![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 28, 21444-21452, July 14, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Republic of Singapore
Received for publication, January 21, 2000, and in revised form, March 13, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PRL-1, -2, and -3 represent a novel class of
protein-tyrosine phosphatase with a C-terminal prenylation motif.
Although PRL-1 has been suggested to be associated with the nucleus,
the presence of three highly homologous members and the existence of a
prenylation motif call for a more detailed examination of their
subcellular localization. In the present study, we first demonstrate
that mouse PRL-1, -2, and -3 are indeed prenylated. Examination of N-terminal epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 expressed in transiently transfected cells suggests that PRL-1, -2, and -3 are present on the
plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures. Stable Chinese
hamster ovary cells expressing PRL-1 and -3 in an inducible manner were
established. When cells were treated with brefeldin A, PRL-1 and -3 accumulated in a collapsed compact structure around the
microtubule-organizing center. Furthermore, PRL-1 and -3 redistributed
into swollen vacuole-like structures when cells were treated with
wortmannin. These characteristics of PRL-1 and -3 are typical for
endosomal proteins. Electron microscope immunogold labeling reveals
that PRL-1 and -3 are indeed associated with the plasma membrane and
the early endosomal compartment. Expression of PRL-3 is detected in the
epithelial cells of the small intestine, where PRL-3 is present in
punctate structures in the cytoplasm. When cells are treated with
FTI-277, a selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor, PRL-1, -2, and -3 shifted into the nucleus. Furthermore, a mutant form of PRL-2 lacking
the C-terminal prenylation signal is associated with the nucleus. These
results establish that the primary association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the membrane of the cell surface and the early endosome is
dependent on their prenylation and that nuclear localization of these
proteins may be triggered by a regulatory event that inhibits their prenylation.
Dynamic tyrosine phosphorylation-dephosphorylation is a major
regulatory event affecting the functional activities of diverse proteins that participate in many aspects of cellular, physiological, and pathogenic processes. The protein-tyrosine phosphatase
(PTP)1 superfamily
encompasses a large group of enzymes that undoubtedly play key roles in
the regulation of the above events. The PTPs are classified into
subgroups depending on their form and substrate specificity, with the
receptor-like transmembrane and some intracellular PTPs being specific
for phosphophotyrosine, whereas other intracellular PTPs are of dual
specificity and dephosphorylate phosphoserine/threonine as well as
phosphotyrosine residues (1-3). The cellular roles and substrates of
many PTPs remain unknown.
The PRL phosphatases (PRL-1, -2, and -3) are three closely related
intracellular enzymes that possess the PTP active site signature
sequence CX5R (4-8). All are proteins of about
20 kDa with at least 75% amino acid sequence similarity. They resemble the dual specificity phosphatases of the PTP superfamily in having few
of the conserved catalytic domain residues typical of the tyrosine-specific PTPs, although PRL-1 has so far only been
demonstrated to dephosphorylate phosphotyrosyl substrates in
vitro (4). Furthermore, outside of themselves, their highest
homology is to Cdc14p, a dual specificity phosphatase that regulates
mitotic exit (9-11), and to PTEN, a dual specificity PTP that
functions as a tumor supressor and has an additional and unique lipid
phosphatase activity (12-15). PRL-1 is the founding member of these
PRL phosphatases. The PRL-1 gene was originally identified as an
immediate early gene whose expression is induced in mitogen-stimulated
cells and regenerating liver (16). Overexpression of PRL-1 can lead to cell transformation, suggesting that it may participate in key events
that regulate cell growth (4, 6), although the underlying mechanism is
currently unknown. A most interesting feature of PRL-1, -2, and -3 is
the presence of a consensus C-terminal CAAX sequence for
prenylation (17, 18), where C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino
acid, and X is any amino acid. Three types of
prenyltransferase carry out the addition of either farnesyl (C15) or
geranylgeranyl (C20) isoprenoids to cellular proteins. Farnesyltransferase (FT) and geranylgeranyl transferase I (GGT I) are
heterodimeric Previous studies suggest that PRL-1 is localized to the interior of the
nucleus (4). Because prenylated proteins are normally associated with
cellular membranes and PRL-1 contains the consensus motif for
prenylation, we have re-examined the subcellular localization of PRL-1
using an different approach. In addition, because PRL-1, -2, and -3 share high degrees of amino acid sequence homology, antibodies against
one may potentially cross-react with others. The subcellular
localization of each PRL was thus investigated independently. Our
results suggest that PRL-1, -2, and -3 are farnesylated and normally
associated with the membrane of the cell surface and the early
endosome. We show that this membrane association depends on their
prenylation and that unlipidated PRL-1, -2, and -3 are shifted into the nucleus.
Materials--
CHO-K1 and other cell lines were obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Synthetic
oligonucleotides were from Oligos Etc (Wilsonville, OR). The
Pyrococcus furiosus DNA polymerase was a product of
Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). The Taq DNA polymerase and Hybond
C-extra nitrocellulose filters were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. Glutathione-Sepharose 4B was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and
rhodamine-conjugated goat were purchased from American Type Culture
Collection, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated c-Myc antibody
(9E10) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-rabbit
IgG was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Brefeldin A was
from Epicentre Technologies (Madison, WI). Wortmannin was purchased
from Sigma. The FTI-277 was a gift from Dr. S. M. Sebti (H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute).
[3H]Farnesyl pyrophosphate and
[3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate were bought from NEN
Life Science Products.
Expression of Recombinant Proteins in Bacteria--
To construct
plasmids expressing wild-type PRLs, the coding regions of PRL-1, -2, and -3 were retrieved by PCR using Pfu polymerase and
appropriate forward primers incorporating a BamHI or a
SalI restriction site and reverse primers incorporating an
EcoRI restriction site. To construct a plasmid expressing a
mutant form of PRL-2 lacking the C-terminal four amino acids (amino
acids 164-167) of the CAAX box (PRL-2-cd), the PRL-2
cDNA was amplified using the same forward primer as above (with an
added SalI site) in conjuction with a reverse primer
corresponding to the sequence encoding amino acids 159-163 and with an
added EcoRI site. Mutant PRL-2 (C101S), where the essential
cysteine residue of the active site of the phosphatase was replaced by
serine, was obtained through a first PCR reaction using a forward
primer corresponding to the desired nucleotide substitution
(5'-TGTGTTGCAGTGCATAGTGTTGCAGGATTGGGA-3'), and the reverse primer was
used to amplify wild-type PRL-2. The completed first PCR reaction was
then used as a template in a second PCR reaction employing the forward
(with an added BamHI site) and reverse (with an added
EcoRI site) primers used to amplify wild-type PRL-2 (above).
All PCR fragments were inserted into the
BamHI-EcoRI-digested pGEX-KG vector (34) or into
the SalI-EcoRI-digested pGEX-3C vector (35) and
sequenced to verify the insertions. The plasmids were transformed into
the Escherichia coli strain DH5 Preparation of Polyclonal Antibodies--
Rabbits were each
injected with 500 µg of GST-PRL-3 emulsified in complete Freund's
adjuvant. Booster injections containing a similar amount of antigen
emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant were administered every 2 weeks. Rabbits were bled 10 days after the third and subsequent booster
injections. For affinity purification, serum was diluted twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and incubated first with cyanogen
bromide-activated Sepharose beads coupled with GST to absorb antibodies
against GST. Antibodies against PRL-3 were then affinity purified by
incubating with beads conjugated to GST-PRL-3. After extensive washing,
specific antibodies were eluted, neutralized, concentrated, and stored
at In Vitro Prenylation--
HeLa cell lysate was used as a
prenyltransferase source and was prepared by scraping cells into 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM
MgCl2 and then passing the cells through a 26-gauge needle
6-8 times. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation in a
microcentrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and the
supernatant was used in the following reactions. A typical prenylation
reaction mixture of 40 µl contained 2 µCi of [3H]FPP
or [3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, 1 µg of purified
recombinant PRL protein, and 40 µg of HeLa cell lysate. The reaction
mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 4 h and resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The gel was dried and exposed
to film at Epitope Tagging and Transfection--
To construct the
pStar-mycPRL vectors, three pairs of oligonucleotides were used in PCR
reactions with the respective PRL cDNA as the template to introduce
the Myc epitope at the N terminus of PRL-1, -2, and -3. For PRL-1,
oligos A
(5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCTCGAATGAACCGCCCTGCTC-3') and B (5'-GTGGATCCTTATTGAATACAACAGTTG-3') were used. Oligos C (5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCTAACCGTCCAGCCCCTGTGGAG-3') and D (5'-CGGGATCCCTACTGAACACAGCAGTGC-3') were used for PRL-2. For
PRL-3, oligo E
(5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCCCGCATGAACCGGCCTGCGCCTG-3') and F (5'-CTGGATCCCTACATGACGCAGCATCTGGTC-3') were used. The PCR fragments were cut with EcoRI and BamHI and
inserted into the inducible expression vector pStar (36). Recombinant
pStar with proper inserts were transiently or stably transfected into
CHO cells as described (36). Stable transfectants were screened for
tetracycline-induced expression after being cultured overnight in the
presence of 4 µg/ml deoxycycline-HCl, and stable CHO cell lines
expressing myc-PRL-1 (clone 9) and myc-PRL-3 (clone 36) were expanded.
To construct the pXJ41-mycPRL-neo vectors, the wild-type PRL-1, -2, and
-3 and the mutant PRL-2 (C101S) coding sequences were excised from the
pGEX-KG-PRL plasmids with BamHI and XhoI and
inserted into the pXJ41-myc-neo vector 3' to and in a continuous
reading frame with the Myc tag in the vector. The DNA encoding mutant
PRL-2 lacking the C-terminal sequence encoding the CAAX box
(PRL-2-cd) was amplified by PCR, as described above for construction of
the bacterial expression plasmid but using a forward primer with an
added BamHI site and a reverse primer incorporating an added
XhoI site and directly inserted into the pXJ41-myc-neo
vector as described for the wild-type PRL sequences. These PRL
expression plasmids were used to transfect NIH 3T3 cells. The stable
transfectants were selected by neomycin resistance and confirmed to
express the desired Myc-tagged PRL protein by immunoblotting cell
lysates with anti-Myc antibody.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Immunofluorescence microscopy
was performed as described previously (37, 38). For treatment with
brefeldin A or wortmannin, cells were incubated with brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) or wortmannin (500 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C,
washed twice in PBSCM (phosphate-buffered saline with 1 mM
MgCl2 and 1 mM CaCl2) and then
fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde in PBSCM. For tetracycline-induced
expression, CHO cells were grown in the presence of 4 µg/ml of
deoxycycline-HCl for 24 h. For farnesyltransferase inhibition,
stable lines of NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in the presence of 10 µg/ml FTI-277 for 16 h prior to fixing. Fixed cells were
then permeabilized and processed for indirect immunofluorescence
microscopy with the respective antibodies.
Electron Microscopy--
Expression of Myc-tagged PRL-1 and
PRL-3 in stable CHO cells was induced by overnight culture in the
presence of 8 µg/ml of tetracycline. Cells were fixed in a mixture of
2% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Cryosections were processed for immunogold
labeling according to the protein A-gold method as described (39, 40).
To mark the early endosomes, cells were incubated with BSA stabilized
colloidal gold before fixation (39-41).
Immunoperoxidase Labeling--
This was performed using a
Vectastain ABC kit from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) according
to the procedure provided by the supplier.
In Vitro Prenylation of Mouse PRL-1, -2, and -3--
Purified
recombinant PRL proteins were incubated with HeLa cell lysates and
labeled farnesyl or geranylgeranyl pyrophosphates. When farnesyl
pyrophosphate was used as the isoprenoid donor, all the PRLs were
farnesylated (Fig. 1). When
geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate was used as the isoprenoid donor, PRL-1
and -2 were geranylgeranylated, but PRL-3 was not (Fig. 1). To ensure
that the lack of detected geranylgeranylation of PRL-3 was not merely
due to its relatively lesser amount in the reaction (Fig.
1A, bottom panel), new preparations of PRL-1 and
-3 were prenylated using freshly prepared cell extract in side-by-side
reactions. As shown in Fig. 1B, equal amounts of PRL-1 and
PRL-3 were equally well farnesylated. However, in contrast to PRL-1,
PRL-3 was still not modified by geranylgeranylation (Fig.
1B, top panel), thus confirming that even when
efficiently farnesylated, PRL-3 is not an in vitro substrate
of a GGT. The mutant PRL-2 protein lacking the CAAX sequence
(PRL-2-cd) was never observed to be prenylated with either isoprenoid
donor (data not shown). Thus the PRLs are prenylated in
vitro, and PRL-3 exhibits a marked difference in its ability to be
modified by C15 and C20 prenyltransferases
PRL-1, -2, and -3 Are Associated with the Plasma Membrane and
Intracellular Punctate Structures in Transiently Transfected
Cells--
Because PRL-1, -2, and -3 are highly homologous proteins
and antibodies against them may potentially cross-react with each other, we took an alternative approach to examine their subcellular localization by expressing N-terminally Myc epitope-tagged versions of
these proteins in transiently transfected CHO cells. Constructs for
Myc-tagged versions of these proteins were cloned into the pStar
plasmid, a tetracycline-inducible expression vector for mammalian cells
(36). As shown in Fig. 2, the Myc-tagged
PRL-1, -2, and -3 exhibited labeling characteristic of the plasma
membrane (see the labeling on the cell edges marked by
arrows) as well as intracellular punctate structures
scattered throughout the entire cytoplasm but concentrated in the
perinuclear region. These punctate structures resemble those of the
secretory and/or endocytotic pathway.
Establishment of Stable CHO Cells Inducibly Expressing PRL-1 and
-3--
To more precisely define the subcellular localization of PRL-1
and -3, we established stably transfected CHO cells that express these
proteins in an inducible manner. CHO cells were transfected with the
pStar vector expressing epitope-tagged PRL-1 and -3, and stable cell
lines expressing myc-PRL-1 and -3 in a tetracycline-inducible manner
were established (Fig. 3). As revealed by
immunoblot analysis, expression of myc-PRL-1 was undetectable for clone
9 in the absence of tetracycline and was induced by tetracycline
treatment (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2).
Similar levels of the Cdk inhibitor p27 were detected in clone 9 cells
regardless of the presence of tetracycline in the culture medium (Fig.
3B). The expression of myc-PRL-3 in clone 36 cells was leaky
because a significant amount of myc-PRL-3 was detected in the absence
of tetracycline (Fig. 3C, lane 1). However, the
expression of myc-PRL-3 was greatly enhanced by tetracycline (Fig.
3C, lane 2).
Effects of Brefeldin A and Wortmannin on the Subcellular
Distribution of PRL-1 and -3--
When Clone 9 was examined by
indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, myc-PRL-1 was detected on the
plasma membrane and associated with microspike-like plasma membrane
processes (Fig. 4A, focusing on the surface labeling). When focused on intracellular labeling (Fig.
4B), distinct punctate structures were detected. Brefeldin A
treatment resulted in the redistribution of intracellular PRL-1 into a
compact structure near the microtubule-organizing center (Fig.
4C), characteristic of proteins associated with the early endosome and the trans-Golgi network (42, 43). Because the PRL-1
labeling does not resemble that of markers of the trans-Golgi network,
this result suggests that the intracellular structures positive for
myc-PRL-1 may be early endosomes. Consistent with this interpretation,
myc-PRL-1 shifted to vacuole-like structures when cells were treated
with wortmannin (Fig. 4D). Wortmannin is a
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor and known to cause redistribution of endosomal proteins to swollen vacuole-like structures (43-45).
Similarly, when clone 36 was examined by indirect immunofluorescence
microscopy, labeling of myc-PRL-3 at both the plasma membrane (Fig.
5A, focal plane at cell
surface) and intracellular punctate structures (Fig. 5B,
focal plane at cell interior) was observed. Myc-PRL-3 is also detected
on microspike-like plasma membrane processes (Fig. 5A).
Brefeldin A and wortmannin redistributed myc-PRL-3 to compact and
vacuole-like structures, respectively (Fig. 5, C and
D). These results suggest that, like myc-PRL-1, myc-PRL-3 is
also associated with the plasma membrane and the early endosome.
Association of PRL-1 and -3 with the Plasma Membrane and Early
Endosome as Revealed by EM Immunogold Labeling--
To define the
precise subcellular localization of myc-PRL-1 and -3, clone 9 and 36 cells were allowed to internalize BSA conjugated with 6-nm gold
particles (BSA-gold) for 6 min so that the early endosome will be
marked by the internalized BSA-gold (41). Cells were processed for
cryosections and then labeled with antibodies against the Myc epitope
followed by protein A-conjugated with 9-nm gold particles (protein
A-gold). As shown in Fig. 6A,
myc-PRL-1 is clearly associated with the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane (arrowheads). Furthermore, myc-PRL-1 is detected in
both vacuole-like as well as vesicular-tubular network of the early endosome (Fig. 6B, large arrowheads). The
BSA-gold (Fig. 6B, small arrowheads) is present
in the vacuole-like but not the vesicular-tubular early endosome. These
results establish that myc-PRL-1 is associated with the membrane of the
cell surface and the early endosome.
Similarly, EM immunogold labeling using cryosections prepared from
clone 36 cells whose early endosomes have been filled with BSA-gold
revealed that the majority of myc-PRL-3 is associated with both the
vacuole-like and vesicular-tubular early endosomal structures (Fig.
6C). Association of myc-PRL-3 with the cytoplasmic side of
the plasma membrane and its processes was also observed by EM
immunogold labeling (data not shown).
Inhibition of Prenylation Redirects PRL-1, -2, and -3 into the
Nucleus--
Association of prenylated proteins with cellular
membranes is usually dependent on their prenylation. We have
investigated whether association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma
membrane and the early endosome is a prenylation-dependent
event. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing Myc-tagged PRL-1, -2, or -3 also
exhibited the endosomal localization of the phosphatases (Fig.
7, A-C). Endosomal
localization was not dependent on the phosphatase activity of PRL-2,
because a mutant, inactive PRL-2 generated by substitution of the
active site essential cysteine residue (Cys101) showed a localization
similar to that of the wild-type, catalytically active PRL-2 (Fig.
7D). Treatment of these cell lines with the selective
farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-277 (46) for 16 h resulted in
the altered localization of all the PRLs to the nucleus (Fig. 7,
E-G). PRL-1 exhibited labeling throughout the entire
nucleus and was enriched in distinct nuclear speckles (Fig. 7E), suggesting that unprenylated PRL-1 is specifically
transported into the nucleus. The nuclear labeling of PRL-2 is distinct
from that of PRL-1 in that it was excluded from some regions of the nucleus and no discrete regions of enrichment were observed (Fig. 7G). PRL-3 showed a similar nuclear redistribution to that
of PRL-2 upon inhibition of prenylation (Fig. 7F). The PRLs
are highly homologous, and the significance and molecular basis of
their different nuclear distributions are presently unknown.
Mutant PRL-2 Lacking the Prenylation Motif Is Localized to the
Nucleus--
The farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-277 can have wide
ranging cellular effects because it will prevent the prenylation of diverse proteins. Although the observed effect of FTI-277 in
redistributing PRL-1, -2, and -3 into the nucleus is likely due to the
direct inhibition of their prenylation, it remains possible that the observed nuclear accumulation of the PRLs is due to an indirect effect
of inhibiting the prenylation of other proteins whose prenylation is
important for plasma membrane and endosome association of PRL-1, -2, and -3. To rule out this possibility, we constructed and stably expressed a mutant PRL-2 (PRL-2-cd) lacking a prenylation signal because of deletion of the CAAX motif. The PRL-2-cd is
localized in the nucleus (Fig. 7H), thus independently
establishing that prenylation of PRL-2 is indeed necessary for its
association with the plasma membrane and early endosome.
Expression of PRL-3 in Small Intestine and Its Association with
Non-nuclear Punctate Structures--
The above studies investigated
the subcellular localization of ectopically expressed, epitope-tagged
PRLs. We were also able to examine the subcellular localization of
endogenous PRL-3 using a purified polyclonal antiserum, which
preferentially recognizes PRL-3. Antiserum from rabbits immunized with
recombinant GST-PRL-3 was incubated with GST-beads to remove anti-GST
antibodies, and then anti-PRL-3 antibodies were affinity purified using
bead-coupled with GST-PRL-3 (see "Experimental Procedures").
Antibody specificity was tested and found to display preferential
recognition against PRL-3 as compared with PRL-1 and PRL-2 (Fig.
8). Cells stably expressing myc-PRL-1
(A-C), myc-PRL-2 (D-F), or myc-PRL-3
(G-I) were processed for double labeling using both the
affinity-purified rabbit antibodies and monoclonal Myc antibody. As
shown, the rabbit antibodies detected myc-PRL-3 as efficiently as the
Myc antibody (Fig. 8, compare G and H). Although
rabbit antibodies recognized myc-PRL-1 (Fig. 8A), the
relatively weaker intensity as compared with that obtained with Myc
antibody (Fig. 8B) suggests that the rabbit antibodies are
not as efficient as the Myc antibody. Under identical conditions,
myc-PRL-2 was essentially not recognized by the rabbit antibodies (Fig.
8D), although Myc antibody gave strong labeling (Fig.
8E). These results suggest that the affinity-purified antibodies recognize preferentially PRL-3, although some
cross-reactivity with PRL-1 but not PRL-2 was observed.
We first investigated the subcellular localization of endognous PRL-3
in diverse cell lines (including A431, NRK, HeLa, Vero, MDCK, and
3T3-L1), but specific labeling was not observed, possibly because of
low levels of expression. We therefore investigated the expression of
PRL-3 in various mouse tissues by immunoperoxidase labeling. Frozen
sections derived from entire 1-week-old mouse were incubated with
affinity-purified PRL-3 antibodies followed by biotinylated anti-rabbit
IgG, avidin-horseradish peroxidase complex, and the substrate. After
careful examination, PRL-3-specific labeling was only observed in some
regions of the small intestine. As shown in Fig.
9B, PRL-3 is present in the
differentiated epithelial cells of the villus but not the proliferating
crypt cells. The selective detection of PRL-3 in the villus but not the
crypt or in other mouse tissues also suggests that the labeling is
specific. In support of this, the villus-specific labeling was not
observed when PRL-3 antibodies were omitted (Fig. 9A). The
labeling of PRL-3 in the epithelial cells is primarily confined to the
apical side of the cells facing the lumen of the gut.
The expression of PRL-3 in the epithelial cells allowed us to
investigate the subcellular localization of PRL-3 by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. As shown, PRL-3 was detected in punctate
structures in the apical cytoplasm of the epithelial cells and
PRL-3-positive structures are enriched in the perinuclear region (Fig.
10A). Importantly, PRL-3 was
not detected in the nuclei (Fig. 10A) marked by Hoechst
staining of the DNA (Fig. 10B). The labeling of PRL-3 is
characteristic of the endosome. These results not only suggest that our
conclusions derived from studies using the transfected cells are not
due to epitope-tagging or overexpression, they also suggest that PRL-3
may participate in differentiation-associated events in the epithelial
cells of the small intestine.
Evidence suggests that PRL-1, -2, and -3 play important roles in
regulating cell growth, including the observations that overexpression of these proteins can lead to cellular transformation (4, 6) and the
discovery of their amino acid sequence homology with Cdc14p and PTEN
(8), two important players in cell growth control. Establishment of
their subcellular localization is thus important for studies aiming to
reveal their specific roles and mechanism of action. Indirect
immunofluorescent and EM immunogold microscopy of cells expressing any
one of the Myc-tagged PRLs show that the PRLs are normally associated
with the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane and with
microspike-like and other plasma membrane processes (Figs. 2, 4,
A and B, and 5, A and B).
Additionally, the PRLs are resident in the early endosome, as
demonstrated by their presence in intracellular punctate structures
resembling endosomes (Figs. 4A, 5A, and 8,
A-C); their characteristic subcellular redistributions in
response to brefeldin A and wortmannin (Fig. 4, C and
D, and 5, C and D), two compounds
known to alter the structures of endosomal compartments and effect the
relocalization of early endosomal proteins such as the transferrin
receptor and endobrevin (42-45); and their presence in vacuole-like as
well as tubular-vesicular structures of the early endosome marked by BSA-gold (Fig. 6, B and C).
Myc-tagged PRLs were used for these studies, because a survey of many
cell lines (including A431, NRK, HeLa, Vero, MDCK, and 3T3-L1) with
antibodies raised against PRL-2 and PRL-3 did not reveal specific
labeling of subcellular structures, possibly because of the low levels
of expression of the PRLs in these cells. The anti-PRL-3 antibodies
preferentially recognize PRL-3 (Fig. 8). The examination of different
mouse tissues indicates that PRL-3 is preferentially expressed in the
small intestine (Fig. 9) where the majority of endogenous PRL-3 is
localized to perinuclear punctate structures but is undetectable in the
nucleus (Fig. 10), consistent with our results obtained using tagged
PRL-1, -2, and -3. Also, the presence of PRL-3 in the differentiated
epithelial cells of the villus but not in the proliferating crypt cells
suggests that PRL-3 may participate in the differentiation-associated
events in the epithelial cells of the small intestine.
All the PRLs can be prenylated in vitro, and it is now clear
that in vivo prenylation is key to their subcellular
localization. The association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma
membrane and the early endosome is abolished by treatment with FTI-277, a potent and selective FT inhibitor (46). Under this condition, all the
PRLs redistribute to the nucleus. Furthermore, a mutant PRL-2 with the
prenylation motif deleted is delivered to the nucleus. These results
not only establish that the plasma membrane and endosomal localization
of PRL-1, -2, and -3 requires their farnesylation but also suggest that
in the absence of farnesylation they are specifically targeted to the
nucleus. Consistent with specific nuclear import is the presence of a
potential nuclear localization signal (NLS) near the C terminus of all
the PRLs. This region, possessing the sequence
KRRX12KYRPKMRLRF(R/K), resembles a typical bipartite NLS with an initial cluster of basic residues separated from
a second more C-terminal basic region by a spacer of 10-12 residues
(47, 48), although the latter portion of this potential signal in the
PRLs is atypical in its alternation of six basic with nonbasic
residues. Whether this is a functional mono- or bipartite NLS needs to
be investigated. Nevertheless it is attractive to speculate that this
NLS is masked by prenylation of the adjacent C terminus of the PRLs,
resulting in their observed plasma membrane and endosomal localization,
and the absence of prenylation permits the specific interaction of the
PRLs with nuclear import proteins to effect a nuclear redistribution.
The positively charged region near the C terminus of the PRLs may
fulfill another function in membrane targeting, similar to that of the
polybasic region of Ki-ras4B. Prenylation and CAAX modification is sufficient to target the ras proteins to endomembranes such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, and a second signal contained with the ras hypervariable domains is required for subsequent transport to the plasma membrane (49, 50). For Ha-ras, N-ras, and
Ki-ras4A, the additional signal is palmitolyation sites, but with
Ki-ras4B it is a polybasic domain of six consecutive lysine residues.
Each type of signal appears to direct different pathways of ras
trafficking to the plasma membrane. The polybasic region may enhance
membrane avidity of Ki-ras4B through electrostatic interactions with
negatively charged membrane phospholipid head groups or with specific
plasma membrane proteins (49). It functions only in conjunction with
the CAAX motif, because mutation of the prenylation site
diverts the majority of Ki-ras4B protein to the nucleus (49), similar
to our observations with PRL-2. Whether an unknown third signal (25) or
perhaps variations in the polybasic region can differentially determine
the final membrane destination of prenylated proteins is unknown but
could explain the observed diversity of membrane compartmentalizations
of these CAAX proteins.
How do we explain the apparent difference between our current study and
the previous one showing nuclear localization of PRL-1 (4)? Among
several possibilities, we propose that the majority of newly made
PRL-1, -2, and -3 are prenylated and targeted to the plasma membrane
and the early endosome with a small fraction being unprenylated and
thus targeted to the nucleus. The antibodies used in previous studies
may specifically recognize the unprenylated form of PRL-1 if the
prenylation signal itself is part of the epitope. In this way,
prenylated PRL-1 was not recognized by these antibodies. Further
experiments are needed to resolve this issue.
Our findings describe two potential sites of action for PRL-1, -2, and
-3 and provide a regulatory mechanism for switching or altering PRL
function. This could occur, for example, in response to cell stress.
Little is known of the cellular regulation of prenyltransferase
activity, but the regulation of isoprenoid biosynthesis may be more
important in this respect. The mevalonate pathway leading to isoprenoid
synthesis in mammalian cells has recently been reported to be activated
by heat shock, UV radiation, or arsenite treatment with a consequent
increase in the prenylation and membrane association of Ras (51). In
plants, environmental changes such as heat and light enhance isoprenoid
synthesis (52). A prenylated calmodulin was found to relocalize from
the plasma membrane to the nuclei of leaf epidermal cells upon shifting
from light to dark conditions (53). This was proposed to result from reduced isoprenoid levels and lack of calmodulin prenylation, because a
similar shift was observed upon treatment with an inhibitor of
mevalonate synthesis.
Several nuclear events occur upon treatment of mammalian cells with FT
inhibitors, such as a p53-dependent increase in
transcription of p21waf1/cip1/sdi and the consequent inhibition
of kinase activity of Cdk complexed with cyclins E or A, reduced
phosphorylation of Rb, and inhibition of DNA replication (54). In cells
lacking p21 or with mutant p53, endoreduplication of DNA is observed
and polyploid cells undergo apoptosis (54). It will be important to
determine whether the PRLs are involved in mediating any of these changes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
enzymes that share a common
subunit and
mediate prenylation of the CAAX sequence (19, 20), with FT
preferring Met, Ser, or Gln in the X position and GGT I
preferring Leu in the X position (21).
Geranylgeranyltransferase II (GGT II) is a distinct
/
dimer that
prenylates XXCC, XCXC, or
CCXX C-terminal sequences when the substrate protein is
bound to a carrier protein called REP (Rab
escort protein) (22, 23). The only known
substrates of GGT II are the Rab proteins. Protein prenylation is
important in targeting proteins to intracellular membranes and in
protein-protein interactions (21, 24, 25). This is often critical for
protein function, as observed with the dependence of mutant Ras
transforming activity on its farnesylation (26, 27). Because of the
presence of oncogenic forms of Ras in about 30% of human cancers, FT
inhibitors have been investigated as anti-tumor agents and have been
shown, for example, to inhibit the anchorage-independent growth and
revert the phenotype of Ras transformed cells and to effect tumor
regression in Ras oncomice (28-31). Nevertheless, various studies have
suggested that FT inhibitors exert these effects on targets other than
Ras, with RhoB and other proteins representing possible alternate
targets (32, 33). It is thus important to identify such other
farnesylated proteins involved in cell growth and transformation and
determine their specific cellular actions in relation to their
prenylation status.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
F' and GST-PRL fusion
proteins produced upon
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside induction. Soluble
purified PRL proteins were obtained by protease 3C cleavage (35) of
affinity-purified GST-PRL-1, -2, and -3 and GST-PRL-2-cd fusion
proteins from pGEX-3C-PRL expressing E. coli.
20 °C in 10% glycerol.
80 °C for 1 week.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
In vitro prenylation of the
PRLs. Purified recombinant PRL-1, -2, and -3 were incubated with
HeLa cell extract and [3H]FPP or
[3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) as
described under "Experimental Procedures." A and
B show the results of experiments conducted with different
preparations of the PRL proteins and cell extracts. Prenylation of the
PRLs is shown in the top panels, and Coomassie Blue-stained
SDS-polyacrylamide gels of the purified PRL proteins are shown in the
bottom panels.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the
plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures. Constructs
encoding N-terminal Myc epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 were
transiently transfected into CHO cells, and the cells were processed
for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to detect the expressed
myc-PRL-1 (A), myc-PRL-2 (B), and myc-PRL-3
(C), respectively. Bar, 10 µm.
Arrows indicate the labeling on the plasma membrane.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Inducible expression of myc-PRL-1 and
myc-PRL-3 in stably transfected CHO clone 9 and clone 36 cells,
respectively. Proteins extracted from CHO clone 9 (A
and B) or 36 (C) cells cultured in the absence
(lanes 1) or the presence (lanes 2) of the
tetracycline derivative, doxycycline-HCl, were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to filters, and
probed with Myc antibodies to detect PRLs together with antibodies
against p27 (A and C) or with anti-p27 antibodies
only (B). As indicated, expression of myc-PRL-1 was induced
in clone 9 cells, whereas the expression of myc-PRL-3 was greatly
enhanced in clone 36 cells by tetracycline. The asterisks in
A and C indicate p27.

View larger version (126K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Association of myc-PRL-1 with the plasma
membrane and the early endosome. Clone 9 cells expressing
myc-PRL-1 were either left untreated (A and B) or
treated with 10 µg/ml of brefeldin A (C) or 500 nM wortmannin (D) for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells
were fixed and then processed for indirect fluorescence microscopy.
Myc-PRL-1 was detected both on the surface (A) as well as in
intracellular endosomal structures (B). The response of
intracellular myc-PRL-1 to the treatment with brefeldin A and
wortmannin is characteristic of early endosomal proteins.
Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (141K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Association of myc-PRL-3 with the plasma
membrane and the early endosome. Clone 36 cells expressing
myc-PRL-3 were either left untreated (A and B) or
treated with 10 µg/ml of brefeldin A (C) or 500 nM wortmannin (D) for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells
were fixed and then processed for indirect fluorescence microscopy.
Myc-PRL-3 was present on the cell surface (A) as well as in
intracellular endosomal structures (B). The response of
myc-PRL-3 to the treatment with brefeldin A and wortmannin is
characteristic of early endosomal proteins. Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Localization of myc-PRL-1 by EM immunogold
labeling. Clone 9 (A and B) or 36 (C) cells were allowed to internalize BSA-conjugated with
6-nm gold particles for 6 min to mark the early endosome. Cells were
processed for cryosectioning and immunogold labeling with anti-Myc
antibodies and protein A-conjugated with 9-nm gold particles. BSA-gold
and myc-PRL-1 are indicated by small and large
arrowheads, respectively. Myc-PRL-1 is present both on the
cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane (A) as well as the
early endosome (B). Association of myc-PRL-3 with the early
endosome is also shown (C). Bar, 200 nm.

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
FTI-277 treatment induces the subcellular
redistribution of the PRLs to the nucleus. Stable NIH 3T3 cell
lines expressing Myc-tagged PRL-1 (A and E),
PRL-3 (B and F), PRL-2 (C and
G), PRL-2 (C101S) (D), and PRL-2-cd
(H) were treated without (A-D and H)
or with FTI-277 (E-G) for 16 h and processed for
immunofluorescent visualization of the myc-PRLs by FITC-conjugated
anti-Myc antibody. Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Preferential recognition of PRL-3 by rabbit
polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant GST-PRL-3. CHO
cells stably expressing myc-PRL-1, myc-PRL-2, and myc-PRL-3 were
processed for double labeling with affinity-purified rabbit anti-PRL-3
antibodies and Myc monoclonal antibody. The relative labeling
intensities obtained using PRL-3 antibodies as compared with those
obtained using the Myc antibody are indicative of the affinity of PRL-3
antibodies for the respective proteins. Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Expression of PRL-3 in villus epithelial
cells of the small intestine. A cryosection of intestine from
1-week-old mouse was processed for immunoperoxidase labeling using
affinity-purified anti-PRL-3 antibodies. Specific labeling of PRL-3 was
observed in differentiated epithelial cells in the villus of the small
intestine (B). The specific labeling was not observed when
PRL-3 antibodies were omitted (A).

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Localization of PRL-3 in punctate structures
of intestinal epithelial cells. Cryosections of 1-week-old mouse
intestine were processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
using affinity-purified anti-PRL-3 antibodies (A), and the
nuclei were revealed by Hoechst staining for DNA (B). The
arrows labeled a, b, and c
designate the same three cells in each panel. Bar, 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. M. Sebti for the kind gift of FTI-277, C.H. Ng for technical assistance, B. L. Tang, X. H. Yang, and K. Guo for photographic assistance, and Y. H. Tan for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Board of Singapore.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Molecular and
Cell Biology, 30 Medical Dr., Singapore 117609, Republic of Singapore.
Tel.: 65-874-3742; Fax: 65-779-1117; E-mail:
mcbcp@imcb.nus.edu.sg.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000453200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; FT, farnesyltransferase; GGT, geranylgeranyl transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GST, glutathione S-transferase; EM, electron microscope; NLS, nuclear localization signal.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Streuli, M. (1996) Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 8, 182-188 |
| 2. | Denu, J. M., Stuckey, J. A., Saper, M. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1996) Cell 87, 361-364 |
| 3. | Tonks, N. K., and Neel, B. G. (1996) Cell 87, 365-368 |
| 4. | Diamond, R. H., Cressman, D. E., Laz, T. M., Abrams, C. S., and Taub, R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3752-3762 |
| 5. | Montagna, M., Serova, O., Sylla, B. S., Feunteun, J., and Lenoir, G. M. (1995) Hum. Genet. 96, 532-538 |
| 6. | Cates, C. A., Michael, R. L., Stayrook, K. R., Harvey, K. A., Burke, Y. D., Randall, S. K., Crowell, P. L., and Crowell, D. N. (1996) Cancer Lett. 110, 49-55 |
| 7. | Zhao, Z., Lee, C.-C., Monckton, D. G., Yazdani, A., Coolbaugh, M. I., Li, X., Bailey, J., Shen, Y., and Caskey, C. T. (1996) Genomics 35, 172-186 |
| 8. | Zeng, Q., Hong, W., and Tan, Y. H. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244, 421-427 |
| 9. | Taylor, G. S., Liu, Y., Baskerville, C., and Charbonneau, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24054-24063 |
| 10. | Li, L., Ernsting, B. R., Wishart, M. J., Lohse, D. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29403-29406 |
| 11. | Visintin, R., Craig, K., Hwang, E. S., Prinz, S., Tyers, M., and Amon, A. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 709-718 |
| 12. | Li, J., Yen, C., liaw, D., Podsypanina, K., Bose, S., Wang, S. I., Puc, J., Miliaresis, C., Rodgers, L., McCombie, R., Bigner, S. H., Giovanella, B. C., Ittmann, M., Tycko, B., Hibshoosh, H., Wigler, M. H., and Parsons, R. (1997) Science 275, 1943-1947 |
| 13. | Steck, P. A., Pershouse, M. A., Jasser, S. A., Yung, W. K., Lin, H., Ligon, A. H., Langford, L. A., Baumgard, M. L., Hattier, T., Davis, T., Frye, C., Hu, R., Swedlund, B., Teng, D. H., and Tavtigian, S. V. (1997) Nat. Genet. 15, 356-362 |
| 14. | Li, D. M., and Sun, H. (1997) Canc. Res. 57, 2124-2129 |
| 15. | Maehama, T., and Dixon, J. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13375-13378 |
| 16. | Mohn, K. L., Laz, T. M., Hsu, J.-C., Melby, A. E., Bravo, R., and Taub, R. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 381-390 |
| 17. | Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1993) Nature 366, 14-15 |
| 18. | Moores, S. L., Schaber, M. D., Mosser, S. D., Rands, D., O'Hara, M. B., Garsky, V. M., Marshall, M. S., Pompliano, D. L., and Gibbs, J. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14603-14610 |
| 19. | Reiss, Y., Goldstein, J. L., Seabra, M. C., Casey, P. J., and Brown, M. S. (1990) Cell 62, 81-88 |
| 20. | Seabra, M. C., Reiss, Y., Casey, P. J., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1991) Cell 65, 429-434 |
| 21. | Zhang, F. L., and Casey, P. J. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 241-269 |
| 22. | Seabra, M. C., Goldstein, J. L., Sudhof, T. C., and Brown, M. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14497-14503 |
| 23. | Andres, D. A., Seabra, M. C., Brown, M. S., Armstrong, S. A., Smeland, T. E., Cremers, F. P., and Goldstein, J. L. (1993) Cell 73, 1091-1099 |
| 24. | Marshall, C. J. (1993) Science 259, 1865-1866 |
| 25. | Seabra, M. C. (1998) Cell. Signal. 10, 167-172 |
| 26. | Jackson, J. H., Cochrane, C. G., Bourne, J. R., Solski, P. A., Buss, J. E., and Der, C. J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3042-3046 |
| 27. | Kato, K., Cox, A. D., Hisaka, M. M., Graham, S. M., Buss, J. E., and Der, C. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6403-6407 |
| 28. | James, G. L., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., Rawson, T. E., Somers, T. C., McDowell, R. S., Crowley, C. W., Lucas, B. K., Levinson, A. D., and Marsters, J. C., Jr. (1993) Science 260, 1937-1942 |
| 29. | Kohl, N. E., Mosser, S. D., deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Pompliano, D. L., Graham, S. L., Smith, R. L., Scolnick, E. M., Oliff, A., and Gibbs, J. B. (1993) Science 260, 1934-1937 |
| 30. | Kohl, N. E., Wilson, F. R., Mosser, S. D., Giuliani, E., deSolms, S. J., Conner, M. W., Anthony, N. J., Holtz, W. J., Gomez, R. P., Lee, T. J., Smith, R. L., Graham, S. L., Hartman, G. D., Gibbs, J. B., and Oliff, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9141-9145 |
| 31. | Kohl, N. E., Omer, C. A., Conner, M. W., Anthony, N. J., Davide, J. P., deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Gomez, R. P., Graham, S. L., Hamilton, K., Handt, L. K., Hartman, G. D., Koblan, K. S., Kral, A. M., Miller, P. J., Mosser, S. M., O'Neill, T. J., Rands, E., Schaber, M. D., Gibbs, J. B., and Oliff, A. (1995) Nat. Med. 1, 792-797 |
| 32. | Gibbs, J. B., Graham, S. L., Hartman, G. D., Koblan, K. S., Kohl, N. E., Omer, C. A., and Oliff, A. (1997) Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 1, 197-203 |
| 33. | Lebowitz, P. F., and Prendergast, G. C. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1439-1445 |
| 34. | Guan, K. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17026-17030 |
| 35. | Walker, P. A., Leong, L. E.-C., Ng, P. W. P., Tan, S. H., Waller, S., Murphy, D., and Porter, A. G. (1994) BioTechnology 12, 601-605 |
| 36. | Zeng, Q., Tan, Y. H., and Hong, W. (1998) Anal. Biochem. 259, 187-194 |
| 37. | Lowe, S. L., Wong, S. H., and Hong, W. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 209-220 |
| 38. | Zhang, T., Wong, S. H., Tang, B. L., Xu, Y., Peter, F., and Hong, W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1157-1168 |
| 39. | Slot, J. W., Geuze, H. J., Gigengack, S., Lienhard, G. E., and James, D. E. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 123-135 |
| 40. | Liou, W., Geuze, H. J., Geelen, M. J., and Slot, J. W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 61-70 |
| 41. | Rabinowitz, S., Horstmann, H., Gordon, S., and Griffiths, G. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 95-112 |
| 42. | Klausner, R. D., Donaldson, J. G., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 1071-1080 |
| 43. | Wong, S. H., Zhang, T., Xu, Y., Subramaniam, V. N., Griffiths, G., and Hong, W. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1549-1563 |
| 44. | Arcaro, A., and Wymann, M. P. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 297-301 |
| 45. | Reaves, B. J., Bright, N. A., Mullock, B. M., and Luzio, J. P. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 749-762 |
| 46. | Lerner, E. C., Qian, Y., Blaskovich, M. A., Fossum, R. D., Vogt, A., Sun, J., Cox, A. D., Der, C. J., Hamilton, A. D., and Sebti, S. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26802-26806 |
| 47. | Dingwall, C., and Laskey, R. A. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 478-481 |
| 48. | Liang, S.-H., and Clarke, M. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32699-32703 |
| 49. | Hancock, J. F., Paterson, H., and Marshall, C. J. (1990) Cell 63, 133-139 |
| 50. | Choy, E., Chiu, V. K., Silletti, J., Feoktistov, M., Morimoto, T., Michaelson, D., Ivanov, I. E., and Philips, M. R. (1999) Cell 98, 69-80 |
| 51. | Shack, S., Gorospe, M., Fawcett, T. W., Hudgins, W. R., and Holbrook, N. J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6021-6028 |
| 52. | Sterner, B. A., Bianchini, G. M., and Korth, K. L. (1994) J. Lipid. Res. 35, 1133-1140 |
| 53. | Rodriguez-Concepcion, M., Yalovsky, S., Zik, M., Fromm, H., and Gruissem, W. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1996-2007 |
| 54. | Sepp-Lorenzino, L., and Rosen, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20243-20251 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-P. Sun, Y. Luo, X. Yu, W.-Q. Wang, B. Zhou, F. Liang, and Z.-Y. Zhang Phosphatase Activity, Trimerization, and the C-terminal Polybasic Region Are All Required for PRL1-mediated Cell Growth and Migration J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2007; 282(39): 29043 - 29051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Michelotti, D. M. Brinkley, D. P. Morris, M. P. Smith, R. J. Louie, and D. A. Schwinn Epigenetic regulation of human {alpha}1d-adrenergic receptor gene expression: a role for DNA methylation in Sp1-dependent regulation FASEB J, July 1, 2007; 21(9): 1979 - 1993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Achiwa and J. S. Lazo PRL-1 Tyrosine Phosphatase Regulates c-Src Levels, Adherence, and Invasion in Human Lung Cancer Cells Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 643 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Dumaual, G. E. Sandusky, P. L. Crowell, and S. K. Randall Cellular Localization of PRL-1 and PRL-2 Gene Expression in Normal Adult Human Tissues J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 2006; 54(12): 1401 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Wang, L Peng, B Dong, L Kong, L Meng, L Yan, Y Xie, and C Shou Overexpression of phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 in breast cancer: association with a poor clinical outcome Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1517 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Fiordalisi, P. J. Keller, and A. D. Cox PRL tyrosine phosphatases regulate rho family GTPases to promote invasion and motility. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3153 - 3161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Basso, P. Kirschmeier, and W. R. Bishop Thematic review series: Lipid Posttranslational Modifications. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 15 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Stephens, H. Han, V. Gokhale, and D. D. Von Hoff PRL phosphatases as potential molecular targets in cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1653 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||