JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 1630-1634, January 21, 2000


Isolation and Characterization of Proteins That Bind to Galactose, Lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli, and Protein A of Staphylococcus aureus from the Hemolymph of Tachypleus tridentatus*

Shean-Tai ChiouDagger , Yih-Wen Chen, Sang-Ching Chen, Chih-Fang Chao, and Teh-Yung Liu§

From the Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica Nankang Borough, Taipei 115, Taiwan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of three novel hemolymph proteins that are believed to be involved in the innate immune response of horseshoe crabs, Tachypleus tridentatus. They include two closely related proteins, one that binds to the protein A of Staphylococcus aureus (PAP) and another that binds to the lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli (LBP). PAP binds specifically to staphylococcal protein A (SpA) with a KD of 3.86 × 10-5 M, whereas LBP binds to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with a KD of 1.03 × 10-6 M. Both PAP and LBP are glycoproteins with an apparent molecular mass of about 40 kDa. N-terminal sequences of PAP and LBP showed 61.9 and 72.2% identity, respectively, to tachylectin-3, a lectin isolated from the amebocyte of T. tridentatus, previously characterized by its affinity to the O-antigen of LPS and blood group A antigen (Muta, T., and Iwanaga, S. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 41-47). The third protein, a galactose-binding protein (GBP), was found to bind tightly to Sepharose CL-4B and could only be eluted from the column matrix with chaotropic agents, such as 4 M urea or M guanidine hydrochloride. Further analysis indicated that GBP binds to D(+)-galactose with a KD of 2.47 × 10-7 M. N-terminal sequence analysis showed that GBP shared a 50% identity with lectin L-6, identified in the granules of amebocyte of T. tridentatus. (Gokudan, S., Muta, T., Tsuda, R., Koori, K., Kawahara, T., Seki, N., Mizunoe, Y., Wai, S. N., Iwanaga, S., and Kawabata, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10086-10091). Lectin-L6 and tachylectin-3 are nonglycosylated intracellular proteins with about half the molecular mass of PAP, LBP, and GBP. GBP also binds to PAP and LBP with KD values of 1.25 × 10-7 and 1.43 × 10-8 M, respectively, and this binding is enhanced about 10-fold upon the addition of SpA and LPS to form the GBP·PAP·SpA and GBP·LBP·LPS complexes, respectively.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Invertebrates have developed several germ line-encoded receptor-dependent pathways, such as proteolytic and prophenol oxidase cascade, pathogen-specific lectins, and antibiotic peptides, which work in concert for the recognition, immobilization, and elimination of the invading pathogens (1, 3-6). The pathogen-specific lectins in the hemolymph are expected to distinguish between self and non-self and to serve as the first line of defense upon the entry of pathogens. The interaction between lectins and pathogens results in the recruitment of other defense mechanisms, which ultimately are responsible for the immobilization and elimination of the invading pathogens.

The hemolymph of horseshoe crab contains three major proteins: hemocyanin, C-reactive protein, and alpha 2-macroglobulin. Hemocyanin functions as oxygen-carrying protein. C-reactive proteins are lectins that bind to phosphocholine of the pneumonococcus C-polysaccharide (7) and to the chromatins of damaged cells (8). alpha 2-macroglobulin exhibits protease inhibitory activity with a broad specificity that can block the activities of proteases secreted from invading microorganisms (9, 10). The Limulus C-reactive proteins, along with the C3 homologue alpha 2-macroglobulin, participates in a complement-like hemolytic activity in horseshoe crab hemolymph (11).

Recently, several lectins have been identified in the amebocytes of horseshoe crab, with a broad range of specificity (2, 12, 13). These lectins have been proposed to function in concert to defend horseshoe crabs from invading pathogens. However, because these lectins are present in the granules of the hemocytes, they are unlikely to be involved in the immediate-early response of host-pathogen interaction.

In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of three novel pathogen-specific proteins from the hemolymph of Tachypleus tridentatus that interact with each other and with pathogen specific antigens, in a manner similar to the opsonization process in vertebrates. A model of interaction for these proteins has been proposed.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Escherichia coli O55:B5 lipopolysaccharide (LPS)1 was purchased from Sigma. Sepharose CL-4B, CNBr-activated Sepharose CL-4B, molecular weight standards, staphylococcal protein A (SpA), and SpA Sepharose CL-4B were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Complete protease inhibitor tablets were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. All other chemicals were of the highest quality commercially available.

Horseshoe Crab and Hemolymph-- T. tridentatus specimens were captured on the beaches of Quimoi Island, Taiwan. Horseshoe crabs were bled by cardiac puncture, and hemolymph was collected in a conical tube containing equal volume of chilled sterile 3% NaCl supplemented with 2 mM propranolol and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to maintain the isotonic condition and to prevent the lysis of amebocytes (14). The amebocytes were separated from plasma by centrifugation at 400 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new conical tube under sterile condition and chilled immediately into liquid nitrogen. The frozen hemolymph was stored at -70 °C.

Preparation of LPS-Sepharose CL-4B Affinity Resin-- LPS affinity resin was prepared by coupling LPS from E. coli O55:B5 with CNBr-activated Sepharose CL-4B according to the manufacturer's instructions, with a ligand concentration of 2 × 10-6 mol/ml of drained gel by assuming the average molecular mass of LPS to be 5000 Da.

Purification of Lectins from Hemolymph-- To prepare material for affinity chromatography, hemolymph was thawed and filtered through a 0.2 µm pyrogen-free filter to remove insoluble residues. Protease inhibitor tablets were added according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five hundred milliliters of filtered, protease inhibitor-supplemented hemolymph was passed sequentially through three 10-mm × 10-cm tandemly linked affinity columns packed with Sepharose CL-4B, SpA-Sepharose CL-4B, and LPS-Sepharose CL-4B, respectively. The columns were preequilibrated with initial buffer (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) and, at the end of sample loading, washed with at least 10 column volumes of the initial buffer until a steady baseline was obtained. The columns were then detached from each other. To recover proteins from the affinity matrix, the Sepharose CL-4B column was eluted with 2 M guanidine hydrochloride, the SpA CL-4B column with 0.1 M citric acid, and the LPS column with 4 M urea in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.4. The effluent fractions containing the adsorbed proteins were collected and desalted by gel filtration on a 1 × 10-cm Sephadex G-25 column, equilibrated, and eluted with 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The entire purification procedure was performed at 4 °C.

Reverse Phase HPLC Analysis-- High performance liquid chromatography was performed on an HP1100 (Hewlett-Packard) HPLC system with a C4 column (Aquapore butyl, 0.25 mm × 10 cm; Perkin-Elmer) using a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min. The compositions of Buffer A and Buffer B were acetonitrile:water:trifloroacetic acid at 10:90:0.1 and acetonitrile:water:trifloroacetic acid at 90: 0:0.1, respectively. Proteins were analyzed by an isocratic elution of 0% Buffer B for 10 min followed by a linear gradient from 0 to 100% Buffer B within 40 min and finally with an isocratic elution of 100% Buffer B for 10 min.

Sugar Analysis-- PAS stain was performed to assay for glycoprotein. At the end of SDS-PAGE, gel was fixed with trichloroacetic acid, oxidized with periodic acid, followed by staining with Schiff's reagent and destaining with acetic acid as described (15). Monosaccharide contents were analyzed by GC-MS using the Hewlett-Packard gas chromatograph model 6890 connected to a HP 5973 mass selective detector. Samples for analysis were subjected to methanolysis, re-N-acetylation, and trimethylsilylation (16) and dissolved in hexane prior to splitless injection into a HP-5MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm inner diameter, Hewlett-Packard). The column head pressure was maintained at around 8.2 psi to give a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min using helium as carrier gas. Oven temperature was held at 60 °C for 1 min, increased to 90 °C in 1 min, and then increased to 290 °C in 25 min. The trimethylsilyl derivatives were analyzed by GC-MS on the HP system using a temperature gradient of 60-140 °C at 25 °C/min and then increased to 300 °C at 10 °C/min.

Protein Sequencing and Sequence Analysis-- Sequencing of samples recovered from the reverse-phase HPLC and from SDS-PAGE/electroblottings were performed on an ABI 492 Procise automatic protein sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). The initial yield ranged from 10 to 20 pmol. The sequences were then analyzed by the GCG package (Genetics Computer Group Inc.).

Surface Plasmon Resonance Analysis-- Surface plasmon resonance technology was used to analyze the affinity between the purified lectins and their analytes. Three to 6 µg of hemolyph lectins were immobilized on sensor chips CM5 (BIAcore AB, Uppsala, Sweden) by the amine coupling method according to the manufacturer's instructions. After immobilization, the sensor chips were washed with assay buffer (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) until a stable baseline was obtained. The binding experiments were performed at 25 °C with a flow rate of 35 µl/min. Binding constant of the lectins were obtained by calculation of data in sensogram with the BIAevaluation program (Version 3.0, BIAcore AB, Uppsala, Sweden).

Peptidase Activity Assay-- Peptidase activities were assayed in 0.1 M Tris·HCl, pH 8.0, containing a given amount of enzyme source and 2 mM 4-methoxybenzyl-Val-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide as substrate in a total volume of 220 µl. The reaction was allowed to proceed at 37 °C for 1 h. At the end of the incubation period, the reaction was stopped by adding 0.8 ml of 0.6 M acetic acid. Absorbency at 405 nm was measured for the release of p-nitroanilide as described (17).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification of Three Hemolymph Lectins-- By passing hymolymph of horseshoe crabs through a tandemly linked affinity columns, we have purified and characterized three new lectins: a GBP that binds to the galactose matrix of Sepharose CL-4B, a PAP that binds to the SpA of Staphylococcus aureus, and a LBP that binds to the LPS of E. coli. Each protein eluted from the respective affinity column was essentially homogeneous as judged by HPLC and SDS-PAGE analyses (Fig. 1). The proteins recovered from HPLC migrated at the position corresponding to a molecular mass of about 40 kDa (Fig. 1, insets). However, a protein band with a molecular mass of about 80 kDa was also found with the GBP sample (Fig. 1A, inset). Subsequent sequence analysis of the two proteins recovered from SDS-PAGE/electroblotting showed that the 40-kDa GBP and the 80-kDa GBP shared identical N-terminal sequences, suggesting that they represent monomer and dimer of GBP (data not shown). GBP isolated accounted for about 0.1% of the total hemolymph protein. The amount of PAP and LBP recovered from the hemolymph varied according to the season of the year when the animal was captured. It was estimated to be 0.01-0.02% and 0.02-0.04% of the total hemolymph protein for PAP and LBP, respectively.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   HPLC of lectins isolated from the hemolymph of horseshoe crab by affinity column. Aliquots (200-500 µl) of proteins eluted from the affinity column were directly loaded on to a C4 column, and HPLC was performed as described under "Materials and Methods." In each panel, the result of SDS-PAGE analysis of the peak under the solid bar is shown in the inset. A, reverse-phase HPLC analysis of GBP. B, reverse-phase HPLC analysis of PAP. C, reverse-phase HPLC analysis of LBP.

GBP, PAP, and LBP Are Glycoproteins-- The presence of glycans in the three proteins were examined by PAS (data not shown), because microheterogeneities were detected in both SDS-PAGE and HPLC analyses (Fig. 1). All three proteins gave positive signal confirming that these three proteins are glycoproteins. Further analysis of sugar composition showed that although all three proteins are glycosylated, PAP and LBP contain a higher amount of galactose than GBP (Table I).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Monosaccharide composition of GBP, PAP, and LBP

N-terminal Sequence Analysis of Hemolymph Lectins-- The results of N-terminal residue analyses of GBP, PAP, and LBP are summarized in Fig. 2. The N-terminal residues 1-26 of GBP share a 50% sequence identity with residues 2-27 of lectin L-6, which is a 27-kDa protein isolated from the large granules of hemocytes (12), as shown in Fig. 2A. Residues 1-27 of LBP and PAP share a 80% sequence identity with each other (Fig. 2D), and residues 1-27 of PAP share a 62% identity with residues 47-73 of tachylectin-3, a 14-kDa protein isolated from the hemocytes of T. tridentatus (18), as shown in Fig. 2B. Residues 1-40 of LBP share a 72% sequence identity with residues 47-86 of this lectin (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence alignment of GBP, PAP, and LBP with other horseshoe crab lectins. The sequence identity of the protein sequences was calculated by GAP, and alignments were made using the PILEUP program of the GCG package. A, alignment of N-terminal sequence of GBP with amebocyte lectin L6 (2). B, alignment of N-terminal sequence of PAP with tachylectin-3 (1). C, alignment of N-terminal sequence of LBP with tachylectin-3 (1). D, alignment of N-terminal sequence of LBP and PAP

Binding Specificity of GBP, PAP, and LBP-- The fact that GBP, PAP, and LBP were selectively adsorbed and eluted from their respective affinity column is a strong indication that each of the protein binds specifically to its own ligand. Table II summarizes the measurement of surface plasmon resonance responses of the immobilized GBP, PAP, and LBP against their respective analytes. D(+)-galactose bound to GBP with a KD of 2.47 × 10-7 M, SpA to PAP with a KD of 3.86 × 10-5 M, and LPS to LBP with a KD of 1.03 × 10-6 M. GBP also shows affinity to PAP and LBP with KD values of 1.25 × 10-7 and 1.43 × 10-8 M, respectively, and this binding is significantly enhanced upon the addition of SpA and LPS to form GBP·PAP·SpA and GBP·LBP·LPS trimers, respectively, with a KD of 1.24 × 10-9 for GBP·PAP·SpA and a KD of 4.95 × 10-7 for GBP·LBP·LPS (Table II and Fig. 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Binding kinetics of hemolymph lectins to their ligands


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A proposed model for the interaction between GBP·PAP·SpA and GBP·LBP·LPS. A, GBP interacts with PAP to form a GBP·PAP complex, which then binds with SpA to form the GBP·PAP·SpA complex. B, GBP interacts with LBP to form a GBP·LBP complex, which then binds with LPS to form the GBP·LBP·LPS complex.

Peptidase Activity Associated with the GBP·LBP Complex-- In an attempt to elucidate the possible physiological function of the GBP·LBP complex, cell-free hemolymph was passed directly through an LPS-Sepharose CL-4B column in the absence of protease inhibitor. The LPS on the Sepharose serves as a surrogate lipopolysaccharide on the Gram - bacterium upon its entry into the hemolymph of horseshoe crab. Under these conditions, it was expected that both GBP and LBP would bind to this affinity column. The column was washed with the initial buffer (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) until a stable baseline was obtained and subsequently eluted with 4 M urea, in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.4. After removal of urea by dialysis or gel filtration, the recovered proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE/electroblotting sequence analysis. Unlike GBP, PAP, and LBP recovered from the three tandemly connected affinity columns, proteins recovered from the direct passage of hemolymph through the LPS-Sepharose CL-4B column showed a complex mixture of protein bands (Table III and Fig. 4). The N-terminal sequences showed that they represented proteolytically degraded forms of GBP (Table III). LBP or its degraded derivatives, if present, were too low to be detected.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Protein sequence from amino termini of GBP derivatives


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Bands used to obtain protein sequences. See Table III for details.

The presence of peptidase activity in the effluent from the LPS-Sepharose CL-4B column was examined, using a typical thrombin substrate, 4-methoxybenzyl-Val-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide, and trypsin as a positive control. The results presented in Table IV indicate that although only a negligible peptidase activity was detected in the freshly collected hemolymph, the activity increased nearly 10-fold after the hemolymph had passed through the LPS-Sepharose CL-4B column. Addition of LPS to the hemolymph enhanced its peptidase activity by nearly 100-fold. Notably, the specific activity of the 4 M urea eluate was about 1600 times higher than the hemolymph spiked with LPS. Neither GBP, PBP, nor PAP isolated in the presence of protease inhibitors (as described above) exhibited any significant peptidase activity. The peptidase activity associated with the M urea eluate from the LPS-Sepharose CL-4B column in the absence of protease inhibitors, therefore, is most likely due to the presence of a peptidase or its precursor activated by LPS. The amount of peptidase eluted by 4 M urea was estimated to be less than 0.01% (w/w) of the proteins eluted by 4 M urea. This estimation is based on the assumption that the putative peptidase possesses a specific activity (milliunits/g of protein) similar or identical to that of trypsin (Table IV).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Association of protease activity with GBP · LBP complex


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

An invertebrate depends solely on innate immunity, consisting of three major coordinately working systems (pattern recognition, enzymatic cascade, and antimicrobial peptide) to protect itself against microbial invasion. Molecular structures that are integral to the Gram - bacteria, such as LPS, are not subjected to changes during the evolutionary process and are highly conserved among these microorganisms. Molecules that are able to recognize these structures would thus be able to identify a wide spectrum of bacteria. In this study, we have isolated and characterized such a protein from the hemolymph of T. tridentatus, the pattern recognition molecules that specifically interact with the LPS of Gram - bacteria. Independently, PAP, a protein that binds to SpA of a Gram + bacterium, S. aureus, was isolated and characterized. Based on the finding that LBP and PAP share an 80% identity in their N-terminal sequences (Fig. 2D), LBP and PAP must be very similar, yet each recognizes a different ligand.

The N-terminal amino acid sequences (residues 1-19) determined for LBP and for PAP share 47-50% identity with residues 2-20 of lectin L-6, an LPS-binding protein isolated from the large granules of amebocyte (Fig. 2, B and C). Significant sequence homologies were not found with any other proteins for which the sequences have been elucidated. Whereas the plasma LBP is a glycosylated protein, lectin L-6 is a nonglycosylated amebocyte protein (12). The existence of two similar lectins, an intracellular one and an extracellular one, in the horseshoe crab is reminiscent of the mammalian system (19, 20).

The principal reactivity of SpA is binding with IgG at the Fc site and affinity chromatography on SpA-Sepharose is the preferred method of isolating IgG from serum of animals (21). Although a number of proteins with IgG-like motif and property have been reported to be present in invertebrates, sequences that are homologous to the Fc site of IgG have not been reported, nor has their binding to SpA been demonstrated (22). The binding site of PAP to SpA remains to be elucidated.

Notably, the peptidase activities induced by exposure of the plasma to a catalytic amount of LPS were almost quantitatively co-adsorbed with LBP-GBP to the LPS-Sepharose CL-4B affinity column and were co-eluted with GBP with 4 M urea. The origin of the peptidase activity is not known, but judging from the specific activity, which is less than <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>1000</DE></FR> that of trypsin, it is highly unlikely that it is the intrinsic property of GBP.

Data obtained from surface plasmon resonance indicated that GBP also binds with PAP and LBP. Binding of PAP and LBP to GBP significantly enhances the affinity of PAP and LBP to their ligands, SpA and LPS, respectively (Table II). Based on these observations, it is suggested that GBP forms a complex with PAP and LBP in the hemolymph of horseshoe crab. Both PAP and LBP contain a higher amount of galactose than GBP (Table I). It is tempting to speculate that the binding of GBP to PAP and to LBP might be mediated by the galactosyl moiety on PAP and LBP.

When pathogens carrying SpA or LPS ligand enter into horseshoe crabs, GBP-anchored LBP or PAP docks onto the pathogens to form the GBP·PAP·SpA or GBP·LBP·LPS complex, as illustrated in Fig. 3. This complex formation could result in the recruitment of other defense mechanism in the amebocytes for the elimination of the invading pathogens.

Nature has evolved a series of galactose recognition proteins that are ubiquitously distributed throughout invertebrates and vertebrates (23-27). Anti-Gal IgG is the most abundant IgG in humans, accounting for no less than 10% of total human IgGs, and the most striking feature of this IgG is its ability of discriminate between self and non-self (28, 29). In this study, we have identified a galactose-binding protein from the hemolymph of horseshoe crabs, which could be a counterpart of anti-Gal IgG in invertebrates.

It would seem therefore, that upon the entry of Gram - bacteria, GBP·LBP complex binds to LPS on the bacterial cell surface and at the same time recruit LPS-dependent plasma peptidase to initiate proteolytic attack on the microbes. The affinity of PAP for SpA, as demonstrated by its selective adsorption to SpA-affinity column and the pervasive presence of SpA as a membrane component of Gram + bacterium, such as S. aureus, could signify its importance in the recognition of such microorganisms upon their entry into horseshoe crab.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Kay-Hooi Khoo and Po-Huang Liang of the Glycobiology Group, Academia Sinica for their helpful discussion. We also thank the Life Science Core Facility of Academia Sinica for protein sequence analysis.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from Academia Sinica, the National Health Research Institute, and the Chinese Petroleum Corp.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, 223 Nanaline Bldg., Box 3711, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27110.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 886-2-2788-9986; Fax: 886-2-2788-9774; E-mail: dtl@gate.sinica.edu.tw.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LPS, lipopolysaccharide; GBP, galactose-binding protein; SpA, staphylococcal protein A; PAP, protein A-binding protein; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; LBP, LPS-binding protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Muta, T., and Iwanaga, S. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 41-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Gokudan, S., Muta, T., Tsuda, R., Koori, K., Kawahara, T., Seki, N., Mizunoe, Y., Wai, S. N., Iwanaga, S., and Kawabata, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10086-10091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Medzhitov, R. M., and Janeway, C. A. J. (1997) Cell 91, 295-298[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Medzhitov, R. M., and Janeway, C. A. J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 12-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hoffmann, J. A., Reichhart, J. M., and Hetru, C. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 8-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Iwanaga, S., and Kawabata, S. (1998) Front. Biosci. 3, D973-D984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Volanakis, J. E., and Kaplan, M. H. (1971) Proc. Exp. Bio. Med. 136, 612-614
8. Robey, F. A., and Liu, T.-Y. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 969-975[Free Full Text]
9. Enghild, J. J., Thogersen, I. B., Salvesen, G., Fey, G. H., Figler, N. L., Gonias, S. L., and Pizzo, S. V. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 10070-10080[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sottrup-Jensen, L., Borth, W., Hall, M., Quigley, J. P., and Armstrong, P. B. (1990) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem. 96, 621-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Armstrong, P. B., Armstrong, M. T., and Quigley, J. P. (1993) Mol. Immunol. 30, 929-934[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Saito, T., Hatada, M., Iwanaga, S., and Kawabata, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30703-30708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kawabata, S., and Iwanaga, S. (1999) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 23, 391-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Mürer, E. H., Levin, J., and Holmer, R. (1975) J. Cell. Physiol. 86, 533-542[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kapitany, R. A., and Zebrowski, E. J. (1973) Anal. Biochem. 53, 361-369
16. Furguson, M. A. J. (1993) in Glycobiology. A Practical Approach (Fukuda, M. , and Kobata, A., eds) , pp. 349-383, IRL Press, Oxford
17. Tanaka, T., McRae, B. J., Cho, K., Cook, R., Fraki, J. E., Johnson, D. A., and Powers, J. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 13552-13557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Inamori, K., Saito, T., Iwaki, D., Nagira, T., Iwanaga, S., Arisaka, F., and Kawabata, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3272-3278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Pugin, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Tobias, P. S. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 2193-2200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Frey, E. A., Miller, D. S., Jahr, T. G., Sundan, A., Bazil, V., Espevik, T., Finlay, B. B., and Wright, S. D. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 176, 1665-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Langone, J. J. (1982) J. Immunol. Methods 55, 277-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Mendoza, H. L., and Faye, I. (1999) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 23, 359-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Dam, T. K., Sarkar, M., Ghosal, J., and Choudhury, A. (1992) Mol. Cell Biochem. 117, 1-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Garber, N., Guempel, U., Belz, A., Gilboa-Garber, N., and Doyle, R. J. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1116, 331-333[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hirabayashi, J., Dutta, S. K., and Kasai, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14450-14460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Galili, U., Rachmilewitz, E. A., Peleg, A., and Flechner, I. (1984) J. Exp. Med. 160, 1519-1531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Galili, U., Macher, B. A., Buehler, J., and Shohet, S. B. (1985) J. Exp. Med. 162, 573-582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Galili, U., Buehler, J., Shohet, S. B., and Macher, B. A. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 165, 693-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Galili, U. (1993) Immunol. Today 14, 480-482[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
P. M.L. Ng, Zhenxiao Jin, S. S.H. Tan, B. Ho, and J. L. Ding
C-reactive protein: a predominant LPS-binding acute phase protein responsive to Pseudomonas infection
Innate Immunity, June 1, 2004; 10(3): 163 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-C. Chen, C.-H. Yen, M.-S. Yeh, C.-J. Huang, and T.-Y. Liu
Biochemical Properties and cDNa Cloning of Two New Lectins from the Plasma of Tachypleus tridentatus. TACHYPLEUS PLASMA LECTIN 1 AND 2+
J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 9631 - 9639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.