![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 21797-21800, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
,
,
§**
From the
Program in Human Genetics and Molecular
Biology, § Department of Medicine, and
Department of
Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
Maryland 21205
Received for publication, January 12, 2000, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike normal mammalian cells, which
use oxygen to generate energy, cancer cells rely on glycolysis for
energy and are therefore less dependent on oxygen. We previously
observed that the c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor regulates
lactate dehydrogenase A and induces lactate overproduction. We,
therefore, sought to determine whether c-Myc controls other genes
regulating glucose metabolism. In Rat1a fibroblasts and murine livers
overexpressing c-Myc, the mRNA levels of the glucose transporter
GLUT1, phosphoglucose isomerase, phosphofructokinase,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, phosphoglycerate kinase, and
enolase were elevated. c-Myc directly transactivates genes encoding
GLUT1, phosphofructokinase, and enolase and increases glucose uptake in
Rat1 fibroblasts. Nuclear run-on studies confirmed that the GLUT1
transcriptional rate is elevated by c-Myc. Our findings suggest that
overexpression of the c-Myc oncoprotein deregulates glycolysis through
the activation of several components of the glucose metabolic pathway.
To form a three-dimensional multicellular spheroid mass,
neoplastic cells alter their metabolism such that they are able to survive and grow in the hostile microenvironments created by the decreased blood flow found in tumor vasculature (1, 2). The most
striking feature of tumor cells is the production of large amounts of
lactic acid, which is due to the glycolytic conversion of glucose to
lactic acid even in the presence of oxygen (3). This is often
accompanied by an increased rate of glucose transport (4-6).
Glucose is a major regulator of gene transcription. In particular, it
stimulates transcription of genes encoding glycolytic and lipogenic
enzymes in adipocytes and hepatocytes through the carbohydrate response
element (ChoRE),1 a
5'-CACGTG-3' motif (7-11). The ChoRE is similar to the core binding
site for the transcription factors USF2 (12), which is implicated in
glucose metabolism, TFE3, and the hypoxia-inducible transcription
factor (HIF). Hence, the ChoRE serves to integrate physiological
signals through transcription factors to regulate glucose metabolism.
During tumor formation, adaptation to hypoxia may be mediated by the
HIF-1 family of transcription factors, which induce angiogenesis and
other metabolic changes. (2, 13, 14). It is notable that glucose
transport and transporter mRNA are induced in cells transformed by
ras or src oncogenes (5). The c-myc
oncogene is activated in a variety of pathways that are important in
controlling cell growth and tumorigenesis. (15-18). Intriguingly, the
ChoRE sequence matches the core E-box (5'-CACGTG-3') binding site for c-Myc, which binds E-boxes of target genes to stimulate transcription (2, 18, 19). Previous work showed that c-Myc directly up-regulates the
expression of the lactate dehydrogenase gene (LDH-A) (20), which is
important in the transformed phenotype (anchorage-independent growth)
of cells that overexpress c-Myc (20, 21). In addition to LDH-A, we
report here the deregulation of GLUT 1 and several glycolytic genes by
c-Myc.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
Rat fibroblasts were cultured
in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies, Inc.) and antibiotics. Rat1a and
Myc-transformed Rat1a-Myc fibroblasts were as described previously
(22). Human lymphoid cells were cultured in Iscove's modified
Dulbecco's medium with 10% FBS and antibiotics. Cells lacking
c-myc (HO15), heterozygous HET15, and parental lines (TGR)
(a gift of John Sedivy, Brown University) were cultured in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (23). HO15 cells were
transfected with either MLVmyc or MLV empty vectors (20) using
Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's
protocol. The human GLUT1 cDNA (24) was kindly provided by Drs. M. Mueckler (Washington University, St. Louis, MO) and C. Heilig (The
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD).
A Rat1 cell line expressing a fusion protein of c-Myc and the human
estrogen receptor (MycER) (a gift of J. M. Bishop, University of
California, San Francisco) was grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, penicillin,
and streptomycin (25). Myc activity was induced when confluent MycER
cells were treated with 0.25 µM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HOTM; Research Biochemicals, Natrick, MA) for the times indicated as
described (20, 26). To block protein synthesis, 10 µM
cycloheximide (CHX) was added to the cells 30 min prior to 4-HOTM treatment.
Adenoviral in Vivo Gene Transfer--
Animal studies were
approved by The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Animal Use
and Care Committee. Adenoviral constructs (a gift from W. El-Deiry,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) containing either LacZ
(Ad/LacZ) or c-myc (Ad/c-myc) coding sequence
were as described (27). Two-month-old male BALB/c mice, weighing
20-25 g, were intravenously injected with 4 × 109
plaque-forming units (pfu) of either Ad/LacZ or Ad/c-myc.
Mice were then sacrificed by exposure to CO2 on days 3, 4, and 5 after viral injection. Their livers were quickly removed and
processed for RNAs or frozen in liquid nitrogen.
RNA Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated by guanidium
thiocyanate lysis followed by cesium chloride centrifugation. 15-µg
aliquots of RNA were used in Northern blot analysis (22). IMAGE
Consortium cDNA clones (28) were obtained (Research Genetics,
Inc.), and the inserts were isolated and 32P-labeled by
Random-Primer synthesis using a Random-PrimeII kit (Stratagene).
Nuclear Run-on Assays--
Nuclear run-on assays were performed
as described (20, 29). Nuclei were isolated from nonadherent cells
(2 × 107) and incubated with buffered
[32P]UTP (500 µCi), and labeled RNAs were isolated
after treatment with DNase, proteinase K incubation, and
phenol-chloroform extraction. Labeled RNAs (1.2 × 107
cpm) from either Rat1a-Myc or Rat1a cells were hybridized at 42 °C
for 40 h with membrane slot-blotted with denatured glucose transporter 1 and vimentin cDNA fragments.
2-[3H]Deoxyglucose (2-DG) Uptake--
Uptake
experiments were conducted on confluent Rat1a and MycER cells. Cells
were treated with 0.25 µM 4-HOTM (Research Biochemicals, Natrick, MA) 1 h before 0.1 mM 2-DG with 10 nM [3H]2-DG (final concentration) were added.
At the end of a 10-min incubation, cells were washed with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were than lysed by the addition of 2 ml of 10 mM NaOH containing 0.1% Triton X-100, and a
100-µl aliquot was assayed for 3H by liquid scintillation
counting (30). The protein content was measured by the method of
Bradford (31).
Myc Induces GLUT1 and Glycolytic Gene Expression in
Myc-transformed Fibroblasts and in Hepatocytes in Vivo--
To
identify genes whose expression is deregulated in the presence of
increased ectopic c-Myc, c-Myc-transformed Rat1a cells were studied
(Fig. 1A). Using this system
of isogenic cell lines, GLUT1, phosphofructokinase (PFK),
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), phosphoglucose
isomerase (GPI), phosphoglycerate mutase (PGM), and enolase showed
elevated mRNA levels in c-Myc-transformed cells as compared with
the nontransformed Rat1a cells. The expression levels of aldolase A,
aldolase C, and triose-phosphate isomerase (TPI) were decreased, and
the expression levels of hexokinase I, hexokinase II, and
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase were unchanged. Rat vimentin was used
as a control (32).
To determine whether c-Myc could induce GLUT1 and glycolytic gene
expression in vivo, we injected adenoviruses expressing either LacZ or c-Myc into mice. Tail-vein injection of adenoviruses has
the advantage of very high hepatic clearance, which yields highly
efficient gene delivery to the liver (33). Four days after injection,
40% of hepatocytes were positive for Glycolytic Genes That Are Direct Targets of c-Myc--
To
determine whether the genes displaying increased or decreased levels of
mRNA expression are transcriptionally activated by Myc, we used a
previously described Rat1 fibroblast line expressing a protein that
fuses Myc to the estrogen receptor ligand binding domain (MycER). With
exposure of cells expressing the MycER protein to estrogenic compounds
such as 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HOTM), the ligand-bound MycER protein
translocates to the nucleus. The MycER protein then activates target
genes without requiring new intervening protein synthesis (26, 34).
Hence, prior exposure of MycER cells to the protein synthesis inhibitor
cycloheximide (CHX) would not block activation or repression of direct
target genes by 4-HOTM. Activation of MycER by 4-HOTM caused induction
of GLUT1, PFK, and enolase mRNAs in the presence of CHX at 2 and
4 h (Fig. 2A). Note that
mRNA levels are diminished in the CHX + TM samples at the 6 h
time point; this is likely due to decreased MycER protein (10% of
0 h level) with CHX treatment (data not shown). GAPDH, GPI, and
PGM expression were not increased in the MycER system. Thus, GAPDH,
GPI, and PGM do not meet this criterion for direct targets of c-Myc.
Among the potentially down-regulated genes identified in Rat1a-Myc
cells, only TPI mRNA moderately decreased in MycER cells exposed to
4-HOTM. However, a decrease in TPI mRNA was also seen with CHX
treatment alone. The ribosomal phosphoprotein (36B4) mRNA level was
shown to be unresponsive to estrogen and independent of cell cycle
progression (35, 36) and was therefore used as a control. To account
for experimental variation, a separate tamoxifen induction experiment
was performed, and GLUT1 expression in MycER cells was determined (Fig.
2B). Following c-Myc induction, GLUT1 expression behaves in
a manner that is consistent with a direct c-Myc target.
To determine whether 4-HOTM itself may directly increase the expression
of GLUT1, PFK, and enolase independent of the MycER protein, we treated
Rat1a cells lacking MycER with 4-HOTM, with or without CHX, and
performed Northern analysis. The mRNA levels of these genes were
unchanged upon addition of 4-HOTM and cycloheximide in the absence of
the MycER protein (Fig. 2C). Hence, the induction of
enolase, GLUT1, and PFK expression in the Rat1a-MycER cells by 4-HOTM
is dependent on MycER activity.
Expression of GLUT1 and Glycolytic Genes in Cells Lacking
c-Myc--
To further authenticate GLUT1, PFK, and enolase as c-Myc
targets, we sought to determine their expression in Rat1 fibroblasts lacking c-myc (Fig. 3). All
three transcripts showed decreased levels in c-myc null
cells as compared with wild type parental cells. The expression of PFK
and enolase are elevated in c-myc null cells rescued by a
constitutively overexpressed c-Myc (HO15-Myc) when compared with empty
vector control transfected myc null cells (HO15-MLV). GLUT1
expression, however, was only slightly elevated in the
c-Myc-overexpressing HO15 cells as compared with control MLV
transfected cells, which display elevated GLUT1 as compared with the
parental HO15 cells. Replicate experiments yielded similar results, in
which the HO15-MLV cells have elevated expression of all three genes as
compared with the HO15 parental cell line. The cause for this elevation
in our control HO15-MLV cells is not known. Thus, in this genetically
defined system Myc levels parallel the expression of these three target
genes.
Among the three up-regulated genes, GLUT1 is most frequently implicated
in tumorigenesis (35-38). We therefore chose to characterize GLUT1
further. Nuclear run-on experiments demonstrated an enhanced transcriptional rate of GLUT1 in Rat1a-Myc cells as compared with Rat1a
fibroblasts (Fig. 4A). The
nuclear run-on signals for enolase and PFK were low and insufficient
for interpretation (not shown). These results, nevertheless, underscore
the activation of GLUT1 by c-Myc at the transcriptional level.
We further sought to determine whether GLUT1 expression parallels that
of c-myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells that are characterized by c-myc gene activation by chromosomal translocation. Both
c-Myc-transformed lymphoblastoid (CB33-Myc) and Burkitt's lymphoma
cell lines, Ramos and ST486, have elevated c-Myc protein levels (20)
that are associated with elevations of GLUT1 mRNA levels compared
with the nontransformed lymphoblastoid CB33 cells (Fig. 4B).
We thus observed a correlation between c-Myc expression and the
endogenous levels of GLUT1 mRNA in these Myc-transformed human
lymphoid cells.
Increased Glucose Uptake in Myc-transformed Cells--
To
determine whether increased Myc activity influences glucose transport,
[3H]2-DG uptake was studied in MycER Rat1 cells as well
as Rat1a cells lacking the MycER system. 4-HOTM increased
[3H]2-DG uptake in MycER cells, while it had no influence
in Rat1a cells (Fig. 5).
Normal mammalian cells use oxygen to generate energy from glucose
and other metabolites through oxidative phosphorylation. In conditions
of oxygen deprivation, normal cells rely on glycolysis to generate
energy by converting glucose to lactic acid. Neoplastic transformation,
however, alters glucose metabolism with enhanced conversion of glucose
to lactic acid, thereby making tumor cells less dependent on oxygen.
The molecular basis for physiological and pathological regulation of
glucose metabolism is beginning to emerge with the identification of
transcription factors that regulate glycolytic genes (2).
The ability of c-Myc, USF1, and HIF-1 transcription factors to regulate
the LDH-A promoter through a Myc consensus binding site 5'-CACGTG-3'
suggests that these transcription factors converge onto common
cis elements (5'-RCGTG-3') that are found in regulatory sequences of glycolytic genes (20). Because hypoxia physiologically induces glycolytic gene expression through HIF-1 binding sites, it
stands to reason that glycolysis might also be activated by USF or
c-Myc. Hence, we sought to determine whether c-Myc regulates genes that
are also regulated by HIF-1.
In this study, we observe that the glucose transporter GLUT1, PFK,
GAPDH, GPI, PGM, and enolase are up-regulated by c-Myc in fibroblasts.
In addition, we used adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the liver as
a means of studying in vivo gene expression and determined
that these genes are also up-regulated by c-Myc in vivo. Our
findings agree with a previous study of transgenic mice that also
suggests the in vivo regulation of hepatic glycolysis by
c-myc (41), although GLUT2, but not GLUT1, was induced in the transgenic livers. While our observation supports the hypothesis that c-Myc induces GLUT1 expression in the liver in vivo,
the physiological significance of this induction is unclear because GLUT2 is the dominant form of hepatic glucose transporter. The use of
transgenic mice, however, cannot establish whether c-Myc regulates
certain genes directly. In our study, only GLUT1, PFK, and enolase
behave as direct target genes in the MycER system. While some HIF-1 and
c-Myc target genes overlap, the two sets of targets remain distinct.
For example, the mRNA levels for HKI and adolase are unchanged or
decreased by c-Myc, but are hypoxia inducible (2, 13, 14). GPI is
increased by c-Myc but is unaffected by hypoxia. Furthermore, we have
reported that c-Myc overexpression down-regulates VEGF, a
HIF-1-mediated hypoxia-inducible gene (42).
We observed that c-Myc directly induces GLUT1 and increases glucose
uptake in the Rat1 MycER cells. In addition to LDH-A, GLUT1 is an
intriguing c-Myc target when its role in oncogenesis is considered (37,
38). Elevation of GLUT1 and c-Myc RNA are among the earliest changes in
gene expression after Ha-ras T24 transformation of Rat1a
fibroblasts (39). Reduction of GLUT1 expression through antisense GLUT1
RNA suppresses NIH 3T3 cell transformation by N-ras (40).
Hence, the induction of GLUT1 expression by c-Myc may play an important
role in tumor glucose metabolism.
The specific roles of PFK and enolase in tumorigenesis are less clear.
Glycolytic flux is controlled at multiple steps of glycolysis, such
that interruption of a non-rate-limiting step may affect overall flux
(43). PFK is a rate-limiting glycolytic enzyme due to its intricate
allosteric responses to ATP/ADP ratios and therefore may be critically
important for the control of glycolytic flux. Enolase has not been
directly implicated in human cancers; however, it is intriguing to note
that a negative transactivating factor of the c-myc promoter
(myc-binding protein 1) may be identical to enolase A
(44, 45). While the role for enolase in regulating c-myc
expression remains to be confirmed and further studied, this finding
suggests that the induction of enolase by c-Myc may increase glycolysis
and also serves as a negative feedback onto c-myc gene expression.
In summary, we observe that while both c-Myc and HIF-1 up-regulates
GLUT1 and glycolytic gene expression, the sets of target genes for
these transcription factors are distinct. HIF-1 physiologically induces
glycolytic gene expression in hypoxic cells that also undergo growth
arrest. By contrast, c-Myc stimulates glucose uptake, glycolysis, and
overall metabolism as well as activates the cell cycle machinery, which
are all necessary for cell proliferation (46). The widespread
deregulation of the c-myc gene in human cancers, therefore,
may be a major contributor to the enhanced tumor glycolysis known as
the Warburg effect, which may confer growth advantage to tumor
cells deprived of oxygen.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, Northern analysis of GLUT1 and
glycolytic gene expression in nonadherent Rat1a-Myc (R1a-Myc) or Rat1a
(R1a) fibroblasts. Vimentin served as a sample loading control.
PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; Ald,
aldolase. B, c-Myc protein expression at 3-5 days
after injection of adenovirus-expressing c-Myc. Equal amounts of
protein (20 µg/lane) were loaded, and Western analysis was performed
with the monoclonal anti-Myc 9E10 antibody. C, elevated
in vivo glycolytic gene expression in c-myc
adenovirally transduced murine livers. Numbers at the
bottom represent days after injection of
adenovirus-expressing galactosidase (LacZ) or c-Myc. 18 S rRNA is shown
as a loading control.
-galactosidase in LacZ
adenovirus-treated animals (data not
shown).2 c-Myc protein levels
were 10-fold elevated in Myc adenovirus-treated animals (Fig.
1B). GLUT1, PFK, GAPDH, PGM, and enolase mRNAs were significantly induced in the Myc-expressing livers as compared with
LacZ-expressing livers at 4 and 5 days after injection of viruses (Fig.
1C). These observations suggest that transient expression of
Myc in vivo induces hepatic expression of the same
glycolytic genes that are induced in the Rat1a system.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, direct c-Myc targets determined by
the use of the Myc-estrogen receptor ligand binding domain (MycER)
hybrid protein system. Rat1 fibroblasts expressing the MycER protein
were treated with CHX, HT, or both reagents (CHX + TM), and RNAs were
collected at the times (h) indicated at the bottom of the
figure. Northern blots were probed with labeled cDNAs of GLUT1
(GT1) or glycolytic genes indicated along the left
sides of the panels of blots. Both 18 S rRNA and human ribosomal
phosphoprotein 36B4 are shown as loading controls. Both GPI and TPI
mRNAs are labile with CHX exposure. DHAP,
dihydroxyacetone phosphate; FBP, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate.
B, Northern analysis of GLUT1 expression in a separate
induction experiment with MycER cells. The labels are similar to those
of A. The top of the figure shows the relative
increase in GLUT1 expression (normalized to the loading control 36B4)
as a function of time. For the 4-h time point, an average over three
experiments from two induction experiments yielded the following
relative increase (from zero time point) in GLUT1 expression with
standard errors: CHX, 1.3 ± 0.5; TM, 2.7 ± 0.3; CHX + TM,
2.2 ± 0.4. C, Northern analysis of enolase, GLUT1, and
PFK expression in 4-hydroxytamoxifen (TM) or TM plus cycloheximide (CHX + TM)-treated Rat1a cells lacking the MycER protein. Numbers
at the bottom represent time of exposure. 18 S rRNA is shown
as a loading control.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of enolase, GLUT1, and PFK
mRNAs in wild-type (TGR(WT)), heterozygous (HET15), or
c-myc null (HO15) Rat1 fibroblasts. HO15-MLV
represents RNAs from myc null cells transfected with the
empty MLV-LTR expression vector, and HO15-Myc the null cells
reconstituted with an MLV-LTR driven human c-Myc expression vector.
Both 18 S rRNA and ribosomal phosphoprotein 36B4 were used as loading
controls.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A, nuclear run-on studies showing
increased transcription of GLUT1 in Rat1a-Myc nuclei as compared with
Rat1a nuclei. Vimentin was used as a control. B, Northern
blot showing expression of GLUT1 mRNA in untransformed CB33 human
lymphoblastoid cells as compared with those with elevated c-Myc
expression: CB33 with ectopic c-Myc expression (CB33-Myc)
and Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines Ramos and ST486. Phosphoprotein 36B4
and 18 S rRNA are shown as loading controls. Relative GLUT1 mRNA
levels are: CB33, 1.0; CB33-Myc, 1.8; Ramos, 11.2; and ST486,
4.3.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
c-Myc stimulates glucose uptake in Rat1
fibroblasts. Rat1a and Rat1-MycER cells were grown under control
conditions (
TM) or with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (+TM), which induces c-Myc
activity. Relative glucose uptake (mean ± S.D. from triplicate
experiments) was determined by measuring intracellular
2-[3H]deoxyglucose (see "Experimental Procedures" for
details).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. G. L. Semenza for IMAGE Consortium glycolytic enzyme cDNA clones, Dr. W. El-Deiry for adenoviruses, and Dr. L. Gardner for comments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Alexander and Margaret Stewart Trust Fund, a research grant from the Maryland American Cancer Society, and National Institutes of Health Grant CA 51497.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Special fellow of the Leukemia Society of America.
Fellow of the Lymphoma Research Foundation of America.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Ross Research Building, Room 1025, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-955-2773; Fax: 410-955-0185; E-mail: cvdang@jhmi.edu.

Fellow of the Lymphoma Research Foundation of America.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000023200
2 S. Kim, Q. Li, C. V. Dang, and A. Lee, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: ChoRE, carbohydrate response element; HIF, hypoxia-inducible transcription factor; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MLV, murine leukemia virus; HOTM, hydroxytamoxifen; TM, tamoxifen; CHX, cycloheximide; 2-DG, 2-deoxyglucose; PFK, phosphofructokinase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPI, phosphoglucose isomerase; PGM, phosphoglycerate mutase; TPI, triose-phosphate isomerase; HK, hexokinase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hemlinger, G., Yuan, F., Dellian, M., and Jain, R. K. (1997) Nature Med. 3, 177-182 |
| 2. | Dang, C. V., and Semenza, G. L. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 68-72 |
| 3. | Warburg, O. H. (1956) Science 123, 309-314 |
| 4. | Pedersen, P. L. (1978) Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 22, 190-274 |
| 5. | Flier, J. S., Mueckler, M. M., Usher, P., and Lodish, H. F. (1987) Science 235, 1492-1495 |
| 6. | Birnbaum, M. J., Haspel, H. C., and Rosen, O. M. (1987) Science 235, 1495-1498 |
| 7. | Jacoby, D. B., Zilz, N. D., and Towle, H. C. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 17623-17626 |
| 8. | Foufelle, F., Gouhot, B., Pegorier, J. P., Perdereau, D., Girard, J., and Ferre, P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20543-20546 |
| 9. | Thompson, K. S., and Towle, H. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8679-8682 |
| 10. | Lefrancois-Martinez, A. M., Diaz-Guerra, M. J., Vallet, V., Kahn, A., and Antoine, B. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 89-96 |
| 11. | Towle, H. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23235-23238 |
| 12. | Vallet, V. S., Casado, M., Henrion, A. A., Bucchini, D., Raymondjean, M., Kahn, A., and Vaulont, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20175-20179 |
| 13. | Semenza, G. L., Roth, P. H., Fang, H. M., and Wang, G. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23757-23763 |
| 14. | Semenza, G. L., Jiang, B. H., Leung, S. W., Passantino, R., Concordet, J. P., Maire, P., and Giallongo, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32529-32537 |
| 15. | He, T. C., Sparks, A. B., Rago, C., Hermeking, H., Zawel, L., da Costa, L. T., Morin, P. J., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1998) Science 281, 1509-1512 |
| 16. | Barone, M. V., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1995) Nature 378, 509-512 |
| 17. | Afar, D. E., Goga, A., McLaughlin, J., Witte, O. N., and Sawyers, C. L. (1994) Science 264, 424-426 |
| 18. | Dang, C. V. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1-11 |
| 19. | Grandori, C., and Eisenman, R. N. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 177-181 |
| 20. | Shim, H., Dolde, C., Lewis, B. C., Wu, C. S., Dang, G., Jungmann, R. A., Dalla-Favera, R., and Dang, C. V. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6658-6663 |
| 21. | Shim, H., Chun, Y. S., Lewis, B. C., and Dang, C. V. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 1511-1516 |
| 22. | Hoang, A. T., Cohen, K. J., Barrett, J. F., Bergstrom, D. A., and Dang, C. V. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6875-6879 |
| 23. | Mateyak, M. K., Obaya, A. J., Adachi, S., and Sedivy, J. M. (1997) Cell. Growth Differ. 8, 1039-1048 |
| 24. | Mueckler, M., Caruso, C., Baldwin, S. A., Panico, M., Belch, I., Morris, H. R., Allard, W. J., Lienhard, G. E., and Lodish, H. F. (1985) Science 229, 941-945 |
| 25. | Littlewood, T. D., Hancock, D. C., Danielian, P. S., Parker, M. G., and Evan, G. I. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1686-1690 |
| 26. | Grandori, C., Mac, J., Siebelt, F., Ayer, D. E., and Eisenman, R. N. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4344-4357 |
| 27. | Mitchell, K. O., and El-Deiry, W. S. (1999) Cell Growth & Differ. 10, 223-230 |
| 28. | Iyer, N. V., Kotch, L. E., Agani, F., Leung, S. W., Laughner, E., Wenger, R. H., Gassmann, M., Gearhart, J. D., Lawler, A. M., Yu, A. Y., and Semenza, G. L. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 149-162 |
| 29. | Groudine, M., Peretz, M., and Weintraub, H. (1981) Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 281-288 |
| 30. | Yu, N., Maciejewski-Lenoir, D., Bloom, F. E., and Magistretti, P. J. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 550-558 |
| 31. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 |
| 32. | Lewis, B. C., Shim, H., Li, Q., Wu, C. S., Lee, L. A., Maity, A., and Dang, C. V. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4967-4978 |
| 33. | Ferry, N., and Heard, J. M. (1998) Hum. Gene Ther. 9, 1975-1981 |
| 34. | Eilers, M., Picard, D., Yamamoto, K. R., and Bishop, J. M. (1989) Nature 340, 66-68 |
| 35. | Laborda, J. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3998 |
| 36. | Keyomarsi, K., and Pardee, A. B. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1112-1116 |
| 37. | Younes, M., Lechago, L. V., Somoano, J. R., Mosharaf, M., and Lechago, J. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 1164-1167 |
| 38. | Younes, M., Lechago, L. V., and Lechago, J. (1996) Clin. Cancer Res. 2, 1151-1154 |
| 39. | Godwin, A. K., and Lieberman, M. W. (1991) Mol. Carcinogenesis 4, 275-285 |
| 40. | Choi, J. W., Yoon, D. J., Lee, H. W., Han, D. P., and Ahn, Y. H. (1995) Yonsei Med. J. 36, 480-486 |
| 41. | Valera, A., Pujol, A., Gregori, X., Riu, E., Visa, J., and Bosch, F. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 1067-1078 |
| 42. | Barr, L. F., Campbell, S. E., Diette, G. B., Gabrielson, E. W., Kim, S., Shim, H., and Dang, C. V. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 143-149 |
| 43. | Fell, D. A. (1998) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 58, 121-124 |
| 44. | Chaudhary, D., and Miller, D. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 3438-3445 |
| 45. | Subramanian, A., and Miller, D. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5958-5965 |
| 46. | Elend, M., and Eilers, M. (1999) Curr. Biol. 28, R936-R938 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Gillies, I. Robey, and R. A. Gatenby Causes and Consequences of Increased Glucose Metabolism of Cancers J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 24S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Winnard Jr., A. P. Pathak, S. Dhara, S. Y. Cho, V. Raman, and M. G. Pomper Molecular Imaging of Metastatic Potential J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 96S - 112S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Clem, S. Telang, A. Clem, A. Yalcin, J. Meier, A. Simmons, M. A. Rasku, S. Arumugam, W. L. Dean, J. Eaton, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses glycolytic flux and tumor growth Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2008; 7(1): 110 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-w. Kim, P. Gao, Y.-C. Liu, G. L. Semenza, and C. V. Dang Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 and Dysregulated c-Myc Cooperatively Induce Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Metabolic Switches Hexokinase 2 and Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(21): 7381 - 7393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. Sampson, N. H. Rong, J. Han, Q. Yang, V. Aris, P. Soteropoulos, N. J. Petrelli, S. P. Dunn, and L. J. Krueger MicroRNA Let-7a Down-regulates MYC and Reverts MYC-Induced Growth in Burkitt Lymphoma Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 9762 - 9770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yuneva, N. Zamboni, P. Oefner, R. Sachidanandam, and Y. Lazebnik Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells J. Cell Biol., October 3, 2007; 178(1): 93 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lopez-Rios, M. Sanchez-Arago, E. Garcia-Garcia, A. D. Ortega, J. R. Berrendero, F. Pozo-Rodriguez, A. Lopez-Encuentra, C. Ballestin, and J. M. Cuezva Loss of the Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Capacity Underlies the Glucose Avidity of Carcinomas Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9013 - 9017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Serganova, J. Humm, C. Ling, and R. Blasberg Tumor hypoxia imaging. Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5260 - 5264. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Sans, D. J. Satterwhite, C. A. Stoltzman, K. T. Breen, and D. E. Ayer MondoA-Mlx Heterodimers Are Candidate Sensors of Cellular Energy Status: Mitochondrial Localization and Direct Regulation of Glycolysis. Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(13): 4863 - 4871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Doughty, B. F. Bleiman, D. J. Wagner, F. J. Dufort, J. M. Mataraza, M. F. Roberts, and T. C. Chiles Antigen receptor-mediated changes in glucose metabolism in B lymphocytes: role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in the glycolytic control of growth Blood, June 1, 2006; 107(11): 4458 - 4465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-Y. Hwang and F. Ismail-Beigi Control of Glut1 promoter activity under basal conditions and in response to hyperosmolarity: role of Sp1 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): C337 - C344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Isidoro, E. Casado, A. Redondo, P. Acebo, E. Espinosa, A. M. Alonso, P. Cejas, D. Hardisson, J. A. Fresno Vara, C. Belda-Iniesta, et al. Breast carcinomas fulfill the Warburg hypothesis and provide metabolic markers of cancer prognosis Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2005; 26(12): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Fleming, G.-L. Shen, S. E. Holloway, M. Davis, and R. A. Brekken Molecular Consequences of Silencing Mutant K-ras in Pancreatic Cancer Cells: Justification for K-ras-Directed Therapy Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 3(7): 413 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tsuneoka, K. Teye, N. Arima, M. Soejima, H. Otera, K. Ohashi, Y. Koga, H. Fujita, K. Shirouzu, H. Kimura, et al. A Novel Myc-target Gene, mimitin, That Is Involved in Cell Proliferation of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19977 - 19985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al. Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mayer, M. Hockel, A. Wree, and P. Vaupel Microregional Expression of Glucose Transporter-1 and Oxygenation Status: Lack of Correlation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2768 - 2773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mizukami, A. Iwamatsu, T. Aki, M. Kimura, K. Nakamura, T. Nao, T. Okusa, M. Matsuzaki, K.-i. Yoshida, and S. Kobayashi ERK1/2 Regulates Intracellular ATP Levels through {alpha}-Enolase Expression in Cardiomyocytes Exposed to Ischemic Hypoxia and Reoxygenation J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50120 - 50131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tsutsumi, T. Yanagawa, T. Shimura, H. Kuwano, and A. Raz Autocrine Motility Factor Signaling Enhances Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7775 - 7784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-w. Kim, K. I. Zeller, Y. Wang, A. G. Jegga, B. J. Aronow, K. A. O'Donnell, and C. V. Dang Evaluation of Myc E-Box Phylogenetic Footprints in Glycolytic Genes by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5923 - 5936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Doedt, S. Krishnamurthy, D. P. Bockmuhl, B. Tebarth, C. Stempel, C. L. Russell, A. J.P. Brown, and J. F. Ernst APSES Proteins Regulate Morphogenesis and Metabolism in Candida albicans Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2004; 15(7): 3167 - 3180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Elstrom, D. E. Bauer, M. Buzzai, R. Karnauskas, M. H. Harris, D. R. Plas, H. Zhuang, R. M. Cinalli, A. Alavi, C. M. Rudin, et al. Akt Stimulates Aerobic Glycolysis in Cancer Cells Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 64(11): 3892 - 3899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tsutsumi, T. Yanagawa, T. Shimura, T. Fukumori, V. Hogan, H. Kuwano, and A. Raz Regulation of Cell Proliferation by Autocrine Motility Factor/Phosphoglucose Isomerase Signaling J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 32165 - 32172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Singhal, R. Wiewrodt, L. D. Malden, K. M. Amin, K. Matzie, J. Friedberg, J. C. Kucharczuk, L. A. Litzky, S. W. Johnson, L. R. Kaiser, et al. Gene Expression Profiling of Malignant Mesothelioma Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 3080 - 3097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Janssen, A. de Groof, M. Wijers, J. Fransen, P. P. Dzeja, A. Terzic, and B. Wieringa Adenylate Kinase 1 Deficiency Induces Molecular and Structural Adaptations to Support Muscle Energy Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12937 - 12945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. O'Connell, A. F. Cheung, C. P. Simkevich, W. Tam, X. Ren, M. K. Mateyak, and J. M. Sedivy A Large Scale Genetic Analysis of c-Myc-regulated Gene Expression Patterns< |