JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000688200 on April 7, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 21975-21980, July 21, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/29/21975    most recent
M000688200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leguy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carlier, M.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leguy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carlier, M.-F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Monomeric gamma -Tubulin Nucleates Microtubules*

Robin LeguyDagger, Ronald Melki, Dominique Pantaloni, and Marie-France Carlier§

From the Dynamique du Cytosquelette, Laboratoire d'Enzymologie et Biochimie Structurales, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Received for publication, January 24, 2000, and in revised form, March 20, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

gamma -Tubulin is required for nucleation and polarized organization of microtubules in vivo. The mechanism of microtubule nucleation by gamma -tubulin and the role of associated proteins is not understood. Here we show that in vitro translated monomeric gamma -tubulin nucleates microtubules by lowering the size of the nucleus from seven to three tubulin subunits. In capping the minus end with high affinity (1010 M-1) and a binding stoichiometry of one molecule of gamma -tubulin/microtubule, gamma -tubulin establishes the critical concentration of the plus end in the medium and prevents minus end growth. gamma -Tubulin interacts strongly with beta -tubulin. A structural model accounts for these results.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Microtubules are highly dynamic polymers of the cytoskeleton that play a crucial role in the organization of intracellular space and in cell division. In an interphase cell, the microtubule network is organized in a radial fashion from the microtubule organizing center, which in animal cells consists of a pair of centrioles surrounded by an electron-dense pericentriolar material. Microtubules are nucleated at the pericentriolar material by their minus end (1). The control of the polarity of the microtubule array is essential in cell function and is mediated by gamma -tubulin. gamma -Tubulin, a member of the tubulin superfamily first identified in Aspergillus nidulans (2), then found in all eukaryotes (3), is required for microtubule nucleation at the centrosome (4-9) and duplication of the centrioles (10), but the mechanism by which it nucleates microtubule assembly is not understood. Although gamma -tubulin is mainly localized in the pericentriolar material, it is also found in cytoplasmic complexes (11). A large gamma -tubulin-ring complex (gamma -TuRC)1 was first identified in the Xenopus egg (12). It was also found in mammalian cells (see Refs. 13, 14, and 15 for a recent review) and at the centrosome in the Drosophila embryo (16), together with a smaller (280 kDa) complex (17). The small complex comprises two molecules of gamma -tubulin and one molecule each of gamma -tubulin complex proteins GCP2 and GCP3 (18, 19), homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spc97p and Spc98p, which are associated with gamma -tubulin in the yeast cytoplasmic gamma -tubulin complex and at the spindle pole bodies (20, 21). The gamma -TuRC derives from the smaller complex by condensation and association with other proteins. The gamma -TuRC nucleates microtubule assembly in vitro (12). Two models were proposed for microtubule nucleation by the gamma -TuRC. In one model (12), the gamma -TuRC acts as a template in which the 13 gamma -tubulin subunits forming the ring interact end-on with the terminal alpha -tubulin subunits at the minus end of the nascent microtubule. In the other model (22), the ring opens and extends into a protofilament interacting laterally with alpha beta -tubulin units to seed a bidimensional microtubule lattice. The smaller gamma -tubulin complex is a poorer nucleator in vitro (18); however, the fact that it has some nucleating activity has to be considered regarding the molecular mechanism of microtubule nucleation and calls for a detailed investigation of the interaction of gamma -tubulin itself with microtubule ends. In vitro translated gamma -tubulin is in part monomeric (23). The bulk in vitro translated gamma -tubulin has been shown to bind microtubule minus ends with high affinity (1010 M-1) and a stoichiometry of 13 ± 2 gamma -tubulin/microtubule (24). In the present work, experiments were performed to analyze the thermodynamic and kinetic effects of gamma -tubulin, isolated as a monomer, in microtubule assembly in vitro, with the ultimate goal to understand the specific roles of gamma -tubulin and of the associated proteins in the nucleation of microtubules at the centrosome.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Vitro Translation and Semipurification of Monomeric 35S-labeled gamma -Tubulin-- 35S-Radiolabeled human gamma -tubulin was synthesized in vitro using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. A coupled translation-transcription system (TNTTM Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate Systems, Promega Corp., Madison, WI) was used, in which T7 polymerase of the recombinant pET plasmid containing the cDNA encoding human gamma -tubulin was incubated in the presence of 50 µCi of [35S]methionine (PROMIX in vitro cell labeling, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The translation product was purified by phosphocellulose chromatography and gel filtration on Superose 6 HR (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in S buffer (80 mM MES-KOH, pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1.4 M glycerol). The 35S elution profile showed a minor 900-kDa peak (attributed to complexes of gamma -tubulin with cytoplasmic chaperonin), followed by a major narrow peak corresponding to the overexpressed monomeric 50-kDa gamma -tubulin (23). Fractions containing monomeric gamma -tubulin were equilibrated in P buffer (60 mM MES-KOH, pH 6.9, 0.75 mM EGTA, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 4.5 M glycerol, 1 mM GTP), rapidly frozen on liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C. The concentration of monomeric gamma -tubulin was determined by quantitative immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody against gamma -tubulin raised in the laboratory and the ECL chemiluminescent detection (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and comparison with standards of bacterially expressed gamma -tubulin. Routinely, 10 ± 3 pmol of radiochemically pure gamma -tubulin were obtained (Fig. 1). A control sample was prepared in exactly the same way except for the absence of cDNA encoding gamma -tubulin in the reticulocyte lysate.

Immunodepletion of gamma -tubulin from the semipurified preparation was performed as follows. In vitro translated 35S-labeled monomeric gamma -tubulin eluted from the Superose 6 HR column (0.22 pmols) was incubated in P buffer at 4 °C for 90 min with 7 × 107 Dynabeads coupled to rabbit anti-IgG (Dynal) that had been preincubated for 30 min at room temperature either with 7.5 µg affinity-purified anti-gamma -tubulin antibody in phosphate-buffered saline buffer (depleted sample) or with phosphate-buffered saline buffer alone (mock depleted control).

Polymerization Measurements-- Tubulin purified from pig brain by three polymerization cycles followed by phosphocellulose chromatography (see Ref. 25 for all standard procedures in tubulin handling) was used in all experiments. Polymerization assays were carried out in PMg buffer (P buffer containing 6 mM MgCl2) as described (25). Polymerization was monitored turbidimetrically at 350 nm, 37 °C, with a 0.4-cm path thermostated cell (Hellma) in a HP 8453 Hewlett-Packard or a Cary 1 Varian spectrophotometer. Experiments were performed in a range of concentrations where it was checked that the turbidity change was linearly correlated with the amount of sedimented microtubules. The lag time tau  was defined as the time at which the linear semilogarithmic plot of the time course of turbidity change intercepts the turbidity line at time zero. Microtubule elongation assays were performed using a preassembled microtubule seed solution (30 µM tubulin) that was 10-fold diluted into the cuvette containing prewarmed tubulin at a series of concentrations in PMg buffer. All pipettings were done gently to avoid microtubule breakage and using truncated warm pipettes tips. Initial rates of elongation (26) were derived from the turbidity recordings using the ChemStation software (Hewlett-Packard).

Electron Microscopy-- Histograms of microtubule length distributions were derived from electron micrographs of negatively stained samples of microtubules assembled from tubulin (5 µM) in the absence or presence of 0.7 nM gamma -tubulin. Observations were made in a Philips EM 410 microscope at a 12,470-fold magnification. Analysis was performed using Optimas software.

Sedimentation Assays-- Microtubules containing or not 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin were sedimented at 200,000 × g at 37 °C for 10 min in a TL 100 Tabletop Beckman ultracentrifuge. The amount of tubulin in the supernatant was determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The Coomassie Blue-stained bands were scanned (Arcus, NIH Image software) and compared with standards that were co-electrophoresed on the same gel. The amounts of gamma -tubulin free and bound to microtubules were determined also by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the pellets and supernatants, followed by autoradiography (PhosphorImager, Molecular Dynamic) with comparison with standards of 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin.

GTP Hydrolysis Measurements-- The rate of hydrolysis of GTP bound to tubulin during the nucleation of microtubules was measured as described (25). The gamma -32P]GTP-tubulin 1:1 complex was separated from free GTP by Sephadex G-25 gel filtration (PD10, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and incubated at 37 °C in PMg buffer, at a concentration of 6 µM in the presence or absence of gamma -tubulin. Aliquots were removed at time intervals during the nucleation period before microtubules were assembled, acid quenched, and processed for Pi extraction. Turbidity measurements were made to verify that no microtubule assembly occurred during the experiment.

Blot Overlay Assay with 35S-labeled gamma -Tubulin-- SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of pure tubulin was done at pH 9.5 under conditions (27) suitable for maximum separation of alpha - and beta -subunits. For brain tubulin, it has been established that beta  is the faster migrating subunit (28, 29). Following transfer on nitrocellulose and visualization of the alpha - and beta -subunits using Ponceau Red, the membrane was submitted to Western immunoblotting (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using the DM1A anti-alpha -tubulin monoclonal antibody (ICN) at a 1:4000 dilution. alpha -Tubulin was verified to be the slower migrating polypeptide. The nitrocellulose sheet was then dehybridized following the ECL protocol provided by Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and washed extensively in buffer S6 containing 30 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. The sheet was incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the presence of gel-filtered 35S-radiolabeled gamma -tubulin (0.6 nM, 25 Ci/mmol), washed extensively five times, dried, and autoradiographed using Hyperfilm beta max (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Monomeric gamma -Tubulin Facilitates Nucleation of Microtubules in Vitro-- In vitro translated 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin was translated in vitro using the reticulocyte lysate system, partially purified by phosphocellulose chromatography and isolated as a 50-kDa polypeptide by Superose 6 chromatography (see "Materials and Methods" and Fig. 1). The effect of monomeric gamma -tubulin on the time course of spontaneous polymerization of pure tubulin was analyzed. gamma -Tubulin caused a dose-dependent decrease in the nucleation lag time that precedes microtubule growth (Fig. 2A). Typically, at 12 µM tubulin, the lag time decreased from 12 to 5 min in the presence of 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin. The decrease in lag time showed a saturation behavior, and the lag reached a low limit value upon increasing the concentration of gamma -tubulin. No effect was observed with a material purified through the same steps from reticulocyte lysates that did not express gamma -tubulin. That control testified that putative 50-kDa polypeptides coming from the reticulocyte lysate and contaminating the monomeric gamma -tubulin fraction were not responsible for the observed nucleating effect. Immunodepletion of gamma -tubulin from the preparation using IgG-coated Dynabeads coupled to anti-gamma -tubulin antibody abolished the effect (Fig. 2B). Because gamma -tubulin was isolated as a 50-kDa protein, it is not possible to imagine that the immunodepletion removed a protein associated with gamma -tubulin that could be responsible for the observed effect. In conclusion, monomeric gamma -tubulin facilitates microtubule nucleation in vitro.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Evaluation of the concentration of in vitro translated monomeric 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin. Semipurified monomeric 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin (40 µl) was co-electrophoresed with the indicated amounts of bacterially expressed recombinant gamma -tubulin. The amount of 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin was determined by immunodetection (ECL) using a polyclonal antibody against gamma -tubulin. Densitometric analysis of the immunoblot is shown on the graph. The arrow indicates that 1.4 ng of gamma -tubulin was present in the 40-µl load, corresponding to a concentration of 0.7 nM monomeric gamma -tubulin. The radiochemical purity of the electrotransferred gamma -tubulin was assessed by autoradiography using the PhosphorImager (inset, gamma *). a.u., arbitrary units.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Microtubule nucleation by monomeric gamma -tubulin. A, gamma -tubulin shortens the nucleation lag phase in spontaneous microtubule assembly. Tubulin was polymerized at 12 µM with the following additions. a, control without gamma -tubulin; b, 0.15 nM gamma -tubulin; c, 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin; d, control containing the same volume as in c of the material purified from the reticulocyte lysate that did not express gamma -tubulin (see "Materials and Methods"). B, the nucleating effect of gamma -tubulin is abolished by immunodepletion of gamma -tubulin from the preparation. Tubulin was polymerized at 17 µM as described under A in the presence of identical volumes of the mock-depleted sample (corresponding to a final concentration of 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin, curve a) or of the immunodepleted sample (curve b). Inset, autoradiography of the total 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin (T), gamma -tubulin bound to the Dynabeads coupled to anti-gamma -tubulin (B), gamma -tubulin present in the supernatants of the Dynabeads in the depleted sample (S), and in the mock-depleted sample (S'). C, tubulin was polymerized at the indicated concentrations in the absence (open circle ) and in the presence (black-triangle) of 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin. The reciprocal of the lag time (1/tau ) is plotted, in a log/log representation, versus the total concentration of tubulin. D, histograms of the length distributions of microtubules (5 µM polymerized tubulin) in the absence and presence of 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin. A total summed microtubule length of 3100 µm was counted for each sample.

Short linear oligomers of tubulin are formed in the prenucleation stages of tubulin polymerization. The nucleus is the linear oligomer that has reached equal probabilities of lateral or longitudinal interaction with an alpha beta -tubulin dimer (30-33). The size of the nucleus is equal to 2m - 1, where m is the value of the slope of the log/log plot of the lag time versus the concentration of alpha beta -tubulin (34). The value of m was lower in the presence of gamma -tubulin (Fig. 2C). The size of the nucleus decreased from 7 to 3 tubulin subunits at a saturating concentration of gamma -tubulin. Accordingly, the apparent rate constant for microtubule growth increased with gamma -tubulin, consistent with a higher number of microtubules. Histograms of length distribution of microtubules (Fig. 2D) showed average lengths of 5.0 and 3.7 µm for microtubules assembled in the absence or presence of 0.6 nM gamma -tubulin, respectively.

Monomeric gamma -Tubulin Lowers the Critical Concentration for Microtubule Assembly-- The effect of gamma -tubulin on the critical concentration for microtubule assembly was measured turbidimetrically and in sedimentation assays (Fig. 3A). The critical concentration decreased in a saturation fashion with gamma -tubulin from 2.5 µM to a lower limit of 1.3 µM, reached at 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin (Fig. 3A, inset). The binding of gamma -tubulin to sedimented microtubules was analyzed by autoradiography in a similar experiment (Fig. 3B). gamma -Tubulin bound to microtubules with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 8-10.10-11 M-1 and a stoichiometry of 1 molecule of gamma -tubulin/microtubule. These data are consistent with the capping of the minus end of microtubules by a single molecule of gamma -tubulin, resulting in a shift of the critical concentration toward the plus end critical concentration. The observed shift is quantitatively consistent with the previously observed difference in the critical concentrations at the plus and minus ends (35), which reflects the treadmilling property of microtubules (36, 37). The affinity of gamma -tubulin is high enough for at least 80% saturation of microtubule ends to be reached at the concentrations (0.6-0.8 nM) of gamma -tubulin used throughout the present work.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   gamma -Tubulin lowers the critical concentration for tubulin polymerization by capping the minus end of microtubules with a molar ratio of one gamma -tubulin molecule/microtubule end. A, tubulin was polymerized at 20 µM at 37 °C in the presence or absence of 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin. Serial dilutions of the microtubules containing 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin (black-triangle) were performed in warm polymerization buffer also containing 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin. Serial dilutions of the microtubules that did not contain gamma -tubulin (open circle ) were performed using a buffer without gamma -tubulin. Following 15 min incubation, samples were sedimented. The amount of tubulin assembled in microtubules was derived from quantitative analysis of the SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of tubulin in the supernatants. Inset, two solutions of microtubules (5.2 µM tubulin) preassembled in the presence or absence of 0.65 nM 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin were mixed in different proportions. The resulting samples thus contained the same amount of tubulin and different amounts of gamma -tubulin. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and centrifuged. The amount of tubulin in the supernatant was determined as above. B, solutions of polymerized tubulin at identical concentrations except for the presence or absence of 0.7 nM gamma -tubulin were mixed in different proportions as described in Fig. 2A, inset. The amounts of microtubule-bound and -free 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin were measured (see "Materials and Methods"). The amount of assembled tubulin was determined as above. Inset, typical autoradiograms of total (T), microtubule-bound (B), and -free (F) gamma -tubulin in samples containing 0.2 and 0.65 nM gamma -tubulin. The concentration of microtubule minus ends was calculated to be 0.62 nM based on a measured average length of 4 µm and 1650 subunits/µm length. The abscissa intercept of the Scatchard plot indicates that the maximum amount of bound gamma -tubulin is 0.65 nM, identical to the concentration of microtubule ends.

Monomeric gamma -Tubulin Caps Microtubule Minus Ends-- Further evidence for capping of the minus end of microtubules by gamma -tubulin was derived from measurements of the rate of microtubule growth at different concentrations of dimeric tubulin (Fig. 4). This kinetic assay allows the determination of the association rate constant of tubulin to microtubule ends, derived from the slope of the J(c) plot, and of the critical concentration, derived from the intercept on the concentration axis (26). In the absence of gamma -tubulin, the plot reflects the contribution of both ends to microtubule growth. A value of 7.5 µM-1 s-1 was found for the sum of the association rate constants at the plus and minus ends. The critical concentration was 1.5 µM, which is intermediate between the critical concentrations at the plus and minus ends. In the presence of 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin, the J(c) plot displayed a lower slope, consistent with a value of the association rate constant of 4.4 µM-1 s-1, and extrapolated to a lower value, 0.8 µM, of the critical concentration. This behavior is consistent with growth of microtubules from the plus end only, in the presence of gamma -tubulin. The value of the association rate constant of tubulin to the minus end (2.7 µM-1 s-1) and the critical concentration for assembly at the minus end (2.3 µM) were derived by subtraction of the two plots. According to these results, the rate constant for association of tubulin to microtubules is 1.6-fold lower at the minus end than at the plus end, in good agreement with previous electron microscopy measurements (35, 38, 39). In conclusion, the present kinetic measurements are in good agreement with previous studies in which gamma -tubulin was localized at the minus end of microtubules (24) and show evidence for the function of gamma -tubulin as a minus end capper.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of gamma -tubulin on the rate of microtubule growth. Microtubules were assembled in the presence or absence of 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin and used as seeds of assembly by diluting them in a prewarmed solution of tubulin at the indicated concentrations with (black-triangle) or without (open circle ) 0.8 nM gamma -tubulin, respectively. The initial rate of turbidity increase was measured. Open circles refer to the rates of growth at the two ends measured in the absence of gamma -tubulin; closed triangles refer to rates of growth at the plus end (+), measured in the presence of gamma -tubulin. The rates were normalized to the same concentration (0.4 nM) of microtubules by measuring the length distribution in each microtubule seed solution. The thin line represents the J(c) plot at the minus end (-) obtained by subtracting the rates measured in the absence or presence of gamma -tubulin.

Monomeric gamma -Tubulin Inhibits GTP Hydrolysis Linked to Destabilization of Prenuclei Oligomers-- Nucleation of microtubules is accompanied by GTP hydrolysis, which destabilizes the nuclei by preventing lateral interaction of prenuclei oligomers with tubulin (25). Hydrolysis of GTP is thought to be linked to the curling of linear oligomers into rings, which is the favored conformation when GDP is bound to tubulin (40). In the presence of 0.7 nM gamma -tubulin the hydrolysis of GTP during the nucleation phase was decreased by 2-fold, whereas more nuclei were formed (data not shown). This result suggests that gamma -tubulin enhances nucleation by inhibiting the hydrolysis of GTP on oligomers, thus preventing their subsequent destabilization.

gamma -Tubulin Interacts with beta -Tubulin in Blot Overlay Assays-- To determine how gamma -tubulin interacts with tubulin at the minus end of microtubules, a blot overlay assay was carried out (Fig. 5) using in vitro translated monomeric 35S-radiolabeled gamma -tubulin and nitrocellulose-transferred alpha beta -tubulin electrophoresed under conditions that maximize the separation of alpha  and beta  subunits (27-29). alpha -Tubulin was identified as the slower migrating subunit. gamma -Tubulin bound the faster migrating beta -tubulin exclusively. No binding was observed using thermodenatured 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin. This result provides biochemical evidence for the strong interaction between beta - and gamma -tubulin that was expected from genetic studies (2). The demonstration of a strong interaction of gamma -tubulin with beta -tubulin does not rule out its interaction with alpha -tubulin, which is also expected given the fact that alpha -tubulin is exposed at the minus end (47). However the strong binding of gamma -tubulin to beta -tubulin imposes constraints on the possible structural models for minus end capping.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   gamma -Tubulin associates with beta -tubulin in a blot overlay assay. alpha beta -Tubulin (6 µg) was electrophoresed at pH 9.5 and transferred onto nitrocellulose, and the alpha - and beta -subunits were probed by Ponceau red staining (a). alpha -Tubulin (upper band) was identified by Western immunoblotting with DM1A antibody (b). The membrane was overlaid with in vitro translated Sephadex-G25 gel-filtered native (c) or thermodenatured (d) 35S-labeled gamma -tubulin (0.6 nM, 25 Ci/mmol). Membrane-bound radiolabeled gamma -tubulin was revealed by autoradiography.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Monomeric gamma -tubulin, in the absence of associated proteins, is able to nucleate microtubules in vitro and to cap microtubule minus end. Although the gamma -tubulin used here is only partially purified from reticulocyte lysates, control experiments unambiguously establish that the nucleation activity is because of monomeric gamma -tubulin. This result is in partial agreement with Vassilev et al. (41) and with Li and Joshi (24) who measured the binding of gamma -tubulin to microtubules. However a binding stoichiometry of 12-15 (13 on average) gamma -tubulin/microtubule end was determined by Li and Joshi (24), whereas here we find that a single molecule of monomeric gamma -tubulin is sufficient to nucleate and cap the minus end. The partial discrepancy between the two estimates may be because of the difference in the material and in the methods used to quantitate the number of microtubules. The in vitro translated gamma -tubulin used by Li and Joshi (24) was not isolated as monomeric gamma -tubulin by a sizing column. We relied on length distribution measurements of negatively stained microtubules observed in the electron microscope, whereas Li and Joshi (24) used fluorescence optical microscopy of rhodamine-labeled microtubules and found a saturating amount of 130 pM gamma -tubulin bound/microtubule, in a solution that contained 0.2 µM polymerized tubulin and 20 µM Taxol, which should correspond to 10 pM microtubules assuming a stoichiometry of 13 gamma -tubulin/microtubule. The authors measured that the number of microtubules was increased 1.5-fold by 8-10 passages through a 26-gauge needle. Different reports found in the literature about the average length of sheared microtubules using the same technique (23, 42-45) provide numbers in the range of 1-2 µm, the lower range corresponding to Taxol-stabilized microtubules that do not rapidly redistribute in length. If the microtubules in Li and Joshi's (24) experiment were 1.5-fold longer before shearing, they must have been 1.5-3 µm long, which corresponds to a concentration of 80-40 pM. This microtubule concentration would in turn correspond to a stoichiometry of 1.6-3.2 gamma -tubulin bound/microtubule. On the other hand, the estimate coming from measurements of the number of microtubules in the fluorescence microscope corresponds to an average length of 200,000/(1650 × 10) = 12.1 µm before shearing, and 12.1/1.5 = 8 µm after shearing, a value much too high to be compatible with the shearing assay. We conclude that there may have been some artifacts in the fluorescence assay, like the lack of resolution of small microtubules or the lack of appreciation of aggregated microtubules, that may have led to an underestimated value of the concentration of microtubule ends, hence an overestimated value of the stoichiometry of bound gamma -tubulin/microtubule end.

In most cell extracts gamma -tubulin is found in small and large gamma -tubulin complexes, which have nucleating properties. The fact that the intrinsic properties of monomeric gamma -tubulin enable it to act as a nucleator and to block minus end growth with high affinity and at a molar ratio of only one molecule of gamma -tubulin/microtubule suggests that gamma -tubulin in those complexes must interact in the same fashion with the minus end of microtubules. A simple model accounting for our results is presented in Fig. 6. This model incorporates the present findings in classical models proposed for microtubule nucleation from pure tubulin (30, 31). In those models, nucleation of microtubules is driven by the lateral association of alpha beta -tubulin with linear oligomers of tubulin in which the subunits interact longitudinally. The lateral association generates a bidimensional microtubule lattice. The longitudinal and lateral growths of the microtubular sheet are determined by the free energy of longitudinal and lateral interactions. In line with this concept and with the model proposed by Erickson and Stoffler (22), we propose that gamma -tubulin facilitates nucleation by binding laterally to beta -tubulin with a much higher affinity than alpha beta -tubulin itself. As a result, gamma -tubulin initiates the growth of a bidimensional microtubule wall from a linear oligomer of alpha beta -tubulin that contains a lower number of subunits than the one which an alpha beta -tubulin molecule would have a chance to interact with. This feature accounts for the decrease in the nucleation lag time, for the increase in microtubule number and corresponding decrease in average length, for the lower cooperativity in the kinetics of polymerization in the presence of gamma -tubulin, and for the lower GTP hydrolysis during the nucleation phase. The model of lateral association of gamma -tubulin to polymerized beta -tubulin is in good agreement with the conclusions derived from the identification of the peptides of gamma -tubulin interacting with alpha beta -tubulin, which indicate that gamma -tubulin and alpha beta -tubulin associate through lateral interactions (46). A single gamma -tubulin appears able to cap the microtubule minus end, preventing growth from that end. To account for this result, the model proposed here stipulates that whereas the plus end-directed face of gamma -tubulin is able to interact longitudinally with the minus end of an alpha -tubulin subunit along a protofilament, it cannot interact with tubulin at its other end. Further, the strong capping suggests that no lateral association of alpha beta -tubulin can take place with the lateral face of gamma -tubulin opposite the one that interacts strongly with a beta -tubulin, making gamma -tubulin a perfect plug.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Model for microtubule nucleation and minus end capping by monomeric gamma -tubulin. A, nucleation. gamma -Tubulin interacts laterally with a beta -subunit in a linear oligomer of three molecules of alpha beta -tubulin. Minus end growth of the nascent protofilament is not allowed (crossed arrow). B, capping. The minus end of a microtubule exposes alpha -tubulin subunits (47). It is proposed that gamma -tubulin interacts laterally with beta -tubulin located at the end of the (n - 1)th protofilament, by occupying the site of a beta -subunit on the nth protofilament, leaving an empty alpha -tubulin binding site behind. It is hypothesized that in binding to the end of the nth protofilament, gamma -tubulin inhibits the lateral association of alpha beta -tubulin to the end of the (n + 1)th protofilament, thus forming a dead-end complex for minus end growth.

The high affinity of gamma -tubulin for microtubule ends and the absence of measurable interaction in solution between dimeric alpha beta -tubulin and gamma -tubulin is very puzzling. Such a large difference in affinity suggests that the regions of alpha beta -tubulin that are recognized by gamma -tubulin are hidden in dimeric tubulin and exposed upon tubulin assembly. It is also possible that the strong binding of gamma -tubulin to the minus end involves its interaction with two tubulin molecules, a lateral interaction with beta -tubulin and a longitudinal interaction with alpha -tubulin, a situation that can occur with the appropriate geometry at the minus end only.

How do the present results relate to the nucleation of microtubules in vivo by small and large complexes? It is highly likely that one of the gamma -tubulin subunits in the complexes interacts with the minus end in the same way as monomeric gamma -tubulin. The role of the associated proteins GCP2 and GCP3 may be to enhance the nucleating/capping properties by stabilizing the bonds between the gamma -tubulin subunits in the oligomer. Within the template open ring model, the gamma -tubulin at one end of the ring would interact laterally with beta -tubulin, whereas association with the GCPs would enhance the longitudinal interaction between gamma -tubulin and the alpha -subunits at the minus end. Within the protofilament oligomer model, the longitudinal interactions between gamma -tubulin subunits maintained by GCP2 and GCP3 would tighten the lateral association of the gamma -tubulin oligomer to the protofilament. In conclusion, the present work may help understand the structural and thermodynamic implications of the function of gamma -tubulin complexes in vivo.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Gérard Charly for the purification of tubulin, Patrice Moreau for raising the anti-tubulin antibody, and Alain Perret for a gift of purified antibody.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer and the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (33) 01 69 82 34 65; Fax: (33) 01 69 82 31 29; E-mail: carlier@lebs.cnrs-gif.fr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000688200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: gamma -TuRC, gamma -tubulin-ring complex; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; GCP, gamma -tubulin complex protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kellogg, D. R., Moritz, M., and Alberts, B. M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 639-674
2. Oakley, C. E., and Oakley, B. R. (1989) Nature 338, 662-664
3. Joshi, H. C. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 54-62
4. Oakley, B. R., Oakley, C. E., Yoon, Y., and Jung, M. K. (1990) Cell 61, 1289-1301
5. Horio, T., Uzawa, S., Jung, M. K., Oakley, B. R., Tanaka, K., and Yanagida, M. (1991) J. Cell Sci. 99, 693-700
6. Joshi, H. C., Palacios, M. J., McNamara, L., and Cleveland, D. W. (1992) Nature 356, 80-83
7. Felix, M. A., Antony, C., Wright, M., and Maro, B. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 19-31
8. Sobel, S. G., and Snyder, M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 1775-1788
9. Sunkel, C. E., Gomes, R., Sampiano, P., Perdigao, J., and Gonzalez, C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 28-36
10. Ruiz, F., Beisson, J., Rossier, J., and Dupuis-Williams, P. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 43-46
11. Stearns, T., and Kirschner, M. W. (1994) Cell 76, 623-638
12. Zheng, Y., Wong, M. L., Alberts, B. M., and Mitchison, T. J. (1995) Nature 378, 578-583
13. Meads, T., and Schroer, T. A. (1995) Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 32, 273-288
14. Detraves, C., Mazarguil, H., Lajoie-Mazenc, I., Julian, M., Raynaud-Messina, B., and Wright, M. (1997) Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 36, 179-189
15. Jeng, R., and Stearns, T. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 9, 339-342
16. Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M. B., Sedat, J. W., Alberts, B. M., and Agard, D. A. (1995) Nature 378, 638-640
17. Moritz, M., Zheng, Y., Alberts, B. M., and Oegema, K. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 1-12
18. Oegema, K., Wiese, C., Martin, O. C., Milligan, R. A., Iwamatsu, A., Mitchison, T. J., and Zheng, Y. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 721-733
19. Murphy, S. M., Urbani, L., and Stearns, T. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 663-674
20. Knop, M., Pereira, G., Giessler, S., Grein, K., and Schiebel, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1550-1564
21. Knop, M., and Schiebel, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6985-6995
22. Erickson, H. P., and Stoffler, D. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 5-8
23. Melki, R., Vainberg, I., Chow, R., and Cowan, N. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 1301-1310
24. Li, Q., and Joshi, H. C. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 207-214
25. Carlier, M.-F., Didry, D., and Pantaloni, D. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 418-427
26. Carlier, M.-F., Hill, T. L., and Chen, Y. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 771-775
27. Best, D., Warr, P. J., and Gull, K. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 114, 281-284
28. Bryan, J., and Wilson, L. (1971) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68, 1762-1766
29. Clayton, L., Quinlan, R. A., Roobol, A., Pogson, C. I., and Gull, K. (1980) FEBS Lett. 115, 301-305
30. Erickson, H. P., and Pantaloni, D. (1981) Biophys. J. 34, 293-309
31. Voter, W. A., and Erickson, H. P. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 10430-10438
32. Kuchnir-Fygenson, D., Flyvbjerg, H., Sneppen, K., Libchaber, A., and Leibler, S. (1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 5058-5063
33. Flyvbjerg, H., Jobs, E., and Leibler, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5975-5979
34. Oosawa, F., and Asakura, S. (1975) Thermodynamics of the Polymerization of Protein , pp. 41-55, Academic Press, New York
35. Bergen, L. G., and Borisy, G. G. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 84, 141-150
36. Margolis, R. L., and Wilson, L. (1978) Cell 13, 1-8
37. Rodionov, V. I., and Borisy, G. G. (1998) Science 275, 215-218
38. Mitchison, T. J., and Kirschner, M. W. (1984) Nature 312, 232-237
39. Horio, T., and Hotani, H. (1986) Nature 321, 605-607
40. Howard, W. D., and Timasheff, S. N. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 8292-8300
41. Vassilev, A., Kimble, M., Silflow, C. D., LaVoie, M., and Kuriyama, R. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 1083-1092
42. Farrell, K. W., Jordan, M. A., Miller, H. P., and Wilson, L. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 104, 1035-1046
43. Keates, R. A., and Hallett, F. R. (1988) Science 241, 1642-1645
44. Williams, R. C., Jr., and Rone, L. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1663-1670
45. Yamauchi, P. S., Flynn, G. C., Marsh, R. L., and Purich, D. L. (1993) J. Neurochem. 60, 817-826
46. Llanos, R., Chevrier, V., Ronjat, M., Meurer-Grob, P., Martinez, P., Frank, R., Bornens, M., Wade, R. H., Wehland, J., and Job, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15712-15720
47. Mitchison, T. J. (1993) Science 261, 1044-1047


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. M. Kollman, A. Zelter, E. G.D. Muller, B. Fox, L. M. Rice, T. N. Davis, and D. A. Agard
The Structure of the {gamma}-Tubulin Small Complex: Implications of Its Architecture and Flexibility for Microtubule Nucleation
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. Sulimenko, E. Draberova, T. Sulimenko, L. Macurek, V. Richterova, P. Draber, and P. Draber
Regulation of Microtubule Formation in Activated Mast Cells by Complexes of {gamma}-Tubulin with Fyn and Syk Kinases.
J. Immunol., June 15, 2006; 176(12): 7243 - 7253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. Colombie, C. Verollet, P. Sampaio, A. Moisand, C. Sunkel, H.-M. Bourbon, M. Wright, and B. Raynaud-Messina
The Drosophila {gamma}-Tubulin Small Complex Subunit Dgrip84 Is Required for Structural and Functional Integrity of the Spindle Apparatus
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 272 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
P. Mussali-Galante, V. Rodriguez-Lara, B. Hernandez-Tellez, M. R. Avila-Costa, L. Colin-Barenque, P. Bizarro-Nevarez, G. Martinez-Levy, M. Rojas-Lemus, G. Pinon-Zarate, L. Saldivar-Osorio, et al.
Inhaled vanadium pentoxide decrease gamma-tubulin of mouse testes at different exposure times
Toxicology and Industrial Health, August 1, 2005; 21(7-8): 215 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
B. Raynaud-Messina, L. Mazzolini, A. Moisand, A.-M. Cirinesi, and M. Wright
Elongation of centriolar microtubule triplets contributes to the formation of the mitotic spindle in {gamma}-tubulin-depleted cells
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2004; 117(23): 5497 - 5507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
V. Malikov, A. Kashina, and V. Rodionov
Cytoplasmic Dynein Nucleates Microtubules to Organize Them into Radial Arrays In Vivo
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2742 - 2749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. L. Fleming, P. R. Shank, and K. Boekelheide
{gamma}-Tubulin Overexpression in Sertoli Cells In Vivo. II: Retention of Spermatids, Residual Bodies, and Germ Cell Apoptosis
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 322 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
R. N. Gunawardane, O. C. Martin, and Y. Zheng
Characterization of a New gamma TuRC Subunit with WD Repeats
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2003; 14(3): 1017 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Straube, M. Brill, B. R. Oakley, T. Horio, and G. Steinberg
Microtubule Organization Requires Cell Cycle-dependent Nucleation at Dispersed Cytoplasmic Sites: Polar and Perinuclear Microtubule Organizing Centers in the Plant Pathogen Ustilago maydis
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2003; 14(2): 642 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]