![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 20084-20089, June 30, 2000
From the
Received for publication, December 9, 1999, and in revised form, April 17, 2000
Rhino- and enteroviruses encode two proteinases,
2A and 3C, which are responsible for the processing of the viral
polyprotein and for cleavage of several cellular proteins. To identify
further targets of the 2A proteinase of human rhinovirus serotype 2 (HRV2), an in vitro cleavage assay followed by
two-dimensional electrophoresis was employed. Cytokeratin 8, a member
of the intermediate filament group of proteins, was found to be
proteolytically cleaved in vitro by the 2A proteinase of
HRV2 and of coxsackievirus B4 and in vivo during HRV2
infection of HeLa cells. The cleavage results in removal of 14 amino
acids from the N-terminal head domain of cytokeratin 8. However, other
intermediate filament proteins (cytokeratins 7 and 18 and vimentin)
were not cleaved in the course of the HRV2 infection. Compared with the
processing of the eucaryotic translation initiation factors 4GI and
4GII, cleavage of cytokeratin 8 occurs late in the infection cycle at
the time of the onset of the cytopathic effect.
Upon infection, many viruses express specific proteinases that are
essential both for maturation of viral polypeptides and for
modification of host cell proteins. By proteolytically attacking host
proteins, viruses interfere with cellular metabolism and structural
organization to promote expression of their own genome. Proteolytic
processing is essential for viral replication, since picornaviruses are
small positive strand RNA viruses that contain a single long open
reading frame. The RNA is translated into a large polyprotein
precursor, which is cleaved into the mature viral proteins by a
sequence of proteolytic cleavages. In the case of rhino- and
enteroviruses, at least two viral proteinases are involved in
processing of the primary translation product. The first proteolytic
step is the cleavage of the polyprotein by 2A proteinase
(2Apro),1 which
cleaves between the C terminus of VP1 and its own N terminus to
separate the capsid protein region from the nonstructural protein precursor (1). All remaining cleavages are carried out by the 3C
proteinase (3Cpro) or its precursor 3CD except for the
cleavage of VP0 to the capsid proteins VP4 and VP2, which occurs
during viral maturation.
Since these proteinases are highly specific (2, 3), it is to be
expected that only a small number of cellular proteins will be cleaved
by these proteinases. This is indeed the case, as was observed in
extracts of poliovirus-infected HeLa cells examined by two-dimensional
gel electrophoresis (4). Using purified enzymes, it has been
demonstrated that poliovirus 3Cpro cleaves transcription
factors TFIIIC and TFIID (the TATA-binding protein) (5, 6), CREB (7),
and the transcription activator Oct-1 (8). 3Cpro also
cleaves the microtubule-associated protein MAP-4, which is thought to
contribute to the collapse of microtubules late in the infection (9,
10). In addition, the 3Cpro of foot-and-mouth-disease virus
was shown to cleave histone H3 (11).
Action of 2Apro on host cell proteins early during
infection has been studied extensively. The 2Apro of
rhino-, polio-, and coxsackieviruses are responsible for the cleavage
of the eucaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G, formerly
p220) leading to shut-off of host cell protein synthesis (12-14).
Cleavage by 2Apro of these viruses occurs at the identical
amino acid sequence of eIF4G. It results in separation of the
N-terminal domain of eIF4G, which binds the cap-binding protein eIF4E,
from the C-terminal region, which binds eIF4A, eIF3, and hence the 40 S
ribosomal complex (for review, see Ref. 15). As a consequence, cellular cap-dependent initiation is inhibited. Translation of
uncapped viral RNA, however, remains intact and is even stimulated as
viral protein synthesis is initiated internally at the internal
ribosome entry segment (IRES) (16-18). Indeed, IRES-driven translation
appears stimulated under conditions in which eIF4G is cleaved (19-21). During foot-and-mouth-disease virus infection, cleavage of eIF4G is
mediated by the leader proteinase, which cuts at a different amino acid
sequence at a site close to that of 2Apro (22, 23).
Recently, a homologue of eIF4G has been identified and termed eIF4GII
(24). eIF4G has therefore been renamed eIF4GI. In HeLa cells infected
with human rhinovirus serotype 14 (HRV14) or poliovirus, cleavage of
eIF4GII lags behind that of eIF4GI (25). Cleavage of both eIF4GI and
eIF4GII is required for complete inhibition of
cap-dependent cellular translation (26). Another cellular
target of 2Apro is the 70-kDa poly(A)-binding protein
(PABP). In HeLa cells infected with coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), cleavage
of PABP starts at a time when cleavage of eIF4GI has been completed
(27). PABP is also specifically degraded during poliovirus infection
and can be cleaved in vitro by CVB3 2Apro and by
both 2Apro and 3Cpro of poliovirus (28).
Recently, it was demonstrated that 2Apro of CVB4 cleaves
dystrophin of heart muscle myocytes in vitro. Cleavage was
also found in the heart of mice infected with CVB3 (29). This is
proposed to lead to the disruption of the cytoskeleton of heart muscle
myocytes by disconnecting actin filaments from the membrane-bound dystrophin.
In this paper, we describe the identification of cytokeratin 8 (K8) as
a target of proteolytic cleavage in HeLa cells infected with human
rhinovirus serotype 2 (HRV2). This cleavage is also observed in
cytoplasmic extracts incubated with highly purified 2Apro
from HRV2 or from CVB4. Scission with both proteinases occurs at the
same site in the head domain of K8 at a distance of 14 amino acids from
the N terminus. Compared with proteolysis of the eIF4G homologues, K8
is cleaved late in the infection cycle. Other intermediate filament
proteins such as K18 and vimentin remain uncleaved upon HRV2 infection.
In this context, it is important to emphasize that the N-terminal
domain of K18, the dimerization partner of K8, is cleaved during
adenovirus infection, whereas K8 is not affected by the adenoviral
proteinase (30). Cleavage of K18 has been shown to result in dramatic
changes of cell morphology, leading to the cytopathic effect of
adenovirus infection. Since K8 and K18 are involved in pair formation
during filament assembly, cleavage within the N-terminal region of K8
by 2Apro of HRV2 might similarly contribute to changes in
the cytoskeletal network late in HRV2 infection and in this way
facilitate virus release from the infected cell.
Cells and Viruses--
HeLa cells, strain Ohio (ATCC CCL2.2)
were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.). Infection
of HeLa cells and preparation of HRV2 was carried out as described
(31).
HeLa Cell Cytoplasmic Extracts--
All manipulations were
performed at 4 °C. 8 × 107 HeLa cells grown in
four 15-cm Petri dishes were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 1.5 mM
CaCl2 and 1.5 mM MgCl2 and once
with phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and
Mg2+. The monolayer was scraped off, taken up in
phosphate-buffered saline, and centrifuged at 300 × g
for 5 min. The pellet was washed with 2 ml of homogenization buffer
(250 mM sucrose, 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4) and
centrifuged again. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml of homogenization
buffer using a 1-ml pipette tip and were lysed by passing through a
22-gauge needle attached to a syringe several times. Disruption of
cells was monitored by phase-contrast microscopy. Nuclei were pelleted
by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min. The
supernatant was then centrifuged for 30 min at 100,000 × g in a Beckman TLA100.3 rotor. The clear cytoplasmic
supernatant was frozen at 2Apro Digestion of HeLa Cell Cytoplasmic Extract and
Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis--
The expression and
purification of recombinant 2Apro of HRV2 and
2Apro of CVB4 was as described (21). Cytoplasmic extract
containing 1 mg of total protein was diluted 1:1 with buffer A (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), brought to a final concentration of 5 mM dithiothreitol, and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C
with 20 µg of purified 2Apro of HRV2 or 2Apro
of CVB4 in a total volume of 600 µl. After cleavage, proteins were
precipitated with methanol/chloroform (33). High resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was carried out using the Protean
II electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad). Samples containing cytoplasmic
proteins were dissolved in 10 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% SDS,
100 mM dithiothreitol supplemented with 2% (v/v)
ampholytes (Merck). Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at
14,000 × g. Isoelectric focusing was performed at
15,500 V-h in a stepwise fashion (2 h at 200 V; 3 h at 500 V;
17 h at 800 V) in 4% acrylamide (Gerbu, Germany), 0.1%
piperazine diacrylamide (Bio-Rad) in 1.5 mm × 16 cm tube gels.
The gel buffer contained 0.035% Nonidet P-40 and 2% ampholytes (1 volume pH 3.5-10, 1 volume pH 4-8, 2 volumes pH 5-7). Degassed 20 mM NaOH served as catholyte, and 6 mM
H3PO4 served as anolyte. For SDS-PAGE, the
extruded tube gels were equilibrated for 3 min in 2.9% SDS, 70 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 0.003% bromphenol blue and were
placed on top of 1.5-mm thick 10% polyacrylamide slab gels. Gels were
silver-stained (34) and scanned for evaluation. Protein identification
was done by comparing molecular weight/pI data with those of previous
experiments (35). For preparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis,
1 mg of protein was loaded onto a 2.3-mm tube gel. After
electrophoresis, the gel was blotted onto an Immobilon-polyvinylidene
fluoride membrane (Millipore Corp.) and stained with Coomassie R-250.
Spots were cut out and subjected to automated N-terminal sequencing using an ABI 476A sequencer.
Data Base Searching--
Peptide sequence manipulations and data
base searching were performed using routines supplied by the Swiss
Institute of Bioinformatics (available on the World Wide Web) (36).
In Vivo Cleavage Kinetic and Western Blotting--
300,000 HeLa
cells per well of a six-well plate were infected with HRV2 at a
multiplicity of infection of 200 plaque-forming units in minimal
essential medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 2%
fetal calf serum and 1.5 mM MgCl2) at 37 °C.
At the times indicated, the medium was removed, and the cells were
lysed by the addition of 100 µl of protein sample buffer 3% SDS, 5%
Peptide Cleavage in Vitro--
Cleavage of peptide substrates
with 2Apro of HRV2 and 2Apro of CVB4 was
carried out as described (3). In competition assays, the peptide eIF4GI
(see Table I) was used as the reference substrate. The relative
cleavage efficiency
(Vmax/Km)rel
value was calculated as described (37).
Antibodies--
Rabbit anti-eIF4GI (38) was supplied by Dr. R. Rhoads (Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA). Rabbit
anti-eIF4GII serum was supplied by Drs. A. Gradi and N. Sonenberg
(McGill University, Montreal, Canada) (24). A polyclonal rabbit
anti-HRV2 2Apro serum was generated by injecting insoluble
material of a 2Apro preparation following standard methods.
Mouse monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratins were M20 (anti-K8),
Cy-90 (anti-K18), and 8.13 (anti-K1, -K5, -K6, -K7, -K8, -K10, and
-K11) from Sigma. Mouse monoclonal anti-vimentin (V9) was from Dako.
Secondary antibodies were alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit Ig and anti-mouse Ig (Sigma), respectively.
Identification of Proteins Susceptible to 2Apro
Cleavage in Cellular Extracts--
In order to identify cellular
proteins that are cleaved by 2Apro of HRV2, an in
vitro cleavage system was used. Cytoplasmic HeLa cell extracts
were incubated with purified recombinant 2Apro. A control
sample lacking the proteinase was incubated in parallel. The enzymatic
activity of 2Apro was monitored by cleavage of eIF4GI on
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting. eIF4GI was completely cleaved
after 2 h of incubation at 37 °C under these conditions (data
not shown). At this point, total protein was precipitated and subjected
to two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis. After silver staining,
the two-dimensional protein pattern of the 2Apro-treated
extract was compared with that of the untreated sample.
As expected, no gross change in the two-dimensional pattern was
observed in extracts incubated with 2Apro, indicating that
most cytoplasmic proteins are refractory to this proteinase. This is in
agreement with the high degree of cleavage specificity of
2Apro of HRV2 observed in previous studies (2, 3). However,
upon close inspection of the pattern, certain specific changes were noted when comparing the sample incubated with 2Apro with
the control sample (2Apro has a molecular mass of 16.2 kDa
and migrates out of the gel under these conditions). Fig.
1 shows a selected region of a typical gel pattern. An arrow denotes a prominent new spot in the
2Apro-treated sample corresponding to a polypeptide of a
molecular mass of about 52 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.3. This
new species obviously represents the cleavage product of a cellular protein. This result was reproducibly obtained in four independent 2Apro cleavage experiments. To identify the corresponding
polypeptide, 2Apro-treated extract was subjected to
preparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, blotted onto a
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, and stained with Coomassie Brilliant
Blue. The spot marked in Fig. 1 was cut out and sequenced as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The resulting N-terminal peptide
sequence XPRAFSSRSY was compared with the Swiss-Prot
database and was unambiguously identified as corresponding to amino
acids 16-24 of human cytokeratin 8 (accession no. P05787), a member of
the intermediate filament proteins. Since this sequence was generated
by N-terminal sequencing, it should represent the P' part of the
2Apro cleavage site of the corresponding protein (the
nomenclature Pn-P1
The same experiment was performed using 2Apro of CVB4. At
the corresponding position marked in Fig. 1, an identical spot appeared upon incubation with the CVB4 proteinase. This spot was again blotted
and cut out. The resulting N-terminal sequence (GPRAFS) identified the
corresponding protein as K8 and clearly showed that in vitro
2Apro of CVB4 cleaves K8 at the identical site as
2Apro of HRV2.
K8 Is Cleaved in HeLa Cells during HRV2 Infection--
To assess
whether K8 is also cleaved in vivo, HeLa cells were infected
with HRV2 and harvested at different times from 1 to 10 h
postinfection. Cells were lysed in the presence of SDS, and extracts
were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Western blots of these samples obtained
with antibodies against eIF4GI, eIF4GII, K8, K18, vimentin, and
2Apro of HRV2, respectively, are shown in Fig.
2. Under these conditions, eIF4GI and
eIF4GII are cleaved completely at 4 h postinfection (Fig. 2,
A and B). There is no discernible difference in
the rate of cleavage of the two proteins. The cleavage of K8 starts at 6 h after infection and continues up to 10 h, when
approximately 50% of K8 is cleaved (Fig. 2C). This
corresponds to the time frame between the onset of the cytopathic
effect, when the infected cells start to round up, and the final stage,
when cells detach and lyse, releasing virus into the medium. By 10 h, a large percentage of the cells is already lysed, resulting in the
progressive loss of intracellular proteins (data not shown). Cleavage
of K8 (molecular mass of 53.5 kDa) by 2Apro removes 14 amino acids of the head domain, resulting in a cleavage product with a
calculated molecular mass of 51.9 kDa, which agrees with the size of
the band obtained in the Western blot. As a control, the same blots
were probed with antibodies against K18 (Fig. 2D) and the
intermediate filament protein vimentin (Fig. 2E). These proteins were clearly not cleaved by 2Apro during
infection. Similarly, a control employing antibody 8.13, which is
capable of recognizing K1, K5, K6, K7, K8, K10, and K11, indicated
cleavage of only K8 (data not shown). Fig. 2F shows the
amount of 2Apro produced during infection. At 6 h
after infection, a clear band is visible, representing about 20 ng of
proteinase as judged from comparison with 2Apro-spiked
cellular extracts in Western blotting (data not shown).
Thus, in contrast to cleavage of eIF4GI and eIF4GII, which starts at an
early time when 2Apro could not even be detected by our
anti-2Apro antibody, cleavage of the cytokeratin K8
commences at a later point when a high amount of 2Apro has
accumulated in the infected cell. Obviously, the translation initiation
factors eIF4GI and eIF4GII, which are the targets for the shut-off of
host cell protein synthesis, are much more susceptible to
2Apro than K8, which is a component of the cytoskeletal network.
Kinetics of in Vitro Cleavage of K8 by 2Apro of
HRV2--
Due to the limited resolution of the two-dimensional gel
electrophoretic system, no spot corresponding to the uncleaved K8 could
be unambiguously identified in the protein pattern. In order to
quantify the extent of in vitro cleavage of K8 by
2Apro and to correlate it with the time course of eIF4GI
cleavage, SDS-PAGE of 2Apro digests of cell extracts was
performed, followed by Western blotting with anti-K8 antibody. Fig.
3 shows the kinetics of the cleavage reaction using 60 µg of HeLa cell cytoplasmic extract and 500 ng of
purified 2Apro of HRV2 in a total volume of 60 µl.
Cleavage of K8 starts at 4 h of incubation. When the amount of
2Apro was raised to 2 µg, most of the K8 was processed
after 24 h of incubation. This cleavage was specific for
2Apro, since a 24-h incubation with buffer alone did not
lead to degradation of K8. Again, controls using antibodies against
K18, K7, or vimentin did not show any cleavage of these proteins (data
not shown). As seen in Fig. 3B, cleavage of eIF4GI is
visible already at 5 min of incubation, leading to a total cleavage of
eIF4GI after 1 h. The order of in vitro cleavages thus
resembles that observed in the HRV2-infected cells. It is noteworthy
that after a 24-h incubation with the high amount of 2Apro,
two of the primary cleavage products of eIF4GI are further processed and appear to co-migrate with the fastest running species. This has
been observed previously (23).
Similar digestion experiments were also carried out with
2Apro of CVB4. Previous studies have shown that both
2Apro of HRV2 and CVB4 cleave eIF4GI at the identical site
of the amino acid sequence (14). In order to compare the two
proteinases with respect to their cleavage activity for K8, HeLa cell
extracts were incubated with purified 2Apro of HRV2 and
2Apro of CVB4, respectively. Indeed, both 2Apro
of HRV2 and 2Apro of CVB4 were found to produce the same
size K8 cleavage product as indicated by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
4). N-terminal sequencing of the K8
fragment (see above) clearly showed that in fact both proteinases use
the same cleavage site on K8.
Kinetic Measurement of Substrate Specificity in Peptide Cleavage
Assays--
In order to determine whether the difference in cleavage
efficiency between eIF4GI and K8 is defined by the amino acid sequence at the cleavage site, synthetic peptides were employed as substrates for 2Apro of HRV2 and for 2Apro of CVB4. The
peptides used are summarized in Table I.
Peptide eIF4GI (termed p220-1 in Ref. 2) spans the 2Apro
cleavage site of human eIF4GI. This peptide was taken as a reference in
competition experiments. The PABP peptide represents the amino acid
sequence of the cleavage site of PABP for 2Apro of CVB3
(28) (see Table I). The K8 peptide corresponds to the cleavage site of
K8 as determined in this paper.
Peptides K8 and PABP were used in competition experiments against the
eIF4GI peptide as the reference substrate. Fig.
5 shows the results. The efficiency of
cleavage by both proteinases drops from the eIF4GI peptide
((Vmax/Km)rel = 1.0) to
K8 (0.76 for 2Apro of HRV2, 0.54 for 2Apro of
CVB4), whereas the PABP peptide is hardly cleaved under these conditions (<0.03 for both 2Apro of HRV2 and
2Apro of CVB4). Subtle differences in substrate
specificities between 2Apro of HRV2 and 2Apro
of CVB4 are observed, but the order of cleavage rates is the same for
both enzymes. Thus, the peptide corresponding to the cleavage site of
K8 is processed rather efficiently, although not as rapidly as that
corresponding to the cleavage site of eIF4GI.
In the life cycle of picornaviruses, a well ordered sequence of
cleavages of viral and cellular proteins occurs. The hierarchy of
cleavages is responsible for consecutive processing of the viral
protein precursors as well as for the pleiotropic effects on the host
cell, e.g. the reduction of cellular transcription and the
shut-off of host cell protein synthesis.
In previous studies of poliovirus infection of HeLa cells, it has been
demonstrated by two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis that only
nine acidic and five basic cellular proteins were degraded (4). By
following the protein pattern of infected cells, it was, however,
impossible to discriminate whether these cleavages were carried out by
the 2Apro or by the 3Cpro enzyme. In order to
identify cellular targets of 2Apro of HRV2, we have
performed digestion experiments of a HeLa cell extract using highly
purified recombinant 2Apro followed by two-dimensional gel
electrophoretic analysis. As expected, the overall two-dimensional
protein pattern did not change greatly, and only a few changes were
observed following 2Apro treatment. However, one strong
spot reproducibly appeared in the two-dimensional pattern of the
2Apro digest, indicating the formation of the cleavage
product of a major cellular protein. Using N-terminal sequencing, this
spot was identified as a fragment of cytokeratin 8, one of the
intermediate filament proteins. As a result of the cleavage by
2Apro, 14 amino acids of the head domain of K8 were
removed. Even more significantly, it was demonstrated that the same
size K8 fragment was also produced late in HRV2 infection of HeLa
cells. Both 2Apro of HRV2 and 2Apro of CVB4
yield a K8 fragment of the same size upon digestion of a HeLa cell
extract. The cleavage site of 2Apro for both proteinases as
derived from the N-terminal sequence of the K8 fragment is VSTS At early times in HRV2 infection, comparison of the cleavages of eIF4GI
and of eIF4GII shows that both homologues are cleaved at similar rates.
Complete cleavage of both eIF4GI and eIF4GII has occurred by 4 h
postinfection. This is in contrast to results obtained upon infection
of HeLa cells by poliovirus or by HRV14, where eIF4GI is cleaved much
faster than eIF4GII (25). However, it is not surprising to find
differences in the kinetics of cleavage between 2Apro of
HRV2 and 2Apro of HRV14, since the latter resembles the
polioviral enzyme in terms of its substrate specificity. In fact, the
proteinases of both HRVs differ to the extent that 2Apro of
HRV2 cannot process a cleavage site peptide containing the P' site of
HRV14 (3, 40).
Cleavage of cytokeratin 8 starts at the time of the onset of the
cytopathic effect when cells round up and start to detach from the
surface. Cytokeratins are members of the intermediate filament family
that together with actin filaments and microtubules form the
cytoskeleton. Depending on the type of epithelial cells, a combination
of acidic type I cytokeratins K9-K20 and of the basic type II
cytokeratins K1-K8 is found. Cytokeratins contain a conserved
Previous work on the effect of viral infection on the cytoskeleton of
the host cell has been carried out mostly with adenovirus. It has been
observed that during the late phase of the adenovirus infection,
cytokeratin K18 is cleaved by the L3 23-kDa proteinase (30). It has
been shown previously that the N-terminal deletion of 83 amino acids
from K18 prevents filament elongation (42). The adenoviral proteinase
removes 73 amino acids from the N terminus of the head domain of K18
(Fig. 6). The collapse of the intermediate filament network at the end
of the replication cycle causes the loss of mechanical stability of the
cells. This is considered to be an important step in the release
process of progeny adenovirus (43). In poliovirus infection of HeLa
cells, alterations in the cytoskeletal network were described already
in 1979, but the molecular basis of this effect has not been elucidated
(44). Recently, it was demonstrated that 2Apro of CVB3
cleaves dystrophin in myocytes and in the hearts of CVB3-infected mice
(29). This cleavage is proposed to disrupt the interaction of the cell
membrane with actin filaments. As hereditary forms of dystrophin
abnormalities were shown to cause cardiomyopathies, this protease
cleavage event is thought to contribute to dilated cardiomyopathy
observed in enteroviral infections. Furthermore, the aspartate-type
human immunodeficiency virus proteinase was shown to cleave in
vitro the intermediate filament proteins vimentin (Fig. 6), glial
fibrillary protein, and desmin (45, 46). Microinjection of the enzyme
into fibroblasts causes the collapse of vimentin filaments (46). Thus,
specific cleavages introduced in cytoskeletal proteins by viral
proteinases may be a frequent mechanism of promoting viral infection.
The cleavage of the cytokeratin K8 by 2Apro during
infection of HeLa cells with HRV2 is a highly specific process, since
other intermediate filament proteins were not cleaved (e.g.
cytokeratin K7, K18, and vimentin). As a result, the head domain of K8
is shortened by 14 amino acids. What is the functional significance of
the truncation of K8? Previous experiments with poliovirus-infected HeLa cells have indicated that destruction of the cytoskeletal network
by treatment with cytochalasin D and nocodazole has no effect on virus
yield in single cycle infections (47). It is therefore unlikely that
the cleavage of K8 by 2Apro of HRV2 affects viral
replication directly. However, since K8 and K18 form heterodimers, it
is tempting to speculate that HRV2 and adenovirus may use similar
strategies to destabilize the integrity of the host cell and thus to
promote the spread of the virus. The truncation introduced in K18 by
the adenoviral proteinase is much more drastic than the cleavage in the
head structure of K8 by the 2Apro of HRV2. Nevertheless, it
must be kept in mind that at the time of the cytopathic effect about
50% of K8 is cleaved (Fig. 2). Furthermore, due to the shut-off of
protein synthesis early in the infection cycle, cleaved cytokeratins
cannot be replaced by newly synthesized intact molecules, which may
further augment the effect of cleavage of 2Apro on K8 (43).
In this context, it may also be of significance that K8 can be
phosphorylated at Ser23, which is close to the cleavage
site of 2Apro. Alternatively, N-terminal truncation of K8
may affect cytoskeletal scaffolding by disrupting the interaction with
linker proteins that cross-link cytokeratin filaments and other
cytoskeletal components (48).
The data presented prove that 2Apro is indeed a
multifunctional enzyme. In addition to its role in processing of the
viral polyprotein and in replication (49), it is responsible for the
modification of cellular proteins both at early and late stages of
the HRV2 infection cycle. The early function of 2Apro
in the host cell shut-off of protein synthesis is well established. The
new results on the cleavage of cytokeratin 8 indicate that 2Apro also acts late in the infection at the time of the
cytopathic effect when major morphologic changes occur in the
infected cell. As indicated by the cleavage of K8 by 2Apro
of CVB4, this mechanism may also operate in enteroviruses. Proof of the
general validity of this concept clearly must await further experimentation.
The expert technical assistance of D. Gauster
and A. Turkowitsch is acknowledged. We thank Drs. L. Huber and I. Fialka (Institute of Molecular Pathology) for discussions and for
initial help with the two-dimensional gel system; Drs. A. Eger
(University of Vienna); R. E. Rhoads, N. Sonenberg, and A. Gradi
for antibodies; Tim Skern for critically reading the manuscript; and Z. Rattler for stimulating discussions.
*
This work was supported by Austrian Science Foundation
Grants P12193-MOB and SFB 5/08.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
2Apro, 2A proteinase;
3Cpro, 3C proteinase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
HRV, human rhinovirus;
CVB, coxsackievirus B;
K1-20, cytokeratin 1-20, respectively;
eIF, eucaryotic initiation
factor;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
PABP, poly(A)-binding protein.
2A Proteinase of Human Rhinovirus Cleaves Cytokeratin 8 in
Infected HeLa Cells*
,
,
Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Division
of Biochemistry, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohrgasse 9/3, A-1030
Vienna, Austria, § Boehringer Ingelheim Austria, Dr.
Boehringergasse 5-11, A-1123 Vienna, Austria, and the ¶ Institute
of Cancer Research, University Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a,
A-1090 Vienna, Austria
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 °C or used for in vitro
cleavage assays directly. Protein concentration was determined using
the Pierce BCA system (32).
-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.04% bromphenol blue 60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8). Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE
and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Blocking and
incubation with antibodies was done using 0.2% Tween 20 and 0.2%
I-block (Tropix) in phosphate-buffered saline. Staining using alkaline
phosphatase reaction was as described (21).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
P1'-Pn' of substrate is that of Schechter and
Berger (39), with the scissile bond lying between P1 and P1'). Indeed,
the derived cleavage site of K8 is VSTS
GPRAFSSRSY, resembling the known consensus cleavage site of 2Apro of HRV2, which is
(L/I)xTx
GP (x designates amino
acids that are not critical for specificity) (2, 3).

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of a new cellular substrate of
HRV 2 2Apro by two-dimensional electrophoresis. HeLa
cell extracts were incubated with buffer (A) or purified
2Apro of HRV2 (B). Following precipitation,
proteins were resolved by two-dimensional electrophoresis. The
arrows in A denote vimentin, phosphodisulfide
isomerase (PDI), heat shock protein 60 (hsp60),
and actin. The circle shows the position of the cleavage
fragment. The arrow in B indicates the
polypeptide identified as cleavage fragment of K8 obtained after
incubation with 2Apro.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Kinetics of cleavage of K8 and of the eIF4G
homologues during HRV2 infection. For each time point, 300,000 cells were infected with HRV2 at a multiplicity of infection of 200 or
were mock-infected (lane M). Protein samples were
prepared by the addition of sample buffer at the indicated time.
Aliquots corresponding to 30,000 cells were analyzed by 6% (blot A and
B), 10% (blots C-E) or 15% (blot F) SDS-PAGE. Following blotting
onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, the indicated proteins were
detected using polyclonal antibodies against eIF4GI, eIF4GII, and HRV2
2Apro and monoclonal antibodies against K8, K18, and
vimentin. The open arrows denote uncleaved
proteins; filled arrows mark cleavage
products.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In vitro cleavage of K8 and of
eIF4GI in cellular extracts with 2Apro of HRV2. 60 µg of HeLa cell protein extract was incubated with 500 ng or 2 µg
of HRV2 2Apro at 37 °C. 10 µg of protein was loaded
per lane. Panel A, 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blot
using a monoclonal anti-K8 antibody. The open
arrows denote uncleaved K8; the filled
arrows mark the C-terminal cleavage product. B,
6% SDS-PAGE and Western blot using a polyclonal anti-eIF4GI antibody.
The open arrows denote uncleaved eIF4GI, and
filled arrows mark the cleavage products.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
In vitro cleavage of K8 in
cellular extracts with 2Apro of HRV2 and of CVB4. 60 µg of HeLa cell protein extract was incubated with 2 µg of HRV2
2Apro or of CVB4 2Apro for 4 h at
37 °C. 10 µg of proteins per lane was analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE,
blotted, and stained using an anti-K8 antibody. The open
arrow marks uncleaved K8, and a filled
arrow marks the cleavage product.
Sequences of peptide substrates for intramolecular cleavage assays in
vitro

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of cleavage of peptides derived
from K8 and PABP by HRV2 2Apro and CVB4
2Apro. For amino acid sequence of peptides see Table
I. The cleavage site peptide of eIF4GI was taken as the reference
substrate (Vmax/Km)rel = 1.0. Shaded bars indicate the relative cleavage
rate of the K8 peptide as compared with the eIF4GI peptide;
black bars show the rate of the PABP peptide
compared with the eIF4GI peptide.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
GP.
It matches the known consensus sequence
((L/I)xTx
GP) for cleavage at the positions P2,
P1', and P2'. Position P4 in the K8 cleavage site is occupied by
valine, which is chemically similar to leucine/isoleucine at P4 of the 2Apro consensus cleavage sequence. Amino acid changes at P1
and P3 are known to have only minor effects on 2Apro
cleavage efficiency (2, 3). Because of the conserved amino acid
pattern, it is likely that cleavage of K8 is caused by a direct action
of 2Apro rather than by an indirect one via activation of a
cellular proteinase. Comparison of the processing rates of peptides
corresponding to the cleavage sites indicates that the eIF4GI peptide
is cleaved somewhat more efficiently than the K8 peptide. However, this
small difference is clearly not sufficient to explain the large
discrepancy between the early cleavage of eIF4GI and the late cleavage
of K8 in the infected cell. This indicates that the relative rates of
protein cleavage are also determined by factors other than the amino
acid sequences at the respective cleavage sites.
-helical central region (rod domain, ~310 amino acids) and
nonhelical head and tail domains varying greatly in size and sequence
(Fig. 6). The mechanism of filament
polymerization is a stepwise process; acidic cytokeratins align with
basic cytokeratins in a 1:1 molar ratio to form a coiled-coil dimer.
Tetramers are generated by side by side aggregation of dimers. The
tetramers then polymerize end to end to form a protofilament, with
eight protofilaments building up the 10-nm filament. It is of
importance that cytokeratins with N-terminal head deletions are still
capable of coiled-coil interactions and higher lateral interactions but are deficient in protofilament elongation (41). In HeLa cells, K8 and
K18 constitute the major cytokeratin species. Since the basic type II
K8 is known to form a pair with the acidic type I K18, the K8-K18
heterodimer therefore constitutes the main building block of the HeLa
cell cytokeratin filaments.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Comparison of intermediate filament proteins
and the cleavage sites of viral proteinases.
-Helical domains
of the rod domain are shown as boxes. The cleavage sites of
HRV2 2Apro on K8, of adenovirus L3 23 kDa proteinase on
K18, and of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease on vimentin
are indicated by arrows. The amino acid sequences at the
cleavage sites are shown. P, positions of phosphorylation
sites.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 43 1 4277 61610; Fax: 43 1 4277 9616; E-mail:
kuechler@bch.univie.ac.at.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hellen, C. U. T.,
Kräusslich, H. G.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
9881-9890[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Sommergruber, W.,
Ahorn, H.,
Klump, H.,
Seipelt, J.,
Zoephel, A.,
Fessl, F.,
Krystek, E.,
Blaas, D.,
Kuechler, E.,
Liebig, H. D.,
and Skern, T.
(1994)
Virology
198,
741-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Sommergruber, W.,
Ahorn, H.,
Zöphel, A.,
Maurer-Fogy, I.,
Fessl, F.,
Schnorrenberg, G.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Blaas, D.,
Kuechler, E.,
and Skern, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22639-22644 4.
Urzaniqui, A.,
and Carrasco, L.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
4729-4735 5.
Clark, M. E.,
Hämmerle, T.,
Wimmer, E.,
and Dasgupta, A.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
2941-2947[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Clark, M. E.,
Lieberman, P. M.,
Berk, A. J.,
and Dasgupta, A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1232-1237 7.
Yalamanchili, P.,
Datta, U.,
and Dasgupta, A.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
1220-1226[Abstract]
8.
Yalamanchili, P.,
Weidman, K.,
and Dasgupta, A.
(1997)
Virology
239,
176-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Joachims, M.,
and Etchison, D.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
5797-5804 10.
Joachims, M.,
Harris, K. S.,
and Etchison, D.
(1995)
Virology
211,
451-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Tesar, M.,
and Marquardt, O.
(1990)
Virology
174,
364-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Etchison, D.,
and Fout, S.
(1985)
J. Virol.
54,
634-638 13.
Kräusslich, H. G.,
Nicklin, M. J.,
Toyoda, H.,
Etchison, D.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
2711-2718 14.
Lamphear, B. J.,
Yan, R. Q.,
Yang, F.,
Waters, D.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Klump, H.,
Kuechler, E.,
Skern, T.,
and Rhoads, R. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19200-19203 15.
Morley, S. J.,
Curtis, P. S.,
and Pain, V. M.
(1997)
RNA
3,
1085-1104[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Jackson, R. J.,
Howell, M. T.,
and Kaminski, A.
(1990)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
15,
477-483[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Jang, S. K.,
Pestova, T. V.,
Hellen, C. U. T.,
Witherell, G. W.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1990)
Enzyme
44,
292-309[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Sonenberg, N.,
and Meerovitch, K.
(1990)
Enzyme
44,
278-291[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Ziegler, E.,
Borman, A. M.,
Deliat, F. G.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Jugovic, D.,
Kean, K. M.,
Skern, T.,
and Kuechler, E.
(1995)
Virology
213,
549-557[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Hunt, S. L.,
Skern, T.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Kuechler, E.,
and Jackson, R. J.
(1999)
Virus Res.
62,
119-128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Liebig, H. D.,
Ziegler, E.,
Yan, R.,
Hartmuth, K.,
Klump, H.,
Kowalski, H.,
Blaas, D.,
Sommergruber, W.,
Frasel, L.,
Lamphear, B.,
Rhoads, R.,
Kuechler, E.,
and Skern, T.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7581-7588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Devaney, M. A.,
Vakharia, V. N.,
Lloyd, R. E.,
Ehrenfeld, E.,
and Grubman, M. J.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
4407-4409 23.
Kirchweger, R.,
Ziegler, E.,
Lamphear, B. J.,
Waters, D.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Sommergruber, W.,
Sobrino, F.,
Hohenadl, C.,
Blaas, D.,
Rhoads, R. E.,
and Skern, T.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
5677-5684 24.
Gradi, A.,
Imataka, H.,
Svitkin, Y. V.,
Rom, E.,
Raught, B.,
Morino, S.,
and Sonenberg, N.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
334-342 25.
Gradi, A.,
Svitkin, Y. V.,
Imataka, H.,
and Sonenberg, N.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11089-11094 26.
Svitkin, Y. V.,
Gradi, A.,
Imataka, H.,
Morino, S.,
and Sonenberg, N.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
3467-3472 27.
Kerekatte, V.,
Keiper, B. D.,
Badorff, C.,
Cai, A. L.,
Knowlton, K. U.,
and Rhoads, R. E.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
709-717 28.
Joachims, M.,
Van Breugel, P. C.,
and Lloyd, R. E.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
718-727 29.
Badorff, C.,
Lee, G. H.,
Lamphear, B.,
Martone, M. E.,
Campbell, K. P.,
Rhoads, R. E.,
and Knowlton, K. U.
(1999)
Nat. Med.
5,
320-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Chen, P. H.,
Ornelles, D. A.,
and Shenk, T.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
3507-3514 31.
Skern, T.,
Sommergruber, W.,
Blaas, D.,
Pieler, C.,
and Kuechler, E.
(1984)
Virology
136,
125-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Smith, P. K.,
Krohn, R. I.,
Hermanson, G. T.,
Mallia, A. K.,
Gartner, F. H.,
Provenzano, M. D.,
Fujimoto, E. K.,
Goeke, N. M.,
Ohlson, B. J.,
and Klenk, D. C.
(1985)
Anal. Biochem.
150,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Wessel, D.,
and Flugge, U. I.
(1984)
Anal. Biochem.
138,
141-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Wray, W.,
Boulikas, T.,
Wray, V.,
and Hancock, R.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
118,
197-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Gerner, C.,
Holzmann, K.,
Meissner, M.,
Gotzmann, J.,
Grimm, R.,
and Sauermann, G.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
74,
145-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Appel, R. D.,
Bairoch, A.,
and Hochstrasser, D. F.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
258-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Pallai, P. V.,
Burkhardt, F.,
Skoog, M.,
Schreiner, K.,
Bax, P.,
Cohen, K. A.,
Hansen, G.,
Palladino, D. E.,
Harris, K. S.,
Nicklin, M. J.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
9738-9741 38.
Yan, R.,
Rychlik, W.,
Etchison, D.,
and Rhoads, R. E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23226-23231 39.
Schechter, I.,
and Berger, A.
(1966)
Biochemistry
5,
3371-3375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Skern, T.,
Sommergruber, W.,
Auer, H.,
Volkmann, P.,
Zorn, M.,
Liebig, H. D.,
Fessl, F.,
Blaas, D.,
and Kuechler, E.
(1991)
Virology
181,
46-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Coulombe, P.,
Chan, Y.,
Albers, K.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
3049-3064 42.
Bader, B. L.,
Magin, T. M.,
Freudenmann, M.,
Stumpp, M.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1293-1307 43.
Zhang, Y.,
and Schneider, R. J.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
2544-2555 44.
Lenk, R.,
and Penman, S.
(1979)
Cell
16,
289-301
45.
Shoeman, R. L.,
Honer, B.,
Stoller, T. J.,
Kesselmeier, C.,
Miedel, M. C.,
Traub, P.,
and Graves, M. C.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6336-6340 46.
Shoeman, R. L.,
Honer, B.,
Stoller, T. J.,
Mothes, E.,
Kesselmeier, C.,
Traub, P.,
and Graves, M. C.
(1991)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
306,
533-537[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Doedens, J.,
Maynell, L. A.,
Klymkowsky, M. W.,
and Kirkegaard, K.
(1994)
Arch. Virol.
9 (suppl.),
159-172
48.
Fuchs, E.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1998)
Science
279,
514-519 49.
Molla, A.,
Paul, A. V.,
Schmid, M.,
Jang, S. K.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1993)
Virology
196,
739-747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Armer, K. Moffat, T. Wileman, G. J. Belsham, T. Jackson, W. P. Duprex, M. Ryan, and P. Monaghan Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus, but Not Bovine Enterovirus, Targets the Host Cell Cytoskeleton via the Nonstructural Protein 3Cpro J. Virol., November 1, 2008; 82(21): 10556 - 10566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Deszcz, E. Gaudernak, E. Kuechler, and J. Seipelt Apoptotic events induced by human rhinovirus infection J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2005; 86(5): 1379 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Dong, H. Su, Y. Huang, Y. Zhong, and G. Zhong Cleavage of Host Keratin 8 by a Chlamydia-Secreted Protease Infect. Immun., July 1, 2004; 72(7): 3863 - 3868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Graham, K. E. Gustin, C. Rivera, N. M. Kuyumcu-Martinez, S. S. Choe, R. E. Lloyd, P. Sarnow, and P. J. Utz Proteolytic Cleavage of the Catalytic Subunit of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase during Poliovirus Infection J. Virol., June 15, 2004; 78(12): 6313 - 6321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gradi, N. Foeger, R. Strong, Y. V. Svitkin, N. Sonenberg, T. Skern, and G. J. Belsham Cleavage of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4GII within Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-Infected Cells: Identification of the L-Protease Cleavage Site In Vitro J. Virol., April 1, 2004; 78(7): 3271 - 3278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hesse, T Berg, B Wiedenmann, U Spengler, R P Woitas, and T M Magin A frequent keratin 8 p.L227L polymorphism, but no point mutations in keratin 8 and 18 genes, in patients with various liver disorders J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2004; 41(4): e42 - e42. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Macarthur and N.A. Jacques Proteome Analysis of Oral Pathogens J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2003; 82(11): 870 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Foeger, E. M. Schmid, and T. Skern Human Rhinovirus 2 2Apro Recognition of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4GI: INVOLVEMENT OF AN EXOSITE J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33200 - 33207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gradi, Y. V. Svitkin, W. Sommergruber, H. Imataka, S. Morino, T. Skern, and N. Sonenberg Human Rhinovirus 2A Proteinase Cleavage Sites in Eukaryotic Initiation Factors (eIF) 4GI and eIF4GII Are Different J. Virol., April 15, 2003; 77(8): 5026 - 5029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|