![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20861-20866, July 7, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Division of Inflammatory Diseases, Eisai Research
Institute, Andover, Massachusetts 01810
Received for publication, April 5, 2000, and in revised form, April 27, 2000
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulates multiple
signaling events, including nuclear factor- The pathophysiology of Gram-negative sepsis and septic shock is
caused by lipopolysaccharide
(LPS),1 a component of the
outer membrane of bacteria that can activate a variety of mammalian
cell types, including monocytes and macrophages (1, 2). This, in turn,
causes the release of a number of proinflammatory mediators, such as
interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor- LPS has been shown to initiate multiple intracellular signaling events,
including the stimulation of pathways that lead to the activation of
NF- The proximal signaling molecules involved in LPS-induced activation of
ERK, p38, and JNK are not well defined. LPS is thought to activate ERK1
and ERK2 proteins via the Ras/Raf-1/MAP kinase kinase (MEK) pathway,
JNK proteins via the MEKK-1/MEK-4 pathway, and p38 proteins via
activation of MEK-3 (14, 15). These pathways are coupled to the
production of certain proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-8, by
phosphorylating and activating the ternary complex Elk-1, resulting in
increased levels of c-fos and enhanced formation of the transcription
factor AP-1 (16). The IL-8 promoter contains a NF- Materials--
The pcDNA3.0 expression vector encoding human
TLR4 cDNA was kindly provided by Drs. Ruslan Medzhitov and Charles
Janeway, Jr. (Yale University). The pEFBOS expression vector encoding
human MD-2 cDNA was kindly provided by Dr. Kensuke Miyake (Saga
Medical School, Japan). The Elk-1 reporter system was purchased from
Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). The ELAM-1-luciferase reporter construct
(pELAM-luc) and human soluble CD14 (sCD14) were generated as described
previously (5). Lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli
0111:B4, epidermal growth factor, and IL-1 Cell Culture and Transfections--
HEK293 cells were
transfected with the pcDNA3.0 expression vector (Invitrogen, Inc)
with or without an insert encoding human TLR4. Transfectants (HEK
vector or HEK-TLR4) were selected with the antibiotic G418, screened
for LPS responsiveness using pELAM-luc, and analyzed for TLR4 mRNA
expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
For the ERK, p38, and JNK signaling experiments, TLR4/MD-2
transfectants were generated by transfecting HEK-TLR4 cells with
pcDNA3.1/Hygro encoding human MD-2 plus pELAM-luc/Zeocin followed
by antibiotic selection with G418, hygromycin, and ZeocinTM. Transfectants were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
the appropriate antibiotic(s). Multiple clones of stable transfectants as well as stable cell lines that contain a heterogeneous population of
transfectants were used in this study.
For transfection experiments, HEK-TLR4 cells were plated in 24-well
tissue culture plates (2 × 105 cells/well) and
maintained in the above medium without antibiotics overnight. The cells
were transfected with MD-2 plasmid or empty vector (pEFBOS) and
pELAM-luc or the Elk-1 reporter constructs (pFA2-Elk-1 and pFR-Luc)
using a calcium phosphate protocol described by
CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). All cells were also
transfected with pRL-TK plasmid, a Renilla luciferase control reporter
vector (Promega, Inc.), to normalize transfection efficiencies. After
transfection, cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 0.5% fetal bovine serum for 18 h. The
following day, cells were either left untreated or incubated with the
indicated amount of ligand and/or inhibitor for 6 h or the
indicated time. The medium was then removed and stored at RT-PCR Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated with RNeasy mini
columns (Qiagen, Inc.), and first-strand synthesis of RNA was carried
out with the ProStar RT-PCR kit (Stratagene, Inc.) using 200 ng of
total RNA. The resulting cDNA was amplified with primers for MD-2
(5'-GAAGCTCAGAAGCAGTATTGGGTC-3' and 5'-GGTTGGTGTAGGATGACAAACTCC-3') and
Immunoblotting Experiments--
HEK-TLR4 or HEK-TLR4/MD-2 cells
were stimulated with LPS (1 µg/ml) plus sCD14 (10 nM) for
15, 30, 60, or 120 min. Cells were lysed in 1× SDS sample buffer
(Invitrogen) containing To study the role of TLR4 in LPS-stimulated signaling events,
HEK293 cells expressing human TLR4 (HEK-TLR4) were generated and tested
for LPS responsiveness after transfection with the NF- In contrast to NF-
Cellular Events Mediated by Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated
Toll-like Receptor 4
MD-2 IS REQUIRED FOR ACTIVATION OF MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN
KINASES AND Elk-1*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (NF-
B) activity and
the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, ERK, JNK, and p38 in
LPS-responsive cells, resulting in transcriptional activation and
cytokine generation. LPS-induced signaling via toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) results in the activation of the transcription factor NF-
B.
Since LPS activates other signaling cascades in responsive cells, the
objective of this study was to determine whether such events are
mediated by TLR4 in response to LPS. We generated human embryonic
kidney cells (HEK293) that stably express TLR4 (HEK-TLR4) and examined their responsiveness to LPS by measuring NF-
B activity and
production of interleukin-8 (IL-8). A trans-reporting system was used
to measure the activity of Elk-1, an ETS-domain transcription factor targeted by MAP kinase pathways. LPS stimulated NF-
B reporter activity and IL-8 production but not Elk-1 activity in HEK-TLR4 cells.
When MD-2, a protein associated with the extracellular domain of TLR4,
was expressed in these cells, there was a marked increase in Elk-1
activity as well as ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinase phosphorylation in
response to LPS. TLR4-mediated NF-
B reporter activity and IL-8
production was enhanced by the expression of MD-2. This study
demonstrates that expression of both TLR4 and MD-2 is required for LPS
to activate or augment the MAP kinase pathways, Elk-1 stimulation, and
IL-8 generation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(1).
Activation of LPS-responsive cells occurs rapidly after LPS interacts
with circulating LPS-binding protein and CD14, a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked cell surface or soluble protein
necessary for efficient responses to LPS (2). Evidence from studies
in vitro indicates that expression of TLR2 and TLR4, two
members of the toll-like receptor (TLR) family of cell surface
proteins, can enable the activation of nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B)
and expression of genes for IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8 (3, 4). TLR4 has been
shown to mediate LPS-induced activation of NF-
B in human embryonic
kidney cells (HEK293) (5, 6), whereas in 293T and Ba/F3 cells,
TLR4-mediated responses to LPS requires the presence of MD-2, a cell
surface protein that associates with TLR4 (7). Observations from
studies with TLR2 and TLR4 knockout mice indicate that TLR4, but not
TLR2, is necessary for responses to LPS under physiological conditions;
TLR2 knockout mice respond normally to LPS, whereas TLR4 knockout mice
or spontaneous TLR4 mutants (C3H/HeJ and C57/10ScCr) are not responsive
to LPS (8-10). On the other hand, studies with TLR2 knockout mice
suggest that TLR2 has a broader recognition pattern than TLR4, which
extends to a number of different bacterial cell wall components
(10).
B and three distinct mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, the
ERK, p38, and JNK proteins (11). TLR4-mediated NF-
B activation is
thought to occur via a signaling pathway that is also utilized by IL-1
and IL-18 (12). This pathway is activated by the interaction between
myeloid differentiation protein (MyD88) with the receptor followed by
stimulation of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) and subsequent
recruitment of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor-6
(TRAF6). Stimulation of these proximal signaling molecules results in
the activation of members of the MAP kinase kinase kinase family that
activate inhibitory kappa B (I
B) kinases (12). I
B kinases can
then phosphorylate I
B proteins that retain the rel-type
transcription factor NF-
B in the cytosol, leading to ubiquitination
and degradation of I
B proteins by the 26 S proteosome, followed by
release and nuclear translocation of NF-
B (13).
B binding site
that is necessary for activation as well as AP-1 binding sites that,
depending on the cell type, contribute to transcriptional activation
(17, 18). The aim of this study was to determine whether TLR4, which
activates NF-
B in response to LPS (5), also mediates LPS-induced
activation of the MAP kinase family of proteins in responsive cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
were purchased from List
Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA), Life Technologies, Inc., and
PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ), respectively. HEK 293 cells and HL-60 cells
were from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Plasmid DNA
was isolated with Qiagen Endo-freeTM Maxi-prep columns
(Chatsworth, CA). Leukocyte cDNA was purchased from
CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). Cycloheximide was
purchased from Sigma.
80 °C
until further analysis for IL-8 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(PharMingen, Inc). The cells were harvested in lysis buffer and assayed
for firefly and Renilla luciferase activity as described by the
manufacturer of the Dual-luciferaseTM Reporter System (Promega, Inc).
The amount of luciferase activity in each sample was quantified by a
Wallac 1450 MicroBetaTrilux counter. The data are shown as mean ± S.E. for one representative experiment in which each transfection was performed in quadruplicate. Each experiment was repeated at least three
times in all figures.
-actin (CLONTECH, Inc.). PCR products were
resolved by electrophoresis on agarose gels containing ethidium bromide
and visualized by UV transillumination.
-mercaptoethanol, sonicated for 5 s,
and boiled at 95 °C for 5 min. Proteins were separated by
Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen) and electroblotted on nitrocellulose
membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). The blots were subsequently blocked
and probed with an antibody specific for phospho-ERK (Promega),
phospho-JNK (Promega), phospho-p38 (New England Biolabs), pan-ERK
(Transduction Labs), JNK (NEB), or p38 (NEB) as described by the
manufacturer of the antibody. Blots were then incubated with an
anti-mouse (Transduction Labs) or anti-rabbit (Pierce) IgG coupled to
horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at 25 °C. Proteins were
visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) as described by the
manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Blots that were probed with
phospho-specific antibodies were stripped as recommended in the ECL
protocol and reblotted with antibodies specific for the particular
protein of interest.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B reporter
construct, pELAM-luc, or an Elk-1 reporter system. Twenty-four hours
post-transfection, cells were left untreated or incubated with 1 µg/ml LPS plus 10 nM sCD14 for an additional 6 h, at
which time medium was collected to measure IL-8 production, and the
cells were lysed to determine luciferase activity in the supernatants.
HEK-TLR4 cells respond to LPS/sCD14 treatment by elevating NF-
B
reporter activity 10-fold above vector controls (Fig.
1A). We have previously shown
that this response to LPS is dependent on the presence of sCD14 (5).
The HEK-TLR4 cells also responded to LPS/sCD14 by secreting IL-8 (Fig.
1B), a chemokine that elicits neutrophil chemotaxis and is
regulated by NF-
B and AP-1 (17). The concentration of IL-8 in the
culture medium was elevated by 2-fold in the basal state and 5-6-fold
above vector controls after LPS/sCD14 treatment (Fig. 1B).
Consistent with this finding, the level of IL-8 mRNA, as determined
by RT-PCR was increased by LPS/sCD14 in a time-dependent
manner from 3 to 24 h in HEK-TLR4 cells but not in HEK-vector
cells (data not shown). Induction of IL-8 mRNA by LPS did not
require de novo protein synthesis, since pretreatment with
the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) for 15 min
before a 6-h LPS or IL-1
stimulus did not inhibit the response (Fig.
2). Cycloheximide caused a superinduction
of IL-8 mRNA in the basal and stimulated state, which does not
occur with
-actin mRNA (Fig. 2), suggesting that new protein
synthesis is required for repression of basal transcription of IL-8.
Superinduction of IL-8 by cycloheximide has been previously reported in
bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (19).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
TLR4-mediates activation of
NF-
B and IL-8 production by LPS in HEK-TLR4
cells. HEK293-vector or HEK-TLR4 cells were transfected with
pELAM-luc (panel A) as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Cells were either left untreated or incubated with 1 µg/ml LPS plus 10 nM sCD14 for 6 h. Cell lysates
were assayed for luciferase activity using the Dual-luciferaseTM
Reporter Assay System. The cell media was collected and analyzed for
IL-8 production by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (panel
B).

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Induction of IL-8 mRNA by LPS does not
require de novo protein synthesis in HEK-TLR4
cells. HEK-TLR4 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of
10 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 15 min and then either
left untreated or incubated with 1 µg/ml LPS plus 10 nM
sCD14 (L) or 20 ng/ml IL-1
(I) for 6 h.
Total RNA was isolated, reversed-transcribed, and amplified with IL-8-
or
-actin-specific primers as described under "Experimental
Procedures." IL-8 or
-actin cDNA was used as a template for
the positive control (PC) reaction. Molecular weights of DNA
markers in lane 1 are noted to the left of each
figure.
B-driven gene expression (Fig. 1), Elk-1 reporter
activity was not affected by LPS/sCD14 in HEK-TLR4 cells despite a
robust increase in Elk-1 activity after epidermal growth factor
treatment (Fig. 3). These results suggest
either TLR4 does not mediate the LPS signals that result in Elk-1
stimulation or HEK293 cells lack other signaling molecules that are
necessary for Elk-1 activation in response to LPS. MD-2 is a recently
identified cell surface protein that physically associates with TLR4
and is a requisite for LPS signaling to NF-
B in 293T and Ba/F3
cells (7). We found that HEK-TLR4 cells do not express MD-2 as
determined by RT-PCR (Fig. 4). In
contrast, MD-2 mRNA was detected in LPS-responsive cells such as
differentiated HL-60 monocytes and leukocytes (Fig. 4). These data
suggest that MD-2 may be the missing protein whose expression is
required for LPS to stimulate Elk-1 reporter activity in HEK-TLR4
cells.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
LPS does not stimulate Elk-1 activity in
HEK-TLR4 cells. HEK293 vector or HEK-TLR4 cells were transfected
with the Elk-1 reporter system as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Cells were either left untreated or incubated with 1 µg/ml LPS plus 10 nM sCD14 or 100 ng/ml epidermal growth
factor for 6 h. The cell lysates were assayed for Elk-1 reporter
activity using the Dual-luciferaseTM Reporter Assay System.

View larger version (86K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MD-2 is not expressed in HEK-TLR4 cells.
Total RNA from HEK-TLR4 or HL-60 cells was reversed-transcribed and,
along with cDNAs from leukocytes, amplified with MD-2- or
-actin-specific primers as described under "Experimental
Procedures." PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1%
agarose gel and visualized by UV transillumination. Plasmid encoding
MD-2 was used as a template for the positive control (MD-2) reaction.
Molecular weights of DNA markers in lane 1 are noted to the
left of each figure.
We co-transfected HEK-TLR4 cells with an pEFBOS expression vector
encoding MD-2 cDNA and either pELAM-luc or an Elk-1 reporter system
followed by the indicated treatment (Fig.
5). Expression of MD-2 in HEK-TLR4 cells
increased LPS/sCD14-induced NF-
B reporter activity 35-fold above
unstimulated cells and 7-fold above LPS/sCD14-treated MD-2-negative
vector controls (Fig. 5A), consistent with previous observations in HEK293T cells (7). When MD-2 and the Elk-1 reporter
system were transfected into HEK-TLR4 cells, Elk-1 activity was
elevated 5-6-fold above basal controls after LPS/sCD14 treatment, a
response that was not observed in HEK-TLR4 cells transfected with the
pEFBOS vector (Fig. 5B). Neither sCD14 nor LPS alone was
capable of eliciting such a response in these cells, indicating that
this MD-2-mediated event is dependent on the presence of sCD14 in the
cell medium. The activation of Elk-1 by LPS/sCD14 was
dose-dependent and reached maximal levels at 10 ng/ml LPS (Fig. 6A). Elk-1 activity
remained elevated in response to increasing concentrations of LPS up to
10 µg/ml. In contrast, LPS/sCD14 treatment did not induce Elk-1
reporter activity in HEK293 cells transfected with MD-2 alone (data not
shown), indicating that expression of both MD-2 and TLR4 is required
for LPS/sCD14 to activate Elk-1. Stimulation of Elk-1 activity occurred
in a time-dependent fashion and reached maximal levels at
6 h after LPS treatment (Fig. 6B).
|
|
Previous studies have shown that the ERK, p38, and Jnk signaling
pathways contribute to Elk-1 activation (16). Cellular lysates from
HEK293 cells that stably co-express TLR4 and MD-2 (HEK-TLR4/MD-2) were
examined for ERK, p38, and Jnk phosphorylation by immunoblotting
analysis using phospho-specific antibodies after stimulation with
LPS/sCD14 for 15, 30, 60, or 120 min. LPS/sCD14 activated all three MAP
kinase proteins tested in HEK-TLR4/MD-2 cells but not in HEK-TLR4 cells
(Fig. 7, upper panels). The
stimulation of ERK, p38, and Jnk phosphorylation was
time-dependent, reaching maximal levels at 60 min after the
addition of LPS/sCD14 to the cell medium. Thus, the presence of MD-2
enables LPS/sCD14 to induce phosphorylation/activation of ERK, p38, and
Jnk proteins in HEK293 cells that co-express TLR4.
|
We next examined the effect of MD-2 expression on LPS-induced IL-8
production in HEK-TLR4 cells. As shown above, cellular production of
IL-8 was elevated above basal levels in HEK-TLR4 cells 6 h after
LPS/sCD14 treatment (Fig. 8). Expression
of MD-2 enhanced IL-8 production by approximately 2.5-fold above
LPS-stimulated vector transfected cells and 20-fold above basal
levels.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The discovery that TLR4 mediates LPS-induced responses in cells
and in vivo (5, 9) prompted us to identify further cellular events that are triggered by TLR4 in response to LPS. The data presented here provide additional evidence that TLR4 mediates LPS-stimulated IL-8 production in HEK293 cells stably expressing TLR4.
In support of these findings, expression of a constitutively active
mutant of TLR4 has been shown to induce IL-8 gene expression in THP-1
cells (3). Induction of IL-8 message levels in HEK-TLR4 cells is a
rapid event that occurs as early as 3 h after LPS stimulation and
does not require new protein synthesis or autocrine factors (Fig. 2).
The increase in IL-8 mRNA and IL-8 production by LPS-activated TLR4
is in agreement with reports demonstrating that LPS stimulates IL-8
synthesis in macrophages and other cell types (20), a response that is
in part dependent upon NF-
B activity (11). We have shown that LPS
stimulates TLR4-mediated NF-
B activity in this and a previous study
(5), suggesting that the increase in NF-
B activity is responsible
for elevated IL-8 transcription and synthesis in HEK-TLR4 cells.
Increasing evidence suggests that the proximal signaling components of
the IL-1 pathway are involved in coupling the LPS-induced signals that
emanate from activated TLR4 to NF-
B. For example, constitutively
active constructs of TLR4 have implicated the involvement of MyD88,
IRAK, TRAF6, and NF-
B-inducing kinase in signaling the activation of
NF-
B from TLR4 (21, 22). In fact, dominant negative constructs of
these signaling proteins have been shown to inhibit LPS-induced NF-
B
activity in human dermal microvessel endothelial cells, and monocytic
leukemia cells (23). Most recently, transforming growth
factor-
-activated kinase 1, a MAP kinase kinase kinase upstream of
NF-
B-inducing kinase, was found to mediate an LPS activation signal
from TLR4 to NF-
B (6).
We show here that the stimulation of NF-
B and IL-8 production in
HEK-TLR4 cells is enhanced by co-expression of MD-2, suggesting that
MD-2 increases the sensitivity of TLR4-expressing cells to LPS. These
data are consistent with a previous report describing the absolute
requirement of MD-2 for LPS-induced NF-
B activity in HEK293T and
Ba/F3 cells (7). In contrast to NF-
B and IL-8 stimulation, we did
not detect Elk-1 reporter activity or phosphorylation of MAP kinase
proteins upon LPS treatment in HEK-TLR4 cells lacking MD-2. When MD-2
was transfected into these cells, Elk-1 and the three MAP kinase
proteins were stimulated by LPS, indicating that MD-2 expression is
required for the activation of these signaling molecules. Thus, in this
cell model system, TLR4 and MD-2 are both responsible for initiating
the signaling pathways that lead to ERK, p38, and Jnk activation as
well as Elk-1. It seems likely that the activation of these signaling
pathways and the enhancement of NF-
B activity might contribute to
the increase in IL-8 generation in HEK-TLR4/MD-2 cells. Holtmann
et al. (24) recently showed that maximal IL-8 gene
expression requires the coordinate action of at least three different
signal transduction pathways, which cooperate to induce mRNA
synthesis and suppress mRNA degradation. Pathways involving the
activation of NF-
B, p38, and stress-activated protein kinase
(SAPK)/JNK were shown to induce IL-8 synthesis and/or transcription
from a minimal IL-8 promoter containing NF-
B and AP-1 binding sites
(24). In addition, the ERK proteins have been shown to activate AP-1
via Elk-1 (25) and modulate IL-8 production in a variety of cells
including mast cells and monocytes (26, 27). Likewise, we have shown
that when HEK-TLR4 cells are treated with the MAP kinase kinase
(upstream regulator of ERK proteins) inhibitor U0126, LPS-stimulated
IL-8 production is partially
suppressed,2 indicating that
the ERK signaling pathway plays a role in IL-8 generation in these
cells. It remains to be determined whether or not p38 or
stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/JNK or both pathways participate
in the regulation of IL-8 by LPS in HEK-TLR4 cells. It will be of
interest to quantify the relative contribution of each one of these
signaling pathways that regulate LPS-induced IL-8 synthesis.
To date the identity of the molecules that link TLR4 and MD-2 to the
three MAP kinase proteins are not well defined. Previous studies have
suggested that tyrosine kinases, small G-proteins, and serine/threonine
kinases mediate LPS signals to these MAP kinase pathways (8). It is
possible that signals generated by LPS may bifurcate from known
signaling molecules that are thought to mediate LPS-induced NF-
B
activation, such as MyD88, IRAK, TRAF6, TGF-
-activated kinase 1, NF-
B-inducing kinase, and I
B kinases or via signal transducers
that have yet to be identified. For example, JNK activation caused by
expression of TLR4-FLAG is blocked by a dominant-negative version of
MyD88 but not TRAF6 (21), and Medzhitov et al. (22) report
that TLR4-activated AP-1 reporter activity is inhibited by a dominant
negative construct of IRAK or TRAF6. Taken together, these studies
suggest that MyD88 and IRAK are involved in TLR4-activated JNK
phosphorylation or AP-1 activity, respectively, whereas TRAF6 does not
contribute to JNK phosphorylation but is required for AP-1 activation.
Thus, it will be necessary to identify which proximal signaling
pathways mediate LPS-induced JNK, ERK, and p38 MAP kinase activation in HEK-TLR4/MD-2 cells.
In summary, these data provide new evidence that the expression of MD-2
in cells that express TLR4 is essential for TLR4-mediated activation of
the three MAP kinases and a downstream target of these kinases, Elk-1.
In addition, TLR4 is capable of mediating the signals initiated by LPS
that induce the production of IL-8, which is enhanced further when MD-2
is co-expressed in HEK293 cells. These studies demonstrate that,
although TLR4 alone can mediate the activation of NF-
B and IL-8
production, co-expression of MD-2 is absolutely necessary for LPS to
activate MAP kinase proteins and Elk-1. The cell surface interactions
among the components of the LPS signaling pathway are not well defined.
However, genetic complementation studies have demonstrated that there
is physical contact between LPS and TLR4 in the course of signal
transduction (28). Based on the present and a previous study (29), it
appears that TLR4·MD-2 complex is capable of recognizing/sensing LPS
with sCD14 better than LPS alone, or perhaps MD-2 is able to "lock" LPS on its binding site for a longer period of time. In the future, it
will be important to understand the molecular interactions between TLR4
and other LPS signaling molecules that result in a cellular response.
Continued identification and characterization of the mechanistic steps
by which TLR4 and other TLRs mediate ligand-induced signals within the
cell will enable further improvements in the discovery of anti-septic agents.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. Sally Ishizaka for helpful comments on this manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Eisai Research
Institute, 100 Research Dr., Wilmington, MA 01887. Tel.: 978-661-7276; Fax: 978-657-7715; E-mail: Jesse_Chow@eri.eisai.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 28, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002896200
2 H. Yang and J. C. Chow, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
TLR, toll-like receptor;
IL, interleukin;
NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B;
I
B, inhibitory
B;
sCD14, soluble CD14;
pELAM-luc, ELAM-1-luciferase reporter plasmid;
MyD88, myeloid
differentiation protein;
IRAK, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase;
TRAF, tumor necrosis factor-associated factor;
RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction;
HEK cells, human embryonic
kidney cells;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
MEK, MAP kinase kinase;
MEKK-1, MAP kinase kinase kinase-1.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Schletter, J., Heine, H., Ulmer, A. J., and Rietschel, E. T. (1995) Arch. Microbiol. 164, 383-389 |
| 2. | Ulevitch, R. J., and Tobias, P. S. (1995) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 437-457 |
| 3. | Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P., and Janeway, C. A., Jr. (1997) Nature 388, 394-397 |
| 4. | Yang, R. B., Mark, M. R., Gray, A., Huang, A., Xie, M. H., Zhang, M., Goddard, A., Wood, W. I., Gurney, A. L., and Godowski, P. J. (1998) Nature 395, 284-288 |
| 5. | Chow, J. C., Young, D. W., Golenbock, D. T., Christ, W. J., and Gusovsky, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10689-10692 |
| 6. | Irie, T., Muta, T., and Takeshige, K. (2000) FEBS Lett. 467, 160-164 |
| 7. | Shimazu, R., Akashi, S., Ogata, H., Nagai, Y., Fukudome, K., Miyake, K., and Kimoto, M. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 189, 1777-1782 |
| 8. | Poltorak, A., He, X., Smirnova, I., Liu, M. Y., Huffel, C. V., Du, X., Birdwell, D., Alejos, E., Silva, M., Galanos, C., Freudenberg, M., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Layton, B., and Beutler, B. (1998) Science 282, 2085-2088 |
| 9. | Hoshino, K., Takeuchi, O., Kawai, T., Sanjo, H., Ogawa, T., Takeda, Y., Takeda, K., and Akira, S. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 3749-3752 |
| 10. | Takeuchi, O., Hoshino, K., Kawai, T., Sanjo, H., Takada, H., Ogawa, T., Takeda, K., and Akira, S. (1999) Immunity 11, 443-451 |
| 11. | Sweet, M. J., and Hume, D. A. (1996) Leukocyte Biol. 60, 8-26 |
| 12. | Kopp, E. B., and Medzhitov, R. (1999) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 13-18 |
| 13. | Mercurio, F., and Manning, A. M. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6163-6171 |
| 14. | Geppert, T. D., Whitehurst, C. E., Thompson, P., and Beutler, B. (1994) Mol. Med. 1, 93-103 |
| 15. | Swantek, J. L., Cobb, M. H., and Geppert, T. D. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6274-6282 |
| 16. | Treisman, R. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 8, 205-215 |
| 17. | Mukaida, N., Okamoto, S., Ishikawa, Y., and Matsushima, K. (1994) J. Leukocyte Biol. 56, 554-558 |
| 18. | Murayama, T., Ohara, Y., Obuchi, M., Khabar, K. S., Higashi, H., Mukaida, N., and Matsushima, K. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 5692-5695 |
| 19. | Dibb, C. R., Strieter, R. M., Burdick, M., and Kunkel, S. L. (1992) Infect. Immun. 60, 3052-3058 |
| 20. | Miller, M. D., and Krangel, M. S. (1992) Crit. Rev. Immunol. 12, 17-46 |
| 21. | Muzio, M., Natoli, G., Saccani, S., Levrero, M., and Mantovani, A. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 2097-2101 |
| 22. | Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P., Kopp, E., Stadlen, A., Chen, C., Ghosh, S., and Janeway, C. A., Jr. (1998) Mol. Cell. 2, 253-258 |
| 23. | Zhang, F. X., Kirschning, C. J., Mancinelli, R., Xu, X. P., Jin, Y., Faure, E., Mantovani, A., Rothe, M., Muzio, M., and Arditi, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7611-7614 |
| 24. | Holtmann, H., Winzen, R., Holland, P., Eickemeier, S., Hoffmann, E., Wallach, D., Malinin, N. L., Cooper, J. A., Resch, K., and Kracht, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6742-6753 |
| 25. | Karin, M., Liu, Zg., and Zandi, E. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 9, 240-246 |
| 26. | Feoktistov, I., Goldstein, A. E., and Biaggioni, I. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 726-734 |
| 27. | Scherle, P. A., Jones, E. A., Favata, M. F., Daulerio, A. J., Covington, M. B., Nurnberg, S. A., Magolda, R. L., and Trzaskos, J. M. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 5681-5686 |
| 28. | Poltorak, A., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Citterio, S., and Beutler, B. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 2163-2167 |
| 29. | Akashi, S., Ogata, H., Kirikae, F., Kirikae, T., Kawasaki, K., Nishijima, M., Shimazu, R., Nagai, Y., Fukudome, K., Kimoto, M., and Miyake, K. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 268, 172-177 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Teghanemt, R. L. Widstrom, T. L. Gioannini, and J. P. Weiss Isolation of Monomeric and Dimeric Secreted MD-2: ENDOTOXIN{middle dot}sCD14 AND TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR 4 ECTODOMAIN SELECTIVELY REACT WITH THE MONOMERIC FORM OF SECRETED MD-2 J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2008; 283(32): 21881 - 21889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Nilsen, S. Deininger, U. Nonstad, F. Skjeldal, H. Husebye, D. Rodionov, S. von Aulock, T. Hartung, E. Lien, O. Bakke, et al. Cellular trafficking of lipoteichoic acid and Toll-like receptor 2 in relation to signaling; role of CD14 and CD36 J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2008; 84(1): 280 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Teghanemt, F. Re, P. Prohinar, R. Widstrom, T. L. Gioannini, and J. P. Weiss Novel Roles in Human MD-2 of Phenylalanines 121 and 126 and Tyrosine 131 in Activation of Toll-like Receptor 4 by Endotoxin J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2008; 283(3): 1257 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Teghanemt, P. Prohinar, T. L. Gioannini, and J. P. Weiss Transfer of Monomeric Endotoxin from MD-2 to CD14: CHARACTERIZATION AND FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36250 - 36256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Li, B. Ho, and J. L. Ding Recombinant Factor C competes against LBP to bind lipopolysaccharide and neutralizes the endotoxicity Innate Immunity, June 1, 2007; 13(3): 150 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Shirey, J.-Y. Jung, and J. M. Carlin Up-Regulation of Gamma Interferon Receptor Expression Due to Chlamydia-Toll-Like Receptor Interaction Does Not Enhance Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 Signaling Infect. Immun., December 1, 2006; 74(12): 6877 - 6884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Visintin, K. A. Halmen, N. Khan, B. G. Monks, D. T. Golenbock, and E. Lien MD-2 expression is not required for cell surface targeting of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1584 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Medvedev, I. Sabroe, J. D. Hasday, and S. N. Vogel Invited review: Tolerance to microbial TLR ligands: molecular mechanisms and relevance to disease Innate Immunity, June 1, 2006; 12(3): 133 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Motegi, M. Kinoshita, K. Sato, N. Shinomiya, S. Ono, S. Nonoyama, H. Hiraide, and S. Seki An in vitro Shwartzman reaction-like response is augmented age-dependently in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Teghanemt, D. Zhang, E. N. Levis, J. P. Weiss, and T. L. Gioannini Molecular Basis of Reduced Potency of Underacylated Endotoxins J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4669 - 4676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Cho, A. E. Jedlicka, R. Clarke, and S. R. Kleeberger Role of Toll-like receptor-4 in genetic susceptibility to lung injury induced by residual oil fly ash Physiol Genomics, June 16, 2005; 22(1): 108 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pugin, S. Stern-Voeffray, B. Daubeuf, M. A. Matthay, G. Elson, and I. Dunn-Siegrist Soluble MD-2 activity in plasma from patients with severe sepsis and septic shock Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 4071 - 4079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. H Haralambieva, I. D Iankov, P. V Ivanova, V. Mitev, and I. G Mitov Chlamydophila pneumoniae induces p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in human fibroblasts through Toll-like receptor 4 J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2004; 53(12): 1187 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vora, A. Youdim, L. S. Thomas, M. Fukata, S. Y. Tesfay, K. Lukasek, K. S. Michelsen, A. Wada, T. Hirayama, M. Arditi, et al. {beta}-Defensin-2 Expression Is Regulated by TLR Signaling in Intestinal Epithelial Cells J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5398 - 5405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wu, R. D. Mosteller, and D. Broek Sphingosine Kinase Protects Lipopolysaccharide-Activated Macrophages from Apoptosis Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7359 - 7369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Arroyo-Espliguero, P Avanzas, S Jeffery, and J C Kaski CD14 and toll-like receptor 4: a link between infection and acute coronary events? Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 983 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Jia, J. N. Kline, A. Penisten, M. A. Apicella, T. L. Gioannini, J. Weiss, and P. B. McCray Jr. Endotoxin responsiveness of human airway epithelia is limited by low expression of MD-2 Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): L428 - L437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ishihara, M. A. K. Rumi, Y. Kadowaki, C. F. Ortega-Cava, T. Yuki, N. Yoshino, Y. Miyaoka, H. Kazumori, N. Ishimura, Y. Amano, et al. Essential Role of MD-2 in TLR4-Dependent Signaling during Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastritis J. Immunol., July 15, 2004; 173(2): 1406 - 1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Samuelsson, L. Hang, B. Wullt, H. Irjala, and C. Svanborg Toll-Like Receptor 4 Expression and Cytokine Responses in the Human Urinary Tract Mucosa Infect. Immun., June 1, 2004; 72(6): 3179 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Parker, M. K. B. Whyte, S. N. Vogel, S. K. Dower, and I. Sabroe Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 Agonists Regulate CCR Expression in Human Monocytic Cells J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4977 - 4986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||