JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002598200 on May 2, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 27, 20942-20948, July 7, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/27/20942    most recent
M002598200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xia, C.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xia, C.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

GCIP, a Novel Human Grap2 and Cyclin D Interacting Protein, Regulates E2F-mediated Transcriptional Activity*

Chunzhi XiaDagger §, Zhenmin BaoDagger §, Fazal TabassamDagger , Wenbin MaDagger , Mengsheng Qiu||, Shao-bing Hua**DaggerDagger, and Mingyao LiuDagger §§

From the Dagger  Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, Center for Cancer Biology and Nutrition, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030, the  Ocean University of Qingdao, Qingdao, 266003 People's Republic of China, the || Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, and ** Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, California 94303

Received for publication, March 27, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Regulation of mammalian cell growth and proliferation is governed through receptor-mediated signaling networks that ultimately converge on the cell cycle machinery. Adaptor proteins play essential roles in the formation of intracellular signaling complexes, relaying extracellular signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus of a cell. The leukocyte-specific adaptor protein Grap2 is a central linker protein in immune cell signaling and activation. Using Grap2 as bait protein, we identified a novel human protein, GCIP (Grap2 cyclin-D interacting protein). We found that GCIP bound to Grap2 in both yeast two-hybrid assays and in mammalian cells through binding to the COOH-terminal unique domain and SH3 domain (designated QC domain) of Grap2. GCIP also associated with cyclin D both in vitro and in vivo. The expression of GCIP was found in all human tissues examined with the highest level of expression in the heart, muscle, peripheral blood leukocytes, and brain. Furthermore, phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein by cyclin D-dependent protein kinase was reduced and E2F1-mediated transcription activity was inhibited in cells transfected with GCIP. High level expression of GCIP in terminally differentiated tissues and the inhibition of E2F1 transcription activation suggest that GCIP could play an important role in controlling cell differentiation and proliferation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In response to extracellular mitogenic and growth signals, cells initiate different signaling pathways that ultimately lead to the transcriptional activation of downstream genes and cell proliferation. One set of the genes that respond to mitogenic signals encodes the D-type cyclins (D1, D2, and D3). These cyclins assemble with their catalytic partners, CDK4 and CDK6, as cells progress through the first gap phase (G1) to the initiation of DNA synthesis (S phase) (1). Assembled cyclin D-Cdk complexes then enter the cell nucleus where they are phosphorylated and activated by CDK-activated kinases. The active cyclin D-Cdk complexes participate in the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma retinoblastoma protein (Rb),1 resulting in the functional inactivation of Rb and the progression of the cell through the late G1 restriction point into the S phase (2, 3). Rb exerts its growth regulatory functions at least in part by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of E2F, a family of transcription factors that play a major role in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression (4, 5, 7). It has been known that E2F proteins mediate the transactivation of a set of genes that controls cellular progression through G1 into the S phase. By binding to the activation domain of E2F, Rb protein actively represses transcription from promoters containing E2F-binding sites, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle progression (3, 6-8). Therefore, disruption of the Rb gene by deletion, mutation, or inactivation by phosphorylation or viral oncoproteins causes the release of free, transcriptional active E2F family of proteins, leading to the unrestricted cell proliferation (4, 5, 8). Understanding the regulation of cyclin D-dependent protein kinases, their phosphorylation of Rb, and their activation of E2F-mediated transcriptional activation will provide insight into the molecular mechanism of cell differentiation and proliferation.

Recently, adaptor proteins or scaffold proteins have been shown to play important roles in the regulation of signaling networks and in determining the specificity and selectivity of signaling pathways (9, 10). Examples include the mitogen-activated protein kinase complexes coordinated by the scaffold proteins Ste5p and Pbs2p in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (11), the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase signaling complexes by JIP-1 (12), and the signaling complexes mediated by T-cell-specific LAT proteins (13). Recently, we identified a novel leukocyte-specific adaptor protein, Grap2, in immune tissues (14). Like Grb2, Grap2 contains two SH3 domains and one SH2 domain in its structure. However, Grap2 has a 120- amino acid glutamine-/proline-rich domain between the SH2 domain and the COOH-terminal SH3 domain. The expression of Grap2 is highly tissue- and cell-specific, found only in immune tissues and in T lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages. Although the roles of Grap2 in immune cell signaling and activation is not clear at this moment, it can form signaling complexes with a number of signaling molecules in T cells and leukemia cells to relay extracellular signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus of the cells.

In this report, we describe the cloning of a novel human protein, GCIP, that interacts with Grap2 and cyclin D. In yeast two-hybrid assays and in mammalian cells, GCIP interacts with full-length Grap2 protein and with the COOH-terminal unique and SH3 domains (designated QC domain) of Grap2. Unlike the highly restricted expression of Grap2, GCIP is ubiquitously expressed in all human tissues examined with a high level of expression in the heart, muscle, peripheral blood leukocytes, kidney, and brain, where cell differentiation and proliferation is limited. Furthermore, we found that GCIP associates with cyclin D1 both in vitro and in mammalian cells. In the presence of GCIP, phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein by cyclin D-dependent Cdk4 kinase was partially inhibited. Overexpression of GCIP in mammalian cells suppressed the E2F1-mediated transcriptional activity, which is required for the transition of the G1 phase to the S phase in cell cycle progression. Together these data suggest that GCIP is a novel human protein potentially involved in the regulation of cell differentiation and proliferation through Grap2 and cyclin D-mediated signaling pathways.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Construction for the Yeast Two-hybrid System-- The unique proline/glutamine-rich domain and the COOH-terminal SH3 domain (QC domain) of Grap2 cDNA (14) was subcloned into yeast plasmid pAS2-1 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) to create an in-frame fusion with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain gene. The pAS2-Grap2QC was transformed into yeast strain PJ69-2A using the lithium acetate procedure and plated onto synthetic complete (SC) media lacking tryptophan and adenine. Pretransformed human bone marrow cDNA library (CLONTECH) was mated with the bait strain for 20 h, and then plated on SC medium plates without tryptophan, leucine, adenine, and histidine. The transformed yeast cells were grown at 30 °C for 3-7 days. Transformants grown on the quadruple dropout plates were assayed for beta -galactosidase activity. Library plasmid DNA was recovered by transformation into Escherichia coli KC8 cells and sequenced on both strands.

GCIP and Grap2 Plasmid Constructs-- Full-length GCIP was cloned into mammalian expression vectors pCMV-HA (CLONTECH) or pCMV-Tag1 (Promega, WI) by PCR using two oligonucleotide primers. The oligonucleotides used were the following: 5'-GAAGATCTAGATGGCGAGCGCAACTGCA-3' and 5'-GGGGTACCTCATAATTCAAGTTCACTCTGAG-3'. PCR products were digested with BglII and KpnI, and cloned into pCMV-HA vector with an in-frame hemagglutinin (HA)-epitope sequence or Flag-epitope sequence at the 5' end. For construction of glutathione S-transferase (GST)-GCIP protein, full-length GCIP or the COOH-terminal domain of GCIP were subcloned into pGEX4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) vector by PCR. GST fusion proteins corresponding to the full-length of Grap2, the SH2 domain, and the QC domain of Grap2 were constructed by PCR and subcloned into pGEX-2TK. Sequences of the expression constructs were confirmed by automatic DNA sequencing.

Northern Blot Analysis and RT-PCR-- Multi-tissue poly(A+) blots with 2 µg/lane RNA from 16 different human tissues were obtained from CLONTECH. The probe used was a full-length GCIP cDNA of ~1.2 kilobases obtained by restriction digestion of the GCIP plasmid. The cDNA probe was radiolabeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA) by random priming, using the Prime-It random primer labeling kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's directions. The hybridizing and washing conditions were as described in the manual provided with ExpressHyb hybridization solution (CLONTECH) with the modification that hybridization was carried out for 4 h at 68 °C in a hybridization oven. After hybridization, the blots were washed first in 2 × sodium citrate buffer and 0.5% SDS buffer for 30 min at room temperature, then followed by three washes with 0.1 × sodium citrate buffer and 0.1% SDS buffer solutions at 50-60 °C. The membrane was exposed to x-ray film (Kodak BioMax MR) for 24 h at -80 °C.

cDNAs from different immune tissues were obtained from CLONTECH. Specific primers (5'-CTACAACAGTGTCTGGGTTGCGTGCC, 3'-GTATCAGAGCCTGTCCATGTCGATGAG) corresponding to the COOH-terminal region of GCIP were used in the RT-PCR reaction. Primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were used as a positive control and the standard for the amount of cDNA used in the PCR.

Cell Lines and Cell Transfection-- Different cells were cultured as described in appropriate culture medium. COS-7 and 293T cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were transfected with plasmids as indicated by LipofectAMINE according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Life Technologies, Bethesda, MD). Jurkat T cells and K562 cells were transfected by electroporation at settings of 960 microfarads and 250 volts. 12-16 h after transfection, the medium was replaced with fresh medium. 36-48 h after transfection, the cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA, 50 mM alpha -glycerophosphate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 0.5 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 3 µg/ml aprotinin). Kinase assays for cyclin D-Cdk4 were performed using GST-Rb as a substrate as described previously (15).

Expression vectors, pCGE2F1, pCMVE2F1VP16, and the pG5E1BCAT are kind gifts from Dr. David Johnson (University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center) (16). For GAL4 and VP16 fusions, a total of 2 µg of plasmids was used in transfections for CAT reporter assays and 10 µg of plasmids was used in luciferase transfection assays. pCMV-LacZ vector was used as an internal control for normalization in all transfections.

In Vitro Binding Assays, Coimmunoprecipitations, and Western Blots-- GST-Grap2 and GST-GCIP fusion proteins were purified as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and used in an in vitro protein binding assay. Briefly, COS-7-transfected cell lysate was incubated with comparable amounts of resin-bound GST fusion proteins. The beads were washed three times in the lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA, 50 mM glycerophosphate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 0.5 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 3 µg/ml aprotinin) and twice in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Proteins bound were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using an anti-HA monoclonal antibody (CLONTECH), and visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For coimmunoprecipitation, COS-7 cells were cultured to approximately 70% confluency before they were co-transfected with cDNAs encoding HA-tagged GCIP and Grap2 or Flag-tagged Grap2. Proteins were precipitated with specific antibodies and immunoblotted with anti-HA or anti-cyclin D antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

CAT Assays-- Transfected cells were harvested, and extracts were prepared by three freeze-thaw cycles and heat inactivation. Cell lysates were then quantitated for total protein, and an equivalent amount of cell lysate (normalized for total protein) from each transfection was assayed for CAT activity as described in manufacturer's manual (Promega, Madison, WI). Briefly, 50 µg of total cellular protein (COS-7 transfected cells) were incubated in a reaction mixture containing 14C-labeled chloramphenicol and n-butyryl coenzyme A. The reaction products are extracted with a small volume of xylene. The n-butyryl chloramphenicol in the xylene phase is mixed with scintillant and counted in a scintillation counter. Conversion to acetylated forms was also analyzed by thin-layer chromatography and visualized by autoradiography.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular Cloning of Human GCIP-- To identify proteins that interact with human Grap2, the COOH-terminal unique glutamine-/proline-rich domain and the SH3 domain (QC domain) of Grap2 was used as a bait to screen a pretransformed human bone marrow cDNA library using the yeast two-hybrid system. A number of clones were identified that contain various lengths of cDNA sequences derived from a novel gene. One of the clones designated A5 contains a 1.5-kilobase insert and has a full-length open reading frame of 360 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 40 kDa (Fig. 1A). We designated the novel molecule GCIP, Grap2-cyclin-D-interacting protein, for its association with Grap2 and cyclin D1 in the cell. As shown in Fig. 1B, GCIP has distinct domain structures. Secondary structural analysis revealed a putative helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif in the middle region of the protein without the basic DNA-binding domain, suggesting a potential role in the regulation of transcription factors. A comparison with bHLH transcription factors and the Id family of proteins reveals the existence of a conserved second helix domain (Fig. 1C). However, the first helix domain is very divergent compared with others. An aspartic/glutamic acid-rich domain is found between the HLH domain and the potential leucine zipper motif. Data base searches found that the new gene shares 65% homology with mouse Maid, a maternally transcribed gene that encodes a potential negative regulator of basic transcription factors in the mouse egg and zygote (17). However, the human GCIP protein has extra 50 amino acids at its amino terminus (Fig. 1A). To confirm the predicted reading frame of GCIP cDNA, HA-GCIP plasmids were transfected into COS-7 cells or 293T cells, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by an anti-HA antibody. As shown in Fig. 2C, a single band with anticipated molecular mass (approximately 42 kDa) of HA-GCIP was observed on the immunoblot.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Deduced amino acid sequence and domain organization of human GCIP. A, amino acid sequence of human GCIP. A total of 360 amino acids are deduced from the open reading frame. B, the potential domain structure of human GCIP. A tentative helix-loop-helix domain is followed by a Asp/Glu-rich acidic domain. A potential leucine zipper domain is also found with one amino acid substitution (Leu-Cys) in GCIP. C, comparison of the potential motif of HLH of GCIP with other bHLH and dnHLH proteins: c-Myc (36), sleraxis (37), myogenin (38), eHAND (39), MyoR (40), neurogenin (41), Id1 and Id3 (27). The consensus sequence of the bHLH region was derived from Murre et al. (42). theta  in the consensus sequence indicates hydrophobic amino acids.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of human GCIP. A, Northern blot analysis of GCIP in different human adult tissues. mRNA derived from different human adult tissues were obtained from CLONTECH and hybridized with a radiolabeled GCIP probe. Twelve different human tissues are: 1, brain; 2, heart; 3, muscle; 4, colon; 5, thymus; 6, spleen; 7, kidney; 8, liver; 9, small intestine; 10, placenta; 11, lung; and 12, peripheral blood leukocytes. The size of the GCIP cDNA was estimated to be approximately 1.4 kilobases with minor bands at 4.0 kilobase. B, PCR analysis of the expression of GCIP mRNA in immune tissues. cDNA from different immune tissues were obtained from CLONTECH. Specific primers of human GCIP (5'-CTACAACAGTGTCTGGGTTGCGTGCC; 3'-GTATCAGAGCCTGTCCATGTCGATGAG) were used to detect the expression of the gene. Relative lower expression of GCIP was found in bone marrow compared with other immune tissues. Two different sizes of products are present in leukocytes, reflecting possible alternative splicing products. No cDNA was added in the control panel. G3PDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. C, expression of HA-tagged GCIP protein in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were transfected with HA-tagged GCIP cDNA and the control plasmid pCMV-HA. A 42-kDa protein was detected in cells transfected with HA-GCIP.

Expression of Human GCIP in Normal Human Tissues and in Immune Tissues-- To examine the expression of the GCIP gene, we performed Northern blot analysis of mRNAs isolated from different human tissues. As shown in Fig. 2A, one major transcript of 1.3 kilobases was detected in all the human tissues, including brain, heart, muscle, colon, thymus, spleen, kidney, liver, small intestine, placenta, lung, and peripheral blood leukocytes. A higher level of GCIP mRNA expression was observed in heart, muscle, peripheral blood leukocytes, kidney, and brain when compared with other tissues, suggesting a potential negative role of GCIP in cell differentiation and proliferation. Probing mRNA isolated from different immune tissues by RT-PCR demonstrated the expression of GCIP in all immune tissues with relatively low expression in bone marrow (Fig. 2B). An extra band was found in leukocytes, but not in other immune tissues. Whether the upper band is an alternatively spliced isoform is under investigation.

Interaction of GCIP with the QC Domain of Grap2 in Yeast Cells-- To confirm the binding specificity of GCIP with Grap2, we co-transformed yeast cells with Gal4-AD/GCIP and one of the following expression plasmids: Gal4-DB, Gal4-DB/Grap2QC, and Gal4-DB/Grap2-SH2. The human p53 and large T-antigen serve as a positive control pair in the study. As shown in Fig. 3A, only yeast cells co-transformed with GCIP/Grap2 QC plasmids were able to grow on the selective medium (SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His) other than the positive control. No growth was observed in cells transformed with GCIP/Grap2 SH2 domain and other plasmids, suggesting that GCIP interacts specifically with the Grap2 QC domain in yeast cells. To quantitate the interactions between GCIP and Grap2, we measured the beta -galactosidase activity of the lacZ reporter gene and compared that with the interaction between p53 and large T-antigens. As shown in Fig. 3B, co-transformation of GCIP with the QC domain of Grap2 in yeast cells strongly activated the expression of the lacZ reporter gene. These results clearly demonstrated that in vivo binding of GCIP to Grap2 is highly specific in yeast cells.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Interaction of GCIP with the QC domain of Grap2 in yeast two-hybrid system. A, yeast cells co-transformed with Gal4-AD/GCIP and Gal4-BD/Grap2-QC domain can grow on selective plate (SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His), indicating in vivo interaction of GCIP and Grap2-QC domain in yeast cells. p53 and large T-antigen are known proteins that interact each other in the cell and used as a positive control. B, activation of lacZ reporter gene activity in cells co-transformed with GCIP and Grap2-QC domain. Like p53 and large T-antigen, co-transformation of GCIP with Grap2-QC domain greatly increased lacZ gene expression (hence the beta -gal activity). 1, Grap2 QC alone; 2, p53 and large T-antigen; 3, GCIP and Grap2-QC domain; 4, GCIP and Grap2-SH2 domain; 5, GCIP alone.

GCIP Binds to Adaptor Protein Grap2 in Vitro and in Vivo-- To verify the binding specificity detected in the yeast two-hybrid assays, we examined the in vitro binding of GCIP to Grap2. GST fusion proteins corresponding to different domains of Grap2 (Fig. 4A) were expressed in E. coli and affinity purified by glutathione-Sepharose beads. Lysate from COS-7 cells transfected with HA-GCIP was incubated with the immobilized GST-Grap2 fusion proteins. The protein complexes were then washed extensively, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride PVDF) membrane. GCIP protein bound to GST-Grap2 domains was detected with anti-HA monoclonal antibodies. Results from Fig. 4B revealed that HA-GCIP expressed in COS-7 cells associated with GST-Grap2 full-length protein and the GST-Grap2 QC domain, thus confirming the results that the QC domain of Grap2 is responsible for the interaction between Grap2 and GCIP detected in the yeast two-hybrid system. Neither GST-Grap2-SH2 domain nor GST alone showed any binding to HA-GCIP, indicating the binding specificity of GCIP to the QC domain of Grap2 fusion protein.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of GCIP to Grap2-QC domain in vitro and in vivo. A, schematic diagram of GST-Grap2 fusion protein. GST fusion proteins corresponding to the Grap2 full-length (FL), the SH2 domain, and the QC domain were constructed, expressed in E. coli, and purified by affinity purification. B, HA-tagged GCIP binds to full-length GST-Grap2 full-length protein and GST-Grap2-QC fusion protein, but not the SH2 domain. C, GCIP co-precipitated with Grap2 and Grap2-QC domain in mammalian cells. cDNAs encoding HA-tagged GCIP and Flag-tagged Grap2 or Grap2-QC domain were co-transfected into COS-7 cells. Proteins were precipitated using anti-Flag monoclonal antibody, M2. Proteins bound to Flag-Grap2 were detected by Western blot analysis using specific anti-HA monoclonal antibody.

To examine whether GCIP and Grap2 can interact in mammalian cells, we co-transfected HA-GCIP with Flag-tagged Grap2 in COS-7 cells. Protein complex was isolated by immunoprecipitation using anti-Flag monoclonal antibodies (M2). The association of GCIP with Flag-tagged Grap2 was detected by Western blot using HA-specific monoclonal antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4C, HA-GCIP coprecipitates with the full-length Grap2 protein and the QC domain of Grap2, not the Grap2-SH2 domain. Together, these results indicated that GCIP specifically interacts with the QC domain of Grap2.

GCIP Interacts with Cyclin D1 Protein-- To test whether GCIP is involved in cell proliferation, we examined the binding of GCIP to cyclin D by in vitro assays. GST fusion proteins corresponding to the full-length of GCIP and the carboxyl terminus of GCIP (Glu209 to Leu360), respectively, were generated and expressed in E. coli. The GST fusion proteins were purified by affinity chromatography with glutathion-Sepharose beads. Cell extracts from 293T cells, COS-7, Jurkat cells, and K562 cells that stimulated with serum were incubated with GST-GCIP fusion protein. Proteins that bind to GST-GCIP fusion proteins were analyzed by Western blot using specific anti-cyclin D1 antibody. As shown in Fig. 5A, the GST-GCIP full-length fusion protein interacted with cyclin D1 from 293T cell extract as detected by specific anti-cyclin D1 antibody. No direct binding of cyclin D1 to the COOH terminus of GCIP or GST beads was detected. Similar results were obtained with cell extracts from other cell types (COS-7, Jurkat, and K562 cells).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of GCIP with cyclin D1. A, GST-GCIP fusion protein binds to cyclin D1. Two GST-fusion proteins corresponding to the full-length and the COOH terminus of GCIP were produced in E. coli and purified by glutathion-agarose beads. COS-7 cell extracts are incubated with the GST fusion proteins. Proteins bound to the GST fusion proteins were analyzed by Western blot. Cyclin D1 was found to associate with the full-length GST-GCIP protein, but not the COOH terminus. The amount of cyclin D used in the cell extract is similar as seen in the lower panel. B, coimmunoprecipitation of HA-GCIP with cyclin D1 in different cells. HA-tagged GCIP cDNA was transfected into different cells and precipitated by monoclonal antibody against HA or cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 was detected in the HA-GCIP precipitate using specific anti-cyclin D1 antibody. As a positive control (last lane), anti-cyclin D1 antibody was used to precipitate the protein in COS-7 lysate.

To further analyze the in vivo binding of GCIP and cyclin D, we transfected HA-tagged GCIP cDNA into different cells (Jurkat, K562, COS-7, and 293T). The cells were starved in serum-free medium initially and subsequently cultured in 10% serum medium. Cells were lysed 48 h after transfection. Proteins bound to GCIP were immunoprecipitated using an anti-HA antibody. Protein complex was separated by SDS-PAGE and subsequently blotted with an anti-cyclin D1 antibody. As shown in Fig. 5B, cyclin D1 was coimmunoprecipitated with HA-GCIP in cells transfected with HA-GCIP, confirming our in vitro observation that GCIP physically interacts with cyclin D1.

GCIP Regulates Cyclin D-Cdk4 Kinase Activity-- Since GCIP can interact with cyclin D in cellular extracts, we examined the effects of GCIP overexpression on the activity of cyclin D-dependent protein kinase (Cdk4). Cyclin D1-Cdk4 complex was immunopurified from COS-7 cells by either anti-cyclin D1 antibodies or anti-Cdk4 antibodies. The activity of the cyclin D-Cdk4 complex was assayed by its ability to phosphorylate the carboxyl-terminal domain of Rb expressed as a GST fusion protein. As shown in Fig. 6, overexpression of GCIP in COS-7 cells reduced the phosphorylation of GST-Rb protein by approximately 50% when the cyclin D-Cdk4 complex was precipitated with anti-Cdk4 antibodies. On the other hand, GCIP has less inhibitory effect on the phosphorylation of GST-Rb (30%) by the cyclin-D-Cdk4 complex purified by anti-cyclin D1 antibodies. Similar inhibitory effect (~30-40%) was observed by adding purified GST-GCIP protein into the phosphorylation reaction of GST-Rb (data not shown). These data suggest that interaction of GCIP with cyclin D1 reduced the kinase activity of the cyclin D-Cdk4 complex either by disrupting the complex formation or by changing the conformation of the complex.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Phosphorylation of Rb by Cdk4 is inhibited by GCIP. Overexpression of GCIP in COS-7 cells reduced the activity of cyclin D-dependent protein kinase (Cdk4). The protein kinase complex was immunoprecipitated by specific anti-Cdk4 or anti-cyclin D antibodies. GST-Rb fusion protein corresponding to the COOH terminus of Rb protein is kindly provided by Dr. Meng-Hong Lee at the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The fusion protein was expressed in E. coli and purified by gluthione-agarose column. Purified GST-Rb fusion protein is used as the phosphorylation substrate. The intensity of the phosphorylated GST-Rb fusion protein was digitized. Phosphorylation of GST-Rb is expressed as 100% in the absence of GCIP. Percentage of inhibition by human GCIP was calculated in the presence of the protein.

GCIP Regulates E2F-mediated Transcriptional Activity-- Since phosphorylation of Rb by cyclin D-dependent protein kinases leads to the activation of E2F transcriptional activation by releasing E2F from Rb (18, 19), we examined whether binding of GCIP to cyclin D has any effect on the activation of E2F-mediated transcription. First, a chimeric E2F protein with the carboxyl-terminal transcription activation domain of E2F1 was fused to a GAL4 DNA-binding domain for its ability to respond to the overexpression of GCIP in transient-transfection assay as described previously (20-22). As shown in Fig. 7A, the GAL4-E2F1 expression vector and the control vector GAL4VP16 could induce transcription activation from a pG5E1BCAT reporter. Co-transfection of GCIP greatly inhibited the transcriptional activity of the GAL4-E2F1 protein, but has little effect on the transcription induced by the GAL4-VP16. Similar results were obtained with the CAT assay on the thin layer plates where co-transfection of GCIP inhibited the CAT activity (Fig. 7B). These results suggested that GCIP directly or indirectly inhibited the transcriptional activation mediated by E2F1 protein.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Repression of E2F1-mediated transcriptional activity by human GCIP. A, a pG5E1BCAT reporter was induced by transfecting the indicated GAL-4 fusion proteins. Co-transfection of 2 µg of cDNAs encoding GCIP or Rb dramatically represses Gal4-E2F1 protein induced CAT activity. Much less effect of GCIP on the inhibition of GAL4-VP16 was observed. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with pG5E1BCAT reporter and expression vectors indicated beneath each column. B, repression of E2F1-activated CAT activity by GCIP in thin layer chromatography assay. Co-transfection of GCIP inhibited E2F1 mediated CAT activity. Cell extracts were incubated with [14C]chloramphenicol and n-butyryl coenzyme A. The reaction mixture were extracted and run on thin layer chromatography. The CAT activity was visualized by exposing to x-ray film for 2-7 days.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have cloned a novel human protein from bone marrow library, GCIP, that bound to the leukocyte-specific adaptor protein Grap2 and the key cell cycle protein, cyclin D. Expression of GCIP mRNA was found in most of the human tissues, especially abundant in the heart, muscle, peripheral blood leukocytes, brain, and kidney. From the two-hybrid system and in vitro binding assays, we found that GCIP interacted with the QC domain of Grap2. We also showed that GCIP protein could interact with cyclin D both in our in vitro assays and in GCIP-transfected cells in which GCIP can be coimmunoprecipitated with cyclin D. Furthermore, the presence of GCIP in cyclin D-Cdk4 complex decreased the cyclin D-dependent kinase activity using GST-Rb as a substrate. These results suggest that association of GCIP with cyclin D may change the conformation of cyclin D-Cdk4 complexes or prevent cyclin D to form stable complex with Cdks, which is essential for the phosphorylation of Rb by fully active kinase complex. Overexpression of GCIP in COS-7 cells indirectly or directly inhibited the E2F1 mediated transcriptional activity. By interacting with cyclin D, GCIP may regulate the phosphorylation status of Rb protein, leading to the inhibitory effects of E2F transcriptional activity. Since GCIP contains a putative HLH structure without the basic DNA-binding domains, it may function as a dominant negative regulator for transcription factors like the Id family of proteins (23-26). Therefore, GCIP may directly interact with transcription factor E2F1, blocking the transcriptional activity of E2F1 in our reporter assays. We are currently examining the molecular basis of this inhibitory effect of GCIP on transcription factors.

The characteristic of HLH without the basic amino acid region identified in GCIP is similar to that of the Id proteins, a family of negative regulators of bHLH transcription factors (23, 24, 27-30). However, the amino acid sequence of GCIP shares little identity with the Id proteins (Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4). Therefore, GCIP may represent a new class of dominant negative HLH proteins, similar to the mouse maternally transcribed gene, Maid (17). Following the putative HLH domain is a region enriched with aspartic and glutamic acids in GCIP. Domains with high acidic amino acid content are considered to be involved in protein-protein interactions. Immediately downstream of the negatively charged domain of GCIP is a potential leucine zipper (leucine-rich) domain, suggesting that these regions may be involved in interactions with other proteins. Due to the structural features of GCIP, it will be of great interest to examine whether GCIP could interact with HLH domain-containing transcription factors and act as a negative regulator in cell differentiation and proliferation.

Grap2 is a novel adaptor protein identified by its interaction with Gab-1 docking protein (14). Similar to Grb2, Grap2 contains two SH3 domains and one SH2 domain. However, Grap2 also contains a unique 120-amino acid proline-/glutamine-rich domain between the SH2 domain and the COOH-terminal SH3 domain. Unlike Grb2, the expression of Grap2 is exclusively limited to immune tissues, e.g. high level of expression in the thymus, spleen, bone marrow, peripheral blood leukocyte, and lymph nodes. There is no or little expression in other tissues tested. In immune cells, Grap2 is found primarily in T lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages.2 During the activation of T lymphocytes, Grap2 plays an important role in transducing signals from cell surface membrane to the nucleus by interacting with different signaling molecules and forming signal transduction complexes. The identification of a novel protein GCIP that interacts with Grap2 and cyclin D will further confirm our hypothesis that Grap2 is a central linker protein in immune cell signaling and proliferation. Signaling pathways linked to Grap2 complex could directly or indirectly affect E2F1 transcriptional activity, a possible mechanism for the regulation of cell cycle and cell proliferation. Other adaptor proteins that contain similar domain structures may also interact with GCIP in different tissues or cells. With distinct domain structure found in GCIP, it will be interesting to examine the kinds of molecules that interact with GCIP during cell differentiation and proliferation.

Regulation of mammalian cell proliferation by extracellular signals is governed through receptor-mediated signaling networks that ultimately converge on the cell cycle machinery driven by cyclin-dependent kinases and cyclin-dependent kinases inhibitors (6). The transition from G1 to S phase is controlled by a series of sequential regulatory events.

We demonstrated that GCIP interacts with cyclin D and this interaction could exert negative effect on the cyclin D-dependent Cdk4 kinase activity. In mammalian cells, expression of D-type cyclins is an early event stimulated by growth factors, cytokins, and other mitogens. D-type cyclins bind and activate cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6. Cyclin D-Cdk complexes phosphorylate the retinoblastoma family of proteins, Rb, that reversibly interacts with members of the E2F family of transcription factors and inhibits the transcriptional activity of E2F (18, 19, 31-33). Phosphorylation of Rb during G1 phase inactivates the ability of Rb to control cell cycle progression, leading to the accumulation of active E2F and possibly other transcription factors required to drive the cell into S phase (34, 35). In this report, we have shown that overexpression of GCIP in cells inhibited the E2F1-mediated transcriptional activity. Although GCIP mRNA is found in most of the human tissues examined, the expression level of GCIP is substantially higher in the heart, muscle, peripheral blood leukocytes, lung, and brain where cell differentiation and proliferation is limited in normal tissues. Therefore, it is tempting to hypothesize that GCIP, together with other transcriptional inhibitors, is the underlining mechanism that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation. Studies on how the expression of GCIP is regulated by cell cycle signals and during cell proliferation will shed new light on the molecular mechanism of cell differentiation and proliferation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. David Johnson, Dr. Meng-Hong Lee (University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center), and Dr. Xin-Hua Feng (Baylor College of Medicine) for valuable constructs.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Scientist Development Grant 0030160N from the American Heart Association National (to M. L.) and a National Science Foundation grant (to M. Q.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Contributed equally to the results of this work.

Dagger Dagger Current address: Calydon, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94089.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Cancer Biology and Nutrition, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-677-7505; Fax: 713-677-7512; E-mail: mliu@ibt.tamu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002598200

2 C. Xia and M. Liu, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Rb, retinoblastoma protein; SH, Src homology domain; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; HA, hemagglutinin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; HLH, helix-loop-helix; Cdk4, cyclin D-dependent protein kinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sherr, C. J. (1993) Cell 73, 1059-1065
2. Meyerson, M., and Harlow, E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2077-2086
3. Weinberg, R. A. (1995) Cell 81, 323-330
4. Nevins, J. R. (1998) Cell Growth Differ 9, 585-593
5. Chellappan, S. P., Giordano, A., and Fisher, P. B. (1998) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 227, 57-103
6. Sherr, C. J., and Roberts, J. M. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1501-1512
7. Dyson, N. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2245-2262
8. Johnson, D. G., and Walker, C. L. (1999) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 39, 295-312
9. Weng, G., Bhalla, U. S., and Iyengar, R. (1999) Science 284, 92-96
10. Bhalla, U. S., and Iyengar, R. (1999) Science 283, 381-387
11. Choi, K.-Y., Satterberg, B., Lyons, D. M., and Elion, E. A. (1994) Cell 78, 499-512
12. Whitmarsh, A. J., Cavanagh, J., Tournier, C., Yasuda, J., and Davis, R. J. (1998) Science 281, 1671-1674
13. Zhang, W., Sloan-Lancaster, J., Kitchen, J., Trible, R. P., and Samelson, L. E. (1998) Cell 92, 83-92
14. Qiu, M., Hua, S., Agrawal, M., Li, G., Cai, J., Chan, E., Zhou, H., Luo, Y., and Liu, M. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253, 443-447
15. Matsushime, H., Quelle, D. E., Shurtleff, S. A., Shibuya, M., Sherr, C. J., and Kato, J. Y. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2066-2076
16. Johnson, D. G., Ohtani, K., and Nevins, J. R. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1514-1525
17. Hwang, S.-Y., Oh, B., Fuchtbauer, A., Fuchtbauer, E.-M., Johnson, K. R., Solter, D., and Knowles, B. B. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 209, 217-226
18. Chellappan, S. P., Hiebert, S., Mudryj, M., Horowitz, J. M., and Nevins, J. R. (1991) Cell 65, 1053-1061
19. Hiebert, S. W., Chellappan, S. P., Horowitz, J. M., and Nevins, J. R. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 177-185
20. Johnson, D. G., Schwarz, J. K., Cress, W. D., and Nevins, J. R. (1993) Nature 365, 349-352
21. Cress, W. D., and Nevins, J. R. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 4213-4219
22. Wang, S., Nath, N., Fusaro, G., and Chellappan, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7447-7460
23. Benezra, R., Davis, R., Lockshon, D., Turner, D., and Weintraub, H. (1990) Cell 61, 49-59
24. Christy, B., Sanders, L., Lau, L., Copeland, N., Jenkins, N., and Nathans, D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1815-1819
25. Deed, R. W., Bianchi, S. M., Atherton, G. T., Johnston, D., Santibanez-Koref, M., Murphy, J. J., and Norton, J. D. (1992) Oncogene 8, 599-607
26. Riechmann, V., van Cruchten, I., and Sablitzky, F. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 749-755
27. Norton, J. D., Deed, R. W., Craggs, G., and Sablitzky, F. (1998) Trends Cell Biol 8, 58-65
28. Sun, X. H., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Baltimore, D. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5603-5611
29. Lyden, D., Young, A. Z., Zagzag, D., Yan, W., Gerald, W., O'Reilly, R., Bader, B. L., Hynes, R. O., Zhuang, Y., Manova, K., and Benezra, R. (1999) Nature 401, 670-677
30. Jen, Y., Weintraub, H., and Benezra, R. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 1466-1497
31. Dynlacht, B. D. (1997) Nature 389, 149-152
32. Ross, J. F., Liu, X., and Dynlacht, B. D. (1999) Mol Cell 3, 195-205
33. Harbour, J. W., Luo, R. X., Dei Santi, A., Postigo, A. A., and Dean, D. C. (1999) Cell 98, 859-869
34. Weintraub, S. J., Chow, K. N., Luo, R. X., Zhang, S. H., He, S., and Dean, D. C. (1995) Nature 375, 812-815
35. Qin, X. Q., Livingston, D. M., Ewen, M., Sellers, W. R., Arany, Z., and Kaelin, W. G., Jr. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 742-755
36. De Pinho, R., Mistock, L., Hatton, K., Ferrier, P., Zimmerman, K., Legouy, E., Tesfaye, A., Collum, R., Yanocopoulos, G., and Niesen, P. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 33, 257-266
37. Cserjesi, P., Brown, D., Ligon, K. L., Lyons, G. E., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A., and Olson, E. N. (1995) Development 121, 1099-1110
38. Wright, W. E., Sassoon, D. A., and Lin, V. K. (1989) Cell 56, 607-617
39. Cserjesi, P., Brown, D., Lyons, G. E., and Olson, E. N. (1995) Dev. Biol. 170, 664-678
40. Lu, J., Webb, R., Richardson, J. A., and Olson, E. N. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 552-557
41. Ma, Q., Kintner, C., and Anderson, D. J. (1996) Cell 87, 43-52
42. Murre, C., McCaw, P. S., and Baltimore, D. (1989) Cell 56, 777-783


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P.-C. Chu, Y.-C. Yang, Y.-T. Lu, H.-T. Chen, L.-C. Yu, and M.-S. Chang
Silencing of p29 Affects DNA Damage Responses with UV Irradiation.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8484 - 8491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
F. Behbod, W. Xian, C. A. Shaw, S. G. Hilsenbeck, A. Tsimelzon, and J. M. Rosen
Transcriptional Profiling of Mammary Gland Side Population Cells
Stem Cells, April 1, 2006; 24(4): 1065 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Bonome, J.-Y. Lee, D.-C. Park, M. Radonovich, C. Pise-Masison, J. Brady, G. J. Gardner, K. Hao, W. H. Wong, J. C. Barrett, et al.
Expression Profiling of Serous Low Malignant Potential, Low-Grade, and High-Grade Tumors of the Ovary
Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 65(22): 10602 - 10612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Guo, L. J. Stafford, B. Bryan, C. Xia, W. Ma, X. Wu, D. Liu, Z. Songyang, and M. Liu
A Rac/Cdc42-specific Exchange Factor, GEFT, Induces Cell Proliferation, Transformation, and Migration
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13207 - 13215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Bourgin, R. P. Bourette, S. Arnaud, Y. Liu, L. R. Rohrschneider, and G. Mouchiroud
Induced Expression and Association of the Mona/Gads Adapter and Gab3 Scaffolding Protein during Monocyte/Macrophage Differentiation
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 3744 - 3756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/27/20942    most recent
M002598200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xia, C.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xia, C.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.