![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 29, 22558-22562, July 21, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 19, 2000, and in revised form, April 26, 2000
We have sought to determine whether insulin-like
growth factor I (IGF-I) regulates the levels of insulin receptor
substrate-1 (IRS-1) in prostate epithelial cells. Exposure of prostate
epithelial cells to IGF-I in the absence of other growth factors leads
to a reduction in IRS-1 levels. Ubiquitin content of IRS-1 is increased in the presence of IGF-I, and inhibitors of the proteasome prevented the reduction of IRS-1 levels seen following IGF-I exposure. These results imply that IRS-1 is targeted to the proteasome upon exposure to
IGF-I. The addition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) maintained IRS-1
levels even in the presence of IGF-I and inhibits
IGF-I-dependent ubiquitination of IRS-1. Thus, these two
growth factors, IGF-I and EGF, had antagonistic effects on IRS-1
protein levels in prostate epithelial cells. This regulation of IRS-1
reveals a novel level of cross-talk between the IGF-I and EGF signal
pathways, which may have implications in tumors that harbor activating
mutations in the EGF receptor.
Insulin and the insulin-like growth factors I and II (IGF-I and
IGF-II)1 are a family of
structurally related polypeptide growth factors. Insulin is primarily
involved in metabolic responses, specifically glucose metabolism (1,
2), whereas IGF-I and IGF-II are mediators of cell proliferation and
regulate body size during both prenatal and postnatal development
(3-5). The biologic responses of both IGF-I and IGF-II are mediated by
the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR), which shows
80% homology to the insulin receptor (IR) (6). The IGF-IR is a
heterotetrameric transmembrane glycoprotein composed of two
extracellular The IRS-1 protein is part of a family of related proteins that includes
at least four members, IRS-1, IRS-2 IRS-3, and IRS-4 (8-13). The IRS
proteins contain a conserved, amino-terminal pleckstrin homology domain
adjacent to a phosphotyrosine binding domain. The
phosphotyrosine binding domain of IRS-1 interacts with phosphorylated NPEY motifs including tyrosine 950 in the Signals generated by IRS-1 phosphorylation are regulated through a
variety of mechanisms. For example, serine phosphorylation of IRS-1
decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 (16) and association of
IRS-1 with 14-3-3 decreases IRS-1-associated PI 3-kinase activity (17,
18). Treatment of cells with okadaic acid results in an increase in
serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 concomitant with decreased
tyrosine phosphorylation and decreased association with the insulin
receptor (16, 19). At least one specific residue, serine 612, is
phosphorylated by both protein kinase C (20) and the extracellular
signal-regulated kinase (21). Serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 is
dependent upon multiple intracellular kinases. As mentioned above, both
protein kinase C and the MAP kinase cascade phosphorylate IRS-1. In
addition, PI 3-kinase-dependent signals including
AKT-1/PKB (protein kinase B) and PI 3-kinase itself also
phosphorylate IRS-1 (22-25).
Phosphorylation of IRS-1 is not the only mechanism of regulation for
this protein, the levels of IRS-1 are also subject to regulation. For
example, chronic insulin treatment leads to decreased IRS-1 levels in
3T3 L1 adipocytes (26) and attenuation of insulin response (26-28). In
this system, IRS-1 is ubiquitinated and degraded via the proteasome
pathway (29). IGF-I also down-regulates IRS-1 in a
proteasome-dependent manner in human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells. We have examined the possibility that IRS-1 levels are regulated
by exposure to IGF-I. Using prostate epithelial cells, we find that
IGF-I treatment targets IRS-1 for degradation via the proteasome.
Interestingly, the addition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) prevents
the IGF-I-mediated degradation of IRS-1. Thus, we have identified a
previously unidentified mechanism of IRS-1 regulation in response to
IGF-I in epithelial cells, and our results indicate that cross-talk
between the IGF-I R and the epidermal growth factor receptor serve to
regulate IRS-1 protein levels.
Materials--
CPTX 1532 and NPTX 1532 cells (30) were cultured
in Keratinocyte-SFM (Life Technologies, Inc.) with supplements supplied by the vendor (bovine pituitary extract and EGF) and additionally supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.). IGF and EGF were purchased from Intergen (Purchase, NY). RPMI and
methionine-free RPMI were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
Cycloheximide, PD98059, LY294002, chloroquine, lactocystin, and MG132
were purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). The anti-IRS-1
antibody was from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). The
anti- Cell Culture--
CPTX 1532 and NPTX 1532 cells were maintained
in keratinocyte medium with supplements and passaged every 3-4 days
using a seeding density of 1 × 104
cells/cm2. All experiments followed the same protocol to
transfer the cells from the growth factor-rich, undefined Keratinocyte
medium into a defined medium containing only IGF-I and/or EGF. The
cultures were grown to 70% confluence and washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Serum-free RPMI medium was then added
to the cultures with the indicated concentrations of IGF-I or EGF. The
cultures were viable in the RPMI medium for a period of 2-3 days, but
this medium did not support sustained proliferation. For the purposes of these experiments, the cells were incubated in the serum-free RPMI
medium for up to 24 h. During this period, the cells are completely viable with no loss of cell number, and the cultures will
proliferate normally if placed into complete keratinocyte medium.
Western Blot and Immunoprecipitation--
CPTX cell extracts
were prepared by scraping cells into a lysis solution consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium
deoxycholate, 160 mM NaCl, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, and
pepstatin, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF. For Western analysis, equal amounts of protein
(assayed using a protein assay based upon the Bradford method (31)
purchased from Bio-Rad) were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto nitrocellulose. The
IRS-1 was analyzed using a standard Western blot protocol. For
immunoprecipitation, cell extracts were prepared as described above.
The lysates were incubated with IRS-1 antibody, collected with protein
A-Sepharose beads, washed with PBS, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and
transferred onto membranes. IRS-1-conjugated ubiquitin was
analyzed using standard Western blot procedures.
Antibodies were removed from nitrocellulose filters by incubating the
filters in a solution of 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS,
62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, at 50 °C for 30 min with
gentle agitation. The membranes were then washed twice with
Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Triton X-100 prior to Western
blot analysis.
Ubiquitination of IRS-1--
Ubiquitinated IRS-1 was visualized
by transfecting CPTX cells with hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ubiquitin
cDNA in an expression construct (BSSK) provided by Dr. Dirk
Bohmann (49). Cells were transfected using LipofectAMINE 2000 for
4 h in serum-free medium, a protocol that provided a transfection
efficiency of ~5% (determined using a Metabolic Labeling of IRS-1--
CPTX 1532 cells were seeded in
tissue culture flasks in complete keratinocyte SFM as described above.
For measurements of IRS-1 degradation, cells were labeled with 1 µCi/ml [35S]methionine for 4 h. At this time, the
cells were washed three times with PBS and placed into RPMI medium
containing either EGF (40 ng/ml) or IGF-I (40 ng/ml). Total cellular
proteins were isolated at time intervals, and equal amounts of protein
were used to immunoprecipitate the IRS-1 protein using an anti-IRS-1
polyclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Saranac Lake, NY).
Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
to a nitrocellulose filter. 35S-labeled IRS-1 was
visualized by autoradiography.
Measurements of the synthesis of IRS-1 involved placing CPTX
cells into RPMI medium containing either EGF or IGF-I for 4 h. At
this time, [32S]methionine (1 µCi/ml) was added for
1 h. Total cellular proteins were then isolated, and the IRS-1
protein was immunoprecipitated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and visualized
by autoradiography following transfer to nitrocellulose filters. The
IRS-1 protein was positively identified on the autoradiograms by
comparison with a Western blot of the same filter.
The relative amount of 35S-labeled IRS-1 was quantitated by
densitometry of the autoradiograms using a Bio-Rad Flour S system equipped with the Quantity One software, which is designed to provide
quantitative measurements of densitometric scans using background
subtraction algorithms.
We examined whether IGF-I exposure alters IRS-1 levels in a
prostate epithelial cell line, CPTX 1532, which is derived from a
primary carcinoma of the prostate (30). When these cells are placed
into serum-free RPMI medium, the levels of the IRS-1 protein are
relatively constant, whereas the addition of IGF-I to the medium causes
a decline in IRS-1 protein levels (Fig.
1). The levels of IRS-1 are dramatically
reduced following exposure to IGF-I for 24 h (Fig. 1). The decline
in IRS-1 protein levels in response to IGF-I is
dose-dependent with a maximal decrease in IRS-1 at 40-60
ng/ml of IGF-I (Fig. 2). This range of
IGF-I is similar to the optimal concentration required for
proliferation, which is 20-40 ng/ml (32). Interestingly, there is an
increase in IRS-1 protein in cultures that are exposed to low levels (2 ng/ml) of IGF-I. This observation was consistent in several experiments but has not been investigated further at this time. A second prostate epithelial cell line derived from normal prostate epithelial tissue, NPTX 1532 (30), also responded to IGF-I treatment with a decline in
IRS-1 protein levels (Fig. 1).
The decrease in IRS-1 is specific to IGF-I, because treatment of CPTX
1532 cells with EGF over the same time period did not cause a decrease
in IRS-1 levels (Fig. 1). In CPTX 1532 cells the addition of EGF or
IGF-I alone will support modest proliferation (10-50% increase in
cell number) for 24-48 h, and the addition of EGF plus IGF-I enhances
proliferation (100-200% increase in cell number). Because EGF and
IGF-I cooperate to stimulate proliferation of CPTX 1532 cells, it was
of interest to determine whether the addition of EGF would mitigate the
reduction in IRS-1 levels observed following IGF-I treatment. The
addition of EGF simultaneously with IGF-I prevents the decrease in
IRS-1 levels (Fig. 3), and this effect is
dependent upon the relative ratio of IGF-I to EGF. The simultaneous
addition of EGF and IGF-I prevented the IGF-I-mediated decline in IRS-1
protein levels even when EGF was present at a 3-fold lower molar ratio
(Fig. 3). The addition of increasing amounts of EGF lead to a
progressive increase in the level of IRS-1 in the face of an amount of
IGF-I that normally induced a reduction in IRS-1 protein levels. Thus,
treatment of these prostate epithelial cell lines with either EGF or
IGF-I had opposing effects on the levels of IRS-1, a critical component
of the IGF-IR signaling complex.
Insulin-like Growth Factor I-mediated Degradation of Insulin
Receptor Substrate-1 Is Inhibited by Epidermal Growth Factor in
Prostate Epithelial Cells*
§,
, and
¶
Lankenau Medical Research Center,
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, § Cell and Molecular
Biology Program, Medical College of Pennsylvania-Hahnemann
University, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennyslvania 19129, and
¶ Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits and two transmembrane
subunits. The
and
subunits of the IGF-IR are synthesized as a single polypeptide
that undergoes proteolytic cleavage at amino acid 710. The
and
subunits are linked in the mature IGF-IR by disulfide bonds (7). The
subunits of the IGF-IR possess intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity
that is activated upon ligand binding to the
subunits. This
tyrosine kinase activity is essential for the biologic activity of the IGF-IR, and mutation of the conserved ATP binding site at lysine 1003 abolishes kinase activity and mitogenic response to IGF-I. The
activated IGF-IR associates with several intracellular targets in
addition to the
subunit itself. These intracellular targets include
the proteins Shc, Grb 2, and the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1)
(8).
subunit of the IGF-IR, a
site that is phosphorylated following ligand binding (14). IRS-1
contains 18 potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites that may be
phosphorylated following activation of the IGF-IR. These phosphotyrosine motifs serve as binding sites for the Src homology 2 domain containing proteins such as Nck, Grb2, Grb 10, Shc, and the p85
regulatory subunit of PI 3-kinase (15). These protein-protein interactions subsequently activate a series of protein-serine kinase
cascades characterized by the activation of MAP kinases and PI 3-kinase
that ultimately affect cellular processes such as protein synthesis,
glycogen metabolism, and transcription of specific gene targets.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma. The anti-ubiquitin antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
-galactosidase reporter
construct). 24 h following transfection, cultures were washed with
PBS three times and placed into RPMI medium containing IGF-I (40 ng/ml), EGF (40 ng/ml), and MG132 (10 µM) in various
combinations as described in the individual experiments. Total cellular
proteins were isolated after a 3-h exposure to individual growth
factors, and the IRS-1 protein was immunoprecipitated as described
above. Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
ubiquitinated IRS-1 was visualized using an anti-HA monoclonal antibody
12CA5 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The IRS-1 protein was
visualized by Western blot analysis on the same blot following removal
of the anti-HA antibody.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Protein levels of IRS-1 in CTPX 1532 and NPTX
1532 cells following exposure to IGF-I or EGF. Prostate epithelial
cells (CPTX 1532 or NTPX 1532) were grown to 70% confluence in
keratinocyte SFM (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum. The cultures were then washed with PBS and placed into
serum-free RPMI 1640 medium with or without the addition of IGF-I (40 ng/ml) or EGF (40 ng/ml). In A, total cellular protein was
isolated and subjected to Western blot analysis for IRS-1 protein and
-actin, as a control for protein content, following a 24-h period.
The results presented are representative of a series of at least five
experiments in which similar effects have been observed.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dose dependence of IGF-I-mediated decline in
IRS-1 protein. CPTX 1532 cells were exposed to increasing
concentrations of IGF-I in serum-free RPMI medium. As described in Fig.
1, the cells were first grown to 70% confluence and then washed with
PBS. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing the indicated concentrations of IGF-I. IRS-1 levels
were determined by Western blot analysis of total cellular protein
following 16 h. As a control for protein loading, the levels of
-actin were measured on the same blot following removal of the
anti-IRS-1 antibody (see "Experimental Procedures"). The experiment
shown is representative of three independent experiments, which all
gave similar results.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
EGF prevents IGF-I-mediated decline in IRS-1
protein levels. CPTX 1532 cells were grown to 70% confluence as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The cells were washed
with PBS and exposed to serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing EGF and
IGF-I in varying concentrations. The ratio of EGF:IGF-I was altered to
determine the effects on IRS-1 protein levels. The concentration of
IGF-I used in this experiment was 40 ng/ml, whereas the concentration
of EGF was varied to achieve the indicated ratio of the two growth
factors. CPTX 1532 cells were exposed to the indicated EGF:IGF-I ratio
for 16 h, and total cellular proteins were isolated and subjected
to Western blot analysis for the IRS-1 protein and
actin, as a
control for protein content. Similar results have been obtained in two
independent experiments.
It has been suggested that IRS-1 degradation may be mediated by
the proteasome (29, 50). A specific inhibitor of the proteasome, lactocystin, has been described (34). The addition of lactocystin to
CPTX 1532 cells simultaneously with IGF-I prevented the IGF-I-mediated decline in IRS-1 protein levels (Fig. 4),
implying that the proteasome may be involved in this process. A second
inhibitor of the proteasome, MG132, also prevented the IGF-I-mediated
decline in IRS-1 levels (not shown). The addition of a drug that
inhibits receptor-mediated endocytosis, chloroquine (35), had no effect
on IGF-I-mediated IRS-1 decline. Similarly, the addition of PD98059,
which inhibits the MAP kinase pathway (36), has no effect on
IGF-I-mediated decreases in IRS-1 protein levels (Fig. 4). However,
inhibition of the PI 3-kinase enzyme using LY294002 (37) (Fig. 4)
prevented the IGF-I-mediated decline in IRS-1 levels. These
results are consistent with those obtained following insulin treatment
of adipocytes. In that system, inhibition of PI 3-kinase prevented the
insulin-mediated decline in IRS-1 levels (38).
|
The fact that inhibition of the proteasome prevented the IGF-I-mediated
decline in IRS-1 protein levels suggests that IGF-I stimulation targets
IRS-1 to the proteasome. A common mechanism for the targeting of
proteins to the proteasome is the covalent attachment of ubiquitin
(50). Because ubiquitinated proteins are labile and anti-ubiquitin
antibodies are of low affinity, we used an experimental protocol
designed to enhance our ability to visualize IRS-1-associated
ubiquitin. First, the time period of the exposure to growth factors was
relatively short (3 h compared to 16-24 h used in Figs. 1 and 2).
Second, parallel cultures were treated with inhibitors of the
proteasome such as lactocystin or MG132, and finally, the CPTX 1532 cells were transiently transfected with an HA-tagged ubiquitin cDNA
in a mammalian expression vector (51) to allow the use of a high
affinity anti-HA monoclonal antibody (clone 12CA5). Following
immunoprecipitation with an anti-IRS-1 antibody, the ubiquitin content
of IRS-1 was examined by Western blot using the anti-HA antibody (Fig.
5). The ubiquitin content of the IRS-1
protein increased when CPTX 1532 cells were exposed to IGF-I, and the
addition of an inhibitor of the proteasome, MG132, caused a dramatic
increase in IRS-1-associated ubiquitin. The addition of fetal bovine
serum or EGF does not cause any increase in the ubiquitin content of
IRS-1, and the addition of equimolar amounts of EGF decreased the
ubiquitin content of IRS-1. This effect is most evident in samples
treated with IGF-I, MG 132, and EGF (Fig. 5). These results indicate
that increased ubiquitin content of the IRS-1 protein is specific for
IGF-I treatment, and the presence of EGF prevented this IGF-I-mediated
ubiquitination.
|
To determine whether the rate of IRS-1 synthesis is affected by either
IGF-I or EGF, CPTX 1532 cells were exposed to IGF-I or EGF alone for
4 h and then were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine
for 1 h, and the amount of labeled IRS-1 was examined. This
provides a quantitative measure of the rate of IRS-1 synthesis in the
presence of IGF-I or EGF. The rate of IRS-1 synthesis was similar
whether the cells were exposed to IGF-I or to EGF (Fig. 6A). Thus, the rate of IRS-1
synthesis does not seem to be influenced by either IGF-I or EGF. To
directly measure the rate of degradation of IRS-1 in the presence of
IGF-I or EGF, CPTX 1532 cells were again labeled with
[35S]methionine. In this case, the cells were exposed to
the [35S]methionine in the presence of normal growth
medium (keratinocytes SFM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum). Following the labeling period, the cells were exposed to either
IGF-1 alone (40 ng/ml) or EGF alone (40 ng/ml), and the labeled IRS-1
was examined. Over a 14-h period the level of labeled IRS-1 decreased
in the presence of IGF-I, whereas the level of labeled IRS-1 was
relatively constant in the presence of EGF (Fig. 6B). Thus,
IRS-1 degradation proceeds more rapidly when CPTX 1532 cells are
exposed to IGF-I than when the cells are exposed to EGF.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study identifies a novel level of regulation for the IRS-1 protein in response to IGF-I stimulation in prostate epithelial cells. The results presented here indicate that IRS-1 levels fluctuate following exposure to either IGF-I or EGF. It seems that, similar to adipocytes exposed to insulin, IGF-I negatively regulates IRS-1 levels in prostate epithelial cells. Surprisingly this effect is counterbalanced by the effects of EGF, which decreases and serves to maintain IRS-1 levels in the presence of IGF-I. This is the first demonstration that an extracellular factor (EGF) can positively influence IRS-1 levels.
The fact that EGF is able to modulate the levels of a signaling molecule critical to IGF-I-dependent responses implies a novel level of cross-talk between the EGF and IGF-I systems. These two growth factors cooperate to stimulate progression of fibroblast cells through G1 and into S phase (39). In BALB 3T3 cells, there is a temporal requirement for the addition of EGF and IGF-I. EGF must be present prior to IGF-I treatment. If IGF-I is added prior to EGF, and subsequently removed, BALB 3T3 cells do not proceed into S phase (39-43).
This information, combined with the results presented here, suggests that one mechanism underlying this cooperation between EGF and IGF-I in prostate epithelial cells is the maintenance of IRS-1 levels. Addition of EGF antagonizes the IGF-I-dependent, proteasome-mediated degradation of IRS-1 by preventing ubiquitination of IRS-1. Because IRS-1 phosphorylation regulates the activity of several critical intracellular enzymes activated by the IGF-IR, a change in the level of IRS-1 may have a profound effect on the ability of the cell to respond to mitogenic stimulation by IGF-I. In this regard, recent results using 32 D cells indicate that the levels of IRS-1 dictate the degree of mitogenic response to IGF-I (44). We should note that the effect of IGF-I on IRS-1 seems to be restricted to epithelial cells as the levels of IRS-1 were not altered by IGF-I treatment of WI-38 fibroblasts (data not shown). This implies that the molecular mechanisms responsible for the cooperation of growth factors in terms of mitogenic responses may vary in different cell types.
In terms of cellular responses, IGF-I can stimulate proliferation or differentiation in several experimental settings. For example differentiation of muscle cell cultures is dependent upon IGF-I (45, 46), yet IGF-I is also mitogenic for muscle cells (47). Similarly, differentiation of 32 D cells in response to IGF-I is dependent upon IRS-1 (44). Thus, modulation of IRS-1 levels may play a role in the type of response generated by IGF-I in prostate epithelial cells. In this light it is interesting that low levels of IGF-I actually increase IRS-1 levels in the prostate epithelial cells used in this study (see Fig. 2). Although the present study has not examined this effect in detail, the response was consistent in several experiments.
Degradation of IRS-1 via the proteasome has been reported to occur in adipocytes (29) and in human breast carcinoma cells (49). Thus, a proteasome-mediated degradation of IRS-1 may have relevance in a number of cell types in addition to the prostate epithelial cells reported here. However, a modulating effect by a physiologically relevant factor such as EGF has not been reported in any other cell type, and it remains to be seen if this is a general phenomenon.
The inhibitor studies presented here indicate that neither receptor endocytosis (inhibited by addition of chloroquine) nor inhibition of the MAP kinase pathway (see effects of PD98059 in Fig. 4) prevents the IGF-I-mediated decline in IRS-1 levels. It seems that ubiquitination of IRS-1 may occur prior to receptor endocytosis. Consistent with this, it has been reported that IRS-1 phosphorylation by the insulin receptor is not linked to receptor endocytosis, whereas Shc phosphorylation is linked to receptor endocytosis (48). Interestingly, the activation of PI 3-kinase is required for the down-regulation of IRS-1 in response to IGF-I (see effect of LY294002 in Fig. 4). Because PI 3-kinase activation is also required for insulin-mediated down-regulation of IRS-1 (38), the signal transduction pathways, which trigger IRS-1 decreases in response to IGF-I and insulin, may be similar.
In summary, our results indicate that the targeted degradation of IRS-1
via the proteasome occurs in response to IGF-I in prostate epithelial
cells. In addition, EGF, a physiologically relevant growth factor known
to act synergistically with IGF-I, prevents the degradation of IRS-1
and may enhance the mitogenic response to IGF-I. This information
provides insight into a novel level of interaction between the EGF and
IGF-I receptor signaling pathways that may be of particular importance
in tumors harboring activating mutations in the EGF receptor.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA68923 (to C. S.) and the Lankenau Women's Medical Board.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Lankenau Medical
Research Center, 100 Lancaster Ave., Wynnewood, PA 19096. Tel.: 610-645-8521; Fax: 610-645-2205; E-mail: Sellc@mlhs.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 12, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000412200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IR, insulin receptor; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HA, hemagglutinin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Gustafson, T. A., Moodie, S. A., and Lavan, B. E. (1999) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 137, 71-190 |
| 2. | Blakesley, V. A., Scrimgeour, A., Esposito, D., and Le Roith, D. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7, 153-159 |
| 3. | Liu, J. L., Grinberg, A., Westphal, H., Sauer, B., Accili, D., Karas, M., and LeRoith, D. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 1452-1462 |
| 4. | Baker, J., Liu, J. P., Robertson, E. J., and Efstratiadis, A. (1993) Cell 75, 73-82 |
| 5. | Liu, J. P., Baker, J., Perkins, A. S., Robertson, E. J., and Efstratiadis, A. (1993) Cell 75, 59-72 |
| 6. | Ullrich, A., Gray, A., Tam, A. W., Yang-Feng, T., Tsubokawa, M., Collins, C., Henzel, W., Le Bon, T., Kathuria, S., Chen, E., Jacobs, S., Franke, U., Ramachandran, J., and Fujita-Yamaguchi, Y. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2503-2512 |
| 7. | LeRoith, D., and Roberts, C. T., Jr. (1993) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 692, 1-9 |
| 8. | Sun, X. J., Rothenberg, P., Kahn, C. R., Backer, J. M., Araki, E., Wilden, P. A., Cahill, D. A., Goldstein, B. J., and White, M. F. (1991) Nature 352, 73-77 |
| 9. | Fantin, V. R., Lavan, B. E., Wang, Q., Jenkins, N. A., Gilbert, D. J., Copeland, N. G., Keller, S. R., and Lienhard, G. E. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 1329-1337 |
| 10. | Lavan, B. E., Fantin, V. R., Chang, E. T., Lane, W. S., Keller, S. R., and Lienhard, G. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21403-21407 |
| 11. | Sciacchitano, S., and Taylor, S. I. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 4931-4940 |
| 12. | Lavan, B. E., Lane, W. S., and Lienhard, G. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11439-11443 |
| 13. | Sun, X. J., Wang, L. M., Zhang, Y., Yenush, L., Myers, M. G., Jr., Glasheen, E., Lane, W. S., Pierce, J. H., and White, M. F. (1995) Nature 377, 173-177 |
| 14. | Craparo, A., O'Neill, T. J., and Gustafson, T. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15639-15643 |
| 15. | White, M. F. (1997) Diabetologia 40 Suppl. 2, 2-17 |
| 16. | Mothe, I., and Van Obberghen, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11222-11227 |
| 17. | Ogihara, T., Isobe, T., Ichimura, T., Taoka, M., Funaki, M., Sakoda, H., Onishi, Y., Inukai, K., Anai, M., Fukushima, Y., Kikuchi, M., Yazaki, Y., Oka, Y., and Asano, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25267-25274 |
| 18. | Craparo, A., Freund, R., and Gustafson, T. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11663-11669 |
| 19. | Tanti, J. F., Gremeaux, T., van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6051-6057 |
| 20. | De Fea, K., and Roth, R. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 12939-12947 |
| 21. | De Fea, K., and Roth, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31400-31406 |
| 22. | Tanti, J. F., Gremeaux, T., Van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 17-21 |
| 23. | Lam, K., Carpenter, C. L., Ruderman, N. B., Friel, J. C., and Kelly, K. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20648-20652 |
| 24. | Li, J., DeFea, K., and Roth, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9351-9356 |
| 25. | Paz, K., Liu, Y. F., Shorer, H., Hemi, R., LeRoith, D., Quan, M., Kanety, H., Seger, R., and Zick, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28816-28822 |
| 26. | Rice, K. M., Turnbow, M. A., and Garner, C. W. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 961-967 |
| 27. | Ricort, J. M., Tanti, J. F., Van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1995) Diabetologia 38, 1148-1156 |
| 28. | Smith, L. K., Rice, K. M., and Garner, C. W. (1996) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 122, 81-92 |
| 29. | Sun, X. J., Goldberg, J. L., Qiao, L. Y., and Mitchell, J. J. (1999) Diabetes 48, 1359-1364 |
| 30. | Bright, R. K., Vocke, C. D., Emmert-Buck, M. R., Duray, P. H., Solomon, D., Fetsch, P., Rhim, J. S., Linehan, W. M., and Topalian, S. L. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 995-1002 |
| 31. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 |
| 32. | Pietrzkowski, Z., Lammers, R., Carpenter, G., Soderquist, A. M., Limardo, M., Phillips, P. D., Ullrich, A., and Baserga, R. (1992) Cell Growth Differ. 3, 199-205 |
| 33. | Deleted in proof |
| 34. | Fenteany, G., Standaert, R. F., Lane, W. S., Choi, S., Corey, E. J., and Schreiber, S. L. (1995) Science 268, 726-731 |
| 35. | Baldwin, D., Jr., Prince, M., Marshall, S., Davies, P., and Olefsky, J. M. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 5975-5978 |
| 36. | Alessi, D. R., Cuenda, A., Cohen, P., Dudley, D. T., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27489-27494 |
| 37. | Vlahos, C. J., Matter, W. F., Hui, K. Y., and Brown, R. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5241-5248 |
| 38. | Smith, L. K., Vlahos, C. J., Reddy, K. K., Falck, J. R., and Garner, C. W. (1995) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 113, 73-81 |
| 39. | Scher, C. D., Shepard, R. C., Antoniades, H. N., and Stiles, C. D. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 560, 217-241 |
| 40. | Leof, E. B., Wharton, W., van Wyk, J. J., and Pledger, W. J. (1982) Exp. Cell Res. 141, 107-115 |
| 41. | Pardee, A. B. (1989) Science 246, 603-608 |
| 42. | Baserga, R. (1984) Exp. Cell Res. 151, 1-5 |
| 43. | Baserga, R. (1992) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 663, 154-157 |
| 44. | Valentinis, B., Romano, G., Peruzzi, F., Morrione, A., Prisco, M., Soddu, S., Cristofanelli, B., Sacchi, A., and Baserga, R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12423-12430 |
| 45. | Florini, J. R., Magri, K. A., Ewton, D. Z., James, P. L., Grindstaff, K., and Rotwein, P. S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15917-15923 |
| 46. | Stewart, C. E., and Rotwein, P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11330-11338 |
| 47. | Florini, J. R., Ewton, D. Z., and Coolican, S. A. (1996) Endocr. Rev. 17, 481-517 |
| 48. | Chow, J. C., Condorelli, G., and Smith, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4672-4680 |
| 49. | Lee, A. V., Gooch, J. L., Oesterreich, S., Guler, R. L., and Lee, D. (2000) Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 1489-1496 |
| 50. | Kornitzer, D., and Ciechanover, A. (2000) J. Cell. Physiol. 182, 1-11 |
| 51. | Treier, M., Staszewski, L. M., and Bohmann, D. (1994) Cell 78, 787-798 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. R Hutcheson, J. M Knowlden, H. E Jones, R. S Burmi, R. A McClelland, D. Barrow, J. M W Gee, and R. I Nicholson Inductive mechanisms limiting response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(Supplement_1): S89 - S97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui, H.-J. Kim, I. Kuiatse, H. Kim, P. H. Brown, and A. V. Lee Epidermal Growth Factor Induces Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 in Breast Cancer Cells via c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase/Activator Protein-1 Signaling to Regulate Cell Migration. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5304 - 5313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kim, C. M. van Golen, and E. L. Feldman Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Induces Preferential Degradation of Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 through the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway in Human Neuroblastoma Cells Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5350 - 5357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui, R. Schiff, G. Arpino, C. K. Osborne, and A. V. Lee Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7721 - 7735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stearns, J. Tran, M. K. Francis, H. Zhang, and C. Sell Activated Ras Enhances Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Induction of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Prostate Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 65(6): 2085 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Usui, T. Imamura, J. Huang, H. Satoh, S. K. Shenoy, R. J. Lefkowitz, C. J. Hupfeld, and J. M. Olefsky {beta}-Arrestin-1 Competitively Inhibits Insulin-Induced Ubiquitination and Degradation of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2004; 24(20): 8929 - 8937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui and A. V. Lee Regulatory Nodes That Integrate and Coordinate Signaling as Potential Targets for Breast Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 396S - 401S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lassarre and J.-M. Ricort Growth Factor-Specific Regulation of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Expression in MCF-7 Breast Carcinoma Cells: Effects on the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling Pathway Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4811 - 4819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Stull, M. M. Richert, A. V. Loladze, and T. L. Wood Requirement for IGF-I in Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Cell Cycle Progression of Mammary Epithelial Cells Endocrinology, May 1, 2002; 143(5): 1872 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zhande, J. J. Mitchell, J. Wu, and X. J. Sun Molecular Mechanism of Insulin-Induced Degradation of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2002; 22(4): 1016 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tezuka, H. Watanabe, S. Nakamura, D. Yu, W. Aung, T. Sasaki, H. Shibuya, and M. Miura Antiapoptotic Activity Is Dispensable for Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor-mediated Clonogenic Radioresistance after {gamma}-Irradiation Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 3206 - 3214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Richards, D. M. Klotz, M. R. Bush, D. K. Walmer, and R. P. DiAugustine E2-Induced Degradation of Uterine Insulin Receptor Substrate-2: Requirement for an IGF-I-Stimulated, Proteasome-Dependent Pathway Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 3842 - 3849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Takano, I. Usui, T. Haruta, J. Kawahara, T. Uno, M. Iwata, and M. Kobayashi Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway Regulates Insulin Signaling via Subcellular Redistribution of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 and Integrates Nutritional Signals and Metabolic Signals of Insulin Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2001; 21(15): 5050 - 5062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||