|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22220-22228, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 22, 2000, and in revised form, March 27, 2000
NRAMP2 (natural
resistance-associated macrophage
protein 2)/DMT1 (divalent
metal transporter 1) is a divalent
metal transporter conserved from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes that
exhibits an unusually broad substrate range, including
Fe2+, Zn2+, Mn2+,
Cu2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Ni2+,
and Pb2+, and mediates active proton-coupled transport.
Recently, it has been shown that the microcytic anemia (mk)
mouse and the Belgrade (b) rat, which have inherited
defects in iron transport that result in iron deficiency anemia, have
the same missense mutation (G185R) in Nramp2. These
findings strongly suggested that NRAMP2 is the apical membrane iron
transporter in intestinal epithelial cells and the endosomal iron
transporter in transferrin cycle endosomes of other cells. To
investigate the cellular functions of NRAMP2, we generated a polyclonal
antibody against the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of human NRAMP2. The
affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N-terminal antibody recognized a
90-116-kDa membrane-associated protein, and this band was shifted to
50 kDa by deglycosylation with peptide N-glycosidase F. Subcellular fractionation revealed that NRAMP2 co-sedimented with the
late endosomal and lysosomal membrane proteins and LAMP-1
(lysosome-associated membrane
protein 1), but not with the transferrin
receptor in early endosomes. The intracellular localization of
endogenous NRAMP2 and recombinant green fluorescent protein
(GFP)-NRAMP2 was examined by immunofluorescence staining and by native
fluorescence of GFP, respectively. Both endogenous and GFP-NRAMP2 were
detected in vesicular structures and were colocalized with LAMP-2, but
not with EEA1 (early endosome
antigen 1) or the transferrin receptor. These
results indicated that NRAMP2 is localized to the late endosomes and
lysosomes, where NRAMP2 may function to transfer the endosomal free
Fe2+ into the cytoplasm in the transferrin cycle.
Iron is indispensable for life, serving as a metal cofactor for
many enzymes, including both non-heme and heme proteins. The normal
human adult has 35-45 mg of iron/kg of body weight. More than
two-thirds of the body's iron content is incorporated into hemoglobin
in developing erythroid precursors and mature red cells (1).
Nutritional iron absorption (both heme and non-heme iron) occurs
primarily in the intestine. Heme iron constitutes only a small fraction
of the available dietary iron, but it is highly available for
absorption. On the other hand, the absorption of non-heme iron is low
and markedly regulated in the first part of the duodenum, in which the
acidic pH promotes solubilization of iron transformed to
Fe2+ by ferrireductase and ascorbate. In non-intestinal
cells, iron is taken into the cell by receptor-mediated endocytosis by
transferrin (Tf).1 Specific
receptors (Tf receptor (TfR)) on the outer face of the plasma membrane
bind diferric Tf with high affinity (2). Once internalized into the
cells, the Tf·TfR complex is delivered to endosomes, which are
acidified to pH 5.5-6.0 through the action of an
ATP-dependent proton pump. Endosomal acidification weakens binding of iron to Tf and produces conformational changes in both Tf
and TfR, strengthening their association (3, 4). The apo-Tf·TfR
complex is recycled back to the plasma membrane, where apo-Tf is
discharged, thereby completing an elegant and efficient cycle.
Previously, it was not clear how iron exits from the transferrin cycle
endosomes. However, recent studies have provided new insight into this
process and demonstrated a surprising link between the Tf cycle and
intestinal iron absorption.
Several inbred strains of rodents have functional defects in iron
uptake and transport that define obligate intracellular steps in the
iron metabolic pathway (5). Among these animals, the microcytic anemia
(mk) mouse and the Belgrade (b) rat have autosomal recessive defects in iron metabolism that are associated with
defects in erythroid iron utilization and intestinal iron uptake
(6-8). Moreover, studies in vivo have shown that this anemia cannot be corrected by increased dietary iron (9, 10) or by
direct iron injection (5), suggesting also a second block in iron
uptake by red blood cell precursors and other peripheral tissues. Using
a positional cloning approach to identify the gene defective in these
rodents, it has recently been demonstrated that the Nramp2
gene is mutated in both the mk and b animal
models (11, 12). Indeed, both the mk mouse and the
b rat have been shown to carry the same mutation at
Nramp2, a glycine-to-arginine substitution (G185R) in one of
the predicted transmembrane domains (TM4) of the protein. Using a
Xenopus oocyte expression cloning assay to screen for iron
uptake, Gunshin et al. (13) searched for an intestinal iron
transporter in the duodenal mRNA from rats fed a low-iron diet. A
single cDNA (initially named Dct1 (divalent cation transporter 1), but recently
renamed as Dmt1 (divalent metal
transporter 1)) encoding the rat isoform of
Nramp2 was found to stimulate iron uptake by ~200-fold.
Voltage-clamp analysis of Nramp2/Dmt1-mediated iron transport indicated
a pH-dependent electrogenic process, similar to those of
other transmembrane transporters. A variety of other ions, including
Zn2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, Cd2+,
Co2+, Ni2+, and Pb2+, stimulated
currents indistinguishable from that of iron at the same concentration,
suggesting that Nramp2/Dmt1 can transport a variety of divalent metal
ions. Nramp2 is an orphan protein with no known function cloned based
on its homology to Nramp1 (14). Nramp1 has been
identified in the mouse Bcg/Ity/Lsh
locus by positional cloning, which controls resistance to infection in vivo with Mycobacterium,
Salmonella, and Leishmania (15). The NRAMP1 and
NRAMP2 proteins are highly similar (64% overall identity) and are
highly hydrophobic integral membrane glycoproteins composed of 12 transmembrane domains that possess several structural characteristics
of ion channels and transporters. The members of the mammalian
Nramp gene family are homologous to the yeast SMF
gene family of Mn2+ transporters (16). Mouse
Nramp2 and human NRAMP2 can functionally complement a Saccharomyces cerevisiae
smf1/smf2 null mutant and a
Schizosaccharomyces pombe pdt1+ null mutant,
respectively, whereas mouse Nramp1 and human
NRAMP1 cannot (17, 18). The functions of NRAMP1 are still
unknown, but this molecule is predicted to function as a metal
transporter similar to NRAMP2. As opposed to Nramp1, which
is expressed exclusively in mononuclear phagocytes such as tissue
macrophages (15), Nramp2 mRNA expression is more
ubiquitous and has been detected in most tissues and cell types
analyzed (13, 14, 19). However, its levels of expression are higher in
the brain, thymus, proximal intestine, kidney, and bone marrow (13).
Immunocytochemical analysis with protein-specific antibodies revealed
that Nramp1 is expressed in the late endosomal and lysosomal membranes
in macrophages and is recruited to the membrane of the phagosome upon
phagocytosis (20-22). On the other hand, some groups argued that
Nramp2 is expressed in the apical membrane in the brush border of
intestinal enterocytes and in Tf-positive recycling endosomes in
non-intestinal cells (23-25). In previous studies, we have reported both cDNA and genomic DNA structures of human NRAMP2
(26, 27), generated human NRAMP2 N-terminal domain-specific antiserum,
and showed that this antiserum recognized functional recombinant NRAMP2 protein expressed in fission yeast (18). In this study, we investigate the subcellular localization of NRAMP2 in cultured human cells with the
affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N-terminal antibody and showed that
NRAMP2 is localized to late endosomes and lysosomes.
Antibodies and Reagents--
Production of anti-NRAMP2
N-terminal antiserum was described previously (18). The
affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N polyclonal antibody (pAb) was purified
from antiserum on a HiTrapTM
N-hydroxysuccinimide activated column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) coupled with glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged
NRAMP2-(1-66) that was produced in Escherichia coli strain
JM106 and purified on a column of glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
Mouse anti-human TfR monoclonal antibody (mAb) (N-2) was prepared as
described previously (28). Mouse anti-human EEA1 mAb and mouse
anti-human LAMP-1 mAb were purchased from Transduction Laboratories.
Mouse anti-human LAMP-2 mAb (H4B4, developed by Drs. J. E. K. Hildreth and J. T. August) was obtained from the Developmental
Studies Hybridoma Bank (Baltimore, MD). Alexa 594-labeled anti-rabbit
IgG, anti-mouse IgG, Alexa 488-labeled anti-rabbit IgG, and Texas
Red-dextran were purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. Cy2-labeled
anti-mouse IgG was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
The human larynx carcinoma
cell line HEp-2 and human cervix carcinoma cell line HeLa were
maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Sigma) containing
10% fetal calf serum, 50 µg/ml penicillin and 50 µg/ml
streptomycin. The african green monkey kidney cell line COS-7 was
maintained in high-glucose Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Sigma)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 50 µg/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. FuGENETM 6 transfection reagent
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used for the transient transfection
of HEp-2, HeLa, and COS-7 cells according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Vector Construction--
The human NRAMP2 cDNA
was amplified using the sense primer NR2-1
(5'-TGATCAACCATGGTGCTGGGTCCTGA-3',
possessing a 5'-BclI site (underlined) and the first six
amino acids including the initiation methionine (double-underlined) of
NRAMP2) and the antisense primer NR2-3
(5'-TGATCATGTTATTTAACGTAGCCACG-3', possessing a 5'-BclI site (underlined) and the final five
amino acids and stop codon (double-underlined) of NRAMP2)
and human NRAMP2 cDNA (26) as a template. The reaction
product was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and cloned into the
pGEM-T easy vector (Promega). Nucleotide sequences of the polymerase
chain reaction products were verified by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method using a LI-COR 4000L automated DNA sequencer. The
resulting plasmid, pNRAMP2-2, was prepared from E. coli
strain SCS110 (Stratagene) and digested with BclI, and the
BclI fragment containing the full-length NRAMP2
cDNA was ligated into the BamHI site of pGFP-C1
(CLONTECH) to generate pGFP-NRAMP2.
Differential Extraction and Immunoblot Analysis--
HEp-2 cells
were homogenized with 15 strokes in a Potter homogenizer and
centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min. The post-nuclear supernatant (PNS) was centrifuged for an additional 30 min at 128,000 × g to recover the pellet as the membrane
fraction. The membrane fraction was resolved in 100 µl of denaturing
buffer (0.5% SDS and 0.1 M Subcellular Fractionation--
Following two rinses with
ice-cold PBS, confluent HEp-2 cells in 450-cm2 culture
dishes were scraped with a rubber policeman, harvested in ice-cold PBS,
and collected by centrifugation at 800 × g for 5 min.
Cells were resuspended in 1.0 ml of ice-cold homogenization buffer (0.3 M sucrose and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) and
homogenized with 10 strokes in a Potter homogenizer. The cell
homogenate was centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min at
4 °C, and the PNS was saved. The pellet was resuspended in 1.0 ml of
ice-cold homogenization buffer, homogenized with 10 strokes, and
centrifuged. A total of ~2.0 ml of PNS was recovered, and then 1.5 ml
of PNS was layered on 31 ml of a 0.3-1.7 M preformed
linear sucrose gradient in homogenization buffer. The gradients were
centrifuged at 24,000 rpm for 3 h at 4 °C in a P28S rotor
(Hitachi Co. Ltd.) and then removed in 3-ml fractions from the bottom
of the tube. Each fraction was dialyzed with PBS overnight and then
centrifuged at 128,000 × g for 30 min to recover the
pellet as the membrane fraction. The membrane fractions were resolved
in 100 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, and aliquots of 5 µl were
resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by
immunoblotting. The enrichment of proteins was confirmed by
densitometric analysis using NIH Image Version 1.59.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Cells grown on glass
coverslips were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, and
permeabilized with 50 µg/ml digitonin in PBS for 10 min. The
coverslips were washed twice (10 min/wash) with PBS and blocked in
0.2% fish skin gelatin in PBS for 10 min. Cells were incubated with
primary antibodies diluted in PBS for 60 min at room temperature.
Coverslips were washed three times (10 min/wash) with 0.2% fish skin
gelatin in PBS. Secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa 488, Alexa 594, or Cy2 were diluted in PBS and incubated on coverslips for 60 min at
room temperature. Coverslips were washed with 0.2% fish skin gelatin
in PBS as described above and mounted on slides in 9:1 glycerol/PBS.
Antibodies were used at the following dilutions: affinity-purified
anti-NRAMP2 N pAb, 1:50; anti-TfR mAb, 1:500; anti-LAMP-2 mAb, 1:1000;
anti-EEA1 mAb, 1:50; Alexa 594-labeled anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa
594-labeled anti-mouse IgG, and Alexa 488-labeled anti-rabbit IgG,
1:500; and Cy2-labeled anti-mouse IgG, 1:100. To label the lysosomal compartment, HEp-2 cells were incubated with 1 mg/ml lysine-fixable Texas Red-dextran in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium for 3 h
at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cells were stripped with
trypsin/EDTA, washed twice with PBS, grown on glass coverslips for
12 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and then fixed with 4%
PFA. GFP-NRAMP2-transfected cells grown on glass coverslips were
treated with nocodazole (100 µg/ml for HEp-2 cells and 20 µg/ml for
HeLa and COS-7 cells). After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, cells
were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA, permeabilized,
and then incubated with primary antibodies followed by secondary
antibodies. The coverslips were examined with an Olympus BX50
microscope. Photographs were taken with an Olympus color chilled 3CCD
camera (Model M-3204C-10). Images were analyzed on a Macintosh computer
using Adobe PhotoShop 4.0J.
Generation of Antibody to Detect Human NRAMP2--
NRAMP2 is an
integral membrane protein that consists of 12 putative transmembrane
domains and two potential glycosylation sites as shown in Fig.
1A. Previously, we produced a
polyclonal antibody against the N-terminal cytoplasmic tail of human
NRAMP2 by immunization with recombinant TrpE-NRAMP2-(1-66) protein
produced in E. coli and showed that this anti-NRAMP2 N
antiserum recognized the functional NRAMP2 protein expressed in fission
yeast (18). However, we failed to detect endogenous human NRAMP2 in
various human cell lines with this anti-NRAMP2 N antiserum (data not
shown). We purified this anti-NRAMP2 N antiserum by recombinant
GST-NRAMP2-(1-66) fusion protein-coupled affinity column
chromatography to detect the endogenous NRAMP2 protein by
immunoblotting and indirect immunofluorescence analysis. Anti-NRAMP2 N
antiserum recognized not only the TrpE-NRAMP2-(1-66) fusion protein,
but also the TrpE protein (Fig. 1B, panel b), and
preimmune serum did not recognize either protein (panel a). The affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb recognized only the
TrpE-NRAMP2-(1-66) fusion protein, but not the TrpE protein (Fig.
1B, panel c). These results indicated that the
affinity-purified NRAMP2 N pAb specifically recognized only the portion
of amino acids 1-66 of human NRAMP2. To identify endogenous NRAMP2,
immunoblot analysis was performed with the affinity-purified NRAMP2 N
pAb using the membrane fractions prepared from HEp-2 and COS-7 cells
(Fig. 1C). The affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb
recognized both the 66-kDa (p66) band and the 90-116-kDa (p116) smear
on immunoblot analysis of the HEp-2 membrane fraction (Fig.
1C, lane 1). In COS-7 cells, the
affinity-purified NRAMP2 N pAb recognized only the p66 band, and not
the p116 band (Fig. 1C, lane 2). The predicted
molecular mass of NRAMP2 is 61.5 kDa, which is close to that of the p66
band. Gruenheid et al. (24) reported that mouse NRAMP2 is a
90-100-kDa integral membrane protein extensively modified by
glycosylation (>40% of the molecular mass); this molecular mass is
close to that of the p116 band. To determine which band(s) actually
represented the human NRAMP2 protein, HEp-2 membrane fractions were
extracted with 1 M NaCl, 2 M urea, or 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 11.0. Although both
p66 and p116 were sedimented in the membrane fraction, p66 was readily
extracted to the soluble fraction by 1 M NaCl or 0.1 M Na2CO3 treatment, but p116 could
not be extracted under any conditions used in this study (Fig.
1D). These solubilization profiles suggest that p66 is not
an integral membrane protein and that p116 could be the NRAMP2 protein.
To confirm the identity of p116, the 0.1 M
Na2CO3-extracted membrane fraction from HEp-2
cells and the membrane fraction from NRAMP2 expressed in fission yeast
were treated with PNGase F, followed by electrophoresis and
immunoblotting. PNGase F treatment of HEp-2 cell membrane resulted in a
shift of the apparent molecular mass of the p116 band from 90-116 to
50 kDa (Fig. 1E, lane 2). PNGase F also converted
the 50-60-kDa recombinant NRAMP2 expressed in fission yeast into
smaller forms with an apparent molecular mass of 50 kDa (Fig.
1E, lane 1), which was the same molecular mass as
the band detected upon PNGase F treatment of the HEp-2 cell membrane.
These results showed that the 0.1 M
Na2CO3-resistant p116 band recognized by this
pAb was the NRAMP2 protein itself.
NRAMP2 Is Co-sedimented with Lysosome-associated Membrane
Protein--
Understanding the localization of NRAMP2 within the cell
is critical for understanding the Fe2+ transport step from
the endosomes to the cytoplasm in the Tf cycle. To confirm the
subcellular localization of NRAMP2 biochemically, we performed
subcellular fractionation of HEp-2 cells. PNS was prepared from HEp-2
cells and fractionated on a 0.3-1.7 M sucrose density
gradient, and the distribution of NRAMP2 within the gradient was
compared with the early endosomal membrane protein TfR and the late
endosomal/lysosomal membrane proteins LAMP-1 and LAMP-2. The enrichment
of NRAMP2, TfR, LAMP-1, and LAMP-2 was confirmed by densitometric
analysis (Fig. 2B). NRAMP2
immunoreactivity was detected in fractions 4-8 and was enriched in
fraction 6, coincident with LAMP-1 (Fig. 2). LAMP-2 also appeared
essentially in the same position of LAMP-1; and it is obvious that TfR
appeared in fractions 5-9, its peak was detected in fraction 7, and
NRAMP2 appeared in a different position from TfR (Fig. 2). We repeated the same experiments, and these differences were consistently seen.
Thus, the observations in our subcellular fractionation studies
suggested that NRAMP2 was expressed within the late endosomal/lysosomal membranes.
Localization of NRAMP2 in HEp-2 Cells--
To elucidate the
intracellular localization of NRAMP2, we performed indirect
immunofluorescence staining of NRAMP2. When HEp-2 cells were fixed with
4% PFA and stained using the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb,
vesicular structures in the perinuclear regions were stained (Fig.
3a). These structures were not
stained by preimmune serum or non-purified antibody (data not shown) or
in the presence of an excess amount of the bacterially expressed
GST-NRAMP2-(1-66) fusion protein that may have been recognized by the
antibody (Fig. 3d). When COS-7 cells were stained with the
affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb, only the nuclear regions were
specifically stained (Fig. 3c). As some of the HEp-2 cells
were disrupted to too great an extent by detergent through the
immunostaining process, they showed staining of not only the
perinuclear vesicles, but also the nuclei (Fig. 3b,
arrowheads). Immunoblot analysis showed that the
affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb recognized only p66, but not
p116/NRAMP2 in the membrane fraction of COS-7 cells (Fig. 1C, lane 2). This indicated that COS-7 cells did
not express p116/NRAMP2 proteins that could be recognized by the
affinity-purified NRAMP2 N pAb. As the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N
pAb specifically recognized a portion of amino acids 1-66 of NRAMP2,
these observations suggested that p66 must be the protein containing
the same epitope as the N-terminal domain of NRAMP2 and that is
localized to the nucleus. Fortunately, because the antibody could not
permeate the nucleus in HEp-2 cells under our immunostaining
conditions, only the perinuclear vesicular structures representing
NRAMP2 were stained. However, because of the different permeability of antibodies, when HeLa cells were stained with the affinity-purified pAb, most of the cells showed staining of not only the perinuclear vesicles, but also of the nuclei under our immunostaining conditions (data not shown).
To identify the perinuclear vesicular structures stained in HEp-2
cells, the cells were double-stained with anti-EEA1 marker for early
(sorting) endosomes; anti-TfR marker for sorting endosomes, recycling
endosomes, and plasma membrane; anti-LAMP-2 marker for late endosomes
and lysosomes; or Texas Red-dextran-endocytosed for 15 h, a marker
of lysosomes. The early endosomal markers EEA1 and TfR were not
colocalized with NRAMP2 (Fig. 4,
A-F), although a small portion of NRAMP2 in the perinuclear
region overlapped with TfR (Fig. 4, D-E). In contrast, most
of the puncta of NRAMP2 were completely colocalized with LAMP-2 (Fig.
4, G-I); and furthermore, endocytosed Texas Red-dextran in
the perinuclear region, which was supposed to be a lysosomal marker,
appeared to be localized in the same compartment as NRAMP2 (Fig. 4,
J-L). These results indicated that NRAMP2 was located in
late endosomes and lysosomes.
Localization of GFP-NRAMP2 in HEp-2, HeLa, and COS-7 Cells--
To
confirm the late endosomal and lysosomal localization of NRAMP2 by
examining the localization of recombinant GFP-NRAMP2, HEp-2 cells were
transfected with pGFP-NRAMP2, fixed with 4% PFA, and stained with
antibodies for several organelle markers. Similar to the staining with
the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb, GFP fluorescence was also
detected in vesicular structures in the perinuclear region in
transfected HEp-2 cells (Fig. 5,
A, D, G, and J), and these
structures were not seen in untransfected cells
(arrowheads). GFP-NRAMP2 was completely colocalized with LAMP-2 and partially colocalized with endocytosed Texas Red-dextran, but showed no colocalization with EEA1. In addition, GFP-NRAMP2 partially overlapped with the perinuclear region of TfR staining (Fig.
5, D-F). To eliminate the possibility that the localization of NRAMP2 to late endosomes and lysosomes was limited to HEp-2 cells,
we also analyzed the subcellular localization of GFP-NRAMP2 in HeLa and
COS-7 cells. HeLa and COS-7 cells were transfected with pGFP-NRAMP2,
followed by immunostaining with antibodies to TfR and LAMP-2. Similar
to the observations obtained by double staining of GFP-NRAMP2 and
organelle markers in HEp-2 cells, GFP-NRAMP2 was colocalized with
LAMP-2 in HeLa and COS-7 cells (Fig. 5, P-U) and partially
overlapped with TfR in the perinuclear region in HeLa cells (Fig. 5,
M-O).
Nocodazole Treatment Does Not Affect the Colocalization of NRAMP2
and LAMP-2--
Both endogenous NRAMP2 and GFP-NRAMP2 partially
overlapped with TfR in the perinuclear region in HEp-2 cells and
notably in HeLa cells (Figs. 4 (D-F) and 5 (D-F
and M-O)). A number of membrane compartments are localized
to the perinuclear region of the cell, including the Golgi, recycling
endosomes and late endosomes and lysosomes. It was previously proposed
that the perinuclear structures marked by TfR represent recycling
endosomes (described by Mellman and co-workers (29) as recycling
vesicles) and that these structures disperse upon treatment with
nocodazole. To more rigorously demonstrate the colocalization of NRAMP2
and LAMP-2, we examined the co-distribution of GFP-NRAMP2 and LAMP-2 in
cells in which the microtubule cytoskeleton had been depolymerized with
nocodazole. Nocodazole treatment also strongly affected the overall
organization of late endosomes and lysosomes. These compartments are
randomly scattered throughout the cytoplasm and change to enlarged
patched structures following nocodazole treatment (30, 31). As shown in
Fig. 6 (A, D,
G, J and M), treatment with nocodazole
caused the perinuclear structures of GFP-NRAMP2 to scatter throughout
the cytoplasm and to patch to the enlarged vesicles. The colocalization
between GFP-NRAMP2 and LAMP-2 was also perfectly observed in these
structures in all cell lines used in this study (Fig. 6, H,
K and N). However, the localization of GFP-NRAMP2
and TfR was separated by treatment with nocodazole (Fig. 6,
B and E). Essentially the same results were
obtained by immunostaining of NRAMP2 in HEp-2 cells (data not shown).
These observations indicated that NRAMP2 and LAMP-2 were present in the
same compartment because if they were in distinct compartments, they
would not necessarily remain colocalized following nocodazole
treatment. Finally, we concluded that NRAMP2 was located in late
endosomes and lysosomes.
NRAMP2 is a divalent metal transporter that exhibits an unusually
broad range of substrate specificity, including Fe2+,
Zn2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, Cd2+,
Co2+, Ni2+, and Pb2+ (13). NRAMP2
has been suggested to function as an endosomal iron transporter in
non-intestinal cells and as an apical membrane iron transporter in
intestinal enterocytes because the microcytic anemia (mk)
mouse and the Belgrade (b) rat, which have inherited defects
in iron transport that result in iron deficiency anemia, have the same
missense mutation (G185R) in Nramp2 (11, 12). To obtain
information about the relationship between the subcellular localization
and the function of NRAMP2/DMT1 in the Tf cycle, we investigated the
subcellular localization of human NRAMP2 by subcellular fractionation
and immunocytochemical analyses and the tagging of NRAMP2 with GFP in
HEp-2 cells. In this study, we showed that NRAMP2 was colocalized with
late endosomal and lysosomal membrane protein markers, but not with
recycling endosomal and/or sorting endosomal protein markers. Recently,
Su et al. (25) reported that both wild-type and mutant G185R
forms of epitope-tagged mouse Nramp2 are colocalized with Tf in HEK293T cells. Gruenheid et al. (24) also reported that mouse Nramp2 is colocalized with Tf in recycling endosomes in Chinese hamster ovary
and RAW264.7 cells. In our study, partial overlap between NRAMP2 and
TfR was seen in the perinuclear region of HEp-2 and HeLa cells, and
this overlap was especially marked in HeLa cells. In HeLa, Chinese
hamster ovary, and some other cells, recycling endosomes and late
endosomes and lysosomes are all clustered around the perinuclear
microtubule-organizing center, and this makes it difficult, at the
level of microscopy, to resolve these organelles in this region (32,
33). In HEp-2 cells, the recycling compartment has a more widely
dispersed tubular distribution (34-36). The difference between the
localization of NRAMP2 and that of TfR was clearer in HEp-2 cells
(Figs. 4 (D-F) and 5 (D-F)). The
microtubule-depolymerizing agent nocodazole has been shown to cause
vesiculation and dispersal of both Golgi cisternae and early endosomal
compartments (37). Nocodazole treatment caused the complete separation
of NRAMP2 and TfR, but NRAMP2 remained colocalized with LAMP-2 in
various cell lines under these conditions (Fig. 6). These results
indicate that the NRAMP2 and LAMP-2 proteins are located on the
membranes of the same compartments, consistent with the localization of NRAMP2 on late endosomes and lysosomes. It is difficult from
immunofluorescence data to make quantitative estimates of protein
localizations. We could not exclude the possibility that sorting
endosomes contain some NRAMP2 and that this protein is concentrated in
late endosomes and lysosomes as they mature.
In iron metabolism, there are three critical steps in which NRAMP2 may
function as an iron transporter: (i) the apical membrane dietary iron
transport step in intestinal enterocytes, (ii) the phagosomal iron
transport step from phagocytosed red blood cells in reticuloendothelial
systems, and (iii) the endosomal iron transport step in the Tf cycle in
erythrocytes and other cells. Canonne-Hergaux et al. (23)
reported that Nramp2 expression is markedly induced in the proximal
portion of the duodenum under conditions of dietary iron deficiency and
that Nramp2 is abundantly expressed in the brush border of absorptive
epithelial cells of the duodenum. These observations demonstrate that
Nramp2 is localized to the apical membrane in brush borders, where
Nramp2 functions as an apical membrane dietary iron transporter, and
indicate that Nramp2 is sorted to the apical membranes by an as yet
unknown sorting mechanism specific to intestinal enterocytes. In
reticuloendothelial systems, macrophages play a fundamental role in
iron metabolism by phagocytosing effete red blood cells, breaking down
their hemoglobin, and recycling iron to transferrin for delivery back
to the erythron (1, 38, 39). The bulk of iron used for erythropoiesis
has passed through this recycling pathway. In reticuloendothelial
macrophages, an iron transporter is needed in the phagosomal membranes
to release the phagosomal free iron into the cytoplasm. These cells
specifically express Nramp1, which is localized to the late endosomes
and lysosomes and which is associated with phagosomal membranes during
phagocytosis. Nramp1 was suggested to play a special role in this
process (39). If Nramp1 functions in this process, Nramp1-deficient
mice would suffer from iron deficiency anemia. However, the
Bcg mutant mouse or the Nramp1 knockout mouse has
not been reported to show recessive defects in iron absorption or to
exhibit severe microcytic hypochromic anemia. These observations
indicate that Nramp1 does not function in this process. Gruenheid
et al. (24) reported that Nramp2 is also expressed in
macrophages and is associated with the phagosomal membrane during
phagocytosis. If NRAMP2 functions in this process, the results obtained
in this study concerning the late endosomal and lysosomal localization
of NRAMP2 are reasonable. In erythrocytes and other cells, iron
absorption is mediated in a Tf·TfR-dependent manner (2).
From the current understanding on iron acquisition via
Tf·TfR-mediated endocytosis (33) and the present results, we propose
the schematic model for the function of NRAMP2 in the Tf·TfR-mediated
iron transport process (Fig. 7). In the
first step, plasma Fe3+·Tf attaches to specific Tf
receptors on the cell surface by a physicochemical interaction, not
requiring temperature or energy. In a temperature- and
energy-dependent manner, the Tf·TfR complexes are then
internalized within clathrin-coated vesicles. Iron is released from the
Tf within the endocytic vesicles by a temperature- and
energy-dependent process that involves endosomal
acidification. Influx of protons into the endosomes occurs via an
ATP-dependent proton pump (vacuolar H+-ATPase).
A separate function that is also a consequence of
pH-dependent conformational change is the release of iron
from Tf. At the acidic pH of sorting endosomes, iron is released from
Tf, and the resulting apo-Tf remains bound to its receptor in the
acidic endosomes (3, 4). The apo-Tf·TfR complex is rapidly sorted to
the recycling endosomes and eventually recycles back to the cell
surface. The free Fe3+ released to endosomes is reduced to
Fe2+ on the cis-side of the endosomal membrane
probably mediated by oxidoreductase (41). Finally, free
Fe2+ is transported to late endosomes and lysosomes and is
then transported into the cytoplasm by NRAMP2. The mechanism of the
passage of material from early sorting endosomes to late endosomes is
still obscure. Two general models have been proposed (40, 42, 43). In
the vesicle transport model (Fig. 7A), the early endosomes would be stable organelles from which transport vesicles would pinch
off to deliver endosomal contents to late endosomes. This would be
similar to the vesicle traffic mechanisms that operate between the
endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. In this model, because
it is impossible that free iron is vectorially sorted to late
endosomes, specific iron carriers may be expressed in sorting
endosomes. Endosomal free iron would be transported to late endosomes
by such a specific iron carrier. In the maturation model (Fig.
7B), the entire contents of the early sorting endosomes would be transformed into late endosomes. In this model, free iron is
concentrated in sorting endosomes by the Tf cycle, and early sorting
endosomes that concentrated free iron gradually mature to late
endosomes with recruitment of the late endosomal components (NRAMP2,
vacuolar H+-ATPase, etc.) and with sorting of the early
endosomal recycling receptors (TfR, low density lipoprotein receptor,
etc.) to recycling endosomes. Finally, endosomes mature to late
endosomes, and then endosomal free iron is transported into the
cytoplasm by NRAMP2. Although the mechanism of the pathway from early
endosome to late endosome is still obscure, the majority of recent data
support the maturation models (33). Once we take a stand on the vesicle transport model for iron transport mediated by NRAMP2, we have to
hypothesize the presence of additional iron carrier protein in the
vesicle to incorporate Fe2+. Together with the previous
studies, we assume that the maturation model is reasonable at the
present time.
In conclusion, we have shown that NRAMP2 is a 90-116-kDa integral
membrane glycoprotein and is colocalized with LAMP-2, but not with TfR
in non-intestinal cells. These results indicate that NRAMP2 is
localized to the membrane of late endosomes and lysosomes, where NRAMP2
act as an iron transporter in the Tf cycle. This raises the question of
why NRAMP2 is localized to late endosomes and lysosomes. NRAMP2 is a
pH-dependent divalent metal/proton symporter (13). The late
endosomal and lysosomal acidic environment may provide the proton
gradient required for further activation of NRAMP2 and for the proton
cotransport of iron by this molecule.
We thank Dr. Masato Ohashi, Takashi Ueno,
Norihiro Nakamura, Atsuki Nara, and Fumi Yamagata for technical advice.
We are grateful to Dr. Yukio Tanizawa for providing the COS-7 cell line
and to Prof. Teruko Nakazawa for giving us the opportunity to perform this research.
*
The monoclonal antibody H4B4 was obtained from the
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of
NICHD and maintained by the Department of Biological Sciences,
University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-836-22-2183;
Fax.: 81-836-22-2185; E-mail: fkishi-ygc@umin.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 4, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001478200
The abbreviations used are:
Tf, transferrin;
TfR, transferrin receptor;
NRAMP, natural resistance-associated
macrophage protein;
DMT1, divalent metal transporter 1;
pAb, polyclonal
antibody;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
EEA1, early endosome antigen 1;
LAMP, lysosome-associated membrane protein;
PNS, post-nuclear supernatant;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PNGase F, peptide
N-glycosidase F;
PFA, p-formaldehyde;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein.
Human NRAMP2/DMT1, Which Mediates Iron Transport across Endosomal
Membranes, Is Localized to Late Endosomes and Lysosomes in HEp-2
Cells*
,
, and
**
Center for Gene Research, Yamaguchi
University and the ¶ Institute of Laboratory Animals, Yamaguchi
University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi
755-8505, the § Department of Cell Biology, National
Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, and the
Ube
Research Laboratory, FUJIREBIO Inc., Ube,
Yamaguchi 759-0134, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol in PBS) and
denatured for 5 min at 95 °C. Protein concentration was determined
by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). For differential extraction, HEp-2
membrane fraction was suspended in a solution containing NaCl, urea,
and Na2CO3, pH 11.0, at final concentrations of
1.0, 2.0, and 0.1 M, respectively. The suspension was
incubated on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 128,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to
a fresh tube, precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid, and resolved
in 100 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. The precipitate was dissolved in
100 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. The supernatant (S) and precipitate
(P) fractions were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and immunoblotted using the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb. For
peptide N-glycosidase F (PNGase F) digestion, aliquots of
0.1 M Na2CO3-treated membrane
fractions prepared from HEp-2 cells and the membrane fraction of
recombinant NRAMP2 expressed in fission yeast were denatured before
digestion in denaturing buffer for 10 min at 95 °C. PNGase F
digestion was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions
(New England Biolabs Inc.). Proteins were transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes, and the blots were incubated with the primary
antibodies. Proteins were detected with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated antibody against rabbit IgG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
NRAMP2 is a 90-116-kDa integral membrane
glycoprotein. A, predicted secondary structure of
NRAMP2. B, immunoblot analysis of TrpE (lane 1)
and recombinant TrpE-NRAMP2-(1-66) (lane 2) proteins with
preimmune serum (panel a), anti-NRAMP2 N pAb (panel
b), or affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb (panel c).
C, immunoblot analysis of membrane fraction prepared from
HEp-2 cells (lane 1) and COS-7 cells (lane 2)
with the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb. D,
differential extraction of p66 and p116 by the various reagents. The
membrane fraction was extracted by the indicated reagents and separated
by high-speed centrifugation into pellet (P) and supernatant
(S) fractions. E, effects of deglycosylation of
NRAMP2 protein with PNGase F. Lane 1, membrane fraction from
recombinant NRAMP2 protein expressed in fission yeast; lane
2, 0.1 M Na2CO3-extracted
membrane fraction from HEp-2 cells.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Subcellular fractionation of NRAMP2.
A, cells were homogenized in homogenization buffer, and the
post-nuclear supernatant was centrifuged on a preformed 0.3-1.7
M sucrose gradient. Membrane fractions were prepared from
each fraction. Immunoblot analyses of NRAMP2, TfR, LAMP-1, and LAMP-2
were performed with fractionated membrane fractions. B, the
distributions of NRAMP2 (closed circles), TfR (open
circles), LAMP-1 (open squares), and LAMP-2 (open
triangles) were quantified by densitometry. Each fraction was
expressed as a percentage of the total protein across the
gradient.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Immunofluorescence staining of NRAMP2 in
HEp-2 and COS-7 cells. HEp-2 (a, b,
and d) or COS-7 (c) cells were fixed and
incubated with the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb
(a-c) or the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb + GST-NRAMP2-(1-66) fusion protein (d), followed by
incubation with the Alexa 594-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody. The
arrowheads indicate the cells that were disrupted to too
great an extent by detergent through the immunostaining process.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunofluorescence staining of endogenous
NRAMP2 in HEp-2 cells. HEp-2 cells were fixed and incubated with
the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb (A, D,
and G) and anti-EEA1 mAb (B), anti-TfR mAb
(E), or anti-LAMP-2 mAb (H), followed by
incubation with the Cy2-labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody (B,
E, and H) and Alexa 594-labeled anti-rabbit IgG
(A, D, and G). Lysosomes of HEp-2
cells were stained with Texas Red-dextran (K) and then fixed
and incubated with the affinity-purified anti-NRAMP2 N pAb, followed by
incubation with the Alexa 488-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody
(J). Overlays of A and B, D
and E, G and H, and J and
K are shown in C, F, I, and
L, respectively. The arrows indicate puncta
that are fluoroactive for both NRAMP2 and LAMP-2.
Bar = 10 µm.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Localization of GFP-NRAMP2 in
HEp-2, HeLa, and COS-7 cells. HEp-2 (A-L), HeLa
(M-R), and COS-7 (S-U) cells expressing
GFP-NRAMP2 under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter were fixed
and incubated with anti-EEA1 mAb (B), anti-TfR mAb
(E and N), or anti-LAMP-2 mAb (H,
Q, and T), followed by incubation with the Alexa
594-labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody (B, E,
H, N, Q, and T). Lysosomes
of transfected HEp-2 cells were stained with Texas Red-dextran
(K). Cellular localization of GFP-NRAMP2 was indicated by
native GFP fluorescence (A, D, G,
J, M, P, and S). Overlays
of A and B, D and E,
G and H, J and K,
M and N, P and Q, and
S and T are shown in C, F,
I, L, O, R, and
U, respectively. The arrows indicate puncta that
are fluoroactive for both NRAMP2 and LAMP-2. The arrowheads
indicate the untransfected cells. Bar = 10 µm.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Distribution of GFP-NRAMP2 in
nocodazole-treated HEp-2, HeLa, and COS-7 cells. HEp-2
(A-C and G-I) and HeLa (D-F
and J-L) cells expressing GFP-NRAMP2 under the control of
the cytomegalovirus promoter were incubated with Dulbecco's minimal
essential medium containing nocodazole for 1 h with 5%
CO2 at 37 °C and then fixed and incubated with anti-TfR
mAb (B and E) or anti-LAMP-2 mAb (H,
K, and N), followed by incubation with the Alexa
594-labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody (B, E,
H, K, and N). Cellular localization of
GFP-NRAMP2 was indicated by GFP fluorescence (A,
D, G, J, and M). Overlays
of A and B, D and E,
G and H, J and K, and
M and N are shown in C, F,
I, L, and O, respectively. The
arrows indicate puncta that are fluoroactive for both
GFP-NRAMP2 and LAMP-2. The arrowheads indicate the
untransfected cells. Bar = 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Model for the function of NRAMP2 in
Fe2+ transport in the transferrin cycle.
See "Discussion" for further explanation. V-ATPase,
vacuolar H+-ATPase.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Andrews, N. C.
(1999)
N. Engl. J. Med.
341,
1986-1995
2.
Ponka, P.,
Beaumont, C.,
and Richardson, D. R.
(1998)
Semin. Hematol.
35,
35-54
3.
Dautry-Varsat, A.,
Ciechnover, A.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
2258-2262
4.
Rao, K.,
Renswoude, J.,
van Kempf, C.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1983)
FEBS Lett.
160,
213-216
5.
Bannerman, R. M.
(1976)
Fed Proc.
35,
2281-2285
6.
Russell, E. S.,
Nash, D. J.,
Bernstein, S. E.,
Kent, E. L.,
McFarland, E. C.,
Matthews, S. M.,
and Norwood, M. S.
(1970)
Blood
35,
838-850
7.
Edwards, J. A.,
and Hoke, J. E.
(1972)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
141,
81-84
8.
Edwards, J. A.,
and Hoke, J. E.
(1975)
Blood
46,
381-388
9.
Garrick, M.,
Scott, D.,
Walpole, S.,
Finkelstein, E.,
Whitbred, J.,
Chopra, S.,
Trivikram, L.,
Mayes, D.,
Rhodes, D.,
Cabbagestalk, K.,
Oklu, R.,
Sadiq, A.,
Mascia, B.,
Hoke, J.,
and Garrick, L.
(1997)
Biometals
10,
65-76
10.
Oates, P. S.,
and Morgan, E. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
G826-G832
11.
Fleming, M. D.,
Trenor, C. C., III,
Su, M. A,
Foernzler, D.,
Beier, D. R.,
Dietrich, W. F.,
and Andrews, N. C.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
383-386
12.
Fleming, M. D.,
Romano, M. A.,
Su, M. A.,
Garrick, L. M.,
Garrick, M. D.,
and Andrews, N. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1148-1153
13.
Gunshin, H.,
Mackenzie, B.,
Berger, U. S.,
Gunshin, Y.,
Romero, M. F.,
Boron, W. F.,
Nussberger, S.,
Gollan, J. L.,
and Hediger, M. A.
(1997)
Nature
388,
482-487
14.
Gruenheid, S.,
Cellier, M.,
Vidal, S.,
and Gros, P.
(1995)
Genomics
20,
514-525
15.
Vidal, S. M.,
Malo, D.,
Vogan, K.,
Skamene, E.,
and Gros, P.
(1993)
Cell
73,
469-485
16.
Superk, F.,
Supekova, L.,
Nelson, H.,
and Nelson, N.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5105-5110
17.
Pinner, E.,
Gruenheid, S.,
Raymond, M.,
and Gros, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28933-28938
18.
Tabuchi, M.,
Yoshida, T.,
Takegawa, K.,
and Kishi, F.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
344,
211-219
19.
Vidal, S.,
Belouchi, A. M.,
Cellier, M.,
Beatty, B.,
and Gros, P.
(1995)
Mamm. Genome
6,
224-230
20.
Gruenheid, S.,
Pinner, E.,
Desjardins, M.,
and Gros, P.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
717-730
21.
Atkinson, P. G. P.,
Blackwell, J. M.,
and Barton, C. H.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
325,
779-786
22.
Searle, S.,
Bright, N. A.,
Roach, T. J.,
Atkinson, P. G. P.,
Barton, C. H.,
Meloen, R. H.,
and Blackwell, J. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2855-2866
23.
Canonne-Hergaux, F. C.,
Gruenheid, S.,
Ponka, P.,
and Gros, P.
(1999)
Blood
93,
4406-4417
24.
Gruenheid, S.,
Ganonne-Hergaux, F.,
Gauthier, S.,
Hackman, D. J.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Gros, P.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
189,
831-841
25.
Su, M. A.,
Trenor, C. C., III,
Fleming, J. C.,
Fleming, M. D.,
and Andrews, N. C.
(1998)
Blood
92,
2157-2163
26.
Kishi, F.,
and Tabuchi, M.
(1997)
Mol. Immunol.
34,
839-842
27.
Kishi, F.,
and Tabuchi, M.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
251,
775-783
28.
Yoshimori, T.,
Shimonishi, Y.,
and Uchida, T.
(1988)
Cell Struct. Funct.
13,
311-324
29.
Daro, E.,
Sluijs, P. V. D.,
Galli, T.,
and Mellman, I.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9559-9564
30.
Scheel, J.,
Matteoni, R.,
Ludwig, T.,
Bernard, L.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1990)
J. Cell Sci.
96,
711-720
31.
Méresse, S.,
Gorvel, J.-P.,
and Chavrier, P.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
3349-3358
32.
Advani, R. J.,
Yang, B.,
Prekeris, R.,
Lee, K. C.,
Klumperman, J.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
765-775
33.
Mukherjee, S.,
Ghosh, R. N.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
759-803
34.
Ghosh, R. N.,
Gelman, D. L.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
2177-2189
35.
Hopkins, C. R.,
Gibson, A.,
Shipman, M.,
and Miller, K.
(1990)
Nature
346,
335-339
36.
Tooze, J.,
and Mollinshead, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
635-653
37.
Turner, J. R.,
and Tartakoff, A. M.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2081-2088
38.
Deiss, A.
(1983)
Semin. Hematol.
20,
81-90
39.
Andrews, N. C.,
and Levy, J. E.
(1999)
Blood
92,
1845-1851
40.
44 Murphy, R. F. (1991) Trends Cell Biol. 1, 77-82
41.
Núñez, M.-T.,
Gaete, V.,
Watkins, J. A.,
and Glass, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6688-6692
42.
Dunn, K. W.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
301-310
43.
Griffiths, G.,
and Gruenberg, J.
(1991)
Trends Cell Biol.
1,
5-9
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Abouhamed, J. Gburek, W. Liu, B. Torchalski, A. Wilhelm, N. A. Wolff, E. I. Christensen, F. Thevenod, and C. P. Smith Divalent metal transporter 1 in the kidney proximal tubule is expressed in late endosomes/lysosomal membranes: implications for renal handling of protein-metal complexes Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1525 - F1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Safaei, K. Katano, B. J. Larson, G. Samimi, A. K. Holzer, W. Naerdemann, M. Tomioka, M. Goodman, and S. B. Howell Intracellular Localization and Trafficking of Fluorescein-Labeled Cisplatin in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 756 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Kelleher and B. Lonnerdal Low Vitamin A Intake Affects Milk Iron Level and Iron Transporters in Rat Mammary Gland and Liver J. Nutr., January 1, 2005; 135(1): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Griffin, D. T. Ward, W. Liu, G. Stewart, I. D. Morris, and C. P. Smith Differential expression of divalent metal transporter DMT1 (Slc11a2) in the spermatogenic epithelium of the developing and adult rat testis Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): C176 - C184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wareing, C. J. Ferguson, M. Delannoy, A. G. Cox, R. F. T. McMahon, R. Green, D. Riccardi, and C. P. Smith Altered dietary iron intake is a strong modulator of renal DMT1 expression Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): F1050 - F1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Knutson, M. R. Vafa, D. J. Haile, and M. Wessling-Resnick Iron loading and erythrophagocytosis increase ferroportin 1 (FPN1) expression in J774 macrophages Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 4191 - 4197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Touret, W. Furuya, J. Forbes, P. Gros, and S. Grinstein Dynamic Traffic through the Recycling Compartment Couples the Metal Transporter Nramp2 (DMT1) with the Transferrin Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25548 - 25557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, K. Mori, J. Y. Li, and J. Barasch Iron, lipocalin, and kidney epithelia Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): F9 - F18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lam-Yuk-Tseung, G. Govoni, J. Forbes, and P. Gros Iron transport by Nramp2/DMT1: pH regulation of transport by 2 histidines in transmembrane domain 6 Blood, May 1, 2003; 101(9): 3699 - 3707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. M. Qian, H. Li, H. Sun, and K. Ho Targeted Drug Delivery via the Transferrin Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis Pathway Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2002; 54(4): 561 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||