JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M908875199 on May 11, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 21862-21869, July 21, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/29/21862    most recent
M908875199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Austin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tooze, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Austin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tooze, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Direct and GTP-dependent Interaction of ADP-ribosylation Factor 1 with Clathrin Adaptor Protein AP-1 on Immature Secretory Granules*

Carol Austin, Ina Hinners, and Sharon A. ToozeDagger

From the Secretory Pathway Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom

Received for publication, November 1, 1999, and in revised form, April 28, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1) mediates clathrin coat formation on PC12 immature secretory granules (ISGs). We have used two approaches to investigate whether ARF1 interacts directly with the clathrin adaptor protein, AP-1. Using an in vitro recruitment assay and co-immunoprecipitation, we could isolate an AP-1·ARF1 complex. Then we used a site-directed photocross-linking approach to determine the components that act downstream of ARF1 in clathrin coat formation on ISGs. Myristoylated ARF1, with a photolabile phenylalanine analogue incorporated into its putative effector domain (switch 1), showed a specific, GTP-dependent interaction with both the gamma - and beta -adaptin subunits of AP-1 on ISGs. These experiments provide evidence for a direct interaction of ARF1 with AP-1. On mature secretory granules myristoylated ARF1 does not bind, and hence clathrin coat formation cannot be initiated, supporting the hypothesis that molecules involved in coat recruitment are removed during ISG maturation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The assembly of clathrin coats on the cytoplasmic face of intracellular membranes occurs at specific sites. Ultimately, the site of coat assembly becomes a transport vesicle as the membrane is deformed by the rearrangement of the clathrin triskelion, driven by interaction with other coat constituents (for recent review see Refs. 1 and 2). The mechanism underlying assembly of the clathrin coat at specific sites involves a complex set of protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions that is not fully understood. At all intracellular sites where clathrin assembles, the minimum machinery is the adaptor proteins (APs)1 and clathrin. Four types of adaptors, AP-1 through AP-4 (1, 3, 4) have been identified to date. All adaptors are heterotetrameric complexes of two large subunits with a molecular mass of ~100 kDa, a medium subunit (~50 kDa) and small subunit (~20 kDa). The first identified and most studied adaptors are AP-1 and AP-2. AP-1 consists of the large subunits gamma  and beta 1, medium chain µ1, and small chain sigma 1 and is found primarily on the Golgi complex (5) and immature secretory granules (6), whereas AP-2, which consists of the alpha , beta 2, µ2, and sigma 2 subunits, is localized mainly to the plasma membrane and endosomes (7). The localization of AP-1 and AP-2 to different compartments can, in part, be attributed to their ability to bind to different sequences in the cytoplasmic domains of trans-membrane receptors (for recent reviews see Refs. 8 and 9).

ARF1 recruits AP-1 to both ISG membranes (6) and the trans-Golgi network (10, 11). ARFs are a family of small molecular mass (~20 kDa) GTP-binding proteins that associate with lipid bilayers and membranes via a myristoylated, hydrophobic amino terminus (12, 13). ARF in the GDP-bound form is cytosolic. Interaction of ARF with its exchange factor allows GDP to be exchanged for GTP, and this causes a major structural change in the switch 1 domain of ARF1 (14), thus exposing the myristic acid and promoting interaction of ARF with the membrane.

ARF1 has been identified as a component of Golgi-derived nonclathrin coated (COP-coated) vesicles (15) and is required for the formation of COPI vesicles (16). However, unlike COP-coated vesicles, ARF is not present in clathrin-coated vesicles in sufficient quantities to be a stoichiometric component of the coat, although it has been shown to recruit AP-1 in a stoichiometric manner (17). Furthermore, ARF1 in the presence of GTPgamma S generates high affinity binding sites for AP-1 that are stable even in the presence of high concentrations of Tris (17). To investigate whether ARF1 interacts with AP-1, we used an in vitro recruitment assay with [35S]myrARF1, followed by co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies directed against AP-1 and discovered an AP-1·ARF1 complex on ISG membranes.

A second approach using site-specific cross-linking was employed to start to understand the nature of the ARF1 interaction with AP-1 on ISG membranes. Recent work using this approach has demonstrated that the switch 1 domain of ARF1 interacts directly with COPI (18). ARF1, with amino acid Ile-46 replaced with the photoactivatable analogue of phenylalanine ((Tmd)Phe) (19), cross-linked to both beta - and gamma -COP (20). Using the ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 mutant, we performed cross-linking experiments with ISGs as the acceptor compartment for ARF and AP-1. We have found that on ISG membranes ARF1 can be cross-linked to AP-1 in a GTP-dependent manner via the gamma - and beta 1-adaptin subunits of AP-1, and this interaction is strictly dependent on the presence of ISG membranes. Mature secretory granules (MSGs) or liposomes do not facilitate a direct interaction between ARF and AP-1. Our data show that the switch 1 domain of ARF1, encompassing Ile-46, interacts with AP-1 as well as COPI.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ISG Preparation-- ISGs and MSGs were prepared from PC12 cells by velocity and equilibrium sucrose gradient centrifugation, as described previously (6). Each gradient generated 3 ml of ISGs and 2 ml of MSGs, <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>24</DE></FR> of which was used per reaction.

AP-1 Purification-- Bovine adrenal AP-1 was purified essentially as described (21, 22) with some modifications: the precipitated coat proteins that had been stripped from the isolated clathrin coated vesicles using 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, were purified using a Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column (5 × 68 cm). The adaptor-rich fractions were pooled, adjusted to a final concentration of 2 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 7.2, loaded on to an Econo-Pac® CHT-II cartridge (Bio-Rad), and eluted with a 90-ml gradient of 2-350 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 7.2, containing 2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.2% sodium azide at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The AP-1 containing fractions were dialyzed into 25 mM Hepes, 25 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgOAc, pH 7.2 (binding buffer). The AP-1 isolated was ~80% pure as determined by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining (23).

Purification of Recombinant Myristoylated ARF1-- BL21(DE3) cells expressing human ARF1 (pET-11d vector) (24) and yeast N-myristoyltransferase (pBB131) (25) were obtained from Dennis Shields (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY). Myristoylated ARF1 (myrARF1) was prepared as described by Franco et al. (26), except that a 50% ammonium sulfate precipitation was performed on the lysed cell supernatant (27) after dilution of the protein concentration to 10 mg/ml. Sequential chromatography by DEAE-Sepharose, HiTrap® SP and Superdex 75 columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were performed to obtain myrARF1 that was >95% pure and >95% myristoylated, as determined by Coomassie Blue-stained 15% SDS-PAGE gels.

PC12 ISG gamma -Adaptin Binding Assay-- The binding assay was performed as described elsewhere (6). Briefly, 125 µl of ISGs were incubated in binding buffer with purified AP-1 and recombinant myrARF1 in the presence or absence of 100 µM GTPgamma S in a total volume of 250 µl. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min the samples were diluted 4-fold in binding buffer, centrifuged (100, 000 g for 1 h), and analyzed by immunoblotting with subsequent incubations of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) anti-gamma -adaptin, 100/3 (Sigma), rabbit anti-mouse antiserum, and 125I-protein A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described (6). The radioactivity bound to the ISGs was quantified using a PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics). All assays were done at least in duplicate.

In Vitro Transcription and Translation-- The human ARF1 cDNA (pET-11d vector) was in vitro transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) and translated using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate based Flexi-lysate kit (Promega) in the presence of [35S]methionine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's protocol. ARF1 was labeled during the in vitro translation reaction with 1 µCi/µl [3H]myristic acid (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) instead of [35S]methionine as described (28).

PC12 ISG Binding Assay Using [35S]ARF and Subsequent Immunoprecipitation-- 25 µl of ISGs were incubated with 5 µl of in vitro translated [35S]ARF with 100 µM GTPgamma S or GDPbeta S in a total of 50 µl at 37 °C for 30 min. The ISGs were sedimented, solubilized, and immunoprecipitated under native conditions (see below) with either preimmune serum or the gamma -adaptin antiserum, STO-25 (6). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, quantified using a PhosphorImager system, and then subjected to autoradiography.

Synthesis of Site-specific Photolabile ARF Mutants-- The cDNA encoding human ARF1, inserted into the pET-11d plasmid, with amino acid Ile-46 replaced by the amber stop codon (TAG), was obtained from Felix Wieland (Biochemie-Zentrum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany) (20). For details refer to Refs. 18-20. In vitro translation was performed in the presence of [35S]methionine and 5 µM ligated suppressor (Tmd)Phe tRNA at 30 °C for 2 h. The resulting [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

Photocross-linking Assays-- In a total volume of 250 µl, ISGs or MSGs were incubated in binding buffer with 25 µl of in vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 with 100 µM nucleotide (either GDPbeta S or GTPgamma S) in the presence or absence of purified AP-1 or recombinant myrARF1 as described in the figure legends, at 37 °C for 30 min, followed 4-fold dilution in binding buffer, and pelleted (100,000 g for 1 h) over a 400-µl cushion of 0.5 M sucrose in binding buffer. The pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of binding buffer containing 0.15 M sucrose. For the samples without membranes, a volume of 25 µl was used; these were not centrifuged but irradiated directly. Samples were irradiated as described (18) and then either trichloroacetic acid precipitated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography or immunoprecipitated.

Antibodies and Immunoprecipitation-- Antibodies used include: rabbit polyclonal antiserum anti-gamma -AP, STO-25 (6); rabbit polyclonal antisera against beta -COP and gamma -COP (a gift from F. T. Wieland); mAb anti-gamma -AP, 100/3 (Sigma); mAb anti-beta -AP (a gift from T. Kirchhausen, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA) (29); mAb anti-alpha -AP, 100/2 (Sigma); and mAb anti-ARF (a gift of R. Kahn). For immunoprecipitation under native conditions, cross-linked ISG pellets were solubilized in 250 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5% (w/v) Triton X-100 (TNTE buffer). For denaturing conditions, the samples were boiled for 3 min in the presence of 1% SDS and then diluted as for the native conditions except that the Triton X-100 concentration was increased to 0.9%. Rabbit anti-mouse antiserum was added to all incubations containing mAbs. The immune complexes were bound by protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After washing in TNTE buffer and once with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, samples were solubilized in sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting and autoradiography.

Removal of AP-1 and COPI from Lysate-- We used a method previously shown to deplete 80% of COPI from rat liver cytosol (30). 110 µl of the translation mix containing in vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was placed over a 40-µl 0.5 M sucrose cushion (in binding buffer) and centrifuged at 300,000 × g using a TLA-100 rotor (Beckman) for 2 h at 4 °C.

Preparation of Liposomes-- Liposomes were prepared using soyabean mixed lipids (Azolectin), containing 20% L-alpha -phosphatidylcholine (Sigma P5638), according to the reverse-phase evaporation method (31). The resulting liposomes were filtered through a 0.8-µm Millex®-PF filter (Millipore). 72.5 mg of liposomes were used per sample.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purified Myristoylated ARF1 Regulates AP-1 Binding to the ISGs-- It has previously been shown, using a cell-free assay system and partially purified components, that ARF1 is required for gamma -adaptin binding to PC12 ISGs (6). We have reproduced the ARF1-dependent AP-1 recruitment to ISGs using purified components (Fig. 1). Quantification relies on the use of the mAb 100/3 that recognizes bovine but not rat gamma -adaptin; hence only the bound exogenous bovine gamma -adaptin is detected. Both purified bovine AP-1 and purified recombinant myrARF1 were titrated into the binding assay (Fig. 1A). We used bovine AP-1 because we could obtain large amounts of tissue for the purification. Our previous experiments have shown that bovine AP-1 binds to ISGs as efficiently as rat AP-1 (6). Human, bovine, and mouse ARF1 are 99% identical; thus it was assumed that the human ARF1 would bind as efficiently to rat ISGs as the endogenous rat ARF1. Increasing the myrARF1 concentration up to 20 µg/ml resulted in an increase in the gamma -adaptin bound to the ISGs at all concentrations of AP-1 used except 1 µg/ml. At 1 µg/ml AP-1, the gamma -adaptin binding was saturated at 4 µg/ml myrARF1, this may be due to limiting amounts of AP-1. In the absence of added ARF1 there is a basal level of gamma -adaptin binding (Fig. 1B); this is likely to be due to endogenous ARF1 already bound to the ISGs and is similar to the level observed in the presence of ARF1 but in the absence of any nucleotide. The addition of GTPgamma S increases gamma -adaptin binding to ISGs 3-4-fold but only in the presence of ARF1 (Fig. 1B). We did not observe GTP-dependent binding of nonmyristoylated ARF1 to the membranes (results not shown). Hence, the only cytosolic component required for purified AP-1 to bind to the ISGs is GTP-bound myrARF1.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Recombinant human myrARF1 recruits purified AP-1 to ISGs in a GTPgamma S-dependent manner. A, PC12 ISGs were incubated with 1 µg/ml (closed circles), 2 µg/ml (open circles), or 4 µg/ml (closed squares) of purified bovine adrenal AP-1 and increasing amounts of recombinant myrARF1 (2-20 µg/ml) at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of GTPgamma S. The amount of gamma -adaptin bound to the ISGs was determined after sedimentation and immunoblotting with the bovine specific mAb antibody, 100/3. The membrane-bound gamma -adaptin was quantified using a PhosphorImager, and results are expressed as a percentage of the signal observed with 2 µg/ml AP-1 and 20 µg/ml myrARF1. B, binding assay, similar to that in panel A, using 2 µg/ml AP-1 in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 20 µg/ml myrARF-1, in the presence (shaded bars) or absence (open bars) of GTPgamma S. The results are expressed as percentages of the signal observed with 2 µg/ml AP-1 and 20 µg/ml myrARF1 in the presence of GTPgamma S. All assays are done in duplicate. Similar results were obtained in at least four independent experiments.

In Vitro Translated [35S]myrARF1 Interacts with AP-1 on the ISGs in a GTP-dependent Manner-- To monitor ARF1 binding to the ISGs, we wanted to generate [35S]myrARF1 by in vitro translation using rabbit reticulocyte lysate. To demonstrate that the ARF1 was myristoylated during the translation reaction, ARF1 mRNA was in vitro translated in the presence of [3H]myristic acid. This resulted in a 3H-labeled ~20-kDa band whose migration was identical to purified recombinant myrARF1 (Fig. 2A, lane 1). Others have also observed N-myristoyltransferase activity (28, 32, 33) in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate.  In vitro translation of ARF1 mRNA in the presence of [35S]methionine resulted in a broader ~20-kDa band (Fig. 2A, lane 2) that, after a lower exposure time, is visible as a doublet (not shown) corresponding to myristoylated and nonmyristoylated [35S]ARF1. These results confirm that ARF1 is myristoylated during the in vitro translation reaction.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   AP-1 forms a complex with myristoylated [35S]ARF on ISGs. A, in vitro translated ARF1, labeled with either [3H]myristic acid (lane 1) or [35S]methionine (lane 2) was subjected to 15% SDS-PAGE and fluorography. Arrows indicate the positions of the myristoylated and nonmyristoylated ARF1 as defined by Coomassie Blue staining of the corresponding purified recombinant proteins (not shown). No labeling was observed in this region in the absence of mRNA. B, in vitro translated [35S]ARF1 was incubated with ISG membranes, in the presence of either GTPgamma S (lanes 1 and 3) or GDPbeta S (lane 2 and 4). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the membranes were pelleted, solubilized, and then immunoprecipitated under native conditions with either the anti-gamma -AP antiserum, STO-25 (gamma -AP, lanes 1 and 2) or preimmune serum (PI, lanes 3 and 4). Samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE, quantified using a PhosphorImager, and subjected to fluorography. B shows a representative fluorograph showing ~20 kDa [35S]myrARF1 as indicated by an arrow. C, three experiments similar to that in B were performed and quantified using a PhosphorImager. Values represent the percentages of [35S]myrARF immunoprecipitated compared with the amount immunoprecipitated with STO-25 in the presence of GTPgamma S (hatched bars) or GDPbeta S (open bars). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

To determine whether AP-1 and ARF1 form a complex, ISG binding assays were performed in the presence of [35S]ARF1. After incubation of [35S]ARF1 with the ISGs in the presence of GTPgamma S or GDPgamma S, immunoprecipitation of gamma -AP was performed with polyclonal, STO-25 to determine whether the [35S]myrARF1 was interacting with AP-1 (Fig. 2, B and C). The myristoylated form of [35S]ARF1 was specifically co-immunoprecipitated with AP-1 in the presence of GTPgamma S (Fig. 2B). The amount of [35S]myrARF1 co-immunoprecipitated in the presence of GTPgamma S was twice that in the presence of GDPbeta S and 4-fold more than preimmune controls. Approximately 1% of the total membrane bound [35S]myrARF1 added to the assay could be co-immunoprecipitated with anti-gamma -AP antibodies. These results demonstrate that AP-1 and myrARF1 do form a complex on the ISG membrane.

Membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 Cross-links to 100-120-kDa Coat Proteins-- To investigate whether ARF1 interacts directly with AP-1, we decided to use site-directed photocross-linking, as used previously by others to demonstrate a direct interaction of the nonclathrin coat, COPI and ARF1 (18). Full-length photoactivatable [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was generated by mutating the codon for Ile-46, in the human ARF1 cDNA, to amber, followed by in vitro translation (of the corresponding mRNA) in the presence of a suppressor tRNA ligated to the photolabile group, (Tmd)Phe, which recognizes this stop codon (18). [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was then incubated with ISGs with or without AP-1 in the presence of GTPgamma S. The GTPgamma S-dependent binding of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 to the ISG membranes (Fig. 3A, lower panel, compare lane 1 versus lane 3 and lane 5 versus lane 7) excludes the possibility that replacement of Ile-46 with the (Tmd)Phe severely alters the GTP-dependent ARF binding to ISGs. The migration of the [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 bound to the ISG membranes is identical to the migration of myrARF1. Irradiation resulted in at least three cross-linked products with estimated molecular masses of 120-140 kDa (region marked X, Fig. 3A, upper panel, lanes 3 and 7). Addition of AP-1 appeared to increase the intensity of the 120-kDa bands (Fig. 3A, lane 7). This was consistent with cross-linking of ARF (~20 kDa) to one or both of the large subunits of AP-1 (~100 kDa). The photocross-linked products are specific because they were not observed in the presence of GDPbeta S (Fig. 3A, upper panel, lanes 1 and 5), or in the absence of irradiation (Fig. 3A, upper panel, lanes 2 and 6). Displacement of the membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 using excess unlabeled recombinant wild type myrARF1 (Fig. 3A, lower panel, lanes 4 and 8) abolished the photocross-linking (Fig. 3A, upper panel, lanes 4 and 8). Importantly, the cross-linked products were not observed in the absence of ISG membranes either in the presence or absence of added AP-1 (Fig. 3A, upper panel, lanes 9 and 10), demonstrating that only membrane-bound myrARF1 interacts with the 100-120-kDa proteins and that ARF1·AP-1 does not interact in solution.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Photocross-linking of membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46. A, in vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)- Phe-46 was incubated in the absence (lanes 9 and 10) or presence (lanes 1-8) of ISG membranes, with GDPbeta S (lanes 1 and 5) or GTPgamma S (lanes 2-4 and 6-10), in the absence (lanes 1-4 and 9) or presence (lanes 5-8 and 10) of 4 µg/ml purified AP-1 or with 40 µg/ml recombinant myrARF1 (lanes 4 and 8). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the membranes were sedimented and irradiated (except samples lanes 2 and 6) and trichloroacetic acid precipitated. Then <FR><NU>9</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> were analyzed by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (upper panel) to visualize the cross-linked products, and <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> was analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (lower panel) to visualize the uncross-linked [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 bound to ISG membranes. In the upper panel, the region of the ISG specific photocross-linked products is labeled (X). Upper and lower panels are representative of at least three independent experiments and were exposed for 1 week and 1 day, respectively. B, photocross-linked products of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 (samples identical to that in panel A, lane 3) were immunoprecipited with preimmune serum (PI, lane 2) or polyclonal antisera, to gamma -adaptin (gamma -AP, lane 3 and 4), beta -COP (lane 5), or gamma -COP (lane 6) under native (n) or denaturing (d) conditions. Lane 1 represents the total photocross-linked products before immunoprecipitation. Samples were analyzed by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and subsequent autoradiography for 2 weeks. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Immunoprecipitation of the specific cross-linked products confirmed an interaction of myrARF1 with AP-1. Immunoprecipitation of the whole AP-1 complex with the gamma -AP polyclonal, STO-25 (6) under native conditions resulted in a 35S-labeled doublet (Fig. 3B, lane 3), whereas immunoprecipitation of the dissociated subunits under denaturing conditions showed a single band of lower intensity corresponding to gamma -AP (Fig. 3B, lanes 4). Because the pattern of cross-linked products derived from [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 bound to ISGs were similar to that observed with Golgi membranes in the presence of coatomer (20), antisera to beta - and gamma -COP were used to characterize the other cross-linked products observed with the ISG membranes. Similar to the result obtained for Golgi membranes (20), anti-beta -COP immunoprecipitated a band of 120 kDa (Fig. 3B, lane 5), and the anti-gamma -COP immunoprecipitated two bands of approximately 120 and 140 kDa (Fig. 3B, lane 6).

Membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 Can Directly Interact with gamma - and beta 1-AP-- To increase the efficiency of cross-linking of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to AP-1 on the ISGs, purified bovine AP-1 was titrated into the photocross-linking binding assay (Fig. 4A, lanes 1-3). The cross-linking pattern showed an increase in the intensity of the labeled 120-kDa bands with increasing AP-1 (Fig. 4A, top panel, lanes 1-3). Immunoprecipitation of the whole AP-1 complex with 100/3 confirmed an increase in the efficiency of cross-linking of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to AP-1 (Fig. 4A, middle panel, lanes 1-3). Increasing the [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 caused a further increase in the intensity of the cross-linked products (Fig. 4A, top panel, lanes 6 and 7), which is due to increased cross-linking to AP-1 (Fig. 4A, middle panel, lanes 6 and 7). Because the mAb 100/3 only recognizes bovine and not rat AP-1, it was surprising that, in the absence of exogenous bovine AP-1, 100/3 could immunoprecipitate a cross-linked product (Fig. 4A, middle panel, lane 1). This suggested that there might be AP-1 in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate used to generate the [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46. Western blot analysis demonstrated that indeed this was the case (data not shown). Using purified bovine AP-1 as a standard and assuming equal cross-reactivity of 100/3 with rabbit AP-1 it was estimated that the rabbit reticulocyte lysate contains ~16 µg/ml AP-1, giving a final concentration of ~1 µg/ml rabbit AP-1 in the binding assay. AP-2 and COPI were also detected in the lysate using polyclonal anti-beta -COP and anti-gamma -COP and may explain the source of beta - and gamma -COP cross-linked to ARF1 on the ISG membranes. Thus, the rabbit reticulocyte lysate acts like a cytosol, providing the adaptor proteins and coatomer for recruitment to ISGs. Increasing the amount of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 resulted in an increased binding (Fig. 4A, bottom panel, lanes 4-7), whereas increasing AP-1 had no effect on the amount of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 bound to the membrane (Fig. 4A, bottom panel, lanes 1-3). This suggests that AP-1 does not influence [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 binding to the membrane. These results confirm a direct interaction of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 with both exogenous rabbit and bovine AP-1 on ISG membranes.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Photocross-linking of membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 to the large subunits of AP-1. A, in vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was either kept constant (see "Experimental Procedures") and incubated in the presence of ISG membranes with increasing amounts of purified bovine AP-1 (lanes 1-3), or the AP-1 concentration was kept constant (4 µg/ml) and the in vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 (lanes 4-7) was varied. All samples contained GTPgamma S. After sedimentation and irradiation, the products (upper panel) were subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography, and the region of the specific photocross-linked products is shown (X). Alternatively, cross-linked samples were immunoprecipitated with the mAb anti-gamma -AP (100/3) under native conditions and then analyzed by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (middle panel) for 1 month. Lower panel, the uncross-linked membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was visualized by analysis of <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> of the products of the upper panel by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The upper and lower panels were exposed for 6 days. Photocross-linking samples, identical to those in lane 1, underwent two rounds of immunoprecipitation (the second round was performed on the remaining supernatant from the first round) with B, polyclonal anti-gamma -AP antisera, STO-25, either under native (n) or denaturing (d) conditions, C, mAb anti-gamma -AP, 100/3 and mAb anti-beta -AP. D, mAb anti-beta -AP and mAb anti-gamma -AP, 100/3 and as indicated. Second round immunoprecipitations with the same antibody as the first round were performed to indicate efficacy of the first round. In B-D, all autoradiographs were obtained after a 3-day exposure.

Immunoprecipitation with STO-25 under native and denaturing conditions (Fig. 3B, lane 3 and 4) implied that both gamma - and beta 1-AP may interact with ARF. The photocross-linking assay in the absence of added bovine AP-1 contains endogenous rat AP-1 from the PC12 ISGs and exogenous rabbit AP-1 from the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Anti-gamma -AP antiserum, STO-25 recognizes rat and, to a lesser extent, rabbit gamma -AP, whereas anti-gamma -AP antibody 100/3 recognizes rabbit and not rat gamma -AP. Quantative immunoprecipitation with STO-25 (Fig. 4B, lane 3) and 100/3 (Fig. 4C, lanes 3 and 5) under denaturing conditions demonstrate that both rat and rabbit gamma -AP directly bind to [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46. Immunoprecipitation of the whole AP-1 complex with the same antisera under native conditions revealed bands of greater intensity than that immunoprecipitated under denaturing conditions, again suggesting cross-linking of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to both beta 1- and gamma -AP. This was confirmed by immunoprecipitation of the dissociated AP-1 subunits with the anti-beta -AP (Fig. 4, C, lane 6 and D, lanes 3 and 5). Because the anti-beta -AP antibody also recognizes both beta 1- and beta 2-AP, we cannot rule out from these immunoprecipitations that beta 2-AP also cross-links with myrARF1. However, [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 does not interact with alpha -AP of AP-2 because no products were immunoprecipitated with anti-alpha -AP under native or denaturing conditions (data not shown); therefore, it is unlikely that [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 interacts with beta 2-AP. Although ARF1 has been shown to recruit AP-2 to endosomal membranes in a GTPgamma S-dependent manner (34), we failed to detect a GTP-dependent association of AP-2 to ISGs,2 consistent with the cross-linking data.

To make the cross-linking assay dependent on exogenous AP-1, we removed the high molecular mass coat proteins in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate, after in vitro translation of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46, by high speed centrifugation. Most of the AP-1 and COPI remained in the cushion and was absent from the supernatant (Fig. 5A, top and middle panels, respectively), whereas most of the [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 remained in the supernatant (Fig. 5A, bottom panel). Greater than 90% of AP-1 and COPI were removed. Some [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 was lost in the sucrose cushion (Fig. 5A, bottom panel, lane 2), and as a result, for the cross-linking assay, the amount of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 was normalized to that in the crude translation mix. The [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 in the depleted lysate bound to the ISGs in a GTPgamma S-dependent manner (Fig. 5B, bottom panel, compare lanes 4 and 5). However, the amount bound was significantly lower than that observed for the crude in vitro translation mix (Fig. 5B, bottom panel, compare lanes 2 and 5) even though the total amount of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 added to the reaction was the same. The myrARF1 bound to the ISGs was still able to interact directly with exogenous bovine AP-1 as indicated by an increase in the cross-linking products with increasing bovine AP-1 (Fig. 5B, top panel, lanes 6-8), and by immunoprecipitation of bovine AP-1 cross-linked to [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 with mAb, 100/3 (Fig. 5B, middle panel, lanes 5-7). As expected, in the absence of bovine AP-1, no cross-linked AP-1 was immunoprecipitated with 100/3 (Fig. 5B, middle panel, lane 5). However, cross-linking of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to AP-1 was still detected in the absence of exogenous bovine AP-1 (Fig. 5B, top panel, lane 5). Because the PC12 ISGs used in the assay have AP-1 containing clathrin coats (6), the cross-linked product in Fig. 5B, top panel, lane 5, is derived from [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 interacting with endogenous PC12 AP-1.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Photocross-linking of membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 after removal of AP-1 from the in vitro translation mix. A, the in vitro translation mix containing [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was centrifuged at 300,000 × g for 2 h over a 0.5 M sucrose cushion to remove high molecular mass complexes. The resulting supernatant (Supe.), cushion, and resuspended pellet were compared with untreated translation mix (Total) for the presence of AP-1 and COPI by Western blotting using mAb anti-gamma -AP, 100/3 and mAb anti-beta -COP, M3A5, respectively, and chemiluminscence, and for [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography for 8 h. B, in vitro translation mix, either untreated (crude) or centrifuged (depleted), containing equal amounts of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 were used for the photocross-linking experiments as in Fig. 3A. Experiments were performed in the presence of either GDPbeta S (lanes 1 and 4) or GTPgamma S (lanes 2, 3, and 5-8), with or without AP-1 as indicated. In the top panel, the region of the ISG specific photocross-linked products is labeled (X). This panel was obtained after a 1-week exposure. Middle panel, samples identical to those in the top panel, lanes 5-7 were immunoprecipitated with mAb anti-gamma -AP, 100/3 under native conditions. Samples were subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography for 10 days. Bottom panel, <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> of the samples of the upper panel were analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography overnight to visualize the uncross-linked, membrane-bound [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46.

myrARF1 and AP-1 Do Not Interact on MSGs-- We next investigated the ability of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to bind and interact with AP-1 on PC12 MSGs because we know that MSGs have no clathrin coat (6). No GTP-dependent binding of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 was observed when using MSGs in the binding assay compared with ISGs (Fig. 6, lower panel), even using the crude in vitro translation mix containing the rabbit coat proteins. As a result, no cross-linking of [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 to AP-1 or COPI was observed on MSGs compared with ISGs (Fig. 6, upper panel, compare lanes 2 and 5). In addition, we did not observe [35S]ARF1-(Tmd)Phe-46 binding or cross-linking to AP-1 on liposomes using the crude in vitro translation mix or even after the addition of ARF-depleted bovine brain cytosol (18) prior to photocross-linking (results not shown). This is in contrast to previous results showing recruitment of AP-1 and clathrin onto liposomes (from soyabean lipids) using ARF-GTP and cytosolic factor(s) (35). Hence, the recruitment of myrARF1 and the AP-1/myrARF1 interaction is specific to ISGs, confirming our previous data that there are molecules on the ISGs that allow coat formation that are removed or inactivated during secretory granule maturation.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Photocross-linking of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 is ISG-specific. In vitro translated [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was incubated in the absence of membranes (lane 1) or in the presence of ISGs (lanes 2-4) or MSGs (lanes 5-7), with GDPbeta S (lanes 3 and 6) or GTPgamma S (lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the membranes were pelleted, irradiated (except lanes 4 and 7), and trichloroacetic acid precipitated, and then <FR><NU>9</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> were analyzed by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (upper panel). The region of the ISG specific photocross-linked products is labeled (X). Lower panel, the uncross-linked membrane [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 was observed by analysis of <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> of the samples from the upper panel by 15% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Both the upper and lower panels were obtained after a 1-week exposure. Similar results were obtained in a duplicate experiment.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

myrARF1 is required for the recruitment of AP-1 to ISGs (6) and ultimately for clathrin-coated vesicle formation during ISG maturation. Previous work showed that ARF1 is a limiting factor in the GTP-stimulated recruitment of AP-1 onto isolated Golgi membranes, and although ARF1 is not a stoichiometric component of the clathrin coat, it appears to function in a stoichiometric manner to generate high affinity binding sites for AP-1 (17). We have extended these findings by demonstrating a direct interaction between AP-1 and myrARF1 in the GTP-bound form. We show that AP-1 and ARF1 form a complex using co-immunoprecipitation of [35S]myrARF1 with gamma -adaptin from solubilized ISG membranes. We could estimate that 1% of the membrane bound myrARF1 is in a complex with AP-1. We exploited a site-directed photocross-linking approach to demonstrate that myrARF1 in the GTP form interacts directly with both the gamma - and beta 1 subunits of AP-1. The interaction of ARF1, via Ile-46, which is in the switch 1 domain, the putative effector region of ARF1 (14), with AP-1 is consistent with data of Liang and Kornfeld (36); using chimeras of mammalian and yeast ARF they showed residues 35-94 were essential for AP-1 recruitment to the Golgi. Because the reticulocyte lysate contains significant amounts of AP-1, COPI, and AP-2 (data not shown), we removed the endogenous coat proteins from the lysate using high speed centrifugation and demonstrated that interaction of myrARF1 and AP-1 was dependent on the addition of exogenous AP-1. In addition, we could not detect an interaction of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 and AP-1 in solution, either in the cross-linking assay in the absence of ISGs or by co-sedimentation of ARF1 with AP-1 during the centrifugation.

The photocross-linking method is qualitative and does not allow a quantification of the stoichiometry between ARF and AP-1. Cross-link yields are typically <1%, because the reactive carbene predominantly interacts with the water molecules (19). The photoprobe is highly specific, because a protein of very close proximity would be required to compete with the abundant water molecules. Because the rabbit reticulocyte lysate used for the in vitro translation also contains ~1 µg/ml of unlabeled ARF proteins, as determined with the pan-ARF antibody, the specific activity of the [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 is further reduced. We are unable to detect by immunoblotting, with antibodies to AP-1 or COPI, the population of coat proteins that were photo cross-linked to myrARF1. Thus, we are unable to quantify the extent of the interaction between myrARF1 and AP-1 or COPI using the photocross-link approach.

Using the reticulocyte lysate, in the presence of GTPgamma S, we observed cross-linking of COPI to [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46, which was dependent upon membranes. The amount of beta -COPI cross-linked is at least as great as AP-1. beta -COP is present, but not enriched, in the ISG fraction. Although Golgi contamination in the ISG fractions has been excluded with assays for trans-Golgi network 38 (37), sialyltransferase assays and labeling with [35S]sulfate (38), endosomal membrane contaminants maybe present in the ISG fraction (39), which may explain the cross-linking of gamma - and beta -COPI. Alternatively, the observations of Martínez-Menárguez et al. (40), showing low but significant labeling of ISGs with COPI in the exocrine pancreas by immunoelectron microscopy, suggest that COPI binding sites may be present on ISG membranes. However, clathrin coats were far more abundant than the COPI coats, suggesting that COPI-mediated transport is a minor pathway and may be a remnant of the retrograde machinery from the Golgi complex.

Interaction of both AP-1 and COPI with the switch 1 domain of ARF1 suggests that common structural features exist between these multisubunit coat protein complexes. A phylogenetic analysis by Schledzewski et al. (41) provides evidence that the clathrin adaptors and F-COP (a subcomplex of COPI containing the subunits beta , gamma , delta , and zeta ) have arisen from coordinated gene duplications of common ancestral genes and predicts that beta -COP is homologous to beta 1-adaptin and gamma -COP to gamma -adaptin. The structural similarities between the adaptors and COPI could explain the cross-linking data of Zhao et al. (20) showing cross-linking of [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-46 to beta - and gamma -COP on Golgi membranes and the results presented here.

How can the switch 1 domain of ARF1 interact with two subunits of AP-1 or COPI? There is increasing evidence to suggest that ARF oligomerizes; crystals of ARF-GDP were found in a dimeric form (42, 43), and cross-linking of ARF with itself has been detected using [35S]ARF-(Tmd)Phe-49 (20). Furthermore, others have determined that there are multiple copies of membrane associated ARF-GTP per coatomer (15, 45, 46). Thus, it is possible that dimers of myrARF1 exist, where the switch I region of one molecule of ARF interacts with the gamma - or beta -subunit of one AP-1 or COPI and the other ARF molecule with the other large subunit.

ISG maturation involves homotypic fusion and changes in the size and dense core (47) of the secretory granule. Unlike MSGs, which lack a clathrin coat, ISGs are partially coated vesicles (48, 49), with AP-1 containing clathrin coats (50). Clathrin coats have been seen enveloping small vesicular structures on ISGs (49), leading to the hypothesis that clathrin-coated vesicles serve to remove components of the secretory granule. We show that myrARF1 does not bind to MSGs and, using photocross-link, that AP-1 and myrARF1 do not interact on the MSG, suggesting that there are proteins on the ISG, required for myrARF1 binding and subsequent AP-1/ARF1 interaction, which cannot be supplied by the reticulocyte lysate or bovine brain cytosol. These proteins may be transmembrane proteins such as mannose-6-phosphate receptor or furin, both of which are present on ISGs but absent from MSGs (37, 39). In support of this others have shown that mannose-6-phosphate receptors can stabilize AP-1 and ARF1 interaction on trans-Golgi network membranes (44), and a bivalent interaction of coatomer with membrane-bound ARF and cytoplasmic tails of cargo or putative cargo receptors has been demonstrated (45).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. A. Paulion, E. Smythe, and M. S. Robinson for advice on the AP-1 purification, D. Shields for the bacteria expressing the human ARF1 and yeast N-myristoyltransferase, R. Kahn for the mAb 1D9, T. Kirchhausen for the beta -AP mAb, and J. Brunner for advice on the suppressor tRNA and (Tmd)Phe, G. Schiavo, J. Tooze, and M. Lowe for critical reading of this manuscript. We are grateful to Prof. F. T. Wieland for the ARF cDNA constructs containing the amber stop codon mutations, polyclonal COP antibodies, and helpful discussions. We especially thank Dr. L. Zhao for technical assistance with the photocross-linking assays.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by European Union Training and Mobility of Researchers Grant FMRX-CT96-0023.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-207-269- 3122; Fax: 44-207-269-3417; E-mail: tooze@icrf.icnet.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M908875199

2 C. Austin, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AP, adaptor protein; ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor; ISG, immature secretory granule; MSG, mature secretory granule; COP, coat protein; COPI, COP complex type I; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-(gamma -thio)triphosphate; (Tmd)Phe, L-4'-(3-trifluoromethyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)-phenylalanine; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; myrARF1, myristoylated ADP-ribosylation factor 1; GDPbeta S, guanosine 5'-(beta -thio)diphosphate; mAb, monoclonal antibody.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hirst, J., and Robinson, M. S. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1404, 173-193
2. Marsh, M., and McMahon, H. T. (1999) Science 285, 215-220
3. Dell'Angelica, E. C., Mullins, C., and Bonifacino, J. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7278-7285
4. Hirst, J., Bright, N. A., Rous, B., and Robinson, M. S. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 2787-2802
5. Ahle, S., Mann, A., Eichelsbacher, U., and Ungewickell, E. (1988) EMBO J. 4, 919-929
6. Dittié, A. S., Hajibagheri, N., and Tooze, S. A. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 523-536
7. Robinson, M. S. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 104, 887-895
8. Kirchausen, T., Bonifacino, J. S., and Riezman, H. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 488-495
9. Le Borgne, R., and Hoflack, B. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1404, 195-209
10. Stamnes, M. A., and Rothman, J. E. (1993) Cell 73, 999-1005
11. Traub, L., Ostrom, J. A., and Kornfeld, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 561-573
12. Boman, A. L., and Kahn, R. A. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 147-150
13. Antonny, B., Beraud-Dufour, S., Chardin, P., and Chabre, M. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4675-84
14. Goldberg, J. (1998) Cell 95, 237-248
15. Serafini, T., Orci, L., Amherdt, M., Brunner, M., Kahn, R. A., and Rothman, J. E. (1991) Cell 67, 239-253
16. Orci, L., Palmer, D. J., Amherdt, M., and Rothman, J. E. (1993) Nature 364, 732-734
17. Zhu, Y., Traub, L. M., and Kornfeld, S. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1323-1337
18. Zhao, L., Helms, J. B., Brugger, B., Harter, C., Martoglio, B., Graf, R., Brunner, J., and Wieland, F. T. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4418-4423
19. Brunner, J. (1989) Methods Enzymol. 172, 628-687
20. Zhao, L., Helms, B. J., Brunner, J., and Wieland, F. T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14198-14203
21. Campbell, C., Squicciarini, J., Shia, M., Pilch, P. F., and Fine, R. E. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 4420-4426
22. Smythe, E., Carter, L. L., and Schmid, S. L. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1163-1171
23. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
24. Tanigawa, G., Orci, L., Amherdt, M., Ravazzola, M., Helms, J. B., and Rothman, J. E. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1365-1371
25. Duronio, R. J., Jackson-Machelski, E., Heuckeroth, R. O., Olins, P. O., Devine, C. S., Yonemoto, W., Slice, L. W., Taylor, S. S., and Gordon, J. I. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1506-1510
26. Franco, M., Chardin, P., Chabre, M., and Paris, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1337-1341
27. Helms, J. B., Palmer, D. J., and Rothman, J. E. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 751-760
28. Utsumi, T., Kuranami, J., Tou, E., Ide, A., Akimaru, K., Hung, M. C., and Klostergaard, J. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 326, 179-184
29. Clairmont, K. B., Boll, W., Ericsson, M., and Kirchhausen, T. (1997) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 611-619
30. Aniento, F., Gu, F., Parton, R. G., and Gruenberg, J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 29-41
31. Szoka, F., Jr., and Papahadjopoulos, D. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 4194-4198
32. Deichaite, I., Casson, L. P., Ling, H. P., and Resh, M. D. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4295-4301
33. Utsumi, T., Tou, E., Takemura, D., Ishisaka, R., Yabuki, M., and Iwata, H. (1998) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 349, 216-224
34. West, M. A., Bright, N. A., and Robinson, M. S. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1239-1254
35. Zhu, Y., Drake, M. T., and Kornfeld, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5013-5018
36. Liang, J. O., and Kornfeld, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4141-4148
37. Dittié, A. S., Thomas, L., Thomas, G., and Tooze, S. A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4859-4870
38. Tooze, S. A., and Huttner, W. B. (1990) Cell 60, 837-847
39. Dittié, A. S., Klumperman, J., and Tooze, S. A. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 3955-3966
40. Martínez-Menárguez, J. A., Geuze, H. J., Slot, J. W., and Klumperman, J. (1999) Cell 98, 81-90
41. Schledzewski, K., Brinkmann, H., and Mendel, R. R. (1999) J Mol. Evol. 48, 770-778
42. Amor, J. C., Harrison, D. H., Kahn, R. A., and Ringe, D. (1994) Nature 372, 704-708
43. Greasley, S. E., Jhoti, H., Teahan, C., Solari, R., Fensome, A., Thomas, G. M., Cockcroft, S., and Bax, B. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 797-806
44. Le Borgne, R., Griffiths, G., and Hoflack, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2162-2170
45. Bremser, M., Nickel, W., Schweikert, M., Ravazzola, M., Amherdt, M., Hughes, C. A., Sollner, T. H., Rothman, J. E., and Wieland, F. T. (1999) Cell 96, 495-506
46. Stamnes, M., Schiavo, G., Stenbeck, G., Sollner, T. H., and Rothman, J. E. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13676-13680
47. Tooze, S. A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1404, 231-244
48. Orci, L., Ravazzola, M., Amherdt, M., Madsen, O., Vassalli, J.-D., and Perrelet, A. (1985) Cell 42, 671-681
49. Tooze, J., and Tooze, S. A. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 839-850
50. Klumperman, J., Kuliawat, R., Griffith, J. M., Geuze, H. J., and Arvan, P. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 359-372


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
R. Ishizaki, H.-W. Shin, H. Mitsuhashi, and K. Nakayama
Redundant Roles of BIG2 and BIG1, Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Factors for ADP-Ribosylation Factors in Membrane Traffic between the trans-Golgi Network and Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 2650 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
I. Lee, B. Doray, J. Govero, and S. Kornfeld
Binding of cargo sorting signals to AP-1 enhances its association with ADP ribosylation factor 1-GTP
J. Cell Biol., February 6, 2008; 180(3): 467 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Haberman, I. Ziv, Y. Gorzalczany, K. Hirschberg, L. Mittleman, M. Fukuda, and R. Sagi-Eisenberg
Synaptotagmin (Syt) IX is an essential determinant for protein sorting to secretory granules in mast cells
Blood, April 15, 2007; 109(8): 3385 - 3392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
G. E. Fernandez and G. S. Payne
Laa1p, a Conserved AP-1 Accessory Protein Important for AP-1 Localization in Yeast
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2006; 17(7): 3304 - 3317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
M. Ahras, G. P. Otto, and S. A. Tooze
Synaptotagmin IV is necessary for the maturation of secretory granules in PC12 cells
J. Cell Biol., April 24, 2006; 173(2): 241 - 251. <