![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20935-20941, July 7, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 21, 2000, and in revised form, April 25, 2000
Purine transport is an indispensable nutritional
function for protozoan parasites, since they are incapable of purine
biosynthesis and must, therefore, acquire purines from the host milieu.
Exploiting a mutant cell line (FBD5) of Leishmania donovani
deficient in inosine and guanosine transport activity, the gene
encoding this transporter (LdNT2) has been cloned by
functional rescue of the mutant phenotype. LdNT2 encodes a
polypeptide of 499 amino acids that shows substantial homology to other
members of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter family. Molecular
analysis revealed that LdNT2 is present as a single gene
copy within the leishmanial genome and encodes a single transcript of 3 kilobase pairs. Transfection of FBD5 parasites with LdNT2
re-established their ability to take up inosine and guanosine
with a concurrent restoration of sensitivity to the inosine
analog formycin B. Kinetic analyses reveal that LdNT2 is highly
specific for inosine (Km = 0.3 µM)
and guanosine (Km = 1.7 µM) and does
not recognize other naturally occurring nucleosides. Expression of
LdNT2 cRNA in Xenopus oocytes significantly
augmented their ability to take up inosine and guanosine, establishing
that LdNT2 by itself suffices to mediate nucleoside transport. These
results authenticate genetically and biochemically that LdNT2 is a
novel nucleoside transporter with an unusual and strict specificity for
inosine and guanosine.
Leishmania donovani is a protozoan parasite and
the etiologic agent of visceral leishmaniasis, a devastating and
invariably fatal disease if untreated. The parasite exhibits an
intricate life cycle in which the extracellular, flagellated
promastigote exists in the phlebotomine sandfly vector, and the
intracellular amastigote resides in the phagolysosome of macrophages
and other reticuloendothelial cells of the mammalian host. Drugs are
the only defense against visceral leishmaniasis, but the efficacy of
these empirically derived agents is compromised both by drug toxicity
and resistance (1). Thus, it is increasingly imperative to identify new
and unique biochemical targets in the parasite for potential
therapeutic exploitation.
Among the most conspicuous metabolic differences between parasites and
their mammalian hosts is the purine pathway. Whereas animal cells
synthesize purine nucleotides de novo, all protozoan parasites are incapable of synthesizing purines and depend upon purine
acquisition from their hosts to survive and proliferate (2). Hence,
each genus of parasite has evolved a unique complement of purine
salvage enzymes in order to scavenge purines from the host milieu (2).
The first step in this salvage process involves the translocation of
purines across the parasite plasma membrane, a process mediated by
membrane permeases. These permeases also initiate the uptake of
pyrazolopyrimidine nucleobase and nucleoside analogs of hypoxanthine
and inosine that are selectively toxic to Leishmania spp.
(3, 4). Thus, purine transporters play vital roles in both purine
nutrition and antiparasitic drug targeting intimating that these
membrane proteins could be targets for either inhibitor or cytotoxic
ligand development.
Genetic and biochemical investigations have demonstrated that L. donovani promastigotes express two nucleoside transport activities of nonoverlapping ligand specificity (5). The first, LdNT1, transports
adenosine, pyrimidine nucleosides, and the cytotoxic adenosine analog
tubercidin, and the second, LdNT2, recognizes inosine, guanosine, and
the cytotoxic inosine isomer formycin B
(FoB)1 (5, 6). Mutant
L. donovani clones deficient in LdNT1 or LdNT2 activity have
been isolated by virtue of their resistance to either tubercidin or
FoB, respectively (5). The availability of these transport-deficient
mutants and the ability to transfect Leishmania with cosmid
expression libraries (7) provided an avenue for cloning the genes
encoding nucleoside transporter proteins by selecting for functional
recovery of the wild type drug sensitivity phenotype and, thus,
nucleoside transport capability. This functional rescue scheme was
previously employed to clone the LdNT1 locus (8).
Functional rescue has now been exploited to isolate LdNT2.
LdNT2 is present as a single copy gene within the leishmanial
genome and encodes a transcript of ~3 kb. Functional expression of
LdNT2 in nucleoside transport-deficient L. donovani and in Xenopus laevis oocytes revealed LdNT2
to be a novel high affinity inosine-guanosine transporter with a
singular predicted membrane topology.
Chemicals, Materials, and Reagents--
Restriction
endonucleases and DNA-modifying enzymes were obtained from New England
Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA), Roche Molecular Biochemicals, or Life
Technologies, Inc. Radiolabeled
D-[2,8-3H]inosine (31.3 Ci
mmol Parasite Cell Culture--
L. donovani wild type
(DI700) and LdNT2-deficient (FBD5) parasites (5) were propagated at
26 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's-Leishmania (DME-L)
medium (9) containing 100 µM xanthine as a purine source.
The FBD5 cells were maintained continuously in DME-L supplemented with
1 µM FoB to ensure that the population did not harbor any
wild type revertants. Transfectants were propagated in DME-L
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 50 µg ml Transfection and Isolation of Cosmids--
To isolate cosmids
containing LdNT2, 30 independent transfections were
performed, using previously reported parameters (10), on exponentially
growing FBD5 cells resuspended at 1 × 108 cells
ml Isolation of LdNT2--
Cosmids F30F12 and F44H9 were subjected
to restriction digestion with BamHI, BglII,
EcoRI, EcoRV, HindIII,
NotI, SacII, and XbaI. To localize the
LdNT2 gene within the F30F12 cosmid, various restriction
fragments were subcloned into the leishmanial shuttle vector pSNAR,
encompassing the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (11), and tested for
restoration of FoB sensitivity after transfection into FBD5 cells and
selection in 20 µg ml Southern Analysis--
Genomic DNA was isolated from L. donovani promastigotes according to standard procedures (22).
Restriction enzyme-digested DNA was blotted onto GeneScreen Plus®
hybridization transfer membrane (NEN Life Science Products) and
hybridized to a 2.2-kb HindIII fragment derived from the
5-kb EcoRV fragment in pSNAR that contains the
LdNT2 ORF.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blotting--
Total cellular RNA was
isolated from ~5 × 108 exponentially growing
L. donovani promastigotes using the RNeasy Midi kit
(Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Poly(A)+ RNA, prepared from
total RNA using the Oligotex mRNA mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia,
CA), was subjected to denaturing agarose electrophoresis, transferred
to a GeneScreen Plus® hybridization transfer membrane (NEN Life
Science Products), and probed with the 2.2-kb HindIII
fragment described above. Signals were normalized by hybridization to
probes corresponding to Leishmania enriettii Vectors for Transport Assays--
LdNT2-mediated transport was
measured both in FBD5 L. donovani and X. laevis
oocytes. For expression in oocytes, a 2.2-kb HindIII
fragment encompassing the entire LdNT2 ORF, ~100 bp of 5'-untranslated region, and 600 bp of 3'-untranslated region was excised from the 5-kb EcoRV fragment and subcloned into the
pOG-1 oocyte expression vector (24), creating pLdNT2-OG-1.
For expression in L. donovani, an ~2.5-kb
BamHI-NotI fragment from pLdNT2-OG-1 encompassing the 2.2-kb HindIII LdNT2 fragment
and ~300 bp of pOG-1 vector-derived sequence encoding the
3'-untranslated region of the X. laevis Nucleoside Uptake into FBD5 Cells Expressing LdNT2--
FBD5
promastigotes were transfected with either pLdNT2-ALTNEO or
pALTNEO, and the resulting transfectants were maintained continuously
in DME-L/FBS supplemented with 25 µg ml Nucleoside Uptake into X. laevis Oocytes--
Oocytes were
dissected and defolliculated as described previously (26, 27) and
maintained at 16 °C in frog Ringer's solution supplemented with 2.5 mM pyruvate, 0.5 mM theophylline, and 50 µg/ml gentamycin (Life Technologies, Inc.). The
pLdNT2-OG-1 plasmid was linearized with NotI and
capped cRNA synthesized in the presence of the cap analog
m7GpppG by T7 polymerase (28). Stage V-VI oocytes were
microinjected with 5-20 ng of cRNA 1 day after defolliculation.
Control oocytes were injected with equivalent volumes of water.
[3H]Inosine (31.3 Ci mmol Cloning of LdNT2 by Functional Rescue of the FoB Sensitivity
Phenotype--
The cloning of LdNT2 was predicated on the
functional restoration of a wild type phenotype (FoB-sensitive,
nucleoside transport-competent) in a FoB-resistant, nucleoside
transport-deficient (FBD5) background (5). Six thousand independent
hygromycin B-resistant colonies representing more than five genome
equivalents of leishmanial DNA (7) were picked after transfection with
a leishmanial cosmid library and tested for sensitivity to 1 µM FoB. Of these, only two colonies exhibited a wild type
FoB-sensitive phenotype, and both were subsequently determined to be
inosine transport-proficient (data not shown). The cosmids, designated
F30F12 and F44H9, were recovered from the two FoB-sensitive
transfectants and subjected to restriction endonuclease analysis with
the enzymes EcoRI, NotI, HindIII,
XbaI, SacII, EcoRV, BglII,
and BamHI. Restriction mapping revealed that both cosmids
were distinct, but both contained a common ~11-kb EcoRI
fragment. The cosmid F30F12 (Fig.
1A) was selected for further
analysis. The location of the LdNT2 gene was determined by
subcloning fragments of F30F12 DNA into the leishmanial transfection
vector pSNAR (11), transfecting them back into FBD5 cells, and testing
for concomitant restoration of FoB sensitivity and inosine transport
capability (Fig. 1). A 5-kb EcoRV fragment conferring the
appropriate phenotype was sequenced in its entirety, and an ORF
(LdNT2) was identified that upon conceptual translation
encoded a hydrophobic polypeptide with significant homology to other
parasite and mammalian equilibrative nucleoside transporters (8,
13-16, 26, 29).
Sequence Analysis of LdNT2--
The LdNT2 ORF comprises
1,497 bp and predicts a polypeptide of 499 amino acids (Fig.
2). A multisequence alignment of LdNT2 with the human equilibrative nucleoside transporters, hENT1(13) and
hENT2 (14, 15), the L. donovani LdNT1.1 transporter (8), and
the Trypanosoma brucei TbNT2 transporter (16) is depicted in
Fig. 2. Pairwise alignments between LdNT2 and each of the other nucleoside transporters in Fig. 2 showed amino acid identities between
25 and 44%. Hydropathy predictions by three independent algorithms
(19-21) suggest that LdNT2 accommodates nine transmembrane domains
(TMs) with a large hydrophilic loop between TMs 5 and 6 (Figs. 2 and
3). LdNT2 also has two potential
Asn-linked glycosylation sites, Asn326 and
Asn490 (Fig. 3), although only Asn326 is
predicted to be within an exposed loop.
Molecular Characterization of LdNT2 in Wild Type and FBD5
Cells--
Southern blot analysis of L. donovani genomic
DNA digested with a battery of restriction enzymes that cut either
within (PstI, PvuI, and SalI) or
outside (EcoRI and HindIII) the ORF indicated that LdNT2 was a single copy gene (Fig.
4A). This result is compatible with the nucleotide sequence of the 5-kb EcoRV fragment that
encompasses LdNT2. The Southern blot of FBD5 genomic DNA
hybridized with the LdNT2 ORF was identical to that of wild
type DNA (Fig. 4A), demonstrating that neither a gross
deletion nor rearrangement of the LdNT2 locus confers the
nucleoside transport-deficient phenotype on FBD5 cells.
Northern analysis of wild type poly(A)+ RNA revealed a
major LdNT2 transcript of ~3-kb (Fig. 4B). A
fainter hybridizing band at ~5 kb was also observed, which could
conceivably be an unprocessed mRNA. FBD5 cells, as well as FBD5
cells transfected with either pALTNEO or pLdNT2-ALTNEO, also
expressed both the major and minor transcripts, indicating that loss of
LdNT2 function in FBD5 cells cannot be attributed to a lack of
LdNT2 transcription (Fig. 4B). As expected,
LdNT2 is overexpressed in the FBD5 strain transfected with
pLdNT2-ALTNEO. The size of this transcript, which arises from splice acceptors within the vector and insert, is also ~3 kb.
Levels of poly(A)+ RNA were normalized for each cell line
using the L. enriettii Functional Characterization of LdNT2 in L. donovani--
To
establish that LdNT2 is a functional nucleoside transporter,
LdNT2 was subcloned into the pALTNEO leishmanial expression vector and transfected into FBD5 cells. Uptake assays using 5 µM [3H]inosine confirmed that transfection
with LdNT2 bestows a robust inosine transport phenotype on
FBD5 cells (71 pmol/s/108 cells) (Fig.
5). FBD5 cells transfected with pALTNEO
alone displayed only minimal inosine transport capability (1 pmol/s/108 cells) (Fig. 5). Substrate saturation curves
with FBD5 pLdNT2-ALTNEO cells revealed that
[3H]inosine and [3H]guanosine transport
displayed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with an apparent
Km value of 0.3 ± 0.1 (n = 4)
and 1.7 ± 0.5 µM (n = 3),
respectively. Representative experiments for both inosine and guanosine
are displayed in Fig. 6. These values are comparable to those determined for wild type parasites (data not shown
and Ref. 6).
An inhibition profile determined for LdNT2-mediated transport into
pLdNT2-ALTNEO FBD5 transfectants revealed that 1 µM [3H]inosine transport was inhibited by a
100-fold excess of nonradiolabeled inosine (96%), guanosine (96%),
and several analogs, including 8-aminoguanosine (95%), 6-thioguanosine
(94%), FoB (74%), 4-thiopurinol riboside (54%), and allopurinol
riboside (44%). No inhibitory effects were observed with
9-deazainosine (5%) and 2-aminopurine riboside (<1%) (Fig.
7). By contrast a 100-fold excess of the naturally occurring nucleosides, adenosine (<1%), xanthosine (35%), uridine (33%), cytidine (<1%), and thymidine (14%), as well as the
nucleobases, adenine (6%), hypoxanthine (24%), guanine (26%), xanthine (12%), thymine (<1%), and uracil (1%), only inhibited 1 µM [3H]D-inosine marginally
(Fig. 7). LdNT2-mediated inosine transport was also not impacted by 100 µM 4-nitrobenzyl-6-thioinosine (NBMPR) (<1%) (Fig. 7),
a potent inhibitor of mammalian nucleoside transport at nanomolar
concentrations (30).
The phenotypic consequence of restored nucleoside transport proficiency
in FBD5 cells was also assessed by growth phenotype in FoB. The
effective concentration of FoB that inhibited growth of the
LdNT2 transfectants by 50% (EC50 value) was
4.5 ± 3.9 nM (n = 4), a value similar
to that determined for wild type promatigotes (5.1 ± 3.5 nM) (n = 4) (5). In contrast, FBD5 cells
transfected with the empty pALTNEO vector exhibited an EC50
value of 5.7 ± 0.9 µM (n = 4).
Functional Expression of LdNT2 in X. laevis Oocytes--
To
confirm that LdNT2 by itself encodes a functional
inosine-guanosine transporter, LdNT2 cRNA was expressed in
Xenopus oocytes. Oocytes injected with the LdNT2
cRNA transported [3H]inosine and
[3H]guanosine 10-20-fold more efficiently than
water-injected control oocytes (Fig. 8).
Rates of uptake were 0.36 and 0.32 pmol min LdNT2 encoding the L. donovani
inosine-guanosine transporter was identified and cloned after screening
for restoration of a wild type phenotype in inosine-guanosine
transport-deficient FBD5 cells following transfection with an
LdNT2-containing cosmid. A similar functional rescue
strategy has also been exploited to pinpoint and isolate the
LdNT1 locus encoding the L. donovani adenosine-pyrimidine nucleoside transporters (8) and offers a powerful
genetic approach toward the isolation of any gene for which a selection
or screen can be devised. Other leishmanial genes that have been
isolated by complementation of mutant phenotypes include several
involved in the biosynthesis of lipophosphoglycan (31, 32), an
important cell surface glycoconjugate and one crucial for biogenesis of
the glycosome (33), a unique kinetoplastid peroxisomal-like microbody
that accommodates glycolytic and other nutritional enzymes (34).
The predicted amino acid sequence indicates that LdNT2 is a member of
the ENT family. This family includes transporters from mammalian cells
(13-15), a variety of protozoan parasites (8, 16, 26, 29, 35), and as
yet many functionally uncharacterized ORFs from eukaryotic cells
uncovered among a variety of genome sequencing projects (13). ENTs are
distinct from bacterial nucleoside transporters (36, 37), as well as
from mammalian concentrative nucleoside transporters (38, 39) both in
their primary sequences and topological profiles. Multisequence
alignment of LdNT2 with other members of this family reveal that LdNT2
shares a number of common residues, most of which reside in predicted
membrane-spanning domains, including the charged residues aspartate 389 and arginine 393 within predicted TM 7 (Fig. 2). Hydropathy predictions
suggest that LdNT2 exhibits an unusual nine membrane-spanning topology with a large hydrophilic loop between TMs 5 and 6, whereas other members of the ENT family are conjectured to possess 11 membrane-spanning domains. The inferred model for LdNT2 lacks a
membrane-spanning domain equivalent to TM 2 of other members of the ENT
family and predicts that TM 8 encompasses two of the carboxyl-terminal
membrane-spanning domains of the other transporters. If this model is
correct, it suggests that the large hydrophilic loop would be on the
opposite side of the membrane from the amino terminus, unlike the other ENTs. Whether this loop is exo- or endofacial in any of these transporters, however, is unknown, since these topological predictions have yet to be confirmed experimentally for any ENT member. The topological predictions for LdNT2 were made by three independent algorithms (19-21) in which individual parameters for length of membrane-spanning regions, hydrophobicity, and surface probability were
considered. These same algorithms predict 11 membrane-spanning regions
for other ENT members.
Functional characterization of LdNT2 indicates that it is a novel high
affinity transport system for both inosine and guanosine (Fig. 6) that
excludes other purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and bases (Fig. 7).
This unusual ligand specificity and affinity are distinct from all
previously characterized ENTs from both mammalian cells and parasites.
For instance, hENT1 and hENT2 both exhibit a broad ligand specificity
for all naturally occurring purine and pyrimidine
D-nucleosides (30), but the affinities of the human
transporters for these nucleoside ligands are much lower than for
either LdNT1 (8) or LdNT2. It is worth noting, however, a
sodium-dependent nucleoside transport activity that appears
to be specific for guanosine has been described in human acute
promyelocytic leukemia cells (40).
LdNT2 also recognizes a variety of cytotoxic inosine and guanosine
analogs, although large excesses of 2-aminopurine riboside and
9-deazainosine failed to impede inosine entry (Fig. 7). The inability
of LdNT2 to recognize efficiently either 2-aminopurine riboside or
adenosine implies that the exocyclic oxygen on C-6 of the purine ring
is a critical determinant for ligand recognition by LdNT2. The inosine
analog NBMPR, in which the C-6 hydroxyl is replaced by an
S-nitrobenzyl moiety, does not inhibit LdNT2 at 100 µM, a concentration 3 orders of magnitude greater than that required to inhibit hENT1 (30).
Southern analysis revealed that LdNT2 is present as a single
copy within the leishmanial genome and that there are no gross anomalies in the LdNT2 locus of the mutant FBD5 line.
Moreover, LdNT2-specific transcripts of a comparable size
and intensity were observed in both wild type and mutant parasites.
These results indicate that loss of LdNT2 function in FBD5 cells is
most likely due to minor deletions or point mutations within the
LdNT2 ORF. Whether this loss of function is due to mutations
within both LdNT2 alleles or to mutations within one allele
with a concomitant loss of heterozygosity, as has been previously
observed for Leishmania (41, 42), is unknown. Isolation and
sequence analysis of the mutant LdNT2 locus from FBD5 cells
should differentiate between these two models.
The availability of a molecular clone encoding LdNT2, a
mutant strain deficient in LdNT2 activity, and both homologous and heterologous expression systems in which to assess LdNT2 function provide a foundation for a thorough analysis of nucleoside transport activity in Leishmania. LdNT2-deficient mutants, the ability
to create further mutants, and the identification of conserved residues among nucleoside transporters provide an avenue for the genetic dissection of nucleoside transport both by forward and reverse genetic
techniques and suggest LdNT2 as a paradigm for the study of nucleoside
transport in higher eukaryotes. Particularly noteworthy is the ability
to generate nonlethal loss-of-function mutants with facility. Finally,
it is worth noting that functional differences between parasite and
mammalian transporters might be exploited therapeutically. Indeed, the
selective toxicity of the drugs melarsoprol and pentamidine, both
currently employed in the treatment of African trypanosomiasis, is
mediated by their uptake on a novel adenine-adenosine transporter (P2)
(43, 44). Since LdNT2 differs from its human counterparts in terms of
ligand specificity, ligand affinities, and inhibitor profiles, these
discrepancies might ultimately be availed of pharmacologically.
We thank Stephen M. Beverley for the generous
gift of the leishmanial cosmid library and for critically reading the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by Grants AI23682 (to B. U.) and
AI44138 (to S. M. L.) from the National Institutes of Health and in
part by a grant from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF245276.
¶
Scholar in Molecular Parasitology.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 26, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002418200
The abbreviations used are:
FoB, formycin B;
DME-L, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's-Leishmania;
FBS, fetal
bovine serum;
HYG, hygromycin B;
ORF, open reading frame;
ENT, equilibrative nucleoside transporter;
TM, transmembrane domain;
NBMPR, 4-nitrobenzyl-6thioinosine.
Cloning of a Novel Inosine-Guanosine Transporter Gene from
Leishmania donovani by Functional Rescue of a
Transport-deficient Mutant*
,
§,
¶
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology and the § Department of Molecular Microbiology and
Immunology, Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland, Oregon 97201
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1) and
D-[8-3H]guanosine (5.0 Ci
mmol
1) were purchased from Moravek (Brea,
CA).
-[32P]dCTP (3000 Ci
mmol
1) was procured from ICN Biomedicals
(Costa Mesa, CA). Hygromycin B was purchased from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals and G418 from BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD). All other
chemicals, materials, and reagents were of the highest grade
commercially available and bought from either Aldrich or Sigma.
1 of hygromycin B
(DME-L/FBS/HYG).
1 in electroporation buffer (10). FBD5
promastigotes were transfected with 10 µg of DNA prepared from a
cosmid library of L. donovani Ld4 strain DNA in the shuttle
vector cLHYG, which encompasses the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene
(7). Transfectants were maintained in the absence of hygromycin B for
24 h post-transfection, after which time they were plated on
semi-solid (1% Noble agar, Difco) DME-L/FBS/HYG and incubated at
26 °C in 5% CO2. After 2-3 weeks, isolated colonies
were picked and inoculated into individual wells of 96-well microtiter
plates containing 200 µl of DME-L/FBS/HYG and proliferated at
26 °C in 5% CO2 until individual wells contained at
least 5 × 106 cells ml
1. To
screen for FoB-sensitive FBD5 transfectants, aliquots of 10 µl from
individual wells of the master microtiter plate were transferred into
wells of two replica 96-well microtiter plates, one plate containing
DME-L/FBS/HYG supplemented with 1 µM FoB and the other
containing DME-L/FBS/HYG alone. Clones that were determined to be
susceptible to 1 µM FoB were expanded from the appropriate wells in the master microtiter plates, and the cosmids were
rescued from these transfectants by alkaline lysis (10).
1 G418. An ~5-kb
EcoRV fragment that conferred the appropriate phenotype was
sequenced in its entirety on a Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems 377 DNA
automated sequencer using dye-terminator cycle methodology by the Core
Facility located within the Department of Molecular Microbiology and
Immunology at the Oregon Health Sciences University. The
LdNT2 open reading frame (ORF) was identified by BLAST
searching of available data bases (12) and subsequently sequenced in
both directions. Pairwise alignments with other members of the
equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) family (8, 13-16) were
performed using the algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch (17).
Multisequence alignments were conducted using the Feng-Doolittle algorithm (18). Membrane spanning domains were deduced from hydropathy
plots constructed from three independent algorithms (19-21).
-tubulin gene (23).
-globin gene was
subcloned into the appropriate sites within the leishmanial expression
vector pALTNEO (25) generating pLdNT2-ALTNEO.
1
G418. Uptake of [3H]inosine (0.31 Ci
mmol
1) and [3H]guanosine (0.05 Ci mmol
1) was measured in FBD5 cells
harboring either pLdNT2-ALTNEO or pALTNEO as described
previously (6). Briefly, FBD5 promastigotes (4 × 108
cells ml
1), resuspended in phosphate-buffered
saline, pH 7.4, and supplemented with 10 mM
D-glucose, were mixed with radiolabel for various times. Uptake was terminated by a modified oil-stop technique using a dibutyl
phthalate cushion (6). All transport measurements on the
LdNT2 transfectants were performed on stationary phase
parasites, since inosine transport into exponentially growing parasites
was nonlinear at concentrations proximal to the Km
value even after a few seconds. Technical limitations of the transport assay precluded the use of fewer cells. Initial rates for each nucleoside concentration were determined by linear regression analysis
over the linear portions of the assay, and Km values
were determined by Hanes analysis. Competition experiments were
performed in the same buffer containing 1 µM
[3H]inosine (0.31 Ci mmol
1)
and 100 µM unlabeled inhibitor.
1) and
[3H]guanosine (5.0 Ci mmol
1)
uptake was assayed after 3 days of cRNA expression. Each oocyte was
dissolved in 0.25 ml of 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and
oocyte-associated radiolabel incorporation was quantitated by liquid
scintillation spectrometry.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Restriction map of the F30F12 cosmid.
A, partial map of the insert within the F30F12 cosmid.
B, map of an 11-kb EcoRI fragment derived from
the F30F12 cosmid. Fragments subcloned into the pSNAR transfection
vector (11) and retransfected into FBD5 cells are indicated by the
arrows. Whether fragments conferred FoB sensitivity is
indicated by either a +, positive, or a
, negative. The location of
the LdNT2 ORF is indicated by a solid gray bar.
Restriction sites are as follows: for panel A, R,
EcoRI; N, NotI; X,
XbaI; for panel B, R,
EcoRI; S, SalI; B,
BglII; RV, EcoRV; H,
HindIII; P, PstI; N,
NotI.

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Protein sequence alignments with
LdNT2. The deduced protein sequence of LdNT2 was aligned with
hENT1 (13), hENT2 (14, 15), TbNT2 (16), and LdNT1 (8), by the method of
Feng and Doolittle (18). Amino acids identical among all five
transporters are shaded black, and conserved amino acids are
shaded gray. The predicted membrane-spanning domains for
hENT1 and LdNT2 are indicated by the solid lines above and
below the aligned proteins and are numbered sequentially.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Predicted topology of LdNT2.
LdNT2 topology was predicted by three hydropathy algorithms
(19-21), which predict nine membrane-spanning domains and an
NH2 terminus on the opposite side of the membrane to the
large hydrophilic loop between membrane-spanning domains 5 and 6. Open circles indicate both hydrophobic and polar residues;
open circles with either + or
indicate charged
residues; gray circles with the letter N indicate
potential N-linked glycosylation sites; and black
circles with white letters indicate residues that are
invariant between LdNT2 and the four other transporters aligned in Fig.
3.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Southern and Northern analysis of
LdNT2. A, Southern analysis of the
LdNT2 locus in wild type (WT) and FBD5 cells.
Genomic DNA (~5 µg) isolated from either wild type or FBD5 cells
(22) was digested with PstI, SalI,
HindIII, PvuI, or EcoRI and probed
with the entire LdNT2 ORF. B, Northern analysis
was performed, as described under "Experimental Procedures," on
polyadenylated RNA (1 µg) from wild type (lane I), FBD5
(lane II), FBD5 transfected with pLdNT2-ALTNEO
(lane III), and FBD5 transfected with pALTNEO (lane
IV) and probed with either the LdNT2 ORF or the
L. enriettii
-tubulin gene (23).
-tubulin gene (23). There is an
additional band that hybridizes to the
-tubulin probe in the
pLdNT2-ALTNEO lane, suggestive of an alternatively spliced
transcript, the reason for which is unclear.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Functional expression of LdNT2 in FBD5
cells. Uptake of 5 µM
D-[2,8-3H]inosine (specific activity 0.31 Ci
mmol
1) by FBD5 cells transfected with either
pLdNT2-ALTNEO (
) or pALTNEO (
) was assayed as
described under "Experimental Procedures" over a 7-s period. Each
time point is the mean ± S.D. of duplicate experiments.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
LdNT2-mediated transport kinetics.
A and B, uptake of
D-[2,8-3H]inosine (specific activity 0.31 Ci
mmol
1) or
D-[8-3H]guanosine (specific activity 0.05 Ci mmol
1) by FBD5 cells transfected with
pLdNT2-ALTNEO was determined over a 7-s period for a range
of substrate concentrations (either 0.25-5 µM for
inosine or 0.5-10 µM for guanosine). The rate of uptake
was determined at each substrate concentration by linear regression
analysis. The results represented as a Hanes analysis are expressed as
either inosine (µM) versus inosine
(µM)/rate of uptake (pmol/s/108 cells) or
guanosine (µM) versus guanosine
(µM)/rate of uptake (pmol/s/108 cells).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Substrate specificity profile of
LdNT2-mediated transport. Uptake of 1 µM
D-[2,8-3H]inosine (specific activity 0.31Ci
mmol
1) by FBD5 cells transfected with
pLdNT2-ALTNEO was determined over a 7-s period in the
presence or absence of various competitors (100 µM).
Results are expressed as percent uptake compared with non-competed 1 µM D-[2,8-3H]inosine uptake and
each value is the mean rate of uptake ± S.D. (n = 3).
1
(oocyte)
1 for inosine and guanosine,
respectively.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Functional expression of LdNT2 in
Xenopus oocytes. Uptake of 5 µCi
ml
1 of either
D-[2,8-3H]inosine (specific activity 31.3 Ci
mmol
1) or
D-[8-3H]guanosine (specific activity 5 Ci
mmol
1) by either LdNT2-injected
(10 ng/oocyte) (black bars) or water-injected oocytes
(white bars) was assayed for 60 min. Each time point is the
mean ± S.D. of 5 individual oocytes.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-8437; Fax: 503-494-8393; E-mail: ullmanb@ohsu.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Grogl, M.,
Thomason, T. N.,
and Franke, E. D.
(1992)
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
47,
117-126
2.
Berens, R. L.,
Krug, E. C.,
and Marr, J. J.
(1995)
in
Purine and Pyrimidine Metabolism
(Marr, J. J.
, and Müller, M., eds)
, pp. 89-117, Academic Press, New York
3.
Marr, J. J.,
and Berens, R. L.
(1983)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
7,
339-356
4.
Marr, J. J.,
Berens, R. L.,
Cohn, N. K.,
Nelson, D. J.,
and Klein, R. S.
(1984)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
25,
292-295
5.
Iovannisci, D. M.,
Kaur, K.,
Young, L.,
and Ullman, B.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4,
1013-1019
6.
Aronow, B.,
Kaur, K.,
McCartan, K.,
and Ullman, B.
(1987)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
22,
29-37
7.
Ryan, K. A.,
Dasgupta, S.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
131,
145-150
8.
Vasudevan, G.,
Carter, N. S.,
Drew, M. E.,
Beverley, S. M.,
Sanchez, M. A.,
Seyfang, A.,
Ullman, B.,
and Landfear, S. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9873-9878
9.
Iovannisci, D. M.,
and Ullman, B.
(1983)
J. Parasitol.
69,
633-636
10.
Descoteaux, A.,
Garraway, L. A.,
Ryan, K. A.,
Garrity, L. K.,
Turco, S. J.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1993)
Methods Mol. Genet.
1,
22-48
11.
Callahan, H. L.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18427-18430
12.
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410
13.
Griffiths, M.,
Beaumont, N.,
Yao, S. Y.,
Sundaram, M.,
Boumah, C. E.,
Davies, A.,
Kwong, F. Y.,
Coe, I.,
Cass, C. E.,
Young, J. D.,
and Baldwin, S. A.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
89-93
14.
Griffiths, M.,
Yao, S. Y.,
Abidi, F.,
Phillips, S. E.,
Cass, C. E.,
Young, J. D.,
and Baldwin, S. A.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
328,
739-743
15.
Crawford, C. R.,
Patel, D. H.,
Naeve, C.,
and Belt, J. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5288-5293
16.
Sanchez, M. A.,
Ullman, B.,
Landfear, S. M.,
and Carter, N. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30244-30249
17.
Needleman, S. B.,
and Wunsch, C. D.
(1970)
J. Mol. Biol.
48,
443-453
18.
Feng, D. F.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1987)
J. Mol. Evol.
25,
351-360
19.
Kyte, J.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132
20.
Engelman, D. M.,
Steitz, T. A.,
and Goldman, A.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.
15,
321-353
21.
Hofmann, K.,
and Stoffel, W.
(1993)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
347,
166
22.
Maniatis, T.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1982)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 9.16-9.19, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
23.
Landfear, S. M.,
McMahon-Pratt, D.,
and Wirth, D. F.
(1983)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
3,
1070-1076
24.
Krieg, P. A.,
and Melton, D. A.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
7057-7070
25.
Laban, A.,
Tobin, J. F.,
Curotto de Lafaille, M. A.,
and Wirth, D. F.
(1990)
Nature
343,
572-574
26.
Chiang, C.-W.,
Carter, N. S.,
Sullivan, W. J., Jr.,
Donald, R. G. K.,
Roos, D. S.,
Naguib, F. N. M.,
El Kouni, M. H.,
Ullman, B.,
and Wilson, C. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35255-35261
27.
Madani, N.,
Kozak, S. L.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Kabat, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8005-8010
28.
Seyfang, A.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Landfear, S. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24210-24215
29.
Maser, P.,
Sutterlin, C.,
Kralli, A.,
and Kaminsky, R.
(1999)
Science
285,
242-244
30.
Griffith, D. A.,
and Jarvis, S. M.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1286,
153-181
31.
Ryan, K. A.,
Garraway, L. A.,
Descoteaux, A.,
Turco, S. J.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8609-8613
32.
Descoteaux, A.,
Luo, Y.,
Turco, S. J.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1995)
Science
269,
1869-1872
33.
Flaspohler, J. A.,
Rickoll, W. L.,
Beverley, S. M.,
and Parsons, M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1093-10101
34.
Opperdoes, F. R.
(1987)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
41,
127-151
35.
Carter, N. S.,
Mamoun, C. B.,
Liu, W.,
Silva, E. O.,
Landfear, S. M.,
Goldberg, D. E.,
and Ullman, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10683-10691
36.
Westh Hansen, S. E.,
Jensen, N.,
and Munch-Petersen, A.
(1987)
Eur. J. Biochem.
168,
385-391
37.
Craig, J. E.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Gallagher, M. P.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
1159-1168
38.
Huang, Q. Q.,
Yao, S. Y.,
Ritzel, M. W.,
Paterson, A. R.,
Cass, C. E.,
and Young, J. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17757-17760
39.
Pajor, A. M.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
3557-3560
40.
Flanagan, S. A.,
and Meckling-Gill, K. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18026-18032
41.
Hwang, H.-Y.,
Gilberts, T.,
Jardim, A.,
Shih, S.,
and Ullman, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30840-30846
42.
Gueiros-Filho, F. J.,
and Beverley, S. M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5655-5663
43.
Carter, N. S.,
and Fairlamb, A. H.
(1993)
Nature
361,
173-176
44.
Carter, N. S.,
Berger, B. J.,
and Fairlamb, A. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28153-28157
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Valdes, W. Liu, B. Ullman, and S. M. Landfear Comprehensive Examination of Charged Intramembrane Residues in a Nucleoside Transporter J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2006; 281(32): 22647 - 22655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Arastu-Kapur, C. S. Arendt, T. Purnat, N. S. Carter, and B. Ullman Second-site Suppression of a Nonfunctional Mutation within the Leishmania donovani Inosine-Guanosine Transporter J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2213 - 2219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Landfear, B. Ullman, N. S. Carter, and M. A. Sanchez Nucleoside and Nucleobase Transporters in Parasitic Protozoa Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2004; 3(2): 245 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stein, G. Vaseduvan, N. S. Carter, B. Ullman, S. M. Landfear, and M. P. Kavanaugh Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter Family Members from Leishmania donovani Are Electrogenic Proton Symporters J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35127 - 35134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Arastu-Kapur, E. Ford, B. Ullman, and N. S. Carter Functional Analysis of an Inosine-Guanosine Transporter from Leishmania donovani: THE ROLE OF CONSERVED RESIDUES, ASPARTATE 389 AND ARGININE 393 J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33327 - 33333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. S. Burchmore, L. J. M. Wallace, D. Candlish, M. I. Al-Salabi, P. R. Beal, M. P. Barrett, S. A. Baldwin, and H. P. de Koning Cloning, Heterologous Expression, and in Situ Characterization of the First High Affinity Nucleobase Transporter from a Protozoan J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23502 - 23507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Al-Salabi, L. J. M. Wallace, and H. P. de Koning A Leishmania major Nucleobase Transporter Responsible for Allopurinol Uptake Is a Functional Homolog of the Trypanosoma brucei H2 Transporter. Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2003; 63(4): 814 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Martinussen, S. L. L. Wadskov-Hansen, and K. Hammer Two Nucleoside Uptake Systems in Lactococcus lactis: Competition between Purine Nucleosides and Cytidine Allows for Modulation of Intracellular Nucleotide Pools J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2003; 185(5): 1503 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Acimovic and I. R. Coe Molecular Evolution of the Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter Family: Identification of Novel Family Members in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2199 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vasudevan, B. Ullman, and S. M. Landfear Point mutations in a nucleoside transporter gene from Leishmania donovani confer drug resistance and alter substrate selectivity PNAS, May 22, 2001; 98(11): 6092 - 6097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||