JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002378200 on April 27, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22395-22400, July 21, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/29/22395    most recent
M002378200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerche, C.
Right arrow Articles by Steinmeyer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerche, C.
Right arrow Articles by Steinmeyer, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of KCNQ5, a Potassium Channel Subunit That May Contribute to Neuronal M-current Diversity*

Christian LercheDagger §, Constanze R. SchererDagger §, Guiscard SeebohmDagger , Christian Derst, Aguan D. Wei||, Andreas E. BuschDagger , and Klaus SteinmeyerDagger **

From the Dagger  Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, DG Cardiovascular Diseases, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany,  Institute for Physiology, Philipps University, D-35033 Marburg, Germany, and the || Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Received for publication, March 21, 2000, and in revised form, April 27, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have isolated KCNQ5, a novel human member of the KCNQ potassium channel gene family that is differentially expressed in subregions of the brain and in skeletal muscle. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, KCNQ5 generated voltage-dependent, slowly activating K+-selective currents that displayed a marked inward rectification at positive membrane voltages. KCNQ5 currents were insensitive to the K+ channel blocker tetraethylammonium but were strongly inhibited by the selective M-current blocker linopirdine. Upon coexpression with the structurally related KCNQ3 channel subunit, current amplitudes increased 4-5-fold. Compared with homomeric KCNQ5 currents, KCNQ3/KCNQ5 currents also displayed slower activation kinetics and less inward rectification, indicating that KCNQ5 combined with KCNQ3 to form functional heteromeric channel proteins. This functional interaction between KCNQ5 and KCNQ3, a component of the M-channel, suggests that KCNQ5 may contribute to a diversity of heteromeric channels underlying native neuronal M-currents.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Voltage-dependent potassium channels are key regulators of the resting membrane potential and modulate the excitability of electrically active cells, such as neurons and myocytes. Several classes of voltage-dependent K+ channels have been cloned, and probably all form oligomeric proteins through the assembly of four alpha -protein subunits. The tetrameric pore complex can further interact with auxiliary subunits to enhance and/or modify currents mediated by the pore-forming alpha -subunits.

The KCNQ family of voltage-dependent K+ channels was originally established by positional cloning of the KCNQ1 gene (1), which encodes a K+ channel protein (KvLQT1) with six transmembrane domains and a characteristic pore region. So far, the KCNQ family consists of four members, all of which are associated with hereditary human diseases. KCNQ1 functionally interacts with KCNE1 (IsK) (2), a small beta -subunit protein with a single transmembrane domain, to generate the slowly activating delayed rectifier IKs current of cardiomyocytes (3-6). Deleterious mutations in either subunit result in prolongation of the cardiac action potential and an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with long QT-syndrome (7-10). Both KCNQ1 and KCNE1 are also expressed in the inner ear, and a class of recessive mutations of either gene is associated with hearing loss (11, 12). In intestine, KCNQ1 probably associates with the IsK-like KCNE3 protein (13) to generate a distinct K+ current (14). This KCNQ1/KCNE3 channel complex may represent the native basolateral cAMP-regulated K+ conductance in colonic crypt cells (15), important for apical cAMP-stimulated chloride secretion associated with secretory diarrhea and cystic fibrosis.

KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 express and colocalize in various subregions of the brain (16-20). KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 were cloned by linkage to benign familial neonatal convulsions, a form of epilepsy in human infants. Missense mutations in either KCNQ2 or KCNQ3 are associated with benign familial neonatal convulsions (16, 21, 22). Since epilepsy is due to an electrical hyperexcitability in the brain, members of the KCNQ gene family may play an important stabilizing role in the nervous system. Whereas KCNQ2 expresses K+ currents very similar to KCNQ1 (16, 17, 19, 20), KCNQ3 alone produces much smaller amplitude currents (17, 19). Coexpression in Xenopus oocytes of both KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 results in currents that are about 10-fold larger than those expressed by KCNQ2 alone (17-19) and that also display altered biophysical and pharmacological properties, suggesting that novel channels are formed by the heteromeric association of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 subunits. The biophysical and pharmacological profiles of KCNQ2/KCNQ3 currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes are very similar to that of the native neuronal M-type K+ current (19, 23), which is thought to be a prominent regulator of neuronal excitability. Similar to the native M-current, KCNQ2/KCNQ3 channel activity is strongly reduced by muscarinic acetylcholine agonists (19, 24, 25), and therefore it is now accepted that KCNQ2/KCNQ3 heteromeric channels form the native M-channel.

KCNQ4, another member of this gene family, is expressed in sensory outer hair cells of the cochlea and is mutated in one form of nonsyndromic autosomal dominant deafness (DFNA2) (26, 27). Interestingly, coexpression of KCNQ3 with KCNQ4 in Xenopus oocytes also increases current amplitudes (26), although to a far less extent than observed with KCNQ2/KCNQ3 coexpression. This raises the possibility that different KCNQ channel subunits can combine to produce variants of M-currents in different parts of the nervous system.

In the present work, we have cloned and characterized a novel member of the KCNQ extended gene family. When functionally expressed in Xenopus oocytes KCNQ5 produced K+ channels activated by depolarization, with kinetic properties similar to other KCNQ channels. KCNQ5 was expressed in skeletal muscle and in the brain, where its expression pattern overlaps with those of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3, which underlie the native M-current. Similar to KCNQ2, KCNQ5 formed functional heteromers with KCNQ3 that produced larger current amplitudes and were sensitive to block by linopirdine, an M-channel-specific inhibitor, suggesting that neuronal M-channels may possibly include heteromeric variants composed of KCNQ3, combined with KCNQ2, KCNQ5, or other members of the KCNQ gene family.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular Cloning and Expression of KCNQ5-- The KCNQ5 gene was initially identified as a genomic survey sequence (bacterial artificial chromosome clone) in a homology search of GenBankTM (accession number AQ344243). Using this sequence, a human brain cDNA library (Edge BioSystems) was screened. A composite full-length cDNA construct was assembled from two overlapping cDNA clones and subcloned into the Xenopus expression vector pSGEM (28). The cDNA was fully sequenced on both strands using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 310). For Xenopus oocyte expression, capped cRNA was synthesized using the T7 mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion). For Northern blot analysis, a DIG1-labeled riboprobe of 1.6 kb in length (containing mainly C-terminal sequences) was generated with the DIG RNA Labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions and hybridized to a series of human RNA blots (CLONTECH). Membranes were exposed for 4 min on a Lumi-Imager (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

Chromosomal Localization of KCNQ5---Fluorescence in situ hybridization (Genome Systems) analysis was performed to determine the chromosomal localization of KCNQ5. Briefly, purified DNA from the bacterial artificial chromosome clone (AQ344243) was labeled with digoxigenin dUTP by nick translation, and the labeled probe was hybridized to human metaphase chromosomes derived from phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes. KCNQ5-specific signals were detected on the long arm of chromosome 6 using fluoresceinated antidigoxigenin antibodies followed by counterstaining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Electrophysiology-- Xenopus laevis oocytes were obtained from tricaine-anesthetized animals. Ovaries were collagenase-treated (1 mg/ ml; Worthington, type II) in OR2 solution (82.5 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) for 120 min and subsequently stored in recording solution ND96 (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) with additional sodium pyruvate (275 mg/liter), theophylline (90 mg/liter), and gentamycin (50 mg/liter) at 18 °C. Oocytes were individually injected with 10 ng of cRNA encoding hKCNQ5, rKCNQ3, hKCNQ2, and hKCNQ1 or coinjected with 10 ng of hKCNQ5 plus 5 ng of hIsk (KCNE1), hMiRP1 (KCNE2), hMiRP2 (KCNE3), or mMiRP3 (KCNE4), respectively. rKCNQ3 was cloned from a lambda ZAP cDNA library (Stratagene) using a DIG-labeled (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) expressed sequence tag clone (GenBankTM accession number AA019129) as a probe. hMiRP1 and hMiRP2 were cloned from human genomic DNA, and mMiRP3 was cloned from murine brain cDNA using primers derived from the published sequences (13). Standard two-electrode voltage clamp recordings were performed at room temperature with a Turbo Tec 10CD (NPI) amplifier, an ITC-16 interface combined with Pulse software (Heka) and Origin version 5.0 (Microcal Software) for data acquisition on a Pentium II PC. Macroscopic currents were recorded 2-4 days after injection. The pipette solution contained 3 M KCl. All fitting procedures were based on the simplex algorithm. Student's t test was used to test for statistical significance, which was assumed if p < 0.05 and indicated by an asterisk. GenBankTM accession numbers for sequences used are as follows: hKCNQ1, AJ006345; hKCNQ2, NM004518; rKCNQ3, AF087454; KCNE1/hIsk, M26685; KCNE2/hMiRP1, AF071002; KCNE3/hMiRP2, AF076531; KCNE4/mMiRP3, AF076533.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning and Tissue Distribution of KCNQ5-- A search of the GenBankTM data base revealed a human bacterial artificial chromosome end sequence (AQ344243) with significant homology to the KCNQ potassium channel family. The sequence information was used to isolate overlapping cDNA clones from a human brain cDNA library (Edge BioSystems), and two cDNA clones were assembled to generate a full-length cDNA clone. The initiator methionine of the cDNA was assigned to the first ATG in frame and is preceded by a stop codon in the same frame. The full-length KCNQ5 cDNA encodes a protein of 932 amino acids (Fig. 1) with a predicted molecular mass of ~102 kDa. Hydropathy analysis supported a topological model with six transmembrane domains. KCNQ5 shows significant homology to other KCNQ predicted proteins, with KCNQ4 being the closest relative (65% identity). KCNQ5 is about 50% identical to KCNQ3 and KCNQ2 but only 40% to KCNQ1. Homology is observed, in particular, throughout the membrane-spanning regions and the conserved pore region between transmembrane segments S5 and S6. Predicted KCNQ proteins are characterized by long C-terminal tails. Among the known KCNQ proteins, KCNQ5 has the longest C terminus, followed by KCNQ2 and KCNQ3. A distinct region of high sequence conservation was found in the KCNQ5 C-terminal tail, shared with the other KCNQ proteins. This region is frequently the site of clinical mutations of other KCNQ proteins associated with hereditary diseases (8, 12, 17). A recent report suggests that deletion of the conserved C-terminal domain of KCNQ1 found in a Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome pedigree disrupts homotypic subunit assembly (29). In addition, in a benign familial neonatal convulsions pedigree, a 56-amino acid extension in the length of the KCNQ2 C-terminal tail caused by a frameshift mutation at the 3'-end of the open reading frame, lowers current amplitudes drastically when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. In contrast, truncation of the last seven natural amino acids increases channel activity 2-fold (30). Together, these results stress the functional importance of the C-terminal region in the KCNQ proteins.


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Protein sequence of KCNQ5 and comparison with other KCNQ proteins. Alignment of human KCNQ5 with human KCNQ1, KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ4 is shown. Identical and conserved amino acids are boxed in black and gray, respectively. The six putative transmembrane domains S1 through S6 and the pore region H5 are indicated by the stippled lines. The KCNQ5 sequence has been deposited in the GenBankTM data base under the accession number AF249278.

The KCNQ5 protein contains numerous potential sites for phosphorylation by protein kinase C but lacks an N-terminal consensus site for cAMP-dependent phosphorylation that is present in KCNQ1 and KCNQ2. KCNQ1 and IKs currents are stimulated by protein kinase A (6, 31), whereas conflicting data have been reported concerning the effect of protein kinase A on KCNQ2 currents (17, 20).

Northern blot analyses (Fig. 2) detected a 7.5-kb KCNQ5 transcript in human adult skeletal muscle and brain. In the brain, KCNQ5 transcripts are widely distributed with strongest expression in cerebral cortex, occipital pole, frontal lobe, and temporal lobe. Lower levels of expression were detected in hippocampus and putamen. The expression pattern of KCNQ5 in the brain is very similar to that previously described for KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 (16-18), with transcript sizes of 8.5 and 10.5 kb, respectively. Notably, in contrast to KCNQ2, KCNQ5 is greatly reduced or absent in cerebellum. KCNQ5 probably is the only KCNQ channel subunit strongly expressed in skeletal muscle. However, the presence of N-terminal splice variants of KCNQ1 (6) and faint expression levels of KCNQ4 (26) has been reported in skeletal muscle as well. In contrast to the presence of transcripts, KCNQ-like currents have not been observed in skeletal muscle. Whether KCNQ5 and related KCNQ channels contribute to electrical signaling in skeletal muscle, therefore, remains unknown.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Tissue distribution of human potassium channel KCNQ5. Northern blots of multiple human tissues and subregions of human brain containing poly(A)+ RNA (CLONTECH), hybridized with a KCNQ5-specific DIG-labeled RNA probe.

Expression of KCNQ5 in Xenopus Oocytes-- The possible function of KCNQ5 as a potassium channel was addressed by electrophysiological analysis of Xenopus oocytes injected with KCNQ5 cRNA transcribed in vitro. Two to four days after injection, novel currents were detected that were not observed in water-injected control oocytes. Currents activated very slowly (Fig. 3A) and were not fully activated even after 3-s test pulses. At lower step potentials, KCNQ5 currents showed a delay in activation, similar to KCNQ1 currents (32). In most cells (in 23 out of 28 oocytes) activation traces above +20 mV displayed a "crossover" phenomenon, which was observed independently of current amplitudes. Activation of KCNQ5 currents was generally slower than that of other KCNQ currents and could be well described by a second order exponential function, with time constants of 119 ± 7 and 929 ± 51 ms at +40 mV (Table I). Current-voltage relationships of KCNQ5 currents are shown in Fig. 3B. Currents were activated at depolarizing potentials positive to -60 mV and displayed marked inward rectification at potentials greater than 0 mV (Fig. 3, A and B). Strong inward rectification only has been demonstrated for the related KCNQ3 channel (18). KCNQ5 deactivation was fitted to a second order exponential function. Two components of deactivation, with time constants of 51 ± 2 and 281 ± 24 ms, were observed at a repolarizing voltage of -100 mV, following a 3-s depolarizing step to +40 mV (Table I). KCNQ1 tail currents display a characteristic "hook" indicative of recovery from inactivation (32, 33). We did not observe such a feature for KCNQ5 currents at voltages between -100 and +40 mV. Additionally, double-pulse protocols commonly used to reveal inactivation (33) also failed to reveal inactivation (not shown).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Functional expression of KCNQ5 in Xenopus oocytes. A, representative current traces from a KCNQ5-injected oocyte subjected to a pulse protocol stepping the membrane potential from holding potential (-100 mV) to test pulses from -100 to +50 mV, and then back to holding potential. B, I-V relationships from KCNQ5 currents recorded in oocytes (n = 12), using the protocol in A. Current amplitudes were normalized to maximum value. C, tail current reversal potentials of KCNQ5 currents as a function of extracellular K+ concentration (n = 5). The dashed line is calculated by the Nernst equation corresponding to a perfectly selective K+ channel.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Activation and deactivation time constants of homomeric and heteromeric KCNQ channels
Oocytes were injected with 10 ng of either KCNQ5 or KCNQ2 cRNA or with a mixture of 10 ng each of KCNQ5 and KCNQ3 or of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 cRNA. Currents were measured and fitted for activation and deactivation time constants as described in the text and under "Experimental Procedures," respectively. Asterisks indicate significance of homomeric versus heteromeric expression. Values are mean ± S.E.; numbers of oocytes are shown in parenthesis.

To examine the K+ selectivity of KCNQ5, tail current reversal potentials were determined in bath solutions containing 5.4, 9.6, 20, 54, and 96 mM K+. A 10-fold reduction in external K+ shifted the reversal potential by about 58 mV (Fig. 3C), indicating nearly perfect selectivity for K+.

Next we investigated the pharmacological properties of KCNQ5 (protocols as described in the legend to Fig. 4D; data not shown). KCNQ5 currents were only weakly sensitive to the nonselective K+ channel blocker TEA. The IC50 value of TEA was 30 mM and similar to results obtained with KCNQ3 (18, 19, 34). Consistently, both channel proteins contain threonine residues within the pore region at a position that mainly determines sensitivity to external blockade by TEA. While in KCNQ2 a tyrosine residue at this position confers high TEA sensitivity (19, 35), other residues may be responsible for the intermediate TEA sensitivity of KCNQ1 and KCNQ4 (6, 34). Another nonspecific potassium channel blocker, quinidine, at 300 µM blocked KCNQ5 currents by 50%. Specific inhibitors of KCNQ1 and IKs were tested at concentrations that nearly completely block these currents. The chromanol 293B (36) at 100 µM blocked KCNQ5 currents by 45%. In comparison, KCNQ1 is 80% blocked, and IKs is completely blocked at this concentration (37). The class III antiarrhythmic agent clofilium blocks KCNQ1 with an IC50 of <10 µM (6). At 30 µM, clofilium reduced KCNQ5 current by 40%, similar to its inhibitory effect on KCNQ3 (30% inhibition at 10 µM). Clofilium produces little inhibition of KCNQ2 at 10 µM (18). Thus, the general pharmacological properties of KCNQ5 are distinct from KCNQ1 and more similar to those of KCNQ3 than to KCNQ2. Most importantly, linopirdine, a specific blocker of the neuronal M-channel very effectively inhibited KCNQ5 with a Kd value of 16 ± 1 µM.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Functional interaction of KCNQ5 with KCNQ3. A, representative current traces from an oocyte coinjected with KCNQ5 and KCNQ3 using the same voltage protocol as in Fig. 3A. B, I-V relationships of oocytes expressing KCNQ5 plus KCNQ3 (n = 11). Current amplitudes normalized to maximum value. C, bar graphs plotting mean current amplitudes at the end of a 3-s test pulse to +40 mV, from a holding potential of -100 mV. Oocytes injected with cRNA encoding KCNQ5 (n = 14), KCNQ3 (n = 6), or KCNQ5 plus KCNQ3 (n = 12), the amount of RNA injected as described in Table I. Current amplitudes normalized to the amplitude of KCNQ5. Error bars indicate S.E. D, concentration dependence of inhibition of KCNQ2/KCNQ3 and KCNQ3/KCNQ5 by linopirdine. Holding potential was -100 mV, 3-s test pulse, to 0 mV every 10 s. Each concentration was perfused for 5 min. Inhibition values were obtained at the end of the depolarizing step and normalized to control (averaged from five oocytes). Error bars indicate S.E.

Functional Interaction of KCNQ5 and KCNQ3-- All members of the KCNQ family form functional heteromeric complexes with homologous or structurally different K+ channel subunits. To investigate the possibility that KCNQ5 might also form heteromeric channels, we coexpressed KCNQ5 with other KCNQ proteins and with cDNAs encoding different KCNE proteins.

After coexpression with either KCNQ1 or KCNQ2, or with any of the four known KCNE proteins (KCNE1 through KCNE4), we failed to detect evidence for functional interaction of any of these proteins with KCNQ5. However, coexpression of KCNQ5 with KCNQ3 (Fig. 4A) produced currents strikingly different from those produced by either KNCQ5 or KCNQ3 alone. Whereas KCNQ3 expressed very small amplitude currents almost indistinguishable from background level, in agreement with previous findings (17, 19), coinjection with KCNQ5 yielded 4-5 times larger currents than KCNQ5 alone (Fig. 4, A and C). There was no significant shift in the voltage dependence of the currents (Fig. 4B), but the I-V relationship indicated that KCNQ5/KCNQ3 currents were less inwardly rectifying at positive membrane potentials.

The increase in current amplitude was accompanied by slight changes in activation kinetics, as shown in Table I. Coexpression of KCNQ5 with KCNQ3 significantly slowed the fast component of activation (KCNQ5/KCNQ3 tau fast = 167 ± 14 ms; KCNQ5 tau fast = 119 ± 7 ms) without altering the slow activation component and the deactivation kinetics (see Table I). Compared with KCNQ2/KCNQ3, heteromeric KCNQ5/KCNQ3 channels exhibited slower activation, whereas deactivation kinetics of both heteromers were very similar (see Table I).

The large increase in current amplitudes, the differences in gating kinetics observed after coexpression, and the colocalization of KCNQ5 with KCNQ3 in distinct subregions of the brain all indicate that KCNQ5 can associate with KCNQ3 to form functional heteromeric channels.

The functional interaction between KCNQ5 and KCNQ3, a molecular component of the neuronal M-current, and the sensitivity of KCNQ5 to the M-channel blocker linopirdine suggest that KCNQ5 may also contribute to the molecular diversity of this physiologically important current.

For better comparison of the kinetic properties of KCNQ3/KCNQ5 heteromers with those of the native M-current and with KCNQ2/KCNQ3 currents heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes, we used a classical M-current protocol. Starting from a holding potential of -30 mV, we stepped to -50 mV and determined deactivation kinetics as described by Wang et al. (19). The data obtained for KCNQ3/KCNQ5 (tau fast = 199 ± 10 ms; tau slow = 985 ± 60 ms; n = 6) and KCNQ2/KCNQ3 (tau fast = 209 ± 11 ms; tau slow = 766 ± 37 ms; n = 6), respectively, correspond well to the time constants reported for the native M-current (tau fast = 103 ms; tau slow = 1041 ms) (19). In addition, similar to homomeric KCNQ5 currents, also heteromeric KCNQ3/KCNQ5 channels were strongly inhibited by linopirdine. As shown in Fig. 4D, sensitivity to block by linopirdine of KCNQ3/KCNQ5 was very similar to that obtained for KCNQ2/KCNQ3 (IC50 values of 15 ± 2 µM and 10 ± 1 µM, respectively), further corroborating the M-like nature of the KCNQ3/KCNQ5 current.

M-currents are found in peripheral and central neurons but have not been described in cerebellum (19). Interestingly, KCNQ5 and KCNQ3 transcripts are only weakly or not expressed in cerebellum (17-19), in contrast to KCNQ2, which is strongly expressed (16, 18, 19).

KCNQ4 also can functionally interact with KCNQ3 (26) to yield M-like currents, raising the possibility that heterogeneous populations of M-channels exist within the peripheral and central nervous system, varying in kinetic and pharmacological properties. Heterogeneity in the molecular composition of M-like channels may possibly be further increased by contributions of K+ channels from other potassium channel gene families (38, 39).

The possibility that the KCNQ5 protein may contribute to M-currents within the brain renders the KCNQ5 gene a candidate genetic locus for epileptic disease. By fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, we mapped the KCNQ5 gene to chromosome 6q14. There are two known loci on chromosome 6 linked to epileptic diseases, a cloned gene at 6q24 (EPM2A), which is defective in progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 2 (40, 41), and an unknown gene mapped to 6p12-p11, which is responsible for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) (42). Although our mapping results probably exclude involvement of KCNQ5 in JME, the identification of KCNQ5 makes it now possible to investigate possible associations with other forms of epilepsy or inherited neurological diseases.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Uwe Gerlach for providing chromanol 293B and Alex Yuan for helpful comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF249278.

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-69-305-3416; Fax: 49-69-305-16393; E-mail: Klaus.Steinmeyer@aventis.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002378200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DIG, digoxigenin; IKs, slow component of the cardiac delayed rectifier current; kb, kilobase(s); TEA, tetraethylammonium.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Wang, Q., Curran, M. E., Splawski, I., Burn, T. C., Millholla, J. M., VanRaay, T. J., Shen, J., Timothy, K. W., Vincent, G. M., de Jager, T., Schwartz, P. J., Towbin, J. A., Moss, A. J., Atkinson, D. L., Landes, G. M., Connors, T. D., and Keating, M. T. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 17-23
2. Takumi, T., Ohkubo, H., and Nakanishi, S. (1988) Science 242, 1042-1044
3. Attali, B. (1996) Nature 384, 24-25
4. Barhanin, J., Lesage, F., Guillemare, E., Fink, M., Lazdunski, M., and Romey, G. (1996) Nature 384, 78-80
5. Sanguinetti, M. C., Curran, M. E., Zou, A., Shen, J., Spector, P. S., Atkinson, D. L., and Keating, M. T. (1996) Nature 384, 80-83
6. Yang, W.-P., Levesque, P. C., Little, W. A., Conder, M. L., Shalaby, F. Y., and Blanar, M. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4017-4021
7. Keating, M. T., and Sanguinetti, M. C. (1996) Science 272, 681-685
8. Chouabe, C., Neyroud, N., Guicheney, P., Lazdunski, M., Romey, G., and Barhanin, J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5472-5479
9. Sanguinetti, M. C. (1999) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 868, 406-413
10. Suessbrich, H., and Busch, A. E. (1999) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 137, 191-226
11. Schulze-Bahr, E., Wang, Q., Wedekind, H., Haverkamp, W., Chen, Q., and Sun, Y. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 267-268
12. Neyroud, N., Tesson, F., Denjoy, I., Leibovici, M., Donger, C., Barhanin, J., Faure, S., Gary, F., Coumel, P., Petit, C., Schwartz, K., and Guicheney, P. (1997) Nat. Genet. 15, 186-189
13. Abbott, G. W., Sesti, F., Splawski, I., Buck, M. E., Lehmann, M. H., Timothy, K. W., Keating, M. T., and Goldstein, S. A. N. (1999) Cell 97, 175-187
14. Schröder, B. C., Waldegger, S., Fehr, S., Bleich, M., Warth, R., Greger, R., and Jentsch, T. J. (2000) Nature 403, 196-199
15. Lohrmann, E., Burhoff, I., Nitschke, R. B., Lang, H.-J., Mania, D., Englert, H. C., Hropot, M., Warth, R., Rohm, W., Bleich, M., and Greger, R. (1995) Pflügers Arch. 429, 517-530
16. Biervert, C., Schröder, B. C., Kubisch, C., Berkovic, S. F., Propping, P., Jentsch, T. J., and Steinlein, O. K. (1998) Science 279, 403-406
17. Schröder, B. C., Kubisch, C., Stein, V., and Jentsch, T. J. (1998) Nature 396, 687-690
18. Yang, W.-P., Levesque, P. C., Little, W. A., Conder, M. L., Ramakrishnan, P., Neubauer, M. G., and Blanar, M. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19419-19423
19. Wang, H.-S., Pan, Z., Shi, W., Brown, B. S., Wymore, R. S., Cohen, I. S., Dixon, J. E., and McKinnon, D. (1998) Science 282, 1890-1893
20. Tinel, N., Lauritzen, I., Chouabe, C., Lazdunski, M., and Borsotto, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 438, 171-176
21. Singh, N. A., Charlier, C., Stauffer, D., DuPont, B. R., Leach, R. J., Melis, R., Ronen, G. M., Bjerre, I., Quattlebaum, T., Murphy, J. V., McHarg, M. L., Gagnon, D., Rosales, T. O., Peiffer, A., Anderson, V. E., and Leppert, M. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 25-29
22. Charlier, C., Singh, N. A., Ryan, S. G., Lewis, T. B., Reus, B. E., Leach, R. J., and Leppert, M. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 53-55
23. Brown, D. A., and Adams, P. R. (1980) Nature 283, 673-676
24. Shapiro, M. S., Roche, J. P., Kaftan, E. J., Cruzblanca, H., Mackie, K., and Hille, B. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 1710-1721
25. Selyanko, A. A., Hadley, J. K., Wood, I. C., Abogadie, F. C., Jentsch, T. J., and Brown, D. A. (2000) J. Physiol. 522, 349-355
26. Kubisch, C., Schröder, B. C., Friedrich, T., Lütjohann, B., El-Amraoui, A., Marlin, S., Petit, C., and Jentsch, T. J. (1999) Cell 96, 437-446
27. Coucke, P. J., Van Hauwe, P., Kelley, P. M., Kunst, H., Schatteman, I., Van Velzen, D., Meyers, J., Ensink, R. J., Verstreken, M., Declau, F., Marres, H., Kastury, K., Bhasin, S., McGuirt, W. T., Smith, R. J., Cremers, C. W., Van de Heyning, P., Willems, P. J., Smith, S. D., and Van Camp, G. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1321-1328
28. Villmann, C., Bull, L., and Hollmann, M. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 7634-7643
29. Schmitt, N., Schwarz, M., Peretz, A., Abitbol, I., Attali, B., and Pongs, O. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 332-340
30. Lerche, H., Biervert, C., Alekov, A. K., Schleithoff, L., Lindner, M., Klinger, W., Bretschneider, F., Mitrovic, N., Jurkat-Rott, K., Bode, H., Lehmann-Horn, F., and Steinlein, O. K. (1999) Ann. Neurol. 46, 305-312
31. Sanguinetti, M. C., Jurkiewicz, N. K., Scott, A., and Siegl, P. K. S. (1991) Circ. Res. 68, 77-84
32. Pusch, M., Magrassi, R., Wollnik, B., and Conti, F. (1998) Biophys. J. 75, 785-792
33. Tristani-Firouzi, M, and Sanguinetti, M. C. (1998) J. Physiol. 510, 37-45
34. Hadley, J. K., Noda, M., Selyanko, A. A., Wood, I. C., Abogadie, F. C., and Brown, D. A. (2000) Br. J. Pharmacol. 129, 413-415
35. MacKinnon, R., and Yellen, G. (1990) Science 250, 276-279
36. Suessbrich, H., Bleich, M., Ecke, D., Rizzo, M., Waldegger, S., Lang, F., Szabo, I., Lang, H.-J., Kunzelmann, K., Greger, R., and Busch, A. E. (1996) FEBS Lett. 396, 271-275
37. Busch, A. E., Busch, G. L., Ford, E., Suessbrich, H., Lang, H.-J., Greger, R., Kunzelmann, K., Attali, B., and Stühmer, W. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol. 122, 187-189
38. Meves, H., Schwarz, J. R., and Wulfsen, I. (1999) Br. J. Pharmacol. 127, 1213-1223
39. Selyanko, A. A., Hadley, J. K., Wood, I. C., Abogadie, F. C., Delmas, P., Buckley, N. J., London, B., and Brown, D. A. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 7742-7756
40. Minassian, B. A., Lee, J. R., Herbrick, J. A., Huizenga, J., Soder, S., Mungall, A. J., Dunham, I., Gardner, R., Fong, C. Y., Carpenter, S., Jardim, L., Satishchandra, P., Andermann, E., Snead, O. C., Lopes-Cendes, I., Tsui, L. C., Delgado-Escueta, A. V., Rouleau, G. A., and Scherer, S. W. (1998) Nat. Genet. 20, 171-174
41. Serratosa, J. M., Gomez-Garre, P., Gallardo, M. E., Anta, B., deBernabe, D. B., Lindhout, D., Augustijn, P. B., Tassinari, C. A., Malafosse, R. M., Topcu, M., Grid, D., Dravet, C., Berkovic, S. F., and deCordoba, S. R. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 345-352
42. Liu, A. W., Delgado-Escueta, A. V., Gee, M. N., Serratosa, J. M., Zhang, Q. W., Alonso, M. E., Medina, M. T., Cordova, S., Zhao, H. Z., Spellman, J. M., Rubio Donnadieu, F., Ramos Peek, J., Treiman, L. J., and Sparkes, R. S. (1996) Am. J. Med. Genet. 63, 438-446


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
O. Zaika, C. C. Hernandez, M. Bal, G. P. Tolstykh, and M. S. Shapiro
Determinants within the Turret and Pore-Loop Domains of KCNQ3 K+ Channels Governing Functional Activity
Biophys. J., December 1, 2008; 95(11): 5121 - 5137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Bal, J. Zhang, O. Zaika, C. C. Hernandez, and M. S. Shapiro
Homomeric and Heteromeric Assembly of KCNQ (Kv7) K+ Channels Assayed by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence/Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Patch Clamp Analysis
J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2008; 283(45): 30668 - 30676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. R. Mackie and K. L. Byron
Cardiovascular KCNQ (Kv7) Potassium Channels: Physiological Regulators and New Targets for Therapeutic Intervention
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2008; 74(5): 1171 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. Nakajo and Y. Kubo
Second coiled-coil domain of KCNQ channel controls current expression and subfamily specific heteromultimerization by salt bridge networks
J. Physiol., June 15, 2008; 586(12): 2827 - 2840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
Z. Jia, J. Bei, L. Rodat-Despoix, B. Liu, Q. Jia, P. Delmas, and H. Zhang
NGF Inhibits M/KCNQ Currents and Selectively Alters Neuronal Excitability in Subsets of Sympathetic Neurons Depending on their M/KCNQ Current Background
J. Gen. Physiol., June 1, 2008; 131(6): 575 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Xu, L. Nie, Y. Zhang, J. Mo, W. Feng, D. Wei, E. Petrov, L. E. Calisto, B. Kachar, K. W. Beisel, et al.
Roles of Alternative Splicing in the Functional Properties of Inner Ear-specific KCNQ4 Channels
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 23899 - 23909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Lerche, I. Bruhova, H. Lerche, K. Steinmeyer, A. D. Wei, N. Strutz-Seebohm, F. Lang, A. E. Busch, B. S. Zhorov, and G. Seebohm
Chromanol 293B Binding in KCNQ1 (Kv7.1) Channels Involves Electrostatic Interactions with a Potassium Ion in the Selectivity Filter
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1503 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. S. Jensen, M. Grunnet, and S.-P. Olesen
Inactivation as a New Regulatory Mechanism for Neuronal Kv7 Channels
Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2747 - 2756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Koyama, M. S. Brodie, and S. B. Appel
Ethanol Inhibition of M-Current and Ethanol-Induced Direct Excitation of Ventral Tegmental Area Dopamine Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1977 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. Balbir, H. Lee, M. Okumura, S. Biswal, R. S. Fitzgerald, and M. Shirahata
A search for genes that may confer divergent morphology and function in the carotid body between two strains of mice
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): L704 - L715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. I. Brueggemann, C. J. Moran, J. A. Barakat, J. Z. Yeh, L. L. Cribbs, and K. L. Byron
Vasopressin stimulates action potential firing by protein kinase C-dependent inhibition of KCNQ5 in A7r5 rat aortic smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1352 - H1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Peretz, A. Sheinin, C. Yue, N. Degani-Katzav, G. Gibor, R. Nachman, A. Gopin, E. Tam, D. Shabat, Y. Yaari, et al.
Pre- and Postsynaptic Activation of M-Channels By a Novel Opener Dampens Neuronal Firing and Transmitter Release
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 283 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
O. Zaika, L. S. Lara, N. Gamper, D. W. Hilgemann, D. B. Jaffe, and M. S. Shapiro
Angiotensin II regulates neuronal excitability via phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent modulation of Kv7 (M-type) K+ channels
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 49 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. L. Wladyka and D. L. Kunze
KCNQ/M-currents contribute to the resting membrane potential in rat visceral sensory neurons
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 175 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Koyama and S. B. Appel
Characterization of M-Current in Ventral Tegmental Area Dopamine Neurons
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 535 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Z. Pan, T. Kao, Z. Horvath, J. Lemos, J.-Y. Sul, S. D. Cranstoun, V. Bennett, S. S. Scherer, and E. C. Cooper
A common ankyrin-G-based mechanism retains KCNQ and NaV channels at electrically active domains of the axon.
J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2599 - 2613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. V. Dzhura, W. He, and K. P. M. Currie
Linopirdine Modulates Calcium Signaling and Stimulus-Secretion Coupling in Adrenal Chromaffin Cells by Targeting M-Type K+ Channels and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1165 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. V. Soldovieri, P. Castaldo, L. Iodice, F. Miceli, V. Barrese, G. Bellini, E. M. del Giudice, A. Pascotto, S. Bonatti, L. Annunziato, et al.
Decreased Subunit Stability as a Novel Mechanism for Potassium Current Impairment by a KCNQ2 C Terminus Mutation Causing Benign Familial Neonatal Convulsions
J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 418 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Wen, T. M. Weiger, T. S. Ferguson, M. Shahidullah, S. S. Scott, and I. B. Levitan
A Drosophila KCNQ Channel Essential for Early Embryonic Development
J. Neurosci., November 2, 2005; 25(44): 10147 - 10156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Li, N. Gamper, D. W. Hilgemann, and M. S. Shapiro
Regulation of Kv7 (KCNQ) K+ Channel Open Probability by Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate
J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9825 - 9835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
N. Gu, K. Vervaeke, H. Hu, and J. F Storm
Kv7/KCNQ/M and HCN/h, but not KCa2/SK channels, contribute to the somatic medium after-hyperpolarization and excitability control in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells
J. Physiol., August 1, 2005; 566(3): 689 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. D. Wei, A. Butler, and L. Salkoff
KCNQ-like Potassium Channels in Caenorhabditis elegans: CONSERVED PROPERTIES AND MODULATION
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21337 - 21345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]