![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 28, 21349-21354, July 14, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the ¶ Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research
Councils Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, Cheshire WA4 4AD, United
Kingdom and the Departments of
Received for publication, February 25, 2000, and in revised form, April 5, 2000
Small angle x-ray solution scattering has been
used to generate a low resolution, model-independent molecular envelope
structure for electron-transferring flavoprotein (ETF) from
Methylophilus methylotrophus (sp.
W3A1). Analysis of both the oxidized and
1-electron-reduced (anionic flavin semiquinone) forms of the protein
revealed that the solution structures of the protein are similar in
both oxidation states. Comparison of the molecular envelope of ETF from
the x-ray scattering data with previously determined structural models
of the protein suggests that ETF samples a range of conformations in
solution. These conformations correspond to a rotation of domain II
with respect to domains I and III about two flexible "hinge" sequences that are unique to M. methylotrophus ETF. The
x-ray scattering data are consistent with previous models concerning the interaction of M. methylotrophus ETF with its
physiological redox partner, trimethylamine dehydrogenase. Our data
reveal that an "induced fit" mechanism accounts for the assembly of
the trimethylamine dehydrogenase-ETF electron transfer complex,
consistent with spectroscopic and modeling studies of the assembly process.
Electron-transferring flavoproteins
(ETFs)1 act as physiological
electron carriers between degradative enzymes in bacteria and
mitochondria and their respective membrane-bound electron transport
pathways (1). ETFs are heterodimeric, and they all possess one
equivalent of non-covalently bound flavin-adenine dinucleotide (FAD)
per ETF dimer, with the exception of ETF from Megasphaera
elsdenii, which contains 2 equivalents of FAD per dimer (2). The
ETFs from pig, human, Paracoccus denitrificans, and
Methylophilus methylotrophus also contain 1 equivalent of AMP per protein dimer (3-6). ETF from M. methylotrophus
(sp. W3A1) is a highly specific electron
carrier that accepts electrons from only one enzyme, trimethylamine
dehydrogenase (TMADH) (7). In methylotrophic bacteria, TMADH catalyzes
the oxidative demethylation of trimethylamine to dimethylamine and
formaldehyde (8). The enzyme enables these organisms to subsist on
trimethylamine as their sole source of carbon. M. methylotrophus ETF consists of two subunits with molecular masses
of 34 and 29 kDa (9), and it shares considerable sequence identity with
bacterial and mammalian ETFs (3, 4). Preliminary crystallographic
studies of M. methylotrophus ETF have been reported, but to
date no crystallographic structure for the protein is available
(10).
Mammalian and bacterial ETFs are thought to act as 1-electron carriers,
cycling between the oxidized and anionic flavin semiquinone forms. The
ETF from M. elsdenii is unusual in that it serves as a
2-electron carrier. ETFs from mammalian sources and P. denitrificans can be reduced (albeit over a long time period) to
the dihydroquinone form by reduction with dithionite or during
photochemical reduction. M. methylotrophus ETF is readily
converted to the semiquinone form in reactions with TMADH or during
artificial reduction with dithionite. Further reduction of M. methylotrophus ETF to its dihydroquinone state can be accomplished
electrochemically (11) or when ETF is in complex with TMADH (12). That
ETF can be reduced to the 2-electron level when in complex with TMADH
provides evidence for structural perturbation on forming the electron
transfer complex. The midpoint reduction potentials of the
quinone/semiquinone and semiquinone/dihydroquinone couples of the FAD
in M. methylotrophus ETF have been determined (11). The
potential of the quinone/semiquinone couple is exceptionally high (+196
mV), consistent with a need to accept electrons from the 4Fe-4S center
of TMADH (midpoint potential, +102 mV (13)). The
semiquinone/dihydroquinone couple, however, is more conventional in
value ( The structure of human ETF has been determined at 2.1-Å resolution
(3), and this protein shares 31% sequence identity with M. methylotrophus ETF. Using the x-ray structure of human ETF as a
template, a model of the structure of M. methylotrophus ETF has been built both in free solution and in complex with TMADH (14).
The model predicts that the two subunits (subunit In this paper we have used small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS)
experiments to gain additional insight into the structural properties
of M. methylotrophus ETF in solution. This low resolution technique is a powerful method to probe the arrangement of domains in
multidomain proteins, protein oligomerization, and complex formation
(see e.g. Ref. 15). Moreover, the use of SAXS experiments to
obtain ab initio model-independent molecular envelope
structures of proteins in solution has been described (16, 17) as an effective approach for identifying molecular features and changes in
soluble proteins. The method, for example, has been used successfully to explore the large conformational change in metal-bound and metal
free transferrin (18) and the methane monooxygenase electron transfer
complex (19). Here we demonstrate that our SAXS data are consistent
with domain II of M. methylotrophus ETF pivoting around the
predicted hinge regions at the domain II/domain I and domain II/domain
III boundaries and that complex assembly with TMADH must therefore
proceed by an induced fit mechanism.
Expression of M. methylotrophus ETF in Escherichia coli--
The
region of M. methylotrophus genomic DNA encoding the two
subunits of ETF was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Oligonucleotide primers 1 (5' AAT GAA GGA GAC GAA GGT ATG AAG
ATA TTA GTG 3') and 2 (5' TTT TTT TTT AAA CTA TGC TGC AAG CTG CGC TTT
CAG CTC TTC 3') were designed using the published gene sequence for
M. methylotrophus ETF (9). The PCR was carried out using
Vent DNA polymerase as specified by the manufacturer (New England
Biolabs, Inc.). PCR products were purified using the Wizard PCR Preps
DNA purification system as specified by the manufacturer (Promega) and
then phosphorylated at the 5' termini using T4 polynucleotide kinase
(New England Biolabs, Inc.). T4 polynucleotide kinase was removed by
phenol/chloroform extraction, and the DNA was concentrated by ethanol
precipitation. PCR products were ligated to plasmid pKK223-3 (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) that had been digested with the restriction enzyme
SmaI and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase
to remove the 5' phosphate group. DNA from the ligation reaction was
used to transform the E. coli strain TG1. The correct
construct (pKKETF11) was verified by restriction analysis, and the
genes encoding ETF were resequenced to ensure that spurious changes had
not arisen during the amplification procedure. E. coli
strain TG1 transformed with pKKETF11 and grown at 22 °C in 2 × TY medium (10 g of bactotryptone, 10 g of yeast extract, 5 g of NaCl
per 1 liter) produced ~2.5 mg ETF per liter of late exponential phase
culture. Improved expression was achieved by deleting the M. methylotrophus ribosome-binding site located before the ETF genes
and replacing it with the ribosome-binding site found in the pKK223-3
expression vector. The deletion was performed using the QuikChange
site-directed mutagenesis kit supplied by Stratagene and
oligonucleotides 3 (5' CAC ACA GGA AAC AGA ATT CAT GAA GAT ATT AGT GGC
AG 3') and 4 (5' CTG CCA CTA ATA TCT TCA TGA ATT CTG TTT CCT GTG TG
3'). To ensure that no spurious changes had arisen as a result of the
mutagenesis reaction, the entire ETF gene was resequenced using the
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech T7 sequencing kit and protocols. Recombinant
ETF was expressed from the new plasmid (pED1) in the E. coli
strain TG1 at 20 °C on 2 × TY medium supplemented with 50 µg/ml timentin. The protein was purified in large quantities (~30
mg/liter of late exponential phase culture) as described by Chen and
Swenson (9).
Sample Preparation and X-ray Scattering Data Collection--
ETF
is purified in the reduced (anionic semiquinone) form. Oxidized ETF for
x-ray scattering studies was obtained by treatment with potassium
ferricyanide followed by rapid gel filtration (Sephadex 25) to remove
excess oxidant. Oxidized protein was used immediately in scattering
experiments after gel filtration and dilution (for concentration-dependent scattering experiments). UV-visible
absorption spectra were recorded before and after x-ray exposure for
samples in both oxidation states to ensure that no
x-ray-dependent redox change occurred. This also allowed
the concentration of ETF samples to be determined using the absorption
at 438 nm ( Interpretation of X-ray Scattering Data--
Reduction and
analysis of scattering data were performed as described previously
(18). The radius of gyration (Rg), the forward
scattering intensity (Io), and the intraparticle
distance distribution function p(r) were
calculated from the experimental scattering data using the indirect
Fourier transform method as implemented in the program GNOM (22).
Relative Io/c values
(c = sample concentration) give the relative molecular
weight of the protein samples when referenced against a suitable
standard (bovine serum albumin was used with a known molecular mass of 66 kDa). The maximum linear dimension (Dmax) of
the particle can be evaluated because of the characteristic of
p(r). The volume (V) of the particle
can be calculated from the Porod invariant (23) and a correction factor
taking into account the limited experimental scattering range (15).
The multipole expansion method proposed by Stuhrmann (24) and developed
by Svergun et al. (16) was used to obtain the molecular
shape of ETF. The smoothed scattering profile of reduced ETF was fitted
ab initio by the scattering from an envelope function starting from an ellipsoidal initial approximation (consistent with the
experimental Rg and Dmax
values). The molecular shape was characterized with spherical harmonics
using 19 free parameters (4th order harmonics), which is acceptable
given the minor differences compared with the shape obtained for 3rd
order harmonics (10 free parameters) and considering the information
content in the data used.
To take advantage of the already existing structural knowledge for this
three-domain protein, scattering data simulations were carried out
using atomic models of the structure of M. methylotrophus ETF (produced by homology modeling based on the crystal structure coordinates of human ETF (3)) in free solution and in the conformation expected when in complex with TMADH (14). Parameters and scattering curves were computed from the model coordinates using the program CRYSOL (25), which also considers the hydration shell of the solvated protein.
X-ray Solution Scattering Data--
The solution scattering curves
and intraparticle distance distributions for the oxidized and
semiquinone forms of M. methylotrophus ETF are shown in Fig.
2A. The figure clearly
demonstrates the very close similarity between the scattering profiles
for the oxidized and semiquinone forms of the protein. The
concentration-dependent low angle scattering region
(s Simulated X-ray Scattering Profiles from Molecular Models--
The
structure of M. methylotrophus ETF has previously been
modeled in two conformations (14). The first conformation (eT-inactive) was obtained from modeling studies in which the structure of M. methylotrophus ETF was built by homology using the crystal
coordinates of human ETF (Fig.
3A). The second conformation
(eT-active) is that obtained by rotating domain II by 50° with
respect to domains I and III such that it produces a complementary fit
with the ETF-binding site (26) seen in the crystal structure of TMADH
(27) (Fig. 3B). Using the molecular coordinates for these
models, simulated x-ray scattering profiles were generated for each
solvated ETF conformer and fitted against the experimental scattering
data for M. methylotrophus ETF (Fig. 3C). The
experimental scattering profile for M. methylotrophus ETF
does not match agreeably with the simulated profile generated from the
structural model for the eT-inactive conformation, which was based on
the crystal structure of human ETF. Significant differences in the low
angle (s Model-independent Molecular Shape Determination from Scattering
Data--
The smoothed experimental scattering profile for reduced
M. methylotrophus ETF was used to calculate an ab
initio low resolution molecular envelope structure for the
protein. Molecular shape calculations were carried out up to 4th order
harmonics, assuming that the molecule incorporates no axes of symmetry.
In all calculations performed, the protein envelope consists of three
apparent "domains," with two of these domains forming a lobed,
globular structure on top of which the third domain, a flattened
ellipsoid, sits. The theoretical scattering calculated from the
restored envelope is given in Fig. 2 as a dotted line (the fit resulted
in a residual value of 1.9%). Fig. 4
represents the average molecular envelope taking into account several
calculations starting from different initial shapes. Manual fitting of
the molecular models of M. methylotrophus ETF into this
molecular envelope structure resulted in an excellent fit between
domains I and III of the model with the two globular domains forming
the base of the molecular envelope. With domains I and III of the model
fitted to the envelope structure in this orientation, domain II of the
model sits at the center of the third domain of the envelope structure,
with the latter forming a flattened "halo" around the domain.
Spectroscopy Studies of ETF·TMADH Complex Assembly--
Previous
studies have established that there are spectral changes associated
with the binding of oxidized ETF to TMADH (12). These spectral changes,
coupled with the ability to reduce ETF to the 2-electron level when in
complex with TMADH, were taken as evidence for a structural
reorganization of ETF (i.e. induced fit) during complex
assembly. The SAXS profiles for both the oxidized and semiquinone forms
are very similar, indicating that the solution structure of ETF in both
redox states is similar. Difference spectroscopy studies of ETF·TMADH
complex assembly with semiquinone ETF also revealed major spectral
perturbation (Fig. 5), consistent with both redox forms of ETF undergoing conformational change during complex
assembly.
It was initially thought that the oxidation state of M. methylotrophus ETF may play a role in the predisposition of the
protein to be in either the eT-active or the eT-inactive conformation and that the redox state of the protein would act as a switch between
the different conformational states. However, the scattering data
indicate that this is not the case, because the SAXS profiles for both
oxidized and semiquinone ETF are practically indistinguishable, indicating essentially identical molecular conformations in solution.
The fitted experimental SAXS profile for M. methylotrophus
ETF closely resembled the simulated profile for the eT-active rather than the eT-inactive conformation of ETF, initially leading us to
believe that the conformation of M. methylotrophus ETF in
solution resembles that of the postulated eT-active form. With regard
to protein function, however, it would be unexpected and certainly less
beneficial if the protein existed predominantly in its active conformation regardless of its redox state. It would be less beneficial for ETF to exist predominantly in its active confirmation because in
the eT-active conformation the isoalloxazine ring is highly exposed,
rendering it susceptible to oxidative attack (by molecular oxygen) in
the semiquinone redox state. Intriguingly, as a result of the
pseudo-symmetry of domains I and III in the M. methylotrophus ETF model, domain II can be rotated by 50° in the
direction of domain III. This is contrary to the direction of rotation
in converting from the eT-inactive to eT-active conformations (where
the rotation is by 50° in the direction of domain I). In terms of the
low resolution molecular shape it would be difficult to distinguish
between the form of ETF in which the rotation of domain II is toward
domain III and the predicted eT-active form (i.e. in which
the rotation is toward domain I). Indeed the simulated scattering
profile of a model of M. methylotrophus ETF (in which domain
II is rotated 50° toward domain III) is as good as the simulated
profile for the model of eT-active ETF (Fig. 3C). The fit to
the experimental data results in a The continuous sampling of a range of conformations between the
extremes discussed above is in harmony with the molecular envelope of
M. methylotrophus ETF restored from the experimental SAXS
profile. Had there been a sizeable energy barrier between the two
extreme conformations (leading to a "flipping" from the eT-inactive
to an eT-active conformation and vice versa) one would expect to observe a more triangular molecular envelope structure. This
arises because domain II of the model would have to be located adjacent
to one or the other of the domains (domains I and III) that form the
globular base of the molecule. However, the calculated molecular
envelope forms a flattened halo around the locus of domain II of the
model. The fit between the molecular envelope structure and domains I
and III of the ETF model is clear-cut. Also, domain II of ETF cannot
occupy all areas of its corresponding halo simultaneously. Combined,
these factors concerning the molecular shape can be taken as evidence
to indicate that M. methylotrophus ETF is sampling a range
of conformations in solution. In so doing, domain II rotates freely
about the axis formed by the polypeptide hinges connecting it to
domains I and III. The molecular envelope structure thus represents an
average conformation for M. methylotrophus ETF in solution,
describing the range of positions occupied by domain II relative to
domains I and III. Furthermore, because the halo surrounding domain II
of the M. methylotrophus ETF model is flattened in the
direction of rotation, it indicates that movement of domain II with
respect to domains I and III occurs mainly in one dimension, with very
little "side to side" movement.
The experimental SAXS data can now be used to refine the original model
of domain motion in M. methylotrophus ETF proposed on the
basis of homology with the human ETF structure (14). Rather than
activation of the ETF·TMADH electron transfer complex being
associated with a simple 50° rotation of one of the domains of ETF
(i.e. a discrete transition from an eT-inactive to an
eT-active conformation) as originally proposed, complex formation
stabilizes the eT-active conformation of ETF. During complex formation,
the highly dynamic nature of ETF is transiently "frozen" in forming the eT-active conformation. This suppression of the ETF dynamics is
achieved by an induced fit mechanism for the interaction of ETF with
TMADH.
Finally, it is also worth commenting on the comparison between
structures of ETF in solution and solid state. Although no crystal
structure of M. methylotrophus ETF has been reported yet, atomic structures of the related human and P. denitrificans
protein (3, 4) can be considered as close structural templates. It is
therefore interesting to note that the distinct conformation of domain
II with respect to domains I and III in the crystalline state (which
has been denoted as the eT-inactive state) is in clear contrast to our
findings in solution. A close inspection of the molecular arrangements
in the crystalline lattice of the two known ETF structures reveals in
both cases several close contacts of domain II with domains from
neighboring molecules. It is the low energy non-covalent interactions
that can effectively influence conformations, particularly in the case
of multidomain proteins. Consequently, the crystal packing forces
arising from non-covalent bonds are likely to alter or stabilize
certain domain orientations. Considering human ETF, structural
flexibility would indeed be an asset because the protein has to
recognize a whole range of different redox partners suggestive of
different protein-protein interactions and docking conformations. By
having a dynamic interface this recognition might be achieved more
readily. The present study is a good illustration of how crystal
structures can be compared with structures investigated under close
physiological conditions, i.e. in solution (such as using
the solution x-ray scattering technique).
*
This work was funded by grants from the Biotechnology and
Biological Sciences Research Council, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1ELL) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
**
A Lister Institute Research Fellow. To whom correspondence may be
addressed. Tel.: 44 116 223 1337; Fax: 44 116 252 3369; E-mail:
nss4@le.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001564200
The abbreviations used are:
ETF, electron-transferring flavoprotein;
FAD, flavin-adenine dinucleotide;
TMADH, trimethylamine dehydrogenase;
eT, electron transfer;
SAXS, small
angle x-ray scattering;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
X-ray Scattering Studies of Methylophilus
methylotrophus (sp. W3A1)
Electron-transferring Flavoprotein
EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE CONFORMATIONAL STATES AND AN INDUCED FIT
MECHANISM FOR ASSEMBLY WITH TRIMETHYLAMINE DEHYDROGENASE*
,
,
, and
**
Biochemistry and
§ Chemistry, University of Leicester, University Road,
Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
197 mV), indicating that there is a kinetic block on full
reduction of ETF by dithionite (
530 mV) or photoexcited
deazariboflavin (
650 mV). The potentials measured for free ETF may
not of course reflect the situation in the electron transfer complex
but nevertheless are likely to serve as a reasonable guide.
(residues 1-321)
and subunit
(residues 322-585)) of M. methylotrophus ETF comprise three domains, viz. domain I (the N-terminal
region of the
subunit), domain II (the C terminus of the
subunit and a small C-terminal region of the
subunit), and domain
III (the majority of the
subunit). M. methylotrophus ETF
is thought to be Y-shaped, with domains I and III forming a shallow
"bowl" in which domain II rests; domain II is thought to be
connected to domains I and III by two flexible regions of polypeptide
chain (14). The isoalloxazine ring of FAD interacts almost exclusively with domain II (see Fig. 1). Significantly, the model shows that domain
II of the M. methylotrophus ETF model must be rotated by approximately 50° relative to domains I and III in order to form an
active electron transfer complex with TMADH (14) (Fig.
1). The models of ETF and the electron
transfer complex formed between TMADH and ETF suggest that ETF is a
dynamic molecule and that large scale conformational changes are
required for complex assembly. It has been proposed that free ETF
adopts a discrete electron transfer (eT)-inactive conformation similar
to that of crystalline human ETF, whereas in complex with TMADH, ETF
adopts an eT-active conformation. The possibility arises, however, that
free ETF can populate a range of conformations between the eT-inactive
and eT-active forms and that these are converted to the eT-active conformation during complex assembly.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Molecular graphics representation of domain
motion in M. methylotrophus ETF (14). In the
eT-inactive complex with TMADH (A) the isoalloxazine ring of
ETF is not adjacent to the residues thought to be on the electron
transfer pathway between TMADH and ETF (26), and there is a large
solvent-filled cavity at the interface of the two proteins. Rotation of
domain II by approximately 50 degrees relative to domains I and III
eliminates these difficulties (B).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
438 = 11,300 M
1 cm
1)
(7). SAXS experiments were performed with protein concentrations between 0.3 and 15 mg/ml. X-ray solution scattering data were collected
in two sessions with the low angle scattering camera on station 2.1 (20) at the Synchotron Radiation Source, Daresbury, UK using a
position-sensitive multiwire proportional counter (21). At the
sample-to-detector distance of 2.4 m and the x-ray wavelength of
= 1.54 Å, a momentum transfer interval of 0.002 Å
1
s
0.050 Å
1 was covered. The modulus of the momentum
transfer is defined as s = 2 sin
/
, where 2
is
the scattering angle. The s range was calibrated using an
oriented specimen of wet rat tail collagen (based on a diffraction
spacing of 670 Å). Samples were contained in a brass cell holding a
teflon ring sandwiched by two mica windows that defines a sample volume
of 120 µl and a thickness of 1.5 mm. The brass cell was maintained at
4 °C during data acquisition. Buffer and sample were measured in
alteration, each in a frame of 60 s (amounting to a total measuring
time of up to 30 min depending on sample concentration and changes
monitored on-line during experiments).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
0.01 Å
1) and radii of
gyration are emphasized in Fig. 2B. The intensity of the
scattering profiles at low scattering angles was found to increase as a
function of [ETF] for both the oxidized and semiquinone forms of the
protein, revealing interparticle interactions. Hence low concentration
(
2 mg/ml) measurements were crucial. Careful I0 analysis established that both forms of ETF
behaved as a heterodimeric protein (~60 kDa) in solution, and
aggregation effects and/or radiation damage may have been induced
during x-ray exposure (after examination of data collected in time
frames). The Rg values obtained by extrapolation
to zero concentration for oxidized and semiquinone ETF are virtually
identical (26.6 ± 0.4 Å and 26.5 ± 0.4 Å, respectively). Furthermore, the maximum linear dimension and volume of both ETF states
revealed equivalent values within error limits (x = 80 Å ± 4%, V = 110,000 Å3 ± 5%). This
illustrated that no large conformational transformation had occurred as
a result of changing the redox state of ETF. Moreover, the
p(r) function with a characteristic shoulder at
40 Å indicates a spread-out, Y-shaped conformation (with distinct
domain features) rather than a compact, globular structure.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Experimental SAXS results for solutions of
oxidized and semiquinone (reduced) M. methylotrophus
ETF. A, representation of the scattering curves
for oxidized (squares) and reduced (circles) ETF
using the combined low and high concentration data for the low angle
and outermost scattering region, respectively. Error bars
are based on counting statistics (only every third experimental data
point is shown for each scattering profile). Calculated distance
distribution functions are shown for both ETF forms (see
inset). I(s) and
p(r) functions for both protein states have been
normalized so that I(0) and the area under
p(r) are scaled to unity. The fit (solid
line) to the experimental SAXS curves represents the scattering
from the restored shape. B, the concentration effect at low
angle is highlighted for scattering profiles shown for oxidized ETF at
14.7 mg/ml and 0.5 mg/ml (solid lines) and for reduced ETF
at 10 mg/ml and 0.3 mg/ml (dotted lines). The concentration
dependence of the radii of gyration and linear regression curves are
shown in the inset graph. r, radius.
0.01 Å
1) and
intermediate angle (0.017 Å
1
s
0.025 Å
1) range result
only in a fit with
eT-inactive2 = 2.2 (Fig. 3C). In contrast, a good fit
(
eT-active2 = 1.5) is obtained for
the eT-active conformation of M. methylotrophus ETF, which
is also reflected in the agreement of calculated and experimental radii
of gyration. A good fit (
new
eT-inactive2 = 1.6) is also
obtained for the simulated scattering profile of a
model of M. methylotrophus ETF in which domain II is rotated 50° toward domain III.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A, molecular model of eT-inactive
M. methylotrophus ETF showing the polypeptide backbone of
the
(red) and
(green) subunits comprising
the three domains designated I, II, and III. Also shown is the FAD,
which forms the redox center of M. methylotrophus ETF.
B, molecular model of eT-active M. methylotrophus
ETF, which corresponds to eT-inactive M. methylotrophus ETF
with domain II rotated 50° relative to domains I and III. This domain
motion renders the structure of the M. methylotrophus ETF
model complementary to the crystal structure of the putative
ETF-binding site on TMADH. C, simulated x-ray scattering
profiles for molecular models of eT-inactive ETF (green) and
eT-active (red) M. methylotrophus ETF
(i.e. with domain II rotated 50° in the direction of
domain I) fitted against the experimental scattering curve for M. methylotrophus ETF (black circles with error bars; for
clarity only every second experimental data point is displayed). The
latter represents the combined scattering curve of reduced ETF as
illustrated in Fig. 2A. Also shown is the fit using the
further molecular model of eT-inactive M. methylotrophus ETF
where domain II is rotated 50° in the direction of domain III, thus
burying the cofactor in the domain interface (blue). The
radii of gyration for the active, inactive, and new inactive models are
26.1 Å, 24.9 Å, and 26.0 Å, respectively. For further explanations
see text.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Three orientations of the calculated
molecular envelope structure for M. methylotrophus ETF
superimposed over the molecular model of M. methylotrophus
ETF (based on homology with the crystal structure of human ETF;
the
and
subunits
are red and green,
respectively). This shows the excellent fit between the globular
base of the envelope structure and domains I and III of the model as
well as the halo formed around domain II by the molecular
envelope.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Spectral changes associated with the
formation of the TMADH·ETF electron transfer complex. A,
absorption spectrum of TMADH and oxidized ETF before (solid
line) and after (dashed line) mixing. Inset,
difference absorption spectrum (after mixing minus before mixing).
B, absorption spectrum of TMADH and semiquinone ETF before
(solid line) and after (dashed line) mixing.
Inset, difference absorption spectrum (after mixing minus
before mixing). Conditions: 15 µM ETF, 10 µM TMADH, 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer,
pH 7.0. Kd for complex dissociation is ~10
µM (12).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 value of 1.6. This
additional model for eT-inactive M. methylotrophus ETF
(i.e. rotation toward domain III) represents a more
"closed" conformation, with the FAD embedded in the interface
between domains II and III. However, it is difficult to consider that
the protein acts like a conformational switch by going from this more
closed, inactive conformation to the eT-active conformation upon
oxidation (even though our SAXS results alone cannot completely exclude this possibility). We suggest, not least in view of our spectroscopic studies, that M. methylotrophus ETF may continuously sample
this more closed eT-inactive conformation and the eT-active
conformation and in doing so also populates other conformations between
these two extremes. Such flexibility may account for the difficulties associated with crystallizing M. methylotrophus ETF.
Therefore, the uniformity of the observed SAXS profiles (bearing in
mind that the scattering measurements represent a time average) for oxidized and semiquinone M. methylotrophus ETF would
indicate that this motion is independent of the redox state of ETF.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 44 1925 60344;
Fax: 44 1925 603748; E-mail: J.G.Grossmann@dl.ac.uk.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Thorpe, C.
(1991)
in
Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes
(Muller, F., ed), Vol. II
, pp. 471-486, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
2.
Whitfield, C. D.,
and Mayhew, S. G.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
2801-2810
3.
Roberts, D. L.,
Frerman, F. E.,
and Kim, J.-J. P.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14355-14360
4.
Roberts, D. L.,
Salazar, D.,
Fulmer, J. P.,
Frerman, F. E.,
and Kim, J.-J. P.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
1977-1989
5.
Sato, K.,
Nishina, Y.,
and Shiga, K.
(1993)
J. Biochem.
114,
215-222
6.
Duplessis, E. R.,
Rohlfs, R. J.,
Hille, R.,
and Thorpe, C.
(1994)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
32,
195-199
7.
Steenkamp, D. J.,
and Gallup, M.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
4086-4089
8.
Steenkamp, D. J.,
and Mallinson, J.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
429,
705-719
9.
Chen, D. W.,
and Swenson, R. P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32120-32130
10.
White, S. A.,
Mathews, F. S.,
Rohlfs, R. J.,
and Hille, R.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
240,
265-266
11.
Byron, C. M.,
Stankovich, M. T.,
Husain, M.,
and Davidson, V. L.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
8582-8587
12.
Jang, M.-H.,
Scrutton, N. S.,
and Hille, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12546-12552
13.
Barber, M. J.,
Pollock, V.,
and Spence, J. T.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
256,
657-659
14.
Chohan, K. K.,
Scrutton, N. S.,
and Sutcliffe, M. J.
(1998)
Protein Pept. Lett.
5,
231-236
15.
Feigin, L. A.,
and Svergun, D. I.
(1987)
Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering
, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
16.
Svergun, D. I.,
Volkov, V. V.,
Kozin, M. B.,
Stuhrmann, H. B.,
Barberato, C.,
and Koch, M. H. J.
(1997)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
30,
798-802
17.
Grossmann, J. G.,
and Hasnain, S. S.
(1997)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
30,
770-775
18.
Grossmann, J. G.,
Crawley, J. B.,
Strange, R. W.,
Patel, K. J.,
Murphy, L. M.,
Neu, M.,
Evans, R. W.,
and Hasnain, S. S.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
279,
461-472
19.
Gallagher, S. C.,
Callaghan, A. J.,
Zhao, J.,
Dalton, H.,
and Trewhella, J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
6752-6760
20.
Towns-Andrews, E.,
Berry, A.,
Bordas, J.,
Mant, P. K.,
Murray, K.,
Roberts, K.,
Sumner, I.,
Morgan, J. S.,
Lewis, R.,
and Gabriel, A.
(1989)
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
60,
2346-2349
21.
Lewis, R. R.
(1994)
J. Synchrotron Radiat.
1,
43-53
22.
Semenyuk, A. V.,
and Svergun, D. I.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
537-540
23.
Porod, G.
(1951)
Kolloid Z.
124,
83-114
24.
Stuhrmann, H. B.
(1970)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
26,
297-306
25.
Svergun, D.,
Barberato, C.,
and Koch, M. H. J.
(1995)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
28,
768-773
26.
Wilson, E. K.,
Huang, L.,
Sutcliffe, M. J.,
Mathews, F. S.,
Hille, R.,
and Scrutton, N. S.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
41-48
27.
Lim, L. W.,
Shamala, N.,
Mathews, F. S.,
Steenkamp, D. J.,
Hamlin, R.,
and Xuong, N. H.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
15140-15146
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Shi, J. Mersfelder, and R. Hille The Interaction of Trimethylamine Dehydrogenase and Electron-transferring Flavoprotein J. Biol. Chem., May 27, 2005; 280(21): 20239 - 20246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Scott and R. A. Ludwig Azorhizobium caulinodans electron-transferring flavoprotein N electrochemically couples pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity to N2 fixation Microbiology, January 1, 2004; 150(1): 117 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jones, F. Talfournier, A. Bobrov, J. G. Grossmann, N. Vekshin, M. J. Sutcliffe, and N. S. Scrutton Electron Transfer and Conformational Change in Complexes of Trimethylamine Dehydrogenase and Electron Transferring Flavoprotein J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8457 - 8465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Talfournier, A. W. Munro, J. Basran, M. J. Sutcliffe, S. Daff, S. K. Chapman, and N. S. Scrutton alpha Arg-237 in Methylophilus methylotrophus (sp. W3A1) Electron-transferring Flavoprotein Affords ~200-Millivolt Stabilization of the FAD Anionic Semiquinone and a Kinetic Block on Full Reduction to the Dihydroquinone J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2001; 276(23): 20190 - 20196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Chohan, M. Jones, J. G. Grossmann, F. E. Frerman, N. S. Scrutton, and M. J. Sutcliffe Protein Dynamics Enhance Electronic Coupling in Electron Transfer Complexes J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2001; 276(36): 34142 - 34147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. H. Zhou, W. Liao, R. H. Cheng, J. E. Lawson, D. B. McCarthy, L. J. Reed, and J. K. Stoops Direct Evidence for the Size and Conformational Variability of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Revealed by Three-dimensional Electron Microscopy. THE "BREATHING" CORE AND ITS FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP TO PROTEIN DYNAMICS J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2001; 276(24): 21704 - 21713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |