JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C000208200 on May 4, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20794-20798, July 7, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/27/20794    most recent
C000208200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdile, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdile, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, P. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Inhibiting Amyloid Precursor Protein C-terminal Cleavage Promotes an Interaction with Presenilin 1*

Giuseppe VerdileDagger , Ralph N. MartinsDagger §, Monika Duthie, Erin Holmes, Peter H. St George-Hyslop||, and Paul E. Fraser||

From the Dagger  Sir James McCusker Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit and Department of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia and the  Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, || Departments of Medical Biophysics and Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, West Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H2, Canada

Received for publication, March 28, 2000, and in revised form, May 1, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Presenilin 1 (PS1) plays a pivotal role in the production of the amyloid-beta protein, which is central to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. It has been demonstrated that PS1 regulates the gamma -secretase proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) C-terminal fragment (APP-C100), which is the final step in amyloid-beta protein production. The mechanism and detailed pathway of this PS1 activity has yet to be fully resolved, but it may be due to a presenilin-controlled trafficking of the APP fragment or possibly an inherent PS1 proteolytic activity. We have investigated the possibility of a direct interaction of PS1 and the APP-C100 within the high molecular mass presenilin complex. However, the APP-C100 is rapidly degraded, and if it forms, then any PS1·APP complex is likely to be very transitory. To circumvent this problem, we have utilized the protease inhibitor N-acetyl-leucyl-norleucinal (LLnL) and the lysosomotropic agent NH4Cl, which inhibits the turnover of the APP-C100. Under these conditions, levels of the fragment increased appreciably, and as shown by glycerol gradient analysis, the APP-C100 shifted to a higher molecular mass complex that overlapped with PS1. Immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that a significant population of the APP-C100 co-precipitated with PS1. These findings suggest that PS1 may mediate the shuttling of APP fragments and/or facilitate their presentation for gamma -secretase cleavage through a direct interaction.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Alzheimer's disease (AD)1 is characterized by extensive neuronal loss culminating in the presentation of dementia. One of the key histopathological elements of the disease is the abnormal deposition of amyloid plaques (for review, see Ref. 1). The major protein component of these plaques is an ~4-kDa peptide (ranging from 39 to 43 residues in length) termed the amyloid-beta protein (Abeta ) (2). Abeta is derived by proteolytic processing of the type 1 transmembrane amyloid precursor protein (APP). Abeta is released by the secretase proteases, which initially cleave APP at the N-terminal beta -secretase site contained within the extracellular domain of the precursor. A beta -secretase candidate gene has recently been independently identified by several groups (3-5). The residual 14-kDa C-terminal APP fragment containing Abeta , as well as the transmembrane and intracellular domains, is subsequently cleaved by a putative enzyme gamma -secretase (6). The gamma -secretase cleavage occurs at two principle sites to produce either the Abeta residues 1-40 (Abeta 40) or a longer, more amyloidogenic form containing residues 1-42 (Abeta 42) (7-9).

Presenilin 1 (PS1) accounts for the majority of inherited forms of early onset familial AD (for review, see Ref. 10). Although the precise function of PS1 and its relationship to AD have yet to be resolved, it has been clearly demonstrated that FAD-linked PS1 mutations result in a relative increase in the level of Abeta 42 as compared with Abeta 40 (11-14). These findings indicate that PS1 is intimately involved in Abeta production, which is further supported by the significant reduction in gamma -secretase activity in PS1-ablated mice (15). In these mice, increased levels of the C-terminal APP fragment is observed that are accompanied by a virtual elimination of Abeta secretion.

It has recently been proposed that PS1 itself represents a potential gamma -secretase based on studies involving the mutation of two predicted transmembrane aspartate residues at codons 257 or 385 (16). Substitutions at either site resulted in marked reduction in gamma -secretase activity and Abeta production. It was subsequently hypothesized that these residues may be integral components within the catalytic site of an independent PS1 protease activity. Although this has yet to be substantiated, it is perhaps more plausible that PS1 is involved in the trafficking of the APP C-terminal fragment or may present substrates to a complex containing gamma -secretase and possibly other components (17). One possibility is that PS1 modulates APP processing via a direct interaction between the two proteins, which has been observed by co-immunoprecipitation studies in transfected cells (18, 19). However, other groups have failed to replicate this finding (20, 21), and if it occurs, it has been suggested that only a small proportion of the total cellular PS1 and APP are found in such a complex (14). One possible explanation for these discrepancies is that the population of APP that contributes to the PS1-related Abeta processing is rapidly degraded, making it difficult to isolate (22, 23). This would be particularly true for the degradation pathway involving the APP C-terminal fragment, which appears to be closely regulated by PS1.

In the current study, we have examined the possibility that PS1 interacts directly with the Abeta -containing, C-terminal fragment of APP. To circumvent the problems associated with rapid degradation, we have inhibited this pathway by using either the calpain 1 inhibitor, N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal (LLnL), or the lysosomotropic agent ammonium chloride (NH4Cl). Both of these agents have been previously shown to decrease the degradation of full-length PS1 and/or the APP-C100 (alpha - and beta -secretase products, C99 and C83, collectively) (6, 24-26). Under these conditions, we have observed that the APP-C100 assembled into a higher molecular mass complex that overlapped with the PS1 endoproteolytic fragments. Immunoprecipitation of PS1 from treated cells resulted in the co-precipitation of a significant quantity of the APP-C100. Our findings suggest that PS1 may control Abeta production through a direct interaction of the APP-C100 within the complex.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Immunoblotting and Co-precipitations-- The human-specific PS1 monoclonal antibody, NT1, directed against residues 41-49 of PS1 was kindly provided by Dr. Paul Mathews (Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY). A rabbit polyclonal antibody, Ab369, that was raised against a synthetic peptide encompassing the terminal 45 amino acid residues of the APP cytoplasmic domain was kindly provided by Dr. Sam Gandy (Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY). To perform the immunoblotting experiments, cells were harvested with trypsin:EDTA, and the pellets were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, containing 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Proteins were resolved on 4-10% Tris/glycine or 10-20% Tris/Tricine SDS polyacrylamide gels (NOVEX, San Diego, CA), transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoreactive bands were visualized by ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (17). For co-precipitation studies, PS1 was immunoprecipitated from treated and control cells using the NT1 antibody as described previously (27). PS1 and its associated proteins were separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the presence of the APP C-terminal fragment was identified by probing with the antibody Ab369. For pre-absorption studies, 10 µg of a synthetic peptide encompassing residues 41-49 of PS1 was employed.

Cell Culture-- Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, provided by Dr. Christian Haass (Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany) and human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells, provided by Dr. Dennis Selkoe (Harvard Medical School), were stably transfected with APP695. All cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium complemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum. Geneticin (250 µg/ml) was included in the media for maintenance of the stably transfected lines. The protease inhibitor LLnL (Sigma), prepared in Me2SO as a stock solution, was added to cells to a final concentration of 50 µM and incubated for 17 h at 37 °C. Control cells were incubated for identical times with media containing 1% Me2SO in the absence of LLnL. In a comparable study, the APP-C100 degradation was inhibited by incubating the cells with 25 mM NH4Cl for 17 h at 37 °C.

Glycerol Gradient Centrifugation-- Glycerol gradient centrifugation was used as described previously (17). Fully confluent cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, prior to lysis with 1% digitonin lysis buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, containing 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA, 5 µg/ml each of chymostatin, pepstatin, leupeptin, and antipain). A clarified supernatant was layered onto a 10-40% (w/v) linear continuous glycerol gradient and centrifuged for 15 h at 35,000 rpm at 4 °C. Fractions were collected by upward displacement and assessed by immunoblotting to determine the presence of PS1 and the APP C-terminal fragment.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Inhibiting Degradation of the APP C-terminal Fragment-- Initial experiments were undertaken to determine the effects of LLnL and NH4Cl on PS1 and APP-C100 turnover. Cell lines were transfected with human APP695 or doubly transfected with APP695 and PS1 containing the wild-type or L392V mutant sequence. Treatment with 50 µM LLnL resulted in an increased level of the APP-C100 fragments but did not significantly affect the turnover of full-length APP (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 4). This effect of LLnL has been previously documented, and at this concentration it significantly reduces the levels of both Abeta 40 and Abeta 42 (7, 26, 28). In contrast, similar LLnL treatment resulted in marked stabilization of the full-length PS1, whereas no changes were observed for the PS1 N-terminal fragment (NTF) (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 4). This is likely because of the considerable differences between the rapid, proteasome-mediated degradation of the full-length PS1 as compared with the extremely long half-life of the endoproteolytic fragments (22, 23). Treatment of cells stably expressing clinical PS1 mutants such as the L392V displayed a similar response for the full-length protein and its fragments (data not shown). These observations are consistent with comparable studies on LLnL (calpain 1) inhibition of PS1 degradation (25, 29). In stably transfected cells expressing higher levels of PS1, the stabilization effect of LLnL was even more pronounced as shown by the significantly higher increase in the immunoreactive band for the full-length protein (Fig. 1A, lane 2). Comparable effects were observed with the familial AD mutant of PS1 with a L392V (data not shown).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Accumulation of PS1 and the APP-C100 fragment after treatment with LLnL or NH4Cl. LLnL (50 µM)-treated HEK 293 cells stably transfected with human APP in the absence or presence of the wild-type PS1 transgene (A). Both cell lines showed an increase in the levels of the APP-C100 fragment and the PS1 full-length protein (lanes 2 and 4) as compared with controls (lanes 1 and 3), but there was no change in the APP holoprotein. Ammonium chloride treatment of human APP-transfected cells co-expressing either PS1 wild-type or PS1 mutant protein (B). No change was observed in PS1 (lanes 2 and 4), but increases comparable with the LLnL treatments in both the APP full-length and C100 fragments (lanes 2 and 4) were observed. FL, full-length.

Treatment of cells expressing APP and PS1 with the lysosomotropic agent NH4Cl resulted in an accumulation of the APP C-100 fragment, as well as the full-length protein (Fig. 1B, lanes 2 and 4). Identical results were obtained for cells expressing only APP (data not shown). This observation is consistent with previous studies showing that alkalization of intracellular compartments alters the turnover of APP and its proteolytic fragments (30, 31). However, this treatment did not have any significant effect on the relative levels of either full-length PS1 or its endoproteolytic fragments. This was shown by Western blotting of cells stably expressing either wild-type or the L392V mutant PS1 protein (Fig. 1B, lanes 2 and 4). Taken together, the data indicate that, in these cells, LLnL and NH4Cl can effectively inhibit the degradation of the APP-C100 fragment. Because our ultimate goal is to investigate whether any direct interaction of these APP fragments occurs with PS1, we have utilized these agents to metabolically freeze the lysosomal/endosomal pathway to overcome the problems associated with isolating this potentially unstable intermediate in the gamma -secretase pathway.

Formation of High Molecular Mass Complexes of PS1 and APP Fragments-- We have previously demonstrated by glycerol gradient fractionation that PS1 undergoes a maturation process with the formation of a high molecular mass complex (17, 32). The holoprotein exists as a possibly immature and rapidly degraded complex with an apparent molecular mass of ~150 kDa. Following endoproteolytic cleavage, the N and C termini remain associated by assembly into a much larger complex (200-400 kDa), which may be due to the recruitment of functional ligands such as beta -catenin. It is also possible that PS1, given its relationship to APP processing, may also form a complex with this molecule or its degradative by-products.

Similar glycerol gradient fractionation techniques were used to examine the distribution of APP-C100 fragments under normal conditions and after treatment with LLnL. Separation of digitonin extracts from HEK 293 cells stably transfected with APP and PS1 demonstrated that the APP fragments were found primarily in the lighter fractions ranging from 20-200 kDa (Fig. 2A). These overlapped to some extent with both the PS1 holoprotein and its endoproteolytic fragments. Following treatment with 50 µM LLnL, the relative intensity of the APP-C100 was increased when compared with the unfractionated samples (Fig. 2B). These also overlapped with the PS1 NTF, but the APP-C100 also populated a much larger range of higher molecular masses extending to ~400 kDa. In addition, the fractions exhibiting the highest levels of APP-C100 coincided with those containing the PS1 fragments. This was particularly true for the higher molecular mass complex (e.g. fraction 6 in Fig. 2B), which contained the larger complex of the PS1 fragments. These observations suggest that inhibiting the degradation of the APP C-terminal fragments result in the formation of these larger complexes. One possible explanation is that the APP-C100 fragments are associated with a number of other proteins as has been shown, for example, by the binding of Hsc-73 to APP upon treatment with LLnL (33). In the case of PS1, this also raises the interesting potential for a direct interaction of these proteins in the APP processing pathway.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   High molecular mass complex formation of the APP-C100 fragment and its association with PS1. Digitonin extracts of HEK 293 cells stably transfected with APP were fractionated on a 10-40% glycerol gradient, and the distribution of the APP-C100 fragment and PS1 were examined by Western blotting. In untreated cells, the APP-C100 fragment appeared in relatively lower molecular mass fractions (lanes 1-5), which partially overlapped (lanes 3-5) with PS1 fractions (lanes 3-6) (A). After treatment with LLnL, the increased level of the APP-C100 fragment resulted in a shift to higher molecular mass fractions (lanes 4-7), which coincided with the major PS1 immunoreactivity (lanes 4-6) (B). The largest accumulations of the APP-C100 were found in the highest fractions with the mature complex containing the PS1 endoproteolytic fragments. The apparent molecular mass for the various fractions are indicated by arrows on the immunoblots.

Association of the APP C-terminal Fragment and PS1-- To establish the presence of PS1 and APP-C100 in these complexes, we undertook co-immunoprecipitation experiments that involved the use of a human-specific monoclonal antibody (NT1) directed toward the PS1 N-terminal. Isolated presenilin complexes from control and treated cells were immunoprecipitated with NT1 antibody, and any co-precipitating APP-C100 was identified using an antibody raised to its cytoplasmic tail (Ab369). In untreated HEK 293 cells stably expressing human APP695 and endogenous PS1, no APP-C100 was detected in the immunoprecipitated PS1 fraction (Fig. 3A, lane 1). Only nonspecific, high molecular mass bands were observed that corresponded to IgG as demonstrated by the control immunoprecipitation where the antibody was omitted (Fig. 3A, lane 3). However, under these native conditions the PS1 complex remained functionally intact and contained other proteins such as beta -catenin (data not shown; Ref. 17). The lack of a detectable amount of the APP-C100 that may be associated with PS1 may be due to either the low levels of the APP fragment and/or the rapidity of its degradation and therefore transient interaction with the presenilin complex.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Co-immunoprecipitation of the APP-C100 fragment with PS1 after LLnL or NH4Cl treatment. Co-immunoprecipitation of extracts from cells treated with LLnL was performed by immunoprecipitation with the PS1 monoclonal antibody (NT1) followed by probing with the APP C-terminal antibody (Ab369) (A). In untreated HEK 293 or MDCK cells stably expressing APP, no detectable levels of the APP-C100 fragment were detected after PS1 immunoprecipitation (lanes 1 and 5). In the presence of 50 µM LLnL, a stable interaction of PS1 and APP-C100 was observed as shown by the strongly immunoreactive band at ~10 kDa (lanes 2 and 6). The contribution of IgG to the bands observed at the higher molecular mass was determined by immunoprecipitation in the absence of antibody (lane 3). In addition, the specificity of the PS1-C100 interaction was demonstrated by preabsorption of the PS1 antibody with the N-terminal peptide antigen (lane 4). Identical results were observed in cells overexpressing wild-type and mutant PS1, in addition to human APP, on treatment with NH4Cl (B). In untreated cells a low level of PS1-C100 binding was observed (lanes 1 and 3) that was enhanced by NH4Cl treatment (lanes 2 and 4) and shown to be specific by preabsorption (lane 5). To validate these results, the reverse co-immunoprecipitation of cell extracts was performed by immunoprecipitation with the APP CTF antibody, Ab369, followed by probing with the PS1-specific antibody, NT1 (C). In untreated cells a low level of APP-PS1 binding was observed (lanes 1 and 4) that was enhanced by LLnL and NH4Cl treatment (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6) and was shown to be specific by immunoprecipitating with an unrelated antibody to fibrinogen (lane 7). As an indicator of the amount of PS1 in the precipitate relative to the APP-C100 fragment, the PS1 immunoprecipitate was probed for PS1 using the polyclonal antibody Ab14 (D). Similar amounts of PS1 were present in the untreated and NH4Cl-treated precipitates (lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5), which were increased markedly after LLnL treatment (lanes 3 and 6). In addition, a very low amount was precipitated, followed by preabsorption of the PS1 antibody with the N-terminal peptide antigen, further demonstrating the specificity of the PS1-C100 interaction (lane 7). FL, full-length.

Freezing of APP-C100 degradation by LLnL inhibition was used to stabilize its interaction with other proteins in its degradation pathway. The observed increase in its apparent molecular mass suggests that this can be achieved (Fig. 2B). In an effort to characterize the complex further, we used a PS1-specific antibody. Under these conditions, an identical immunoprecipitation with the PS1 NTF antibody followed by immunoblotting with the APP-C100 antibody revealed the presence of a significant level of the APP-C100 fragment (Fig. 3A, lane 2). The specificity of this precipitated band was shown by preabsorption of the antibody with the corresponding peptide antigen. This completely eliminated the immunoreactive band (Fig. 3A, lane 4). Identical results were obtained in an independent MDCK cell line expressing the same human APP695 species (Fig. 3A, lanes 5 and 6). These observations clearly support a direct interaction of PS1 and the APP fragment that is involved in amyloid-beta processing.

It could be argued that increased levels of PS1 and APP-C100 due to LLnL treatment might result in a nonspecific association between these two molecules. In support of this argument a marked increase in immunoprecipitated full-length PS1 was observed when cells were treated with LLnL (Fig. 3D, lanes 3 and 6). However, the increased PS1 that was precipitated may also result in the formation of other unrelated complexes. To address this question, APP-C100 was selectively increased by treatment with the alkalizing agent NH4Cl, which inhibits the lysosomal/endosomal pathway. This pathway has been shown to play a role in the processing of the APP-C100 fragment to generate Abeta (30, 31). As with LLnL, the NH4Cl treatment increases the cellular level of the APP-C100 fragment (Fig. 1). Cells stably expressing wild-type or mutant PS1, as well as human APP, were treated with NH4Cl, and the PS1 complex was isolated by immunoprecipitation. In the absence of NH4Cl corresponding to low levels of APP-C100, no co-immunoprecipitation of the fragments was observed (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 3). However, the association of PS1 and APP-C100 was observed following incubation in NH4Cl (Fig. 3B, lanes 2 and 4). Similar to the LLnL study, the specificity of this complex was demonstrated by the preabsorption of the PS1 antibody with its peptide antigen (Fig. 3B, lane 5). Immunopreciptation with the anti-APP CTF antibody (Ab369) and probing with the PS1 antibody NT1 resulted in a significant co-precipitation of the two proteins (Fig. 3C). The PS1-APP-C100 interaction was enhanced by treatment with LLnL or NH4Cl (Fig. 3C). The specificity of this complex was demonstrated by the lack of PS1 present after precipitating with an unrelated antibody (Fig. 3C, lane 7). The amount of PS1 relative to APP-C100 within the precipitated complex was similar in the NH4Cl-treated cells, suggesting that the interaction was not simply due to elevated PS1 levels (Fig. 3D, lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5). These findings indicate that under independent conditions that alter both the degradation of APP and the production of Abeta , both of which are PS1-linked pathways, the association of PS1 with the APP-C100 fragment was observed.

The mechanism by which PS1 controls Abeta processing has not been completely resolved, but it may regulate APP-C100 trafficking and/or presentation of this fragment to gamma -secretase(s). All PS1 mutations studied to date lead to an increased generation of Abeta 42 with little or no change in Abeta 40 levels (11-14). This may be the result of two unique proteases as has been suggested by some studies (8, 34). Alternative evidence has been presented suggesting these gamma -secretase activities are located in different compartments. Peraus et al. (35) provided evidence for gamma -secretase activity in the early endosomes resulting in the generation of Abeta peptides that correspond mainly to the Abeta 40 species. On the other hand, Abeta 42 had been localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and the trans-Golgi network (36-39).

It has been shown by sucrose gradient fractionation that under normal conditions APP C-terminal fragments co-distributed with PS1 NTF and CTF in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi compartments (40). This finding raises the possibility that PS1 is involved in the trafficking of the APP-C100 from the endosomal/lysosomal organelles to these compartments for Abeta production. Some circumstantial evidence for this has been provided by the recent finding of an interaction between the hydrophilic loop of PS1 and Rab11 (41). Rab11 is a small GTPase belonging to the RAS-related superfamily involved in vesicular transport especially in the endocytic pathway (42). Alternatively, molecular chaperones could be involved in trafficking proteins from compartment to compartment. Evidence in support of this notion is demonstrated by the co-distribution of APP-C100 and PS1 (both NTF and CTF) with receptor-associated protein (RAP) (40). RAP is a molecular chaperone assisting membrane proteins in their passage through the early secretory pathway between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus (43). RAP has been shown to interact with megalin, a member of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family and has been shown to facilitate endocytic trafficking (44). Taken together it is conceivable that mutations in PS1 may direct the APP-C100 to a compartment containing an active Abeta 42 gamma -secretase. Likewise, native PS1 could transport APP-C100 to the compartment where the Abeta 40-generating protease is more active. This trafficking could be performed either through vesicular transport or molecular chaperones.

In summary, our findings provide strong evidence for a direct interaction between PS1 and the C100 fragment of APP. Demonstration of this direct interaction was enhanced by metabolically freezing either APP-C100 or both PS1 holoprotein and APP-C100 degradation by employment of the lysosomotropic agent NH4Cl and the proteasomal inhibitor LLnL, respectively. These approaches should greatly facilitate future studies of this nature directed at understanding the mechanism by which mutant PS1 selectively regulates APP metabolism to produce Abeta .

    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported by grants from the McCusker Foundation for Alzheimer's Disease Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, National Health and Medical Research Council, and Hollywood Private Hospital (to R. N. M.). Support was also provided by the Alzheimer Society of Ontario, Medical Research Council of Canada, Ontario Mental Health Foundation, and Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation (to P. E. F. and P. St G. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: University Department of Surgery, Hollywood Private Hospital, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. Tel.: 618-9346-6703; Fax: 618-9346-6666; E-mail: rmartins@cyllene.uwa.edu.au.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 4, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000208200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AD, Alzheimer's disease; Abeta , amyloid-beta protein; APP, amyloid precursor protein; APP-C100, APP C-terminal fragment; CTF, C-terminal fragment, Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; LLnL, N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal; NTF, N-terminal fragment; PS1, presenilin 1; RAP, receptor-associated protein; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; HEK, human embryonic kidney.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 399, A23-A31
2. Masters, C. L., Simms, G., Weinman, N. A., Multhaup, G., McDonald, B. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4245-4249
3. Vassar, R., Bennett, B. D., Babu-Khan, S., Kahn, S., Mendiaz, E. A., Denis, P., Teplow, D. B., Ross, S., Amarante, P., Loeloff, R., Luo, Y., Fisher, S., Fuller, L., Edenson, S., Lile, J., Jarosinski, M. A., Biere, A. L., Curran, E., Burgess, T., Louis, J. C., Collins, F., Treanor, J., Rogers, G., and Citron, M. (1999) Science 286, 735-741
4. Sinha, S., Anderson, J. P., Barbour, R., Basi, G. S., Caccavello, R., Davis, D., Doan, M., Dovey, H. F., Frigon, N., Hong, J., Jacobson-Croak, K., Jewett, N., Keim, P., Knops, J., Lieberburg, I., Power, M., Tan, H., Tatsuno, G., Tung, J., Schenk, D., Seubert, P., Suomensaari, S. M., Wang, S., Walker, D., Zhao, J., McConglogue, L., and Varghese, J. (1999) Nature 402, 537-540
5. Yan, R., Bienkowski, M. J., Shuck, M. E., Miao, H., Tory, M. C., Pauley, A. M., Brashier, J. R., Stratman, N. C., Mathews, W. R., Buhl, A. E., Carter, D. B., Tomasselli, A. G., Parodi, L. A., Heinrikson, R. L., and Gurney, M. E. (1999) Nature 402, 533-537
6. Haass, C., Schlossmacher, M. G., Hung, A. Y., Vigo-Pelfrey, C., Mellon, A., Ostaszewski, B. L., Lieberburg, I., Koo, E. H., Schenk, D., Teplow, D. B., and Selkoe, D. E. (1992) Nature 359, 322-325
7. Klafki, H., Abramowski, D., Swoboda, R., Paganetti, P. A., and Staufenbiel, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28655-28659
8. Citron, M., Diehl, T. S., Gordon, G., Biere, A. L., Seubert, P., and Selkoe, D. J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13170-13175
9. Murphy, M. P., Hickman, L. J., Eckman, C. B., Uljon, S. N., Wang, R., and Golde, T. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11914-11923
10. Nishimura, M., Yu, G., and St George-Hyslop, P. H. (1999) Clin. Genet. 55, 219-225
11. Borchelt, D. R., Thinakaran, G., Eckman, C. B., Lee, M. K., Davenport, F., Ratovitsky, T., Prada, C. M., Kim, G., Seekins, S., Yager, D., Slunt, H. H., Wang, R., Seeger, M., Levey, A. I., Gandy, S. E., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Price, D. L., and Younkin, S. G. (1996) Neuron 17, 1005-1013
12. Citron, M., Westaway, D., Xia, W. M., Carlson, G., Diehl, T., Levesque, G., Johnsonwood, K., Lee, M., Seubert, P., Davis, A., Kholodenko, D., Motter, R., Sherrington, R., Perry, B., Yao, H., Strome, R., Lieberburg, I., Rommens, J., Kim, S., Schenk, D., Fraser, P., St George-Hyslop, P. H., and Selkoe, D. J. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 67-72
13. Lemere, C. A., Lopera, F., Kosik, K. S., Lendon, C. L., Ossa, J., Saido, T. C., Yamaguchi, H., Ruiz, A., Martinez, A., Madrigal, L., Hincapie, L., Arango, J. C. L., Anthony, D. C., Koo, E. H., Goate, A. M., Selkoe, D. J., and Arango, J. C. V. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 1146-1150
14. Xia, W. M., Zhang, J. M., Kholodenko, D., Citron, M., Podlisny, M. B., Teplow, D. B., Haass, C., Seubert, P., Koo, E. H., and Selkoe, D. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7977-7982
15. Destrooper, B., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Vanderstichele, H., Guhde, G., Annaert, W., Vonfigura, K., and Vanleuven, F. (1998) Nature 391, 387-390
16. Wolfe, M. S., Xia, W. M., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Kimberly, W. T., and Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 398, 513-517
17. Yu, G., Chen, F. S., Levesque, G., Nishimura, M., Zhang, D. M., Levesque, L., Rogaeva, E., Xu, D. H., Liang, Y., Duthie, M., St George Hyslop, P. H., and Fraser, P. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16470-16475
18. Waragai, M., Imafuku, I., Takeuchi, S., Kanazawa, I., Oyama, F., Udagawa, Y., Kawabata, M., and Okazawa, H. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239, 480-482
19. Xia, W. M., Zhang, J. M., Perez, R., Koo, E. H., and Selkoe, D. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8208-8213
20. Kim, S. S., Choi, Y. M., and Suh, Y. H. (1997) J. Mol. Neurosci. 9, 49-54
21. Thinakaran, G., Regard, J. B., Bouton, C. M., Harris, C. L., Price, D. L., Borchelt, D. R., and Sisodia, S. S. (1998) Neurobiol. Dis. 4, 438-453
22. Ratovitsky, T., Slunt, H. H., Thinakaran, G., Price, D. L., Sisodia, S. S., and Borchelt, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24536-24541
23. Podlisny, M. B., Citron, M., Amarante, P., Sherrington, R., Xia, W. M., Zhang, J. M., Diehl, T., Levesque, G., Fraser, P., Haass, C., Koo, E. H. M., Seubert, P., St George-Hyslop, P. H., Teplow, D. B., and Selkoe, D. J. (1997) Neurobiol. Dis. 3, 325-337
24. Caporaso, G. L., Gandy, S. E., Buxbaum, J. D., Ramabhadran, T. V., and Greengard, P. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3055-3059
25. Steiner, H., Capell, A., Pesold, B., Citron, M., Kloetzel, P. M., Selkoe, D. J., Romig, H., Mendla, K., and Haass, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32322-32331
26. Zhang, L. L., Song, L. X., and Parker, E. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8966-8972
27. Levesque, L., Annaert, W., Craessaerts, K., Mathews, P. M., Seeger, M., Nixon, R. A., Van Leuven, F., Gandy, S., Westaway, D., St George-Hyslop, P. H., De Strooper, B., and Fraser, P. E. (1998) Mol. Med. 5, 542-554
28. Yamazaki, T., Haass, C., Saido, T. C., Omura, S., and Ihara, Y. (1997) Biochemistry 8, 8377-8383
29. Fraser, P. E., Levesque, G., Yu, G., Mills, L. R., Thirlwell, J., Frantseva, M., Gandy, S. E., Seeger, M., Carlen, P. L., and St George-Hyslop, P. H. (1998) Neurobiol. Aging 19 Suppl. 1, 19-21
30. Benowitz, L. I., Rodriguez, W., Paskevich, P., Mufson, E. J., Schenk, D., and Neve, R. L. (1989) Exp. Neurol. 106, 237-250
31. Cole, G. M., Huynh, T. V., and Saitoh, T. (1989) Neurochem. Res. 14, 933-939
32. Capell, A., Grunberg, J., Pesold, B., Diehlmann, A., Citron, M., Nixon, R., Beyreuther, K., Selkoe, D. J., and Haass, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3205-3211
33. Kouchi, Z., Sorimachi, H., Suzuki, K., and Ishiura, S. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 804-810
34. Sudoh, S., Kawamura, Y., Sato, K., Wang, R., Saido, T. C., Oyama, F., Sakaki, Y., Komano, H., and Yanagisawa, K. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1535-1543
35. Peraus, G. C., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 7714-7724
36. Hartmann, T., Bieger, S. C., Bruhl, B., Tienari, P. J., Ida, N., Allsop, D., Roberts, G. W., Masters, C. L., Dotti, C. G., Unsicker, K., and Beyreuther, K. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 1016-1020
37. Wild-Bode, C., Yamazaki, T., Capell, A., Leimer, U., Steiner, H., Ihara, Y., and Haass, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16085-16088
38. Skovronsky, D. M., Doms, R. W., and Lee, V. M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 1031-1039
39. Greenfield, J. P., Xu, H., Greengard, P., Gandy, S., and Seeger, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33843-33846
40. Annaert, W. G., Levesque, L., Craessaerts, K., Dierinck, I., Snellings, G., Westaway, D., St George-Hyslop, P. H., Cordell, B., Fraser, P., and De Strooper, B. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 277-294
41. Dumanchin, C., Czech, C., Campion, D., Cuif, M. H., Poyot, T., Martin, C., Charbonnier, F., Goud, B., Pradier, L., and Frebourg, T. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1263-1269
42. Trischler, M., Stoorvogel, W., and Ullrich, O. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 4773-4783
43. Bu, G., and Schwartz, A. L. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 272-276
44. Czekay, R. P., Orlando, R. A., Woodward, L, Lundstrom, M., and Farquhar, M. G. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 517-532


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Verdile, A. Gnjec, J. Miklossy, J. Fonte, G. Veurink, K. Bates, B. Kakulas, P. D. Mehta, E. A. Milward, N. Tan, et al.
Protein markers for Alzheimer disease in the frontal cortex and cerebellum
Neurology, October 26, 2004; 63(8): 1385 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Araki, N. Miyagi, N. Kato, T. Yoshida, S. Wada, M. Nishimura, H. Komano, T. Yamamoto, B. De Strooper, K. Yamamoto, et al.
Coordinated Metabolism of Alcadein and Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Regulates FE65-dependent Gene Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24343 - 24354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. L. Bowen, G. Verdile, T. Liu, A. F. Parlow, G. Perry, M. A. Smith, R. N. Martins, and C. S. Atwood
Luteinizing Hormone, a Reproductive Regulator That Modulates the Processing of Amyloid-{beta} Precursor Protein and Amyloid-{beta} Deposition
J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20539 - 20545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Araki, S. Tomita, H. Yamaguchi, N. Miyagi, A. Sumioka, Y. Kirino, and T. Suzuki
Novel Cadherin-related Membrane Proteins, Alcadeins, Enhance the X11-like Protein-mediated Stabilization of Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49448 - 49458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. B. J. Kwok, G. M. Halliday, W. S. Brooks, G. Dolios, H. Laudon, O. Murayama, M. Hallupp, R. F. Badenhop, J. Vickers, R. Wang, et al.
Presenilin-1 Mutation L271V Results in Altered Exon 8 Splicing and Alzheimer's Disease with Non-cored Plaques and No Neuritic Dystrophy
J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 6748 - 6754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. M. Mathews, Y. Jiang, S. D. Schmidt, O. M. Grbovic, M. Mercken, and R. A. Nixon
Calpain Activity Regulates the Cell Surface Distribution of Amyloid Precursor Protein. INHIBITION OF CALPAINS ENHANCES ENDOSOMAL GENERATION OF beta -CLEAVED C-TERMINAL APP FRAGMENTS
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36415 - 36424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. A. Craig, L. M. Benson, S. Yu. Venyaminov, E. S. Klimtchuk, Z. Bajzer, F. G. Prendergast, S. Naylor, and R. Kumar
The Metal-binding Properties of DREAM. EVIDENCE FOR CALCIUM-MEDIATED CHANGES IN DREAM STRUCTURE
J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 2002; 277(13): 10955 - 10966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Pinnix, U. Musunuru, H. Tun, A. Sridharan, T. Golde, C. Eckman, C. Ziani-Cherif, L. Onstead, and K. Sambamurti
A Novel gamma -Secretase Assay Based on Detection of the Putative C-terminal Fragment-gamma of Amyloid beta Protein Precursor
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(1): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/27/20794    most recent
C000208200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdile, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdile, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, P. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.