![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20742-20747, July 7, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 30, 2000
In a signal sequence trap screening of the murine
brain, we identified a new member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily designated TROY. TROY is a type I membrane protein of 416 amino acids with characteristic cysteine-rich motifs in the
extracellular domain and a tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 2 binding sequence in the cytoplasmic domain of 223 amino
acids. In fact, activation of nuclear factor Tumor necrosis factor-related cytokines form a large family of
pleiotropic mediators of host defense and immune systems that act
either locally as membrane proteins or on distant target cells as
secreted proteins. Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF)1 mediate
the action of tumor necrosis factor-related cytokines leading to cell
death or to cell proliferation and differentiation (1-3). Most of the
genes for TNFRSF encode type I transmembrane glycoproteins with an
extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single membrane-spanning region,
and a cytoplasmic region that activates cell functions. The
characteristic pattern is found within the extracellular domain formed
by cysteine-rich 40-residue repeats with a 25-30% homology. The
majority of conserved positions are cysteine residues. The
cysteine-rich repeats reflect the characteristic structural domain of
the TNFRSF (4-6). Overall, this family of glycoproteins shows a
relatively low level of sequence conservation, despite sharing a common
fundamental structure. Cytoplasmic regions of the receptors show
considerably more diversity than do extracellular regions in sequence
and size. Although there is no common motif found in all members of the
TNFRSF, some elements are shared between subsets of family members. For
instance, tumor necrosis factor (4, 7, 8), CD95/FAS (9), and tumor
necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (10-12)
share a domain of approximately 80 amino acids near the C-terminal
called the "death domain" (13-15) that is required for induction
of apoptosis by these receptors. On the other hand, the majority of
TNFRSF members recruit the TNFR-associated factor (TRAF) family of
intracellular adaptor molecules through cytoplasmic tails to promote
cell survival by activation of downstream protein kinase cascades and,
ultimately, transcription factors of the NF- The members of the TNFRSF are not only involved in the immune system
but are also involved in many other biological systems. For example,
osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of NF We have now identified a new member of the TNFRSF expressed on the
mouse embryo (TROY), using a newly established signal sequence trap
method SST-REX (23). TROY shows a unique tissue distribution in the
embryo as well as after birth; in the embryo, TROY is exclusively expressed in the epithelium including the neuroepithelium, skin, bronchiolar epithelium, conjunctiva, and so forth, whereas after birth,
TROY is strongly expressed in hair follicles like Edar as well as in neurons.
Reagents and Cell Lines--
Recombinant murine interleukin 3 was produced in silk worms (24). Ba/F3 cells (25) were maintained in
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 1 ng/ml
murine interleukin 3. Human embryonic kidney 293T cells (26) were
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum. An ecotropic retrovirus packaging cell line BOSC23
(26) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing
10% fetal calf serum and a guanine phosphoribosyltransferase selection reagent (Specialty Media, Lavallette, NJ). Two days before
transfection, cells were transferred to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/10% fetal calf serum that did not contain guanine
phosphoribosyltransferase selection reagents. Nullipotent embryonal
carcinoma NF-1 was obtained from ATCC, and human glioma U251 and
gliosarcoma GI-1 were from RIKEN (Tsukuba, Japan).
Cloning of a cDNA for TROY--
Total RNA was prepared from
mouse brain, and poly(A)+ RNA was further purified using
oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography. cDNA was synthesized by random
hexamers primed with SuperScript Choice System (Life Technologies,
Inc.), separated through a SizeSep 400 spun column (Pharmacia), and
inserted into the BstXI site of a cloning vector for SST,
pMX-SST, using BstXI adapters (Invitrogen). The ligated DNA
was introduced into DH10B cells (Electromax; Life Technologies, Inc.)
by electroporation. Plasmid DNA was prepared using standard methods.
Infection of Ba/F3 cells with retroviruses carrying a cDNA library
for SST and isolation of cDNA fragments by polymerase chain
reaction from factor-independent clones were performed as described
previously (23). Full-length cDNA clones for TROY were obtained
from a mouse brain and an embryonic day 17.5 skin cDNA library
synthesized by oligo(dT) and random priming, respectively. A
biotinylated probe of 460 bp was obtained by polymerase chain reaction
from TROY cDNA using primers 5'-CAAGGTCCTACCTCTACACA and
5'-AAGGTTCACCTTGCTGGTAC, using 50 µM biotin-21-dUTP
(CLONTECH), 200 µM dATP, dGTP, and
dCTP, and 10 µM dTTP. Mouse brain and embryonic skin
cDNA libraries were screened using biotinylated linear DNA probes
coated with RecA proteins, as described previously (27-29). To isolate
a cDNA clone encoding a human counterpart of TROY, a human
gliosarcoma cell line GI-1 cDNA library synthesized by random
priming was screened using the mouse TROY cDNA coding region as a probe.
RNA Blot Hybridization--
Total RNAs of cell lines were
extracted with Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc.), and mouse embryo
poly(A)+ RNA was purified with FastTrack2.0 (Invitrogen).
Total RNA (30 µg) and 3 µg of poly(A)+ RNA were
fractionated in a 0.7% agarose gel containing formaldehyde and
transferred to a Hybond N+ nylon filter (Amersham). Mouse Multiple
Tissue Northern blot was obtained from CLONTECH.
The Northern blot was hybridized with radiolabeled TROY cDNA.
In Situ Hybridization--
A 456-bp
BamHI-HindIII cDNA fragment (coding region
151-607) of mouse TROY was inserted into a pBluescriptII KS vector.
Digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes for TROY were transcribed in
vitro from linearized, gel-purified plasmids using T7 polymerase
(antisense cRNA probe) and T3 polymerase (sense cRNA probe). Embryos
were embedded in OCT compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN), frozen in
n-hexane, and then cut and analyzed by in situ
hybridization using a modification of previously reported methods (30,
31). When control sections were hybridized with identical quantities of
sense cRNA, signals were nil (data not shown).
NF- Interspecific Mouse Backcross Mapping--
Interspecific
backcross progenies were generated by mating (C57BL/6J × Mus spretus)F1 females and C57BL/6J males, as
described previously (34, 35). A total of 205 N2 mice were used to map the Troy locus (see text for details). The probe, a 1690-bp
fragment of mouse cDNA, was labeled with
[
A description of the probes and restriction fragment-length
polymorphisms for the loci linked to Troy including
Ctsg, Gjb2, and Fzd3 has been reported
previously (36, 37). One locus for our interspecific backcross has not
been reported. The Blk probe, an 854-bp EcoRI
fragment of mouse cDNA, detected co-segregated KpnI
fragments. Recombination distances were calculated using Map Manager,
version 2.6.5. Gene order was determined by minimizing the number of
recombination events required to explain the allele distribution patterns.
Isolation of the Mouse TROY cDNA Clone Encoding a Newly
Identified Member of the TNFR Superfamily--
In the SST-REX method
(23), Ba/F3 clones transduced with cDNAs containing signal
sequences showed factor-independent growth through surface expression
of a constitutively active receptor for thrombopoietin as a fusion
protein. Among the cDNA clones isolated by SST-REX from a mouse
brain cDNA library, the LTI9 clone showed homology with members of
the TNFR superfamily at the amino acid sequence level. Positions of
cysteine residues in the cysteine-rich repeat were perfectly conserved.
Full-length cDNAs obtained from oligo(dT)-primed cDNA libraries
derived from mouse brain using the RecA screening method (27-29) were
confirmed to contain a sequence that was identical to LTI9.
These cDNAs contain an open reading frame of 1251 nucleotides. The
putative initiation codon is preceded by a sequence (AGAGCC) in good
agreement with the Kozak's consensus sequence for initiation of
translation in eukaryotes (38). The termination codon is followed by a
3' untranslated region of 2590 bp. A canonical polyadenylation signal
is present 36 bp upstream of the poly(A) tail (39). The protein
putatively encoded by the TROY mRNA is a cysteine-rich protein of
416 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 45 kDa
(Fig. 1). Two hydrophobic regions are
present in the protein, representing the signal sequence and the
transmembrane region. A hydrophobic stretch of 25 amino acids toward
the C terminus (amino acids 169-193) was assigned as a transmembrane
domain because it had a potentially single helical span. A cleavage
site for the signal peptide was found between Cys (at position 29) and Glu (at position 30).
Like other members of the TNFRSF, TROY contains the characteristic
cysteine-rich motifs (C - x(4,6) - [FYH] - x(5,10) - C - x(0,2) - C - x(2,3) - C - x(7,11) - C - x(4,6) - [DNEQSKP] - x(2)- C) that have
been shown by x-ray crystallography to represent a repetitive
structural unit (40, 41) (Fig. 1). TROY contains two perfect TNFR
motifs and one imperfect motif in which C2 and C6 are not present. TROY
exhibited a significant and extensive homology (33%) with all three
motifs of Edar, the dl gene product (Fig.
2) (21, 22).
The cytoplasmic tail of TROY spans amino acids 194-416 of the
precursor protein and does not harbor the death domain discovered in
the intracellular domains of CD95 (9), TNFR (4, 7, 8), tumor necrosis
factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (10-12), and Edar;
however, it does contain a major TRAF2-binding consensus
sequence, TLQE (amino acids 276-279).
A shorter clone, dTROY, was also identified from a cDNA library of
mouse embryonic day 17.5 skin. The extracellular and transmembrane domains of dTROY were identical to those of TROY. However, the cytoplasmic tail of dTROY has only 21 amino acids and does not contain
a TRAF2-binding consensus sequence (Fig.
3). A consensus sequence of the 5'
boundary of the intron was present on the transition point from the
common sequence to the unique sequence of dTROY, suggesting that dTROY
contains the same sequence from the intron at the 3' end. To confirm
that dTROY was not an artifact, a dTROY-specific reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction was performed using a sense
primer of the common sequence and an antisense primer of the unique
sequence of dTROY. A band of dTROY was amplified from the total RNA of
embryonic day 17.5 skin but not from mouse brain or liver (data not
shown).
Isolation of a cDNA Clone Encoding a Human Counterpart of
TROY--
A human counterpart of TROY expression in the human
gliosarcoma cell line GI-1 was detected in the Northern blot
hybridization (Fig. 4). A human
counterpart was obtained from a cDNA library derived from the GI-1
cell line using RecA screening. This cDNA contains an open reading
frame of 1269 nucleotides and encodes a cysteine-rich protein of 423 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 46 kDa. The overall
identity between human TROY and murine TROY at the amino acid level is
75%, with a 92% identity in the extracellular and transmembrane
domain. The cytoplasmic tail of human TROY was 234 amino acids long and
had a 57% homology with murine TROY (Fig. 1).
Expression of TROY RNA--
Expression of TROY mRNA was
examined by Northern blot analysis using a cDNA for the open
reading frame of TROY as a probe (Fig. 4). TROY mRNA was strongly
expressed in the brain, with an approximate molecular size of 4.5 kb,
which was close to the length of the TROY cDNA clone (3970 nucleotides) identified. TROY mRNA was detected in most tissues,
but not in the spleen. In the embryo, the expression level was
periodically increased and was particularly strong in the skin. TROY
mRNA was also detected in human glioma U251 cells, GI-1 cells, A3-1
embryonic stem cells, and nullipotent embryonal carcinoma NF-1 cells
(data not shown). Cellular localization of TROY mRNA was
investigated by in situ hybridization in mouse embryo day
13.5. Interestingly, TROY mRNA was detected exclusively in the
epithelium (i.e. neuroepithelium in the frontal and lateral
lobes, the epidermis of the skin, bronchiolar epithelium, epithelium of
the tongue, gastric epithelium, conjunctiva, and cochlea), whereas in
neonatal mice, TROY mRNA was mainly detected in hair follicles like
Edar and in neuron-like cells in the cerebrum but not in the epidermis
of the skin (Fig. 5).
TROY Induces NF- Troy Is Located Near Wc--
The mouse chromosomal location of
Troy was determined by interspecific backcross analysis,
using progeny derived from matings of [(C57BL/6J × M. spretus)F1 × C57BL/6J] mice. This interspecific backcross mapping panel has been typed for over 2900 loci that are well
distributed among all of the autosomes as well as the X chromosome
(34). C57BL/6J and M. spretus DNAs were digested with
several enzymes and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization for
informative restriction fragment length polymorphisms using a mouse
cDNA TROY probe. The 15.5-kb PstI M. spretus
restriction fragment length polymorphisms (see "Materials and
Methods") was used to follow the segregation of the Troy
locus in backcross mice. Mapping showed that Troy is located
in the central region of mouse chromosome 14 linked to Ctsg,
Gjb2, Blk, and Fzd3. Although 161 mice
were analyzed for every marker (shown in the segregation analysis; Fig.
7), up to 191 mice were typed for some
pairs of markers. Each locus was analyzed in pairwise combinations for recombination frequencies, using additional data. Ratios of the total
number of mice exhibiting recombinant chromosomes to the total number
of mice analyzed for each pair of loci and the most likely gene order
are as follows: centromere - Ctsg (1:191) - Gjb2
(2:180) - Troy - (2:171) - Blk - (4:175) - Fzd3. The recombination frequencies [expressed as genetic
distances in cM ± the S.E.] are: centromere - Ctsg
(0.5 ± 0.5) - Gjb2 (1.1 ± 0.8) - Troy
(1.2 ± 0.8)- Blk (2.3 ± 1.1) - Fzd3.
We compared our interspecific map of chromosome 14 with a composite
mouse linkage map that shows the location of many uncloned mouse
mutations (provided by the Mouse Genome Data Base, a computerized database maintained at The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) and
found that Troy localized in the vicinity of the waved coat (Wc) locus, a mutant that presents abnormality in the skin
and hair (49-51).
We isolated and characterized a newly identified member of TNFRSF,
TROY, from a cDNA library of the murine brain using SST-REX. In
structural analysis of the cDNA, the translation product of TROY
was shown to be a type I transmembrane protein of 416 amino acid
residues. Whereas the extracellular domain of TROY retains the
characteristic structure of TNFRSF, the intracellular domain does not
contain the death domain.
During our characterization of TROY, Hu et al. (52) reported
a novel member of the TNFRSF (TNFRSF19) that was identical to TROY,
except that the cytoplasmic tail was shorter than that of TROY by 68 amino acids. In a search of the expressed sequence tag database, three
clones (GenBankTM accession numbers AI551729, AA445805, and
AI48211) encoding the C-terminal region of TROY were identified, all of
which were identical to the C-terminal region of TROY, but not to that
of TNFRSF19. Moreover, the cytoplasmic tail of human TROY identified in
this study was similar to murine TROY but not to TNFRSF19 in size and
sequence, indicating that TROY is a major and complete cDNA clone.
When compared with other members of the TNFRSF, the closest known
relative of TROY is a receptor called Edar (21, 22) that specifies hair
follicle fate and is 33% identical to TROY in the extracellular
domain. Mice with mutations in the Edar gene not only have defects in
hair follicle induction but also lack sweat glands and have malformed
teeth (21, 22). The expression of TROY is strong in embryonic skin and
hair follicles, as is the case for Edar. This high homology in the
extracellular domain and the similarity of distribution between TROY
and Edar strongly suggest that TROY also plays some role in the
development of embryonic skin and induction of hair follicles. Whereas
Edar harbors a death domain, TROY does not contain one and activates
NF- In this context, it is of interest that the gene for Troy is
located near the waved coat (Wc) locus, a mutant
of which presents abnormality in skin and hair. Heterozygotes of the
Wc locus have a wavy coat and whiskers and dry and scaly
skin, and homozygotes die in utero (49-51). The central
region of mouse chromosome 14 shares regions of homology with human
chromosomes 7q, 8p, 13q, and 14q. The draft sequence of human
chromosome13q12.11-3 from the Sanger center has been registered in the
European Molecular Biology Laboratory database and includes the
sequence of human TROY (nucleotides 624-1586). It would be interesting
to examine whether there is a similar genetic disease in the human.
TROY exhibits a major TRAF2-binding consensus sequence in the
cytoplasmic tail, and overexpression of TROY induced NF- We also found a truncated form of TROY, dTROY, that harbors a smaller
cytoplasmic tail than TROY. The consensus sequence of the 5' boundary
of the intron was found on the transition point from the TROY/dTROY
common nucleotide sequence to the dTROY unique sequence, indicating
that dTROY is an alternative splicing form containing an unspliced
intron. Unlike TROY, dTROY can not induce NF- In summary, TROY is a novel member of the TNFRSF that exhibits a
similarity with Edar in structure and expression patterns, and the gene
for TROY is located in the vicinity of Wc. The present data
also suggest that TROY is involved in embryonic development and the
development of skin and hair follicles. For further study, it is
important to identify the cognate ligand, which is now under investigation.
We thank Dedorah B. Householder for excellent
technical assistance, Dr. Hiroyoshi Nakano (Department of Immunology,
Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan) for the TRAF
expression vector, and Mariko Ohara for editorial assistance.
*
This research was supported by a grant-in-aid from the
Ministry of Health and Welfare and a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan and in part by the
United States National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human
Services. The Department of Hematopoietic Factors of the Institute of
Medical Science, University of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan) is supported in
part by Chugai Pharmaceutical Ltd.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequences for the mouse TROY, dTROY, and human
TROY reported in this paper have been submitted to the
DDBJ/GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession numbers
AB040432, AB040433, and AB040434, respectively.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-35449-5758;
Fax: 81-35449-5453; E-mail: kitamura@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 6, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002691200
The abbreviations used are:
TNFR, tumor necrosis
factor receptor;
TNFRSF, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily;
TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor;
NF, nuclear
factor;
bp, base pair(s);
kb, kilobase(s);
SST, signal sequence
trap.
TROY, a Newly Identified Member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor
Receptor Superfamily, Exhibits a Homology with Edar and Is Expressed in
Embryonic Skin and Hair Follicles*
§,
,
,
,
**
Department of Hematopoietic Factors, The
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo
108-8639, Japan, § Cytokine Research Program, Chugai
Research Institute for Molecular Medicine, Inc., Niihari, Ibaraki
300-4101, Japan, ¶ Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology,
Wakayama Medical School, Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan, and
Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Institute,
Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland
21702
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B was induced by the
overexpression of TROY and inhibited by dominant negative forms of
TRAF2, TRAF5, and TRAF6, indicating that TRAFs and nuclear factor
B
are involved in the signal transduction of TROY. We also cloned a
cDNA for a human counterpart, which showed a 75% homology with
mouse TROY at the amino acid level. The extracellular domain of TROY
exhibits an extensive homology with that of Edar, a receptor that
specifies hair follicle fate. TROY mRNA is strongly expressed in
brain and embryo and moderately expressed in the heart, lung, and liver
but not the spleen. In the embryo, the expression level is particularly
strong in the skin. Interestingly, in situ hybridization
analysis of the embryo showed that TROY mRNA was exclusively
expressed in the epithelium of many tissues. On the other hand, in
neonatal mice, TROY is expressed in hair follicles like Edar as well as
in the cerebrum, suggesting pleiotropic functions of TROY in
development as well as in the adult mice. The Troy gene is
located near the waved coat (Wc) locus, a
mutant related to abnormalities in skin and hair.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B and activator protein
1 family (16, 17). A major TRAF2-binding consensus sequence,
(P/S/A/T)X(Q/E)E, and a minor consensus motif,
PXQXXD, were defined, based on structural analyses (18).
B has been shown to play
critical roles in osteoclast differentiation and function (19, 20). The
downless (dl) gene isolated by positional cloning
encodes Edar, a new member of the TNFRSF (21, 22). Mice with mutations
in this gene have defects in hair follicle induction, lack sweat
glands, and have malformed teeth. Based on the mutant phenotype and
Edar expression pattern, it was proposed that Edar specifies the fate
of hair follicles.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B-dependent Reporter Assays--
Human
embryonic kidney 293T cells were plated in 6-well plates at a
concentration of 106 cells/well. On the following day,
using FuGENE6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), the cells were
transfected with 100 ng of pTK-lacZ, a thymidine kinase promoter-driven
-galactosidase expression plasmid, to normalize for transfection
efficiency, together with 100 ng of a reporter plasmid and various
amounts of each expression vector. Total DNA (3 µg) was kept constant
by supplementation with DNA derived from the pCOSI vector. A reporter
plasmid,
B-luc, has five repeats of the NF-
B site upstream of a
promoter derived from human T-cell lymphotrophic virus 1 and a
luciferase reporter gene (32). Twenty-four h after the transfection,
the cells were harvested in phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in the
luciferase lysis buffer. The lysates were assayed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activities (33).
-32P]dCTP using nick translation labeling kits (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). A fragment of 9.6 kb was detected in
PstI-digested C57BL/6J DNA, and a fragment of 15.5 kb was
detected in PstI-digested M. spretus DNA. The
presence or absence of the 15.5-kb PstI M. spretus-specific fragment was monitored in the backcross mice.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison between the protein sequence of
mouse and human TROY. The signal sequence and transmembrane domain
are underlined, and common amino acid residues are
shaded. Two perfect TNFR cysteine-rich motifs are dot
underlined, conserved cysteine residues and conserved amino acid
residues are indicated by the asterisks and dots,
respectively.
![]()
View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Alignment of the extracellular domain of
mouse TROY with that of mouse Edar. Identical residues are
indicated with an asterisk, and similar residues are
indicated by a dot.
![]()
View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Structure of dTROY, a putative decoy
receptor. The region of dTROY that is structurally different from
TROY is boxed. The consensus sequence of the 5' boundary of
the intron is shaded. The dTROY-specific antisense primer
region is underlined.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Northern blot analysis for detection of TROY
transcripts. Blotted membranes were probed with a
[32P]dCTP-labeled TROY cDNA fragment in PerfectHyb
solution (Toyobo) and then washed with 0.2× saline/sodium
phosphate/EDTA at 65 °C. Hybridized signals were identified using
BAS2000 or x-ray films (Fuji Film).

View larger version (176K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
In situ hybridization of
TROY. Sections of an embryo at embryonic day 13.5 (A,
lung; B, oculus; C, skin; D, frontal
lobe) and neonatal (E, skin; F, cerebrum) were
incubated with 0.1 ml of hybridization buffer containing 40 ng of the
cRNA and then washed for 1 h in 0.1× SSC at 65 °C. The
sections were then stained with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated
anti-digoxigenin Fab fragment (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), nitro
blue tetrazolium (Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
and levamisole. TROY mRNA is seen in the epithelium
(i.e. bronchiolar epithelium (arrowhead),
conjunctiva (arrowhead), epidermis of the skin
(arrowhead), and neuroepithelium (arrowhead)),
whereas in neonatal mice, TROY mRNA is detected in hair follicles
(arrowhead) and in neuron-like cells (arrowhead)
but not in the epidermis of the skin. Bar, 100 µm.
B Activation--
Because the TRAF2-binding
consensus sequence TLQE was found in the cytoplasmic domain of TROY, we
asked whether TROY activates NF-
B through TRAF2. Human embryonic
kidney 293T cells were transiently transfected with an interleukin 2 promoter-derived NF-
B-luciferase reporter gene (32) and a TROY
expression vector (Fig. 6).
Co-transfection of TROY induced a >3.5-fold higher luciferase
activity, as compared with that seen with the vector control. To
determine whether TRAF2, TRAF5, and TRAF6 are involved in NF-
B
activation by TROY, we tested whether TROY-induced NF-
B activation
was inhibited by dominant negative mutants of TRAF2, TRAF5, and TRAF6
lacking the N-terminal zinc-binding domain required for NF-
B
activation (42-48). Overexpression of dominant negative TRAF2, TRAF5,
or TRAF6 blocked NF-
B activation in the reporter assay. These
results demonstrated that TRAFs were involved in TROY-mediated NF-
B
activation. The dTROY with a small cytoplasmic domain did not activate
NF-
B.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
TROY mediates NF-
B
activation. 293T cells were transiently transfected with 100 ng of
luc reporter plasmid, 100 ng of
-galactosidase plasmid, and the
indicated expression plasmids. Twenty-four h later, the cells were
collected, and the luciferase activity in each sample was determined.
The values were normalized to the expression of
-galactosidase. The
level of induction in luciferase activity is indicated as compared with
cells transfected with the control vector. Data are shown as the
average ± S.D. of triplicate samples and represent one of three
independent experiments, all of which had similar results.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Troy maps to the central region of mouse
chromosome 14. Troy was placed on mouse chromosome 14 by interspecific backcross analysis. The segregation patterns of
Troy and flanking genes in 161 backcross animals typed for
all loci are shown at the top of the figure. For individual
pairs of loci, more than 161 animals were typed (see text). Each column
represents the chromosome identified in the backcross progeny inherited
from the (C57BL/6J × M. spretus)F1 parent.
, the presence of a C57BL/6J allele;
, the presence of a M. spretus allele. The number of offspring inheriting each type of
chromosome is listed at the bottom of each column. A partial
chromosome 14 linkage map showing the location of Troy in
relation to linked genes is shown at the bottom of the
figure. Recombination distances between loci in cM are shown to
the left of the chromosome, and the positions of loci in
human chromosomes (where known) are shown to the right.
References for the human map positions of loci cited in this study can
be obtained from the Genome Data Base, a computerized database of human
linkage information maintained by The William H. Welch Medical Library
of The Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B through TRAF proteins. Therefore, it would be interesting to
know how TROY and Edar functionally interact with each other.
B
activation, as noted in the reporter assay using luciferase. This
activation was blocked by overexpression of dominant negative TRAF2,
TRAF5, and TRAF6. Like most members of the TNFRSF, TROY is perhaps
homotrimerized by stimulation of its ligands and recruits TRAF2, TRAF5,
and TRAF6 to the cytoplasmic tail, which promotes cell survival and
proliferation by activating downstream protein kinase cascades and
eventually activating transcription factors in the NF-
B and
activator protein 1 family. Hu et al. (52) reported that
NF-
B activation is not induced by TNFRSF19, a truncated version of
TROY lacking the C-terminal 77 amino acid residues of the cytoplasmic
tail, indicating that the C-terminal region of TROY is essential for
activation of NF-
B and for signal transduction.
B activation and may
play a role as a decoy receptor such as tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 3 (53) and decoy receptor 3 (54) for
the CD90 ligand to negate a signal from a ligand for TROY. Expression
of dTROY mRNA, detected using dTROY-specific reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction, was found in the embryonic
skin but not in the brain or liver. In the embryo, the expression level
of TROY appears to be significantly increased during the late stages of
embryogenesis and fluctuated from embryonic day 11.5 to embryonic day
15.5. Moreover, the TROY sequence was found as an expressed sequence
tag in the mouse four-cell embryo (GenBankTM
accession number AU041881). These results suggest that TROY may play
pleiotropic roles in embryogenesis. Of particular interest is the fact
that homozygotes for the Wc locus result in embryonic lethality.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Banchereau, J.,
Bazan, F.,
Blanchard, D.,
Briere, F.,
Galizzi, J. P.,
van Kooten, C.,
Liu, Y. J.,
Rousset, F.,
and Saeland, S.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
881-922
2.
Smith, C. A.,
Farrah, T.,
and Goodwin, R. G.
(1994)
Cell
76,
959-962
3.
Gruss, H. J.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1995)
Blood
85,
3378-3404
4.
Smith, C. A.,
Davis, T.,
Anderson, D.,
Solam, L.,
Beckmann, M. P.,
Jerzy, R.,
Dower, S. K.,
Cosman, D.,
and Goodwin, R. G.
(1990)
Science
248,
1019-1023
5.
Marsters, S. A.,
Frutkin, A. D.,
Simpson, N. J.,
Fendly, B. M.,
and Ashkenazi, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem
267,
5747-5750
6.
Armitage, R. J.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
6,
407-413
7.
Loetscher, H.,
Pan, Y. C.,
Lahm, H. W.,
Gentz, R.,
Brockhaus, M.,
Tabuchi, H.,
and Lesslauer, W.
(1990)
Cell
61,
351-359
8.
Schall, T. J.,
Lewis, M.,
Koller, K. J.,
Lee, A.,
Rice, G. C.,
Wong, G. H.,
Gatanaga, T.,
Granger, G. A.,
Lentz, R.,
and Raab, H.
(1990)
Cell
61,
361-370
9.
Itoh, N.,
Yonehara, S.,
Ishii, A.,
Yonehara, M.,
Mizushima, S.,
Sameshima, M.,
Hase, A.,
Seto, Y.,
and Nagata, S.
(1991)
Cell
66,
233-243
10.
Pan, G.,
O'Rourke, K.,
Chinnaiyan, A. M.,
Gentz, R.,
Ebner, R.,
Ni, J.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1997)
Science
276,
111-113
11.
Chaudhary, P. M.,
Eby, M.,
Jasmin, A.,
Bookwalter, A.,
Murray, J.,
and Hood, L.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
821-830
12.
MacFarlane, M.,
Ahmad, M.,
Srinivasula, S. M.,
Fernandes-Alnemri, T.,
Cohen, G. M.,
and Alnemri, E. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25417-25420
13.
Tartaglia, L. A.,
Ayres, T. M.,
Wong, G. H.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1993)
Cell
74,
845-853
14.
Tartaglia, L. A.,
Rothe, M.,
Hu, Y. F.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1993)
Cell
73,
213-216
15.
Wong, G. H.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
1751-1755
16.
Arch, R. H.,
Gedrich, R. W.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2821-2830
17.
Arch, R. H.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
558-565
18.
Ye, H.,
Park, Y. C.,
Kreishman, M.,
Kieff, E.,
and Wu, H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
321-330
19.
Simonet, W. S.,
Lacey, D. L.,
Dunstan, C. R.,
Kelley, M.,
Chang, M. S.,
Luthy, R.,
Nguyen, H. Q.,
Wooden, S.,
Bennett, L.,
Boone, T.,
Shimamoto, G.,
DeRose, M.,
Elliott, R.,
Colombero, A.,
Tan, H. L.,
Trail, G.,
Sullivan, J.,
Davy, E.,
Bucay, N.,
Renshaw-Gegg, L.,
Hughes, T. M.,
Hill, D.,
Pattison, W.,
Campbell, P.,
Sander, S.,
Van, G.,
Tarpley, J.,
Derby, P.,
Lee, R.,
and Boyle, W. J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
309-319
20.
Anderson, D. M.,
Maraskovsky, E.,
Billingsley, W. L.,
Dougall, W. C.,
Tometsko, M. E.,
Roux, E. R.,
Teepe, M. C.,
DuBose, R. F.,
Cosman, D.,
and Galibert, L.
(1997)
Nature
390,
175-179
21.
Headon, D. J.,
and Overbeek, P. A.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
370-374
22.
Monreal, A. W.,
Ferguson, B. M.,
Headon, D. J.,
Street, S. L.,
Overbeek, P. A.,
and Zonana, J.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
366-369
23.
Kojima, T.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1999)
Nat. Biotechnol.
17,
487-490
24.
Miyajima, A.,
Schreurs, J.,
Otsu, K.,
Kondo, A.,
Arai, K.,
and Maeda, S.
(1987)
Gene (Amst.)
58,
273-281
25.
Palacios, R.,
and Steinmetz, M.
(1985)
Cell
41,
727-734
26.
Pear, W. S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396
27.
Honigberg, S. M.,
Rao, B. J.,
and Radding, C. M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9586-9590
28.
Rigas, B.,
Welcher, A. A.,
Ward, D. C.,
and Weissman, S. M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9591-9595
29.
Teintze, M.,
Arzimanoglou, I. I.,
Lovelace, C. I.,
Xu, Z. J.,
and Rigas, B.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
211,
804-811
30.
Braissant, O.,
and Wahli, W.
(1998)
Biochemica
1,
10-16
31.
Braissant, O.,
and Wahli, W.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2748-2754
32.
Fujisawa, J.,
Seiki, M.,
Toita, M.,
Miyatake, S.,
Arai, K.,
and Yoshida, M.
(1988)
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
79,
800-804
33.
Kashiwada, M.,
Shirakata, Y.,
Inoue, J. I.,
Nakano, H.,
Okazaki, K.,
Okumura, K.,
Yamamoto, T.,
Nagaoka, H.,
and Takemori, T.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
237-244
34.
Copeland, N. G.,
and Jenkins, N. A.
(1991)
Trends Genet.
7,
113-118
35.
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Taylor, B. A.,
and Lee, B. K.
(1982)
J. Virol.
43,
26-36
36.
Heusel, J. W.,
Scarpati, E. M.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Shapiro, S. D.,
and Ley, T. J.
(1993)
Blood
81,
1614-1623
37.
Wang, Y.,
Macke, J. P.,
Abella, B. S.,
Andreasson, K.,
Worley, P.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Nathans, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4468-4476
38.
Kozak, M.
(1986)
Cell
44,
283-292
39.
Mason, P. J.,
Elkington, J. A.,
Lloyd, M. M.,
Jones, M. B.,
and Williams, J. G.
(1986)
Cell
46,
263-270
40.
Banner, D. W.,
D'Arcy, A.,
Janes, W.,
Gentz, R.,
Schoenfeld, H. J.,
Broger, C.,
Loetscher, H.,
and Lesslauer, W.
(1993)
Cell
73,
431-445
41.
Bajorath, J.,
and Aruffo, A.
(1997)
Proteins
27,
59-70
42.
Rothe, M.,
Sarma, V.,
Dixit, V. M.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1995)
Science
269,
1424-1427
43.
Rothe, M.,
Wong, S. C.,
Henzel, W. J.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1994)
Cell
78,
681-692
44.
Sato, T.,
Irie, S.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
358,
113-118
45.
Nakano, H.,
Oshima, H.,
Chung, W.,
Williams-Abbott, L.,
Ware, C. F.,
Yagita, H.,
and Okumura, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14661-14664
46.
Ishida, T.,
Mizushima, S.,
Azuma, S.,
Kobayashi, N.,
Tojo, T.,
Suzuki, K.,
Aizawa, S.,
Watanabe, T.,
Mosialos, G.,
Kieff, E.,
Yamamoto, T.,
and Inoue, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
28745-28748
47.
Cheng, G.,
Cleary, A. M.,
Ye, Z. S.,
Hong, D. I.,
Lederman, S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Science
267,
1494-1498
48.
Cao, Z.,
Xiong, J.,
Takeuchi, M.,
Kurama, T.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1996)
Nature
383,
443-446
49.
Green, M.
(1973)
Mouse News Lett.
49,
32
50.
Green, M.
(1972)
Mouse News Lett.
47,
36
51.
Diwan, S.,
and Stevens, L.
(1974)
Mouse News Lett.
51,
24-25
52.
Hu, S.,
Tamada, K.,
Ni, J.,
Vincenz, C.,
and Chen, L.
(1999)
Genomics
62,
103-107
53.
Degli-Esposti, M. A.,
Smolak, P. J.,
Walczak, H.,
Waugh, J.,
Huang, C. P.,
DuBose, R. F.,
Goodwin, R. G.,
and Smith, C. A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1165-1170
54.
Pitti, R. M.,
Marsters, S. A.,
Lawrence, D. A.,
Roy, M.,
Kischkel, F. C.,
Dowd, P.,
Huang, A.,
Donahue, C. J.,
Sherwood, S. W.,
Baldwin, D. T.,
Godowski, P. J.,
Wood, W. I.,
Gurney, A. L.,
Hillan, K. J.,
Cohen, R. L.,
Goddard, A. D.,
Botstein, D.,
and Ashkenazi, A.
(1998)
Nature
396,
699-703
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Pispa, M. Pummila, P. A. Barker, I. Thesleff, and M. L. Mikkola Edar and Troy signalling pathways act redundantly to regulate initiation of hair follicle development Hum. Mol. Genet., November 1, 2008; 17(21): 3380 - 3391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pantalacci, A. Chaumot, G. Benoit, A. Sadier, F. Delsuc, E. J. P. Douzery, and V. Laudet Conserved Features and Evolutionary Shifts of the EDA Signaling Pathway Involved in Vertebrate Skin Appendage Development Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 912 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schmidt-Ullrich, D. J. Tobin, D. Lenhard, P. Schneider, R. Paus, and C. Scheidereit NF-{kappa}B transmits Eda A1/EdaR signalling to activate Shh and cyclin D1 expression, and controls post-initiation hair placode down growth Development, March 15, 2006; 133(6): 1045 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yuhki, M. Yamada, M. Kawano, T. Iwasato, S. Itohara, H. Yoshida, M. Ogawa, and Y. Mishina BMPR1A signaling is necessary for hair follicle cycling and hair shaft differentiation in mice Development, April 15, 2004; 131(8): 1825 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, X. Li, L. Wang, P. Ding, Y. Zhang, W. Han, and D. Ma An alternative form of paraptosis-like cell death, triggered by TAJ/TROY and enhanced by PDCD5 overexpression J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2004; 117(8): 1525 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Bharti, Y. Takada, S. Shishodia, and B. B. Aggarwal Evidence That Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor (NF)-{kappa}B Ligand Can Suppress Cell Proliferation and Induce Apoptosis through Activation of a NF-{kappa}B-independent and TRAF6-dependent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 6065 - 6076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ruiz, C. Segrelles, A. Bravo, M. Santos, P. Perez, H. Leis, J. L. Jorcano, and J. M. Paramio Abnormal epidermal differentiation and impaired epithelial-mesenchymal tissue interactions in mice lacking the retinoblastoma relatives p107 and p130 Development, June 1, 2003; 130(11): 2341 - 2353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Laurikkala, J. Pispa, H.-S. Jung, P. Nieminen, M. Mikkola, X. Wang, U. Saarialho-Kere, J. Galceran, R. Grosschedl, and I. Thesleff Regulation of hair follicle development by the TNF signal ectodysplasin and its receptor Edar Development, March 7, 2003; 129(10): 2541 - 2553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Sinha, S. Zachariah, H. I. Quinones, M. Shindo, and P. M. Chaudhary Role of TRAF3 and -6 in the Activation of the NF-kappa B and JNK Pathways by X-linked Ectodermal Dysplasia Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 44953 - 44961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Naito, H. Yoshida, E. Nishioka, M. Satoh, S. Azuma, T. Yamamoto, S.-i. Nishikawa, and J.-i. Inoue TRAF6-deficient mice display hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia PNAS, June 25, 2002; 99(13): 8766 - 8771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Thesleff and M. L. Mikkola Death Receptor Signaling Giving Life to Ectodermal Organs Sci. Signal., May 7, 2002; 2002(131): pe22 - pe22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Priolo and C. Lagana Ectodermal dysplasias: a new clinical-genetic classification J. Med. Genet., September 1, 2001; 38(9): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Sica, G. Zhu, K. Tamada, D. Liu, J. Ni, and L. Chen RELT, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, is selectively expressed in hematopoietic tissues and activates transcription factor NF-{kappa}B Blood, May 1, 2001; 97(9): 2702 - 2707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yan, L.-C. Wang, S. G. Hymowitz, S. Schilbach, J. Lee, A. Goddard, A. M. de Vos, W.-Q. Gao, and V. M. Dixit Two-Amino Acid Molecular Switch in an Epithelial Morphogen That Regulates Binding to Two Distinct Receptors Science, October 20, 2000; 290(5491): 523 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kumar, M. T. Eby, S. Sinha, A. Jasmin, and P. M. Chaudhary The Ectodermal Dysplasia Receptor Activates the Nuclear Factor-kappa B, JNK, and Cell Death Pathways and Binds to Ectodysplasin A J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2001; 276(4): 2668 - 2677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schneider, S. L. Street, O. Gaide, S. Hertig, A. Tardivel, J. Tschopp, L. Runkel, K. Alevizopoulos, B. M. Ferguson, and J. Zonana Mutations Leading to X-linked Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia Affect Three Major Functional Domains in the Tumor Necrosis Factor Family Member Ectodysplasin-A J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2001; 276(22): 18819 - 18827. [Abstract] [Full Text] |