![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 21801-21804, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, April 24, 2000
Decorin belongs to a family of small leucine-rich
proteoglycans that are directly involved in the control of matrix
organization and cell growth. Genetic evidence indicates that decorin
is required for the proper assembly of collagenous matrices. Here, we
sought to establish the precise binding site of decorin on type I
collagen. Using rotary shadowing electron microscopy and photoaffinity
labeling, we mapped the binding site of decorin protein core to a
narrow region near the C terminus of type I collagen. This region is located within the cyanogen bromide peptide fragment Decorin belongs to a growing family of small leucine-rich
proteoglycans that mediate fundamental cellular processes, including regulation of the orderly assembly of extracellular matrices, corneal
transparency, tensile strength of skin and tendon, viscoelasticity of
blood vessels, and tumor cell proliferation (1-3). One of the key
roles of decorin is to bind collagens, including types I, II, III, VI,
and XIV (4-6), and to modulate collagen fibrillogenesis. Although it
is thought that the main force that drives collagen fibril formation
in vivo is the collagen structure itself, several molecules
can regulate and fine tune this process (7, 8). Decorin induces a
delayed fibril assembly and a subsequent reduction in the average
fibril diameter (9). This process is mediated by the protein core (10),
likely by the central
LRR4-61
(11-13), and requires preservation of disulfide bonding (14) and
proper folding of the protein core (15). In support of these biochemical findings is genetic evidence derived from decorin null
animals in which aberrant collagen formation in the dermis causes a
skin fragility phenotype (16). In the absence of decorin, the collagen
network of the null animals is loosely packed and exhibits irregular
collagen contours, with numerous thin fibrils abnormally fused to
larger collagen shafts. Thus, the skin fragility phenotype can be
ascribed to the generation of an abnormal collagen fibril and matrix
structure in the absence of the regulatory protein decorin.
In this study we sought to establish the exact binding site of decorin
on type I collagen. Employing two independent strategies, rotary
shadowing electron microscopy and photoaffinity labeling, we mapped the
major binding site of decorin protein core near the C terminus of type
I collagen. This region is located within the cyanogen bromide fragment
CB6 of the Purification of Decorin and Procollagen and Rotary Shadowing
Electron Microscopy--
Decorin proteoglycan and its protein core
were purified to homogeneity from the medium conditioned by HT1080
cells as described previously (15). The purity of the final
decorin preparations was determined by SDS-PAGE following labeling
(~10 µg each) to high specific activity (~9 × 1017 cpm/mol) using IODO-GEN (Pierce) and 125I
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). As an additional control, we iodinated the 175-kDa immunopurified EGF receptor (17). Type I procollagen, isolated from cultured chick tendon fibroblasts (18), was incubated at
nearly equimolar concentrations with either decorin or its core protein
at 23 °C for various intervals (15 s, 2 min, 15 min, and 60 min).
Procollagen, decorin, and decorin core were also evaluated individually
for purity. The samples were dissolved in 0.1 M ammonium
bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.0., mixed to a final concentration of 70%
glycerol, sprayed onto freshly cleaved mica, and rotary shadowed at 6 degrees using a mixture of platinum and carbon in a Balzers BAE 250 evaporator (19). Images were collected using a Philips 410 TEM,
calibrated using a carbon grating replica (Fullam), confirmed by
graphatized carbon (Polaron), and enlarged to a final magnification
of × 100,000. Measurements were taken using a 10× loupe fitted
with a reticle having scale divisions of 0.1 mm. The length of the
procollagen triple helix was measured beginning at the N-terminal end
of the C-propeptide and continuing to the middle of the bound decorin core.
Photoaffinity Labeling--
The recombinant decorin core was
derivatized with SASD that was previously radiolabeled with
125I using sodium iodide and IODO-BEADs. Decorin core was
reacted at a 1:50 ratio with SASD for 30 min which resulted, on the
average, in derivatization of each I domain molecule with three SASD
groups. Photoaffinity-derivatized decorin core was separated from
reactants by gel filtration chromatography. All of the above procedures were carried out in the dark. Derivatized decorin was then allowed to
bind to reconstituted collagen fibrils in a glass Petri dish. After
removing unbound decorin, bound decorin was covalently cross-linked to
collagen by irradiation with long wave ultraviolet light. The covalent
linkage between decorin and collagen was then severed by reduction with
Arch-shaped Structure of Decorin--
To establish the purity of
the preparations, we radioiodinated decorin or its protein core and
subjected them to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. There were no
contaminant bands in any preparation of decorin core (43-50 kDa) or
decorin proteoglycan, a polydisperse population centering around 100 kDa (Fig. 1A). As an
additional molecular weight marker, we labeled the 175-kDa EGF receptor
(Fig. 1A). The same preparations of decorin and decorin core
were capable of binding to and inducing phosphorylation of the EGF
receptor in A431 squamous carcinoma cells (17) and concurrently
inducing growth suppression (not shown). Thus, the preparations used in this study are pure and biologically active.
Using rotary shadowing electron microscopy, arch-shaped structures were
clearly discernible for nearly all the molecules (Fig. 1B).
The overall dimensions were ~7 nm (the distance between the two
arms) × ~5 nm (the distance between the base of the arch and the apex). These measurements are very close to those obtained with the
three-dimensional model of decorin (6.5 × 4.5 × 3 nm) (20). These data are in agreement with those reported for a mixed
population of leucine-rich proteoglycans (including decorin, fibromodulin and lumican) isolated from bovine sclera (21). Our study
is the first to demonstrate that biologically active human decorin,
based on its ability to modulate EGF receptor activity, folds into an
arch-shaped structure similar to the ribonuclease inhibitor (22,
23).
Decorin Binds to a Region Near the C terminus of
When decorin core was mixed with procollagen, it clearly bound near the
procollagen C-propeptide (Fig. 2D). Notably, the decorin core appeared smaller when bound to collagen (compare Fig.
2D with 2B). We interpret this as due to the
intercalation of the procollagen monomer within the groove of the
arch-shaped decorin core. The rotary shadowing profile of two
intercalated molecules should, in fact, increase by a relatively small
amount, because part of the shadow would be generated by the
procollagen triple helix. The larger appearance of decorin proteoglycan
bound to procollagen does agree with this concept, since the two
molecules could interact via the glycosaminoglycan chain and thus would not be intercalated. Occasionally, two procollagen molecules were joined near their C-propeptide or single molecules formed loops when a
portion near the amino end of the triple helix overlapped a decorin
core molecule bound near the C-propeptide (Fig. 2E); larger
aggregates were also observed (Fig. 2E). However, the
physiological relevance of these aggregates is in question, since the
C-propeptide is cleaved prior to fibril formation in
vivo.
Quantitative analysis of decorin binding to procollagen revealed a
major interactive site (~41% of te binding events) centering at
~275 nm from the N terminus (Fig.
3A), in addition to other binding sites. However, the data obtained with the decorin core were
quite clear, with ~75% of all the observations (n = 72) falling within a short interval between 260 and 280 nm from the N
terminus (Fig. 3B). When the data were combined (Fig. 3C),
the vast majority (~67% of the observations, n = 96)
again fell within the narrow interval between 260 and 280 nm from the N
terminus, thereby positioning the decorin-binding site at ~25 ± 4 nm from the C-propeptide (see below).
Decorin Protein Core Binds Specifically to the CNBr Peptide
It is not known whether decorin specifically binds to Precise Location of the Decorin-binding Site on Collagen
The position of decorin on the collagen
Other studies have mapped a major and a minor decorin-binding site at
~50 and 100 nm from the N terminus, respectively (29). This
discrepancy can be in part attributed to the fact that these authors
have utilized decorin extracted with the chaotropic agent guanidinium
hydrochloride and used cuprolinic blue to stain the decorin
proteoglycan in solution. The former could unravel cryptic binding
sites that would not be present in the native molecule, whereas the
latter could generate nonspecific binding, since cuprolinic blue is
known to precipitate the glycosaminoglycan chain of decorin.
Immunoelectron microscopic studies, using either ferritin- (30) or
gold-labeled (31) antibodies, have detected a major binding site for
decorin near the d band in the D-gap region of type
I collagen. However, in both studies, a considerable proportion of
binding sites was also located in the c band as in our case. Using
antibodies (~15 nm in size) and either ferritin (12 nm in size) or
gold (20 nm in size) labels, one has to account for these additional
measurements when mapping a binding site on a molecule. Thus, decorin
core could be displaced by 27-35 nm, equivalent to 94-122 amino acid
residues, thereby positioning decorin within the c band.
In conclusion, we have mapped the major decorin-binding site to the
c1 band of the collagen fibril, in close proximity to one
of the major intermolecular cross-linking sites. Our data favor a model
where decorin exhibits a high degree of specificity, since it binds to
a unique site, despite the availability of the entire triple helix of
collagen and the repetitive nature of the collagen sequence. The
decorin core specifically binds to the We thank P. M. Mayne, T. Boyd, and
S. F. Tufa for excellent technical assistance and C. C. Clark
and D. Birk for critical reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the Shriners
Hospital for Children (to D. R. K.) and by National
Institutes of Health Grants RO1 HL63446 (to S. A. S.), RO1
AR10481 (to R. M.), and RO1 CA39481 and RO1 CA47282 (to R. V. I.). The electron microscopy facilities were supported in part
by the Fred Meyer and R. Blaine Bramble Charitable Trust Foundations.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rm. 249 JAH, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust St., Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail:
iozzo@lac.jci.tju.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000278200
The abbreviations used are:
LRR, leucine-rich
repeat;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
SASD, sulfosuccinimidyl-2-[p-azidosalicylamido]ethyl-1,3'-dithiopropionate;
EGF, epidermal growth factor.
ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Decorin Binds Near the C Terminus of Type I Collagen*
,
,
§§
Shriners Hospital Research Facilities,
Portland, Oregon 97201, the § Department of Medicine and the
Cardeza Foundation, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19107, the ¶ Department of Cell Biology, University
of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, the
LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, New Jersey 08876, the
** Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110, and the

Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell
Biology, and the Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1(I) CB6 and is
~25 nm from the C terminus, in a zone that coincides with the
c1 band of the collagen fibril
D-period. This location is very close to one of the
major intermolecular cross-linking sites of collagen heterotrimers.
Thus, decorin protein core possesses a unique binding specificity that
could potentially regulate collagen fibril stability.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1(I) chain, in a zone that coincides with the
c1 band of the collagen fibril D-period. This location is very close to one of the major intermolecular cross-linking sites of type I collagen. Thus, decorin possesses a
unique binding specificity that could potentially affect the structure
and cross-linking of collagen.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol, resulting in tagging of the decorin-binding site
on collagen. The labeled collagen was then subjected to SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography before or after cleavage with CNBr, followed by
staining with Coomassie Blue or autoradiography to identify the labeled
cross-linking site.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purity of the decorin preparation and
arch-shaped structure of the decorin core. A,
autoradiograph of decorin protein core and decorin proteoglycan
following iodination with 125I. Notice the lack of
contaminants in the preparations of decorin core (43-46 kDa) or
decorin proteoglycan, a polydisperse population of proteoglycan
centering around 100 kDa. As a further control, we used the 175-kDa
epidermal growth factor receptor as indicated. B, rotary
shadowed electron microscopy of isolated decorin protein core.
1(I) Collagen
Chain--
Binding of decorin to collagen interferes with horizontal
accretion of collagen molecules and prevents lateral growth of the fibrils (2). Thus, the exact location of the decorin-binding site on
type I collagen is of general interest. To address this point, we first
examined the in vitro binding of decorin or its protein core
to mature type I collagen isolated from bovine skin. Although binding
could be localized near the end of these molecules (not shown), the
lack of polarity of the mature collagen precluded any meaningful
interpretation of the data. To circumvent this problem, we took
advantage of the presence of the relatively large, globular
C-propeptide in procollagen molecules. To this end, we purified type I
procollagen from freshly isolated embryonic chick tendon fibroblasts
and analyzed it by rotary shadowing electron microscopy. Approximately
60% of the molecules existed as monomers of 293.7 ± 2.83 nm
(mean ± S.D., n = 70) and included an intact globular C-propeptide (10-12 nm in diameter) that was used as a
reference point for polarity (Fig.
2A). When decorin was
incubated with procollagen (1:1), it bound not only near the C terminus of procollagen, but also in multiple regions along the monomer (Fig.
2B). Particularly common in the decorin + procollagen
mixtures were linear aggregates (Fig. 2C), not seen in the
pure procollagen samples. These aggregates, which formed quickly even
in samples sprayed within 15 s of mixing, demonstrated periodicity
(Fig. 2C), due to the presence of bound decorin and/or
retained C-propeptide.

View larger version (206K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Gallery of electron micrographs of rotary
shadowed molecules of procollagen alone (A) or
interacting with either decorin proteoglycan (B,
C) or decorin protein core (D,
E). A, type I procollagen shadowed
alone. The C-propeptide is positioned to the right in each
figure. B, decorin most commonly binds to a region close to
the C-propeptide, although other sites are occasionally identified
(arrowheads). C, linear aggregates of procollagen
B decorin complexes display periodicity (arrowheads).
D, decorin protein core almost uniformly binds to a region
near the C terminus (arrowheads). E,
occasionally, a loop is formed when the N terminus of a triple helix
crosses at the decorin core-binding region, a profile not seen in
samples of procollagen shadowed alone. Examples of aggregates of two or
more molecules complexed with decorin core are also shown. The
aggregates are often joined at the site bound by decorin core and can
often be recognized by a close proximity of C-propeptide globular
domains. This theme is also recognized in larger aggregates
(arrowheads). All images excluding two lowermost;
bar = 100 nm. Lowermost two images; bar = 200 nm.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Decorin core binds to the C terminus of
procollagen. Quantitative analysis of decorin/procollagen
(A), decorin core/procollagen (B), and combined
decorin and decorin core/procollagen (C) interactions. The
histograms were generated with a bin size of ~10 nm, and the
frequency distribution of binding events along the procollagen monomers
were plotted as a distance from the N terminus. Measurements were taken
between the center of decorin bound to procollagen and the point at
which the procollagen triple helix joins the C-propeptide.
1(I)
CB6--
To confirm the rotary shadowing data, we utilized a
photoaffinity labeling and cross-inking approach. We derivatized
decorin core with SASD, allowed it to interact with collagen fibrils, and covalently cross-inked the 125I-decorin core to the
collagen with long wave UV light. The covalent linkage between decorin
and collagen was then severed by reduction with
-mercaptoethanol,
resulting in tagging of the decorin-binding site on collagen followed
by CNBr digestion and SDS-PAGE. An aliquot of the SASD-labeled decorin
core was analyzed by SDS-PAGE for purity, and a single band of ~43
kDa was detected by autoradiography (Fig.
4A). A major binding site of
decorin corresponded to the
1(I) CB6 collagen peptide (Fig.
4B), the most C-terminal fragment (Fig. 4C). The
identity of all the CNBr peptide bands was confirmed by N-terminal
sequencing (not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Decorin core binds specifically to the
1(I) CB6 collagen peptide. A,
autoradiograph (lane 1) of radiolabeled, photoaffinity
derivatized decorin core run under nonreducing conditions to avoid
cleaving of the radiolabeled photoaffinity probe. Notice the presence
of a major band migrating at ~43 kDa (asterisk). Molecular
mass markers are in lane 2. B, the vast
bulk of the labeling of decorin is incorporated into a fragment
co-migrating (lane 2, arrow) with the
1(I) CB6
peptide of type I collagen (lane 1). In lane 1,
CNBr-generated peptides of type I collagen were separated on a reducing
SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Lane 2 is an autoradiograph of a similar gel. C, schematic
representation of human
2(I) and
1(I) chains illustrating the
major CNBr peptides. The position of each methionine residue is
indicated by vertical lines. The bottom panel
shows the sequence of the decorin-binding site within the
c1 band of the
1(I) chain as predicted from the rotary
shadowing data. Hyl943, one of the two major intermolecular
cross-linking sites, is labeled by an asterisk.
1(I) or
2(I) or to both chains. Our results show that decorin binds to the
1(I) but not to the
2(I) chain, despite their significant homology. The specificity of binding further suggests that the
1(I)
chain might differ in sequence in the decorin-binding site (see below).
Taken together, these findings independently corroborate the rotary
shadowing electron microscopy data presented above. Moreover, the data
indicate that the binding site of decorin on the procollagen triple
helix and the mature reconstituted fibrils is the same.
1(I)--
The best fit between electron microscopic and
sequence-generated data was achieved for the 67-nm
D-period length of 234 residues for both
1(I) and
2(I) chains (24), which computes to 0.286 nm/residue (25). Because
the triple helical portion of the human
1(I) chain has 1014 residues, and the nonhelical ends have 17 N-terminal and 26 C-terminal
telopeptide residues, respectively, the length of type I collagen
molecules can be calculated to be ~299 nm (26). Our measurements of
procollagen monomers (293.7 ± 2.83 nm) are very close to the
predicted size. Thus, in doing our calculations, we corrected the
location of the major decorin-binding site by ~2% (293/299 nm). This
site centers at residues 961-962 according to Chapman (27), ~90
residues from the Y of the last G-X-Y triplet of the
C-telopeptide (Fig. 4C). This entire region is >99%
identical in human, calf, and chicken, in contrast with the
2(I)
chain at the same location, which shows significant dissimilarity (25),
thus providing additional supporting evidence for the results presented
above. Notably, this region corresponds to the c1 band in
the overlap zone of the D-stagger (26, 27). It spans
~14 residues on either side potentially reaching the c2-c1 interband and the b2 band,
and is very close to Hyl943, one of the two major
intermolecular cross-linking sites (26) (Fig. 4C).
1(I) chain differs from that
previously proposed (the d band) to represent the major binding site
(28). There are several explanations for this discrepancy. First,
previous studies have used cationic dyes that interact with the
sulfated glycosaminoglycan chains, which are not required for binding
to collagen (10, 14). Second, the tissues were fixed and dehydrated,
thus including a substantial intrinsic error in the calculations, since
it is well established that significant shrinkage, up to 5-20%,
occurs during sample preparation for electron microscopy. Just a 5%
inaccuracy would lead to ~15 nm error, which translates into a
difference of 52 residues (15/0.286). This error, compounded with the
fact that the glycosaminoglycan side chains are known to be highly
polydisperse, makes these studies difficult to interpret (28). Indeed,
cuprolinic blue-stained filaments can reach 75 nm in length, equivalent
to ~12 concatenated decorin molecules. This would imply that multiple
decorin molecules are positioned axially within the
D-gap region, an image that was never observed in
our study.
1(I), but not to the
2(I),
chain, and it could play a role in the stabilization of collagen
in vivo.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Kresse, H.,
Hausser, H.,
and Schönherr, E.
(1993)
Experientia (Basel)
49,
403-416
2.
Iozzo, R. V.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
609-652
3.
Iozzo, R. V.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18843-18846
4.
Vogel, K. G.,
Paulsson, M.,
and Heinegård, D.
(1984)
Biochem. J.
223,
587-597
5.
Bidanset, D. J.,
Guidry, C.,
Rosenberg, L. C.,
Choi, H. U.,
Timpl, R.,
and Höök, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5250-5256
6.
Hedbom, E.,
and Heinegård, D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
27307-27312
7.
Kadler, K. E.,
Holmes, D. F.,
Trotter, J. A.,
and Chapman, J. A.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
316,
1-11
8.
Birk, D. E.,
Fitch, J. M.,
Babiarz, J. P.,
Doane, K. J.,
and Linsenmayer, T. F.
(1990)
J. Cell Sci.
95,
649-657
9.
Vogel, K. G.,
and Trotter, J. A.
(1987)
Collagen Rel. Res.
7,
105-114
10.
Vogel, K. G.,
Koob, T. J.,
and Fisher, L. W.
(1987)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
148,
658-663
11.
Svensson, L.,
Heinegård, D.,
and Oldberg, Å.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20712-20716
12.
Schönherr, E.,
Hausser, H.,
Beavan, L.,
and Kresse, H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8877-8883
13.
Kresse, H.,
Liszio, C.,
Schönherr, E.,
and Fisher, L. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18404-18410
14.
Scott, P. G.,
Winterbottom, N.,
Dodd, C. M.,
Edwards, E.,
and Pearson, C. H.
(1986)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
138,
1348-1354
15.
Ramamurthy, P.,
Hocking, A. M.,
and McQuillan, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19578-19584
16.
Danielson, K. G.,
Baribault, H.,
Holmes, D. F.,
Graham, H.,
Kadler, K. E.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
729-743
17.
Iozzo, R. V.,
Moscatello, D.,
McQuillan, D. J.,
and Eichstetter, I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4489-4492
18.
Swanson, S.,
Mayne, P. M.,
Wright, D. W.,
Accavitti, M. A.,
Fitch, J. M.,
Linsenmayer, T. F.,
and Mayne, R.
(1992)
Matrix
12,
56-65
19.
Sakai, L. Y.,
and Keene, D. R.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
245,
29-52
20.
Weber, I. T.,
Harrison, R. W.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31767-31770
21.
Scott, J. E.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8795-8799
22.
Kobe, B.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1995)
Nature
374,
183-186
23.
Kajava, A. V.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
277,
519-527
24.
Meek, K. M.,
Chapman, J. A.,
and Hardcastle, R. A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
10710-10714
25.
Kadler, K. E.
(1995)
Protein Prof.
2,
491-619
26.
Piez, K. A.
(1984)
in
Extracellular Matrix Biochemistry
(Piez, K. A.
, and Reddi, A. H., eds)
, pp. 1-39, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
27.
Chapman, J. A.
(1974)
Connect. Tissue Res.
2,
137-150
28.
Scott, J. E.,
and Orford, C. R.
(1981)
Biochem. J.
197,
213-216
29.
Yu, L.,
Cummings, C.,
Sheehan, J. K.,
Kadler, K. E.,
Holmes, D. F.,
and Chapman, J. A.
(1993)
in
Dermatan Sulphate Proteoglycans
(Scott, J. E., ed)
, pp. 183-192, Portland Press, London
30.
Pringle, G. A.,
and Dodd, C. M.
(1990)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
38,
1405-1411
31.
Fleischmajer, R.,
Fisher, L. W.,
MacDonald, E. D.,
Jacobs, L., Jr.,
Perlish, J. S.,
and Termine, J. D.
(1991)
J. Struct. Biol.
106,
82-90
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Liu, E.N. Lamme, R.P.M. Steegers-Theunissen, I.P.C. Krapels, Z. Bian, H. Marres, P.H.M. Spauwen, A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, and J.W. Von den Hoff Cleft Palate Cells Can Regenerate a Palatal Mucosa in vitro J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 788 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Fiedler, E. Schonherr, R. Waddington, S. Niland, D. G. Seidler, D. Aeschlimann, and J. A. Eble Decorin Regulates Endothelial Cell Motility on Collagen I through Activation of Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor and Modulation of {alpha}2{beta}1 Integrin Activity J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17406 - 17415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Prante, H. Milting, A. Kassner, M. Farr, M. Ambrosius, S. Schon, D. G. Seidler, A. E. Banayosy, R. Korfer, J. Kuhn, et al. Transforming Growth Factor beta1-regulated Xylosyltransferase I Activity in Human Cardiac Fibroblasts and Its Impact for Myocardial Remodeling J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26441 - 26449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Moring, J. R. Baker, and T. T. Norton Modulation of Glycosaminoglycan Levels in Tree Shrew Sclera during Lens-Induced Myopia Development and Recovery Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 2947 - 2956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kalamajski, A. Aspberg, and A. Oldberg The Decorin Sequence SYIRIADTNIT Binds Collagen Type I J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2007; 282(22): 16062 - 16067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takaluoma, M. Hyry, J. Lantto, R. Sormunen, R. A. Bank, K. I. Kivirikko, J. Myllyharju, and R. Soininen Tissue-specific Changes in the Hydroxylysine Content and Cross-links of Collagens and Alterations in Fibril Morphology in Lysyl Hydroxylase 1 Knock-out Mice J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6588 - 6596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Musselmann, B. Kane, B. Alexandrou, and J. R. Hassell Stimulation of Collagen Synthesis by Insulin and Proteoglycan Accumulation by Ascorbate in Bovine Keratocytes In Vitro Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5260 - 5266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mochida, D. Parisuthiman, M. Kaku, J.-i. Hanai, V. P. Sukhatme, and M. Yamauchi Nephrocan, a Novel Member of the Small Leucine-rich Repeat Protein Family, Is an Inhibitor of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 36044 - 36051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Prante, K. Bieback, C. Funke, S. Schon, S. Kern, J. Kuhn, M. Gastens, K. Kleesiek, and C. Gotting The Formation of Extracellular Matrix During Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Correlates with Increased Levels of Xylosyltransferase I Stem Cells, October 1, 2006; 24(10): 2252 - 2261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.C. Margolis, E. Beniash, and C.E. Fowler Role of Macromolecular Assembly of Enamel Matrix Proteins in Enamel Formation J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 775 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ruotsalainen, L. Sipila, M. Vapola, R. Sormunen, A. M. Salo, L. Uitto, D. K. Mercer, S. P. Robins, M. Risteli, A. Aszodi, et al. Glycosylation catalyzed by lysyl hydroxylase 3 is essential for basement membranes J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2006; 119(4): 625 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Bhide, C. A. Laschinger, P. D. Arora, W. Lee, L. Hakkinen, H. Larjava, J. Sodek, and C. A. McCulloch Collagen Phagocytosis by Fibroblasts Is Regulated by Decorin J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 23103 - 23113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Canty and K. E. Kadler Procollagen trafficking, processing and fibrillogenesis J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2005; 118(7): 1341 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goldoni, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, Z. Shriver, R. Sasisekharan, D. E. Birk, S. Campbell, and R. V. Iozzo Biologically Active Decorin Is a Monomer in Solution J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6606 - 6612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Majsterek, E. McAdams, E. Adachi, S. T. Dhume, and A. Fertala Prospects and limitations of the rational engineering of fibrillar collagens Protein Sci., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 2063 - 2072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nili, A. N. Cheema, F. J. Giordano, A. W. Barolet, S. Babaei, R. Hickey, M. R. Eskandarian, M. Smeets, J. Butany, G. Pasterkamp, et al. Decorin Inhibition of PDGF-Stimulated Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Function: Potential Mechanism for Inhibition of Intimal Hyperplasia after Balloon Angioplasty Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 163(3): 869 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Scott, J. G. Grossmann, C. M. Dodd, J. K. Sheehan, and P. N. Bishop Light and X-ray Scattering Show Decorin to Be a Dimer in Solution J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 18353 - 18359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. MAZZUCATO, M. R. COZZI, P. PRADELLA, D. PERISSINOTTO, A. MALMSTROM, M. MORGELIN, P. SPESSOTTO, A. COLOMBATTI, L. DE MARCO, and R. PERRIS Vascular PG-M/versican variants promote platelet adhesion at low shear rates and cooperate with collagens to induce aggregation FASEB J, December 1, 2002; 16(14): 1903 - 1916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ameye and M. F. Young Mice deficient in small leucine-rich proteoglycans: novel in vivo models for osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, muscular dystrophy, and corneal diseases Glycobiology, September 1, 2002; 12(9): 107R - 116R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Li, W.-S. Hou, C. R. Escalante-Torres, B. D. Gelb, and D. Bromme Collagenase Activity of Cathepsin K Depends on Complex Formation with Chondroitin Sulfate J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28669 - 28676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Schaefer, K. Macakova, I. Raslik, M. Micegova, H.-J. Grone, E. Schonherr, H. Robenek, F. G. Echtermeyer, S. Grassel, P. Bruckner, et al. Absence of Decorin Adversely Influences Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis of the Obstructed Kidney by Enhanced Apoptosis and Increased Inflammatory Reaction Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 160(3): 1181 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Di Lullo, S. M. Sweeney, J. Korkko, L. Ala-Kokko, and J. D. San Antonio Mapping the Ligand-binding Sites and Disease-associated Mutations on the Most Abundant Protein in the Human, Type I Collagen J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2002; 277(6): 4223 - 4231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Malhas, R. A. Abuknesha, and R. G. Price Interaction of the Leucine-Rich Repeats of Polycystin-1 with Extracellular Matrix Proteins: Possible Role in Cell Proliferation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takanosu, T. C. Boyd, M. Le Goff, S. P. Henry, Y. Zhang, P. N. Bishop, and R. Mayne Structure, Chromosomal Location, and Tissue-Specific Expression of the Mouse Opticin Gene Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2001; 42(10): 2202 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kavanagh and D. E. Ashhurst Distribution of Biglycan and Decorin in Collateral and Cruciate Ligaments and Menisci of the Rabbit Knee Joint J. Histochem. Cytochem., July 1, 2001; 49(7): 877 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Holmes, C. J. Gilpin, C. Baldock, U. Ziese, A. J. Koster, and K. E. Kadler Corneal collagen fibril structure in three dimensions: Structural insights into fibril assembly, mechanical properties, and tissue organization PNAS, May 30, 2001; (2001) 111150598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ezura, S. Chakravarti, A. Oldberg, I. Chervoneva, and D. E. Birk Differential Expression of Lumican and Fibromodulin Regulate Collagen Fibrillogenesis in Developing Mouse Tendons J. Cell Biol., November 13, 2000; 151(4): 779 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Lee, C. Yamamoto, Y. Feng, S. Potter-Perigo, W. H. Briggs, K. T. Landschulz, T. G. Turi, J. F. Thompson, P. Libby, and T. N. Wight Mechanical Strain Induces Specific Changes in the Synthesis and Organization of Proteoglycans by Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2001; 276(17): 13847 - 13851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wiberg, E. Hedbom, A. Khairullina, S. R. Lamande, A. Oldberg, R. Timpl, M. Morgelin, and D. Heinegard Biglycan and Decorin Bind Close to the N-terminal Region of the Collagen VI Triple Helix J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2001; 276(22): 18947 - 18952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||