![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22537-22543, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of
Received for publication, April 9, 2000, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
Exposure of vascular smooth muscle cells to
arginine vasopressin (AVP) increases smooth muscle Vascular smooth muscle cells
(VSMC)1 represent a highly
plastic cell type that displays distinct changes in patterns of gene expression and proliferative rate during development and in association with vascular diseases (1, 2). During normal development VSMC undergo
continuous differentiation from a proliferative phenotype, characteristic of embryonic and neonatal vessels, to a
non-proliferating contractile phenotype associated with adult vessels.
Smooth muscle It is presumed that modulation of VSMC phenotype is mediated through
activation of specific signal transduction pathways that act on
transcription factors. In cultured VSMC, increases in SM- Earlier work from our laboratory showed that induction of SM- Reagents--
The expression plasmid for SRF was a gift of Dr.
Michael Gilman (Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA). Full-length SRF
was made as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product, cut with
XbaI and BamHI, and inserted into pCGN cut with
XbaI and BamHI. The phospho-specific antibody
against SRF was a gift of Dr. Michael Greenberg (Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA), and specifically recognizes SRF phosphorylated at
serine 103 (26). Antibody against SRF used in electrophoretic mobility
shift assays (EMSA) super-shift assays was purchased from Santa Cruz
Pharmaceuticals (Santa Cruz, CA).
VSMC Isolation and Culture--
Rat VSMC were isolated and
cultured as described previously (27, 28). Briefly, thoracic aortas
were dissected from Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) and
incubated in Eagle's MEM containing 2 mg/ml collagenase for 1 h
at 37 °C. The adventitia was removed, and the aortas were minced and
incubated in the MEM collagenase solution at 37 °C for 2 h. The
isolated cells were plated at a density of 1 × 104
cells/ml culture media (Eagle's MEM containing 100 units/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum) in
35-mm culture dishes. Cells were passed by trypsinization and used
between passage numbers 3 to 9.
Reverse Transcription-PCR of JNK Isoforms and JNK Expression
Constructs--
mRNA was isolated from VSMC using the Promega
poly(A)tract 1000 kit. Reverse transcription-PCR reactions were
performed using primers specific for individual JNK isoforms: JNK1 5'
primer, GCAGCTTATGATGCTATTCTTGAA; 3' primer, TGGATGCTGAGAGCCATTGAT;
JNK2 5' primer, GCTGCATTTGATACAGTTCTTGG; 3' primer,
GATCGATGAAGACTGAGAAGGAG; JNK3 5' primer,
AAACATTACAACATGAGCAAAAGCAA(A/T)GT; 3' primer, TGGGAAGAGTTTGGGGAAGGTGAG.
The resultant PCR products were confirmed to be the appropriate JNK
isoform by direct sequencing.
Inhibitory forms of JNKs in which the TPY sequence required for
activation by upstream kinases was replaced by APF were prepared as
described previously (29). Fusion proteins consisting of MKK7 fused to
specific JNK isoforms were prepared as described previously (30) by
fusing the murine MKK7 Assay of p38 MAP Kinase--
VSMC grown to 80-90% confluence
in 60-mm dishes were made quiescent by incubation with Eagle's MEM
plus 0.2% FCS for 12 h. Cells were stimulated with AVP
(10 Transfection and Determination of Reporter Activity in
VSMC--
A genomic clone of the 765-base pair rat SM-
PCR technique was then used to make single point mutations (T to G) at
positions EMSA--
VSMC were grown to confluence and growth arrested for
3 days in media containing 0.2% FCS. The cells were then exposed to AVP or vehicle (control) for the indicated times. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, and nuclear extracts were prepared by a modification of the method of Andrew and Faller (34). Briefly, cell pellets containing 107 cells were resuspended in a 5× volume of
Buffer A (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at
4 °C for 10 min, vortexed, and centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of
Buffer C (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA,
0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer,
and incubated at 4 °C for 20 min. Samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 25,000 × g, and the supernatant was recovered.
Extracts were separated into aliquots and stored at
Single-stranded oligonucleotide probes encoding the CArG elements plus
10 nucleotides of flanking sequence on both sides were custom-designed
as follows: CArG-A sense, 5'-TGTCTTTGCTCCTTGTTTGGGAAGCGAGTG; CArG-AMut sense, 5'-TGTCTTTGCTCCTTGGTTG-GGAAGCGAGTG; CArG-B sense, GTGCTGAGGTCCCTATATGGTTGTGTTAGA; CArG-Bmut sense,
GTGCTGAGGTCCCTAGATGGTTGTGTTAGA. The 5' and 3'
oligonucleotides were annealed by heating for 5 min at 95 °C and
allowing the reaction mixture to slowly return to room temperature.
Probes were radiolabeled using DNA polymerase I large (Klenow) fragment
and [32P]dCTP for CArG-B and [32P]dGTP for
CArG-A. Unincorporated 32P nucleotides were removed by
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the labeled probe was eluted
from the gel. A 30-min binding reaction was performed at 4 °C (20 µl total volume; 5-10 µg of nuclear binding proteins, ~75 pg of
32P-labeled DNA, 0.125 µg of poly(dI-dC) in 12 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 150 mM KCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.3 mM dithiothreitol, and 12% glycerol). For competition
studies, the appropriate concentration of unlabeled DNA was added to
the reaction 30 min before the addition of the radiolabeled probe. In
the super-shift experiments, antibodies were preincubated at 4 °C
for 30 min with the nuclear binding proteins before addition of
32P-labeled DNA. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved on a
5% acrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide, Life Technologies)
and electrophoresed at 25 mAmp/gel for 2 h in 1× TGE (25 mM Tris, 1.0 mM EDTA, 190 mM
glycine). The gels were subsequently dried and exposed to film for autoradiography.
We previously demonstrated that expression of dominant negative
MKK4, which specifically activates JNKs, partially inhibited the
AVP-mediated increase in SM- Since inhibition of JNKs only partially inhibited the ability of AVP to
induce SM-
Induction of Smooth Muscle
-Actin in Vascular Smooth Muscle
Cells by Arginine Vasopressin Is Mediated by c-Jun Amino-terminal
Kinases and p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase*
,
,
,
,
Medicine and
§ Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences
Center, Denver, Colorado 80262
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin
(SM-
-actin) expression through activation of the SM-
-actin
promoter. The goal of this study was to determine the role of the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) family in regulation of
SM-
-actin expression. AVP activated all three MAP kinase family
members: ERKs, JNKs, and p38 MAP kinase. Inhibition of JNKs or p38
decreased AVP-stimulated SM-
-actin promoter activity, whereas
inhibition of ERKs had no effect. A 150-base pair region of the
promoter containing two CArG boxes was sufficient to mediate regulation
by vasoconstrictors. Mutations in either CArG box decreased
AVP-stimulated promoter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
using oligonucleotides corresponding to either CArG box resulted in a
complex of similar mobility whose intensity was increased by AVP.
Antibodies against serum response factor (SRF) completely super-shifted
this complex, indicating that SRF binds to both CArG boxes.
Overexpression of SRF increased basal promoter activity, but activity
was still stimulated by AVP. AVP stimulation rapidly increased SRF
phosphorylation. These data indicate that both JNKs and p38 participate
in regulation of SM-
-actin expression. SRF, which binds to two
critical CArG boxes in the promoter, represents a potential target of
these kinases.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin (SM-
-actin) is probably the earliest marker
of this process, and quantitative changes in SM-
-actin expression
occur during development (3). In pathophysiologic settings such as
atherosclerotic lesions (4) or following creation of intimal lesions by
balloon catheterization, a subpopulation of VSMC undergo a phenotypic conversion to acquire many of the characteristics of neonatal SMC. This
modulation of phenotype is associated with a decrease in expression of
SM-
-actin and increases in non-muscle
-actin expression (5).
-actin expression are observed in response to specific agonists.
Vasoconstrictors such as arginine vasopressin (AVP) or angiotensin II
(6-8) as well as transforming growth factor-
(9) increase
expression, and these effects are mediated largely through increased
transcription. We (10) and others (11) have previously demonstrated
that a 150-base pair region of the rat SM-
-actin promoter is
sufficient to mediate induction by vasoconstrictors in VSMC. This
region contains two CC(A/T)6GG elements, known as CArG
boxes: CArG-B (
121 to
112) and CArG-A (
71 to
62). Multiple CArG
boxes have been identified in promoters of muscle-specific genes
including skeletal and cardiac
-actin (12, 13) and myosin light
chain (14). A CArG box also forms the core of the serum response
element, controlling induction of c-fos. Serum response
factor (SRF), a member of the MADS family of transcription factors
(15), binds to the CArG box in the c-fos promoter (16) as well as to
CArG boxes in promoters of muscle-specific genes (17-19). Induction of
c-fos by mitogens involves formation of a ternary complex
between DNA, SRF, and ternary complex factor (TCF), a member of the
ets family of transcription factors (20). Phosphorylation of
ternary complex factor (TCF) by members of the mitogen-activated
protein kinase (MAP kinase) family is critical for formation of this
complex (21). Although SRF binding to CArG boxes in promoters of
muscle-specific genes appears to be required for increased expression
(17-19), these genes are generally repressed by mitogenic stimuli.
Conversely, induction of these genes during phenotypic modulation is
often associated with withdrawal from the cell cycle and growth arrest. The mechanism whereby SRF acts on these two opposing patterns of gene
expression remains to be determined but is likely to involve interactions with other transcriptional factors mediated through specific signaling pathways.
-actin
promoter activity by AVP is mediated through members of the
Gq family of trimeric G-proteins (22). These studies implicated a role for MAP kinase in this regulation. Three major MAP
kinase families have been described: extracellular-regulated kinases
(ERKs),the c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 MAP kinase
family (23-25). Each of these is activated by specific upstream
kinases: MKK1/2 for extracellular-regulated kinases (ERKs), MKK4/7 for
JNKs, and MKK3/6 for p38 MAP kinase. Expression of dominant negative
MKK4 inhibited the induction of the SM-
-actin promoter by
vasoconstrictors (22). However, the role of other members of the MAP
kinase family has not been examined in detail. The goal of the present
study was to determine the role of the MAP kinase family in regulation
of SM-
-actin expression and identify transcription factors that may
mediate this effect.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 (31) to individual JNK
cDNAs.2
7 M) for the indicated time.
Lysates were prepared by harvesting cells in 250 µl of ice-cold lysis
buffer: 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitors (10 µg/ml
aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin), and phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM sodium
fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM
sodium pyrophosphate). Solubilized proteins were centrifuged at
14,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min. Supernatant protein
was quantified by the Bradford assay. For immunoprecipitation, 400 µg
of cell lysates were incubated with rabbit anti-p38MAPK antibody (Santa
Cruz Pharmaceutical) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with
protein A-Sepharose beads for 2 h at 4 °C. The beads were
washed once with 1 ml of lysis buffer and 2 times with 1 ml of PAN
buffer, pH 7.0 (10 mM PIPES, 100 mM NaCl). The
beads were then suspended in 50 µl of kinase buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 200 mM MgCl2, 20 µM ATP, 20 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 25 mM
-glycerophosphate, pH 7.2, and a recombinant fragment of ATF-21-96 (Santa
Cruz) and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. Reactions were terminated
with 2× Laemmli buffer, and proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, with quantification of activity
by autoradiography and phosphorimaging.
-actin
promoter was isolated and ligated into a promoterless luciferase vector (PA3-Luc) or the pCAT Basic vector (Promega, CATACT(
713/52)) as
described previously (10). For studies examining signaling pathways,
VSMC were transiently transfected using electroporation with 15 µg of
the SM-
-actin-luciferase construct together with 5 µg of a
cytomegalovirus-
-galactosidase vector (CLONTECH)
and 5 µg of plasmids encoding signaling enzymes or pcDNA-3 as a
control as described previously (10). Cells were incubated for 18 h in Eagle's MEM media with 10% FCS as described previously and then
placed in Eagle's MEM media with 0.2% FCS with or without AVP
(10
6 M) for 72 h. Cells were
then harvested, and luciferase and
-galactosidase activity
determined as described previously (32). Results are expressed as
luciferase units normalized to
-galactosidase.
66 and
115 in CArG-A and CArG-B, respectively, or to make
the double mutant. Oligonucleotides for the point mutations were
custom-designed and obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.:
CArG-Amut sense, 5'-TTTGCTCCTTGGTTGGGAAGC, and CArG-Bmut sense, 5'-TGAGGTCCCTAGATGGTTGTG, where the bold type
indicates the mutation. Oligonucleotides for the end sequences of the
SM-
-actin promoter were as described previously (10) and contained a
HindIII site (5') or an XbaI site (3'). The
resulting PCR products were ligated into the HindIII and
XbaI sites of the pCCAT Basic vector (CATCArG-AMut,
CATCArG-Bmut, and CATCARrG-ABMut). The sequences of the double-stranded
cDNAs were verified using the SEQUENASE version 2.0 kit from United
States Biochemical Corp. Plasmids were grown in Escherichia
coli DH5
and purified by an alkaline lysis procedure with
purification over an anion-exchange resin (Qiagen Inc.). Cells were
transfected as described above. After incubation with or without AVP,
cells were harvested by trypsinization, and the cell pellets were
frozen in liquid N2. CAT activity was measured using a
modification of the thin-layer chromatographic method as described
previously (33). Results are expressed as pmol of chloramphenicol
acetylated/h/milliunit of
-galactosidase.
70 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin promoter activity (22). Since
multiple forms of JNK have been identified by molecular cloning, we
sought to determine which isoforms were expressed in VSMC. By reverse
transcription-PCR analysis and direct sequencing of the PCR product,
all three gene products (JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3) were expressed in these
cells (data not shown). Although the expression of JNK1 and JNK2 has
been shown to be widespread, JNK3 expression has only been reported in
a limited number of tissues including heart and brain (25). To test the
role of individual isoforms in the regulation of SM-
-actin
expression, VSMC were transiently co-transfected with the SM-
-actin
promoter construct along with dominant-negative isoforms of JNK in
which the sequence TPY, required for activation by upstream kinases,
had been mutated to APF (35). Expression of APF mutants of JNK1, JNK2,
or JNK3 inhibited induction of the SM-
-actin promoter by either AVP
or angiotensin II (Fig. 1). Zheng
et al. (30) report that fusion of JNKs to their upstream activating kinases (MKK7) results in constitutively active forms of JNK
(30). We have prepared similar constructs based on the findings of
these authors and have demonstrated that they have constitutive
activity.2 Co-transfection of multiple MKK7/JNK fusions
together with the SM-
-actin promoter resulted in a 3-4-fold
increase in promoter activity in the absence of AVP stimulation (Fig.
2).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression of dominant negative JNK isoforms
inhibits induction of SM-
-actin promoter by
vasoconstrictors. VSMC were transiently transfected with the
SM-
-actin promoter (15 µg) along with plasmids encoding dominant
negative forms (APF) of individual JNK isoforms (5 µg) or control
plasmid (pcDNA-3). Cells were then stimulated with AVP or
angiotensin II (AII) for 3 d, and promoter activity
normalized to
-galactosidase was determined. Results represent the
mean of three independent experiments performed in duplicate, with the
S.E. indicated.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of constitutively active MKK7/JNK
fusions stimulates SM-
-actin promoter
activity. VSMC were transiently co-transfected with the
SM-
-actin promoter along with 5 µg of plasmids encoding MKK7
fusions with the indicated JNK isoform. Cells were then incubated for 3 days with media containing 0.2% FBS. Separate dishes were transfected
without the MKK7 fusions and stimulated with AVP or 0.2% FBS for 3 days. Cells were harvested, and promoter activity normalized to
-galactosidase determined. Results represent the mean of three
independent experiments performed in duplicate with the S.E. indicated.
*, p < 0.05 versus basal.
-actin, we examined the role of p38 MAP kinase in
regulating expression of the promoter. Stimulation of VSMC with AVP
increased p38 MAP kinase, as determined by immunoprecipitation with
anti-p38 antibodies and phosphorylation of ATF-2 in the immunocomplex (Fig. 3). Maximal stimulation
(~3-4-fold) was observed at 5-10 min and had decreased by 30 min.
The stimulation was approximately 20% of that seen in cells exposed to
UV light for 1 min. Treatment of cells with a SB203580, a specific p38
inhibitor (36) inhibited AVP-mediated induction of the SM-
-actin
promoter in a dose-dependent fashion, with half-maximal
inhibition occurring between 2 and 5 µM (Fig.
4A). In contrast, PD98059, a
specific MEK inhibitor (37), had no effect on either basal or
AVP-stimulated SM-
-actin promoter activity (Fig. 4B).
Conversely, expression of constitutively active MKK6, which
specifically activates p38 MAP kinase (38), increased SM-
-actin
promoter activity to the same level seen with AVP stimulation of cells
not expressing constitutively active MKK6 (Fig.
5). This increase was blocked by treating
the cells with SB203580.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stimulation of p38 MAP kinase in VSMC.
VSMC were serum-restricted overnight and then stimulated with
10
7 M AVP for 2, 5, 10, 15, or 30 min. A separate dish of cells was stimulated for 1 min with UV light
and incubated for an additional 30 min. Cells were lysed and
immunoprecipitated with anti-p38 antibodies. After washing, the
immunoprecipitates were assayed for kinase activity using recombinant
ATF-2. Samples were analyzed by SDS-gels followed by autoradiography
and quantitated with a PhosphorImager. A representative experiment is
shown. B, basal.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of MAP kinase inhibitors on induction
of SM-
-actin promoter by AVP. Panel
A, VSMC transfected with the SM-
-actin promoter construct were
stimulated for 3 days with AVP in the presence of the indicated
concentration of SB203580. Cells were harvested and analyzed for
luciferase activity normalized to
-galactosidase. Results represent
the mean of three experiments performed in duplicate with the S.E.
indicated. *, p < 0.05 versus AVP in the
absence of inhibitor. Panel B, identical cells transfected
with the same plasmids were incubated with AVP in the presence of 50 µM PD90859. Luciferase activity was determined as in
panel A.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Constitutively active MKK6 increases
SM-
-actin promoter activity. VSMC were
co-transfected with the SM-
-actin promoter and either pcDNA-3 or
plasmid encoding constitutively active MKK6. Cells not transfected with
MKK6 were then stimulated with media containing AVP or 0.2% FBS alone
(Basal) in the presence or absence of 10 µM
SB203580. Cells transfected with MKK6 were incubated with media
containing 0.2% FBS. After 3 days, cells were harvested, and promoter
activity was determined. Results represent the mean of four independent
experiments with the S.E. indicated. *, p < 0.05 versus basal. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
To identify potential targets of these kinase pathways, we sought to
characterize critical elements of the SM-
-actin promoter and
identify transcription factors that bind to these elements. Point
mutations in each of the two CArG boxes were prepared by PCR and
ligated into a promoterless CAT vector. VSMC were transfected with the
respective constructs, and CAT activity was determined after incubation
of cells for 3 days in the presence or absence of AVP, PDGF, or both
agents. A point mutation in either CArG box resulted in a marked
decrease in both basal and AVP-stimulated CAT activity (Fig.
6). Constructs encoding a mutation in
CArG-B retained greater levels of promoter activity in response to AVP than mutations in CArG-A. A construct in which both CArG boxes were
simultaneously mutated did not show any increased CAT activity in
response to AVP. Mutations in the individual CArG boxes also blunted
the increase in SM-
-actin promoter activity induced by transient
expression of constitutively active
16(
16Q212L), (data not shown).
|
Complexes formed with the individual CArG boxes were analyzed by EMSA
using nuclear extracts prepared from control and AVP-treated VSMC.
Incubation of nuclear extracts with 32P-labeled CArG-B
revealed a single major complex (Fig.
7A). Exposure of cells to AVP
increased the intensity of this band by as early as 4-6 h, and this
increase was maintained for at least 24 h(data not shown). The labeled
complex was competed off by double-stranded cold oligonucleotides (Fig.
7, DS) but not by single-stranded sense (SS) or
antisense oligonucleotides (not shown). Incubation of the same extracts
with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide containing the point
mutation shown in Fig. 6 did not result in the appearance of this band.
EMSA with 32P-CArG-A and identical extracts produced a
major specific band of similar mobility as seen with CArG-B (Fig.
7B). The lower bands seen in this figure appear to represent
binding to single-stranded DNA or nonspecific complexes. The intensity
of this band was also increased in extracts from AVP-stimulated cells.
With equal concentrations of oligonucleotide and extract protein, the
intensity of the band seen with CArG-A was significantly less intense
than that seen with CArG-B (exposure time in Fig. 7A was
three times as long as Fig. 7B). As with CArG-B, this
complex was not detected using 32P-CArG-Amut (data not
shown).
|
Previous studies indicate that one of the transcription factors binding
to CArG boxes in this promoter is SRF (11, 39). Incubation of nuclear
extracts with antibodies against SRF completely super-shifted the
complex formed with both 32P-CArG-B and
32P-CArG-A in both extracts from control and AVP-stimulated
cells (Fig. 7, A and B), indicating that SRF
constitutively forms part of these complexes. To assess the functional
role of SRF, VSMC were co-transfected with an expression plasmid
encoding full-length SRF (a gift of Dr. Michael Gilman, Ariad
Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge MA) along with the SM-
-actin promoter
construct. Overexpression of SRF increased basal promoter activity to
levels greater than seen with AVP alone (Fig.
8). Exposure to AVP caused a further increase in promoter activity in cells overexpressing SRF.
Overexpression of SRF also increased promoter activity with the
CArG-BMut; activity in AVP-treated cells was about 70% that seen with
the wild-type promoter in the absence of SRF overexpression. With the
CArG-AMut, overexpression of SRF did not increase basal promoter
activity but increased activity in AVP-stimulated cells to
approximately 25% that of the levels detected using the wild-type
promoter without SRF overexpression. These results indicate that
increased SRF expression has a greater effect on CArG-B. To confirm
this finding we employed a truncated version of the SM-
-actin
promoter in which CArG-B had been deleted (
102). Overexpression of
SRF had no significant effect on the promoter activity of this
construct either in the absence of presence of AVP stimulation.
Expression of SRF failed to increase promoter activity using the double
mutant in which both CArG boxes have been altered (data not shown).
|
Expression levels of SRF protein were examined by immunoblotting.
Exposure of VSMC to either AVP, angiotensin II, or PDGF for up to
72 h did not significantly alter SRF expression (Fig. 9A). Stimulation of
fibroblasts by growth factors has been shown to increase
phosphorylation of SRF at serine 103 (26). Using a phospho-specific SRF
antibody (a gift of Dr. Michael Greenberg, Harvard Medical School), the
effect of AVP on SRF phosphorylation was determined. AVP rapidly
increased SRF phosphorylation by 5 min, and this effect was sustained
for at least 30 min (Fig. 9B). By densitometry, the increase
in phosphorylation at 15 min was 3-4-fold.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data from our laboratory and those of others have demonstrated
that vasoconstrictors increase expression of SM-
-actin in VSMC
through transcriptional activation of the promoter. We have previously
presented data suggesting that the JNK family of MAP kinases
participate in induction of the promoter by AVP by co-transfection of a
dominant negative JNK kinase, MKK4 (22). In this study we have
confirmed a role for JNKs using two distinct strategies. Inhibitory
forms of individual JNK isoforms (APF) blocked vasoconstrictor-mediated induction, and expression of MKK7/JNK fusions, which are constitutively active, increased promoter activity in the absence of vasoconstrictor stimulation. In both of these studies we did not detect any selectivity for individual JNK isoforms. Since the inhibitory constructs only partially inhibited induction of SM-
-actin, it is likely that additional signaling pathways are involved in regulation of the promoter. From these studies, the p38 MAP kinase pathway clearly plays
an important role. Pharmacologic inhibition of p38 MAP kinase completely blocked induction of SM-
-actin promoter activity by AVP,
and a constitutively active form of MKK6, a specific p38 MAP kinase
kinase, induced promoter activity to a similar extent as stimulation
with AVP. We would therefore propose that regulation of the
SM-
-actin promoter is multifactorial, involving both JNKs and p38.
The relative contributions of each pathway are difficult to assess. The
magnitude and duration of kinase activation in AVP-stimulated cells is
more transient than the sustained activation seen with expression of
constitutively active isoforms. From studies using expression of
Jun-Gal4 and UAS-luc, it appears that dominant negative forms of MKK4
or JNKs do not completely block the activation of wild-type JNKs (data
not shown). It is therefore conceivable that the partial effects seen
in Figs. 1 and 2 may be a result of incomplete inhibition of endogenous
JNK activity by the dominant negative constructs. Finally, although the
activation of JNKs by expression of MKK7/JNK constructs is sustained,
the magnitude is less than the more transient peak of activity seen
with wild-type JNKs activated by vasoconstrictors. The availability of
specific pharmacological inhibitors of the JNK pathway will facilitate assessment of the role of this pathway in regulation of SM-
-actin expression by AVP.
We presume that the effects of these kinase pathways on regulation of
SM-
-actin promoter activity is mediated through phosphorylation of
downstream transcription factors that bind to critical regulatory elements. We have previously shown that a 150-base pair region of the
SM-
-actin promoter, which contains two CArG boxes, is sufficient to
mediate stimulation of the promoter by vasoconstrictors (10). Our
results employing point mutations demonstrate that both CArG boxes are
required for AVP stimulation of the promoter and that mutations within
the central A/T-rich hexamer are sufficient to disrupt regulated
transcription. These mutations also blocked induction of the promoter
by transient expression of
16Q212L, a constitutively
active forms of
16 (data not shown), consistent with our
previous results that vasoconstrictors and
16Q212L act through the same pathways to induce SM-
-actin expression (22).
SRF is a transcription factor that has been shown to bind to CArG boxes
in a variety of promoters, including those of immediate early genes
such as c-fos (16) as well as muscle-specific genes (11, 17,
40, 41). By EMSA analysis with nuclear extracts from VSMC, we have
demonstrated that SRF forms a component of the complex detected with
each of the two proximal CArG boxes of the SM-
-actin promoter. The
relative intensities of the complexes formed suggest that SRF binds
with greater affinity to CArG-B than to CArG-A, consistent with what
has been observed by other investigators (11). This is confirmed by the
finding that non-radioactive oligonucleotides corresponding to CArG-B
displace complexes formed with 32P-CArG-B or
32P-CArG-A more potently than non-radioactive CArG-A.
Formation of SRF-containing complexes appears to be critical for
activation of the promoter, since mutations in the A/T-rich central
region of the CArG boxes dramatically decreased both the amount of
complex detected and promoter activity. This region has been shown to be critical for SRF binding to the CArG box contained within the c-fos promoter (42).
Although SRF appears to be constitutively bound to these elements, we observed increases in the intensity of the complexes formed within cells stimulated with AVP. Similar increases have been reported in extracts of cells stimulated with angiotensin II (11). Since AVP did not increase protein expression of SRF, we propose that post-translational modifications of SRF may result in increased affinity for individual CArG boxes. Studies examining growth factor induction of the c-fos promoter demonstrate that increased phosphorylation of SRF at serine 103 contributes to transcriptional activation by increasing the affinity of SRF for the CArG box forming the core of the serum response element (26). Using a phospho-specific antibody specific for serine 103, we have shown that AVP stimulation rapidly increases SRF phosphorylation at this site.
We have not determined how SRF phosphorylation mediates activation of
the promoter. One possibility, analogous to what occurs in the c-fos
promoter, is that phosphorylation increases the affinity of SRF for the
CArG boxes in the SM-
-actin promoter. Increased steady state binding
of SRF would then lead to increased transcription. Support for such a
model is provided by the observation that overexpression of SRF, which
increases the concentration of SRF and favors increased binding, was
sufficient to mediate an increase in SM-
-actin promoter activity,
even in the absence of vasoconstrictor stimulation (Fig. 8). However,
AVP stimulation of cells overexpressing SRF resulted in further
increases in promoter activity, suggesting additional mechanisms are
operative. Phosphorylation of SRF may be required for formation of
higher order complexes of transcription factors and co-activators.
These factors remain to be identified, although several factors that
may modulate SRF binding have been described.
YY1 has been shown to enhance the affinity of SRF binding to the
c-fos promoter by causing structural changes in the DNA
(43). However, other studies demonstrate antagonism of the effects of SRF by YY1 on expression of skeletal and cardiac 
actin genes (13,
44-46). Our studies to date have not detected complexes containing YY1
binding to either CArG box of the SM-
-actin promoter (data not
shown). Homeobox proteins such as Phox1 have also been shown to enhance
SRF binding (47). In this case this effect was not mediated through
direct binding of Phox to DNA. A role for the homeobox protein Mhox has
been proposed to mediate induction of the SM-
-actin promoter by
angiotensin II (11). It is likely, as suggested by other workers, that
binding of SRF to multiple CArG boxes coordinates the formation of a
higher order complex necessary for increases transcription of the
SM-
-actin gene (48). SRF phosphorylation may be critical for this process.
In summary, our studies indicate that increased transcription of the
SM-
-actin gene by AVP is mediated through integration of both JNKs
and p38 MAP kinase. These pathways act on factors binding to two CArG
boxes that lie within the first 150 base pairs of the promoter region.
SRF, which is rapidly phosphorylated following AVP stimulation, binds
to both boxes. Increased SRF phosphorylation through either JNK or
p38-dependent pathways may be critical for forming larger
complexes and engaging the transcriptional machinery.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Michael Gilman and Michael Greenberg for providing the expression vector for SRF and the phospho-SRF specific antibodies and Dr. Lynn Heasley for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK 19928, DK 39902, and HL 62824.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Box C-281, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. Ninth Ave., Denver, CO 80262. Tel.: 303-315-6733; Fax: 303-315-4852; E-mail: Raphael.Nemenoff@UCHSC.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003000200
2 S.-Y. Han, and L. E. Heasley, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
VSMC, vascular
smooth muscle cells;
MEM, minimal essential media;
SM-
-actin, smooth
muscle
-actin;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth
factor;
AVP, arginine vasopressin;
SRF, serum response factor;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
JNK, c-Jun amino-terminal kinase;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic
acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Owens, G. K. (1995) Physiol. Rev. 75, 487-517 |
| 2. | Campbell, J. H., Tachas, G., Black, M. J., Cockerill, G., and Campbell, G. R. (1991) Basic Res. Cardiol. 86, 3-11 |
| 3. | Owens, G. K., and Wise, G. (1997) Agents Actions Suppl. 48, 3-24 |
| 4. | Ross, R., Wight, T. N., Strandness, E., and Thiele, B. (1984) Am. J. Pathol. 114, 79-93 |
| 5. | Gabbiani, G., Kocher, O., Bloom, W. S., Vanderkerckhove, J., and Weber, K. (1984) J. Clin. Invest. 73, 148-152 |
| 6. | Geisterfer, A. A. T., Peach, M. J., and Owens, G. K. (1988) Circ. Res. 62, 749-756 |
| 7. | Geisterfer, A. A. T., and Owens, G. K. (1989) Hypertension 14, 413-420 |
| 8. | Berk, B. C., and Alexander, R. W. (1989) Biochem. Pharmacol. 38, 219-225 |
| 9. | Kocher, O., and Madri, J. A. (1989) In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 25, 424-434 |
| 10. | Van Putten, V., Li, X., Maselli, J., and Nemenoff, R. A. (1994) Circ. Res. 75, 1126-1130 |
| 11. | Hautmann, M. B., Thompson, M. M., Swartz, E. A., Olson, E. N., and Owens, G. K. (1997) Circ. Res. 81, 600-610 |
| 12. | Muscat, G. E. O., Gustafson, T. A., and Kedes, L. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4120-4133 |
| 13. | MacLellan, W. R., Lee, T.-C., Schwartz, R. J., and Schneider, M. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16754-16760 |
| 14. | Catala, F., Wanner, R., Barton, P., Cohen, A., Wright, W., and Buckingham, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4585-4596 |
| 15. | Shore, P., and Sharrocks, A. D. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 1-13 |
| 16. | Treisman, R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 2711-2717 |
| 17. | Lee, T.-C., Chow, K.-L., Fang, P., and Schwartz, R. J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5090-5100 |
| 18. | Boxer, L. M., Miwa, T., Gustafson, T. A., and Kedes, L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1284-1292 |
| 19. | Shimuzu, R. T., Blank, R. S., Jervis, R., Lawrenz-Smith, S. C., and Owens, G. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7631-7643 |
| 20. | Gille, H., Sharrocks, A. D., and Shaw, P. E. (1992) Nature 358, 414-417 |
| 21. | Hill, C. S., and Treisman, R. (1994) Cell 80, 199-211 |
| 22. | Higashita, R., Li, L., Van Putten, V., Yamamura, M., Zarinetchi, F., Heasley, L. E., and Nemenoff, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25845-25850 |
| 23. | Whitmarsh, A. J., and Davis, R. J. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 481-485 |
| 24. | Takahashi, E., and Berk, B. C. (1998) Acta Physiol. Scand. 164, 611-621 |
| 25. | Ip, Y. T., and Davis, R. J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 205-219 |
| 26. | Rivera, V. M., Miranti, C. K., Misra, R. P., Ginty, D. D., Chen, R. H., Blenis, J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6260-6273 |
| 27. | Caramelo, C., Tsai, P., and Schrier, R. W. (1988) Biochem. J. 254, 625-629 |
| 28. | Meyer-Lehnert, H., Takeda, K., and Schrier, R. W. (1988) Am J. Physiol. 254, F254-F266 |
| 29. | Butterfield, L., Storey, B., Maas, L., and Heasley, L. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10110-10116 |
| 30. | Zheng, C., Xiang, J., Hunter, T., and Lin, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28966-28971 |
| 31. | Tournier, C., Whitmarsh, A. J., Cavanagh, J., Barrett, T., and Davis, R. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1569-1581 |
| 32. | Heasley, L. E., Thaler, S., Nicks, M., Price, B., Skorecki, K., and Nemenoff, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14501-14504 |
| 33. | Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., and Howard, B. H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051 |
| 34. | Andrew, N. C., and Faller, D. V. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499 |
| 35. | Butterfield, L., Zentrich, E., Beekman, A., and Heasley, L. E. (1999) Biochem. J. 338, 681-686 |
| 36. | Lee, J. C., Laydon, J. T., McDonnell, P. C., Gallagher, T. F., Kumar, S., Green, D., McNulty, D., Blumenthal, M. J., Heys, J. R., Landvatter, S. W., Strickler, J. E., McLaughlin, M. M., Siemens, I. R., Fisher, S. M., Livi, G. P., White, J. R., Adams, J. L., and Young, P. R. (1994) Nature 372, 739-746 |
| 37. | Dudley, D. T., Pang, L., Decker, S. J., Bridges, A. J., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7686-7689 |
| 38. | Han, J., Lee, J. D., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2886-2891 |
| 39. | Hautmann, M. B., Madsen, C. S., and Owens, G. K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10948-10956 |
| 40. | McDonough, P. M., Hanford, D. S., Sprenkle, A. B., Mellon, N. R., and Glembotski, C. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24046-24053 |
| 41. | Kim, S., Ip, H. S., Lu, M. M., Clendenin, C., and Parmacek, M. S. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2266-2278 |
| 42. | Pellegrini, L., Tan, S., and Richmon, T. J. (1995) Nature 376, 490-498 |
| 43. | Nateson, S., and Gilman, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5975-5982 |
| 44. | Gualberto, A., LePage, D., Pons, G., Mader, S. L., Park, K., Atchison, M. L., and Walsh, K. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4209-4214 |
| 45. | Lee, T.-C., Shi, Y., and Schwartz, R. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9814-9818 |
| 46. | Chen, C. Y., and Schwartz, R. J. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 812-822 |
| 47. | Grueneberg, D. A., Natesan, S., Alexandre, C., and Gilman, M. Z. (1992) Science 257, 1089-1095 |
| 48. | Mack, C. P., Thompson, M. M., Lawrenz-Smith, S., and Owens, G. K. (2000) Circ. Res. 86, 221-232 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Izumi, Y. Nakayama, H. Memetimin, T. Inoue, Y. Kohda, H. Nonoguchi, and K. Tomita Regulation of V2R transcription by hypertonicity and V1aR-V2R signal interaction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1170 - F1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sebe, S.-K. Leivonen, A. Fintha, A. Masszi, L. Rosivall, V.-M. Kahari, and I. Mucsi Transforming growth factor-{beta}-induced alpha-smooth muscle cell actin expression in renal proximal tubular cells is regulated by p38{beta} mitogen-activated protein kinase, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1,2 and the Smad signalling during epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1537 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Jeon, H. J. Moon, M. J. Lee, H. Y. Song, Y. M. Kim, Y. C. Bae, J. S. Jung, and J. H. Kim Sphingosylphosphorylcholine induces differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into smooth-muscle-like cells through a TGF-{beta}-dependent mechanism J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2006; 119(23): 4994 - 5005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Deaton, C. Su, T. G. Valencia, and S. R. Grant Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-induced Expression of Smooth Muscle Marker Genes Involves Activation of PKN and p38 MAPK J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 31172 - 31181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kaplan-Albuquerque, V. Van Putten, M. C. Weiser-Evans, and R. A. Nemenoff Depletion of Serum Response Factor by RNA Interference Mimics the Mitogenic Effects of Platelet Derived Growth Factor-BB in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Circ. Res., September 2, 2005; 97(5): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Winn, L. Marek, S.-Y. Han, K. Rodriguez, N. Rodriguez, M. Hammond, M. Van Scoyk, H. Acosta, J. Mirus, N. Barry, et al. Restoration of Wnt-7a Expression Reverses Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cellular Transformation through Frizzled-9-mediated Growth Inhibition and Promotion of Cell Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19625 - 19634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kaplan-Albuquerque, Y. E. Bogaert, V. Van Putten, M. C. Weiser-Evans, and R. A. Nemenoff Patterns of Gene Expression Differentially Regulated by Platelet-derived Growth Factor and Hypertrophic Stimuli in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: MARKERS FOR PHENOTYPIC MODULATION AND RESPONSE TO INJURY J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19966 - 19976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Masszi, L. Fan, L. Rosivall, C. A. McCulloch, O. D. Rotstein, I. M |