![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22324-22330, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of
Received for publication, September 20, 1999, and in revised form, March 14, 2000
Protein kinase C (PKC) regulates fundamental
cellular functions including proliferation, differentiation,
tumorigenesis, and apoptosis. All-trans-retinoic acid
(atRA) modulates PKC activity, but the mechanism of this regulation is
unknown. Amino acid alignments and crystal structure analysis of
retinoic acid (RA)-binding proteins revealed a putative atRA-binding
motif in PKC, suggesting existence of an atRA binding site on the PKC
molecule. This was supported by photolabeling studies showing
concentration- and UV-dependent photoincorporation of
[3H]atRA into PKC Protein kinase C (PKC)1
is from a gene family of serine/threonine protein kinases that are key
regulatory enzymes in signal transduction. The PKC family consists of
several subfamilies (classic: PKC isozymes regulate gene expression and a variety of cellular
functions, including growth, differentiation, tumor promotion, aging,
and apoptosis (1, 2, 5); however, the biological significance of the
heterogeneity in the PKC family is not clear. The distinct subcellular
distribution, the presence of several isozymes in the same cell, and
differential activation or inhibition by different stimuli suggest that
each isozyme is involved in the regulation of different functions and
has a unique role in the cell (2, 4, 9, 10).
Retinoids are vitamin A derivatives that regulate cellular growth,
differentiation, development, and apoptosis (11, 12). Retinoids control
gene expression and synthesis of a variety of proteins through nuclear
retinoic acid receptors and are directly involved in regulation of
numerous signaling molecules, including PKC (13-18). Specifically,
retinoids have been implicated in the mechanism of reversion from the
malignant to the normal cell phenotype, inhibition of cancer
invasiveness, and are currently used to treat various types of cancer,
including promyelocytic leukemia, head and neck, skin, breast, and
ovarian cancers (19-22). It has been postulated that retinoids exert
some of their effects on cellular differentiation and reversion of
malignant phenotype through interactions with PKC isozymes (13, 16, 23,
24). It has been shown that retinoic acid alters the cellular
localization of PKC In this work, we have begun the characterization of the biochemical
events underlying this regulation. We have previously identified an
amino acid motif common to the putative RA binding sites of several
RA-utilizing proteins (28). The presence of this motif in several PKC
isoforms led us to postulate and examine the existence of cellular
mechanisms that mediate receptor-independent signaling by retinoids
through a direct interaction with various PKC isozymes. We have used
photoaffinity labeling to demonstrate that purified, recombinant PKCs
bind atRA with high affinity. Using PKC activity assays, we have shown
that preincubation of PKC Taken together, this is the first evidence for a direct, high affinity
binding of atRA to PKC Materials
Recombinant human PKC isoforms and catalytic subunit were
obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). All-trans-retinoic
acid (atRA), phosphatidyl-L-serine (PS), phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), histone type III, diacylglycerol (DAG,
1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol), and arachidonic acid (AA) were
from Sigma. [11,12-3H]All-trans-retinoic acid
([3H]atRA) was purchased from NEN Life Science Products,
and adenosine 5'-[ Methods
Amino Acid Alignment
Polypeptides for CRABP I (29), CRABP II (29), and RAR (30) were
selected on the basis of the crystal structures of these proteins with
atRA bound. A polypeptide for UGT2B7 was selected according to modeling
of a RA binding site in this protein (28). Polypeptides for PKC
proteins were chosen through a homology comparison to CRABP and RAR Photoaffinity Labeling with [3H]atRA
Direct photoaffinity labeling with [3H]atRA was
done using modifications of the method described by Bernstein (32). For
screening of the different PKC isoforms, 7 pmol each of PKC
Following electrophoresis, gels were stained with Coomassie Blue,
destained, washed thoroughly with water, treated with Autofluor autoradiography enhancer, (National Diagnostics, Manville, NJ), dried,
and subjected to autoradiography at
For more detailed studies with PKC Enzymatic Assay
Preparation of Mixed Micelles--
PS (2.8 mg) and PMA (final
concentration: 100 µM) dissolved in chloroform were
transferred to a glass tube. Following evaporation of chloroform under
a stream of nitrogen, 1 ml of 3% Triton X-100 (prepared fresh) was
added and the mixture was sonicated.
PKC Assay--
PKC Amino Acid Alignment--
Amino acid alignments and comparison of
the crystal structures of several atRA-utilizing proteins, such as
CRABP I and II (cytosolic retinoic acid-binding protein I and II),
nuclear receptor RAR
The amino acid distribution among the analyzed sequences revealed three
categories of homologous amino acids (Fig. 1): conserved in CRABP and
UGT2B7 (yellow blocks), conserved in PKCs and
RAR
On the basis of the significant sequence homologies among the
analyzed sequences, we propose that the amino acids shown on the
consensus line might represent all or part of the RA binding pocket of
PKC
Additionally, significant homologies between a PKC Photoaffinity Labeling--
To test our hypothesis of a direct
interaction between atRA and PKC, we used direct photoaffinity labeling
of PKC
To characterize atRA interactions with PKC, we examined the ability of
atRA to compete with different PKC activators such as PS, PMA, DAG, and
Ca2+ for binding to PKC
In order to identify whether other PKC isozymes contain atRA-binding
sites, PKC
The catalytic subunit of PKC was used for photoaffinity labeling to
determine other possible sites of atRA binding to the PKC molecule.
There was some atRA binding to the catalytic subunit of PKC (~3% of
atRA binding to PKC
Direct comparison of the photolabeling of PKC
Taken together, these data suggest that: 1) the majority of atRA binds
to the regulatory subunit of PKC and 2) the major atRA binding site in
PKC
Recent site-directed mutagenesis studies from another laboratory
carried out on several residues in the C2 domain of PKC
The general conclusion from these experiments is that all the PKC
isoforms studied directly interact with atRA but the binding of atRA to
different isoforms occurs with different affinity. Although the major
site of atRA binding in PKC Enzymatic Activity--
To examine the effects of atRA binding on
PKC catalytic activity, the activity of purified PKC
To characterize specific interactions of atRA with individual
activators of PKC
In the absence of atRA, PKC A Model for PKC/atRA Interaction--
A model for the proposed
regulation of PKC by phosphorylation, membrane binding, and activation
is well established and has been published previously (8). In this
model, newly synthesized PKC associates with the detergent-insoluble
fraction of cells. Three phosphorylation events convert PKC into a
mature form that is released into cytosol but is inactive due to the
presence of pseudosubstrate in the substrate-binding cavity. PKC
translocation to the membrane occurs once DAG binds to the C1 domain
and is followed by phospholipid (PS) binding to the C2 domain.
Association of DAG with its binding site in the C1 domain and PS with
its binding site on the C2 domain leads to pseudosubstrate release and
PKC activation.
Based on our results, we propose a modification of this existing model,
which accounts for the direct interaction between atRA and PKC
Because atRA does not exist in the cell in the free form, we
hypothesize that it can react with PKC following binding to CRABP in
those cells where PKC and CRABP are both expressed. In preliminary experiments (data not shown) on CRABP and PKC interactions, a significant decrease of CRABP photolabeling by atRA was seen in the
presence of PKC, which suggests that there is an interplay between PKC,
CRABP and atRA. Experiments are in progress to elucidate the exact
mechanism of this interaction and its implications. Previously, it has
been shown that apo-CRABP can be phosphorylated by Ca2+-
and PS-dependent PKC and that holo-CRABP inhibits PKC
activity (36, 44), which suggests that an interaction between
RA-binding proteins and PKC may play a role in the regulation of PKC
activity and retinoid action.
Our model is restricted to the regulation of PKC
Our results show that, in vitro, at concentrations lower
than 50 µM, atRA can not displace PS from its binding
site (Fig. 6). Therefore, atRA binding to PKC Conclusions--
Our results from PKC photoaffinity labeling and
measurements of catalytic activity of PKC
The fact that atRA treatment modulates PKC activity could account for
some of the diverse effects that atRA treatment has on cancer cells.
Using retinoids at therapeutic doses to alter PKC activity could
control major cellular processes in malignant cells, including
inhibition of cell proliferation and initiation of differentiation or
apoptosis. Thus, agents that decrease the activity of certain PKC
isozymes might be beneficial as pharmacological tools to alter cellular
functions regulated by these PKC isozymes, specifically under
pathological conditions such as cancer.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants DK51791 and DK49715 (to A. R.-P.) and ES06765 (to V. M. S.) and by an intramural pilot grant (to C. A. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 516, Little Rock,
AR 72205. Tel.: 501-686-5414; Fax: 501-603-1146; E-mail: RadominskaAnna@exchange.uams.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M907722199
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
RA, retinoic acid;
atRA, all-trans-retinoic acid;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
DAG, diacylglycerol
(1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol);
PMA, phorbol
12-myristate-13-acetate;
AA, arachidonic acid;
CRABP, cellular retinoic
acid-binding protein;
RAR
Direct Interaction of All-trans-retinoic Acid with
Protein Kinase C (PKC)
IMPLICATIONS FOR PKC SIGNALING AND CANCER THERAPY*
§,
,
,
,
, and
Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Pharmacology, ¶ Toxicology,
Obstetrics and
Gynecology, and ** Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas
for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, which was effectively protected by
4-OH-atRA, 9-cis-RA, and atRA glucuronide, but not by
retinol. Photoaffinity labeling demonstrated strong competition between
atRA and phosphatidylserine (PS) for binding to PKC
, a slight
competition with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, and none with
diacylglycerol, fatty acids, or Ca2+. At pharmacological
concentrations (10 µM), atRA decreased PKC
activity
through the competition with PS but not
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, diacylglycerol, or Ca2+.
These results let us hypothesize that in vivo,
pharmacological concentrations of atRA may hamper binding of PS to
PKC
and prevent PKC
activation. Thus, this study provides the
first evidence for direct binding of atRA to PKC isozymes and suggests
the existence of a general mechanism for regulation of PKC activity
during exposure to retinoids, as in retinoid-based cancer therapy.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
I,
II,
; novel:
,
,
,
; atypical:
,
,
) classified according to their
requirements for Ca2+, phospholipids (phosphatidylserine
(PS)) and diacylglycerol (DAG) or phorbol esters for activation (1-4).
The classic and novel PKC isozymes contain an amino-terminal regulatory
domain and a carboxyl-terminal catalytic domain (4). The regulatory
domain of classic PKC isozymes contains two common regions, C1 and C2. The C1 domain mediates DAG and phorbol ester binding through distinct low and high affinity binding sites (5), while the C2 domain mediates
Ca2+ and PS binding and contains the receptor for activated
C kinase binding site (6, 7). PKC requires acidic phospholipids for its
activity, and, in the presence of activators, the enzyme has the
highest binding affinity for membranes containing PS. Upon activation,
PKC isozymes are translocated to distinct subcellular compartments
(membranes) and cell structures to phosphorylate their respective
substrates (4, 8). This compartmentalization is required for the
phosphorylation of specific substrates and the regulation of different
physiological functions (4, 9). Preventing PKC translocation from
the cytoplasm to membranes inhibits PKC function and the
subsequent phosphorylation of specific substrates (7, 9).
, consistent with PKC
inactivation, in
endometrial adenocarcinoma cells concurrent with the induction of
differentiation of these cells (24). Collectively, the data suggest
that alterations in PKC activity induced by retinoids are associated
with reversion of the malignant phenotype (25-27). However, the
mechanism by which retinoic acid regulates PKC is not known.
with micromolar concentrations of atRA
decreases PKC activity.
that results in a decrease in PKC
activity. Given the significance of these in vitro results, we hypothesize that atRA might also be involved in regulating PKC
activity in vivo by competing with PS for binding to PKC molecules. The exact localization of the atRA binding sites is under investigation.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]triphosphate
([
-32P]ATP) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
NuPAGE 4-12% BisTris gels, sample buffer, and running buffer were
from Novex (San Diego, CA). All other reagents were of the highest
purity available.
proteins and represent COOH-terminal fragments of their C2 domains.
Sequences were aligned using programs resident in the GCG Protein and
DNA Analysis Package (31).
,
I,
II,
,
,
, and
in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7, were
incubated for 2 min at room temperature with or without 30 µM atRA. The PKC catalytic subunit was labeled according
to the same protocol, except that only 2 pmol of protein was used.
[3H]atRA (30 Ci/mmol) was added to a final concentration
of 1.5 µM (0.03 nmol, ~1 µCi, in a final volume of 20 µl). atRA and [3H]atRA were added in ethanol with a
final concentration of 2% ethanol in all samples. Samples were
incubated for 10 min on ice prior to photolabeling with a handheld long
wave (366 nm) UV lamp (UVP-21, Ultraviolet Products, San Gabriel, CA)
for 15 min. Proteins were denatured by addition of NuPAGE denaturing
buffer (Novex) followed by sonication, boiling for 1 min and, finally,
centrifugation at 13,000 rpm in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge (Brinkman
Instruments, Westbury, NY). Proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a NuPAGE minigel (1.5 mm).
80 °C for 4-7 days. Results
were quantitated by densitometric analysis of the autoradiograms using
an AlphaInnotech IS-1000 Digital Imaging System (AlphaInnotech, San
Leandro, CA).
, photoaffinity labeling was
carried out in essentially the same manner using 0.2 µg (2.6 pmol) of
protein/sample in a final volume of 10 µl with an ethanol concentration of 5%. Any other modifications are given in the descriptions of specific experiments.
activity was assayed with Triton X-100
mixed micelles, using the phosphorylation of histone 1, as described by
Bell et al. (33). Unless stated otherwise, the reaction
mixture contained 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 20 mM
MgCl2, 1.0 mM CaCl2, 0.25 mM EGTA, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.28 mg/ml PS, 10 µM PMA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.3%
Triton X-100, 50 µM histone 1, 20 µM
[
-32P]ATP, and 150 milliunits of PKC
in a final
volume of 25 µl. Samples were incubated for 5 min at 30 °C, and
reactions were terminated by spotting an aliquot of reaction mixture on
phosphocellulose disks (P-81, 2.3 cm, Whatman, Clifton, NJ). After
washing the disks with 1% phosphoric acid,
-32P
incorporation into histone 1 was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Non-PKC
-specific activity (background) was determined in samples incubated in the absence of the enzyme.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and UGT2B7 (the enzyme catalyzing
glucuronidation of atRA) with the C2 domain of PKC was carried out as
the initial step in the investigation. A motif, previously designated
as comprising part of the atRA-binding site, was present in three PKC
isozymes examined (
,
I, and
) (Fig.
1).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of amino acid alignments of the C2
domain for PKC and various proteins that interact with atRA. Amino
acids conserved in CRABP and UGT2B7 (yellow blocks),
conserved in PKCs and RAR
(green blocks), and
maintained across all the analyzed sequences (red
blocks) are shown. For the purpose of this alignment, amino
acids in the hydrophobic set (Leu, Val, Ile, Ala), the hydrophilic set
(Thr, Ser, Asn), the acidic set (Asp, Glu), and the basic set (Lys,
Arg, His) were considered homologous.
(green blocks), and those maintained
across all the analyzed sequences (red blocks).
For the purpose of this alignment, amino acids in hydrophobic set (Leu,
Val, Ile, Ala), hydrophilic set (Thr, Ser, Asn), acidic set (Asp, Glu)
and basic set (Lys, Arg, His) were considered homologous. The alignment
shows a significant homology of amino acids in the C2 domains to
amino acids constituting RA binding pockets for CRABPs, RAR
, and
that predicted for UGT2B7 (double underlined
sequences). Arg-249 of PKC
and PKC
corresponds to
Arg-111 involved in the interaction with the RA carboxyl in CRABPs and
Lys-229 of RAR
, involved in electrostatic interaction with the
ligand (star). A lysine cluster that constitutes a
phosphatidylserine binding site in C2 domains is positioned 35 amino
acids upstream from the center of the predicted RA binding site of PKCs.
. The conserved motif in CRABP I contains five amino acids,
Arg-111, Leu-120, Phe-122, Arg-131, and Tyr-133, which have been
identified from analysis of the crystal structure as being a part of
the atRA binding pocket (29, 34).
sequence
pattern containing the previously defined PS binding site and the
predicted atRA binding site (amino acids 172-260) of the C2 domain and
the PKC
C1 domain sequence were not detected.
with [11,12-3H]atRA, which covalently modified
the PKC
protein within the atRA-binding site and provided the direct
evidence for atRA binding to PKC. Because atRA is one of the several
common retinoids used experimentally and clinically, it was the
retinoid of choice to investigate the direct interaction between
retinoids and PKC. The photoaffinity labeling occurred in a
concentration-dependent manner, was dependent on UV
irradiation, and was effectively protected by unlabeled atRA, atRA
glucuronide (atRAG), and various other retinoids (Fig.
2). It has been demonstrated here that
PKC
exhibits different affinities for various retinoids and that the
presence of a carboxyl function on the ligand was an obligatory
requirement for binding to PKC. All RA derivatives tested, with the
exception of 13-cis-RA, strongly inhibited binding of atRA
to PKC
. These results also indicate that atRA derivatives such as
9-cis-RA and atRAG might be functional ligands for PKC
.
Thus, our data demonstrate that atRA binds to PKC
through a
RA-binding site and that this process is highly specific.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Photoaffinity labeling of
PKC
by [3H]atRA and protection
with various retinoids. Direct photoaffinity labeling with
[3H]atRA carried out as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A, PKC
was photolabeled with different
concentrations of [3H]atRA. Lane 1,
control with no UV; lanes 2-7, increasing
concentrations of [3H]atRA (0.4125, 0.825, 1.65, 3.3, 6.6, and 13.2 µM). The graph is a plot of relative
density versus concentration of [3H]atRA
ligand, demonstrating the concentration dependence of
photoincorporation of [3H]atRA. B, protection
of PKC
from photolabeling with unlabeled atRA, atRAG, retinol,
9-cis-RA, 13-cis-RA, and 4-OH-atRA. For each
ligand, lanes 1-4 represent increasing
concentrations of retinoid (0, 5, 25, and 125 µM). The
graphs show the results of quantitation of the protection experiments
by densitometry.
. Fig.
3 showed that there was a strong
competition between PS and atRA for binding to PKC
but only a slight
competition between PMA and atRA and no competition between DAG and
atRA. These results indicated that atRA does not interact with PKC
through the PMA or DAG binding sites. They also confirmed that atRA
binds specifically to PKC
and competes with PS for binding. This is
consistent with our hypothesis based on the amino acid analysis shown
in Fig. 1 and with a model proposing that PS interacts with PKC
within a different domain than DAG and PMA. Calcium had no effect on
atRA binding to PKC
in the presence of PS, PMA, or DAG (data not
shown), which demonstrates that, although PS and Ca2+
binding sites are localized to the same domain (C2) of PKC
, atRA
does not interact with PKC
through the Ca2+ binding site
(Fig. 3).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Photoaffinity labeling of
PKC
by [3H]atRA and protection
with various activators of PKC. PKC
was photolabeled with
[3H]atRA and protected by various activators of PKC (PS,
PMA, and DAG). Four lanes are shown for each ligand, representing
increasing concentrations of activator (0, 25, 50, and 250 µM).
,
I,
II,
,
,
, and
were photolabeled under the same conditions with equimolar concentrations of PKC protein and the ligand. The data presented in Fig.
4 show that all PKC isozymes investigated
were photolabeled; however, clear differences in the degree of
incorporation of label into individual isozymes were observed. Thus,
PKC
II had the highest affinity for atRA, while PKC
had the lowest
affinity.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Differential photoaffinity labeling of PKC
isoforms by [3H]atRA. Seven different isoforms (
,
I,
II,
,
,
, and
) of PKC were photolabeled
with 3.3 µM [3H]atRA. The photoaffinity
labeling was performed as described above. The relative
photoincorporation of [3H]atRA into the PKC
isoforms was determined by densitometry. PKC
II showed the highest
photoincorporation of [3H]atRA; therefore, it was
assigned a density of 100%, and all other densities are expressed as
percentages of PKC
II activity.
). However, this binding was not UV-light
dependent nor was it protected by unlabeled atRA (data not shown).
These results indicated that there is no specific interaction between
atRA and the PKC catalytic subunit and suggested that atRA binding
occurs in the regulatory subunit of PKC. However, the efficiency of
this binding differs depending on the PKC isoform being used for photolabeling.
and PKC
by atRA and
protection by PS and arachidonic acid were also carried out and the
data are presented in Fig. 5. PKC
was
photolabeled by atRA with 6-fold lower efficiency than PKC
. Like
photolabeling of PKC
, the photolabeling of PKC
by atRA was
light-sensitive and protected by increasing concentrations of unlabeled
atRA, which demonstrated that atRA binding to PKC
is specific.
However, in contrast to PKC
, the photolabeling of PKC
was not
protected by preincubation with PS (Fig. 5). Furthermore, there was no
competition between arachidonic acid and atRA for binding to PKC
,
but the photolabeling of PKC
by atRA was dramatically diminished by
all concentrations of arachidonic acid used in the study (Fig. 5). No
effect of PMA on PKC
photolabeling by atRA was found (data not
shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Photoaffinity labeling of
PKC
and PKC
by
[3H]atRA and protection by unlabeled atRA, PS, and
A. PKC
and PKC
were photolabeled with [3H]atRA
in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations (0, 5, 25, and
125 µM) of unlabeled atRA (lanes 2-5), PS
(lanes 6-9), or AA (lanes 10-13); lane
1, no UV.
may be localized in close proximity to the PS binding site.
These results also show that there is no apparent affinity of atRA for
the fatty acid binding site of PKC
, presumably localized to the C1
domain. In the case of PKC
, which lacks the C2 domain and is
strongly regulated by fatty acids (35), atRA may bind to the C1 domain
either in, or in close proximity to, the fatty acid binding site.
, including
the arginine residues, Arg-249 and Arg-252, indicated that all mutants
exhibited full membrane binding affinity and enzymatic activity at
saturating concentrations of PS, DAG, and Ca2+ (43). These
studies also have shown that amino acids Arg-249 and Arg-252 in the C2
domain of PKC
are involved in electrostatic interactions with
membrane anionic phospholipids. The two arginines are positioned in the
center of our amino acid alignment of proteins that bind RA (Fig. 1),
with Arg-249 being highly conserved. Particularly, Arg-249 aligns with
Arg-111 of CRABP I and II, which is involved in electrostatic
interaction with carboxyl function of RA (29). It is likely that RA may
interact with Arg-249 and/or Arg-252 of PKC in a similar fashion and,
thus, could be responsible for the interplay between PS and RA
demonstrated in our studies. This explanation does not exclude other
possible interpretations for RA-mediated modifications of PKC activity,
including a RA-induced allosteric effect.
is postulated to be on the regulatory
domain, in PKC
, the binding occurs in the C1 domain of the
regulatory subunit. The exact location and the nature of this binding
and its relation to PS and arachidonic acid binding are currently under
investigation in our laboratory. Whether the interaction between PKC
and RA results in up- or down-regulation of PKC activity clearly
depends on the biological system being studied (36, 37).
, the most
common PKC isoform, was determined in the presence or absence of atRA
and various PKC activators. Pre-incubation of PKC
with PS and PMA,
followed by the addition of increasing concentrations of atRA, resulted in a 23% and 61% decrease in PKC
activity in the presence of 50 and 100 µM atRA, respectively (Fig.
6; data not shown for 100 µM). At concentrations lower than 50 µM,
atRA had no effect if added following pre-incubation with the PS/PMA
complex. Simultaneous incubation of PKC
with PS, PMA, and atRA
resulted in a slight (20%) decrease in PKC
activity in the presence
of 1-10 µM atRA and a 30% decrease in PKC
activity
in the presence of 20-50 µM atRA (Fig. 6). In contrast,
pre-incubation of PKC
with atRA prior to addition of the PS/PMA
complex resulted in a dramatic decrease in PKC
activity (40% and
62% in the presence of 1 and 20 µM atRA, respectively)
and total inhibition of the kinase activity at 50 µM atRA
(Fig. 6). These results show that: 1) atRA decreases PKC
activity,
2) atRA competes with PS and/or PMA for binding to PKC
, and 3) atRA
binds to PKC
with a high affinity and cannot be displaced by an
addition of PS and/or PMA.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of atRA on PKC
activity. In general, PKC
activity was assayed as
described under "Experimental Procedures," and details are provided
with individual experiments. To assess the overall effect of atRA on
PKC activity, prior to the measurement of enzymatic activity, PKC
was incubated at 30 °C in the presence of 1) mixed micelles
containing Triton X-100, PS, PMA and increasing concentrations of atRA
for 10 min (PS/PMA/atRA + PKC); 2) mixed micelles containing Triton
X-100, PS, and PMA for 10 min followed by 10 min of incubation in the
presence of increasing concentrations of atRA (PS/PMA + PKC + atRA); or 3) increasing concentrations of atRA for 10 min
followed by 10 min of incubation in the presence of mixed micelles
containing Triton X-100, PS, and PMA (atRA + PKC + PS/PMA). Specific
activity of PKC
in the presence of PS, PMA, and Ca2+ and
the absence of atRA was 733 ± 78 nmol phosphate/min/ng protein.
The results are expressed as % of PKC activity in the absence of atRA
and presence of the vehicle (ethanol, 2% final concentration);
mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
, the enzyme was pre-incubated in the presence of
20 µM atRA or the vehicle and the activity measured
following addition of increasing concentrations of PS, PMA, DAG, and
Ca2+. In the absence of atRA, PKC
activity was
stimulated by PS in a concentration-dependent manner and
reached a plateau at concentration of 350 µg/ml PS (23-fold
stimulation in comparison with PKC
activity in the absence of PS)
(Fig. 7). In the presence of atRA, the
stimulation of PKC
activity by PS was decreased to 30% of the
stimulation in the absence of atRA. These results show that atRA
decreases stimulation of PKC
activity by PS and suggest that atRA
and PS compete for binding to PKC
.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of PS on PKC
activity in the presence and absence of atRA. Prior to
measurement of PKC
activity, the enzyme was incubated for 10 min at
30 °C in the presence of ethanol or 20 µM atRA in
ethanol (2% final concentration), followed by 10 min of incubation
with mixed micelles containing 0.3% Triton X-100, 10 µM
PMA, and increasing concentrations of PS. The results are expressed as
mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
activity increased gradually in the
presence of increasing concentrations of PMA and reached a plateau at a
concentration of 1 µM PMA (10-fold stimulation in
comparison with PKC
activity in the absence of PMA) (Fig. 8A). atRA decreased the
activity of PKC
by 44% in the absence of PMA but did not prevent
subsequent stimulation of the PKC
activity by increasing
concentrations of PMA (Fig. 8A). Likewise, atRA decreased
PKC
activity in the absence of DAG but did not prevent PKC
stimulation by increasing concentrations of DAG (Fig. 8B).
These results show that atRA does not inhibit the activation of PKC
by PMA or DAG and suggest that atRA does not compete with PMA or DAG
for binding. Finally, atRA decreased the overall PKC
activity by
53% in the absence of Ca2+ and the presence of PS and PMA
but did not prevent PKC
stimulation by increasing concentrations of
Ca2+ (Fig. 9). These results
demonstrate that atRA prevents the stimulation of PKC
activity by PS
and suggest that atRA alters the interaction of PS with PKC
.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of PMA (A) and DAG
(B) on PKC
activity in the
presence and absence of atRA. Prior to measurement of PKC
activity, the enzyme was incubated for 10 min at 30 °C in the
presence of ethanol or 20 µM atRA in ethanol (2% final
concentration), followed by 10 min of incubation with mixed micelles
containing 0.3% Triton X-100, 280 µg/ml PS, and increasing
concentrations of PMA or DAG. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Effect of Ca2+ concentration on
PKC
activity in the presence and absence of
atRA. Prior to measurement of PKC
activity, the enzyme was
incubated for 10 min at 30 °C in the presence of ethanol or 20 µM atRA in ethanol (2% final concentration), followed by
10 min of incubation with mixed micelles containing 0.3% Triton X-100,
10 µM PMA, and 280 µg/ml PS. The reaction was initiated
by addition of the substrate, [
-32P]ATP and increasing
concentrations of Ca2+. The results are expressed as
mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
in
the cell (Fig. 10). The central
hypothesis of our model is that atRA binds to PKC at pharmacological
concentrations (1.0 µM or higher), a situation that can
result from consumption of large amounts of vitamin A or its metabolic
precursors or atRA therapy (38). Under normal conditions, atRA and
13-cis-RA are present in the plasma at nanomolar
concentrations (39, 40) and atRA is considered the most prevalent form
of vitamin A in most tissues (41, 42). We tested our hypothesis by
exploring the effect of different atRA concentrations on both atRA
binding and PKC activity. The results show that, in an in
vitro system, atRA binds to PKC with high affinity at
concentrations above 10 µM.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Model for the regulation of PKC by atRA and
postulated involvement of CRABP proteins. The top
portion of the diagram represents the release of PKC into the
cytoplasm, phosphorylation of the catalytic domain (dotted
oval) and optional transfer of RA from the RA/CRABP complex.
The left bottom portion shows activation of PKC
through interaction of the C1 domain (green
circle) with DAG and the C2 domain (yellow
oval) with PS, in the absence of RA binding. The scheme on
the bottom right shows inhibition of the PKC
activation by binding of RA, restricting the PS interaction with its
binding site, and, in consequence, blocking release of the
pseudosubstrate (blue rectangle). In our model,
we depicted a RA molecule bound within the PS binding region. This
indicates a functional relation between RA and PS but does not
necessarily define the exact binding site for RA.
by atRA and is
still hypothetical. We propose that atRA interacts with PKC when the
atRA concentration in the cell exceeds 1.0 µM
(pharmacological). Following atRA entry into the cell and binding to
CRABP, the complex can react with PKC. As shown in Fig. 10, the
interaction of atRA and PKC may occur: 1) when PKC is associated with
the detergent-insoluble fraction of cells, 2) following PKC
phosphorylation and release into the cytosol, or 3) when PKC
translocates to the membrane domain but prior to PKC binding to
phospholipids (PS). With atRA bound to the PKC
molecule, the final
activation by PS cannot occur. A similar model for PKC
is under investigation.
probably does not
occur following PKC translocation to cellular membranes because the
binding site is not accessible in this situation. However, once atRA is
bound to PKC prior to PKC translocation, the association of PKC with membrane phospholipids and final activation cannot occur. Our examination of the crystal structure of the C2 domain of PKC
showed
that a polypeptide of the predicted atRA binding site and a lysine
cluster, which constitutes the PS binding site (45), appear to form a
shared binding pocket (Fig. 11). A
23-amino acid spacer runs between and behind the two sites, bringing
them to this common interface. Whether there are other atRA binding
sites on the PKC molecule and the specificity of atRA binding to these sites are subjects currently being investigated.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 11.
Distribution of binding sites for PS and RA
in the C2 domain of PKC
. The PS binding
site is marked in green, and the proposed RA binding site is
marked in red; the terminal amino acids for the C2 domain
polypeptide used in crystallography are underlined.
are consistent and
demonstrate: 1) the existence of a specific atRA-binding site on PKC
and 2) a direct interaction between atRA and PKC
that decreases PKC activity. The results presented here also suggest that atRA may be
involved in the mechanism of regulation of PKC activity in the cell.
Previous reports are inconsistent and atRA has been shown to stimulate
or inhibit PKC activity depending on the experimental model used (36,
44, 46). Cope and co-workers (47) have demonstrated an interaction,
similar to that shown here, between RA and PKC in vivo in
the mouse brain. The precise mechanism of the PS-atRA interaction, such
as allosteric effects and/or steric hindrance to PS binding, resulting
in a decrease in enzymatic activity has not been unambiguously determined.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, nuclear retinoic acid receptor
;
UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase;
atRAG, all-trans-retinoyl-
-glucuronide;
4-OH-atRA, 4-hydroxy-atRA;
BisTris, bis(2-hydroxyethyl)iminotris(hydroxymethyl) methane.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1986)
Science
233,
305-312
2.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1988)
Nature
334,
661-665
3.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1989)
JAMA
262,
1826-1833
4.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1988)
Biofactors
1,
17-20
5.
Newton, A. C.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
161-167
6.
Perin, M. S.,
Fried, V. A.,
Mignery, G. A.,
Jahn, R.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1990)
Nature
345,
260-263
7.
Ron, D.,
Luo, J.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24180-24187
8.
Newton, A. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28495-28498
9.
Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
Science
268,
247-251
10.
Mischak, H.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Goodnight, J.,
Kazanietz, M. G.,
Blumberg, P. M.,
and Mushinski, J. F.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20110-20115
11.
De Luca, L. M.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2924-2933
12.
Gudas, L. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15399-15402
13.
Isakov, N.
(1988)
Cell Immunol.
115,
288-298
14.
Chambon, P.
(1994)
Semin. Cell Biol.
5,
115-125
15.
Hendrix, M. J.,
Wood, W. R.,
Seftor, E. A.,
Lotan, D.,
Nakajima, M.,
Misiorowski, R. L.,
Seftor, R. E.,
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.,
Bevacqua, S. J.,
and Liotta, L. A.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
46,
4121-4130
16.
Fontana, J. A.,
Reppucci, A.,
Durham, J. P.,
and Miranda, D.
(1986)
Cancer Res.
46,
2468-2473
17.
Srivastava, R. K.,
Srivastava, A. R.,
Cho-Chung, Y. S.,
and Longo, D. L.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
1755-1763
18.
Hsu, S. L.,
Chen, M. C.,
Chou, Y. H.,
Hwang, G. Y.,
and Yin, S. C.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
248,
87-96
19.
Bracke, M. E.,
Van Larebeke, N. A.,
Vyncke, B. M.,
and Mareel, M. M.
(1991)
Br. J. Cancer
63,
867-872
20.
Dulaney, A. M.,
and Murgatroyd, R. J.
(1993)
Ann. Pharmacother.
27,
211-214
21.
Muindi, J. R.,
Frankel, S. R.,
Huselton, C.,
DeGrazia, F.,
Garland, W. A.,
Young, C. W.,
and Warrell, R. P., Jr.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
2138-2142
22.
Lotan, R.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
1031-1039
23.
Cho, Y.,
Tighe, A. P.,
and Talmage, D. A.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
172,
306-313
24.
Carter, C. A.,
Parham, G. P.,
and Chambers, T.
(1998)
Pathobiology
66,
284-292
25.
Tonini, G.,
Parodi, M.,
Di Martino, D.,
and Varesio, L.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
280,
221-224
26.
Kahl-Ranier, P.,
and Marian, B.
(1994)
Nutr. Cancer
21,
157-168
27.
Gruber, J. R.,
Ohno, S.,
and Niles, R. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13356-13360
28.
Radominska-Pandya, A.,
Czernik, P.,
Little, J. M.,
Battaglia, E.,
and Mackenzie, P. I.
(1999)
Drug Metab. Rev.
31,
817-900
29.
Kleywegt, G. J.,
Bergfors, T.,
Senn, H.,
Le Motte, P.,
Gsell, B.,
Shudo, K.,
and Jones, T. A.
(1994)
Structure
2,
1241-1258
30.
Renaud, J. P.,
Rochel, N.,
Ruff, M.,
Vivat, V.,
Chambon, P.,
Gronemeyer, H.,
and Moras, D.
(1995)
Nature
378,
681-689
31.
Genetics Computer Group, Wisconsin Package Version 10 (0),
Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI
32.
Bernstein, P. S.,
Choi, S. Y.,
Ho, Y. C.,
and Rando, R. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
654-658
33.
Bell, R. M.,
Hannun, Y.,
and Loomis, C.
(1986)
Methods Enzymol.
124,
353-359
34.
Thompson, J. R.,
Bratt, J. M.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
252,
433-446
35.
Kochs, G.,
Hummel, R.,
Meyer, D.,
Hug, H.,
Marme, D.,
and Sarre, T. F.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
216,
597-606
36.
Cope, F. O.,
Staller, J. M.,
Mahsem, R. A.,
and Boutwell, R. K.
(1984)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
120,
593-601
37.
Ninomiya, M.,
Fujiki, H.,
Paik, N. S.,
Horiuchi, T.,
and Boutwell, R. K.
(1986)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
138,
330-334
38.
Budd, G. T.,
Adamson, P. C.,
Gupta, M.,
Homayoun, P.,
Sandstrom, S. K.,
Murphy, R. F.,
McLain, D.,
Tuason, L.,
Peereboom, G.,
and Ganapathi, R. D.
(1988)
Clin. Cancer Res.
4,
635-642
39.
De Luca, L. M.,
Darwiche, N.,
Celli, G.,
Kosa, K.,
Jones, C.,
and Ross, S.
(1994)
Nutr. Rev.
52,
45-52
40.
Athar, M.,
Agrawal, R.,
Wang, Z. Y.,
Lloyd, J. R.,
Vickers, D. R.,
and Mukhtar, H.
(1991)
Carcinogenesis
12,
2325-2329
41.
Steele, V. E.,
Kelloff, G. J.,
Wilkinson, B. P.,
and Arnold, J. T.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
2068-2074
42.
Shklar, G.,
Schwartz, J.,
Grau, D.,
Trickler, D. P.,
and Wallace, K. D.
(1980)
Oral Surg.
50,
45-52
43.
Medkova, M.,
and Cho, W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17544-17552
44.
Cope, F. O.,
Howard, B. D.,
and Boutwell, R. K.
(1986)
Experientia (Basel)
42,
1023-1027
45.
Sutton, R. B.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1998)
Structure
6,
1395-1405
46.
Gundimeda, U.,
Hara, S. K.,
Anderson, W. B.,
and Gopalakrishna, R.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
300,
526-530
47.
Cope, F. O.
(1986)
Cancer Lett.
30,
275-288
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Alzamora, L. R. Brown, and B. J. Harvey Direct Binding and Activation of Protein Kinase C Isoforms by Aldosterone and 17{beta}-Estradiol Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 21(11): 2637 - 2650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Kim, J. S. Hong, S.-H. Ryu, W.-C. Chung, J.-H. Yoon, and J. S. Koo Regulation of Mucin Gene Expression by CREB via a Nonclassical Retinoic Acid Signaling Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2007; 27(19): 6933 - 6947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ertesvag, H.-C. Aasheim, S. Naderi, and H. K. Blomhoff Vitamin A potentiates CpG-mediated memory B-cell proliferation and differentiation: involvement of early activation of p38MAPK Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3865 - 3872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. He, T.-C. Lu, M. Fleet, M. Sunamoto, M. Husain, W. Fang, S. Neves, Y. Chen, S. Shankland, R. Iyengar, et al. Retinoic Acid Inhibits HIV-1-Induced Podocyte Proliferation through the cAMP Pathway J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 93 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aggarwal, S.-W. Kim, K. Cheon, F. H. Tabassam, J.-H. Yoon, and J. S. Koo Nonclassical Action of Retinoic Acid on the Activation of the cAMP Response Element-binding Protein in Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2006; 17(2): 566 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pasquali, P. Chieffi, W. J Deery, G. Nicoletti, A. Bellastella, and A. A Sinisi Differential effects of all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) on Erk1/2 phosphorylation and cAMP accumulation in normal and malignant human prostate epithelial cells: Erk1/2 inhibition restores RA-induced decrease of cell growth in malignant prostate cells Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 152(4): 663 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-W. Zhao, X. Li, Q. Zhao, Y. Huang, D. Li, Z.-G. Peng, W.-Z. Shen, J. Zhao, Q. Zhou, Z. Chen, et al. Protein kinase C{delta} mediates retinoic acid and phorbol myristate acetate-induced phospholipid scramblase 1 gene expression: its role in leukemic cell differentiation Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3731 - 3738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||