|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 26, 20217-20222, June 30, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, November 11, 1999, and in revised form, April 13, 2000
An early event of Integrin is a large family of adhesion molecules involved in many
physiological processes, ranging from normal developmental processes to
pathological processes such as tumor growth and inflammation (for
review, see Refs. 1-4). Among the integrins, the Either way, the initial effect of PKC activation on integrin molecules
is increased mobility of surface-bound The question is: what proteins are responsible for translating the PKC
signals to release the cytoskeletal constraint on integrin? MacMARCKS,
a member of the MARCKS family of PKC substrates, is a
macrophage-enriched myristoylated
alanine-rich C kinase
substrate (20, 21) that is primarily found in hemopoietic
cells and epithelia cells.2
Its myristoylated N-terminal membrane targeting domain together with
the positively charged effector domain (20) in the middle of the
protein facilitate its association with the plasma membrane (22, 23).
Because the effector domain contains the PKC phosphorylation sites, the
membrane association of this protein is regulated by PKC-mediated
phosphorylation (24).
Recent functional studies have indicated that the MARCKS family of
proteins is involved in cell spreading (25, 26). Our studies have shown
that MacMARCKS affects J774 macrophage cell spreading, likely the
result of its effect on the tyrosine phosphorylation of the focal
adhesion protein paxillin and on the activation of The recent application of the single-particle tracking technique
provides a new insight into lateral movement of the integrin molecule
(18, 28). This technique, developed in the late 1980s, visualizes the
receptor or motor movement by conjugating it with small particles
(40-200 nm) (18, 28-32) and observing particle movement in living
cells with video-enhanced contrast microscopy. The technique allows us
to study the behavior of a small group of molecules at the nanometer
spatial precision with 30-ms time resolution (33, 34). The recorded
particle track (Fig. 1) can then be analyzed for its randomness or
restrictions, and a diffusion coefficient can also be obtained. In many
cases, cytoskeletal constraints on receptors have been observed
(35-38). In terms of Here we report that MacMARCKS is required for releasing cytoskeletal
constraints on integrin, a process initiated by PKC activation. Either
mutation or lack of MacMARCKS blocks the PKC-stimulated increase of
integrin mobility. Such a block can be bypassed by adding cytoskeleton
depolymerizing reagent, suggesting that MacMARCKS indeed regulates the
cytoskeleton-integrin link.
Materials--
J774 cell and Wehi 274.1 cells were purchased
from ATCC. Hybridoma HB 226, which produces hamster anti-mouse
Cell Preparation--
J774 cells, Wehi 274.1.7 cells, or mutated
cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10%
fetal bovine serum. Before the experiment, 5 × 106
cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) once and then
treated with neuraminidase X (1 milliunit in 3 ml of buffer containing
0.13 M NaCl, 0.05 M NaAc, pH 6.5) for 30 min.
Then, 0.5 ml of the cell suspension was added to 2.5 ml of Hanks'
solution and plated on an acid-washed coverslip coated with
poly-L-lysine (18, 40).
Conjugation of Antibodies to the Fluorescent Latex
Beads--
Antibody against
Since the microbeads used here have autofluorescence, at the end of the
experiments, the beads were illuminated for their fluorescence so that
they would not be confused with the subcellular organelles (Fig.
1A).
Video Microscopy--
Cells were plated on
poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips in a steel chamber and
placed on a water-jacketed heating stage on a Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope with minimum light to prevent "burning" the cells. On
poly-L-lysine coated surfaces in the serum-free medium, all
types of cells used in these report adhered and spread equally well
(Fig. 1B), regardless the status of MacMARCKS protein in
these cells. After the cells spread and clearly showed their lamellipodia, the anti- Data Analysis--
For each track of a bead, the mean square
displacement (MSD) for each time interval was calculated from the
xy coordinates of the particles according to Equations 1-3
(for review see, Ref. 34) by programming a macro in SigmaPlot
software.3
Protein Phosphorylation--
Protein phosphorylation in vector-
or MacMARCKS-transfected cells was determined by prelabeling cells with
32P-labeled inorganic phosphate (200 µCi) for 1 h in
phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
dialyzed fetal bovine serum. After adding PMA (100 ng/ml), the cells
were lysed in the lysis buffer (20), and MacMARCKS protein was
immunoprecipitated with polyclonal anti-MacMARCKS antibody (41). The
immunoprecipitant was then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and autoradiography.
Two-dimensional Phosphopeptide Mapping--
The gel slice
containing MacMARCKS band was excised from the fully destained SDS gel
and was washed with 50% methanol for at least 12 h. After drying
with SpeedVac, the gel slice was incubated in 750 µl of 50 mM NH4HCO3 containing 100 µg/ml
thermolysin and trace of phenol red at 37 °C for 16-18 h. The
supernatant containing phosphopeptides was then collected and
lyophilized in SpeedVac. The residues were redissolved in 10 µl of
electrophoresis buffer (10% acetic acid, 1% pyridine), spotted on
phosphocellulose plate (plastic back, Eastman Kodak Co.), and
electrophoresis run at 400 V for 40 min in one dimension. The
phosphocellulose plate was air-dried, and then chromatography was run
in pyridine:n-butyl alcohol:HAc:H2O (15:10:3:12)
on the other dimension. After air-drying, the plate was exposed to the film.
MacMARCKS Mutation Inhibits the PMA-stimulated Increase in the
Random Diffusion of
We first measured the diffusion of
In addition to the pharmaceutical reagents, we also tested MCP-1, a
physiological stimulus that can activate PKC and Expression of Exogenous Wild Type MacMARCKS Restores
We suspected that this spontaneous increase in diffusion rate without
PMA may be due to the uncontrolled phosphorylation of the transfected
MacMARCKS in Wehi cells as compared with the endogenous MacMARCKS in
J774 cells. Therefore, we examined the basal phosphorylation level of
MacMARCKS in Wehi cells. Although the phosphorylated MacMARCKS in
untreated J774 cells was only 30% of that in the PMA-treated J774
cells, this ratio reached to 80% in Wehi cells (Fig.
4). To be sure that MacMARCKS is
phosphorylated at its PKC sites, we also performed two-dimensional
phosphopeptide mapping and found that only the previously identified
PKC sites was heavily phosphorylated (Fig. 4) (20). These data showed
that a higher percentage of the transfected MacMARCKS in Wehi cells was
phosphorylated when compared with endogenous MacMARCKS in J774 cells.
We thus speculate that this higher phosphorylation may be due to loose control of MacMARCKS phosphorylation in Wehi cells because MacMARCKS is
exogenous transfected protein.
MacMARCKS Phosphorylation Is Required for Integrin
Mobility--
If the high diffusion rate of
It is important to note, however, that although wild type MacMARCKS is
able to stimulate the integrin mobility without PMA stimulation in Wehi
cells, it is insufficient to fully activate the cell to adhere to
ICAM-1-coated surface until PMA is added (27). This is likely due to
that the increased mobility is only a first step in cell adhesion. A
successful adhesion would require the involvement of many more
proteins, and some of those may also be regulated by the addition of
PMA. Therefore, this observation indicates that MacMARCKS is an
essential but not sufficient condition. The phosphorylation of other
components stimulated by PMA may also be required to fully activate integrin.
Cytoskeleton Depolymerizing Reagents Overcome MacMARCKS
Defects--
The above data suggest that MacMARCKS is involved in
releasing the cytoskeletal constraint on integrin molecules. Either
mutation or lack of MacMARCKS in these cells prevents releasing
integrin from its cytoskeleton constraint. If this is true, then
artificially breaking the cytoskeletal link between integrin and
cytoskeleton should overcome the defect of MacMARCKS. Kucik et
al. have shown that small concentrations of cytochalasin D, an
actin-depolymerizing agent, can bypass the PKC requirement and directly
break the cytoskeleton to promote integrin diffusion. Following this
approach, we observed that, after adding 0.3 µg/ml cytochalasin D,
both mutant J774 cells and the MacMARCKS-deficient Wehi cells presented
highly motile integrin molecules (Fig.
5). The data show that defects caused by
MacMARCKS deficiency indeed lie prior or on the cytoskeletal constraint
on the integrin molecules.
Ample evidence has suggested a model in which cytoskeleton
restricts the mobility of receptors, including We speculate that MacMARCKS may be a direct part of the cytoskeletal
constraint. The MARCKS family was identified as cytoskeleton-associated protein in the beginning (for review, see Ref. 42). Our recent study
shows that MacMARCKS associates with a subunit of dynactin, which is an
important regulator of microtubule motor
protein.4 However, MacMARCKS
is unlikely to bind directly to How MacMARCKS is involved in the We greatly appreciate Dr. D. Kucik and Dr.
E. J. Brown for their extensive help in setting up the
single-particle tracking techniques in our laboratory and for
intellectually stimulating discussions.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM 54715.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Oral
Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois, 801 S. Paulina
St., Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-996-3520; Fax: 312-996-6044; E-mail:
jxli@uic.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909129199
2
J. Li, unpublished data.
3
The computer program created in our laboratory
for use in SigmaPlot software is available to anyone upon request.
4
Yue, L., Lu, S., Garces, J., Jin, T., and Li, J. (May 25, 2000) J. Biol. Chem. 10.1074/jbc.M001845200.
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
DOG, 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol;
ED, effector domain
deletion mutant of MacMARCKS;
ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule
1;
MARCKS, myristoylated
alanine-rich C kinase
substrate;
MacMARCKS, macrophage-enriched
myristoylated alanine-rich
C kinase substrate;
MCP-1, macrophage chemoattractant protein-1;
MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid;
MSD, mean square
displacement;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
MHC, major histocompatibility
complex.
Macrophage-enriched Myristoylated Alanine-rich C Kinase Substrate
and Its Phosphorylation Is Required for the Phorbol Ester-stimulated
Diffusion of
2 Integrin Molecules*
and
§¶
Department of Oral Biology, College of
Dentistry and the § Department of Microbiology and
Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois,
Chicago, Illinois 60612
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 integrin
activation is the increased diffusion rate of this molecule on the cell
surface, thereby providing integrin molecules with a better chance to
meet the ligands. The activation of protein kinase C (PKC) stimulates
integrin diffusion by releasing the cytoskeletal constraint on integrin
molecules. We report here that macrophage-enriched myristoylated
alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MacMARCKS), a membrane-associated PKC
substrate involved in integrin activation, is required for this
PKC-stimulated diffusion of integrin molecules. Using the
single-particle tracking technique, we observed that the activation of
PKC stimulated an 11-fold increase in the diffusion rate of
2 integrins in wild type J774 macrophage cells but not
in those expressing mutant MacMARCKS. Further evidence is provided from
a MacMARCKS-deficient cell line in which phorbol esters failed to
stimulate the diffusion of integrin. Transfection of wild type
MacMARCKS into these cells restored the rapid diffusion rate of the
2 integrins. The phosphorylation of MacMARCKS is
important because transfection of a nonphosphorylatable MacMARCKS
mutant or the addition of staurosporine eliminates the rapid diffusion
rate of integrin. Furthermore, adding cytochalasin D bypasses the
MacMARCKS deficiency and stimulates
2 integrin diffusion, suggesting that MacMARCKS's involvement in integrin activation is prior or at the site of cytoskeleton. Therefore, we
conclude that MacMARCKS is required for releasing the cytoskeletal constraint on integrin molecules during PKC-mediated integrin activation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2
family is found exclusively in hemopoietic cells, and its activation, i.e. binding to its ligand, plays a vital role in
immunological responses such as T cell activation (5), phagocytosis
(6), and inflammation (7-9). A typical example of its role is the diapedesis of leukocytes. In its resting state, these immune cells do
not adhere to the endothelium. Once stimulated, however,
2 integrin molecules on these cells show a high avidity
toward the ligand on the epithelial cells of blood vessels, and the
cells adhere firmly to endothelium (10, 11). Therefore, tight control of the activation process of
2 integrin is essential in
regulating immune responses. Many substances can stimulate the
activation of
2 integrin including chemokine, bacterial
substance. Protein kinase C
(PKC)1-mediated signal
transduction pathway is very important for cell adhesion (12) and is
essential for the activation of
2 integrin (for review,
see Refs. 1, 2, 13, and 14), which is also part of the "inside-out"
pathway. It has been suggested that the activation of PKC initiates
either the conformation of integrin molecules to a high affinity state
(15) or the clustering status of integrin molecules to obtain high
avidity binding (16, 17).
2 integrin molecules (18). This increased mobility results from an increase in
random diffusion, not from an added external force. A similar increase
in integrin diffusion also results from slightly depolymerizing the
actin cytoskeleton, thereby suggesting that PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation actually causes the release of cytoskeletal constraints on integrin molecules (18). Such an increased lateral movement of
2 integrin molecules provides a better chance to meet
ligands or to meet each other to form a cluster. Following the
formation of a cluster, a firm link with the cytoskeleton is
reestablished (19).
2
integrin (25). Recently, the involvement of MacMARCKS in
2 integrin activation was also demonstrated in cells
deficient in both MARCKS and MacMARCKS expression (27). The question is how MacMARCKS is required for integrin activation.
2 integrin, Kucik et
al. (18) showed that an important step in the PKC-stimulated
integrin activation is the relaxation of cytoskeletal constraints on
2 integrin molecules. This observation provided a basis
for the hypothesis that certain proteins may be required for
transducing the PKC signal to the cytoskeleton.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 integrin antibody (2E6) (39), was purchased from ATCC
and was grown in serum-free medium from Life Technologies, Inc. After
removing the hybridoma, we collected the antibody-containing
supernatant and concentrated it for later use. Monoclonal anti-MHC II
(M1/42) antibody was kindly provided by Dr. R. Steinman (Rockefeller
University, New York, NY). The carboxylated fluorescent latex beads
were purchased from Molecular Probe (catalog no. F-8811; 200 nm in
size). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and other cell culture
media were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA), 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG),
cytochalasin D, nocodazole, neuraminidase X, and other routine
chemicals were purchased from Sigma. Macrophage chemoattractant
protein-1 (MCP-1) was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).
2 integrin (2E6) either in
the form of whole antibody or Fab2 fragments at a
concentration of 10 mg/ml was conjugated to the carboxylated beads as
described by the manufacturer's instructions (Molecular Probes). Since
no difference between Fab2-conjugated and whole antibody-conjugated
beads was observed in our single-particle tracking (data not shown),
the whole antibody-coated beads were used in most cases. In a glass
tube, 100 µl of antibody or BSA were added to the reaction mixture
containing 50 µl of MES (200 mM), 50 µl of
H2O, and 200 µl of carboxylated latex beads and left at
room temperature for 15 min. Then 2 mg of
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide were added to the tube,
which was vortexed for 2 h at room temperature. At the end of
2 h, 450 µl of glycine (1 M, pH = 6.25) were
added, and the tube was vortexed for an additional 30 min to terminate the reaction. The excess proteins were removed by dialyzing the reaction mixture in a dialyzing bag (Mr cut-off
300,000) against 1 liter of 50 mM MES (pH 6.0) overnight.
The buffer was then changed to PBS by dialyzing the beads against 1 liter of PBS for another 4 h. The beads were stored at 4 °C in
1.5 ml of PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.02% azide.
2 integrin antibody
(2E6)-conjugated beads were added at a concentration of 4-5
beads/cell. PMA (100 nM), DOG (20 µM), MCP-1
(40 ng/ml), or cytochalasin D (0.3 µg/ml) was added at the same time
as the beads. Recording was started as soon as the 2E6-conjugated beads
fell onto and bound to the cells and continued for 30 s. Although
the larger latex beads could be phagocytosed by macrophages, the beads
used here were not phagocytosed during the observation time judged by
vertical imaging on confocal microscope. This is either because the
beads are too small to cause phagocytic receptor aggregation or because
the 30-s observation time is too short for macrophages to phagocytose
them. Beads coated with BSA or antibody against MHC II were used as
controls. Bead motion was observed using video-enhanced differential
interference contrast microscopy. A CCD camera system (Optronic DE750)
with digital contrast enhancement and a Pentium II 400-MHz computer with 384 MB of RAM recorded the beads' motion directly into RAM at 30 frames/s. For each track, a 36-s segment was recorded using PIXCI
software (Epix Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) and transferred later to the
hard drive. Location of the beads was determined manually in each video
frame for 15 s, i.e. 450 frames. As examples, tracks of
2E6-coated beads were shown for each type of cells used in this report
in the presence and absence of PMA (Fig.
1B).

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, autofluorescence of the latex beads
distinguishes them from the intracellular organelles. B,
left panel, all types of cells used in the
experiments spread equally well on the poly-L-lysine-coated
coverslips, with 2E6-coated fluorescent beads on their surfaces;
right panel, sample tracks of 2E6-coated beads on
each type of cells treated with (+PMA) or without
(
PMA) of PMA. In this case, the position of particles
during 15 s of motion (450 frames at 30 frames/s) was extracted
and a line connecting these points was drawn.
(Eq. 1)
(Eq. 2)
The obtained MSD is the sum of the random and directed
motion.
(Eq. 3)
because
(Eq. 4)
(Eq. 5)
Thus, we obtain Equation 7.
(Eq. 6)
By fitting the MSD calculated from the experimental data to the
quadratic equation (Equation 7) using the SigmaPlot software, the
diffusion coefficient D can be extracted.
(Eq. 7)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 Integrin in J774 Macrophage
Cells--
To determine whether MacMARCKS mediates PKC's effect on
the cytoskeletal constraint on integrin, we first examined the effect of the MacMARCKS mutation on the diffusion rate of the
2
integrin in J774 macrophage cells. J774 macrophage cells express
endogenous wild type MacMARCKS, and their
2 integrin
molecules can be activated by adding PMA, which activates PKC (25). We
previously showed that expression of the effector domain deletion
mutant of MacMARCKS in these cells blocks PMA-stimulated
2 integrin activation (25). Therefore, we tested whether
this mutant affects the increased mobility of integrin in the initial
steps of integrin activation.
2 integrin of the
wild type J774 cells before and after PMA treatment and compared it with that obtained from a B cell line by Kucik et al. (18). In agreement with their report, we, too, observed an approximately 11-fold increase in the diffusion rate of
2 integrin
molecules after adding PMA to the wild type J774 cells that were
transfected with empty vector as control (Fig.
2). For comparison, we examined the
diffusion rate of
2 integrin molecules in J774 cells
expressing the effector domain deletion mutant of MacMARCKS, the
expression of which blocks activation of
2 integrin in
these cells (25). Differing from the control J774 cells, no
PMA-stimulated increase of integrin diffusion was seen in these mutant
J774 cells (Fig. 2). Although the diffusion rate appeared slightly
higher in unstimulated MacMARCKS mutant cells than that of unstimulated
wild type cells, statistical analysis showed that this difference is
not significant. In addition to PMA, DOG, another PKC activator, was
also tested and a similar effect on integrin mobility was observed.
Same as in the case of PMA, MacMARCKS mutation also blocked the
increase in the mobility of
2 integrin stimulated by DOG
(Fig. 2). These data coincide with the inhibitory effect of this mutant
on the activation of
2 integrin (25), suggesting that
MacMARCKS is likely involved in the initial step of
2
integrin activation, i.e. the releasing of integrin
molecules from cytoskeletal constraint. This MacMARCKS effect appears
not to be universally applied to all receptors. MHC II, another
membrane protein with 
dimeric structure, showed very little
change in its mobility in respond to PMA treatment. MacMARCKS mutation
did not alter its mobility neither (Fig. 2). As negative control, the
movement of BSA-coated beads was also recorded. Similar to previous
reports, we too showed that the BSA beads were basically immobile and
its diffusion coefficient is far smaller
(~10
12) than that of
2
integrin and MHC II.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
PMA, DOG, and MCP-1 stimulate the diffusion
rate of
2 integrin, and MacMARCKS
mutation blocks such an increase. A, a plot of MSD
versus time of a 2E6-coated bead on vector-transfected
control J774 cells (VEC) and J774 cells expressing the
effector domain deletion mutant of MacMARCKS (ED) in the
presence of PMA. The calculation was described under "Experimental
Procedures." B, bar graph shows the
mean and standard deviation of the diffusion coefficient (D)
in both types of J774 cells and without or with the addition of PMA,
DOG, and MCP-1. J774 minus PMA, D = 0.74 ± 0.19 × 10
10; J774 plus PMA,
D = 8.10 ± 1.52 × 10
10; J774 plus DOG = 7.99 ± 1.43 × 10
10; J774 plus MCP-1 = 6.54 ± 2.05 × 10
10; ED minus PMA,
1.92 ± 0.38 × 10
10; ED plus PMA:
1.50 ± 0.15 × 10
10; ED plus
DOG = 0.29 ± 0.19 × 10
10; ED
plus MCP-1 = 0.46 ± 0.24 × 10
10. C, in addition, the
diffusion coefficient of MHC II in both wild type and mutant cells
stimulated with PMA are also shown: J774 minus PMA = 9.99 ± 1.57 × 10
10; J774 with PMA = 10.87 ± 2.15 × 10
10; ED with
PMA = 11.21 ± 2.23 × 10
10.
The BSA-coated beads was included as negative control, and they were
basically not moving diffusion coefficient at the range of
10
12 (data not shown).
2
integrin. Our data showed that MCP-1 was also capable of inducing the
increase in the mobility of
2 integrin molecules and
MacMARCKS mutation again blocked the increase (Fig. 2).
2 Integrin Mobility in MacMARCKS-deficient Macrophage
Cell Line--
To further test the above conclusion, we chose a cell
line, Wehi 274.1.7, that has undetectable amounts of MacMARCKS protein and whose
2 integrin cannot be activated by adding PMA
(27). Our previous report showed that, when wild type MacMARCKS is
expressed in these cells, the PMA-induced,
2
integrin-mediated adhesion to ICAM-1-coated surface is restored in
these cells (27). Thus, this cell line is a very useful model for
studying
2 integrin diffusion by using the
single-particle tracking technique. We observed that, although the
diffusion rate of the
2 integrins in the
vector-transfected control Wehi cells is similar to that of resting
J774 cells, the diffusion rate of the
2 integrins does
not increase in response to PMA as in the J774 cells (Fig. 3). The data correspond to the inability
of
2 integrin to bind ICAM-1 (27). The data further
support the observation made by Kucik et al. that the
increased diffusion of
2 integrin is closely correlated
with
2 integrin-mediated adhesion (18). After wild type
MacMARCKS is expressed in these cells, the diffusion rate of
2 integrin molecules increases approximately 11-fold to
a level similar to that in PMA-treated J774 cells, even without adding
PMA.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of MacMARCKS in Wehi 274.1.7 cells
restored the rapid diffusion rate of
2 integrin. Deficient in MacMARCKS
expression,
2 integrin in Wehi 274.1.7 cells showed a
minimum diffusion rate (D = 0.46 ± 0.11 × 10
10) even with PMA stimulation
(D = 0.68 ± 0.13 × 10
10). Introducing wild type MacMARCKS into
these cells caused
2 integrin to move at a higher rate
(D = 5.09 ± 1.25 × 10
10) in the absence of PMA treatment, a rate
similar to that in the presence of PMA (D = 6.76 ± 1.78 × 10
10). Such a rapid diffusion
rate can be abolished by adding 100 nM staurosporine
(D = 0.37 ± 0.10 × 10
10). The
2 integrin in cells
expressing the SA mutant of MacMARCKS also showed a low diffusion rate
both without (D = 1.60 ± 0.35 × 10
10) or with (D = 1.99 ± 0.40 × 10
10) PMA.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MacMARCKS phosphorylation in Wehi 274.1.7 cells and in J774 cells without and with PMA. Top, the
ratio of phosphorylated MacMARCKS in cells without and with PMA
stimulation. Middle, the autoradiographs of the
phosphorylated proteins on SDS gels (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Wehi cells show much higher phosphorylation of
MacMARCKS before PMA treatment. Bottom, the two-dimensional
phosphopeptide maps of each of the phosphorylated band, indicating only
the PKC sites were phosphorylated (for detailed reference of the sites,
see Ref. 20).
2 integrin
in MacMARCKS-transfected Wehi cells results from the high level of
MacMARCKS phosphorylation, then adding staurosporine, which inhibits
MacMARCKS phosphorylation, should eliminate the rapid diffusion rate of
2 integrin molecules. Fig. 3 confirms that adding 100 nM staurosporine indeed lowers the diffusion rate of
2 integrin in Wehi cells to the same level as in the
unstimulated J774 cells. In addition, if our speculation is true, the
cells expressing a nonphosphorylatable mutant of MacMARCKS should not
have a rapid diffusion rate. The SA mutant of MacMARCKS was mutated at
the phosphorylation sites (serine to alanine) (20) and therefore
prevented MacMARCKS from being phosphorylated by PKC. Transfection of
this mutant in Wehi cells indeed did not increase the mobility of
2 integrin before or after adding PMA, suggesting that
phosphorylation is necessary for MacMARCKS to release the constraint on integrin.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Cytochalasin D at low concentration bypasses
the MacMARCKS deficiency. The low diffusion rate due to the lack
of MacMARCKS in Wehi cells (Wehi Vec,
D = 0.46 ± 0.11 × 10
10) or MacMARCKS mutation in ED-J774 cells
(D = 1.92 ± 0.38 × 10
10) was restored by adding 0.3 µg/ml
cytochalasin D to D = 7.62 ± 1.80 × 10
10 in Wehi cells and to D = 4.33 ± 1.01 × 10
10 in ED-J774
cells.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2
integrin, on the cell surface (18, 35-38). Evidence suggests that PKC
activation releases the cytoskeletal constraint on
2
integrin, and that getting free from cytoskeletal constraint and
diffusing rapidly on the membrane surface is a key step in
2 integrin activation (18). Integrin has a better
chance, then, of meeting and binding the multivalent ligand and then
undergoing conformational changes to a high affinity state. Bound
integrins become relatively stationary, and more integrin molecules
join to form a large cluster. Under the cluster, a new and stronger
cytoskeleton link forms and new signals are transduced (19). In accord
with this model, we have shown that the
2 integrin in
J774 cells, similar to that in the B cells (18), responds to PMA
stimulation by increasing its lateral diffusion rate. We further found
that MacMARCKS protein is required for this PMA-stimulated increase of
integrin diffusion. Either mutation or lack of MacMARCKS blocks the
PMA-stimulated increased diffusion. Such a loss of a rapid diffusion
rate likely results from the inability of the cell to release the
cytoskeletal constraint on
2 integrin molecules, because
after cytoskeleton is artificially depolymerized, the cells can bypass
the MacMARCKS deficiency. This observation indicates that the final
target of MacMARCKS is likely to be the cytoskeleton, either directly
or indirectly. What is also important is that MacMARCKS phosphorylation is required, because staurosporine inhibits
MacMARCKS-dependent increase of the diffusion rate of
2 integrin. The nonphosphorylatable form of MacMARCKS is
incapable of conferring an increased diffusion rate on Wehi cells. The
data further suggest that MacMARCKS regulates the cytoskeletal
constraint under the control of PKC.
2 integrin, partly
because efforts to explore such binding did not show positive results
(data not shown). In addition, the fact that lacking MacMARCKS immobilizes the
2 integrin clearly excludes the
possibility that MacMARCKS directly restricts integrin diffusion.
Rather, we think MacMARCKS may merely regulate a complex of proteins
that links
2 integrin to cytoskeleton. Such a complex of
proteins may be the previously described cytoskeletal barriers adjacent
to the membrane that limits integrin diffusion (35-38). We propose a
model here in which this complex that affects
2 integrin
diffusion may form with or without MacMARCKS. Only the unphosphorylated MacMARCKS may be incorporated into this barrier. PKC-mediated phosphorylation causes MacMARCKS to break the complex. Without MacMARCKS, this cytoskeletal link can still form but no longer can be
broken by PKC. When exogenous MacMARCKS is expressed in Wehi cells,
MacMARCKS is reintroduced into this cytoskeletal complex. Because
exogenous MacMARCKS somehow is easily phosphorylated in Wehi cells, we
observed that the cytoskeletal complex is not stable, and we suspect
that this is the reason
2 integrin in these cells has a
rapid diffusion rate even before PMA treatment. Inhibition of kinases
by staurosporine or transfection of nonphosphorylatable mutants of
MacMARCKS reduces integrin mobility, further supporting this notion.
Currently, the key problem for the hypothesis is that a
MacMARCKS-containing cytoskeletal complex that somehow links to
2 integrin have not been identified. Whether a link truly exists remains to be determined. However, it is certain now that
one of the consequences of MacMARCKS mutation is the failure to release
the cytoskeleton constraint on
2 integrin molecules, a
finding supported by the fact that depolymerizing cytoskeleton can
bypass MacMARCKS deficiency.
2 integrin activation
process as a cytoskeleton constraint is not known. Several
possibilities exist. MacMARCKS may behave like MARCKS, which attaches
to the plasma membrane (43) and cross-links actin so that it may
modulate the general fluidity of the membrane. However, in such cases, MacMARCKS would have an effect on all membrane-bound receptors. An
explanation is needed for its selective effects on
2
integrin but not on MHC II molecules. Alternatively, the
membrane-associated MacMARCKS may serve as an anchor for other
MacMARCKS binding proteins that may be linked to integrin. The key to
this alternative hypothesis is to find the links between MacMARCKS and
integrins. If this is the case, then other MacMARCKS like proteins such
as MARCKS and GAP-43 (44) would likely be specific for other surface
receptors. In addition, whether tyrosine kinases, for example focal
adhesion kinase (45, 46), are involved in this cytoskeletal constraint should also be examined.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hynes, R. O.
(1992)
Cell
69,
11-25
2.
Clark, E. A.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-239
3.
Stewart, M.,
Thiel, M.,
and Hogg, N.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
690-696
4.
Varner, J. A.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
724-730
5.
Dustin, M. L.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1989)
Nature
341,
619-624
6.
Buyon, J. P.,
Abramson, S. N.,
Philips, M. R.,
Slade, S. G.,
Ross, G. D.,
Weissman, G.,
and Winchester, R. J.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
140,
3156-3160
7.
Graham, I. L.,
Lefkowith, J. B.,
Anderson, D. C.,
and Brown, E. J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1509-1517
8.
Nathan, C.,
Srimal, S.,
Farber, C.,
Sanchez, E.,
Kabbash, L.,
Asch, A.,
Gailit, J.,
and Wright, S. D.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1341-1349
9.
Kashishian, A.,
MacAuley, A.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1990)
Oncogene
5,
1463-1470
10.
Wallis, W. J.,
Beatty, P. G.,
Ochs, H. D.,
and Harlan, J. M.
(1985)
J. Immunol.
135,
2323-2330
11.
Gladwin, A. M.,
Hassall, D. G.,
Martin, J. F.,
and Booth, R. F.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1052,
166-172
12.
Woods, A.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1992)
J. Cell Sci.
101,
277-290
13.
Springer, T. A.
(1990)
Nature
346,
425-434
14.
Rosales, C.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1995)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
57,
189-198
15.
Lollo, B. A.,
Chan, K. W.,
Hanson, E. M.,
Moy, V. T.,
and Brian, A. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21693-21700
16.
Landis, R. C.,
Bennett, R. I.,
and Hogg, N.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1519-1527
17.
McDowall, A.,
Leitinger, B.,
Stanley, P.,
Bates, P. A.,
Randi, A. M.,
and Hogg, N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27396-27403
18.
Kucik, D. F.,
Dustin, M. L.,
Miller, J. T.,
and Brown, E. J.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
2139-2144
19.
Yamada, K. M.,
and Miyamoto, S.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
681-689
20.
Li, J.,
and Aderem, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
791-801
21.
Blackshear, P. J.,
Verghese, G. M.,
Johnson, J. D.,
Haupt, D. M.,
and Stumpo, D. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13540-13546
22.
Mosior, M.,
and McLaughlin, S.
(1991)
Biophys. J.
60,
149-159
23.
Vergeres, G.,
and Ramsden, J. J.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
5-11
24.
Kim, J.,
Blackshear, P. J.,
Johnson, J. D.,
and McLaughlin, S.
(1994)
Biophys. J.
67,
227-237
25.
Li, J.,
Zhu, Z.,
and Bao, Z.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12985-12990
26.
Myat, M. M.,
Anderson, S.,
Allen, L. A.,
and Aderem, A.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
611-614
27.
Yue, L.,
Bao, Z.,
and Li, J.
(2000)
Cell Adhes. Commun.
7,
355-366
28.
Schmidt, C. E.,
Horwitz, A. F.,
Lauffenburger, D. A.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
977-991
29.
Kucik, D. F.,
Elson, E. L.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76,
314-322
30.
Gelles, J.,
Schnapp, B. J.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1988)
Nature
331,
450-453
31.
Sheetz, M. P.,
Turney, S.,
Qian, H.,
and Elson, E. L.
(1989)
Nature
340,
284-288
32.
Kucik, D. F.,
Elson, E. L.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
1617-1622
33.
Kucik, D. F.,
Elson, E. L.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1989)
Nature
340,
315-317
34.
Qian, H.,
Sheetz, M. P.,
and Elson, E. L.
(1991)
Biophys. J.
60,
910-921
35.
Simson, R.,
Sheets, E. D.,
and Jacobson, K.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
989-993
36.
Sako, Y.,
and Kusumi, A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1251-1264
37.
Anderson, C. M.,
Georgiou, G. N.,
Morrison, I. E.,
Stevenson, G. V.,
and Cherry, R. J.
(1992)
J. Cell Sci.
101,
415-425
38.
Wilson, K. M.,
Morrison, I. E.,
Smith, P. R.,
Fernandez, N.,
and Cherry, R. J.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
2101-2109
39.
Metlay, J. P.,
Witmer-Pack, M. D.,
Agger, R.,
Crowley, M. T.,
Lawless, D.,
and Steinman, R. M.
(1990)
J. Exp. Med.
171,
1753-1771
40.
Wright, S. D.
(1986)
Methods Enzymol.
132,
204-221
41.
Zhu, Z.,
Bao, Z.,
and Li, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17652-17655
42.
Aderem, A.
(1992)
Cell
71,
713-716
43.
Arbuzova, A.,
Murray, D.,
and McLaughlin, S.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1376,
369-379
44.
Liu, Y.,
and Storm, D. R.
(1990)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
11,
107-111
45.
Guan, J. L.,
and Shalloway, D.
(1992)
Nature
358,
690-692
46.
Schaller, M. D.,
Borgman, C. A.,
Cobb, B. S.,
Vines, R. R.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5192-5196
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Ada-Nguema, H. Xenias, M. P. Sheetz, and P. J. Keely The small GTPase R-Ras regulates organization of actin and drives membrane protrusions through the activity of PLC{epsilon} J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2006; 119(7): 1307 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kim, C. V. Carman, W. Yang, A. Salas, and T. A. Springer The primacy of affinity over clustering in regulation of adhesiveness of the integrin {alpha}L{beta}2 J. Cell Biol., December 20, 2004; 167(6): 1241 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Zimmerman, J. M. D. T. Nelissen, S. E. van Emst-de Vries, P. H. G. M. Willems, F. de Lange, J. G. Collard, F. N. van Leeuwen, and C. G. Figdor Cytoskeletal restraints regulate homotypic ALCAM-mediated adhesion through PKC{alpha} independently of Rho-like GTPases J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2004; 117(13): 2841 - 2852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Feigelson, V. Grabovsky, R. Shamri, S. Levy, and R. Alon The CD81 Tetraspanin Facilitates Instantaneous Leukocyte VLA-4 Adhesion Strengthening to Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (VCAM-1) under Shear Flow J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51203 - 51212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ni, C. G. Kevil, D. C. Bullard, and D. F. Kucik Avidity Modulation Activates Adhesion under Flow and Requires Cooperativity among Adhesion Receptors Biophys. J., December 1, 2003; 85(6): 4122 - 4133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jongstra-Bilen, R. Harrison, and S. Grinstein Fc{gamma}-receptors Induce Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) Mobilization and Accumulation in the Phagocytic Cup for Optimal Phagocytosis J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45720 - 45729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Wojcikiewicz, X. Zhang, A. Chen, and V. T. Moy Contributions of molecular binding events and cellular compliance to the modulation of leukocyte adhesion J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2003; 116(12): 2531 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Worthylake and K. Burridge RhoA and ROCK Promote Migration by Limiting Membrane Protrusions J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13578 - 13584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, B. R. Schwartz, J. Tupper, N. Lin, R. K. Winn, and J. M. Harlan The GTPase Rap1 Regulates Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate-stimulated but Not Ligand-induced beta 1 Integrin-dependent Leukocyte Adhesion J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40893 - 40900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Jin and J. Li Dynamitin Controls beta 2 Integrin Avidity by Modulating Cytoskeletal Constraint on Integrin Molecules J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 32963 - 32969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, H. Hayashi, R. Harrison, B. Chiu, J. R. Chan, H. L. Ostergaard, R. D. Inman, J. Jongstra, M. I. Cybulsky, and J. Jongstra-Bilen Modulation of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18)-Mediated Adhesion by the Leukocyte-Specific Protein 1 Is Key to Its Role in Neutrophil Polarization and Chemotaxis J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 415 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Palmantier, M. D. George, S. K. Akiyama, F. M. Wolber, K. Olden, and J. D. Roberts cis-Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Stimulate {beta}1 Integrin-mediated Adhesion ofHuman Breast Carcinoma Cells to Type IV Collagen by Activating ProteinKinases C-{{epsilon}} and -{micro} Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(6): 2445 - 2452. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yue, S. Lu, J. Garces, T. Jin, and J. Li Protein Kinase C-regulated Dynamitin-Macrophage-enriched Myristoylated Alanine-Rice C Kinase Substrate Interaction Is Involved in Macrophage Cell Spreading J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 23948 - 23956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |