Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909512199 on April 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 20157-20167, June 30, 2000
Identification of a Novel, Dendritic Cell-associated
Molecule, Dectin-1, by Subtractive cDNA Cloning*
Kiyoshi
Ariizumi,
Guo-Liang
Shen,
Sojin
Shikano,
Shan
Xu,
Robert
Ritter III,
Tadashi
Kumamoto,
Dale
Edelbaum,
Akimichi
Morita,
Paul
R.
Bergstresser, and
Akira
Takashima
From the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9069
Received for publication, November 24, 1999, and in revised form, April 20, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Dendritic cells (DC) are special subsets of
antigen presenting cells characterized by their potent capacity to
activate immunologically naive T cells. By subtracting the mRNAs
expressed by the mouse epidermus-derived DC line XS52 with the
mRNAs expressed by the J774 macrophage line, we identified five
novel genes that were expressed selectively by this DC line. One of
these genes encoded a type II membrane-integrated polypeptide of 244 amino acids containing a putative carbohydrate recognition domain motif
at the COOH-terminal end. This molecule, termed "dectin-1," was
expressed abundantly at both mRNA and protein levels by the XS52 DC
line, but not by non-DC lines (including the J774 macrophage line).
Dectin-1 mRNA was detected predominantly in spleen and thymus (by
Northern blotting) and in skin-resident DC, i.e. Langerhans
cells (by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction).
Affinity-purified antibody against dectin-1 identified a 43-kDa
glycoprotein in membrane fractions isolated from the XS52 DC line and
from the dectin-1 cDNA-transfected COS-1 cells. His-tagged recombinant
proteins containing the extracellular domains of dectin-1 showed marked
and specific binding to the surface of T cells and promoted their
proliferation in the presence of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody at
suboptimal concentrations. These in vitro results suggest
that dectin-1 on DC may bind to as yet undefined ligand(s) on T cells,
thereby delivering T cell co-stimulatory signals. Not only do these
results document the efficacy of subtractive cDNA cloning for the
identification of unique genes expressed by DC, they also provide a
framework for studying the physiological function of dectin-1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
It has been an established concept that immunologically naive T
cells can be activated most efficiently or even exclusively by special
subsets of antigen-presenting cells, termed dendritic cells
(DC)1 (1). DC play central
roles in the induction of cellular immune reactions against a wide
variety of antigens, including chemical haptens, foreign proteins,
infectious pathogens, and tumor-associated antigens (2-5). Members of
the DC family have been identified in many organs, including
(a) spleen (splenic DC), thymus (thymic DC), lymph nodes
(interdigitating cells), and tonsils (tonsil DC); (b)
epidermis (Langerhans cells) and mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity,
intestinal tract, and respiratory tract; (c) dermis (dermal
DC) and other connective tissues (interstitial DC), d) peripheral blood
(blood DC); and (e) afferent lymphatics (veiled cells)
(6).
DC are characterized morphologically by the extension of long, lamellar
dendrites. Upon activation with proinflammatory stimuli, DC acquire
surface expression of relatively large amounts of major histocompatibility complex class I and class II molecules as well as
co-stimulatory molecules (e.g. CD40, CD80, and CD86) and
adhesion molecules (e.g. CD11a, CD11c, CD54, CD58, and
CD102) (1, 6). These surface molecules allow DC to establish intimate,
antigen-specific interaction with T cells. DC are also capable of
incorporating exogenous antigens efficiently by phagocytosis,
endocytosis, and pinocytosis (7), and surface expression of IgG and IgE
receptors and carbohydrate receptors appears to contribute to this
function (8-11). DC are highly mobile leukocytes, migrating across
different tissues via blood or lymphatic vessels (12). This mobility is mediated in part by the expression of homing receptors (e.g.
CD44, CD62P ligand, and cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen) and chemokine receptors (e.g. CXC chemokine receptor-1, -2, and
-3 and CC chemokine receptor-1 through -7) (6, 13-16). Finally, DC
elaborate a wide variety of cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1
, IL-6,
IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor-
) and chemokines (IL-8, macrophage
inflammatory protein-1
and -1
, DC-chemokine-1, and thymus-expressed chemokine) (17-21), thereby regulating the magnitude and direction of T cell activation.
The ultimate goal in our laboratories has been to understand the
biology of DC at a molecular level. As an initial step, we established
a stable, long term DC line from the epidermis of newborn BALB/c mice.
This DC line, termed "XS52," retains important features of resident
DC in the epidermis of skin (i.e. Langerhans cells),
including their surface phenotype, antigen-presenting capacity, and
cytokine and cytokine receptor profiles (19, 22-31). Taking the
advantage of having relatively large numbers of a pure DC population
(with cell doubling time of 18-24 h), we chose to employ the
subtractive cloning strategy for the identification of genes that are
expressed preferentially by a DC line. Here we report the results of
this molecular approach, focusing on the characterization of one of the
novel genes identified by the subtraction.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Female BALB/c mice (6-10 weeks old) and New
Zealand White rabbits (4-20 weeks old) were housed in the
pathogen-free facility of the Animal Resource Center at the University
of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. All of the experiments were
conducted according to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health.
Cell Lines--
XS52 cells are a long term DC line established
from the epidermis of BALB/c mice (22). This line was maintained and
expanded in complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with mouse recombinant
granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (1 ng/ml) and
NS47 fibroblast culture supernatant (10% v/v) as a source of CSF-1
(22, 23). The phenotypic and functional features of this DC line have
been described elsewhere (19, 22-31). The J774 cells are a long term macrophage line established from BALB/c mice; this line was purchased from the American Tissue Type Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and
maintained in complete RPMI 1640 in the absence of added growth factors. We also used the Pam 212 keratinocyte line (32), NS fibroblast
lines (22, 23, 33), 7-17 dendritic epidermal 
T cell line (34,
35), Raw macrophage line (ATCC), HDK-1 CD4+ Th1 clone and
D10 CD4+ Th2 line (kindly provided by Dr. Nancy Street,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), 5C5 and 2G9 B cell
hybridoma clones (provided by Dr. Mansour Mohamadzadeh, University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center), and COS-1 line (ATCC).
Cell Isolation--
Epidermal cells were isolated from abdominal
skin of BALB/c mice using two sequential trypsin treatments and then
enriched for Langerhans cells by centrifugation over Histopaque (1.083; Sigma) as before (30, 36). In some experiments, the epidermal cells
harvested from the medium/Histopaque interface (interface epidermal
cells) were depleted of Langerhans cells by anti-Ia mAb plus complement
treatment as before (30). Splenic DC were isolated as described
previously (36). Briefly, spleen cell suspensions were prepared by
mechanical dissociation, followed by collagenase treatment (1%
collagenase, 1 h, 37 °C). After lysis of erythrocytes, splenic
cells were subjected to gradient centrifugation with Percoll (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech); cells collected from the interface between 1.035 and 1.075 g/ml Percoll were then incubated on tissue culture plates.
After a 90-min incubation, nonadherent cells were removed by extensive
pipetting, and the adherent cells were cultured overnight. Cells
released during the second culture period were harvested and used as
splenic DC preparations.
Identification of Dectin-1 cDNA Clone by the Subtractive
Cloning Strategy--
A subtractive cDNA library was constructed
using the methods reported by Rubenstein et al. (37).
Briefly, poly(A)+ RNAs isolated from the XS52 DC line were
reverse-transcribed into cDNAs, ligated unidirectionally to the
ZapII phages (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and then converted into a
single-stranded phagemid library in which cDNAs were synthesized as
an antisense strand (pBluescript II SK(
), Strategene). This cDNA
library (1.2 µg) was hybridized with 50 µg of biotinylated
poly(A)+ RNA isolated from the J774 macrophage line.
Unhybridized cDNAs were purified by the streptavidin-phenol
extraction method and converted into a double-stranded form by
Taq DNA polymerase. Subsequently, the resulting
"DC-specific" cDNA library was screened sequentially by
differential colony hybridization, slot-blotting, and Northern blotting.
In colony hybridization, colonies were transferred onto nylon membranes
and hybridized differentially with total cDNA probes prepared from
XS52 DC-derived poly(A)+ RNAs and from J774
macrophage-derived poly(A)+ RNAs. In slot blotting, the
cDNA inserts were polymerase chain reaction-amplified, slot-blotted
onto nylon membranes, and hybridized with total cDNA probes from
XS52 DC and from J774 macrophages. In both screening steps, we isolated
only those clones that were hybridized strongly with XS52 DC-derived
total cDNA probes but not detectable with the J774
macrophage-derived cDNA probes.
Northern blotting was performed as described previously (38). Briefly,
cDNA inserts were excised by enzymatic digestion and
32P-labeled. Total RNAs (10 µg/lane) isolated from XS52
DC or J774 macrophages by using RNA-STAT60 (Tel-TestB; Friendswood, TX)
were size-fractionated on a vertical agarose gel, transferred onto a
nylon membrane, and hybridized with the above 32P-labeled
probes. Once again, we selected those cDNA clones that showed
strong hybridization only with the XS52 DC-derived probes. Finally, 50 cDNA clones selected by Northern blotting were sequenced and
subjected to homology search using the GenBankTM and EMBL
data bases.
Tissue and Cell Distributions of Dectin-1 mRNA
Expression--
Total RNAs were isolated from several different lines
or from different mouse organs. In some experiments, XS52 DC and J774 macrophages were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of
10 ng/ml of either GM-CSF or CSF-1 before RNA isolation. Northern blotting was carried out as described above using
32P-labeled dectin-1 cDNA probe (clone 1C11-5) or the
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase control probe (38). Reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction was carried out as described
previously (30, 38). Briefly, total RNA isolated from the interface
epidermal cells was reverse-transcribed into cDNA and then
PCR-amplified with the following primer sets:
5'-AGGCCCTATGAAGAACTACAGACA-3' (nt 1384-1407) and
5'-TGGCCAGGACAGCATAAGGAA-3' (nt 1830-1811) for dectin-1;
5'-TACAGGCTCCGAGATGAACAACAA-3' (nt 450-473) and 5'-TGGGGAAGGCATTAGAAACAGTC-3' (nt 899-921) for IL-1
, or
5'-GTGGGCCGCTCTAGGCACCAA-3' (nt 25-45) and
5'-CTCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3' (nt 541-564) for
-actin. The
PCR products were separated on agarose gel, transferred onto a
membrane, and hybridized with 32P-labeled dectin-1,
IL-1
, or
-actin cDNA probe.
Preparation of His-Dectin-1 Fusion Proteins--
His-dectin-1
fusion protein consisting of, from the N terminus, hexahistidine and
the extracellular domain of dectin-1 was produced in Escherichia
coli as follows. The DNA fragment encoding an extracellular domain
(aa 73-244) of dectin-1 was PCR-amplified, and BamHI and
SmaI sites were then attached to the resulting DNA fragment
at the 5'- and 3'-end, respectively. Using BamHI and SmaI sites, the fragment was ligated to immediately
downstream of the hexahistidine sequence in pQE-30 vector (Qiagen,
Chatsworth, CA). This recombinant vector was introduced into E. coli; His-dectin-1 protein was extracted from
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside-treated E. coli in 8 M urea, 100 mM sodium phosphate,
10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0) buffer and purified using
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen). Approximately
5-8 mg of proteins were recovered from 1.5 liters of E. coli culture by elution at pH 5.9 and 4.9. After extensive
dialysis against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), relatively
small fractions (4-20%) of the His-dectin-1 proteins were recovered
in a soluble form, and this fraction was used in the functional studies
(see below). As a control protein with a His tag, His-dihydrofolate
reductase (DHFR) was produced in E. coli transformed with
the commercially available His-DHFR plasmid pQE-16 (Qiagen) and
purified as described above.
COS-1 cells were transfected using FuGene 6 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) with pSecTag vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) that
contained the DNA insert encoding, from the N terminus, the Ig
leader sequence, hexahistidine sequence, TEV site, and extracellular domain (aa 73-244) of dectin-1. Culture supernatants collected at
48-60 h after transfection were purified using the
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin.
Immunoblotting and Flow Cytometric Analyses--
A synthetic
21-aa peptide containing a cysteine residue at the N terminus of the
20-aa sequence GRNPEEKDNFLSRNKENHKP corresponding to aa 75-94 of
dectin-1 was used to immunize rabbits. After three rounds of standard
immunization, serum was collected and subjected to affinity
purification of peptide-specific Ab using the same 21-mer peptide.
Briefly, high pressure liquid chromatography-purified peptide was
conjugated to the thiol coupling gel in buffer A (50 mM
Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.5). Following washing and
equilibration with a 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 40 ml
of serum was applied to the peptide antigen-conjugated thiol coupling
gel, and peptide-specific antibodies were then eluted, after extensive
washing with the phosphate buffer, with 100 mM glycine-HCl
(pH 2.5). After neutralization, the fractions showing significant
A280 values were dialyzed against buffer B (10 mM NaH2PO4, 20 mM NaCl,
pH 7.0).
XS52 DC were homogenized in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3) with 5-10
strokes with a 27-gauge needle on a 1-ml syringe and centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 × g, and the resulting supernatants
("crude lysates") were fractionated into cytosolic and membrane
fractions by centrifugation for 40 min at 100,000 × g.
In some experiments, whole cell extracts were prepared from several
different cell lines in 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS, followed by
centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g. The
full-length cDNA for dectin-1 was excised from clone 1C11-5 by
digestion with EcoRI and XbaI restriction enzymes
and inserted into a mammalian expression vector pZeoSV2(+) (Invitrogen). COS-1 cells were transfected with the resulting vector or
an empty vector alone using FuGene 6, and membrane fractions were
prepared at 72 h after transfection. These samples were separated by 10-20% or 4-20% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto polyvinylidene
fluoride membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and then blotted with 0.72 µg/ml of affinity-purified rabbit anti-dectin-1 or control rabbit IgG. After extensive wash, the membrane was blotted with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Zymed
Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA) and then developed with the
ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Different cell lines were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS and
then incubated with 1 µg/ml of anti-dectin-1 or control rabbit IgG,
followed by incubation with FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG. Splenic DC
preparations were subjected to double staining with anti-dectin-1
followed by phosphatidylethanolamine-conjugated secondary Ab and with
FITC-conjugated anti-Ia or anti-CD11c mAb (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA).
These samples were analyzed by FACScan (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain
View, CA) as before (22).
His-Dectin-1 Binding Assays--
Binding properties of
His-dectin-1 were examined in binding buffer (Hank's balanced salt
solution containing 1.3 mM CaCl2, 3% fetal
calf serum, and 10 mM HEPES) by using four different protocols. First, soluble fractions of bacterially produced
His-dectin-1 proteins were labeled with biotin (Pierce) and tested for
the binding to selected cell lines (2 × 106
cells/ml). Following a 30-min incubation on ice with 5 µg/ml of
biotinylated His-dectin-1, the cells were washed and incubated with
FITC-conjugated streptavidin at 1:100 dilution (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Samples were then analyzed by FACScan. In some experiments, the activated D10 T cells were cultured for 16 h in the presence of 4 µg/ml tunicamycin (Sigma) before
analyses, or they were incubated with 0.25% trypsin in PBS for 20 min
at 37 °C. For the N-glycosidase treatment, the cells were
first fixed with 0.4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 3 h at 4 °C,
washed with PBS, and then incubated with 600 milliunits/ml
neuraminidase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 3 h at 37 °C,
followed by the second 16-h incubation at room temperature.
Subsequently, the samples were washed with 50 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 8.0) and treated with 10 units/ml N-glycosidase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in the same buffer for 16 h at
37 °C. To determine the extent of deglycosylation achieved by the
above treatment with tunicamycin or N-glycosidase, the same
T cell samples were tested for their ability to bind biotinylated
phytohemagglutinin and biotinylated wheat germ agglutinin (both
purchased from Sigma).
Second, soluble fractions of bacterially produced His-dectin-1 proteins
(3 µg in 100 µl of 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.5) were labeled with 100 µCi of 125I (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA)
in the presence of an IODO-BEAD (Pierce). After a 10-min incubation at
room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the removal of the bead
and the addition of 100 µl of 3% bovine serum albumin. The
125I-labeled His-dectin-1 (0.7 µg/ml, specific activity:
5 × 106 cpm/µg) was then incubated with the
activated D10 T cells (1 × 107 cells/ml). After a
90-min incubation on ice, the cell suspensions were overlaid on the top
of 700 µl of 100% fetal calf serum and centrifuged at 600 × g for 1 min to remove the unbound probes. The cellular
pellets were washed three more times in PBS and then counted for
radioactivities. To test the specificity, the incubation was carried
out in the presence of "cold" His-dectin-1 (76 µg/ml) or
anti-dectin-1 (50 µg/ml); His-DHFR or control IgG at the same concentrations were added to serve as controls.
Third, His-dectin-1 proteins produced by COS-1 cells were biotinylated,
incubated at 5 µg/ml with the activated D10 T cells (2 × 106 cells/ml), and then analyzed by FACScan as described
above. To test the specificity, nonlabeled, bacterially produced
His-dectin-1 or His-DHFR (160 µg/ml) was added to the incubation.
Finally, 125I-labeled, bacterially produced His-dectin-1
proteins were incubated for 120 min on ice with agarose beads that were
conjugated with mannose, fucose, lactose, GluNAc, or GalNAc (all
purchased from Sigma). Specific binding was then examined by counting
the radioactivities that were eluted by the addition of the
corresponding carbohydrates.
T Cell Co-stimulation Assay--
ELISA plates were coated with
graded concentrations of anti-CD3
mAb (Pharmingen) together with
bacterially produced His-dectin-1 (10 µg/ml). In some experiments,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb (0.3 µg/ml) and His-dectin-1 (10 µg/ml) were preincubated with graded
concentrations of anti-dectin-1 or control IgG. Splenic T cells
purified from normal BALB/c mice were cultured in these wells
(105 cells/well) for 4 days, pulsed with
[3H]thymidine for 16 h, and then harvested as before
(22).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of Novel Genes Expressed by XS52 DC Line by Using
the Subtractive Cloning Strategy--
Based on the hypothesis that one
or more specific genes are expressed by DC, but not by other
antigen-presenting cells (including macrophages), we hybridized the
XS52 DC-derived cDNA library with excess amounts of biotinylated
mRNAs isolated from the J774 macrophage line and isolated only the
unhybridized cDNA clones. About 99% of the starting cDNA
clones were eliminated by this procedure, estimated by counting the
colony-forming units before and after subtraction (Table
I). Subsequently, we constructed the
"DC-specific" cDNA library from the unhybridized clones and
tested this library by three rounds of screening. Of the 12,000 independent colonies analyzed first by colony hybridization, 226 colonies showed strong hybridization with the total cDNA probes
from XS52 DC, but not with the probes from J774 macrophages. In other
words, the overwhelming majority of the colonies failed to show any
detectable hybridization with the DC probes (about 40-50% of the
colonies), or they showed comparable levels of hybridization with the
DC probes and the macrophage probes. We next tested these 226 clones in
slot blotting and selected 140 clones that showed preferential
hybridization with the DC probes. Finally, these 140 clones were
examined for their expression levels in XS52 DC versus J774
macrophages by Northern blotting; we were able to confirm DC-specific
expression for 50 of these clones (Table I).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Summary of isolation of dendritic cell-specific genes
Genes expressed selectively by the XS52 DC line were enriched by
subtractive hybridization of the XS52 DC cDNA library (1.5 × 107) with biotinylated mRNA prepared from the J774
macrophage line. The 12,000 clones in the resulting subtractive
cDNA library (1.6 × 105) were sequentially screened
by colony hybridization (first), slot blot hybridization (second), and
Northern blotting (third).
|
|
Through partial sequencing and cross-hybridization, we found that the
above 50 clones contained 11 distinct genes. A homology search of their
nucleotide sequences revealed six genes that encoded currently
recognized polypeptides, including C10 (a
-chemokine) (39), IL-1
(40), cathepsin C (a cysteine protease) (41), spermidine/spermine
N1-acetyltransferase (42), and A1 (a hemopoietic
cell-specific early response gene) (43). We have also identified a gene
that encodes a mouse equivalent of rat Rab-2 (a Ras-related protein) (44). The remaining five genes were judged to be distinct from any
nucleotides currently registered in the GenBankTM or EMBL
data bank. We focused our subsequent effort on one of these novel genes.
Structural Features of Dectin-1 Polypeptide--
Clone 1C11-5
contained 735 nucleotides (nt) in its open reading frame, and it showed
DC-specific hybridization in colony hybridization, slot blotting, and
Northern blotting. As shown in Fig.
1A, the deduced amino acid
sequence of this clone revealed a polypeptide of 244 aa with type II
configuration, consisting of a cytoplasmic domain (aa 1-44), a
putative transmembrane domain (aa 45-68), and extracellular domains
(aa 69-244). The overall amino acid sequence of this polypeptide
showed significant homology with several polypeptides, including
(a) endothelial receptor (LOX-1) for oxidated low density
lipoprotein (26.6% similarity by Clustral method analyzed with
Lasergene Program; DNA Star, Madison, WI) (45), (b) a
natural killer cell receptor CD94 (21.8%) (46, 47), (c)
another receptor CD69 encoded in the natural killer gene complex
(17.8%) (48), (d) asialoglycoprotein receptors, i.e. hepatic lectin-1 (18.9%) and hepatic lectin-2 (15.6%)
(49, 50), and (e) low affinity Fc
receptor CD23 (15.6%)
(51). All of these molecules contain carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) motifs and, thus, belong structurally to the family of C-type (Ca2+-dependent) lectins. Spiess has identified
13 invariant amino acid residues (including six cysteines playing a
critical role in forming disulfide bridge frameworks) that are
relatively conserved among CRD sequences in different C-type lectins
(52). We identified a putative CRD motif at the COOH-terminal region
(aa 119-244) of the 1C11-5 polypeptide sequence, and this motif
contained 11 out of the 13 invariant residues, including all six
cysteine residues (as indicated with asterisks in Fig.
1A). Moreover, this CRD motif showed relatively high degrees
of homology (22.0-38.4% identities) with the CRD sequences found in
other C-type lectins (Fig. 1B). Thus, we concluded that
clone 1C11-5 encoded a unique polypeptide that belonged structurally to
the C-type lectin family, and this polypeptide was designated as
"DC-associated C-type lectin-1" or "dectin-1." It is also
important to note that a putative immunoreceptor tyrosine-based
activation motif (ITAM) (YXXL) (53, 54) was found in the
cytoplasmic domain of dectin-1 (indicated with an underline
in Fig. 1A).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Deduced amino acid sequence of dectin-1 and
its homology with members of the C-type lectin family.
A, deduced amino acid sequence of dectin-1 is shown,
segmented into a cytoplasmic domain, a transmembrane domain, and
extracellular domains containing a putative CRD motif at the
COOH-terminal end. Asterisks and triangles
indicate the invariant residues of C-type lectins and putative
N-glycosylation sites, respectively. B, a
putative CRD sequence of dectin-1 was aligned with the CRD sequences in
other C-type lectins in mice (m), rats (r), and
humans (h).
|
|
Cell and Tissue Distributions of Dectin-1 mRNA--
Northern
blotting showed that dectin-1 mRNA (about 3.2 kilobases in size)
was expressed at relatively high levels by XS52 DC, whereas it was
detected at only negligible levels in J774 macrophages (Fig.
2A). Most importantly,
dectin-1 mRNA was totally undetectable in other tested cell lines,
including an additional macrophage line (Raw), a 
T cell line
(7-17), two 
T cell lines (HDK-1 and D10), a B cell hybridoma
clone (5C5), a keratinocyte line (Pam 212), and a fibroblast line
(NS01). Because the XS52 DC line, but not other cell lines, had been
expanded in the presence of added GM-CSF and CSF-1 (22, 23), we
considered that dectin-1 mRNA expression might be simply induced by
either of these growth factors. As shown in Fig. 2B,
expression patterns of dectin-1 mRNA remained unchanged in both
XS52 cells and J774 cells, regardless of the presence or absence of
GM-CSF or CSF-1 in culture medium, thus excluding the possibility that
dectin-1 expression was regulated by the added growth factors.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cell- and tissue-specific expression of
dectin-1. Total RNAs were isolated from XS52 DC, J774 and Raw
macrophages, 7-17 dendritic epidermal  T cells, HDK-1 Th1 cells,
D10 Th2 cells, 5C5 B cell hybridoma, Pam 212 keratinocytes, and NS01
fibroblasts (A) or from the indicated tissues in adult
BALB/c mice (C). B, XS52 cells and J774 cells
were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of GM-CSF (10 ng/ml) or CSF-1 (10 ng/ml) before isolation of RNA. The RNA samples
were then examined by Northern blotting for dectin-1 or
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
D, interface epidermal cells isolated from BALB/c mice
were examined for dectin-1 mRNA expression by reverse
transcriptase-PCR. Some samples were treated with anti-Ia mAb plus
complement to deplete Langerhans cells; the extent of depletion was
assessed by measuring IL-1 mRNA, which is known to be expressed
exclusively by Langerhans cells within murine epidermal cells.
|
|
As noted in Fig. 2C, abundant expression of dectin-1
mRNA was detected in spleen and thymus, the tissues known to
contain relatively large numbers of DC (1, 6). Unexpectedly, Northern blotting failed to reveal dectin-1 mRNA expression in skin, the tissue from which the XS52 DC line had been established (22). This did
not mean, however, that dectin-1 mRNA was absent from this tissue,
because a strong PCR signal was detected in epidermal cells freshly
isolated from BALB/c mice (Fig. 2D). With respect to the
source of dectin-1 mRNA expression, depletion of the
Ia+ epidermal cell population (i.e. Langerhans
cells) abrogated almost completely dectin-1 mRNA, as well as
IL-1
mRNA, which is known to be expressed exclusively by
Langerhans cells in murine epidermis (18, 55, 56). This corroborates
our observations that dectin-1 mRNA was detected by Northern
blotting in the XS52 Langerhans cell-like line, but not in cell lines
derived from other epidermal cell populations, i.e. the Pam
212 keratinocyte line and the 7-17 epidermal 
T cell line (Fig.
2A). These results suggest that dectin-1 mRNA is
expressed constitutively and preferentially by Langerhans cells in the epidermis.
Identification of Dectin-1 Protein--
To study dectin-1 protein
expression, we produced rabbit Ab against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to aa 75-94 of dectin-1 and purified them by affinity
chromatography. The resulting anti-dectin-1 Ab recognized in
immunoblotting a bacterially produced recombinant fusion protein of
about 27 kDa consisting of a hexahistidine tag and an extracellular
domain sequence (aa 73-244) of dectin-1 (Fig. 3). The same Ab also immunolabeled a
major band of 43 kDa in crude lysates of XS52 DC. By contrast, control
rabbit IgG failed to label any specific bands. When XS52 cell lysates
were fractionated into a membrane fraction and a cytosolic fraction,
the 43-kDa immunoreactivity was detected primarily in the membrane
fraction (Fig. 4), in accordance with the
predicted molecular structure. The above molecular size of dectin-1
protein detected in immunoblotting was considerably larger than the
size predicted from the full-length amino acid sequence (28 kDa). This
discordance most likely resulted from glycosylation, because
N-glycosidase treatment of XS52 DC lysates reduced
substantially the molecular size of dectin-1 immunoreactivity (data not
shown) and because dectin-1 contains two putative
N-glycosylation sites at aa 185 and 233 (as indicated with
triangles in Fig. 1A). Thus, dectin-1 is
expressed by XS52 DC as a 43-kDa membrane-associated glycoprotein.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Identification of dectin-1 protein.
Whole cell extracts prepared by Triton X-100 from J774 macrophages
(lane 1) or from XS52 DC (lane
2) or His-dectin-1 fusion proteins produced in E. coli (lane 3) were examined for the
immunoreactivity to anti-His-dectin-1 Ab (top
panel) or control IgG (middle panel).
The same samples were also stained with Coomassie Blue
(bottom panel).
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Membrane association of dectin-1
protein. Crude lysates prepared mechanically from XS52 DC were
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 40 min, and the pellet
(membrane fraction) and the supernatant (cytosolic fraction) were
examined by immunoblotting with anti-dectin-1 or control IgG. The data
shown are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
To determine the extent to which dectin-1 protein expression occurred
in a DC-specific manner, we tested whole cell extracts prepared from
several different cell lines by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig.
5, the 43-kDa immunoreactivity was,
again, detected in XS52 DC extracts, whereas it was totally
undetectable in extracts from other tested cell lines, including J774
macrophage, HDK-1 
T cell, 7-17 epidermal 
T cell, 2G9 B
cell hybridoma, Pam 212 keratinocyte, and NS47 fibroblast lines.
Dectin-1 protein with the same molecular weight was also detected in a
second DC line (XS106) derived from A/J mice (data not shown). These
results, together with our observation with Northern blotting, document that dectin-1 mRNA and protein are expressed selectively by DC lines.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Cell type specificity of dectin-1 protein
expression. Whole cell extracts were prepared from the indicated
cell lines in the cell lysis buffer containing Triton X-100. These
samples were then examined by immunoblotting for dectin-1
immunoreactivity (top) and by Coomassie Blue staining for
protein profiles (bottom). The data shown are representative
of two independent experiments.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 6, a 43-kDa
immunoreactivity was detected in the membrane fraction prepared from
COS-1 cells that had been transfected with dectin-1 cDNA (clone
1C11-5), and this band closely corresponded in molecular size to the
natural dectin-1 protein produced by XS52 DC. No immunoreactivity was
detected after transfection with the vector alone. An additional band
of about 40 kDa was also detected only in the COS-1 membrane fraction;
the molecular identity of this second band remains unclear at present.
In flow cytometric analyses, anti-dectin-1 Ab recognized dectin-1
proteins on the surface of paraformaldehyde-fixed XS52 cells (Fig.
7A, left
panel). A similar staining profile was also observed in the absence of fixation (data not shown). Consistent with our observations in immunoblotting, no significant staining was observed with
anti-dectin-1 Ab for NS47 fibroblasts (Fig. 7A,
right panel) or other cell lines, including
macrophage, B cell, T cell, and keratinocyte lines (data not
shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Production of dectin-1 protein by introducing
the dectin-1 cDNA clone. COS-1 cells were transfected with
pZeoSV-Dec1KZ vector encoding the full-length dectin-1 polypeptide
(derived from clone 1C11-5) or pZeoSV2(+) control vector.
Membrane fractions prepared from these transfectants or from XS52 DC
were examined by immunoblotting. The data shown are representative of
three independent experiments.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Surface expression of dectin-1 on DC.
A, XS52 DC and NS47 fibroblasts were fixed with
paraformaldehyde and incubated with anti-dectin-1 Ab (closed
histograms) or control IgG (open
histograms), followed by FITC-conjugated, anti-rabbit IgG.
B, splenic DC preparations isolated from adult BALB/c mice
were double-stained with anti-Ia mAb (y-axis) and with
anti-dectin-1 (x-axis in the right
panel) or control IgG (x-axis in the
left panel). C, splenic DC were
double-stained with anti-dectin-1 Ab (closed
histograms) or control IgG (open
histograms) with anti-Ia mAb (left
panel) or anti-CD11c mAb (right
panel). Data shown are the histograms for dectin-1 staining
within the Iahigh or CD11c+ population
(i.e. splenic DC), with the percentages of dectin-1 positive
cells indicated with numbers. All of the data shown are
representative of at least three independent experiments.
|
|
Because dectin-1 mRNA was expressed most abundantly in spleen, we
next examined dectin-1 protein expression in this tissue. Splenic DC
preparations isolated by our standard protocol contained routinely
40-70% DC, as assessed by morphology and surface expression of Ia
(major histocompatibility complex class II) molecules and CD11c (36).
As shown in Fig. 7B, dectin-1 expression was detected in
some, but not all, cells in this preparation, and a majority of the
cells expressing dectin-1 co-expressed Ia molecules at relatively high
levels. On the other hand, when dectin-1 expression was analyzed in the
gated population of Iahigh cells, it became clear that
dectin-1 protein was not expressed by all Iahigh cells
(Fig. 7C, left panel). The percentage
of dectin-1+ cells in the Iahigh population
varied from 25 to 32% in four independent experiments. Likewise,
dectin-1 expression was detected in 20-42% of the CD11c+
population (Fig. 7C, right panel).
These observations suggested that dectin-1 protein was expressed on the
surface of some, but not all, splenic DC. It is to be noted that
dectin-1 expression was also detectable in minor fractions of the
Ia
population as well as the CD11c
population, with the implication that expression of dectin-1 does not
occur exclusively within the DC populations in living animals.
Considering the data together, it is reasonable to conclude that
dectin-1 is a unique polypeptide that is characterized by the inclusion
of a CRD motif and by its preferential expression by some DC
populations in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues.
Functional Potential of Dectin-1--
As an initial step to study
the function, we tested whether His-dectin-1 fusion protein would bind
to any cell types. As shown in Fig.
8A, His-dectin-1 proteins
produced in E. coli migrated as a 27-kDa band, closely
corresponding to the predicted molecular size of 21 kDa. Recombinant
proteins produced and secreted by COS-1 cells, however, showed
significantly higher molecular masses (37 and 39 kDa) than the
predicted size (25 kDa), consistent with our hypothesis that dectin-1
is a heavily glycosylated polypeptide. On the other hand, it remains
unclear whether the 37 and 39 bands differ each other only in the
extent of glycosylation. Soluble fractions of the bacterially produced
His-dectin-1 were labeled with biotin and tested for binding. Among
several tested cell lines, only the D10 T cell line showed modest, but
significant, binding (Fig. 8B). When tested after
stimulation with concanavalin A, D10 T cells showed markedly elevated
binding of His-dectin-1. Likewise, two additional T cell lines (HDK-1
and 7-17) also showed significant binding of His-dectin-1 only in the
activated states. Binding of His-dectin-1 to the activated T cells was
also confirmed by using FITC-conjugated mAb against the His tag (data
not shown). 125I-Labeled His-dectin-1 (produced in E. coli) bound significantly to the surfaces of activated D10 T
cells. Importantly, this binding was competed with "cold"
His-dectin-1, but not with His-DHFR, and it was inhibited by
anti-dectin-1 Ab, but not by control Ab, thus documenting the
specificity (Fig. 8C). Moreover, the glycosylated His-dectin-1 proteins (produced in COS-1 cells) also bound to the
activated D10 T cells in a manner that was inhibitable by bacterially
produced His-dectin-1 but not by His-DHFR (Fig. 8D). We
noticed that the recombinant proteins produced in COS-1 cells were less
efficient than those produced in E. coli in their T cell
binding ability; mechanisms for this functional disparity remain to be
determined. Nevertheless, these results indicate that extracellular
domains of dectin-1 bind specifically to one or more putative molecules
that are expressed on activated T cells.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Binding of His-dectin-1 to T cells.
A, recombinant His-dectin-1 proteins produced in E. coli or in COS-1 cells were purified using Ni2+-NTA
resin and then examined by immunoblotting with anti-dectin-1 Ab.
B, a soluble fraction of the bacterially produced
His-dectin-1 was biotinylated and examined for the binding to the
indicated cell lines. The three T cell lines were tested for
His-dectin-1 binding before (resting) and after concanavalin A
stimulation (activated). The binding of biotinylated His-dectin-1
(closed histograms) or biotinylated His-DHFR
control (open histograms) was examined with
FITC-conjugated streptavidin. Data shown are representative of three
different experiments. C, a soluble fraction of the bacterially
produced His-dectin-1 was labeled with 125I and incubated
with activated D10 T cells in the presence of "cold" His-dectin-1
or His-DHFR (upper panels) or anti-dectin-1 or
control IgG (lower panels). Data shown are
representative of three independent experiments, showing the mean ± S.D. from triplicate samples. D, activated D10 T cells
were incubated with biotinylated His-dectin-1 (produced in COS-1 cells)
in the presence of no competitor (open
histogram), nonlabeled bacterially produced His-dectin-1
(closed histogram), or His-DHFR
(dotted line).
|
|
An important question then concerned whether His-dectin-1 fusion
proteins containing a CRD sequence would recognize carbohydrate moieties. 125I-Labeled His-dectin-1 failed to show specific
binding to any of the tested carbohydrate probes, i.e.
agarose beads conjugated with mannose, fucose, lactose, GluNAc, or
GalNAc (data not shown). Furthermore, pretreatment of T cells with
tunicamycin, which diminished substantially the binding of a bona
fide lectin, phytohemagglutinin, had only marginal effects on the
binding of His-dectin-1 (Fig. 9A). Likewise,
N-glycosidase treatment of paraformaldehyde-fixed T cells
had no effects on the binding of His-dectin-1, whereas the same
treatment markedly reduced the binding of wheat germ agglutinin
(WGA) (Fig. 9B). By marked contrast, a brief
exposure of activated T cells to trypsin abrogated their dectin-1
binding capacity almost completely (Fig. 9C). Thus, dectin-1
appears to bind to one or more trypsin-sensitive,
tunicamycin/N-glycosidase-resistant ligands on T cells. We
interpreted these results to suggest that although dectin-1 belongs
structurally to the C-type lectin family by the inclusion of a CRD
motif, it may not function as a conventional C-type lectin in the
ligand specificity.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Characterization of the dectin-1-binding
moiety on activated T cells. The activated D10 T cells were tested
for their ability to bind His-dectin-1 and the indicated lectins
following treatment with tunicamycin (A),
N-glycosidase (B), or trypsin (C).
A, the cells were cultured for 16 h in the presence
(closed histogram) or absence (open
histogram) of 4 µg/ml tunicamycin. B, the cells
were fixed with paraformaldehyde and then subjected to the
neuraminidase/N-glycosidase digestion (closed
histogram) or the digestion with neuraminidase alone
(open histogram). C, the cells were
incubated with 0.25% trypsin (closed histogram) or PBS alone (open
histogram) for 20 min at 37 °C. Data shown in the upper
panels indicate the binding of bacterially produced
His-dectin-1 (open and closed
histograms) or His-DHFR control (dotted
lines). The data in the lower panels
indicate the binding of biotinylated phytohemagglutinin
(PHA) or wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)
(open and closed histograms,
respectively) or His-DHFR control (dotted lines).
The binding of biotinylated wheat germ agglutinin was reduced
significantly by neuraminidase treatment alone (data not shown) and
diminished further by the subsequent N-glycosidase
treatment. All of the results shown are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
To study the biological outcome of dectin-1 binding, splenic T cells
were incubated on plates coated with His-dectin-1 (10 µg/ml). As
shown in Fig. 10 (left
panel), immobilized His-dectin-1 alone failed to induce
significant T cell proliferation. However, His-dectin-1 promoted marked
proliferation of T cells when anti-CD3 mAb was co-immobilized onto the
same plates at suboptimal concentrations. For example, in the presence
of 0.1-0.3 µg/ml of anti-CD3 mAb, His-dectin-1 caused more than
10-fold augmentation. On the other hand, His-dectin-1 had almost no
effect on T cell proliferation that was triggered by higher
concentrations of anti-CD3 mAb. In dose-response experiments, 3 µg/ml
of His-dectin-1 was found to be sufficient for this biological activity
(data not shown). Importantly, the co-stimulatory activity of
His-dectin-1 was blocked almost completely with anti-dectin-1 Ab, but
not with control IgG (Fig. 10, right panel).
These results have revealed the potential of dectin-1 to deliver
co-stimulatory signals to T cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Co-stimulatory potential of dectin-1.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates were coated with the indicated
concentrations of anti-CD3 mAb together with His-dectin-1 (10 µg/ml)
or buffer alone. Splenic T cells purified from normal BALB/c mice were
cultured in these wells (105 cells/well) for 4 days, pulsed
with [3H]thymidine for 16 h, and then harvested
(left panel). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb (0.3 µg/ml) and His-dectin-1 (10 µg/ml) were incubated with the indicated concentrations of
anti-dectin-1 or control IgG. Splenic T cells were cultured in these
wells and examined for [3H]thymidine uptake as described
above. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments,
showing the mean ± S.D. (n = 3) of
[3H]thymidine uptake.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
One major technical barrier for studying the biology of DC at
molecular levels had been the unavailability of pure DC preparations. This barrier has been overcome recently by the development of refined
methods for isolating and culturing DC in large quantities (57-59) and
by the establishment of stable DC lines (22, 60-65). By the PCR-based
differential display between "freshly isolated" immature Langerhans
cells versus "cultured" mature Langerhans cells, Ross
et al. (66) have identified about 500 cDNA fragments whose expression was either up- or down-regulated during their maturation. By screening a cDNA library constructed from the
cultured Langerhans cells with differential hybridization, they also
identified that the expression of fascin, an actin-bundling protein,
was markedly up-regulated during maturation (67). By searching the Human Genome Sciences nucleotide data bases with a consensus motif of
C-type lectins, Bates et al. (68) identified a new C-type lectin, termed DC immunoreceptor (DCIR), which was expressed by short
term human DC cultures generated from CD34+ progenitors as
well as from CD14+ monocytes. Taking advantage of the XS52
DC line maintaining many features of skin-resident DC (19, 22-31), we
employed the subtractive cDNA cloning strategy to identify the
genes expressed predominantly by this DC line. We have identified 11 different genes (including five novel genes) that were expressed
selectively by XS52 cells, documenting the efficacy of our approach.
Clone 1C11-5 encoded a novel, type II membrane-integrated polypeptide
containing a single CRD motif at the COOH-terminal end. This
polypeptide, termed dectin-1, was expressed on the surface of XS52 DC
as a glycoprotein of about 43 kDa in size. Members of the C-type lectin
family can be divided into two groups based on the molecular
structures: (a) type I surface lectins with multiple CRDs on
their NH2-terminal ends and (b) type II surface
lectins with a single CRD on their COOH termini. Importantly, DC have been shown to express both types of C-type lectins. Jiang et
al. have cloned a novel, type I membrane-integrated C-type lectin, termed DEC-205, by using a DC-specific mAb (NLDC145) as a molecular probe (11). As observed for dectin-1, surface expression of DEC-205 was
detected in some, but not all, splenic DC (69). Subsequently, Vremec
and Shortman (70) found that DEC-205 is expressed preferentially by a
specific subset of splenic DC called "lymphoid DC" as defined by
their surface expression of CD8
homodimers. Sallusto et
al. (10) reported that human DC express macrophage mannose
receptor, a prototypic C-type lectin with the type I configuration. These two DC-associated C-type lectins, DEC-205 and macrophage mannose
receptor, contain multiple CRD motifs (10 and 8, respectively) at their
NH2-terminal ends; thus, they belong to the type I surface lectin subfamily. Interestingly, both have been shown to mediate the
uptake of glycosylated macromolecules by DC (10, 11).
DC also express CD23 (low affinity Fc
receptor) (71) and CD69 (very
early activation antigen) (72), both of which belong to the type II
surface lectin subfamily. Although sharing the same molecular
configuration, dectin-1 showed only limited degrees of sequence
homology to CD23 (17.8% identity) or CD69 (15.6%), and the extent of
homology was rather limited even within the highly conserved CRD motifs
(22.0% with CD23 and 22.6% with CD69). More recently, Bates et
al. (68) isolated a novel member (DCIR) by searching the
nucleotide data bases with a motif (SCYWFSH) that is shared by hepatic
lectin-1, hepatic lectin-2, and macrophage lectin. DCIR is expressed
not only by DC but also by small fractions of other antigen presenting
cells (monocytes, macrophages, and B cells), as we observed for
dectin-1. Interestingly, DCIR contains, in the intracellular domain, a
consensus immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) (54),
suggesting its potential to deliver immunoregulatory signals (68).
Dectin-1 showed relatively low sequence homology with DCIR (15.5%
identity in overall sequence and 18.8% within the CRD region), and
dectin-1 contained a putative ITAM motif, instead of the ITIM motif, in
the cytoplasmic domain. ITAM motifs are also found in CD23 and
macrophage lectin (51, 73), whereas an ITIM motif is present in CD72 (a
B cell-associated C-type lectin) (74). It is, therefore, tempting to
speculate that the ITAM-containing lectins and the ITIM-containing
lectins may play counteracting roles in immunoregulation.
Unfortunately, natural ligands recognized by those DC-associated C-type
lectins (including dectin-1) remain mostly unknown, thus preventing us from directly testing this possibility. In sum, dectin-1 is the sixth
member of the unique family of DC-associated C-type lectins. Very
recently, we have identified the seventh member, termed "dectin-2," which resembles dectin-1 by virtue of the molecular configuration (a
type II membrane-integrated polypeptide with a single CRD in the
extracellular domain) and the expression profile (preferential expression by DC in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues) (75).
With respect to the function of dectin-1, His-dectin-1 proteins bound
to the surfaces of activated T cells, and immobilized His-dectin-1
promoted the proliferation of T cells only in the presence of anti-CD3
mAb at suboptimal concentrations. These observations suggest that
dectin-1 proteins expressed on DC bind to putative ligand(s) on T cells
and deliver co-stimulatory signals. On the other hand, His-dectin-1 (in
a soluble form) and anti-dectin-1 Ab both failed to block DC-induced T
cell activation in allogeneic mixed leukocyte reactions (data not
shown), with the implication that the co-stimulatory property of
dectin-1 may be replaceable by other molecules expressed on DC.
His-dectin-1 did not bind to any of the conventional carbohydrate
probes, and pretreatment of T cells with trypsin, but not with
tunicamycin or N-glycosidase, abrogated their ability to
bind His-dectin-1. These observations may imply that dectin-1
recognizes rather unique carbohydrate moieties or that dectin-1 must
form homo- or heterodimers to exert high affinity binding, as has been
reported for other type II lectins with single CRD motifs (76, 77).
Alternatively, dectin-1 may recognize peptide or glycopeptide
ligand(s). In fact, it is known that carbohydrates do not necessarily
serve as natural ligands of all of the molecules that belong
structurally to the C-type lectin family. For example, CD23, which has
been shown to recognize Gal-Gal-NAc under certain experimental
conditions (78), binds enzymatically de-glycosylated IgE and even
recombinant (nonglycosylated) IgE produced in E. coli (79).
Further studies are required to determine the physiological function of
dectin-1 and to identify its ligand(s). Nevertheless, we believe that
the present study has formed both technical and conceptual bases for
such studies.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Nancy Street and Mansour
Mohamadzadeh for providing T cell clones and B cell hybridoma clones,
respectively. We are also grateful to Pat Adcock for secretarial
assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants RO1-AR44189, RO1-AR35068, RO1-AR43777, and RO1-AI43262; a grant
from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ohmiya, Japan; and an award from
the Centre de Recherches et Investigations Epidermiques et Sensorielles
(to A. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF262985.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Dermatology,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines
Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9069. Tel.: 214-648-3419; Fax: 214-648-3472; E-mail: atakas@mednet.swmed.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 12, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909512199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DC, dendritic cells;
aa, amino acid(s);
CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain;
DCIR, DC
immunoreceptor;
DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase, CSF, colony-stimulating
factor;
GM-CSF, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor;
IL, interleukin;
ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif;
ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif;
Ab, antibody;
mAb, monoclonal Ab;
nt, nucleotide(s);
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Banchereau, J.,
and Steinman, R. M.
(1998)
Nature
392,
245-252
|
| 2.
|
Steinman, R. M.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
9,
271-296
|
| 3.
|
Bhardwaj, N.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
795-799
|
| 4.
|
Johnson, L. L.,
and Sayles, P. C.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1799-1802
|
| 5.
|
Shurin, M. R.
(1996)
Cancer Immunol. Immunother.
43,
158-164
|
| 6.
|
Hart, D. N. J.
(1997)
Blood
90,
3245-3287
|
| 7.
|
Lanzavecchia, A.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
8,
348-354
|
| 8.
|
Fanger, N. A.,
Wardwell, K.,
Shen, L.,
Tedder, T. F.,
and Guyre, P. M.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
157,
541-548
|
| 9.
|
Maurer, D.,
Fiebiger, E.,
Ebner, C.,
Reiniger, B.,
Fisher, G. F.,
Wichlas, S.,
Jouvin, M.,
Schmitt-Egenolf, M.,
Kraft, D.,
Kinet, J.,
and Stingl, G.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
607-616
|
| 10.
|
Sallusto, F.,
Cella, M.,
Danieli, C.,
and Lanzavecchia, A.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
389-400
|
| 11.
|
Jiang, W.,
Swiggard, W. J.,
Heufler, C.,
Peng, M.,
Mirza, A.,
Steinman, R. M.,
and Nussenzweig, M. C.
(1995)
Nature
375,
151-155
|
| 12.
|
Sallusto, F.,
and Lanzavecchia, A.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
189,
611-614
|
| 13.
|
Weiss, J. M.,
Sleeman, J.,
Renkl, A. C.,
Dittmar, H.,
Termeer, C. C.,
Taxis, S.,
Howells, N.,
Schöpf, E.,
Ponta, H.,
Herrlich, P.,
and Simon, J. C.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
1137-1147
|
| 14.
|
Koszik, F.,
Strunk, D.,
Simonitsch, I.,
Picker, L. J.,
Stingl, G.,
and Payer, E.
(1994)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
102,
773-780
|
| 15.
|
Robert, C.,
Fuhlbrigge, R. C.,
Kieffer, J. D.,
Ayehunie, S.,
Hynes, R. O.,
Cheng, G.,
von Andrian, U. H.,
and Kupper, T. S.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
189,
627-635
|
| 16.
|
Dieu, M.-C.,
Vanbervliet, B.,
Vicari, A.,
Bridon, J.-M.,
Oldham, E.,
Aït-Yahia, S.,
Briere, F.,
Zlotnik, A.,
Lebecque, S.,
and Caux, C.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
373-386
|
| 17.
|
Caux, C.,
Massacrier, C.,
Vanbervliet, B.,
Dubois, B.,
Van Kooten, C.,
Durand, I.,
and Banchereau, J.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1263-1272
|
| 18.
|
Heufler, C.,
Topar, G.,
Koch, F.,
Trockenbacher, B.,
Kämpgen, E.,
Romani, N.,
and Schuler, G.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
176,
1221-1226
|
| 19.
|
Mohamadzadeh, M.,
Poltorak, A. N.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
Beutler, B.,
and Takashima, A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
3102-3106
|
| 20.
|
Adema, G. J.,
Hartgers, F.,
Verstraten, R.,
de Vries, E.,
Marland, G.,
Menon, S.,
Foster, J.,
Xu, Y.,
Nooyen, P.,
McClanahan, T.,
Bacon, K. B.,
and Figdor, C. G.
(1997)
Nature
387,
713-717
|
| 21.
|
Vicari, A. P.,
Figueroa, D. J.,
Hedrick, J. A.,
Foster, J. S.,
Singh, K. P.,
Menon, S.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Bacon, K. B.,
and Zlotnik, A.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
291-301
|
| 22.
|
Xu, S.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Caceres-Dittmar, G.,
Edelbaum, D.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
2697-2705
|
| 23.
|
Takashima, A.,
Edelbaum, D.,
Kitajima, T.,
Shadduck, R. K.,
Gilmore, G. L.,
Xu, S.,
Taylor, R. S.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Ariizumi, K.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
5128-5135
|
| 24.
|
Xu, S.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Edelbaum, D.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
1018-1024
|
| 25.
|
Kitajima, T.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Mohamadzadeh, M.,
Edelbaum, D.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
3794-3800
|
| 26.
|
Kitajima, T.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
5190-5197
|
| 27.
|
Kitajima, T.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
142-147
|
| 28.
|
Kitajima, T.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
3312-3316
|
| 29.
|
Yokota, K.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Kitajima, T.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
Street, N. E.,
and Takashima, A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
1529-1537
|
| 30.
|
Ariizumi, K.,
Kitajima, T.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
2137-2141
|
| 31.
|
Mohamadzadeh, M.,
Ariizumi, K.,
Sugamura, K.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Immunol.
26,
156-160
|
| 32.
|
Yuspa, S. H.,
Hawley-Nelson, P.,
Koehler, B.,
and Stanley, J. R.
(1980)
Cancer Res.
40,
4694-4703
|
| 33.
|
Schuhmachers, G.,
Xu, S.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
105,
225-230
|
| 34.
|
Kuziel, W. A.,
Takashima, A.,
Bonyhadi, M.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
Allison, J. P.,
Tigelaar, R. E.,
and Tucker, P. W.
(1987)
Nature
328,
263-266
|
| 35.
|
Matsue, H.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
6012-6019
|
| 36.
|
Matsue, H.,
Edelbaum, D.,
Hartmann, A. C.,
Morita, A.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
Yagita, H.,
Okumura, K.,
and Takashima, A.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
5287-5298
|
| 37.
|
Rubenstein, J. L. R.,
Brice, A. E.,
Ciaranello, R. D.,
Denney, D.,
Porteus, M. M. H.,
and Usdin, T. B.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
4833-4842
|
| 38.
|
Ariizumi, K.,
Meng, Y.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
6031-6039
|
| 39.
|
Orlofsky, A.,
Berger, M. S.,
and Prystowsky, M. B.
(1991)
Cell Regul.
2,
403-412
|
| 40.
|
Gray, P. W.,
Glaister, D.,
Ellson, C.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Pennica, D.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
137,
3644-3648
|
| 41.
|
Ishidoh, K.,
Muno, D.,
Sato, N.,
and Kominami, E.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16312-16317
|
| 42.
|
Fogel-Petrovic, M.,
Kramer, D. L.,
Ganis, B.,
Casero, R. A., Jr.,
and Porter, C. W.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1216,
255-264
|
| 43.
|
Lin, E. Y.,
Orlofsky, A.,
Berger, M. S.,
and Prystowsky, M. B.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
1979-1988
|
| 44.
|
Touchot, N.,
Chardin, P.,
and Traitian, A.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
8210-8214
|
| 45.
|
Sawamura, T.,
Kume, N.,
Aoyama, T.,
Moriwaki, H.,
Hoshikawa, H.,
Aiba, Y.,
Tanaka, T.,
Miwa, S.,
Katsura, Y.,
Kita, T.,
and Masaki, T.
(1997)
Nature
386,
73-77
|
| 46.
|
Dissen, E.,
Berg, S. F.,
Westgaard, I. H.,
and Fossum, S.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
2080-2086
|
| 47.
|
Lazetic, S.,
Chang, C.,
Houchins, J. P.,
Lanier, L. L.,
and Phillips, J. H.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
157,
4741-4745
|
| 48.
|
Hamann, J.,
Fiebig, H.,
and Strauss, M.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
4920-4927
|
| 49.
|
Spiess, M.,
Schwartz, A. L.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
1979-1982
|
| 50.
|
McPhaul, M.,
and Berg, P.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
1841-1847
|
| 51.
|
Kondo, H.,
Ichikawa, Y.,
Nakamura, K.,
and Tsuchiya, S.
(1994)
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
105,
38-48
|
| 52.
|
Spiess, M.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
10009-10018
|
| 53.
|
Reth, M.
(1989)
Nature
338,
383-384
|
| 54.
|
Vivier, E.,
and Daeron, M.
(1997)
Immunol. Today
18,
286-291
|
| 55.
|
Matsue, H.,
Cruz, P. D., Jr.,
Bergstresser, P. R.,
and Takashima, A.
(1992)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
99,
537-541
|
| 56.
|
Enk, A. H.,
and Katz, S. I.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1398-1402
|
| 57.
|
Caux, C.,
Dezutter-Dambuyant, C.,
Schmitt, D.,
and Banchereau, J.
(1992)
Nature
360,
258-261
|
| 58.
|
Sallusto, F.,
and Lanzavecchia, A.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
1109-1118
|
| 59.
|
Inaba, K.,
Inaba, M.,
Romani, N.,
Aya, H.,
Deguchi, M.,
Ikehara, S.,
Muramatsu, S.,
and Steinman, R. M.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
176,
1693-1702
|
| 60.
|
Paglia, P.,
Girolomoni, G.,
Robbiati, F.,
Granucci, F.,
and Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
178,
1893-1901
|
| 61.
|
Granucci, F.,
Girolomoni, G.,
Lutz, M. B.,
Foti, M.,
Marconi, G.,
Gnocchi, P.,
Nolli, L.,
and Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.
(1994)
Eur. J. Immunol.
24,
2522-2526
|
| 62.
|
Girolomoni, G.,
Lutz, M. B.,
Pastore, S.,
Abmann, C. U.,
Cavani, A.,
and Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
2163-2169
|
| 63.
|
Elbe, A.,
Schleischitz, S.,
Strunk, D.,
and Stingl, G.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
2878-2889
|
| 64.
|
Timares, L.,
Takashima, A.,
and Johnston, S. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13147-13152
|
| 65.
|