Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002775200 on May 5, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22127-22135, July 21, 2000
Cloning, Characterization, and Phylogenetic Analysis of
Siglec-9, a New Member of the CD33-related Group of Siglecs
EVIDENCE FOR CO-EVOLUTION WITH SIALIC ACID SYNTHESIS
PATHWAYS*
Takashi
Angata
and
Ajit
Varki§
From the Glycobiology Research and Training Center, Department of
Medicine and Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego,
La Jolla, California 92093
Received for publication, April 2, 2000, and in revised form, May 3, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Siglecs are a subfamily of I-type lectins
(immunoglobulin superfamily proteins that bind sugars) that
specifically recognize sialic acids. We report the cloning and
characterization of human Siglec-9. The cDNA encodes a type 1 transmembrane protein with three extracellular immunoglobulin-like
domains and a cytosolic tail containing two tyrosines, one within a
typical immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM). The
N-terminal V-set Ig domain has most amino acid residues typical of
Siglecs. Siglec-9 is expressed on granulocytes and monocytes.
Expression of the full-length cDNA in COS cells induces sialic-acid
dependent erythrocyte binding. A recombinant soluble form of the
extracellular domain binds to
2-3 and
2-6-linked sialic acids.
Typical of Siglecs, the carboxyl group and side chain of sialic acid
are essential for recognition, and mutation of a critical arginine
residue in domain 1 abrogates binding. The underlying glycan structure
also affects binding, with Gal
1-4Glc[NAc] being preferred.
Siglec-9 shows closest homology to Siglec-7 and both belong to a
Siglec-3/CD33-related subset of Siglecs (with Siglecs-5, -6, and -8).
The Siglec-9 gene is on chromosome 19q13.3-13.4, in a cluster with all
Siglec-3/CD33-related Siglec genes, suggesting their origin by gene
duplications. A homology search of the Drosophila
melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes
suggests that Siglec expression may be limited to animals of
deuterostome lineage, coincident with the appearance of the genes of
the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sialic acids are a family of
-keto acids with 9-carbon
backbones that are expressed abundantly in animals of the deuterostome lineage (1-3). They are found mostly at distal positions of
oligosaccharide chains of glycoproteins and glycolipids and are thus
exposed to the extracellular environment, allowing them to be
recognized during the initial contact of cells with various pathogenic
agents such as viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and toxins (4, 5). The
marked structural complexity of sialic acids can thus be interpreted as
a result of evolutionary arms race between the hosts and the pathogens
(6). Recent studies have revealed another prominent role of sialic
acids, namely their functions in generating ligands for endogenous
lectins (4). Siglecs (sialic acid-binding Ig superfamily lectins) are a family of such sialic
acid-recognizing lectins that have been recently defined (7). These
proteins are all single-pass type 1 transmembrane polypeptides, with an N-terminal Ig V-set domain, followed by variable numbers of Ig C2-set
domains, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail. The first
V-set Ig-like domain is the most important in carbohydrate recognition,
and the second Ig-like domain may also contribute to the binding
(8-11). Eight members of the family have been described so far in
humans, and each shows highly cell type-specific expression: Siglec-1/sialoadhesin (expressed on macrophages) (12); Siglec-2/CD22 (on B lymphocytes) (13); Siglec-3/CD33 (on myeloid precursors and
monocytes) (14); Siglec-4a/myelin-associated glycoprotein (on
oligodendroglia and Schwann cells) (15); Siglec-5 (on neutrophils and
monocytes) (16); Siglec-6/OBBP-1 (on B lymphocytes and placental trophoblasts) (17); Siglec-7/AIRM1 (on natural killer cells and
monocytes) (18-20); and Siglec-8 (on eosinophils) (21).
Many of the Siglecs have potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites in
the context of an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif in
their cytoplasmic tails, suggesting their involvement in intracellular
signaling pathways. In fact, Siglecs-3 and -7 have been shown to be
capable of transmitting negative regulatory signals upon cross-linking
by specific antibodies (18, 22, 23). In case of CD22/Siglec-2, a
negative regulatory role was further proven by the studies using
genetically engineered mice (24-27). On the other hand, the precise
functional importance of sialic acid-binding property of Siglecs is not
well understood, although the phenotypic similarity between Siglec-2
null mice and ST6Gal-I (Gal
1-4GlcNAc
2-6 sialyltransferase)
null mice (28) suggests that sialic acid binding does affect the
signaling activity of this Siglec.
Expression of sialic acids is well documented in animals of the
deuterostome lineage (primarily in echinoderms and vertebrates), but
their expression in another major group of animals, the protostomes (including nematodes, arthropods, and mollusks), is inconspicuous (1,
2). From evolutionary point of view, it is also an open question
whether there are any Siglec homologs in the protostome lineage.
However, given occasional reports of sialic acids in insects (29-31),
it is possible that the expression of sialic acids and sialic acid
binding lectins is simply under more strict spatio-temporal regulation
that has diminished possibilities for cDNA cloning of the relevant genes.
Here we report the molecular cloning and characterization of a new
member of Siglec family in humans, Siglec-9, and show that it is
closely related to a Siglec-3/CD33-related subgroup that have arisen by
gene duplications. We describe the expression pattern and glycan
binding specificity of the molecule. The possible co-evolution of
sialic acids and Siglecs is also explored and discussed, taking advantage of the recent near-completion of the genomic DNA sequencing of a fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) (32) and a nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) (33).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Biotinylated polyacrylamide
(PAA-Bio)1 polyvalently
substituted with sialylated oligosaccharides were purchased from
Glycotech. Culture media were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.
Unless otherwise specified, all other reagents were purchased from Sigma.
Cloning and Mutation of a Full-length cDNA Encoding
Siglec-9--
Total RNA was prepared from human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells using RNeasy Midi Kit (Qiagen). First strand cDNA
was synthesized by reverse transcription (Superscript II, Life
Technologies, Inc.) of 1 µg of peripheral blood mononuclear cell
total RNA using random DNA hexamers as primers. The reaction product
was subjected to PCR using Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) using primers SLY-5'-untranslated region
(5'-CTCGGATCCCTGGCACCTCTAACCC-3') and SLY-3'-untranslated region
(5'-CCTCTAGAATCAGCCTCTGACTTCTCCC-3'). The product was further
amplified by nested PCR using SLY-5'-Chi (5'-CCTGTCGACGCCACCATGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCC-3') and
SLY-3'-untranslated region as primers. The PCR product was digested
with SalI and XbaI, ligated to
SalI-XbaI sites of pBluescript II KS (
)
(Stratagene), and sequenced. A point mutation converting an arginine
residue (Arg120) to lysine was introduced using QuickChange
site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene), following the
manufacturer's protocol. Individual clones were isolated, and plasmids
were purified and sequenced.
Northern Blot Analysis--
A 267-base pair 3' end cDNA
fragment of Siglec-9 was amplified by PCR and labeled with the Strip-EZ
DNA kit (Ambion) and [
-32P]dATP (NEN Life Science
Products). A human 12-lane Multiple Tissue Northern blot
(CLONTECH) was probed with the labeled probe.
Hybridization signals were visualized using a Storm 860 PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics).
Expression of Full-length Siglec-9 on COS-7 Cells and Erythrocyte
Rosetting--
The XhoI-XbaI fragment of
Siglec-9/pBluescript II KS (
) containing full-length coding sequence
of Siglec-9 (wild type and R120K mutant) was subcloned into the
XhoI-XbaI sites of pcDNA3.1 (+) (Invitrogen),
and sequenced. Constructs were transfected using LipofectAMINE reagent
(Life Technologies, Inc.) into COS-7 cells. Erythrocyte rosetting was
performed as described previously (20), 48 h after transfection,
with or without Arthrobacter ureafaciens sialidase
(Calbiochem) pretreatment of COS-7 cells or erythrocytes.
Production of Recombinant Chimeric Siglec-9-Fc--
A DNA
fragment of Siglec-9 encoding the three Ig-like domains was amplified
by PCR using SLY-5'-Chi and SLY-3'-Chi-2
(5'-ATCTGATGTGGCTTTGCTCTGCAGGG-3') as primers and Siglec-9/pBluescript
II KS (-) (wild type and R120K) as template. The fragment was cloned
into the expression vector EK-Fc-pEDdC (prepared in this laboratory by
Hui-Ling Han), giving rise to a fusion protein of Siglec-9
extracellular domains and a human IgG Fc tail with a FLAG epitope
tag/enterokinase cleavage site (DYKDDDDK) in between. The constructs
were transfected using LipofectAMINE into CHO-TAg cells, culture
supernatants collected, and the chimeric proteins were purified on
protein A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Binding Specificity of Siglec-9--
Binding to sialylated
oligosaccharides on PAA-Bio arrays was performed as described (17, 20).
Briefly, microtiter plate (Nunc, catalog number 269620) wells were
coated with protein A (0.5 µg/well) in 50 mM sodium
carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.5, at 4 °C overnight. Wells were
washed three times with ELISA buffer (20 mM HEPES, 1%
bovine serum albumin, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA,
pH 7.45), blocked with ELISA buffer (room temperature for 1 h),
and sequentially incubated at room temperature with the following (each
incubation followed by three washes with ELISA buffer): Siglec-9-Fc
(0.5 µg/well, human
globulin as negative control), 2 h;
probes (1 µg/well), 2 h; streptavidin-conjugated alkaline
phosphatase (1:1000 diluted from stock solution, Life Technologies,
Inc.), 1 h. After final wash, p-Nitrophenyl Phosphate Liquid Substrate (Sigma) was added and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and absorbance was measured at 405 nm.
Modification of Sialic Acids in Probes--
The PAA-Bio probes
were subjected to mild periodate treatment, as described previously
(20). Typically, 10 µg of the probe was incubated in 100 µl of 2 mM NaIO4/phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min
on ice in the dark. After the incubation, 100 µl of 20 mM
NaBH4 in phosphate-buffered saline was added to the mixture and further incubated at room temperature for 1 h in the dark. The
mixture was diluted with 800 µl of ELISA buffer and directly used in
the assay. The PAA-Bio probes were also treated with iodoethane, as
described previously (34). The PAA-Bio probes carrying
Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-4Glc, Neu5Ac
2-6Gal
1-4Glc, and
Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-4[Fuc
1-3]GlcNAc (10 µg) were lyophilized
in Reacti-Vials (Pierce) and dissolved in 35 µl of dry
Me2SO. To each vial 7 µl of iodoethane (Aldrich) was
added and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Remaining iodoethane was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. To the
residue was added 460 µl of 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.45) containing 125 mM NaCl, and then 2.5 µl of 1 M NaBH4 was added and incubated at room
temperature for 1 h to reduce ethylester at the C-1 position of
sialic acids to an alcohol. At the end of the reaction 500 µl of 20 mM HEPES buffer containing 125 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 2% bovine serum albumin was added, and the mixture was directly used in the binding assay as described above.
Generation of a Monospecific Chicken Polyclonal Antibody (IgY)
against the Extracellular Domain of Siglec-9--
Siglec-9-Fc chimeric
protein (1 mg) was treated with enterokinase (a generous gift from Dr.
J. Evan Sadler) and incubated with protein A-Sepharose overnight at
4 °C, to remove the IgG-Fc portion and any intact protein. The
supernatant containing only the Siglec-9 extracellular domain (450 µg) was concentrated and used as an antigen to raise polyclonal
antibodies in chickens. Two Rhode Island Red hens were each immunized
with 75 µg of the antigen in Freund's complete adjuvant, followed by
injections of 50 µg of antigen in Freund's incomplete adjuvant 22 and 44 days later. Eggs laid after the second booster injection were collected, egg yolks were separated, and immunoglobulin fraction was
purified using EGGstract IgY Purification System (Promega). IgY is the
major serum immunoglobulin in chicken that also accumulates in egg
yolk. To subtract any IgY subfraction that might cross-react with
Siglec-7, the purified IgY (200 µg) was incubated with Siglec-7-Fc (100 µg) immobilized on protein A-Sepharose, and supernatant was used
as monospecific polyclonal antibody against Siglec-9.
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Peripheral Blood
Leukocytes--
Human peripheral blood was collected from healthy
adult donors, and granulocytes and lymphocytes/monocytes were separated using Mono-Poly Resolving Medium (ICN). Each cell population (1 × 106 cells/sample) was incubated with polyclonal IgY against
Siglec-9 (prepared as described above), followed by fluorescein
isothiocyanate-labeled F(ab')2 fragment of donkey
anti-chicken IgY (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Two-color staining was
performed to distinguish lymphocyte populations, using
CyChrome-conjugated anti-CD4, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD8, CyChrome-conjugated anti-CD56 (from Pharmingen), and
TRI-COLOR-conjugated anti-CD19 (Caltag) as secondary staining,
following standard protocols (35). Cells were analyzed using FACScan
(Becton Dickinson), and data were processed using CellQuest software
(Becton Dickinson).
Chromosomal Localization of Siglec-9--
From the physical map
of human chromosome 19 (Human Genome Center, Laurence Livermore
National Laboratory), BAC clones contiguously covering the region of
chromosome 19 containing the Siglec-3/CD33 gene were identified and
obtained through Research Genetics. The BAC DNA clones were prepared by
a modified alkaline lysis method recommended by BACPAC Resources,
Rosewell Park Cancer Institute, and subjected to PCR using SP1
(5'-GCCTTCTCCTTGGAAGACAG-3') and SP-5' (5'-AAACTCGGGACCGATTCCAC-3') as
primers. PCR products were purified and directly sequenced.
Phylogenetic Analysis of Siglecs--
DNA sequences of human
Siglecs 1-9 encoding the first two Ig-like domains (750 nucleotides;
the human Siglec-1 sequence was kindly provided by Dr. P. Crocker,
Dundee, UK) were aligned using ClustalW at the European Bioinformatics
Institute web site and then subjected to phylogenetic analysis using
PAUP 4.0 (Sinauer Associates). The phylogenetic tree was constructed
using the neighbor joining method (36). The distance matrix was based
on Tamura-Nei genetic distance (37).
Homology Search for Siglecs in Fruit Fly and Nematode Genomic
Sequences--
The sequences of the first 150 amino acids of Siglecs
1-9 (encoding the first Ig V-set domain in each case) were used as
templates in homology search of the nr, htgs, and Drosophila
genome divisions of GenBankTM data base at the National
Center for Biotechnology Information web site using tblastn program
(38). These divisions include all cDNA and genomic DNA sequences
made public. Genomic DNA sequences that showed significant homology
(expectation value, <1) to Siglecs were first analyzed for putative
protein-coding sequences. Putative protein-coding sequences were either
found in annotated GenBankTM entries or using Berkeley Fly
Data Base of Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (for fruit
fly genomic DNA sequences). These putative protein-coding sequences, as
well as the cDNA sequences that showed significant homology
(expectation value, <1) to Siglecs, were translated to amino acid
sequences and analyzed for domain structures using the SMART program at
European Molecular Biology Laboratories at the Heidelberg web site (39,
40). If a candidate sequence showed similar overall domain structure to
Siglecs (Ig domains followed by a transmembrane domain), its human
homologs were searched using the tblastn program on the
GenBankTM data base at the National Center for
Biotechnology Information. As a control, the sequence of the first 150 amino acids of human neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) was used as
template in similar procedure to find homologs in the nematode and
fruit fly.
Homology Search of Enzymes Involved in Sugar Nucleotide
Synthesis--
The amino acid sequences of the following human enzymes
were used to identify putative orthologs in mouse, fruit fly, and nematode: UDP-Gal 4-epimerase (GenBankTM accession number
NM_000403), GDP-Man pyrophosphorylase (NM_013334), UDP-HexNAc
pyrophosphorylase (NM_003115), GDP-Man 4,6-dehydratase (NM_001500),
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-Man epimerase-reductase (NM_003313), UDP-GlcNAc
2-epimerase/ManNAc kinase (NM_005476), GlcNAc 2-epimerase (NM_002910),
and CMP-Neu5Ac synthetase. Because human CMP-Neu5Ac synthetase cDNA
is yet to be reported, its sequence was deduced from genomic DNA
(AC007671) and EST (AW402305) sequences, using mouse CMP-Neu5Ac
synthetase cDNA (AJ006215) as a template. Orthologs of these
enzymes were searched for in the GenBankTM data base (nr,
htgs, and EST data base, and Drosophila genome divisions)
using tblastn program, as described above. If a sequence with high
homology was found only in genomic DNA, the putative protein-coding
sequence was sought in the annotated GenBankTM entry or
using the Berkeley Fly Data Base of the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project. In the case of the mouse, sequences with high homology
were often found only among EST sequences. In such cases, we deduced
the longest contiguous coding sequences possible from both 5' and 3'
ends and left the gap in between as is. Such cases include: UDP-Gal
4-epimerase (N-terminal coding sequence from AA880071; C-terminal
coding sequence from AI327487), GDP-Man pyrophosphorylase (entire
coding sequence deduced from AI322967, AA016515, AI118793, and
AA572327), UDP-HexNAc pyrophosphorylase (N-terminal from AA474378 and
AA798356; C-terminal from AA666936, AA437860, and AA896061), and
GDP-Man 4,6-dehydratase (N-terminal from AI852418; C-terminal from
AI747296, AI322318, AA403686, and AA538309). Putative orthologs were
aligned using ClustalW and analyzed by PAUP 4.0 as described.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of a Full-length cDNA Encoding the Putative
Siglec-9--
During a 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends
experiment that eventually resulted in the cloning of Siglec-7 (20), we
noted two independent but highly homologous DNA fragments, one of which turned out to be Siglec-7 and the other an as yet unknown gene product
(tentatively named Siglec-Y). When the sequence of the Siglec-Y was
compared with data base sequences at GenBankTM, we found
one entry named "OB-binding protein-like protein gene" (GenBankTM accession number AF135027) that showed 100%
nucleotide identity in two segments. This submission was based only on
computer-based exon-intron predictions using raw genomic sequences from
the human genome project and was accompanied by an incorrect prediction for the protein coding sequence (at the time of comparison, May 1999;
the entry was later modified several
times).2 During an
independent attempt to find new Siglec candidates from the dbEST data
base using 3' coding sequences (encoding the transmembrane domain and
the cytoplasmic tail) of Siglecs, we found a Siglec-like EST sequence
(AA936059) that also showed 100% nucleotide identity with the above
sequence. We therefore designed primers to clone the Siglec-Y
full-length cDNA by reverse transcription-PCR, using RNA prepared
from peripheral blood mononuclear cells as template.
The cDNA we finally cloned contained an open reading frame (1392 nucleotides) that encodes a signal peptide, three Ig-like domains (one
V-set domain followed by two C2-set domains), a putative transmembrane
domain and cytosolic tail (Fig.
1A). The first Ig-like domain
contains many features conserved among all Siglecs. The most prominent
examples are a typically placed arginine (Arg120) and an
aromatic amino acid (Trp128), which are known to be
involved in sialic acid recognition of Siglec-1/sialoadhesin from x-ray
crystallographic analysis of a Siglec-ligand co-crystal (41) and in
Siglecs-1, -2, -3, -4, and -7 by mutagenesis experiments (10, 11, 20,
22, 42). One exception is the lack of an aromatic amino acid in the
proximity (typically the second amino acid residue) of the putative N
terminus of the mature protein. Notably, the first, second and third
Ig-like domains of Siglec-9 contained three, four, and three cysteines, respectively, suggesting that there are either interdomain disulfide bonds, as suggested for other Siglecs, or interpolypeptide disulfide bonds as in immunoglobulins. The putative cytoplasmic tail contains two
tyrosine residues, of which the first (Tyr433) is found in
an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif ((S/I/L/V)XYXX(L/V)). The second tyrosine residue
is in a motif (TEY456SEI) similar to the putative binding
site (TIYXX(V/I)) on signaling lymphocyte activating
molecule (SLAM) for SLAM-associated protein (SAP) (43). Nucleotide
identity with other human Siglecs (in the first 750 nucleotides) are:
Siglec-1/sialoadhesin, 49.9%; Siglec-2/CD22, 49.9%; Siglec-3/CD33,
73.3%; Siglec-4a/myelin-associated glycoprotein, 49.2%; Siglec-5,
71.5%; Siglec-6/OB-BP 1, 73.1%; Siglec-7/AIRM1, 90.5%; and Siglec-8,
81.4%. Alignment of closely related Siglec subset (Siglecs-3, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9; Fig. 1B) reveals a high degree of
conservation in the extracellular domains among these molecules. The
cytoplasmic tail is less highly conserved, except for the amino acids
surrounding the two tyrosines mentioned above, suggesting that these
motifs are under functional positive selection. The new molecule was
renamed as Siglec-9, based on the high homology with known Siglecs,
conservation of defining features, and sialic
acid-dependent binding properties shown below.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Primary sequence of Siglec-9 and comparison
with other Siglecs. A, cDNA and derived amino acid
sequences of Siglec-9. The dotted line and double
line indicate the putative signal peptide and transmembrane
sequence, respectively. Potential N-glycosylation sites are
underlined. The rectangle indicates the putative
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif, and the dotted
rectangle indicates the motif similar to the SAP-docking site. The
two amino acid residues essential to sialic acid-binding,
Arg120 and Trp128, are circled. The
putative N-terminal ends of the three Ig domains are indicated with
arrows and labeled for each domain (D1, D2, and D3).
B, amino acid sequence alignment of Siglec-9 and closely
related Siglecs. Amino acid sequences of human Siglec-3, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9 were aligned using ClustalW multiple sequence alignment
program and minimally adjusted manually. GenBankTM
accession numbers for Siglec-3, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9 are NM_001772,
NM_003830, NM_001245, NM_014385, NM_014442, and AF227924,
respectively.
|
|
Expression Pattern of Siglec-9--
Northern blot analysis
indicates the following pattern for Siglec-9 mRNA expression in
human tissues: high expression in the liver and less prominent
expression in spleen, placenta, and skeletal muscle (Fig.
2A). The major mRNA
species is estimated to be about 1.8 kilobases long. Although
expression of Siglec-9 mRNA in total peripheral blood leukocyte
mRNA appears to be relatively low, most known Siglecs to date are
expressed on only a subset of blood leukocytes and sometimes on mature
cells that expressed their message only during their development in the
bone marrow. We therefore examined Siglec-9 expression in peripheral
blood leukocytes using a monospecific chicken polyclonal antibody
generated against the extracellular domain of Siglec-9. Flow cytometry
analysis revealed its expression on the great majority of granulocytes
and monocytes (Fig. 2B). Natural killer cells
(CD56-positive) appeared to be very weakly positive (data not shown).
At present we cannot rule out that this could be due to any
cross-reactivity of anti-Siglec-9 antibody to Siglec-7, which is known
to be highly expressed on natural killer cells (18, 19). Nevertheless,
antibody binding to granulocytes and monocytes must be due to
expression of Siglec-9 and not due to any cross-reactivity with
Siglec-7, because expression of the latter is highest in natural killer
cells, less prominent in monocytes, and minimal in granulocytes (19), a
staining pattern clearly different from that shown above.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of Siglec-9. A,
Northern blot analysis. A human 12-lane Multiple Tissue Northern blot
(CLONTECH) was probed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Tissue sources of mRNA were
indicated above each lane. The region of the blot corresponding to the
major ~1.8-kilobase (kb) message is shown. B,
flow cytometry analysis of Siglec-9 expression on peripheral blood
leukocytes. Single-color staining signals with anti-Siglec-9 and with
negative control antibodies are represented with thick and
thin lines, respectively.
|
|
Erythrocyte Rosetting by Siglec-9 Transfected COS-7
Cells--
When COS-7 cells were transfected with the full-length
cDNA of wild type Siglec-9, it induced binding of human
erythrocytes (Fig. 3). This binding was
completely abolished by pretreating erythrocytes with sialidase,
indicating that the binding is sialic acid-dependent. On
the other hand, the cells transfected with R120K mutant did not bind
erythrocytes at all. Notably, sialidase pretreatment of COS cells to
eliminate sialylated ligands on the same cell surface
(cis-ligands) was an absolute prerequisite for the
erythrocyte binding.

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Erythrocyte rosetting by Siglec-9-transfected
COS cells. COS cells were transfected with wild type
(A-C) or R120K mutant (D-F) Siglec-9 and
treated with (B, C, E, and
F) or without (A and D) sialidase,
followed by incubation with erythrocytes treated with (C and
F) or without (A, B, D, and
E) sialidase, as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Sialic Acid Binding Specificity of Siglec-9--
A recombinant
chimeric protein of the Siglec-9 extracellular domain and human IgG Fc
domain was produced and used in the ligand binding assay to further
analyze the sialic acid binding specificity of Siglec-9. PAA-Bio probes
multiply substituted with sialylated oligosaccharides (20% mol/mol
oligosaccharide/acrylamide, 20-25 oligosaccharides/30-kDa polymer)
were used in the assay. As shown in Fig.
4, Siglec-9 recognized both
2-3- and
2-6-linked sialic acids (Neu5Ac
2-3/6Gal
1-4Glc). Notably,
the underlying glycan structures had a profound effect on binding:
sialic acids
2-3-linked to Gal
1-4GlcNAc were far better ligands
than those
2-3-linked to Gal
1-3GalNAc structure. The weaker
binding of Neu5Ac
2-6GalNAc, compared with
Neu5Ac
2-6Gal
1-4Glc, may be also due to the difference in the
penultimate sugar structure. The R120K mutant showed very poor binding
(<10%) compared with wild type Siglec-9, indicating that this
arginine residue is critical in ligand binding, as has been the case
with all Siglecs analyzed so far (10, 11, 20, 22, 42). Notably,
introduction of fucose on the GlcNAc residue seemed to have no adverse
effect on the binding of Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-4GlcNAc to Siglec-9
(Fig. 4). This is in contrast to previous finding using Siglecs-1, -3, -4, and -5, which all showed marked reduction of binding because of
such a fucose residue (34).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Binding of sialylated ligands to the
recombinant Siglec-9 extracellular domain. Siglec-9-Fc chimeric
proteins were immobilized via protein A to microtiter plate, and
binding of biotinylated polyacrylamide arrays multiply conjugated with
sialyloligosaccharides was determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The data shown are the mean values ± S.D. of triplicates.
|
|
Mild periodate treatment of the probes (which specifically truncates
the glycerol-like side chains of sialic acids) almost completely
abolished binding (Fig. 5A),
proving that the side chain is recognized by Siglec-9. Also, iodoethane
treatment (which modifies the carboxyl group of sialic acid) reduced
binding of the probes by ~60% (Fig. 5B). The partial loss
of binding was concomitant with the extent of sialic acid reduction
(~50%, as determined by acid hydrolysis, fluorescence
derivatization, and high pressure liquid chromatography analysis; data
not shown). This result, along with the loss of binding to the R120K
mutant, strongly suggests that the carboxyl group of sialic acid is
essential in ligand recognition by Siglec-9.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of sialic acid modifications on ligand
binding to Siglec-9. PAA-Bio probes were treated with mild
periodate to specifically truncate the glycerol-like side chain of
sialic acids (A) or with iodoethane to modify carboxyl group
(B), as described under "Experimental Procedures" and
used in the same binding assay as in Fig. 4. Data shown are the mean
values ± S.D. of triplicates.
|
|
Chromosomal Localization of Siglec-9--
PCR-based screening of
five BAC clones contiguously encompassing ~500-kilobase DNA stretch
around Siglec-3/CD33 gene (44) revealed that the Siglec-9 gene is
localized on band 19q13.3-13.4, within 200 kilobases centromeric to
the Siglec-3/CD33 gene (on the adjacent BAC clone). Its closest
homolog, Siglec-7, is localized on the same BAC clone as Siglec-3
(20).
Phylogenetic Analysis of Siglecs--
Phylogenetic analysis of all
9 reported human Siglecs (Fig.
6A) revealed a close
association of Siglec-9 with a subgroup related to Siglec-3/CD33. As
expected from the high sequence identity mentioned above, Siglec-9 is
very closely related to Siglec-7. This result, along with published
evidence for the presence of Siglecs-3, -5, -6, -7, and -8 genes on
human chromosome 19q13.3-13.4 (16, 19-21, 45, 46), suggests that
there were multiple gene duplications of Siglec-3-related genes during
evolution (the existing data do not allow us to predict which one was
the ancestral gene). Interestingly, when the four known mouse Siglec
sequences are incorporated into the analysis (Fig. 6B),
Siglec-1/sialoadhesin, Siglec-2/CD22, and Siglec-4a/myelin-associated
glycoprotein all group with their human orthologs, whereas the
previously proposed mouse Siglec-3/CD33 does not form exclusive clade
with human Siglec-3. Instead, it is loosely associated with
Siglec-3-related human Siglecs and stands at about equal distance from
human Siglecs-3, -6, and -8.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Phylogenetic analysis of Siglecs. The
first 750 nucleotides of Siglecs were aligned using ClustalW multiple
sequence alignment program and analyzed for phylogenetic relationship
using PAUP 4.0. Unrooted phylograms constructed using the
neighbor-joining method are shown for human Siglecs (A) and
for human and mouse Siglecs (B). The internodes indicated
with arrowheads are supported by bootstrap values >90 for
100 resamplings.
|
|
Homology Search for Siglecs in Fruit Fly and Nematode Genomic
Sequences--
The first 150 amino acids of human Siglecs correspond
to the unique and defining first V-set Ig domain, contain amino acid residues critical for the sialic acid binding, and are most highly conserved among the Siglecs (10, 11, 22, 41, 42). Amino acid sequences
of this region were used as probes to identify possible Siglec
orthologs in nematode and fruit fly genomic DNA sequences. In the
nematode, genomic sequences under GenBankTM accession
number U80022 and AF067220 contained segments with some similarity to
Siglecs. However, the predicted protein from the former (AAC25886)
contained not only Ig-like domains but also a fibronectin type-III-like
domain and showed higher homology to human titin, and the latter DNA
segment showed no overlap with any putative gene predicted by the
submitters. With regard to the fruit fly, one cDNA clone
(L13255 = lachesin) showed significant similarity to
human Siglecs, but the encoded protein is known to be GPI-anchored (47)
and showed higher homology to the limbic system-associated membrane
protein (NM_002338) in humans. Thus, we conclude that there are no
obvious Siglec homologs in the nematode or fruit fly. As a "positive
control" we used another human Ig superfamily molecule, NCAM as a
probe. In this case, orthologs were easily found by the same approach,
namely SAX-3 (nematode) and fasciculin II (fruit fly). The former is not considered as direct ortholog of human NCAM but belongs to a
closely related protein family including NCAM, which share the same
overall molecular structure (Ig-like domains + fibronectin type
III-like domains + transmembrane domain) and expression in neural
tissues (48). Fasciculin in the fruit fly is widely considered a true
NCAM ortholog (49).
Homology Search of Enzymes Involved in Sugar Nucleotide
Synthesis--
As shown in Table I,
human genes involved in the synthesis of many major sugar nucleotides
have putative orthologs in nematode and fruit fly. The only exceptions
we found are apparent lack of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of
sialic acids and CMP-sialic acids: UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/ManNAc kinase
(50, 51), GlcNAc 2-epimerase/renin-binding protein (52), and CMP-sialic
acid synthetase (53). This result suggests that these animals lack expression of sialic acids, at least as synthesized by the conventional pathway in vertebrates. However, it should be noted that some segments
of fruit fly genomic DNA showed significant similarity to coding
sequences of C-terminal half (putative kinase domain; Ref. 54) of
UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/ManNAc kinase (AE003811) and N-terminal half of
CMP-sialic acid synthetase (AE003515).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Siglec-9 cDNA encodes a protein with many typical features
of previously described Siglecs. The first Ig-like domain contains two
amino acid residues critical in sialic acid recognition (41): arginine
in
-strand F (Arg120 in Siglec-9) and aromatic amino
acid in
-strand G (Trp128). Crystallographic study of
Siglec-1/sialoadhesin showed that these residues are directly
interacting with the carboxyl group and glycerol-like side chain of
sialic acid, respectively (41). A notable exception in Siglec-9 was the
lack of aromatic amino acid near its putative N terminus (typically the
second residue), which in Siglec-1 is in contact with sialic acid
5-acetamido group. The fact that Siglec-9 shows robust binding to
ligands, whereas mutation of this residue results in the complete loss
of sialic acid recognition in Siglec-1/sialoadhesin (41), clearly shows that the importance of this aromatic side chain in ligand binding is
variable among Siglecs. On the other hand, almost complete loss
of ligand binding in R120K mutant indicates that the stable salt bridge
between the arginine and carboxyl group of sialic acid is
indispensable in ligand binding of Siglec-9, as is the case with all
other Siglecs examined so far (10, 11, 20, 22, 42).
The cytosolic tail of Siglec-9 contains two tyrosine residues.
The amino acid sequence around the first tyrosine
(LQY433ASL) is found in the context of an
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif
((S/I/L/V)XYXX(L/V)), which is the docking site for the phosphotyrosine phosphatases, SHP-1 and SHP-2 (55, 56). The
actual functionality of this motif in Siglec-9 remains to be
determined, but this motif is likely to be involved in the signal
transduction, judging from the high sequence identity of the motif with
those in Siglec-3/CD33 and Siglec-7/AIRM1, which have been shown to
interact with SHP-1 (18, 22, 23). Interestingly, the sequence around
the second tyrosine (TEY456SEI) does not strictly conform
with but is similar to the proposed SAP-docking site
(TIYXX(V/I)) on SLAM/CDw150 (43). It is known that SAP
interacts with this motif in SLAM and 2B4 (Ig superfamily molecules
expressed on T/B lymphocytes and natural killer cells, respectively) to
prevent docking of SHP-2 (57, 58). A mutation in SAP causes human
X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (57). Whether this motif in
Siglec-9 actually interacts with SAP and the similar protein EAT-2 (43)
remains to be determined.
Despite the relatively low abundance of mRNA in peripheral blood
leukocytes as analyzed by Northern blots, flow cytometry revealed that
Siglec-9 is actually expressed on granulocytes and monocytes. In view
of expression of Siglec-9 on monocytes, the mRNA expression found
in the liver and spleen may be due to Kupfer cells and splenic tissue
macrophages, respectively, although this remains to be proven by a
direct histochemical approach. The wide distribution of Siglec-9 among
cells that can be elicited in the innate immune response, along with
its potential as negative regulator of signal transduction, raises the
intriguing question whether Siglec-9 functions as general negative
regulator of "rapidly responding" cells. Experiments to analyze
this hypothetical role of Siglec-9, as well as that of another
similarly distributed Siglec, Siglec-5 (on neutrophils and monocytes),
is now underway in our laboratory.
Siglec-9 recognizes both
2-3- and
2-6-linked sialic acids. Such
promiscuous recognition of sialic acid linkages is seen primarily among
Siglecs expressed on monocytes (Siglecs-3, -5, -7, and -9) and
granulocytes (Siglecs-5, -8, and -9) (16, 19, 21, 34). Other Siglecs,
i.e. Siglecs-1, -2, -4, and -6, show much more strict
linkage specificity (12, 13, 15, 17, 34, 59, 60). Another unusual
aspect of ligand recognition by Siglec-9 is also worthy of note,
i.e. the preference for the underlying glycan structure. As
far as we know Siglec-9 is the only Siglec that can recognize the
Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-4[Fuc
1-3]GlcNAc structure (i.e.
recognition is not disturbed by the fucose residue on the GlcNAc).
Promiscuous as its binding is with regard to sialyl linkage, Siglec-9
still distinguishes between Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-4GlcNAc (typically
found in N-linked glycans) and Neu5Ac
2-3Gal
1-3GalNAc (typically found in O-linked glycans and
glycosphingolipids). The relevance of this promiscuity and selectivity
with regard to Siglec functions is unclear, but it appears to support
our hypothesis stated above: that engagement of the Siglecs by
polyvalent ligands may be able to elicit negative intracellular
signals, thus silencing the cells that are inappropriately activated.
Alternatively, Siglecs may be functioning in a manner similar to that
of killer cell Ig-like receptors expressed on natural killer cells,
which send negative intracellular signals if engaged by major
histocompatibility complex class I molecules expressed on target cells.
Viral infection or malignant transformation result in down-regulation
of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on cell surface, thus rendering the cell vulnerable to attack by natural killer cells
(61). Likewise, if viral infection or malignant transformation results
in drastic change in surface sialic acid expression (as occurs with
infection by neuraminidase-producing viruses like influenza virus),
this may elicit activation of the Siglec-carrying cells in similar
manner. Interestingly, the killer cell Ig-like inhibitory receptor
genes are clustered on chromosome 19q13.4 (61), near the
Siglec-3-related genes.
Six of the nine known Siglecs (Siglec-3, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9) are
closely related to each other both in primary sequence (see
"Results") and chromosomal localization (16, 19-21, 45, 46) and
are hence grouped as "Siglec-3/CD33-related." The genes for these
are all localized on chromosome 19q13.3-13.4. The presence of this
cluster suggests that these genes emerged by repeated gene duplication
at some time during vertebrate evolution. We show here that the
previously reported mouse Siglec-3/CD33 does not show a clear
relationship to the established human counterpart (Fig.
6B). One explanation is that the true mouse ortholog has not
yet been isolated. Another possibility is that some of the gene
duplications in this cluster took place after separation of the
ancestors of primates and rodents. Notably, there are other clustered
gene families in close vicinity of the Siglec-3 subfamily, such as
1-2 fucosyltransferases (19q13.3) (62), the kallikrein gene cluster
(19q13.3-13.4) (63), and the killer cell Ig-like receptor family
(19q13.4) (see above), suggesting that there have been frequent gene
duplications in this chromosomal region. In this regard, it is
interesting that there are chromosome-specific minisatellites in
19q13.3-qter region (64) that could have facilitated duplication of
these genes by unequal crossing over of sister chromatids in meiotic
recombination (65). Regardless of the similarity in sequences of the
Siglec-3/CD33-related group, it is striking that each is expressed in
different pattern of cell type specificity and shows distinct patterns
of sialic acid recognition. Thus, the gene duplication events may have
been selected for by specific new functions in different cell types. In
this regard, final definition of the true mouse orthologs may require
not only their cloning but also the antibody-based exploration of their expression patterns in different cell types.
Although some Ig superfamily genes are highly conserved from nematode
to humans (e.g. NCAM and related molecules), there seems to
be no distinct Siglec homologs in C. elegans or D. melanogaster, two of the most extensively studied protostome
lineage animals. This result is consistent with the fact that this
lineage is also thought to lack constitutive expression of sialic
acids. Although not conclusive, the results of our homology search on
the newly available comprehensive genomic data also support the notion
that protostome lineage animals generally do not synthesize sialic acids. We found that both Drosophila and
Caenorhabditis genomes apparently lack the enzyme genes
required for sialic acid biosynthesis, whereas other genes involved in
sugar nucleotide biosynthesis are present and well conserved. Thus, the
reported capability of insect cells to express sialic acids under
certain circumstances (29, 31, 66) should be addressed in other ways,
such as the possibility of alternate pathways of biosynthesis and/or
uptake of sialic acids or the biosynthetic precursors from the
environment. Regardless, our data suggest that the emergence of Siglecs
during evolution was dependent on the constitutive expression of sialic acids in deuterostome lineage animals. In this respect, it is particularly interesting to see whether there are any Siglec homologs in echinoderms such as sea urchins and starfishes, which are known to
express large amounts of sialic acids. It should be mentioned that when
we used full-length amino acid sequences of Siglecs in the homology
search of Drosophila genome, we did find some gene products
that showed significant homology and similar overall molecular
structure, such as irregular optic chiasma C/roughest, neuromusculin, and faint sausage. Although the
overall homology was significant between these gene products and human
Siglec proteins (especially Siglec-2/CD22), it was limited to the Ig
domains 2 and later. Because Siglecs are defined by sialic acid
binding, molecules lacking homology in the unique first Ig domain were not considered as Siglec homologs. The same consideration applies to
furrowed, which is considered as fruit fly homolog of
selectins (67) but shows low similarity to mammalian selectins in the C-type lectin domain. These phenomena suggest a split of fates between
two genes of common ancestry under different biochemical environment
characteristic of deuterostome and protostome lineages (presence or
absence of sialic acids). The fact that Siglec-2/CD22 shows highest
homology with fly proteins also implies that Siglec-2/CD22 may be the
closest to the ancestor of mammalian Siglec family; it is unlikely that
Siglec-2/CD22 was generated by gene duplication from another Siglec
gene and later evolved to acquire similarity to aforementioned fly
proteins under different environmental constraints. However, further
analysis of the Siglec family in other animals will be needed to
address this issue, as well as the issue of the relevant mouse
orthologs of Siglec-9 and the other Siglec-3/CD33-related group.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Hiromu Takematsu, Els
Brinkman-Van der Linden, and Pascal Gagneux for general
advice and helpful discussions.
 |
Note Added in Proof |
The results reported here are in good
agreement with another paper on Siglec-9 published by Zhang et
al. (Zhang, J. Q., Nicoll, G., Jones, C., and Crocker, P. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22121-22126) in this issue
of the Journal.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grants R01-GM323373 and P01-HL57345.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF227924.
Partially supported by the Naito Foundation (Tokyo, Japan).
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Glycobiology Research
and Training Center, La Jolla, CA 92093-0687. Tel.: 858-534-3296; Fax:
858-534-5611; E-mail: avarki@ucsd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002775200
2
The incorrect prediction of intron splicing and
putative cDNA and protein sequences were corrected in a later
release of their submission in December, 1999. The submitters later
published a paper on the adjacent kallikrein gene cluster on
chromosome19q13.3-4 (63), in which they referred to the Siglec-like
gene as the "unknown gene."
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PAA-Bio, biotinylated polyacrylamide;
SLAM, signaling lymphocyte activation
molecule;
SAP, SLAM-associated protein;
NCAM, neural cell adhesion
molecule;
BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome;
EST, expressed sequence
tag;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schauer, R.
(1982)
Sialic Acids: Chemistry, Metabolism and Function, Cell Biology Monographs
, Vol. Volume 10
, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 2.
|
Varki, A.
(1992)
Glycobiology
2,
25-40
|
| 3.
|
Kelm, S.,
and Schauer, R.
(1997)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
175,
137-240
|
| 4.
|
Varki, A.
(1997)
FASEB J.
11,
248-255
|
| 5.
|
Karlsson, K. A.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
29,
1-11
|
| 6.
|
Gagneux, P.,
and Varki, A.
(1999)
Glycobiology
9,
747-755
|
| 7.
|
Crocker, P. R.,
Clark, E. A.,
Filbin, M.,
Gordon, S.,
Jones, Y.,
Kehrl, J. H.,
Kelm, S.,
Le Douarin, N.,
Powell, L.,
Roder, J.,
Schnaar, R. L.,
Sgroi, D. C.,
Stamenkovic, K.,
Schauer, R.,
Schachner, M.,
Van den Berg, T. K.,
Van der Merwe, P. A.,
Watt, S. M.,
and Varki, A.
(1998)
Glycobiology
8,
v
|
| 8.
|
Law, C. L.,
Aruffo, A.,
Chandran, K. A.,
Doty, R. T.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
3368-3376
|
| 9.
|
Nath, D.,
Van der Merwe, P. A.,
Kelm, S.,
Bradfield, P.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26184-26191
|
| 10.
|
Vinson, M.,
Van der Merwe, P. A.,
Kelm, S.,
May, A.,
Jones, E. Y.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9267-9272
|
| 11.
|
Van der Merwe, P. A.,
Crocker, P. R.,
Vinson, M.,
Barclay, A. N.,
Schauer, R.,
and Kelm, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9273-9280
|
| 12.
|
Crocker, P. R.,
Mucklow, S.,
Bouckson, V.,
McWilliam, A.,
Willis, A. C.,
Gordon, S.,
Milon, G.,
Kelm, S.,
and Bradfield, P.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4490-4503
|
| 13.
|
Sgroi, D.,
Varki, A.,
Braesch-Andersen, S.,
and Stamenkovic, I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7011-7018
|
| 14.
|
Freeman, S. D.,
Kelm, S.,
Barber, E. K.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1995)
Blood
85,
2005-2012
|
| 15.
|
Kelm, S.,
Pelz, A.,
Schauer, R.,
Filbin, M. T.,
Tang, S.,
De Bellard, M. -E.,
Schnaar, R. L.,
Mahoney, J. A.,
Hartnell, A.,
Bradfield, P.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
965-972
|
| 16.
|
Cornish, A. L.,
Freeman, S.,
Forbes, G.,
Ni, J.,
Zhang, M.,
Cepeda, M.,
Gentz, R.,
Augustus, M.,
Carter, K. C.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1998)
Blood
92,
2123-2132
|
| 17.
|
Patel, N.,
Brinkman-Van der Linden, E. C. M.,
Altmann, S. W.,
Gish, K.,
Balasubramanian, S.,
Timans, J. C.,
Peterson, D.,
Bell, M. P.,
Bazan, J. F.,
Varki, A.,
and Kastelein, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22729-22738
|
| 18.
|
Falco, M.,
Biassoni, R.,
Bottino, C.,
Vitale, M.,
Sivori, S.,
Augugliaro, R.,
Moretta, L.,
and Moretta, A.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
793-801
|
| 19.
|
Nicoll, G.,
Ni, J.,
Liu, D.,
Klenerman, P.,
Munday, J.,
Dubock, S.,
Mattei, M. G.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34089-34095
|
| 20.
|
Angata, T.,
and Varki, A.
(2000)
Glycobiology
10,
431-438
|
| 21.
|
Floyd, H.,
Ni, J.,
Cornish, A. L.,
Zeng, Z. Z.,
Liu, D.,
Carter, K. C.,
Steel, J.,
and Crocker, P. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
861-866
|
| 22.
|
Taylor, V. C.,
Buckley, C. D.,
Douglas, M.,
Cody, A. J.,
Simmons, D. L.,
and Freeman, S. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11505-11512
|
| 23.
|
Ulyanova, T.,
Blasioli, J.,
Woodford-Thomas, T. A.,
and Thomas, M. L.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
3440-3449
|
| 24.
|
O'Keefe, T. L.,
Williams, G. T.,
Davies, S. L.,
and Neuberger, M. S.
(1996)
Science
274,
798-801
|
| 25.
|
Otipoby, K. L.,
Andersson, K. B.,
Draves, K. E.,
Klaus, S. J.,
Farr, A. G.,
Kerner, J. D.,
Perlmutter, R. M.,
Law, C. L.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1996)
Nature
384,
634-637
|
| 26.
|
Sato, S.,
Miller, A. S.,
Inaoki, M.,
Bock, C. B.,
Jansen, P. J.,
Tang, M. L. K.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
551-562
|
| 27.
|
Nitschke, L.,
Carsetti, R.,
Ocker, B.,
Köhler, G.,
and Lamers, M. C.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
133-143
|
| 28.
|
Hennet, T.,
Chui, D.,
Paulson, J. C.,
and Marth, J. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4504-4509
|
| 29.
|
Roth, J.,
Kempf, A.,
Reuter, G.,
Schauer, R.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1992)
Science
256,
673-675
|
| 30.
|
Davis, T. R.,
and Wood, H. A.
(1995)
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim.
31,
659-663
|
| 31.
|
Schauer, R.,
Krisch, B.,
Lapina, E. B.,
Shaw, L.,
Gerardy-Schahn, R.,
and Malykh, Y. N.
(1999)
Glycoconj. J.
16,
S32
|
| 32.
|
Adams, M. D.,
et al..
(2000)
Science
287,
2185-2195
|
| 33.
|
The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium.
(1998)
Science
282,
2012-2018
|
| 34.
|
Brinkman-Van der Linden, E. C. M.,
and Varki, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8625-8632
|
| 35.
| Coligan, E. C., Kruisbeek, A. M., Margulies, D. H.,
Shevach, E. M., and Strober, W. (eds) Current Protocols in
Immunology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 36.
|
Saitou, N.,
and Nei, M.
(1987)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
4,
406-425
|
| 37.
|
Tamura, K.,
and Nei, M.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
10,
512-526
|
| 38.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402
|
| 39.
|
Schultz, J.,
Milpetz, F.,
Bork, P.,
and Ponting, C. P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5857-5864
|
| 40.
|
Schultz, J.,
Copley, R. R.,
Doerks, T.,
Ponting, C. P.,
and Bork, P.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
231-234
|
| 41.
|
May, A. P.,
Robinson, R. C.,
Vinson, M.,
Crocker, P. R.,
and Jones, E. Y.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
719-728
|
| 42.
|
Tang, S.,
Shen, Y. J.,
DeBellard, M. E.,
Mukhopadhyay, G.,
Salzer, J. L.,
Crocker, P. R.,
and Filbin, M. T.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1355-1366
|
| 43.
|
Poy, F.,
Yaffe, M. B.,
Sayos, J.,
Saxena, K.,
Morra, M.,
Sumegi, J,.,
Cantley, L. C.,
Terhorst, C.,
and Eck, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
555-561
|
| 44.
|
Gordon, L. A.,
Bergmann, A.,
Christensen, M.,
Danganan, L.,
Lee, D. A.,
Ashworth, L. K.,
Nelson, D. O.,
Olsen, A. S.,
Mohrenweiser, H. W.,
and Carrano, A. V.
(1995)
Genomics
30,
187-194
|
| 45.
|
Peiper, S. C.,
Ashmun, R. A.,
and Look, A. T.
(1988)
Blood
72,
314-321
|
| 46.
|
Takei, Y.,
Sasaki, S.,
Fujiwara, T.,
Takahashi, E.,
Muto, T.,
and Nakamura, Y.
(1997)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
78,
295-300
|
| 47.
|
Karlstrom, R. O.,
Wilder, L. P.,
and Bastiani, M. J.
(1993)
Development
118,
509-522
|
| 48.
|
Zallen, J. A.,
Yi, B. A.,
and Bargmann, C. I.
(1998)
Cell
92,
217-227
|
| 49.
|
Mendoza, H. L.,
and Faye, I.
(1999)
Dev. Comp. Immunol.
23,
359-374
|
| 50.
|
Hinderlich, S.,
Stäsche, R.,
Zeitler, R.,
and Reutter, W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24313-24318
|
| 51.
|
Stäsche, R.,
Hinderlich, S.,
Weise, C.,
Effertz, K.,
Lucka, L.,
Moormann, P.,
and Reutter, W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24319-24324
|
| 52.
|
Maru, I.,
Ohta, Y.,
Murata, K.,
and Tsukada, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16294-16299
|
| 53.
|
Münster, A. K.,
Eckhardt, M.,
Potvin, B.,
Mühlenhoff, M.,
Stanley, P.,
and Gerardy-Schahn, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9140-9145
|
| 54.
|
Effertz, K.,
Hinderlich, S.,
and Reutter, W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28771-28778
|
| 55.
|
Vely, F.,
and Vivier, E.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
2075-2077
|
| 56.
|
Newman, P. J.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
5-9
|
| 57.
|
Sayos, J.,
Wu, C.,
Morra, M.,
Wang, N.,
Zhang, X.,
Allen, D.,
van Schaik, S.,
Notarangelo, L.,
Geha, R.,
Roncarolo, M. G.,
Oettgen, H.,
de Vries, J. E.,
Aversa, G.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1998)
Nature
395,
462-469
|
| 58.
|
Tangye, S. G.,
Lazetic, S.,
Woollatt, E.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
Lanier, L. L.,
and Phillips, J. H.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
6981-6985
|
| 59.
|
Powell, L. D.,
Jain, R. K.,
Matta, K. L.,
Sabesan, S.,
and Varki, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7523-7532
|
| 60.
|
Collins, B. E.,
Kiso, M.,
Hasegawa, A.,
Tropak, M. B.,
Roder, J. C.,
Crocker, P. R.,
and Schnaar, R. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16889-16895
|
| 61.
|
Long, E. O.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
17,
875-904
|
| 62.
|
Reguigne-Arnould, I.,
Couillin, P.,
Mollicone, R.,
Faure, S.,
Fletcher, A.,
Kelly, R. J.,
Lowe, J. B.,
and Oriol, R.
(1995)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
71,
158-162
|
| 63.
|
Yousef, G. M.,
Luo, L. Y.,
and Diamandis, E. P.
(1999)
Anticancer. Res.
19,
2843-2852
|
| 64.
|
Das, H. K.,
Jackson, C. L.,
Miller, D. A.,
Leff, T.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
4787-4793
|
| 65.
|
Fitch, D. H.,
Bailey, W. J.,
Tagle, D. A.,
Goodman, M.,
Sieu, L.,
and Slightom, J. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7396-7400
|
| 66.
|
Castellino, F. J.,
Davidson, D. J.,
Rosen, E.,
and McLinden, J.
(1993)
Methods Enzymol.
223,
168-185
|
| 67.
|
Leshko-Lindsay, L.,
and Corces, V. G.
(1997)
Development
124,
169-180
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Carlin, A. L. Lewis, A. Varki, and V. Nizet
Group B Streptococcal Capsular Sialic Acids Interact with Siglecs (Immunoglobulin-Like Lectins) on Human Leukocytes
J. Bacteriol.,
February 15, 2007;
189(4):
1231 - 1237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Viswanathan, N. Tomiya, J. Park, S. Singh, Y. C. Lee, K. Palter, and M. J. Betenbaugh
Expression of a Functional Drosophila melanogaster CMP-sialic Acid Synthetase: DIFFERENTIAL LOCALIZATION OF THE DROSOPHILA AND HUMAN ENZYMES
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 9, 2006;
281(23):
15929 - 15940.
|