![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22090-22097, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NCI, National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, January 3, 2000, and in revised form, April 27, 2000
Recently, we identified a novel Escherichia
coli RNA polymerase (RNAP)-associated protein, an ATPase, called
RapA (Sukhodolets, M. V., and Jin, D. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7018-7023). RapA is a bacterial homolog of
SWI2/SNF2. We showed that RapA forms a stable complex with RNAP
holoenzyme and that binding to RNAP holoenzyme stimulates the ATPase
activity of RapA. We have further analyzed the interactions between
purified RapA and the two forms of RNAP: core RNAP and RNAP holoenzyme.
We found that RapA interacts with either form of RNAP. However, RapA
exhibits higher affinity for core RNAP than for RNAP holoenzyme.
Chemical cross-linking of the RNAP-RapA complex indicated that the
RapA-binding sites are located at the interface between the In Escherichia coli, RNA polymerase
(RNAP)1 exists in two forms:
core RNAP and RNAP holoenzyme. The basic transcription machinery, core
RNAP, consisting of subunits Recently, we described a new RNAP-associated protein named RapA with a
molecular mass of 110 kDa (10). Interestingly, the RapA protein is a
member of the SWI/SNF protein family (10-16), which has been
implicated in eukaryotic nucleosome remodeling and DNA repair (for
reviews, see Refs. 16-18). We found that the RapA protein co-purifies
with RNAP holoenzyme exclusively and that after purification to
homogeneity, RapA is capable of forming a stable complex with RNAP
holoenzyme in vitro (10). In addition, the RapA protein is
an ATPase, and its ATPase activity is stimulated upon binding to RNAP
holoenzyme, indicating that RapA interacts with RNAP holoenzyme both
physically and functionally. Independently, Muzzin et al.
(19) also reported that the same 110-kDa protein (but named HepA) is
associated with RNAP in E. coli. However, they found that
this new protein appeared to be associated only with core RNAP but not
with RNAP holoenzyme (19). Thus, it is important to address whether and
how RapA interacts with the two forms of RNAP. This is not only an
unsolved issue but could also shed some light on the function of RapA.
In this study, we further characterized the interaction between RNAP
and the RapA protein biochemically. Specifically, we analyzed the
conditions that affect the interactions between RapA and either core
RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme and measured the dissociation constants
(Kd) of RapA-RNAP complexes. We also identified the
subunits of RNAP that are in close contact with RapA by chemical cross-linking. Furthermore, in an attempt to address the cellular function of RapA, we constructed a rapA null mutation and
studied the effect of this mutation in vivo.
Materials and Chemical Reagents--
The RapA protein and RNAP
were purified from E. coli K12 cells (MG1655) as described
previously (10). The protein concentrations were determined using the
Bradford assay (20) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. RNAP
concentrations were also determined by UV absorbance using the molar
extinction coefficient data of Lowe et al. (21). The
RapA-specific and Reconstitution of RNAP-RapA Complex in Vitro--
Stability of
the complex of RapA with either core RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme was
studied by gel filtration using a Superose 6 HR 10/30 column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (10). All runs were
performed in TGED buffer (0.01 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5%
glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol)
with the salt concentrations indicated in the legends for Figs. 1 and 2.
Glycerol Gradient Ultracentrifugation Experiments--
Purified
enzymes were premixed in 100 µl of glycerol gradient centrifugation
buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 10 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
dithiothreitol, 200 mM NaCl) and layered on top of 4 ml of
15-30% (top to bottom) linear gradients of glycerol in the above
buffer. The samples were then spun in a SW-60 rotor for 21 h at
37,500 rpm (6 °C). Each 4-ml tube was fractionated into 13 fractions
using the Beckman Fraction Recovery system. Equal volumes of 2×
Laemmli sample buffer were then added to each fraction, and the samples
were analyzed on SDS 10% polyacrylamide gels. The gels were stained
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 or silver.
ATPase Assays--
The ATPase activities were determined by
measuring the amount of [ Determination of the Dissociation Constants (Kd Values)
of RNAP-RapA Complexes--
The stimulation of RapA ATPase activity by
RNAP was used to determine the apparent Kd values of
RNAP-RapA complexes (Ref. 10; this work). Sequential dilutions of
purified RapA alone or purified RapA premixed with either purified core
RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme (2 mol of RapA per 1 mol of RNAP) in binding buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 4 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µg/ml bovine
serum albumin, 50 mM NaCl) were made. It was found necessary to use siliconized tubes and maintain bovine serum albumin in
the buffer to eliminate nonspecific binding of proteins to the tube
walls, particularly at low protein concentrations. ATPase activity of
each dilution was determined and calculated as pmol of ATP
hydrolyzed/min/µg of RapA (Aobs). The
difference between the ATPase activities of RNAP/RapA mixtures and RapA
alone at each RapA concentration was calculated as
Chemical Cross-linking--
Purified RNAP or a 1:1 RNAP-RapA
complex, typically at a final concentration of 2.6 µM,
was incubated with 1 mM EGS-NHS in 50 mM HEPES,
pH 7.8, in a final volume of 100 µl. Reactions were incubated as
specified in the legends for Figs. 6 and 7 and quenched by the addition
of 100 µl of 2× Laemmli sample buffer. The cross-linked protein
products were analyzed by electrophoresis on SDS-5% polyacrylamide gels and subsequently silver-stained or transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp.), followed by immunostaining with antibodies specific for RapA or various subunits of RNAP. Anti-rabbit and anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Calbiochem) were
used to visualize the membrane-bound antibody-antigen complexes.
Cloning of the rapA Gene--
The rapA gene was
cloned into the expression vector pBAD24 (22) as follows. 1) A DNA
fragment containing the rapA gene was amplified by
polymerase chain reaction using the primers DJ142 (5'-TAG CAG GAG GAA
TTC ACC ATG CCT TTT ACA CTT GGT CAA CGC TGG), which contains the
sequence upstream of the EcoRI site of pBAD24 and the
beginning of the coding sequence for rapA, and DJ143A (5'-ACA CTT ATC AAG CTT TAT GGT CAT CCT GAT ACA GGA TAA CCA ACC A),
which covers sequences about 80 base pairs downstream of the rapA gene and introduces a HindIII site. 2) The
amplified DNA fragment was purified, digested with the restriction
enzymes EcoRI and HindIII, and ligated with the
pBAD24 vector DNA, which had been digested with EcoRI and
HindIII. The resulting plasmid pDJ61 (Ampr) was
confirmed by restriction mapping and by arabinose induction of
rapA.
Construction of the rapA Null Mutation--
In pDJ61, there are
only three PvuII sites, all of which are located in the
middle of the rapA gene. After the pDJ61 plasmid DNA had
been digested with the restriction enzyme PvuII, the largest DNA fragment (6.5 kilobase pairs), which contained some vector sequence
and parts of the rapA gene (including the coding sequence from base pairs 1-752 and base pairs 2042-2906 but deleted most of
the conserved regions in the SNF2 family), was purified. This 6.5-kilobase pair DNA fragment was then ligated with a 1.0-kilobase pair DNA fragment containing a cat gene conferring
chloramphenicol resistance (Cmr), which was purified from
pCAT19 (23) after it had been digested with the restriction enzyme
SmaI. The resulting plasmid pDJ62 was linearized by
digestion with the restriction enzyme EcoO109I (a unique
site in vector), followed by transformation with the strain JC7623,
which contains the recBC and sbcBC mutations
(24). Recombinants between the linear DNA and the chromosome were
selected on LB + Cm plates. The true recombinants were Cm-resistant but Amp-sensitive. The rapA::cat null
mutation (both the deletion and insertion mutation) was confirmed by
the following criteria: 1) the absence of detectable RapA protein in
the rapA null mutant as determined by two-dimensional
electrophoresis and immunoblotting with antibodies raised against RapA
and 2) the demonstration of linkages between
rapA::cat and leu and
between rapA::cat and carA by P1 transductions.
Bacterial Techniques--
Bacterial media and techniques were as
described (25). Bacterial growth was followed by measuring the optical
density of cultures at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer. The
rapA::cat null mutation was transferred into
different strain backgrounds by P1 phage-mediated transduction, and the
rapA null mutant was selected on LB + Cm plates. The
mfd mutant (26-28) with a linked Tn10 marker was obtained
from Dr. Aziz Sancar (University of North Carolina). The mfd
mutation was transferred into other strains by P1 phage-mediated transduction. The linkage between mfd and Tn10 is >50%,
and the mfd phenotype was screened by UV sensitivity at a
high UV irradiation dosage (28). Spontaneous or UV-induced
rifampicin-resistant (Rifr) mutations were isolated as
described (29). For UV mutagenesis (25), about 5-10% of cells
survived UV irradiation. Eight cultures of different strains were used
for each set of experiments, and the cultures were plated on LB + rifampicin (50 µg/ml) plates.
UV Sensitivity Assays--
Cultures of different strains were
grown in LB or M63 medium supplemented with glucose, amino acids, and
vitamins. Either overnight or mid-log phase cultures were diluted
10-fold with plain M63 medium, and 1-ml aliquots of the diluted
cultures were placed into 24-well cell culture plates (Costar, Corning
Inc.). Cultures of different strains were tested simultaneously in
different rows on each plate. To avoid differences that might be caused by their positions in the wells, cells from different cultures were
randomly placed in different rows in different sets of experiments. The
24-well plate was placed either underneath a UV lamp(s) (254 nm) that
was fixed on a stand or in the chamber of an UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene, CA) with five 254-nm 8-watt UV lamps. Cells were
irradiated with different doses of UV light by placing aluminum foil on
different wells for different lengths of time. The numbers of surviving
cells for each UV dose were counted after plating an appropriate
dilution of the cells on LB plates and incubating them overnight at
37 °C. Alternatively, a series of culture dilutions (10 RapA Forms Complexes with either Core RNAP or RNAP
Holoenzyme--
Previously, we showed that RapA forms a stable complex
with RNAP holoenzyme, as if it were a subunit of RNAP (10). Using the
same conditions (in the presence of 0.1 M NaCl), we
determined whether RapA also interacts with core RNAP. We found that a
stable core RNAP-RapA complex can be reconstituted with highly purified RapA and core RNAP in vitro (Fig.
1). When the 110-kDa RapA protein and
core RNAP were mixed and passed through a Superose 6 HR gel filtration
column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), they coeluted as a complex (Fig.
1A), whereas each of the two proteins eluted in different
fractions when they were run separately (Fig. 1, C and
D). These results showed that RapA also forms a stable
complex with core RNAP, just as it forms a stable complex with RNAP
holoenzyme (Fig. 1B).
Because we found that RapA co-purified only with RNAP holoenzyme and
not with core RNAP during our purification procedure and that the
fractions containing both RapA and RNAP holoenzyme were eluted at about
0.4 M NaCl in the final step of Mono-Q chromatography (10),
we again studied the interaction of RapA with core or holoenzyme by gel
filtration at 0.4 M NaCl (Fig.
2). When RapA and the core RNAP were
mixed and passed through the gel filtration column at 0.4 M
NaCl, a significant fraction of RapA coeluted with RNAP as an RNAP-RapA
complex (Fig. 2A). The core RNAP-RapA complex was less
stable at 0.4 M NaCl than at 0.1 M NaCl, as
shown by the increasing dissociation of RapA from the complex,
resulting in more free, unbound RapA at 0.4 M NaCl (compare
Fig. 2A with Fig. 1A). However, the fraction of
RapA bound to core RNAP at 0.4 M NaCl was still much
greater that that bound to RNAP holoenzyme (Fig. 2B). By
scanning the Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250-stained gels, we estimated
that the amount of RapA complexed with core RNAP was approximately 10 times greater than that complexed with RNAP holoenzyme.
Apparently, the RNAP-RapA complexes behaved differently in gel
filtration than in Mono-Q chromatography. To further demonstrate that
RapA can interact with either core or holoenzyme, we also analyzed the
interaction between RapA and the two forms of RNAP by glycerol gradient
ultracentrifugation (Fig. 3). Consistent with the gel filtration results, we detected complex formation between
RapA and either core or holoenzyme. Again, we found that the
interaction between RapA and core RNAP was stronger than that between
RapA and RNAP holoenzyme. At 0.7 µM RNAP and 0.7 µM RapA, while all RapA remained bound to core RNAP
during the course of ultracentrifugation (Fig. 3A), the less
stable RNAP holoenzyme-RapA complex showed a trace of RapA dissociating
from the complex (Fig. 3B). The differences in RapA binding
to core or holoenzyme were even more apparent at 0.06 µM
RNAP and 0.12 µM RapA. At this lower concentration of
proteins, while a fraction of RapA was still associated with core RNAP
(Fig. 3D), almost no RapA was associated with holoenzyme
(Fig. 3E).
To determine whether binding to core RNAP can also stimulate the ATPase
activity of RapA, we compared the ATPase activities of free RapA and
core RNAP-RapA complexes (Fig. 4). The
ATPase activity of core RNAP-RapA complex was nearly 4-fold higher than that of RapA alone (compare lane 2 with
lane 5), very similar to that of RNAP
holoenzyme-RapA complex (compare lane 2 with
lane 6). The stimulation of RapA ATPase by
binding to either core RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme further confirms that
RapA interacts with both forms of RNAP. Moreover, it also provides a
basis for determining the dissociation constants of RNAP-RapA
complexes.
Determination of the Affinity of RapA to RNAP Holoenzyme or Core
RNAP--
We also determined the relative affinities of holoenzyme and
core RNAP-RapA complexes by taking advantage of the stimulatory effect
of RNAP on the RapA ATPase activity (Fig. 4). We used a fixed ratio
(2:1) of Rap and RNAP in one set of experiments and RapA alone in a
parallel set of experiments. We measured ATPase activity
(Aobs) in sequentially diluted reaction
mixtures. We calculated the difference ( RapA Cross-links to the
To simplify the identification of new cross-linked species of the
RNAP-RapA complex, we compared the patterns of the cross-linked protein
products in the reactions containing RapA and RNAP with those in
parallel reactions containing RNAP alone. It has been shown that RNAP
subunits are capable of intramolecular cross-linking forming complex
patterns (30). After cross-linking, the reaction mixtures were
separated on SDS-5% polyacrylamide gels, and the gels were either
silver-stained or transferred onto Immnobilon P membranes for
immunostaining with antibodies specific for RapA or various subunits of
RNAP (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6A shows the kinetics of a representative cross-linking
reaction. Core RNAP treated with EGS-NHS showed a complex pattern of
high molecular weight bands as a result of intramolecular cross-linking of its subunits (Fig. 6A, lanes 2-6).
However, new cross-linked species appeared in the reaction containing
core RNAP and RapA (Fig. 6A, lanes
8-12). One new cross-linked product with an apparent molecular mass of 260-270 kDa that reacted with both
In addition, a few new cross-linked complexes were found in the
presence of RapA. One example is the product with a molecular mass of
about 125 kDa that was apparent even by silver staining (Fig.
6A, marked as RapACL1). It reacted with
RapA-specific polyclonal antibodies (Fig. 6B), suggesting
that the cross-linked product might have an additional mass of about 15 kDa. Since our RNAP preparation contained the
Similarly, we treated either purified RNAP holoenzyme or the mixture
containing RNAP holoenzyme and RapA with EGS-NHS in parallel cross-linking experiments (Fig. 7). The
patterns of the cross-linked complexes of RNAP holoenzyme were
significantly more complicated than that of core RNAP due to the
presence of the The rapA Null Mutants Exhibited No Significant UV
Sensitivity--
Previously, we analyzed the effects of RapA in
in vitro transcription and detected only a marginal
activation of the RNAP transcriptional activity (10). To study the
function of the RapA protein in the cell, we constructed a
rapA null mutation by combining an internal deletion and an
insertion of a cat (Cmr) cassette in the gene.
The rapA gene appeared to be nonessential for the bacterial
cell, based on the following criteria. 1) The rapA null
mutation could be introduced into other cells that harbored either a
plasmid expressing the wild-type rapA gene or only the
vector with similar efficiency by phage P1-mediated transduction. 2)
The rapA null mutant exhibited no detectable difference in
growth compared with wild-type cells under a variety of conditions,
such as different incubation temperatures and growth media (data not
shown). Similar results were also reported in Ref. 19.
Because some eukaryotic SWI/SNF family members have been implicated in
DNA repair, we explored the possibility that RapA could be important
for DNA damage recovery. Originally, our preliminary results suggested
that the rapA null mutant was hypersensitive to UV
irradiation and the antibiotic mitomycin C (a DNA-damaging agent).2 However, further
studies determined that these phenotypes were caused by the presence of
a cryptic phage with
Because it was reported recently by Muzzin et al. (19) that
disruption of the same E. coli gene (also called
hepA) caused UV sensitivity, we carefully analyzed this
phenotype further (see "Experimental Procedures"). To assure that
we could detect even marginal increases in UV sensitivity in our
assays, we included the mfd mutant in every UV sensitivity
assay as a control. The mfd gene encodes the
transcription-repair coupling factor (26). The mfd mutation
has been reported to confer either no (27) or only mild increase in UV
sensitivity (28) when compared with the isogenic wild-type strains.
Initially, we performed the UV sensitivity assays in the JC7623 strain
background that contains the recBC and sbcBC
mutations and was used for UV sensitivity assays by Muzzin et
al. (19). The rapA null mutant behaved somewhat similar
to the isogenic wild-type strain in response to UV irradiation, whereas
the mfd mutant exhibited mild UV sensitivity compared with
the wild-type strain (Fig. 8). We also
performed the same experiments in the MG1655 strain background that is
a prototype of the wild-type K12 strain and observed a pattern similar
to that seen in JC7623 (Fig. 8). At low UV doses, there was a very small difference among the wild type and mfd and
rapA mutants. At high UV doses, while the mfd
mutant became noticeably UV-sensitive, the rapA mutant was
only slightly more UV-sensitive than wild type strain. We also
determined the UV sensitivity of the mfd rapA double mutant
and found that the double mutant was only slightly more UV-sensitive
than the mfd mutant (data not shown). The rapA null mutation in each strain background was confirmed, and we detected
no RapA in the mutants (Fig. 8B). We also performed UV sensitivity assays using a microdrop method (see "Experimental Procedures") and detected no significant differences in UV
sensitivity between the rapA null mutation and the isogenic
wild type strain, whereas the mfd mutation conferred an
increase in UV sensitivity compared with the wild type strain (data not
shown).
To determine whether the rapA mutation affects mutation
rate, we measured the occurrence of mutations conferring rifampicin resistance (Rifr) from either wild type cells or the
rapA null mutant (Fig. 9). We
observed very similar spontaneous mutation rates of Rifr
mutations from the two strains. With UV mutagenesis, the
Rifr mutation rates were increased for the two strains. It
appeared that the UV-induced Rifr mutation rate was about
2-fold lower in the rapA mutant when compared with the wild
type strain.
We have demonstrated that RapA interacts with both core RNAP and
RNAP holoenzyme in a purified system using several different methods.
By binding to either form of RNAP, the RapA ATPase activity is
stimulated. Under the experimental conditions we used, RapA formed
complexes with either core RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme in the nanomolar
range, suggesting that the interaction is highly specific. However, the
affinity of RapA to core RNAP is about 5-16-fold higher than to RNAP
holoenzyme. If core RNAP is indeed the main RapA-binding form of RNAP
in vivo, it indicates that the function of RapA is more
likely related to transcription elongation/termination than to
initiation. We are currently exploring this possibility.
Previously, we found that almost all of the RapA protein molecules in
the cell co-purified with RNAP holoenzyme (10). We do not know why RapA
was not associated with core RNAP during the Mono Q step of the RNAP
purification procedure. Several possibilities could contribute to this
apparent difference: 1) some special conditions during the RNAP
purification procedure; 2) special chromatographic conditions; and 3)
some factors missing in a purified system. On the other hand, Muzzin
et al. (19) reported that the same protein interacted only
with core RNAP but not with holoenzyme. It is possible that differences
in the nature of the protein and in the conditions for the binding
assays contributed to these apparently different results.
We have shown that RapA cross-links to the The rapA null mutant behaved very similar to the isogenic
wild-type strain under various laboratory conditions. In the course of
extended examination using two different genetic backgrounds, our
experiments consistently showed that the rapA null mutant exhibited only a marginal increase in UV sensitivity compared with the
wild-type strains (Fig. 8). The observed UV sensitivity of the
rapA mutant was significantly less than that of the
mfd mutant, which by itself showed only a mild increase in
UV sensitivity compared with the wild type strain. Thus, our results
were quantitatively different from the results reported by Muzzin
et al. (19). This apparent difference could be due to the
differences in strain backgrounds or experimental conditions used
between the two laboratories. In that report, the authors also claimed
that the expression level of the RapA (HepA) protein was substantially
higher in the recBC sbcBC (JC7623) strain and speculated
that the possible disruption of RecBCD function that is important for
DNA repair pathways may be compensated by increased expression of RapA
(HepA). However, we detected no substantial difference in the amount of
RapA protein between the JC7623 strain and the wild-type MG1655 strain
by immunoassays using antibodies against RapA (Fig. 8B).
Furthermore, the RapA expression level was not increased upon DNA
damage induced by mitomycin C (data not shown). We also detected little
or no effect of rapA on spontaneous or UV-induced mutational
rates. Based on our data, it seems unlikely that RapA plays a major
role in DNA repair, at least for damage induced by UV irradiation or
mitomycin C. Currently, we are investigating the regulation of
rapA in the hope that it will lead to understanding of the
function of this RNAP-associated protein.
We thank Dr. Richard Burgess for the
monoclonal antibodies specific for the *
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000056200
2
Maxim V. Sukhodolets and Ding Jun Jin,
unpublished observations.
The abbreviations used are:
RNAP, RNA
polymerase;
EGS-NHS, ethylene glycol bis(succinic acid
N-hydroxysuccinimide ester).
Interaction between RNA Polymerase and RapA, a Bacterial Homolog
of the SWI/SNF Protein Family*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
' subunits of RNAP. Contrary to previously reported results (Muzzin,
O., Campbell, E., A., Xia, L., Severinova, E., Darst, S. A., and
Severinov, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15157-15161), our in vivo analysis of a rapA
null mutant suggested that RapA is not likely to be directly involved
in DNA repair.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2
', is capable of
transcription elongation and termination, but it is unable to initiate
transcription; whereas RNAP holoenzyme, consisting of
2
'
, is capable of initiating transcription from
promoters on a DNA template (1, 2). A number of proteins that associate
with core RNAP and/or holoenzyme and participate in different aspects
of transcription have been identified, such as NusA (3, 4), GreA, and
GreB (5-9).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-70-specific polyclonal antibodies were previously
described (10). The monoclonal antibodies specific for the
(4RA1),
(NT63), or
' (NT73) subunits of RNAP were kindly provided by Dr.
Richard Burgess (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI), and the
polyclonal antibodies specific for the
subunit of RNAP were kindly
provided by Dr. Dan Gentry (SmithKline Beecham). The bifunctional
cross-linker ethylene glycol bis(succinic acid
N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) (EGS-NHS) was purchased from Sigma.
-32P]ADP released from
[
-32P]ATP. The reaction conditions and separation of
samples by chromatography using poly(ethyleneimine)-cellulose plates
(J.T. Baker Inc.) were as described (10). Plates were autoradiographed
using Kodak Bio-Max MR film and scanned on a PhosphorImager (Molecular
Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) to quantitate the amount of
[
-32P]ATP hydrolyzed. The ATPase activity was
expressed as pmol of ATP hydrolyzed/min/µg of RapA.
Aobs at that particular RapA concentration.
The value of
Amax (maximal activation) was calculated from the double-reciprocal plot
(1/
Aobs versus 1/[RapA]). The
ratio of
Aobs and
Amax was calculated and plotted as a function of RapA concentration. The apparent Kd values were
obtained directly from these adsorption isotherms as the RapA
concentrations corresponding to half-maximal
Aobs/
Amax. Each
titration was repeated at least twice with similar results.
3 to 10
6) were
microdropped (10 µl) on LB plates. Cells from different strains on
one plate were exposed to a given dosage of UV irradiation as described
above. Different sets of plates were exposed to different dosages of UV
irradiation. The numbers of surviving cells were counted after
incubation overnight at 37 °C. To minimize light-induced reactivation of repair pathways, the experiments were performed with
minimal background light.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Formation of stable complexes of purified
RapA with either core RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme. The stability of
the RNAP-RapA complex was studied by gel filtration on a Superose 6 HR
10/30 column as described under "Experimental Procedures." All runs
were performed in TGED buffer containing 0.1 M NaCl.
SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250
are shown. The positions of the subunits of RNAP and RapA are
indicated. A, 2.5 µM core RNAP plus 0.6 µM RapA. B, 2.5 µM RNAP
holoenzyme plus 0.6 µM RapA. C, 0.6 µM RapA. D, 2.5 µM core RNAP.
E, 2.5 µM RNAP holoenzyme.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The complex of RapA with core RNAP or RNAP
holoenzyme is destabilized at 0.4 M NaCl. The Superose
6 HR 10/30 column runs were performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." All runs were carried out in TGED buffer
containing 0.4 M NaCl. SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels stained
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 are shown. The positions of the
subunits of RNAP and RapA are indicated. A, 2.5 µM core RNAP plus 0.6 µM RapA.
B, 2.5 µM RNAP holoenzyme plus 0.6 µM RapA. C, 0.6 µM RapA.
D, 2.5 µM core RNAP. E, 2.5 µM RNAP holoenzyme.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The core RNAP binds RapA with a higher
affinity than the RNAP holoenzyme. Glycerol gradient
ultracentrifugations of protein mixtures were performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." SDS 10% polyacrylamide gels
stained with either Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (A,
B, and C) or silver (D and
E) are shown. The positions of RapA and RNAP subunits are
indicated. A, 0.7 µM core RNAP plus 0.7 µM RapA. B, 0.7 µM RNAP
holoenzyme plus 0.7 µM RapA. C, 0.7 µM RapA. D, 0.06 µM core RNAP
plus 0.12 µM RapA. E, 0.06 µM
RNAP holoenzyme plus 0.12 µM RapA. The first
lane in each panel shows protein standards
(Bio-Rad, broad range).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
ATPase activity of RapA is stimulated by core
RNAP and RNAP holoenzyme. ATPase activity was determined as
described under "Experimental Procedures," and an autoradiograph of
a representative ATPase assay is shown. The positions of the substrate
(ATP) and the product (ADP) are indicated. Lane
1, no proteins; lane 2, RapA (0.2 µM); lane 3, core RNAP (0.1 µM); lane 4, RNAP holoenzyme (0.1 µM); lane 5, 2:1 (mol/mol) mixture
of RapA (0.2 µM) and core RNAP (0.1 µM);
lane 6, 2:1 (mol/mol) mixture of RapA (0.2 µM) and RNAP holoenzyme (0.1 µM).
Aobs)
between the ATPase activities of RNAP-RapA mixtures and RapA alone at
each RapA concentration and determined
Amax
(maximal activation) as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The ratio of
Aobs and
Amax was calculated and plotted as a function
of RapA concentration (Fig. 5). We found
that at high concentrations of proteins, the activation of RapA ATPase was relatively constant (plateau in Fig. 5). Upon sequential dilution, the activation of RapA ATPase decreased, as the RNAP-RapA complexes dissociated. Although this method cannot be used to obtain an explicit
Kd for the complex, we assumed that at half-maximal activation of RapA ATPase the free and bound RNAP concentrations were
equal. Therefore, the Kd can be approximated as the
concentration of RapA at that point. The apparent Kd values, calculated from this method, were 5-10 nM for
RapA-core RNAP and 50-80 nM for RapA-RNAP holoenzyme
complex. These values show that the RapA protein exhibits higher
affinity to core RNAP than to RNAP holoenzyme, in agreement with the
gel filtration and glycerol gradient ultracentrifugation studies
described above.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Determination of the apparent
Kd of RNAP-RapA complex. The dissociation
constants of the complexes of RapA with core RNAP or RNAP holoenzyme
were determined based on the activation of RapA ATPase by RNAP.
Sequential dilutions of RapA alone, the RNAP holoenzyme-RapA complex
(molar ratio 1:2, respectively; closed
rectangles), and core RNAP-RapA complex (molar ratio 1:2,
respectively; open rectangles) were made, and the
dilutions were assayed for ATPase activity. The ratio of
Aobs and
Amax was
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures" and plotted
as a function of RapA concentration. The apparent Kd
values were obtained directly from these adsorption isotherms as the
RapA concentrations corresponding to half-maximal
Aobs/
Amax. Inset, the RapA
amount (ng) is plotted versus pmol of ATP hydrolyzed in the
sample (37 °C, 45-min reactions). The specific activity of the RapA
ATPase calculated from this plot was about 30 pmol of ATP
hydrolyzed/min/µg of RapA.
' and
Subunits of RNAP--
We
probed the interface between RapA and RNAP using various cross-linking
agents. Cross-linking experiments with EGS-NHS, a 12-carbon atom
linker-bifunctional cross-linking reagent capable of modifying amino
groups, yielded positive results, although we failed to obtain
cross-linked RNAP-RapA complexes using several bifunctional reagents
with the linker arm of fewer than 10 carbon atoms.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
RapA cross-links to the
' and
subunits of
RNAP. A, kinetics of the cross-linking reaction. Core
RNAP (lanes 1-6) or 1:1 core RNAP-RapA complex
(lanes 7-12) was incubated with EGS-NHS under
the conditions specified under "Experimental Procedures." A
silver-stained, SDS 5% polyacrylamide gel is shown. The positions of
the
and
' subunits of RNAP, RapA, the RapA-
' complex, and the
cross-linked forms of RapA (RapACL1 and
RapACL2; see "Results") are indicated.
B, immunoblotting of the cross-linked products separated on
a SDS 5% polyacrylamide gel with
'- and
-specific monoclonal
antibodies and RapA-specific polyclonal antibodies. Core RNAP
(lanes 3, 4, 7,
8, 11, and 12) or 1:1 core RNAP-RapA
complex (lanes 1, 2, 5,
6, 9, and 10) was incubated with
EGS-NHS for 30 min. The positions of the
and
' subunits of RNAP,
RapA, and the RapA-
' complex are indicated; the position of the
RapA-
' complex is also indicated by arrows.
C, immunoblotting of the cross-linked products separated on
a SDS-5% polyacrylamide gel with
-specific monoclonal antibodies
and RapA-specific polyclonal antibodies. Core RNAP (lanes
1, 2, 5, and 6) or 1:1 core
RNAP-RapA complex (lanes 3, 4,
7, and 8) was incubated with EGS-NHS for 30 min.
The positions of the
subunit of RNAP, RapA, the RapA-
complex,
the cross-linked
-
complex, and the RapACL1-
complex are indicated.
'-specific monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 6B, lane
6, arrow) and RapA-specific polyclonal antibodies
(Fig. 6B, lane 2, arrow) is
the RapA-
' complex. Another new cross-linked product with an
apparent molecular mass of about 150 kDa that reacted with both
-specific monoclonal antibodies and RapA-specific polyclonal
antibodies (Fig. 6C, lanes 8 and
4, respectively) is therefore the RapA-
complex. Because this cross-linked product co-migrated with the
and
' subunits, it was not apparent by silver staining (Fig. 6A).
subunit of RNAP,
which has a molecular mass of 10.1 kDa, we investigated whether this
125-kDa product was the RapA-
complex. However, this cross-linked
product did not react with
-specific polyclonal antibodies (data not
shown), confirming that it is not the RapA-
complex. Since no other
small proteins (or small RNAs) were noted in RNAP or RapA preparations
(judging from silver-stained SDS-12% polyacrylamide gels), it seems
likely that the unidentified cross-linked species are the result of
intramolecular cross-linking of RapA itself (Fig. 6A,
RapACL1 and RapACL2). The same
intramolecular cross-linking of RapA could explain the formation of
another new RapA-containing cross-linked complex in Fig. 6C
(marked as RapACL1-
).
-70 subunit, which is known to cross-link to
multiple subunits of RNAP (30). We detected no apparent cross-linked
species that reacted with both RapA-specific and
-70-specific
antibodies in the reactions containing RNAP holoenzyme and RapA (data
not shown). However, it is interesting to note that in the presence of
RapA the amount of the cross-linked
-
-70 complex (which has a
molecular mass of about 130 kDa) and the amount of the cross-linked
-
complex were significantly reduced (Fig. 7, lanes
2 and 4 and lanes 6 and
8). This apparent RapA effect on the cross-linking
efficiency indicates that RapA changes the configuration of holoenzyme
upon its binding to RNAP.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The efficiency of the cross-linking between
the
and
-70 subunits
of RNAP is greatly reduced in the presence of RapA. Immunoblotting
of the cross-linked products separated on a SDS 5% polyacrylamide gel
with
-specific monoclonal antibodies and
-70-specific polyclonal
antibodies. RNAP holoenzyme (lanes 1,
2, 5, and 6) or 1:1 RNAP
holoenzyme-RapA complex (lanes 3, 4,
7, and 8) was incubated with EGS-NHS for 30 min
as described under "Experimental Procedures." The positions of the
and
-70 subunits of RNAP and the cross-linked
-
and
-
-70 complexes are indicated.
-80 immunity. Thus, the originally
constructed rapA mutant was a lysogen for the phage; upon UV
irradiation or mitomycin C treatment, the repressor of the cryptic
phage was inactivated and the lysogenic phage was induced, and it
entered the lytic phase of its cycle, resulting in increased cell
death. After we constructed a phage-free rapA null mutant,
we observed no UV-hypersensitive or mitomycin C-hypersensitive phenotypes compared with the wild-type isogenic strain (data not shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The rapA null mutation has
no significant effect on UV sensitivity. A, the
rapA null mutant exhibited only a marginal increase in UV
sensitivity in the JC7623 (recBCsbcBC) background or in the
MG1655 background (either with low UV doses or high UV doses). The
survival percentages are plotted as a function of UV dose. UV
irradiation assays were performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Open rectangles, parental strain;
closed rectangles, the rapA null
mutant; open circles, the mfd mutant.
The data were averaged from at least two independent experiments.
B, the rapA null mutation was confirmed by
Western blotting with RapA-specific antibodies. Cell lysates were
prepared from exponentially growing cells (E) or overnight
cultures (O), and equivalents corresponding to 0.2 ml of the
culture with A600 = 0.4 were loaded on an SDS
8% polyacrylamide gel. The gel was immunostained by RapA-specific
antibodies. Lanes 1, 2, 7,
and 8, wild type parental strains; lanes
3, 4, 9, and 10, the
rapA null mutants; lanes 5,
6, 11, and 12, the mfd
mutants. Lanes 13 and 14 contain 0.15 and 0.6 ng of purified RapA, respectively. The 100-105-kDa protein
that cross-reacted with RapA-specific antibodies was identified as
alcohol dehydrogenase E (M. V. Sukhodolets and D. J. Jin,
unpublished data). However, it shows no significant sequence homology
to RapA (E. Koonin, personal communication). Note that the level of
RapA is higher in the exponentially growing cells than that in the
overnight cultures.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
The rapA null mutation has
no significant effect on spontaneous or UV-induced mutation rate.
Frequencies of Rifr mutations in MG1655 and MG1655
rapA mutant were determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." For spontaneous (open
columns) or UV-induced (closed
columns) Rifr mutations, the equivalent of
0.5-ml overnight cultures was plated on LB plus rifampicin plates and
incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. For UV mutagenesis, UV doses that
killed about 90-95% of cells were used. For each set of experiments,
eight cultures were used for each strain. The data represent the
average results from these eight cultures.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
' subunits of
RNAP, suggesting that it lies in the interface of these two subunits.
Furthermore, it appeared that upon binding to RapA the RNAP holoenzyme
alters its configuration, because the cross-linking efficiency of the
-
-70 and
-
complexes was greatly reduced in the presence of
RapA, although we detected no cross-linking between RapA and the
-70
subunit or
-
-70 complex. Because RapA is able to bind to RNAP
holoenzyme, forming a 1:1 complex (10), it is clear that the binding
sites for RapA and the
-70 are distinct. The E. coli RNAP
structure has been determined from a combination of x-ray
crystallography and electron microscopy (31). The binding site for GreB
on RNAP has been proposed (32). The binding sites for RapA on RNAP
await future determination.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
,
, and
' subunits of
RNAP and thank Dr. Aziz Sancar for the mfd mutant. We also
thank Drs. Richard Burgess and Michael Maurizi and for comments on the manuscript.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Molecular Biology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 37, Rm.
2E14, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-402-9281; Fax:
301-594-3611; E-mail: djjin@helix.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Burgess, R. R.,
Erickson, B.,
Gentry, D.,
Gribskov, M. M.,
Hager, D.,
Lesley, S.,
Strickland, M.,
and Thompson, N.
(1987)
RNA Polymerase and the Regulation of Transcription
, pp. 3-15, Elsevier Science Publishing, New York
2.
Travers, A. A.,
and Burgess, R. R.
(1969)
Nature
222,
537-540
3.
Friedman, D. I.,
and Gottesman, M.
(1983)
in
Lambda II
(Hendrix, R. W.
, Roberts, J. W.
, Stahl, F. W.
, and Weisberg, R. A., eds)
, pp. 21-51, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
4.
Greenblatt, J.,
and Li, J.
(1981)
Cell
24,
421-428
5.
Sparkowski, J.,
and Das, A.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
5256-5257
6.
Borukhov, S.,
Sagitov, V.,
and Goldfarb, A.
(1993)
Cell
72,
459-466
7.
Feng, G. H.,
Lee, D. N.,
Wang, D.,
Chan, C. L.,
and Landick, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22282-22294
8.
Altman, C. R.,
Solow-Cordero, D. E.,
and Chamberlin, M. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3784-3788
9.
Hsu, L. M.,
Vo, N. V.,
and Chamberlin, M. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11588-11592
10.
Sukhodolets, M. V.,
and Jin, D. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7018-7023
11.
Neigeborn, L.,
and Carlson, M.
(1984)
Genetics
108,
845-858
12.
Andrews, B. J.,
and Herskowitz, I.
(1989)
Cell
57,
21-29
13.
Lewis, L. K.,
Jenkins, M. E.,
and Mount, D. W.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
3377-3385
14.
Bork, P.,
and Koonin, E. V.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
751-752
15.
Kolsto, A.,
Bork, P.,
Kvaloy, K.,
Lindback, T.,
Gronstadt, A.,
Kristensen, T.,
and Sander, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
230,
684-688
16.
Eisen, J. A.,
Sweder, K. S.,
and Hanawalt, P. C.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
2715-2723
17.
Peterson, C. L.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6,
171-175
18.
Muchardt, C.,
and Yaniv, M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
293,
187-198
19.
Muzzin, O.,
Campbell, E., A.,
Xia, L.,
Severinova, E.,
Darst, S. A.,
and Severinov, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15157-15161
20.
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
21.
Lowe, P. A.,
Hager, D. A.,
and Burgess, R. R.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
1344-1352
22.
Guzman, L. M.,
Belin, D.,
Carson, M. J.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4221-4130
23.
Fuqua, W. C.
(1992)
BioTechniques
12,
223-225
24.
Winans, S. C.,
Elledge, S. J.,
Krueger, J. H.,
and Walker, G. C.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
161,
1219-1221
25.
Miller, J. H.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
26.
Selby, C. P.,
Witkin, E. M.,
and Sancar, A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
11574-11578
27.
Witkin, E. M.
(1966)
Science
152,
1345-1352
28.
Oller, A. R.,
Fijalkowska, I. J.,
Dunn, R. L.,
and Schaarer, R. M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11036-11040
29.
Jin, D. J.,
and Gross, C. A.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
202,
45-58
30.
Hillel, Z.,
and Wu, C. W.
(1977)
Biochemistry
16,
3334-3342
31.
Darst, S. A.,
Polyakov, A.,
Richter, C.,
and Zhang, G.
(1998)
J. Struct. Biol.
124,
115-122
32.
Polyakov, A.,
Richter, C.,
Malhotra, A.,
Koulich, D.,
Borukhov, S.,
and Darst, S, A.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
281,
465-473
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. A. McKinley and M. V. Sukhodolets Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-associated SWI/SNF protein RapA: evidence for RNA-directed binding and remodeling activity Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7044 - 7060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Smith and N. J. Savery RNA polymerase mutants defective in the initiation of transcription-coupled DNA repair Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 755 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Sukhodolets, J. E. Cabrera, H. Zhi, and D. J. Jin RapA, a bacterial homolog of SWI2/SNF2, stimulates RNA polymerase recycling in transcription Genes & Dev., December 15, 2001; 15(24): 3330 - 3341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cabrera and D. J. Jin Growth Phase and Growth Rate Regulation of the rapA Gene, Encoding the RNA Polymerase-Associated Protein RapA in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., October 15, 2001; 183(20): 6126 - 6134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||