![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 28, 21295-21301, July 14, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Actinin in an ADP-ribosylation
Factor-reversible Manner*
,
,
,
,
,
, and
From the
Department of Life Science and Division of
Molecular and Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and
Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea, the § Mass Spectrometry
Analysis Group, Korea Basic Science Institute, Taejon 305-333, Korea, and the ¶ Department of Pharmacology and the Institute for
Cell and Developmental Biology, State University of New York,
Stony Brook, New York 11794-8651
Received for publication, March 23, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial phospholipase D (PLD) has been
implicated in the regulation of Ca2+ mobilization and
contractile performance in the heart. However, the molecular identity
of this myocardial PLD and the mechanisms that regulate it are not well
understood. Using subcellular fractionation and Western blot analysis,
we found that PLD2 is the major myocardial PLD and that it localizes
primarily to sarcolemmal membranes. A 100-kDa PLD2-interacting cardiac
protein was detected using a protein overlay assay employing purified
PLD2 and then identified as Mammalian phospholipase D
(PLD)1 hydrolyzes
phosphatidylcholine (PC) to generate the signaling lipid, phosphatidic
acid (PA) (1), and has been implicated as a regulator in multiple
settings in the heart (2, 3). These settings include stimulating inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate production in cardiomyocytes (4), inducing
phosphorylation of cardiac proteins (5), and increasing intracellular
free Ca2+ and contractile force (6). Prolonged activation
of cardiac PLD has also been linked to cardiac hypertrophy, potentially
through the conversion of PA to diacylglycerol, the endogenous
activator of protein kinase C (PKC) (1). Many hormones,
neurotransmitters and growth factors exert their cellular effects
through PA. Catecholamine (7), angiotensin II (8), and endothelin-1 (9)
are all able to stimulate the production of PA in cardiomyocytes,
presumably through some combination of Ca2+ mobilization
and the actions of small GTP-binding proteins (ARF and Rho family
members), PKC, and tyrosine phosphorylation (1). However, the molecular
identity of myocardial PLD and the specific mechanisms that regulate it
remain unknown.
Mammalian PLD has been implicated in a wide range of physiological
processes and diseases including inflammation, secretion, mitogenesis,
cytoskeletal rearrangement and respiratory bursts in neutrophils (10).
Two types of mammalian PLD, PLD1 and PLD2, have been cloned (1). PLD1
has low basal activity, requires PIP2 for its activation,
and is activated by PKC and by ARF and Rho small G-protein family
members via direct association (11-14). PLD2 also requires
PIP2 for its enzymatic activity (15), but unlike PLD1, it
can be activated by unsaturated fatty acids such as oleate (16). PLD2
is constitutively active in vitro, and its activity in that
setting is relatively insensitive to the PLD1-activating factors
PKC In this study, we report that the major myocardial PLD isozyme is PLD2
and that it localizes to the sarcolemmal (SL) membrane. Furthermore, we
suggest that PLD2 is negatively regulated by Materials--
The enhanced chemiluminescence kit and
dipalmitoylphosphatidyl [methyl-3H]choline
were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (dipalmitoyl-PC), phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine, and GTP Preparation of Sarcolemmal Membranes and Detergent-insoluble
Fractions--
Frozen rat heart was processed for the preparation of
purified SL membranes according to Pitts (18). In brief, rat ventricles were minced and homogenized in 0.6 M sucrose, 10 mM imidazole HCl, pH 7.0, and the homogenate was
centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The
resulting pellet (P1) was discarded, while the supernatant (S1) was
diluted with 160 mM KCl, 20 mM MOPS, pH 7.4 (KCl/MOPS), and centrifuged at 96,000 × g for 30 min.
The supernatant (S2) was removed, and the pellet (P2) was resuspended in KCl/MOPS, layered on top of a 30% sucrose solution containing 0.3 M KCl, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, and centrifuged
at 95,000 × g (Beckman SW 41 rotor) for 90 min. The
band at the sample-sucrose interface (SL) and the pellet (sarcoplasmic
reticulum) was recovered. The SL fraction was diluted with 5 volumes of
KCl/MOPS and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min.
The SL pellet was resuspended in buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH
7.3, 3 mM EGTA, 3 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, 80 mM KC1) and stored at
Cell Culture--
COS-7 cells were cultured at 37 °C in 5%
CO2 in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum. Spodoptera
frugiperda (Sf9) cells were cultured at 27 °C in TC-100
medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Expression and Purification of PLD2--
Recombinant human PLD2
was expressed in Sf9 cells and purified by
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose affinity chromatography
as described previously (12).
PLD2 Overlay Assay--
Rat heart membrane proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The
blots were preincubated for 14 h at room temperature in blocking
buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5% (w/v) skim milk), rinsed with Tris-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), and then
incubated 1 h at room temperature with overlay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.2% Tween
20, 5% (w/v) skim milk) containing 1 µg/ml PLD2. The membranes were
then washed five times with Tris-buffered saline and incubated for
3 h with an anti-PLD antibody. After the washing, the membranes
were then incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies and developed utilizing an
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit.
Partial Purification of the PLD2-interacting Protein--
Rat
heart tissue was homogenized in buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol) containing protease
inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM aprotinin, 2 mM leupeptin, 1 mM
pepstatin). The homogenate was spun for 45 min at 20,000 × g to pellet most of the membrane fraction. The pellet was
then resuspended and extracted with buffer B containing 1% cholic
acid. The resulting membrane extracts (100 mg of protein in 50 ml) was
applied to a Q-Sepharose anion-exchange column (1 cm × 10 cm).
After washing the column with 40 ml of buffer B, bound proteins were
eluted with a 40 ml of linear gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl in
buffer B. Fractions were collected and tested by the PLD2 overlay
assay. Peak fractions were pooled and brought to 1.0 M NaCl
by addition of solid salt and loaded onto a phenyl-Sepharose (1 cm × 5 cm). Proteins were eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min by applying
a decreasing gradient of NaCl (1 to 0 M) in buffer B over a
time of 60 min. The proteins in the fractions were then separated by
SDS-PAGE and probed using the PLD2 overlay assay.
Protein Identification by Peptide Mass Fingerprinting
Analysis--
Fractions of the phenyl-Sepharose were subjected to
SDS-PAGE. After stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, the candidate
band was excised from the gel and digested with trypsin as described (19). A 1-µl aliquot of the total digest (total volume, 30 µl) was
used for peptide mass fingerprinting (20, 21). The masses of the
tryptic peptides were measured with a Voyager DE time-of-flight mass
spectrometer (Perceptive Biosystems, Inc., Framingham, MA) in the Korea
Basic Science Institute. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization was performed with Purification of In Vitro Binding Analysis--
Wild-type murine PLD2, N-terminal
185-amino acid-deleted mutant PLD2 (PLD2 Preparation of COS-7 Cell Membranes--
Cells transfected with
the wild-type murine PLD2, N-terminal 185-amino acid-deleted mutant
PLD2 (PLD2 Measurement of PLD
Activity--
PIP2-dependent PLD activity was
assessed by measuring choline release from phosphatidylcholine (PC)
essentially as described previously (27). Aliquots of the purified PLD
preparation were added to a standard assay mixture (150 µl)
containing 125 µl of buffer D (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 3 mM EGTA, 2 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, 80 mM KC1, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and 25 µl of phospholipid vesicles
composed of dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine, PIP2, and dipalmitoyl-PC in a molar ratio of 16:1.4:1 and
dipalmitoylphosphatidyl-[methyl-3H]choline
(total 200,000 dpm/assay). The final concentration of PC was 3.3 µM. The assay mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Oleate-dependent activity was assayed as described
earlier (16). In brief, PC vesicle (25 µl) containing 5 nmol of
dipalmitoyl-PC and 200,000 dpm of
dipalmitoylphosphatidyl-[methyl-3H]choline
were added to a reaction mixture (175 µl) containing 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.0, 2 mM EGTA, 1.7 mM CaCl2, 20 µM sodium oleate,
and 100 mM KCl. The final concentration of PC was 25 µM in the reaction mixtures. The assay mixtures were
incubated at 30 °C for 1 h and the reactions terminated by
addition of 0.3 ml of 1 N HCl in 5 mM EGTA and
1 ml of chloroform:methanol:HCl (50:50:0.3). After a brief
centrifugation, the [methyl-3H]choline in 0.5 ml of the aqueous phase was quantified by liquid scintillation counting.
Co-immunoprecipitation of Immunoblotting--
Immunoblotting was performed as previously
reported (12). In brief, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose
membrane after SDS-PAGE. The membranes were blocked with TTBS buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.05% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% skim milk. Subsequently, the blots
were incubated with the primary antibody for 3 h. The membrane was
washed four times for 10 min with TTBS before being incubated with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for 1 h.
Visualization of the immune complexes was performed with horseradish
peroxidase-dependent enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL).
PLD2 Is the Major Cardiac PLD Isoenzyme and Localizes to the
Sarcolemmal Membrane--
We used polyclonal antisera that recognize
both PLD1 and PLD2 (anti-PLD antibody) to determine which isoforms are
expressed in heart. A band corresponding to PLD2 (105 kDa, as shown in
the control lane) was weakly detected in a homogenate of rat heart (Fig. 1A) and was highly
enriched in a fraction consisting of sarcolemmal (plasma) membranes
(SL). A band at the position that would correspond to PLD1
(120 kDa, as shown in the control lane) was not visualized in any
fraction but this band was slightly detected in sarcolemma after long
time-exposure (data not shown). To confirm that the band strongly
recognized by the pan-PLD-specific antisera was PLD2, immunoblot
analysis was performed utilizing an anti-PLD2-specific antibody (Fig.
1B). This antibody detected a band at the same position on
the Western blot (105 kDa) and in the same fractionation samples as the
more generic anti-PLD antibody. These results suggest that the major
PLD isozyme in the rat heart is PLD2 and that it is present primarily
in the sarcolemmal membrane, consistent with its localization primarily in the plasma membrane in other cell types (17, 28, 37).
Partial Purification of a Protein Interacting with PLD2--
To
search for proteins that interact with PLD2 in the sarcolemmal
membrane, we carried out a protein overlay assay. Nitrocellulose blots
of proteins from rat heart membrane extracts were incubated with
purified PLD2, and the PLD2 bound was then detected using the anti-PLD
antibody. A band corresponding to a protein 100 kDa (p100) in size was
visualized and partially purified by sequential column chromatography
as described under "Experimental Procedures." On an anionic
Q-Sepharose exchange column, p100 eluted with a relatively broad
profile (fractions 36-60, Fig.
2A). These fractions were
pooled and further purified on phenyl-Sepharose, from which p100 eluted
as a sharper peak (fractions 35-45). Analysis by SDS-PAGE revealed
that these fractions contained a protein band with a molecular mass of
100 kDa, which matched the molecular weight of the protein reactive in
the overlay assay (Fig. 2B).
Identification of the 100-kDa PLD2-binding Protein as
PLD2 Directly Interacts with The N-terminal region (1-185) of PLD2 Is Responsible for the
Direct Interaction between PLD2 and The Inhibition of PLD2 by PLD is thought to play an important role in several different
aspects of cardiac physiology (2, 3). PLD activity is enriched in
sarcolemmal membranes (31), and its functional significance has been
linked to Ca2+ mobilization and changes in the force of
contraction of the heart (6). Although oleate (32) and several agonists
that activate PI-PLC activity (7-9) are known to enhance myocardial
PLD activity, the molecular identity and the regulatory mechanism of
myocardial PLD have not previously been described. We report here that
PLD2 is the major myocardial PLD, that it is enriched in sarcolemmal membranes, and that Both PLD1 and PLD2 mRNA have been reported to be expressed in the
heart (33), and evidence has been presented that there are two types of
PLD activity in the heart: one in the sarcolemma and the other in the
sacroplasmic reticulum. We found that PLD2 is major myocardial PLD and
the majority of it was present in the sarcolemma. Supporting our
molecular data that the sarcolemma isoform is PLD2, it was previously
reported that this activity can also be stimulated by unsaturated fatty
acids such as oleate (32), which is characteristic of PLD2 (16).
It has been reported that PLD may be functionally associated with the
actin-based cytoskeleton. Stimulation of PLD in fibroblasts and
endothelial cells leads to the formation of actin stress fibers, and
this effect is mimicked by the addition of purified PLD or PA and
blocked by inhibitors of PLD-dependent generation of PA (34, 35). Recently, Iyer et al. (36) reported association of
PLD1 activity with the actin-based membrane skeleton in U937 cells.
PLD2 also has been implicated in the regulation of the cytoskeleton.
Overexpression of PLD2 promoted cytoskeletal reorganization in
serum-stimulated fibroblasts (17), and it co-localized with membrane
ruffles induced by EGF (37). In this report, we identified It proved technically difficult to demonstrate in vivo
association of Purified PLD2 exhibits a high basal activity in the standard in
vitro assay and after transfection into COS-7 cells, and it can be
minimally stimulated further by the well-known activators of PLD1 (17).
This seemed paradoxical, because, although PLD2 mRNA is expressed
in many tissues and mammalian cell lines (44), they nonetheless do not
exhibit elevated PLD basal activities. Recently, Sung et al.
(25) reported that an N-terminal truncated PLD2 exhibited low basal
activity in vitro but elevated activity in vivo.
The authors hypothesized that unknown negative regulatory factors might
inhibit the basal activity of PLD2 through interaction with its N
terminus. This hypothesis is consistent with our finding that
PLD2 carries a PX motif in the N-terminal region (Fig. 5A)
(45). PX motifs have been reported to mediate a wide variety of
protein-protein interactions including kinase or SH3-domain binding
(46). Although significantly conserved PX domain is present in animal
and yeast PLD (46), its function is unknown. In this study, we have
shown that Although ARF has long been known to be a potent activator of PLD1,
several recent findings raised the possibility that ARF could also
stimulate PLD2 activity. It has been reported that ARF stimulated the
activity of hPLD2 1.6-fold in an in vitro reconstitution assay (25) and that it mediated insulin-dependent PLD2
activation in HIRcB cells (28). Moreover, a PLD2 mutant form that
lacked the N-terminal 308 amino acids and exhibited reduced basal
activity was stimulated more than 5-fold by ARF (25). Our observation that ARF1 reversed the Of interest is the mechanism through which ARF blocks the interaction
of PLD activation and ARF translocation is tightly coupled. fMLP
(formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine) or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate leads to the translocation of ARF proteins to the
particulate membrane as well as activation of PLD in neutrophils and
mast cells (51, 52). Translocation of ARF to the actin cytoskeleton has
also been reported and suggested to be involved in actin reorganization (53, 54). Recently, Iyer et al. (36) demonstrated that PLD activity can be stimulated in detergent-insoluble fractions derived from U937 cells membranes incubated with GTP
-actinin using peptide-mass
fingerprinting with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass
spectroscopy. The direct association between PLD2 and
-actinin was
confirmed using an in vitro binding assay and localized to
PLD2's N-terminal 185 amino acids. Purified
-actinin potently
inhibits PLD2 activity (IC50 = 80 nM) in an interaction-dependent and ADP-ribosylation
factor-reversible manner. Finally,
-actinin co-localizes with actin
and with PLD2 in the detergent-insoluble fraction from sarcolemmal
membranes. These results suggest that PLD2 is reciprocally regulated in
sarcolemmal membranes by
-actinin and ARF1 and accordingly that a
major role for PLD2 in cardiac function may involve reorganization of
the actin cytoskeleton.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, ARF, and Rho (17). The finding that purified PLD2 is
constitutively active in vitro led to the proposal that PLD2
may be regulated in vivo by negative regulatory agents that
are released upon agonist stimulation.
-actinin through direct
interaction and that this inhibition can be overcome by ARF. These
results provide the basis for a more detailed model for PLD2 regulation
in vivo.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S were obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). Anti-
-actinin antibody and sodium oleate were purchased from Sigma. A polyclonal antibody that recognized both PLD1 and PLD2
was produced as described previously (16). The anti-ARF and the
PLD2-specific polyclonal antibodies were a generous gift from Dr. J. David Lambeth (Emory University). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgA+IgM+IgG were from Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories. Nickel-agarose, DEAE-Sepharose, and
phenyl-Sepharose resin were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala,
Sweden). Protein A-Sepharose was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA).
70 °C until use. To generate the detergent-insoluble proteins,
sarcolemmal membranes were incubated with buffer A containing 1%
Triton X-100 for 30 min at 4 °C. The detergent-insoluble pellets (SLDIF) were separated by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, washed twice in buffer A with 1%
Triton X-100, and resuspended in buffer A without detergent.
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as the matrix. Trypsin autolysis products were used for internal calibration. Delayed
ion extraction resulted in peptide masses with better than 50 ppm mass
accuracy on average. Comparison of the mass values against the
SWISS-PROT data base was performed using Peptide Search (22).
-Actinin and ARF1--
-Actinin was
purified from rat heart as described previously (23) and judged to be
>95% pure by SDS-PAGE. Myristoylated recombinant ARF1 was expressed
in E. coli and purified as described (24).
(1-185)), and the
N-terminal 308-amino acid-deleted mutant PLD2 (PLD2
(1-308)) (25)
were transfected as described (26). Transfected cells were lysed in
lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 1% sodium cholate)
containing protease inhibitors. After centrifugation (12,000 × g for 15 min), aliquots of the soluble extract were incubated with anti-PLD antibody immobilized on protein A-Sepharose. The PLD2, PLD2
(1-185), and PLD2
(1-308) immune complexes were then incubated with purified
-actinin in 0.5 ml of buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl) for 1 h
at 4 °C. The resulting immune complexes were washed three times with
1 ml of buffer C containing 0.25% CHAPS and subjected to SDS-PAGE,
followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-
-actinin or anti-PLD antibody.
(1-185)), and the N-terminal 308-amino acid-deleted
mutant PLD2 (PLD2
(1-308)) were disrupted by sonication in 1 ml of
ice-cold buffer D (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 3 mM
EGTA, 2 mM CaCl2, 3 mM
MgCl2, 80 mM KC1, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol). The lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C and the pellet resuspended in
buffer D and referred to as membranes.
-Actinin and ARF1 with
PLD2--
Purified recombinant human PLD2 (0.1 µg) was precipitated
using immobilized anti-PLD antibody. The immune complexes were
incubated with various concentrations of ARF1 and 100 nM
-actinin in 150 µl of buffer A at 37 °C for 15 min. The
resulting immune complexes were washed twice with buffer A containing
0.25% CHAPS and analyzed by immunoblot with anti-ARF or
anti-
-actinin antibody.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Detection of PLD2 in sarcolemmal
membranes. Rat heart ventricle was homogenized and sarcolemmal
membranes purified as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Each lane was loaded with 20 µg of proteins and the immunoblots
analyzed with anti-PLD antibody (A) and PLD2-specific
antibody (B). PLD1, PLD1-overexpressed COS-7 cell
lysate; PLD2, PLD2-overexpressed COS-7 cell lysate;
H, homogenate; S1, supernatant of 12,000 × g; P1, pellet of 12,000 × g;
S2, supernatant of 96,000 × g;
P2, pellet of 96,000 × g; SL,
sarcolemmal membrane; SR, crude sarcoplasmic reticulum. The
results shown are those of a single experiment representative of three
experiments performed with independent preparations.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Identification of PLD2-binding protein (p100)
by protein overlay assay. Rat heart membrane extract was subjected
to sequential chromatography on Q-Sepharose and phenyl-Sepharose
columns. PLD2 overlay assays were performed on the indicated fractions.
Detailed procedures can be found under "Experimental Procedures."
A, Q-Sepharose column chromatography (a). The
indicated fractions of the Q-Sepharose elute in a were
overlaid with (c) or without (b) purified PLD2.
B, phenyl-Sepharose column chromatography (a).
The indicated fractions of the phenyl-Sepharose elute were overlaid
with purified PLD2 (b). The proteins present in aliquots (10 µl) of the phenyl-Sepharose fractions were visualized by Coomassie
Brilliant Blue staining (c). The positions of molecular size
standards (in kilodaltons) are shown on the left.
-Actinin--
To pursue identification of p100, the partially
purified preparation was resolved using SDS-PAGE. The p100 candidate
band was excised after Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and
"in-gel" digested with trypsin. The resultant peptides were eluted
and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass
spectrometer (Fig. 3A). A
search for these masses in a comprehensive sequence data base showed
that 14 masses matched to the calculated tryptic peptide masses of
-actinin with an accuracy of >50 ppm. These peptides covered 20%
of the sequence of
-actinin (Fig. 3B). Finally, the band
at 100 kDa that was enriched in fractions 35-45 in the phenyl-Sepharose elute and detected using the PLD2 overlay assay was
also detected by specific antibody to
-actinin (Fig.
3C).

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Identification of p100 as
-actinin. A, the map was produced
using the peptide supernatant obtained after in-gel digestion of the
excised band with trypsin as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A data base search for the measured tryptic peptide
masses uniquely identified p100 as
-actinin. The peaks labeled with
an A matched the calculated tryptic peptide masses from
-actinin within 50 ppm. Trypsin autolysis products are marked by a
T. B, coverage map for
-actinin. The matching
peptides are underlined. C, the fractions
(25-55) of phenyl-Sepharose (Fig. 2B) were
immunoblot-analyzed with anti-
-actinin antibody.
-Actinin and Co-localizes with It
in the Sarcolemmal Membrane--
To further confirm the direct
interaction between PLD2 and 
actinin, we incubated a purified
recombinant human PLD2-anti-PLD-antibody complex with
-actinin
purified from rat heart. Immunoblot analysis of the immune complex with
anti-
-actinin antibody demonstrated that
-actinin was
co-immunoprecipitated only when PLD2 was present (Fig.
4A, lane
3) and that the
-actinin-reactive band did not derive
from the Sf9 cells from which the PLD2 was prepared
(lane 2). Next, we explored whether PLD2 and
-actinin co-localize to the sarcolemmal membrane. Immunoblot
analysis (Fig. 4B) revealed that
-actinin and PLD2 are
both present in sarcolemmal membranes and are enriched in the
detergent-insoluble membrane fraction, consistent with the several
reports that PLD2 can be found in this fraction when it is prepared
from plasma membranes of several cell lines (15, 55). Actin was weakly
detected in the SL membranes but highly enriched in the
detergent-insoluble membrane fraction, suggesting that not only do PLD2
and
-actinin associate, but they do so in the context of the actin
cytoskeleton.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Direct interaction of
-actinin with PLD2 and their co-localization in
sarcolemmal membrane. A, PLD2-coupled immune complexes
were incubated with purified
-actinin. As a negative control,
anti-PLD antibody coupled to protein A-Sepharose was incubated with
-actinin, and analysis of the PLD2-coupled immune complex (in the
absence of added
-actinin) was also performed. The resultant
complexes were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-
-actinin
or anti-PLD antibody. B, sarcolemmal membranes were prepared
as described in "Experimental Procedures." Sarcolemmal membrane
fractions were extracted with 1% Triton X-100, and the
detergent-insoluble fraction was isolated, washed, and resuspended in
buffer B. Aliquots (20 µg) of each fraction were immunoblot-analyzed
with anti-PLD, anti-
-actinin, or anti-actin antibody. H,
homogenate; S1, supernatant of 12,000 × g;
P2, pellet of 96,000 × g; SL,
sarcolemmal membrane; SLDIF, detergent-insoluble
fraction of sarcolemmal membrane. The results shown are those of a
single experiment representative of three experiments performed with
independent preparations.
-Actinin--
PLD2 has four
conserved catalytic regions (I-IV), a PIP2-binding site, a
pleckstrin homology domain, and an N-terminal phox (PX) domain that has
been proposed to mediate a wide variety of protein-protein interactions
(1, 45) (Fig. 5A). Using COS-7 cells to overexpress wild-type and N-terminally deleted mutants of PLD2
(PLD2
(1-185) and PLD2
(1-308)), we found that truncation of the
N-terminal 185 amino acids from PLD2 (which removes the PX domains but
still yields a catalytically active enzyme) resulted in the complete
loss of
-actinin binding to PLD2 (Fig. 5B). It appears,
therefore, that the N-terminal 185 amino acids contain a site critical
for the interaction of PLD2 with
-actinin.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The N-terminal region (1-185) of PLD2 is
required for the interaction of
-actinin with
PLD2. A, schematic outline of the structural domains of
PLD2. Boxes, location of regions of highly conserved
sequence in PLD. PX, phox; PH, pleckstrin
homology; CR, conserved region. B, COS-7 cells
were transfected with the empty vector (MOCK), N-terminal
185-amino acid-truncated PLD2 (PLD2
(1-185)),
N-terminal 308-amino acid-truncated PLD2
(PLD2
(1-308)), or wild-type PLD2
(PLD2). Immune complexes were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Purified
-actinin and the immune
complexes were incubated and then subjected to immunoblot analysis with
anti-PLD or anti-
-actinin antibody. The results shown are those of a
single experiment representative of two experiments performed with
independent preparations.
-Actinin Inhibits PLD2 Activity via Direct Interaction--
We
next examined whether
-actinin plays a role in the regulation of
PLD2 by determining whether it affected PLD2 activity in the in
vitro setting. As shown in Fig.
6A, purified
-actinin inhibited PIP2-dependent PLD2 activity in a
concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 of the
-actinin -mediated inhibition was 80 nM, and inhibition
was complete at 300 nM.
-Actinin does not have a
pleckstrin homology domain but has been reported to bind PIP2 (29, 30), and PIP2 is a required co-factor
for PLD2 activity in the standard in vitro assay system (15,
16, 25). To exclude the possibility that the mechanism of the
-actinin inhibition might involve PIP2 sequestration, we
examined the effect of
-actinin on oleate-dependent
activation of PLD2, which is an alternate method for activation of PLD2
that does not require PIP2 (16).
-Actinin similarly
inhibited the oleate-dependent activation in a
concentration-dependent manner. To further delineate the interaction and inhibition of
-actinin on PLD2 activity, we examined the effect of
-actinin on the deletion mutants of PLD2. We
overexpressed wild-type and N-terminally deleted mutants of PLD2
(PLD2
(1-185) and PLD2
(1-308)), and used then COS-7 cell
membranes as a source of PLD2. As in the above binding assay,
-actinin did not inhibit either of the N-terminally deleted mutants
(PLD2
(1-185) and PLD2
(1-308)), whereas it inhibited whole PLD2
in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6B).
These results led us to the conclusion that the observed inhibition
occurred through direct interaction between
-actinin and the
N-terminal region (1-185) of PLD2.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of PLD2 activity by
-actinin. A, effect of
-actinin
on the PIP2 or oleate-dependent activity of
PLD2 is plotted. The assay was performed to measure
PIP2-dependent (open
rectangles) or oleate-dependent
(closed rectangles) PLD2 activity as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The PLD2 activity was determined
as a function of the
-actinin concentration. The data represent
means ± S.E. of three experiments performed in duplicate.
B, N-terminal 185 amino acid region is responsible for the
inhibition of PLD2 by
-actinin. COS-7 cell membranes overexpressing
N-terminal 185-amino acid-truncated PLD2
(PLD2
(1-185)) (closed
rectangles), N-terminal 308-amino acid-truncated PLD2
(PLD2
(1-308)) (open
rectangles), or wild-type PLD2 (PLD2)
(open circles) were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures" and used as a source of PLD2. PLD
activity was determined with 0.5 µg of membranes and various
concentrations of purified
-actinin. The data represent the
means ± S.E. of three experiments performed in duplicate.
-Actinin Is Overcome by ARF1--
ARF
has been implicated as a potent activator of PLD1 in a variety of
settings (1). Recent evidence has suggested the possibility that PLD2
may also be activated by ARF (25, 28, 37), and it was proposed that
this might be physiologically relevant in settings where the PLD2 high
basal activity had been suppressed (25). We accordingly examined the
possibility that inhibition of PLD2 by
-actinin might be countered
by ARF1 stimulation. Upon addition of ARF1, PLD2 basal activity
increased modestly, whereas the 60% inhibition mediated by addition of
100 nM
-actinin was almost completely eliminated (Fig.
7A). To further investigate the mechanism underlying this phenomena, we examined whether ARF1 affected the interaction between PLD2 and
-actinin. Recombinant PLD2
was pre-bound to anti-PLD antibody immobilized on protein A-Sepharose
and incubated with
-actinin and ARF. We found that the interaction
between PLD2 and
-actinin was disrupted by the presence of ARF1 in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 7B), which
correlated with the reversal of inhibition in the in vitro activity assay. These results suggest that ARF1 overcomes the
-actinin-attenuated activity of PLD2 by eliminating its interaction with PLD2.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The inhibition of PLD2 by
-actinin was reversible by ARF1. A,
effect of varying concentrations of ARF1 on the inhibition of PLD2 by
-actinin. The dose-dependent effect of ARF1 on PLD2
activity was measured in the absence (open
circles) or the presence (closed
circles) of 100 nM
-actinin. The assay also
contained 10 µM GTP
S. Data represent the means ± S.E. of three experiments performed in duplicate. B, effect
of ARF1 on the interaction between PLD2 and
-actinin. PLD2-coupled
immune complexes were incubated with 100 nM
-actinin,
and the indicated concentrations of ARF1 were added to the assay
mixtures. The resultant pellets were subjected to immunoblot analysis
with anti-
-actinin and anti-ARF antibody. The results shown are
those of a single experiment, representative of three experiments
performed with independent preparations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actinin inhibits the high basal activity of
PLD2 in an ARF-reversible manner.
-actinin
as a PLD2-binding protein, which potently inhibits the basal activity
of PLD2.
-Actinin is known as a key regulator of actin-based
structures such as stress fibers and focal adhesions (38). Binding of
-actinin to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase N (39),
and vinculin (40) is consistent with functional roles of
-actinin in
signal transduction and cytoskeletal reorganization. Therefore, our
results suggest that regulation of PLD2 by
-actinin might be
involved in cytoskeletal reorganization.
-actinin with PLD2 in the sarcolemmal membrane using an immunoprecipitation approach, because PLD2 and
-actinin are tightly associated with membrane structures and we found that we could
not extract them using the mild detergent conditions required to
observe the interaction in vitro (1% cholic acid was required to extract them, whereas in vitro interaction was
disrupted at cholic acid concentrations greater than 0.5%; data not
shown). However, the combination of in vitro association and
of co-localization in vivo to the detergent-insoluble
fraction of sarcolemma membranes provides strong support for their
interaction and further supports the idea that PLD2 interacts with the
actin cytoskeleton.
-Actinin shares sequence homology to fodrin,
which was previously reported to inhibit PLD1 and PLD2 through an
indirect mechanism involving sequestration of PIP2 (41).
Our findings indicate that the mechanism of
-actinin inhibition of
PLD2 does not involve blockade of PIP2 but rather direct
interaction, suggesting that these related cytoskeletal proteins use
different mechanisms to achieve the same end: suppression of PLD
activity in cells. It has also been reported that PLD2 can be inhibited
by synuclein (42), which regulates synaptic transmission, and by
proteins involved in endocytosis (43), suggesting that different cells
may suppress PLD2 activity using different mechanisms, each one
appropriate for the primary role played by PLD2 in that particular cell type.
-actinin directly interacts with PLD2 through its N-terminal 185 amino acids as inhibits it.
-actinin inhibits PLD2 activity through direct
interaction with N-terminal 185 amino acids which contain the PX motif.
This result raised the possibility that PX domain might play a
regulatory role through direct interaction with regulatory proteins
such as
-actinin.
-actinin inhibition of PLD2 activity strongly supports the hypothesis that ARF1 can potently activate PLD2 activity in the in vivo setting where it is suppressed by inhibitory proteins.
-actinin with PLD2 and accordingly its inhibitory effect on PLD2
activity. It seems unlikely that the mechanism involves a simple
competition for an identical or overlapping binding site, since
-actinin interacts with the N terminus (Fig. 5B) and ARF
does not (25). However, several lines of evidence suggest that there
are interactions between the N terminus and C terminus for PLD. First,
there is synergism between factors that stimulate PLD1 through the N
terminus such as PKC and factors that stimulate PLD1 through the C
terminus, such as ARF and Rho and this synergism has been suggested to
involve conformational changes in the PLD structure (47). Second, PLD1
and PLD2 encode a "split" catalytic site, one part of which is in
the N-terminal half of the protein (but not in the first 308 amino
acids), and the other in the C-terminal half. It has been reported that
both catalytic sites are needed to be functional (48), that they are
likely to associate in the three-dimensional structure (49), and that
the N-terminal and C-terminal halves by themselves show affinity for
each other (50). Taken together, these findings suggest two
possibilities for the ARF-mediated reversal of
-actinin inhibition
of PLD. First, the sites of interactions for
-actinin and ARF1 with
PLD2 may lie far apart in the primary structure but close together in
the tertiary structure of PLD2. Accordingly, ARF might conceivably
physically interfere with the
-actinin-PLD2 interaction.
Alternatively, a conformational change induced by ARF might alter the
structure of the N terminus and accordingly eliminate the binding site
for
-actinin.
S and that the level of
ARF was increased there. Moreover, Honda et al. (37) have reported that ARF6 co-localizes with PLD2 in ruffling membranes after
treatment with EGF. Our finding that PLD2 is regulated by ARF1 and
-actinin further extends the hypothesis that extracellular agonists
can stimulate PLD2 activity in the actin cytoskeleton through the
action of ARF proteins.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the National Research Laboratory and Brain Research of Ministry of Science and Technology and the Center for Cell Signalling Research in the Republic of Korea (to S. H. R.) and by National Institutes of Health Grant GM54813 (to M. A. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
82-562-279-5971; Fax: 82-562-279-2199; E-mail:
sungho@postech.ac.kr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002463200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
PLD, phospholipase
D;
ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor;
GTP
S, guanosine
5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate);
PA, phosphatidic acid;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PIP2, phosphatidyl 4,5-bisphosphate;
PKC, protein kinase C;
small G proteins, low molecular weight
GTP-binding proteins;
MOPS, morpholinopropanesulfonic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
SL, sarcolemmal;
PX, phox.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Frohman, M. A., and Morris, A. J. (1999) Chem. Phys. Lipids. 98, 127-140 |
| 2. | Dhalla, N. S., Xu, Y. J., Sheu, S. S., Tappia, P. S., and Panagia, V. (1997) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 29, 2865-2871 |
| 3. | Xu, Y. J., Botsford, M. W., Panagia, V., and Dhalla, N. S. (1996) Can. J. Cardiol. 12, 1092-8 |
| 4. | Henry, R. A., Boyce, S. Y., Kurz, T., and Wolf, R. A. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, 349-358 |
| 5. | Bocckino, S. B., Wilson, P. B., and Exton, J. H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 6210-6213 |
| 6. | Xu, Y. J., Panagia, V., Shao, Q., Wang, X., and Dhalla, N. S. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, 651-659 |
| 7. | Novakova, O., Drnkova, J., Kubista, V., and Novak, F. (1994) Physiol. Res. 43, 151-156 |
| 8. | Sadoshima, J., and Izumo, S. (1993) Circ. Res. 73, 424-438 |
| 9. | Ye, H., Wolf, R. A., Kurz, T., and Corr, P. B. (1994) Cardiovasc. Res. 28, 1828-1834 |
| 10. | Exton, J. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15579-15582 |
| 11. | Lee, T. G., Park, J. B., Lee, S. D., Hong, S., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y., Yi, K. S., Bae, S., Hannun, Y. A., Obeid, L. M., Suh, P. G., and Ryu, S. H. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1347, 199-204 |
| 12. | Kim, J. H., Lee, S. D., Han, J. M., Lee, T. G., Kim, Y., Park, J. B., Lambeth, J. D., Suh, P. G., and Ryu, S. H. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 231-235 |
| 13. | Yamazaki, M., Zhang, Y., Watanabe, H., Yokozeki, T., Ohno, S., Kaibuchi, K., Shibata, H., Mukai, H., Ono, Y., Frohman, M. A., and Kanaho, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6035-6038 |
| 14. | Hammond, S. M., Jenco, J. M., Nakashima, S., Cadwallader, K., Gu, Q., Cook, S., Nozawa, Y., Prestwich, G. D., Frohman, M. A., and Morris, A. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3860-3868 |
| 15. | Sciorra, V. A, Rudge, S. A., Prestwich, G. D., Frohman, M. A, Engebrecht, J., and Morris, A. J. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5911-5921 |
| 16. | Kim, J. H., Kim, Y., Lee, S. D., Lopez, I., Arnold, R. S., Lambeth, J. D., Suh, P. G., and Ryu, S. H. (1999) FEBS Lett. 454, 42-46 |
| 17. | Colley, W. C., Sung, T. C., Roll, R., Jenco, J., Hammond, S. M., Altshuller, Y., Bar-Sagi, D., Morris, A. J., and Frohman, M. A. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 191-201 |
| 18. | Pitts, B. J. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 6232-6235 |
| 19. | Jensen, O. N., Vorm, O., and Mann, M. (1996) Electrophoresis 17, 938-944 |
| 20. | Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O., and Mann, M. (1996) Anal. Chem. 68, 850-858 |
| 21. | Mortz, E., Vorm, O., Mann, M., and Roepstorff, P. (1994) Biol. Mass. Spectrom 23, 249-261 |
| 22. | Jensen, O. N., Podtelejnikov, A. V., and Mann, M. (1997) Anal. Chem. 69, 4741-4750 |
| 23. | Crawford, A. W., Michelsen, J. W., and Beckerle, M. C. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 1381-1393 |
| 24. | Lambeth, J. D., Kwak, J. Y., Bowman, E. P., Perry, D., Uhlinger, D. J., and Lopez, I. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2431-2434 |
| 25. | Sung, T. C., Altshuller, Y. M., Morris, A. J., and Frohman, M. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 494-502 |
| 26. | Kim, Y., Han, J. M., Park, J. B., Lee, S. D., Oh, Y. S., Chung, C., Lee, T. G., Kim, J. H., Park, S. K., Yoo, J. S., Suh, P. G., and Ryu, S. H. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 10344-10351 |
| 27. | Kim, Y., Kim, J. E., Lee, S. D., Lee, T. G., Kim, J. H., Park, J. B., Han, J. M., Jang, S. K., Suh, P. G., and Ryu, S. H. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 319-330 |
| 28. | Rizzo, M. A., Shome, K., Vasudevan, C., Stolz, D. B., Sung, T. C., Frohman, M. A., Watkins, S. C., and Romero, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1131-1139 |
| 29. | Fukami, K., Furuhashi, K., Inagaki, M., Endo, T., Hatano, S., and Takenawa, T. (1992) Nature 359, 150-152 |
| 30. | Fukami, K., Sawada, N., Endo, T., and Takenawa, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2646-2650 |
| 31. | Panagia, V., Ou, C., Taira, Y., Dai, J., and Dhalla, N. S. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1064, 242-250 |
| 32. | Liu, S. Y., Tappia, P. S., Dai, J., Williams, S. A., and Panagia, V. (1998) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 30, 1203-1214 |
| 33. | Kodaki, T., and Yamashita, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11408-11413 |
| 34. | Ha, K. S., and Exton, J. H. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1789-1796 |
| 35. | Cross, M. J., Roberts, S., Ridley, A. J., Hodgkin, M. N., Stewart, A., Claesson-Welsh, L., and Wakelam, M. J. O. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 588-597 |
| 36. | Iyer, S. S., and Kusner, D. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2350-2359 |
| 37. | Honda, A., Nogami, M., Yokozeki, T., Yamazaki, M., Nakamura, H., Watanabe, H., Kawamoto, K., Nakayama, K., Morris, A. J., Frohman, M. A., and Kanaho, Y. (1999) Cell 99, 521-532 |
| 38. | Yamada, K. M., and Geiger, B. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 76-85 |
| 39. | Mukai, H., Toshimori, M., Shibata, H., Takanaga, H., Kitagawa, M., Miyahara, M., Shimakawa, M., and Ono, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4740-4746 |
| 40. | Kroemker, M., Rüdiger, A.-H., Jockusch, B. M., and Rüdiger, M. (1994) FEBS Lett. 355, 259-262 |
| 41. | Lukowski, S., Mira, J. P., Zachowski, A., and Geny, B. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248, 278-284 |
| 42. | Jenco, J. M., Rawlingson, A., Daniels, B., and Morris, A. J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4901-4909 |
| 43. | Lee, C., Kang, H. S., Chung, J. K., Sekiya, F., Kim, J. R., Han, J. S., Kim, S. R., Bae, Y. S., Morris, A. J., and Rhee, S. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15986-15992 |
| 44. | Meier, K. E., Gibbs, T. C., Knoepp, S. M., and Ella, K. M. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1439, 199-213 |
| 45. | Houle, M. G., and Bourgoin, S. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1439, 135-149 |
| 46. | Ponting, C. P. (1996) Protein. Sci. 5, 2353-2357 |
| 47. | Sung, T. C., Zhang, Y., Morris, A. J., and Frohman, M. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3659-3666 |
| 48. | Sung, T. C., Roper, R. L., Zhang, Y., Rudge, S. A., Temel, R., Hammond, S. M., Morris, A. J., Moss, B., Engebrecht, J., and Frohman, M. A. (1997) EMBO J 16, 4519-4530 |
| 49. | Waite, M. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1439, 187-197 |
| 50. | Xie, Z., Ho, W. T., and Exton, J. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34679-34682 |
| 51. | DeMatteis, M. A., Santini, G., Khan, R. A., DiTullio, G., and Luini, A. (1993) Nature 364, 818-821 |
| 52. | Fensome, A., Whatmore, J., Morgan, C., Jones, D., and Cockcroft, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13157-13164 |
| 53. | Song, J., Khachikian, Z., Radhakrishna, H., and Donaldson, J. G. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2257-2267 |
| 54. | Norman, J. C., Jones, D., Barry, S. T., Holt, M. R., Cockcroft, S., and Critchley, D. R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1981-1995 |
| 55. | Czarny, M., Lavie, Y., Fiucci, G., and Liscovitch, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2717-2724 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Gomez-Cambronero, M. Di Fulvio, and K. Knapek Understanding phospholipase D (PLD) using leukocytes: PLD involvement in cell adhesion and chemotaxis J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 82(2): 272 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ushio-Fukai Nuclear Phospholipase D1 in Vascular Smooth Muscle: Specific Activation by G Protein-Coupled Receptors Circ. Res., July 21, 2006; 99(2): 116 - 118. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Hornberger, W. K. Chu, Y. W. Mak, J. W. Hsiung, S. A. Huang, and S. Chien The role of phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mTOR signaling in skeletal muscle PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4741 - 4746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. McGrath, D. L. Cottle, M.-A. Nguyen, J. M. Dyson, I. D. Coghill, P. A. Robinson, M. Holdsworth, B. S. Cowling, E. C. Hardeman, C. A. Mitchell, et al. Four and a Half LIM Protein 1 Binds Myosin-binding Protein C and Regulates Myosin Filament Formation and Sarcomere Assembly J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7666 - 7683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Powner, R. M. Payne, T. R. Pettitt, M. L. Giudici, R. F. Irvine, and M. J. O. Wakelam Phospholipase D2 stimulates integrin-mediated adhesion via phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase I{gamma}b J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2005; 118(13): 2975 - 2986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kim, J. H. Kim, M. Ohba, P.-G. Suh, and S. H. Ryu Novel Functions of the Phospholipase D2-Phox Homology Domain in Protein Kinase C{zeta} Activation Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 3194 - 3208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||