JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001028200 on March 29, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 19857-19865, June 30, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/26/19857    most recent
M001028200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Määttä, A.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Määttä, A.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, F. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structure and Regulation of the Envoplakin Gene*

Arto MäättäDagger, Christiana Ruhrberg§, and Fiona M. Watt

From the Keratinocyte Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom

Received for publication, February 2, 2000, and in revised form, March 15, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Envoplakin, a member of the plakin family of proteins, is a component of desmosomes and the epidermal cornified envelope. To understand how envoplakin expression is regulated, we have analyzed the structure of the mouse envoplakin gene and characterized the promoters of both the human and mouse genes. The mouse gene consists of 22 exons and maps to chromosome 11E1, syntenic to the location of the human gene on 17q25. The exon-intron structure of the mouse envoplakin gene is common to all members of the plakin family: the N-terminal protein domain is encoded by 21 small exons, and the central rod domain and the C-terminal globular domain are coded by a single large exon. The C terminus shows the highest sequence conservation between mouse and human envoplakins and between envoplakin and the other family members. The N terminus is also conserved, with sequence homology extending to Drosophila Kakapo. A region between nucleotides -101 and 288 was necessary for promoter activity in transiently transfected primary keratinocytes. This region is highly conserved between the human and mouse genes and contains at least two different positively acting elements identified by site-directed mutagenesis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Mutation of a GC box binding Sp1 and Sp3 proteins or a combined E box and Krüppel-like element interacting with unidentified nuclear proteins virtually abolished promoter activity. 600 base pairs of the mouse upstream sequence was sufficient to drive expression of a beta -galactosidase reporter gene in the suprabasal layers of epidermis, esophagus, and forestomach of transgenic mice. Thus, we have identified a regulatory region in the envoplakin gene that can account for the expression pattern of the endogenous protein in stratified squamous epithelia.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plakins are cytoskeletal linker proteins mediating the association of intermediate filaments with cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interaction sites (1, 2). The common domain structure of the plakins reflects this function. The N-terminal globular domain directs the proteins to membrane localization sites, desmosomes, or hemidesmosomes. The central rod domain forms a coiled coil structure and mediates the assembly of plakins into homodimers and, putatively, higher order structures. Finally, the C-terminal globular domain binds intermediate filament bundles (reviewed in Refs. 1-3).

At present five members of the plakin family of proteins are well characterized. Desmoplakin (4) is an abundant component of the desmosome inner plaque that binds keratin filaments to epithelial cell-cell attachment sites (2, 5). Plectin (6, 7) is a ubiquitously expressed protein that is able to bridge intermediate filaments to microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton (8) and is found in desmosomes, hemidesmosomes, and adherens junctions (3). In epithelia BPAG11 (9) is also part of the hemidesmosome plaque (3, 5, 10), whereas the splice variants of BPAG1 found in neurons bind not only neurofilaments but also actin filaments and microtubules (11, 12).

The two newest members of the plakin family are envoplakin and periplakin (13-15), which were originally identified as components of the epidermal cornified envelope, a submembranous layer of transglutaminase cross-linked protein that contributes to the barrier properties of the outermost layers of the skin (16). Envoplakin and periplakin are also found in desmosomes, and it has been proposed that they act as an interdesmosomal scaffold on which the cornified envelope is assembled (13, 14, 17). A further contribution of envoplakin and periplakin to epidermal barrier function is the covalent attachment of ceramide lipids to these proteins (17). In addition to expression in epidermis, envoplakin and periplakin are found in other stratified squamous epithelia and in two-layered and transitional epithelia such as mammary gland and bladder (14). Although envoplakin and periplakin share the characteristic plakin domain structure, their C-terminal domains are considerably smaller than the respective domains of the other plakins, and they are unique among the plakins in having the potential to heterodimerize with each other (14).

Gene targeting of plakins in mice and characterization of certain human pathologies have underlined the importance of this protein family. Desmoplakin is crucial for the assembly or stability of desmosomes and mice without desmoplakin die at day 6.5 of embryonic development (18). Desmoplakin is haploinsufficient in man, a heterozygous null allele causing a striated palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (19). In mice lack of either plectin or BPAG1 is not embryonically lethal but causes epidermal blistering as a result of the dissociation of keratin bundles from hemidesmosomes (11, 20); in addition, the BPAG1 null animals have severe neuronal degeneration (11). Humans with autoantibodies against BPAG1 or mutations resulting in loss of plectin also have skin blistering (21, 22). All the plakins, including envoplakin and periplakin, are targets for autoantibodies in paraneoplastic pemphigus, a skin and mucosal blistering disease that develops in some patients with lymphatic malignancies (23, 24).

So far, knowledge about the regulation of plakin genes is limited. None of the promoters has been analyzed for tissue-specific regulatory regions in vivo, and only the BPAG1 and periplakin promoters have been characterized by reporter gene transfection in keratinocytes (25, 26). To facilitate the analysis of envoplakin function, we have cloned the mouse envoplakin gene and analyzed the envoplakin promoter in cultured keratinocytes and the epidermis of transgenic mice.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Genomic Cloning and Sequencing-- Three lambda -phage clones were isolated and purified from a 129/Sv mouse genomic library using the p210-23 human envoplakin cDNA clone (13) as a probe. Restriction mapping and Southern blotting with several different envoplakin cDNA fragments were carried out to characterize the clones. Overlapping restriction fragments were subcloned into pBluescript KS II for sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed with fluorescent dye-labeled terminators and AmpliTaq thermostable DNA polymerase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the reactions were run in an ABI automatic sequencer.

Sequence Analysis-- Sequences were assembled in the MacVector program. Comparison with the human cDNA sequence was made in MacVector and by using the GAP algorithm in the Genetics Computing Group package. The conceptual translation product of mouse envoplakin was compared with data bases by Blast, ScanPS, Prosite, and Pfam searches (in the Genomic Computing laboratory server in Imperial Cancer Research Fund and in the ProteinPredict servers at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory). Multiple sequence alignment was carried out with the ClustalX program.

Chromosomal Localization-- DNA isolated from the lambda  phage M210-52 was labeled with biotin-14-ATP using a Bionick kit (Life Technologies, Inc.) and hybridized to metaphase chromosome spreads of normal mouse spleen cells. The hybridized chromosomes were stained with chromosome paints (Cambio) for identification, and the slides were counterstained with diamino-2-phenyl-indole dihydrochloride (Sigma) and mounted in Citifluor (Citifluor Ltd.). Separate images of the probe signal, banding pattern, and the counterstain were pseudocolored and merged using Smartcapture software (Digital Scientific).

Reporter Gene Constructs-- The human envoplakin promoter was PCR amplified and cloned directly into the HindIII-BglII site of luciferase reporter gene plasmid pGL3 (Promega). The 3' end primer, 5'-CCCCAAGCTTCGCTCCTCACTGGCTGGTCA (cloning site underlined), is located in the 5'-untranslated region starting position +21 (start of the cDNA: zero). Four different 5' end primers were used: 5'-GATCAGATCTGGTACCCAGTGTGAGGAAAAG for the generation of the plasmid p-1068ELuc, 5'-GGGAAGATCTGGAGGCTGAGGCAGGAGAAT for the plasmid p-670ELuc, 5'-GGGAAGATCTAAACCTTCTGTGGGAGTCGG for the plasmid p-220Eluc, and 5'-GGGAAGATCTAGACTGGTTGTGCAGGAGGA for the plasmid p-158ELuc. A SacI digestion was used to make the plasmid p-363ELuc from the plasmid p-670ELuc, a SmaI-MscI digestion was used to make the plasmid p-288ELuc, and a SmaI-StuI double digestion was used to yield the plasmid p-101ELuc. The plasmid p-1068Delta SS Eluc lacks the SacI-StuI fragment (from -363 to -101). To amplify the mouse envoplakin promoter the primers 5'- GGGAAGATCTCAGATTTGAGAGCAGTTATGG and 5'-CCCCAAAGCTTCGCGTCCTCGCTGGCTACTAG were used for the 5' and 3' ends, respectively. The mouse promoter was then digested with HindIII, and the resultant 546-bp fragment was ligated to the HindIII site in the pGL3 polylinker.

Site-directed Mutagenesis-- Putative transcription factor binding sites were mutated in the plasmid p-363 Eluc using a GeneEditor kit (Promega). The following oligonucleotide primers were used: 5'-CCTTCCCTATCTGGATCCGATCGCCGCTGCG, to change a prospective Krüppel-like factor (Klf) binding site at bp -265 in the promoter to yield plasmid p-363 Mut Klf; 5'-CCCCTAGGCATGTACATGTAACAAGTCCAAC, to mutate overlapping E box and Klf sites at -240 to generate plasmid p-363 Mut E+K; and 5'-GGGCAGGCTCGGCCATGGCCTCAGGGCTGTGC, to mutate an Sp1 site at -190 to yield plasmid p-363 Mut Sp. The mutations were confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing. The three mutations create a new BamHI, BsrG1, and NcoI site, respectively.

Promoter Analysis by Transient Transfections-- Stocks of human primary keratinocytes (kc, km, and kq) were cultured in FAD medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 5 µg/ml insulin, 10-10 M cholera toxin, and 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor with a mitomycin C-treated 3T3-J2 feeder layer (27). For transient transfections the cells were grown in serum-free keratinocyte medium (KBM-2, Clonetics) and used at passages 2-6. Cells were adapted to serum-free conditions for at least one passage before transfection.

For transient transfections 1.2-2 × 105 cells/well were plated in 6-well plates. The next day a total of 2.5 µg of plasmid DNA consisting of 2 µg of the luciferase construct and 0.5 µg of beta -galactosidase reference plasmid/well was transfected using Superfect reagent (Qiagen). After 3 h the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and fed with fresh medium. Cells were harvested 16-72 h after transfection, and the luciferase and beta -galactosidase activities were measured in total cell extracts using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega) and Galacto-Light Plus assay (Tropix), respectively. Luciferase activities were standardized using the beta -galactosidase activity of the same extracts.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays-- Human and mouse primary keratinocytes were cultured as described above except that mouse keratinocytes were grown on collagen-coated dishes (Biocoat, Becton Dickinson) rather than on a feeder layer, and nuclear extracts were isolated from confluent cultures as described (28). Binding of the nuclear extracts to end-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides was performed as described in (28). Top strand sequences for the binding sites were as follows: Klf site, 5'-CTATCTGGGTGTGATCGCCG; E box + Klf site, 5'-TTGTTACACCCCACATGCCTAG; and Sp1 site, 5'-GGCTCGGCCCCGCCCTCAGGG. The following antibodies (all from Santa Cruz) were used to supershift or prevent formation of protein DNA complexes: M-19 for gut-enriched Klf4, C-20 for upstream stimulatory factor-1, N-262 for c-Myc, (D-20)-G for Sp3, and 1C6 for Sp1. 0.1-2 µg of the antibodies were incubated with the nuclear extracts 10 min before addition of the labeled probe as described (28, 29).

Generation and Analysis of Transgenic Mice-- The nucleotide sequence around the translation start site of the mouse envoplakin gene was mutated by PCR to a NcoI site (from CCATGT to CCATGG; start codon underlined) to facilitate cloning into the pPSD vector that carries the beta -galactosidase gene (30). The plasmid p06EP-LacZ contains the promoter sequences up to a HindIII site at 608 bp upstream from the ATG site. To generate p34EP-LacZ, a 2.8-kb HindIII fragment was subcloned from the lambda  clone M210-52 to the HindIII site of linearized p06EP-LacZ. SalI digestion was used for both plasmids to release the insert for microinjection into recipient oocytes, yielding six founders for p34EP-LacZ and seven founders for p06EP-LacZ. DNA-positive mice were screened by PCR using primers 5'-CAGAGACAGCGCACCTGCAGGGA and 5'-GATGGGCGCATCGTAACCGTCA derived from the mouse envoplakin promoter and beta  -galactosidase gene, respectively.

Mouse genomic DNA isolated from tail snips of PCR-positive animals was digested with PstI or XhoI to evaluate transgene integration and copy number. For Southern blotting an internal 0.4-kb EcoRI fragment from the LacZ gene was used. After screening all the transgene-positive founders for beta -galactosidase activity in tail sections, two founders per construct were selected to establish lines. Lines 7782 and 7783 expressing 34EPLacZ both had a transgene copy number of at least 5. Lines 7494 and 7495 expressing 06EP LacZ both had a transgene copy number of at least 20. Histochemical staining for beta -galactosidase activity was performed as described (31). Representative photographs were scanned into Photoshop 5.0, where the brightness and contrast were adjusted equally for each panel shown.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Mouse Envoplakin Gene Consists of 22 Exons and Maps to Chromosome 11E1-- We cloned the mouse envoplakin gene from a 129/Sv mouse genomic lambda -library. Three overlapping clones (Fig. 1) were isolated and purified by using the 5' end of the human envoplakin cDNA as a probe. Sequencing of these clones revealed potential exons that could code for mouse envoplakin. We compared these exons with the human envoplakin cDNA sequence (13) and with the exon-intron structure of the human envoplakin gene (32). Finally, we performed reverse transcription-PCR on mouse keratinocytes to confirm the predicted size of the envoplakin transcript and sequenced several mouse envoplakin N-terminal cDNA fragments (not shown). By these approaches, we determined the exon-intron structure of the entire N terminus and the beginning of the central rod domain of the mouse envoplakin gene.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The exon-intron structure of the mouse envoplakin gene. The three overlapping lambda  clones covering most of the gene are indicated. The last exon (number 22) was cloned by genomic PCR; the 3' end PCR primer was derived from the 3'-untranslated region of mouse envoplakin expressed sequence tag sequences. The numbering of the exons is shown in bold type, and the sizes of the exons (base pairs) are in regular type. Shaded boxes represent the N-terminal exons. The 22nd exon codes for both the rod domain (hatched box) and the C terminus of the protein (open box).

The 3' end of the gene was not included in the isolated lambda -clones. Based on the structure of the human gene we assumed that it would encode the rest of the rod and the C-terminal domain and would comprise a single exon. We used sequence information from mouse expressed sequence tag clones that showed highest similarity to the human envoplakin cDNA (GenBankTM accession numbers AA726169, AA727101, and AA798910) and performed genomic PCR to isolate a 3-kb fragment that, as predicted, encoded the missing part of the gene.

The mouse envoplakin gene consists of 22 exons (Fig. 1). The first 21 exons, corresponding to the large N-terminal protein domain, are small (39-194 bp in length). The sizes of these exons are perfectly conserved between the human and mouse genes. In general, the pattern of exon sizes in the envoplakin gene resembles human periplakin more than the other plakin genes: 13 out of 21 N-terminal exons are identical in size in envoplakin and periplakin. Although small N-terminal exons characterize all the known plakin genes, the sizes of the exons are not conserved among family members, except for a few exons near the end of the N-terminal head domain of the proteins (not shown).

The lambda  clone M210-52 was used to determine the chromosomal localization of the mouse envoplakin gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The Evpl locus was present as a single copy residing on chromosome 11E1 in 20 metaphases analyzed on chromosome spreads of normal mouse spleen cells (Fig. 2). This region is syntenic to the human chromosomal band 17q25, where the human envoplakin gene has been localized (33).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Fluorescence in situ hybridization maps the mouse envoplakin gene to chromosome 11E1. The right-hand panel shows a metaphase chromosome spread from normal mouse spleen cells hybridized with lambda  clone M210-52 for mouse envoplakin. The arrow points to chromosome 11, which is also shown separately in the left-hand panel. The two black dots on chromosome 11 represent the hybridization signal from each sister chromatid.

Conservation of Coding Sequences between Mouse and Human Envoplakin and Other Plakin Family Members-- The coding sequence of the mouse envoplakin gene that we compiled predicts a polypeptide of 2035 amino acid residues (Fig. 3). This is one amino acid longer than the corresponding human protein owing to an additional residue at the C terminus before the stop codon. Mouse envoplakin is characterized by the common plakin structure: N-terminal and C-terminal domains are separated by an 828-amino acid rod domain. The boundaries of the rod domain were determined by the CoilScan program in the GCG package that predicts regions with a high probability of forming coiled coil structures (not shown). The same boundaries were seen when using the Coils algorithm in the PredictProtein server. The boundaries for the central rod domain of mouse envoplakin were predicted to differ from the human envoplakin protein (13). This reflects the more interrupted structure of the envoplakin rod when compared with predicted rod domains of the other plakins, and the actual borders for the protein domains must await experimental verification.


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Amino acid sequence of mouse envoplakin. The conceptual translation product was deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the exons of the mouse envoplakin gene. The putative borders for the central rod domain and the conserved linker domain are shown. The KGS motifs in the beginning of the N terminus are underlined.

Comparison of the mouse envoplakin sequence with human envoplakin and other plakins is shown in Table I. Mouse and human envoplakins are highly conserved. The N-terminal globular domain of the protein is similar to other plakin N termini including Kakapo, a Drosophila protein carrying domains homologous to plectin and dystrophin (34, 35). The most conserved N-terminal sequence within the whole family is shown in Fig. 4A; it includes a tyrosine residue (amino acid 210) followed by closely spaced leucines and ending with a DWSD motif. Notably this structure is present in both Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans Kakapo proteins (GenBankTM accession number for the cosmid that contains the coding sequence is ZK1151) and its mouse homologue, the actin cross-linking protein ACF-7 (mACF-7; Ref. 36). Interestingly, the five times repeated KGS motif in the beginning of envoplakin (Fig. 3) is conserved between mouse and human but is not found in the other plakins.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Similarity (as a percentage) between mouse envoplakin protein domains and other plakins and plakin-related proteins
Mouse envoplakin protein domains are indicated in Fig. 3. GAP program in the Genetics Computing Group suite was used to produce an optimal alignment between the mouse envoplakin domains and corresponding protein sequences of other plakins.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Alignment of conserved protein domains in the plakin family. The Clustal-X program was used for multiple sequence alignment of plakin protein domains. A, the first half of the N terminus contains a conserved sequence that is found in all plakins and in actin cross-linking factor-7. mEPL, mouse envoplakin N-terminal sequence from amino acid residue 204; hEPL, human envoplakin from amino acid 204; mPPL, mouse periplakin from amino acid 191; hPPL, human periplakin from amino acid 192; hDP, human desmoplakin from amino acid 249; hBPAG1, human bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 from amino acid 352; rPLEC, rat plectin from amino acid 190; mACF-7, mouse actin cross-linking factor 7 from amino acid 812; dKAKAPO, Drosophila Kakapo from amino acid 597. B, alignment of the linker sequence in the C terminus of the plakins. Mouse and human envoplakin are shown from amino acid 1684, human periplakin is shown from amino acid 1654, mouse periplakin is shown from amino acid 1655, human desmoplakin is shown from amino acid 2463, rat plectin is shown from amino acid 3731, and human bullous pemphigoid antigen-1 is shown from amino acid 2336.

The newly defined linker domain between the rod and the C-terminal globular domains (14, 15) has the highest sequence conservation between human and mouse envoplakin (Table I). The alignment of the linker domains in different plakins (Fig. 4B) indicates the conserved and similar residues between mouse envoplakin and the other plakin family members. The linker domain is lacking in ACF-7 and in Kakapo, the C terminus of which is not homologous to plakins but to dystrophin (34-36).

Conservation of the Human and Mouse Upstream Sequences Indicates Potential Regulatory Regions-- The nucleotide sequence of the putative human envoplakin promoter was determined from the cosmid ICRFc105D03119 (33). Comparison of the corresponding mouse sequence revealed a considerable degree of sequence homology (Fig. 5). Both the mouse and human sequences lacked a TATA box and had instead an initiator element consensus sequence only. Conservation was highest around and just upstream from the initiator consensus sequence and in a stretch of about 150 bp starting at nucleotide -137 of the human sequence (Fig. 5). The human promoter has an Alu repetitive element further upstream from the conserved region (from bp -550). The relative locations and sequences of several putative binding sites for transcription factors were well conserved between species. These include several GC and GT boxes for the Sp1 family of transcription factors, E boxes for helix-loop-helix factors, and two binding sites for Krüppel-like transcription factors.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Sequence comparison of human and mouse envoplakin promoters. A sequence comparison between the human (top) and mouse (bottom) envoplakin promoters was produced by the GAP program in the GCG package. ATG translation start site is in bold type. The beginning of the human envoplakin cDNA is in bold italics; this nucleotide was designated as +1. The putative initiator element is underlined, and some consensus binding sites for transcription factors are boxed.

Two Conserved DNA Motifs Are Necessary for High Level Reporter Gene Expression in Primary Human Keratinocytes-- The high degree of conservation between the human and mouse envoplakin upstream sequences suggested that important regulatory motifs might lie within the first few hundred base pairs of that region. To test this hypothesis we assayed promoter activity in reporter gene transfections. Both human and mouse upstream sequences were cloned into luciferase reporter gene constructs. In addition, we constructed a deletion series of the potential human promoter. These plasmids were transiently transfected into human primary epidermal keratinocytes. Each plasmid was tested in at least five independent transfections.

The longest fragment of the human upstream sequence tested, extending over 1 kb from the 5' end of the gene, consistently gave the highest luciferase activities (Fig. 6). These values were on average 500 times higher than obtained by transfection of the empty vector alone, which indicates that the fragment contains sequences capable of high promoter (or combined promoter and enhancer) activity. The mean activity of this construct (p-1068ELuc) was designated as 100%, and the mean activities of the other constructs were calculated relative to that. The mouse promoter (p-MEPLuc; up to the HindIII site at -523 of the mouse sequence) was on average slightly more active than the longest tested human fragment (Fig. 6), possibly reflecting the presence of an Alu repetitive sequence in the human promoter upstream from the highly conserved region. The shortest fragment of the human promoter tested (p-101ELuc) was only about five times more active than the empty vector alone (Fig. 6).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Deletion analysis of envoplakin gene promoter activity in human keratinocytes. Envoplakin promoter-luciferase constructs were transiently transfected in human foreskin keratinocytes, and luciferase activity was measured 24 h after transfection. p-MEPLuc is the mouse promoter; all the other constructs are human. The raw luciferase values were normalized against co-transfected beta -galactosidase reference plasmid. The values are presented as percentages of the most active human promoter fragment, which was assigned the value of 100%. Each bar shows the mean and standard error of five independent transfections (three transfections in the case of pMEPLuc). The positions of putative transcription factor binding sites are shown above the graph.

In comparing the activity of a series of fragments of the human promoter intermediate in length between p-1068 and p-101, the most remarkable difference was between the shortest promoter and a construct extending to nucleotide -363 (Fig. 6). To test the importance of this region, we deleted it from the full-length promoter. The resultant plasmid, p-1068Delta SS, had as little promoter activity as the shortest (p-101) plasmid. Thus, deletion of the 260-bp fragment rendered the envoplakin promoter inactive. This region includes that part of the upstream sequence that is most highly conserved between human and mouse genes (Fig. 5). Furthermore, even though the more distal sequences (from -363 to -1068) seemingly contain additional positive regulatory elements, the activity of these elements was dependent on the presence of the 260-bp fragment. The activity of the 260-bp fragment could be divided into two additive elements: transfection of the construct p-220ELuc resulted in approximately half the activity of the construct p-363ELuc (Fig. 6).

To further characterize the 260-bp fragment, we mutated three conserved elements harboring putative transcription factor binding sites. The mutations were designed to abolish the consensus binding sites for a Klf site at nucleotide -265 (p-Mut Klf), an overlapping E box and Klf site at -240 (p-Mut E+Klf), and an Sp1 site at -190 (p-Mut Sp1) (Fig. 5). The mutations were compared with the wild type promoter for activity in luciferase reporter gene assays (Fig. 7). The first mutation did not significantly change promoter activity, and an additional deletion construct (p-288 Eluc) confirmed that the two basic helix-loop-helix protein binding sites upstream from -265 Klf site were not needed for high level activity, which further narrowed the critical region to 187 bp between -101 and -288. Mutations p-Mut E+Klf and p- Mut Sp1 very effectively reduced promoter activity, each causing a greater than 20-fold decrease in luciferase activity compared with wild type (Fig. 7). This indicated that an Sp1 site and an element containing overlapping E box and Klf sequences were both necessary for the function of the fragment.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Site-directed mutagenesis of the envoplakin upstream sequence indicates two conserved elements necessary for promoter activity. Point mutations abolishing transcription factor consensus binding sites were introduced into plasmid p-363ELuc. p-Mut Klf removes a consensus Klf site, p-MutE+Klf is at an combined E box and Klf site, and p-MutSp1 is at an Sp1 site. A deletion construct p-288Eluc removed the two most distal E box sequences in p-363ELuc. The constructs were transfected into primary human keratinocytes and luciferase activities were measured 24 h later. The luciferase values were normalized against a beta -galactosidase reference plasmid. The means and standard errors of four independent transfections are shown.

To study transcription factor binding to these sites, we employed electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Fig. 8). The Sp1 site was found to interact with Sp1 protein family members in both human (not shown) and mouse keratinocyte nuclear extracts (Fig. 8A). Specific complexes could be disrupted by preincubating the nuclear extracts with antibodies against Sp1 or Sp3, whereas a control antibody (c-Fos) did not prevent complex formation (Fig. 8A). None of the antibodies we tested affected nuclear protein binding to the combined E box and Klf site at -240, indicating that in keratinocytes this site is not occupied by the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor upstream stimulatory factor-1, by c-Myc, or by any of the Krüppel family members recognized by an antibody against Klf4 (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Electrophoretic mobility shift assays of the two DNA elements critical for envoplakin promoter activity. Nuclear extracts from primary mouse keratinocytes were incubated with radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to DNA elements critical for promoter activity. A, the Sp1 site (Mut Sp1 at bp -190). Specific complexes were competed by 100-fold excess of unlabeled probe but not by 100-fold excess of a nonspecific probe (N.S.). Preincubation of the nuclear extracts with antibodies against Sp1 or Sp3 perturbed complex formation while preincubation with a c-Fos antibody did not affect complex formation. B, the site containing overlapping basic helix-loop-helix and Klf consensus motifs (at -240) bound specific proteins that were not competed by excess of a nonspecific probe (N.S.). Moreover, the complexes were not affected by antibodies against upstream stimulatory factor-1 (Usf), c-Myc, or Klf4.

600 bp of the Mouse Envoplakin Upstream Sequence Can Direct beta -Galactosidase Expression to Differentiated Keratinocytes in Transgenic Mice-- We analyzed the tissue specificity of the envoplakin upstream sequences by using LacZ reporter gene constructs in transgenic mice. Two different versions of promoter-LacZ minigenes carrying either 3.4 or 0.6 kb of the mouse envoplakin promoter were constructed. Microinjection of these constructs yielded six and seven founder mice, respectively. LacZ activity was analyzed in tail skin of the founders. For both constructs four founders stained positively for beta -galactosidase, and staining was restricted to the suprabasal layers of the epidermis (not shown). For both constructs, two independent lines presenting the strongest staining were bred for detailed analysis.

Histochemical staining for beta  -galactosidase activity in adult back skin revealed that both of the constructs were able to direct reporter gene expression in the differentiated cell layers of the epidermis (Fig. 9, A and B). No staining was detectable in the dermis or in the basal layer of the epidermis. In hair follicles staining was confined to the inner root sheath. Both promoters were active in the esophagus and forestomach (Fig. 9, C and D). No staining was observed in the epithelium of either bladder or mammary gland (Fig. 9, E and F), even though these epithelia are known to express envoplakin (14). In negative littermates, no beta -galactosidase activity was detected in the skin, esophagus, or forestomach (data not shown).


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   The promoter of the mouse envoplakin gene drives reporter gene expression in the epidermis of transgenic mice. Epithelial tissues of DNA-positive animals were stained for beta -galactosidase activity (blue cytoplasmic staining) and counterstained with hematoxylin. A, 0.6-kb promoter. B-F, 3.4-kb promoter. A and B, back skin. Note that both promoters are active in the differentiated keratinocytes of the skin. In the hair follicles, the staining is restricted to the inner root sheath. C, esophagus. D, forestomach. E, bladder. F, mammary gland. Original magnification was 250× in all panels.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Keratinocytes have distinct features that increase the structural integrity and mechanical strength of the epidermis. Desmosomes connect keratin intermediate filaments to a dynamic network extending throughout the tissue (2, 8). Cornified envelopes, the functional end point of keratinocyte terminal differentiation, form a rigid and protective protein barrier in the outer layers of the epidermis (for a recent review see Ref. 37). Envoplakin is a component of both desmosomes and cornified envelopes (13) and is thus a potentially important structural protein of the epidermis. In this report we present the genomic organization of mouse envoplakin and determine key regulatory elements in the human and mouse envoplakin promoters.

The mouse envoplakin gene, Evpl, lies on chromosome 11E1, syntenic to human chromosome 17q25, where the corresponding human gene, EVPL, resides (33). In both species, the envoplakin gene is proximal to the acidic keratin gene clusters that localize to 11D in mouse and 17q21-23 in man (38, 39). There are several mouse mutations with skin phenotypes, such as bareskin (Bsk) and rex (Re), that segregate with chromosome 11 (40). One mouse mutation, Rim3, affecting skin and hair follicles, has been mapped more accurately to the distal region of chromosome 11 (41) and envoplakin can thus be considered as a potential candidate gene for this disorder. No human diseases have so far been linked to the envoplakin gene. A skin disorder, focal nonepidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with esophageal cancer, is mapped to 17q25, but high resolution mapping and sequencing have excluded envoplakin as a candidate gene (32).

The mouse envoplakin gene has 22 exons, like its human counterpart (32) and the human periplakin gene (26). As evaluated by the sizes of the exons and homology at the DNA level, envoplakin and periplakin form a pair of closely related genes that are to some extent divergent from the other plakins. This is further emphasized by the fact that at the protein level mouse and human envoplakin are most similar to periplakin. The linker domain immediately C-terminal to the rod domain is the most conserved part of the plakin family (14, 15, 23), and some paraneoplastic pemphigus autoantibodies cross-react with C-terminal fusion proteins of envoplakin, periplakin, and desmoplakin (23). The function of this part of the plakin proteins has not been demonstrated conclusively but is likely to be involved, together with the C-terminal repeats, in the interaction of plakins with intermediate filaments (42, 43). The presence of a potential protein kinase C phosphorylation site in the linker further suggests a regulatory role in protein interactions for this domain.

The putative promoters of both the human and mouse envoplakin genes lack a TATA box. As originally described for housekeeping genes, they have a possible initiator element preceded by several binding sites for transcription factors of the Sp1 family. It is of interest that the envoplakin upstream sequence shares several features with the periplakin promoter (26). They both are TATA-less, harbor several Sp-1 sites, and need sequences distal to the basal promoter for optimal expression in cultured keratinocytes. Because envoplakin and periplakin are usually co-expressed and possibly form heterodimers (14), it is conceivable that they are targets for the same signaling pathways and transcription factors.

Using transgenic mice we were able to show that only 600 bp of the mouse envoplakin promoter are needed for gene expression in suprabasal keratinocytes. Moreover, transient transfections into human primary keratinocytes demonstrated that a 187-bp element of the human upstream sequence, which is highly conserved in the mouse, is necessary for high level reporter gene expression. The 187-bp region harbors several fully conserved binding sites for transcription factors, such as Krüppel-like factors and basic helix-loop-helix factors that interact with E box sequences. Notably, no conserved activator protein-1 sites were found in this region, although members of the Fos and Jun protein families are involved in the regulation of several promoters of keratinocyte-specific genes (43-45).

The importance of the conserved Sp1-binding site in the promoter activity of the envoplakin gene is interesting in the light of recent reports on the function of Sp1 in regulating other epithelial genes. Usually, Sp1 does not determine the tissue specificity of a gene on its own but acts co-operatively with other transcription factors such as Ets (in the human transglutaminase 3 promoter; Ref. 47) or AP-2 (in the keratin K3 promoter; Ref. 48). The Sp1 family comprises four proteins, one of which, Sp3, can antagonize the action of Sp1. It has been suggested that the ratio of Sp1 to Sp3 regulates the papilloma virus 16 promoter during epithelial differentiation (49). Sp3 levels are higher in basal keratinocytes, and Sp1 is up-regulated in differentiating keratinocytes. These observations support the conclusion that Sp1 plays a role in activating differentiation-specific genes such as envoplakin (the present study), distal-less Dlx3 (50), and involucrin (51).

Klf4, a member of the Krüppel family of transcription factors, has recently been shown to be crucial for the barrier function of the epidermis (52). Targeted inactivation of Klf4 leads to neonatal death because of transepidermal water loss and genes regulated by Klf4 in keratinocytes encode cornified envelope proteins (52). We were able to detect a weak binding of Klf proteins to the site at -265 (data not shown) that did not affect envoplakin promoter activity in cultured keratinocytes. In contrast, the element containing overlapping sites for basic helix-loop-helix proteins and Klf proteins that was essential for promoter activity did not interact with any of the candidate factors tested by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These included upstream stimulatory factor-1, which has been shown to be crucial for syndecan-1 enhancer activity in a keratinocyte cell line (29, 53), c-Myc, which is known to regulate epidermal differentiation (54), and any of the several Klf family members recognized by polyclonal antibody M-19 against Klf4 (SantaCruz). Future work is needed to determine the exact nature of the transcription factors interacting with the MutE + Klf site in the envoplakin promoter. It is possible that other Klf sites in the envoplakin promoter are used in later stages of epidermal differentiation than could be studied in our transient transfection assays.

Different regulatory regions appear to be responsible for envoplakin expression in stratified squamous epithelia compared with transitional or simple epithelia. Even the 3.4-kb envoplakin promoter failed to express beta -galactosidase in mammary gland, in bladder, or in the simple epithelium of gastric mucosa. It is thus likely that other, as yet uncharacterized, regulatory regions exist in the gene. At least in the case of bladder urothelium there is evidence for highly tissue-specific regulatory regions because the promoter of the uroplakin II gene is not active in any other epithelium studied (55).

Epidermal gene expression has been the subject of considerable and continuing research (44, 56). A number of promoters of genes up-regulated during keratinocyte terminal differentiation have been characterized previously. These include cornified envelope precursors such as involucrin (51, 57), small proline-rich proteins (46), and loricrin (58, 59) and desmosomal proteins such as desmoglein-1 (60). The regions needed for epidermal expression of these genes have been elucidated in many cases. Usually, a few kilobases of the promoter are sufficient for correct expression in skin. For example, a 2.5-kb fragment of the human transglutaminase-1 gene (61) and the so called distal regulatory region (from 1.95 to 2.5 kb upstream) of the human involucrin promoter (51) direct beta -galactosidase expression correctly. Likewise, a 4.2-kb fragment of the desmoglein-1 promoter controls epidermal expression, even though it fails to act position-independently and is not sufficient for expression in other stratified epithelia (60). In the loricrin gene, on the contrary, far-upstream sequences between 6.5 and 14 kb are needed for correct expression (59). Interestingly, a short 90-bp promoter fragment of the keratin-5 gene misdirects beta -galactosidase expression to suprabasal keratinocytes, even though longer constructs are correctly expressed in basal cells (62). Thus, gene expression can be activated in differentiated keratinocytes both by very proximal promoter elements and by more distal enhancer-like elements. Among those so far studied, the proximal promoter of envoplakin is one of the shortest that is correctly expressed in differentiated keratinocytes and might thus turn out to be useful in biotechnological or therapeutic applications where size constraints of the vectors often limit the range of tissue-specific promoters that can be tested.

Although to date analysis of the promoters of keratinocyte-specific genes has tended to highlight their diversity rather than common elements, evidence is starting to emerge for "master switches" orchestrating the fate of different keratinocyte populations and the subsets of genes expressed in them. Notably, lack of p63 leads to almost total absence of the proliferative and differentiating cell compartments of the epidermis (63, 64), and ectopic expression of a mammalian distal-less homologue (Dlx3) in the epidermal basal layer of transgenic mice leads to premature expression of several markers of terminal differentiation (65). As described above, Klf4 may co-ordinately regulate several cornified envelope genes during late stages of differentiation (52). The relative abundance of Sp1 and Sp3 is also emerging as an important determinant of the expression levels of differentiation-related genes. Combining in vivo experiments in transgenic mice with in vitro mapping of regulatory elements will help to elucidate the signaling pathways that control epidermal differentiation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jill Williamson for chromosome FISH, the Imperial Cancer Research Fund Transgenic Unit for DNA microinjections and animal care, and David Shima for help with screening the mouse genomic library.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Recipient of a EMBO long-term fellowship.

§ Present address: Endothelial Cell Biology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-207-2693528; Fax: 44-207-2693078; E-mail: f.watt@icrf.icnet.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 29, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001028200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: BPAG1, bullous pemphigoid antigen 1; ACF-7, actin cross-linking factor 7; Klf, Krüppel-like factor; Sp1, specificity protein 1; bp, base pair(s); PCR, polymerase chain reaction; kb, kilobase(s).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ruhrberg, C., and Watt, F. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 392-397
2. Kowalczyk, A. P., Bornslaeger, E. A., Norvell, S. M., Palka, H. L., and Green, K. J. (1999) Int. Rev. Cytol. 185, 237-302
3. Wiche, G. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2477-2486
4. Green, K. J., Goldman, R. D., and Chisholm, R. L. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 2613-2617
5. Green, K. J., and Jones, J. C. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 871-881
6. Wiche, G., Krepler, R., Artlieb, U., Pytela, R., and Denk, H. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 887-901
7. Wiche, G., Becker, B., Luber, K., Weitzer, G., Castanon, M. J., Hauptmann, R., Stratowa, C., and Stewart, M. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 83-99
8. Svitkina, T. M., Verkhovsky, A. B., and Borisy, G. G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 991-1007
9. Sawamura, D., Li, K., Chu, M. L., and Uitto, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17784-17790
10. Burgeson, R. E., and Christiano, A. M. (1987) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 9, 651-658
11. Guo, L., Degenstein, L., Dowling, J., Yu, Q. C., Wollmann, R., Perman, B., and Fuchs, E. (1995) Cell. 81, 233-243
12. Yang, Y., Bauer, C., Strasser, G., Wollman, R., Julien, J. P., and Fuchs, E. (1999) Cell. 98, 229-238
13. Ruhrberg, C., Hajibagheri, M. A., Simon, M., Dooley, T. P., and Watt, F. M. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 715-729
14. Ruhrberg, C., Hajibagheri, M. A., Parry, D. A., and Watt, F. M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1835-1849
15. Aho, S., McLean, W. H., Li, K., and Uitto, J. (1998) Genomics. 48, 242-247
16. Simon, M., and Green, H. (1984) Cell. 36, 827-34
17. Marekov, L. N., and Steinert, P. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17763-17770
18. Gallicano, G. I., Kouklis, P., Bauer, C., Yin, M., Vasioukhin, V., Degenstein, L., and Fuchs, E. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 2009-2022
19. Armstrong, D. K., McKenna, K. E., Purkis, P. E., Green, K. J., Eady, R. A., Leigh, I. M., and Hughes, A. E. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 143-148
20. Andrä, K., Lassmann, H., Bittner, R., Shorny, S., Fässler, R., Propst, F., and Wiche, G. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3143-3156
21. McLean, W. H., Pulkkinen, L., Smith, F. J., Rugg, E. L., Lane, E. B., Bullrich, F., Burgeson, R. E., Amano, S., Hudson, D. L., Owaribe, K., McGrath, J. A., McMillan, J. R., Eady, R. A., Leigh, I. M., Christiano, A. M., and Uitto, J. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1724-1735
22. Smith, F. J., Eady, R. A., Leigh, I. M., McMillan, J. R., Rugg, E. L., Kelsell, D. P., Bryant, S. P., Spurr, N. K., Geddes, J. F., Kirtschig, G., Milana, G., de Bono, A. G., Owaribe, K., Wiche, G., Pulkkinen, L., Uitto, J., McLean, W. H., and Lane, E. B. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 450-457
23. Mahoney, M. G., Aho, S., Uitto, J., and Stanley, J. R. (1998) J. Invest. Dermatol. 111, 308-313
24. Kiyokawa, C, Ruhrberg, C., Nie, Z., Karashima, T., Mori, O., Nishikawa, T., Green, K. J., Anhalt, G. J., DiColandrea, T., Watt, F. M., and Hashimoto, T. (1998) J. Invest. Dermatol. 111, 1236-1238
25. Tamai, K., Sawamura, D., Do, H. C., Tamai, Y., Li, K., and Uitto, J. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 814-822
26. Aho, S., Rothenberger, K., Tan, E. M., Ryoo, Y. W., Cho, B. H., McLean, W. H., and Uitto, J. (1999) Genomics. 56, 160-168
27. Watt, F. M. (1998) in Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook (Celis, J. E., ed), 2nd Ed., Vol. 1 , pp. 113-118, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
28. Jaakkola, P., Vihinen, T., Määttä, A., and Jalkanen, M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3210-3219
29. Määttä, A., Jaakkola, P., and Jalkanen, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9891-9898
30. Echelard, Y., Vassileva, G., and McMahon, A. P. (1994) Development 120, 2213-2224
31. Jaakkola, P., Kontusaari, S., Kauppi, T., Määttä, A., and Jalkanen, M. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 959-69
32. Risk, J. M., Ruhrberg, C., Hennies, H., Mills, H. S., Di Colandrea, T., Evans, K. E., Ellis, A., Watt, F. M., Bishop, D. T., Spurr, N. K., Stevens, H. P., Leigh, I. M., Reis, A., Kelsell, D. P., and Field, J. K. (1999) Genomics 59, 234-242
33. Ruhrberg, C., Williamson, J. A., Sheer, D., and Watt, F. M. (1996) Genomics 37, 381-385
34. Gregory, S. L., and Brown, N. H. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1271-1282
35. Strumpf, D., and Volk, T. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1259-1270
36. Leung, C. L., Sun, D., Zheng, M., Knowles, D. R., and Liem, R. K. H. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1275-1285
37. Ishida-Yamamoto, A., and Iizuka, H. (1998) Exp. Dermatol. 7, 1-10
38. Montgomery, J. C., Silverman, K. A., and Buchberg, A. M. (1997) Mamm. Genome 7, S190-S208
39. Sato, H., Koide, T., Sagai, T., Ishiguro, S. I., Tamai, M., Saitou, N., and Shiroishi, T. (1999) Genomics 56, 303-309
40. Lyon, M. F., and Zenthon, J. F. (1986) Mouse News Lett. 74, 96
41. Sato, H., Koide, T., Masuya, H., Wakana, S., Sagai, T., Umezawa, A., Ishiguro, S., Tamai, M., and Shiroishi, T. (1998) Mamm. Genome 9, 20-25
42. Stappenbeck, T. S., Bornslaeger, E. A., Corcoran, C. M., Luu, H. H., Virata, M. L., and Green, K. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 691-705
43. Nikolic, B., MacNulty, E., Mir, B., and Wiche, G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 1455-1467
44. Eckert, R. L., Crish, J. F., Banks, E. B., and Welter, J. F. (1997) J. Invest. Dermatol. 109, 501-509
45. Sark, M. W., Fischer, D. F., de Meijer, E., van de Putte, P., and Backendorf, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24683-24692
46. Rossi, A., Jang, S. I., Ceci, R., Steinert, P. M., and Markova, N. G. (1998) J. Invest. Dermatol. 110, 34-40
47. Lee, J. H., Jang, S.-I., Yang, J. M., Markova, N. G., and Steinert, P. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4561-4568
48. Chen, T. T., Wu, R. L., Castro-Munozledo, F., and Sun, T. T. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3056-3064
49. Apt, D., Watts, R. M., Suske, G., and Bernard, H. U. (1996) Virology 224, 281-291
50. Park, G. T., and Morasso, M. I. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26599-26608
51. Crish, J. F., Zaim, T. M., and Eckert, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30460-30465
52. Serge, J. A., Bauer, C., and Fuchs, E. (1999) Nat. Genet. 22, 356-360
53. Jaakkola, P., Määttä, A., and Jalkanen, M. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1279-1286
54. Gandarillas, A., and Watt, F. M. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2869-2882
55. Lin, J. H., Zhao, H., and Sun, T. T. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 679-83
56. Fuchs, E., and Byrne, C. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 725-736
57. Carroll, J. M., Albers, K. M., Garlick, J. A., Harrington, R., and Taichman, L. B. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10270-10274
58. DiSepio, D., Jones, A., Longley, M. A., Bundman, D., Rothnagel, J. A., and Roop, D. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10792-10799
59. DiSepio, D., Bickenbach, J. R., Longley, M. A., Bundman, D. S., Rothnagel, J. A., and Roop, D. R. (1999) Differentiation 64, 225-235
60. Adams, M. J., Reichel, M. B., King, I. A., Marsden, M. D., Greenwood, M. D., Thirlwell, H., Arnemann, J., Buxton, R. S., and Ali, R. R. (1998) Biochem. J. 329, 165-174
61. Yamada, K., Matsuki, M., Morishima, Y., Ueda, E., Tabata, K., Yasuno, H., Suzuki, M., and Yamanishi, K. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 2223-2231
62. Byrne, C., and Fuchs, E. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3176-3190
63. Mills, A. A., Zheng, B., Wang, X. J., Vogel, H., Roop, D. R., and Bradley, A. (1999) Nature 398, 708-713
64. Yang, A., Schweitzer, R., Sun, D., Kaghad, M., Walker, N., Bronson, R. T., Tabin, C., Sharpe, A., Caput, D., Crum, C., and McKeon, F. (1999) Nature 398, 714-718
65. Morasso, M. I., Markova, N. G., and Sargent, T. D. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1879-1887


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Spurny, K. Abdoulrahman, L. Janda, D. Runzler, G. Kohler, M. J. Castanon, and G. Wiche
Oxidation and Nitrosylation of Cysteines Proximal to the Intermediate Filament (IF)-binding Site of Plectin: EFFECTS ON STRUCTURE AND VIMENTIN BINDING AND INVOLVEMENT IN IF COLLAPSE
J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 8175 - 8187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Osada, H. L. Park, Y. Nagakawa, K. Yamashita, A. Fomenkov, M. S. Kim, G. Wu, S. Nomoto, B. Trink, and D. Sidransky
Differential Recognition of Response Elements Determines Target Gene Specificity for p53 and p63
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2005; 25(14): 6077 - 6089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. E. Kalinin, W. W. Idler, L. N. Marekov, P. McPhie, B. Bowers, P. M. Steinert, and A. C. Steven
Co-assembly of Envoplakin and Periplakin into Oligomers and Ca2+-dependent Vesicle Binding: IMPLICATIONS FOR CORNIFIED CELL ENVELOPE FORMATION IN STRATIFIED SQUAMOUS EPITHELIA
J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 22773 - 22780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Piccinni, A.-L. Bolcato-Bellemin, A. Klein, V. W. Yang, M. Kedinger, P. Simon-Assmann, and O. Lefebvre
Kruppel-like Factors Regulate the Lama1 Gene Encoding the Laminin {alpha}1 Chain
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9103 - 9114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. Karashima and F. M. Watt
Interaction of periplakin and envoplakin with intermediate filaments<