, serves as a model for understanding how RTKs
translate ligand binding into cellular response (1). Numerous studies
point to a role for receptor dimerization in the stimulation of
receptor tyrosine kinase activity by growth factors (2). Moreover,
because the ten different ErbB receptor homo- and heterodimeric pairs are capable of mediating different cellular responses, dimerization also appears to be involved in signal specification (3, 4). Specification is thought to arise from differences in the intrinsic abilities of each of the different tyrosine phosphorylated ErbB receptors to recruit and activate specific src homology-2 (SH2) and
phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain-containing intracellular signaling
proteins (4, 5).
The ErbB signaling network model emphasizes that it is the identity of
the receptor dimer that dictates the ultimate cellular response and
makes no provisions for a single receptor dimer to discriminate among
ligands. In this study we examine the effects of several different
ligands on cellular growth signaling in a cell line expressing a single
member of the ErbB family. We observed that different ligands are
capable of inducing different biological and biochemical responses,
indicating that an ErbB receptor homodimer is capable of discriminating
among its binding ligands.
Materials--
CEM/HER4 cells were from Bristol-Myers Squibb
Co., Seattle, WA. Recombinant human betacellulin was purchased from R & D Systems. GST fusion proteins of the EGF-like domains of mouse NRG1
Anti-ErbB4 antibodies Ab-1 and Ab-2 were from NeoMarkers; RC20,
anti-SHP1, and anti-Shc polyclonal antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories; anti-SHP2, anti-Shc monoclonal, anti-Grb2 polyclonal, and
immobilized anti-phosphotyrosines PY20 and PY99 antibodies were from
Santa Cruz Biotechnologies. Production, characterization, and use of
rabbit anti-p85 has been described previously (8). Antibodies to
phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of p38, JNK, ERK1/2, and
Akt were from New England Biolabs. MTT, soybean trypsin inhibitor
immobilized on Sepharose, and TPCK-treated trypsin were from Sigma.
Growth Factor Treatment and Immunoprecipitation--
Cells were
maintained in RPMI/10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum ( Whole Cell Labeling and Tryptic Mapping--
1 × 108 cells were simultaneously serum-starved and
radiolabeled for 4 h at 37 °C with 24 mCi of
[32P]orthophosphate in 24 ml of phosphate-free RPMI.
Cells were then treated with 50 nM growth factor for 2 min,
and ErbB4 was immunoprecipitated from cleared lysates. Precipitates
were resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE, and proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose. The ErbB4 protein was digested from the nitrocellulose
overnight using 10 µg of TPCK-treated trypsin, and trypsin was
removed using 20 µl of immobilized soybean trypsin inhibitor.
Phosphotyrosine-containing phosphopeptides were then immunopurified
using a 1:1 mixture of immobilized anti-phosphotyrosine PY20 and PY99
antibodies and eluted with low pH values. Purified phosphopeptides were
resolved electrophoretically in the first dimension and by thin layer
chromatography in the second, according to established procedures (9).
Phosphopeptides were visualized using a Storm phosphoimaging system.
MTT Assay--
CEM/HER4 cells were pelleted, resuspended at a
density of 1 × 105 cells/ml in RPMI/0.1% To test whether a single ErbB receptor dimer is capable of
distinguishing between different EGF-like growth factors, we examined the response of ErbB4 in CEM/HER4 cells to treatment with different ligands. CEM/HER4 is a human T cell line lacking endogenous ErbB receptor expression, as assessed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction,3 that has
been stably transfected with the cDNA encoding human ErbB4 (10). In
the absence of other ErbB family members the only signaling receptor
species in these cells is an ErbB4 homodimer. We assessed the
biological and biochemical outcomes of treating these cells with the
following four EGF-like ligands known to bind to and stimulate ErbB4:
betacellulin (BTC), neuregulin-1 We observed that the four growth factors examined stimulated similar
levels of ErbB4 receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, as determined by
immunoblotting anti-ErbB4 immunoprecipitates with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibodies (Fig. 1A). No ErbB4
tyrosine phosphorylation was observed prior to growth factor treatment.
Re-probing with an anti-ErbB4 antibody revealed similar levels of
receptor in all five precipitates. In addition, covalent cross-linking
experiments revealed that each growth factor induced similar levels of
ErbB4 dimer (not shown).
Despite their abilities to induce similar levels of gross receptor
tyrosine phosphorylation, the four growth factors exhibited different
biological potencies in the MTT colorimetric assay (Fig. 1B). Because the MTT assay measures mitochondrial activity,
differences relative to untreated cells reflect both cell growth
induced by growth factors and cell survival following serum starvation.
Although none of the growth factors stimulated a response as robust as serum, probably because of the relatively low ErbB4 receptor content of
the CEM/HER4 cells, NRG1 To address the biochemical mechanisms underlying the observed
differences in biological potencies of the activating ligands we first
examined the activation of intracellular kinase cascades associated
with receptor stimulation. By immunoblotting with antibodies specific
for activated (phosphorylated) forms of the signaling kinases Akt, JNK,
p38, and ERK1/2, we observed that the different growth factors
activated the kinases to different extents in the CEM/HER4 cells (Fig.
2A). None of the factors
significantly stimulated either JNK or p38 phosphorylation (not shown).
However, Akt and ERK1/2 appeared to be differentially activated in
CEM/HER4 cells in response to the different growth factors.
Specifically, NRG1
Ligand Discrimination in Signaling through an ErbB4 Receptor
Homodimer*
§,
,
,
, and
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical
School and Division of Signal Transduction, Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, the ¶ Department of
Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
92037, and the
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular
Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
neuregulin-2
, and neuregulin-3 exhibited different biological
potencies in a cellular growth assay. Moreover, the different ligands
induced different patterns of recruitment of intracellular signaling
proteins to the activated receptor and induced differential usage of
intracellular kinase signaling cascades. Finally, two-dimensional
phosphopeptide mapping of ligand-stimulated ErbB4 revealed that the
different growth factors induce different patterns of receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. These results indicate that ErbB4 activation by growth
factors is not generic and suggest that individual ErbB receptors can
discriminate between different EGF-like ligands within the context of a
single receptor dimer. More generally, our observations significantly
modify our understanding of signaling through receptor tyrosine kinases
and point to a number of possible models for ligand-mediated signal diversification.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and NRG2
were produced, purified, and handled as described
previously (6, 7). GST·NRG-3 was produced by first amplifying the
region corresponding to the EGF-like domain from a full-length NRG-3 cDNA clone obtained by screening a mouse C57Bl/6 lZAP cDNA
library.2 The region selected
includes the 10 amino acids amino-terminal to the first cysteine
residue of the NRG-3 EGF-like domain (primer sequence corresponds to
the amino acid sequence STERSEHF) and ends with the sequence ESEDVYQR,
which immediately precedes the predicted transmembrane domain. The
resulting fragment was subcloned into the
EcoRI/BamHI sites of pAcSecG2T (PharMingen).
Subsequent steps were identical to those used in the preparation of
GST·NRG-1
and GST·NRG-2
, as described previously (6).
FBS)
containing 0.2 mg/ml G418 and split upon reaching a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml. For immunoprecipitation experiments cells
were pelleted at 500 × g, resuspended in an equal
volume of RPMI/0.1%
FBS, and serum-starved for 16 h. Cells
were then pelleted and resuspended in RPMI/0.1%
FBS at a density of
4 × 107 cells/ml, and 0.5 ml was diluted into 0.5 ml
of 100 nM growth factor in RPMI/0.1%
FBS at 37 °C.
After 2 min cells were pelleted with a 15-s microfuge pulse
(12,000 × g) and immediately resuspended in
co-immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM ZnCl2, 10 mM glycerophosphate, 5 mM tetrasodium
pyrophosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 4 µg/ml each aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin; see Ref. 7). Crude
lysates were cleared by microcentrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 × g, and supernatants were used for immunoprecipitation
experiments as described previously (7). Precipitated proteins were
resolved by 6-10% gradient SDS-PAGE, and the receptor region of
filters blotted with anti-phosphotyrosine RC20. Filters were also
probed with appropriate antibodies to precipitated proteins. For kinase
activation experiments cells were treated with growth factors as
described above, and at various times cells were diluted into 5×
Laemmli sample buffer. Lysates corresponding to 1.5 × 106 cells were resolved by 5-7.5% gradient SDS-PAGE, and
filters were blotted with antibodies recognizing activated kinases and then re-probed with antibodies recognizing the total kinase population.
FBS, and
seeded into 96-well plates at 0.1 ml per well. Cells were serum-starved
for 16 h and then treated with 50 nM growth factor and
incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. MTT in phosphate-buffered saline
was then added to wells to a concentration of 1 mg/ml, and cells were
incubated for another 3 h at 37 °C. Lysis solution (20% SDS in
50% N,N-dimethylformamide, pH 4.7) was added to
50%, and wells were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The absorbance at
570 nm was determined, and the absorbance of wells lacking cells was subtracted.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(NRG1
), neuregulin-2
(NRG2
), and neuregulin-3 (NRG3). All experiments were carried out
using saturating levels of purified growth factors (50 nM)
to overcome any differences in receptor binding affinity and to fully
activate the ErbB4 receptor.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Lack of correlation between gross ErbB4
receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and biological activity.
A, ligand-stimulated receptor tyrosine phosphorylation.
CEM/HER4 cells were treated with 50 nM indicated growth
factor for 2 min at 37 °C, and ErbB4 was immunoprecipitated from
detergent lysates. The receptor region of the gel was immunoblotted
with anti-phosphotyrosine (upper panel) and then re-probed
with anti-ErbB4 antibody (lower panel). Results are
representative of five independent experiments. B,
stimulation of CEM/HER4 cellular growth properties by EGF-like growth
factors. Serum-starved cells were treated with 50 nM
indicated growth factor. After 24 h the MTT assay was carried out
to assess cell growth and viability, and the -fold induction over
untreated cells was plotted. Fetal bovine serum stimulated a
5.6+0.8-fold induction. Error bars represent S.E. of
triplicates. Data are representative of three independent
experiments.
reproducibly exhibited a higher activity in
the MTT assay than did the other factors. NRG1
was followed by BTC,
NRG2
, and then NRG3. These observations indicate that gross receptor
tyrosine phosphorylation as detected by anti-phosphotyrosine blotting
does not closely correlate with biological activity, and suggest that
an ErbB4 homodimer is capable of discriminating between its binding
ligands in mediating biological activity.
and NRG2
were the most potent in stimulating
Akt, whereas BTC appeared to be the most potent in stimulating ERK1/2.
Differences were due to the overall extent of kinase activation in
response to the growth factors rather than to differences in the
kinetics of activation (data not shown).

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Signaling pathways elicited by EGF-like
growth factors. A, stimulation of signaling kinases. Cells
were treated with 50 nM growth factor, and lysates were
blotted with antibodies recognizing phosphorylated forms of the
indicated kinases (upper panels) and then re-probed with
antibodies recognizing total protein (middle panels). Bands
were quantified and normalized (lower panels) by dividing
the signal intensity obtained with the phospho-specific antibody by
that obtained with the total protein antibody. Shown are the results at
the times of peak kinase activation; 5 min for Akt and 10 min for
ERK1/2. Results are representative of at least two independent
experiments. B, recruitment of SH2 and PTB domain-containing
signaling proteins to ErbB4. Cells were treated with 50 nM
growth factor for 2 min at 37 °C, and the indicated signaling
proteins were immunoprecipitated. The receptor region was blotted with
anti-phosphotyrosine (upper panels) while the lower regions
of the gel were probed with antibodies to the precipitated signaling
proteins (lower panels). Data are representative of at least
three independent experiments.
Intracellular kinase cascades are triggered in response to the binding of specific SH2 and PTB domain-containing proteins to specific phosphorylated tyrosine residues in tail regions of activated ErbB receptors (4, 5). To determine whether the differential recruitment of signaling proteins might account for the observed differences in signaling kinase activation we examined the association of five representative signaling molecules with ErbB4 in response to growth factor treatment. The signaling proteins examined were the adaptor proteins Grb2 and Shc, the tyrosine phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2, and the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. In these experiments cells were treated with growth factors, signaling proteins were immunoprecipitated with their respective antibodies, and the receptor region of the gel was probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. Because the different ligands stimulated similar extents of total receptor tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1A), this method is suitable for assessing the extent of ErbB4 association with each signaling protein.
No evidence for ligand-stimulated association of either of the
phosphotyrosine phosphatases with ErbB4 was observed (not shown). However, whereas all four growth factors stimulated the recruitment of
Grb2 to ErbB4 to similar extents, BTC and NRG1
preferentially stimulated the recruitment of Shc, and NRG1
and NRG2
preferentially stimulated the association of p85 (Fig. 2B).
Taken together, the results of Fig. 2 indicate that ligand
discrimination by the ErbB4 receptor results in the differential
stimulation of intracellular signaling cascades, possibly through the
differential recruitment of intracellular SH2 and PTB domain-containing
signaling proteins.
Signaling proteins are thought to become recruited to phosphorylated tyrosine residues of activated receptor tyrosine kinases in a sequence-specific manner (11, 12). For example, the SH2 domain of p85 binds to sites containing a methionine three residues carboxyl-terminal to the phosphorylated tyrosine, whereas the SH2 domain of Grb2 selects sites that have an asparagine two residues carboxyl-terminal to the phosphotyrosine. The PTB domain of Shc selects motifs containing the sequence NPXpY, where X is any amino acid and pY is the phosphorylated tyrosine residue.
The selectivity patterns of SH2 and PTB domains suggest that the observed differential recruitment of intracellular signaling proteins may result from the differential phosphorylation of specific ErbB4 tyrosine residues in response to growth factor binding. To test this possibility we metabolically labeled CEM/HER4 cells with [32P]-orthophosphate and examined ErbB4 phosphorylation by two-dimensional tryptic phosphopeptide mapping. Our current (not shown) and previous studies4 indicate that ErbB receptors are very highly constitutively phosphorylated on numerous serine and threonine residues. This yields very complicated phosphopeptide maps that can mask ligand-stimulated differences in receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. For this reason we developed a method for enriching in the phosphotyrosine-containing tryptic peptides by affinity for two anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies prior to mapping (see "Experimental Procedures").
We observed that the different ligands induced different
tyrosine-containing phosphopeptide patterns in ErbB4 (Fig.
3). No phosphopeptides were observed
after anti-phosphotyrosine purification when cells were not treated
with growth factor. This is consistent with our observation that ErbB4
is not constitutively tyrosine phosphorylated (Fig. 1A) and
highlights the utility of the anti-phosphotyrosine peptide purification
method prior to mapping. Six to nine phosphopeptides were observed in
each ErbB4 map after growth factor treatment, and the presence of
several of the phosphopeptides depended on the identity of the
stimulating ligand. Peptides 1-5 were similarly induced by all four
growth factors. Peptide 6 was induced by three of the four (BTC,
NRG1
, and NRG2
), as was peptide 7 (BTC, NRG1
, and NRG3).
Peptide 8 was preferentially induced by BTC and NRG1
, and peptides 9 and 10 were specific for NRG1
and NRG3, respectively. These results
indicate that the different growth factor ligands are capable of
inducing the differential tyrosine phosphorylation of the ErbB4
receptor.
|
Our observations suggest that the different EGF-like ligands are capable of influencing phosphorylation site usage in the ErbB4 homodimer, thereby dictating which intracellular signaling proteins become efficiently recruited and activated, and hence determining which kinase signaling cascades are efficiently triggered. In the heterologous context of the transfected T cell ligand discrimination is reflected in different potencies of growth factor-stimulated cellular growth properties. However, in the normal context of fetal cardiac myocytes or mammary epithelial cells, differential ligand stimulation of ErbB4 could influence diverse cellular activities such as survival, differentiation, or fate (13, 14).
Our previous and unpublished results suggest that ligand-induced
differential ErbB receptor phosphorylation is not unique to ErbB4.
Using human mammary tumor cells that express different ErbB receptors,
we have obtained evidence that EGF and BTC induce the differential
phosphorylation of EGF receptor homodimers4 and that
NRG1
and NRG2
induce the differential phosphorylation of4 and differential signaling through (7) ErbB2/ErbB3
heterodimers. Taken together our observations suggest that the
stimulation of ErbB receptor signaling is not generic; several states
of an activated receptor dimer may exist depending on the identity of
the growth factor bound to the dimeric receptor complex. Different
activation (phosphorylation) states could then influence the usage of
intracellular signaling pathways, which in turn could dictate cellular
response (Fig. 4A).
|
The physical mechanism by which ligands differentially influence ErbB receptor tyrosine phosphorylation remains a very interesting question. It has been previously suggested that tyrosine phosphorylation site usage within ErbB2 may be dictated by its dimerizing ErbB receptor partner (15). Hence, differences in the intrinsic abilities of different ligands to induce different receptor heterodimers could result in differential receptor phosphorylation and signaling. However, because the CEM/HER4 cells lack other ErbB receptors and an ErbB4 homodimer is the only signaling entity, differential receptor heterodimerization cannot account for the observed differential signaling. A number of studies have ascribed differences in the biological activities of EGF-like ligands to differences in the stability of the ligand-receptor complex during internalization and routing (16-18). In our studies we examined ErbB4 phosphorylation at 2 min, and we have observed differential phosphorylation of ErbB2 30 s after ligand treatment.4 Because differential phosphorylation appears to precede significant receptor internalization, receptor-ligand complex stability is also an unlikely explanation.
Fig. 4B illustrates three possible mechanisms for
differential signaling through a single ErbB receptor dimer. One
possibility (depicted by ligand 2) is that growth factors
differentially promote the association of the active receptor complex
with other cellular components that in turn modulate the receptor
phosphorylation state. Candidates for such components are other
kinases, phosphatases, or scaffolding proteins involved in the assembly
of signaling complexes (19). Interestingly, our recent work has
uncovered evidence for a class of cell surface proteins called
modulators that directly interact with ErbB receptors to regulate their
response to EGF-like
ligands.5 The kekkon-1
protein from Drosophila melanogaster appears to interact
directly with Drosophila EGF receptor to suppress its activity (20), whereas the membrane-bound ASGP2 component of the rat
mucin MUC4 interacts directly with ErbB2 to potentiate its response to
NRG1
(21). These or other cell surface modulator components may also
affect autophosphorylation site usage in activated ErbB receptors.
Alternatively, ligand discrimination may be a property intrinsic to ErbB receptors, so that other cellular components are not required to mediate differential phosphorylation and signaling. One possibility, depicted by ligand 3 in Fig. 4B, is that the different ligands might induce different oligomeric states of the receptor, which in turn influences phosphorylation site selection. Biochemical (22) and molecular modeling (23) studies have pointed to a potential role for higher order oligomers of ErbB receptors in signaling. It has also been reported that differential oligomerization of the ephrin ligands induces differential signaling through the eph family growth factor RTKs (24). Finally, the tyrosine kinase domain of the fibroblast growth factor receptor crystallized as a dimer with the catalytic sites oriented away from each other (25). Because intermolecular cross-phosphorylation of the kinase domain subunits in this conformation would be difficult, it has been speculated that higher-order aggregates may be involved in RTK tyrosine phosphorylation.
Another very intriguing hypothesis is that the different ligands could induce different conformations within the context of a receptor dimer (ligand 4 in Fig. 4B; reviewed in Ref. 26). Indeed, crystal structures suggest that erythropoietin (EPO) receptor ligands that exhibit different potencies induce different conformations within EPO receptor dimers (27, 28). Moreover, Burke and Stern (29) have suggested that the rotational orientation of ErbB2 subunits within a receptor homodimer may be a critical determinant in the transforming activity of this receptor.
Studies are currently underway to determine whether ligand
discrimination is a property intrinsic to the ErbB receptors themselves or whether other cellular components may contribute to differential ErbB receptor tyrosine phosphorylation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA71702 to (K. L. C.) and by a Massachusetts Department of Public Health Breast Cancer Research Program grant (to C. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Inst. of Medicine, Rm. 1018, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-667-0934; Fax: 617-667-0957; E-mail: ccrovell@caregroup.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 14, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C901015199
2 C. Lai, unpublished observation.
3 G. D. Plowman, personal communication.
4 C. Sweeney and K. L. Carraway III, manuscript in preparation.
5 K. L. Carraway III and C. Sweeney, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
RTK(s), receptor
tyrosine kinase(s);
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
SH2, src homology-2;
PTB, phosphotyrosine binding;
FBS, heat-inactivated fetal bovine
serum;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
BTC, betacellulin;
NRG, neuregulin;
MTT, thiazolyl blue;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
TPCK, L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone;
EPO, erythropoietin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Moghal, N., and Sternberg, P. W. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 190-196 |
| 2. | Heldin, C. H. (1995) Cell 80, 213-223 |
| 3. | Riese, D. J., II, and Stern, D. F. (1998) Bioessays 20, 41-48 |
| 4. | Carraway, K. L., III, and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Cell 78, 5-8 |
| 5. | Alroy, I., and Yarden, Y. (1997) FEBS Lett. 410, 83-86 |
| 6. | Carraway, K. L., III, Weber, J. L., Unger, M. J., Ledesma, J., Yu, N., Gassmann, M., and Lai, C. (1997) Nature 387, 512-516 |
| 7. | Crovello, C. S., Lai, C., Cantley, L. C., and Carraway, K. L., III. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26954-26961 |
| 8. | Carraway, K. L., III, Soltoff, S. P., Diamonti, A. J., and Cantley, L. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7111-7116 |
| 9. | Boyle, W. J., van der Geer, P., and Hunter, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 110-149 |
| 10. | Plowman, G. D., Green, J. M., Culouscou, J. M., Carlton, G. W., Rothwell, V. M., and Buckley, S. (1993) Nature 366, 473-475 |
| 11. | Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778 |
| 12. | van der Geer, P., and Pawson, T. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 277-280 |
| 13. | Carraway, K. L., III, and Burden, S. J. (1995) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 606-612 |
| 14. | Burden, S., and Yarden, Y. (1997) Neuron 18, 847-855 |
| 15. | Olayioye, M. A., Graus-Porta, D., Beerli, R. R., Rohrer, J., Gay, B., and Hynes, N. E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5042-5051 |
| 16. | Ebner, R., and Derynck, R. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 599-612 |
| 17. | Lenferink, A. E., Kramer, R. H., van Vugt, M. J., Konigswieser, M., Di Fiore, P. P., van Zoelen, E. J., and van de Poll, M. L. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 859-865 |
| 18. | Waterman, H., Sabanai, I., Geiger, B., and Yarden, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13819-13827 |
| 19. | Pawson, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Science 278, 2075-2080 |
| 20. | Ghiglione, C., Carraway, K. L., III, Amundadottir, L. T., Boswell, R. E., Perrimon, N., and Duffy, J. B. (1999) Cell 96, 847-856 |
| 21. | Carraway, K. L., III, Rossi, E. A., Komatsu, M., Price-Schiavi, S. A., Huang, D., Guy, P. M., Carvajal, M. E., Fregien, N., Carraway, C. A., and Carraway, K. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5263-5266 |
| 22. | Huang, G. C., Ouyang, X., and Epstein, R. J. (1998) Biochem J. 331, 113-119 |
| 23. | Murali, R., Brennan, P. J., Kieber-Emmons, T., and Greene, M. I. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6252-6257 |
| 24. | Stein, E., Lane, A. A., Cerretti, D. P., Schoecklmann, H. O., Schroff, A. D., Van Etten, R. L., and Daniel, T. O. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 667-678 |
| 25. | Mohammadi, M., Schlessinger, J., and Hubbard, S. R. (1996) Cell 86, 577-587 |
| 26. | Jiang, G., and Hunter, T. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 568-571 |
| 27. | Syed, R. S., Reid, S. W., Li, C., Cheetham, J. C., Aoki, K. H., Liu, B., Zhan, H., Osslund, T. D., Chirino, A. J., Zhang, J., Finer-Moore, J., Elliott, S., Sitney, K., Katz, B. A., Matthews, D. J., Wendoloski, J. J., Egrie, J., and Stroud, R. M. (1998) Nature 395, 511-516 |
| 28. | Livnah, O., Stura, E. A., Johnson, D. L., Middleton, S. A., Mulcahy, L. S., Wrighton, N. C., Dower, W. J., Jolliffe, L. K., and Wilson, I. A. (1996) Science 273, 464-471 |
| 29. | Burke, C. L., and Stern, D. F. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5371-5379 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Lynch, T. Vargo-Gogola, M. D. Martin, B. Fingleton, H. C. Crawford, and L. M. Matrisian Matrix Metalloproteinase 7 Mediates Mammary Epithelial Cell Tumorigenesis through the ErbB4 Receptor Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6760 - 6767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hoshino, T. Uchida, T. Otsuki, S. Kawamoto, K. Okubo, M. Takeichi, and O. Chisaka Cornichon-like Protein Facilitates Secretion of HB-EGF and Regulates Proper Development of Cranial Nerves Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1143 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suzuki, H. Shiraha, T. Fujikawa, N. Takaoka, N. Ueda, Y. Nakanishi, K. Koike, A. Takaki, and Y. Shiratori Des-{gamma}-carboxy Prothrombin Is a Potential Autologous Growth Factor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6409 - 6415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Sanderson, S. N. Erickson, P. J. Gough, K. J. Garton, P. T. Wille, E. W. Raines, A. J. Dunbar, and P. J. Dempsey ADAM10 Mediates Ectodomain Shedding of the Betacellulin Precursor Activated by p-Aminophenylmercuric Acetate and Extracellular Calcium Influx J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 1826 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Suenaga, N. Takada, M. Hatakeyama, M. Ichikawa, X. Yu, K. Tomii, N. Okimoto, N. Futatsugi, T. Narumi, M. Shirouzu, et al. Novel Mechanism of Interaction of p85 Subunit of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and ErbB3 Receptor-derived Phosphotyrosyl Peptides J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1321 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Karihaloo, S. Kale, N. D. Rosenblum, and L. G. Cantley Hepatocyte Growth Factor-Mediated Renal Epithelial Branching Morphogenesis Is Regulated by Glypican-4 Expression Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2004; 24(19): 8745 - 8752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Saito, S. Okada, K. Ohshima, E. Yamada, M. Sato, Y. Uehara, H. Shimizu, J. E. Pessin, and M. Mori Differential Activation of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Receptor Downstream Signaling Pathways by Betacellulin and EGF Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4232 - 4243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ma, Y. Z. Huang, G. M. Pitcher, J. G. Valtschanoff, Y. H. Ma, L. Y. Feng, B. Lu, W. C. Xiong, M. W. Salter, R. J. Weinberg, et al. Ligand-Dependent Recruitment of the ErbB4 Signaling Complex into Neuronal Lipid Rafts J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3164 - 3175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Yau, H.-F. Wang, C. Lai, and F.-C. Liu Neural Development of the Neuregulin Receptor ErbB4 in the Cerebral Cortex and the Hippocampus: Preferential Expression by Interneurons Tangentially Migrating from the Ganglionic Eminences Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2003; 13(3): 252 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-A. Huotari, P. J. Miettinen, J. Palgi, T. Koivisto, J. Ustinov, D. Harari, Y. Yarden, and T. Otonkoski ErbB Signaling Regulates Lineage Determination of Developing Pancreatic Islet Cells in Embryonic Organ Culture Endocrinology, November 1, 2002; 143(11): 4437 - 4446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Penington, I. Bryant, and D. J. Riese II Constitutively Active ErbB4 and ErbB2 Mutants Exhibit Distinct Biological Activities Cell Growth Differ., June 1, 2002; 13(6): 247 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Diamonti, P. M. Guy, C. Ivanof, K. Wong, C. Sweeney, and K. L. Carraway III An RBCC protein implicated in maintenance of steady-state neuregulin receptor levels PNAS, February 20, 2002; (2002) 52709799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-H. Yu, J. F. Woessner Jr., J. D. McNeish, and I. Stamenkovic CD44 anchors the assembly of matrilysin/MMP-7 with heparin-binding epidermal growth factor precursor and ErbB4 and regulates female reproductive organ remodeling Genes & Dev., February 1, 2002; 16(3): 307 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-K. Park, R. Miller, I. Krane, and T. Vartanian The erbB2 gene is required for the development of terminally differentiated spinal cord oligodendrocytes J. Cell Biol., September 17, 2001; 154(6): 1245 - 1258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sweeney, D. Fambrough, C. Huard, A. J. Diamonti, E. S. Lander, L. C. Cantley, and K. L. Carraway III Growth Factor-specific Signaling Pathway Stimulation and Gene Expression Mediated by ErbB Receptors J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22685 - 22698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coulpier, J. Anders, and C. F. Ibanez Coordinated Activation of Autophosphorylation Sites in the RET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase. IMPORTANCE OF TYROSINE 1062 FOR GDNF MEDIATED NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION AND SURVIVAL J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2002; 277(3): 1991 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Diamonti, P. M. Guy, C. Ivanof, K. Wong, C. Sweeney, and K. L. Carraway III An RBCC protein implicated in maintenance of steady-state neuregulin receptor levels PNAS, March 5, 2002; 99(5): 2866 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |