![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 21981-21987, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of ¶ Medicine/Endocrinology,
Received for publication, February 7, 2000, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
Glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase
(GFAT) is the rate-limiting enzyme in glucosamine synthesis. Prior
studies from our laboratory indicated that activation of adenylate
cyclase was associated with depletion of O-GlcNAc
modification. This finding and evidence that human GFAT (hGFAT) might
be regulated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) led us
to investigate the role of PKA in hGFAT function. We confirmed that
adenylate cyclase activation by forskolin results in diminished
O-GlcNAc modification of several cellular proteins which
can be overcome by exposure of the cells to glucosamine but not
glucose, suggesting the PKA activation results in depletion of
UDP-GlcNAc for O-glycosylation. To determine if GFAT is
indeed regulated by PKA, we expressed the active form of the enzyme
using a vaccinia virus expression system and showed that the activity
of the enzyme was to decrease to undetectable levels by PKA
phosphorylation. We mapped the PKA phosphorylation sites with the aid
of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectroscopy and
showed that the protein was stoichiometrically phosphorylated at serine
205 and also phosphorylated, to a lesser extent at serine 235. Mutagenesis studies indicated that the phosphorylation of serine 205 by
PKA was necessary for the observed inhibition of enzyme activity while
serine 235 phosphorylation played no observable role. The activity of
GFAT is down-regulated by cAMP, thus placing regulation on the
hexosamine pathway that is in concert with the energy requirements of
the organism. During starvation, hormones acting through adenylate
cyclase could direct the flux of glucose metabolism into energy
production rather than into synthetic pathways that require hexosamines.
For single cell organisms, the concentration of extracellular
nutrients depends on the environment while multicellular organisms normally maintain the concentration of these nutrients at relatively constant level. In vertebrates, the extracellular glucose concentration is tightly maintained despite changes in the availability of dietary carbohydrates. This homeostasis is accomplished by appropriate hormone
signaling that directs glucose into energy yielding pathways during
starvation versus synthetic and storage pathways in the fed
state. Insulin is the major hormone that coordinates the utilization of
glucose for synthetic and storage functions in the fed state while a
variety of other hormones are secreted in response to stress and
starvation to coordinate the utilization of glucose for energy
production. A key intermediary metabolite of glucose is fructose
6-phosphate (Fru-6-P).1
Fru-6-P metabolism is tightly regulated allosterically and by hormones
to be in concert with the nutritional status of the intact organism.
Fru-6-P can be metabolized through glycolysis to create ATP and/or it
can be metabolized to glucosamine for use in glycoprotein synthesis by
the enzyme GFAT (1). Furthermore, in liver and kidney, Fru-6-P can be
utilized for gluconeogenesis. Thus, this substrate plays a pivotal role
in the flux of glucose into energy yielding pathways or into synthetic
and storage pathways. In hormone responsive tissues, starvation or
stress is signaled by glucagon and epinephrine, and in both cases,
these hormones are coupled to the accumulation of cyclic AMP (cAMP).
The impact of cAMP accumulation in the liver on Fru-6-P metabolism is
to direct the flux of Fru-6-P into gluconeogenesis (2) while in the
heart, cAMP accumulation through epinephrine stimulation results in the
flux of Fru-6-P into glycolysis (3). Thus, the net effect of starvation
or stress is for the liver to release glucose to provide for the energy
requirements of muscle and heart. From this consideration, it would be
reasonable to predict that part of this concerted control on Fru-6-P
utilization during starvation or stress would be the cessation of
Fru-6-P flux into glucosamine synthesis and hence into glycoprotein synthesis.
Previously, we reported that glucose starvation combined adenylate
cyclase activation by forskolin treatment of NRK fibroblasts resulted
in the depletion of the transcription factor Sp1 by a process that
involves proteasomes (4, 5). Under normal circumstances, Sp1 (4, 6, 7)
and several other transcription factors (8-11) and nuclear proteins
(12) are modified by the covalent O-linkage of the
monosaccharide N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) to
serine or threonine residues in the protein backbone. However, under
these conditions of adenylate cyclase activation and glucose starvation, Sp1 and several other proteins were observed to undergo nearly complete removal of the O-GlcNAc modification (4).
Conversely, exposure of cells to glucose or glucosamine resulted in an
increase in the modification of proteins by O-GlcNAc (4,
13). We postulated that the O-GlcNAc state of Sp1 or other
proteins controlled the degradation of this transcription factor by the
proteasome (4, 5). Since Sp1 is critically important for the
transcription of TATA-less housekeeping genes (14), this loss of Sp1
would result in the down-regulation of those genes that encode the bulk of cellular proteins under conditions of nutrient deprivation or stress
(cAMP). A role for the O-GlcNAc modification in the control
of protein synthesis at the translational level has also been suggested
by the studies of elongation factor 2 (15-17). Together, these studies
suggest that the O-GlcNAc state of certain intracellular proteins may coordinate the level of macromolecular synthesis in the
cell in a manner that reflects the nutritional status.
The studies described in this article resulted from our attempt to
understand how the O-GlcNAc status of Sp1 and other proteins could be modified by exposure of cells to the adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin. Either this treatment resulted in a decreased rate of modification or an increased rate of O-GlcNAc
removal from these proteins. Since we had shown that
O-GlcNAc modification is a substrate driven in certain cell
types (13, 18, 19), we focused our attention on the enzyme that
controls the synthesis of glucosamine, GFAT. Analysis of the predicted
amino acid sequence of GFAT indicated the presence of two potential
cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) phosphorylation sites
(20). While recently evidence has suggested that PKA phosphorylation of
liver-derived rat GFAT activates this enzyme (20), we showed that PKA
phosphorylation of recombinant hGFAT shut down enzymatic activity,
thereby reducing the availability of substrate for O-GlcNAc
modification. This notion would fit with the idea that stress and
starvation should cause the flux of glucose carbons into energy
yielding pathways rather than synthetic pathways. Our results are
compatible with GFAT playing a regulatory role in glycoprotein
synthesis that is in concert with the metabolic signals that regulate
Fru-6-P utilization.
Materials--
Protein kinase A catalytic subunit,
5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd), L-glutamine, glutamic
acid, 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, mycophenolic acid,
thrombin, and trifluoroacetic acid were purchased from Sigma.
[ Cell Culture--
BSC40 cells and NRK cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum (Life
Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), 100 µg of penicillin/ml, and
50 µg of gentamicin/ml at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with
7.5% CO2.
Western Blot Detection of Intracellular O-GlcNAc-modified
Proteins--
Cultured NRK cells at 70% confluency in 10-cm culture
dishes were incubated in glucose-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium with 10% fetal calf serum for 24 h. The next morning, the
cells were pretreated with/without forskolin (100 µM) for
1 h followed by different concentrations of glucose or glucosamine
treatment for additional 5 h. The cells were then washed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline, scraped down, and lysed by freeze-thaw
cycles in cold high-salt lysis buffer containing 20 mM
HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 20% glycerol. The protein
supernatant was collected after centrifugation and the protein
concentration was determined by a colorimetric protein assay (Bio-Rad
Dc). The extracts containing equal amounts of protein were
subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by transfer onto a nitrocellulose
membrane. The O-GlcNAc signal was detected by a monoclonal
RL2 antibody (4, 13, 18, 19, 21) using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence
System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Cloning and Expression of Recombinant Human GST-GFAT
Construct--
Parental human GFAT (hGFAT) cDNA was kindly
provided by Dr. G. McKnight in the Bluescript plasmid (22). For cloning
into the pTM3 expression construct, the 5,152-base pair region of hGFAT cDNA was amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide primers with the following sequences: 5'-CATGAATTCTGTGGTATATTTGCTTAC-3' and
5'-CATGGATCCGGCTTCCCAATCTTTATC-3'. The PCR product was ligated into a
the pT7T3 plasmid between EcoRI and BamHI. The
cloned PCR product was sequenced to confirm fidelity of the PCR
amplication and then it was digested with BsmBI, which is
unique and intrinsic to the GFAT sequence, and EcoRI. This fragment was ligated into the 5' region of GFAT, thereby placing the
EcoRI site immediately 5' to the coding sequence. The 5' 900 base pairs of the hGFAT cDNA between the EcoRI site and
an intrinsic PstI site was cloned into the pTM3-GST plasmid
(5) placing the GFAT open reading frame in-frame with GST. The
remainder of the GFAT coding sequence was excised from the GFAT
cDNA with PstI and SalI and ligated
downstream of the 900-base pair fragment of GFAT that had already been
cloned into GST-pTM3. This yielded a construct that encodes the
full-length GFAT as a fusion protein with GST. The procedures for
generation of recombinant GST-hGFAT vaccinia virus were as described
(4, 5, 23) using both mycophenolic acid and BrdUrd selections. The
vaccinia virus system was a kind gift from Dr. B. Moss.
Enzyme Assay of hGFAT--
hGFAT was expressed as a fusion
protein with GST in BSC40 cells using the viral expression system.
24 h after infection, the cells were lysed in high-salt lysis
buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 0.5 M
NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol by three cycles of
freeze-thaw. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation and
purified by incubation with a 50% slurry of glutathione-Sepharose
beads at 4 °C for 30 min. The beads (100 µl) were washed with cold
enzyme assay buffer containing 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mM CaCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and
10% glycerol. The fusion protein was eluted from the bead with 10 mM reduced glutathione and the concentration of the protein
was determined by both standard protein assay (Bio-Rad Dc)
and SDS-PAGE. The enzyme activity was determined by a
spectrophotometric method as described (22, 24). Essentially, in a
standard 1-ml assay, the purified GST-GFAT fusion protein (1 µg)
bound to the glutathione-Sepharose beads was incubated with 10 mM glutamine, 10 mM fructose 6-phosphate, 0.5 mM 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, and 20 units of glutamate dehydrogenase in enzyme assay buffer at 37 °C for 1 h. The supernatant was collected after incubation and absorbance at 365 nm was determined. A blank calibration control consisted of the entire
reaction mixture with GST alone bound to the beads.
Phosphorylation of hGFAT--
The purified GST-hGFAT fusion
protein (1 µg) was phosphorylated in vitro while bound on
glutathione-Sepharose beads by the catalytic subunit of
cAMP-dependent PKA in phosphorylation buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), [ Mutagenesis Study of hGFAT--
The two potential PKA
phosphorylation sites (Ser205, Ser235) were
mutated to alanine by PCR, one site at a time or in combination of the
two sites. The enzyme activity and phosphorylation assays were
performed as described above.
Cloning of the Escherichia coli GFAT Isoform--
DH5 RP-HPLC Separation of Radiolabeled hGFAT Tryptic
Digests--
Purified wild type GST-hGFAT fusion protein (20 µg)
bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads was phosphorylated using
[ MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry to Identify Phosphorylated GFAT
Peptides--
The HPLC fractions containing the
32P-labeled peptides were vacuum dried, solubilized in 5%
trifluoroacetic acid in water and the mass of the peptides in the
fraction was determined by MALDI-TOF as described previously (5, 7,
25). The instrument was calibrated with Neurotensin and Substance P. An
unphosphorylated GST-GFAT tryptic digest and trypsin blank were also
run as controls.
Forskolin Stimulation of NRK Cells Results in Reduced O-GlcNAc
Modification of Intracellular Proteins--
Previously, we showed that
glucose starvation and forskolin stimulation of NRK cells results in
reduced modification of Sp1 and other intracellular proteins by
O-GlcNAc (4). To determine whether this response results
from depletion of substrate for the enzyme O-GlcNAc
transferase, the cells were starved of glucose, then pretreated with or
without forskolin prior to exposure to glucose or glucosamine (Fig.
1). The level of protein modification by
O-GlcNAc was then determined on extracts from these cells
using Western blotting with the monoclonal antibody, RL2. In prior
studies, we have shown that the binding of RL2 to proteins on Western
blots can be blocked by preadsorption of the antibody with GlcNAc but not with GlcN or other acetylated hexosamines (13, 19, 26). Under
glucose starvation conditions, multiple protein bands were detected
with RL2 and these bands became more intense when the cells were
treated with 5 or 25 mM glucose. The bands became still more intense if the cells were treated with 5 mM
glucosamine. However, when the cells were pretreated with forskolin for
1 h prior to the exposure to the sugars, the RL2 signal in the
glucose-starved cells and in the glucose-treated cells became
undetectable while glucosamine treatment of the cells was able to
restore the RL2 signal. The Western blot was stripped and reprobed with
an anti-STAT3 antibody to control for protein loading. Only small
fluctuations in the STAT3 signal were evident. This result agrees with
our earlier observations (4) and is compatible with the notion that
forskolin treatment of the cells blocks the activity of GFAT, thereby
depriving O-GlcNAc transferase of substrate for protein modification and a reduction of modification on the O-GlcNAc
proteins. This substrate restriction can be overcome in
forskolin-treated cells by the provision of glucosamine in the
extracellular medium.
PKA Treatment Induces a Loss of hGFAT Activity in Vitro--
To
directly test the effect of PKA phosphorylation on hGFAT, we expressed
and purified recombinant hGFAT and exposed the enzyme to the catalytic
subunit of PKA. To express hGFAT, we developed a recombinant vaccinia
virus that encodes hGFAT as a fusion protein with GST. The GST-hGFAT
was expressed in BSC40 cells infected with the recombinant vaccinia
virus and the fusion protein was purified to near homogeneity on a
glutathione affinity column (see below). To determine if it was
necessary to cleave hGFAT from the GST tag, we compared the activity of
GST-hGFAT bound to the glutathione affinity beads with the activity of
hGFAT cleaved from the GST with thrombin. The GFAT activity of the
fusion protein bound to the beads was the same as the activity of the
enzyme cleaved from the GST (and the beads) with thrombin (data not
shown). Therefore, the phosphorylation studies on GFAT could be
performed directly on the purified and bound GST-hGFAT. This approach
gave certain advantages. Because the phosphorylation step was performed on the GST-hGFAT bound to the affinity column, the subsequent removal
of the catalytic subunit of PKA and a buffer exchange for the optimal
measurement of GFAT activity was simplified. Treatment of 10 pmol (1 µg) of GST-hGFAT fusion protein with various doses of PKA in this
manner resulted in a dose-dependent loss of GFAT activity
from the fusion protein (Fig.
2A) and a corresponding dose-dependent increase in the phosphorylation of GST-GFAT
(Fig. 2B). The half-maximal effect of PKA on GFAT activity
occurred at a dose of approximately 50 units (1 unit of PKA transfers 1 pmol of phosphate/min) and at 150 units, no residual GFAT activity could be measured. Correspondingly, incorporation of
[32P]phosphate into GFAT was dose-dependent
with half-maximal phosphorylation occurring at a dose of approximately
50 units of PKA (Fig. 2B). A similar inhibition of GFAT
activity was observed when the enzyme activity was measured following
cleavage of the GFAT by thrombin to remove GST (data not shown). The
phosphorylation and activity studies were performed on equal quantities
of GST-GFAT protein (Fig. 2C). Since the GFAT activity assay
was performed after the removal of ATP and PKA by washing the
glutathione affinity beads, the possibilities of an allosteric effect
of ATP or a phosphorylation effect on the read out enzyme for the GFAT
activity assay, glutamate dehydrogenase, was made much less
likely.
To further control for potential interference of the PKA
phosphorylation reagents with the GFAT enzyme assay, we performed similar studies on recombinant GFAT cloned from E. coli. The
E. coli GFAT shows roughly 35% sequence homology with the
mammalian homolog and is not feedback inhibited by UDP-GlcNAc (25).
E. coli GFAT also contains a potential PKA phosphorylation
motif (serine 342), but this serine residue is in a region of the
E. coli GFAT that is not conserved in mammalian GFAT. The
E. coli GFAT cDNA was expressed as a fusion protein with
GST using the same viral expression system. Functional studies showed
that this cloned E. coli GFAT fusion protein was
enzymatically active. Exposure of 10 pmol of E. coli GFAT to
the same dose range of PKA resulted in no significant effect on the
activity of the bacterial enzyme (Fig. 2A). This result
suggested that the sensitivity of hGFAT to PKA treatment results from
specific structural determinants in the human enzyme and not from an
effect of PKA on the GFAT enzyme assay system.
RP-HPLC Separation of Phosphorylated hGFAT Tryptic
Peptides--
Examination of the sequence of hGFAT reveals two
potential PKA phosphorylation sites (20) at serine 205 and serine 235. To determine the actual sites of phosphorylation, we conducted a
phosphopeptide mapping study of hGFAT. To this end, purified GST-GFAT
fusion protein was labeled sequentially with [
The mass spectroscopic analysis of the minor phosphorylation peak with
retention time of 20 min displayed multiple peptides, most of which
could be identified as unphosphorylated peptides derived from
GST-hGFAT. One peptide had a mass of 815.70. This mass corresponds to
the predicted tryptic peptide containing serine 235 in a phosphorylated
state. Analysis of the unfractionated tryptic peptides from
unphosphorylated GST-hGFAT did not yield a peptide with a mass of 815. However, we were not able to detect a peptide with a mass of 734 corresponding to the unphosphorylated serine 235 tryptic peptide.
Failure to detect this peptide makes it impossible to assess the
stoichiometry of phosphorylation of this site. However, the fact that
the HPLC fraction containing this peptide contained less radioactivity
than the fraction containing the serine 205 peptide suggests that the
serine 235 site is less efficiently phosphorylated by PKA. The serine
235 site resides in a KKGS motif whereas the serine 205 site resides in
the preferred RRGS PKA phosphorylation motif (27). No other GST-hGFAT
peptide was observed to undergo a mass transition that would correspond to phosphorylation. The radioactive peak that eluted early from the
HPLC separation of the tryptic peptides was likely a salt peak in that
it did not contain peptides derived from GST-hGFAT.
The S205A Mutant hGFAT Abolished the Sensitivity to PKA
Treatment--
To determine the functional significance of these PKA
phosphorylation sites in hGFAT, the sites were mutated. Three mutant forms of hGFAT were generated in which the two serines (205 and 235) in
the PKA recognition sites were mutated to alanine, one at time or in
combination. These GST-hGFAT mutants were expressed using the same
viral expression vectors, and purified to near homogeneity by
glutathione affinity chromatography (Fig.
5). Functional studies showed that the
three mutant forms of hGFAT protein exhibited the same specific enzyme
activity as the wild-type form. However, in vitro PKA
treatment of both single serine 205 and double serine 205 + serine 235 mutants resulted in no significant effect on the GFAT activity (Fig.
6A). However, similar to wild
type GFAT, the single serine 235 mutant exhibited the loss of enzyme
activity following PKA treatment (Fig. 6A). Consistent with
the functional study, the double serine 205 + serine 235 mutant showed
no phosphate incorporation when treated with PKA (Fig. 6B),
indicating that the mutagenesis eliminated all potential
phosphorylation sites in the GST-hGFAT protein. This mutagenesis study
indicates that the phosphorylation of serine 205 by PKA is necessary
for the observed inhibition of GFAT activity. Since inhibition of GFAT activity by PKA phosphorylation does not occur in the serine 205 mutant, then other potential phosphorylation sites do not play a role
in this control of enzyme activity. In particular, while serine 235 may
also be phosphorylated by PKA, this phosphorylation has no significant
effect on the activity of the enzyme when measured in
vitro.
In our studies of the transcription factor, Sp1, we showed that
activation of PKA by forskolin resulted in a marked decrease in the
glycosylation of Sp1 and other proteins (4). Since the O-GlcNAc modification may involve the same serine or
threonine residues that can be phosphorylated, the notion has been
raised that glycosylation and phosphorylation may occur as reciprocal events (8). Indeed, in some systems, this reciprocal relationship seems
to hold because the modification sites map to the same residue in the
proteins (28, 29). In addition to the Sp1 example cited here, a recent
study on cerebellar neurons also demonstrated that an activation of PKA
was coupled to a reduction of the O-GlcNAc level in
cytoskeletal proteins (30). However, when cells were exposed to a
selective inhibitor of the
O-GlcNAc- Our finding that GFAT activity is inhibited by PKA-mediated
phosphorylation differs from the report of Zhou et al. (20) who showed that the activity of rat GFAT is stimulated by
phosphorylation. There are several possible explanations for this
discrepancy. First, we used a different assay method to measure GFAT
activity (22) as compared with that of a previous report (20). Our findings with the E. coli GFAT using the same coupled assay
system that showed that the E. coli enzyme is not regulated
by PKA rules out an artifact related to the assay system we used for
our studies. Second, in our mapping study, we showed that hGFAT
phosphorylation by PKA elicited a full mass transition from the
unphosphorylated RRGS205 peptide that contained the
regulatory PKA recognition site to the phosphorylated form. Although
the previous report did show that rat liver GFAT also could be
phosphorylated in vitro, there was a lack of data to show
the phosphorylation stoichiometry. Third, in the previous report, the
authors used rat liver as source for purification of GFAT protein while
our study used recombinant hGFAT. While the mouse GFAT protein is
98.6% homologous to hGFAT (32, 33) and also contains identical
phosphorylation sites at the same positions, it remains possible that
the GFAT isolated from the rat liver differs for the hGFAT studied by
us. Recently, a GFAT isozyme (termed GFAT2) has been identified that is
the product of distinct gene (34). While this isoform is homologous to
the GFAT enzyme we studied, it remains possible that the enzyme purified by Zhou et al. (20) from liver is this isoform or a mixture of the isoforms and that this other isozyme is regulated differently by PKA. Interestingly, GFAT2, with a predicted mass identical to hGFAT, also contains an RRGS motif at a homologous position to serine 205 (serine 202 in GFAT2) but does not contain a
KKGS motif at or near the 235 position. Thus, PKA regulation, either up
or down, is possible for GFAT2. The use in this study of a defined
recombinant form of hGFAT eliminates the ambiguity that might be caused
by the study of a less defined protein.
There is accumulating evidence that the flux of glucose into the
hexosamine pathway may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes. It
has been suggested that the toxicity of glucose and streptozotocin to
pancreatic *
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grant DK55262 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001049200
The abbreviations used are:
Fru-6-P, fructose
6-phosphate;
GFAT, glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase;
O-GlcNAc, O-linked
N-acetylglucosamine;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization-time of flight;
NRK, normal rat kidney;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
PKA, protein kinase A;
RP-HPLC, reverse phase-high
performance liquid chromatography;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
BrdUrd, 5-bromodeoxyuridine.
Phosphorylation of Human Glutamine:Fructose-6-phosphate
Amidotransferase by cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase at
Serine 205 Blocks the Enzyme Activity*
,
,
,
¶
Cell Biology, and § Biochemistry and Molecular
Genetics, The University of Alabama,
Birmingham, Alabama 35294
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP was purchased from NEN Life Science Products
Inc. Glutamate dehydrogenase, sequencing grade trypsin, fructose
6-phosphate, and ATP were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Glutathione-Sepharose 4B was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
RP-HPLC column was purchased from VYDAC.
-32P]ATP (10 µCi),
100 µM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol at 30 °C for 20 min. After the
phosphorylation reaction, the beads were washed with enzyme assay
buffer. An aliquot of beads was removed and the bound protein was
separated by SDS-PAGE. The gel was fixed and stained with Coomassie
Blue and the level of phosphorylation was determined by
autoradiography. The remainder of the beads was assayed for GFAT
enzymatic activity as described above. An unphosphorylated GST-hGFAT
control was treated identically in the phosphorylation buffer without
PKA but in the presence of ATP.
cell (5 µg) DNA was used as a template for PCR amplicification of the
E. coli GFAT. Two oligonucleotide primers, designed based on
the sequence of the E. coli GFAT gene (Genebank
accession numbers: AE000450 and U00096)
(5'-CATTCTAGAATGTGTGGAATTGTTGGC and
5'-CATAGGCCTTTACTCAACCGTAACCGATTTTGC) were used to amplify the
E. coli GFAT gene (1.8 kilobase). The PCR product
was purified and cloned into Bluescript between XbaI and
StuI and the insert sequence was confirmed by restriction
digestion and automated sequencing. For expression of the E. coli enzyme, the gene was cloned into the GST-pTM3 construct
between SpeI and SalI and expressed as a GST
fusion protein following generation of recombinant E. coli
GFAT vaccinia virus. The assay of E. coli GFAT enzymatic activity was performed exactly as described for the hGFAT.
-32P]ATP (ATP concentration of 0.1 µM,
specific activity: 3000 Ci/mmol) and 100 units of PKA catalytic subunit
at 30 °C for 15 min. An equal aliquot of PKA and 10 mM
cold ATP was added to the labeling reaction and incubation was
continued for another 15 min to ensure stoichiometric phosphorylation.
The beads were washed two times with washing buffer containing 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) and 150 mM NaCl, one time
with buffer containing only 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0). The
bound and labeled GST-hGFAT fusion protein was eluted from the
glutathione beads with 10 mM reduced glutathione in the 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) buffer at room temperature for 20 min. The protein solution was concentrated by a size exclusion filter (Microcon), after which the GST-hGFAT fusion protein was digested with
sequencing grade trypsin in the 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0)
buffer at an enzyme/protein ratio of 1:10 at room temperature
overnight. The GST-hGFAT tryptic peptides were separated by RP-HPLC on
a Microsorb-MV C18 column (Rainin, Woburn, MA). Elution of the column was with a linear increasing concentration (5-75%) of acetonitrile in
water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The radioactivity in an equal aliquot from each collected
fraction was determined using a scintillation counter.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
RL2 Western blot of protein extracted from
NRK cells treated as indicated with glucose, glucosamine, and
forskolin. Near confluent NRK cells were glucose starved for
24 h, after which the cells were stimulated with/without 100 µM forskolin for 1 h before the addition of
different concentrations of glucose or glucosamine as indicated. After
6 h, the cellular protein extracted in high salt lysis buffer was
separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted with RL2 monoclonal antibody
(top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with
STAT3 monoclonal antibody to confirm equal protein loading (lower
panel).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of PKA on the activity of hGFAT and
E. coli GFAT fusion proteins. Affinity purified
GST-E. coli GFAT (
) and GST-hGFAT (
) fusion proteins
were phosphorylated while bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads with
increasing doses of PKA catalytic subunit. A, enzymatic
activity of GFAT fusion proteins after exposure to increasing doses of
PKA catalytic subunit in the presence of [
-32P]ATP.
The enzymatic activity is proportional to the absorbance of the
reaction mixture at 365 nm. Each data point represents the mean value
of enzyme activity from three independent experiments. B, an
aliquot of the phosphorylated GST-hGFAT fusion protein exposed to the
various doses of PKA was run on an SDS-PAGE gel and the level of
phosphorylation was determined by autoradiography. The only major
32P-labeled protein corresponded in size to GST-hGFAT (106 kDa). C, Coomassie Blue staining of the
32P-labeled GST-hGFAT fusion protein shown in B.
The first lane on the left shows the 97-kDa
molecular mass marker.
-32P]ATP
then with cold ATP catalyzed in each case by 100 units of PKA to ensure
stoichiometic phosphorylation of the protein. The protein was then
cleaved with sequence grade trypsin and the resulting peptides were
separated by HPLC. Fig. 3A
shows the UV absorbance at 214 nm of the eluted peptides while the
lower panel shows the profile of radiolabeled peptide. Two
major peaks of radioactivity with retention times of 5-10 and 25-29
min and one lesser peak of radioactivity with a retention time of
20-21 min were eluted. Based on the number of basic amino acids in the
hGFAT sequence, 80 tryptic peptides can be generated from hGFAT. The
predicted tryptic peptides containing the PKA phosphorylation motifs
with serine 205 and serine 235 have unmodified molecular masses of 911.11 and 734.80 Da, respectively, and phosphorylation would add 80 mass units to these peptides. Tryptic peptides of GST would not have
such molecular weights and there are no potential PKA phosphorylation
sites in GST. To identify the phosphorylated peptides, the radioactive
fractions were subjected to analysis using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
(Fig. 4). The radioactive peak with the
25-29 min HPLC retention time contained a peptide with a molecular
mass of 991.86 (Fig. 4A). This mass corresponds to the
predicted mass of the peptide containing serine 205 in a phosphorylated
state. The other peptides detected by mass spectroscopy correspond in mass to unphosphorylated tryptic peptides from hGFAT. When
unphosphorylated GST-hGFAT was digested by trypsin and the entire
tryptic digest was subjected to mass spectroscopic analysis, we
identified a tryptic fragment with a molecular mass of 911 but no
fragment with a mass of 991 (data not shown). These results suggest
that the serine 205 site was stoichiometrically phosphorylated by PKA thereby resulting in the quantitative transition of the serine 205-containing peptide from a mass of 911 to a phosphorylated form of
991.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
RP-HPLC separation of trypsin-digested
GST-hGFAT phosphopeptides. GST-hGFAT fusion protein was expressed
using vaccinia virus in BSC40 cells and affinity purified on
glutathione-Sepharose beads. 20 µg of the protein was phosphorylated
by PKA in the presence of [
-32P]ATP followed by
unlabeled ATP to ensure stoichiometric phosphorylation. After labeling,
the protein was eluted from the Sepharose beads and digested to
completion by sequence grade trypsin. The tryptic peptides were then
separated by RP-HPLC. A, UV absorbance profile at 214 nm of
the peptides eluted using a linear acetonitrile gradient. B,
an aliquot of each collected fraction was subjected to scintillation
counting. The graph shows the 32P counts in the eluted
peptide fractions. Fractions with highest radioactivity were selected
for mass spectrometric identification.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MALDI-TOF identification of phosphorylated
hGFAT tryptic peptides. RP-HPLC separated 32P-labeled
GFAT peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The tryptic
GFAT peptides containing phosphorylated serine 205 and serine 235 have
a net mass of 991.86 Da (panel A) and 815.70 Da (panel
B), respectively. The peptides identified with these masses are
indicated with an asterisk. The insets indicate
the sequence of the individual tryptic peptides of hGFAT that contain
the potential PKA serine phosphorylation sites and the calculated
unmodified molecular weight of these peptides. Phosphorylation
contributes 80 Da to the mass. The other mass spectrometric peaks
represent tryptic GST peptides (1009.85 Da, 1031.85 Da), GFAT peptide
(763.61 Da), and other unidentified peptides.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
GST-GFAT fusion proteins. Vaccinia
expressed GST-GFAT fusion proteins, either wild-type or with mutations,
were purified by glutathione affinity chromatography, then analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue: lane 1,
GST-E. coli GFAT; lane 2, wild type GST-hGFAT;
lane 3, GST-hGFAT with a serine 205 to alanine mutation;
lane 4, GST-hGFAT with a serine 235 to alanine mutation;
lane 5, GST-hGFAT with alanine mutations at both serine 205 and serine 235. The molecular weight standards are shown on the
left side of the figure.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The effect of PKA on the activity of hGFAT
with the indicated serine to alanine mutations. Equal quantities
of affinity purified wild-type and mutant forms of GST-hGFAT fusion
proteins, bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads, were phosphorylated
in vitro with increasing doses of the PKA catalytic subunit.
A, changes of enzymatic activity of wild-type
versus mutant hGFAT after phosphorylation with increasing
doses of PKA subunit. Each data point represents the mean value of
enzyme activity from three independent experiments. Wild-type hGFAT,
; Ser205 mutant, ×; Ser235 mutant,
;
Ser205 + Ser235 double mutant,
.
B, wild-type (WT) and the Ser205 + Ser235 double mutant hGFAT (DM) were
phosphorylated in vitro with 150 units of PKA catalytic
subunit in the presence of [
-32P]ATP. The
32P incorporation into the 106-kDa GST-hGFAT band was
detected by autoradiography.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-N-acetylglucosaminidase (O-GlcNAcase) only a slightly reduced phosphorylation level
of Sp1 was observed (31) despite the accumulation of
O-GlcNAc on the transcription factor. Furthermore, the
generalized loss of the O-GlcNAc signal in many proteins in
response to PKA activation, while not ruling out the idea that there
may be sites that can switch between phosphorylation and glycosylation,
and the observation that the level of O-GlcNAc modification
of many intracellular proteins can be affected by substrate
availability prompted us to explore another hypothesis, that PKA
activation may limit UDP-GlcNAc availability for protein modification
through an action on GFAT, the rate-limiting step in glucosamine
synthesis. GFAT has been noted to contain potential PKA phosphorylation
sites (20), raising the possibility that phosphorylation of the protein
could alter the enzyme activity. To test this idea, we expressed and
purified hGFAT using a vaccinia virus expression system that allowed
the recovery of active enzyme. This mammalian expression system also allowed us to place mutations into the protein. Our studies showed that
hGFAT was indeed phosphorylated by the catalytic subunit of PKA.
Mapping studies indicated that the RRGS205 motif in GFAT
was stoichiometrically phosphorylated while it appeared that the
KKGS235 motif was less efficiently phosphorylated. Failure
to identify the unphosphorylated form of the KKGS235
peptide made it impossible to accurately assess the stoichiometry of
phosphorylation of this site. This phosphorylation was associated with
a complete loss of GFAT enzymatic activity and phosphorylation of the
RRGS205 but not the KKGS235 motif was necessary
for this loss of activity. That a mutation in the RRGS205
motif completely blocked the inhibitory effect of PKA suggests that
this phosphorylation site is the only site in the hGFAT molecule that
mediates the inhibitory effect of PKA on GFAT activity. These finding
with regard to hGFAT suggest that the observed deglycosylation of
intracellular proteins in response to PKA activation by forskolin results largely from inhibition of glucosamine synthesis and substrate restriction for the O-GlcNAc transferase enzyme.
-cells may involve this pathway (19, 25, 35), and there
is also evidence that glucose-stimulated gene expression that could
lead to diabetes complications involves the metabolism of glucose to
glucosamine (18, 36). Resistance to the action of insulin in adipocytes
(37, 38) and skeletal muscle (39, 40) has also been associated with
this pathway of glucose metabolism. Our finding implie that PKA
activation could block the flux of glucose into glucosamine by
inhibiting the key enzyme, GFAT, that catalyzes this step in glucose
metabolism. Since adenylate cyclase is activated by hormones, such as
glucagon and epinephrine, that are involved in glucose regulation
during nutritional deprivation, then the shut down of GFAT in response to these hormones would assure that the flux of glucose carbons went
into energy producing rather than synthetic pathways during starvation
conditions. The down-regulation of GFAT by PKA phosphorylation adds
another means of regulating the activity of this enzyme. GFAT activity
is also down-regulated by its downstream product, UDP-GlcNAc (41) and
the expression of the GFAT gene is up-regulated in growth
factor-stimulated cells (33, 42). These regulatory mechanisms imply
that the fractional flux of glucose to glucosamine is not fixed but
depends on other signals received by the cell.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Medicine/Endocrinology, The University of Alabama, 1808 7th
Ave. S., Rm. 756, Birmingham, AL 35294. Tel.: 205-934-4116; Fax: 205-934-4389; E-mail: kudlow@uab.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Kornfeld, S.,
and Ginsburg, V.
(1966)
Exp. Cell. Res.
41,
592-600
2.
Pilkis, S. J.,
Claus, T. H.,
Kurland, I. J.,
and Lange, A. J.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
799-835
3.
Depre, C.,
Rider, M. H.,
and Hue, L.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
258,
277-290
4.
Han, I.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2550-2558
5.
Su, K.,
Roos, M. D.,
Yang, X.,
Han, I.,
Paterson, A. J.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
15194-15202
6.
Jackson, S. P.,
and Tjian, R.
(1988)
Cell
55,
125-133
7.
Roos, M. D.,
Su, K.,
Baker, J. R.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6472-6480
8.
Hart, G. W.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
315-335
9.
Gomez-Cuadrado, A.,
Martin, M.,
Noel, M.,
and Ruiz-Carrillo, A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6670-6685
10.
Reason, A. J.,
Morris, H. R.,
Panico, M.,
Marais, R.,
Treisman, R. H.,
Haltiwanger, R. S.,
Hart, G. W.,
Kelly, W. G.,
and Dell, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16911-16921
11.
Shaw, P.,
Freeman, J.,
Bovey, R.,
and Iggo, R.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
921-930
12.
Lubas, W. A.,
Smith, M.,
Starr, C. M.,
and Hanover, J. A.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
1686-1694
13.
Roos, M. D.,
Han, I-O.,
Paterson, A. J.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C803-C811
14.
Pugh, B. F.,
and Tjian, R.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
1935-1945
15.
Chakraborty, A.,
Saha, A.,
Bose, M.,
Chatterjee,
and Gupta, N. K.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
6700-6706
16.
Datta, B.,
Chakrabarti, D.,
Roy, A. L.,
and Gupta, N. K.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3324-3328
17.
Datta, B.,
Ray, M.,
Chakrabarti, D.,
Wylie, D. E.,
and Gupta, N. K.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
20620-20624
18.
Sayeski, P. P.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15237-15234
19.
Liu, K.,
Paterson, A. J.,
Chin, E.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2820-2825
20.
Zhou, J.,
Huynh, Q. K.,
Hoffman, R. T.,
Crook, E. D.,
Daniels, M. C.,
Gulve, E. A.,
and McClain, D. A.
(1998)
Diabetes
47,
1836-1840
21.
Snow, C. M.,
Senior, A.,
and Gerace, L.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
104,
1143-1156
22.
McKnight, G. L.,
Mudri, S. L.,
Mathewes, S. L.,
Traxinger, R. R.,
Marshall, S.,
Sheppard, P. O.,
and O'Hara, P. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
25208-25212
23.
Moss, B.
(1991)
Science
252,
1662-1667
24.
Traxinger, R. R.,
and Marshall, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10148-10154
25.
Roos, M. D.,
Xie, W.,
Su, K.,
Clark, J. A.,
Yang, X.,
Chin, E.,
Paterson, A. J.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1998)
Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians
110,
422-432
26.
Konrad, R. J.,
Janowski, K. M.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
267,
26-32
27.
Kennelly, P. J.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15555-15558
28.
Chou, T. Y.,
Hart, G. W.,
and Dang, C. V.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18961-18965
29.
Kelly, W. G.,
Dahmus, M. E.,
and Hart, G. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10416-10424
30.
Griffith, L. S.,
and Schmitz, B.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
262,
824-831
31.
Haltiwanger, R. S.,
Grove, K.,
and Philipsberg, G. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3611-3617
32.
Sayeski, P. P.,
Paterson, A. J.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
140,
289-290
33.
Sayeski, P. P.,
Wang, D.,
Su, K.,
Han, I-O.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1458-1466
34.
Oki, T.,
Yamazaki, K.,
Kuromitsu, J.,
Okada, M.,
and Tanaka, I.
(1999)
Genomics
57,
227-234
35.
Hanover, J. A.,
Lai, Z.,
Lee, G.,
Lubas, W. A.,
and Sato, S. M.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
362,
38-45
36.
Wang, J.,
Liu, R.,
Hawkins, M.,
Barzilai, N.,
and Rossetti, L.
(1998)
Nature
393,
684-688
37.
Marshall, S.,
Bacote, V.,
and Traxinger, R. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10155-10161
38.
Thomson, M. J.,
Williams, M. G.,
and Frost, S. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7759-7764
39.
Cooksey, R. C.,
Hebert, L. F., Jr.,
Zhu, J. H.,
Wofford, P.,
Garvey, W. T.,
and McClain, D. A.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
1151-1157
40.
Hebert, L. F., Jr.,
Daniels, M. C.,
Zhou, J.,
Crook, E. D.,
Turner, R. L.,
Simmons, S. T.,
Neidigh, J. L.,
Zhu, J. S.,
Baron, A. D.,
and McClain, D. A.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
930936
41.
Kornfeld, R.
(1967)
J. Biol. Chem.
242,
3135-3141
42.
Paterson, A. J.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
2809-2816
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Wang, M. Gucek, and G. W. Hart Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O-GlcNAc PNAS, September 16, 2008; 105(37): 13793 - 13798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zhang, A. J. Paterson, P. Huang, K. Wang, and J. E. Kudlow Metabolic Control of Proteasome Function Physiology, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 373 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zhang, Y. Hu, P. Huang, C. A. Toleman, A. J. Paterson, and J. E. Kudlow Proteasome Function Is Regulated by Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase through Phosphorylation of Rpt6 J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22460 - 22471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hu, L. Riesland, A. J. Paterson, and J. E. Kudlow Phosphorylation of Mouse Glutamine-Fructose-6-phosphate Amidotransferase 2 (GFAT2) by cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Increases the Enzyme Activity J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 29988 - 29993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. HANOVER Glycan-dependent signaling: O-linked N-acetylglucosamine FASEB J, September 1, 2001; 15(11): 1865 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, K. Su, M. D. Roos, Q. Chang, A. J. Paterson, and J. E. Kudlow O-linkage of N-acetylglucosamine to Sp1 activation domain inhibits its transcriptional capability PNAS, May 18, 2001; (2001) 111099998. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, K. Su, M. D. Roos, Q. Chang, A. J. Paterson, and J. E. Kudlow O-linkage of N-acetylglucosamine to Sp1 activation domain inhibits its transcriptional capability PNAS, June 5, 2001; 98(12): 6611 - 6616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||