J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 1708-1714, January 21, 2000
Sp1 Binding Is Critical for Promoter Assembly and Activation of
the MCP-1 Gene by Tumor Necrosis Factor*
Dongsheng
Ping
,
Gunther
Boekhoudt
,
Fuping
Zhang§,
Ann
Morris
,
Sjaak
Philipsen¶,
Stephen T.
Warren§, and
Jeremy
M.
Boss
From the
Department of Microbiology and
Immunology and the § Department of Biochemistry and Howard
Hughes Medical Institute, Emory University School of Medicine,
Atlanta, Georgia 30322 and ¶ Erasmus University Rotterdam,
Medical Genetics Center, Department of Cell Biology,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
 |
ABSTRACT |
The monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene
(MCP-1) is induced by the inflammatory cytokine tumor
necrosis factor through the coordinate assembly of an
NF-
B-dependent distal regulatory region and a proximal
region that has been suggested to bind Sp1 as well as other factors. To
provide a genetic correlation for Sp1 activity in this system, a cell
line homozygous for a targeted truncation of the Sp1 gene
was derived and examined. We found that the lack of Sp1 binding
activity resulted in the inability of both the distal and proximal
regions to assemble in vivo even though the binding of
NF-
B to distal region DNA was unaffected in vitro. We
also found that Sp1 and NF-
B were the minimal mammalian transcription factors required for efficient activity when transfected into Drosophila Schneider cells. Additionally, Sp3 was able
to compensate for Sp1 in the Drosophila tissue cell system
but not in the Sp1
/
cell line suggesting
that Sp1 usage is site-specific and is likely to depend on the context
of the binding site. Together, these data provide genetic and
biochemical proof for Sp1 in regulating the MCP-1 gene.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
TNF1 is a
proinflammatory cytokine that has broad effects on immune responses.
Although TNF has the ability to induce apoptosis in some cell systems
and in some tumors, TNF carries out a majority of its function through
the stimulation of gene expression. A large number of genes have been
identified that are responsive to TNF (1, 2). Such genes include
cytokines, transcription factors, adhesion molecules, and structural
proteins. The mechanics of TNF-mediated gene induction has concentrated
on the factor NF-
B (3). NF-
B represents a diverse family of
homologous proteins that interact to form a variety of heterodimers,
which appear to have distinct functions (4, 5). The major form is
composed of the p50 and p65 subunits. NF-
B is held in an inactive state in the cytoplasm by the inhibitor I
B (reviewed in Ref. 5).
Upon TNF signaling, I
B is phosphorylated by the I
B kinase, IKK
(6), polyubiquitinated, and degraded (5, 7). The separation of I
B
from the NF-
B complex reveals a nuclear localization sequence on
NF-
B that allows its nuclear transport and gene activation. In most
genes, NF-
B alone is not sufficient to activate gene expression, and
numerous other factors appear to be involved in mediating expression.
In some cases, a complex of proteins, which includes at least one
NF-
B molecule, forms a compact regulatory unit that has been termed
an enhanceosome (8, 9). However, in other genes, such as the monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 gene (MCP-1) (10) and the
manganous superoxide dismutase gene (11), the regions controlling gene
expression are separated by more than 2 kb of DNA. Such systems are
likely to require more extensive and complex interactions for which
little is known.
Monocyte chemoattractant proteins (MCP) are a family of proinflammatory
C-C chemokines that recruit macrophages, monocytes, T cells, and
basophils to regions of infection and disease (12-15). Five MCP genes
have been identified in the mouse (reviewed in Ref. 15). The murine
JE gene is highly homologous to the human MCP-1
gene and is regulated in a similar fashion. Thus, JE has been considered to be the ortholog of human MCP-1 for
several years (15). Expression of MCP-1 is associated with a variety of
disease states, including the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (16), HIV
replication (17, 18), glomerular nephritis (19), and allergic and
chronic inflammatory diseases (15, 20, 21). MCP-1 expression is
regulated by a host of cytokines that include tumor necrosis factor
(TNF) (10), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (22), and
interferon-
(IFN-
) (23). Additionally, MCP-1 expression can be
induced by agents and factors that stress cells (24-27). Other
intercellular agents, such as retinoic acid, glucocorticoids, and
estrogen, can inhibit the induction of the MCP-1 gene
(28-31).
In vivo genomic footprinting (IVGF) and mutational analyses
of the upstream region of murine MCP-1 have identified two
regulatory regions, proximal and distal, that are separated by ~2.4
kb (10, 32). The proximal regulatory region contains three sites that became occupied upon TNF induction of MCP-1: a site with
partial homology to a
B-binding site, termed
B-3, site B, and a
GC box. The
B-3 site does not bind NF-
B family members (10).
However, in the human gene,
B-3 has homology to a IFN-
response
element and was shown to be required for IFN-
induction (23),
suggesting that this region might display IFN-
responsiveness in the
mouse. Mutation of site B and
B-3 did not affect TNF induction;
however, mutation of the GC box proved to be critical for regulation by both TNF and PDGF (33). We have recently found that both Sp1 and Sp3
can bind to this site in vitro (33), but it is not clear which of these factors function in vivo. Sp1 was one of the
first sequence-specific eukaryotic transcription factors purified and cloned (34, 35). Sp1-binding sites (GGGGCGGGG) are found in numerous
genes and in genes lacking TATA boxes, suggesting that it may provide a
link to the recruitment of TFIID to TATAless promoters (36, 37). Sp1
has also been found to interact with NF-
B in vitro and
in vivo (38-40). However, despite the number of genes
containing Sp1 sites, little information is available for genes that
"require" Sp1 for expression. To address this issue, Marin et
al. (41) constructed ES cells that contained a targeted disruption
of the Sp1 gene. This mutation proved to be an embryonic lethal when homozygous in a mouse, demonstrating a critical role for
Sp1 in development. The second Sp1 allele was knocked out as
well, creating an ES cell line with both genes disrupted. The only
major change in gene expression observed in early
Sp1
/
embryos was a decrease in the
MeCP-2 gene. MeCP-2 encodes a protein that
functions in the maintenance of gene silencing at regions of methylated
DNA. All other genes examined were close to their normal levels of
expression, suggesting some compensating mechanism for Sp1. The role of
Sp1 in cytokine induced expression was not examined.
The MCP-1 distal regulatory region contains four elements as
follows: site A,
B-1,
B-2, and the HS site. Site A is
constitutively occupied irrespective of MCP-1 gene
expression and is required for maximal induction by TNF (10). The HS
site is sensitive to hypermethylation by DMS in cells treated with TNF.
The proteins that interact with sites A and HS are currently unknown.
The two
B sites are essential for TNF induction and in murine
fibroblasts bind p50/p65, NF-
B heterodimer (32). With the exception
of site A, the induction of MCP-1 by TNF leads to the
occupancy and therefore assembly of both distal and proximal regulatory
regions by factors already present in the nucleus and those that are
transported into the nucleus, such as NF-
B (10). The coordinate
occupancy of both the distal and proximal regions by TNF suggests that
interactions between the proteins that bind to these sites may occur
that promote factor assembly and/or chromatin remodeling.
To investigate factor assembly of both the proximal and distal regions,
it is important to identify the factor(s) that could bind to the GC box
in vivo and to determine their role in promoter/regulatory region assembly. In this report, the Sp1
/
ES
cells were differentiated into a fibroblast-like cell line and used to
study the mechanism of TNF induction on MCP-1 in the absence
of functional Sp1. Additionally, a Drosophila cell line system, which lacks endogenous Sp1, was used to determine the minimal
mammalian components that were necessary for MCP-1
expression. The results show that Sp1 is required for maximal
MCP-1 expression. In the absence of Sp1, assembly of the
distal regulatory NF-
B region was drastically inhibited, suggesting
communication between these two regions. Moreover, the minimal
mammalian components necessary for expression in Drosophila
cells included Sp1 and the p65 NF-
B subunit. Sp3, a member of the
Sp1 family of DNA transcription factors and found to be expressed at
normal levels in Sp1
/
cells, could
substitute for Sp1 in the Drosophila system. Together, these
results provide a genetic proof of the involvement of Sp1 in
MCP-1 expression and suggest interactions between Sp1 and
NF-
B that span 2.5 kb of DNA.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Lines and Culture--
NIH3T3 and BALB/3T3 murine
fibroblasts were obtained from the ATCC. Both of these cell lines
respond to TNF induction with similar kinetics (10, 32). Fibroblasts
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media supplemented with
10% bovine calf serum (HyClone, Inc., Logan, UT), 1 mM
glutamine, and antibiotics. Sp1
/
ES cells
were passaged twice on 0.1% gelatin-coated culture dishes, each to
about 70% confluency to reduce the MEF feeder cells (mitomycin C-treated) on which the ES cells were maintained. ES colonies were
mildly trypsinized from the gelatin-coated dishes, and cell aggregates
were carefully removed and added to 150-mm bacteriological Petri dishes
containing Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media + minimum Eagle's
medium nonessential amino acids with 15% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and
0.5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide. Cell aggregates were cultured for 4-6
days with one passage carried out by gravity sedimentation of the
aggregates in 50-ml tubes, followed by supernatant aspiration and
addition of fresh media. Aggregates were again collected by gravity
sedimentation and seeded into 60-mm tissue culture dishes coated with
collagen (as recommended by the supplier; Collaborative Biomedical
Products, Inc., Bedford, MA) in
- minimum Eagle's medium
supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 1 ng/ml basic
fibroblast growth factor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 4 µg/ml
insulin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Adherent cells were cultured for
7-14 days with media changes every 2 days. The cultures were then
subcultured every 3-4 days allowing at each subculture for cell
attachment for 4-6 h followed by media replacement to remove any
residual non-adherent cells. By three serial subcultures, the cells
exhibited a uniform, fibroblast-like appearance.
Sp1
/
cells were passaged on collagen-coated
plates in the above conditions.
Recombinant human TNF was obtained from Genzyme, Inc. (Cambridge, MA),
and was added to the cultures at a final concentration of 500 units/ml
for the indicated time.
The Drosophila melanogaster Schneider cell line (ATCC, CRL
1963) was maintained in Drosophila cell media (Life
Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10% v/v),
antibiotics, and 1 mM glutamine. Cells were grown at room temperature.
Plasmids--
MCP-1 transcriptional CAT reporter plasmids have
all been described previously (10, 32). NF-
B p65 and p50 subunit
Drosophila expression plasmids (9) were provided by A. Neish
(Emory University). A similar set of NF-
B mammalian expression
vectors were provided by Dr. T. Collins (Brigham and Women's Hospital,
Boston). A Drosophila Sp1 expression vector was provided by
R. Tjian (University of California, Berkeley). The mammalian equivalent
was created by cloning the Sp1 cDNA into the pcDNA3.1
(Invitrogen, Inc.) expression vector.
Transfections--
Transient transfections of NIH3T3 cells were
carried out as described previously (10, 32). Briefly 107
cells/transfection were grown to 70% confluence, collected, washed, resuspended in 0.8 ml of RPMI, and transfected by electroporation at
290 V, 960 microfarads. All assays contained 20 µg of the
MCP-1 reporter DNA and 1 µg of pSV2AlkPhos, an
alkaline phosphatase reporter vector (transfection efficiency control
plasmid). Cultures were harvested at 48 h post-transfection after
receiving TNF or media for the indicated time. BALB/3T3 cells were not
used for transient transfections because of their poor transfection
efficiency (10, 32, 42). Schneider cells were transfected by
electroporation as above. Cultures were harvested 48 h
post-transfection. In these assays, 20 µg of the indicated reporter
was used with 10 µg of each of the indicated expression vectors (p65,
Sp1, or Sp3) and 1 µg of the alkaline phosphatase reporter control.
The NF-
B p50 expression vector was added in the indicated amount.
Promoterless CAT reporter plasmid DNA (pCATbasic) was added to bring
the total amount of DNA transfected to 50 µg/assay.
In Vivo Genomic Footprinting (IVGF)--
IVGF assays were done
exactly as described (10, 32). For MCP-1, IVGF assays of the
coding strand of the distal regulatory region and the noncoding strand
for the proximal regulatory region are shown as these are the most
informative strands. IVGF of the distal region and proximal regions
were performed in BALB/3T3 cells using the JE
B3-1, -2, and -3 JE5-7,
-8, and -9 primer sets as described previously (10, 32). NIH3T3 cells
were not used due to a sequence polymorphism in one of their
MCP-1 alleles that prevents interpretation of the footprint.
The extension, PCR, and labeling primers used for IVGF of the coding
strand of IP-10 gene were as follows:
5'CAGCACTTGGGTTCATGGTGCT, 5'-GGATGTCTCTCAGCGGTGGATGAA, and
5'-AGCGGTGGATGAAGCGCTTCTCGAG, respectively.
Nuclear Extracts and EMSA--
Nuclear extracts were prepared
from BALB/3T3 or the Sp1
/
cell lines as
described previously (10, 32, 33). In each case, 20, 10-cm plates were
used. The standard DNA binding reaction contained 4 µg of nuclear
extract, 0.6 µg of poly[dI·dC]-poly[dI·dC], 250 ng of
denatured sonicated salmon sperm DNA, 15 mM HEPES (pH 7.9),
10% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 0.12 mM EDTA, 5 µg
of bovine serum albumin, 12 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, and the indicated amount of
competitor DNA. Labeled probe was added after a 10-min preincubation, and the reactions were incubated for an additional 30 min on ice. The
sequence of the coding strand of the MCP-1 GC box-specific probe used in the EMSAs was as follows:
5'GCACCCTGCCTGACTCCACCCCCCTGGCTTACAA. Competitor DNA for consensus Sp1
and AP-1 sites were 5'ATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAG and
5'CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.;
Valencia, CA), respectively, where the underlined bases represent the
consensus sites. The sequence for the
B-binding site in the distal
region used as a probe spanned
B-2 and is
5'ACTGCCCTCAGAATGGGAATTTCCACGCTCTTATC. Nonspecific
DNA competitors encoded site A and site B of the MCP-1 gene
are 5'AGAACTGCTTGGCTGCAGGCCCAGCATCTGGAGCTCACATT and
5'TGATGCTACTCCTTGGCACCAAGCACCCTG, respectively. NF-
B p65, p50,
Sp1, and Sp3 antibody supershift assays were carried out by adding 1 µl of antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) to the reaction
mixture 5 min prior to the addition of the labeled probe. Samples were
separated by electrophoresis in a 5% polyacrylamide gel (49:1,
acrylamide:bisacrylamide) at 4 °C with recirculating buffer and
analyzed by autoradiography.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blots--
RNA was isolated from
subconfluent plates using the Nonidet P-40 lysis procedure as described
previously (10). Twelve µg of RNA were separated on denaturing
formaldehyde gels, blotted, and probed with random primed and labeled
cDNA encoding MCP-1 or glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) following standard procedures (10, 32). RT-PCR
analysis was performed using 0.5 µg of total RNA in an assay kit from
Perkin-Elmer, Inc. RT-PCR primers for IP-10 were as follows:
mIP-10-5, 5'TCTGCCTCATCCTGCTGGGTCT, and mIP-10-3,
5'CTTGATAACCCCTTGGGAAGATGGTG. GAPDH primers were as follows: mGAP-5,
5'CAGTATGACTCCACTCACGGCA, and mGAP-3, 5'CAGATCCACGACGGACACAT. PCR
conditions (30 cycles) included 0.5 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C,
and 1 min at 72 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
Creation of an Sp1-deficient Fibroblast Cell Line--
Our
previous work suggested a role for Sp1 in both TNF- and PDGF-induced
MCP-1 expression (10, 32, 33). However, without direct
genetic evidence, several important questions about the function of Sp1
in this system could not be answered. These included the following: is
Sp1 essential for the expression of MCP-1; does Sp1 control
assembly of the proximal regulatory region; and does Sp1 influence the
assembly of the distal regulatory region? The creation of ES cells
homozygous for an Sp1-targeted disruption provided an
opportunity to obtain a genetic correlation between Sp1 and
MCP-1 expression (41). Unfortunately, the
Sp1
/
genotype resulted in an embryonic
lethal. To obtain cell lines that could be used to link
MCP-1 and Sp1, ES cells containing a homozygous disruption
of the Sp1 gene were differentiated in culture. After
supplementing the media with basic fibroblast growth factor and
insulin, cells with a fibroblast-like appearance emerged and were
passaged. These cells will be referred to as
Sp1
/
cells.
To characterize the Sp1
/
cells, Sp1
expression was examined, and the ability of these cells to respond to
TNF was evaluated by examining components of the TNF-signaling pathway.
Both alleles of the Sp1 gene in the
Sp1
/
cell line produce a truncated protein
with a molecular mass of 65 kDa (41). The truncated Sp1 protein lacks
the DNA binding and activation domains. A Western blot containing
lysates prepared from wild-type NIH3T3 and
Sp1
/
cells was stained with antisera to Sp1
(Fig. 1A). The results show
the expected sizes, demonstrating that wild-type (90 kDa) Sp1 is not
present in the Sp1
/
cell line.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
NF- B signal pathways
are functional in Sp1 / cells.
A, Sp1 / embryonic fibroblasts
produce a truncated Sp1 protein. Western blots of the whole cell
extracts from Sp1 / cells (lane 1)
and control NIH3T3 cells (lane 2) were separated on 7.5%
SDS-PAGE and probed using anti-Sp1 antisera. The truncated Sp1 protein
lacks the C-terminal DNA binding domain and migrates at 65 kDa.
B, TNF induces degradation of I B in
Sp1 / cells. Western blots of the whole cell
extracts (50 µg/lane) from control (0 h) and TNF-treated
Sp1 / cells are shown probed with
anti-I B antisera. C, TNF induces activation and
translocation of NF- B proteins from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in
Sp1 / cells. Nuclear extracts (30 µg/well)
prepared from Sp1 / cells either treated with
media ( ) or TNF for 30 min (+) were assayed by Western blotting for
the presence of p50, p65, or Sp3 as indicated. All blots were developed
using the ECL chemiluminescent kit of Roche Molecular
Biochemicals.
|
|
During induction of gene expression by TNF, the NF-
B inhibitor I
B
is phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, and degraded. This process allows
NF-
B to translocate to the nucleus. To determine if this process is
active in the Sp1
/
cells, the cells were treated with
TNF, and a whole cell lysate was prepared and analyzed by Western
blotting for the presence of I
B. After 10 min the presence of I
B
is diminished, suggesting that the signaling pathway is intact (Fig.
1B). The rapid reappearance of I
B is also normal and is a
result of TNF-induced expression of the I
B gene (43).
Finally, the ability of NF-
B subunits to translocate to the nucleus
following TNF treatment was examined. Nuclear extracts prepared from
Sp1
/
cells showed that the nuclear
concentration of NF-
B p50 and p65 increased following exposure to
TNF (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the transcription factor Sp3, which
is not known to be affected by TNF, showed no increase in nuclear
concentration. Together, these data demonstrate that the TNF signaling
pathway is intact and is functional in Sp1
/
cells.
MCP-1 Induction Is Severely Reduced in the Absence of Sp1--
To
determine if the loss of Sp1 affects the ability of MCP-1 to
be induced by TNF, a Northern blot was carried out on wild-type BALB/3T3 and Sp1
/
cells. As expected, in the
wild type, MCP-1 was induced rapidly and maintained
expression over the time course of the assay (Fig. 2). However, in the
Sp1
/
cells, the levels of MCP-1
were severely compromised (Fig. 2). Thus, Sp1 is required for maximal
expression of MCP-1. The low levels of expression suggest an
Sp1-independent pathway or that another factor is substituting for Sp1.
To determine if the loss of expression was due to Sp1, the
Sp1 cDNA was cloned into a mammalian expression vector.
This clone was transiently transfected into the
Sp1
/
cells. After 36 h, the cells were
treated with TNF. In comparison to wild-type NIH3T3 cells, MCP-1
induction by TNF was partially restored (data not shown),
suggesting that the disruption of the Sp1 gene was the cause
of the lack of MCP-1 induction by TNF.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
TNF induction of the MCP-1 requires Sp1.
An autoradiograph of a Northern blot of RNA (12 µg/lane) isolated
from Sp1 / cells and BALB/3T3 cells probed
with labeled MCP-1, and GAPDH cDNA is shown.
Cells were treated with TNF for 0-4 h as indicated.
|
|
Sp1 Is Required for Efficient Assembly of Both the Proximal and
Distal Regulatory Regions--
During TNF-induced expression, both the
distal and proximal regulatory regions of the MCP-1 gene
become occupied when examined by IVGF. In particular, the two distal
B sites show substantial changes in the footprint pattern, which are
due to NF-
B binding (10, 32). In addition to the proximal GC box,
site B at
72 is occupied as is
B-3 (10). To examine the ability of
TNF to induce the assembly of both the proximal and distal regulatory regions of MCP-1, IVGF was performed on cells treated with
TNF for 0.5 and 4 h (Fig. 3).
Compared with the wild-type control lanes, a slight footprint was
observed in the distal
B-binding sites at 0.5 h. A slight
change in footprint was also observed at the proximal GC box, but no
change was observed at site B. These results suggest that assembly of
both the proximal and distal regulatory regions is impaired in the
absence of Sp1. Moreover, the slight protection of the GC box suggests
that another factor with GC box binding activity may substitute for Sp1
but not with high efficiency. The observed occupancy by IVGF provides
an explanation for the low levels of MCP-1 mRNA that
accumulate following TNF treatment in Sp1
/
cells.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sp1 / cells treated
with TNF show reduced occupancy of both the proximal Sp1 region and the
distal NF- B region in
vivo. DNA isolated from Sp1 /
cells or BALB3T3 control cells treated with or without TNF for the
times indicated were analyzed by IVGF. IVGF patterns of the most
informative strands are shown as follows: for the proximal region the
lower strand, and for the distal region, the upper strand. The DNA
sequence with the wild-type pattern of IVGF protection in response to
TNF is shown (10, 32). Open and solid circles
show the sequences that became significantly occupied or became
DMS-hypersensitive after TNF treatment in BALB/3T3 cells,
respectively.
|
|
The Lack of Sp1 Does Not Affect NF-
B Binding Activity or Sp3
Binding Activity--
One explanation for the lack of activity might
be that cells lacking Sp1 may have either lower levels of NF-
B or
somehow the lack of Sp1 leads to decreased NF-
B binding activity. To determine if this may be the case, nuclear extracts prepared from BALB/3T3 cells and Sp1
/
cells treated with
TNF were compared. Extracts from Sp1
/
cells
treated with media instead of TNF were also prepared. EMSAs were
performed on the nuclear extracts using the MCP-1
B-2
sequence as a probe (Fig. 4A).
This sequence has a high affinity for NF-
B (10, 32). Whereas many
specific protein-DNA complexes form with this probe, complexes a and b
appear only in extracts from cells treated with TNF. Complexes a and b
appear in both wild-type and Sp1
/
cells. The
specificity of complex formation was demonstrated by specific and
nonspecific DNA competition experiments. The specificity for the p50
and p65 subunits was demonstrated by antibody-generated supershift
assays, which resulted in the formation of complexes c and d (Fig.
4A).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
NF- B and Sp3 bind
DNA in Sp1 / cells. Nuclear
extracts were prepared from the indicated cell types following media
control or TNF treatment (30 min). Four µg of extract was used in
binding assay. A, TNF-activated NF- B proteins bind the
MCP-1 B-2 site probe in EMSAs. Specific (SC)
and nonspecific (NC) DNA competitors, B-2 DNA or site B
DNA, respectively, were added prior to the addition of the probe.
Specific DNA protein complexes represented by bands a and
b induced in TNF-treated cells were supershifted by NF- B
p50 and p65 antibodies, respectively, to bands c and
d. Sp1 antibody did not supershift any of the complexes.
B, Sp3 binds to the proximal AP-1/GC box oligonucleotide in
EMSAs. Three bands, a-c, were detected in each of the
extracts and were competed by specific but not nonspecific competitor,
MCP-1 GC box DNA and site A DNA, respectively. Band
b has similar mobilities in both Sp1 /
and NIH3T3 extracts and was supershifted by Sp3 antibody in each of the
extracts. Band c has different mobilities in
Sp1 / cell extracts and NIH3T3 cell extracts.
Band c is supershifted by antibody to Sp1 in NIH3T3 cells
but not in Sp1 / cells. A control antibody to
c-Jun did not supershift any of the complexes.
|
|
To compare the binding activity of Sp3 in Sp1 wild-type and mutant
cells, EMSAs were performed using the above extracts with the
MCP-1 GC box probe (Fig. 4B). Three specific
protein DNA complexes (bands a, b, and c) formed on the
MCP-1 GC box. Two distinct mobilities were discerned for
complex c, depending on whether the extracts were prepared from
Sp1 wild-type or mutant cells. By using Sp1-specific antisera, antibody supershifted protein-DNA complexes were generated in
wild-type but not Sp1 mutant cells (band d). The protein-DNA complex represented in band b is found in all cells and is supershifted by antisera to Sp3. These data demonstrate that Sp1 binding activity is
not present in the Sp1
/
cell type. Moreover,
Sp3 binding activity is clearly present in both mutant and wild-type
cells, suggesting that Sp3 may substitute for Sp1 in the mutant cell types.
The IP-10 Gene Is Induced by TNF in Sp1
/
Cells--
To determine if genes that do not contain an Sp1-binding
site could be regulated by TNF in the Sp1
/
cell line, the IP-10 gene which does not contain a GC box
was examined after induction for RNA levels and occupancy of its
B-binding site(s). IP-10 is a chemokine that is regulated by both
TNF and IFN-
and is therefore a good candidate for this analysis.
RT-PCR was carried out on RNA prepared from control and TNF-treated
wild-type and Sp1
/
cells (Fig.
5A). The results show only a
small difference between Sp1 wild-type and mutant cells. To examine
further the ability of NF-
B to function in this system, IVGF was
carried out on the coding strand of the IP-10 promoter in
both BALB/3T3 and Sp1
/
cells (Fig.
5B). The IP-10 IVGF pattern has three points of
reference. An AP-1 site at
81 is partially protected in both
untreated and TNF-treated cells. The
B1 site is unoccupied in
untreated cells and displays a sharp hypersensitive band at
114 and a
slight decrease in the intensities of the G residues at
113 through
111 upon induction by TNF. At the
B2 site, the G at position
169
showed marginal protection after 30 min of TNF treatment. A similar
pattern was observed in control and TNF-treated
Sp1
/
cells, further supporting the
supposition that the Sp1
/
cell line is
responsive to TNF and that defects in NF-
B assembly at the
MCP-1 gene are due to a lack of Sp1.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
TNF induces IP-10 gene
expression in Sp1 / cells.
A, RT-PCR of IP-10 and GAPDH mRNA
isolated from control or TNF-treated (4 h) BALB/3T3 or
Sp1 / cells. B, IVGF of
IP-10 promoter region. Lane V, in vitro control.
The other lanes indicate genomic DNAs isolated at the indicated time
points following TNF treatment. Solid and open
circles indicate TNF-induced DMS hypersensitivity or occupancy,
respectively. Nucleotide positions are indicated from the start of
transcription of the IP-10 gene.
|
|
Sp1 or Sp3 Can Function with NF-
B to Activate Transcription of
MCP-1--
The accumulated data on MCP-1 gene regulation
suggest that a minimal set of gene-specific transcription factors for
the expression of the MCP-1 gene could consist of NF-
B
and Sp1 (10, 32, 33, 44-46). To test this hypothesis, the
Drosophila tissue culture system, which utilizes Schneider
cells, was employed. These cells lack both NF-
B and Sp1 (39, 47).
Schneider cells have been used in other systems to demonstrate a role
for Sp1 and NF-
B activity on a regulatory sequence (9, 39, 40, 48).
Thus, to determine if these factors could be sufficient, a
transcription reporter plasmid, driven by 2.6 kb of MCP-1 5'-flanking
DNA fused to the CAT gene, was cotransfected into Schneider cells with
plasmids expressing the p65 subunit of NF-
B and Sp1 (Fig.
6A). The wild-type MCP-1 vector contains both the proximal and distal
regulatory regions. Whereas plasmids expressing Sp1 and p65 provided
low levels of expression over background when introduced alone, a synergistic increase in expression was observed when both expression plasmids were introduced together. The synergistic effect was dependent
on the presence of both
B-binding sites and the GC box, as mutations
that scramble the sequence of these cis-acting elements had dramatic
effects on transcription (Fig. 6C). Mutation of the HS
sequence had no effect on expression of the reporter plasmid. This is
in contrast to TNF-treated cells, where mutation of the HS element
resulted in reduced expression (32), suggesting that the HS-DNA-binding
protein is not present in Drosophila cells. Thus, this
experiment suggests that Sp1 and p65 are the sufficient mammalian
factors required for expression of MCP-1. Interestingly, the addition
of an NF-
B p50 expression vector with p65 and the full
MCP-1 reporter resulted in lower levels of transcription than when p50 was omitted (Fig. 6B). This is similar to
previous observations in transfections in NIH3T3 cells (32), suggesting that the overexpression of p50 in cells may prevent activation of the
MCP-1 gene. It is possible that the overexpression of p50 competes for binding to the MCP-1
B sites and prevents
access by p65.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
High level expression of MCP-1
CAT constructions in Drosophila cells requires
both Sp1 and NF- B p65. Transient
transfections of the Drosophila Schneider cell line were
carried out using the indicated vectors as described under "Materials
and Methods." Assays were performed in triplicate, and the average is
shown with the standard error of the mean. A, Sp1 and
NF- B p65 cooperatively activate the wild-type pJECAT2.6 reporter
vector. B, NF- B p50 expression suppresses p65 and Sp1
dependent activation of the MCP-1 reporter. C,
both the distal NF- B sites and the proximal GC box are required for
the expression in Drosophila cells.
|
|
To test the hypothesis that Sp3 could substitute for Sp1 in the
regulation of MCP-1, an Sp3 expression vector was
cotransfected into Schneider cells with the wild-type MCP-1
reporter (Fig. 7). Similar to Sp1
transfections, Sp3 was able to stimulate expression of the reporter
gene in a synergistic manner with NF-
B p65 (Fig. 7A).
Also as above, mutations that destroyed the distal
B sites or the GC
box resulted in reduced activity from the reporter (Fig. 7B), and a mutation in the HS element had no effect. NF-
B
p50 also showed similar activity in repressing expression with p65 and
Sp3. Thus, these data suggest that Sp3 can also synergize with NF-
B
p65 to activate transcription of the MCP-1 gene. Moreover, these data support the hypothesis that Sp3 substitutes for Sp1 in the
Sp1
/
cells in providing low levels of
expression from the MCP-1 gene.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Sp3 can synergize with
NF- B p65 to activate expression of the
MCP-1 gene in Drosophila cells.
Transfection assays were performed as in Fig. 5 and as described under
"Materials and Methods." A, Sp3 cooperates with NF- B
p65 but not p50 to activate expression. B, both the distal
NF- B sites and the proximal GC box are required for the cooperative
induction.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented in this paper provide a genetic correlation
between the expression and activity of Sp1 and MCP-1 gene
regulation by the inflammatory cytokine TNF. This was demonstrated in
two systems. The first utilized a fibroblast-like cell line that was derived from ES cells that contained disruptions of both of its Sp1 alleles. The second system employed was the
Drosophila tissue culture system that lacks Sp1 and NF-
B
proteins. Each of these systems showed a dependence on Sp1 for
activity. The data showed that Sp3 was able to substitute for Sp1 in
the Drosophila cell lines and suggest that Sp3 may partially
substitute for the lack of Sp1 in the Sp1
/
ES cells.
The finding that the lack of Sp1 resulted in a considerable loss of
expression during TNF induction of MCP-1 was surprising considering that many genes thought to require Sp1 were not affected in
the ES cells or in early Sp1
/
embryos (41).
Even more surprising was the observation that the lack of Sp1 affected
the in vivo footprint at the distal regulatory region, which
is located ~2.4 kb upstream. This suggests that assembly of
sequence-specific transcription factors on DNA regulating MCP-1 is coordinate. Previous studies examining the assembly
of the distal and proximal regions in the presence and absence of the
p50 and p65 NF-
B subunits showed that whereas the absence of p50 did
not affect assembly in either region, p65 was required for assembly of
the distal region. IVGF experiments conducted on the proximal GC box
region in p65
/
cells showed a moderate decrease in
protection.2 Together these
results suggest that the p65 and Sp1 may interact over the 2.5 kb of
DNA separating their binding sites. NF-
B and Sp1 have been shown to
interact in other systems, which include the HIV promoter (38-40) and
VCAM-1 (48). But in each of these systems, the sites are in close
proximity to each other. Close proximity could allow direct
protein-protein interactions to occur between the DNA bound factors.
In the MCP-1 gene, Sp1 and NF-
B could also interact in a
direct manner. The removal of the DNA between the distal and proximal regulatory regions had no effect on the overall level of activation in
a transient transfection system (32), suggesting that there is no need
to have the sites far apart. Interactions between the distal and
proximal regions could occur through the looping of chromatin DNA.
Another possibility is that Sp1 and NF-
B interact with a
cofactor/coactivator that remodels chromatin, such as CBP/p300 or
members of the SWI·SNF complex. NF-
B p65 has been shown by several
groups to interact with CBP/p300 (49, 50). Because CBP/p300 have
histone acetylase activity, this suggests that the recruitment of these
factors could aid in the remodeling of chromatin encoding
MCP-1. Nucleosome repositioning occurs in the HIV promoter upon activation and involves both NF-
B and Sp1 (51). It is possible
that such repositioning by an Sp1-mediated event could translate
upstream to the
B sites and allow binding and gene activation.
Recently, several multiprotein coactivator complexes have been
described that appear to link either Sp1 or NF-
B to the general
transcription machinery have been described and termed CRSP and ARC
(52-55). If active in the cells studied here, it is possible that
these complexes may provide a physical connection between the proximal
and distal regulatory regions of the MCP-1 gene.
The ability of Sp3 to activate or repress gene expression at GC boxes
is not well resolved and appears to be dependent on the gene being
assayed (56-58). Our data support a role for Sp3 in the activation of
transcription. The ability of Sp3 to synergize with NF-
B to activate
expression in the Drosophila system was indistinguishable
from that of Sp1. However, Sp3 could not compensate completely for Sp1
in the regulation of MCP-1 by TNF in the
Sp1
/
cells. Thus, differences in
promoter composition are likely to play a large role in whether Sp1 or
Sp3 is recruited or is able to activate expression.
Our data suggest that Sp1 may be required for the expression of other
TNF-regulated genes. As stated above, genes that are activated by TNF
use NF-
B as the primary activator of transcription. Many of these
genes also have Sp1-binding sites located close to the start of
transcription (59). Thus, it is reasonable to consider that in such
genes NF-
B may require Sp1 to activate transcription or to aid in
the repositioning/remodeling of chromatin. Such dependence of one
activator on another may explain the lethality of
Sp1
/
embryos, where the presence of one
critical factor is missing. It is also possible that the observed
effects of Sp1 on MCP-1 expression are unique to the
distance between the Sp1 site and the
B sites. If this is the case,
then we expect that analysis of other genes, such as the manganous
superoxide dismutase gene, where the regulatory sites are also
separated by several
B will have a similar dependence on Sp1,
whereas genes that have compact
B/GC regulatory regions will not.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to the generous contributions
made by Drs. T. Collins (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston), A. Neish (Emory University), and R. Tjian (University of California,
Berkeley) in supplying NF-
B p50, NF-
B p65, Sp1, and Sp3
expression vectors. We also thank A. Neish for comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
grant CA74271 (to J. M. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
404-727-5973; Fax: 404-727-1719; E-mail:
boss@microbio.emory.edu.
2
D. Ping, G. Boekhoudt, and J. M. Boss,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TNF, tumor necrosis
factor;
MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1;
kb, kilobase pair;
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth
factor;
IFN, interferon;
IVGF, in vivo genomic footprinting;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility
shift assay;
DMS, dimethyl sulfate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kronke, M.,
Schutze, S.,
Scheurich, P.,
and Pfizenmaier, K.
(1992)
Immunol. Ser.
56,
189-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Gordon, H. M.,
Kucera, G.,
Salvo, R.,
and Boss, J. M.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
148,
4021-4027[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Schutze, S.,
Wiegmann, K.,
Machleidt, T.,
and Kronke, M.
(1995)
Immunobiology
193,
193-203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Schmid, R. M.,
Duckett, C. S.,
Leung, K.,
Rice, N. R.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1529-1533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Baldwin, A. S.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-681[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Delhase, M.,
Hayakawa, M.,
Chen, Y.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
Science
284,
309-312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Ghosh, S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1990)
Nature
344,
678-682[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Thanos, D.,
Du, W.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1993)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
58,
73-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Thanos, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
Cell
83,
1091-1100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Ping, D.,
Jones, P. L.,
and Boss, J. M.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
455-469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Jones, P. L.,
Ping, D.,
and Boss, J. M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6970-6981[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Baggiolini, M.,
Dewald, B.,
and Moser, B.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
675-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Howard, O. M. Z.,
Ben-Baruch, A.,
and Oppenheim, J. J.
(1996)
Trends Biotechnol.
14,
46-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Ransohoff, R. M.,
Glabinski, A.,
and Tani, M.
(1996)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
7,
35-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Luster, A. D.,
and Rothenberg, M. E.
(1997)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
62,
620-633[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Schwartz, C. J.,
Valente, A. J.,
Sprague, E. A.,
Kelley, J. L.,
and Nerem, R. M.
(1991)
Clin. Cardiol.
14,
I1-I16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Weiss, L.,
Si-Mohamed, A.,
Giral, P.,
Castiel, P.,
Ledur, A.,
Blondin, C.,
Kazatchkine, M. D.,
and Haeffner-Cavaillon, N.
(1997)
J. Infect. Dis.
176,
1621-1624[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sozzani, S.,
Introna, M.,
Bernasconi, S.,
Polentarutti, N.,
Cinque, P.,
Poli, G.,
Sica, A.,
and Mantovani, A.
(1997)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
62,
30-33[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Brown, Z.,
Robson, R. L.,
and Westwick, J.
(1996)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
59,
75-80[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Baggiolini, M.,
and Dahinden, C. A.
(1994)
Immunol. Today
15,
127-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Lloyd, C. M.,
Dorf, M. E.,
Proudfoot, A.,
Salant, D. J.,
and Gutierrez-Ramos, J.-C.
(1997)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
62,
676-680[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Cochran, B. H.,
Reffel, A. C.,
and Stiles, C. D.
(1983)
Cell
33,
939-947[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Zhou, Z. H.,
Chartuvedi, L.,
Han, P.,
Aras, S.,
Li, Y.,
Kolattukudy, E.,
Ping, D.,
Boss, J. M.,
and Ransohoff, R. M.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
2908-2916
|
| 24.
|
Gibran, N. S.,
Ferguson, M.,
Heimbach, D. M.,
and Isik, F. F.
(1997)
J. Surg. Res.
70,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Shyy, J. Y.-J.,
Li, Y.-S.,
Lin, M.-C.,
Chen, W.,
Yuan, S.,
Usami, S.,
and Chien, S.
(1995)
J. Biomech.
28,
1451-1457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Glabinski, A. R.,
Balasingam, V.,
Tani, M.,
Kunkel, S. L.,
Strieter, R. M.,
Yong, V. W.,
and Ransohoff, R. M.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
4363-4368[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Faller, D. V.,
Weng, H.,
Graves, D. T.,
and Choi, S.-Y.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
172,
240-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Hanazawa, S.,
Takeshita, A.,
and Kitano, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21379-21384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Kawahara, R. S.,
Deng, Z.-W.,
and Deuel, T. F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13261-13266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Frazier-Jessen, M. R.,
and Kovacs, E. J.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
1838-1845[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Brach, M. A.,
Gruss, H.-J.,
Riedel, D.,
Asano, Y.,
Vos, S. D.,
and Herrmann, F.
(1992)
Mol. Pharmacol.
42,
63-68[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Ping, D.,
Bodkhoudt, G. H.,
Rogers, E. M.,
and Boss, J. M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
727-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ping, D.,
Boekhoudt, G.,
and Boss, J. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31909-31916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.,
Carner, K. R.,
Masiarz, F. R.,
and Tjian, R.
(1987)
Cell
51,
1079-1090[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Dynan, W. S.,
Saffer, J. D.,
Lee, W. S.,
and Tjian, R.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
4915-4919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Charron, D.
(1990)
Adv. Immunol.
48,
107-160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Smale, S. T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
103-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Pazin, M. J.,
Sheridan, P. L.,
Cannon, K.,
Cao, Z.,
Keck, J. G.,
Kadonaga, J. T.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
37-49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Edwards, N. L.,
Duckett, C. S.,
Agranoff, A. B.,
Schmid, R. M.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3551-3558[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Agranoff, A. B.,
Pascal, E.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6570-6583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Marin, M.,
Karis, A.,
Visser, P.,
Grosveld, F.,
and Philipsen, S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
619-628[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Freter, R. R.,
Alberta, J. A.,
Lam, K. K.,
and Stiles, C. D.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
315-325[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Ito, C. Y.,
Kazantsev, A. G.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3787-3792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ueda, A.,
Okuda, K.,
Ohno, S.,
Shirai, A.,
Igarashi, T.,
Matsunaga, K.,
Fukushima, J.,
Kawamoto, S.,
Ishigatsubo, Y.,
and Okubo, T.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
2052-2063[Abstract]
|
| 45.
|
Ueda, A.,
Ishigatsubo, Y.,
Okubo, T.,
and Yoshimura, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31092-31099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Freter, R. R.,
Alberta, J. A.,
Hwang, G. Y.,
Wrentmore, A. L.,
and Stiles, C. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17417-17424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Courey, A. J.,
and Tjian, R.
(1988)
Cell
55,
887-898[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Neish, A. S.,
Khachigian, L. M.,
Park, A.,
Baichwal, V. R.,
and Collins, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28903-28909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Gerritsen, M. E.,
Williams, A. J.,
Neish, A. S.,
Moore, S.,
Shi, Y.,
and Collins, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2927-2932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Zhong, H.,
Voll, R. E.,
and Ghosh, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
661-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Steger, D. J.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2463-2472[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Naar, A. M.,
Ryu, S.,
and Tjian, R.
(1998)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
63,
189-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Naar, A. M.,
Beaurang, P. A.,
Zhou, S.,
Abraham, S.,
Solomon, W.,
and Tjian, R.
(1999)
Nature
398,
828-832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Naar, A. M.,
Beaurang, P. A.,
Robinson, K. M.,
Oliner, J. D.,
Avizonis, D.,
Scheek, S.,
Kadonaga, J. T.,
and Tjian, R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3020-3031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|