![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22121-22126, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From The Wellcome Trust Biocentre, Department of Biochemistry,
University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, United Kingdom
Received for publication, April 3, 2000, and in revised form, May 2, 2000
Here we characterize the properties and
expression pattern of Siglec-9 (sialic acid-binding
Ig-like lectin-9), a new member of the Siglec
subgroup of the immunoglobulin superfamily. A full-length cDNA
encoding Siglec-9 was isolated from a dibutyryl cAMP-treated HL-60 cell
cDNA library. Siglec-9 is predicted to contain three extracellular
immunoglobulin-like domains that comprise an N-terminal V-set domain
and two C2-set domains, a transmembrane region and a cytoplasmic tail
containing two putative tyrosine-based signaling motifs. Overall,
Siglec-9 is ~80% identical in amino acid sequence to Siglec-7,
suggesting that the genes encoding these two proteins arose relatively
recently by gene duplication. Binding assays showed that, similar to
Siglec-7, Siglec-9 recognized sialic acid in either the Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins
(Siglecs)1 are transmembrane
sialic acid-binding proteins of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily
characterized by the presence of an N-terminal V-set Ig-like domain and
variable numbers of C2 set domains (1). The first Siglecs to be
characterized were sialoadhesin/Siglec-1, CD22/Siglec-2, CD33/Siglec-3
and myelin-associated glycoprotein/Siglec-4 which share ~25-30%
sequence identity within the extracellular regions (2). Recent studies
(3-8) have uncovered the existence of a cluster of genes on human
chromosome 19q13.3-4 that encode novel Siglecs highly related to CD33.
This CD33-related subgroup includes Siglecs-3, -5, -6, -7, and -8, each
of which share ~50-70% sequence identity, suggesting that the genes
encoding them have arisen relatively recently by gene duplication and
exon shuffling. Despite their sequence similarity, all novel Siglecs
characterized to date are expressed on distinct subsets of hemopoietic
cells, such as neutrophils (Siglec-5) (4), B cells (Siglec-6) (8), natural killer (NK) cells (Siglec-7) (5, 6), and eosinophils (Siglec-8)
(7). Each of these Siglecs also exhibits distinct carbohydrate binding
properties (4, 5, 7-10). These differences in expression and ligand
binding suggest that each Siglec mediates a specific, nonredundant
function in hemopoietic cell biology.
The cytoplasmic tails of most CD33-related Siglecs contain two
homologous tyrosine-based motifs, one of which fits the consensus for
immune receptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) (11). The
presence of one or more ITIMs has been described in a growing number of
other leukocyte membrane receptors, many of which are tightly linked to
CD33-related Siglecs on chromosome 19q13.4, in a region known as the
leukocyte receptor cluster (12). The consensus that has emerged is that
receptors bearing ITIMs mediate inhibitory functions when
co-cross-linked with activating receptors bearing tyrosine based
activatory motifs (reviewed in Ref. 11). This has been shown to be due
to tyrosine phosphorylation of the ITIMs, leading to recruitment and
activation of intracellular phosphatases, either the tyrosine
phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2, or the inositol phosphatase, SHIP
(reviewed in Ref. 11). From the limited studies that have been carried
out so far, CD33 and related Siglecs appear to behave similarly in
mediating inhibitory signals. Taylor and co-workers (13) showed that
the tyrosine residues of both motifs in CD33 can be phosphorylated by
Src-like kinases following antibody-induced cross-linking and that this leads to recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2. The potential functional significance of tyrosine phosphorylation and SHP-1 recruitment by these
novel Siglecs was first demonstrated by Falco and colleagues (6) who
identified Siglec-7 as p75/AIRM1, a receptor that could inhibit NK cell
cytotoxicity. In a separate study of mononuclear phagocytes, it was
shown that co-cross-linking of CD33 with the CD64 high affinity Fc
receptor led to reduced CD64-dependent calcium fluxing as a
result of SHP-1 recruitment and activation (14).
In this paper we describe the properties and expression pattern of
Siglec-9, a new member of the Siglec family highly related to Siglec-7.
When expressed at the cell surface, Siglec-9 exhibits sialic
acid-dependent binding to human red blood cells and
synthetic sialoglycoconjugates. Using a specific monoclonal antibody,
we demonstrate that, unlike other Siglecs characterized previously, Siglec-9 is expressed quite broadly among human blood leukocytes, being
found on monocytes, neutrophils, B cells, NK cells, and minor subsets
of T cells.
Materials--
Unless specified otherwise, all reagents and
chemicals were purchased from Sigma. 125I-Streptavidin
(20-40 mCi/mg) and protein A-Sepharose were obtained from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. Vibrio cholerae sialidase was purchased
from Calbiochem. Biotinylated polyacrylamide (PAA) glycoconjugates carrying either NeuAc Isolation of Siglec-9 cDNA--
Based on a Siglec-like
genomic sequence deposited in GenBank (accession number AF135027), a
dibutyryl cAMP-treated HL-60 cDNA library kindly provided by Dr.
D. L. Simmons was used to isolate a full-length cDNA by
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following forward and reverse
primers (5'-3'): AACCCCAGACATGCTGCTGCTGCTG and
CATATGGTTATCATAGCTCATCACGT. The PCR product was cloned into pCR2.1
(Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) and sequenced. The full-length
sequence is available in GenBank under accession number AF247180.
Northern Blot Analysis--
A human Multiple Tissue Northern
blot containing approximately 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA per
lane from various human tissues was purchased from Origene Technologies
Ltd. (Rockville, MD) and hybridized with a 32P-labeled
probe corresponding to a region of Siglec-9 (bases 960-1522) that was
predicted not to cross-hybridize with mRNA encoding the other
highly related Siglecs.
Cells--
The following cell lines were provided by the ICRF
Cell Production Service: COS-1, Chinese hamster ovary K1 (CHO), KG1b,
K562, HL-60, U937, and THP-1. Daudi, Ramos, Jurkat, HUT78, JY, and
MonoMac6 were provided by Dr. Craig Stocks (Dundee University). YT
cells were provided by Dr. Gillian Griffiths (Oxford University). CHO cells stably expressing Siglec-7 (Siglec-7-CHO) were prepared as
described previously (5). COS-1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. CHO cells were cultured in Ham's F10 medium with 5% fetal calf serum
and all other cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 5 or
10% fetal calf serum. Human red blood cells were obtained from healthy
donors and stored at 4 °C in Alsever's solution for up to 2 weeks.
Human blood leukocytes were obtained from whole blood by dextran
sedimentation followed by lysis of contaminating red blood cells.
Mononuclear fractions for flow cytometry were obtained by density
gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Production of Fc Proteins--
A construct encoding CD33-Fc was
provided by Dr. D. L. Simmons. Constructs encoding Siglec-5-Fc and
Siglec-8-Fc proteins were generated as described previously (4, 7).
Constructs encoding Siglec-7-Fc and Siglec-9-Fc proteins were prepared
using a modified version of the pEE14 vector (15), designated
pEE14-3C-Fc. To prepare pEE14-3C-Fc, the BamHI site of pEE14
was first ablated and a HindIII-XbaI fragment
from pIG1-3C-Fc vector (16) was introduced (generously provided by
Prof. J. Heath, Birmingham University). This fragment encodes a
rhinovirus protease 3C cleavage site followed by human IgG1
Fc region. For Siglec-7-Fc, the entire extracellular region was
amplified by PCR using the following forward and reverse primers (5' to
3'): ACAAGCTTGCACCTCCAACCCCAGATATG and
ACGGATCCACTTACCTGTCCTCATTTTGCCTGTGTACTCCTG. The PCR product was
digested with HindIII and BamHI and cloned into
the pEE14-3C-Fc vector. For Siglec-9-Fc, a
HindIII-BamHI fragment encoding the leader
peptide of human CD33 (17) was cloned into the corresponding sites of
pEE14-3C-Fc. The resulting vector was designated pEE14-33L-3C-Fc. cDNA encoding the extracellular region (not including the leader peptide) of Siglec-9 was amplified by PCR using the following forward
and reverse primers (5' to 3'): CTCGGATTCCAAGTAAACTGCTGCACGATGC and
CCCGGATCCACTTACCTGTTGATGTGGCTTTGCTCTGCAA. The PCR product was cut with
BamHI and cloned into the BamHI site of
pEE14-33L-3C-Fc. Stable CHO cell lines secreting Siglec-Fc proteins
were prepared following standard methods (15).
Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies to Siglec-9--
Balb/c mice
were immunized three times with 10 µg of Siglec-9-Fc and spleen cells
fused with the SP2 myeloma using standard methods (18). Hybridoma
supernatants that reacted with Siglec-9-Fc, but not Siglec-7-Fc, were
identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In brief,
Siglec-7-Fc or Siglec-9-Fc at 1 µg/ml were immobilized to wells of
microtiter plates coated with goat anti-human IgG1 (Fc-specific).
Putative anti-Siglec-9 hybridoma supernatants were added to either
Siglec-7-Fc or Siglec-9-Fc-coated wells and binding of the mAbs
detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. The
alkaline phosphatase substrate, fluorescein diphosphate, was added and
the fluorescent product measured on a Perceptive Biosystems
Cytofluor II fluorescent plate reader. A single positive hybridoma was
identified and cloned four times by limiting dilution. The
anti-Siglec-9 mAb was designated K8 (IgG1( Red Blood Cell Binding Assays--
These were carried out as
described previously (19). Briefly, COS-1 cells were sham-transfected
or transfected with cDNA encoding full-length Siglec-9 or Siglec-7
used as a positive control. After 3 days, COS cells were
sialidase-treated or untreated and human red blood cells, either
sialidase-treated or untreated, were added. Rosetting was assessed by
microscopy after thorough washing to remove unbound red blood cells.
Binding Assays with Polyacrylamide Glycoconjugates--
CHO
cells stably expressing Siglec-9 (Siglec-9-CHO) were generated by
transfection with full-length Siglec-9 cloned into the pcDNA3
vector (Invitrogen). G418-resistant CHO cell clones expressing Siglec-9
were identified by their ability to bind anti-Siglec-9 mAb. Binding
assays with PAA glycoconjugates were carried out as described
previously (5). Briefly, Siglec-9-CHO or wild-type CHO cells were
sialidase-treated to remove cell surface sialic acids that could mask
the binding site of Siglec-9 and then incubated with saturating
concentrations (20 µg/ml) of various PAA conjugates. After 1 h,
cells were washed and binding of PAA conjugates detected by incubation
with 125I-streptavidin.
FACS Analysis--
Single and double labeling experiments were
performed following standard protocols (20). Cells were fixed in 2%
formaldehyde and analyzed on a Becton-Dickinson FACSort.
Characterization and Features of Siglec-9--
A full-length
cDNA encoding a novel Siglec-like protein was isolated by PCR from
a dibutyryl cAMP-treated HL-60 cDNA library using primers derived
from the sequence of a Siglec-like gene (GenBank accession number
AF135027). This gene was previously identified during characterization
of novel human kallikrein-like genes located on chromosome 19q13.3-4
(21) and encodes a putative protein with high sequence similarity to
Siglecs-5, -6, -7, and -8 (5, 7). This protein has been designated
Siglec-9 based on sequence similarity and its ability to bind sialic
acid (see below).
Sequencing of independent PCR products from the HL-60 cDNA library
confirmed the prediction (5, 7) that this novel Siglec contains three
Ig-like domains made up of an N-terminal V-set domain and two C2-set
domains (Fig. 1). However, a small number of differences were found in the coding sequence (not shown), only one
of which resulted in a change in the protein sequence, with a
conservative substitution of Arg269 to His269
(Fig. 1). There are 8 potential N-linked glycosylation sites and a cytoplasmic tail of 94 amino acids. Overall, the coding sequence
of Siglec-9 is ~84% identical to that of Siglec-7, the homology
extending throughout the extracellular, transmembrane, and
intracellular regions (Fig. 1).
Siglec-9 contains most of the characteristic features of the Siglec
subgroup of Ig superfamily proteins. These include the critical
arginine at position 120 that interacts with the carboxyl group of
sialic acid and the unusual pattern of cysteines in domains 1 and 2 that form intra-
Within the cytoplasmic tail, there are two conserved, putative
tyrosine-based signaling motifs typical of the majority of CD33-related
Siglecs (Fig. 1). The membrane proximal motif, LQYASL, fits the ITIM
consensus, (L/I/V/S)XYXX(L/V), and is similar to the corresponding motif in CD33, LHYASL, which has been shown to be
dominant in tyrosine phosphorylation and recruitment of SHP-1 (13, 14)
and SHP-2 (13). In comparison, the membrane distal motif, TEYSEI does
not fit the ITIM consensus but is similar to the membrane distal motif
of CD33, TEYSEV, which can also be tyrosine phosphorylated and interact
weakly with SHP-1 and SHP-2 (13). These sequence similarities strongly
suggest that Siglec-9 can also become phosphorylated and interact with
tyrosine phosphatases, but further experiments are required to explore
this possibility.
Siglec-9 Mediates Sialic Acid-dependent Binding to
Human Red Blood Cells and Glycoconjugates--
To investigate the
potential sialic acid binding properties of Siglec-9, we initially
performed binding assays in which native and sialidase-treated human
red blood cells were added to transiently transfected COS cells. In
contrast to Siglec-7 (5), no binding could be detected unless the COS
cells were treated with sialidase before the binding assays (data not
shown). Sialidase treatment is thought to remove potentially inhibitory
sialic acids in the COS cell glycocalyx that interact with the
Siglec-binding sites in cis. It is currently unclear how
Siglec-7 expressed on COS or CHO cells mediates high levels of binding
without a requirement for sialidase pretreatment, but this is a feature
that is not apparently shared by Siglec-9, despite the high degree of
sequence identity shared between the two molecules (Fig. 1). Although
the binding site of Siglec-9 appears to be masked on transfected COS cells, a recent report (26) raises the possibility that unmasking could
occur on activated cells that naturally express the receptor.
To determine the sialic acid linkage preference of Siglec-9, binding
assays were carried out with synthetic polyacrylamide conjugates using
CHO cells that had been sialidase-treated to remove the inhibitory
sialic acids (Fig. 2). Under these
conditions, sialidase-treated wild-type CHO cells showed no detectable
binding to glycoconjugates whereas sialidase-treated CHO cells stably expressing Siglec-9 bound similarly to glycoconjugates carrying sialic
acid in either Expression of Siglec-9 in Tissues and on Peripheral Blood
Leukocytes--
A human multiple tissue Northern blot was probed with
a Siglec-9 specific cDNA probe that was predicted not to
cross-hybridize with other Siglecs (Fig.
3). A clear signal at ~1.8 kilobases was observed with spleen and placenta but Siglec-9 mRNA was low or
undetectable in liver, colon, stomach, and testis (Fig. 3). The
presence of readily detectable mRNA transcripts in spleen and
placenta is consistent with the possibility that Siglec-9 is expressed
on hemopoietic cells since these organs are rich in leukocytes.
To investigate expression of Siglec-9 at the cellular level, a
Siglec-9-specific mAb, K8, was isolated. Given the high degree of
sequence similarity between Siglec-9 and Siglec-7 it was important to
rule out cross-reactivity of K8 with Siglec-7. Using stably transfected
CHO cell lines expressing either Siglec-7 or Siglec-9, FACS assays
showed clearly that K8 does not cross-react with Siglec-7 (Fig.
4). Likewise, the anti-Siglec-7 mAb, S7
described previously (5), does not cross-react with Siglec-9 expressed
on CHO cells (Fig. 4). The potential cross-reactivity of K8 with
Siglecs-3, -5, -7, and -8 was also investigated by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay, using Siglec-Fc proteins. No reactivity of K8 with
any other Siglecs was observed, despite high binding to the relevant mAbs (data not shown). Thus, K8 appears to be specific for
Siglec-9.
Next, a detailed analysis of the expression of Siglec-9 on human
peripheral blood leukocytes was carried out by flow cytometry. Expression on granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes was compared by
gating cells according to their characteristic forward and side scatter
properties (not shown). With granulocytes, ~97% of cells expressed
intermediate levels of Siglec-9 (Fig.
5A). In comparison, 100% of
monocytes were strongly positive. Since granulocytes contain mostly
neutrophils, together with a small percentage of eosinophils, we asked
whether Siglec-9 is absent from the eosinophils by carrying out double
labeling in conjunction with anti-CD16, a low affinity Fc receptor that
is expressed at low levels on eosinophils (7). This showed that,
similar to Siglec-5 (7), Siglec-9 is expressed on all neutrophils but
is absent from eosinophils (data not shown). Interestingly, the
expression of Siglecs-5 and -9 on granulocytes is reciprocal to that of
Siglec-8 which is only found on eosinophils (7). With lymphocytes, two
distinct labeled populations could be identified. ~26% of cells in
the lymphocyte gate were weakly labeled with anti-Siglec-9, while ~2.5% were strongly labeled (Fig. 5A). To characterize
the lymphocyte-reactive subsets in more detail, double labeling was
carried out by combining staining for Siglec-9 with staining for CD3
(pan T cell), CD4 (T cell subset), CD8 (T cell subsets and NK cells),
CD19 (pan B cell), CD16 (NK cells), and CD56 (NK cells) (Fig.
5B). Depending on the donor, the weakly labeled cells
contained ~2% of the CD4-high T cells, ~5% of the CD8-high T
cells, ~50% of CD8-mid NK cells, ~50% of the CD19+ B
cells, ~50% of the CD56+ NK cells, and ~50% of the
CD16+ NK cells. The strongly labeled cells in the
lymphocyte gate were mostly made up of CD16-high cells (Fig.
5B). Surprisingly, these cells also expressed low levels of
CD4, but they do not appear to be contaminating CD4+
monocytes because a monocyte marker, CD14, was absent from these cells
(data not shown). Furthermore, this Siglec-9+, CD16-high
subset of cells was also negative for Siglec-7 (data not shown) which
is expressed by monocytes (5). Currently, the nature of these cells is
not known. However, they were not labeled with CD56 or CD8 (Fig.
5B) and may correspond to a minor population of
CD16+, CD56
Finally, FACS staining of various human leukemic cell lines was
performed. Weak positive labeling was observed with the U937 promonocytic cell line (data not shown). No staining was seen with the
other cell lines studied: KG1b (immature myeloid), HL-60 (myelomonocytic), MonoMac-6 (monocytic), THP-1 (monocytic), K562 (erythromyeloid), YT (NK-like), Daudi (B cell), Ramos (B cell), JY (B
cell), HUT78 (T cell), and Jurkat (T cell) (data not shown). The
failure of the myeloid cell lines, HL-60, MonoMac-6, and THP-1, to
express Siglec-9 was surprising given the high levels on blood monocytes and neutrophils. Since the Siglec-9 cDNA was isolated from a dibutyryl cAMP-treated HL-60 cell library, it is possible that
terminal differentiation of myeloid cells is required for Siglec-9 gene
expression. An alternative possibility is suggested by the recent
finding that treatment of normal hemopoietic progenitors and leukemic
myeloid cells with anti-Siglec-3 or anti-Siglec-7 mAbs resulted in
inhibition of cell growth (29). If naturally occurring ligation of
Siglec-9 expressed by leukemic cells also inhibits cell growth, this
could lead to selective expansion of variant cells that express low,
non-inhibitory levels of Siglec-9. Further experiments are needed to
investigate these possibilities.
The results presented here with Siglec-9 extend the theme established
previously, that the CD33-related Siglecs are expressed on distinct
subsets of hemopoietic cells. It is striking that the ITIM-containing
members of this subgroup are found at highest levels on effector cells
of the innate immune system, namely neutrophils, monocytes, and NK
cells. Siglec-9 is the first example of a Siglec being expressed on all
three cell populations. Given that other related leukocyte receptors
with ITIMs are important in negative regulation of cellular activation
events (11), it is possible that the ITIM-containing Siglecs mediate
similar functions via sialic acid recognition. It is thought that
sialic acids appeared relatively late in evolution, being absent from
many potential pathogens (30-32). In addition to their well recognized
roles in cell-cell repulsion and masking of subterminal sugars
(30-32), it is conceivable that sialic acids have evolved to function
as molecular determinants of "self." Thus, sialic
acid-dependent ligation of Siglecs could provide a
mechanism that contributes to the setting of appropriate
thresholds for cellular activation. This could help prevent undesirable
self-reactivity and tissue damage, while at the same time permitting
effective killing of non-sialylated pathogens.
We are grateful to Maggie Chambers at
Scottish Diagnostics for help with immunization, Helen Floyd, Sheena
Kerr, and Kevin Lock for discussions, and Soerge Kelm for critical
reading of the manuscript.
The results reported here are in good
agreement with another paper on Siglec-9 published by Angata and Varki
(Angata, T., and Varki, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22127-22135) in this issue of the Journal.
*
This work was supported in part by the Wellcome Trust and
the Human Frontiers Science Program.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF247180.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: MSI/WTB Complex, Dept.
of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH,
Scotland, United Kingdom. Tel.: 44-1382-345781; Fax: 44-1382-345855;
E-mail: p.r.crocker@dundee.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 8, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002788200
The abbreviations used are:
Siglec, sialic
acid-binding Ig-like lectin;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary cells;
ITIM, immune receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif;
PAA, biotinylated
polyacrylamide;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
Siglec-7-Fc, the three
extracellular domains of Siglec-7 coupled to the Fc part of human
IgG1;
Siglec-9-Fc the three extracellular domains of
Siglec-9 coupled to the Fc part of human IgG1, 2,3-PAA,
NeuAc
Siglec-9, a Novel Sialic Acid Binding Member of the
Immunoglobulin Superfamily Expressed Broadly on Human Blood
Leukocytes*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2,3- or
2,6-glycosidic linkage to galactose. Using a specific mAb, Siglec-9
was found to be expressed at high or intermediate levels by monocytes,
neutrophils, and a minor population of CD16+,
CD56
cells. Weaker expression was observed on ~50% of
B cells and NK cells and minor subsets of CD8+ T cells and
CD4+ T cells. These results show that despite their high
degree of sequence similarity, Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 have distinct
expression profiles.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2,3Gal
1,4Glc (2,3-PAA) or
NeuAc
2,6Gal
1,4Glc (2,6-PAA), were obtained from Syntesome
(Munich, Germany). These conjugates have a molecular mass of ~30 kDa
and contain 20% mol of saccharide and 5% mol of biotin.
Phycoerythrin-conjugated mAbs against the following human CD antigens
were purchased from Serotec (Kidlington, United Kingdom): CD3, CD4,
CD8, CD16, CD19, CD56. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
F(ab)2 anti-mouse IgG was from Dako (Cambridge, UK).
)) and was used as a
tissue culture supernatant in all experiments.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Predicted protein sequence of Siglec-9 and
alignment with the closely related Siglec, Siglec-7. Alignment was
performed with the ClustalW multiple sequence alignment program and
optimized by eye. Residues that are identical are boxed in
black, similar residues in gray. Asterisks
indicate positions of the three cysteine residues in domain 1 that are
characteristic of Siglecs. Open circles underlie residues in
Siglec-9 and Siglec-7 that correspond to residues in
sialoadhesin/siglec-1 that are important for sialic acid binding (22).
Potential N-linked glycosylation sites on Siglec-7 are shown
by open boxes. Predicted
-strands (A, A', B, and C etc.)
in domains 1 and 2 (22) and putative tyrosine-based signaling motifs in
the cytoplasmic tail are shown. Vertical lines indicate
positions of intron-exon boundaries, as deduced from the sequence of
the gene encoding Siglec-9 (GenBank accession number AF135027). The
beginning of domains 1, 2, and 3 are shown by D1, D2, and D3,
respectively. The linker region between domains 2 and 3 is encoded by a
separate exon. The transmembrane region and cytoplasmic tail (encoded
by two exons) are indicated. GenBank accession numbers for the
sequences encoding Siglec-9 and Siglec-7 are AF247180 and AF170485,
respectively.
sheet and inter-domain disulfide bonds (22).
Interestingly, unlike Siglecs described previously, Siglec-9 is
predicted to lack the first of the two aromatic residues that has been
shown in sialoadhesin to be important for interacting with the
N-acetyl moiety at the C-5 position of sialic acid (22). Since Siglec-9 binds sialic acids with a specificity that is similar to
other Siglecs (see below), the aromatic residue on the A strand cannot
be an obligatory requirement for sialic acid binding by Siglecs. This
would also be consistent with studies showing that naturally occurring
and artificial modifications of sialic acid at the C-5 position can
result in marked differences in Siglec recognition (23-25).
2,3- or
2,6-linkages. Therefore, the binding specificity of Siglec-9 appears to be similar to that of Siglec-5 and
Siglec-7 (4, 5).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding of polyacrylamide conjugates to
Siglec-9 expressed on CHO cells compared with wild type CHO cells.
Cells were treated with sialidase to remove cis-inhibitory sialic acids
and then incubated with biotinylated PAA glycoconjugates linked to
3'-sialyllactose (2,3-PAA), 6'-sialyllactose
(2,6-PAA), or lactose (Lac-PAA; Gal
1,4Glc
coupled to PAA) at 20 µg/ml or with buffer alone (no
sugar). Unbound conjugate was washed off and binding detected with
125I-streptavidin. Data show mean ± S.D. of
triplicates from one experiment representative of three experiments
performed.

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analysis of Siglec-9 mRNA
expression in human tissues. Each lane of the blot contains
approximately 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from the tissue
indicated and is normalized for levels of
-actin mRNA. A major
form of Siglec-9 mRNA is seen at ~1.8 kilobases in spleen and
placenta. Placenta appears to express an additional form of Siglec-9
mRNA at ~3.3 kilobases.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Anti-Siglec-9 mAb does not cross-react with
Siglec-7 and vice versa. CHO cells expressing Siglec-9 or Siglec-7
were stained with anti-Siglec-9 mAb, K8, or anti-Siglec-7 mAb, S7 and
binding detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-mouse
F(ab)2. Thick lines show staining with the mAbs.
Thin lines show staining in the absence of primary antibody.
No cross-reactivity is detected with either mAb.
cells (27) that were shown
previously to have morphological features of NK cells and exhibit low
levels of natural cytotoxicity (28).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Expression of Siglec-9 on human peripheral
blood leukocyte subsets. A, FACS histograms showing
expression of Siglec-9 on granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes,
gated in each case according to their characteristic side and forward
scatter properties. Thick lines show staining with
anti-Siglec-9 mAb, K8. Thin lines show staining in the
presence of an irrelevant isotype matched control mAb. Siglec-9 is
expressed on ~97% of neutrophils, 100% of monocytes, and ~28% of
lymphocytes. Among the lymphocytes, ~26% are labeled weakly and
~2.5% are labeled strongly. B, double labeling of the
lymphocyte fraction with antibodies to CD3 (pan T cell), CD4 (T cell
subset), CD8 (T cell subset and NK cells), CD19 (B cells), CD16 (NK
cells), and CD56 (NK cells). Siglec-9 is expressed weakly on minor
subsets of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, a
major subset of CD19+ B cells and 45-50% of
CD56+ CD16+ CD8-mid NK cells. The cells that
are strongly labeled by anti-Siglec-9 are mostly made up of
CD56
CD8
CD16-high cells
(arrowed and circled). The values in the
quadrants show the percentages of the total cells analyzed.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
Note Added in Proof
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Recipient of a Medical Research Council studentship.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
2,3Gal
1,4Glc coupled to PAA;
2, 6-PAA,
NeuAc
2,6Gal
1,4Glc coupled to PAA;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
NK cells, natural killer
cells.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Crocker, P. R.,
Clark, E. A.,
Filbin, M.,
Gordon, S.,
Jones, Y.,
Kehrl, J. H.,
Kelm, S.,
Le Douarin, N.,
Powell, L.,
Roder, J.,
Schnaar, R. L.,
Sgroi, D. C.,
Stamenkovic, K.,
Schauer, R.,
Schachner, M.,
van den Berg, T. K.,
van der Merwe, P. A.,
Watt, S. M.,
and Varki, A.
(1998)
Glycobiology
8,
v
2.
Crocker, P. R.,
Mucklow, S.,
Bouckson, V.,
McWilliam, A.,
Willis, A. C.,
Gordon, S.,
Milon, G.,
Kelm, S.,
and Bradfield, P.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4490-4503
3.
Takei, Y.,
Sasaki, S.,
Fujiwara, T.,
Takahashi, E.,
Muto, T.,
and Nakamura, Y.
(1997)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
78,
295-300
4.
Cornish, A. L.,
Freeman, S.,
Forbes, G.,
Ni, J.,
Zhang, M.,
Cepeda, M.,
Gentz, R.,
Augustus, M.,
Carter, K. C.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1998)
Blood
92,
2123-2132
5.
Nicoll, G.,
Ni, J.,
Liu, D.,
Klenerman, P.,
Munday, J.,
Dubock, S.,
Mattei, M. G.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34089-34095
6.
Falco, M.,
Biassoni, R.,
Bottino, C.,
Vitale, M.,
Sivori, S.,
Augugliaro, R.,
Moretta, L.,
and Moretta, A.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
793-802
7.
Floyd, H.,
Ni, J.,
Cornish, A. L.,
Zeng, Z.,
Liu, D.,
Carter, K. C.,
Steel, J.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
861-866
8.
Patel, N.,
Brinkman-van der Linden, E. C.,
Altmann, S. W.,
Gish, K.,
Balasubramanian, S.,
Timans, J. C.,
Peterson, D.,
Bell, M. P.,
Bazan, J. F.,
Varki, A.,
and Kastelein, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22729-22738
9.
Freeman, S. D.,
Kelm, S.,
Barber, E. K.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1995)
Blood
85,
2005-2012
10.
Brinkman-van der Linden, E. C.,
and Varki, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8625-8632
11.
Bolland, S.,
and Ravetch, J. V.
(1999)
Adv. Immunol.
72,
149-177
12.
Wende, H.,
Colonna, M.,
Ziegler, A.,
and Volz, A.
(1999)
Mammal. Gen.
10,
154-160
13.
Taylor, V. C.,
Buckley, C. D.,
Douglas, M.,
Cody, A. J.,
Simmons, D. L.,
and Freeman, S. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11505-11512
14.
Ulyanova, T.,
Blasioli, J.,
Woodford-Thomas, T. A.,
and Thomas, M. L.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
3440-3449
15.
Bebbington, C.
(1991)
Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology
, Vol. 2
, pp. 136-145, Academic Press, London
16.
Karow, J.,
Hudson, K. R.,
Hall, M. A.,
Vernallis, A. B.,
Taylor, J. A.,
Gossler, A.,
and Heath, J. K.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
318,
489-495
17.
Simmons, D. L.,
and Seed, B.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
2797-2800
18.
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1988)
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 139-243, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
19.
Kelm, S.,
Pelz, A.,
Schauer, R.,
Filbin, M. T.,
Tang, S.,
de Bellard, M. E.,
Schnaar, R. L.,
Mahoney, J. A.,
Hartnell, A.,
Bradfield, P.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
965-972
20.
Kantor, A. B.,
and Roederer, M.
(1997)
in
Weir's Handbook of Experimental Immunology
(Herzenberg, L. A.
, Weir, D. M.
, Herzenberg, L. A.
, and Blackwell, C., eds), Vol. II
, pp. 49.1-49.13, Blackwell Science, Oxford
21.
Yousef, G. M.,
Luo, L. Y.,
and Diamandis, E. P.
(1999)
Anticancer Res.
19,
2843-52
22.
May, A. P.,
Robinson, R. C.,
Vinson, M.,
Crocker, P. R.,
and Jones, E. Y.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
719-728
23.
Kelm, S.,
Schauer, R.,
Manuguerra, J. C.,
Gross, H. J.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1994)
Glycoconj. J.
11,
576-585
24.
Kelm, S.,
Brossmer, R.,
Isecke, R.,
Gross, H. J.,
Strenge, K.,
and Schauer, R.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
255,
663-672
25.
Brinkman-van der Linden, E. C.,
Sjoberg, E. R.,
Juneja, L. R.,
Crocker, P. R.,
Varki, N.,
and Varki, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8633-8640
26.
Razi, N.,
and Varki, A.
(1999)
Glycobiology
9,
1225-1234
27.
Lanier, L. L.,
Le, A. M.,
Civin, C. I.,
Loken, M. R.,
and Phillips, J. H.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
136,
4480-4486
28.
McKenzie, R. S.,
Simms, P. E.,
Helfrich, B. A.,
Fisher, R. I.,
and Ellis, T. M.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
6318-6322
29.
Vitale, C.,
Romagnani, C.,
Falco, M.,
Ponte, M.,
Vitale, M.,
Moretta, A.,
Bacigalupo, A.,
Moretta, L.,
and Mingari, M. C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
15091-15096
30.
Kelm, S.,
and Schauer, R.
(1997)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
175,
137-240
31.
Schauer, R.,
and Kamerling, J.
(1997)
in
Glycoproteins II
(Montreuil, J. V. J.
, and Schachter, H., eds)
, pp. 243-402, Elsevier, Amsterdam
32.
Varki, A.
(1999)
in
Essentials of Glycobiology
(Varki, A.
, Cummings, R.
, Esko, J.
, Freeze, H.
, Hart, G.
, and Marth, J., eds)
, pp. 195-209, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Gunnarsson, L. Levander, P. Pahlsson, and M. Grenegard The acute-phase protein {alpha}1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) induces rises in cytosolic Ca2+ in neutrophil granulocytes via sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) FASEB J, December 1, 2007; 21(14): 4059 - 4069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, A. Raper, N. Sugita, R. Hingorani, M. Salio, M. J. Palmowski, V. Cerundolo, and P. R. Crocker Characterization of Siglec-H as a novel endocytic receptor expressed on murine plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors Blood, May 1, 2006; 107(9): 3600 - 3608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. von Gunten and H.-U. Simon Sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectins may regulate innate immune responses by modulating the life span of granulocytes FASEB J, April 1, 2006; 20(6): 601 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hernandez-Caselles, M. Martinez-Esparza, A. B. Perez-Oliva, A. M. Quintanilla-Cecconi, A. Garcia-Alonso, D. M. R. Alvarez-Lopez, and P. Garcia-Penarrubia A study of CD33 (SIGLEC-3) antigen expression and function on activated human T and NK cells: two isoforms of CD33 are generated by alternative splicing J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 79(1): 46 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Varki and T. Angata Siglecs--the major subfamily of I-type lectins Glycobiology, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 1R - 27R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. von Gunten, S. Yousefi, M. Seitz, S. M. Jakob, T. Schaffner, R. Seger, J. Takala, P. M. Villiger, and H.-U. Simon Siglec-9 transduces apoptotic and nonapoptotic death signals into neutrophils depending on the proinflammatory cytokine environment Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1423 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Avril, S. D. Freeman, H. Attrill, R. G. Clarke, and P. R. Crocker Siglec-5 (CD170) Can Mediate Inhibitory Signaling in the Absence of Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-based Inhibitory Motif Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19843 - 19851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Avril, H. Floyd, F. Lopez, E. Vivier, and P. R. Crocker The Membrane-Proximal Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Inhibitory Motif Is Critical for the Inhibitory Signaling Mediated by Siglecs-7 and -9, CD33-Related Siglecs Expressed on Human Monocytes and NK Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6841 - 6849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ikehara, S. K. Ikehara, and J. C. Paulson Negative Regulation of T Cell Receptor Signaling by Siglec-7 (p70/AIRM) and Siglec-9 J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 43117 - 43125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Blixt, B. E. Collins, I. M. van den Nieuwenhof, P. R. Crocker, and J. C. Paulson Sialoside Specificity of the Siglec Family Assessed Using Novel Multivalent Probes: IDENTIFICATION OF POTENT INHIBITORS OF MYELIN-ASSOCIATED GLYCOPROTEIN J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31007 - 31019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Alphey, H. Attrill, P. R. Crocker, and D. M. F. van Aalten High Resolution Crystal Structures of Siglec-7. INSIGHTS INTO LIGAND SPECIFICITY IN THE SIGLEC FAMILY J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3372 - 3377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Collins, O. Blixt, N. V. Bovin, C.-P. Danzer, D. Chui, J. D. Marth, L. Nitschke, and J. C. Paulson Constitutively unmasked CD22 on B cells of ST6Gal I knockout mice: novel sialoside probe for murine CD22 Glycobiology, September 1, 2002; 12(9): 563 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Angata, S. C. Kerr, D. R. Greaves, N. M. Varki, P. R. Crocker, and A. Varki Cloning and Characterization of Human Siglec-11. A RECENTLY EVOLVED SIGNALING MOLECULE THAT CAN INTERACT WITH SHP-1 AND SHP-2 AND IS EXPRESSED BY TISSUE MACROPHAGES, INCLUDING BRAIN MICROGLIA J. Biol. Chem., June 28, 2002; 277(27): 24466 - 24474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamaji, T. Teranishi, M. S. Alphey, P. R. Crocker, and Y. Hashimoto A Small Region of the Natural Killer Cell Receptor, Siglec-7, Is Responsible for Its Preferred Binding to alpha 2,8-Disialyl and Branched alpha 2,6-Sialyl Residues. A COMPARISON WITH Siglec-9 J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2002; 277(8): 6324 - 6332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. van den Berg, D. Nath, H. J. Ziltener, D. Vestweber, M. Fukuda, I. van Die, and P. R. Crocker Cutting Edge: CD43 Functions as a T Cell Counterreceptor for the Macrophage Adhesion Receptor Sialoadhesin (Siglec-1) J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 3637 - 3640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Scholler, M. Hayden-Ledbetter, K.-E. Hellstrom, I. Hellstrom, and J. A. Ledbetter CD83 Is a Sialic Acid-Binding Ig-Like Lectin (Siglec) Adhesion Receptor that Binds Monocytes and a Subset of Activated CD8+ T Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 3865 - 3872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hartnell, J. Steel, H. Turley, M. Jones, D. G. Jackson, and P. R. Crocker Characterization of human sialoadhesin, a sialic acid binding receptor expressed by resident and inflammatory macrophage populations Blood, January 1, 2001; 97(1): 288 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Li, W. Zhang, T. Wan, J. Zhang, T. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Wang, and X. Cao Cloning and Characterization of Siglec-10, a Novel Sialic Acid Binding Member of the Ig Superfamily, from Human Dendritic Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 28106 - 28112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yu, C.-M. Lai, M. Maoui, D. Banville, and S.-H. Shen Identification and Characterization of S2V, a Novel Putative Siglec That Contains Two V Set Ig-like Domains and Recruits Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases SHPs J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 23816 - 23824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||