![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 2098-2102, January 21, 2000
From the In fibroblasts, the G protein Rho family small GTP-binding proteins play a major role in
regulating the actin polymerization necessary for cytoskeleton formation, determination of cell shape, and regulatory responses including chemotaxis and mitogenesis (1). In fibroblasts, the formation
of stress fibers generally parallels the assembly of focal adhesions.
For instance, some stimuli involving lysophosphatidic acid
(LPA)1, thrombin, and
bombesin induce both. G proteins of the G12 subfamily have
been shown to be involved in Rho-dependent actin stress
fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly stimulated by G
protein-coupled receptors (2, 3). Recent reports have indicated that
G G protein In this study, we transfected Materials--
cDNAs of several Transfection and Staining--
HeLa cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum. Transient transfection was performed using LipofectAMINE
Plus according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies,
Inc.). The medium was replaced 24 h after transfection, and the
cells were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h and then fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. Before fixation,
transfected cells were treated with 20 µM Y-27632 for
2 h (17), with 150 µM tyrophostin A25, 10 µM tyrophostin AG 1478, 10 µM PP2, 30 µg/ml genistein, 1 µM Ro31-8220, 100 nM
wortmannin or 50 µM LY-294002 for 3 h, or with 1 µM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 24 h. Fixed
cells were immunostained using antibodies against Fig. 1 and
2 illustrate the effects of transient
co-expression of In contrast with G Expression of
G Protein 
Subunits Induce Stress Fiber Formation and Focal
Adhesion Assembly in a Rho-dependent Manner in HeLa
Cells*
,
,
, and
¶
Department of Biochemistry, Institute for
Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi
480-0392 and the § Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology,
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori-ku,
Yokohama 226-8501, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits
G
12 and G
13 stimulate
Rho-dependent stress fiber formation and focal adhesion
assembly, whereas G protein 
subunits instead exert a disruptive
influence. We show here that the latter can, however, stimulate the
formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions in epithelial-like HeLa
cells. Transient expression of
1 with
2,
5,
7, and
12 in quiescent HeLa cells induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly as did expression of the constitutively active G
12.
Co-expression of 
with G
i2 and the C-terminal
fragment of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase, both of which are known
to bind and sequester free 
, blocked 
-induced stress fiber
and focal adhesion formation. Inhibition was also noted with
co-expression of a dominant negative mutant of Rho. Botulinum C3
exoenzyme, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Rho, and a
Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, similarly inhibited

-induced stress fiber and focal adhesion assembly. These results
indicate that G protein 
subunits regulate
Rho-dependent actin polymerization in HeLa cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
12 and G
13 are directly associated with
p115 (4) and PDZ (5) guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) for Rho,
G
13 stimulating the guanine nucleotide exchange activity
of p115-RhoGEF (4). RhoGEFs then activate Rho. In contrast to
G
12 and G
13, microinjection of
constitutively active forms of G
i2, G
q,
and G
11 into fibroblasts does not induce stress fiber
formation (2, 3). Furthermore, pertussis toxin does not inhibit
LPA-induced stress fiber formation, suggesting uncoupling of this
signal pathway to G proteins of the Gi/o subfamily (6).

subunits regulate the c-Jun N-terminal kinase cascade
through Rho family GTP-binding proteins such as Rac, Cdc42, and Rho (7,
8). This suggests the possibility that 
regulates Rho family
GTP-binding proteins, leading to production of stress fibers and focal
adhesions. However, microinjection of 
into quiescent Swiss 3T3
fibroblasts did not induce stress fiber formation (2). Furthermore,
co-transfection of
1 with
2,
5, or
7 into CV-1 (9) and NIH 3T3
fibroblasts (10) did not remarkably change the stress fibers in medium
containing serum, although a slight decrease was observed. In contrast
to these slight effects of 
subunits, co-transfection of
12 with
1 into NIH 3T3 cells induced cell
rounding, disruption of stress fibers, and enhancement of cell
migration associated with specific phosphorylation of
12
by protein kinase C (10, 11).

subunits into epithelial-like HeLa
cells. Contrary to the results with fibroblasts, 
as well as
G
12 induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. We show here that 
subunits regulate
Rho-dependent actin polymerization in HeLa cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
isoforms were prepared
using synthetic polymerase chain reaction primers. cDNAs of bovine
1 and
2 were generously provided by
M. I. Simon (California Institute of Technology) and T. Nukada
(Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry), respectively, and subcloned into pCMV
as described previously (12). cDNAs of RhoA and Rac1 were kindly
provided by K. Kaibuchi (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) and
Cdc42Hs cDNA by R. A. Cerione (Cornell University). All
cDNAs of G protein subunits, FLAG-tagged dominant negative mutants
of small GTP-binding proteins, and a C-terminal fragment (amino acids
495-689) of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase (13) were subcloned
into the pCMV5 vector as described previously (8, 12). The plasmid for
the C3 exoenzyme was kindly provided by S. Narumiya (Kyoto University)
(14), and that for the
-opioid receptor was provided by C. Evans
(UCLA) (15). Antibodies against the
and G
i2
subunits, generated by ourselves, have been described previously (16).
Antibodies against G
12, G
s,
G
q/11, and phosphotyrosine were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Phospho-specific stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun
N-terminal kinase antibody was obtained from New England Biolabs, Inc.
Mouse monoclonal antibody against vinculin was purchased from Sigma.
Y-27632 (17) was supplied by Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries.
,
, and
vinculin followed by secondary antibodies, fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, and
tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, as
described earlier (18). The cells were also stained for F-actin with
tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate phalloidin (Sigma). After applying
coverslips, slides were examined under a laser scanning microscope
(FLUOVIEW Olympus) equipped for fluorescence. All experiments were
performed at least three times with similar results.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 with various
subunits, including
2,
5,
7, and
12 in quiescent HeLa cells. Combinations of
1 with all individual
subunits stimulated the
formation of thick stress fibers (Fig. 1) as well as focal adhesion
assembly, as assessed by localization of vinculin at the leading edges
and middle body in cells (Fig. 2). Such stress fibers and focal
adhesions were not observed in expression-negative cells, which were
seen among surrounding transfected cells (Figs. 1 and 2). Expression of
the GTPase-deficient G
12 subunit
(G
12Q229L) also induced actin stress fiber and focal adhesion assembly (Fig. 3, A,
B, I, and J) as previously observed in
Swiss 3T3 cells (2). However, the other GTPase-deficient
subunits,
G
i2 (G
i2Q205L), G
11,
(G
11Q209L), and G
s
(G
sQ227L), were without such effects (Fig. 3,
C-H), although G
11Q209L appeared to induce
the formation of thin actin fibers because of bright staining of
transfected cells with rhodamine phalloidin (Fig. 3, E and
F). Activated G
i2 and G
11 were
also ineffective in Swiss 3T3 cells (2, 3).

View larger version (70K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Induction of actin stress fiber formation by
G protein 
subunits. HeLa
cells were co-transfected with
1 and
2
(A and B),
5 (C and
D),
7 (E and F), or
12 (G and H) and double-stained
for
subunit (A, C, E, and
G) and F-actin (B, D, F,
and H). The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Induction of focal adhesion assembly by G
protein 
subunits. HeLa
cells were co-transfected with
1 and
2
(A and B),
5 (C and
D),
7 (E and F), or
12 (G and H), and double-stained
for
subunit (A, C, E, and
G) and vinculin (B, D, F,
and H). The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A GTPase-deficient mutant of
G
12 induces actin stress fiber
formation and focal adhesion assembly, but other GTPase-deficient
mutants of G protein
subunits do not.
HeLa cells were transfected with G
12Q229L (A,
B, I, J), G
i2Q205L
(C, D), G
11Q209L (E,
F), or G
sQ227L (G, H)
and double-stained for
subunits (A, C,
E, G, I) and F-actin (B,
D, F, H) or vinculin (J).
The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Scale bar, 50 µm.
12Q229L subunits, it was reported that
microinjection of 
into Swiss 3T3 cells (2) and transfection of

into NIH 3T3 cells (10) did not stimulate stress fiber formation. In addition, NIH 3T3 cells, which were transfected with
various 
subunits and cultured in the same conditions as HeLa
cells in this study, did not induce stress fiber formation (data not
shown). Therefore, the different responses to 
observed in HeLa
cells and fibroblasts seem to be cell type differences rather than
experimental differences.
1 or
2 alone failed to
stimulate the formation of actin stress fibers (data not shown),
suggesting that 
complexes are necessary for this purpose. To
test whether the 
complex is indeed involved in induction of
stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly, we co-expressed
G
i2 and the C-terminal fragment of the
-adrenergic
receptor kinase, both of which are expected to bind and sequester free

, and showed this to prevent the
1
2-induced actin stress fiber formation
(Fig. 4, C and E) and focal adhesion assembly (Fig. 4, D and F). In
contrast, G
i2 and the C-terminal fragment of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase did not prevent
G
12Q229L-induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly (data not shown).

View larger version (130K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of Gi2
and the C-terminal fragment of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase
on 
-induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion
assembly. HeLa cells were co-transfected with
1 and
2 (A and B) plus
G
i2 (C and D) or the C-terminal
fragment of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase (
ARKct)
(E and F) and stained for F-actin (A,
C, and E) or vinculin (B,
D, and F). Cells expressing the
subunit were
identified by staining with the antibody as indicated by
arrowheads. The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.
It is well known that actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion
assembly are induced by activation of Rho in several cells and tissues
(1). To determine whether the effects of 
in HeLa cells were
Rho-dependent, cells were co-transfected with
1
2 and dominant negative mutants of Rho
family GTP-binding proteins. As shown in Fig.
5 (A and B),
co-transfection of RhoT19N completely inhibited 
-induced stress
fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. In contrast,
co-transfection of dominant negative mutants of other Rho family
GTP-binding proteins, Rac (RacT17N) and Cdc42 (Cdc42T17N), was without
effect (Fig. 5, C-F). These dominant negative mutants
seemed to be functional, because RacT17N and Cdc42T17N diminished the
phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase induced by LPA in HeLa cells
(19) when the phosphorylation was determined by immunoblotting with
phospho-specific c-Jun N-terminal kinase antibody (data not shown).
G
12Q229L-induced stress fiber formation and assembly of
focal adhesion was also inhibited by co-transfection of RhoT19N (data
not shown). To confirm the Rho dependence, cells were co-transfected
with
1
2 and the botulinum C3 exoenzyme,
which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Rho, or
1
2-transfected cells were treated with
Y-27632, a Rho-associated protein kinase (p160ROCK) inhibitor (17). In
both cases, actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly
were prevented (Fig. 5, G-J). These results clearly
demonstrated that 
subunits regulate stress fiber formation and
assembly of focal adhesion in a Rho and p160ROCK-dependent
manner. The stimulation by expression of G
12Q229L was
also prevented by C3 exoenzyme co-transfection and Y-27632 treatment
(data not shown).
|
A previous study showed the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrophostin A25
to inhibit the formation of stress fibers stimulated by LPA but not by
constitutively active Rho in quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells, indicating the
existence of a protein-tyrosine kinase acting in the LPA pathway
upstream of Rho (20). Another study showed that tyrophostin A25 and
tyrophostin AG 1478 inhibit the formation of stress fibers stimulated
by constitutively active G
13Q226L but not by
G
12Q229L (3). Therefore, we examined the effects of
several kinds of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on
1
2-transfected cells. Tyrophostin A25
(Fig. 6, C and D)
and tyrophostin AG 1478 (data not shown) did not significantly
influence the stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly
induced by 
or G
12Q229L. Similarly, a selective
inhibitor of the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases PP2 did not
inhibit 
-induced stress fiber formation (data not shown).
Although these tyrosine kinase inhibitors did not influence stress
fiber formation, they effectively inhibited tyrosine kinases in the
cells; tyrophostin A25 and PP2 decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of
focal adhesion kinase-like protein (about 125 kDa) stimulated by
G
12Q229L when phosphorylation was determined by antibody
against phosphotyrosine (data not shown). Unlike these tyrosine kinase
inhibitors, genistein blocked the formation of actin stress fibers
stimulated by both 
and G
12Q229L (Fig. 6,
E and F). These results suggested that genistein-sensitive but not tyrophostin-sensitive or Src-like tyrosine
kinases are involved in the signaling with 
and
G
12Q229L-induced Rho-dependent stress fiber
formation.
|
Because 
subunits can stimulate phospholipase C-
, which
results in up-regulation of protein kinase C (21, 22), we examined whether protein kinase C activation was required for the formation of
actin stress fibers by 
. However, down-regulation of endogenous protein kinase C by a 24-h exposure of cells to 1 µM
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or treatment of cells with protein
kinase C inhibitor Ro31-8220 for 3 h before fixation did not
significantly inhibit 
-induced stress fiber formation (Fig. 6,
G and H).
There have been several reports that G protein-coupled receptors,
including LPA and muscarinic receptors, are linked with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in a 
-dependent fashion
in cells (23, 24). To examine whether activation of
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase was required for 
-induced stress
fiber formation, the cells were treated with the phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY-294002 for 3 h before
fixation. No inhibition was observed (Fig. 6, I and
J). To verify that these inhibitors for protein kinase C and
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase C down-regulation
actually inhibited the respective pathways, we determined effects of
these treatments on the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase
induced by LPA (25, 26). All inhibitors and protein kinase C depletion
diminished the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (data not
shown), indicating that these treatments effectively inhibited these
signaling pathways.
It is generally accepted that the 
-mediated signal pathway mainly
acts through Gi/o-coupled receptors, and when cells were transiently transfected with cDNA encoding the
-opioid receptor and stimulated by
(D-Ala2,D-Leu5)enkephalin,
stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly were induced (data
not shown). However, co-transfection with the C-terminal fragment of
the
-adrenergic receptor kinase or treatment with pertussis toxin
did not significantly block these effects. Thus
-opioid receptors
may couple not only with Gi/o but also with G12
and G13, for whose
subunits more effectively stimulate Rho than 
subunits in HeLa cells.
The present study clearly demonstrated that 
subunits, like
G
12, regulate Rho-dependent actin
polymerization, resulting in stress fiber formation and focal adhesion
assembly in HeLa cells. Some recent reports have indicated that
G
12 and G
13 are able to bind directly to
p115-RhoGEF (4) or PDZ-RhoGEF (5) and that G
13 but not
G
12 stimulates the GDP-GTP exchange reaction of
p115-RhoGEF (4). Therefore, it is possible that 
subunits also
directly interact with RhoGEF. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the 
complex has been shown to associate with
Cdc24, a GEF for Cdc42, suggesting a cascade from 
to actin
organization via Cdc42 (27, 28). The large number of RhoGEFs so far
found share Dbl and pleckstrin homology domains (29). Some members of
the family also have Src homology 2, Src homology 3, GTPase-activating protein, RasGEF ,and/or serine/threonine kinase domains, suggesting that they may interact with various molecules. In addition, analyses of
the expression of RhoGEF family members have revealed that most are
subject to varying degrees of tissue restriction (29). The different
cell-specific responses to 
subunits observed in HeLa and NIH 3T3
cells may thus result from differential expression of the RhoGEF
regulated by 
in these cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. M. I. Simon, T. Nukada, S. Narumiya, C. Evans, K. Kaibuchi, and R. A. Cerione for supplying plasmids.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was partly supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and by CREST.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kamiya-cho, Kasugai, Aichi 480-0392, Japan. Tel.: 81-568-88-0811; Fax: 81-568-88-0829; E-mail: toasano@inst-hsc.pref.aichi.jp.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; G protein, guanine nucleotide binding regulatory protein; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
279,
509-514 |
| 2. |
Buhl, A. M.,
Johnson, N. L.,
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24631-24634 |
| 3. |
Gohla, A.,
Harhammer, R.,
and Schultz, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4653-4659 |
| 4. |
Hart, M. J.,
Jiang, X.,
Kozasa, T.,
Roscoe, W.,
Singer, W. D.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sternweis, P. C.,
and Bollag, G.
(1998)
Science
280,
2112-2114 |
| 5. |
Fukuhara, S.,
Murga, C.,
Zohar, M.,
Igishi, T.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5868-5879 |
| 6. | Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2600-2610[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Coso, O. A.,
Teramoto, H.,
Simonds, W. F.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3963-3966 |
| 8. |
Yamauchi, J.,
Kaziro, Y.,
and Itoh, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1957-1965 |
| 9. |
Lin, H. C.,
Duncan, J. A.,
Kozasa, T.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5057-5060 |
| 10. |
Ueda, H.,
Yamauchi, J.,
Itoh, H.,
Morishita, R.,
Kaziro, Y.,
Kato, K.,
and Asano, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12124-12128 |
| 11. |
Morishita, R.,
Nakayama, H.,
Isobe, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Okano, T.,
Fukada, Y.,
Mizuno, K.,
Ohno, S.,
Kozawa, O.,
Kato, K.,
and Asano, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29469-29475 |
| 12. | Yamauchi, J., Kaziro, Y., and Itoh, H. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 694-700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Koch, W. J.,
Hawes, B. E.,
Inglese, J.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6193-6197 |
| 14. |
Nemoto, Y.,
Namba, T.,
Kozaki, S.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19312-19319 |
| 15. |
Evans, C. J.,
Keith, D. E., Jr.,
Morrison, H.,
Magendzo, K.,
and Edwards, R. H.
(1992)
Science
258,
1952-1955 |
| 16. | Morishita, R., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1988) Eur. J. Biochem. 174, 87-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Uehata, M., Ishizaki, T., Satoh, H., Ono, T., Kawahara, T., Morishita, T., Tamakawa, H., Yamagami, K., Inui, J., Maekawa, M., and Narumiya, S. (1997) Nature 389, 990-994[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Ueda, H., Saga, S., Shinohara, H., Morishita, R., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1503-1511[Abstract] |
| 19. |
Collins, L. R.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17349-17353 |
| 20. | Nobes, C. D., Hawkins, P., Stephens, L., and Hall, A. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 225-233[Abstract] |
| 21. | Camps, M., Hou, C., Sidiropoulos, D., Stock, J. B., Jakobs, K. H., and Gierschik, P. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 821-831[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Clapham, D. E., and Neer, E. J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37, 167-203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Hawes, B. E.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
van Biesen, T.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12133-12136 |
| 24. |
Lopez-Ilasaca, M.,
Crespo, P.,
Pellici, P. G.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Wetzker, R.
(1997)
Science
275,
394-397 |
| 25. |
Nagao, M.,
Yamauchi, J.,
Kaziro, Y.,
and Itoh, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22892-22898 |
| 26. |
Lopez-Ilasaca, M.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Wetzker, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2505-2508 |
| 27. | Zhao, Z. S., Leung, T., Manser, E., and Lim, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5246-5257[Abstract] |
| 28. | Nern, A., and Arkowitz, R. A. (1998) Nature 391, 195-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Whitehead, I. P., Campbell, S., Rossman, K. L., and Der, C. J. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1332, 1-23 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Ueda, R. Nagae, M. Kozawa, R. Morishita, S. Kimura, T. Nagase, O. Ohara, S. Yoshida, and T. Asano Heterotrimeric G Protein {gamma} Subunits Stimulate FLJ00018, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac1 and Cdc42 J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1946 - 1953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Doe, R. Bentley, D. J. Behm, R. Lafferty, R. Stavenger, D. Jung, M. Bamford, T. Panchal, E. Grygielko, L. L. Wright, et al. Novel Rho Kinase Inhibitors with Anti-inflammatory and Vasodilatory Activities J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 89 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-I. Hwang, I. D. C. Fraser, S. Choi, X.-F. Qin, and M. I. Simon From the Cover: Analysis of C5a-mediated chemotaxis by lentiviral delivery of small interfering RNA PNAS, January 13, 2004; 101(2): 488 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Niu, J. Profirovic, H. Pan, R. Vaiskunaite, and T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya G Protein {beta}{gamma} Subunits Stimulate p114RhoGEF, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for RhoA and Rac1: Regulation of Cell Shape and Reactive Oxygen Species Production Circ. Res., October 31, 2003; 93(9): 848 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Maruyama, M. Nishida, Y. Sugimoto, S. Tanabe, J. H. Turner, T. Kozasa, T. Wada, T. Nagao, and H. Kurose G{alpha}12/13 Mediates {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptor-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy Circ. Res., November 15, 2002; 91(10): 961 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Massoumi, C. Larsson, and A. Sjolander Leukotriene D4 induces stress-fibre formation in intestinal epithelial cells via activation of RhoA and PKC{delta} J. Cell Sci., January 9, 2002; 115(17): 3509 - 3515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-P. Gratacap, B. Payrastre, B. Nieswandt, and S. Offermanns Differential Regulation of Rho and Rac through Heterotrimeric G-proteins and Cyclic Nucleotides J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2001; 276(51): 47906 - 47913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ueda, R. Morishita, H. Itoh, S. Narumiya, K. Mikoshiba, K. Kato, and T. Asano Galpha 11 Induces Caspase-mediated Proteolytic Activation of Rho-associated Kinase, ROCK-I, in HeLa Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 42527 - 42533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Faivre, K. Regnauld, E. Bruyneel, Q.-D. Nguyen, M. Mareel, S. Emami, and C. Gespach Suppression of Cellular Invasion by Activated G-Protein Subunits Galpha o, Galpha i1, Galpha i2, and Galpha i3 and Sequestration of Gbeta gamma Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2001; 60(2): 363 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Richards New Signaling Pathways for Hormones and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Action in Endocrine Cells Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2001; 15(2): 209 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ueda, R. Morishita, J. Yamauchi, H. Itoh, K. Kato, and T. Asano Regulation of Rac and Cdc42 Pathways by Gi during Lysophosphatidic Acid-induced Cell Spreading J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6846 - 6852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||