JBC Advanced Peptides, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002496200 on April 25, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20458-20466, July 7, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/27/20458    most recent
M002496200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thanbichler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goody, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thanbichler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goody, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Kinetics of the Interaction of Translation Factor SelB from Escherichia coli with Guanosine Nucleotides and Selenocysteine Insertion Sequence RNA*

Martin ThanbichlerDagger , August BöckDagger , and Roger S. Goody§

From the Dagger  Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie der Universität München, Maria-Ward-Straße 1a, 80638 München, Germany and the § Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Rheinlanddamm 201, 44026 Dortmund, Germany

Received for publication, March 24, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The kinetics of the interaction of GTP and GDP with SelB, the specific translation factor for the incorporation of selenocysteine into proteins, have been investigated using the stopped-flow method. Useful signals were obtained using intrinsic (i.e. tryptophan) fluorescence, the fluorescence of methylanthraniloyl derivatives of nucleotides, or fluorescence resonance energy transfer from tryptophan to the methylanthraniloyl group. The affinities of SelB for GTP (Kd = 0.74 µM) and GDP (Kd = 13.4 µM) were considerably lower than those of other translation factors. Of functional significance is the fact that the rate constant for GDP release from its complex with SelB (15 s-1) is many orders of magnitude larger than for elongation factor Tu, explaining why a GDP/GTP exchange factor is not required for the action of SelB. In contrast, the rate of release of GTP is 2 orders of magnitude slower and not significantly faster than for elongation factor Tu. Using a fluorescently labeled 17-nucleotide RNA minihelix that represents a binding site for the protein and that is part of the fdhF selenocysteine insertion sequence element positioned immediately downstream of the UGA triplet coding for selenocysteine incorporation, the kinetics of the interaction were studied. The high affinity of the interaction (Kd ~ 1 nM) appeared to be increased even further when selenocysteyl-tRNASec was bound to SelB, but to be independent of the presence or nature of the guanosine nucleotide at the active site. These results suggest that the affinity of SelB for its RNA binding site is maximized when charged tRNA is bound and decreases to allow dissociation and reading of codons downstream of the selenocysteine codon after selenocysteine peptide bond formation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The specialized translation factor SelB is the key molecule for the specific incorporation of the amino acid selenocysteine into polypeptides. SelB binds guanine nucleotides; selenocysteyl-tRNASec 1; and a secondary structure of the mRNA, the SECIS element. In bacterial selenoprotein mRNAs, this SECIS element is located immediately downstream of the UGA codon directing selenocysteine insertion, whereas in Archaea and Eukarya, it is situated in the 3'-nontranslated region (for a review, see Ref. 1). Binding of SelB to the SECIS structure is mediated by an ~17-kDa C-terminal domain of the protein (domain IVb) that maintains its binding capacity when separated from the rest of the molecule. Minimization of the SECIS element showed that a 17-nucleotide long minihelix (see Fig. 1) was still able to bind to SelB or its C-terminal domain and to promote selenocysteine incorporation in vivo. On the other hand, the N-terminal two-thirds of SelB, which display sequence similarity to elongation factor Tu, are still capable of binding selenocysteyl-tRNASec when separated from the mRNA binding domain (2, 3).

The formation of the quaternary complex is essential for the decoding of the UGA codon with selenocysteine at the ribosome. It is assumed that within this complex, SelB attains a conformation rendering it compatible for interaction with the ribosome, which is required for triggering GTPase activity. It is further assumed that GTP hydrolysis changes the conformation such that the charged tRNA is released. Therefore, in this model, SelB has two functions: the first one is to discriminate between an UGA codon programmed for selenocysteine insertion by the SECIS element and an ordinary UGA stop codon that lacks the SECIS element (4). Furthermore, in bacterial mRNAs coding for selenocysteine, SelB also tethers the tRNA to the ribosomal A site (4, 5).

Characterization of the kinetics of the SelB interaction with its substrates and the conformational changes involved is therefore of paramount importance for understanding the decoding process. Equilibrium dialysis measurements of the interaction of the protein with guanine nucleotides had indicated that GDP binding is approximately an order of magnitude weaker that GTP binding (6). This could obviate the necessity for a guanine nucleotide release factor. It has also been observed that SelB forms a tighter complex with the SECIS element in the presence of selenocysteyl-tRNASec than in its absence (7). This study deals with a detailed analysis of the association and dissociation kinetics of guanine nucleotides with SelB alone and in the presence of the mRNA. Additionally, the kinetics of the interaction of SelB with SECIS elements and the influence of guanine nucleotides and selenocysteyl-tRNASec thereon were investigated.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- L-[14C]Serine was obtained from NEN Life Science Products and had a specific activity of 160 mCi/mmol. Sodium [75Se]selenite with a specific activity of 296 mCi/mmol and RNase P1 were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Freiburg, Germany). Yeast inorganic pyrophosphatase was from Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany). Bovine serum albumin and bakers' yeast tRNA were obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). The 17-nucleotide long minihelix representing the binding part of the SECIS element of the fdhF mRNA from Escherichia coli (see Fig. 1) was prepared as described previously (2) and was a generous gift from M. Kromayer. The labeled fdhF minihelix carrying a (3',6'-dipivaloylfluoresceinyl)-6-carboxamidohexyl group at the 5'-end (5'-fluorescein-GGUUGCAGGUCUGCACC-3') was synthesized by Interactiva (Ulm, Germany). Selenocysteine synthase (SelA) purified as described (8) was a generous gift from K. Forchhammer. T7 RNA polymerase was isolated as described (9) and kindly provided by S. Leonhartsberger.

Purification of SelB and SelB-(472-614)-- For purification of SelB, E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (10) was transformed with plasmid pWL194 (11) harboring selB under control of the T7 Phi 10-promoter. Transformants were grown in a 10- or 50-liter Biostat fermentor (B. Braun, Dassel, Germany) at 37 °C in a medium containing 3% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 0.4% glucose, 0.2% glycerol, 25 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 60 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.1), and 100 µg/ml ampicillin. At an A600 of 3.0, expression of selB was induced by addition of 100 µM isopropyl-beta -thiogalactopyranoside. Subsequently, the temperature was lowered to 30 °C. After 75-150 min, the suspension was chilled to 0 °C, and the cells were harvested in a continuous flow centrifuge.

Breakage of the cells, removal of cell debris, enrichment of SelB by sedimentation with the ribosomes and subsequent extraction from the pellet with high salt buffer, and fractionated ammonium sulfate precipitation were performed as described (11). The final precipitate was dissolved in 50 ml of buffer A (100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 2 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM EDTA). After dialysis for 6 h against two changes (2 liters each) of the same buffer, the solution was applied to a hydroxylapatite column (1.6 × 12.5 cm; Bio-Gel HTP, Bio-Rad). The column was developed with 500 ml of a linear gradient of 100-200 mM potassium phosphate in buffer A at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. SelB was eluted at a potassium phosphate concentration of ~165 mM. Fractions containing SelB, as monitored by SDS gel electrophoresis, were pooled and dialyzed against two changes (2 liters each) of buffer B (100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM EDTA) for 6 and 12 h, respectively. The pool was then loaded onto a Q-Sepharose anion-exchange column (1.2 × 8 cm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which was developed with 90 ml of a linear gradient of 0-267 mM KCl in buffer B at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. SelB was eluted at ~125 mM KCl. The fractions containing the protein were pooled and dialyzed for 12 h against 2 liters of buffer B. The solution was then applied to an SP-Sepharose Fast Flow cation-exchange column (1 × 5 cm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was developed with 80 ml of a linear gradient of 0-400 mM KCl in buffer B at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. SelB was eluted at ~230 mM KCl. Fractions that contained SelB were pooled and dialyzed for 12 h against 2 liters of buffer B. Finally, the solution was concentrated by dialysis for 12 h against 500 ml of buffer B containing 50% glycerol and stored at -20 °C.

His-tagged SelB-(472-614) was purified essentially as described by Kromayer et al. (2). Protein concentrations were determined spectroscopically at 280 nm (epsilon SelB = 81,080 M-1 cm-1, epsilon SelB-(472-614) = 26,600 M-1 cm-1) according to Gill and von Hippel (12).

Isolation of Selenophosphate Synthetase-- Purification of selenophosphate synthetase (SelD) was performed according to the method of Ehrenreich et al. (13).

Isolation of Seryl-tRNA Synthetase-- Seryl-tRNA synthetase was purified essentially as described by Härtlein et al. (14).

Preparation and Folding of the RNA Stem-Loops-- The 39-nucleotide RNA stem-loop comprising most of the fdnG SECIS element from E. coli (15, 16) (Fig. 1) was synthesized in vitro using oligonucleotides as a template (9, 17). The reaction mixture contained 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), 40 mM MgCl2, 1 mM spermidine, 5 mM DTT, 0.01% Triton X-100, 8% polyethylene glycol 8000, 8 mM GMP, 2.4 units/ml pyrophosphatase, 20 µg/ml T7 RNA polymerase, and a 0.2 µM concentration of the partially double-stranded DNA template. After incubation at 37 °C for 3 h, the solution was extracted with phenol (equilibrated with 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.6)). The transcripts were subsequently precipitated with ethanol and separated on a 17.5% polyacrylamide gel (38:2 cross-link) under denaturing conditions. After visualization by UV shadowing, the transcript with the correct length was cut out and electroeluted from the gel using a Biotrap® chamber (Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel)


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structures of fdhF and fdnG SECIS elements. Bases that are protected by SelB against chemical modification (26) are marked by triangles. The shaded regions were synthesized in vitro and used for the experiments reported here.

To remove salt, which strongly favors the formation of biologically inactive dimers, both the unlabeled and fluorescein-labeled RNA oligonucleotides were precipitated by addition of 0.1 volume of sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and 1 volume of isopropyl alcohol before further use. After incubation at -20 °C, the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 45 min, washed with 80% ethanol, dried, and resolubilized in 0.1 mM EDTA.

Folding of the stem-loops was performed at a maximal concentration of 200 µM in a volume of 100 µl. The solution was incubated for 90 s at 80 °C and then rapidly cooled on ice. Under these conditions, all RNA oligonucleotides exclusively adopted the stem-loop conformation.

Determination of the RNA Stem-Loop Concentration-- To determine their exact concentration, RNA stem-loops were hydrolyzed by RNase P1 in a reaction mixture containing 30 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 1.6 mM ZnCl2, and 8 units/ml RNase P1 in a volume of 100 µl. After incubation for 2 h at 60 °C, the solution was diluted with distilled H2O, and potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) was added to a final concentration of 50 mM. Subsequently, the absorption of the released nucleotide monophosphates was measured at 260 nm. From the value obtained, the oligonucleotide concentration was calculated using the specific absorption coefficients epsilon 260 = 177.2 mM-1 cm-1 for the fdhF minihelix and epsilon 260 = 424.8 mM-1 cm-1 for the fdnG stem-loop. The underlying specific absorption coefficients (epsilon 260) of the nucleotide monophosphates were 15.31 M-1 cm-1 for AMP, 11.67 mM-1 cm-1 for GMP, 9.82 mM-1 cm-1 for UMP, and 7.45 mM-1 cm-1 for CMP.

Isolation of tRNASec-- tRNASec was purified from E. coli MC4100 (18) carrying plasmid pCB2013 according to the procedure described by Baron and Böck (19). Its concentration was determined by aminoacylation with L-[14C]serine under saturating seryl-tRNA synthetase concentrations. The aminoacylation mixture was pipetted into 250 µl of ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.1% L-serine. After addition of 100 µg of bakers' yeast tRNA, the precipitate was transferred onto glass-fiber filters and washed four times with 1 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.1% L-serine, five times with 1 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.05% L-serine, and three times with 1 ml of 80% ethanol. The filters were dried at 65 °C, and their radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting.

Aminoacylation of tRNASec-- Aminoacylation of tRNASec was performed in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM Hepes (pH 7.0), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM ATP, 200 µM L-serine, 83 µM tRNASec, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 2.5 units/ml pyrophosphatase, and 0.84 mg/ml seryl-tRNA synthetase. After incubation for 15 min at 37 °C, the reaction was stopped by addition of 0.033 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and subsequent treatment with phenol equilibrated with 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.6). Seryl-tRNASec was precipitated from the aqueous phase at -20 °C by addition of 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and 1 volume of isopropyl alcohol. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 30 min, washed with 80% ethanol, dried in vacuo, and resolubilized in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.6).

Conversion of Seryl-tRNASec to Selenocysteyl-tRNASec-- Ser-tRNASec was converted to selenocysteyl-tRNASec in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM Pipes (pH 6.7), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 mM ATP, 250 µM sodium selenite, 17 µM seryl-tRNASec, 0.1 mg/ml SelA, and 5.9 mg/ml SelD. After incubation at 37 °C for 35 min, 0.05 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and 0.05 volume of 200 mM DTT were added. The solution was thoroughly shaken with 1 volume of phenol equilibrated with 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g. The supernatant was then mixed with 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and 1 volume of isopropyl alcohol and incubated for 1 h on ice. The precipitate was sedimented by centrifugation for 10 min at 16,000 × g, washed with 80% ethanol containing 5 mM DTT, dried in vacuo, and resolubilized in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.6) containing 5 mM DTT. All steps were performed in a glove box under anaerobic conditions. The concentration of selenocysteyl-tRNASec was determined by performing parallel reactions using sodium [75Se]selenite instead of the nonradioactive compound and determining the radioactivity as described above.

Transient Kinetic Experiments-- Stopped-flow experiments were performed in a High Tech Scientific instrument using an excitation wavelength of 366 nm and an emission cutoff filter with an edge at 389 nm for monitoring the fluorescence from the methylanthraniloyl group. For tryptophan fluorescence, an excitation wavelength of 289 nm and a 320-nm cutoff filter were used. For fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements, a combination of the 289-nm excitation wavelength with the 389-nm filter were used. To monitor the fluorescence of the fluorescein group, an excitation wavelength of 494 nm and a 530-nm cutoff filter were used. Since the protein stock solutions were in 50% glycerol and relatively dilute, all solutions of reactants were adjusted to 10% glycerol content. Experiments in which the only source of glycerol was the protein stock solution, which resulted in a final glycerol concentration in the observation chamber that was <= 5%, led to very similar results for nucleotide association kinetics, but with the disadvantage that there was a significant disturbance of the optical signal at the beginning of the transient. The buffer used contained 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol. Primary data fitting was performed with the software of the stopped-flow apparatus, and secondary analysis was with GraFit Version 3.0 (Erithacus Software, Staines, United Kingdom) and Scientist Version 2.01 (Micromath, Salt Lake City, UT).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interaction of mantdGTP and GTP with SelB-- Binding of GTP and GDP derivatives with a methylanthraniloyl group in the ribose moiety to SelB resulted in a significant increase (~130%) in the fluorescence of the attached group. It was difficult to use this signal in equilibrium titration experiments since titrating a fixed concentration of the enzyme with increasing concentrations of fluorescent nucleotide resulted in a strongly increasing background signal from excess unbound nucleotide. The standard solution to this problem would be to titrate an increasing concentration of protein to a fixed concentration of fluorescent nucleotide. This was precluded by the low solubility of the protein, which prevented preparation of a highly concentrated stock solution. These problems did not prevent transient kinetic experiments using the stopped-flow method, and an example of the fluorescence transient seen on rapid mixing of SelB and mantdGTP is shown in Fig. 2A. mantdGTP was used for most of the studies reported here since it was noticed that with mantGTP (i.e. the ribose rather than the deoxyribose derivative), biphasic association curves were obtained, and it was suspected that this was due to the fact that mantGTP is a mixture of the 2'- and 3'-isomers (20). The monophasic transients observed with mantdGTP were consistent with this interpretation.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Kinetics of association of SelB with mantdGTP. A, transient of the association of SelB (0.3 µM) with mantdGTP (19 µM) as monitored in the stopped-flow apparatus. Fluorescence was detected by resonance energy transfer from tryptophan to the mant group using 289 nm as the excitation wavelength and detecting through a 389-nm cutoff filter. The fitted line corresponds to an exponential function with a rate constant of 3.29 s-1. B, dependence of the pseudo first-order rate constant obtained from experiments of the type shown in A on the mantdGTP concentration. The fitted straight line corresponds to values of 1.67 × 105 M-1 s-1 for k+1 and 0.11 s-1 for k-1 (as defined in Equation 1).

Increasing the mantdGTP concentration while keeping the SelB concentration constant led to a linear increase in the observed pseudo first-order rate constant of association, as shown in Fig. 2B. In this type of experiment, the observed rate constant is given by the following relationship (Equation 1),
k<SUB><UP>obs</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>+1</UP></SUB>(<UP>mantdGTP</UP>)+k<SUB><UP>−1</UP></SUB> (Eq. 1)
where k+1 and k-1 are the association and dissociation rate constants, respectively in the interaction between the protein and the nucleotide. The slope of the fitted straight line in Fig. 2B defines the value of k+1 as 1.67 × 105 M-1 s-1, whereas the intercept on the y axis is small, but appears to be of the order of ~0.1 s-1, giving an approximate value for k-1.

The value of k-1 was determined more exactly in a displacement experiment in which an excess of unlabeled GTP was used to displace mantGTP. As shown in Fig. 3, the rate of mantdGTP release is indeed relatively slow and has the value of 0.092 s-1. Taking the two kinetic constants together allows us to calculate a value of 0.55 µM for the Kd value of mantdGTP. This is in reasonable agreement with the value of 1.7 µM determined by equilibrium dialysis using radioactively labeled GTP (6).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Displacement of mantdGTP from SelB. A complex of mantdGTP (4 µM) and SelB (1.2 µM) in one syringe of the stopped-flow apparatus was mixed with GTP (200 µM) in the other. The fluorescence of the mant group was excited at 366 nm and observed through a 389-nm cutoff filter. Due to slight bleaching of fluorescence during the measurement, a linear term was introduced into the single exponential fit. The fitted line corresponds to a rate constant of 0.092 s-1.

Since it was of importance to determine the corresponding parameters for the natural substrate GTP, intrinsic protein fluorescence was also examined as a potential signal of nucleotide binding. A small (~2.5%) increase in fluorescence occurred on GTP binding, and although this was too small to be used conveniently for accurate equilibrium titrations, it could be used to monitor the association kinetics with SelB using the stopped-flow method. As can be seen from the data of Fig. 4A, the signal is noisy, but increasing the GTP concentration led to an obvious increase in the rate of the transient seen. In Fig. 4B, it is apparent that there is a linear dependence of the observed rate constant on the GTP concentration, and the slope of the plot of the rate constant against GTP concentration leads to a value of 2.16 × 105 M-1 s-1, which is similar to that of mantdGTP from Fig. 2B. The rate constant for the association of unmodified GTP could also be determined by using it as a competitor for mantdGTP in experiments of the type described for Fig. 5. Here, the GTP concentration was varied, and the mantdGTP concentration was held constant. The slope of the straight line fit to the data points defines the rate constant for GTP association with SelB, which, in approximate agreement with the results of Fig. 4B, has a value of 1.93 × 105 M-1 s-1.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Kinetics of association of SelB with GTP. A, association kinetics of SelB (0.6 µM) with GTP (16 µM) using tryptophan fluorescence as a monitor (excitation wavelength of 289 nm; detection through a 320-nm cutoff filter). The curve was fitted as a single exponential, making allowance for significant bleaching of fluorescence by including a linear term in the fit equation. The fitted line corresponds to a rate constant of 3.85 s-1. B, dependence of the pseudo first-order rate constant obtained from experiments of the type shown in A on the GTP concentration. The fitted straight line corresponds to values of 2.16 × 105 M-1 s-1 for k+1 and 0.28 s-1 for k-1.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Competitive binding kinetics of SelB with mantdGTP in presence of varying concentrations of GTP. The concentrations of SelB and mantdGTP were 0.6 and 6 µM, respectively. Fluorescence was detected as described in the legend Fig. 2. The fitted line corresponds to a value of 1.93 × 105 M-1 s-1 for k+1.

The rate constant for GTP release was determined by displacement with excess mantdGTP. Since this experiment could not be performed with a very large excess of mantdGTP (because of the high background from unbound mantdGTP), it was performed at two different concentrations of mantdGTP, both in moderate excess over GTP, which was preincubated with SelB. Since the measured rate constant in both cases was identical within experimental error, we conclude that this represents the value k-1 for GTP (0.16 s-1). Again, the calculated Kd value (0.74 µM) is in good agreement with that determined previously by equilibrium dialysis (6).

Interaction of mantdGDP and GDP with SelB-- GDP and mantGDP displayed quantitatively different kinetics of the interaction with SelB when compared with GTP or mantGTP. Initial stopped-flow experiments showed that the association reaction was faster than for GTP or mantdGTP. Since the signal quality at the high concentrations of mantGDP needed for these studies was not sufficient to detect the deviation from monophasic behavior seen with mantGTP, the more readily available mantGDP (and not mantdGDP) was used for these experiments. Fig. 6A shows the dependence of the observed rate constant for association of mantGDP on the concentration. From the approximately linear dependence, values of 1.79 × 106 M-1 s-1 for the association rate constant and 14.25 s-1 for the dissociation rate constant were obtained. The rate constant for association of unmodified GDP was obtained by examining the competing influence of GDP on the mantGDP association, as described above for GTP, and the results are shown in Fig. 6B. The value obtained from the slope of the fitted straight line (1.12 × 106 M-1 s-1) is similar to that for mantGDP and confirms that the association rate constant is considerably greater than for GTP.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Kinetics of association of SelB with mantGDP and GDP. A, dependence of the pseudo first-order rate constant for association of SelB (0.75 µM) with mantGDP on the nucleotide concentration. Fluorescence was detected as described in the legend to Fig. 2A. The slope of the fitted straight line corresponds to a value of 1.79 × 106 M-1 s-1 for k+1, whereas the y axis intercept gives a value of 14.25 s-1 for k-1. B, competitive binding kinetics of SelB (0.6 µM) with mantGDP (5 µM) in the presence of varying concentrations of GDP. Detection was as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The fitted line corresponds to a value of 1.12 × 106 M-1 s-1 for k+1.

A further indication of the more rapid equilibration of GDP compared with GTP was obtained from experiments in which GDP was used as a competitor of mantdGTP binding in association reactions. In contrast to the behavior shown in Fig. 5, where GTP competed with mantdGTP binding, the first-order rate constant for mantdGTP binding decreased as the GDP concentration was increased (data not shown). As discussed previously (21), this type of behavior arises when the competing ligand is in rapid equilibrium with its bound form on the time scale of the observed transient.

More accurate estimates of the dissociation rate constants for mantGDP and GDP were obtained from displacement experiments, as shown in Fig. 7. Displacement of mantGDP by GDP could be measured easily since a large excess of the nonfluorescent unmodified nucleotide could be used. The value of the dissociation rate constant obtained (13.9 s-1) is consistent with the magnitude of the intercept on the y axis in Fig. 6A (14.25 s-1). GDP dissociation was more difficult to measure due to the large background fluorescence of a high concentration of mantGDP as displacing agent. The experiment was repeated at two different concentrations of displacing agent, with little effect on the measured rate constant, which was ~15 s-1.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Displacement of mantGDP from SelB. The displacement of mantGDP from a complex generated by mixing 40 µM mantGDP with 1.2 µM SelB in one syringe of the stopped-flow apparatus by GDP (1 mM) was monitored by resonance energy transfer as described in the legend to Fig. 2A. The fitted line corresponds to a rate constant of 13.9 s-1.

The calculated Kd values for GDP and mantGDP are 13.4 and 7.8 µM, respectively. The results of the kinetic experiments with GTP, GDP, and their fluorescent derivatives are summarized in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Rate constants for the interaction of SelB with guanosine nucleotides and their mant derivatives

Interaction of RNA Stem-Loops with SelB-- On interaction of SelB with the 17-mer fdhF minihelix, there was a small quenching of the intrinsic protein fluorescence. However, the size of the signal change was too small to allow reliable kinetic or titration experiments to be performed.

Detailed investigations of the interactions of the two RNA stem-loop structures directing selenocysteine insertion in E. coli (Fig. 1) with SelB were possible using a fluorescently labeled construct. The fdhF minihelix bearing a fluorescein group at the 5'-end displayed a significant increase in fluorescence intensity on interaction with the protein. The signal was stable enough to allow a titration of SelB to a constant concentration of labeled fdhF minihelix RNA. This resulted in a maximal increase of ~7% in fluorescein fluorescence. The shape of the curve obtained (Fig. 8A) already indicates a high affinity for the interaction since at the concentration used (181 nM fluorescent fdhF minihelix), the almost linear approach to the plateau reached at saturation suggests that the Kd value must be much less than 181 nM. Fitting the data to a quadratic equation leads to a Kd value of 0.7 nM. However, this value is not regarded as highly reliable since it will be determined by just a few points as saturation is closely approached. The signal was not stable enough to allow titrations at significantly lower concentrations of RNA. However, the kinetic studies described below confirm that the Kd value is in the range of 1 nM.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Interaction of SelB with SECIS elements. A, titration of SelB to fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix RNA (181 nM). The measurements were performed with an SLM8000 spectrophotometer (Aminco, Silver Spring, MD). Excitation was at 490 nm, and emission was detected at 520 nm. The fitted line corresponds to a Kd value of 0.7 nM. B, displacement of the fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix (181 nM) from a complex with SelB (198 nM) by the unlabeled fdhF minihelix () or fdnG stem-loop (down-triangle). Fluorescence was detected as described for A. The fitted line corresponds to a Kd value of 1.26 nM for the labeled stem-loop construct (from the kinetic data of Table II) and a fitted Kd value of 1.36 nM for the unlabeled fdhF minihelix. The fitted Kd value for the fdnG stem-loop (fitted line not shown) is 1.38 nM.

To test whether the fluorescent label on the RNA has an influence on the interaction with SelB, a competitive titration was performed in which fluorescent fdhF minihelix was displaced from its preformed complex with SelB by a large excess of unlabeled fdhF minihelix. As shown in Fig. 8B, the labeled RNA could be completely displaced. This provides evidence that the binding is purely competitive and excludes the possibility of nonspecific binding of the labeled RNA. Fitting the data using the program Scientist led to the conclusion that the affinity of SelB for the fdhF minihelix is almost unaffected by the modification. Using a Kd value of 1.26 nM for fluorescent fdhF minihelix, the Kd for the unmodified minihelix was calculated to be 1.36 nM. Fig. 8B also shows that displacement by the other stem-loop construct examined (fdnG) led to identical results, and the derived Kd value was 1.38 nM. We thus conclude that the interaction of the stem-loop structures with SelB occurs with nanomolar affinity and is unaffected by a large fluorescent label at the 5'-end of the structure.

In further experiments, the fluorescently labeled RNA was used to investigate the kinetics of the interaction with SelB. Fig. 9A shows the results of monitoring the association reaction in the stopped-flow apparatus. The rate constant for the single exponential transient observed showed a linear dependence on the concentration of SelB at a constant fluorescent fdhF minihelix concentration (Fig. 9B). The linear dependence allows calculation of the second-order rate constant for the interaction, which is rapid and approaches the diffusion-controlled limit (Table II). The fact that the fit to the points obtained passes through the origin of the graph within the limits of experimental error shows that the dissociation rate is very low. It could be measured directly by displacement of fluorescent fdhF minihelix from its complex by an excess of unlabeled fdhF minihelix (Fig. 10A). Using the value for the dissociation rate constant obtained (0.28 s-1) together with the association rate constant (Table II), a Kd value of 1.26 nM can be calculated for the interaction, confirming the conclusion arising from the titration experiments of Fig. 8A that the Kd value is of the order of 1 nM.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Kinetics of association of SelB with fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix. A, association transient of SelB (0.125 µM) and the fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix (45.3 nM). The fluorescence of the fluorescein group was excited at 494 nm and detected through a 530-nm cutoff filter. The fitted line corresponds to a monoexponential function with a rate constant of 29.6 s-1. B, dependence of the pseudo first-order rate constant for the association of SelB with the labeled fdhF minihelix on the SelB concentration. The fitted straight line corresponds to values of 2.23 × 108 for k+1 and 0.75 for k-1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Rate constants for the interaction of SelB with the fluorescein-labeled fdhF stem-loop structure


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Displacement of fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix from SelB and SelB-(472-614). A, displacement of the fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix from SelB by the unlabeled fdhF minihelix. A complex of SelB (0.25 µM) and the labeled fdhF minihelix (0.14 µM) in one syringe was mixed with 15 µM unlabeled fdhF minihelix in the other syringe (curve a). Fluorescence was detected as described in the legend to Fig. 9A. The experiment represented by curve b was performed under the same conditions, but 4 µM GTP and 2.5 µM selenocysteyl-tRNASec were included in both syringes, and the labeled fdhF minihelix concentration was 0.21 µM. Fitting of the data to a monoexponential function defined the rate constants for the reactions as 0.28 s-1 (curve a) and 0.043 s-1 (curve b). B, displacement of the fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix from SelB-(472-614) by the unlabeled fdhF minihelix. A complex of SelB-(472-614) (0.31 µM) and the labeled fdhF minihelix (0.14 µM) in one syringe was mixed with 15 µM unlabeled fdhF minihelix in the other syringe. Fluorescence was detected as described in the legend to Fig. 9A. The fitted line corresponds to an exponential function with a rate constant of 0.037 s-1.

It was possible to obtain an approximate value for the association rate constant for unmodified RNA by examining the effect of the unlabeled fdhF stem-loop on the association kinetics of the labeled molecule. As shown in Fig. 11, inclusion of unlabeled stem-loop RNA with the fluorescently labeled fdhF minihelix resulted in a measurable effect on the association kinetics. A global analysis of the curves shown Fig. 11 leads to a value of ~108 M-1 s-1 for the association rate constant for the unlabeled construct.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Kinetics of association of fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix with SelB in the presence of different concentrations of unlabeled fdhF minihelix. The concentrations of fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix (0.136 µM) and SelB (0.128 µM) were constant, whereas the concentration of unlabeled minihelix was varied as indicated in the graph. Fluorescence was detected as described in the legend to Fig. 9A. The fitted lines represent association transients calculated by global analysis of the curves using the program Scientist. They define the values of the rate constants for the association and dissociation reactions as k+1 = 2.39 × 108 M-1 s-1 and k-1 = 0.28 s-1 for the labeled fdhF minihelix and k+1 = 1.09 × 108 M-1 s-1 and k-1 = 0.28 s-1 for the unlabeled fdhF minihelix.

To examine possible interaction or communication between the nucleotide and stem-loop binding sites, the experiments of Fig. 9 were repeated in the presence of GDP and GTP. As can be seen from the values for the association and dissociation rate constants given in Table II, there was no detectable influence of the state of the nucleotide binding site of SelB on the kinetics of the interaction.

In complementary experiments, the effect of stem-loop RNA on the interaction of the protein with nucleotides was examined. As shown in Table III, the values for the association and dissociation rate constants for mantdGTP and mantGDP obtained in the presence of the fdnG stem-loop at a concentration that is enough to saturate the mRNA binding site are indistinguishable from those obtained in the absence of RNA.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Rate constants for the interaction of guanosine nucleotides with SelB in the presence of the fdnG stem-loop structure

Interaction of the RNA Binding Domain (Domain IVb) with Stem-Loop RNA-- To determine to what extent the RNA binding properties of this domain are affected by the rest of the protein, we examined the interaction of the separately expressed domain with the stem-loop structure. Using the fluorescein-labeled fdhF minihelix and the isolated domain in the stopped-flow apparatus, the association kinetics were nearly identical to those seen with full-length SelB (ka = 2.58 × 108 M-1 s-1) (data not shown). However, the dissociation kinetics were slowed significantly. The rate constant for dissociation was 0.037 s-1 (Fig. 10B), in comparison with 0.28 s-1 for the dissociation from full-length SelB. Thus, the affinity of the isolated fragment (Kd = 0.14 nM) is increased in comparison with full-length SelB (Kd = 1.26 nM).

An indication that this difference in the properties of SelB and domain IVb might be of mechanistic importance comes from the second curve shown in Fig. 10A. We have not yet been able to identify a useable direct signal to monitor the interaction of selenocysteyl-tRNASec with SelB, but a clear indication of its binding arises from the observation that in the presence of the charged tRNA, the rate of dissociation of the fdhF minihelix is slowed significantly. In quantitative terms, it is slowed to a rate that is nearly indistinguishable from that of the stem-loop construct from isolated domain IVb, suggesting that whatever the nature of the interactions of domain IVb with the other domains of SelB that lead to a reduction of its affinity for the stem-loop structure, these interactions are removed or relieved when selenocysteyl-tRNASec is bound.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results presented show that SelB displays a relatively low affinity for GTP and GDP in binary complexes between the protein and the nucleotides. In contrast to EF-Tu, the GTP affinity is greater (by an order of magnitude) than the GDP affinity. This difference is mainly due to a dramatic difference in the GDP affinities in the two systems, with the GTP affinities being more similar. Although GDP is bound more weakly than GTP, its kinetics of interaction with SelB are considerably faster. Thus, the association rate constant is almost an order of magnitude faster for GDP than for GTP (cf. a factor of 3 for EF-Tu) (22). In terms of affinity, this effect is more than compensated for by the fact that GDP is released ~2 orders of magnitude faster than GTP so that GTP binds more strongly than GDP.

The weaker binding of GDP compared with GTP and, in particular, the high dissociation rate constant are consistent with the idea that an exchange factor for SelB is not required since the intrinsic GDP dissociation rate is of the same order of magnitude as the exchange factor-catalyzed dissociation rate with EF-Tu. Somewhat similar properties have been seen for the E. coli signal recognition particle receptor FtsY (23), i.e. weak affinities for GTP and GDP and high exchange rates. However, in this case, GDP is bound more strongly than GTP and exchanges rapidly in comparison with EF-Tu or the Ras family of proteins, but more slowly than GTP.

When the kinetic results obtained in this work are compared with those for other GTPases, the most striking difference observed is the rapid rate of spontaneous GDP dissociation. With the exception of FtsY, all other GTPases involved in signal transduction and regulation that have been characterized in detail with respect to their kinetic properties have slow (~10-3 s-1 for EF-Tu) (22) or very slow (10-6 to 10-4 s-1 for Ras and Ras-related proteins) (21, 24) GDP dissociation rates, which are accelerated dramatically by exchange factors. The same is also true for the heterotrimeric G-proteins; and in the case of GTPases involved in signal transduction, it is easy to understand why GDP release must occur in a manner that is dependent on activation or recruitment of an exchange factor, this process being dependent, in general, on primary activation events in the signal transduction pathway. For ribosomal elongation factors, the requirement for an exchange factor is more difficult to rationalize; and in the case described here, SelB appears to function without one, proving that the kinetic properties of the GTPase can be designed so that the principle already known from other elongation factors can work even if the GDP produced concomitantly with peptide bond formation is bound weakly to the factor and dissociates spontaneously, allowing rebinding of GTP and the start of another cycle.

The experiments reported on the kinetics of the interaction of stem-loop constructs with SelB show that this is a high affinity interaction, with a Kd value of ~1.3 nM. The association rate constant approaches the diffusion-controlled limit, and dissociation in the absence of tRNA occurs with a half-life of a few seconds. Neither the association nor the dissociation kinetics are affected by the presence or the nature of the guanosine nucleotide at the active site of the GTPase domain. Conversely, as is to be expected based on thermodynamic considerations, the presence of a stem-loop construct at its binding site does not affect the kinetics of the nucleotide interaction with SelB. Thus, there is no coupling between the nucleotide binding site and the RNA binding site, meaning that recruitment of SelB to its binding site on mRNA is not dependent on the state of the nucleotide binding site.

Although we were not able to identify a usable spectroscopic signal for the interaction of selenocysteyl-tRNASec with SelB, there was a clear indication that the rate of dissociation from the stem-loop structure was slower when the charged tRNA was bound, suggesting an interaction between the two binding sites. The fact that a similar slowing down of the dissociation rate from mRNA was seen with the isolated domain IVb suggests that an interaction between the tRNA binding domain and the mRNA binding domain occurs in the absence of tRNA that is weakened or removed when tRNA is bound. Further studies with additional signals will be needed to clarify the nature of the interactions between the two different types of RNA binding sites. The possible functional significance of this effect is that the full affinity of SelB for its binding site on RNA is only realized when selenocysteyl-tRNASec is bound. Binding of the charged tRNA thus increases the stability of the SelB·GTP·selenocysteyl-tRNASec·mRNA quaternary complex and thereby favors the conformation of SelB able to interact with the ribosome. This interaction triggers GTP hydrolysis and most probably the release of the tRNA in the vicinity of the ribosomal A site (4). As a consequence, there will be an increase in the rate of dissociation of SelB from its mRNA binding site. This is required for the translation of downstream codons since SelB complexed to its SECIS site exerts a considerable kinetic barrier to the processivity of translation (25).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Andrea Beste for the synthesis of mant nucleotides.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (to A. B.) and by the Max Planck Society.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-231-1206381; Fax: 49-231-1206229; E-mail: goody@mpi-do.mpg.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002496200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Sec, selenocysteine; DTT, dithiothreitol; Pipes, piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid); mantdGT(D)P, 3'-methylanthraniloyl-2'-deoxy-GT(D)P; mantGT(D)P, 2'(3')-methylanthraniloyl-GT(D)P; EF-Tu, elongation factor Tu; SECIS, selenocysteine insertion sequence.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hüttenhofer, A., and Böck, A. (1998) in RNA Structure and Function (Grunberg-Manago, M. , and Simons, R. W., eds) , pp. 603-639, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
2. Kromayer, M., Wilting, R., Tormay, P., and Böck, A. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 262, 413-420
3. Liu, Z., Reches, M., Groisman, I., and Engelberg-Kulka, H. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 896-902
4. Hüttenhofer, A., and Böck, A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 885-890
5. Heider, J., Baron, C., and Böck, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3759-3766
6. Forchhammer, K., Leinfelder, W., and Böck, A. (1989) Nature 342, 453-456
7. Baron, C., Heider, J., and Böck, A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4181-4185
8. Forchhammer, K., Leinfelder, W., Boesmiller, K., Veprek, B., and Böck, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6318-6323
9. Wyatt, J. R., Chastain, M., and Puglisi, J. D. (1991) BioTechniques 11, 764-769
10. Studier, F. W., and Moffat, B. A. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 189, 113-130
11. Forchhammer, K., Rücknagel, K. P., and Böck, A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9346-9350
12. Gill, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326
13. Ehrenreich, A., Forchhammer, K., Tormay, P., Veprek, B., and Böck, A. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 767-773
14. Härtlein, M., Madern, D., and Leberman, R. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1005-1017
15. Berg, B. L., Li, J., Heider, J., and Stewart, V. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22380-22385
16. Berg, B. L., Baron, C., and Stewart, V. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22386-22391
17. Milligan, J. F., Groebe, D. R., Witherell, G. W., and Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8783-8798
18. Casadaban, M. J., and Cohen, S. N. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4530-4533
19. Baron, C., and Böck, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20375-20379
20. Rensland, H., Lautwein, A., Wittinghofer, A., and Goody, R. S. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 11181-11185
21. John, J., Sohmen, R., Feuerstein, J., Linke, R., Wittinghofer, A., and Goody, R. S. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 6058-6065
22. Wagner, A., Simon, I., Sprinzl, M., and Goody, R. S. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12535-12542
23. Moser, C., Mol, O., Goody, R. S., and Sinning, I. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11339-11344
24. Simon, I., Zerial, M., and Goody, R. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20470-20478
25. Suppmann, S., Persson, B. C., and Böck, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2284-2293
26. Hüttenhofer, A., Westhof, E., and Böck, A. (1996) RNA 2, 354-366


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. B. Ozturk and T. G. Kinzy
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Independence of the G-protein eEF1A through Novel Mutant Forms and Biochemical Properties
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2008; 283(34): 23244 - 23253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
V. Hauryliuk, S. Hansson, and M. Ehrenberg
Cofactor Dependent Conformational Switching of GTPases
Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1704 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. B. Gromadski, T. Schummer, A. Stromgaard, C. R. Knudsen, T. G. Kinzy, and M. V. Rodnina
Kinetics of the Interactions between Yeast Elongation Factors 1A and 1B{alpha}, Guanine Nucleotides, and Aminoacyl-tRNA
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35629 - 35637.
[Abstract]