|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M910425199 on May 8, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22479-22486, July 21, 2000
Peroxynitrite Targets the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor,
Raf-1, and MEK Independently to Activate MAPK*
Ping
Zhang ,
Yi-Zhe
Wang ,
Elliott
Kagan§, and
James C.
Bonner ¶
From the Laboratory of Pulmonary Pathobiology, NIEHS,
National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27709 and the § Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services
University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Received for publication, December 30, 1999, and in revised form, May 4, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activation of ERK-1 and -2 by
H2O2 in a variety of cell types requires
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation. In this study,
we investigated the activation of ERK by ONOO in cultured
rat lung myofibroblasts. Western blot analysis using anti-phospho-ERK
antibodies along with an ERK kinase assay using the
phosphorylated heat- and
acid-stable protein (PHAS-1) substrate demonstrated that ERK activation peaked within 15 min after
ONOO treatment and was maximally activated with 100 µM ONOO . Activation of ERK by
ONOO and H2O2 was blocked by the
antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Catalase
blocked ERK activation by H2O2, but not by
ONOO , demonstrating that the effect of ONOO
was not due to the generation of H2O2. Both
H2O2 and ONOO induced
phosphorylation of EGFR in Western blot experiments using an
anti-phospho-EGFR antibody. However, the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor
AG1478 abolished ERK activation by H2O2, but
not by ONOO . Both H2O2 and
ONOO activated Raf-1. However, the Raf inhibitor
forskolin blocked ERK activation by H2O2, but
not by ONOO . The MEK inhibitor PD98059 inhibited ERK
activation by both H2O2 and ONOO .
Moreover, ONOO or H2O2 caused a
cytotoxic response of myofibroblasts that was prevented by
preincubation with PD98059. In a cell-free kinase assay,
ONOO (but not H2O2) induced
autophosphorylation and nitration of a glutathione
S-transferase-MEK-1 fusion protein. Collectively, these
data indicate that ONOO activates EGFR and Raf-1, but
these signaling intermediates are not required for
ONOO -induced ERK activation. However, MEK-1 activation is
required for ONOO -induced ERK activation in
myofibroblasts. In contrast, H2O2-induced ERK
activation is dependent on EGFR activation, which then leads to
downstream Raf-1 and MEK-1 activation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Inflammation following tissue injury is associated with increased
generation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide anion
(O 2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (1).
Moreover, nitric oxide (NO·) is synthesized by inflammatory
cells and has the potential to react with O 2 via a nearly
diffusion-limited reaction to form peroxynitrite (ONOO )
(2-5). These oxidants may serve several physiological or
pathophysiological functions. For example, NO· is thought to
play a major role in host defense, but is also presumed to contribute
to tissue injury (2). H2O2 and O 2
released into the extracellular environment by mononuclear cells during an oxidative burst may also play a role in immune defense (1). ONOO is a potent cytotoxic species that has been proposed
to contribute to the pathophysiology of a wide variety of inflammatory
diseases. Although ONOO is extremely short-lived at
physiological pH (1-s half-life) (6), the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine
by ONOO reaction with tyrosyl residues serves as a stable
marker or "footprint" (7-9). ONOO not only affects
tyrosine residues on proteins, but also may induce oxidative reaction
products through modifications of cysteine, methionine, and tryptophan
(4).
Increasing evidence supports the idea that oxidants serve as signaling
intermediates required for receptor tyrosine kinase function and
downstream activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs).1 In particular,
H2O2 generated intracellularly following the
binding of platelet-derived growth factor or epidermal growth factor
(EGF) to their respective receptors appears to reversibly inhibit
protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity, which is required for
phosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases (10, 11). In the absence
of EGF, exogenous H2O2 alone can cause
phosphorylation of EGFR through reversible oxidative modification of
cysteine residues, leading to downstream activation of a Raf/MEK/MAPK
phosphorylation cascade (12-14). In contrast, ONOO
stimulates phosphorylation of EGFR tyrosine residues by causing irreversible dimerization of EGFR via dityrosine cross-links (15). More
recently, several nitric oxide-related species, including ONOO , have been reported to activate MAPKs (16-18), yet
the mechanism of MAPK activation by ONOO remains unclear.
MAPKs are a family of serine/threonine kinases that regulate a
diversity of cellular activities. Three major classes have been
described: extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun
N-terminal kinases (JNKs; also known as stress-activated protein
kinases), and p38 MAPK (reviewed in Ref. 19). JNKs and p38 MAPKs
mediate signals in response to cytokines and environmental stress,
whereas the ERK subtypes are classically recognized as key transducers
in the signaling cascade mediating cell proliferation in response to
growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor and EGF. Two
major isoforms of ERK, p44 (ERK-1) and p42 (ERK-2), have been
identified in mammalian systems. A major pathway involved in ERK-1 and
-2 phosphorylation in a variety of cell types requires the sequential
activation of Raf and MEK (20, 21). It is becoming increasingly clear
that the ERK pathway, like those of p38 and JNK, is activated by
environmental stress, including reactive oxygen species such as
H2O2 (12).
In this study, we have investigated the mechanism of
ONOO -induced ERK-1 and -2 activation. Similar to previous
studies on the mechanism of H2O2-induced ERK
activation, we found that ONOO activates EGFR, Raf-1, and
MEK-1. However, unlike H2O2, which requires
EGFR phosphorylation to initiate a downstream signaling cascade for
activation of ERK, we report that ONOO induces
autophosphorylation of EGFR, Raf-1, and MEK-1 independently.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Primary passage rat pulmonary myofibroblasts
were isolated and characterized as described previously (22).
Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated these cells to be positive
for markers of smooth muscle cells ( -smooth muscle actin and desmin)
and fibroblasts (vimentin), indicating a myofibroblast phenotype (23).
Following the isolation procedure, aliquots of cells (1 × 106/ml) were stored in liquid nitrogen. Cells (1 × 106) were thawed from the liquid nitrogen and plated in a
175-cm2 flask in 10% fetal bovine serum/Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with L-glutamine and
Fungizone. After reaching confluence, the cells were liberated with
trypsin, replated on 100-mm dishes, and grown to confluence in 10%
fetal bovine serum/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. At this point,
the cells were designated as passage 2. Cells were then rendered
quiescent for 24 h with serum-free defined medium (SFDM)
consisting of Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 0.25% bovine serum
albumin and an insulin/transferrin/selenium mixture (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) for the experiments described below.
Oxidant Treatments--
Peroxynitrite was synthesized from
acidified nitrite and hydrogen peroxide (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.,
Lake Placid, NY). Stocks of ONOO were stored in 1.2 N NaOH at 80 °C. Prior to experimentation, ONOO was quantitated spectrophotometrically (extinction
coefficient at 302 nm = 1670 M 1 cm 1)
(24). Cells in SFDM were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
and then equilibrated in PBS for 5 min. ONOO was
delivered as a single bolus (e.g. 10 µl of 100 mM stock delivered in 1 ml to give a final concentration of
1 mM) against one side of the dish while rapidly swirling
the medium to assure optimal exposure of the cells to
ONOO before decomposition (15, 25). In control
experiments, ONOO was prediluted for 1 min in an
equivalent volume of PBS prior to adding to the cells. This
"delayed" PBS solution contained completely decomposed
ONOO as determined spectrophotometrically, but still
contained contaminants such as nitrite and nitrate (24). In other
control experiments, cells were treated with equal volumes of 1.2 N NaOH (vehicle control). PBS, rather than SFDM, was used
as the medium for ONOO treatments to avoid interfering
reactions of ONOO with media constituents.
Western Blot Analysis--
Confluent cell monolayers on 100-mm
dishes were growth-arrested in serum-free medium for 24 h prior to
treatment with ONOO , H2O2, or
metabolic inhibitors. Cells were washed twice with PBS, scraped,
resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 20 µg/ml
leupeptin, and 20 µg/ml pepstatin), and clarified by centrifugation
at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. Thirty µg of protein/sample was separated
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane, and blocked for 2 h at 25 °C with
0.5% nonfat milk in PBS buffer (20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, and 0.01% Tween 20). The membrane was then
incubated overnight at 4 °C with an appropriate dilution of
anti-phospho-ERK or anti-ERK (New England Biolabs Inc.),
anti-phospho-MEK-1 or anti-MEK-1 (New England Biolabs Inc.), or
anti-phospho-EGFR or anti-EGFR (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) polyclonal
antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation for 2 h with
a 1:2000 dilution of the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibody. The immunoblot signal was visualized through
enhanced chemiluminescence.
PHAS-1 Kinase Assay--
ERK activity in cell lysates was
measured as described previously (26) by phosphorylation of PHAS-1, a
substrate for ERK (27). Briefly, confluent cell monolayers on 100-mm
dishes were growth-arrested in serum-free medium for 24 h, treated
with ONOO , chilled on ice, washed twice with PBS, and
scraped with 800 µl of lysis buffer. ERK was immunoprecipitated by
incubating 200 µl of lysate with 2 µg of anti-ERK antibody (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 2 h and then adding 20 µl of
protein A-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). After an overnight
incubation at 0-4 °C with end-over-end mixing, the immune complex
was recovered by centrifugation and washed three times with lysis
buffer and once with 250 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, and 200 µM
Na3VO4. Immune complex kinase assays were
performed using a MAPK assay kit (Stratagene). The ERK pellets were
resuspended in Stratagene reaction buffer containing 120 µg of PHAS-1
substrate along with 3-5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP in a
final volume of 180 µl. Kinase reactions took place for 30 min at
room temperature and were stopped by adding 4× SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis reducing sample buffer and boiling for 10 min. ERK-PHAS
samples were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, dried, and autoradiographed.
Raf-1 Kinase Assay--
Raf-1 kinase activity was measured by
immunoprecipitation with an anti-Raf-1 antibody followed by a
phosphorylation assay using bacterially expressed, kinase-inactive
MEK-1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) as the substrate. The lysis buffer
consisted of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, aprotinin, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml pepstatin, 200 µM Na3VO4, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Lysates were incubated
with antibody for 90 min at 4 °C, and protein A-agarose beads were
then added for an additional 30 min to immunoprecipitate Raf-1. Pellets
were washed and resuspended in 20 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM PIPES (pH 7.0), 10 mM MnCl2, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 200 µM
Na3VO4) containing 1 ng of kinase-inactive
MEK-1 and 5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP. Raf-activated MEK-1
was resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, dried, and autoradiographed.
Cell-free MEK-1 Phosphorylation Assay--
This assay was a
modification of a previously reported method (21). Recombinant
non-activated GST-MEK-1 (0.5 µg; Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) was
diluted in 20 µl of assay dilution buffer (20 mM MOPS (pH
7.2), 25 mM -glycerol phosphate, 5 mM EGTA,
1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol) supplemented with a magnesium/ATP mixture (75 mM magnesium chloride and 500 µM unlabeled
ATP). An increasing concentration of ONOO (1-1000
µM) was added to the solution and incubated for 15 min at
30 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol. Activated GST-MEK-1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) was loaded on gels as
a positive control. As an additional control, activated GST-Raf-1 was
incubated with non-activated GST-MEK-1. Phosphorylation of GST-MEK-1
was detected by Western blotting using an anti-phospho-MEK-1 antibody.
Western blots were stripped and reblotted using an anti-nitrotyrosine antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.).
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation Assay--
Confluent
rat lung myofibroblasts on 24-well tissue culture plates were rendered
quiescent in SFDM for 24 h; then the medium was switched to PBS,
and ONOO (1-1000 µM) was added to the
medium with constant swirling. After 15 min, the medium was removed,
and fresh SFDM containing 5 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was added back. After 24 h at
37 °C with 5% CO2 and humidified air, the cells were
rinsed three times with SFDM and chilled on ice for 30 min. The medium was removed, and 5% trichloroacetic acid (0.5 ml/well) was added for
10 min. After removing the trichloroacetic acid, the cells were washed
three times with ice-cold water and solubilized with a solution of 1%
Triton X-100 and 0.1% NaOH. Radioactivity was measured in a liquid
scintillation counter.
Cytotoxicity Assay--
Cytotoxicity was measured by the MTT
cell viability assay (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
 |
RESULTS |
ONOO Activation of ERK Requires Immediate Addition to
Cell Cultures--
Since ONOO has an extremely short
half-life at neutral pH (~1 s) (6), we assessed ERK activation in
cultures of pulmonary myofibroblasts that received ONOO
immediately as compared with cell cultures that received
ONOO that had first been allowed to incubate
(i.e. delayed) in PBS for 1 min at pH 7.4. The immediate
addition strategy was performed by delivering a single bolus of the
ONOO stock against the side of the dish while swirling
the PBS solution to allow for mixing. Direct addition resulted in
strong ERK activation, whereas the delay of ONOO in PBS
for 1 min caused no activation of ERK (Fig.
1). This experiment was essential for
demonstrating that ERK activation was due to ONOO and not
to trace amounts of H2O2, which is relatively
stable at pH 7.4. Furthermore, this experiment ruled out the formation of stable nitrating agents that could potentially be formed by the
reaction of ONOO with components of the cell culture
medium. The addition of the same volume of 1.2 N NaOH alone
to PBS (10 µl/1 ml), either immediately or delayed, did not cause ERK
activation (data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Immediate addition of
ONOO is required to activate ERK-1
and ERK-2. A, representative Western blot results for
phospho-ERK and total ERK after the immediate addition of
ONOO versus addition of ONOO to
cultures after 1 min in PBS (pH 7.4) to allow for ONOO
degradation. Myofibroblasts were rendered quiescent for 24 h in
SFDM and then switched to PBS (pH 7.4) for the addition of
ONOO to a final concentration of 1 mM.
Immediate addition was performed by delivering a bolus of the
ONOO stock in 1.2 M NaOH directly against the
side of the dish and immediately mixing the PBS solution overlaying the
cells. Delayed addition was performed by adding the same amount of the
ONOO stock in 1.2 M NaOH to PBS for 1 min in
the absence of cells and then adding the 1 mM
ONOO solution to the cells. After 15 min, the cell
lysates were harvested and assayed for ERK activation by Western blot
analysis using an anti-phospho-ERK antibody. The data shown are typical
of four separate experiments. B, densitometric analysis of
ERK activation from four separate experiments. The relative level of
ERK activation was determined by densitometric scanning of the
phospho-ERK bands and normalized to the ERK signal. **,
p < 0.01 as compared with no addition.
|
|
ONOO Activates ERK in a Time- and
Concentration-dependent Manner--
Treatment of cells
with 1 mM ONOO activated ERK maximally within
15 min as determined by Western blotting using an anti-phospho-ERK antibody or by an ERK kinase assay using the PHAS-1 substrate (Fig.
2A). Phospho-ERK Western
blotting and PHAS-1 experiments performed with increasing
concentrations of ONOO (1-1000 µM) showed
that maximal activation of ERK was reached at 100 µM
(Fig. 2B). In these experiments, Western blotting with an
antibody that detects unphosphorylated ERK was used to show that ERK
protein levels did not change appreciably as a consequence of
ONOO treatment. H2O2 also
maximally activated ERK at 100 µM (data not shown). The
concentrations of ONOO or H2O2
required to activate ERK in our study were within the micromolar range
reported by other investigators for activation of cellular signaling
pathways (12, 15).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ONOO
activates ERK-1 and ERK-2 in a time- and
concentration-dependent manner. A,
myofibroblasts were rendered quiescent for 24 h in SFDM and then
switched to PBS and exposed to 1 mM ONOO for
the indicated time points. Cell lysates were collected for Western
blotting using an antibody specific for phosphorylated ERK (upper
panel) or an antibody against total ERK (middle panel).
ERK activity was measured by kinase assay following immunoprecipitation
of ERK and using PHAS-1 as a substrate (lower panel).
B, cells were exposed to an increasing concentration of
ONOO for 15 min prior to collecting cell lysates for
phospho-ERK and ERK Western blotting (upper and middle
panels, respectively) or immunoprecipitation of ERK followed by
PHAS-1 kinase assay (lower panel).
|
|
Effect of Antioxidants on ONOO - and
H2O2-induced ERK Activation--
To determine
if ONOO -induced ERK activation was due to the presence of
H2O2, cells were preincubated with catalase
(3000 units/ml) for 1 h and then treated with either
ONOO or H2O2 for 15 or 30 min.
H2O2-induced ERK activation was completely inhibited by catalase, whereas ONOO -induced ERK
activation was not affected (Fig. 3).
N-Acetyl-L-cysteine has been reported to block
the effects of both H2O2 (11) and ONOO (28-30). Pretreatment of cells with 50 mM N-acetyl-L-cysteine for 1 h
prior to adding oxidants inhibited both ONOO - and
H2O2-induced ERK activation (Fig. 3).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of antioxidants
N-acetyl-L-cysteine and catalase on
ONOO - and
H2O2-induced ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation.
Confluent quiescent cultures of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts were
incubated with N-acetyl-L-cysteine
(NAC; 50 mM) or catalase (3000 units/ml) and
then treated with 1 mM ONOO (upper
panel) or H2O2 (lower panel)
for 15 or 30 min prior to collecting cell lysates for Western blotting
using an anti-phospho-ERK antibody.
|
|
EGFR Phosphorylation Is Required for
H2O2-induced ERK Activation, but Not for
ONOO -induced ERK Activation--
We observed that EGF,
ONOO , and H2O2 induced
phosphorylation of EGFR as determined by Western blotting using an
antibody specific for phospho-EGFR (Fig.
4A). Moreover, the EGFR
tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478 (31) abolished phosphorylation of EGFR
induced by all of these agents (Fig. 4A). However, although
AG1478 significantly inhibited ERK activation induced by EGF and
H2O2, AG1478 did not significantly inhibit ERK
activation induced by ONOO (Fig. 4, B and
C).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity
blocks H2O2-induced ERK activation, but not
ONOO -induced ERK activation.
Confluent quiescent cultures of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts were
pretreated with 100 µM AG1478 for 1 h to inhibit
EGFR tyrosine kinase activity and then treated with EGF (50 ng/ml),
ONOO (1 mM), H2O2 (1 mM), or medium alone (no addition (NA)) for 15 min prior to collecting cell lysates for Western blot analysis.
A, Western blot analysis of phospho-EGFR and EGFR
demonstrating inhibition of EGF-, ONOO -, and
H2O2-induced EGFR phosphorylation by AG1478;
B, representative Western blots using an anti-phospho-ERK
antibody showing that AG1478 blocked ERK activation by EGF and
H2O2, but not by ONOO ;
C, relative levels of ERK activation determined by
densitometric scanning of the phospho-ERK bands and normalized to the
ERK signal. AG1478 significantly inhibited EGF- and
H2O2-induced ERK activation, but did not
significantly inhibit ONOO -induced ERK activation. Data
are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three experiments. *,
p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (significant
inhibition of ERK activation by AG1478 as compared with corresponding
EGF and H2O2 treatments in the absence of
AG1478).
|
|
ERK Activation by H2O2 Is Dependent on
Raf-1, yet ONOO -induced ERK Activation Is Not
Raf-dependent--
Using a Raf-1 kinase assay that
utilized MEK-1 as the substrate, we observed that both
H2O2 and ONOO stimulated
Raf-1-dependent phosphorylation of MEK-1 (Fig.
5A). Furthermore, activation
of Raf-1 by both of these oxidants was blocked by pretreatment with
forskolin (Fig. 5A). Pretreatment of cells with forskolin
prior to the addition of oxidant significantly blocked
H2O2-induced ERK activation in phospho-ERK
Western blot assays, yet forskolin did not affect
ONOO -induced ERK activation (Fig. 5, B and
C).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of Raf-1 kinase activity blocks
H2O2-induced ERK activation, but not
ONOO -induced ERK activation.
Confluent quiescent cultures of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts were
pretreated with 50 µM forskolin for 1 h to inhibit
Raf activity and then treated with 1 mM ONOO
or H2O2 for 15 or 30 min prior to collecting
cell lysates for Raf-1 kinase assay or Western blot analysis of
phospho-ERK and ERK. A, Raf-1 kinase assay showing
inhibition of ONOO - and
H2O2-induced Raf-1 phosphorylation of MEK-1 by
forskolin; B, representative Western blots of phospho-ERK
and total ERK showing that forskolin inhibited
H2O2-induced ERK activation, but not
ONOO -induced ERK activation; C, relative
levels of ERK activation determined by densitometric scanning of the
phospho-ERK bands and normalized to the ERK signal. Forskolin
significantly inhibited H2O2-induced ERK
activation, but did not affect ONOO -induced ERK
activation. Data are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three
experiments. **, p < 0.01 (significant inhibition of
ERK activation by forskolin as compared with corresponding
H2O2 treatments in the absence of
forskolin).
|
|
Activation of ERK by ONOO and
H2O2 Requires MEK--
Pretreatment of cells
with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (50 µM) (32) abolished
activation of ERK induced by either ONOO or
H2O2 in phospho-ERK Western blot experiments
(Fig. 6). Accordingly, the MEK inhibitor
blocked the phosphorylation of MEK-1 by either ONOO or
H2O2 in Western blot experiments using an
anti-phospho-MEK-1 antibody.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The MEK inhibitor PD98059 blocks
ONOO - and
H2O2-induced ERK activation. Confluent
quiescent cultures of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts were pretreated with
50 µM PD98059 or vehicle control (Me2SO)
1 h prior to treatment with 1 mM ONOO or
H2O2. After 15 or 30 min, cell lysates were
collected for Western blot analysis. A, Western blot
analysis of phospho-MEK-1 and MEK-1; B, representative
Western blots of phospho-ERK and ERK; C, relative levels of
ERK activation determined by densitometric scanning of the phospho-ERK
bands and normalized to the ERK signal. PD98059 significantly inhibited
ONOO - and H2O2-induced ERK
activation. Data are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three
experiments. **, p < 0.01 (significant inhibition of
ERK activation by PD98059 as compared with corresponding
ONOO or H2O2 treatments in the
absence of PD98059).
|
|
ONOO Causes Nitration and Autophosphorylation of
Recombinant GST-MEK-1 Fusion Protein in a Cell-free System--
To
further investigate the mechanism through which ONOO
phosphorylates MEK-1, we treated recombinant non-activated GST-MEK-1 with ONOO in a buffer solution containing a magnesium/ATP
mixture and performed Western blotting using an anti-phospho-MEK-1
antibody or an anti-nitrotyrosine antibody. As shown in Fig.
7, ONOO induced
phosphorylation of GST-MEK-1. Moreover, ONOO caused a
concentration-dependent increase in nitrotyrosine formation on GST-MEK-1 (Fig. 7). These experiments provide, for the first time,
evidence of a direct biochemical modification of MEK-1 by ONOO that results in autophosphorylation. In parallel
experiments, H2O2 did not phosphorylate
GST-MEK-1 in this cell-free system (data not shown). Non-activated
Raf-1 was not commercially available to perform a similar type of
experiment. However, lysates from ONOO - and
H2O2-treated cells were immunoprecipitated with
the anti-nitrotyrosine antibody, and Western blotting was performed
using an anti-phospho-Raf-1 antibody. Phosphorylated Raf-1 was
co-immunoprecipitated with the anti-nitrotyrosine antibody from lysates
of ONOO -treated cells, but not from lysates of
H2O2-treated cells (data not shown).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Western blot analysis showing phosphorylation
and nitration of GST-MEK-1 fusion protein by
ONOO in a cell-free system.
GST-MEK-1 was treated with ONOO in PBS supplemented with
the magnesium/ATP mixture and incubated for 15 min prior to stopping
the reaction with SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer.
Active MEK-1 was loaded as a positive control. Western blot analysis
was performed using an anti-phospho-MEK-1 antibody (upper
panel), an anti-MEK-1 antibody raised against non-activated MEK-1
(middle panel), or an anti-nitrotyrosine antibody
(lower panel).
|
|
ONOO -induced Cytotoxicity Is Blocked by Pretreatment
with MEK Inhibitor--
To address the biological relevance of
ONOO -induced MAPK activation, we sought to determine
first whether ONOO caused mitogenesis of rat lung
myofibroblasts using a [3H]thymidine incorporation assay.
As shown in Fig. 8A,
recombinant EGF (50 ng/ml) caused a severalfold increase in
[3H]thymidine uptake. However, ONOO caused
a concentration-dependent decrease in
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 8A).
Interestingly, the decrease in [3H]thymidine
incorporation caused by ONOO treatment was prevented by
pretreatment of cells with 50 µM PD98059 for 1 h
prior to the addition of ONOO (Fig. 8B). Since
the decrease in mitogenesis by ONOO suggested a cytotoxic
effect, we utilized the MTT assay to measure ONOO -induced
cytotoxicity. Treatment with ONOO (1 mM)
caused a rapid change in cell morphology (within 30 min) that was
characterized by cell shrinkage and loss of focal adhesions (Fig.
9A). Pretreatment of the cells
with 50 µM PD98059 for 1 h protected the cells from
the ONOO -induced change in cell morphology.
ONOO also caused a concentration-dependent
decrease in cell survival as measured by the MTT cytotoxicity assay
(Fig. 9B). Pretreatment with 50 µM PD98059
significantly protected the cells against ONOO -induced
cytotoxicity. Using the MTT assay, we also observed that a 30-min
treatment with 100 µM H2O2
induced 80-90% cytotoxicity in cells that were pretreated for 1 h with Me2SO vehicle alone, whereas
H2O2 treatment induced only 10-15%
cytotoxicity in cells pretreated with 50 µM PD98059 for
1 h (data not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of
ONOO on [3H]thymidine
uptake by rat lung myofibroblasts. A, cells were
rendered quiescent in SFDM for 24 h and then switched to PBS and
treated with ONOO . After 15 min, the medium was
aspirated, and fresh SFDM was added back along with 5 µCi/ml
[3H]thymidine for 24 h. B, quiescent
cells were pretreated for 1 h with 50 µM PD98059
(PD) in SFDM, and then the medium aspirated and PBS was
added back. The medium was aspirated again 15 min after adding 1 mM ONOO , and fresh SFDM with 5 µCi/ml
[3H]thymidine were added back for 24 h.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Cytotoxic effect of
ONOO on rat lung myofibroblasts and
protective effect of PD98059. A, quiescent cells on
glass chamber slides were pretreated with 50 µM PD98059
or vehicle control (Me2SO) for 1 h and then were
treated with ONOO (1 mM) for 30 min prior to
fixation and staining with hematoxylin and eosin. B,
quiescent cells on 24-well plates were pretreated with 50 µM PD98059 (PD) for 1 h and then treated
with increasing concentrations of ONOO for 30 min prior
to assay of cell survival by the MTT cytotoxicity assay.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have investigated possible differences in the
mechanism of ERK activation by H2O2 and
ONOO in vitro using primary passage rat
pulmonary myofibroblasts. ONOO was found to be a potent
activator of ERK and also caused phosphorylation of EGFR, Raf-1, and
MEK-1. Although these results initially suggested a mechanism of MAPK
activation similar to that stimulated by H2O2, we observed that inhibitors of EGFR (AG1478) and Raf-1 (forskolin) did
not block ONOO -induced MAPK activation. Since
H2O2 requires EGFR to activate MAPK, these data
suggested a different mechanism of MAPK activation between
ONOO and H2O2. We further
explored the mechanism of activation and found that ONOO ,
but not H2O2, caused nitration and
autophosphorylation of recombinant GST-MEK-1 fusion protein in a
cell-free system. Additionally, phosphorylated Raf-1 was
co-immunoprecipitated with an anti-nitrotyrosine antibody from lysates
of ONOO -treated cells. Collectively, these observations
indicate that nitration of Raf-1 and MEK-1 causes autophosphorylation.
In our experiments, it was essential to test the possibility that
H2O2 was contributing to the activation of ERK
since our preparations of ONOO were synthesized from
acidified nitrite and H2O2. Thus, these stocks
of ONOO could contain trace amounts of
H2O2. Moreover, a recent study by Kirsch and de
Groot (33) demonstrated that H2O2 can be formed by the reaction of ONOO with nicotinamide nucleotides. We
excluded the possible contribution of H2O2 by
demonstrating that ONOO -induced phosphorylation of ERK
required the immediate addition of ONOO to cell cultures
due to the rapid degradation of this oxidant at neutral pH (Fig. 1).
Premixing the ONOO in PBS (pH 7.4) for 1 min resulted in
a complete loss of ERK-phosphorylating activity. In contrast, this
premixing delay did not diminish the activity of
H2O2 in activating ERK. However, to
definitively exclude the possibility that trace levels of
H2O2 present in the preparations of
ONOO were mediating activation of ERK, catalase was used
to eliminate H2O2 as has been reported
previously (10, 11). Pretreatment of cells with catalase abolished
activation of ERK by H2O2, but did not inhibit
ERK activation by ONOO (Fig. 3). These data confirmed
that activation of ERK following treatment with ONOO was
not due to the presence of H2O2.
H2O2-induced ERK activation has been reported
to require phosphorylation of EGFR (12, 13). For this reason, we
investigated the role of EGFR in ONOO -induced ERK
activation. Using a Western blot technique with an antibody specific
for the phosphorylated form of EGFR, we showed that ONOO ,
as well as EGF and H2O2, strongly induced
phosphorylation of EGFR within 5 min (Fig. 4). We then employed the
EGFR-specific tyrphostin analog AG1478, which has been reported to
block the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR on pulmonary myofibroblasts
(31). EGFR activation induced by ONOO was completely
blocked by a 1-h pretreatment with AG1478. Despite the complete block
of ONOO - induced EGFR phosphorylation by AG1478,
ONOO -induced ERK activation was not affected by AG1478.
In contrast, H2O2-induced ERK activation was
completely blocked by AG1478, indicating that phosphorylation of EGFR
is required for further downstream signaling of MAPK by
H2O2. These findings show that ONOO , like H2O2, is capable of
activating ERK via EGFR phosphorylation. However, unlike
H2O2, ONOO can also bypass
blockade of EGFR and directly activate Raf and MEK to cause ERK phosphorylation.
Both H2O2 and ONOO caused Raf-1
activation, and this was blocked by pretreatment of cells with
forskolin (Fig. 5). H2O2-induced ERK activation
was significantly inhibited by forskolin, yet activation of ERK by
ONOO was not affected by forskolin. These findings
indicate that ONOO can bypass the forskolin-mediated
Raf-1 blockade and activate a signaling intermediate downstream of
Raf-1. The most likely signaling intermediate that interfaces Raf-1 to
ERK signaling is MEK (21). The MEK inhibitor almost completely
inhibited phosphorylation of MEK and ERK by either ONOO
or H2O2 (Fig. 6). This observation suggests
that ERK is not activated directly by ONOO , but instead
requires MEK.
Our findings demonstrate important differences in the mechanisms of
H2O2- and ONOO -induced signal
transduction involving MAPKs. The effect of
H2O2 on MAPK activation is dependent on the
phosphorylation of EGFR, whereas ONOO is capable of
bypassing EGFR and Raf-1 blockades to activate MAPK. Although
H2O2 can be a source of cellular stress
generated from exogenous environmental insult, it is becoming
increasingly clear that intracellular H2O2
functions as a signaling molecule in normal physiological processes to
regulate the phosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR
and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (10, 11). The effect of
H2O2 on EGFR activation to trigger a MAPK
signaling cascade appears to be due to the quenching of
protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity (11, 34). In contrast,
ONOO appears to activate EGFR via nitration of tyrosine
residues, which results in receptor dimerization and
autophosphorylation (15). We have also observed that ONOO
treatment of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts causes nitration and autophosphorylation of EGFR and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor.2
We provide evidence for the first time that ONOO directly
activates MEK (i.e. autophosphorylation) in a cell-free
system that excluded other proteins (Fig. 7).
H2O2 did not activate MEK-1 in the cell-free
system. As has been shown for ONOO -induced
autophosphorylation of EGFR (15), it is likely that a nitration
reaction is responsible for autophosphorylation of MEK-1 by
ONOO , and we showed that GST-MEK-1 was nitrated in a
concentration-dependent manner that correlated with the
amount of ONOO that was required to induce
autophosphorylation (Fig. 7). We excluded the possible contribution of
phosphatase inhibition as a mechanism of ONOO -induced
MEK-1 activation since the cell-free phosphorylation assay excluded phosphatases.
We addressed the biological relevance of ONOO -induced
MAPK activation. Since mitogenesis is the paradigm of EGFR activation and ONOO activated EGFR, we first investigated the effect
of ONOO on DNA synthesis using a
[3H]thymidine incorporation assay. Although EGF was a
potent stimulator of mitogenesis in rat lung myofibroblasts,
ONOO caused a concentration-dependent decrease in
mitogenesis (Fig. 8), and this was due to a reduction in cell survival
as determined by the MTT cytotoxicity assay (Fig. 9). Our finding that
the MEK inhibitor PD98059 prevented ONOO - and
H2O2-induced cytotoxicity was surprising since
activation of the ERK pathway is necessary for proliferative and cell
survival responses (35). Indeed, both EGF-induced DNA synthesis and
ONOO -induced cytotoxicity in myofibroblasts were blocked
by PD98059. Thus, in the same cell type, MEK is critical for both
proliferative and cytotoxic responses, depending on the stimulus. Other
investigators have made observations similar to ours in other systems.
Bhat and Zhang (36) reported that PD98059 protected oligodendrocytes from the cytotoxic effects of H2O2. Jimenez
et al. (37) showed that asbestos- and
H2O2-induced pleural mesothelial cell death was
abrogated by the MEK inhibitor PD98059. The mechanism through which MEK
or ERK mediates cytotoxicity in response to ONOO or other
oxidants is unclear. One possibility is that activation of ERK along
with simultaneous activation of other kinases (e.g. p38 or
JNK) could lead to a cell death response, whereas EGF does not activate
these other kinases in myofibroblasts. It is known that oxidants,
including H2O2 and ONOO , activate
all three families of MAPKs (12, 18). Thus, we suggest that activation
of the ERK pathway by ONOO or
H2O2 may be required (but not sufficient) for a
cytotoxic response.
In summary, we report that ONOO independently activates
components of the MAPK signaling cascade that involves EGFR, Raf-1, and
MEK-1. Although H2O2-induced ERK activation was
completely blocked at the level of EGFR phosphorylation,
ONOO could bypass blockade of either EGFR tyrosine kinase
or Raf-1 kinase and cause ERK activation. ONOO caused
nitration and autophosphorylation of GST-MEK-1 fusion protein in a
cell-free system, suggesting that formation of nitrotyrosine activates
MEK-1. These findings indicate that the mechanism of MAPK activation by
ONOO is fundamentally different from that of
H2O2-induced MAPK activation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Ron Mason and Thomas Eling
(NIEHS) for helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.
Special thanks are due to Dr. Ron Mason for invaluable input during the
course of the study. We are grateful to Annette Rice and Benita Parker for isolation and maintenance of rat pulmonary myofibroblasts.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the NIEHS Division of Intramural
Research (to P. Z., Y.-X. W., and J. C. B.) and by NHLBI Grant HL-54196 (to E. K.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NIEHS, P. O. Box
12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-541-0766; Fax:
919-541-4133; E-mail: bonnerj@niehs.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 8, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910425199
2
P. Zhang and J. C. Bonner, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAPKs, mitogen-activated protein kinases;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor;
SFDM, serum-free defined medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
PHAS, phosphorylated heat- and
acid-stable protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rosen, G. M.,
Pou, S.,
Ramos, C. L.,
Cohen, M. S.,
and Britigan, B. E.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
200-209
|
| 2.
|
Beckman, J. S.,
and Koppenol, W. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1424-C1437
|
| 3.
|
Carreras, M. C.,
Pargament, G. A.,
Catz, S. D.,
Poderoso, J. J.,
and Boveris, A.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
341,
65-68
|
| 4.
|
Pryor, W. A.,
and Squadrito, G. L.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
L699-L722
|
| 5.
|
Ischiropoulos, H.,
Zhu, L.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1992)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
298,
446-451
|
| 6.
|
Zhu, L.,
Gunn, C.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1995)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
298,
452-457
|
| 7.
|
Tanaka, S.,
Choe, N.,
Hemenway, D. R.,
Zhu, S.,
Matalon, S.,
and Kagan, E.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
445-454
|
| 8.
|
Haddad, I. Y.,
Pataki, G.,
Hu, P.,
Galliani, C.,
Beckman, J. S.,
and Matalon, S.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
2407-2413
|
| 9.
|
Saleh, D.,
Barnes, P. J.,
and Giaid, A.
(1997)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
155,
1763-1769
|
| 10.
|
Sundaresan, M., Yu, Z.-X.,
Ferrans, V. J.,
Irani, K.,
and Finkel, T.
(1995)
Science
270,
296-299
|
| 11.
|
Bae, Y. S.,
Kang, S. W.,
Seo, M. S.,
Baines, I. C.,
Tekle, E.,
Chock, P. B.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
217-221
|
| 12.
|
Guyton, K. Z.,
Liu, Y.,
Gorospe, M.,
Xu, Q.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4138-4142
|
| 13.
|
Goldkorn, T.,
Balaban, N.,
Matsukuma, K.,
Chea, V.,
Gould, R.,
Last, G.,
Chan, C.,
and Chavez, C.
(1998)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
19,
786-798
|
| 14.
|
Zhang, J.,
Jin, N.,
Liu, Y.,
and Roades, R. A.
(1998)
Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol.
19,
324-332
|
| 15.
|
van der Vliet, A.,
Hristova, M.,
Cross, C. E.,
Eiserich, J. P.,
and Goldkorn, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31860-31866
|
| 16.
|
Lander, H. M.,
Jocavina, A. T.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Tauras, J. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19705-19709
|
| 17.
|
Oh-hashi, K.,
Maruyama, W.,
Yi, H.,
Takahashi, T.,
Naoi, M.,
and Isobe, K.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
263,
504-509
|
| 18.
|
Schieke, S. M.,
Brivida, K.,
Klotz, L.-O.,
and Sies, H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
448,
301-303
|
| 19.
|
Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
42,
459-467
|
| 20.
|
Kyriakis, J. M.,
App, H.,
Zhang, X. F.,
Banerjee, P.,
Brautigan, D. L.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Avruch, J.
(1992)
Nature
358,
417-421
|
| 21.
|
MacDonald, S. G.,
Crews, C. M.,
Wu, L.,
Driller, J.,
Clark, R.,
Erikson, L.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6615-6620
|
| 22.
|
Coin, P. G.,
Lindroos, P. M.,
Bird, G. S. J.,
Osornio-Vargas, A. R.,
Roggli, V. L.,
and Bonner, J. C.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
4797-4806
|
| 23.
|
Bonner, J. C.,
Lindroos, P. M.,
Rice, A. B.,
Moomaw, C. R.,
and Morgan, D. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
L72-L80
|
| 24.
|
Radi, R.,
Beckman, J. S.,
Bush, K. M.,
and Freeman, B. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4244-4250
|
| 25.
|
Shin, J. T.,
Barbeito, L.,
MacMillan-Crow, L. A.,
Beckman, J. S.,
and Thompson, J. A.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
335,
32-41
|
| 26.
|
Lindroos, P. M.,
Rice, A. B.,
Wang, Y.-Z.,
and Bonner, J. C.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
3464-3468
|
| 27.
|
Lin, T. A.,
Kong, X.,
Haystead, T. A.,
Pause, A.,
Belsham, G.,
Sonenberg, N.,
and Lawrence, J. C., Jr.
(1994)
Science
266,
653-656
|
| 28.
|
Jackson, R. M.,
Parish, G.,
and Helton, E. S.
(1998)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
25,
463-472
|
| 29.
|
Foresti, R.,
Sarathchandra, P.,
Clark, J. E.,
Green, C. J.,
and Motterlini, R.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
339,
729-736
|
| 30.
|
Kondo, H.,
Takahashi, M.,
and Niki, E.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
413,
236-238
|
| 31.
|
Rice, A. B.,
Moomaw, C. R.,
Morgan, D. L.,
and Bonner, J. C.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
155,
213-221
|
| 32.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Dudley, D. T.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27489-27494
|
| 33.
|
Kirsch, M.,
and de Groot, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24664-24670
|
| 34.
|
Hecht, D.,
and Zick, Y.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
188,
773-779
|
| 35.
|
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingaud, J.,
Davis, R.,
and Greenberg, M.
(1995)
Science
270,
326-331
|
| 36.
|
Bhat, N. R.,
and Zhang, P.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
112-119
|
| 37.
|
Jimenez, L. A.,
Zanella, C.,
Fung, H.,
Janssen, Y. M. W.,
Vacek, P.,
Charland, C.,
Goldberg, J.,
and Mossman, B. T.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
L1029-L1035
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. P. Hu, S. B. Patil, M. Panasiewicz, W. Li, J. Hauser, L. E. Humphrey, and M. G. Brattain
Heterogeneity of Receptor Function in Colon Carcinoma Cells Determined by Cross-talk between Type I Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2008;
68(19):
8004 - 8013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Tephly and A. B. Carter
Constitutive NADPH oxidase and increased mitochondrial respiratory chain activity regulate chemokine gene expression
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
November 1, 2007;
293(5):
L1143 - L1155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Tephly and A. B. Carter
Differential Expression and Oxidation of MKP-1 Modulates TNF-{alpha} Gene Expression
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
September 1, 2007;
37(3):
366 - 374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2007;
87(1):
315 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Zhang, Y.-F. Xu, Y.-H. Liu, J. Yin, H.-L. Li, Q. Wang, and J.-Z. Wang
Peroxynitrite induces Alzheimer-like tau modifications and accumulation in rat brain and its underlying mechanisms
FASEB J,
July 1, 2006;
20(9):
1431 - 1442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Saito, A. Yamamoto-Katou, H. Yoshioka, N. Doke, and K. Kawakita
Peroxynitrite Generation and Tyrosine Nitration in Defense Responses in Tobacco BY-2 Cells
Plant Cell Physiol.,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
689 - 697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Levrand, B. Pesse, F. Feihl, B. Waeber, P. Pacher, J. Rolli, M.-D. Schaller, and L. Liaudet
Peroxynitrite Is a Potent Inhibitor of NF-{kappa}B Activation Triggered by Inflammatory Stimuli in Cardiac and Endothelial Cell Lines
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 14, 2005;
280(41):
34878 - 34887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Rangasamy, J. Guo, W. A. Mitzner, J. Roman, A. Singh, A. D. Fryer, M. Yamamoto, T. W. Kensler, R. M. Tuder, S. N. Georas, et al.
Disruption of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to severe airway inflammation and asthma in mice
J. Exp. Med.,
July 5, 2005;
202(1):
47 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Midwinter, A. V. Peskin, M. C. M. Vissers, and C. C. Winterbourn
Extracellular Oxidation by Taurine Chloramine Activates ERK via the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 2004;
279(31):
32205 - 32211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Carter, L. A. Tephly, S. Venkataraman, L. W. Oberley, Y. Zhang, G. R. Buettner, D. R. Spitz, and G. W. Hunninghake
High Levels of Catalase and Glutathione Peroxidase Activity Dampen H2O2 Signaling in Human Alveolar Macrophages
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
July 1, 2004;
31(1):
43 - 53.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Upmacis, R. S. Deeb, M. J. Resnick, R. Lindenbaum, C. Gamss, D. Mittar, and D. P. Hajjar
Involvement of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in peroxynitrite-mediated arachidonic acid release in vascular smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
June 1, 2004;
286(6):
C1271 - C1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Cobbs, T. R. Whisenhunt, D. R. Wesemann, L. E. Harkins, E. G. Van Meir, and M. Samanta
Inactivation of Wild-Type p53 Protein Function by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Malignant Glioma Cells
Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2003;
63(24):
8670 - 8673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Nabeyrat, G. E. Jones, P. S. Fenwick, P. J. Barnes, and L. E. Donnelly
Mitogen-activated protein kinases mediate peroxynitrite-induced cell death in human bronchial epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
June 1, 2003;
284(6):
L1112 - L1120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. W. Lee, S.-S. Lee, S. J. Lee, and H.-D. Um
Bcl-w Is Expressed in a Majority of Infiltrative Gastric Adenocarcinomas and Suppresses the Cancer Cell Death by Blocking Stress-activated Protein Kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Activation
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2003;
63(5):
1093 - 1100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Iwagaki, N. Choe, Y. Li, D. R. Hemenway, and E. Kagan
Asbestos Inhalation Induces Tyrosine Nitration Associated with Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation in the Rat Lung
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
January 1, 2003;
28(1):
51 - 60.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Fazal, W. M. Al-Ghoul, M. J. Schmidt, M. A. Choudhry, and M. M. Sayeed
Lyn- and ERK-mediated vs. Ca2+-mediated neutrophil O2- responses with thermal injury
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
November 1, 2002;
283(5):
C1469 - C1479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Bonner
The epidermal growth factor receptor at the crossroads of airway remodeling
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
September 1, 2002;
283(3):
L528 - L530.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Kim, E. S. Cho, J. K. Seong, and H.-D. Um
Adaptive concentrations of hydrogen peroxide suppress cell death by blocking the activation of SAPK/JNK pathway
J. Cell Sci.,
January 12, 2001;
114(23):
4329 - 4334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. P. Barry, B. Mullan, D. Sheehan, M. G. Kazanietz, F. Shanahan, J. K. Collins, and G. C. O'Sullivan
Constitutive ERK1/2 Activation in Esophagogastric Rib Bone Marrow Micrometastatic Cells Is MEK-independent
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 27, 2001;
276(18):
15537 - 15546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Colavitti, G. Pani, B. Bedogni, R. Anzevino, S. Borrello, J. Waltenberger, and T. Galeotti
Reactive Oxygen Species as Downstream Mediators of Angiogenic Signaling by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/KDR
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 25, 2002;
277(5):
3101 - 3108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|