J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 1897-1901, January 21, 2000
Primary Structure and Function Analysis of the Abrus
precatorius Agglutinin A Chain by Site-directed Mutagenesis
Pro199 OF AMPHIPHILIC
-HELIX H IMPAIRS
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS INHIBITORY ACTIVITY*
Chao-Lin
Liu
,
Chia-Chu
Tsai
,
Su-Chang
Lin§,
Li-In
Wang
,
Chong-Ing
Hsu
,
Ming-Jing
Hwang¶, and
Jung-Yaw
Lin
From the
Institute of Biochemistry, College of
Medicine, National Taiwan University, the § Institute of
Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, and the
¶ Institute of Biomedicine, Academia Sinica, Nankang,
Taipei , Taiwan, Republic of China
 |
ABSTRACT |
Abrus agglutinin (AAG), a
low-toxicity protein from the plant Abrus precatorius, is
less lethal than abrina (ABRa) in mice (LD50 = 5 mg/kg
versus 20 µg/kg of body weight). Nucleotide sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding full-length AAG showed an open reading frame with 1641 base pairs, corresponding to a 547-amino acid
residue preproprotein containing a signal peptide and a linker region
(two amino acid residues) between the AAG-A and AAG-B subunits. AAG had
high homology to ABRa (77.8%). The 13 amino acid residues involved in
catalytic function, which are highly conserved among abrins and ricins,
were also conserved within AAG-A. The protein synthesis inhibitory
activity of AAG-A (IC50 = 3.5 nM) was weaker than that of ABRa-A (0.05 nM). Molecular modeling followed
by site-directed mutagenesis showed that Pro199 of AAG-A,
located in amphiphilic helix H and corresponding to Asn200
of ABRa-A, can induce bending of helix H. This bending would presumably
affect the binding of AAG-A to its target sequence, GpApGpAp, in the
tetraloop structure of the 28 S rRNA subunit and could be one of the
major factors contributing to the relatively weak protein synthesis
inhibitory activity and toxicity of AAG.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ribosome-inactivating proteins
(RIPs)1 compose a family of
N-glycosidases that cleave a specific adenine residue from
the
-sarcin-ricin loop of the 28 S rRNA. In rats, for example, RIPs
were found to hydrolyze the C-N glycosidic bond of the adenosine
residue at position 4324 of the 28 S rRNA subunit (1, 2). RIPs can cleave a synthetic RNA structure with a short double-helical stem and a
loop containing a centered GpApGpAp sequence, the first A being the
cleavage site (3). The depurination blocks the ability of ribosomes to
bind to elongation factor-2 (4), thereby inhibiting protein synthesis.
There are two categories of RIP, type I (single chain) and type II (two
chains) (5). Type II RIPs contain two types of subunit: the B chain, a
lectin with two D-galactose moiety-binding sites (6); and
the A chain, which inhibits protein synthesis (7). The B chain
facilitates translocation of type II RIPs into cells. Type I RIPs, such
as trichosanthin and momorcharin (8, 9), carry the toxophoric A chain
only. Because they lack the B chain and therefore cannot be easily
translocated into cells, they are less toxic than type II RIPs
(10).
Two kinds of type II RIP have been isolated from jequirity bean, the
plant Abrus precatorius (5, 11). One kind, abrin (ABR), is
extremely toxic to eukaryotic cells; the other kind, Abrus
agglutinin (AAG), is of low toxicity. ABRs are heterodimeric glycoproteins, whereas AAG is a heterotetrameric glycoprotein. Both of
these type II RIPs inhibit the growth of tumors in experimental animals
(7, 12); ABR is 10-100 times more toxic to some transformed cell lines
than to normal cells (13).
Many attempts have been made to study the structure and function of
these toxic proteins; this interest has been stimulated in part by the
use of the A chain in the preparation of immunotoxins for cancer
chemotherapy (14, 15). The therapeutic indexes of AAG and ABRa are
similar (12). However, ABRa is extremely toxic, with an
LD50 of 20 µg/kg of body weight; the LD50 of
the relatively nontoxic AAG, on the other hand, is 5 mg/kg of body weight (10). The remarkable disparity prompted us to examine the causes
for this difference in the toxicity of ABRa and AAG at the molecular level.
In this paper, we report the determination of the amino acid sequence
of AAG by protein techniques and the molecular cloning of the cDNA
encoding AAG. Using molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis,
we found that Asn200 of ABRa-A and Pro199 of
AAG-A are involved in the differences in the protein synthesis inhibition and toxicity of these two type II RIPs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Taq DNA polymerase, the pGEM-T and
pGEM-T-easy vectors, and the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system were
obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). Restriction endonucleases and T4
ligase were purchased from New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA).
Deoxyribonucleotide primers were synthesized by the phosphoramidite
method in an Applied Biosystems automated DNA synthesizer. The Marathon
cDNA amplification kit was from CLONTECH (Palo
Alto, CA). The pGEX-2T expression vector and all columns used for
protein purification were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden).
Purification of Abrus Agglutinin Subunits and Determination of
Amino Acid Sequences--
AAG was purified from extracts of mature
A. precatorius seeds as described previously (11). AAG-A and
AAG-B were separated and purified by fractionation of reduced AAG
through a Sephadex G-150 column (1.8 × 90 cm), which was eluted
with 0.01 M Tris (pH 8.6) in 6 M urea and 0.13 M 2-mercaptoethanol. AAG-A was found in the first protein
peak, whereas AAG-B was found in the second protein peak. The
homogeneity of purified lectins and their subunits was analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as described by Laemmli
(16), and the protein concentration was measured by the bicinchoninic
acid method (17).
The amino acid sequences of AAG-A and AAG-B were determined by protein
techniques as previously reported (18). AAG was cleaved with cyanogen
bromide as described previously (19) to facilitate analysis of the
primary structure. The cleavage products were separated by SDS-PAGE and
subsequently electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane.
The blot was stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue and destained
with 50% methanol. The sequences of the peptide bands were analyzed
with an ABI 476A sequencer.
The peptides generated by L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl
chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin, Lys-C endoproteinase, or
Streptococcus aureus V8 endoproteinase digestion and
cyanogen bromide cleavage were purified by HPLC on a C18 reverse-phase
column (4.6 mm × 20 cm), which was eluted with a linear gradient
of acetonitrile (10-70%) in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The amino
acid sequences of the purified peptides were then determined as
described above.
Preparation of Abrus Agglutinin cDNA and 5'- and
3'-RACE--
Total cellular RNA was extracted from fresh maturing
seeds of A. precatorius, which had been collected at the
beginning of October from the plantation of the National Institute of
Forestry at the Ken-Tin National Park, by the guanidium thiocyanate
procedure (20). The poly(A+) RNA fraction was obtained by
oligo(dT)-cellulose column chromatography as described previously (21),
and poly(A+)-rich mRNA was reverse-transcribed with the
Marathon cDNA amplification kit. The resulting cDNAs were
ligated to Marathon adaptors for 5'- and 3'-RACE and used as the
template for the subsequent PCR steps.
The N-terminal and internal amino acid sequences of AAG were used to
design degenerate oligonucleotide primers for amplification of AAG
cDNA for 5'- and 3'-RACE. The PCR profile for each of the RACE PCR
steps was as follow: 35 cycles of denaturation of 94 °C for 1 min,
annealing at 45 °C for 1 min, and extension at 67 °C for 2 min.
The PCR products were ligated to T vector for amplification and DNA
sequencing (22, 23).
For the first PCR, AAG cDNA was amplified with the sense degenerate
primer A and the antisense degenerate primer B, corresponding to amino
acids 119-127 and 222-228 of AAG-B, respectively. The amplified
product was sequenced and used to design the specific antisense primer
GSP-1, corresponding to amino acids 129-135 of AAG-B. GSP-1 was then
used with the sense degenerate primer C, derived from amino acids 1-8
of AAG-A, for the second PCR. The product of the second PCR step was
sequenced and used to design the specific antisense primer GSP-2,
corresponding to amino acids 11-17 of AAG-A. In the third PCR step,
GSP-2 was used along with the Marathon primer AP-1. The product of this
step was used as the template for the fourth PCR step, in which GSP-2
was used along with the sense primer AP-2 to yield the 5'-end of the
AAG cDNA.
The DNA sequence of the product obtained from the first PCR step was
also used to design GSP-3, a specific sense primer corresponding to
amino acids 174-182 of AAG-B. GSP-3 was then used along with the
Marathon primers AP-1 and AP-2 in consecutive PCR steps, as described
above, to yield the 3'-end of the AAG cDNA.
The full-length AAG cDNA was obtained by fusion of the
corresponding 5'- and 3'-RACE fragments. The AAG cDNA encoding
AAG-A, linker, and AAG-B was obtained by amplifying A. precatorius cDNA with the sense primer GSP-4, which encodes
the first seven N-terminal amino acid residues of AAG-A, and the
antisense primer GSP-5 (which encodes the last eight C-terminal amino
acid residues and the stop codon of AAG-B. The PCR product was then
ligated into the T vector pTAAGcDNA (Fig.
1 and Table I).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
cDNA cloning of AAG. Shown is a
schematic diagram of the cloning strategy for AAG cDNA.
U, untranslated region; S, signal peptide;
L, linker. The double-stranded cDNAs were ligated to
adaptors and subjected to PCR with various primers as shown in Table
I.
|
|
Expression of AAG-A in Escherichia coli--
To construct the
AAG-A expression vector, we obtained AAG-A cDNA by amplifying
pTAAGcDNA with the sense primer GSP-6, which encodes the first
seven N-terminal amino acid residues of AAG-A behind a BamHI
restriction site, and the antisense primer GSP-7, which encodes the
last seven C-terminal amino acid residues of AAG-A with a stop codon
following an EcoRI restriction site. The amplified
BamHI-EcoRI fragment of AAG-A was also ligated
into the T-easy vector to form pTAAG-A for amplification and nucleotide sequence analysis. The AAG-A fragment was then ligated into pGEX-2T to
yield the expression vector pGEX-AAG-A (24).
The transformed cells were grown to a density of ~4 × 108 cells/ml and induced with 0.5 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside at 30 °C for
4 h. The fusion protein was then purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B column chromatography and treated with thrombin. The reaction products were purified with a Mono Q fast protein liquid chromatography column (1.6 × 50 mm) to obtain reAAG-A (25).
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out as described previously (26).
A mutated primer, GSP-8, was synthesized to obtain the site-specific
mutant AAG P199N, whereas another mutated primer, GSP-9, was used to
obtain ABRa-A N200P (Table I).
Measurement of in Vitro Protein Synthesis Inhibition--
The
inhibitory effects of the wild-type and mutant proteins on translation
in vitro were examined by measuring the incorporation of
L-[3H]leucine into protein in a rabbit
reticulocyte cell-free system as described previously (25). Various
amounts of AAG-A, ABRa-A, or their mutant proteins were mixed with 11.5 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate in 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH
7.8) containing 4 µCi/ml L-[3H]leucine, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and
50 mM KCl, followed by incubation at 30 °C for 90 min.
The reaction products were precipitated with 25% trichloroacetic acid
and collected on glass microfiber filters, and the radioactivity of the
filters was determined with a liquid scintillation counter. Each
reported value is the mean of triplicate samples.
Molecular Modeling of AAG and ABRa--
Molecular modeling of
AAG-A was performed using the crystal structure of ABRa-A obtained from
the Protein Data Bank as the template (27). The amino acid sequence of
AAG-A was aligned with the sequence of ABRa-A to optimize identities.
Amino acid substitutions, insertions, and deletions in AAG-A and ABRa-A
were simulated with Program Quanta on a Silicon Graphics system
(28-30).
 |
RESULTS |
Purification and Determination of the Amino Acid Sequence of Abrus
Agglutinin--
Sequential chromatography through Sepharose 6B and
Sephadex G-100 columns typically yielded 450 mg of purified AAG from
200 g of seeds. Fractionation of 10 mg of reduced AAG on a
Sephadex G-150 column in the presence of 6 M urea and 0.13 mM 2-mercaptoethanol yielded roughly 1.5 mg of AAG-A and
2.5 mg of AAG-B. The complete primary structure of AAG was determined
by sequencing the peptides generated by Lys-C endoproteinase, S. aureus V8 endoproteinase, or
L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated
trypsin digestion and cyanogen bromide treatment (Fig.
2). The calculated molecular masses of
AAG-A and AAG-B were 28,618 and 29,981 Da, respectively.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Complete amino acid sequence of AAG. The
peptides generated by trypsin, S. aureus V8 endoproteinase,
or Lys-C endoproteinase digestion and cyanogen bromide cleavage of AAG
were purified by reverse-phase HPLC. The C1 and C161 cyanogen bromide
cleavage fragments were obtained by SDS-PAGE followed by
electroblotting onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The amino
acid sequences of purified peptides were determined with an ABI 476A
sequencer. The designations of peptides are as follows: T,
trypsin; L, Lys-C endoproteinase; V, S. aureus V8 endoproteinase; and C, cyanogen
bromide.
|
|
Alignment of the amino acid sequences of AAG and ABRa showed high
homology: AAG-A and ABRa-A had 168 (66.9%) invariant residues and 27 (10.8%) similar residues, whereas AAG-B and ABRa-B had 214 (80.2%)
invariant residues and 17 (6.4%) similar residues (Fig.
3).

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Alignment of amino acid sequences of AAG and
ABRa, ABRb, and ABRd. The completely conserved residues are marked
by asterisks. Sites of potential asparagine-linked
N-glycosylation are shown in black. The linkers
between the A and B chains are boxed. The six or seven
N-terminal amino acid residues are underlined.
|
|
Thirteen amino acid residues at the proposed active site, including two
catalytic residues, Glu163 and Arg166, have
been reported to be highly conserved among type I and II RIPs (31);
these 13 residues were completely conserved within AAG-A. Two putative
galactose-binding residues, Asn51 and Asn260,
were present in AAG-B; these residues are also present in ABRa-B at the
same sites. ABRa contains two putative N-linked
oligosaccharide glycosylation sites (at Asn100 and
Asn140) in the B chain and none in the A chain (32).
Sequence analysis showed that AAG-B contains two glycosylation sites at
the same locations as in ABRa-B, whereas AAG-A contains a new
glycosylation site, Asn250, not present in ABRa-A.
Cloning of the Abrus Agglutinin cDNA--
RNA extraction from
15 g of A. precatorius seeds yielded 275 mg of total
RNA. Sequence analysis showed that the AAG cDNA contains 2047 base
pairs, with an open reading frame encoding a preproprotein with 547 amino acid residues: a 20-residue signal peptide, a 258-residue polypeptide (AAG-A), a 2-residue linker peptide, and a 267-residue polypeptide (AAG-B). The complete amino acid sequence of AAG deduced from the nucleotide sequence of AAG cDNA was identical to that determined by the protein sequencing techniques, except that there were
two extra residues, Arg259 and Ser260, which
form the internal linker between AAG-A and AAG-B. These results
indicate that the precursor synthesized from the open reading frame of
the AAG mRNA is post-translationally cleaved into AAG-A and AAG-B,
which are linked by a disulfide bond.
Expression and Function of the Abrus Agglutinin A Chain--
The
yield of reAAG-A after affinity column purification and thrombin
digestion of the glutathione S-transferase-AAG-A fusion protein followed by Mono Q chromatography purification was 1.0 mg/liter
of induced culture. reAAG-A was homogeneous upon analysis by 10%
SDS-PAGE, with an estimated molecular mass of 29 kDa (Fig. 4). Analysis of the protein synthesis
inhibitory activity of reAAG-A showed the IC50 of reAAG-A
to be 3.5 nM, which is similar to that of native AAG-A and
70-fold weaker than that of ABRa-A (26).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
SDS-PAGE analysis of native and recombinant
proteins. Samples of purified proteins and recombinant proteins
were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining. Lane
1, AAG; lane 2, molecular mass markers
(phosphorylase b, 97.4 kDa; serum albumin, 66.2 kDa;
ovalbumin, 45.0 kDa; carbonic anhydrase, 31.0 kDa; trypsin inhibitor,
21.5 kDa; and lysozyme, 14.4 kDa); lane 3, AAG
treated with 2-mercaptoethanol; lane 4, AAG-B;
lane 5, AAG-A; lane 6,
reAAG-A; lane 7, reAAG-A P199N; lane
8, reABRa-A; lane 9, reABRa-A
N200P.
|
|
Molecular modeling was carried out to elucidate the structural features
of AAG-A that might cause its lower inhibitory activity. The model
showed that one of the putative substrate-binding sites of ABRa-A,
Asn200, which corresponds to Arg213 of ricin
(31), was substituted with Pro199 in AAG-A. Expression
plasmids carrying AAG-A P199N and ABRa-A N200P were created, and
reAAG-A P199N and reABRa-A N200P were purified to examine their
inhibitory effects on protein synthesis in the rabbit reticulocyte
lysate system. reAAG-A P199N (IC50 = 0.53 nM)
was 7-fold more potent than wild-type reAAG-A, whereas reABRa-A N200P
(IC50 = 2.3 nM) was 46-fold less potent than
wild-type reABRa-A (Fig. 5).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of reABRa-A and reAAG-A and their
mutant proteins on protein synthesis. The inhibitory effects of
reABRa-A and reAAG-A and their mutant proteins on protein biosynthesis
were examined in the rabbit reticulocyte cell-free system. ,
reABRa-A; , reAAG-A; ×, reABRa-A N200P; , reAAG-A P199N.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results of this study show that AAG is composed of 547 amino
acid residues: 258 residues in AAG-A and 267 residues in AAG-B plus a
2-residue linker and a 20-residue signal peptide. Alignment of the
amino acid sequence of AAG with those of ABRa, ABRb, and ABRd (32)
shows considerable similarity among these four type II RIPs, with 347 invariant amino acid residues (66.1%) (Fig. 3); there are 382, 368, and 380 invariant residues between AAG and ABRa, ABRb, and ABRd, respectively.
The phylogenic tree constructed from the sequence similarity suggests
that the three isoabrins are more closely related to each other than to
AAG (33). Furthermore, the isoabrins have been classified into two
subtypes according to their N-terminal sequence; the N-terminal amino
acid sequence of type A-1 (ABRa) is Glu-Asp-Arg-Pro-Ile-Lys-Phe,
whereas that of type A-2 (ABRb and ABRd) is Gln-Asp-Gln-Val-Ile-Lys-Phe
(32). Comparison of the amino acid sequence of AAG-A with those of
ABRs indicated that the isoabrins were derived from AAG (Fig.
3).
Analysis of the primary structure of AAG revealed the presence of three
putative consensus sequences (Asn-Xan-(Ser/Thr)) for Asn-linked
oligosaccharide chain attachment; AAG-B contains glycosylation sites at
Asn110 and Asn140, which are also present in
ABRa-B, whereas AAG-A contains a new N-glycosylation site at
Asn250, which is not present in ABRa-A. Steric hindrance by
the oligosaccharide at this putative glycosylation site,
Asn250-Ala251-Thr252, could render
AAG-A resistant to proteolytic digestion at
Asn250-Ala251 during post-translational
processing. The AAG-A cDNA was cloned and expressed in E. coli, and purified reAAG-A was found to be as biologically active
as native AAG-A, with an IC50 of 3.5 nM. This
suggests that glycosylation at Asn250 of AAG-A is not
indispensable for its biologic activity.
The putative endopeptidase cleavage sites of the AAG precursor are
Ile258-Arg259, at the N terminus of the linker
dipeptide, and Ser260-Val261, at the C terminus
of the linker peptide (Fig. 6). Thus,
whereas the internal linker of the ABRa precursor is cleaved as a
decapeptide (34), the AAG proprotein is cleaved at
Ile258-Arg259, releasing the internal linker
dipeptide Arg-Ser. Several plant lectins and trypsin inhibitors have
been reported to share similar post-translational processing. The
C-terminal cleavage site of the AAG proprotein is the same as those of
ABRa-A and Acacia confusa trypsin inhibitor, whereas the
N-terminal cleavage site differs from those of ABRa-A and A. confusa trypsin inhibitor (34). The cleavage sites of AAG and the
ABRs are also quite different from those of ricin (35), Ricinus
communis agglutinin (36), Sambucus
sieboldiana agglutinin (21), pea legumin (37), and soybean
glycinin (38).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Alignment of amino acid sequences of linker
regions of three plant proteins: AAG, ABRa, and A. confusa
trypsin inhibitor. The linkers are underlined.
ACTI, A. confusa trypsin inhibitor.
|
|
The cDNAs of the A chains of three ABRs have been cloned and
expressed in E. coli (25, 32). X-ray crystallographic
analysis of type II RIPs has been carried out (27, 39-41), and a well defined cleft at the active site was proposed (42). The invariant amino
acid residues clustered together around the ABRa putative active site
are Tyr74, Tyr113, Glu164,
Arg167, and Trp198. Site-directed mutagenesis
studies of these residues showed that Glu164 and
Arg167 are directly involved in catalysis, whereas
Tyr74, Tyr113, and Trp198 are
involved in substrate binding (25, 26).
The invariant amino acid residues conserved among most RIPs are also
conserved in AAG-A. However, AAG-A has only a very weak inhibitory
activity (IC50 = 3.5 nM) compared with ABRa-A
(IC50 = 0.05 nM) despite the structural
similarity of the two. Comparison of the structures of these two
proteins revealed that Asn200 of ABRa-A, corresponding to
Arg213 of the ricin A chain, is required for the binding of
substrate to the GpApGpAp sequence in the tetraloop located at the
3'-terminal region of 28 S rRNA (43, 44). However, in AAG-A, this
residue is replaced by Pro199. This substitution could
cause bending of amphiphilic helix H of AAG-A, thus hindering the
interactions between AAG-A and its substrate at the centered GpApGpAp
sequence. A similar situation has been reported previously (45) in
which Pro14 of melittin caused 120° bending between
segments 1-10 and 14-26 of the
-helix. Replacement of
Asn200 of ABRa-A with Pro by site-directed mutagenesis
remarkably increased the IC50, whereas substitution of
Pro199 with Asn markedly decreased the IC50 of
AAG-A. This suggests that Asn200 of ABRa-A is important for
its inhibitory activity.
ABRa and AAG have similar therapeutic indexes for the treatment of
experimental mice with tumors (12), but AAG has much lower toxicity
(LD50 = 5 mg/kg of body weight) compared with ABRa (LD50 = 20 µg/kg of body weight). In our recent studies,
AAG and ABRa were found to cause apoptosis; the antitumor activity is significantly correlated with
apoptosis.2 Further
investigations are needed to study the apoptosis induced by AAG and
ABRa with the goal of developing immunotoxins for cancer chemotherapy.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Jeff Racliff for careful reading of
the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Grant
NSC88-2314-B-002-002 from the National Science Council, Republic of
China.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF190173.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of
Biochemistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 9F, No. 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Rd., Taipei 100, Taiwan, ROC. Tel.: 886-2-23123456 (ext. 8206/8207); Fax: 886-2-23415334; E-mail:
linma@tpts4.seed.net.tw.
2
S.-F. Shih, Y.-H. Wu, C.-H. Hung, C.-L. Liu,
C.-C. Tsai, S.-C. Lin, L.-I. Wang, C.-I. Hsu, M.-J. Hwang, and J.-Y.
Lin, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RIPs, ribosome-inactivating proteins;
ABR, abrin;
ABRa, abrina;
ABRa-A and
ABRa-B, abrina A and B chains, respectively;
reABRa, recombinant
abrina;
ABRs, ABRa, ABRb, and ABRd;
AAG, Abrus agglutinin;
AAG-A and AAG-B, Abrus agglutinin A and B chains,
respectively;
reAAG, recombinant Abrus agglutinin;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
GSP, gene-specific primer;
AP, adaptor
primer.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Endo, Y.,
and Tsurugi, K.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
8128-8130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Endo, Y.,
Misui, K.,
Motizuki, K.,
and Tsurugi, K.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5908-5912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Endo, Y.,
Gluck, A.,
and Wool, I. G.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
221,
193-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Jimenez, A.,
and Vazquez, D.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
39,
649-672[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Barbieri, L.,
and Stripe, F.
(1982)
Cancer Surv.
1,
489-520
|
| 6.
|
Nicolson, G. L.,
and Blaustein, J.
(1972)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
266,
543-547[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Olsnes, S.,
and Phil, A.
(1982)
in
Receptors and Recognition Series: The Specificity and Action of Animal, Bacterial and Plant Toxins
(Cuatrecasas, P., ed), Vol. 31
, p. 131, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London
|
| 8.
|
Ma, X. Q.,
Wang, Y. P.,
and Wang, J. H.
(1987)
Sci. Sin. Ser. B
30,
692-697
|
| 9.
|
Huang, Q.,
Liu, S.,
Tang, Y.,
Jin, S.,
and Wang, Y.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
309,
285-298
|
| 10.
|
Stripe, F.,
Barbieri, L.,
Battelli, M. G.,
Soria, M.,
and Lappi, D. A.
(1992)
Bio/Technology
10,
405-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Lin, J. Y.,
Lee, T. C.,
Hu, S. T.,
and Tung, T. C.
(1981)
Toxicon
19,
41-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lin, J. Y.,
Li, J. S.,
and Tung, T. C.
(1981)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
66,
523-528
|
| 13.
|
Nicolson, G. L.,
Lacorbiere, M.,
and Hunter, T. R.
(1972)
Cancer Res.
35,
144-155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Oeltmann, T. N.,
and Frankel, A. E.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2334-2337[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Brinkmann, U.,
Pai, L. H.,
FitzGerald, D. J.,
Willingham, M.,
and Pastan, I.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8616-8620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Smith, P. K.,
Krohn, R. I.,
Hermanson, G. T.,
Mallia, A. K.,
Gartner, F. H.,
Provenzano, M. D.,
Fujimoto, E. K.,
Goeke, N. M.,
Olson, B. J.,
and Klenk, D. C.
(1985)
Anal. Biochem.
150,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Chen, Y.-L.,
Chow, L. P.,
Tsugita, A.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
309,
115-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Lin, S.-H.,
Chow, L. P.,
Chen, Y.-L.,
Liaw, Y. C.,
Chen, J. K.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
240,
564-569[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 7-10, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 21.
|
Kaku, H.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Tazaki, K.,
Minami, E.,
Mizuno, H.,
and Shibuya, N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1480-1485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Smith, L. M.,
Sanders, J. Z.,
Kaiser, R. J.,
Huges, P.,
Dodd, C.,
Connell, C. R.,
Heiner, C.,
Kent, S. B. H.,
and Hood, L. E.
(1986)
Nature
321,
674-679[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Smith, D. B.,
and Johnson, K. S.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
31-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Hung, C. H.,
Lee, M. C.,
Chen, J. K.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
219,
83-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Chen, J. K.,
Hung, C. H.,
Liaw, Y. C.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
827-833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Tahirov, T. H.,
Lu, T. H.,
Liaw, Y. C.,
Chen, Y.-L.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
250,
354-367[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Peitsch, M. C.
(1995)
Bio/Technology
13,
658-660[CrossRef]
|
| 29.
|
Peitsch, M. C.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
274-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Funatsn, G.,
Islam, M. R.,
Mianaml, Y.,
Sung-Sil, K.,
and Kimura, M.
(1991)
Biochimie (Paris)
73,
1157-1161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Hung, C. H.,
Lee, M. C.,
Lee, T. C.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
229,
263-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gison, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Hung, C. H.,
Lee, M. C.,
and Lin, J. Y.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
184,
1524-1528[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Lamb, F. I.,
Roberts, L. M.,
and Lord, J. M.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
148,
265-270[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Roberts, L. M.,
Lamb, F. I.,
Pappin, D. J.,
and Lord, J. M.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
15682-15686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Boulter, D.
(1984)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
304,
323-332
|
| 38.
|
Nielsen, N. C.
(1984)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
304,
287-296
|
| 39.
|
Nicholls, A.,
Sharp, K. A.,
and Honig, B.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
11,
281-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Rutenber, E.,
Katzin, B. J.,
Ernst, S.,
Mlsna, D.,
Collins, E. S.,
Ready, M. P.,
and Robertus, J. D.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
10,
240-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Katzin, B. J.,
Collins, E. J.,
and Robertus, J. D.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
10,
251-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Rutenber, E.,
and Robertus, J. D.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
10,
260-369[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Monzingo, A. F.,
and Robertus, J. D.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
1136-1145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Kitaoka, Y.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
257,
255-262[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Terwilliger, T. C.,
and Eisenberg, D.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
6016-6022[Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bagaria, K. Surendranath, U. A. Ramagopal, S. Ramakumar, and A. A. Karande
Structure-Function Analysis and Insights into the Reduced Toxicity of Abrus precatorius Agglutinin I in Relation to Abrin
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 10, 2006;
281(45):
34465 - 34474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-P. Weng, Y.-P. Lin, C.-I. Hsu, and J.-Y. Lin
Functional Domains of a Pore-forming Cardiotoxic Protein, Volvatoxin A2
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2004;
279(8):
6805 - 6814.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.