JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002253200 on May 11, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22104-22113, July 21, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/29/22104    most recent
M002253200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sequences within the DNA Cross-linking Patch of sigma 54 Involved in Promoter Recognition, sigma  Isomerization, and Open Complex Formation*

Matthew ChaneyDagger, Melinda Pitt, and Martin Buck§

From the Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Received for publication, March 14, 2000, and in revised form, April 21, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the sigma 54 subunit functions in enhancer-dependent transcription. Mutagenesis has been used to probe the function of a sequence in the sigma 54 DNA binding domain that includes residues that cross-link to promoter DNA. Several activities of the sigma  and holoenzyme are shown to depend on the cross-linking patch. The patch contributes to promoter binding by sigma 54, and holoenzyme and is involved in activator-dependent sigma  isomerization. As part of the sigma 54-holoenzyme, some residues in the patch limit basal transcription. Other cross-linking patch sequences appear to limit activator-dependent open complex formation. Deletion of 19 residues adjacent to the cross-linking patch resulted in a holoenzyme unable to respond to activator but capable of activator-independent (bypass) transcription in vitro. Overall results are consistent with the cross-linking patch directing interactions to the -12 promoter region to set basal and activated levels of transcription.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

sigma factors play a pivotal role in bacterial transcription. Through their association with core RNA polymerase they function in promoter-specific initiation. DNA contact by sigma  is required for promoter recognition and can contribute to the DNA opening event in open promoter complex formation. Two classes of sigma  factor exist, apparently unrelated by sequence (1, 2). Members of the class related to the sigma 70 of Escherichia coli form holoenzymes that are active for transcription in the absence of accessory proteins (3, 4). In contrast, the sigma 54-type factor forms a holoenzyme silent for transcription until acted upon by an enhancer binding activator protein. In a reaction requiring nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis by the activator protein, the sigma 54-holoenzyme bound in a closed complex isomerizes, and start site proximal DNA is melted out to form a stable open promoter complex (5-9). Thus, one core RNA polymerase can participate in two distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation.

Key functional activities of sigma 54 are arranged in discrete sequences across three regions identified by sequence alignment (Fig. 1). The amino-terminal Region I includes sequences that are essential for enhancer responsiveness, whereas Region II sequences assist in promoter recognition (9-12). Region III contains determinants for core polymerase binding at its amino end and a domain containing motifs for DNA binding toward the carboxyl-terminal end (13, 14). The sigma 54-holoenzyme recognizes promoters with conserved sequences at -24 and -12 relative to the transcription start site, and sigma  contacts these sequences (15). Determining the amino acids in sigma  that direct promoter binding is important for understanding how the initial specific closed complex is formed. Additionally, whether sigma -DNA contacts contribute to post binding steps such as DNA melting can be evaluated. Biochemical and genetic experiments with Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli sigma 54 has shown that the major DNA-contacting surfaces of sigma 54 are located in a carboxyl-terminal domain of approximately 150 amino acids (14-17). Within the holoenzyme-promoter closed complex, DNA sequences that must be melted to form open complex are contacted by sigma 54 (14, 15, 17, 18). The DNA binding domain is likely to be functionally involved in open complex formation.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   K. pneumoniae sigma 54 is divided into three regions (I-III) based on sequence alignments (2). The amino-terminal Region I is required for response to activator and masks single-stranded DNA binding activity in the sigma 54-holoenzyme (9, 39, 40). Region II is acidic and variable among members of the sigma 54 protein family. Region III includes the core RNA polymerase binding sequences and many DNA binding determinants: the sequence that cross-links to promoter DNA (X-L), a helix-turn-helix motif (HTH), and the conserved eight-residue sequence termed the RpoN box and sequences that modulate DNA binding (MOD) (17, 21, 41, 42). The amino acid sequence of the cross-linking patch is shown. Conserved residues that have been mutated are underlined

Cross-linking methods are useful for identifying sigma -DNA interacting domains. Native promoter DNA can be specifically cross-linked to sigma 54 and its holoenzyme by a "zero length" UV light-catalyzed reaction (19). The DNA cross-linking patch of sigma 54, composed of residues 329-346 (17), sits at the amino terminus of the DNA binding domain and is linked by a predicted surface-exposed element to an adjacent domain that enhances DNA binding activity (20, 21). We have shown that the invariant residue Arg-336, within the cross-linking patch, is important for maintaining the holoenzyme as a closed complex, silent for transcription before activation (22). Deletion of Region I (Delta I) or mutation of Arg-336, each, alter the interaction of holoenzyme with -12 promoter sequences and allow the holoenzyme to isomerize independent of activator (9, 22, 23). Region I binds core polymerase, and deletion of Region I alters the conformation of the carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain of sigma 54 as part of the holoenzyme, suggesting a linked interaction between amino and carboxyl parts of sigma 54 (13, 24).

Identification of sigma 54 sequences involved in interaction with promoter DNA provides a basis for understanding the mechanism of transcription initiation by enhancer binding activators. To further explore the involvement of the DNA cross-linking patch in sigma 54 function, conserved residues within the patch were mutated. Single amino acid substitutions were obtained that led to defects in sigma  promoter binding, sigma  isomerization, and activator-dependent transcription. We also deleted the adjacent surface-exposed element, amino acids 310-328, which links the cross-linking patch with a domain that enhances DNA binding (20, 21). Deletion of the linking element resulted in holoenzyme unable to form open complex but able to initiate transcription in the absence of activator from supercoiled DNA.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Manipulations-- The K. pneumoniae rpoN gene codons 328 (Trp), 338 (Asp), and 342 (Arg) were changed to CGA (Ala); codon 340 (Leu), in line with other substitutions of Leu in sigma 54 (10), was changed to AGC (Ser); and codons 310-328 were deleted using the Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to mutate a carboxyl-terminal-coding SacI-HindIII fragment from pMM70 (25), cloned in M13mp18. Replacement cloning of a carboxyl-terminal-encoding pMM70 BamHI-HindIII fragment and DNA sequencing were used to confirm the structure of the altered rpoN genes. For overexpression, BamHI-HindIII fragments were replacement-cloned into pWVC93025 (14).

Growth and beta -Galactosidase Assays-- Mutant rpoN genes were recloned into the low copy-number plasmid pHSG576 (43) and transformed into the rpoN deletion strain of K. pneumoniae UNF2792 (hisD2, Delta rpoN71::kan, recA56, sbl300::Tn10) (26). For the growth assay, colonies were replicated from Luria agar plates onto nitrogen-free Davis minimal agar (NFDM) plates (44) supplemented with 1 mg/ml arginine or ammonium sulfate and grown overnight at 37 °C. The beta -galactosidase assays were performed by inoculating 4.0 ml of NFDM containing appropriate supplements with 0.1 ml of overnight nutrient broth culture and grown under anaerobic conditions for 18 h at 30 °C. Chromosomal ntrC and nifA expression was activated by supplementing NFDM with 100 µg/ml aspartic acid or repressed with 200 µg/ml ammonium sulfate. Assays were performed in duplicate. Test promoters were provided on the following plasmids (see also Table II): K. pneumoniae nifH by pMB1, K. pneumoniae nifH049 by pWVC88049, K. pneumoniae nifH050 by pWVC88050, K. pneumoniae nifH053 by pWVC88053, and K. pneumoniae nifH054 by pWVC88054 (27).

Immunoblotting-- Mutant plasmids were transformed into K. pneumoniae UNF2792, and transformed cells were grown overnight. Cells (1 ml) were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 60 µl of 10 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.9; 10 µl of concentrated cells was lysed with 10 µl of 2× SDS sample buffer and heated to 95 °C, and 6 µl of each sample was loaded. Proteins were resolved on denaturing SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis mini-gels and blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Anti-sigma 54 (a gift from A. Ishihama (28)) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Promega) antibodies were used for detection.

Protein Preparations-- All mutant sigma 54 proteins except W328A were overproduced and re-folded from urea as described previously (15), except that induction was at 42 °C. Re-folded protein was chromatographed on DEAE-cellulose at pH 7.0 in 20 mM imidazole buffer and eluted with a NaCl gradient. Purified protein was stored in 50% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA at -20 °C. The L340S protein did not bind to DEAE-cellulose and was chromatographed on heparin (Hi-Trap, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

In initial overexpression trials, only W328A was found as soluble protein. The W328A protein was expressed in the tryptophan auxotroph E. coli CY15077 grown in Luria broth at 30 °C. Cells were disrupted by French pressure cell treatment, and the protein was purified at 4 °C by the same procedures used for wild type sigma 54 (14). Briefly, the cell-free extract was subjected to streptomycin sulfate precipitation to remove nucleic acid and then ammonium sulfate fractionation to recover the W328A protein as a precipitate. This was followed by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography, heparin (Hi-Trap, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and finally strong anion exchange chromatography. The protein was stored as above except NaCl was at 50 mM.

Open Complex Assay-- The DNA used in the assay was a 650-base pair fragment containing the Sinorhizobium meliloti nifH promoter and NifA upstream activation sequences, prepared by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the promoter in pMB210 (27) and gel-purified. Reactions contained 5 nM [32P]DNA, 50 nM E. coli core RNA polymerase (Epicentre Technologies), 25-400 nM sigma 54, 3.8 µM PspFDelta HTH (29), and 1 mM GTP in STA buffer (25 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.0, 8 mM magnesium acetate, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 3.5% w/v polyethylene glycol 6000). Core and sigma 54 were added to the DNA and incubated at 30 °C for 5 min before the addition of activator and GTP. At 15 min, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 3 µl of stop mix (50% glycerol, 600 µg/ml heparin, and 0.05% w/v bromphenol blue) and gently mixed. Reactions were directly loaded onto 4% native polyacrylamide Bio-Rad mini-protean II gels and run at room temperature at 60 V in 25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine buffer, pH 8.6, for 2 h. [32P]DNA was detected by a phosphorimaging device. Reactions were replicated to enhance reliability of the data.

Transcription Assays-- S. meliloti nifH promoter DNA as plasmid pMKC28 was used as the template in transcription experiments (22). Assays (at 30 °C) contained holoenzyme assembled from 100 nM E. coli core RNA polymerase and a 6-fold excess of sigma 54. Pre-incubation of promoter DNA (20 nM) and holoenzyme was for 10 min in STA buffer with ATP (4 mM) and activator protein PspFDelta HTH (4 µM) unless otherwise stated in the figure legend. A mixture of the remaining 3 NTPs (GTP and CTP 0.2 mM, UTP 0.05 mM) and 1.5 µCi of [alpha -32P]UTP plus 100 µg/ml heparin was then added for a further 10 min. Reactions were stopped by mixing in formamide-sequencing loading buffer and heated to 90 °C, and half the sample was directly run on 6% denaturing sequencing gels. Reactions were replicated to enhance reliability of the data. Transcripts were detected by phosphorimaging device. Transcription from nifH on pMKC28 yields a 469-base product.

Gel-shift Assays-- These were conducted using linear end-labeled S. meliloti nifH promoter fragments as described previously (9, 30). Reactions were replicated to enhance reliability of the data. Either an 88-mer homoduplex or heteroduplex molecule from -60 to +28, the latter with the -10 to -1 or -12/-11 non-template strand sequence mismatched, was used. One strand was [32P]DNA, and the other unlabeled strand was annealed at a 2-fold excess. Binding reactions with DNA (2.5 nM) were in STA buffer at 30 °C, and bound and unbound DNA was resolved on 4-4.5% native polyacrylamide Bio-Rad mini-protean II gels run at room temperature at 60 V in 25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine buffer, pH 8.6.

DNA Footprints-- These were conducted on linear DNA fragments generated by primer extension of single-stranded DNA derived from M13mp19 clones of the S. meliloti nifH promoter (9, 23). End-labeled universal sequencing primer was extended by Klenow polymerase. Footprints were as before and used either S1 nuclease (9) or ortho-copper phenanthroline (o-Cup)1 (23).

Protein-Promoter Cross-linking-- This was conducted as described previously (17). Briefly sigma 54 (4 µM) and labeled 21-base pair (-30 to -10) S. meliloti nifH promoter duplex (100 nM) were incubated together in STA buffer with 0.34 µg/µl salmon sperm DNA at 30 °C for 10 min, chilled on ice, and irradiated with a 254-nm light source for 20 min on ice. The cross-linking reactions were warmed to 37 °C and resolved on denaturing SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis mini gels. Reactions were replicated to enhance reliability of the data. Cross-linking products were detected by a phosphorimaging device.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mutations in sigma 54-- Enzyme and chemical cleavage of sigma 54 suggested that the patch of sigma 54 that can be UV-cross-linked to promoter DNA resided between or included residues Trp-328 to Cys-346 (14, 17). To further study the importance of this patch for sigma 54 function, single amino acid substitutions of conserved residues W328A, R336A, D338A, L340S, R342A, and deletion of an adjacent surface-exposed region Delta 310-328 were created by site-directed mutagenesis. Preparation of R336A has been described previously (22). In each case the integrity of the mutated rpoN was established by DNA sequencing. Immunoblots using polyclonal anti-sigma 54 antibody confirmed that all mutants were expressed as intact protein (data not shown).

In Vivo Function and Transcription Activities of the sigma 54 Mutants-- Initially the ability of each mutant sigma 54 to complement an rpoN- K. pneumoniae mutant for growth on arginine as a nitrogen source was tested (Table I). The Delta 310-328 mutant did not allow growth, whereas L340S allowed approximately 25% growth compared with wild type. The mutants W328A, D338A, and R342A were largely unimpaired for growth. Using the rpoN- K. pneumoniae strain, each sigma 54 mutant was tested for transcription activity using sigma 54-dependent reporter promoters fused to lacZ. Five test promoters were used to evaluate any promoter-specific effects: the wild type K. pneumoniae nifH and mutants nifH049, nifH050, nifH053, and nifH054, all of which respond to activator NifA. The nifH049, -050, -053, and -054 promoters are mutants of the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter (see Table II) with changed affinities for sigma 54 (18). Bacteria were grown under anaerobic nitrogen-limiting conditions to induce synthesis and activity of chromosomal nifA. Overall, the in vivo transcription results mirror the initial growth test. Delta 310-328 gave no detectable transcription activity, whereas L340S produced significantly lower transcription activity compared with wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme at all promoters (Table II, data in parentheses). At the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter, all mutants gave reduced levels of activity compared with wild type (Table II, column 2, data in parentheses). At the K. pneumoniae nifH049 promoter, all point mutant transcription activity increased with D338A and R342A, producing close to wild type level (Table II, column 3, data in parentheses). At the nifH049 promoter, the activity of L340S, although low, was 4-fold that seen at the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter. As discussed previously (22), the "T-tract" in the nifH049 promoter may be compensating for a lost or reduced contact made by sigma 54 as part of the holoenzyme (18). Greater affinity for the promoter could increase occupancy and potentially favor initiation by holoenzymes, which form open complexes slowly.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Complementation for growth on arginine in an rpoN- K. pneumoniae mutant
+++ indicates growth judged comparable with cells containing the wild type rpoN. + indicates poor growth, and - indicates no growth.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
beta -Galactosidase activity from the K. pneumoniae nifH mutant promoter series
The mean activity of wild type and each mutant sigma 54-holoenzyme at the wild type K. pneumoniae nifH promoter was set at 1. beta -Galactosidase activity at the mutant promoters is shown to the nearest fold difference. The actual mean values for beta -galactosidase activity in Miller units at the wild type K. pneumoniae nifH promoter were: wild type, 19852; W328A, 14529; D338A, 18392; L340S, 536; R342A, 13955. The -17 to -11 sequence of each promoter is indicated with the mutated base in bold. Values for each mutant at the wild type K. pneumoniae nifH and mutant promoters, compared with the mean beta -galactosidase activity of wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme taken as 100%, are shown in parentheses.

To further explore the stimulatory effect of the T-tract we used a K. pneumoniae nifH mutant promoter series in which each C from -17 to -15 has individually been replaced by T (27) (Table II). These data show that for wild type and all mutant sigma 54-holoenzymes, a C to T change at -17 or -15 produces at least a 2-fold increase in transcription activity and is at least as stimulatory for transcription as the -17 to -15 CCC to TTT change (Table II). Except for L340S, which showed a 3-fold increase in activity, the C to T change at -16 was not stimulatory for transcription. The L340S sigma 54-holoenzyme, which has the lowest activity compared with wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme (Table II, data in parentheses), was highly stimulated by the C to T change at -15, producing a 10-fold increase above its activity at the wild type nifH promoter. In vivo experiments using a consensus promoter sequence where the consensus -12 core promoter sequence (TTGC) was randomly mutated suggested that the -15 consensus T was important for maintaining promoter function (31). The results suggest that the L340S mutation may cause a disruption in correct recognition and/or binding to the K. pneumoniae nifH-12 promoter region, which is to some degree rescued by the C to T change at -15.

Overall the in vivo analysis revealed that substitutions in the cross-linking patch and deletion of adjacent residues leads to three classes of mutant: class I, no transcription activity (Delta 310-328); class II, reduced transcription activity (L340S); and class III, significant levels of activity stimulated further by a high affinity promoter. To facilitate further analysis of any defects in the mutant sigma s, proteins were overexpressed and purified. Each sigma 54 was judged to be >90% pure by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Core Binding-- An essential early step in transcription is the binding of sigma  to core to form the holoenzyme. To determine whether any mutation grossly altered the interaction of sigma  with core, a native gel holoenzyme assembly assay was conducted. With the exception of L340S, each mutant shifted all core at a molar ratio of 1:1 (sigma 54:core), indicating that core binding was intact and could not readily account for the defects in transcription seen in vivo (data not shown). In contrast to the other mutants and wild type sigma 54, L340S and its holoenzyme did not enter the native gel, indicating this protein has altered physical properties. All other mutant holoenzymes appeared to have a mobility indistinguishable from wild type holoenzyme. This suggests that, with the exception of L340S, the conformation of the holoenzyme is not grossly changed by the cross-link patch substitution or deletion of residues 310-328. The native gel also showed that free-running W328A sigma 54 (not associated with core) has increased mobility compared with wild type sigma 54, suggesting that the W328A substitution has altered the conformation of the sigma 54 protein (data not shown).

sigma 54 Interactions with Native DNA-- sigma 54 binds the S. meliloti nifH promoter in the absence of core polymerase (18). To evaluate the effects of mutations on sigma 54 DNA binding, gel-shift assays using S. meliloti nifH promoter DNA were conducted. Titration of the mutant sigma 54 showed that mutations W328A and R342A each reduce DNA binding, whereas Delta 310-328 and D338A were essentially wild type for DNA binding in this assay (Fig. 2A). Wild type sigma 54 shifted half the DNA at 1.5 µM, whereas W328A and R342A shifted approximately half the probe at 4 µM. L340S did not detectably bind the DNA; however, it could not be properly assayed because of its aberrant gel mobility. The lack of DNA binding by L340S may therefore be related to structural defects (as indicated by native gel mobility) rather than loss of an essential DNA contact.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, DNA binding activity of mutant sigma 54 compared with wild type (WT) sigma 54 on the S. meliloti nifH promoter in a gel mobility shift assay. B, UV cross-linking of mutant and wild type sigma 54 to a 21-base pair S. meliloti nifH promoter fragment. The arrow indicates the lack of a lower mobility product in the W328A cross-linking reaction. C, ortho-copper phenanthroline footprint of sigma 54 protein at the S. meliloti nifH promoter. The arrow indicates loss of the hypersensitive site at -5 in the W328A sigma 54 footprint. All sigma 54 proteins were present at a concentration judged to bind 50% of the DNA in the gel mobility shift assay (A). Lane 1, DNA alone. Lane 2, wild type sigma 54. Lane 3, W328A

The reduced DNA binding of W328A and R342A indicates that they are functionally important residues within the DNA cross-linking patch of sigma 54 that contribute to DNA binding. We directly confirmed this by conducting a DNA cross-linking assay (Fig. 2B). The formation of two products in the cross-linking assay probably reflects stable cross-linking of sigma 54 to either both strands or one strand of the DNA (17). Interestingly R342A, which showed reduced DNA binding in the gel-shift assay, gave wild type levels of cross-link product, indicating that residue Arg-342 is less important for the cross-linking reaction (Fig. 2B, compare lanes 1 and 6). W328A consistently produced only the lower band cross-link product (Fig. 2B, lane 3). Trp-328 may be important for a DNA interaction necessary to form the slower running cross-link product, or the altered conformation of the W328A mutant, as suggested by its native gel mobility, may result in the loss of the slower running cross-link product. It is notable that the Delta 310-328 sigma 54 protein, which lacks residue Trp-328, was unlike the W328A mutant and not defective for DNA binding or UV-cross-linking (Fig. 2B, lane 2). The effect of the W328A mutation upon DNA binding appears hidden in the Delta 310-328 protein. This might be because deletion of residues 310-328 reveals further DNA binding activity in the sigma 54 protein (21), or via Delta 310-328, a change in Region I position has occurred to unmask DNA binding (11).

The interaction of the mutant sigma 54 with the S. meliloti nifH promoter was further investigated by DNase I, S1, and o-Cup footprinting. In the DNase I and S1 assays, all mutant sigma 54 gave footprints indistinguishable from wild type sigma 54 (data not shown). In the o-Cup footprinting assay, D338A and R342A sigma 54 gave similar footprints to wild type sigma 54 (data not shown). o-Cup footprints of W328A and Delta 310-328 sigma 54 did not show the typical cut at -5 on the top strand, suggesting that Trp-328 is involved in a start site proximal promoter interaction (Fig. 2C).

Taken together, the gel-shift, DNA-cross-linking, and o-Cup footprinting assays establish that residues W328A and R342A both contribute to the DNA binding activity of sigma 54 and that each mutant has a different qualitative and quantitative effect on the sigma 54 DNA interaction.

sigma 54 Interactions with Melted DNA-- Artificially melted DNA at -12/-11 simulates the nucleation of promoter DNA melting seen within the natural holoenzyme closed complex (23). The -12/-11 position was identified as a nucleation site by o-Cup footprinting and by gel mobility assays with DNA fork junction probes (23, 32). Heteroduplex S. meliloti nifH DNA, where the top strand bases at -12 and -11 are mismatched, was used to investigate the interactions of the mutant sigma 54 with the -12 promoter region early melted DNA. As with fork junction DNA, where the bottom strand thymine residue is unpaired compared with double-stranded DNA, the -12/-11 early melted DNA was preferred for wild type sigma  binding (32). Like wild type sigma 54, mutants W328A, D338A, and R342A all showed a preference for binding the early melted DNA (Fig. 3). In contrast, the Delta 310-328 sigma 54 showed no preference for binding the early melted DNA and bound it less well than native double-stranded DNA (Fig. 3).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   DNA binding activity of mutant sigma 54 compared with wild type (WT) on the S. meliloti nifH promoter using native 88-mer, early melted (-12/-11) and late melted (-10/-1) heteroduplex 88-mer DNA. Values shown are for percent DNA bound with sigma 54 proteins at 1 µM.

A second assay to examine whether the sigma 54 interaction with melted DNA changed was performed by measuring the ability of sigma  to bind heteroduplex DNA that is mismatched from -1 to -10, DNA which is melted in the later stages of open complex formation (9, 22). Wild type and mutant sigma 54 including Delta 310-328 sigma 54 showed a preference for binding the -10/-1 late-melted DNA (Fig. 3). It seems that sigma 54 has a modest preference for binding to melted DNA structures that are normally only created when holoenzyme is bound to the promoter. This suggests that, normally as part of the holoenzyme, sigma 54 is likely to be intimately involved in the initiation and maintenance of the DNA strand separation needed for open complex formation (9, 22, 32). Apparently the cross-linking patch mutants assayed here, unlike Delta 310-328 sigma 54, do not change the binding preference of sigma 54 but do contribute to overall binding activity.

sigma 54 Isomerization-- When activator and hydrolyzable nucleoside triphosphate are added to sigma  bound to early melted DNA, a new sigma 54-DNA complex results (the supershifted band) with an extended sigma  DNase I footprint indicating that activator interacts with sigma  and causes it to isomerize and increase its interaction with DNA.2 All cross-linking patch mutant sigma s were tested for isomerization. For activation we used a deletion mutant form of the activator PspF that lacks its DNA binding domain, PspFDelta HTH (29), to simplify the gel-shift assay. In the isomerization assay, mutants D338A and R342A sigma 54 behaved as wild type (data not shown). The Delta 310-328 sigma 54 mutant did not respond to activator to produce a supershift (data not shown), whereas W328A produced only a small amount of supershift (Fig. 4). The lack of any supershifted band for Delta 310-328 is found also with sigma 54 lacking Region I and correlates with an inactivity for transcription in vivo.2 The defective response of W328A to activator in the supershift assay was investigated further. Titration of the W328A protein did not increase the amount of supershifted complex (Fig. 4), nor was the amount of supershifting DNA increased by longer incubation times (data not shown). Replacing PspF with the activator NifA, increasing the amount of PspF, or increasing the amount of DNA probe in the reaction did not result in an increased conversion of DNA-bound sigma 54 to the isomerized form (data not shown). Exposing the W328A protein to PspF and nucleotide before adding the DNA did not detectably change the percentage of supershifted product (data not shown). Overall, these results show that the W328A protein is unable to be rescued for sigma 54 isomerization. Whether its altered conformation or its changed DNA interaction per se, detected by o-Cup footprint (Fig. 2C), reduces sigma  isomerization is not clear. Nonetheless, Trp-328 contributes to sigma 54 isomerization.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Gel-shift mobility assay for sigma 54 isomerization on the 88-mer early melted (-12/-11) heteroduplex. Plots indicate the percentage of DNA bound with normal mobility (sigma 54-DNA) and the percentage of DNA bound with lower mobility (sssigma 54-DNA) in response to the activator and nucleotide. The free DNA is not shown. Conditions were as for other gel-shift assays except PspFDelta HTH (4 µM) and dGTP (4 µM) were also added. sigma 54 proteins were at 1 to 6 µM. WT, wild type.

Holoenzyme Interaction with Native DNA-- Gel-shift assays using the S. meliloti nifH promoter 88-mer were conducted to study the effect of the sigma 54 mutants on holoenzyme DNA binding. The mutant W328A that showed decreased sigma 54 DNA binding activity formed holoenzyme that bound DNA with approximately the same affinity as wild type holoenzyme, suggesting that core was still able to stabilize the sigma  on DNA (Fig. 5). In contrast, the R342A holoenzyme showed a decrease in DNA binding compared with wild type. At 80 nM, the wild type holoenzyme bound 39% of the DNA, whereas the R342A holoenzyme bound 17% (Fig. 5). This result suggests that residue Arg-342 makes an important contribution to the DNA binding energy of the holoenzyme in the closed complex, consistent with the reduced R342A sigma 54 DNA binding (Fig. 2A). The Delta 310-328 and L340S holoenzymes bound approximately 2-fold more of the DNA probe than wild type holoenzyme, approximately equivalent to the DNA binding activities observed for deleted Region I sigma 54 and deleted Regions I and II sigma 54 (11). This suggests that these mutants may have allowed the holoenzyme to form a conformation equivalent to that of the deleted Region I sigma 54-holoenzyme, which has an extended DNA contact (9). Because L340S sigma 54 alone does not bind DNA and has altered physical properties (aberrant mobility on native gel), the above result suggests that on binding to core to form the holoenzyme, L340S is reconfigured and revealed to have much of its DNA binding activity intact. The interaction with promoter DNA apparently stabilizes a more native conformation of the L340S holoenzyme. It seems L340S alters sigma 54 conformation but in a way readily rescued in the holoenzyme DNA complex. On association with core RNA polymerase to form the holoenzyme, the conformation of sigma 54 is altered (20, 24). The mutants W328A, L340S, and Delta 310-328 may be changed for core-dependent DNA binding.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   DNA binding activity of mutant holoenzyme compared with wild type holoenzyme on the S. meliloti nifH promoter 88-mer DNA. Data shown is for holoenzymes (Esigma 54) at 40 nM.

Holoenzyme Interaction with Melted DNA-- Closed promoter complexes formed with the sigma 54-holoenzyme are very heparin-sensitive, but holoenzyme binding to early melted DNA results in an increased stability toward heparin (30). Stability may reflect altered sigma 54-core interactions, which are normally disrupted by heparin (13). Heparin stability of holoenzymes on the early melted DNA was tested to evaluate the contribution of the cross-linking patch to stability. All mutant holoenzymes except Delta 310-328 bound the DNA with an affinity similar to wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme with between 70 and 85% of the DNA bound with 100 nM holoenzyme (Fig. 6, top). The Delta 310-328 holoenzyme bound about 56% of the probe (Fig. 6). The holoenzyme-DNA complex was then challenged for 5 min with the polyanion heparin. Of the initial complex formed for wild type, W328A, D338A, and R342A holoenzymes, 37-50% of the complex was heparin-stable after 5 min (Fig. 6). For the Delta 310-328 and L340S holoenzymes, only 7 and 23% of the complexes were heparin-stable after 5 min. This suggests that the Delta 310-328 and L340S sigma 54 disrupt holoenzyme interactions in the -12/-11 promoter region, which leads to heparin stability. For Delta 310-328, the defect may be in DNA binding to early melted DNA, for L340S in core interactions (see above). In both cases, defects in stability on the early melted DNA correlate with an activator-independent transcription activity (Ref. 32 and see below).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Heparin stability of mutant holoenzyme on early melted (-12/-11) S. meliloti nifH 88-mer heteroduplex DNA. The top section shows the amount of DNA probe bound before (-) and 5 min after (+) the addition of heparin. The top band in the L340S (-) lane has the mobility of DNA probe bound by free core (E). The graphed data shows the percentage of DNA still bound by holoenzyme (Esigma 54) after the 5-min heparin challenge. WT, wild type.

Holoenzyme binding to late melted (-10/-1) DNA was assayed. Wild type holoenzyme is able to form a heparin-stable interaction with this premelted DNA template when activated. The Delta 310-328, as shown for deleted Region I sigma 54 and the R336A holoenzyme (10, 22), was able to form a heparin-stable complex on premelted DNA in the absence of activation (data not shown). This result suggests the Delta 310-328 sigma 54, like deleted Region I sigma 54 and R336A sigma 54, may result in activator-independent holoenzyme isomerization (9, 22). The unactivated L340S holoenzyme on the late melted DNA gave slightly increased stability toward heparin compared with wild type holoenzyme (data not shown), suggesting an improved interaction with single strand DNA and a low level of holoenzyme isomerization. The mutants W328A, D338A, and R342A holoenzymes behaved like wild type holoenzyme and did not form heparin-stable complexes on the late melted DNA in the absence of activator and NTP (data not shown).

Holoenzyme Footprinting-- As previously reported for holoenzyme with sigma 54 lacking its Region I sequence and the R336A holoenzyme, there is a correlation between activator-independent heparin-stable binding of holoenzyme to late melted DNA (-10/-1 bubble), activator bypass transcription, and altered holoenzyme-DNA interactions at start site and -12 proximal promoter sequences as detected by S1 and o-Cup footprints (9, 22). In the S1 footprint assay, only Delta 310-328 holoenzyme gave the extended footprint to +20 (Fig. 7A, lane 4), equivalent to that made by activated wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme or the deregulated deleted Region I sigma 54 and R336A holoenzymes (Fig. 7A, lanes 3 and 6) suggested to be related to holoenzyme isomerization and single-stranded DNA binding activity (9, 22). The L340S holoenzyme did not give the extended footprint but was different from wild type holoenzyme in that it did not protect the DNA from cutting at -10 (Fig. 7A, lane 8).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, S1 footprint of holoenzymes at the S. meliloti nifH promoter. The extended footprint of the Delta 310-328 (lane 4), R336A (lane 6), and Region I deleted (Delta I) (lane 3) holoenzymes is indicated by the dotted line. Delta I and R336A holoenzymes are included as positive controls for the extended footprint. The arrow indicates sensitivity at -10. Lane 0, DNA alone. Lane 1, core RNA polymerase. B, ortho-copper phenanthroline footprint. The arrow indicates the loss of the hypersensitive site at -12 in the Delta 310-328 (lane 4) and L340S (lane 8) holoenzyme footprints. Delta I (lane 3) and R336A (lane 6) holoenzymes are positive controls for loss of the hypersensitive site. Lane 0, DNA alone. Lane 1, core RNA polymerase. WT, wild type. E, core RNA polymerase.

When the holoenzymes were footprinted with o-Cup, both Delta 310-328 and L340S holoenzymes gave footprints in which the hypersensitive site around -12 was absent (Fig. 7B, lanes 4 and 8) equivalent to that made by deleted Region I sigma 54 and R336A holoenzymes (Fig. 7B, lanes 3 and 6). The W328A holoenzyme and the other mutants produced footprints similar to the wild type holoenzyme. The -12 site is suggested to be where nucleation of DNA melting occurs (23) and is important for maintaining the inhibited state of the holoenzyme by preventing polymerase isomerization (32). With wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme, reactivity at -12 is diminished upon open complex formation (23). The L340S holoenzyme would appear to be similar to the Delta 310-328, deleted Region I sigma 54, and R336A holoenzymes in that it has lost the o-Cup -12-sensitive site but different in that its S1 footprint (and binding to late melted DNA) shows it has not isomerized to the same extent. This suggests that some interactions with the promoter -12 sequence can be separated from other interactions that, when altered, result in efficient activator-independent isomerization of the holoenzyme.

In Vitro Transcription-- For the sigma 54-holoenzyme closed complex to be converted into an open complex, the closed complex must interact with an activator of the sigma 54-holoenzyme in a reaction that requires nucleotide hydrolysis. Single round in vitro transcription assays were conducted to study the effect of the mutants on activator-dependent and -independent transcription initiation. Using supercoiled DNA, the level of sigma 54-dependent transcription from the S. meliloti nifH promoter was measured with PspFDelta HTH as activator (Fig. 8A). We also measured any potential of the mutant sigma 54 to support transcription without activator by preincubating holoenzyme and template DNA with GTP before heparin challenge (Fig. 8B). The initiating sequence of the S. meliloti nifH promoter is GGG (+1 to +3); thus, the addition of GTP before heparin could allow open complexes to initiate and form heparin-stable complexes. Transcripts are then extended from the heparin-stable activator-independent initiated complex that has formed. In activator-dependent assays, ATP and PspFDelta HTH were added before the heparin challenge. Hence transcripts in this assay arise from heparin-stable uninitiated open complexes, since ATP is not an effective initiating nucleotide at the S. meliloti nifH promoter.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, in vitro activator-dependent transcription activity at the supercoiled S. meliloti nifH promoter. Changes in transcription activity as a function of activator PspFDelta HTH concentration (nM). Holoenzyme was present at 100 nM. Reactants were preincubated with ATP (4 mM) before the addition of heparin. B, in vitro activator-independent (bypass) transcription assay in which reactants were preincubated with GTP (1 mM) before the addition of heparin. Reactions were performed as standard with (+) or without (-) activator. Delta I and R336A are included as positive controls for bypass transcription. WT, wild type.

Using saturating levels of PspFDelta HTH, the activator-dependent assay revealed a trend for transcription activity levels closely following the pattern seen in the in vivo assays (see Table I). The Delta 310-328 holoenzyme essentially produced no activated transcript, whereas W328A, D338A, and R342A gave levels closest to wild type activity. The L340S mutant produced approximately 18% of the transcripts made by wild type holoenzyme. With holoenzyme present at 100 nM, the amount of PspFDelta HTH required for half-maximal transcription was measured as an indicator of the apparent affinity of each closed complex for activator. Mutants W328A, D338A, and R342A showed similar half-maximal PspFDelta HTH requirements as the wild type holoenzyme. The L340S holoenzyme required approximately 2-fold more activator, similar to results previously reported for R336A (22). The apparent reduced affinity for activator of the L340S mutant may be indirect and due to its aberrant structure rather than loss of any specific activator contact. As previously reported for R336A holoenzyme (22), a time course of exposure to heparin before the addition of the NTP extension mix showed no significant difference in stability of the transcription-competent open complexes between L340S and wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme (data not shown). This together with the closed complex (Fig. 5) and open complex gel mobility assay data (Fig. 9) suggests that L340S holoenzyme is defective at some step where the closed complex is converted to the open complex but that Leu-340 is unimportant for the stability of the resultant open complex. Activator-dependent transcription was also tested on a linearized DNA template. All mutants were active for transcription on the linear DNA, suggesting no obvious defect in DNA melting (data not shown). However, mutants D338A and R342A were more active than the wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme for activated transcription from the linear DNA template. With PspFDelta HTH at 800 nM, the D338A and R342A sigma 54-holoenzymes were 42% and 24%, respectively, more active for transcription than wild type sigma 54-holoenzyme (data not shown). This suggests that the D338A and R342A sigma 54-holoenzymes could be enhanced for a DNA-melting activity that is not detected when transiently melting supercoiled DNA is used as template.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Gel mobility shift assay for heparin stable open complex formation on linear S. meliloti nifH promoter DNA homoduplex. sigma 54 was titrated against core (50 nM) with a saturating level of the activator PspFDelta HTH (4 µM) and 1 mM GTP. The maximum activity for wild type (WT) was taken as 100%.

In the activator-independent assay (GTP addition before heparin), among the mutants investigated here only Delta 310-328 and, to a much lower extent, L340S holoenzyme (both of which showed altered interaction in the heteroduplex and footprinting assays) produced discernable levels of transcripts (Fig. 8B, lanes 5 and 9). The native gel mobility data indicate that L340S is structurally disrupted. Delta 310-328 has lost a potential surface-exposed loop connecting the carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain with the rest of sigma 54. In both cases the activator bypass activity and correlating holoenzyme activities (instability on early melted DNA, stability on late melted DNA, and altered footprints) might be due to local or more extensive structural disruptions in sigma 54, interfering with correct functioning of Arg-336 or the Region I of sigma 54, both of which are known to function to restrict the holoenzyme to the transcriptionally silent closed complex (9, 22, 32).

Stable Initiated Complex Formation-- In the single round transcription assay, abortive initiation and promoter escape activities can influence the amount of transcript produced. Therefore, to investigate the ability of holoenzyme to form heparin-stable initiated complexes on linear DNA, we used a gel mobility shift assay. To ensure that the polymerase was saturated with sigma 54, increasing amounts of sigma  were added to a constant concentration of core (33). For activation, we used PspFDelta HTH with GTP as the hydrolyzable nucleotide to allow open complexes to initiate. The Delta 310-328 holoenzyme was unable to efficiently form heparin-resistant complexes and, as suggested by the in vivo transcription assays and DNA binding assays, appears to form a closed complex unable to respond to activator. Although the L340S holoenzyme was very active for closed complex formation, it appears that little of the closed complex detected can be converted to heparin-stable initiated complex (Fig. 9). This correlates with the poor transcription activity observed for this mutant in vivo and in vitro (Table I and Fig. 8A). The W328A holoenzyme was approximately 60% as active as wild type for stable initiated complex formation, whereas D338A and R342A sigma 54-holoenzymes, as suggested by transcription on linear DNA, were in repeated experiments consistently improved compared with wild type for stable complex formation (Fig. 9). The increase in initiated complex formation as the ratio of sigma  to core polymerase is increased must reflect that D338A and R342A sigma 54 have an altered affinity for core within the assay. It is notable that R342A holoenzyme, which formed low levels of closed complexes, was not obviously defective for stable complex formation. Thus, the mutation R342A appears important for sigma 54 and holoenzyme DNA binding but unimportant for the post DNA binding step of stable initiated complex formation. Closed complexes that form with R342A may convert more efficiently to initiated complexes than wild type.

The reduced activity of the W328A holoenzyme for initiated complex formation might be due to a defect in DNA strand separation. A repeat of the initiated complex assay at 15 °C showed that stable initiated complex formation by W328A holoenzyme was not especially temperature-dependent (data not shown). Cold-sensitive DNA opening is evident for mutants in sigma 70 that are believed to lack single-stranded DNA binding activity (34). The insensitivity of the W328A holoenzyme activity to lower temperature suggests residue Trp-328 is not involved in DNA opening in the way that aromatic residues in sigma 70 are.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The sigma 54-holoenzyme closed complex is converted to an open complex via a reaction employing activator nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis (5-9). In vivo and in vitro transcription assays identified three classes of mutant in the patch of sigma 54 that can be cross-linked to DNA. The Delta 310-328 sigma 54 was inactive for transcription; L340S, like R336A (22), gave reduced transcription activity; and the remaining mutants gave close to wild type transcription levels. The cross-linking patch contains residues both important for promoter binding (Trp-328 and Arg-342) and sigma  isomerization (Trp-328) as well as restricting basal transcription (amino acids 310-328 and Leu-340) and setting the level of open complex formation (Trp-328, Asp-338, Leu-340, and Arg-342). DNA footprints suggest that the cross-linking patch directs interactions with promoter DNA near -12. The -12 promoter sequence has a crucial role in sigma 54-dependent transcription, providing interactions that set basal transcription and which start DNA melting (23, 31, 32). Mutations in the -12 region produced promoters that increased basal transcription or diminished activation (31). Some sequences in the cross-linking patch apparently contribute to interactions with the -12 promoter region important for control of sigma 54-holoenzyme transcription activity. Interactions of the three classes of mutant sigma  and their holoenzymes with both native and heteroduplex promoter DNA templates are discussed in the context of the sigma 54 transcription initiation mechanism.

The class I mutant Delta 310-328 holoenzyme was inactive for activator-dependent transcription in vivo and in vitro due to the inability of its closed complex to respond to activator and form an open complex. The Delta 310-328 holoenzyme did allow activator bypass transcription in vitro (Fig. 8B, lane 5) and formed a heparin-stable complex on late melted DNA (data not shown), showing the conformation of the holoenzyme had changed. The Delta 310-328 and wild type sigma 54 had similar affinities for native promoter DNA (Fig. 2A). Like the deleted Region I sigma 54-holoenzyme (11) the Delta 310-328 holoenzyme was enhanced for DNA binding (Fig. 5). Also, as for deleted Region I and R336A holoenzymes (9, 22), S1 footprinting showed the Delta 310-328 holoenzyme has isomerized to give an extended footprint (Fig. 7A, lane 4), and o-Cup footprinting revealed an altered interaction at -12 (Fig. 7B, lane 4). The Delta 310-328 sigma 54 was defective for binding to early melted DNA (Fig. 3), and its holoenzyme was unstable on this template (Fig. 6). Possibly, this critically relates to the inability to be activated because the initial nucleation of DNA melting may not have occurred. Furthermore, residues 310-328 are likely surface-exposed (20) and could be a site for activator contact (35). Removal of these residues could change the holoenzyme conformation such that it is unable to respond to activator and isomerize properly. Interestingly, single-stranded DNA binding activity has been implicated for a region of sigma 54 between amino acids 329 and 364 (21). Deletion of residues 310-328 may cause a local change in conformation, which reveals this single strand DNA binding activity. Thus Delta 310-328 appears to behave like deleted Region I sigma 54. Both are unable to respond to activator and form an unstable holoenzyme interaction with early melted DNA. Instead, a stable interaction with late melted DNA is favored. In contrast, wild type holoenzyme can form an activator-independent heparin-stable complex on early melted DNA but cannot on late melted DNA (9, 30). Mutant sigma s such as Delta 310-328 and deleted Region I sigma 54, which exhibit a reverse activity with heparin-stable holoenzyme complex forming on late melted DNA are also capable of activator bypass transcription (see Fig. 8B, lanes 3 and 5). The bypass activity of the Delta 310-328 sigma 54-holoenzyme supports the idea that disrupting sigma 54 recognition of early melted DNA near the -12 promoter region directs the holoenzyme to form a more stable complex with melted downstream promoter sequences and which, under specialized conditions, can allow activator-independent transcription (9, 22, 32).

The class II L340S holoenzyme was shown to be defective in conversion from closed to open complex (compare Fig. 5 with Figs. 8A and 9). The purified L340S sigma 54 protein was physically disrupted and could not be directly assayed for DNA or core binding. However, when the L340S sigma 54 was mixed with core and promoter DNA, a closed complex with normal gel mobility was observed. Interaction between sigma , core, and DNA apparently caused the sigma  to become restructured and to form a closed complex capable of transcription. The L340S holoenzyme showed a 10-fold increase in transcription activity at the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter when the C at -15 was changed to T (Table II). Replacing the K. pneumoniae nifH -15 C with a T is stimulatory for binding of sigma 54 and its holoenzyme