J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 1902-1909, January 21, 2000
Inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal Kinase/AP-1 and NF-
B
Pathways by PICOT, a Novel Protein Kinase C-interacting Protein
with a Thioredoxin Homology Domain*
Stephan
Witte
§,
Martin
Villalba
,
Kun
Bi
,
Yuhong
Liu
,
Noah
Isakov¶, and
Amnon
Altman
From the
Division of Cell Biology, La Jolla Institute
for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, California 92121 and the
¶ Department of Microbiology, Ben-Gurion University of
the Negev, Beer Sheba 84105, Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
Protein kinase C-
(PKC
) is a
Ca2+-independent PKC isoform that is selectively
expressed in T lymphocytes (and muscle), and is thought to play an
important role in T cell receptor-induced activation. To gain a better
understanding of the function and regulation of PKC
, we have
employed the yeast two-hybrid system to identify PKC
-interacting
proteins. We report the isolation and characterization of a cDNA
encoding a novel 335-amino acid (37.5-kDa) PKC
-interacting protein
termed PICOT (for PKC-interacting cousin of thioredoxin). PICOT is
expressed in various tissues, including in T cells, where it
colocalizes with PKC
. PICOT displays an N-terminal thioredoxin
homology domain, which is required for the interaction with PKC.
Comparison of the unique C-terminal region of PICOT with expressed
sequence tag data bases revealed two tandem repeats of a novel domain
that is highly conserved from plants to mammals. Transient
overexpression of full-length PICOT (but not its N- or C-terminal
fragments) in T cells inhibited the activation of c-Jun N-terminal
kinase (but not extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and the
transcription factors AP-1 or NF-
B. These findings suggest that
PICOT and its evolutionary conserved homologues may interact with
PKC-related kinases in multiple organisms and, second, that it plays a
role in regulating the function of the thioredoxin system.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Members of the protein kinase C
(PKC)1 family of
intracellular serine/threonine kinases play critical roles in the
regulation of cellular differentiation and proliferation in many cell
types and in response to diverse stimuli, including hormones,
neurotransmitters, and growth factors (1-3). The PKC family consists
of 11 known mammalian members that are expressed in a wide variety of
tissues and cell types. Based on sequence similarities, domain
structures, and cofactor requirements, PKC isoenzymes can be grouped
into three subfamilies. 1) The Ca2+-dependent
conventional enzymes, consisting of PKC-
, -
I, -
II, and -
,
contain three conserved domains, namely the diacylglycerol/phorbol ester binding C1 domain, which contains two repeats of a cysteine-rich zinc finger, the phospholipid- and calcium-binding C2 domain, and the
catalytic C3 and C4 domains. 2) The Ca2+-independent
enzymes (PKC-
, -
, -
, -
and -µ) are termed novel PKCs. The
C2-like N-terminal domain of these enzymes can bind acidic
phospholipids but not Ca2+. 3) A third PKC subfamily,
termed atypical PKCs, includes PKC-
and -
/
that possess a
single cysteine-rich domain, lacking the ability to bind phospholipids
or phorbol esters. PKC activity is regulated by defined cofactors that
interact with specific regions of the regulatory domain as well as
transphosphorylation by serine/threonine kinases and
autophosphorylation. The activation is accompanied by a conformational
change that releases the basic pseudosubstrate region from the
catalytic cleft of the kinase domain. In addition, interaction with
specific proteins, termed receptors for activated PKC, that function as
selective scaffolds for activated PKCs at discrete subcellular
compartments, play a role in activation of PKC (4).
In the course of isolating novel PKC isoforms that play a role in T
cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling, we isolated PKC
, a
Ca2+-independent PKC isoform characterized by a unique
tissue distribution, i.e. in skeletal muscle, lymphoid
organs, and hematopoietic cell lines, particularly in T cells (5).
PKC
plays a selective role in the activation of the c-Jun N-terminal
kinase (JNK)/AP-1 pathway and the interleukin-2 gene in T cells (6-8),
and to colocalize with the TCR complex to the contact site between
antigen-specific T cells and antigen-presenting cells (9), where it
participates in the formation of a supramolecular activation cluster
(10).
In order to a gain a better understanding of the function and
regulation of PKC
in TCR signaling, we have employed the yeast two-hybrid system to identify PKC
-interacting proteins. Here we
describe the isolation of a novel PKC
-interacting protein having a
unique domain structure, which consists of an N-terminal thioredoxin
(Trx)-homologous domain followed by two tandem repeats of a novel,
evolutionary conserved protein domain. We have termed this protein
PICOT (for PKC-interacting cousin
of thioredoxin). Transient overexpression of
PICOT inhibited the activation of JNK and two transcription factors
i.e. AP-1 and NF-
B, induced by PKC
or by combinations
of T cell-activating stimuli, suggesting that this novel protein plays
an important role in regulating T cell activation and the function of
PKC
.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Antibodies and Expression Plasmids--
The anti-CD3 monoclonal
antibody (mAb) was affinity-purified from culture supernatants of the
OKT3 hybridoma as described (11). An anti-human CD28 mAb was obtained
from PharMingen. The PKC
-specific mAb and rabbit polyclonal antibody
were from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), respectively. The anti-c-Myc mAb
(9E10) was purified from culture supernatants of the corresponding
hybridoma by protein A-Sepharose chromatography, and the
anti-hemagglutinin (HA) mAb (12CA5) was from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. Polyclonal goat anti-JNK and rabbit anti-ERK2 antibodies
were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and phospho-c-Jun- or
phospho-ERK2-specific antibodies were from New England Biolabs
(Beverly, MA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled secondary antibodies
were from Pierce. A polyclonal rabbit anti-PICOT antiserum was
generated using standard protocols. In brief, a peptide comprising
amino acids 90-108 of the deduced human PICOT sequence was coupled to
keyhole limpet hemocyanin and injected into two rabbits. Both antisera
recognized a protein band with the predicted electrophoretic mobility
of PICOT (38 kDa) in immunoblots of cell lysates. For
immunohistochemistry, a portion of the antiserum was affinity-purified
on a Sepharose-coupled synthetic peptide column.
The full-length PKC
cDNA with a C-terminal hexahistidine tag in
the pEF mammalian expression vector has been described previously (12).
An HA-tagged constitutively active calcineurin mutant consisting of the
catalytic subunit of calcineurin (CnA), from which the
calmodulin-binding and the autoinhibitory domains were deleted
(CnA
CaM-AI) was a generous gift from Dr. M. Karin (University of
California, San Diego), and was described (8). To construct human PICOT
expression vectors, the corresponding full-length cDNA or fragments
encoding the N- (residues 1-146) or C- (residues 133-335) terminal
regions of PICOT were subcloned into pEF, and an N-terminal
hexahistidine tag followed by a subsequent HA tag was added at the 5'
end of the cDNA. HA-tagged JNK1 and c-Myc-tagged ERK2 were cloned
in pSR
and pcDNA3, respectively.
The AP-1 and NF-
B luciferase reporter plasmids were obtained from M. Karin.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
The yeast two-hybrid system used in
this study was kindly donated by E. A. Golemis (Fox Chase Cancer
Center, Philadelphia, PA), and has been described previously (14).
cDNAs encoding full-length PKC
or fragments comprising its
regulatory (amino acids 1-378) or catalytic (amino acids 379-706)
domains were subcloned into pGilda (15) to generate in-frame fusion
proteins with the LexA DNA-binding domain. These baits were used to
screen a Jurkat T cell cDNA library as described (15). To map the
PKC
-binding domain of human PICOT, the cDNAs encoding the N- or
C-terminal regions of PICOT were subcloned into the activation domain
fusion vector pJG4-5 (14)
Cell Culture and Transfection--
Simian virus 40 large T
antigen (TAg)-transfected human leukemic Jurkat-TAg cells were grown in
RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM minimal essential medium with non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, 10% fetal bovine serum, and antibiotics. For expression of
recombinant proteins, cells were transfected for 48 h with
appropriate amounts of plasmids (usually 3-20 µg total) by
electroporation as described (11, 12). In each experiment, cells in
different groups were transfected with the same total amount of plasmid
DNA by supplementing expression vector DNA with the proper amounts of
the corresponding empty vector. Where indicated, the cells were
stimulated with anti-CD3 and/or anti-CD28 antibodies, phorbol myristate
acetate (PMA; 100 ng/ml) and/or ionomycin (1 µg/ml), or irradiated
with UV (312 nm) for 1 min at room temperature using a transilluminator (FBTI-88; Fisher Scientific) and cultured for an additional h. Cells
were lysed in 1× Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaPPi, 5 mM NaF, 5 mM Na3VO4) supplemented with
protease inhibitors (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 10 min on ice.
The insoluble material was removed by centrifugation.
Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Fusion Proteins and in Vitro
Binding Assays--
The cDNAs encoding full-length human PICOT or
its N-terminal or C-terminal fragments were subcloned into the
bacterial GST fusion vector pGEX-5X-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Expression and purification of the GST fusion proteins was performed as
described (16). Cell lysates (usually from 1 × 107
cells) were incubated with 10 µg of GST fusion proteins coupled to 40 µl of glutathione-agarose for 2 h at 4 °C. The binding
mixtures were washed extensively in 1× Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
RT-PCR and Northern Blotting--
Multi Tissue cDNA Panels
(CLONTECH) were screened by RT-PCR with a pair of PICOT-specific
primers according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For
amplification of a 1-kilobase pair PICOT fragment, 35 cycles were used,
and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase control was amplified
using 25 PCR cycles. 20 µg of total RNA from Jurkat cells was
prepared using standard procedures. The PICOT plasmid isolated from the
yeast two-hybrid screen or a full-length glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase cDNA were used for generation of
32P-labeled probes using a commercial kit (Rediprime II,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Subcellular Fractionation--
Jurkat cells were lysed and
separated into a membrane, cytosol, and detergent-insoluble fractions
as described (12).
Immunofluorescence--
Transfected or nontransfected Jurkat-TAg
cells were left unstimulated, or stimulated with 100 ng/ml PMA for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were then spun down, washed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde, and
permeabilized in 0.05% saponin. Transfected cells were then stained
with a polyclonal rabbit anti-PICOT antibody and an anti-PKC
mAb.
Nontransfected cells were stained with a polyclonal anti-PKC
antibody and Alexa 488-conjugated, affinity-purified anti-PICOT
antibody. Samples were then incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce) or Alexa 594 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), respectively, and were subsequently
washed four times with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. After the final
wash, the cells were mounted on glass slides using a drop of
Aqua-Poly/mount (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA). Samples were
viewed with a Plan-Apochromat 63× lens on a Nikon microscope. Images
were taken using a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 laser scanning confocal imaging system.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
Lysates (1-2 × 107 cells) were mixed with antibodies (1-2 µg) for
2 h, followed by addition of 40 µl of protein A/G Plus-Sepharose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for an additional h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were washed twice with 1× Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer
and twice with PBS (pH 7.2). After boiling in 20 µl 2x Laemmli sample
buffer, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to
nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were immunoblotted with
the indicated primary antibodies, followed by horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Bands were visualized by
chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). When necessary,
membranes were stripped by incubation in 62.5 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 6.7, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS for 1 h at
65 °C, washed, and then reprobed with other antibodies as indicated.
In Vitro Kinase Assays--
In vitro kinase assays of
immunoprecipitated JNK or ERK2 were conducted as described. Briefly,
washed JNK1 or ERK2 immunoprecipitates were assayed using 2 µg of
GST-c-Jun fusion protein or myelin basic protein as substrates,
respectively, in 20 µl of JNK or ERK2 kinase buffers containing 3 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (30 Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Kinase reactions were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with
gentle shaking, and were stopped by addition of 20 µl of 2× Laemmli
buffer. Proteins were resolved by SDS/13% PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and subjected to autoradiography. Substrate
phosphorylation was quantified by PhosphorImager (Storm 860; Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) analysis. The nitrocellulose membranes were
routinely reprobed with anti-JNK or -ERK2 antibodies to confirm equal
expression levels of the immunoprecipitated kinases.
Reporter Assays--
Transfected Jurkat-TAg cells were
harvested, washed twice with PBS, and lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer
(100 mM KPO4, pH 7.8, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X-100) for 10 min at room temperature. The
lysates were then centrifuged (15,000 × g, 5 min at
4 °C). Fifty µl of the supernatant were mixed with 100 µl of
assay buffer (17.5 mM glycylglycine, pH 7.8, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 0.135 mM coenzyme A, 0.235 mM luciferin), and the
luciferase activity determined in a luminometer (Monolight 2010;
Analytical Luminescence Laboratory, Sparks, MD). The protein content
was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay. The final results were
expressed as arbitrary relative luciferase units per microgram of protein.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of a cDNA Encoding a Novel PKC
-interacting
Protein--
To identify proteins that interact with PKC
in
vivo, we performed three independent yeast two-hybrid screens
using the full-length PKC
, its regulatory domain, or its catalytic
domain as baits to screen a Jurkat T lymphoma cDNA library fused to
a cDNA encoding a transcription activation domain (14). Since
expression of catalytically active forms of PKC
as LexA fusion
proteins was toxic to yeast (data not shown), a point-mutated cDNA
encoding a catalytically inactive PKC
(K409R) was used for the yeast
two-hybrid screening. Approximately 5 × 107
independent clones were screened with each bait. No clones growing on
selective medium were obtained with the isolated regulatory or
catalytic domains of PKC
, respectively (Table
I). Screening with the catalytically
inactive, full-length PKC
bait resulted in 17 primary positive
colonies, which grew on selective medium and were
-galactosidase-positive when tested in a filter lift assay (Table
I). Thus, the observed interaction in yeast requires full-length
PKC
, but does not depend on its intact catalytic activity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Specific interactions between PKC and PICOT in the yeast
two-hybrid system
EGY48 yeast cells were cotransformed with expression vectors encoding
various LexA DNA-binding domain and activation domain fusion proteins.
Activation of the leu2 reporter gene was monitored by growth
on leucine-deficient medium, and the activity of the lacZ
reporter gene was monitored using a filter assay.
|
|
Ten of the positive, PKC
-interacting clones were found to contain
cDNAs that specifically interacted with the bait. Partial sequence
analysis revealed that these clones encoded identical cDNAs. The
two longest cDNAs (~1,250 base pairs in length) were sequenced,
and found to contain an open reading frame (ORF) encoding a putative
protein of 335 amino acids (Fig.
1a). Since the putative protein product contained a Trx-homologous domain (see below), it was
named PICOT (for PKC-interacting
cousin of thioredoxin) (see below).
Northern blot analysis using one of the yeast two-hybrid clones as a
probe indicated that a hybridizing mRNA of 1.5 kilobase pairs is
expressed in a preparation of total RNA from Jurkat T cells (Fig.
1b), suggesting the isolated clones contained the complete
ORF. A rapid amplification of cDNA ends PCR of a human thymus
cDNA library failed to reveal additional upstream sequences, thus
confirming that the isolated cDNAs were full-length.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Primary sequence and mRNA expression of
PICOT. a, the primary sequence of PICOT deduced from
the cDNA. The two repeats of the evolutionary conserved novel
domain (see Fig. 2C) are underlined.
b, Northern blot analysis of the expression of PICOT
mRNA in Jurkat T cells. The PICOT plasmid isolated from the yeast
two-hybrid screen was used as a probe. c, expression of
PICOT protein in subcellular fractions. Membrane, detergent-insoluble,
and cytosolic fractions of Jurkat cells were immunoblotted with a
PICOT-specific rabbit antiserum. d, expression of PICOT in
different human tissues analyzed by RT-PCR (top
panel). The same human cDNA panel was also screened for
the expression of PKC (middle panel) and, as a
loading control, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(bottom panel).
|
|
Identification of PICOT Homologous Sequences--
The isolated
human PICOT cDNA sequence was used to conduct a search of the
GenBank data base of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for homologous
sequences. This analysis identified an identical putative human ORF
(accession no. h59799) as well as homologous mouse (accession no.
aa009010) and rat (accession no. aa866363) clones. The corresponding
plasmids were obtained from Genome Systems or Research Genetics,
respectively, and sequenced. Using the BLAST algorithm, homologous
sequences were also identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(Swissprot ye04 yeast), Escherichia coli (Swissprot ydhd_ecoli), Haemophilus influenzae (Swissprot ydhd_haein),
Caenorhabditis elegans (GenBank g3217992), and
Arabidopsis thaliana (GenBank g3335374) (see Fig.
2).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Homology analysis of the primary sequence of
PICOT. a, schematic representation of the domain
structure of PICOT. b, alignment of the N-terminal fragment
of human PICOT with human Trx. Identical residues are in
black, and conserved substitutions are in gray.
The catalytic center of Trx and the corresponding PICOT sequence are
boxed. The corresponding amino acid residues are
numbered. C, analysis of the C-terminal region of
PICOT reveals a novel, evolutionary conserved domain. The two repeats
of this domain in PICOT, pih1 (residues 145-228) and pih2 (residues
247-330), are shown in the two upper
lines and are compared with homologous sequences from mouse,
C. elegans, yeast, E. coli, H. influenzae, and A. thaliana. pih, PICOT
homology domain.
|
|
Structure and Expression of PICOT--
The ORF of the PICOT
cDNA encodes a putative protein with a predicted molecular mass of
37.5 kDa (Fig. 1a). The codon for the first methionine is
surrounded by a consensus Kozak sequence, but is not preceded by an
in-frame stop codon. To confirm the expression of the putative protein
encoded by the cDNA we have isolated, rabbit antisera were
generated against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids
90-108 of PICOT, a hydrophilic sequence with a high surface
probability. Immunoblotting of lysates from E. coli
expressing full-length PICOT as a GST fusion protein (GST-PICOT) or
from untransfected Jurkat cells revealed expression of an
immunoreactive ~74-kDa protein in E. coli, and a ~38-kDa
protein in Jurkat cells, consistent with the predicted size of PICOT
(data not shown). This antiserum was used in subsequent expression
studies (see below).
To determine the cellular localization of PICOT, we fractionated Jurkat
T lymphoma cells and analyzed the cellular distribution of the protein.
As shown in Fig. 1c, PICOT was almost exclusively localized
in the cytosol, with additional, very low expression in the membrane
fraction, but no detectable expression in the detergent-insoluble
cellular fraction.
The tissue distribution of PICOT was analyzed by RT-PCR using a
commercial cDNA panel derived from different human tissues. The
expression of PICOT mRNA was more ubiquitous than that of PKC
;
nevertheless, it was not expressed in all tissues. It was abundant in
heart, spleen, and testis, with low but detectable expression in the
other tissues tested, including in the thymus and peripheral blood
leukocytes; expression of the relevant mRNA in the lung, placenta,
colon, and small intestine was very low (Fig. 1d).
Sequence Analysis of PICOT--
Search of the GenBank nucleotide
data base revealed a 29% amino acid identity and an additional 11%
similarity between the N-terminal region of PICOT (residues 12-143)
and the Trx family of proteins (Fig. 2, a and b).
However, the Trx homology domain of PICOT lacks the conserved
Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys motif, which is essential for catalytic activity (17),
and contains instead an Ala-Pro-Gln-Cys motif. The aforementioned EST
data base-derived mouse and rat homologues of PICOT encode the
corresponding full-length proteins. The deduced protein sequences show
>99% identity to the human sequence, with the rat protein lacking
residues 90-148 of human or mouse PICOT (data not shown).
Analysis of the protein sequence of PICOT against sequences of putative
proteins derived from genome sequencing projects revealed a highly
conserved sequence motif of 84 amino acids. This motif represents a
novel, previously unknown domain, which is found in all organisms
searched, including nematodes, yeast, bacteria, viruses, and plants
(Fig. 2c). The human, mouse, and rat PICOT proteins display
two tandem repeats of this domain (Fig. 2, a and
c), whereas the homologous proteins present in lower
organisms contain only a single repeat. Thus, PICOT shows a discrete
domain structure, consisting of an N-terminal Trx-like domain followed by two novel PICOT homology domains (Fig. 2a).
Association of PKC
with PICOT in Intact T Cells and in
Vitro--
To confirm the interaction of PICOT with PKC
, and
analyze its specificity at the level of PKC, we first ascertained
whether these two proteins are associated in intact T cells. Jurkat-TAg cells were cotransfected with PKC
plus HA epitope-tagged PICOT expression vectors. When lysates from these cells were
immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA mAb, PKC
was found to
coimmunoprecipitate with PICOT (Fig.
3a). An unrelated control
antibody did not precipitate either of these two proteins. This
interaction was confirmed by precipitating T cell lysates with a
GST-PICOT fusion protein in vitro. Incubation of the
recombinant protein, but not the control GST protein, with lysates from
Jurkat cells transfected with PKC
, PKC
, or PKC
, followed by
immunoblotting with antibodies against the respective PKC isoforms,
revealed that PICOT bound PKC
and, to a lower extent, PKC
(Fig.
3b). Under the same conditions, no interaction with PKC
was detected, suggesting that PICOT displays some selectivity with
regard to its ability to associate with PKC isoforms.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Association of PICOT with
PKC in intact T cells and in vitro.
a, an anti-HA mAb was used to immunoprecipitate PICOT from
Jurkat-TAg cells cotransfected with an HA-PICOT plus PKC expression
vectors. The immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with an anti-PKC
antibody (top panel) or anti-HA mAb
(bottom panel). Whole cell lysates
(WCL) or a normal mouse immunoglobulin (mIg)
immunoprecipitation were used as positive and negative controls,
respectively. b, a GST-PICOT fusion protein, or a control
GST protein, were used to precipitate lysates from Jurkat-TAg cells
transfected with PKC , PKC , or PKC expression plasmids, and
washed precipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with
the respective anti-PKC antibodies. C, a similar experiment
to the one described in B was performed using GST fusion
proteins encoding the N-terminal (GST-PICOT-N) or C-terminal
(GST-PICOT-C) in addition to the full-length protein. The precipitates
were immunoblotted with an anti-PKC antibody.
|
|
The Trx-like Domain of PICOT Is Sufficient for Interaction with
PKC
--
In order to further define the structural basis for the
interaction of PICOT with PKC
, we expressed the PICOT N-terminal region corresponding to its Trx-like domain (residues 1-146) and its
C-terminal fragment representing the two tandem PICOT homology domains
(residues 133-335) as GST fusion proteins, and used these recombinant
proteins to precipitate cell lysates from PKC
-transfected Jurkat
cells. As shown in Fig. 3c, the N-terminal, Trx-like domain of PICOT was sufficient for PKC
binding, although it was less effective than the full-length protein. In contrast, the C-terminal region of PICOT did not display any detectable binding to PKC
. In
yeast, only full-length PICOT associated with PKC
(Table I), suggesting that the affinity of the interaction is lower in yeast. This
difference may reflect a favorable conformation of PICOT for this
interaction in vitro (where it was expressed as a GST fusion
protein) compared with yeast (where PICOT was expressed as a fusion
protein with a transcription activation domain).
Intracellular Localization of PICOT and PKC
--
In order to
determine the relative localization of PICOT versus PKC
in
situ, transfected or untransfected Jurkat cells were stained with
PICOT- and PKC
-specific antibodies, and analyzed by confocal
microscopy. In unstimulated cells, which were transfected with both
PICOT and PKC
, both proteins colocalized to a distinct cytoplasmic
area under the plasma membrane (Fig. 4,
a and b), and their colocalization was evident
when the two individual images were overlaid (Fig. 4c). PMA
stimulation caused translocation of both PICOT and PKC
to a more
extended membrane (or submembrane) area, with colocalization of the two
proteins still evident (Fig. 4, d-f).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Localization of PICOT and
PKC in T cells. Jurkat-TAg cells
were cotransfected with PICOT and PKC expression vectors for 48 h (two top rows) or were left
untransfected (bottom row). The transfected cells
were either unstimulated or stimulated for the final 10 min of culture
with PMA (100 ng/ml). The cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained
as described under "Materials and Methods. Localization of the
relevant proteins was analyzed by confocal microscopy. The
right column represents an overlay of the PKC
(left column) and PICOT (middle
column) images. The images shown are representative of ~50
cells observed in each group.
|
|
We also analyzed the localization of the relevant endogenous protein in
untransfected cells. The quality of this analysis was lower due to the
lower expression of the proteins and the fact that it was necessary to
use a polyclonal anti-PKC
antibody, which produces a less
satisfactory staining than that obtained with the monoclonal antibody
used in the transfected cells. Nevertheless, endogenous PICOT and
PKC
also appeared to colocalize in the same area of the cell, with
an overall staining pattern similar to the one observed in the
transfected cells (Fig. 4, g-i).
Selective Inhibition of JNK Activation by PICOT--
As PICOT was
identified on the basis of its interaction with PKC
, we examined the
effect of transient PICOT overexpression on the activation of the
stress-activated protein kinase JNK, since it represents a selective
target of PKC
in the TCR/CD28 signaling pathway (7, 8). Jurkat-TAg
cells were cotransfected with different combinations of expression
plasmids encoding PICOT, PKC
and/or constitutively active
calcineurin (CnA
CaM-AI). The latter plasmid was used since
calcineurin cooperates with PKC
in the activation of JNK and the
interleukin-2 promoter (7, 8).
As predicted, transient overexpression PKC
caused activation of the
cotransfected epitope-tagged JNK reporter, and this effect was somewhat
augmented by CnA coexpression (Fig.
5a, lanes
3 and 5 versus lane
1 in the two upper panels).
When the cells were additionally cotransfected with a PICOT expression
vector, the PKC
- or PKC
/CnA-induced JNK activation was
significantly reduced (Fig. 5a, lanes
4 and 6). Overexpression of PICOT alone also
seemed to reduce the basal JNK activity (lane 2).
Densitometric analysis of the phospho-c-Jun bands revealed that PICOT
reduced the PKC
- or PKC
/CnA-induced JNK activation by 70% and
55%, respectively. Immunoblotting of immunoprecipitated JNK with a
specific antibody confirmed that all groups expressed a similar level
of transfected JNK (Fig. 5a, third
lane from the top). Similarly, immunoblotting of
cell lysates from the same cells with antibodies specific for PKC
,
PICOT, or HA-CnA confirmed the expected overexpression of the
corresponding proteins in the cells (Fig. 5a,
three bottom panels).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of transient PICOT overexpression on
MAP kinase activities in transfected Jurkat T cells. a,
PICOT inhibits PKC -induced JNK activation. Jurkat-TAg cells were
transfected with the indicated combinations of expression vectors plus
an HA-tagged JNK1 plasmid. JNK1 activity was determined in in
vitro immune complex (anti-HA) kinase assays (two
top panels). The same immunoprecipitates were
immunoblotted with an anti-JNK antibody (third
panel from top), and aliquots of cell lysates
were immunoblotted with anti-PKC , -PICOT, or -HA antibodies to
reveal the proper overexpression of the transfected proteins.
b, the activation of ERK2 was assessed in a similar way in
anti-c-Myc (9E10 mAb) immunoprecipitates from cells transfected with
the indicated plasmid combinations plus a c-Myc epitope-tagged ERK2
expression vector. Control immunoblots of the immunoprecipitates (with
anti-ERK2 antibodies) or cell lysates (with anti-PKC , -PKC , or
-PICOT antibodies) are shown in the four lower
panels. c, cells were transfected with empty
vector, PICOT, or dominant-negative (K/R) PKC expression vectors and
were left unstimulated or stimulated with the indicated stimuli for the
final 5 min (anti-CD3/CD28 or PMA plus ionomycin) or 1 min (UV) of
culture. JNK1 was immunoprecipitated and tested for in
vitro kinase activity as in a.
|
|
In order to examine the selectivity of this inhibitory effect of PICOT,
we also assessed the effect of transient PICOT overexpression on the
activation of another MAP kinase, i.e. ERK2, using similar in vitro immune complex kinase assays. As reported before
(8), ERK2 can be non-selectively activated by both PKC
and PKC
(Fig. 5b, lanes 3 and 5
versus lane 1 in the upper
panel). Coexpression of PICOT alone did not reduce ERK2
activity and, in some experiments, even enhanced it (data not shown).
Similarly, coexpression of PICOT with PKC
(lane
4) or PKC
(lane 6) did not inhibit
the PKC-induced ERK2 activity. Immunoblotting with an ERK2-specific antibody confirmed the equivalent expression levels of ERK2 in most
groups, with the exception of the two PKC
-transfected groups, which
displayed lower ERK2 expression, thereby making the PKC
-induced ERK2
activation even more pronounced than the apparent level. PKC and/or
PICOT were properly overexpressed in the transfected cells. Thus, the
PICOT-mediated inhibition of PKC-induced MAP kinase activation is
specific for JNK and, furthermore, PICOT alone can induce ERK, but not
JNK, activation.
Next, we determined the effect of PICOT overexpression on JNK
activation induced by several stimuli, including a physiological stimulus provided by anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies. As reported previously (8, 18), stimulation of Jurkat cells with this antibody combination, a
combination of PMA plus ionomycin, or by UV irradiation, all induced
marked activation of the cotransfected JNK1 reporter when compared with
the unstimulated cells (Fig. 5c, lane
1). Coexpression of PICOT in the same cells reduced the
basal or anti-CD3/CD28-induced JNK activity by
80%, but had a much
smaller effect on the PMA/ionomycin- or UV-induced kinase activity
(lane 2). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of
PICOT overexpression was very similar to that caused by overexpressing
a dominant-negative PKC
(
-K/R) mutant (lane 3), supporting the notion that PICOT exerts its inhibitory
activity by interfering with the cellular function of PKC
.
PICOT Inhibits the Activation of AP-1 and NF-
B in T
Cells--
Our earlier studies demonstrated that, among several PKC
isoforms tested, PKC
functions as a selective AP-1 activator via a
Ras-dependent pathway (6). Therefore, we assessed the
effect of transient PICOT overexpression on the activation of an AP-1 reporter plasmid. As expected, PMA stimulation or transient
overexpression of PKC
caused a marked increase of AP-1 activity, and
the constitutively active plasmid (PKC
-A/E) was more active than the
wild-type kinase in that regard (Fig.
6a). When the cells were
cotransfected with increasing amounts of the PICOT expression plasmid,
a dose-dependent inhibition of the basal or PKC
-induced
AP-1 activity was observed. Five µg of the PICOT plasmid reduced the
basal activity of AP-1 by ~90%, and the activities induced by
wild-type or constitutively active PKC
(in the absence of PMA
stimulation) by ~95 and ~60%, respectively. The failure of PICOT
to inhibit AP-1 activity in PMA-stimulated cells may reflect activation
of AP-1 by other, endogenous PKC isoforms that are not sensitive to the
inhibitory effect of PICOT, e.g. PKC
(see Fig.
3b).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PICOT overexpression inhibits AP-1 and
NF- B activation. a, Jurkat-TAg
cells were cotransfected with an AP-1:luciferase reporter plasmid plus
the indicated expression vectors. One group was additionally stimulated
with PMA (100 ng/ml) for the final 6 h of culture. Luciferase
activity in cell extracts was determined as described under
"Materials and Methods." The overexpression of PICOT was verified
by immunoblotting (data not shown). b, cells were
transfected with the indicated combinations of empty vector,
constitutively active (A/E) PKC , and/or full-length (wt),
N-terminal (N), or C-terminal (C) fragments of
PICOT. The activity of a cotransfected AP-1 reporter was determined as
in a. c, PICOT inhibits NF- B activation.
Jurkat-TAg cells were cotransfected with an NF- B:luciferase reporter
plasmid plus the indicated amounts of a PICOT expression vector. The
cells were either left unstimulated, or stimulated with a combination
of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 antibodies, or with PMA (100 ng/ml), for the
final 6 h of culture. The inset show the expression
level of transfected PICOT determined by anti-HA immunoblotting.
|
|
Further analysis of the structural requirements for the inhibition of
AP-1 activation by PICOT revealed that the full-length protein was
necessary. Thus, while native PICOT was capable of inhibiting AP-1
activation induced by constitutively active PKC
by 60%,
the isolated N- or C-terminal fragments of PICOT displayed minimal inhibitory activity (Fig. 6b).
In order to determine the effect of transient PICOT overexpression on
the activity of another transcription factor that is known to be
induced by stress signals, we assessed the activation of the
transcription factor NF-
B by the combined stimulation of anti-CD3
plus anti-CD28 antibodies. In the absence of PICOT coexpression, this
combination induced a ~5-fold activation of NF-
B. Transient
expression of a lower dose of PICOT (5 µg) caused a minimal reduction
of activity, but at the higher dose (10 µg plasmid DNA), NF-
B
activity was reduced by 63% (Fig. 6c). As in the case of
AP-1, this inhibition required the full-length PICOT protein (data not
shown). The selectivity of this effect is indicated by the fact that
the PMA-induced activation of NF-
B was not inhibited under the same conditions.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several recent studies have relied on the yeast two-hybrid system
to isolate PKC-interacting proteins, which were found to represent
either substrates or regulators of distinct PKC isoforms (19-21).
Here, we have used a similar strategy to isolate proteins that interact
with PKC
, a Ca2+-independent PKC isoform that is
expressed selectively in T cells (5) and has been implicated in T
cell-specific functions (6-10, 22). This study reports the isolation
and partial characterization of a novel PKC
-interacting protein
termed PICOT. Our results establish the expression of the corresponding
mRNA and protein in T and other cells, and the association of PICOT
with PKC
in intact T cells and in vitro which requires
the N-terminal, Trx-homologous domain of PICOT. Since PICOT interacts
with kinase-inactive PKC
, and our preliminary results indicate that
PICOT is not phosphorylated by PKC
in vitro (data not
shown), PICOT most likely does not represent a PKC
substrate.
Furthermore, PICOT associated in vitro not only with PKC
,
but also with PKC
. Nevertheless, its interaction with PKC is not
promiscuous since it did not associate with another PKC isoform,
i.e. PKC
. The degree of specificity of the interaction between PICOT and distinct PKC isoforms, particularly in intact cells,
remains to be established.
The stoichiometry of the association between PICOT and PKC appears to
be low. Although the two proteins could be coimmunoprecipitated from
transfected, overexpressing cells, we could not reproducibly demonstrate coimmunoprecipitation of the relevant endogenous proteins. This may reflect the use of lysis conditions that are unfavorable for
the maintenance of this association, or the requirement of other
cellular factors (e.g. lipids or adaptor proteins) for
optimal interaction between these two proteins. In addition, the
association may take place in specific sites within the cell, and only
under specific conditions. However, analysis by confocal microscopy revealed overlap, albeit incomplete, between the intracellular localization of PICOT and PKC
, even in untransfected cells.
Nevertheless, our data indicating that PICOT regulates cellular
functions mediated by PKC
or physiological stimuli in T cells
suggest that the association between PICOT and PKC is physiologically
relevant. Thus, the activation of two important elements in the
TCR/CD28 signaling cascade leading to interleukin-2 production,
i.e. JNK and AP-1, both of which are selectively activated
by PKC
(6-8), was inhibited by coexpressed PICOT. This effect was
selective and did not reflect a general inhibition of cellular
functions, since the activation of another MAP kinase, ERK2, was not
inhibited by PICOT. Since JNK positively regulates AP-1 activity by
phosphorylating two regulatory serine residues in the activation domain
of c-Jun (18), it is not surprising that the PKC
-mediated activation
of AP-1 was also inhibited by PICOT.
The JNK/AP-1 pathway is not the only target for inhibition by PICOT,
since this novel protein also inhibited the anti-CD3 plus
anti-CD28-induced activation of another transcription factor, i.e. NF-
B. Since both of these pathways are commonly
activated in response to stress signals and inflammatory stimuli
(23-28), our findings suggest that PICOT may regulate stress-induced
signaling pathways in other cell types and organisms. Although the
N-terminal, Trx-homologous region of PICOT was sufficient to
mediate PKC binding, inhibition of AP-1 or NF-
B activation required
the intact protein. This raises the possibility that The N-terminal
domain of PICOT binds regulators and/or effectors, whereas the
C-terminal region mediates the biological functions of this protein. At
present, we do not know whether PICOT homologues expressed in lower
organisms also interact with, and potentially regulate, protein
kinases. Studies to examine the effects of PICOT on stress responses
triggered by different stimuli are currently in progress.
Of particular interest is the novel domain that appears as two tandem
repeats at the C-terminal region of PICOT. We have provisionally termed
this domain PICOT homology (PIH) domain (Fig.
2c). This domain, which hitherto has not been recognized, is
highly conserved in evolution from plants to mammals. However, in
contrast to PICOT, only one repeat of this domain is found in lower
organisms, where it constitutes most of the putative protein encoded by
the corresponding EST sequences. The high degree of conservation of
this domain suggests that it plays an important, yet to be identified,
role in cellular functions. Studies are in progress to isolate PIH domain-interacting proteins.
Although the exact mechanism by which PICOT inhibits the activation of
the JNK/AP-1 pathway or NF-
B remains to be elucidated, the homology
of PICOT to Trx is of particular interest. The evolutionary conserved
Trx system has evolved to protect cells from damage mediated by
reactive oxygen species, which are generated as part of a cellular
defense mechanism against invading pathogens (17, 29, 30). Various
cellular insults, i.e. mitogens, inflammatory stimuli, UV or
ionizing radiation, ischemia, phorbol ester, and hydrogen peroxide
up-regulate the expression of Trx and induce its translocation to the
nucleus. Trx exerts both extracellular and intracellular functions,
including its extracellular ability to protect cells from tumor
necrosis factor- or Fas-mediated apoptosis (17). Trx is known to
promote the DNA binding and transcriptional activities of AP-1 and
NF-
B as well as the activity of the estrogen receptor (17, 31, 32).
It mediates these effects by reducing cysteine residues in the p50
subunit of NF-
B, the two components of AP-1, i.e. c-Jun
and c-Fos, and Ref-1, an endonuclease that participates in AP-1
activation (17, 31, 32). These modifications are necessary for the
binding of these transcription factors to their cognate DNA sequences
in the promoter regions of various genes (17).
Since PICOT does not possess the essential catalytic motif of Trx
(Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys) and, in fact, lacks the first of the two cysteine
residues in the catalytic center, it almost certainly lacks Trx
enzymatic activity. This notion is supported by the findings that
mutation of either or both cysteine residues in the catalytic center of
Trx abolishes its enzymatic (33) and mitogenic (34) activities, and
converts the mutated proteins into competitive inhibitors of Trx
reductase (34). Another type of peroxidase enzymes, the peroxiredoxins,
contain a single conserved cysteine residue, but do not share homology
with Trx (35). This structural feature of PICOT raises the interesting
possibility that PICOT functions as an endogenous antagonist of Trx or
its activating enzyme, Trx reductase, via its ability to compete for substrate binding. Since the Trx system, which is highly conserved throughout evolution, plays an important role in regulating the intracellular redox state, which is critical for both cell viability and proliferation (17, 29, 30), actions that are mediated in part by
regulation of the transcription factors NF-
B and AP-1 (30), it is
possible that PICOT has a highly conserved role in regulating the Trx
system. Our findings, that transient PICOT overexpression inhibits the
activation of AP-1 and one of its upstream activators (JNK), as well as
NF-
B, are consistent with this putative function.
Finally, since the production of reactive oxygen species (27) and the
concomitant induction of genetic programs that mediate defense
mechanisms against pathogenic agents (36, 37) are highly conserved in
evolution, including in plants (38), an intriguing possibility is that
PICOT and its evolutionary conserved homologues regulate innate
immunity defense mechanisms. Furthermore, the conservation of Trx
system (17, 29, 30) and the PKC superfamily (39, 40) during evolution,
and the findings that PKC homologues play a role in plant defense
mechanisms against viral pathogens (13, 41), raise the intriguing
possibility that an axis consisting of PICOT/PKC/Trx homologues plays a
general and well conserved important regulatory role in cellular
functions. Thus, the biological significance of PICOT and its putative
homologues may extend well beyond its role in T cell activation.
Additional studies aimed at elucidating the physiological role and
regulation of PICOT are likely to shed light on these notions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank E. A. Golemis and M. Karin for reagents.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant CA35299 (to A. A.) and a Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft fellowship (to S. W.) This is publication
281 from the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Current address: ICON Clinical Research, 63225 Langen, Germany.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of Cell
Biology, La Jolla Inst. for Allergy and Immunology, 10355 Science Center Dr., San Diego, CA 92121. Tel.: 619-558-3527; Fax: 619-558-3526; E-mail: amnon@liai.org.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
TCR, T cell receptor;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
Trx, thioredoxin;
PICOT, PKC-interacting cousin of thioredoxin;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
HA, hemagglutinin;
PMA, phorbol myristate acetate;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
TAg, T antigen;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
RT, reverse transcription;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
ORF, open reading frame.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Newton, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28495-28498[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Nishizuka, Y.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
484-496[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Jaken, S.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
168-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
Science
268,
247-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Baier, G.,
Telford, D.,
Giampa, L.,
Coggeshall, K. M.,
Baier-Bitterlich, G.,
Isakov, N.,
and Altman, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4997-5004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Baier-Bitterlich, G.,
Überall, F.,
Bauer, B.,
Fresser, F.,
Wachter, H.,
Grünicke, H.,
Utermann, G.,
Altman, A.,
and Baier, G.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1842-1850[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Ghaffari-Tabrizi, N.,
Bauer, B.,
Altman, A.,
Utermann, G.,
Uberall, F.,
and Baier, G.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
132-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Werlen, G.,
Jacinto, E.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3101-3111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Monks, C. R. F.,
Kupfer, H.,
Tamir, I.,
Barlow, A.,
and Kupfer, A.
(1997)
Nature
385,
83-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Monks, C. R.,
Freiberg, B. A.,
Kupfer, H.,
Sciaky, N.,
and Kupfer, A.
(1998)
Nature
395,
82-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Liu, Y.-C.,
Elly, C.,
Langdon, W. Y.,
and Altman, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
168-173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Meller, N.,
Liu, Y. C.,
Collins, T. L., N., B.-B.,
Baier, G.,
Isakov, N.,
and Altman, A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5782-5791[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Subramaniam, R.,
Despres, C.,
and Brisson, N.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
653-664[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Golemis, E. A.,
Serebriiskii, I.,
Gyurtis, J.,
and Brent, R.
(1997)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. M.
, Brent, R.
, Kingston, R. E.
, Morre, D. D.
, Seidman, J. G.
, Smith, J. A.
, and Struhl, K., eds), Vol. 3
, pp. 20.1.1-20.1.8, Wiley Interscience, New York
|
| 15.
|
Witte, S.,
and Krawinkel, U.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22243-22247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Liu, Y.-C.,
Elly, C.,
Yoshida, H.,
Bonnefoy-Bérard, N.,
and Altman, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14591-14595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Nakamura, H.,
Nakamura, K.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
351-369[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Su, B.,
Jacinto, E.,
Hibi, M.,
Kallunki, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Ben Neriah, Y.
(1994)
Cell
77,
727-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Staudinger, J.,
Zhou, J.,
Burgess, R.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
263-271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Diaz-Meco, M. T.,
Municio, M. M.,
Sanchez, P.,
Lozano, J.,
and Moscat, J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
105-114[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Puls, A.,
Schmidt, S.,
Grawe, F.,
and Stabel, S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6191-6196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Meller, N.,
Altman, A.,
and Isakov, N.
(1998)
Stem Cells
16,
178-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Verma, I. M.,
Stevenson, J. K.,
Schwartz, E. M.,
Van Antwerp, D.,
and Miyamoto, S.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2723-2735[Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Cell
87,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Karin, M.
(1997)
N. Engl. J. Med.
336,
1066-1071[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Karin, M.,
Liu, Z.,
and Zandi, E.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
240-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Muller, J. M.,
Rupec, R. A.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1997)
Methods
11,
301-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
O'Neill, L. A. J.,
and Greene, C.
(1998)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
63,
650-657[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Powis, G.,
Oblong, J. E.,
Gasdaska, P. Y.,
Berggren, M.,
Hill, S. R.,
Kirkpatrick, D. L.,
Chantler, E. L.,
Gallegos, A.,
Chen, T.,
Marshall, N.,
and Cotgreave, I. A.
(1994)
Oncol. Res.
6,
539-544[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Holmgren, A.,
and Björnstedt, M.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
252,
199-208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Hayashi, S.,
Hajiro Nakanishi, K.,
Makino, Y.,
Eguchi, H.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Tanaka, H.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4035-4040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hirota, K.,
Matsui, M.,
Iwata, S.,
Nishiyama, A.,
Mori, K.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3633-3638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Holmgren, A.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54,
237-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Oblong, J. E.,
Berggren, M.,
Gasdaska, P. Y.,
and Powis, G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11714-11720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kang, S. W.,
Baines, I. C.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6303-6311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Fearon, D. T.,
and Locksley, R. M.
(1996)
Science
272,
50-53[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Medzhitov, R.,
and Janeway, C. A. J.
(1997)
Cell
91,
295-298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Whitham, S.,
Dinesh-Kumar, S. P.,
Choi, D.,
Hehl, R.,
Corr, C.,
and Baker, B.
(1994)
Cell
78,
1101-1115[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kruse, M.,
Gamulin, V.,
Cetkovic, H.,
Pancer, Z.,
Muller, I. M.,
and Muller, W. E.
(1996)
J. Mol. Evol.
43,
374-383[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Mellor, H.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
281-292
|
| 41.
|
Sokolova, M.,
Prufer, D.,
Tacke, E.,
and Rohde, W.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
400,
201-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us