Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003177200 on April 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 28, 21364-21371, July 14, 2000
Interferon-
Induces Nmi-IFP35 Heterodimeric Complex Formation
That Is Affected by the Phosphorylation of IFP35*
Xiangjun
Zhou
§,
Jian
Liao¶,
Anke
Meyerdierks
,
Li
Feng
,
Louie
Naumovski**,
Erik C.
Böttger
, and
M. Bishr
Omary

From the
Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center
and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94304, the
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische
Hochschule Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany, and the ** Department of
Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Received for publication, September 15, 1999, and in revised form, April 19, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Nmi and IFP35 are interferon (IFN)-induced
proteins. In cells treated with IFN-
, Nmi enhances the association
of transcription co-activator CBP/p300 with signal transducer and
activator of transcription proteins, and IFP35 forms a high molecular
weight cytosolic complex of unknown constituents. Here we show that Nmi and IFP35 co-immunoprecipitate with an anti-keratin 19 antibody, which
is due to cross-reaction of the antibody with Nmi, and suggests an
Nmi-IFP35 physical association. In support of this, Nmi and IFP35
co-immunoprecipitate using anti-Nmi and anti-IFP35 antibodies, manifest enhanced colocalization as determined by immunofluorescence staining of IFN-treated cells, and form heterodimers as determined by
chemical cross-linking. Nmi and IFP35 are primarily cytosolic proteins,
and their interaction is increased after IFN-
treatment of cells as
early as 1 h after exposure. Sucrose gradient sedimentation and
size fractionation showed a shift of Nmi-IFP35 heterodimers toward a
heavier fraction (100-200 kDa) in IFN-
-treated cells. This dynamic
complex formation is reversed by pretreatment with okadaic acid.
Two-dimensional gel analysis indicates that the IFN-induced complex
formation correlates with IFP35 dephosphorylation. Our data demonstrate
Nmi-IFP35 cytosolic localization and heterodimerization, and an
IFN-
-regulated molecular event in which Nmi and IFP35 participate,
reversibly and by a dephosphorylation dependent fashion, in a
100-200-kDa molecular complex formation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The early cellular responses to
IFN,1 in terms of signal
transduction and immediate gene expression, have been studied
extensively (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). The essential role of the
molecular signaling complex of IFN receptors/Janus kinases (JAKs)/STATs in signal transduction has been demonstrated by many studies including mouse knock-out experiments (3-7). In general, the IFN
receptor-preassociated kinase JAKs are activated by
IFN-dependent IFN-
/
receptor dimerization or IFN-
receptor tetramerization. JAKs then initiate a tyrosine phosphorylation
cascade within the signaling complex, resulting in activation of STATs
through tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent dimerization
(e.g. STAT1/2 heterodimers for IFN-
/
, and STAT1 homodimers for IFN-
). Activated STATs are then rapidly translocated into the nucleus by unknown mechanism(s) and bind to specific DNA
sequences, then activate transcription of early responsive genes (8,
9). The known crystal structure of a tyrosine-phosphorylated and
DNA-bound STAT1 homodimer highlights the molecular detail by which
STAT-DNA binding is controlled by the intermolecular regulatory
interactions of phosphorylated tyrosine-Src homology 2 domains between
two STATs (10). More recently, human cDNA microarray analysis of
cells treated with IFN identified regulated gene expression patterns
that had some similarities as well as differences depending on the IFN
(
versus
) (11). These studies of IFN signal
transduction provide insight to our understanding of cellular events by
which IFN exert their biological effects, including antiviral and
antiproliferative effects, which have not been fully elucidated.
Although it is thought that the biological effects of IFN are likely
carried out by their induced proteins, many IFN-induced proteins are
poorly characterized, and no specific IFN-induced gene products have
been linked directly to antiproliferative activity (1). Two
independently identified IFN-induced proteins are Nmi
(N-Myc-interacting protein) and IFP35 (IFN-induced 35-kDa protein).
IFP35 was identified by differential screening of cDNA libraries
from HeLa cells treated with IFN-
(12). IFP35 contains an N-terminal
leucine zipper domain, and is translocated into a 200-440-kDa complex
with unknown constituents in cells exposed to IFN-
(13). The
transcription factor B-ATF associates with IFP35, as demonstrated by
yeast two-hybrid screening and in vitro pull-down
experiments (14). Human IFP35 is located within a 500-kilobase region
of chromosome 17q21 which also includes the BRCA1 gene (15).
Nmi was first cloned as a Myc-interacting protein by yeast two-hybrid
screening, and is located within human chromosome 22q13.3 where
translocations have been reported in some human leukemias (16, 17). Nmi
contains two Nmi-IFP35 homolog domains (18, 19), interacts with all
STATs except STAT2, and augments IFN-
signal transduction (20).
In this study we show that IFN-
induces Nmi-IFP35 association.
Identification of this association occurred as part of experiments aimed at characterizing proteins that associate with the epithelial specific intermediate filament protein, keratin polypeptide 19 (K19),
using an anti-K19 monoclonal antibody (mAb) termed 4.62. Two proteins
with apparent molecular masses of 38 and 35 kDa co-purified with K19.
Microseqencing of these two proteins showed that they correspond to Nmi
and IFP35, respectively. Further characterization of Nmi and IFP35 and
their apparent association with K19 supported the conclusion that
anti-K19 mAb 4.62 recognizes Nmi upon IFN treatment of cells rather
than that Nmi/IFP35 bind to K19. However, we demonstrate using several
modalities that Nmi and IFP35 do associate physically and form a
100-200 kDa complex upon IFN stimulation of cells. This complex
formation is dynamic and correlates with IFP35 dephosphorylation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture, Constructs, Antibodies, and Reagents--
Human
HT29 (colon), Molt-4 (leukemic T lymphocyte), and Jurkat (leukemic T
lymphocyte) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA) and were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and
100 µg/ml streptomycin. The antibodies used were: anti-keratin 19 mAbs 4.62 (Sigma), A53-B/A2.26 (B/A2, NeoMarkers, Union City, CA), and
KA4 (a gift from Dr. Robert Webster); anti-K18 mAbs L2A1 (21) and CK5
(Sigma); anti-IFP35 rabbit polyclonal and mAb (Rb35 and mAb35,
respectively; Ref. 12); anti-Nmi rabbit Ab (RbNmi, Refs. 18 and 19);
anti-lamin B1 mAb (Zymed Laboratories Inc.
Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA); and anti-Ep-CAM mAb I4D4 which
recognizes an epithelial-specific cell surface cell adhesion molecule
(22). Anti-STAT1 (sc-464), c-Myc (9E10), CBP (sc-319), and c-Fos
(sc-253x) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,
CA). Disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and immobilized protein A-Sepharose
were supplied by Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, IL). The in
vitro TNT T7 quick coupled transcription/translation system was
from Promega (Madison, WI). The Nmi cDNA (in the pcDNA3.1/GS plasmid) was supplied by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Bacterial expressed
maltose-binding protein (MBP) fused IFP35 plasmid pMALc IFP35 was
generated by in-frame subcloning of IFP35 cDNA into a pMALc vector
(New England BioLab, Beverly, MA). The
[35S]methionine/cysteine protein labeling mixture (1186 Ci/mmol) was purchased from NEN Life Science Products Inc. (Boston,
MA). Recombinant interferon-
-2b and -
were from Schering
(Kenilworth, NJ) and Genentech (South San Francisco, CA), respectively.
The phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (OA) was from Alexis Corp. (San
Diego, CA).
Immunobiochemical Methods--
Cells, pre-exposed to a variety
of treatments, were collected and washed with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS), pH 7.4. Cells then were solubilized with 1% Nonidet P-40 in PBS
supplemented with 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM pepstatin A, 10 µM leupeptin, 25 µg/ml aprotinin (Nonidet P-40 buffer)
(45 min, 4 °C), followed by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was used for
immunoprecipitation with different antibodies and protein A-Sepharose
4B. Precipitates were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) and Coomassie staining (23), by Western blotting
after transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (24), or by
two-dimensional isoelectric focusing (IEF)/SDS-PAGE electrophoresis
followed by Western blotting (25). Immunoblotted bands were visualized
using enhanced chemiluminescence. For chemical cross-linking, cell
extracts (Nonidet P-40 solubilized or non-detergent cytosolic
fractions) were incubated with 1 mM DSS (10 min, 22 °C)
with intermittent mixing. The cross-linking reaction was quenched by
the addition of nonreducing SDS-PAGE sample buffer, or 100 mM glycine in Nonidet P-40 buffer for subsequent immunoprecipitation. Microsequencing was done after isolation of the
35- and 38-kDa protein bands by co-immunoprecipitation using mAb 4.62 (preparative scale) followed by in-gel digestion with Lys-C, then
sequencing of several high performance liquid chromatography-separated
peptides as described (21).
Bacterial Expression, in Vitro Translation, and Metabolic
Labeling--
Escherichia coli host TB-1 was transformed
with the MBP-IFP35 fusion plasmid pMALc IFP35 and cultured in the
presence of isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. The
harvested cells were sonicated, followed by passing the cell extract
through an amylose column to immobilize fused MBP-IFP35. [35S]Methinione/cysteine-labeled Nmi was produced by an
in vitro TNT quick coupled transcription-translation system,
according to the supplier's instructions. The in vitro
translation reaction mixture was diluted (1:100) with Nonidet P-40
buffer then incubated with 10 µl of MBP-IFP35/amylose resin (1 h,
4 °C) or with anti-K19, control, or anti-Nmi antibodies (14 h,
4 °C). After washing, the immunoprecipitates and resin were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography using Amplify (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Cellular Fractionation, Size Fractionation, and Sucrose Gradient
Sedimentation--
Adherent HT29 cells (near confluence,
~107 cells) were rinsed twice using PBS, scraped off the
dish, suspended in 1 ml of PBS and subjected to five cycles of
freeze-thawing to disrupt the cells. Complete disruption was
ascertained by trypan blue staining. After spinning at 16,000 × g for 2 min, the supernatant was removed and further
ultracentrifuged at 45,000 rpm for 1 h (Beckman TL-100 ultracentrifuge and TLA-45 rotor). The post-second spin supernatant was
collected as the cytosolic fraction. The same steps (45 min solubilization of the pooled pellets, 2 min 16,000 × g
spinning followed by 1 h 45,000 rpm spinning) were applied to the
pellets of both centrifugations, after solubilization with 1 ml of
Nonidet P-40 buffer (1 h) to generate an Nonidet P-40 fraction.
Similarly, the two post-Nonidet P-40 pellets were solubilized for
1 h with 1 ml of 1% Empigen BB (Emp) in PBS then ultracentrifuged
to generate an Emp and pellet fractions. The Nonidet P-40, Emp, and
residual pellet extracts represent membrane-enriched, cytoskeletal, and nuclear-enriched, and insoluble fractions, respectively (26). All
buffers and detergent solutions (4 °C) contained 5 mM
EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM pepstatin A, 10 µM leupeptin, 25 µg/ml
aprotinin. Equivalent proportions of the four HT29 cell fractions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting.
The cytosolic fraction was also subjected to immunoprecipitation,
sucrose gradient centrifugation, or size fractionation by centrifugal
filters. The centrifugal filters used for size fractionation were
CentriconTM YM-100 which retain >90% of proteins larger than 97 kDa
(Millipore, Bedford, MA). Cytosolic fractions (500 µl) were passed
through the filter by centrifugation (1,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C) and washed twice with 1 ml of PBS by spinning (1,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C). Both flow-through (~2.4 ml) and
retained fraction (~100 µl) were recovered. The flow-through was
further concentrated with Centricon YM-10 (5,000 × g
spinning, 2 h, 4 °C) and the volume of retained material was
adjusted to be equivalent to the retained material from CentriconTM
YM-100. Equal portions of the flow-through and retained material were
analyzed by Western blotting using anti-Nmi and anti-IFP35 antibodies.
For sucrose gradient centrifugation, a 10-ml continuous 0 to 50%
sucrose gradient (in PBS with 5 mM EDTA) was prepared using
a gradient mixer. An HT29 cell cytosolic fraction (1 ml) was layered at
the top of the gradient, followed by ultracentrifugation (38,000 rpm,
18 h, SW40 rotor). Fractions (1 ml/fraction for fraction numbers
1-7 in Fig. 6 and number 1-6 in Fig. 7, 0.5 ml/fraction for numbers
8-14 in Fig. 6 and numbers 7-15 in Fig. 7) were collected after
puncturing the tube bottom with a 20-gauge needle. Aliquots of
fractions (which contained most of Nmi and IFP35) were subjected to DSS
cross-linking followed by SDS-PAGE, transfer to polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes, then blotting with anti-IFP35 or Nmi antibodies.
Ultracentrifugation of molecular weight reference proteins (catalase,
human IgA, myosin,
-galactosidase, bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin,
carbonic anhydrase, and soybean trypsin inhibitor) and fraction
collection were similarly done, followed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie
staining to determine the migration position of the protein standards.
Immunofluorescence Staining--
HT29 cells were seeded in an
8-chamber slide (Nalge Nunc, Naperville, IL) (10,000 cells/well),
allowed to adhere, then cultured in the absence or presence of IFN-
(1000 IU/ml, 16 h), then fixed with methanol (3 min,
20 °C).
After blocking with PBS containing 2.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.2 mg/ml RNase A (blocking buffer) for 30 min, cells were co-incubated
with mAb35 (1:50 dilution) and RbNmi (1:100 dilution) in blocking
buffer for 30 min. After washing three times, cells were incubated with
10% goat serum in blocking buffer for 15 min followed by a 20-min
incubation with Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:100
dilution), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
antibody (1:100 dilution), and Toto-3 DNA staining dye (1:10,000
dilution), and then washed five times with PBS. All incubations were
done at 25 °C. Images were captured using a Nikon TE300 microscope coupled to a Bio-Rad MRC1024 confocal microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Co-immunoprecipitation of Nmi and IFP35 with Anti-K19 mAb
4.62--
As part of characterizing potential keratin-associated
proteins in human colonic HT29 cells, we used HT29 cell Nonidet P-40 lysates to immunoprecipitate different keratin pairs. Keratins, the
intermediate filament proteins of epithelial cells, are expressed as
obligate noncovalent heteropolymers (27). Of the >20-member keratin
family, enterocytes express preferentially keratin (K) polypeptides 8 and 18 (K8/18) with variable levels of K19 and K20. Immunoprecipitation
of K8/18 (preferentially) using mAb L2A1 or CK5 also co-precipitates
the already characterized associated proteins 14-3-3 and heat shock
protein 70 that associate with K18 and K8, respectively (Fig.
1A, lanes 1 and 2)
(28, 29). However, immunoprecipitation of K8/19 using mAb 4.62 (which
preferentially recognizes K19; Ref. 30) co-precipitated (in addition to
HSP70 which associates with K8) two proteins with an apparent molecular mass of 38 and 35 kDa (Fig. 1A, lane 3, asterisks highlight
p38 and p35). The co-precipitated p38 and p35 appeared to associate specifically with K19 since they were absent in anti-K18
immunoprecipitates of HT29 cell lysates, and from mAb 4.62 precipitates
from Molt-4 cell lysates (Fig. 1A, lane 4) that lack
keratins (not shown).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Anti-K19 mAb 4.62 co-precipitates
interferon-induced Nmi and IFP35 proteins. Panel A,
near confluent HT29 or Molt-4 cells were solubilized using Nonidet P-40
buffer then used for immunoprecipitation with antibodies that recognize
K8/18 (L2A1 and CK5), K8/19 (4.62) preferentially, or with normal
ascites (Ig) as control. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed under
nonreducing conditions by SDS-PAGE then Coomassie staining. Two
proteins (mass of 38 and 35 kDa) that co-purified with K19 using mAb
4.62 (lane 3) are highlighted with asterisks.
Note that small amounts of K19 and K18 co-precipitate with K8/18 and
K8/19, respectively, due to the heteropolymeric nature of keratins and
the normal association of the so-called type II keratins
(e.g. K8) with type I keratins (e.g. K18 and 19).
The heavy Ig band at the top of the gel is seen in
lanes 2-5 but not in lane 1 since mAb L2A1 was
covalently coupled to the protein A-Sepharose beads. Panel
B, HT29 cells were cultured with or without 1,000 IU/ml IFN-
for 16 h, then used to immunoprecipitate K8/18 with mAb L2A1 or
K8/19 with mAb 4.62 followed by analysis with SDS-PAGE and Coomassie
staining. Panel C, K8/18 (L2A1) and K8/19 (4.62)
immunoprecipitates were obtained from IFN- -treated and untreated
HT29 cells as in panel B. Precipitates were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining, or were transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes followed by immunoblotting with anti-Nmi or
anti-IFP35 antibodies. Aliquots of Nonidet P-40 solubilized cell
lysates were also analyzed concurrently.
|
|
Microsequencing of peptides isolated from purified p38 and p35 afforded
the sequences NVTEIPDTLREDQM (p38) and TRGGGEVEALTVVPQG and
IPLVFRGHTQQDPEVPK (p35) with 100% identity with residues 160-173 of
Nmi and residues 219-234 and 272-287 of IFP35, respectively. Since
Nmi and IFP35 are IFN-induced proteins (12, 18), we tested and showed
that Nmi/IFP35 association with K8/19 precipitates is far more easily
detectable upon treatment of HT29 cells with IFN-
(Fig.
1B). Further confirmation of p38 and p35 identity was
obtained by immunoblotting K8/18 and K8/19 precipitates that were
isolated from IFN-
(Fig. 1C) or -
(not shown) treated
and untreated HT29 cells with anti-IFP35 and anti-Nmi antibodies. We
further tested the specificity of co-immunoprecipitation of Nmi/IFP35
with K19 using two other anti-K19 antibodies, KA4 and B/A2, which
recognize different K19 epitopes to those recognized by mAb 4.62 (30).
Nmi co-precipitates with K8/19 only upon using mAb 4.62 but not B/A2
(Fig. 2A) or KA4 (not shown
but identical to mAb B/A2 results). This suggested that Nmi and/or
IFP35 may be recognized by mAb 4.62 after IFN-
induction, or that
their association with K19 blocked recognition by mAb B/A2 and KA4. To
distinguish between these possibilities, we examined mAb 4.62 and L2A1
immunoprecipitates, obtained from Jurkat cell lysates, by
immunoblotting with anti-Nmi/IFP35 antibodies. Of note, Jurkat cells
express Nmi and IFP35 but not keratins. Interestingly, mAb 4.62 but not
L2A1 (Fig. 2B) or mAbs B/A2 or KA4 (not shown)
co-immunoprecipitates IFP35 (Fig. 2B) and Nmi (not shown)
from Jurkat cell lysates. Furthermore, blotting of K8/19
immunoprecipitates, that were obtained from IFN-treated Jurkat and HT29
cells, with mAb 4.62 showed that it also cross-reacts with Nmi but not
IFP35 (Fig. 2C, lane 1). In addition, Nmi and IFP35
co-immunopurify together upon precipitation using mAb 4.62 regardless
of whether HT29 cells (K19 containing) or Jurkat cells (K19 lacking)
are used (Fig. 2C, lanes 1-6). The recognition of Nmi by
mAb 4.62 was further confirmed by the immunoprecipitation of in
vitro translated and 35S-labeled Nmi with mAb 4.62 but
not with mAb B/A2 (Fig. 2D). Taken together, these results
indicate that mAb 4.62 recognizes Nmi by molecular mimicry, after
IFN-
exposure of cells, and that Nmi associates with IFP35.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Anti-K19 mAb 4.62 recognizes Nmi.
Panel A, HT29 cells, cultured with or without 1,000 IU/ml
IFN- for 16 h, were solubilized then the lysates were used for
immunoprecipitation with mAb 4.62 or B/A2. Precipitates were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining, or by immunoblotting using anti-Nmi
antibody. Blotting of identical precipitates using anti-IFP35 antibody
gave similar results (not shown). Panel B, Nonidet P-40
lysates of HT29 or Jurkat cells (±IFN- as in panel A)
were subjected to immunoprecipitation with mAb L2A1 or 4.62 followed by
immunoblotting with mAb35 (anti-IFP35) or mAb 4.62 (anti-K19).
Panel C, identical lysates to those in panel B
were obtained from HT29 (H) or Jurkat (J) cells
then used for immunoprecipitation with anti-K19 mAb 4.62. Precipitates
were analyzed by immunoblotting with mAb 4.62, RbNmi, or mAb35.
Panel D, in vitro translated and
[35S]methionine/cysteine-labeled Nmi was used for
immunoprecipitation with mAb 4.62, B/A2, RbNmi, or normal rabbit serum
(NRS). The immunoprecipitates (i.p.) were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography. An aliquot of the
in vitro translation reaction mixture was also loaded on the
same gel (lane 5) to indicate the position of the
35S-labeled Nmi protein.
|
|
Nmi and IFP35 Are Primarily Cytosolic Proteins and Their
Association Is Induced by IFN--
We examined the cellular
localization of Nmi and IFP35 by immunoblotting of four HT29 cellular
fractions: cytosol, membrane (Nonidet P-40 soluble),
cytoskeletal/nuclear (Emp soluble), and insoluble pellet (Fig.
3, A and B). Most
of Nmi and IFP35 are found in the cytosol, but a small population is
present in the Nonidet P-40 and Emp fractions (Fig. 3A).
IFN-
induced a slight increase of Nmi/IFP35 in all fractions (Fig.
3A), and in some experiments the level of increase was more
dramatic (e.g. Fig. 1C and not shown). Lack of
significant contamination of the different fractions was verified by
immunoblotting using antibodies to membrane associated (Ep-CAM) and
nuclear (lamin B1) markers (Fig. 3A). Similar
results were obtained by immunoprecipitation of K8/19 from the
cytosolic and Nonidet P-40 fractions of HT29 cells (Fig. 3B). The preferential recognition of the Nmi-IFP35 complex
by mAb 4.62 after IFN-
treatment, in a fashion that is independent of Nmi/IFP35 protein levels, suggests that a modification and/or a
conformational change of Nmi allow recognition by mAb 4.62. Such
recognition occurs within 1 h upon HT29 cell exposure to IFN-
and peaks by 24 h (Fig. 3C). Exposure to IFN-
beyond
24 h gives similar results to the 24-h time point (not shown).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The spatial-temporal distribution of Nmi and
IFP35 in HT29 cells treated with IFN- .
Panel A, HT29 cells, cultured with or without 1,000 IU/ml
IFN- (16 h), were fractionated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Equivalent ratios (by volume) of each fraction were
analyzed by immunoblotting using RbNmi (a), mAb35
(b), mAb I4D4 (c), and anti-lamin B1
(d). Panel B, HT29 cell cytosolic and Nonidet
P-40 fractions, isolated as in panel A, were incubated with
mAb 4.62 to immunoprecipitate K8/19. Precipitates were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining, or by blotting with RbNmi and mAb35.
Panel C, HT29 cells were cultured in the presence of 1,000 IU/ml IFN- for the indicated times followed by precipitation of
K8/19 with mAb 4.62. Precipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE then
Coomassie staining, or were blotted with anti-Nmi (RbNmi) or
anti-IFP35 (mAb35) antibodies.
|
|
Nmi and IFP35 Form Heterodimers--
In order to examine the
nature of Nmi and IFP35 association, we performed pull-down,
co-immunoprecipitation, and chemical cross-linking experiments. The
MBP-IFP35 fusion protein, but not MBP, binds with in vitro
translated and 35S-labeled Nmi (Fig.
4A). In addition, Nmi and
IFP35 co-immunoprecipitate with each other, when using anti-Nmi or
anti-IFP35 antibodies, from IFN-
-treated (Fig. 4B, lanes
5-8) or untreated cells (Fig. 4B, lanes 1-4).
However, Nmi-IFP35 association becomes recognized by mAb 4.62 preferentially in cells after IFN-
treatment (Fig. 4B,
compare lanes 4 and 8). Chemical cross-linking of
HT29 cell lysates followed by immunoprecipitation using anti-Nmi and
anti-IFP35 antibodies (RbNmi and Rb35, respectively) then blotting with
anti-IFP35 mAb35 demonstrated that Nmi and IFP35 form heterodimers
(Fig. 4C, note generation of a 75-kDa species after
cross-linking with simultaneous loss of the 35-kDa IFP35 band). We were
unable to obtain meaningful data if an identical membrane to that used
in Fig. 4C is blotted with RbNmi due to the high background
that results from two antibodies of the same species (i.e.
rabbit antibody for both immunoprecipitation and blotting, not shown).
Colocalization of Nmi and IFP35 in cells was also demonstrated by
indirect immunofluorescence staining of HT29 cells with RbNmi and
mAb35. As shown in Fig. 5, there is
partial colocalization of Nmi and IFP35 in HT29 cells, and the extent
of colocalization increases after IFN-
treatment commensurate with
increased Nmi/IFP35 levels. Of note, fluorescence staining is likely to
underestimate the colocalization since most of Nmi and IFP35 are
soluble cytosolic proteins (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nmi and IFP35 form heterodimers.
Panel A, in vitro translated and
[35S]methionine/cysteine labeled Nmi was incubated with
bacterial expressed MBP-IFP35 fusion or MBP proteins immobilized on
amylose resin. After washing, the remaining resin-bound proteins were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE, Coomassie staining, and fluorography. Panel
B, Nonidet P-40 lysates were obtained from HT29 cells that were
cultured in the absence (lanes 1-4) or presence
(lanes 5-8) of 1,000 IU/ml IFN- (16 h).
Immunoprecipitates were then obtained from the lysates using Rb35
(lanes 2 and 6), RbNmi (lanes 3 and
7), mAb 4.62 (lanes 4 and 8), or
normal rabbit serum (lanes 1 and 5) followed by
immunoblotting of the SDS-PAGE resolved precipitates with RbNmi or
mAb35 antibodies. Panel C, Nonidet P-40 lysates, similar to
those used in panel B, were incubated with or without 1 mM DSS for 10 min at 22 °C, quenched with 100 mM glycine, then used for immunoprecipitation with Rb35
(lanes 1-4) or RbNmi (lanes 5-8), followed by
immunoblotting with mAb35. The arrowhead indicates a
nonspecific antibody-reactive band.
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
INF- induces partial
colocalization of Nmi with IFP35 as determined by immunofluorescence
staining. HT29 cells, with or without IFN- treatment (1,000 IU/ml, 16 h), were triple-stained using mAb35 (anti-IFP35,
red color, left panels), RbNmi (anti-Nmi,
green color, middle panels), and Toto-3 (DNA
staining dye, blue color, all panels) as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Staining was analyzed by
confocal microscopy and images show scanning of a single plane. Note
the increased Nmi-IFP35 co-localization signal (yellow
color, right panels), and staining intensity in cells
after IFN- treatment.
|
|
IFN Induces Nmi-IFP35 Heterodimer Formation and Participation in a
100-200-kDa Complex--
The cross-linking and co-immunoprecipitation
results shown in Fig. 4 clearly indicated that Nmi and IFP35 form
heterodimers. We further investigated the size of this complex and
whether IFN-
plays a role in modulating its size. For this we first
used size exclusion filters (i.e. CentriconTM YM-100) that
allow >90% retention of proteins >97 kDa, in order to distinguish
Nmi or IFP35 monomers and Nmi-IFP35 heterodimers from other >100 kDa
complexes containing Nmi or IFP35. As shown in Fig.
6A, the amounts of Nmi and
IFP35 from IFN-treated and untreated HT29 cells were relatively similar in the flow-through (lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8), but
were significantly increased in the retained fractions (lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10). This indicates that IFN may induce the
formation of a >100 kDa complex that contains Nmi and IFP35 with or
without other possible proteins. To address this further, we subjected
the HT29 cell cytosolic fractions (obtained from cells with or without
IFN-
treatment) to sucrose gradient centrifugation, followed by DSS
cross-linking. As shown in Fig. 6B, immunoblotting of the
sucrose gradient centrifugation fractions with mAb35 and RbNmi
indicated that Nmi and IFP35 are mainly in fractions 10 and 11, which
correspond to molecular mass in the range of 100-200 and 50-100 kDa,
respectively. The Nmi and IFP35 in fraction number 11 likely represents
the heterodimeric form, while species in fraction 10 correspond to
higher mass complexes. RbNmi antibody does not recognize the 75-kDa
cross-linked species (Fig. 6B), although it is able to
recognize it by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4C). Notably, both
Nmi and IFP35 signals in IFN-
-treated cells shifted toward the
heavier fraction 10, which indicate that IFN induces the formation of
the 100-200-kDa Nmi/IFP35-containing complex.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
INF- induces
Nmi and IFP35 complex formation. Panel A, cytosolic
fractions of HT29 cells (with or without 1,000 IU/ml IFN- treatment
for 16 h) were obtained as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The
fractions were allowed to pass through CentriconTM YM-100 filters by
centrifugation. Aliquots from the flow-through (FT) and
retained (Ret) subfractions, along with input cytosol prior
to subfractionation (Input), were separated by SDS-PAGE
followed by immunoblotting with RbNmi (anti-Nmi) or mAb35
(anti-IFP35) antibodies. Note the shift in intensity of the
Nmi and IFP35 signals in the retained fractions (+ versus
IFN- ) as compared with the input and flow-through samples that
gave more similar +IFN versus IFN-associated signals.
Panel B, cytosolic fractions of HT29 cells (with or without
1,000 IU/ml IFN- -treatment for 16 h) were subfractionated over
a sucrose gradient as described under "Experimental Procedures."
All subfractions were analyzed for the presence of Nmi/IFP35 and only
subfractions 8-13 had any measurable Nmi/IFP35 (not shown).
Subfractions (numbers 8-13) were further divided into two parts, one
of which was cross-linked using DSS (as described in the legend to Fig.
4). The cross-linked and uncross-linked subfractions were analyzed by
Western blotting with RbNmi (anti-Nmi) or mAb35
(anti-IFP35) antibodies. Asterisks highlight the
cross-linked and migration-shifted IFP35 products. The anti-Nmi
antibody does not recognize the cross-linked Nmi-containing product(s)
by immunoblotting. The ranges of molecular sizes for each fraction are:
numbers 8, >300 kDa; 9, 150-300 kDa;
10, 100-200 kDa; 11, 50-100 kDa; 12,
20-50 kDa; 13, <20 kDa as determined by processing of
molecular reference markers under identical conditions.
|
|
IFN-induced Complex Formation Correlates with IFP35
Dephosphorylation--
In order to examine whether phosphorylation
plays a role in IFP35-Nmi heterodimerization and the 100-200-kDa
complex formation, IFN-treated HT29 cells were cultured in the presence
or absence of OA. Phosphatase inhibition by OA reversed the IFN-induced
complex formation, as demonstrated by the shift of IFP35 (and Nmi which colocalized with IFP35, not shown) toward the lighter fractions (Fig.
7A). Two-dimensional gel
analysis revealed four IFP35 and two Nmi charged isoforms (Fig.
7B, panels a and d, respectively). The IFP35
isoforms shift toward the basic direction upon IFN treatment while Nmi
isoforms remain unchanged (Fig. 7B, panels b and
e) which suggests IFN-induced IFP35 dephosphorylation. This
was supported by metabolic labeling with 32PO4
(not shown) and by incubating IFN-treated HT29 cells with OA which
results in IFP35 hyperphosphorylation without any apparent effect on
Nmi phosphorylation (Fig. 7B, panels c and f).
Exposure of IFN-treated cells to OA does not affect the IFP-Nmi
association as determined by cross-linking using DSS (not shown) or by
co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 7C, lanes 3 and 4),
but does affect the ability of the anti-K19 4.62 mAb to recognize
Nmi-IFP35 (Fig. 7C, lanes 1 and 2). The IEF
profile of Nmi-IFP35 that is co-immunoprecipitated using mAb 4.62 (from
IFN-treated HT29 cells) is similar to that obtained by direct IFP35
immunoprecipitation (not shown). Taken together, these data suggest
that the IFN-induced 100-200 kDa complex formation and the recognition
of IFP-Nmi by anti-K19 mAb 4.62 are associated with IFP35
dephosphorylation but inhibited by IFP35 hyperphosphorylation.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
IFN- -induced IFP35
dephosphorylation correlates with the 100-200-kDa complex
formation. Panel A, cytosolic preparations were
isolated from IFN-treated (1,000 IU/ml, 16 h) HT-29 cells that
were cultured in the presence or absence of OA (0.2 µg/ml for the
last hour of culture). The cytosolic preparations were analyzed by
sucrose gradient centrifugation, fraction collection then
immunoblotting with anti-IFP35 antibody as described in the legend to
Fig. 6. Note that the fraction numbers in this panel differ from those
in Fig. 6 due to differences in the volume of collected fractions (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Note the shift of the IFP35-containing
fraction to a lighter kDa (i.e. higher fraction number) upon
OA exposure. Panel B, IFP35 and Nmi immunoprecipitates that
were obtained from HT-29 cells (± IFN; +IFN and +OA) followed by
two-dimensional separation (IEF then SDS-PAGE in the horizontal then
vertical dimension, respectively). Separated samples were then
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes followed by blotting
with the indicated antibodies. Panel C, HT29 cells were
cultured in the presence of IFN (± OA) as in panel
A followed by immunoprecipitation of K19 or IFP35 then blotting of
the precipitates with anti-IFP35 or anti-Nmi antibodies. The amount of
immunoprecipitated K19 in lanes 1 and 2 are
equivalent as determined by Coomassie staining (not shown).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Anti-K19 mAb 4.62 Cross-reacts with Nmi Upon IFN Induction--
As
part of studying K19-associated proteins using anti-K19 antibodies, we
encountered the Nmi and IFP35 proteins which co-immunoprecipitated with
K19 using mAb 4.62 (Fig. 1). However, further characterization indicated that this apparent trimolecular complex is due to anti-K19 mAb 4.62 recognition of Nmi by molecular mimicry after IFN-
treatment (Fig. 2), with pull down of IFP35 due to its physical
association with Nmi (Fig. 4). Amino acid sequence alignment of Nmi and
K19 shows no significant similarity (also true for IFP35 and K19), which suggests that Nmi recognition by 4.62 is likely to be
conformation-dependent rather than primary amino acid
sequence-dependent. To that end, the epitope of mAb 4.62 on
K19 was mapped to K19 amino acids 346-359 (30). Within this region,
the maximal homology between Nmi and K19 is 195VDYDRQS
(Nmi) versus 355ADSERQN (K19). We examined the
possibility that these homology regions may represent the 4.62 recognition site on Nmi by testing the peptides
192EDRVDYDRQSGS (from Nmi) and 352DVRADSERQNQE
(from K19) for their ability to block binding of mAb 4.62 to Nmi and/or
K19. However, neither peptide had any measurable effect (not shown),
thereby suggesting that Nmi linear amino acid sequence 192-203 is not
involved in mAb 4.62 recognition. The preferential recognition of
IFN-
-induced and IFP35-bound Nmi by 4.62 makes this antibody a
useful reagent for studying Nmi dynamics upon IFN-
activation,
particularly in non-epithelial cells that normally do not express K19.
Although mAb 4.62 can recognize Nmi without IFN-
activation, the
efficiency and stoichiometry of recognition increase dramatically even
when taking into consideration the induction of Nmi protein levels by
IFN-
(e.g. Fig. 1C, lanes 3 and 4 versus
5 and 6 and Fig. 3, A and B).
Another important point to make is a cautionary one in that
co-immunoprecipitation studies that conclude protein-protein
associations should be done with more than one antibody. Cross-reaction
of anti-keratin antibodies with other proteins has been reported
previously. For example, a mouse anti-rat K19 antibody (termed mAb RK7)
cross-reacts with cytocentrin, a 102-kDa protein that associates with
the pole of the mitotic apparatus (31). In addition, an anti-p53
antibody can also recognize epidermal keratins depending on the
keratinocyte differentiation state (32).
Nmi-IFP35 Heterodimeric and Complex Formation--
The recently
described role of Nmi in cytokine signaling, by enhancing STAT-CBP/p300
complex formation in cells treated with interleukin-2 or IFN-
,
raises the possibility that it may represent a general mechanism in
cytokine signal transduction (20). IFP35 may interact with the
transcription factor B-ATF (14) and form part of a 200-440-kDa complex
in IFN-
-treated HeLa cells, although its function is unknown (13).
Our identification of Nmi association with IFP35 may shed light on the
function of Nmi and IFP35 since their association by definition links
at least one aspect of their function together. We show here that Nmi
and IFP35 are primarily cytosolic proteins, although they are present
in small amounts in the membrane and cytoskeletal/nuclear fractions of
HT29 cells (Fig. 3A). The interaction of Nmi and IFP35, as
shown by 4.62 co-immunoprecipitation, appears in IFN-
-treated cells
as early as 1 h (Fig. 3C) and is likely due to an
IFN-
-regulated modification that allows recognition by mAb 4.62. The
IFN-
-induced Nmi-IFP35 interaction peaks at 24 h (Fig.
3C) and lasts up to 72 h after IFN-
treatment (not
shown), also in part due to the IFN-
-induced expression of both
proteins. This suggests that an IFN-
-regulated Nmi-IFP35 interaction
occur as part of post-translational and translational contributions.
Isoelectric focusing analysis of Nmi/IFP35 obtained by mAb 4.62 (not
shown), RbNmi (Fig. 7B, panel d), and Rb35 (Fig. 7B,
panel a) immunoprecipitations show that Nmi and IFP35 have
multiple isoforms (two for Nmi and 4 for IFP35) that are (in the case
of IFP35) modulated upon IFN or IFN/OA exposure.
The evidence for Nmi-IFP35 heterodimerization was demonstrated by the
generation of a 75-kDa mAb35-recognized band in Nmi and IFP35
immunoprecipitates of DSS cross-linked HT29 cell lysates (Fig.
4C). This 75-kDa species likely consists of IFP35 (35 kDa) and Nmi (38 kDa). The interaction of Nmi and IFP35 is also supported by
in vitro binding of the MBP-IFP35 fusion protein with
35S-labeled in vitro translated Nmi (Fig.
4A), by their reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation from HT29
cell lysates (Fig. 4B), by their co-immunoprecipitation using mAb 4.62 (Fig. 1), and by their in vivo co-localization (Fig. 5). It
is important to emphasize that Nmi-IFP35 heterodimers occur under basal
conditions (e.g. Fig. 4, B and C) but
heterodimer formation also increases as Nmi and IFP35 are induced by
IFN-
. In addition, IFN-
results in higher order complex formation
(Fig. 6) that includes Nmi-IFP35 in association with a molecular event
that allows the anti-K19 antibody mAb 4.62 to recognize Nmi-IFP35 (Fig.
1).
The size fractionation results (Fig. 6A) indicate that a
subpopulation of Nmi and IFP35 participate in a >100 kDa complex that
increases in stoichiometry after IFN-
exposure. This was supported
by sucrose gradient centrifugation which further refined the molecular
weight range of the complex to 100-200 kDa (Fig. 6B, fraction
10). The observation of a cross-linked 75-kDa, but not a larger
Nmi/IFP35 containing species, suggests that the potential remaining
component(s) of this complex are inaccessible to DSS or that the
100-200-kDa complex is not recognized by blotting with the anti-IFP35
antibody. However, the possibility of Nmi-IFP35 heterotetramer
formation upon IFN-
stimulation cannot be ruled out. Given that
IFP35 is found in a 200-440-kDa molecular complex in HeLa cells (13)
and that Nmi associates with STATs and CBP/p300 in peripheral blood
lymphocytes (20), it is possible that STATs, CBP/p300, or other
reported Nmi and IFP35-interacting proteins such as Myc, Fos, and Jun
may be involved in the observed 100-200-kDa Nmi-IFP35 complex in HT29
cells. Immunoprecipitation of HT29 cell (with or without IFN-
treatment) lysates (with or without DSS cross-linking) with RbNmi or
Rb35 followed by immunoblotting with antibodies to STAT1, c-Myc, CBP,
and c-Fos, and vice versa, failed to identify any associations between
these proteins and Nmi/IFP35 (not shown).
An important feature of Nmi-IFP35 interaction is its regulation by
IFN-
. The Nmi and IFP35 binding, as examined by RbNmi and mAb35
immunoblotting of mAb 4.62 immunoprecipitates with HT29 cell lysates,
is not induced by insulin-like growth factor-1, hepatocyte growth
factor, and epidermal growth factor (not shown). The molecular
mechanism underlying the IFN-
-induced 100-200-kDa complex formation
appears to involve IFP35 dephosphorylation (Fig. 7). Inspection of the
IFP35 protein sequence (12) shows at least 7 Ser/Thr potential
phosphorylation sites (based on proximity to Pro and Lys/Arg residues)
whose in vivo identification may shed light on the precise
regulation and function of the IFN-induced complex described herein.
The IFN-
-regulated Nmi-IFP35 complex formation is likely to play a
role in IFN-
signaling or cellular response(s), and links at least
some aspects of Nmi and IFP35 functions together. Further
characterization of the Nmi-IFP35 interaction and complex formation,
and their regulation, should provide insight into the cellular response
to IFN-
.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Kris Morrow for preparing the
figures, Dr. Robert Webster for supplying the KA4 antibody, Dr. Young
Moo Lee (University of California Davis, Protein Structure Laboratory)
for performing microsequencing, Dr. Diana Toivola for assistance with
confocal microscopy, and Dr. Kayoko Kanda for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 244 B9 (to E. C. B.), a
Veterans Affairs Career Development Award (to M. B. O.), and
National Institutes of Health Grant DK47918 (to M. B. O.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by Training Grant DK07056 (to Stanford University School
of Medicine). To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
¶
Current address: Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA 94303.

To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Palo Alto
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 154J 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA
94304. Fax: 650-852-3259.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003177200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon(s);
IFP35, IFN-induced 35-kDa protein;
JAK, Janus kinases;
K, keratin;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
Nmi, N-Myc-interacting protein;
OA, okadaic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
DSS, disuccinimidyl suberate;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stark, G. R.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Williams, B. R.,
Silverman, R. H.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
227-264
|
| 2.
|
Boehm, U.,
Klamp, T.,
Groot, M.,
and Howard, J. C.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
749-795
|
| 3.
|
Kjerrulf, M.,
Grdic, D.,
Ekman, L.,
Schon, K.,
Vajdy, M.,
and Lycke, N. Y.
(1997)
Immunology
92,
60-68
|
| 4.
|
Rodig, S. J.,
Meraz, M. A.,
White, J. M.,
Lampe, P. A.,
Riley, J. K.,
Arthur, C. D.,
King, K. L.,
Sheehan, K. C.,
Yin, L.,
Pennica, D.,
Johnson, E. M., Jr.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Cell
93,
373-383
|
| 5.
|
Neubauer, H.,
Cumano, A.,
Muller, M.,
Wu, H.,
Huffstadt, U.,
and Pfeffer, K.
(1998)
Cell
93,
397-409
|
| 6.
|
Durbin, J. E.,
Hackenmiller, R.,
Simon, M. C.,
and Levy, D. E.
(1996)
Cell
84,
443-450
|
| 7.
|
Meraz, M. A.,
White, J. M.,
Sheehan, K. C.,
Bach, E. A.,
Rodig, S. J.,
Dighe, A. S.,
Kaplan, D. H.,
Riley, J. K.,
Greenlund, A. C.,
Campbell, D.,
Carver-Moore, K.,
DuBois, R. N.,
Clark, R.,
Aguet, M.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1996)
Cell
84,
431-442
|
| 8.
|
Leonard, W. J.,
and O'Shea, J. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
293-322
|
| 9.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635
|
| 10.
|
Chen, X.,
Vinkemeier, U.,
Zhao, Y.,
Jeruzalmi, D.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
827-839
|
| 11.
|
Perou, C. M.,
Jeffrey, S. S.,
van de Rijn, M.,
Rees, C. A.,
Eisen, M. B.,
Ross, D. T.,
Pergamenschikov, A.,
Williams, C. F.,
Zhu, S. X.,
Lee, J. C.,
Lashkari, D.,
Shalon, D.,
Brown, P. O.,
and Botstein, D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9212-9217
|
| 12.
|
Bange, F. C.,
Vogel, U.,
Flohr, T.,
Kiekenbeck, M.,
Denecke, B.,
and Bottger, E. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1091-1098
|
| 13.
|
Meyerdierks, A.,
Denecke, B.,
Rohde, M.,
Taparowsky, E. J.,
and Bottger, E. C.
(1999)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
47,
169-182
|
| 14.
|
Wang, X.,
Johansen, L. M.,
Tae, H. J.,
and Taparowsky, E. J.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
229,
316-322
|
| 15.
|
Brown, M. A.,
Jones, K. A.,
Nicolai, H.,
Bonjardim, M.,
Black, D.,
McFarlane, R.,
de Jong, P.,
Quirk, J. P.,
Lehrach, H.,
and Solomon, E.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4362-4366
|
| 16.
|
Bao, J.,
and Zervos, A. S.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
2171-2176
|
| 17.
|
Bannasch, D.,
Weis, I.,
and Schwab, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6810-6817
|
| 18.
|
Lebrun, S. J.,
Shpall, R. L.,
and Naumovski, L.
(1998)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
18,
767-771
|
| 19.
|
Lee, N. D.,
Chen, J.,
Shpall, R. L.,
and Naumovski, L.
(1999)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
19,
1245-1252
|
| 20.
|
Zhu, M.,
John, S.,
Berg, M.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1999)
Cell
96,
121-130
|
| 21.
|
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
345-357
|
| 22.
|
Chou, C. F.,
Riopel, C. L.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
298,
457-463
|
| 23.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 24.
|
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354
|
| 25.
|
Liao, J.,
Ku, N-O.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1996)
Electrophoresis
17,
1671-1676
|
| 26.
|
Omary, M. B.,
Ku, N. O.,
Liao, J.,
and Price, D.
(1998)
Subcell. Biochem.
31,
105-140
|
| 27.
|
Fuchs, E.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1998)
Science
279,
514-519
|
| 28.
|
Ku, N. O.,
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1892-1906
|
| 29.
|
Liao, J.,
Lowthert, L. A.,
Ghori, N.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
915-922
|
| 30.
|
Bottger, V.,
Stasiak, P. C.,
Harrison, D. L.,
Mellerick, D. M.,
and Lane, E. B.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
231,
475-485
|
| 31.
|
Paul, E. C.,
and Quaroni, A.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
106,
967-981
|
| 32.
|
Weinberg, W. C.,
and Yuspa, S. H.
(1997)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
109,
611-612
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Li, T.-H. Lee, and H. Avraham
A Novel Tricomplex of BRCA1, Nmi, and c-Myc Inhibits c-Myc-induced Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene (hTERT) Promoter Activity in Breast Cancer
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 31, 2002;
277(23):
20965 - 20973.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Chen, R. L. Shpall, A. Meyerdierks, M. Hagemeier, E. C. Bottger, and L. Naumovski
Interferon-inducible Myc/STAT-interacting Protein Nmi Associates with IFP 35 into a High Molecular Mass Complex and Inhibits Proteasome-mediated Degradation of IFP 35
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 10, 2000;
275(46):
36278 - 36284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|