JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000453200 on March 30, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 28, 21444-21452, July 14, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/28/21444    most recent
M000453200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Pallen, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Pallen, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Prenylation-dependent Association of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the Plasma Membrane and the Early Endosome*

Qi Zeng, Xiaoning Si, Heinrich Horstmann, Yue Xu, Wanjin Hong, and Catherine J. PallenDagger

From the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Republic of Singapore

Received for publication, January 21, 2000, and in revised form, March 13, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PRL-1, -2, and -3 represent a novel class of protein-tyrosine phosphatase with a C-terminal prenylation motif. Although PRL-1 has been suggested to be associated with the nucleus, the presence of three highly homologous members and the existence of a prenylation motif call for a more detailed examination of their subcellular localization. In the present study, we first demonstrate that mouse PRL-1, -2, and -3 are indeed prenylated. Examination of N-terminal epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 expressed in transiently transfected cells suggests that PRL-1, -2, and -3 are present on the plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures. Stable Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing PRL-1 and -3 in an inducible manner were established. When cells were treated with brefeldin A, PRL-1 and -3 accumulated in a collapsed compact structure around the microtubule-organizing center. Furthermore, PRL-1 and -3 redistributed into swollen vacuole-like structures when cells were treated with wortmannin. These characteristics of PRL-1 and -3 are typical for endosomal proteins. Electron microscope immunogold labeling reveals that PRL-1 and -3 are indeed associated with the plasma membrane and the early endosomal compartment. Expression of PRL-3 is detected in the epithelial cells of the small intestine, where PRL-3 is present in punctate structures in the cytoplasm. When cells are treated with FTI-277, a selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor, PRL-1, -2, and -3 shifted into the nucleus. Furthermore, a mutant form of PRL-2 lacking the C-terminal prenylation signal is associated with the nucleus. These results establish that the primary association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the membrane of the cell surface and the early endosome is dependent on their prenylation and that nuclear localization of these proteins may be triggered by a regulatory event that inhibits their prenylation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Dynamic tyrosine phosphorylation-dephosphorylation is a major regulatory event affecting the functional activities of diverse proteins that participate in many aspects of cellular, physiological, and pathogenic processes. The protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)1 superfamily encompasses a large group of enzymes that undoubtedly play key roles in the regulation of the above events. The PTPs are classified into subgroups depending on their form and substrate specificity, with the receptor-like transmembrane and some intracellular PTPs being specific for phosphophotyrosine, whereas other intracellular PTPs are of dual specificity and dephosphorylate phosphoserine/threonine as well as phosphotyrosine residues (1-3). The cellular roles and substrates of many PTPs remain unknown.

The PRL phosphatases (PRL-1, -2, and -3) are three closely related intracellular enzymes that possess the PTP active site signature sequence CX5R (4-8). All are proteins of about 20 kDa with at least 75% amino acid sequence similarity. They resemble the dual specificity phosphatases of the PTP superfamily in having few of the conserved catalytic domain residues typical of the tyrosine-specific PTPs, although PRL-1 has so far only been demonstrated to dephosphorylate phosphotyrosyl substrates in vitro (4). Furthermore, outside of themselves, their highest homology is to Cdc14p, a dual specificity phosphatase that regulates mitotic exit (9-11), and to PTEN, a dual specificity PTP that functions as a tumor supressor and has an additional and unique lipid phosphatase activity (12-15). PRL-1 is the founding member of these PRL phosphatases. The PRL-1 gene was originally identified as an immediate early gene whose expression is induced in mitogen-stimulated cells and regenerating liver (16). Overexpression of PRL-1 can lead to cell transformation, suggesting that it may participate in key events that regulate cell growth (4, 6), although the underlying mechanism is currently unknown. A most interesting feature of PRL-1, -2, and -3 is the presence of a consensus C-terminal CAAX sequence for prenylation (17, 18), where C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is any amino acid. Three types of prenyltransferase carry out the addition of either farnesyl (C15) or geranylgeranyl (C20) isoprenoids to cellular proteins. Farnesyltransferase (FT) and geranylgeranyl transferase I (GGT I) are heterodimeric alpha /beta enzymes that share a common alpha  subunit and mediate prenylation of the CAAX sequence (19, 20), with FT preferring Met, Ser, or Gln in the X position and GGT I preferring Leu in the X position (21). Geranylgeranyltransferase II (GGT II) is a distinct alpha /beta dimer that prenylates XXCC, XCXC, or CCXX C-terminal sequences when the substrate protein is bound to a carrier protein called REP (Rab escort protein) (22, 23). The only known substrates of GGT II are the Rab proteins. Protein prenylation is important in targeting proteins to intracellular membranes and in protein-protein interactions (21, 24, 25). This is often critical for protein function, as observed with the dependence of mutant Ras transforming activity on its farnesylation (26, 27). Because of the presence of oncogenic forms of Ras in about 30% of human cancers, FT inhibitors have been investigated as anti-tumor agents and have been shown, for example, to inhibit the anchorage-independent growth and revert the phenotype of Ras transformed cells and to effect tumor regression in Ras oncomice (28-31). Nevertheless, various studies have suggested that FT inhibitors exert these effects on targets other than Ras, with RhoB and other proteins representing possible alternate targets (32, 33). It is thus important to identify such other farnesylated proteins involved in cell growth and transformation and determine their specific cellular actions in relation to their prenylation status.

Previous studies suggest that PRL-1 is localized to the interior of the nucleus (4). Because prenylated proteins are normally associated with cellular membranes and PRL-1 contains the consensus motif for prenylation, we have re-examined the subcellular localization of PRL-1 using an different approach. In addition, because PRL-1, -2, and -3 share high degrees of amino acid sequence homology, antibodies against one may potentially cross-react with others. The subcellular localization of each PRL was thus investigated independently. Our results suggest that PRL-1, -2, and -3 are farnesylated and normally associated with the membrane of the cell surface and the early endosome. We show that this membrane association depends on their prenylation and that unlipidated PRL-1, -2, and -3 are shifted into the nucleus.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- CHO-K1 and other cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Synthetic oligonucleotides were from Oligos Etc (Wilsonville, OR). The Pyrococcus furiosus DNA polymerase was a product of Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). The Taq DNA polymerase and Hybond C-extra nitrocellulose filters were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Glutathione-Sepharose 4B was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and rhodamine-conjugated goat were purchased from American Type Culture Collection, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated c-Myc antibody (9E10) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Brefeldin A was from Epicentre Technologies (Madison, WI). Wortmannin was purchased from Sigma. The FTI-277 was a gift from Dr. S. M. Sebti (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute). [3H]Farnesyl pyrophosphate and [3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate were bought from NEN Life Science Products.

Expression of Recombinant Proteins in Bacteria-- To construct plasmids expressing wild-type PRLs, the coding regions of PRL-1, -2, and -3 were retrieved by PCR using Pfu polymerase and appropriate forward primers incorporating a BamHI or a SalI restriction site and reverse primers incorporating an EcoRI restriction site. To construct a plasmid expressing a mutant form of PRL-2 lacking the C-terminal four amino acids (amino acids 164-167) of the CAAX box (PRL-2-cd), the PRL-2 cDNA was amplified using the same forward primer as above (with an added SalI site) in conjuction with a reverse primer corresponding to the sequence encoding amino acids 159-163 and with an added EcoRI site. Mutant PRL-2 (C101S), where the essential cysteine residue of the active site of the phosphatase was replaced by serine, was obtained through a first PCR reaction using a forward primer corresponding to the desired nucleotide substitution (5'-TGTGTTGCAGTGCATAGTGTTGCAGGATTGGGA-3'), and the reverse primer was used to amplify wild-type PRL-2. The completed first PCR reaction was then used as a template in a second PCR reaction employing the forward (with an added BamHI site) and reverse (with an added EcoRI site) primers used to amplify wild-type PRL-2 (above). All PCR fragments were inserted into the BamHI-EcoRI-digested pGEX-KG vector (34) or into the SalI-EcoRI-digested pGEX-3C vector (35) and sequenced to verify the insertions. The plasmids were transformed into the Escherichia coli strain DH5alpha F' and GST-PRL fusion proteins produced upon isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside induction. Soluble purified PRL proteins were obtained by protease 3C cleavage (35) of affinity-purified GST-PRL-1, -2, and -3 and GST-PRL-2-cd fusion proteins from pGEX-3C-PRL expressing E. coli.

Preparation of Polyclonal Antibodies-- Rabbits were each injected with 500 µg of GST-PRL-3 emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant. Booster injections containing a similar amount of antigen emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant were administered every 2 weeks. Rabbits were bled 10 days after the third and subsequent booster injections. For affinity purification, serum was diluted twice with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated first with cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose beads coupled with GST to absorb antibodies against GST. Antibodies against PRL-3 were then affinity purified by incubating with beads conjugated to GST-PRL-3. After extensive washing, specific antibodies were eluted, neutralized, concentrated, and stored at -20 °C in 10% glycerol.

In Vitro Prenylation-- HeLa cell lysate was used as a prenyltransferase source and was prepared by scraping cells into 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and then passing the cells through a 26-gauge needle 6-8 times. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used in the following reactions. A typical prenylation reaction mixture of 40 µl contained 2 µCi of [3H]FPP or [3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, 1 µg of purified recombinant PRL protein, and 40 µg of HeLa cell lysate. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 4 h and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The gel was dried and exposed to film at -80 °C for 1 week.

Epitope Tagging and Transfection-- To construct the pStar-mycPRL vectors, three pairs of oligonucleotides were used in PCR reactions with the respective PRL cDNA as the template to introduce the Myc epitope at the N terminus of PRL-1, -2, and -3. For PRL-1, oligos A (5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCTCGAATGAACCGCCCTGCTC-3') and B (5'-GTGGATCCTTATTGAATACAACAGTTG-3') were used. Oligos C (5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCTAACCGTCCAGCCCCTGTGGAG-3') and D (5'-CGGGATCCCTACTGAACACAGCAGTGC-3') were used for PRL-2. For PRL-3, oligo E (5'-GCGAATTCACCATGGAGCAGAAGCTGATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTCGCCCGCATGAACCGGCCTGCGCCTG-3') and F (5'-CTGGATCCCTACATGACGCAGCATCTGGTC-3') were used. The PCR fragments were cut with EcoRI and BamHI and inserted into the inducible expression vector pStar (36). Recombinant pStar with proper inserts were transiently or stably transfected into CHO cells as described (36). Stable transfectants were screened for tetracycline-induced expression after being cultured overnight in the presence of 4 µg/ml deoxycycline-HCl, and stable CHO cell lines expressing myc-PRL-1 (clone 9) and myc-PRL-3 (clone 36) were expanded. To construct the pXJ41-mycPRL-neo vectors, the wild-type PRL-1, -2, and -3 and the mutant PRL-2 (C101S) coding sequences were excised from the pGEX-KG-PRL plasmids with BamHI and XhoI and inserted into the pXJ41-myc-neo vector 3' to and in a continuous reading frame with the Myc tag in the vector. The DNA encoding mutant PRL-2 lacking the C-terminal sequence encoding the CAAX box (PRL-2-cd) was amplified by PCR, as described above for construction of the bacterial expression plasmid but using a forward primer with an added BamHI site and a reverse primer incorporating an added XhoI site and directly inserted into the pXJ41-myc-neo vector as described for the wild-type PRL sequences. These PRL expression plasmids were used to transfect NIH 3T3 cells. The stable transfectants were selected by neomycin resistance and confirmed to express the desired Myc-tagged PRL protein by immunoblotting cell lysates with anti-Myc antibody.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed as described previously (37, 38). For treatment with brefeldin A or wortmannin, cells were incubated with brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) or wortmannin (500 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C, washed twice in PBSCM (phosphate-buffered saline with 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM CaCl2) and then fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde in PBSCM. For tetracycline-induced expression, CHO cells were grown in the presence of 4 µg/ml of deoxycycline-HCl for 24 h. For farnesyltransferase inhibition, stable lines of NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in the presence of 10 µg/ml FTI-277 for 16 h prior to fixing. Fixed cells were then permeabilized and processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with the respective antibodies.

Electron Microscopy-- Expression of Myc-tagged PRL-1 and PRL-3 in stable CHO cells was induced by overnight culture in the presence of 8 µg/ml of tetracycline. Cells were fixed in a mixture of 2% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Cryosections were processed for immunogold labeling according to the protein A-gold method as described (39, 40). To mark the early endosomes, cells were incubated with BSA stabilized colloidal gold before fixation (39-41).

Immunoperoxidase Labeling-- This was performed using a Vectastain ABC kit from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) according to the procedure provided by the supplier.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Vitro Prenylation of Mouse PRL-1, -2, and -3-- Purified recombinant PRL proteins were incubated with HeLa cell lysates and labeled farnesyl or geranylgeranyl pyrophosphates. When farnesyl pyrophosphate was used as the isoprenoid donor, all the PRLs were farnesylated (Fig. 1). When geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate was used as the isoprenoid donor, PRL-1 and -2 were geranylgeranylated, but PRL-3 was not (Fig. 1). To ensure that the lack of detected geranylgeranylation of PRL-3 was not merely due to its relatively lesser amount in the reaction (Fig. 1A, bottom panel), new preparations of PRL-1 and -3 were prenylated using freshly prepared cell extract in side-by-side reactions. As shown in Fig. 1B, equal amounts of PRL-1 and PRL-3 were equally well farnesylated. However, in contrast to PRL-1, PRL-3 was still not modified by geranylgeranylation (Fig. 1B, top panel), thus confirming that even when efficiently farnesylated, PRL-3 is not an in vitro substrate of a GGT. The mutant PRL-2 protein lacking the CAAX sequence (PRL-2-cd) was never observed to be prenylated with either isoprenoid donor (data not shown). Thus the PRLs are prenylated in vitro, and PRL-3 exhibits a marked difference in its ability to be modified by C15 and C20 prenyltransferases


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   In vitro prenylation of the PRLs. Purified recombinant PRL-1, -2, and -3 were incubated with HeLa cell extract and [3H]FPP or [3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) as described under "Experimental Procedures." A and B show the results of experiments conducted with different preparations of the PRL proteins and cell extracts. Prenylation of the PRLs is shown in the top panels, and Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels of the purified PRL proteins are shown in the bottom panels.

PRL-1, -2, and -3 Are Associated with the Plasma Membrane and Intracellular Punctate Structures in Transiently Transfected Cells-- Because PRL-1, -2, and -3 are highly homologous proteins and antibodies against them may potentially cross-react with each other, we took an alternative approach to examine their subcellular localization by expressing N-terminally Myc epitope-tagged versions of these proteins in transiently transfected CHO cells. Constructs for Myc-tagged versions of these proteins were cloned into the pStar plasmid, a tetracycline-inducible expression vector for mammalian cells (36). As shown in Fig. 2, the Myc-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 exhibited labeling characteristic of the plasma membrane (see the labeling on the cell edges marked by arrows) as well as intracellular punctate structures scattered throughout the entire cytoplasm but concentrated in the perinuclear region. These punctate structures resemble those of the secretory and/or endocytotic pathway.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures. Constructs encoding N-terminal Myc epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 were transiently transfected into CHO cells, and the cells were processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to detect the expressed myc-PRL-1 (A), myc-PRL-2 (B), and myc-PRL-3 (C), respectively. Bar, 10 µm. Arrows indicate the labeling on the plasma membrane.

Establishment of Stable CHO Cells Inducibly Expressing PRL-1 and -3-- To more precisely define the subcellular localization of PRL-1 and -3, we established stably transfected CHO cells that express these proteins in an inducible manner. CHO cells were transfected with the pStar vector expressing epitope-tagged PRL-1 and -3, and stable cell lines expressing myc-PRL-1 and -3 in a tetracycline-inducible manner were established (Fig. 3). As revealed by immunoblot analysis, expression of myc-PRL-1 was undetectable for clone 9 in the absence of tetracycline and was induced by tetracycline treatment (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2). Similar levels of the Cdk inhibitor p27 were detected in clone 9 cells regardless of the presence of tetracycline in the culture medium (Fig. 3B). The expression of myc-PRL-3 in clone 36 cells was leaky because a significant amount of myc-PRL-3 was detected in the absence of tetracycline (Fig. 3C, lane 1). However, the expression of myc-PRL-3 was greatly enhanced by tetracycline (Fig. 3C, lane 2).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inducible expression of myc-PRL-1 and myc-PRL-3 in stably transfected CHO clone 9 and clone 36 cells, respectively. Proteins extracted from CHO clone 9 (A and B) or 36 (C) cells cultured in the absence (lanes 1) or the presence (lanes 2) of the tetracycline derivative, doxycycline-HCl, were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to filters, and probed with Myc antibodies to detect PRLs together with antibodies against p27 (A and C) or with anti-p27 antibodies only (B). As indicated, expression of myc-PRL-1 was induced in clone 9 cells, whereas the expression of myc-PRL-3 was greatly enhanced in clone 36 cells by tetracycline. The asterisks in A and C indicate p27.

Effects of Brefeldin A and Wortmannin on the Subcellular Distribution of PRL-1 and -3-- When Clone 9 was examined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, myc-PRL-1 was detected on the plasma membrane and associated with microspike-like plasma membrane processes (Fig. 4A, focusing on the surface labeling). When focused on intracellular labeling (Fig. 4B), distinct punctate structures were detected. Brefeldin A treatment resulted in the redistribution of intracellular PRL-1 into a compact structure near the microtubule-organizing center (Fig. 4C), characteristic of proteins associated with the early endosome and the trans-Golgi network (42, 43). Because the PRL-1 labeling does not resemble that of markers of the trans-Golgi network, this result suggests that the intracellular structures positive for myc-PRL-1 may be early endosomes. Consistent with this interpretation, myc-PRL-1 shifted to vacuole-like structures when cells were treated with wortmannin (Fig. 4D). Wortmannin is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor and known to cause redistribution of endosomal proteins to swollen vacuole-like structures (43-45).


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Association of myc-PRL-1 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome. Clone 9 cells expressing myc-PRL-1 were either left untreated (A and B) or treated with 10 µg/ml of brefeldin A (C) or 500 nM wortmannin (D) for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells were fixed and then processed for indirect fluorescence microscopy. Myc-PRL-1 was detected both on the surface (A) as well as in intracellular endosomal structures (B). The response of intracellular myc-PRL-1 to the treatment with brefeldin A and wortmannin is characteristic of early endosomal proteins. Bar, 10 µm.

Similarly, when clone 36 was examined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, labeling of myc-PRL-3 at both the plasma membrane (Fig. 5A, focal plane at cell surface) and intracellular punctate structures (Fig. 5B, focal plane at cell interior) was observed. Myc-PRL-3 is also detected on microspike-like plasma membrane processes (Fig. 5A). Brefeldin A and wortmannin redistributed myc-PRL-3 to compact and vacuole-like structures, respectively (Fig. 5, C and D). These results suggest that, like myc-PRL-1, myc-PRL-3 is also associated with the plasma membrane and the early endosome.


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of myc-PRL-3 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome. Clone 36 cells expressing myc-PRL-3 were either left untreated (A and B) or treated with 10 µg/ml of brefeldin A (C) or 500 nM wortmannin (D) for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells were fixed and then processed for indirect fluorescence microscopy. Myc-PRL-3 was present on the cell surface (A) as well as in intracellular endosomal structures (B). The response of myc-PRL-3 to the treatment with brefeldin A and wortmannin is characteristic of early endosomal proteins. Bar, 10 µm.

Association of PRL-1 and -3 with the Plasma Membrane and Early Endosome as Revealed by EM Immunogold Labeling-- To define the precise subcellular localization of myc-PRL-1 and -3, clone 9 and 36 cells were allowed to internalize BSA conjugated with 6-nm gold particles (BSA-gold) for 6 min so that the early endosome will be marked by the internalized BSA-gold (41). Cells were processed for cryosections and then labeled with antibodies against the Myc epitope followed by protein A-conjugated with 9-nm gold particles (protein A-gold). As shown in Fig. 6A, myc-PRL-1 is clearly associated with the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane (arrowheads). Furthermore, myc-PRL-1 is detected in both vacuole-like as well as vesicular-tubular network of the early endosome (Fig. 6B, large arrowheads). The BSA-gold (Fig. 6B, small arrowheads) is present in the vacuole-like but not the vesicular-tubular early endosome. These results establish that myc-PRL-1 is associated with the membrane of the cell surface and the early endosome.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Localization of myc-PRL-1 by EM immunogold labeling. Clone 9 (A and B) or 36 (C) cells were allowed to internalize BSA-conjugated with 6-nm gold particles for 6 min to mark the early endosome. Cells were processed for cryosectioning and immunogold labeling with anti-Myc antibodies and protein A-conjugated with 9-nm gold particles. BSA-gold and myc-PRL-1 are indicated by small and large arrowheads, respectively. Myc-PRL-1 is present both on the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane (A) as well as the early endosome (B). Association of myc-PRL-3 with the early endosome is also shown (C). Bar, 200 nm.

Similarly, EM immunogold labeling using cryosections prepared from clone 36 cells whose early endosomes have been filled with BSA-gold revealed that the majority of myc-PRL-3 is associated with both the vacuole-like and vesicular-tubular early endosomal structures (Fig. 6C). Association of myc-PRL-3 with the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane and its processes was also observed by EM immunogold labeling (data not shown).

Inhibition of Prenylation Redirects PRL-1, -2, and -3 into the Nucleus-- Association of prenylated proteins with cellular membranes is usually dependent on their prenylation. We have investigated whether association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome is a prenylation-dependent event. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing Myc-tagged PRL-1, -2, or -3 also exhibited the endosomal localization of the phosphatases (Fig. 7, A-C). Endosomal localization was not dependent on the phosphatase activity of PRL-2, because a mutant, inactive PRL-2 generated by substitution of the active site essential cysteine residue (Cys101) showed a localization similar to that of the wild-type, catalytically active PRL-2 (Fig. 7D). Treatment of these cell lines with the selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-277 (46) for 16 h resulted in the altered localization of all the PRLs to the nucleus (Fig. 7, E-G). PRL-1 exhibited labeling throughout the entire nucleus and was enriched in distinct nuclear speckles (Fig. 7E), suggesting that unprenylated PRL-1 is specifically transported into the nucleus. The nuclear labeling of PRL-2 is distinct from that of PRL-1 in that it was excluded from some regions of the nucleus and no discrete regions of enrichment were observed (Fig. 7G). PRL-3 showed a similar nuclear redistribution to that of PRL-2 upon inhibition of prenylation (Fig. 7F). The PRLs are highly homologous, and the significance and molecular basis of their different nuclear distributions are presently unknown.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   FTI-277 treatment induces the subcellular redistribution of the PRLs to the nucleus. Stable NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing Myc-tagged PRL-1 (A and E), PRL-3 (B and F), PRL-2 (C and G), PRL-2 (C101S) (D), and PRL-2-cd (H) were treated without (A-D and H) or with FTI-277 (E-G) for 16 h and processed for immunofluorescent visualization of the myc-PRLs by FITC-conjugated anti-Myc antibody. Bar, 10 µm.

Mutant PRL-2 Lacking the Prenylation Motif Is Localized to the Nucleus-- The farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-277 can have wide ranging cellular effects because it will prevent the prenylation of diverse proteins. Although the observed effect of FTI-277 in redistributing PRL-1, -2, and -3 into the nucleus is likely due to the direct inhibition of their prenylation, it remains possible that the observed nuclear accumulation of the PRLs is due to an indirect effect of inhibiting the prenylation of other proteins whose prenylation is important for plasma membrane and endosome association of PRL-1, -2, and -3. To rule out this possibility, we constructed and stably expressed a mutant PRL-2 (PRL-2-cd) lacking a prenylation signal because of deletion of the CAAX motif. The PRL-2-cd is localized in the nucleus (Fig. 7H), thus independently establishing that prenylation of PRL-2 is indeed necessary for its association with the plasma membrane and early endosome.

Expression of PRL-3 in Small Intestine and Its Association with Non-nuclear Punctate Structures-- The above studies investigated the subcellular localization of ectopically expressed, epitope-tagged PRLs. We were also able to examine the subcellular localization of endogenous PRL-3 using a purified polyclonal antiserum, which preferentially recognizes PRL-3. Antiserum from rabbits immunized with recombinant GST-PRL-3 was incubated with GST-beads to remove anti-GST antibodies, and then anti-PRL-3 antibodies were affinity purified using bead-coupled with GST-PRL-3 (see "Experimental Procedures"). Antibody specificity was tested and found to display preferential recognition against PRL-3 as compared with PRL-1 and PRL-2 (Fig. 8). Cells stably expressing myc-PRL-1 (A-C), myc-PRL-2 (D-F), or myc-PRL-3 (G-I) were processed for double labeling using both the affinity-purified rabbit antibodies and monoclonal Myc antibody. As shown, the rabbit antibodies detected myc-PRL-3 as efficiently as the Myc antibody (Fig. 8, compare G and H). Although rabbit antibodies recognized myc-PRL-1 (Fig. 8A), the relatively weaker intensity as compared with that obtained with Myc antibody (Fig. 8B) suggests that the rabbit antibodies are not as efficient as the Myc antibody. Under identical conditions, myc-PRL-2 was essentially not recognized by the rabbit antibodies (Fig. 8D), although Myc antibody gave strong labeling (Fig. 8E). These results suggest that the affinity-purified antibodies recognize preferentially PRL-3, although some cross-reactivity with PRL-1 but not PRL-2 was observed.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Preferential recognition of PRL-3 by rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant GST-PRL-3. CHO cells stably expressing myc-PRL-1, myc-PRL-2, and myc-PRL-3 were processed for double labeling with affinity-purified rabbit anti-PRL-3 antibodies and Myc monoclonal antibody. The relative labeling intensities obtained using PRL-3 antibodies as compared with those obtained using the Myc antibody are indicative of the affinity of PRL-3 antibodies for the respective proteins. Bar, 10 µm.

We first investigated the subcellular localization of endognous PRL-3 in diverse cell lines (including A431, NRK, HeLa, Vero, MDCK, and 3T3-L1), but specific labeling was not observed, possibly because of low levels of expression. We therefore investigated the expression of PRL-3 in various mouse tissues by immunoperoxidase labeling. Frozen sections derived from entire 1-week-old mouse were incubated with affinity-purified PRL-3 antibodies followed by biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG, avidin-horseradish peroxidase complex, and the substrate. After careful examination, PRL-3-specific labeling was only observed in some regions of the small intestine. As shown in Fig. 9B, PRL-3 is present in the differentiated epithelial cells of the villus but not the proliferating crypt cells. The selective detection of PRL-3 in the villus but not the crypt or in other mouse tissues also suggests that the labeling is specific. In support of this, the villus-specific labeling was not observed when PRL-3 antibodies were omitted (Fig. 9A). The labeling of PRL-3 in the epithelial cells is primarily confined to the apical side of the cells facing the lumen of the gut.


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Expression of PRL-3 in villus epithelial cells of the small intestine. A cryosection of intestine from 1-week-old mouse was processed for immunoperoxidase labeling using affinity-purified anti-PRL-3 antibodies. Specific labeling of PRL-3 was observed in differentiated epithelial cells in the villus of the small intestine (B). The specific labeling was not observed when PRL-3 antibodies were omitted (A).

The expression of PRL-3 in the epithelial cells allowed us to investigate the subcellular localization of PRL-3 by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. As shown, PRL-3 was detected in punctate structures in the apical cytoplasm of the epithelial cells and PRL-3-positive structures are enriched in the perinuclear region (Fig. 10A). Importantly, PRL-3 was not detected in the nuclei (Fig. 10A) marked by Hoechst staining of the DNA (Fig. 10B). The labeling of PRL-3 is characteristic of the endosome. These results not only suggest that our conclusions derived from studies using the transfected cells are not due to epitope-tagging or overexpression, they also suggest that PRL-3 may participate in differentiation-associated events in the epithelial cells of the small intestine.


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Localization of PRL-3 in punctate structures of intestinal epithelial cells. Cryosections of 1-week-old mouse intestine were processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using affinity-purified anti-PRL-3 antibodies (A), and the nuclei were revealed by Hoechst staining for DNA (B). The arrows labeled a, b, and c designate the same three cells in each panel. Bar, 10 µm.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Evidence suggests that PRL-1, -2, and -3 play important roles in regulating cell growth, including the observations that overexpression of these proteins can lead to cellular transformation (4, 6) and the discovery of their amino acid sequence homology with Cdc14p and PTEN (8), two important players in cell growth control. Establishment of their subcellular localization is thus important for studies aiming to reveal their specific roles and mechanism of action. Indirect immunofluorescent and EM immunogold microscopy of cells expressing any one of the Myc-tagged PRLs show that the PRLs are normally associated with the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane and with microspike-like and other plasma membrane processes (Figs. 2, 4, A and B, and 5, A and B). Additionally, the PRLs are resident in the early endosome, as demonstrated by their presence in intracellular punctate structures resembling endosomes (Figs. 4A, 5A, and 8, A-C); their characteristic subcellular redistributions in response to brefeldin A and wortmannin (Fig. 4, C and D, and 5, C and D), two compounds known to alter the structures of endosomal compartments and effect the relocalization of early endosomal proteins such as the transferrin receptor and endobrevin (42-45); and their presence in vacuole-like as well as tubular-vesicular structures of the early endosome marked by BSA-gold (Fig. 6, B and C).

Myc-tagged PRLs were used for these studies, because a survey of many cell lines (including A431, NRK, HeLa, Vero, MDCK, and 3T3-L1) with antibodies raised against PRL-2 and PRL-3 did not reveal specific labeling of subcellular structures, possibly because of the low levels of expression of the PRLs in these cells. The anti-PRL-3 antibodies preferentially recognize PRL-3 (Fig. 8). The examination of different mouse tissues indicates that PRL-3 is preferentially expressed in the small intestine (Fig. 9) where the majority of endogenous PRL-3 is localized to perinuclear punctate structures but is undetectable in the nucleus (Fig. 10), consistent with our results obtained using tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3. Also, the presence of PRL-3 in the differentiated epithelial cells of the villus but not in the proliferating crypt cells suggests that PRL-3 may participate in the differentiation-associated events in the epithelial cells of the small intestine.

All the PRLs can be prenylated in vitro, and it is now clear that in vivo prenylation is key to their subcellular localization. The association of PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome is abolished by treatment with FTI-277, a potent and selective FT inhibitor (46). Under this condition, all the PRLs redistribute to the nucleus. Furthermore, a mutant PRL-2 with the prenylation motif deleted is delivered to the nucleus. These results not only establish that the plasma membrane and endosomal localization of PRL-1, -2, and -3 requires their farnesylation but also suggest that in the absence of farnesylation they are specifically targeted to the nucleus. Consistent with specific nuclear import is the presence of a potential nuclear localization signal (NLS) near the C terminus of all the PRLs. This region, possessing the sequence KRRX12KYRPKMRLRF(R/K), resembles a typical bipartite NLS with an initial cluster of basic residues separated from a second more C-terminal basic region by a spacer of 10-12 residues (47, 48), although the latter portion of this potential signal in the PRLs is atypical in its alternation of six basic with nonbasic residues. Whether this is a functional mono- or bipartite NLS needs to be investigated. Nevertheless it is attractive to speculate that this NLS is masked by prenylation of the adjacent C terminus of the PRLs, resulting in their observed plasma membrane and endosomal localization, and the absence of prenylation permits the specific interaction of the PRLs with nuclear import proteins to effect a nuclear redistribution.

The positively charged region near the C terminus of the PRLs may fulfill another function in membrane targeting, similar to that of the polybasic region of Ki-ras4B. Prenylation and CAAX modification is sufficient to target the ras proteins to endomembranes such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, and a second signal contained with the ras hypervariable domains is required for subsequent transport to the plasma membrane (49, 50). For Ha-ras, N-ras, and Ki-ras4A, the additional signal is palmitolyation sites, but with Ki-ras4B it is a polybasic domain of six consecutive lysine residues. Each type of signal appears to direct different pathways of ras trafficking to the plasma membrane. The polybasic region may enhance membrane avidity of Ki-ras4B through electrostatic interactions with negatively charged membrane phospholipid head groups or with specific plasma membrane proteins (49). It functions only in conjunction with the CAAX motif, because mutation of the prenylation site diverts the majority of Ki-ras4B protein to the nucleus (49), similar to our observations with PRL-2. Whether an unknown third signal (25) or perhaps variations in the polybasic region can differentially determine the final membrane destination of prenylated proteins is unknown but could explain the observed diversity of membrane compartmentalizations of these CAAX proteins.

How do we explain the apparent difference between our current study and the previous one showing nuclear localization of PRL-1 (4)? Among several possibilities, we propose that the majority of newly made PRL-1, -2, and -3 are prenylated and targeted to the plasma membrane and the early endosome with a small fraction being unprenylated and thus targeted to the nucleus. The antibodies used in previous studies may specifically recognize the unprenylated form of PRL-1 if the prenylation signal itself is part of the epitope. In this way, prenylated PRL-1 was not recognized by these antibodies. Further experiments are needed to resolve this issue.

Our findings describe two potential sites of action for PRL-1, -2, and -3 and provide a regulatory mechanism for switching or altering PRL function. This could occur, for example, in response to cell stress. Little is known of the cellular regulation of prenyltransferase activity, but the regulation of isoprenoid biosynthesis may be more important in this respect. The mevalonate pathway leading to isoprenoid synthesis in mammalian cells has recently been reported to be activated by heat shock, UV radiation, or arsenite treatment with a consequent increase in the prenylation and membrane association of Ras (51). In plants, environmental changes such as heat and light enhance isoprenoid synthesis (52). A prenylated calmodulin was found to relocalize from the plasma membrane to the nuclei of leaf epidermal cells upon shifting from light to dark conditions (53). This was proposed to result from reduced isoprenoid levels and lack of calmodulin prenylation, because a similar shift was observed upon treatment with an inhibitor of mevalonate synthesis.

Several nuclear events occur upon treatment of mammalian cells with FT inhibitors, such as a p53-dependent increase in transcription of p21waf1/cip1/sdi and the consequent inhibition of kinase activity of Cdk complexed with cyclins E or A, reduced phosphorylation of Rb, and inhibition of DNA replication (54). In cells lacking p21 or with mutant p53, endoreduplication of DNA is observed and polyploid cells undergo apoptosis (54). It will be important to determine whether the PRLs are involved in mediating any of these changes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank S. M. Sebti for the kind gift of FTI-277, C.H. Ng for technical assistance, B. L. Tang, X. H. Yang, and K. Guo for photographic assistance, and Y. H. Tan for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Board of Singapore.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Dr., Singapore 117609, Republic of Singapore. Tel.: 65-874-3742; Fax: 65-779-1117; E-mail: mcbcp@imcb.nus.edu.sg.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000453200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; FT, farnesyltransferase; GGT, geranylgeranyl transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GST, glutathione S-transferase; EM, electron microscope; NLS, nuclear localization signal.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Streuli, M. (1996) Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 8, 182-188
2. Denu, J. M., Stuckey, J. A., Saper, M. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1996) Cell 87, 361-364
3. Tonks, N. K., and Neel, B. G. (1996) Cell 87, 365-368
4. Diamond, R. H., Cressman, D. E., Laz, T. M., Abrams, C. S., and Taub, R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3752-3762
5. Montagna, M., Serova, O., Sylla, B. S., Feunteun, J., and Lenoir, G. M. (1995) Hum. Genet. 96, 532-538
6. Cates, C. A., Michael, R. L., Stayrook, K. R., Harvey, K. A., Burke, Y. D., Randall, S. K., Crowell, P. L., and Crowell, D. N. (1996) Cancer Lett. 110, 49-55
7. Zhao, Z., Lee, C.-C., Monckton, D. G., Yazdani, A., Coolbaugh, M. I., Li, X., Bailey, J., Shen, Y., and Caskey, C. T. (1996) Genomics 35, 172-186
8. Zeng, Q., Hong, W., and Tan, Y. H. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244, 421-427
9. Taylor, G. S., Liu, Y., Baskerville, C., and Charbonneau, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24054-24063
10. Li, L., Ernsting, B. R., Wishart, M. J., Lohse, D. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29403-29406
11. Visintin, R., Craig, K., Hwang, E. S., Prinz, S., Tyers, M., and Amon, A. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 709-718
12. Li, J., Yen, C., liaw, D., Podsypanina, K., Bose, S., Wang, S. I., Puc, J., Miliaresis, C., Rodgers, L., McCombie, R., Bigner, S. H., Giovanella, B. C., Ittmann, M., Tycko, B., Hibshoosh, H., Wigler, M. H., and Parsons, R. (1997) Science 275, 1943-1947
13. Steck, P. A., Pershouse, M. A., Jasser, S. A., Yung, W. K., Lin, H., Ligon, A. H., Langford, L. A., Baumgard, M. L., Hattier, T., Davis, T., Frye, C., Hu, R., Swedlund, B., Teng, D. H., and Tavtigian, S. V. (1997) Nat. Genet. 15, 356-362
14. Li, D. M., and Sun, H. (1997) Canc. Res. 57, 2124-2129
15. Maehama, T., and Dixon, J. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13375-13378
16. Mohn, K. L., Laz, T. M., Hsu, J.-C., Melby, A. E., Bravo, R., and Taub, R. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 381-390
17. Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1993) Nature 366, 14-15
18. Moores, S. L., Schaber, M. D., Mosser, S. D., Rands, D., O'Hara, M. B., Garsky, V. M., Marshall, M. S., Pompliano, D. L., and Gibbs, J. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14603-14610
19. Reiss, Y., Goldstein, J. L., Seabra, M. C., Casey, P. J., and Brown, M. S. (1990) Cell 62, 81-88
20. Seabra, M. C., Reiss, Y., Casey, P. J., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1991) Cell 65, 429-434
21. Zhang, F. L., and Casey, P. J. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 241-269
22. Seabra, M. C., Goldstein, J. L., Sudhof, T. C., and Brown, M. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14497-14503
23. Andres, D. A., Seabra, M. C., Brown, M. S., Armstrong, S. A., Smeland, T. E., Cremers, F. P., and Goldstein, J. L. (1993) Cell 73, 1091-1099
24. Marshall, C. J. (1993) Science 259, 1865-1866
25. Seabra, M. C. (1998) Cell. Signal. 10, 167-172
26. Jackson, J. H., Cochrane, C. G., Bourne, J. R., Solski, P. A., Buss, J. E., and Der, C. J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3042-3046
27. Kato, K., Cox, A. D., Hisaka, M. M., Graham, S. M., Buss, J. E., and Der, C. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6403-6407
28. James, G. L., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., Rawson, T. E., Somers, T. C., McDowell, R. S., Crowley, C. W., Lucas, B. K., Levinson, A. D., and Marsters, J. C., Jr. (1993) Science 260, 1937-1942
29. Kohl, N. E., Mosser, S. D., deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Pompliano, D. L., Graham, S. L., Smith, R. L., Scolnick, E. M., Oliff, A., and Gibbs, J. B. (1993) Science 260, 1934-1937
30. Kohl, N. E., Wilson, F. R., Mosser, S. D., Giuliani, E., deSolms, S. J., Conner, M. W., Anthony, N. J., Holtz, W. J., Gomez, R. P., Lee, T. J., Smith, R. L., Graham, S. L., Hartman, G. D., Gibbs, J. B., and Oliff, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9141-9145
31. Kohl, N. E., Omer, C. A., Conner, M. W., Anthony, N. J., Davide, J. P., deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Gomez, R. P., Graham, S. L., Hamilton, K., Handt, L. K., Hartman, G. D., Koblan, K. S., Kral, A. M., Miller, P. J., Mosser, S. M., O'Neill, T. J., Rands, E., Schaber, M. D., Gibbs, J. B., and Oliff, A. (1995) Nat. Med. 1, 792-797
32. Gibbs, J. B., Graham, S. L., Hartman, G. D., Koblan, K. S., Kohl, N. E., Omer, C. A., and Oliff, A. (1997) Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 1, 197-203
33. Lebowitz, P. F., and Prendergast, G. C. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1439-1445
34. Guan, K. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17026-17030
35. Walker, P. A., Leong, L. E.-C., Ng, P. W. P., Tan, S. H., Waller, S., Murphy, D., and Porter, A. G. (1994) BioTechnology 12, 601-605
36. Zeng, Q., Tan, Y. H., and Hong, W. (1998) Anal. Biochem. 259, 187-194
37. Lowe, S. L., Wong, S. H., and Hong, W. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 209-220
38. Zhang, T., Wong, S. H., Tang, B. L., Xu, Y., Peter, F., and Hong, W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1157-1168
39. Slot, J. W., Geuze, H. J., Gigengack, S., Lienhard, G. E., and James, D. E. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 123-135
40. Liou, W., Geuze, H. J., Geelen, M. J., and Slot, J. W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 61-70
41. Rabinowitz, S., Horstmann, H., Gordon, S., and Griffiths, G. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 95-112
42. Klausner, R. D., Donaldson, J. G., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 1071-1080
43. Wong, S. H., Zhang, T., Xu, Y., Subramaniam, V. N., Griffiths, G., and Hong, W. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1549-1563
44. Arcaro, A., and Wymann, M. P. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 297-301
45. Reaves, B. J., Bright, N. A., Mullock, B. M., and Luzio, J. P. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 749-762
46. Lerner, E. C., Qian, Y., Blaskovich, M. A., Fossum, R. D., Vogt, A., Sun, J., Cox, A. D., Der, C. J., Hamilton, A. D., and Sebti, S. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26802-26806
47. Dingwall, C., and Laskey, R. A. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 478-481
48. Liang, S.-H., and Clarke, M. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32699-32703
49. Hancock, J. F., Paterson, H., and Marshall, C. J. (1990) Cell 63, 133-139
50. Choy, E., Chiu, V. K., Silletti, J., Feoktistov, M., Morimoto, T., Michaelson, D., Ivanov, I. E., and Philips, M. R. (1999) Cell 98, 69-80
51. Shack, S., Gorospe, M., Fawcett, T. W., Hudgins, W. R., and Holbrook, N. J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6021-6028
52. Sterner, B. A., Bianchini, G. M., and Korth, K. L. (1994) J. Lipid. Res. 35, 1133-1140
53. Rodriguez-Concepcion, M., Yalovsky, S., Zik, M., Fromm, H., and Gruissem, W. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1996-2007
54. Sepp-Lorenzino, L., and Rosen, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20243-20251


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-P. Sun, Y. Luo, X. Yu, W.-Q. Wang, B. Zhou, F. Liang, and Z.-Y. Zhang
Phosphatase Activity, Trimerization, and the C-terminal Polybasic Region Are All Required for PRL1-mediated Cell Growth and Migration
J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2007; 282(39): 29043 - 29051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
G. A. Michelotti, D. M. Brinkley, D. P. Morris, M. P. Smith, R. J. Louie, and D. A. Schwinn
Epigenetic regulation of human {alpha}1d-adrenergic receptor gene expression: a role for DNA methylation in Sp1-dependent regulation
FASEB J, July 1, 2007; 21(9): 1979 - 1993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Achiwa and J. S. Lazo
PRL-1 Tyrosine Phosphatase Regulates c-Src Levels, Adherence, and Invasion in Human Lung Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 643 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
C. M. Dumaual, G. E. Sandusky, P. L. Crowell, and S. K. Randall
Cellular Localization of PRL-1 and PRL-2 Gene Expression in Normal Adult Human Tissues
J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 2006; 54(12): 1401 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L Wang, L Peng, B Dong, L Kong, L Meng, L Yan, Y Xie, and C Shou
Overexpression of phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 in breast cancer: association with a poor clinical outcome
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1517 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. J. Fiordalisi, P. J. Keller, and A. D. Cox
PRL tyrosine phosphatases regulate rho family GTPases to promote invasion and motility.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3153 - 3161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. D. Basso, P. Kirschmeier, and W. R. Bishop
Thematic review series: Lipid Posttranslational Modifications. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 15 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
B. J. Stephens, H. Han, V. Gokhale, and D. D. Von Hoff
PRL phosphatases as potential molecular targets in cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1653 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]