JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Asano, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Asano, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 2098-2102, January 21, 2000


G Protein beta gamma Subunits Induce Stress Fiber Formation and Focal Adhesion Assembly in a Rho-dependent Manner in HeLa Cells*

Hiroshi UedaDagger , Hiroshi Itoh§, Junji Yamauchi§, Rika MorishitaDagger , Yoshito Kaziro§, Kanefusa KatoDagger , and Tomiko AsanoDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi 480-0392 and the § Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In fibroblasts, the G protein alpha  subunits Galpha 12 and Galpha 13 stimulate Rho-dependent stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly, whereas G protein beta gamma subunits instead exert a disruptive influence. We show here that the latter can, however, stimulate the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions in epithelial-like HeLa cells. Transient expression of beta 1 with gamma 2, gamma 5, gamma 7, and gamma 12 in quiescent HeLa cells induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly as did expression of the constitutively active Galpha 12. Co-expression of beta gamma with Galpha i2 and the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase, both of which are known to bind and sequester free beta gamma , blocked beta gamma -induced stress fiber and focal adhesion formation. Inhibition was also noted with co-expression of a dominant negative mutant of Rho. Botulinum C3 exoenzyme, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Rho, and a Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, similarly inhibited beta gamma -induced stress fiber and focal adhesion assembly. These results indicate that G protein beta gamma subunits regulate Rho-dependent actin polymerization in HeLa cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Rho family small GTP-binding proteins play a major role in regulating the actin polymerization necessary for cytoskeleton formation, determination of cell shape, and regulatory responses including chemotaxis and mitogenesis (1). In fibroblasts, the formation of stress fibers generally parallels the assembly of focal adhesions. For instance, some stimuli involving lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)1, thrombin, and bombesin induce both. G proteins of the G12 subfamily have been shown to be involved in Rho-dependent actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly stimulated by G protein-coupled receptors (2, 3). Recent reports have indicated that Galpha 12 and Galpha 13 are directly associated with p115 (4) and PDZ (5) guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) for Rho, Galpha 13 stimulating the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of p115-RhoGEF (4). RhoGEFs then activate Rho. In contrast to Galpha 12 and Galpha 13, microinjection of constitutively active forms of Galpha i2, Galpha q, and Galpha 11 into fibroblasts does not induce stress fiber formation (2, 3). Furthermore, pertussis toxin does not inhibit LPA-induced stress fiber formation, suggesting uncoupling of this signal pathway to G proteins of the Gi/o subfamily (6).

G protein beta gamma subunits regulate the c-Jun N-terminal kinase cascade through Rho family GTP-binding proteins such as Rac, Cdc42, and Rho (7, 8). This suggests the possibility that beta gamma regulates Rho family GTP-binding proteins, leading to production of stress fibers and focal adhesions. However, microinjection of beta gamma into quiescent Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts did not induce stress fiber formation (2). Furthermore, co-transfection of beta 1 with gamma 2, gamma 5, or gamma 7 into CV-1 (9) and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (10) did not remarkably change the stress fibers in medium containing serum, although a slight decrease was observed. In contrast to these slight effects of beta gamma subunits, co-transfection of gamma 12 with beta 1 into NIH 3T3 cells induced cell rounding, disruption of stress fibers, and enhancement of cell migration associated with specific phosphorylation of gamma 12 by protein kinase C (10, 11).

In this study, we transfected beta gamma subunits into epithelial-like HeLa cells. Contrary to the results with fibroblasts, beta gamma as well as Galpha 12 induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. We show here that beta gamma subunits regulate Rho-dependent actin polymerization in HeLa cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- cDNAs of several gamma  isoforms were prepared using synthetic polymerase chain reaction primers. cDNAs of bovine beta 1 and gamma 2 were generously provided by M. I. Simon (California Institute of Technology) and T. Nukada (Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry), respectively, and subcloned into pCMV as described previously (12). cDNAs of RhoA and Rac1 were kindly provided by K. Kaibuchi (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) and Cdc42Hs cDNA by R. A. Cerione (Cornell University). All cDNAs of G protein subunits, FLAG-tagged dominant negative mutants of small GTP-binding proteins, and a C-terminal fragment (amino acids 495-689) of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase (13) were subcloned into the pCMV5 vector as described previously (8, 12). The plasmid for the C3 exoenzyme was kindly provided by S. Narumiya (Kyoto University) (14), and that for the delta -opioid receptor was provided by C. Evans (UCLA) (15). Antibodies against the beta  and Galpha i2 subunits, generated by ourselves, have been described previously (16). Antibodies against Galpha 12, Galpha s, Galpha q/11, and phosphotyrosine were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Phospho-specific stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase antibody was obtained from New England Biolabs, Inc. Mouse monoclonal antibody against vinculin was purchased from Sigma. Y-27632 (17) was supplied by Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries.

Transfection and Staining-- HeLa cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Transient transfection was performed using LipofectAMINE Plus according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). The medium was replaced 24 h after transfection, and the cells were starved in serum-free medium for 24 h and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. Before fixation, transfected cells were treated with 20 µM Y-27632 for 2 h (17), with 150 µM tyrophostin A25, 10 µM tyrophostin AG 1478, 10 µM PP2, 30 µg/ml genistein, 1 µM Ro31-8220, 100 nM wortmannin or 50 µM LY-294002 for 3 h, or with 1 µM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 24 h. Fixed cells were immunostained using antibodies against alpha , beta , and vinculin followed by secondary antibodies, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, as described earlier (18). The cells were also stained for F-actin with tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate phalloidin (Sigma). After applying coverslips, slides were examined under a laser scanning microscope (FLUOVIEW Olympus) equipped for fluorescence. All experiments were performed at least three times with similar results.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fig. 1 and 2 illustrate the effects of transient co-expression of beta 1 with various gamma  subunits, including gamma 2, gamma 5, gamma 7, and gamma 12 in quiescent HeLa cells. Combinations of beta 1 with all individual gamma  subunits stimulated the formation of thick stress fibers (Fig. 1) as well as focal adhesion assembly, as assessed by localization of vinculin at the leading edges and middle body in cells (Fig. 2). Such stress fibers and focal adhesions were not observed in expression-negative cells, which were seen among surrounding transfected cells (Figs. 1 and 2). Expression of the GTPase-deficient Galpha 12 subunit (Galpha 12Q229L) also induced actin stress fiber and focal adhesion assembly (Fig. 3, A, B, I, and J) as previously observed in Swiss 3T3 cells (2). However, the other GTPase-deficient alpha  subunits, Galpha i2 (Galpha i2Q205L), Galpha 11, (Galpha 11Q209L), and Galpha s (Galpha sQ227L), were without such effects (Fig. 3, C-H), although Galpha 11Q209L appeared to induce the formation of thin actin fibers because of bright staining of transfected cells with rhodamine phalloidin (Fig. 3, E and F). Activated Galpha i2 and Galpha 11 were also ineffective in Swiss 3T3 cells (2, 3).


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Induction of actin stress fiber formation by G protein beta gamma subunits. HeLa cells were co-transfected with beta 1 and gamma 2 (A and B), gamma 5 (C and D), gamma 7 (E and F), or gamma 12 (G and H) and double-stained for beta  subunit (A, C, E, and G) and F-actin (B, D, F, and H). The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Induction of focal adhesion assembly by G protein beta gamma subunits. HeLa cells were co-transfected with beta 1 and gamma 2 (A and B), gamma 5 (C and D), gamma 7 (E and F), or gamma 12 (G and H), and double-stained for beta  subunit (A, C, E, and G) and vinculin (B, D, F, and H). The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A GTPase-deficient mutant of Galpha 12 induces actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly, but other GTPase-deficient mutants of G protein alpha  subunits do not. HeLa cells were transfected with Galpha 12Q229L (A, B, I, J), Galpha i2Q205L (C, D), Galpha 11Q209L (E, F), or Galpha sQ227L (G, H) and double-stained for alpha  subunits (A, C, E, G, I) and F-actin (B, D, F, H) or vinculin (J). The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.

In contrast with Galpha 12Q229L subunits, it was reported that microinjection of beta gamma into Swiss 3T3 cells (2) and transfection of beta gamma into NIH 3T3 cells (10) did not stimulate stress fiber formation. In addition, NIH 3T3 cells, which were transfected with various beta gamma subunits and cultured in the same conditions as HeLa cells in this study, did not induce stress fiber formation (data not shown). Therefore, the different responses to beta gamma observed in HeLa cells and fibroblasts seem to be cell type differences rather than experimental differences.

Expression of beta 1 or gamma 2 alone failed to stimulate the formation of actin stress fibers (data not shown), suggesting that beta gamma complexes are necessary for this purpose. To test whether the beta gamma complex is indeed involved in induction of stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly, we co-expressed Galpha i2 and the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase, both of which are expected to bind and sequester free beta gamma , and showed this to prevent the beta 1gamma 2-induced actin stress fiber formation (Fig. 4, C and E) and focal adhesion assembly (Fig. 4, D and F). In contrast, Galpha i2 and the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase did not prevent Galpha 12Q229L-induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly (data not shown).


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of Gi2alpha and the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase on beta gamma -induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. HeLa cells were co-transfected with beta 1 and gamma 2 (A and B) plus Galpha i2 (C and D) or the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARKct) (E and F) and stained for F-actin (A, C, and E) or vinculin (B, D, and F). Cells expressing the beta  subunit were identified by staining with the antibody as indicated by arrowheads. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.

It is well known that actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly are induced by activation of Rho in several cells and tissues (1). To determine whether the effects of beta gamma in HeLa cells were Rho-dependent, cells were co-transfected with beta 1gamma 2 and dominant negative mutants of Rho family GTP-binding proteins. As shown in Fig. 5 (A and B), co-transfection of RhoT19N completely inhibited beta gamma -induced stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. In contrast, co-transfection of dominant negative mutants of other Rho family GTP-binding proteins, Rac (RacT17N) and Cdc42 (Cdc42T17N), was without effect (Fig. 5, C-F). These dominant negative mutants seemed to be functional, because RacT17N and Cdc42T17N diminished the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase induced by LPA in HeLa cells (19) when the phosphorylation was determined by immunoblotting with phospho-specific c-Jun N-terminal kinase antibody (data not shown). Galpha 12Q229L-induced stress fiber formation and assembly of focal adhesion was also inhibited by co-transfection of RhoT19N (data not shown). To confirm the Rho dependence, cells were co-transfected with beta 1gamma 2 and the botulinum C3 exoenzyme, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Rho, or beta 1gamma 2-transfected cells were treated with Y-27632, a Rho-associated protein kinase (p160ROCK) inhibitor (17). In both cases, actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly were prevented (Fig. 5, G-J). These results clearly demonstrated that beta gamma subunits regulate stress fiber formation and assembly of focal adhesion in a Rho and p160ROCK-dependent manner. The stimulation by expression of Galpha 12Q229L was also prevented by C3 exoenzyme co-transfection and Y-27632 treatment (data not shown).


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of dominant negative mutants of the Rho family GTP-binding proteins, C3 exoenzyme, and Y-27632 on beta gamma -induced actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly in HeLa cells. A-H, HeLa cells were co-transfected with beta 1 and gamma 2 plus RhoT19N (A and B), RacT17N (C and D), Cdc42T17N (E and F), or C3 exoenzyme (G and H) and stained for F-actin (A, C, E, and G) or vinculin (B, D, F, and H). I and J, beta 1gamma 2-transfected HeLa cells were incubated with 20 µM Y-27632 for 2 h and stained for F-actin (I) or vinculin (J). Cells expressing the beta  subunit were identified by staining with the antibody as indicated by arrowheads. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm.

A previous study showed the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrophostin A25 to inhibit the formation of stress fibers stimulated by LPA but not by constitutively active Rho in quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells, indicating the existence of a protein-tyrosine kinase acting in the LPA pathway upstream of Rho (20). Another study showed that tyrophostin A25 and tyrophostin AG 1478 inhibit the formation of stress fibers stimulated by constitutively active Galpha 13Q226L but not by Galpha 12Q229L (3). Therefore, we examined the effects of several kinds of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on beta 1gamma 2-transfected cells. Tyrophostin A25 (Fig. 6, C and D) and tyrophostin AG 1478 (data not shown) did not significantly influence the stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly induced by beta gamma or Galpha 12Q229L. Similarly, a selective inhibitor of the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases PP2 did not inhibit beta gamma -induced stress fiber formation (data not shown). Although these tyrosine kinase inhibitors did not influence stress fiber formation, they effectively inhibited tyrosine kinases in the cells; tyrophostin A25 and PP2 decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase-like protein (about 125 kDa) stimulated by Galpha 12Q229L when phosphorylation was determined by antibody against phosphotyrosine (data not shown). Unlike these tyrosine kinase inhibitors, genistein blocked the formation of actin stress fibers stimulated by both beta gamma and Galpha 12Q229L (Fig. 6, E and F). These results suggested that genistein-sensitive but not tyrophostin-sensitive or Src-like tyrosine kinases are involved in the signaling with beta gamma and Galpha 12Q229L-induced Rho-dependent stress fiber formation.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of various reagents on beta gamma - or Galpha 12Q229L-induced stress fiber formation. HeLa cells were co-transfected with beta 1 and gamma 2 (A, C, E, G-J) or transfected with Galpha 12Q229L (B, D, F) and treated with tyrophostin A25 (C, D), genistein (E, F), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (G), Ro31-8220 (H), wortmannin (I), or LY-294002 (J), and stained for F-actin. Cells expressing the beta  or Galpha 12 subunit were identified by staining with the respective antibodies as indicated by arrowheads. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm. PKC, protein kinase C.

Because beta gamma subunits can stimulate phospholipase C-beta , which results in up-regulation of protein kinase C (21, 22), we examined whether protein kinase C activation was required for the formation of actin stress fibers by beta gamma . However, down-regulation of endogenous protein kinase C by a 24-h exposure of cells to 1 µM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or treatment of cells with protein kinase C inhibitor Ro31-8220 for 3 h before fixation did not significantly inhibit beta gamma -induced stress fiber formation (Fig. 6, G and H).

There have been several reports that G protein-coupled receptors, including LPA and muscarinic receptors, are linked with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in a beta gamma -dependent fashion in cells (23, 24). To examine whether activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase was required for beta gamma -induced stress fiber formation, the cells were treated with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY-294002 for 3 h before fixation. No inhibition was observed (Fig. 6, I and J). To verify that these inhibitors for protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase C down-regulation actually inhibited the respective pathways, we determined effects of these treatments on the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase induced by LPA (25, 26). All inhibitors and protein kinase C depletion diminished the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (data not shown), indicating that these treatments effectively inhibited these signaling pathways.

It is generally accepted that the beta gamma -mediated signal pathway mainly acts through Gi/o-coupled receptors, and when cells were transiently transfected with cDNA encoding the delta -opioid receptor and stimulated by (D-Ala2,D-Leu5)enkephalin, stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly were induced (data not shown). However, co-transfection with the C-terminal fragment of the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase or treatment with pertussis toxin did not significantly block these effects. Thus delta -opioid receptors may couple not only with Gi/o but also with G12 and G13, for whose alpha  subunits more effectively stimulate Rho than beta gamma subunits in HeLa cells.

The present study clearly demonstrated that beta gamma subunits, like Galpha 12, regulate Rho-dependent actin polymerization, resulting in stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly in HeLa cells. Some recent reports have indicated that Galpha 12 and Galpha 13 are able to bind directly to p115-RhoGEF (4) or PDZ-RhoGEF (5) and that Galpha 13 but not Galpha 12 stimulates the GDP-GTP exchange reaction of p115-RhoGEF (4). Therefore, it is possible that beta gamma subunits also directly interact with RhoGEF. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the beta gamma complex has been shown to associate with Cdc24, a GEF for Cdc42, suggesting a cascade from beta gamma to actin organization via Cdc42 (27, 28). The large number of RhoGEFs so far found share Dbl and pleckstrin homology domains (29). Some members of the family also have Src homology 2, Src homology 3, GTPase-activating protein, RasGEF ,and/or serine/threonine kinase domains, suggesting that they may interact with various molecules. In addition, analyses of the expression of RhoGEF family members have revealed that most are subject to varying degrees of tissue restriction (29). The different cell-specific responses to beta gamma subunits observed in HeLa and NIH 3T3 cells may thus result from differential expression of the RhoGEF regulated by beta gamma in these cells.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. M. I. Simon, T. Nukada, S. Narumiya, C. Evans, K. Kaibuchi, and R. A. Cerione for supplying plasmids.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was partly supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and by CREST.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kamiya-cho, Kasugai, Aichi 480-0392, Japan. Tel.: 81-568-88-0811; Fax: 81-568-88-0829; E-mail: toasano@inst-hsc.pref.aichi.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; G protein, guanine nucleotide binding regulatory protein; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hall, A. (1998) Science 279, 509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Buhl, A. M., Johnson, N. L., Dhanasekaran, N., and Johnson, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24631-24634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Gohla, A., Harhammer, R., and Schultz, G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4653-4659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Hart, M. J., Jiang, X., Kozasa, T., Roscoe, W., Singer, W. D., Gilman, A. G., Sternweis, P. C., and Bollag, G. (1998) Science 280, 2112-2114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Fukuhara, S., Murga, C., Zohar, M., Igishi, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5868-5879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2600-2610[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Coso, O. A., Teramoto, H., Simonds, W. F., and Gutkind, J. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3963-3966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Yamauchi, J., Kaziro, Y., and Itoh, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1957-1965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Lin, H. C., Duncan, J. A., Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5057-5060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ueda, H., Yamauchi, J., Itoh, H., Morishita, R., Kaziro, Y., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12124-12128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Morishita, R., Nakayama, H., Isobe, T., Matsuda, T., Hashimoto, Y., Okano, T., Fukada, Y., Mizuno, K., Ohno, S., Kozawa, O., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29469-29475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Yamauchi, J., Kaziro, Y., and Itoh, H. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 694-700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Koch, W. J., Hawes, B. E., Inglese, J., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6193-6197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Nemoto, Y., Namba, T., Kozaki, S., and Narumiya, S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19312-19319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Evans, C. J., Keith, D. E., Jr., Morrison, H., Magendzo, K., and Edwards, R. H. (1992) Science 258, 1952-1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Morishita, R., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1988) Eur. J. Biochem. 174, 87-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Uehata, M., Ishizaki, T., Satoh, H., Ono, T., Kawahara, T., Morishita, T., Tamakawa, H., Yamagami, K., Inui, J., Maekawa, M., and Narumiya, S. (1997) Nature 389, 990-994[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Ueda, H., Saga, S., Shinohara, H., Morishita, R., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1503-1511[Abstract]
19. Collins, L. R., Minden, A., Karin, M., and Brown, J. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17349-17353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Nobes, C. D., Hawkins, P., Stephens, L., and Hall, A. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 225-233[Abstract]
21. Camps, M., Hou, C., Sidiropoulos, D., Stock, J. B., Jakobs, K. H., and Gierschik, P. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 821-831[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Clapham, D. E., and Neer, E. J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37, 167-203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, L. M., van Biesen, T., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12133-12136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Lopez-Ilasaca, M., Crespo, P., Pellici, P. G., Gutkind, J. S., and Wetzker, R. (1997) Science 275, 394-397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Nagao, M., Yamauchi, J., Kaziro, Y., and Itoh, H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22892-22898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Lopez-Ilasaca, M., Gutkind, J. S., and Wetzker, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2505-2508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Zhao, Z. S., Leung, T., Manser, E., and Lim, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5246-5257[Abstract]
28. Nern, A., and Arkowitz, R. A. (1998) Nature 391, 195-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Whitehead, I. P., Campbell, S., Rossman, K. L., and Der, C. J. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1332, 1-23


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Ueda, R. Nagae, M. Kozawa, R. Morishita, S. Kimura, T. Nagase, O. Ohara, S. Yoshida, and T. Asano
Heterotrimeric G Protein {gamma} Subunits Stimulate FLJ00018, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac1 and Cdc42
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1946 - 1953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Doe, R. Bentley, D. J. Behm, R. Lafferty, R. Stavenger, D. Jung, M. Bamford, T. Panchal, E. Grygielko, L. L. Wright, et al.
Novel Rho Kinase Inhibitors with Anti-inflammatory and Vasodilatory Activities
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 89 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-I. Hwang, I. D. C. Fraser, S. Choi, X.-F. Qin, and M. I. Simon
From the Cover: Analysis of C5a-mediated chemotaxis by lentiviral delivery of small interfering RNA
PNAS, January 13, 2004; 101(2): 488 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. Niu, J. Profirovic, H. Pan, R. Vaiskunaite, and T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya
G Protein {beta}{gamma} Subunits Stimulate p114RhoGEF, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for RhoA and Rac1: Regulation of Cell Shape and Reactive Oxygen Species Production
Circ. Res., October 31, 2003; 93(9): 848 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Maruyama, M. Nishida, Y. Sugimoto, S. Tanabe, J. H. Turner, T. Kozasa, T. Wada, T. Nagao, and H. Kurose
G{alpha}12/13 Mediates {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptor-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Circ. Res., November 15, 2002; 91(10): 961 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Massoumi, C. Larsson, and A. Sjolander
Leukotriene D4 induces stress-fibre formation in intestinal epithelial cells via activation of RhoA and PKC{delta}
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 2002; 115(17): 3509 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-P. Gratacap, B. Payrastre, B. Nieswandt, and S. Offermanns
Differential Regulation of Rho and Rac through Heterotrimeric G-proteins and Cyclic Nucleotides
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2001; 276(51): 47906 - 47913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Ueda, R. Morishita, H. Itoh, S. Narumiya, K. Mikoshiba, K. Kato, and T. Asano
Galpha 11 Induces Caspase-mediated Proteolytic Activation of Rho-associated Kinase, ROCK-I, in HeLa Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 42527 - 42533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Faivre, K. Regnauld, E. Bruyneel, Q.-D. Nguyen, M. Mareel, S. Emami, and C. Gespach
Suppression of Cellular Invasion by Activated G-Protein Subunits Galpha o, Galpha i1, Galpha i2, and Galpha i3 and Sequestration of Gbeta gamma
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2001; 60(2): 363 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. S. Richards
New Signaling Pathways for Hormones and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Action in Endocrine Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2001; 15(2): 209 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Ueda, R. Morishita, J. Yamauchi, H. Itoh, K. Kato, and T. Asano
Regulation of Rac and Cdc42 Pathways by Gi during Lysophosphatidic Acid-induced Cell Spreading
J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6846 - 6852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Asano, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Asano, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?